20190884 Ver 1_White_100112_MY2_2022_20230123

ID#* 20190884
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 01/23/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/23/2023
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Emily Dunnigan
Project Information
ID#:* 20190884
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: White Buffer Full Delivery Project
County: Randolph
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: White _100112_MY2_2022.pdf 9.76MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Emily Dunnigan
Signature: *
{mac% "c�Igly

Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
sport
ied
)106
Construction Completed: 2021
Data Collected: July 28, 2022 Report
Submitted: January 19, 2023
Prepared by:
HDR Engineering
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, NC 27601-3034
Davey Resource Group Contributing Staff: Ben Furr, Ryan Smith,
Alex DiGeronimo, William Bailey, Yvette Mariotte, Michael
Foster, Kevin Williams
This MY2 Baseline Monitoring Report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
NCAC rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective November 1, 2015 and Nutrients Offset Credit Trading 15A NCAC 02B. 0703, effective April 1,
2020 and DWR —1998, Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment

DAVEY#-.
Resource Group
January 19, 2023
North Carolina Department of Mitigation Services
217 W Jones St #3000a
Raleigh, NC 27603
Re: Task 6 Draft Monitoring Year 2 Report for the White Mitigation Project
Cape Fear River Basin; CU# 03030003
Randolph County, North Carolina
DMS ID No. 100112; Contract No. 7860
Ms. Dunnigan,
As per your letter concerning the White Mitigation Project MY2 Report, we have updated the reviewed
report and addressed your comments as follows:
Title Page: Please add the full range of dates for site data collection.
RE: Data for MY2 was collected solely on July 28, 2022. Invasives were treated and visual site
inspections were completed at other points in the year, but all pertinent MY2 data was collected
on that date.
Section 2.0 Annual Monitoring: Please indicate the results of the conservation easement
boundary integrity assessment.
RE: Comply. Conservation easement boundary integrity assessment results have been added to
section 2.2.
Section 2.2: Suggest surveying a random vegetation plot(s) in the areas surrounding VP1 in MY3
to support visual assessment of stem survival outside VP1.
RE: A Random vegetation plot will be surveyed in the area near VP1 and included in the MY3
report if it fails to meet density criteria in MY3.
Section 2.3 Adaptive Management Plan: Due to the challenges seen with stem plantings at the
site, are other measures such as soil sampling and herbaceous treatment being considered? Also,
will ripping be proposed in any of the compacted pasture areas?
RE: Stem plantings are performing well across >90% of the site upon visual inspections. Invasives
are currently being treated, and the area of overgrowth around VP5 will be mowed and replanted
in February and March respectively. No soil tests have been conducted on site, and neither soil
tests nor ripping have been proposed on the site.
Appendix B: Consider including a table when Summarizing plot stem counts including volunteers
that can be counted toward success. When stems that cannot be counted towards success are
included in Table 8, it can be difficult to tell which plots are meeting success requirements and
what the correct stem count is with volunteers.
RE: Table 8 is generated by the CVS-EEP program. The highlighted cells in Table 8 contain stems
per acre calculations using only planted stem counts and only planted stem data is used to
determine the pass or failure of a vegetation plot. Volunteer stems (listed in the T column) do not
count towards success criteria. Stems per acre calculations including volunteers can be found
adjacent to the highlighted stems per acre counts in Table 8 in line with the T column.
Phone: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27604
daveyresourcegroup.com/carolinas

DAVEY#-.
Resource Group
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call
(843.830.1536).
Sincerely,
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
� 14."to � 5L _--O
Alex DiGeronimo
Phone: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27604
daveyresourcegroup.com/carolinas

FN White Mitigation Project I DMS Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Contents
1.0 Project Summary............................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Location and Background Information.......................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Annual Monitoring............................................................................................................................ 2
2.1 Methods........................................................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Results and Discussion................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Adaptive Management Plan..........................................................................................................3
3.0 References.........................................................................................................................................3
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

