NC0023906_Application_20181203

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Cotmnr Ertv&wwwnW Quality
NUCHAEL S_ REGAN
secrsOmy
LINDA CULPEPPER
Iiw r Diracmr
December 03, 2018
Harry Tyson, Deputy City Manager
City of Wilson
112 Goldsboro St E
PO Box 10
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO023906
Wilson WWTP
Wilson County
Dear Applicant:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the December 3, 2018 receipt of your permit renewal application
and supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW
permitting branch. Per G.S. 150E-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https•lldeg nc gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
Sincerely, (�
Wren Thedford
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
Q��
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-807-6300

NORTH CAROLINA
Justification for Reduction of Monitoring
for
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit No. NCO023906
As per NCDENR's document "DWQ Guidance Regarding the Reduction of Monitoring Frequencies in NPDES
Permits for Exceptionally Performing Facilities" dated October 22, 2012, we respectfully request that the
monitoring frequencies for BOD5, TSS, NH3-N, and Fecal Coliform be continued at the recommended twice per
week minimum.
The City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility is an Exceptionally Performing Facility and has
demonstrated consistent, long-term treatment performance at levels far below effluent limitations (<50%) and
should be considered for a reduction in monitoring from existing permit frequencies to a 2/week minimum
frequency for BOD5, TSS, NH3-N, and Fecal Conform. Our facility meets all of the approval criteria for this request
as outlined in the document:
• The facility has not experienced a civil penalty assessment for permit limit violations for each target
parameter during the previous three years.
• Neither the permittee, nor any of its employees, have been convicted of criminal violations of the Clean
Water Act within the previous five years.
• The facility is not currently under a SOC for target parameter effluent limit noncompliance.
• The facility is not on EPA's Quarterly Noncompliance Report for target parameter limit violations.
• For BOD5, TSS, NH3-N, and Fecal Coliform, the three year arithmetic mean of effluent data is less than
50% of the monthly average limit.
Parameter
3 year arithmetic mean
Monthly Avp, Limit
% of Monthly Avii. Limit
BODs
1.1 m
5.0 m
22% <50%
TSS
0.14 mg1L
30.0 m
0.5% <50%
NH3-N
0.06 m
1.0 m
6% <50%
Parameter
3 ar
geometric man
Monthly An, Limit
% of Monthly
Avg. Limit
Fecal
1 3
cfu/100 mL
200 cft/100 mL
1.5%
<50%)
• No more than 15 daily sampling results over the 3 year review period exceeded 200% of the monthly
average limit for BOD5, TSS, and NH3-N.
o BOD: 200% of Summer monthly average limit of 5.0 mg/L equals 10.0 mg/L.
BOD: 2000/ of Winter monthly average limit of 10.0 mg/L equals 20.0 mg/L.
During the 3 year review period, no data exceeded 10.0 mg/L during the Summer and no data
exceeded 20.0 mg/L during the Winter.
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF WILSON
INCORPORATED 1849
WATER RECLAMATION DIVISION I PO. BOX 10 1 WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894-0010 I I252I 399-2491 I [phone]
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906 Renewal
FORM
2A NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.B. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow 2 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information-
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRAICERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 6 7550-22. Page 1. of 4 s2

