20230119 Ver 1_Skyway Logistics Park Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Compressed_20230119

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW-2019-00292 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
I. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Skyway Logistics Park
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The project purpose is for the construction of an industrial development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Owner and Applicant: EastGroup Properties LP
Attn: Ron Coffey
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental / Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 65b]: PJD issued on 10-05-2020 under SAW-2019-00292
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
2928 Shopton Road Charlotte, NC 28202
Lat: 35.16695, Long:-80.93506
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 14107125, 14107126, 14107121, 14107104, 14124107,
14107106, 14107122, 14107123, 14107109
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Coffey Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Lower Catawba, 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Section 10 & 404 ❑
R
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20180124

7 TLAS
5-V1RONMENTAL
November 08, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611
Charlotte, NC 28262
Re: Skyway Logistics Park- +/- 117.7 Acres
2928 Shopton Road Charlotte, NC 28202
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Bryan:
The applicant, Ron Coffey of EastGroup Properties LP, is requesting approval of the enclosed
delineation package of potential Waters of the U.S. for a preliminary jurisdictional
determination. The applicant is the owner of all 9 Mecklenburg County parcels. Atlas
Environmental staff was onsite in September 2020 and assessed the presence of five streams,
eleven wetlands, and three ponds. A preliminary jurisdictional determination was issued on
October 05, 2020, under Corps Action ID 2019-00292. Since the issuance of the previous PDJ
site conditions have changed and the ponds have been breached. Atlas re -delineated the site
and is requesting a new preliminary jurisdictional determination based on the current site
conditions.
Enclosed are the necessary jurisdictional determination documents and additional information.
Thank you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any
additional information.
Best regards,
(I �.d1&wW_'
Jennifer L Robertson, President
[e-mail]
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

urisdictional Determination Reauest
U8 Army Corps
If Engltteers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�zutatoryPet-rnitProuam/Contact/CounlyLocator.asl2x,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: if you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. if you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2928 Shonton Road
City, State:
Charlotte, NC 28202
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14107125, 14107126, 14107121, 14107104, 14124107,
14107106, 14107122, 14107123, 14107109
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: EastGroup Properties LP Attn: Ron Coffey
Mailing Address: 3495 Piedmont Road NE Building 11, Suite 350
Atlanta, GA 30305
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑� I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: EastGroup Properties LP Attn: Ron Coffey
Mailing Address: 3495 Piedmont Road NE Building 11, Suite 350
Atlanta, GA 30305
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION;°¢
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property,
Print Name
Capacity: 0 Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
63
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
FJ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process,
El I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel,
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
El Other:
3 Foi- NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a if there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization formlletter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
W1Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 117.7 acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.16695
Longitude:-80.93506
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
LJ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
G Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re2ulatoLy-Permit-
Pro 2ram/Juri s dicti on/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Fvl Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
z Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
Fvl USGS Topographic Map
W-1 Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LiDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑� NC Division of Water Resources Stream identification Forms
1J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.arMy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/rejzdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 Ann A Prelim JD Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see htti)://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Reaulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

L A ■ C
1.I RAN MENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name:
Property Owner of Record
Contact Name,
Address:
Address:
Phone/Fax Number:
Email Address:
Project Address:
Project Address:
Tax PIN:
Signature:
Date:
Skyway Logistics Park
EastGroup Properties, LP
:1r+Ti1f+7•fi�'
3495 Piedmont Road, Buildino 11, Suite 350
U-1111111 MMKI91#19 ~
404)301-2670
ron.coffey @eastgroup. net
Shopton Road, Charlotte, NC
Tax parcel numbers: 141071125, 14107126, 14107121, 14124107
141071104,14i07i09,14107106,14107122,14107123
11 /09/2022
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (rn)
j ro bertson @ a tl asenvi. cam
www.atlasenvi.com

