NC0085928_Issuance of Permit_20100622

• Arf
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
June 22, 2010
Mr. John T. Guglielmetti
American Truetzschler Inc.
P. 0. Box 669228
Charlotte, NC 28266
Subject: Issuance of Renewal NPDES Permit
NPDES Permit NC0085928
American Truetzschler Inc. Groundwater Remediation
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Guglielmetti:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as
subsequently amended).
Summary of Changes in Renewal Permit from Existing Permit
1) Effluent daily maximum limit for 1,1-Dich/oroethene was removed.
2) Effluent daily maximum limit for Trichloroethylene (TCE) was removed.
3) The minimum detection limit narrative was re-assigned to cover the affected parameters.
4) Special Condition A. (2) was amended to contain the current narrative requirements.
Change made on final:
5) Parameter codes were added to Effluent Characteristics.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this
decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits
required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local
governmental permits that may be required.
Page 1 of 2
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 North C aro l i n a
Internet: ppor!h2nity I Affirmative
e Ac JUatlf/.4(J /1
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

' f
•
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Ron Berry at telephone number
[phone] or at email [e-mail].
Sin erely,
a\-f4A"
.leen H. Sullins
0-1
Attachments
Cc: Mooresville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section (email)
Environmental Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Unit/Susan Meadows (email)
Mecklenburg County/Meredith Moore (email)
Central Files
NPDES Unit
•
•
Page 2 of 2

Permit No. NC0085928.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
American Truetzschler, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
American Truetzschler, Inc. Groundwater Remediation
12300 Moores Chapel Road
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as Unnamed Tributary to the Catawba River in the Catawba River
Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set
forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become August 1, 2010.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2015.
Signed this day June 22, 2010.
/ '1 ak.
Col en H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

• Permit No. NC0085928
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises
under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
American Truetzschler, Inc.
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.05 MGD groundwater remediation treatment facility
consisting of:
o collection/equalization tank
o tank transfer pump
o particulate filter
o air stripper system
o final transfer pump
o meter
o two(2) sodium cation exchange systems
o two(2) crushed limestone filtration units
o final filter (compost filter)
Note: Provides activated carbon canister filter for Harbor House subdivision wells including
disposal of filter canister
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an UT
to the Catawba River, a waterbody classified as WS-IV, CA waters located within the Catawba
River Basin.

•
it ,r \_._!� f. r. raj ``%W1 Y'
I .! '!- f, \• 1 •• ••.
111 } -, :. i ,..
•
. s._) r
, . , .
!- if i`� x65 �'. •,.
r ..
,\,
1;; �?� 11 q • •-�Ir.�-
, . ,.).:1 \ .11) if '1- .. dt, Z ...... ---- .•,--.."'",::::771:.--;.:^4—... —... _--N. ,.., . . . — — _..7
41
•
�`-�.� ,�'_- - '-• _ ' ,: f:,' , ' American -%, -. '..'Fob ,
l I f t: Truetzschler Inc. f '
s, oi. .
• It, 0
r t,' \ U -s . . L. S',
. ., ** ,;. • • •- /.:••••-•. •%
i 1 ff f GWR DischargeN4_ ' /1'/-1' i `
• •
Rest � '
y ► 4_\.� `., . , _ X69 4, \,:. .. •_ f . ..
? ' :
c• \S„,„_,,...-7 rt.!„,,,• '41 6• ••• :t . w
'N\
- \?, • . • . . • is - '' i .
'' ("1:
• ,
,/ • r=te_ \.• f •
) , f.:.---, ------ ‘,,,
_. ,
-- /
--, .1\
,; ` moi, } i, ..I 1 +r. . i i
. :rI 1F • rd III,• ,,
do-
11 .I'
1_ / . . I`
)i. •-•...!,,V"; i'.„, ". 'i ,''. \. ; ., . ,,,:V,"• -• t, I .,"'t' ._..,.,I. ' : 7 • • -- .-.1„ , -
0 - -xe -' 1;1 uk__,\ .,. i ,, - .- ,.' . • I 1 ' - .:.-,-7-:-/..; '; . '
USGS Quad: F14SE Mt. Holly, NC
Outfall Facility ••••.....„,..6.Latitude: 35° 15' 30.6" N 35° 15' 35" N
Longitude: 81° 0' 7.2" W 81° 0' 10" W -0-
Facility Location
Stream Class: WS-IV, CA North .
Subbasin: 03-08-34 HUC: 03050101 American Truetzschler Inc. GWR NC0085928
Receiving Stream: UT to Catawba River
Mecklenburg County

Permit No. NC0085928
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below:
LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS Monthly Daily Measurement Sample Sample
Average Maximum Frequency Type Location
Flow 0.05 MGD Weekly Pump or Effluent
(50050) Meter
1
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.38 µg/L Monthly Grab Effluent
(34531)
Tetrachloroethylene. pg/L(PCE) 1 Monthly Grab Effluent
(34475)
1,1-Dichloroethane, pg/L Monthly Grab Effluent
(34496)
1,1-Dichioroethene, pg/L Monthly Grab Effluent
(34501)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane, pg/L Monthly Grab Effluent
(34506)
Trichloroethylene, pg/L (TCE) Monthly Grab Effluent
(39180)
Chronic Toxicity 2
(TGP3B, THP3B) Quarterly Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. The minimum detection limit is 1.0 µg/L. If the measured level is below the minimum
detection limit, then the measurement is considered to be in compliance and should be
reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report(DMR) as <1.0µg/L.
2. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia P/F at 90%), monitor quarterly in February, May, August and
November[see Special Condition A. (2)]. All effluent characteristics must be monitored and
reported to coincide with toxicity sampling.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.

•
Permit No. NC0085928
• A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent
versions or"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised-February 1998)
or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of February, May, August and
November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent
discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the
permit limit, then multiple-concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two
following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised-February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised-February
1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1)for the months in which tests were performed. If reporting pass/fail results using the
parameter code TGP3B, DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is sent to the below address. If reporting Chronic Value
results using the parameter code THP3B, DWQ Form AT-3(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR/DWQ/Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than
30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating
the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of
"No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences
Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will
be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-opened and modified
to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
•
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and AT
Forms.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last
day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0085928
Revision: 6/16/10
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility American Truetzschler Inc.
Name:
Applicant Address: P. O. Box 669228; Charlotte NC 28256
Facility Address: 12300 Moores Chapel Road; Charlotte, NC 28214
Permitted Flow 0.05 MGD
Type of Waste: Groundwater Remediation for chlorinated solvents
Facility/Permit Status: Class I /Active; Renewal
County: Mecklenburg County
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream: UT to Catawba Stream Classification: WS-IV, CA
River
Subbasin: 03-08-34 Index No. 11-(117)
Drainage Area (mi2): - 303(d) Listed? Yes, low pH
Summer 7010 (cfs) - Regional Office: Mooresville
Winter 7010 (cfs): - State Grid/USGS F14SE
Quad: Mt. Holly, NC
3002 (cfs) - Permit Writer: Ron Berry
Average Flow (cfs): - Date: , 4/27/10
IWC (%): 100% HUC: 03050101
BACKGROUND
American Truetzschler Inc. was issued a NPDES permit in December 1996 for its
Groundwater Remediation System to address contamination of the aquifer from chlorinated
solvents. The original permit was issued with EPA based water quality standards daily
maximum limits for 1,1-Dichloroethylene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, and Trichloroethylene. Also, •
monitoring for 1,1-Dichloroethane, 1,1,1 Trichloroethane, and Tetrachloroethylene was
required. A chronic limited toxicity requirement has existed since 1996. During subsequent
permit renewals no permit changes were made.
Minor equipment changes have occurred since the initial installation but none since the last
permit renewal. As part of the aquifer containment impact, American Truetzschler, Inc. is
also providing a replaceable activated carbon filter canister for an adjacent subdivision
well.
Three recovery wells transfer groundwater to a collection tank. Once full the tank is
pumped through a filter then into an air stripper system. The wastewater is then pumped
through cation exchangers and limestone filters. From the limestone filters the wastewater
flows through a final filter (compost filter) and into a stormwater retention pond and UT. A
meter is available to monitor the flow through the treatment system. The majority, if not all
of, the flow is absorbed in the pond and UT. The UT natural flow is to the Catawba River, a
class WS-IV, CA stream in the Catawba River Basin.
The disposal associated with this treatment facility is the spent cation resin, spent
limestone, and spent filters.There were several months in which no discharged occurred.
This segment of the Catawba River is impaired for low pH as well as adjacent segments.
The planning group is evaluating the low pH but has no actions and/or recommendations
relative to this discharge. As a typical groundwater remediation system effluent pH
monitoring was not a requirement but effluent pH data is available on the majority of lab
reports. •
DATA REVIEW
Since February 2006 this facility had four chronic toxicity failures, February 2006,
November 2006, November 2008, and May 2009. There are observations and concerns
3