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NC002—
Renewal
Neuse
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name City of Wilson — Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Mailing Address P.O. Box 10
Wilson NC 27894-0010
Contact Person Jimmy Pridoen
Tide Water Reclamation Manager
Telephone Number [phone] - office / [phone] - cell
Facility Address 3100 Stantonsburg Road
(not P.O. Box) Wilson NC 27893
A.2. Applicant Information. if the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Same as above
Mailing Address Same as above
Same as above
Contact Person came as above
Title Same as above
Telephone Number (Same as above) Same as above
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant
® facility ❑ applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO023906 PSD NA
UIC NA Other W00001896 & W00023177
RCRA NA Other W00018709 & NCG110000/NCG110081
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Wilson 49.620 Separate Municipal
Lucema 1128 Separate Municipal
Black Creek & Sims 763 & 283 Separate & Separate Municipal & Municipal
Total population served 51,794
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RNER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
Not Applicable
If transport is by a party other then the applicant, provide.
Transporter Name NA
Mailing Address NA
NA
Contact Person NA
Title NA
Telephone Number (NAI NA
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following
Name NA
Mailing Address NA
NA
Contact Person NA
Title NA
Telephone Number (NA) NA
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge NA
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. NA
mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A8. through A8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection) ❑ Yes
® No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
NA
Annual daily volume disposed by this methodNA
Is disposal through this method E] continuous or ❑ intermittent? NA
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-8 8 7550-22. Page 4 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906 I Renewal I Neuse
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outlet) (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a. go to Part B. "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or tam, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County)
(State)
35° 40' 37"
77° 54' 51"
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable)
NA
fL
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
NA
R.
e. Average daily flow rate
9.22
mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge?
❑ Yes
® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
NA
Average duration of each discharge:
NA
Average flow per discharge:
NA
mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
NA
g. is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
❑ Yes
® No
A.10. Description of Receiving waters.
a. Name of receiving water Contentnea Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known) Contentnea
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known): 03020203020030
C. Name of State ManagementfRiver Basin (if known): Neuse River Basin
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): 03020203
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute NA cis chronic NA cs
a. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): NA mg4 of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22. Page 5 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. what level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
® Advanced ® Other. Describe: Biological Nutrient Removal
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal gr Design CBOD5 removal 98 %
Design SS removal 98 %
Design P removal 80 %
Design N removal 88 %
Other NH,-N 93 %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this orltfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorination using liawd sodium hvoochlor to
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlonnation used for this oulfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart
Outfall number: 001 (3-Year Data Set Used: October 2015 - September 2018)
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.08
&u.
pH (Maximum)
7.86
&u.
Flow Rate
29.98
MGD
9.22
MGD
1,096
Temperature(writer) (Nov -Mar)
22.1
°C
15.3
°C
310
Temperature (Summer) (Apr -Oct)
28.5
°C
23.0
°C
439
' For pH please report a minimum and a maximum dail value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
ML/MDL
Cone.
Units
Cone.
Units
Number of
METHOD
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
OD5
8.3
m IL
1.1
m /L
740
SM5210 B
2.0
DEMAND (Report one)
�CB0D5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FECAL COLIFORM '(Geometric Mean)
1,200
almlos mL
3'
r: IW mL
315
SM9222 (D) I
1
Colilert 18
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
9.44
m IL
0.14
m IL
326
SM2540 D
2.50
END OF PART A.
RFPFR TO THE APPI ICATION OVFRVIFW !PAGE 11 TO nFTFRMINF WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE - -
EPA Form 3516-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 75506 & 7550.22. Page 6 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RNER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate 2 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All other: go to Part C (Certification).
BA. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
2,400,000 gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
City-wide sewer system rehabilitation plan includes 5 yr. 10 yr, and 20 yr plan for sewer line reolacemenVreoair, and
manhole reolacemenVreoair. A crew is dedicated to monitoring and inspecting system
8.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes. See attached
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, ifapplicable. See attached
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground. Not Applicable
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within %mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant Not,Applicable
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed. See attached
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed. NA
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram. See attached
B.4. OperationlMalntenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractors responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name: Granville Farms Inc
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1396
Oxford NC 27565
Telephone Number. [phone]
Responsibilities of Contractor Manage land application of residuals program
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
None
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State. or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550.22. Page 7 of 42

3100 Old Stantonsburg Road, Wilson, NC - Google Maps
Page 1 of 25
Gougl@
A}
t
https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl 11/27/2012

Page 1 of 1
Print - Maps
bfr)g Maps
Old Stantonsburg Rd, Wilson, NC 27893
My Notes
�] On the go? Use m.".com to rma maps.
s direcwns. businesses, and more
http://www.bing.comlmapslprint.aspx?mkt--en-us&z15&s=h&cp=35.687537, 77.8954O... 11/27/2012

Page 1 of 1
PnrT 43- Tre+� �.z a+d
Print - Maps
biftg Maps
Old Stantonsburg Rd, Wilson, NC 27893
My Notes
[a _ m.bing.com
http://www.bing.com/mapslp int.aspx?mkt—en-us&z=16&s=h&cp=35.687537,-77.89540... 11/27/2012

Sr'-Q4A z. d
a-
SsL Jl �'' _ . • CAutRry Club
`� •"III = O`p .F,' est Hmm %: g
l .•PS \ U U r G
E
LO
ul u d • �� 1 J-.� ' � .l i -
c �+
p70
`o (SR
c u
•aoU SR n180I'
k e
0 In
�.
n 23
g i ; — —
3o m '
3 3
0, SR 1692 love _ -
_v -, j I Club
I
f
c it,
0
,m ww
O
J
` GREEN ENGANEERINQ
_o A,ER WASTEWATER SLRVEyM "ar'aH"`'T HOMINY CREEK
'•r 3W !1 OOLDeMnO Br. Pa BON SW w&BM NG 27M
O
� 78 (2lQ, 897�6 PM(Pffi, 9t�7MY dAaOpMrlyaam
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY
JaWMY a, zoos
3
o r - 2OW crrY OF WLBON NORTH CAROUNA

ry
�'^ v
t
SI rf4
�6
Southside Ouffall
l
y Sri.
F Y •� y,
D F �
-Aoi
Export Outfail
1 i%n
�
t

Lane.StreetOutfall Tois�n
s rr
9y .
Y r _
�r
-
' a
= T �oN Hominy Swamp.0utfa1l
Toisno
:JT R ✓ rn_ �_ �'� mom' Wi � e i.
Toisnot
Export Outfall
VA
♦ i t-` k1 '
jxr
i n r r
tnea
i
-'
Dischar a Point
h' -f US.�x4 rGG
I •
'l Part B- Item B.2.a&b&d