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
3316 SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107104 114107104
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
P3 M21-177
Land Area
16.917 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
14985-250
03/17/2003
$720,000.00
07382-962
07/20/1993
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107106 114107106
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
M4-467
Land Area
10.37 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
27657-751
09/14/2012
$456,000.00
03729-317
02/20/1975
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14124107 114124107
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
15.682 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
PARTNERSHIP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
24210-145
10/23/2008
$419,000.00
07852-669
07/21/1994
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107109 114107109
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
29.3 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
IN:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
IN:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
20570-273
06/09/2006
$1,187,000.00
13714-747
06/20/2002
$0.00
03326-197
02/17/1972
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
3522 SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107121 T
4107121
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
3 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer INo
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
14183-968
10/04/2002
$0.00
03355-501
11/15/1971
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107122 114107122
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
8.313 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
PARTNERSHIP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
19589-665
11/04/2005
$374,000.00
09411-848
12/19/1997
$7,000.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107123 114107123
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
11.788 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
21173-969
10/05/2006
$457,000.00
16208-123
09/30/2003
$130,000.00
09825-610
07/30/1998
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SHOPTON RD CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107126 114107126
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
6.333 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
14183-968
10/04/2002
$0.00
14183-958
10/04/2002
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710452200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
3522 PINECREST DR CHARLOTTE
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
14107125 114107125
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
15.997 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
NON -NC CORP
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
11 /08/2022
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES
3495 PIEDMONT RD BLDG 11
LP
STE 350
ATLANTA GA 30305
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
36641-484
10/ 13/2021
14183-958
10/04/2002
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
59.12
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I SUGAR
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

co
Y
0) 0)
co
U
I �
io
U O
� U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
19t— N O O[-- M Ln 00 O O — O N Ln Ln 0
O O N O Ln 0 (O M Ln (O M N O— Ln q9t 0
O I— O 00 qqt Ln O O 00 00 O O N Ln O 00
Mq,t M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M
._ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
p
J
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N M N Oqqt O I-- Ln qqt Ln I-- O M— M I-- M
I— Ln Ln (O r— O (O N O O N O O M (O Ln Ln
O O 00 Ln M 0 0 0 00 Ln Ln Ln Ln
(O (O (O (O I�- (O I�- (O (O (O (O (O I�
"= Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo
M M M M M M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
J
Q W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
L Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
+0-J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H H H H H H W W W W W W W W W W W
O O O O O O a� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� a�
O O O O O O D U U U U U U U U U U
LL LL LL LL LL LL Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
_ Ln I-- M O I-- N I-- I-- Ln I-- — N M I-- — 1-- O
N N O M NI-* —I-t I-- O O 4 O CD CD
� 00 Lo � Lo CD O M Ln N O Ln
O M N O CD I— 66 CD
E O
Q
0)
Q
I L L L L L L
J J J J J J Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
0)
O
U
I
0
2
O
U
c
I
2
L
co
O M M N Ln M LL W W LL LL LL LL LL LL O O O O O O W O
Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
O O 75 75 O O O O O O O O O O O O O
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
'co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V)Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
co
Z O O O O O O O O O O
NI O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
L O O O O O O O O— O N O— N
0) — N co � Lo (O M M Ln Ln Ln
co
�:omomomomo� 0

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11/8/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: EastGroup Properties LP, Ron, Coffey, 3495 Piedmont
Road NE Building 11, Suite 350, Atlanta, Ga', 30305
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Skyway Logistics Park, SAW-
2019-00292
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 2928 Shopton Road Charlotte, NC 28202
Review area is currently undeveloped and project purpose is for the construction of a industrial development.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.16695 Longitude:-80.93506
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Coffey Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date (s): 09/02/2020, 09/08/2021, 09/19/2022, 11/02/2022
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non -
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
CH 100
35.17172000
-80.93794000
1425 LF
Non Wetland
Section 404
CH 200
35.17158000
-80.94021000
127 LF
Non Wetland
Section 404
CH 300
35.16952000
-80.93892000
493 LF
Non Wetland
Section 404
CH 400
35.16860000
-80.93456000
3889 LF
Non Wetland
Section 404
CH 500
35.16574000
-80.93500000
527 LF
Non Wetland
Section 404
CH 600
35.16390000
-80.92967000
442 LF
Non Wetland
Section 404
WL 1000
35.17167000
-80.93639000
1.517 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 1100
35.17125000
-80.93855000
2.047 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 3000
35.17004000
-80.93868000
0.275 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 3100
35.16905000
-80.93930000
0.0997 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 4000
35.17027000
-80.93449000
1.301 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 4100
35.16800000
-80.93421000
4.2 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 4200
35.16508000
-80.93069000
7.593 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 5000
35.16531000
-80.93212000
2.7 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 5100
35.16568000
-80.93555000
0.001 AC
Wetland
Section 404
WL 5200
35.16557000
-80.93645000
0.527 AC
Wetland
Section 404
OW1
35.17158000
-80.93809000
0.06 AC
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved 7D (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of 7Ds and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AID for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AID
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AID
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID
or a PJD, the 7D will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map: Resource Maps, Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: GIS Database
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: GIS Database, Charlotte West Quad_
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
National wetlands inventorymap(s). Cite name: NWI GIS Database_
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: FEMA NFHL .kml layer
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site Photos during Field Determination
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: PJD issued 10/05/2020
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations.
Authorized Agent:
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Click here to enter a date.
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1 Nov. 08, 2022
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