FOISNOt
Water & Process Technologies
0
OptiS erse* AP0520
p
Internal Treatment
• Applicable as an All-polymer internal treatment
• Superior control of hardness and iron deposition
Treatment and Feeding Requirements
• Improves boiler efficiency by maintaining Proper trea ; ent leve for OptiSperse AP0520 de-
cleaner heat transfer surfaces pend on ma y fact, s particular to a given boiler
• PolyTrack*tracer provides easy and accurate system. The • odu'• should be used in accordance
determination of product levels with control p o .dures that GE Infrastructure Wa-
ter&Process ; hnologies establishes for a specific
application.
Description and Use
OptiSperse PO 20 may be fed neat, or diluted to
OptiSperse AP0520 is an aqueous blend of a poly- any cony•nient strength with softened makeup,
meric dispersant and an easily testable product condens'te,orf=-dwater.
W]FF . ,WiV GEM for aSSffaW n aV an "A®
SogP Fr W-bW I-hWW Srevent the formation of Packaging In ormation
scale deposits on internal boiler surfaces.
OptiSperse AP0520 is a liquid blend, available in a
OptiSperse AP0520 controls deposit formation wide variety of customized containers and delivery
O through two surface adsorption mechanisms: ais- methods. Contact your GE representative for de-
persion and Crystal Modification. tails.
Dispersion: The OptiSperse AP0520 polymer ad-
sorbs strongly to deposit particles, altering their Storage
normal surface charge properties. The attraction Store OptiSperse AP0520 at moderate temperatures
between particles and internal boiler surfaces is
greatly reduced. This inhibits both particle growth and protect from freezing. If frozen, thaw corn-
and attachment to surfaces. The result is a stabi- pletely and mix thoroughly prior to use.
lized suspension of colloidal particles readily re-
moved through blowdown. Safety Precautions
Crystal Modification: The OptiSperse AP0520 poly- A Material Safety aata Sheet containing detailed
mer distorts the normal crystalline structure of information about this product is available upon
deposit particles, so that normal growth is pre- request.
vented.This avoids the formation of large, unstable
particles that settle onto boiler surfaces.
OptiSperse AP0520 promotes maximum boiler effi-
ciency by preventing the formation of both hard-
ness and metal oxide deposits on boiler heat
transfer surfaces.
Visit us online at www.gewater.com Global Headquarters Americas Europe/Middlei Erast/Africa Asia/Pacific
O
02005,General Electric Company. Trevose,PA Watertown,MA Heverlee,Belgium Shanghai,China
All rights reserved. [phone] [phone] [phone] [phone]
*Trademark of General Electric Company;may be registered in one or more countries. PFB1006EN 0506

from the Regional Office staff that low nutrient levels were the major contributors to all the
toxicity test failures. One of the functions of the compost filters is to add nutrient organics
to help sustain the longevity of the toxicity test species. Aquatic Toxicology unit has been
contacted about these observations and concerns.
There have been several NOV issued for non-compliance since 2006. The Regional Office O
recommends renewing this permit and feels this operation has demonstrated efficiency in
meeting its objectives and maintaining its compliance.
Since 2006 there have been four reported 1,1-Dichloroethene result above the minimum
detection limit, one reported 1,2-Dichloroethane result above its minimum detection limit,
and all the other chlorinated solvents test results were reported below their detection
limits. However, the DMRs reported detection limits varied. Per the ORC, the contracted lab
had changed procedures and is using a new instrument and procedure, and thought the
higher detection limit was acceptable. The ORC alerted the lab that per the permit the
reported data had to meet the less than 1.0 µg/I detection limit.
Over the last 12 months the average flow is 5,000 gpd with a maximum of 12,000 gpd and
a minimum of less than a 1,000 gpd.
There was pH data available, and it had a range of 6.4 S.U. to 7.9 S.U.. With the treated
effluent passing through a limestone filter the pH should typically be at the higher end of
the range.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS (RPA)
An EPA approved reasonable potential analysis was conducted using the January 2006 to
January 2010 DMR data and applying the most recent water quality standards (WQS) under
the Water Supply category from the February 2010 NC and EPA Criteria Table for:
1) 1,1-Dichloroethene
2) 1,2-Dichloroethane
3) Trichloroethylene
4) 1,1-Dichloroethane
5) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
6) Tetrachloroethylene
The RPA results were used in the permitting strategy.
PERMITTING STRATEGY
Based on the results of the RPA 12-Dichloroethane has the potential to exceed its WQS and
its daily maximum limit will remain. The RPA results for 1,2-Dichloroethene indicated no
potential to exceed its WQS and the limit will be removed. The other reported chlorinated
solvents had continuous "below detection limits" values and did not have the potential to
exceed their WQS. Consequently, these other solvents compliance limits were not
continued and/or added to the permit. Since the treatment system uses replacement
components to treat the wastewater and meet compliance, the monitoring frequency will
not change. The minimum detection limit footnote was assigned to the two parameters with
WQS less than 1.0 µg/L.
The quarterly chronic toxicity test will remain. The toxicity narrative was updated to reflect
the most current language. Any assessment on the validity and/or suspect causes of
failures of toxicity should be addressed through the Aquatic Toxicology Unit.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
In keeping with Division policies the following will be incorporated into the permit:
• Daily maximum limits for 1,1-Dochloroethene and Trichloroethylene (TCE) will be
removed.
• Minimum detection limits for 1,2-Dichloroethane and Tetrachloroethylene will be
assigned.
0
• The chronic toxicity permit limit narrative will be revised.
• Parameter codes will be added.
3

May cause severe gastrointestinal irritation.
TARGET ORGANS:
Prolonged or repeated exposures may cause primary irritant
dermatitis.
MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED:
Not known.
SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE:
May cause redness or itching of skin, irritation, and/or tearing of
eyes (direct contact) .
3 Composition / information on ingredients
Information for specific product ingredients as required by the
U.S. OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD is listed. Refer to
additional sections of this MSDS for our assessment of the potential
hazards of this formulation.
HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS:
Cas# Chemical Name Range(w/w%)
1310-73-2 SODIUM HYDROXIDE (CAUSTIC SODA) 5-10
Corrosive; toxic (by ingestion)
903573-39-7 ACRYLATE TERPOLYMER 5-10
Eye irritant
202420-04-0 CHLOROTOLYLTRIAZOLE SODIUM SALT 1-5
Potential irritant
4 First-aid measures
SKIN CONTACT:
Wash thoroughly with soap and water. Remove con urinated clothing.
Thoroughly wash clothing before reuse. Get medic attention if
irritation develops or persists.
EYE CONTACT:
URGENT! Immediately flush eyes with plenty of low-pre ur- ater
for at least 20 minutes while removing contact lenses. -.ld eyelids
apart. Get immediate medical attention.
INHALATION:
If nasal, throat or lung irritation develops - r- ove to fresh air
and get medical attention.
INGESTION:
Do not feed anything by mouth to an unco •cious or convulsive
victim. Do not induce vomiting. Immedi- ely contact physician.
Dilute contents of stomach using 2-: luid ounces (60-240 mL) of
milk or water.
NOTES TO PHYSICIANS:
No special instructions
5 Fire-fighting measures
Substance or Preparation:GENGARD GN8108 Page 2

PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: April 28, 2010
Permit Scheduled to Issue: July 2010
0
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit,
please cont Ron B at [phone] or email ron.berry ncdenr.gov.
NAME: _kt,oe. DATE: rP /y70
70
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
0
NAME: DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DATE:
0
' hCLi
1' 3

WITH THE EQUIPMENT OR ELSE USE SUPPLIED AIR-RESPIRATORS.
If air-purifying respirator use is appropriate, use a
respirator with acid gas cartridges and dust/mist prefilters.
0 SKIN PROTECTION:
gauntlet-type neoprene gloves, chemical resistant apron--
Wash off after each use. Replace as necessary.
EYE PROTECTION:
splash proof chemical goggles, face shield
9 Physical and chemical properties
Specific Gray. (70F,21C) 1.261 Vapor Pressure (mmHG) - 18.0
Freeze Point (F) 18 Vapor Density (air=1) < 1.00
Freeze Point (C) -8
Viscosity(cps 70F,21C) 7 % Solubility (water) 100.0 /
Odor Strong
Appearance Pink
Physical State Liquid
Flash Point P-M(CC) > 200F > 936
pH As Is (approx.) 3.2
Evaporation Rate (Ether=1) < 1.00
Percent VOC: 0.0
NA = not applicable ND = not determined
10 Stability and reactivity
•
STABILITY:
Stable under normal storage co .itions.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION:
Will not occur.
INCOMPATIBILITIES:
May react with strong .xidizers.
DECOMPOSITION PRODUCT-
elemental oxides
INTERNAL PUMPOUT/CLEANOUT CATEGORIES:
"Bw
11 Toxicological information
Oral LD50 RAT: >2,000 mg/kg
NOTE - Estimated value
Dermal LD50 RABBIT: >2,000 mg/kg
NOTE - Estimated value
Skin Irritation Score RABBIT: 0-2.95
NOTE - Repeated studies indicate little or no irritation; not DOT
corrosive
Eye Irritation Score RABBIT: 2.0
NOTE - Maximum score at 1 hour; completely reversible by 48 hours
12 Ecological information
Substance or Preparation:CORTROL 1S3000 Page 4

ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 28, 2010
MEMORANDUM
To: Britt Setzer
NCDENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
Mooresville Regional Office
From: Ron Berry
NCDENR / DWQ / NPDES Program
Central Raleigh Office
Subject: Review of renewal draft NPDES Permit NC0085928
American Truetzschler Inc. Groundwater Remediation
Please complete this form to indicate your agency's position or viewpoint on this draft permit and return
via either email, fax, or mail to my attention by May 25, 2010. If you have any questions on the draft
permit, please contact me at telephone number [phone] or via e-mail at ron.berrvPncdenr.gov. My
fax number is [phone].
RESPONSE: (Check one)
.,J Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly,
the stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the
designated water quality standards.
Concurs with issuance of this permit, provided the following conditions are met:
Opposes the issuance of this permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signedcit4W____
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet:http://h2o.encstate.nc.us/ Natural/An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

The Charlotte Observer Publishing Co.
Charlotte, NC
North Carolina ) ss Affidavit of Publication
Mecklenburg County)
THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
DINA SPRINKLE
NCDENR/DWO/POINT SOURCE BRANCH
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699
REFERENCE: 30063432
6462133 County Of Lincoln
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly authorized to administer Public Notice
North Carolina Environmental Management
oaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared,
Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
being duly sworn or affirmed according to law, Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit
doth depose and say that he/she is a • The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
proposes to issue a NPDES wastewater discharge permit to the
representative of The Charlotte Observer person(s)listed below.
Publishing Company, a corporation organi zed and Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice.The
doing business under the laws of the State of Director of the NC Division of Water Quality(DWO)may hold a
public hearing should there be a significant degree of public
interest.Please mail comments and/or information requests to
Delaware, and publishing a newspaper known as The DWO at the above address.Interested persons may visit the DWG)
at 512 N.Salisbury Street,Raleigh.NC to review information on
Charlotte Observer in the city of Charlotte, file.Additional information on NPDES permits and this notice may
Countyof Mecklenburg, and State of North Carolina be found)80on our webstte:www ncwaterqual ty.org,or by calling
9 (91 s)Bp7-s3oa:
Thand that as such he/she is familiar with the for ens Middle Lincoln
oy requested
eWWTPvinl permit
� 74 this
Y County;
discharge is treated domestic wastewater to Forney Creek,
books, records, files, and business of said Catawba River Basin.
Corporation and byreference to the files of said American •Truetzschler Inc. requested renewal of permit
PNC0085928 -for its groundwater remediation facility in
Mecklenburg County; this permitted discharge is treated
publication, the attached advertisement was groundwater to an unnamed tributary to the Catawba River in the
Catawba River Basin.
inserted. The following is correctly copied from Mariners Watch HOA requested renewal of permit NC0068705for
the books and files of the aforesaid Corporation Mariners Watch WWTP in Mecklenburg County;this permitted
p discharge is treated domestic wastewater to Lake Wylie in the
and Publication. Catawba River Basin.
Aqua North Carolina, Inc. requested renewal of permit
•
NC0063789 for Mint Hit Festival WWTP in Mecklenburg County.
This permitted discharge is treated domestic wastewater to Irvins
Creek in the Catawba River Basin.
Duke Energy Carolinas,LLC has requested renewal of permit
NC0004979 for the Allen Steam Station in Gaston County. This
facility discharges treated industrial wastewater to the Catawba
and South Fork Catawba Rivers in the Catawba River Basin.
Duke Power has applied for renewal of its NPDES discharge
permit for Riverbend Steam Station (number NC0004961)
discharging to the Catawba River in the Catawba River Basin.This
facility discharge is treated industrial wastewater to Catawba
River,Catawba River Basin.
Duke Energy Carolinas,LLC has applied for a renewal of permit
NC0004987 for Marshall Steam Station in Catawba County.This
PUBLISHED ON• 05/02 permitted facility discharges treated industrial wastewater to the
Catawba River in the Catawba River Basin.This discharge may
affect future allocations in their watershed,
LP6462133
AD SPACE: 116 LINE
FILED ON: 06/04/10
NAME: ,.- A. -1 '�_ .:.I TITLE:
DATE: Qi —
In Testi .ny Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal, the
day and ear aforesaid.
•
Notar /011"/ _ • My Commission Expires: _/_/_
I
111
My Commission Expires May 27, 2011

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
American Truetzschler Inc. Outfall 001 I
NCO085928 Qw=0.05 MGD
Time Period.all 2006-Jam 2010
I
Ow(MGD) 0.06 IoWTP Cass I Ceicsdabon of 1010 based on 7010
7O10S(ds) 0 AMC CO Q 70105 WA 1010=0.843(7010)a8D3
7Q10W(cfs) 0 Q 7010W WA SUMMER 1010=0(c(s)
3002(ds) 0 Q 3002 WA WA
I
Avg.Steam Fate,Q4(c13) 0 Q QA WA WINTER 1Q10=0(cfs)
ReeY6p Seem UT to Catawb.Rivet Steam Can WSW WA
STANDARDS&
PARAMETER TYPE` CRfTEMA(2) POe. Uras REASONABLE POTBflML RESULTS RECOSIMMIDED ACTION
M Ieags/ Hutu/ = eta eerier or ramie Or I
M
Mirk ear
1.1 NC 330 1Aaae: NO WOS
4{ri 43 4 a2
Cho�ic.--310—NopckeiS�Ftomeceed— -.-- .— —'
Mumma emit,rnaltaln frequency
I
1,2dctloroWlmr C 0.38 1 MN NO WOS
MA 43 1 1.3 __ _
Ceatc 0.36T i_ii;s lNNateeerq)eDes�i iSt_— _
Nee dirae,etiUiAaegarecy
Art NO WOE _.__ --- — I tkMaoMlryMr C 23 uyL 43 0 0.5
_ oP_at
Chair:---25— $ hSfWwseed—
$e m.M.IreAtein frequency
AIN: NO WOE
1A41JroraLr.e NC 6700 tql 43 0 0.5 __ _ _ _ _ _ --
-.4; ;;;;;i---"-------- —
_
I Chrodr: 6.700 Nopt8NtAlpetoeed— -
14laldaaegpmtoy
Amar NO WOO
1,1,14tlehbro•M)trte C 2500 tot 43 0 0.5 _
Cle.1c 2,300 rNPOI IUI.receed— —_-----'-
—-
MaiduNINalemey
AIN: NO WOS
taadNmeSyen C 0.7 tot 43 0 0.5
ate.--0.7—TIP;aeieeirroessd--- —•— - •—
SNOW freepecy
Arta: NO WOE
aalL 0 0 NN •
Ames NO VMS
MIL 0 0 N/A
Chale:---WA
Aeras: NO WOS •
ttgt 0 0 N/A I
AIN: NO VMS
eyL 0 0 NM
Mile: NO WOE
tpt 0 0 NIA
CcM1c--- —.—__ •_'_---.— ------._._._
Agit NO WOE --- I
uyl 0 0 N/A
Acils NO WOE
ealL 0 0 N/A
Chatc: -NM 11
Ohs NO WOE
lOt 0 0 Nal -- —'—'—•---'-- — —'--- —' — — I
GiaiC- is
Mat NO 111106 r
tot 0 0 N/A
•Legend: ••Reslard Dacherge
C=CareMege t
NC=MonandergNYe
A=AeaOeae
I
RPA,rye
47I/RM0
III

IMeritech, Inc. •
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody O ��� `�S
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone]
Client Information
I Client: 11,ueirAwrs-Ntaurior\ 4;� ,,r.�-
KW
Contact: (',I,a,,(as VQ,,, „bQ,r NPDES #: NC 06 44725
Address: 16"701 A rp�ri- Aa, Phone: (coo)g 44.50g►
1 City: J� .ir,n Pipe Number:i
County: State: Wk_ Zip: 2.: , /
Type of Facility Generating Effluent: AP
Sample Informat n
ISampling Site: . ro: el:.C' -
Sample Type: Grab Compos. e # of Contai rs Z
Sampling Time: STAR II ate: 3 _g.07 T m-. � $: Sb PM
I
END D. e: 3 _q-p7 Time- ni :00NA AM PM
Sample Chilled(Covered with e): ` - .— No,-
I Collector's Name (Print): / M� ��� �n� �cs
Collector's Signature: ► - . 3-13-D7 as 9`Q7AM
IToxicity Test Information 4S rr CrUAevr UM` ' 3.
Test Required: Chronic: ✓ Test S . ni 1 : Ceriodaphnia Dubia:
1 Acute: i . \ Pimephales promelas:
\ ysidopsis bahia:
IWC: /` \
I Toxicity Test Concentration(s): Z:6QTe \
List Any Special Requirements / \�
• / �\
I \�
Shipping Information t
I
Relinquished By: „i,, Date: 3 /(:)/o 7 Ti . ) -46,001M
Received By: &Pi . Date: 3_4•+-O7 Time: V; ,f4 PM
IRelinquished By: Date: Time: AMP
Received By: / •t, 'A.l , _---`X Date: 3 - 4.--07 Time: f. :V.I AM
Sample Temperature (S'): Method of Shipment: WTC(p/u) UPS Fed-Ex
I ircle One Other:
� r+ MLra�MN/Mr�ria'ice
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From: Gr Fr A\ S
I --j
Received By: , Aez-.. Date: 3 -1-0 1 Time: 1(oc(n AM
Sample Temperature (C°): 0 t D / 0, Sample Condition: -lcc a

