970014_Inspection_20221116

Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Date of Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Q'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 10 Denied Access
//__ Departure Time: County: \N
Owner Email:
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: Gauche. St v y /
Owner Name: LIMA Q 4 V C--\i'S` .e W
Phone:
Region: VS. J V_O
Mailing Address: - l a_.l lit/ I Ct nQi tea . )
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
eiuj
Title:
Latitude 1 I) IV i
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
l.�atl#9§44b#W
obitss4
k {rpt-'r�.nwdpte�rlt•
n
*�'•ttb�vry,��� y9g`��
b`# dkA# NA'„sw 5RR5Yuk Ea4. naxi
k". x»
s ,
Wean to Finish
;
Layer
_.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
$
Non -Layer
841
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
UJ!
�
&q:ii4•:
���#��i#a�ea
�� as>am
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Weanasaaai
s n n
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
,"k 'f'):`lµ' fi tji ; (OPa � g ,'Q gg
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
{' :
f
Beef Stocker
Gilts
¢
Non -Layers
t3
A
Beef Feeder
I -
2-
Boars
Pullets
x
Beef Brood Cow
gg @@
Turkeys
\r #+. d iks 'k§§;NI
a$ vuk =tx e >c spat
¢3d ttl1,`s#vx-si}k kHHk}< &kPadtdlaAt
TurkeyPoults
ttikd'i4gidw .!:#
xi
Other
$bv _'.„;, 3 xrdxm.,Fxix, {ix.�xax. arix Y ra rdzx r#ka e9
4b. 9.. .� .� » _ ....»
.. .,.,. ,.3„w 4P:'i. l:.:„ mrtr
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 174 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;:gt No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: C/
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3
Structure 4
//1-1--yeY
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ���fllNo ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
IAINo ❑NA El NE
7I/kI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No ❑NA ❑NE
No NA ❑ NE
0No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑No CANA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
46
'TLC CO-1 C
NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement.
iffreasteapplicathQn
[Rainfall .43.Stesl ' rop i i
ffisskisaw.is
Munthly
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑No MNA ❑NE
❑No [31NA ❑NE
❑No K]NA ❑NE
iL
171„No NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 'VINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
❑ Yes OsNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
DIVasteausics
fall I., Y et'ons
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
aiNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑No XI NA ❑NE
5/12/2020�Continued

Facility Number: 61 ) -
7Date of Inspection: j ��l{ZJ ��/
r ❑ Yes `181
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No V NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues �(
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes IXI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? TC
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. .�,c,
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) i
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
S5l lS Q\l,vy 1,e r
❑ Yes gNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 4No ❑NA ❑NE
rY-4 vij or) b j I f 1� je l I v6bn. pry, � ,2 5'f-r eH5 1J7, .j2/( Co1 6: w,Q.4
of ^ co v e(t1.2�ai.i73 �n.er44 # c r U t % iha 440Petk
[nLi+ loge_
p%-��- p
1` Vzja'ii'IGC.a
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signa
Page 3 of 3
tova Dal Ley
Phone
Date:
5/12/2020