X
9 HAzEN AND SAWYER
i 8-L4;�FIC RE 1-1
CITY OF WILSON, NC
HOMINY CREEK WWMF
SITE LAYOUT

Part B - Item B.3.
Plant Description
The Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) is located south of the City of Wilson on
SR 1602. Plant effluent from the facility is piped through approximately 7,700 feet of 48-inch
outfall to Contentnea Creek. The discharge point is approximately 2.5 miles downstream of the
Wiggins Mill Reservoir dam. Wastewater is conveyed to the Hominy Creek WRF by the
Hominy Swamp, Contentnea and Toisnot Swamp interceptors. Flow enters the plant through the
36-inch Hominy Swamp Interceptor, the 30-inch Contentnea Interceptor and the 20-inch force
main from the Toisnot Pump Station. A separate influent pump station at the treatment plant site
conveys wastewater from the Hominy Swamp and Contentnea Interceptors to the preliminary
treatment facilities.
As shown in Figure 1-2, the Hominy Creek WRF provides tertiary treatment, including nitrogen
and phosphorus removal, for a design capacity of 14 mgd. Raw wastewater from the off -site and
on -site pump stations receives preliminary treatment by screening and grit removal before being
conveyed to the primary clarifiers. From the primary clarifiers, flow is distributed to the
biological nutrient removal (BNR) activated sludge stage. Major process units of the BNR
activated sludge stage consist of a biological phosphorus removal (BPR) tank, seven (7) aeration
tanks, five (5) secondary clarifiers and three (3) return activated sludge (RAS) pumping stations.
Secondary clarifier effluent receives tertiary treatment in five (5) effluent filters and is then
aerated and disinfected in two (2) post aeration/chlorine contact tanks to meet DO and fecal
coliform effluent limits. The effluent is then dechlorinated at the end of the post aeration/chlorine
contact tanks to meet a total residual chlorine effluent limit, and is discharged to Contentnea
Creek through the 48-inch outfall.
The two (2) preaeration basins shown on the schematic (Figure 1-2) are no longer in service.

Part B - Item B.3.
The solids handling facilities for the primary and waste activated sludge consist of two (2)
gravity belt thickeners for waste activated sludge thickening, four (4) anaerobic digesters for
solids stabilization, two (2) belt filter presses for dewatering, three (3) liquid sludge holding
tanks, an alkaline sludge stabilization facility capable of producing a Class A stabilized sludge
product and a covered sludge storage pad. The Class A dewatered sludge is disposed of by land
application on privately -owned farm land. The anaerobically digested Class B sludge is land
applied on privately -owned farm land or taken to a privately -owned composting facility.
Existing sand drying beds are available for standby dewatering or for use when draining a
digester for cleaning.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
C. If the answer to 0.5.b is'1'es,' briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (H applicable).
NA
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction NA / NA / NA NA / NA / NA
- End Construction NA / NA / NA NA / NA / NA
- Begin Discharge NA / NA / NA NA / NA / NA
- Attain Operational Level NA / NA / NA NA / NA / NA
e. Haw appropriate permits/clearanms concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? NA ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly: NA
NA
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
On combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall Number. 001 (3-Year Data Set Used: October 2015 - September 2018)
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
1.53
mg/L
0.06
mg/L
324
SM4500-NH3 (E)
0.200
CHLORINE (TOTAL
14
pg/L
0
pg/L
749
SM4500-CI (G)
10.0
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
11.37
mg/L
9.17
mg/L
749
HACH 10360
0.01
TOTAL KJELDAHL
3.07
mg/L
0.723
mg/L
189
SM4500-NH3 (E)
0.200
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
4.03
mg/L
1.48
mg/L
189
SM4500-NO3 (E)
0.050
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
30.5
mg/L
2.5
mg/L
12
EPA-1664A
5.0
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
1.36
mg/L
0.250
mg/L
158
SM4500-P (E)
0.050
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
356
mg/L
305
mg/L
4
SM2540 (C)
10.0
(TDS)
OTHER: Conductivity
"15
pmhoslcm
502
pmhos/Crn
748
SM2510 (8)
10.0
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510.2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7650-e & 7550-22, P,,ve a of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
lit
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2P., as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitorirg Data)
® Part F (industrial User Discharges and RCRAIGERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the intonmation submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true.
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official We Harry Tvson Debut yvC\City Manager
Signature . lam^
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed November 26, 2018
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Forth 3510-2A (Rev, 1-99), Replaces EPA fors 755M & 7550-22. Page 9 of.. _