r Qar
LL
5 6ea
O
L.r)
OLn
La
O
Ln
N
N
N
Y
Ghesterb
O
N
a
r,
Mo
y
L
c
U
i
-0
FY
0)
0
c
acui
N
Brahman M ea
a
p
Ayrs'hi'r`e Glen PI
Q
fa
Murray
CD
0
U
�
N
>-
w
'�
v '
C
U
L
O
L
d
v
U
Q
i
LO
O
y��'h
ro
V
p
-0
a,
.03
op
U
o
+2
Q
a�
_
fa
�
o
a
e
\ - .r
�a
O�
cn
cn
0
M
f t
�r
O�OI.P
rV
y
9a�
Z
o
Ln
fu
w
a
0
aL
-L2U
N
L
cn
a
LE
4 P
cn
LLU
•,
a4,d a/d
fo
�
a
C L
L Q
U
(� � Q
>2
_
�
N
�
N
p
p � p
p L ra
'Oa
40��S
N
+
ra
J >� p
Q)
(n

it110
N
O
N >_
CO
N w
Z U
N �
L O
a f
Q
v U
O
N
C: L
�l CD-
0 Q
>Y� 0
� � CL
a
00
f N (
(O J
Z 4�1
V O W
L
p V L
a _j L2
N
N
O
N
M
O
L
O
Z
0
LO
M
Q1
O
CO
Lr;
M
0)
fu
c
O
U
Li
73
LL
N
N
LO
O
N

r

C)
LL
0
O
O
N
O
O
Ln
,- 4
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
6�
l
�O
l
�,
O
N
i
`90
�
l
r-
0 OjA
dl
L!]
N l�
0 9t> r�pld
O'�Sa✓
�
a
(3) �
-0
a�
O N
N
m a- V)
J
i
O
o w
00 O
v
v �
z �
o �
co +c,
U Q
C C �
O O
i Q Q
0 0 O
U) U a
00 OL
7
N O
� N �
Z 4�
4' O co
ip LU
fo
a-J LE
0
N
0
N
C
N
7
r,
N
fo
0
00
V-
u)
M
O
OP
i
In
V-
Sri
M
4O
co
c
a
O
O
v

1

o
w
00
o
U
U
Z
�
y
L'
O
C
00
LO
U
i
Q
ro
ro
fu
ra
0
co
O
O
L
Lr
Q
Q
Q
O
o
-C
-C
"
CO
ca.
M
N
QNi
O
cn
�
N
Z
L
w
fu
a`
-L2U

r'
�--"�� /•fir �.. � .���J ,�, ��R ,� �.� j �..;, .r.
Pr
CD
CD
CD
LL
�, • ,Q-..� �. cif ./ r- ' ` r `
.�`k • / ��i• �.• ' '` •�i /' { .'� JJ / r! .
�. �,y`1 S i� {+7,� rl�', ILy f ir• �I L/ i�'•A+.'may
�•. ���L. Joy � :'� �' r���� r •� � � � r�.,.��.
Vy
All
emu' 5 f• y� I� ,r. 1J = s .-.
fir-_ � � ='• �- � _
� ��� � r I � ��� � � � • • \ � 1 • ,:l fir- ____ _.�-'� -..: ,.
a:� ...': rj rr✓� �1 � � f S J � �jjJf I � �/ r}
`
ID
O
N
O
N
c0
N
73
N
fu
0
O
w
rlj
00
O
U
U
z
�
y
L'
0
00
U
2
LO
fo
0
>�
>�
.
op
C
C
O
O
L! )
CL
Q
CL
O
O
V)
Ln
a
CO
C-
LO
re)QNi
73
O
cn
N
fo
z
0
CD
4-J
}i
V
1-j
Z,
LU
-0
a`
-L2U

