860004_Inspection_20221114

Type of Visit: ` I. Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ") Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
444,711
Arrival Time:
\V) SI
Farm Name: Double/ C` canys
Owner Name: el aiLf. CIIQl� ITh IA -
Mailing Address:
602' v\ `2d.)
Physical Address: cte
Facility Contact:
dd'l t Ja 6bv\
Onsite Representative: \\
Certified Operator: \"
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Departure Time: County:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Region: a)
Integrator:
PhoneW 3b-1CS1
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude 6 0-eV Q 0 tl
Longitude:
try NI 7(€ 2_,e,O\i'Er 12A ---7Dwtitke. .. —) �arttel/1/4 av\©
pg
t�A
a9x t&'tt$xi x4��tt9p CK t$ k$#9'#3,
•$#G #q .xti »ae v"..� }.�i:4P's'a 44i##dRia
e i . n� � §§;�
tt dttt •NSb'Rd
Popltr,{t M ;
¢xxm �g.'15*k..�va3es #u �'�� t°'.
¢#1�4 *f Its
� e $ � M pg
).
Wean to Finish --`
Layer
Dairy Cow
$gggq.
Wean to Feeder -- 1
Non Layer.
Dairy Calf
Feeder _—+x
%'a�
ft
1' *
sy
a'"
*a
#"arrwar*:
�.� y„f*.,„
34 ' tt ll'3'a
« w +u ftt` # f to $
s*assr.
r n
�uatrrfr
$t J? .ar a ' h.
DairyHeifer
tt
--
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
tt,
ei
--
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
'4i +i
Farrow to Finish --`41
Gilts --a
Layers
: ,
`XI
Beef Stocker
c350
f t
Non -Layers
I'
Beef Feeder
--"
Boars
Pullets
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
e_
�Gstt#a
+
a
Turkeys
)*sattta�
#t +ea et
0 ki{°azn#=.+k$I
Turkey Poults
rOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ,IAINo ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes y1No ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: &:). - V4-
(7fr
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Date of Inspection: \l c Ie.
❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
r��
Structure
{�-1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �"-� rf1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes jkf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) r \
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [71No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No 7NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No IX NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) �� ft
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17
as a pp ..... deeklp-F• eelwatd ❑ Wan« A,.,.ly ais ❑Sail lalysis �iisftyrs — *W ntlterJ'ede
c ng v r i1� n
❑ Stocki' .e n - y z7cm�.�-,�.�,-.,�...ute-htspee-CrenS ❑ Mt..L1.Iy- and-Il' Raiiffeii-brpeeherrs
22. Did the facilitTfair to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 7❑� No t4 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
❑ Yes No 14NA❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No jC NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
f70 stt
I�'"5� ` —'may

Date of Inspection:
❑ Yes likNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c4 No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
%No El NA ❑NE
IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
to ei
f
es1
cLn
N}X
144
2-VD c als
CAM v? kWy WLW
-' \\
an
V &Or2J ih yecu"
x` _ y-- 0, -- o-e 9; s. cL. c_x u3(
\JeD
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
cc & C V aind\b'
_..Date:
5/12/2020