MI 1 N M 1 M M IIIIII M IIIIII M I I N M M M 1 1
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
1,1-dlchloroethylene 1,2-dIchloroethane
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 1f1eme 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.7060 1 mem + 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0915
2 2/21108 1 0.5 Mean 0.7093 2 2/21/00 + 0.5 Mean 0.5140
3 3/17/081 0.5 C.V. 0.9954 3 3/17/06 , 1 0.5 C.V. 0.1780
4 414/081 0.5 n 43 4 4/4/08'r 1 0.5 n 43
5 8/+0,00, 1 0.5 5 5/16,00 r 1 0.5
6 8/24/061 0.5 Mult Factor= 2.4000 6 8/24,00 1 0.5 Mutt Factor= 1.2100
7 7/01061 0.5 Max.Value 3.4 ug/L 7 7/27/08 < 1 0.5 Max.Value 1.1 ug/L
8 e16/061 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 8.2 ug/L 8 6/15/08 1 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 1.3 ug/L
9 6/29/06 1.4 1.4 9 8/28,00 1 0.5
10 10/19106 + 0.5 10 10/19/06 1 0.5
11 11/14/061 0.5 11 11/14/06 + 0.5
12 12/01001 0.5 12 12/0100 + 0.5
13 12/12108/ 1 0.5 13 12/12/06
+ 0.5
14 1/12107 1 0.5 14 2/+2/07 + 0.5
15 2/20/07 `. 1 0.5 15 2/20/07 *, 1 0.5
16 328071 0.5 16 3/26107 '..' 1 0.5
17 4/30/07 2.6 2.9 17 4/30/07 .' + 0.5
18 5/19/07 r 33 3.3 18 5/15/07 1 0.5
;rr
19 9/21107 1 0.5 19 6/21/07';i ; 1 0.5
20 6/26/07 1. 0,5 20 6/20/02 1.1 1.1
21 10/16107.' ": 1. 0.5 21 10/16/07 1. 0.5
22 11/29/07 1 0.5 22 11/26/07 1. 0.5
23 12/25/07 1 0.5 23 12/25/07 . 1. 0.5
24 +m/oa 1. 0.5 24 1/25/06 ? 1. 0.5
25 2116106 ; 1. 0.5 25 2/16/00 1. 0.5
26 3/27/08 ; 1 0.5 26 3/27106 ;/ 1. 0.5
27 4/18/09 1 0.5 27 4/18/00 1. 0.5
28 5/8100 1` 1 0.5 28 5/8108 :; 1. 0.5
29 5/27,06 % 1. 0.5 29 8/27/08 1. 0.5
30 8/28,06 1 0.5 30 8/20/00 1. 0.5
31 6/12/08 1. 0.5 31 6/12/08 1 0.5
32 11/18108 " 1. 0.5 32 11ne1087ti 1. 0.5
33 11/25/08 3.4 3.4 33 11/25/06,;,y 1. 0.5
34 12/12/06 1 0.5 34 12/12108 1. 0.5
35 1/0,06 "'% 1. 0.5 35 1/6/00 • + 0.5
36 2/17106 . 1. 0.5 36 2/17108 1 0.5
37 3/18106 1 0.5 37 3/18106 1 0.5
38 4/8/00 '1 1 0.5 38 4/2106. 1- 0.5
39 5/16,06 '.` 1. 0.5 39 5/16/06;:.:' 1 0.5
40 8/12/06 ;A 1 0.5 40 5/12,08 1 0.5
41 7/31/06'"'`3 1 0.5 41 7/31,08 :,: 1 0.5
42 8/11/00 1 0.5 42 8/+1108 1- 0.5
43 6/31/08 :` 1. 0.5 43 8/31106 '" 1. 0.5
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
RPA,data
1- 4/27/2010

I
SHAPIRO-WILK'S TEST FOR NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA (cont.)
IICOEFFICIENTS AND DIFFERENCES
i x(n-i-1) x(i) a(i) x(n-i-1) - x(i)
Ii 7.8333 -10.1667 0.4493 18.0000
14 .7500
2 6.8333 -7.9167 0.3098
3 5.8333 -6.1667 0.2554 12.0000
4 4.8333 -5.9167 0.2145 10.7500
5 4.0833 -5.1667 0.1807 9.2500
I
6 4 .0833 -4.9167 0.1512 9.0000
7 3.8333 -4.1667 0.1245 8.0000
8 3.0833 -3.1667 0.0997 6.2500
9 3.0833 -2.1667 0.0764 5.2500
II 10 2.0833 -0.9167 0.0539 3.0000
2.0000
11 2.0 0.0833 0.0321
12 1.8 33 1.0833 0.0107 0.7500
II tik 1 .
\ W X 54 .5449
y 568.5833
/
Calculated 0.956 C tical W = 0.884
I1 .956 x 0. . 4
The reproduction •ata , normally distributed
evaluated a ` 9= confidence interval.
I /
14. Ai /Passes!
I \,
F test fo •m•• -ity of Variance
IEff u- ariance 34.8788
F = = 2.07
Co of variance .. .8106
Numerator degrees • fr edom: 11 Den& na.or degrees of freedom: 11
II Critical F = 5.3'
II 2.07 s 32 ► The Test PASSES, the varia es of the two groups
are si• ifi antly the same, homogeneous. .\
II
1
1

11111 INIII 11111 1 - - - ! - NM - In - S - N - M M
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
trichloroethylene 1,1-dichlorothane 1,1,1-trlchloro-eth
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL■1/2DL Results Date Data BDLa1/2DL
1 1116/05 ; 1. 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 1/16/06 1. 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 1/16/061. 0.5
2 2121/00` 1. 2.' 0.5
0.5 Mean 0.5000 2 3/2+/06 1. 0.5 Mean 0.5000 2 2/21/06 +.
3 3/17,05: 1. 0.5 C.V. 0.0000 3 3/17/06 1. 0.5 C.V. 0.0000 3 3/17/06
g +. 0.5
•
4 414/00 1. 0.5 n 43 4 4/606 a 1. 0.5 n 43 4 4,4101 5 a, 1. 0.5
d
5 5/+606 1. 0.5 5 5/16/06 1. 0.5 5 5/16/06 1. 0.5
6 6/24/06 ` ' +. 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.0000 6 6/2406, 1 1. 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.0000 6 6/24/06 �'� +. 0.5
7 70+05 . 1. 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 ug/L 7 7127106 1. 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 ug/L 7 7127/01 • 1. 0.5
8 6/16/00 1. 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.5 ug/L 8 616/06 1. 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.5 ug/L 8 8/15/08 4. 1. 0.5
9 6/3/906 1. 0.50 9 9/26ioe` 1. 0.5 9 6/606 1. 0.5
10 bonne '. 1. 0.50 10 +8/19/06 1. 0.5 10 101008 x 1.
0.5
11 11/14/00 ` 1. 0.50 11 11/14/06 1. 0.5 11 11/14/06 . 1. 0.5
12 +vvoo • 1. 0.50 12 12/0/90 1. 0.5 12 1211,06 1. 0.5
13 12/12/00 1. 0.50 13 13/13/08 1. 0.5 13 12112106 1. 0.5
14 1/12/07:''` 1. 0.50 14 1/12/07 1. 0.5 14 1/12/07 1. 0.5
15 2120107; 1. 0.50 15 2120/07 1 0.5 15 2120107 1. 0.5
16 017007 1. 0.50 16 3/26107 1. 0.5 16 3/2907 1. 0.5
17 4/3607 1. 0.50 17 4/30/07 1. 0.5 17 4/30/07 1.
0.5
18 5/1607 : 1. 0.50 18 5/1607 1. 0.5 18 5/15/07 1. 0.5
19 0121107 1. 0.50 19 5/2107 1. 0.5 19 6/21/07 1. 0.5
20 6/26/07 :' 1. 0.50 20 9176/37 1. 0.5 20 6/28107 1. 0.5
21 10/16/07 ' 1. 0.50 21 18/19107 1. 0.5 21 18/19/07 1 0.5
22 11/21/07 1 0.50 22 11/26/07, 1. 0.5 22 11126/07 1. 0.5
23 12/25/07 1. 0.50 23 12/25/07 1. 0.5 23 12126/07 1. 0.5
24 1/26/06 ';, 1. 0.50 24 1/25,01 ti 1. 0.5 24 1'25.01 1. 0.5
25 2/1601 1. 0.50 25 2116/01. '• 1. 0.5 25 2/16/08 1. 0.5
26 3/27/01 1. 0.50 26 3127/00 1. 0.5 26 3/27/01 1. 0.5
" ?
27 4/10/06 ;' 1 0.50 27 4/+6/06 1 0.5 27 Meme - I. 0.5
28 5/608 1. 0.50 28 5/6+05 1. 0.5 28 5/0011 1. 0.5
29 6/2706 1. 0.50 29 6/27/01• ` 1. 0.5 29 0121me 1. 0.5
30 e12eroe 1. 0.50 30 6/28/01 1. 0.5 30 6126101 1. 0.5
31 9/12/00'' 1. 0.50 31 6/13/01 1. 0.5 31 9/12105 1. 0.5
32 1105,08 1. 0.50 32 11ne108j 1. 0.5 32 11/16/00 1. 0.5
33 11125/0 1. 0.50 33 11/25/00 1. 0.5 33 11/25/00 1. 0.5
34 trims 1.1. 0.50 34 13/+3/06 • 1 0.5 34 1v12/o1 1. 0.5
35 1/0/00 1. 0.50 35 1/0/09 G 1. 0.5 35 1rom6 I. 0.5
36 3/4/,06 `;;: 1. 0.50 36 3/+7/09 1 0.5
38 2117/09 1. 0.5
37 3/16/091. 0.50 37 3/16/09 .;', 1. 0.5 37 3/16/09 1. 0.5
38 418109 + 1. 0.50 38 418/09 1. 0.5 38 416109 1. 0.5
39 5/19/09 1. 0.50 39 6/16/00 1. 0.5 39 5/19/00:;.; 1. 0.5
40 6/12/09 1 0.50 40 6/12/09 1. 0.5 40 6/12100 1. 0.5
41 701,09 1 0.50 41 7/31/00 1. 0.5 41 7131/09 1. 0.5
42 8/11138 1. 0.50 42 8/11/09 1. 0.5 42 0/11/09 `,`. 1. 0.5
43 6731,00 1 0.50 43 &woo 1. 0.5 43 8/3+/09 ' 1. 0.5
44 44
44
45
45 45
•
46 47 46 � 46
47 47
48
49 48 48
49 49
3 RPA,data
4/27/2010

