860004_Inspection_20211018

Facility Number
(0\N
yilDiyision of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0951Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Arrival Time:
\V)ak
Departure Time:
E tarns
add e Cl 1-P-v\chn50n
Mailing Address: Fb'- V\jt(61ce__ '(-D, )
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator: 1-5hOSOA
Location of Farm:
ec Lot LV\
Vnb
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region: . -lJ
Phone: 6,—i)bl)
Integrator:
^ T
Onsite Representative: I v ✓✓
by O-
Certification Numbe : ' yrAi(
Certification Number:
00u
Title:
Latitude:
b
Longitude:
\16 a
40
Z1-10 —7 O lj(
u.)V ,.r 62) • CrAeyyk 6\,\
CI
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr Poultr Ca . acit Po
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
3C)
0
Beef Feeder
�✓�
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters n Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? TTTT
❑ Yes IX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 14-.) -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
61r-I-- fin
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes []
77 No ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Yes ❑l No yl NA ❑ NE
❑Yes 1No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes (k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes El No NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1 `l k-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
n Yes r i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 1:X1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes ❑ No [T �`•NA ElNE
❑ Yes [11No IA. NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No `y'C NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Vi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IP No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes 0
pWaste Application lkiy Ftee1 Qarc]___ aste_Ana_ 1 aSoit Analysis ❑ *astc T►n„.f.,rs 1P3ieaiher Code
`Rainfall
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If ycs, check apprvpriaiu uluw.
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑.Ci p, Yield specttuns Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑edge-£etvoy
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No aNA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: '6 6 - 014
Date of Inspection: VA.,\,`/S 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No NA El NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [1 Yes 4 No n NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [1 Yes p No ❑ NA 0 NE
Other Issues K-C
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document n Yes tp No NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [] Yes rilil
No n NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [i Ycs No ❑ NA ❑ N
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Ycs ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ElLagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 7T��
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 41 No
n Yes t! No
n Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
[l NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other continents.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
1�.
go\ ryy-yer
cC1AA b,-ufre.
r- wi -- u •
c�= --RI lG (D COWS) o'- 4 cl
*.vose c ocLA,0 A rckcA;ve_ f
Or `(l\vrc,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Sign
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020