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson -Hominy Creek WRF, NC0023906
[PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION "Refer to attached Effluent Priority Pollutant Analyses'
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA 'Refer to attached Effluent Priority Pollutant Analyses*
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the pemnitfing authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Cone.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
<1.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 200.8
1.0
ARSENIC
<10
pglL
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
10
BERYLLIUM
<0.10
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 200.8
0.10
CADMIUM
<0,2
pg/L
NA
NA
0
Pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
0.2
CHROMIUM
<5
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (8)
5
COPPER
50.0
pg/L
NA
NA
5.00
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
2
LEAD
<10
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
10
MERCURY
0.52
ng/L
NA
NA
0.04
ng/L
NA
NA
12
EPA 1631 (E)
0.5
NICKEL
<10
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
10
SELENIUM
<5
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
5
SILVER
<10
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
5
THALLIUM
0.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
P91L
NA
NA
4
EPA 200.8
1.0
ZINC
25.2
pg/L
NA
NA
15.6
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
10
CYANIDE
<10
Pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
12
EPA 335.4
10
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
0.028
mg/L
NA
NA
0.013
mg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 420.4
0.010
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
56
mg/L
NA
NA
42.9
mg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 2340 (C)
0.662
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
MOLYBDENUM
6
pg/L
NA
NA
2
pg/L
NA
NA
12
SM 3113 (B)
1
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO02390
Renewal
Neuse
Ouffall number: 001 (Complete once for each oulfall discharging effluent to waters of the United Stales.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Cone.
Units
Mass
Units
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
5.0
ACRYLONITRILE
<50.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
60.0
BENZENE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
BROMOFORM
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
CARBON
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
CHLORODIBROMO-
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
8.3
pg/L
NA
NA
5.3
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
DICHLOROBROMO-
3 7
pgA.
NA
NA
1.7
pg/L
NA
NA
12
EPA 624
2.0
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
<20
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA624
2.0
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
1,3-DICHLORO-
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
METHYL BROMIDE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
METHYL CHLORIDE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 & 755022. Page 11 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
TRICHLOROETHANE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
VINYLCHLORIDE
<2.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 624
2.0
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
<20.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
20.0
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
<50.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
50.0
2-1,1ITROPHENOL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
4-1,1ITROPHENOL
<50.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA625
50.0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
PHENOL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
TRIOHLOROPHENOL
RIC
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
ANTHRACENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
BENZIDINE
<50.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg1L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
50.0
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 12 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MLIMDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
Pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
BENZO(K)
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
FLUORANTHENE
BIS OROETHO%Y)
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
METHANE HAKE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
ETHER
BIS (2-CHL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
THER
PROPVL)EETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
Pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
<5.0
Pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
Pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
DIBENZO(A,H)
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROSENZENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
1,3-DICHLOROSENZENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
3,3.DICHLORO-
<25.0
Pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
25.0
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATEF<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
DIMETHYL PHTHALATEpg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
2,4-DINITROTOLUENEpg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
2,6.DINITROTOLUENEpg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
1,2-DIPHENYL-
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6E 7550-22. Page 13 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MLIMDL
Number
Cone.
Units
Mass
Units
Cone.
Units
Mass
Units
of
METHOD
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
FLUORENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
HEXA-
<5.0
pg1L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
SUTADIENE
DIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pglL
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
NAPHTHALENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
NITROBENZENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
6.0
N-NITROSODI-N-
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PROPYLAMINE
OSODI-
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
METHYLAMINE
METH
N-NITROSODI-
<10.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
10.0
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
PYRENE
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
1.
TRIOHLOROBENZENE
RIC
<5.0
pg/L
NA
NA
0
pg/L
NA
NA
4
EPA 625
5.0
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other basaneutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide infomlation on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE -
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22, Pagr; 14 or cz

kR ) .I
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.: NC 0023906 Month: November
Outfall: 001 Year: 2015
Facility Name: Wilson - Hominy Creek WWMF ORC: James W. Pridgen
Date of Sampling 11/1712015 Phone [phone]
Par. Cnalvtical Services and Citv Of Wilson WWTP Lab
Parameter
Sample
T
Analytical
Method
Quandtation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Numberaf
Sam les
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
SM 4500 NH3 C
0.200
NO
mg/L
1
Dissolved oxygen
Grab
SM 4500 O-G
0.05
9.52
mg/L
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
SM 4500 NO3 E
0.050
0.84
mg/L
t
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
SM 4500 N org
C
0.200
0.476
mgA
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
SM 4500 O-G
0.050
0.103
mg/L
1
Total Dissolved solids
Composite
SM 2540 C
40.0
283
rng/L
1
Hardness
Composite
SM 2340 C
0.20
38
mg CaCO3/L
1
Chlonne (total residual, TRC)
Grab
SM 4500 CI G
10
NO
ug/L
1
Oil and grease
Grab
EPA 1664E
5.0
NO
mg/L
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
Arsenic
Campo
Compo
Compo
Compo
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Compo
Copper
Comp
Comp
Lead
Mercury
Gra
Nickel
Comp
Selenium
Comp
Silver
Comp
Thallium
Zinc
Comp
Comp
Cyanide
Gr
site
EPA 200.8
1
site
EPA 200.8
10
site
EPA 200.8
0.10
site
EPA 200.8
0.2
site
EPA 200.8
5
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
6
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ng/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

N7/'4 t '.
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
EPA 420.4
10
28
ug/L
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
NO
ug/L
t
Acxylonitrile
Grab
EPA624
50
NO
ug/L
t
,Benzene
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
!Bromofonn
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
NO
ug/L
1
Chloroform
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
5.1
ug/L
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
2.1
ug/L
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Iluantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
I Samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
EPA624
4.0
NO
ug/L
1
'Ethylbenzene
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-telrachloroethane
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1
1.1.1-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1