FN White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Figures
Figure 1. Service Area Map (Appendix A)
Figure 2. Vicinity Map (Appendix A)
Figure 3. Asset Map (Appendix A)
Figure 4.1-4.5 Monitoring Plan View (Appendix A)
Figure 5.1— 5.6 Vegetation Plots and Site Photographs (Appendix 8)
Figure 6. Planned Replant Area Map
Tables
Table 1. Project Credits (Appendix A)
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History (Appendix A)
Table 3. Project Contacts Table (Appendix A)
Table 4. Project Information (Appendix A)
Table 5. Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Components (Appendix A)
Table 6. Baseline Planted Species and Quantities (Appendix A)
Table 6. Monitoring Year 2 Vegetation Data (Appendix 8)
Table 7. Replant Area Species, Source, and Quantities (Appendix D)
Appendices
Appendix A —
General Tables and Figures
Appendix B —
Vegetation Plot Data and Site Photographs
Appendix C —
Regulatory Considerations
Appendix D
— Adaptive Management Plan
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

FNWhite Mitigation Project I DMS Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
1.0 Project Summary
1.1 Location and Background Information
The White Mitigation Project (Site) was selected by the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) to provide
Buffer Mitigation Units (BMUs) in the Randleman Lake Watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code 030300030106)
(Figure 1). The Randleman Lake Watershed is located within the larger Cape Fear River Basin (Hydrologic
Unit Code 03030003). The Site is located within the Southern Outer Piedmont, approximately 2.9 miles
southeast of Archdale, NC (Figure 2). The 12.2 acre Site involved restoration and enhancement of 504,075
square feet of riparian buffers along Unnamed Tributary to (UT) Muddy Creek (UT MC) (UT MC, Index #17-
9-(1)) and UT 1, UT 2, and UT 5 that were previously active cattle pasture (Table 1 and Figure 3).
Directions to the Site:
From Raleigh -Durham International Airport: 1-40 west for 61.6 miles; keep left for 1-85 S, go 17.6 miles to
exit 113; turn left onto NC-62, go .2 miles; turn right onto Weant Rd, go to end; turn right onto Suits Rd,
the project site will be on the left.
The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by North Carolina Division of Water Resources in
November of 2020. Construction began in December 2020 and finished in March of 2021. Site planting
finalized in February of 2021. LMG provided construction oversight services for the Site. LMG completed
baseline vegetation monitoring on March 12, 2021.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4 of Appendix A.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The following goals and objectives address the primary issues within the watershed and assist DMS in
meeting planning goals.
Primary goals for the Site, as detailed in the White Mitigation Project Mitigation Plan (HDR 2020) include:
1. Reduce water quality stressors associated with nutrient, sediment, and pathogen loading.
2. Enhance terrestrial and aquatic habitat.
The following objectives accomplish the goals listed above:
1. Reducing water quality stressors is directlytied to the following:
a) Reducing non -point source (i.e., cattle accessing the channels, stormwater runoff
through pastures and feeding stations) pollution associated with on -site agricultural
operations from the installation of exclusionary fencing to remove cattle and
machinery from on -site streams and riparian buffers.
b) Reducing non -point pollution associated with on -site agricultural operations by the
restoration and enhancement of riparian vegetative buffers on adjacent floodplains
to treat surface water runoff from adjacent pastureland.
c) Further removal of agricultural equipment and cattle by providing and improving
culverted agricultural crossings.
d) Treatment of pollution associated with off -site agricultural, institutional, and
residential properties by the restoration and enhancement of riparian vegetative
buffers on -site to attenuate nutrient and sediment laden floodwaters.
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