o
o
0
K ) y O
• w
' �,. ■i gat y , tr'. O
=4ali.•' - 1-y w ; Liz
^l`' =E• •y:.''i �"�p,�' �?F,,�. -tom^ � ,. • `�ti ; �'s� , � ,_ �-
Aj
.}�=- - : �:•igTR{-:•a�Y.. • � fir,. �'�.. � ` ,!` _
A 1 . f'•C`�1 ' F �•ns'i:y,.�.1 .� „/a ti t T• _ � � * w
Trk. tk v r-''��w�•,��+_ --r. + C [ � 1 �i5•! r °tii;+ �. .r "• �y •�•rti-LyA y,.' ?�
�S r � � •- .- -,; is ` _• _'��: •� "s- --'+�' - -
•��'- ` '�„ �4�'f ti� �+ ifs [ - /qE - � � r -r� �-^:.��"
me
O
N
O
N
CO
N
7
ate-,
ra
M
o
00
O
U
U
Z
�
y
�O
L'
00
U
Q
LO
_0
-6
Q%
fu
(O
O
CO
C
C
O
O
LO
Q
Q
Q
O
O
�
vi
vi
a
CO
C-
Lri
M
73
QNi
O
cn
N
fu
Z
C5
�
ate-,
fo
a-
N
a--,
W
-a
O
a`
_L2U

L
U
C
Q)
QJ
C7�
m
Elm
O
O
8si
O �
Ayrshire Glen PI
,.i Gr
1)
_0
C
fo
>4-J
L
B
U
� �
Q
2
-
N
OC
(n
>
U- LL J OC
O
N
O
N
C
N
7
N
rya
0
o
w
00
o
U
U
Z
�
L'
O
�
LO
U
Q
LO
M
6
6
Q1
fu
(O
O
CO
C
C
O
O
Q
Q
Q
O
O
O
�p
vi
vi
CO
C-
LO
N
m
O
cn
N
fu
Z
CD
4�
4�
a..,
W
"6
O
a`
-L2U

R
)
CL
2
2
| §
■ ■
_ _ __ e_ »_ e_ CD
__ __ //
a-
§ o
q
r*4
C
§ R
/
c
§
|
�
2
�)
�
±
=k
\
0C
u
U
=
k \
22$
N
E
-
t
k
Lh
!
/
U
/
2
u
§
op
f
`
/
0
Lr
\
§
2
0
0
t�o
$
$
@
@
G
2
E
m
E
0$
ru
4
k
4-
r
flu
R
m
f
4--
±
g
a
\
-
\
§ \
■
§�
2
L
u
B
�£
20
w
4
z�
§U
z
§
__
.
/
2
§^
0
k

N M
CA
O O
N N
N
Eam
d
o'°
m
�
m e o
°
a
d
�
c a
a=c_
m
a
tio
p
m o
a
E
m
�°trio
N 'O a E_ a
;
m
C
m
a
N
O>
a
� E
V
�
7
N
Q
C
co
76
— U O
.N
N
E
f0 m
E-
'°. m N
—O
N
p r
a) a d a-°i •7
:s m 7 O'
"
U
(j
E
N
V
a O
m m
O
t_Np
U
O m m O
L
W,
Z C7
O.
O m m m N
of
L
O
O
O
.L-..L-. 7 d
a�i
a
ma
Em 3
o
a
m (7
LZa
Z
4
�
ZN
�Eao
Q
0
£
c£ L
°�CL3:
m
E
o a
U
y a a m
mmLoa)
N
c
o
m
L
Q m
f0d
O
¢
f0
c�mtaci
as
a
m
acoym
m�£oo
7
o'c
U'
m
La
pa�iQT
O
O
o'
T
>£°
aaiE
Oc >
ami
c
'
;; L c o
.Lm 3
O
f0
y
o
o
m�am
aE
E >,m
LL
?
m
a
c
a
o•m of
a)a
°
m
a�i
ami g
2° m m
�a 9
E
Oa
:,m
c c
.am.,
a
a
m m E a)
m0
CO
N
d
CL
E
°°ate
mmo=
a
m
�2°�a-°
QU
�a
-°m
din
mo
ULn
°
_m
m
a°m°
arc
Q
m
a m
m
'
o N a c y
:>
m
3
mdc°
5
.Lm
E
a
�°m.Lm
C)
Ec�a
m
z�
�E
a2<8c
maxim°
a)
and
ium
f0
d
a)
m
°�°�
o5 ac
d
m
ooa'p
£
c.Ci
>d
iim>,
�LLmm
mt mm
rnm
m
p
mm
.m
E
$'0ma
N
ru
0
acimErn
°m
E
jinn
:s r:r
E m=
�o
>L
> ami
m
•L
�o
m
m
tcyE
amo
�pO_'o
Emcmi�
a co
��
a°�'oc
� 'O
Qoma�id
m
Q�
Z�
N
�o
m°°
t�Zo
a)
LN
C
m
j- 9 ai
C!ACCfO
m m
mm
L
o'm0
O. d .Cm-. N
M -0C)
W .Lm-.
t�
(n
'pj
E o
'pin
d N
�a�
O O. ' C
tEmt
m
O
F
W E_ D as
d E
fn U
2 m. =o a m
F O
a) fn
fn
M
F c8 a
O
m
U
t
2
z
a)
�ami
aTi °
2 d
O
N
N
L )
�
0
w
O
rn 3
�>-
_ i_)
N
U
cm
w
m
DO
o
Z
O
m
w
w
>
m
U
m
m
a
a
m
4
i
m
$
a)
a
m
U
c
3
L
2
v v
a
c
0O
.16
4-
m
Qo
(n
¢
p
CO
p J
�
w
m
w
j a°r
O
a
Z
(Q
00
�°
C
co co>
m L
3 O co
a
� co
o� S�
z �
C
¢
p
p
Q
pMj
LL
p
(W')
3
I
t
m
O
O
4-
ui
CD-
a
N
CD-
I-
�
O
O
d
° w
c
c
co
lf)R
M
a a
Y
w
m
O
i
m
_
iii LL
A� o
N w
`v
w
c
ID
v m §
w
a L
o 'o 'o c
o c
a o0
> a
c >
m
a
c
m `�
c
.�
a
m m c °
O
++
W
"a
a
m
m m w m
m
.N,
co
..
O
c
a
�+
v
�
w ❑
�p
w
0
` m
o
rn
m
o c
o
a c
z �
�
�
Q
z V
Z
w
.!
2