1, 1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA 524
2.0
ND
ug/L
t
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
EPA, 61-4
2.0
NG
ug/L
I
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chlcro-m-creso
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
ND
ug/L
1
4,5-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
EPA 625
20.0
ND
ug/L
1
112,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
EPA625
50.0
ND
ug/L
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
50.0
ND
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
ND
ug/L
1
Phenol
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
2,4,64richlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
ND
ug/L
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
Anthracene
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
Benzidine
Grab
EPA 625
50-0
ND
ug/L
1
anthracene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
pyrene
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
uglL
1
oFluoranthene
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NDEE
ug1L
1
hi)perylene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
)Fluoranthene
loroethoxy) methane
F(2-chloroethoxy)
Grab
Grab
EPA625
EPA 625
5.0
10.0
ND
ND
uglL
ug/Lloroethyl)
1
ether
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
uglLloroisopropyl)
ether
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
EPA625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
uglL
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5 0
ND ug/L 1

2-chlcronaphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
4-chlcrophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
sample
Analyticat
tluantitation
Sample
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
Base -neutral compounds (cont)
Chrysene
Grab
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
I1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
Fluoranthene
Grab
Fluorene
Grab
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
Hexachloroethane
Grab
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
Isophorone
Grab
Naphthalene
Grab
------
Grab
Grab
uglL I 1
ug/L I
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 624
5.0
ND
uglL
EPA 624
5.0
ND
uglL
EPA 624
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
25.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
uglL
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
uglL
EPA 625
50
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
100
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
10.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
EPA 625
5.0
ND
uglL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

N-nitrosodi-n-prcpylamine
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
1
N-nitroscdimethyfamine
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
iV-nitrosodiphemhamine
Grab
EPA 625
1D.0
ND
ug/L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction and supervision
in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible
for gathering the information, the aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing viol
Analysis for the following parameters were collected on the dates as noted: TDS Collected and Analyzed
on 0612012013 and Chloride Collected and Analyzed on 0511512013.

Permit Nc.
Outfall
Facility Name
Date of Sampling
Anaytical Laboratoni:
Annual Mlon toriny and Pollutant Scan
NC0023906 Month: August
001 Year: 2016
City of Wilson ORC James VV. Pridgen
8/9/2016 Phone [phone]
City of Wilson NC 130 Pace Analytic I NC 12,40 and 667
ber of
Sample
Parameter
Type
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
S
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
Composite
S
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
S
Total Phosphorus
Composite
Composite
Composite
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Grab
Oil and grease
Grab
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide
and total
Antimony
Composite
Arsenic
Composite
Beryllium
Composite
Composite
Cadmium
Chromium
Composite
Composite
Copper
Lead
Composite
Mercury
Composite
Composite
Nickel
Selenium Composite
Silver Composite
Thallium Composite
Zinc Composite
Cyanide Grab
Total phenolic compounds Grab
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein Grab
Acrylonitrile Grab
Benzene Grab
Bromoform Grab
Carbon tetrachloride Grab
Chlorobenzene Grab
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
Chloroethane
Grab
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Analytical
SM45000
SM4500CIG-2000
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
Num
Samples
Method
Level
Result
Measurement
M4500NH3C-1997
0.2
0.28
mglL
1
G 2001
0.05
8.39
mg/L
1
1
M4500NO3-E2000
0.05
1.51
mg/L
M400NorgC-1997
0.2
0.448
mg/L
1
SM4500PE1999
0.05
1.04
mg/L
1
SM254OC-1997
40
328
mg/L
1
SM2340C-1997
0.2
44
mg/L CaCo3
1
10
NO
ug/L
1
EPA 1664B
5
ND
mg/L
1
phenols
1
ND
ug/L
10
ND
ug/L
10.1
ND
ug/L
14
WEPA200.811
0.2
ND
ug/L
14
5
ND
uglL
14
2
ND
ug/L
1
SM3113B-2004
10
NO
uglL
1
EPA 1631 E
0.5
ND
ng/L
1
SM3113B-2004
10
ND
ug/L
1
SM31138-2004
5
ND
ug/L
1
SM3113B-2004
5
ND
ugll
1
EPA 200.8
1
ND
ug/L
1
SM3111B-1999
10
23
ug/L
1
EPA 335 4
0.01
ND
mg/L
1
EPA 420.4
0.01
0.013
m9/L
1
EPA 624
5
NO
ug/L
1
EPA 624
50
NO
ug/L
1
EPA 624
2
NO
ug/L
1
EPA 624
2
NO
ug/L
1
EPA624
2
NO
ug/L
1
EPA 624
2
NO
uglL
1
EPA 624
2
ND
ug/L
1
EPA 624
2
ND
uglL
1
EPA 624
5
NO
uglL
1
EPA 624
2
8.3
uglL
1
EPA 624
2
2 7
uglL
1
EPA 624
2
ND
uglL
1
EPA 624
2
ND
ug/L
1
EPA 624
2
NO
ug/L
1

Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Volatile organic compounds (Cont)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Grab
EPA 624
1,1,1-tdchloroethane
Grab
EPA624
11,2-tdchloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
Vinyl chloride
Grab
EPA 624
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chioro-m-creso
Grab
EPA 625
2-chlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
2,4-dimethylphenol
Grab
EPA 625
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
EPA 625
2,4-dinitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
2-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
4-nitrophenol
Grab
EPA 625
Pentachlorophenol
Grab
EPA 625
Phenol
Grab
EPA 625
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
EPA625
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene Grab EPA 625
Acenaphthylene Grab EPA 625
Anthracene Grab EPA 625
Benzidine Grab EPA 625
Benzo(a)anthracene Grab EPA 625
Benzo(a)pyrene Grab EPA625
3,4 benzoFluoranthene Grab EPA 625
Benzo(ghi)perylene Grab EPA 625
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene Grab EPA 625
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane Grab EPA 625
Bis (2-chioroethyi) ether
Grab
EP
Bis (2chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
EP
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Grab
Grab
Grab
E
E
E
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
E
4chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
E
A 625
A 625
PA 625
PA 625
PA 625
PA 625
PA 625
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
Measurement
Number of
Samples
Level
Result
9
NO
uglL
1
2
ND
uglL
1
1
2
NO
ug/L
1
2
NO
ug/L
1
2
ND
ug/L
1
2
NO
ug/L
1
2
ND
uglL
22222
NOug/L1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
Np
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
10
NO
ug/L
1
20
NO
ug/L
1
50
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
50
NO
ug/L
1
10
NO
uglL
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
10
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
50
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
ND
u91L
1
5
NO
ug/L
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
uglL
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
uglL
1
5
NO
ug/L
1
5
NO
ug/L
1

Parameter
Sample
Anaiy#icad
Quantitation
Sampis
Units of
Number of
Samples
Type
Method
Levei
Result
Measurement
Sass neutral compounds (cost)
Ghrysene Grab EPA 625 5 ND ug/L 1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
uglL
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
5
ND
ug/L
1
1,3-dichlcrobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
5
ND
ug/L
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
5
ND
ug/L
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
EPA625
25
ND
ug/L
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
5
NO
ug/L
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
uglL
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Fluorene
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
EPA625
10
ND
ug/L
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
uglL
1
indeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
isophorone
Grab
EPA625
10
ND
ug/L
1
Naphthalene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
uglL
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
ug&
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
EPA 625
5
NO
ug/L
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
Pyrene
Grab
EPA 625
5
ND
uglL
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA625
5
ND
ug/L
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction and supervision
in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that manage the system, or those persons directly responsible
for gathering the information, the aware that there are significant penalties for su rmati n, cluding
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. !: e i e . i
L
Name
Signature
fU 3�1�
Date

Permit No.
Annuall Monitoring and Podutant Scan
NIC0023906
Nlonth May
ay
Outfall
Facility Name
Date of Sampling
A l t' 1 L b t'
EFF A-106
HOMINY CREEKvvWMF ORC
05/16/2017 (*05116/2017) Phone
PACE Anal tical and City of Wilson
James W. Pridgen
252-399-2491
na y ica a ora ori.
Parameter
Y
Parameter
Code
Sampie
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Ammonia (as N) *
C0610
Composite
SM4500 C-1997
0.2
NO
mg/L
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
50060
Grab
SM2540 B-1997
10
NO
ug/L
Dissolved oxygen
00300
Grab
SM4500 G-2001
0.01
8.9
mg/L
Nitrite+Nitrate Total (as N)*
00630
Composite
SM4500 E-2001
0.05
1.64
mg/L
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen*
00625
1 Composite
SM4500C 1997
0.2
1.2
mglL
Oil and Grease
00556
Grab
EPA 1664B
5.0
NO
mg/L
Total Phosphorus
C0665
Composite
SM4500 P-1999
0.5
1.01
mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids
70295
Composite
SM2540 C-1997
40
356
mg/L
mg/L CaCO3
Hardness
00900
Composite
SM 2340B
0.662
41.4
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antimony
01097
Composite
EPA 200.8
1
NO
ug/L
ug/L
Arsenic
01002
Composite
EPA 200.8
10
NO
Beryllium
01012
Composite
EPA 200.8
0.10
NO
ug/L
Cadmium
01027
Composite
EPA 200.8
0.20
NO
ug/L
Chromium
01034
Composite
EPA 200.8
5
NO
ug/L
ug/L
Copper
01042
Composite
EPA 200.8
2
2
ug/L
Lead
01051
Composite
EPA 200.8
10
NO
Mercury (Method 1631E)
COMER
Composite
EPA 1631
0.5
NO
ug/L
ug/L
Nickel
01067
Composite
EPA 200.8
10
NO
Selenium
01147
Composite
EPA 200.8
5
NO
ug/L
Silver
01077
Composite
EPA 200.8
5
NO
uglL
Thallium
01059
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
ND
uglL
Zinc
01092
Composite
EPA 200.8
10
16
ug/L
Cyanide
00720
1 Grab
EPA 335.4
0.010
ND
mg/L
Total phenolic compounds
32730
Grab
EPA 420.4
0.010
ND
mg/L
Volatile organic compounds
5.0
NO
Acrolein
34210
Grab
EPA 624
NO
ug/L
Acrylonitrile
34215
Grab
EPA 624
50.0
NO
ug/L
Benzene
34030
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Bromoform
32104
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
2.0
NO
ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride
32102
Grab
EPA 624
NO
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
34301
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
34306
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Chloroethane
85811
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
5.0
NO
ug/L
2-chioroethyl vinyl ether
34576
Grab
EPA 624
7.6
ug/L
Chloroform
32106
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
3.1
ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
32101
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
1,1-dichloroethane
34496
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,2-dichloroethane
32103
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
2.0
NO
ug/L
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
34546
Grab
EPA 624
NO
ug/L
1,1-dichloroethylene
334501
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,2-dichloropropane
34541
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,3-dichloropropylene
77163
Grab
EPA 624
NO
ug/L
Ethylbenzene
34371
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Methyl Bromide
34413
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
2.0
NO
ug/L
Methyl Chloride
34418
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Methylene Chloride
34423
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
81549
Grab
EPA 624
L