1
EQUAL VARIANCE t TEST
'
t = 19.9 - 12.2
= 3.734
2.075
' Degrees of freedom = 22
Critical t = 2.508
3.734 x 2.508
' Test fails. There is a significant difference in reproduction
between the Control an• the effluent evaluated at a 99% confidence interval.
' Chronic Test FAI
' The mean # ''of you • •roduced by ch group is dissimilar
1

NE MI 1 N 11111 E MN MI N IM 11111 E MN NE I A MN 1 11111
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
ane tetrachloroethylene 0
Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Da
Sid Dev. 0.0000 1 tne/00 1. 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 Std Dev. NO DATA 1
Mean 0.5000 2 281/011 1. 0.5 Mean 0.5000 2 Mean NO DATA 2
C.V. 0.0000 3 V17/00 1. 0.5 C.V. 0.0000 3 C.V. NO DATA 3
n 43 4 4M/00 1. 0.5 n 43 4 n 0 4
5 0n11/0e 1. 0.5 5 5
Mull Factor= 1.0000 6 1/21/0e 1. 0.5 MuIt Factor= 1.0000 6 MuIt Factor= N/A 6
Max.Value 0.5 ug/L 7 7/27/011 1, 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 ug/L 7 Max.Value 0.0 ug/L 7
Max.Pred Cw 0.5 ug/L 8 8/15/01 1. 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.5 ug/L 8 Max.Pred Cw N/A ug/L 8
9 '/28/08 1. 0.500 9 9
10 10/11/08 1. 0.500 10 10
11 11/1/01 1. 0.500 11 11
12 Uro/ 1. 0.500 12 12
13 12/12101 1. 0.500 13 13
14 112107 1. 0.5 14 14
15 2/20/07 1. 0.5 15 • 15
16 3/20/07 1. 0.5 16 16
17 4/30/07 1. 0.5 17 17
18 5/15,07 1. 0.5 18 18
19 8/21/07 1. 0.5 19 19
20 9120107 1. 0.5 20 • 20
21 101122,07 1. 0.5 21 21
22 11/28/07 1. 0.5 22 • 22
23 1225/07 1. 0.5 23 23
24 1/25/011 1. 0.5 24 24
25 2/10/08 1. 0.5 25 25
26 3/27!01 1. 0.5 26 26
27 4/1e/0e L 0.5 27 27
28 51e/0e 1. 0.5 28 28
29 8/27,01 1. 0.5 29 29
30 8/28078 1. 0.5 30 30
31 9112108 1. 0.5 31 31
32 11115,08 1. 0.5 32 32
33 11/25/011 1. 0.5 33 33
34 12112108 1. 0.5 34 34
35 116100 1. 0.5 35 35
36 2/17/00 1. 0.5 36 36
37 3/18/00 1. 0.5 37 37
38 4/8100 1. 0.5 38 38
39 5/+9/00 1. 0.5 39 •
39
40 8/12/00 1. 0.5 40 40
41 7/31/00 1. 0.5 41 41
42 8/1/00 1. 0.5 42 • 42
43 8/31!08 1. 0.5 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
46 46 46
47 47 47
48 48 48
49 49 49
RPA,data
5- 4/27/2010

Meritech, Inc.
Ceriodaphnia dubia Reproduction Data Sheet
Client: Lb'V1A-C. Start Date: Li i to 167 Start Time: 1'. 1J
NPDES#: NC(-c)9 Li?2.<- End Date: 41-ZA o, End Time: 01', Li Se'
Reviewed by: peg--
Replicates
Effluent Day # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I.3rd Brood
3 O O O o �y o n p g'1 �-0-, ` ,O/ ,l' 1b0 J
Control 5 LV/p yI/'D (/ 3/l/ -//ill y�0 14© 31 S/// Y 7 C.V. Mean
7 J / /( 1/ 12- 11 11 1 2- 10 1 Z 5 8/I I 7.E:_lReproduction
Total 2`{�2 •2 5 'Zy Z.`2 25" 25/ 2-LI Z5. 2-1 !O z3,'��
3 O o O o O 0 0
0 O O
v.os% 5 L// L/g V e `l/gs Y/7 34o 4'/8 3/7- 3/e
7 c...) 8 8 8 `1 A e (0,..,- 6 8 19 , 1
Total 20 2-0 _ 20 20 _ 13 2.1 00 ,,„1,- - 20 /i' % RED. is,7
3 O o .{OO '=- O O O 'O 0 O /�
I.2j % 5 9 't/ - "/ '/4 ,r0,51/ gt6 L7 V63/16
7 6 7 7/6= 6 '7 '/ - 6 6 G; C, 15-I
Total ii lin 17 1`I '2/ I 16 to 13 f? % RED. 35.7
3 0 9O f 0 0 0 • O ` .co o Q O c
Z. Co % 5, H ! 3 ! coo blv'`�
� .D S
7 0 6x 0 I 4 . • 0 y -- D — 0 1deac4 5. 7
Total iiy L} 1-7 Z I '`-----. '1 p 5 % RED. 75-,7
3 O O O 4/ 0 0 0 0 O ----'"Crz.-
5.z °i° s 2.
G p y .Z 3 � u�
7 `I 0 o © 0 Li O D ,Li, 1
Total 6) _3 2- D 3 P 2. 3 3 8 _ 3 p % RED. 52, (4.
3 0 00 O O O O 0 p
/0, % 5 -2� / 3 J) L/ .z .,2 u2 3 0 . 4/ i y
7 -- 0 - 2! It © * U 1 0 .a * o 2.6
Total a D f 3 P 6 a 3 1) a D (;) / 8s.
% RED.
mg MN 11111 ililili N ililili I 110111 11111 ilii NMI MN it EN 11111 it I iI NM MI NMI