FNWhite Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
2. Enhancement of terrestrial and aquatic habitat is directly tied to
a) Restoration of native vegetation to the previously maintained and highly impacted
riparian corridors in order to diversify flora and created a protected habitat corridor
that provides an abundance of available foraging and cover habitat for a multitude of
mammals and birds. Additionally, establishment of woody vegetation in the riparian
corridor provides direct inputs of woody debris to adjacent conveyances that assist in
increasing biomass and cover habitat for aquatic species.
2.0 Annual Monitoring
2.1 Methods
Monitoring of the parameters listed in Table 5 (Appendix A) were conducted on July 28, 2022. Ten (10)
permanent vegetation plots (totaling more than 2 percent of the planted area on Site) within the buffer
restoration area were monitored using the Carolina Vegetation (CVS) protocols. Vegetative problem
areas, invasive species, and project boundary encroachments have been mapped and included as part of
Current Condition Plan View (Figure 4.1-4.5, Appendix A). Year 3 vegetation survey is anticipated to occur
in September 2023.
2.2 Results and Discussion
This section documents the conditions observed in Year 2 monitoring. Table 6 details specific vegetative
data in relation to the Year 2 conditions (Appendix B).
The 1,830 feet of repaired stream bank has remained stable over the past year of monitoring. Livestakes
and bare -root plantings along the majority stabilized streambanks have increased in vigor over the past
monitoring year. One bare area measuring 20 feet in length was observed during the spring invasive
species treatment at the confluence of UT 3 and UT MC. While the stream bank remains stable, livestakes
will need to be reestablished in the subsequent monitoring year.
The areas of minor erosion observed during Year 1 monitoring have stabilized and filled with
herbaceous vegetation as expected.
The conservation easement boundary is intact and functioning properly; furthermore, the owners of the
property no longer own cattle.
Eight of the ten permanent vegetation plots are meeting or exceeding success criteria outlined in the
Mitigation Plan. Vegetation plots 1 and 5 have failed to meet the success criteria of 260 stems per
acre; however, the site is at 319 stems per acre.
Vegetation Plot 1 is demonstrating a planted stem density of 161 stems per acre after 2 years of
monitoring. With the inclusion of volunteer stems the plot still fails to meet success criteria with only 242
stems per acre. It is unknown what is causing the high mortality of planted stems within the vegetation
plot. Visual observations at the time of monitoring suggests that the stem density of VP1 is not indicative
of planted stem survival in the surrounding area and the plot will be reassessed during MY3 monitoring.
Vegetation plot 5 has failed to meet criteria for the second year in a row due to dense herbaceous
growth. Knotweed (Polygonum spp.) and spiny pigweed (Amaranthus spinosus) have taken the place
of fescue, stifling bare -root plantings in and around VP5. VP5 had a stem density of 81 stems per acre,
with only two bare -root plantings surviving in the plot; others were either dead or unable to be located
due to the dense vegetative growth.
Randolph County, NC Page 2 January 19, 2023

FNWhite Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Several areas of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were treated in
April 2021 (MY1). While the areas previously treated are dead, 38 new areas of invasive growth were
discovered during vegetation monitoring in September 2021 and May 2022, and are depicted in
Figures 4.1-4.5. It is important to note that the Site had dense growth of Chinese privet along the banks
and floodplain of UT MC, UT 3, UT 4, and UT 5 that were treated and removed during construction. Much
of the new growth is a result of stump coppicing and sprouting from a prevalent seed bank. New areas of
invasive species growth were treated in May and July 2022. Further details of invasive species
management procedures can be found in Section 2.3 of this document.
2.3 Adaptive Management Plan
Approximately 38 instances of invasive species, mainly Chinese privet and multiflora rose, were spot
treated using a 6% solution of aquatic glyphosate. Treatments were made during May 2022 and July
2022. Invasive species will be monitored and treated as needed in subsequent monitoring years.
Dense herbaceous vegetation observed along the right bank of UT2 near VP5 has choked out planted
stems. This area is depicted in the Current Condition Plan Review (Figure 4.1-4.5). It is anticipated
that approximately 1 acre of area will be replanted at a density of 360 stems per acre (Figure 6) in March
2023. Table 7 outlines species and quantities chosen for the replant based on the approved planting plan
in the Mitigation Plan. Prior to replanting this area, the dense herbaceous layer of vegetation may
be mowed to allow planted stems time to establish.
Livestakes will be clipped from black willow (Salix nigra) and tag alder (Alnus serrulata) on site and
reestablished in the bare area observed between UT 3 and UT MC.
3.0 References
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR) 2020. Mitigation Plan White Mitigation Project. Randolph
County, North Carolina. October 29, 2020.
Lee, Michael & Peet, Robert & D. Roberts, Steven & Wentworth, Thomas. 2018. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation All Levels of Plot Sampling, Version 4.2.
North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC). Title 15A — Environmental Quality. Chapter 02 —
Environmental Management. Subchapter B. 15A NCAC 02B .0295. Mitigation Program
Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. Accessed on September 20,
2019.
http://reports.oa h.state. nc.0 s/ncac/title%2015a%20%20envi ronm enta 1%20g ua I ity/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

H1� White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
J MY2 Monitoring Report
Appendix A — Background Tables and Figures
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

\
�
)
/)}\)}\)))
o
°°
\§
\
o
,
f!;