'Tetrachloroethylene
34475 I
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
Mc. I
ugjL
Toluene
34010
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
34506
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,1,2-trichloroethane
34511
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Trichloroethylene
39180
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
39175
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
uglL
Acid-extractabie compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
34452
Grab
EPA 625
6.0
NO
ug/L
2-chlorophenol
34586
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
2,4-dichlorophenol
34601
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
2,4-dimethylphenol
34606
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
NO
ug/L
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
34657
Grab
EPA625
20.0
NO
ug/L
2,4-dinitrophenol
34616
Grab
EPA625
50.0
NO
ug/L
2-nitrophenol
34591
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
4-nitrophenol
34646
Grab
EPA625
50.0
NO
ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
39032
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
NO
ug/L
Phenol
34694
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
2,4,6-tdchlorophenol
34621
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
NO
ug/L
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene 34206 Grab EPA 625 5.0 NO ugIL
Acenaphthylene 34200 Grab EPA 625 5.0 NO ug/L
Anthracene CO220 Grab EPA 625 5.0 NO ug/L
Benzidine
39120
Grab
EPA 625
50.0
NO
ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene
34526
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
34247
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
3,4 benzofluoranthene
34230
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Benzo(ghi)perylene
34521
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
34242
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
34278
Grab
EPA625
10.0
NO
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
34273
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
34283
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
39100
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
34636
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Butyl benzyl phthalate
34292
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
2-chloronaphthalene
34581
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
34641
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Chrysene
34320
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Di-n-butyl phthalate
39110
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
34596
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
34556
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
1,2-dichlorobenzene
34536
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
1,3-dichlorobenzene
34566
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
1,4-dichlorobenzene
34571
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
34631
Grab
EPA625
25.0
NO
ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
34336
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
34341
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
2,4-dinitrotoluene
34611
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
2,6-dinitrotoluene
C0626
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
1,2-diphenythydrazine
34346
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Fluoranthene
C0376
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Fluorene
34381
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
C0700
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
39702
Grab
EPA625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
34386
Grab
EPA625
10.0
NO
ug/L
Hexachloroethane
34396
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
34403
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L

Isepherone
3440E
Grab
EPA o"25
10.0
NO
ilg/L
Naphthalene
34696
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
Nitrobenzene
34447
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
34428
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
N-nitrosodimethylamine
34438
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
NO
ug/L
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
34433
Grab
EPA 625
10.0
ND
ug/L
Phenanthrene
34461
Grab
EPA 625
5.0
ND
ug/L
Pyrene
1,2,4,-ttichlorobenzene
34469
34551
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
5.0
5.0
ND
1 ND
ug/L
41
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Authorized Representative Name
Signature
Date

