760012_Inspection_20221118

Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
'e ke, Dal E W xpY[S.eS
1i5� n Tbwn e
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: V,adol�h
Region: WS Y__C)
Mailing Address: `5 kb VWI\ F-or AA' 1l (2d •) 12l-Ar l eima{ N0 ry1?-)
Physical Address: kyr' Wal l/ AA c l\ 12.) y d,\Q rnGLn
Facility Contact: / 1Y y) I4000 WV) (I. I Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
swan oY tic, 1sle\1
()S l S =7 V-cxvrrierv� v� ,�C;+- -k
Latitude:
Integrator:
N C� %-13l'I
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude: 1 g b I /U(l
gwav-AA-iurest.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Layer
Non -Layer
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
a esinnn
gP
4 0i4t1'
444.4
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: l 4 -
Date of Inspection: \ l Nj (`mod'
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
51,3 C'ona>°le 5'h . 5dv
1,0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? lyTTTYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 'T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes X1 No ❑ NA O NE
❑ Exc -e Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN L PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
12. Crop Type(s): CO n 5i (U(��Q )
13. Soil Type(s): J
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? E Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes A, No El NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Eliy� i Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Required Records & Documents
7""C
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes V No El NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes IX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis -` Pratts` _ t] Weather Code
Rainfall [�f Stocking Crop Yield ❑' ^" M ? +ins Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility7ciClifail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes IY I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
El Yes I41No ❑NA NE
S G�so n ` Itckc\e

Facility Number:' l
12'
Date of Inspection: I I I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document . ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �y5
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. r7��
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes FA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2ron Cal ortii av coni$Qt-cd ? Cavxpe rc 221 , jot arr\
•eackici.- e sfzt+457 spud b�ni1 via �c� ,ijioJ( I-hk v
�.. Gi51�. U f LrY3,L �jfGQ 2 irlSlt�
CNN-4e,✓ in ,r ovl 1nvx11 ckseOp
1-115 (`)-ry
if 0,gh. d-1
0'0(1 1° g,32- q,i`)
Reviewer/Inspector Name: \(.10(000. C U r
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur t
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: uI `\ I l
5/12/2020