FN White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
August 2019
October 2020
Final Design — Planting and Construction Plans
November 2020
November 2020
Construction and Planting
March 2021
March 2021
Mitigation Plan/As-built (Year 0 Monitoring -Baseline)
March 12, 2021
March 22, 2021
Invasive Species Treatment
April 22, 2021
Year 1 Monitoring
September 9, 2021
Invasive Species Treatment
October 22, 2021
MY1 Monitoring Report
November 2021
Year 2 Monitoring
July 28, 2022
Invasive Species Treatment
May 22 & July 28, 2022
MY2 Monitoring Report
January 19, 2023
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Designer
HDR Engineering
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-3034
Primary project design POC
Vickie Miller [phone]
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks, Inc.
5616 Coble Church Rd
Julian, NC 27283
Construction Contractor POC
Chris Sizemore [phone]
Planting Contractor
KBS Earthworks, Inc.
5616 Coble Church Rd
Julian, NC 27283
Planting Contractor POC
Chris Sizemore [phone]
Monitoring Performers
Davey Resource Group, Inc
3101 Poplarwood Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Michael Foster and William Bailey
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Davey Resource Group, Inc
3101 Poplarwood Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Alex DiGeronimo [phone]
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

FN White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Table 4. Project Information
Project Attributes
Project Name
White Mitigation Project
County
Randolph
Project Area (acres)
12.2
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.887369,-79.927081
River Basin
Cape Fear (03030003)
Service Area
Randleman Lake Watershed
14 digit HUC
03030003010060
EPA level IV Ecoregion
Southern Outer Piedmont
BMUs
466,747.935
Table 5. Monitoring Plan Components
Parameter
Monitoring
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Method
10
Annual
Vegetation will be monitored using the
Vegetation
CVS Level 2
Vegetation
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
plots (10 x
protocols. Data to be collected are the
10 meter)
following: planted stem density, planted
stem height and planted stem vigor.
Invasive and
Visual
Semi-
Locations of exotic and nuisance
nuisance
---
annual
vegetation will be mapped and treated,
vegetation
as necessary.
Visual
Semi-
Areas of dense fescue were mapped and
Fescue
annual
treated. Fescue will be monitored to
ensure the survivability of planted
stems.
Dense
Visual
Semi-
Areas of dense herbaceous growth were
Herbaceous
annual
mapped. A treatment and replanting
Growth
plan have been developed and will be
(Knotweed,
implemented in March 2023.
Spiny Pigweed)
Herbaceous growth will be monitored to
ensure the survivability of planted
stems.
Visual
Semi-
Mapping of fence damage, vegetation
Project
annual
damage, boundary encroachments, etc.
Boundary
will be mapped and addressed as
necessary
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

—
E
`L• l��•5�, '� ` :2`- i t+:may Y - �, •�' {ti -�- ��
�s - - �{ ti ?k A Z.,y '� r •`SST L•�.y�. � n}.
pi
� � r � ll � � _ �_ _ : r• { yes r''
f .. �-` `-�- �L '�`"ram 'j � f'.•i�y' y K-*.. � r _ '- r•_y r'-� _ ,5• _
'-r�'• +>! r�,- y�.• tx7J _ - - Y■ - . f • _ . r � r � -, �. � • .w • r-�� �r - S ,!-= � �_ [�
i _ • - _ �.• •:ram f 'iir't ~_
-� �b
to
fit ■
To
• r �S 1 1 • �I - s �•; _ C� a
`� �' I �• je)� - -_ i•�}"t :�t:'�, _�`~ ill i!'v I *, .�,E•
i 1`NiA- _=R.J ti•, �- '� >• riac !'•� i I - - -.
�' rKi ,r PROJECT SITE _ El= r xE ' r `r; -• 1'
�� I .!' 'I• •1 s-'�.�..., � � •,r :Rr flA Ste. 1 j t
T. _ • f�. y r>I '�,i ' ly, `lam. ' -. • �r r l - • • - • _ �.[_.
Project Boundary '4 " ,. ,} 1 _ '• - ,
Hill
Randleman Lake Watershed
u:
PA
SERVICE AREA MAP
WHITE MITIGATION PROJECT
0 4 8
I I I I I RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Miles FIGURE 1

Oak Hollow J� .• — r... I Ivv i 3
f nke — ;f ,J r 35A
is Li
92B 33~� 78
ilffss I7226
CIA
691 94
99
/1000,
High Point
f
Kira
I I I I I
0 Mies 4
7j
VICINITY MAP
WHITE MITIGATION PROJECT
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 2

0
m w
m Ulo
cm
0
I A -
r
LL
t, o
.�J N
r
TT
F•
.yF f fY�S
[
0
N

v
N F
OC N
W Z
Z
- W
K
a O
Q
V
2
Y 0
m
cQc
C (7
a
K
z
v
o
W
v
Y U v
_ a > v
W
m
�
OV
a
1
I
7
t .fj
(c1 \
It '.