.Date: 4/12/10 DMR Data for NPDES Permit NC0085928
I
. pb:rdb American Truetzscher, Inc. Ground Warter Remediation
O Flow Rdg ,'?. Flow Monthly Avg - -Permitted Flow I 0.06
0
0.05
0.04 I
0
0 0.03
0.02
0.01
�c�
0 � I
O
0.00 eQ�-- � .
""` _ E ,�ga ��o �—E
4 4 4 4 4 ? o o $ g o $ $ g o
MR
I
0 34501-1,1-dichloroethylene --d Daily Max Limit
6.00 i.
I
5.00
I
1 4.00
O O
1 3.00 TIir:; i 0
•
2.00 1
i 0
1.00 0-000 0 0 00 000-0.0.0_....._...__.. 0 0o--O0 OO O00 .-0--.-000--- 000-Oo-0-O0--490
I
ALL 1.0µg/L RDG ARE LESS THAN
o.00 4 a� gp
o 0 0 ° ° n r 8 8 8 00 00 0o co 0 O am 0,.... '
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0
-, 2 3 v 2 - 3 - N Z -, 5 5 - O. 2 5 r'o
_
0 32103- 1,2-dichloroethane Daily Max Limit I
6.00
5.00
I
4.00
e� 3.00 I I
Y
2.00
1
1.00 00-0e--0-0-00 -0000 000 - 0 4o- 0-000-000 -0 00 Doo-000-00--O
ALL 1.0 µg/L RDG ARE LESS THAN,considered in compliance
�c io o c �o �o n r n n n n 00 0o 00 00 00 00 a rn
0 o q o 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S
! 2 2 d z - 2 2 vi z 2 2 .n z 2 2
I

•
Meritech TEL
Data Sheet for Mini Chronic Pass/Fail Test: Certodaphniri ritrbia Incubator r:•:_--I
Tient: L l I-C Pipe #: County: SGo q _ 3 -7-o-) Date End:
'f-� ,Re�, cc. Date Start: 3_fy.0?
\PDES #:NLCG 9 Li 7 2_47--c- Time/ Date of Culture Transfer: S..
S:�r
/4..,,,,—
! :� / 3-c�.-•G�'Time Start:---, •t�d�/� Time End:�p ��'��WA?'"
Dilution Water: Lake Reidsville Time / Date Neonates Born: 7;..r„— r ?,-7-C7-1st Renewal Date'` 3 -`T-o') Time: J A,
rl
fest Organism Source: Age of Neonates at Test Start: �"
� � g � �5 2nd Renewal Date: 3 �z-o� Time: S�.�'!:,-,
;timed/ Aerated for D.O.: Y/a Randomized: ON Culture Tray Temp:Z,S °C Analyst:Alm &viewed by: V^
iontrol Organism Reproduction Collection (Start) Dates!
)ay#3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sample 1: 3-..5--p2" Sample 2: 3- 8-07
t Young Produced Ci Cl 0 O 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 Test Transferred Fed
Sample Type/ ation By: By:
kdults Live/Dead L LL L L L L L L L L % 100% /1
)ay#5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
/ pH Grab Comp Duration Day 0 -titter L—
t Young Produced 3 "3/b y Z. `1/g `i/rc vh y z/S '7' '4.p V San(p-le 1 +1.51 X 24-7 Day I Mi-
kdults Live / Dead L 1— L- ,_ l.. L L L 1_ L 1. L - Sample 2 'i,'1q_ 29.2, Day 2 IAL
)ay#7 1 2 3 4 5`` ,,, 6 7 8 9 10 11 1,2// Day 3 tfe'
f Young Produced 1X/0 9 '/-1 Jo 11--,.,',- "i m/ID S � 4 f0 , C r t`J
_ � Hardness m:/I 0 tt; Day 4 t��
sidults Live/Dead - L L L L L '1' L L
Siec.Cond.(umhos/cm) 180 , 5'1 Day 5 lr�� /t '--
xtit..3-
r "� 1 Chlorine m_•/1 n1 .-:i
otal Produced 23 9. ) 1:a 03 ,�,a I,zL I LJ ) - ; , I C1 ( ..;.,3_EMIEN �O.l LO. Cay 6 j-s
Percent Control Producing' 1.. ; sod:A" . % "' ' :'i MI �' ' 2- Terminated by: /ll�
Treatment 2 Organism Reproduction .,- 6.e1
Effluent %: 7 _pH lit Sample 1't Sam.le 2nd Sample
Z: 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --" 9 10 I i 12 q• i.0 . 8.o3 8,03 '1.9 B
Young Produced C; CJ 0 0 0 0 i 0 U U C C -�„ ` �`
kdults Live/ Dead 1_ t_ L L L - L ` L L L L Treatment 2 • -.0 rl,c1� 111111111 7,4$ g,o 1
Jay#5 D.O. 1"Sample 1st Sam.le 2nd Sample
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
t Young Produced .3 Z y Li 3 3 Z 2 y Z i 7 Control r],els 7,q9 FINI QQ8 p8p�1 . 22. I.
kdults Live/ Dead L L- L L L 1. L t` L L L 1✓ Treatment 2 rijcilo 8.01 rill ,q• 8. 2(0 '1,q'7,
Day#7 j£1 - , 3 4 5i 6 7)K 8k 9* 10• 11 l2•
i Young Produced SA y '7/7 7/ I ti 1/25r C7 Li 1 yZTemp. I"Sample 1:t Sample 2nd Sample
kdults Live/ Dead /L L L L p L L., v t_. j L. L Control 25.0 24.9 25. 125,0 25. 1241
6 )4 � 7 /C � p �' IP di Treatment 2 2,5S) End
rJ 2.14.9 25.0 25.0 25.0 2
Total Produced j 9 Start End Start End Start End
�C �-)mmen s:L f' C
;.,i,% `l� 45r:li;:fii_ac_e_ai.� Lr±)_qt- itht,Y-fz1 F \7r D--5 )1=;IA
11111 11111 EN — MN I NE — * NM N 11111 " ,— MN — — MI MN NM

•Date: 4/12/10 DMR Data for NPDES Permit NC0085928
•
pb:rdb American Truetzschler Inc. GWR
0 39180-Trichloroethylene Daily Max Limit
6.00 _ ..
5.00 U
4.00 r
3.00 k. -
ALL 1.0µg/L RDGS LESS THAN,considered in compliance
2.00
1
1.00 © 000 0 O 00 00 0 0 0 0 000 O 00 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 490 O 0 00--0 O -000
0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cg o 0 0 8 g 8 8 g?
n > c > n > c i
g g - , z Aig g - "' ° .° z g g f
0 34496-1,1-dichloroethane 34506-1,1,1-trichloro-ethane 34475-Tetrachloroethylene
6.00 '
5.00 •
4.00 _ __.. _...-- -
k
3.00 •
2.00 ----
1.00 0 000- 0 000 00-00-0 0 000 0 00 0.0 00 000 0-- 00---4900 000 00 000}
ALL 1.0µG/L RDGS LESS THAN
4 4 0 0 o q o o i o
1
1

EQUAL VARIANCE t TEST
II
I
t = 19.9 - 12.2
= 3.734
2.075
IIDegrees of freedom = 2
Critical t = 2.5
II �..
3.734 x 2. �B
II
Test fails. ere is a significant - `fference in reproduction
between the Conti and the effluent ev.. ' ated at a 99% confidence interval.
I '
Chro - Test FAILS
II
The mean # of y.. g • .•.•uced by each group is dissimilar
ti '
II
\
t
////
I .

•Dpte: 4/12/10 DMR Data for NPDES it NC0085928
•
pb:rdb American Truetzsder, Inc. Gr d Water Remediation I
TGP3B-P/F STATRE 7Day Chr Ceriodaphnia
mm/dd/yy Comment Sample UoM Value Modifier Cell Type Loc
I
221/06 2=fail Composite pass/fail 2 DLYVALUE Effluent
4/41061=Pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
5/161061=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent I 8/15/06 1=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
11/14/06 2=fail Composite pass/fail 2 DLWALUE Effluent
2/20/07 1=pass Composite pass/tail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
I
5/15/07 1=pass Composite pass/fad 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
821/071=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
11/13/07 1=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
I
2/19/08 1=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
2221081=pass Composite pass/ail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
516/081=pass Composite pass/ail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
826/081=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
I
8291081=pass Composite pass/fail t DLYVALUE Effluent
11/18/08 2=fail Composite pass/faii 2. DLYVALUE Effluent
2/17/09 1=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent I 2/20/091=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
5/19109 2=fail Composite pass/fail 2. DLYVALUE Effluent
6/9/09 THP3B-CHV S Biological Composite percent 100. GRATRTHN DLYVALUE Effluent
I
8/11/09 1=pass Composite pass/fail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
11/10/091=pass Composite pass/ail 1. DLYVALUE Effluent
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I