\\
k©
,7
q
q
00
/
c
§
q
a
�2
0
r
o
U
/k
k
§
0
k0
3
b
3
k
ƒ
k
2
2
c
$
CL
%
J
2
2
B
LL
O
%
D
\
/
C
LU
k
t
.
�
�
g
..
G
92
2
2
U
0k
�0
/
zk
w
y
2
\,�
.-�C
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
m
q
m
t
m
t
q
R
2
©
�
2
~
g
_
§
�
%
k
£
N
q
9
9
9
q�
"
,
�
~
Q
R
R
$
§
0
«
S
g
2
ja
\a
\
kk
\
k
e
Na
ca
�;
E;
E
E
_
_
_ C
N �
2
O
2
\§
\§
§]
a�
r
/
2
�;
�;
%$
Ca
);
2
//
//
�k
\/
�
\/
(
�
§§k
§§k
k�
§#
§
°;
-ee-eeta
a+k§
�)�
/ �e
/ �e
c
ƒ
I
m
�
�
I
\
\
�
)
�
a
a
k
9
)
R
k
�

j.2
c
pni
}
:
|
`
U
y
k
_
-
°
E
u
§
3
2
\ ƒ f
)
0
N
§
Z
{ }
$
^�
|
) ) �
k k
«,
^
4 « r k."
�.
�» «
q
q
C
/
\
2
/
±
\
/
U
�
&
t
/
2
ƒ
/
ƒ
«
2
�
�
e
/
/
/
$
/
/
t
$
2
2
0
/
2
2
/
LO
re)
a
\
k
/
)
/
�
/
/
.
%
0
..
\
ƒ
/

1

(] (� Z-< LL
Smote
Ftd 11`'6�'ea� o
o
r\
0
0
Lau o
N
f �
0
Ches r
_L
a
v _ hear
c�
rshire Glen
J{
5
O�
Q
No�cV) °�n°����
°P����S �OOJ00000
0
N
O
N
O
ro
7
fo
fa
0
o
w
00
o
U
U
Z
�
y
L'
o
�
r\
ro
LO
U
Q
ran
-0
C�
co
N
c
c
O
O
N
o
a
a
a
r\
O
O
O
ID
vi
vi
a`
CO
C-
LO
N
m
O
cn
N
fo
Z
CD
L
ate-,
N
Z,
W
-0
ra
r
a`
_3
L2
U

I-T1
(sapul) Ilpjuled

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 0 11 /2022
9 9
Skyway Logistics Park
Project/Site: 400 (Coffey Creek)
Latitude: 35.16865
Evaluator:J Sinclair A Baggarley
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.93458
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Charlotte West
Stream is at least intermittent 43
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Pe nial
I e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 10_S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv (SuhtntA = a.1 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1.5
3
3
3
2
O
1
0.5
0
0
O