� 0
� m w
m a v o
m � U �
-
a w w U C '- z - Q
O U
I I i w 1 1 T E
0
DNA
s
E

FYZ White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Appendix 6 —Vegetation Plot Data and Site Photographs
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

z
iiiiiiiiiiiiili
INIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN
IN
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN
IN
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN
IN
iiiiiiiiiiiiili�MINIMUM
o w E
p E E
EE 'Q
E E
1

FYZ White Mitigation Project I DMS Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
ures .5.1 - .5.12 Vepetatlon Plots and .site Photogrcohs
Figure 5.1 Vegetation Plot 1 (07/28/2022)
Figure 5.3 Vegetation Plot 3 (07/28/2022)
5
4
Figure 5.2 Vegetation Plot 2 (07/28/2022)
Figure 5.4 Vegetation Plot 4 (07/28/2022)
III Figure 5.5 Vegetation Plot 5 (07/28/2022) 111 Figure 5.6 Vegetation Plot 6 (07/28/2022) 111
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

M White Mitigation Project I DMS Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
rigures --).1 - --).1z vegerarion riors ano sire rnr
Figure 5.7 Vegetation Plot 7 (07/28/2022)
Figure 5.8 Vegetation Plot 8 (07/28/2022)
Figure 5.9 Vegetation Plot 9 (07/28/2022) I I Figure 5.10 Vegetation Plot 10 (07/28/2022)
1>
a a
wi,
_ ...
Figure 5.11 Treated Multiflora rose UT2 Fi ure 5.12 Lack of vegetation bank at confluence
g g g g
(07/28/2022) of UT3 and UT to Muddy Creek (07/28/2022)
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

F)I White Mitigation Project I DMS Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Appendix C — Regulatory Considerations
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 16, 2020
Division of Mitigation Services
Attn: Jeremiah Dow/Kelly Phillips
(via electronic mail: jeremiah.dowOncdenr.gov, Kelly. PhillipsOncdenr.gov )
Re: White Farms Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan Approval
Dear Mr. Dow,
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) received a draft Mitigation Plan (Plan) from the Division
of Mitigation Services (DMS) for the White Farms site (Site) in 2020. The Plan was submitted to
DWR for review and approval under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be used as a buffer mitigation
project. DWR reviewed the Plan and provided comments and recommendations. DMS submitted
a revised Plan that addressed all comments and recommendations provided by DWR. The table
below summarizes the timeline of the Plan:
Project Site
DWR Project
Initial Mitigation
Revised Buffer Plan
Location/ITUC
Name
fD #
Plan
Received
Received
Final Draft
White Farms
2019-0884vl
July 20, 2020
November 10, 2020
Randleman Lake
Watershed
By copy of this letter, the Final Draft of the Plan is approved. A copy of the final draft can be
found online at:
https: [/edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?id=1349646&dbid=0&repo=WaterResources
Please feel free to call [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSignedNAby::
-Wlm_ ;
A43C72700BD543E...
Katie Merritt
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
cc: DWR File Copy
D Qor
Nth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
v� 512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EnrrA
oaoa .�r orE�wm�me�e o ,ir, /`� 919.707.9000

FYZ White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Appendix D — Adaptive Management Plan
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023

w
j.,.t" r • r r

FYZ White Mitigation Project I DMs Project No. 100112
MY2 Monitoring Report
Table 7. Replant Area Species, Source, and Quantities
Species Planted
Plant Source
Quantity
to be Planted
Platanus occidentalis
Bare Root (3-4')
50
Betula nigra
Bare Root (3-4')
50
Ulmus americana
Bare Root (3-4')
50
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Bare Root (3-4')
25
Carpinus caroliniana
1 Gallon Pot
20
Quercus phellos
1 Gallon Pot
20
Quercus nigra
1 Gallon Pot
50
Quercus phellos
Bare Root (3-4')
50
Quercus nigra
Bare Root (3-4')
50
Randolph County, NC January 19, 2023