_ 0 Meritech, Inc. i
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
I
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville,NC 27320
sem_• [phone]
Client Information
I
Client: To
Contact: a ;ti,�„ 3r
l�r��r. ,r PA#
NPDES
#:
Address: l re I AirT,4 gA, ii..hone:
I
City: ,.. . :,n `ipe Number:
County: 3. ._ , . State: 1�S c Zip: / , _
I
Type of Facility • e z\ating Effluent: I Sample Information
ISampling Site:Sample Type: .bposite # of Containers 2_
Sampling Time: START •a : 07 Time: $;30 01 PM
I
/ -
END '., :te: ,, .ay Time: ct:10 WI PM
Sample Chilled (Covered w• h Ice): es /l/ No
I
Collector's Name (Print): rt• �, ber
Collector's Signature: ., . ,,A/`,
4
IToxicity Test Information
Test Required: Chronic: // Test a rg.nis Ceriodaphnia Dubia:
I Acute: imephales promelas:
sidopsis bahia:
IWC:
IToxicity Test Concentration(- 2.t,�0
List Any Special Requirem=is:
1
Shipping Information
I
Relinquished By: to ►,. ,, ►, sate:q 3-� -D'j Time: AM PM
Received By: �!� ":!_ ► Date: 3-1°-a Time: 10:4 PM
IRelinquished By: La� *. . Date: 3 --a”, Time: l I :lo PM
Received By: ` ',a Date: ?'r' Time: i —A PM
I
Samp T m erature ( °): Method of Shipment: WTC(p/u) UPS Fed-Ex
`/J Circle One Other:
,/I it --
Sample Receiving (Lab, atory Use Only) Qct - Af,-..,..._�� 3_6_07 1,1. c4-
Received
-I' c4Received From: I oMaa.S A . vcs
IReceived By.t A h . ' '1I Date: 3` -67 Time:'4 C A
Sample Temperature (C°): 611-k / G.kk Sample Condition: lc cc4
I

1 M IN 1 M NE N N E NM 1 I i - i - 1 MINI M
NC0085928 American Truetzschler Inc-Trustsechler remediation site Mooresville 001
VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %OVER
LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE LIMIT VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 03/31/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 04/30/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichlorosthene 05/31/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 08/30/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichlorosMane 07/31/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethylene 09/28/08 Monthly ugh 0.057 1.4 2,358.14 Daily Maximum Exceeded Proceed to NOV
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 10/31/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 11/30/08 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 11/11/08 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation Proceed to NOV
Effluent 1,1-dlohioroethylene 12/08/08 Monthly ugh 0.057 1. 1,854.39 Daily Maximum Exceeded No Action,BPJ
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 01/31/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 02/28/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 03/31/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethylene 04/30/07 Monthly ugh 0.057 2.9 4,987,72 Daily Maximum Exceeded Proceed to NOV
11/14/0d Aquatic toxicity permit Iimk violation Proceed to NOV
Effluent 1,1-dkhloroethylene 05/15/07 Monthly ugh 0.057 3.3 5,689.47 Daily Maximum Exceeded Proceed to NOV
Effluent 1,1.dichloroethane 08/31/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 08/9/137 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 08/11/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,In conduit or thru treatment plant 08/18/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 08/25/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1.dichloroethane 09/30/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,2-dichloroethane 09/28/07 Monthly ugh 0.38 1.1 189.47 Daily Maximum Exceeded No Action,BPJ
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 09/01/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 09/08/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 09/15/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,In conduit or thru treatment plant 09/22/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent Flow,In conduit or thru treatment plant 09/29/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation No Action,Facility Reporting Error
Effluent 1,1-dichloroetane 10/31/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation None
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 10/08/07 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation None
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethane 11/30/07 Monthly ugh Frequency Violation None
Effluent Flow,in conduit or thru treatment plant 04/19/08 Weekly mgd Frequency Violation None
07/01/08 Late/Missing DMR No Action,BIMS Calculation Error
11/18/08 Aquatic toxicity permit limit violation Proceed to NOV
05/19/09 Aquatic toxicity permit limitviolation Proceed to NOV
Effluent 1,1-dichloroethylene 11/25/08 Monthly ugh 0.057 3.4 5,864.91 Daily Maximum Exceeded No Action,Facility Reporting Error

EQUAL VARIANCE t TEST
'
t = 22 .8 - 23 .7
-0.712
1.288
Degrees of freed, = 22
Critical t 2.508
-0.7 < 2.508,0
Test passed. - is not a ,ignifican. difference in reproduction
between the Contro a'' the eff - ,t evalu. ed at a 99% confidence interval .
f:
1 . \
'' onic 141( PA- ES
•
1

11111 11111 111111 MINI 11111 111111 NM 11111 11111 NMI NMI Ell MINI NM 11111 11111
•
VIOLATION COMMENT LAST UPDATED BY ID
marcia.allocco
marcla.allocco
marcia.allocco
marcla.allocco
Sample collected<1 ugh reported under wrong parameter code marcia.allocco
1 daily max=NOV as per guidance marola.allocco
Sample collected<1 ugh reported under wrong parameter code marcia.allocco
Sample collected<1 ugh reported under wrong parameter code marcia.allocco
marcia.allocco
Detection limit is only 1 ug/L marcia.allocco
Sample collected<1 ugh reported under wrong parameter code marcia.allocco
Semple collected<1 ugh reported under wrong parameter code marcia.allocco
Sample collected on March 29,2007 had a 1,1-DCA concentration of<1 ugh-reported under an Invalid parameter code marcia.allocco
John.Waley
NC NOV IV 2/5/07 John.glorgino
john.lesley
Sample collected on August 21,2007 had a 1,1-DCA concentration of<1 ugh-reported under an invalid parameter code monis.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 8/21/07 marols.sllocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 8/21/07 marola.alloc oo
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 8/21/07 marcla.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 8/21/07 marcia.allocco
Sample collected on September 26,2007 had a 1,1-DCA concentration of<1 ugh-reported under an invalid parameter code marcla.allocco
Detection limit is 1.0 ug/L so reading within 10%of limit. as per guidance from C.Whitingof Lab Cert. this does not warrant a violation as could be within uncertainty of method. marcia.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 9/26/07 marca.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 9/26/07 marcia.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 9/26/07 marcia.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 9/26/07 marcia.allocco
Facility reported no flow for month but got a sample on 9/26/07 marcia.allocco
blmsprod.cron
blmsprod.cron
bimsprod.cron
bimsprod.cron
BIMS shows receipt on 7/1/2008 bob.sledge
NC NOV-1/29/09 john.giorgino
NC NOV-7/23109 John.giorgino
sample taken when not discharging from system john.lesley

IISHAPIRO-WILK'S TEST FOR NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA (cont. ) ,
IICOEFFICIENTS AND DIFFERENCES
i x(n-i-1) x(i) a(i) x(n- i-1) - x(i ,
1 4 .3333 -9.6667 0.4493 14 .0000
2 3.2500 -3 .6667 0.3098 6.9167
3 3.2500 -2 .7500 0 .2554 6.0000
I
4 2.3333 -2 .7500 0.2145 5.0833
5 2.3333 -2 .7500 0.1807 5.0833
6 2 .3333 -2.6667 0.1512 5.0000
7 2 .3333 -1.6667 0.1245 4 .0000
8 - 3333 -0 .7500 0.0997 3 .0833
I 9 2 . '500 -0.7500 0.0764 3.0000
10 1 .3 3 -0.7500 0.0539 2.0833
11 1.25s -0.7500 0.0321 2.0000
12 1.2500 0.3333 0.0107 0.9167
II
1
W X 194 .6
II 218.9167
Calculated W = 0 889 ,"-'''tical W = 0.884
I0.889 6 .8f 4
l
The re roductio,� i= •ormally distributed
Ievaluate• =t a 99%/co idence interval.
IITest/Passes!
F test for H-•mogeneity of Vari- ce
Effluent ariance 14.9697
F = _ = 3.0
IIControl variance 4.9318
I
Numerator degrees of fre-iom: 11 !ennatoredegrees of eedom: 11
Critical F
I
3.04 s 5.32 =► The Test PASSES, the variances of the two groups
are significantly the same, homogeneous.
II
II
II
II
II

.r
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
To: Western NPDES Program Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Dina Sprinkle
Date: February 12, 2010
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Mecklenburg County
NPDES Permit No.: NC0085928
PART I- GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and address: American Truetzschler,Inc.
Post Office Box 669228
Charlotte,North Carolina 28266
2. Date of investigation: February.9, 2010
3. Report prepared by: Samar Bou-Ghazale,Environmental Engineer II
4. Person contacted and telephone number: Mr. Robert Hird, P.G. Consultant, (704)
726-1683.
5. Directions to site: From the intersection of Sam Wilson Road(SR1625) and I-85 (Exit 29,
Southbound Lane)in western Mecklenburg County,turn left(south)on Sam Wilson Road
and travel approximately 0.1 mile to the junction with Performance Road(SR 1603).
Turn left(west)onto Performance Road and travel approximately 1.1 miles to the junction
with Moores Chapel Road (SR 1601). Turn left(south) onto Moores Chapel Road and
travel approximately 0.3 mile. American Truetzschler, Inc. is on the right(west) side of
the road.
6. Discharge point(s), List for all discharge points: -
Latitude: 35° 15' 32" Longitude: 81° 00' 19"
•
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: F 14 SE USGS Quad Name: Mt. Holly,NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. There is area available for
expansion, if necessary.
8. Topography(relationship to flood plain included): Slopes ranges from 1-2%. The WWT
facilities are not located in the flood plain.

