010003_Inspection_20211122

Facility Number
01
Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Ck. rvation
O Other Agency
Integrator:
PhoneO ` 615 _ 6 61 I
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name: V_otOwner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
di( Le_v\fis Fancy\
v�l Lewis
�TrY 12-d., Sv' (aop IBC 2,-/M9
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region: wse_O
pcbrIN/ Lewis
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Dr v Poultr
Design Current
Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA NE
❑ Yes El No NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA E NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 0
03
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,;10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11 Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 1M 06
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 91
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes j� No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? l
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of AcceptableyCCrjc
Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
(\
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Yes vo No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes D No y" t NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
Weekly Freeboard
Rainfall og_❑ Crop Yiold 19±26 Mlnune IiispeetTvtts-
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑No NA ❑NE
7.1No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ONE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
04,41=ritia.003,atilltde"
VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 0 ( -
Date of Ins
,i
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applik,....on equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document n Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 7 Yes No [ 1 NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 7 Yes N] No U NA ❑ NE
permit? (i,e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) ll��
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. f Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? n Yes $ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? n Yes [IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 7Yes 7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
1. Shn oGklu-v\APA 4- C l - i (Sly
o/adL (gm, & l is . Apt uli\c1 , (,k) 1 41- 116Cs.t
ca l lorl-_.f 1Lx
I�1i s-i' Sl ucy! Suvl[ y i ` 13 VVI AAA �jl Sd W
I
OCa; wse coved,"-6n2 )(1
jusA Y c6 YI Vca (iQ I )ock_,J G1A C (J,Kcfctv att c..
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu
Phone:4 )L TU)— �
Date:
iPi
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020