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 0 11 /2022
9 9
Skyway Logistics Park
Project/Site: 100, CH 300, CH 60o
Latitude: 35.17173
Evaluator:J Sinclair A Baggarley
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.93797
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Charlotte West
Stream is at least intermittent 33.5
Ephemeral Intermittent Pe nial
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 10_S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv (SuhtntA = 6 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
O
3
2
1
0.5
1
3
2
2
1
O
0.5
0
0.5
0
O

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 0 11 /2022
9 9
Skyway Logistics Park
Project/Site: 200 and CH Soo
Latitude: 35.16571
Evaluator:J Sinclair J Robertson
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.93516
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Charlotte West
Stream is at least intermittent 26.5
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
Ephemeral IntepAittent Perennial
-1I""
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = a 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv (SuhtntA = a 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
1
2
1
2
1
0.5
1
O
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
O
O
0
0.5
0.5
0
O

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Skyway Logistics Park City/County: Charlotte/ Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/19/22
Applicant/Owner: EastGroup Properties State: NC Sampling Point: WL 1100
Investigator(s): J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): -2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.17111 Long:-80.93827 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climate conditions are normal. See attached climate data report
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WL 1100
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 80 x 2 = 160
1.
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 190 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.11
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
20 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Carex sp.
60 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Microstegium vimineum 10 No FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WL 1100
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/1 50 10YR 5/3 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
4-18 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Skyway Logistics Park City/County: Charlotte/ Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/19/22
Applicant/Owner: EastGroup Properties LP State: NC Sampling Point: WL 5000
Investigator(s): J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): -0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.16440 Long:-80.93115 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climate conditions are normal. See attached climate data report
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WL 5000
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
3.
Acerrubrum
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Platanus occidentalis
15
Yes
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species 67 x 3 = 201
2.
Acerrubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
Asimina triloba
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 122 (A) 341 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.80
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
25
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
5
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Carex sp.
5
Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
2
No
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
1 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WL 5000
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 5YR 5/1 70 5YR 5/4 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
2-16 7.5YR 5/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Skyway Logistic Park City/County: Charlotte/ Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/19/2022
Applicant/Owner: EastGroup Properties State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley Section, Township, Range: Mecklenburg
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): -3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.16469 Long:-80.93153 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Pacolet NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Climate conditions are normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Quercus rubra
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3. Acer rubrum
4. Quercus falcata
5. Quercus alba
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 43
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Acer rubrum
3. Fagus grandifolia
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
25
Yes
FACU
30
Yes
FACU
10
No
FAC
10
No
FACU
10
No
FACU
85
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
17
15 Yes
5 Yes
5 Yes
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Fragaria vesca
5
Yes
2. Allium cepa
2
No
3. Oxalis stricta
5
Yes
4. Stellaria media
2
No
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Toxicodendron radicans
3.
4.
5.
FACU
FAC
FACU
5
FACU
UPL
FACU
14 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
5 Yes FACU
2 Yes FAC
7 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
9
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
22.2%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
FAC species 17 x 3 =
51
FACU species 110 x 4 =
440
UPL species 2 x 5 =
10
Column Totals: 129 (A)
501
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.88
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/4 30 Loamy/Clayey
6-16 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Site Photographs
jr *%p:
Ab
sk"
1: CH 100
2: CH 100
N.:
3: CH 100
4: CH 200
5: CH 300
6: CH 400 (Coffey Creek)

Site Photographs
7: CH 400 (Coffey Creek)
8: CH 500
10: CH 600
11: WL 1000
9: CH 500 12: WL 1100

Site Photographs
13:VVL11UU
16:VVL4UUU
`
'
�~r
',-
n~~ ^~ ~^
14:VVL3UUU
17:VVL41UU
15:VVL3100 18:VVL4100

Site P
per' r
iw
19: WL 5000 22: WL 5200
06.
• . f LAIM
M, A01 j;
�x isms
r !.
20: WL 5000
21: WL 5100
23: WL 5200

itME
N
O
N >-
CO
N w
Z U
c
L O
a
u Q
v U
O � �
L
�l CD-
0 0
L/) L/) CL
a
00
ra
N U
Z E V
V O W4-
fu
p V L
a -j L2
N
N
O
N
M
O
L
O
Z
0
M
Q1
O
OP
Lr;
M
0)
fu
c
O
U
Li
73
LL
N
N
O
M
M
n