Page Two
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approx. 1000+feet from the WWTP site.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
a. Classification: WS-IV, CA
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba, 030834
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The discharge
of treated groundwater is to an unnamed tributary(wet weather drainage ditch)that
extends for several hundred yards before reaching the Catawba River. Unknown
users downstream.
PART II -DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater: 0.05 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity: 0.05 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of current facility(current design capacity): 0.050 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the
previous two years: N/A-
e. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The existing
WWT facilities consist of an equalization tank,particulate filter,two sodium cation
exchange systems,two crushed limestone filtration units and an air stripper.
f. Description of proposed WWT facilities: There are no proposed WWT facilities at
this time.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
2. Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Carbon canisters are removed by
Heritage Environmental Svcs, LLC located in Chicago. Contact name is Terrell
Carr at 877-381-2341 Ext 2342.
3. Treatment plant classification: Class I(no change from previous rating).
4. SIC Code(s): 3552 Wastewater Code(s): 66 MTU Code(s): 55008
5. Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates:N/A
PART IV-EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
American Truetzschler, Inc. (ATI) requests renewal of the subject NPDES permit and the
removal of the toxicity requirements.
Machinery parts were used to be cleaned on site and therefore, chlorinated solvent was
discovered in the groundwater in 1990. This facility has 3 recovery wells and holds a permit to

discharge treated groundwater from its facility. Also,ATI is providing activated carbon filters at
the Harbor House well. Harbor House is a subdivision across the road from ATI and from I-85
where the plume has migrated and contaminated the drinking water. Results from the drinking
well (PWS NC0160211)are being sent to Public Water Supply.
It should be noted that ATI is consistently meeting the NPDES permit limits with the
exception of toxicity. The effluent is so clean so that the organisms used in the toxicity test
cannot survive due to the lack of nutrients in the waste stream. The discharge location as
mentioned above is in a dry ditch and is approximately 3000 feet from the lake Wylie. Based on
the above,this office questions the need to require toxicity testing at this facility. This Company
is an international company and was engaged in building machinery for the textile industries.
Pending review and approval by the Western NPDES Program Unit, it is recommended
that the permit be renewed with the toxicity requirements be removed from the permit.
•
‘""
Signature of Report -repar- Date
4 2/ir/,D
Water Quality Regional Supervisor Date

•
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - GW
For discharges associated with groundwater treatment facilities.
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number NC0085928
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up -down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise,please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name American Truetzschler, Inc.
Facility Name American Truetzschler, Inc.
Mailing Address PO Box 669228
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code NC/28266
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone] -
E'12:1; .
e-mail Address
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ® DEN R - WATER
Street Address or State Road 12300 Moores Chapel Road QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code NC/28214
County Mecklenburg
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name American Truetzschler, Inc.
Mailing Address PO Box 669228
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code NC/28266
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
4. Ownership Status:

•
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - GW
For discharges associated with groundwater treatment facilities.
Federal ❑ State D Private ® Public ❑
5. Products recovered:
Gasoline ❑ Diesel fuel ❑ Solvents® Other
6. Number of separate discharge points: 1
Outfall Identification number(s) 001
7. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ❑ Intermittent
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: 7 Duration: 15 minutes per event
8. Treatment System Design flow 0.5 MGD
9. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude
Catawba River
10. Please list all additives to the treatment system, including chemicals or nutrients, that
have the potential to be discharged.
No chemicals or nutrients are discharged. During the remediation process, contaminated
ground water is pumped through an air stripper, cation-exchange resin canisters,
a limestone bed, and a compost filter.
11. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
12. Additional Information
All applicants (including renewal)
• A USGS topographical map (or copy of the relevant portion) which shows all outfalls
• A summary of the most recent analytical results (effluent data, if available) containing the
maximum values for each chemical detected
NEW Applicants only:
• Engineering Alternative Analysis
• Description of remediation treatment system components, capacities, and removal
efficiency for detected compounds.
• If the treatment system will discharge to a storm sewer, written approval from the
municipality responsible for the sewer.
• A list of any chemicals found in detectable amounts at the site, with the maximum
observed concentration reported for each chemical (the most recent sample must be
collected less than one year prior to the date of this application)
• For petroleum-contaminated sites-Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds(VOC)
should be performed. Analyses for any fuel additives likely to be present at the site and for
phenol and lead should also be performed.

1
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - GW
For discharges associated with groundwater treatment facilities.
For sites contaminated with solvents or other contaminants- EPA Method 624/625
analysis should be performed.
13. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Irk- L L . Cr,. 1.c\ ..�.e.1't= Cco+t.‘v..I1es.
Printed name of Persoiigning Title
Yat..1 ;A PI PIALt - '24 3109
S ure of App cant Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18
U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than
5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)

01,
''aBm
ff- - - - - 691 A'
txIOC C.
- u Rest Areas
-10•-
\ 160I r �j
TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 1 N Project: AMERICAN TRUETZSCHLER
A&W 12300 MOORES CHAPEL RD
DATE: 7-21-09 CHARLOTTE, NC
SCALE: SHOWN Project: A.T.

•
TABLE 1
• Summary of Effluent Sampling
American Truetzschler,Inc.Facility
Charlotte,North Carolina
Page 1
cc c
c m
46
2 to
a
d
=
2 J 2 J o - m J O`Q J J i_ LL
2Z 3/4' i L a� p Z 24. C.2 g� iii6000
tv
Sample Y .. m . V.2v of. U ••
Designation Date Sampled
NCAC 2L 7 200 0.7 2.8 700 0.38 NA
Effluent 1/5/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
2/10/1998 5.2 3.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
2/17/98(1) <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
3/27/1998 <1.0(H) <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/16/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
5/26/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
6/15/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
724/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
8/18/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
9/30/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
10/7/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/10/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
12/4/1998 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
1/7/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
2/9/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
3/11/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/8/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
5/26/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
6/2/1999 7.2(1) 1.8(1) <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
6/23/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
7/26/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
8/10/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
9/30/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
10/6/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/30/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
12/14/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail(2)
12/21/1999 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
1/4/2000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail(3)
2/15/2000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
3/9/2000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
6/22/2000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
12/20/2000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
8/28/2001 2.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
9/2/2001 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
9/19/2001 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/2/2001 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/6/2001 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
12/42001 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
12/17/2001 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
6262002 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
11/19/2002 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
2/25/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
3/25/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
4/22/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
5/20/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
6/25/2003 8.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
7/22/2003 3.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
8/5/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
9/9/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
10/7/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
11/11/2003 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass

TABLE 1
•
Summary of Effluent Sampling
American Truetzschler,Inc.Facility
Charlotte,North Carolina
Page 2
CCe
4.1
t L c _ -
J
g ` J o f " J_ •
e J_ C O J 12 u.
.c 12 1-0i ! L Y o 3 cc u c
Samplei c`!
Designation Date Sampled
14CKCIL r t _ 1 20o i 0.7 t 2.s l 7Oo J 038 14A
Effluent 12/9/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
1/6/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
2/3/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
2/17/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Fail
3/3/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Fail
4/20/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
5/11/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Fail
5/14/2004 3.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
9/21/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
9/24/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
10/19/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
10/22/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/9/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
11/12/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
12/7/2004 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
12/10/2004 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
1/25/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
1/28/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
2/15/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
2/18/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
3/8/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
3/11/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/5/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
4/8/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
5/10/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
5/13/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
6/21/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
6/24/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
8/16/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
8/19/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
9/29/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
10272005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/1/2005 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
12/21/2005 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
1/16/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
2/21/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
3/14/2006 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
3/17/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/4/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
5/16/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
6/26/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
7/27/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
8/15/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
9/28/2006 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
10/19/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/14/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
12/8/2006 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
12/12/2006 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA

TABLE 1
•. ' ' Summary of Effluent Sampling
American Truetzschler,Inc.Facility
1 Charlotte,North Carolina
Page 3
t �y L O L .c K _
O Q t 8 0 e
e - QJ o -p1 q a e ; 12LL
L 3. CL/ ! .2 v p 1 L 1 'C C
V V v .2 v O
7 v • E r v 7 N .c
Sample r
r
Designation Date Sampled
14IAA 2L f f 7 I Ida 0.7 ma r '7a6 1 O 8 NA
1/12/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
2/20/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
3/29/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/30/2007 2.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
5/15/2007 3.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
8/21/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
926/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.1 NA
10/19/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/13/2007 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
11282007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
12/20/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
1252008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
2/19/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
3/27/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/18/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
5/6/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
6272008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
8/26/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
9/12/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
11/18/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
11/25/2008 3.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
12/12/2008 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
1162009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
2/17/2009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
3/16/2009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
4/8/2009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
5/19/2009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Fail
6/9/2009 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
6/12/2009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
7/14/2009 NA NA NA NA NA NA Pass
7/312009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA
8/11/2009 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Pass
9/1/2009 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 NA
10/52009 <5.0 <5..0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 NA
11/2/2009 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA
Notes: NCAC=North Carolina Administrative Code
Bold=indicates a concentration greater than the NCAC 2L standard
NA=Not Applicable