The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About030001_Inspection_20221202Type of Visit: ip Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 19.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: VOA 111 1 /Departure Time:l l 4 1) y V CountyrA-R /'o,1� Region: a) Farm Name: E gPA.O�1 51O.V1Q\ X{f Y \ Owner Email: Phone: Arrival Time: Owner Name: tO\\A d T l"20\rn I 1 Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: (7W eptmbi 11 Title: Vine: t3C \Ad\ C1a \0;11 Latitude: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: es nt‘ Longitude: gay ovl 16015' qI b to 2-4 ` 114--i9i-Wy crj \AI Vishaxote C i 05 2't 0_}"-7 k1AN re1 V 5EA15WD:I 7 �eammiG 7U Ut'Ytb, 0 nE 9 aka#�t �P� � ren � � � s'kf¢$} <#fr $# ��.6i Yfrf Tk #YWry�wyf0frfftfF�4�At1x' f 7 t • fr y}m �� a � ^ �fiBx.ffr>(y� t.95 Mfi .}#Ej45y*¢ b ,$$$fit {�' -3a }("��t i ��A.N tfi lf'44�'&@N 3'�$ it. � �. a Wean to Finish -- Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder -- a Non Layer Dairy Calf d x 't»fr*�#ai#.f, rvao-a+s�,ir#fr'at ' �FeedertoFinish --°*fre aaa�p'#r#' Dairy Heifer --'ffsx,+��vfi#rTr� k Farrow to Wean § t• fr asr�k * � r+k.en to. DryCow t# r. Farrow toFeeder _-':e;tl�^glt` x..�;Ca�aais*>s'axe Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish -- _ •th i s Beef Stocker Gilts --Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder ' ;. Boars Pullets Beef Brood Co 1 4+i< - >*'It'''"';n $•f .;� sss`- art#�~skkf Turkeys tfax■ w" i@upke� f#'+rf#8# g & gafir oaf a# ttk Atfr =rab39 eyt� a tg'�a��a-�3.��TurkeOtheryPoults �a Other x+2 v......zza :.• $ ?Iwtpi a.'a#xz # X; d'.a�E?:� ea.,#a ',::,a«..t:'e:Y)#Hr s#s: s5}. & 3?:F}#+x 4a $'•s a. P Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: 03 - O Date of Inspection: 71 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: V' 1 C k' Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): = 11i11i------,,,`````` 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes )4No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 4 No ,�0 NA ❑ NE �x� 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 7� 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes irlt No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application r 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes t x1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? �C 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): Out n 1 AT 1 t f)AA—LCXJt CrAtert 13. Soil Type(s): �H/ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes No El NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EXI y.,I No ❑ NA El NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 'hL No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents '1"' 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes CA, No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 2 . Does record keeping need improvement. c ❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application Waste Analysis Soil Ana - f `ice Weather Code Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 12 Mlhuh, I1isye.,tions Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ii7 llt ❑ Yes IANo ❑ NA ❑ NE igation equipment? ❑ Yes "`❑��'lllNo L7tNA ❑ NE 5/12/2020 Continued 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers o Page 2 of 3 Date of Inspection: Facility Number: W - sot 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes the appropriate box(es) below. E Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes SNo ❑ NA ❑ NE NA ❑ NE ❑ No 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues Tt��1, 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? E Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) r 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 17t� No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ID Other: 7T 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Eck v.b`raA on Jut btrey-`a - •°CAL 10\v d?r -acaac *()?):Q CAv\1M() uSec4res Iv •knG1uce., 'P-.`� PAS i„Arha\/ ly eY Nee4 fcH ro tic -Par 0l1\ -Re. Us. Crocb Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 -€ \OC <cx 01 Phone:9„ 13L -- 1 c.— f 6s.. Date: 5/12/2020