Permit No.
Outfail
Facility Name
Date of Sampling
Analytical Laboratory:
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
NCO023906 Month: February
EFF A-461 Year: 2018
City of Wilson - WRF ORC
02/06/2018 Phone
Pace Analytical Services
James M/. Pridgen
[phone]
Parameter
Parameter
Code
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Ammonia (as N)
C0610
Composite
SM 4500 C-2011
0.2
0.31
mg/L
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
60060
Grab
SM 4500 G-2011
10
NO
ug/L
Dissolved oxygen
00300
Composite
Sfv14500 G-2011
0
10.47
mg/L
Nitrite + Nitrate Total (as N)
00630
Composite
SM 4500 E 2011
0.05
0.325
mg/L
Total Kjeldahi Nitrogen
1 00625
1 Composite
I SM 4500 C-2011
0.2
1.41
mg/L
Oil and Grease
00556
Grab
EPA 1664B
5.0
NO
mg/L
Total Phosphorus
C0665
Composite
SM 4500 E-2011
0.05
0.057
mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids
70295
Composite
SM 2540 B-2011
2.5
253
mg/L
Hardness
00900
Composite
SM 2340 C-2011
662
38800
ug/L
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide
and total phenols .
Antimony
01097
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
NO
ug/L
Arsenic
01002
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
10
NO
ug/L
Beryllium
01012
Composite
EPA 200.8
0.10
NO
ug/L
Cadmium
01027
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
0.2
NO
ug/L
Chromium
01034
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
5
NO
ug/L
Copper
01042
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
2
50
ug/L
Lead
01051
1 Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
10
NO
ug/L
Mercury (Method 1631 E)
COMER
Composite
EPA 1631 E
0.5
0.518
ng/L
Nickel
01067
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
10
ND
ug/L
Selenium
01147
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
5
NO
ug/L
Silver
01077
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
5
NO
ug/L
Thallium
01059
Composite
EPA 200.8
1.0
NO
ug/L
Zinc 1
01092
Composite
SM 3113 B-2010
1 10
25.2
ug/L
Cyanide
00720
Grab
EPA 335.4
0.010
NO
mg/L
Total phenolic compounds
32730
Grab
EPA 420.4
0.010
0.011
mg/L
Volatile organic compounds -
Acrolein
34210
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
NO
ug/L
Acrylonitrile
34215
Grab
EPA 624
500
NO
ug/L
Benzene
34030
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
Bromoform
32104
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride
32102
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
34301
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
34306
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Chloroethane
85811
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
34576
Grab
EPA 624
5.0
NO
ug/L
Chloroform
32106
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
32101
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
uglL
1,1-dichloroethane
34496
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
1,2-dichloroethane
32103
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
34546
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,1-dichloroethylene
334501
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
ND
ug/L
1,2-dichloropropane
34541
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
uglL
1,3-dichloropropylene
77163
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Ethylbenzene
34371
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Methyl Bromide
34413
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Methyl Chloride
34418
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Methylene Chloride
34423
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L

1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethare
81549
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Tetrachlorcethylens
34475
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Toluene
34010
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,1,1-trichloroethane
34506
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
1,1,2-tdchloroethane
34511
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Trichloroethylene
39180
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
39175 1
Grab
EPA 624
2.0
NO
ug/L
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
34452
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
2-chlorophenol
34586
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
2,4-dichlorophenol
34601
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
2,4-dimethylphenol
34606
Grab
EPA 625
10.2
NO
ug/L
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
34657
Grab
EPA 625
20.4
NO
ug/L
2,4-dinitrophenol
34616
Grab
EPA 625
51.0
NO
ug/L
2-nitrophenol
34591
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
ug/L
4-nitrophenol
34646
Grab
EPA 625
51.0
NO
ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
39032
Grab
EPA 625
10.2
NO
ug/L
Phenol
34694
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
34621
Grab
EPA 625
10.2
NO
ug/L
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene 34205 Grab EPA 625 5.1 NO ug/L
Acenaphthylene 34200 Grab EPA 625 5.1 ND ug/L
Anthracene CO220 Grab EPA 625 5.1 NO ug/L
Benzidine
39120
Grab
EPA 625
51.0
ND
uglL
Benzo(a)anthracene
34526
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
34247
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
uglL
3A benzofluoranthene
34230
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Benzo(ghi)perylene
34521
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
34242
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
34278
Grab
EPA 625
10.2
NO
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
34273
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Bis (2-chioroisopropyl) ether
34283
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Bis (2-ethyihexyl) phthalate
39100
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
lug/L
4-bromophenyI phenyl ether
34636
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Butyl benzyl phthalate
34292
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
2-chloronaphthalene
34581
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
34641
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Chrysene
34320
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
Di-n-butyl phthalate
39110
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
34596
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
34556
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
1,2-dichlorobenzene
34536
Grab
EPA625
5.1
NO
ug/L
1,3-dichlorobenzene
34566
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
1,4-dichlorobenzene
34571
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
3,3-dichiorobenzidine
34631
Grab
EPA 625
25.5
NO
ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
34336
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
34341
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
u9fl
2,4-dinitrotoluene
34611
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
2,6-dinitrotoluene
CO626
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
34346
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Fluoranthene
CO376
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
ug/L
Fluorene
34381
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
CO700
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
39702
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
34386
Grab
EPA 625
10.2
ND
ug/L
Hexachloroethane
34396
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L

Inoenolt,2.3-co)pyrene
1 34+03
Grab
EPA 625
1 5.1
NO
I ugIL
isophorone
34408
Grab
EPA 525
10.2
NO
NO
ugiL
ug/L
Naphthalene
34696
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
hlitrobenzene
34447
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
ug/L
N-nitrosodi-n-propylemine
34428
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
N-nitrosodimethylamine
34438
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
34433
Grab
EPA 625
10.2
NO
ug/L
Phenanthrene
34461
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
NO
ug/L
Pyrene
34469
Grab
EPA 625
5.1
ND
ug/L
1,2,4,-thchlorobenzene
34551
Grab
EPA625
5.1
ND
ug/L
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imp sonme
for knowing violations. ��,` I j
/)-2F
Date

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
:[!!
Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION *Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA *Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
P0TW5 meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POT Ws with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analyzes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitcring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the forth to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent Windy tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
23 chronic 0 acute *Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
E.2. Individual Test Date. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
a. Test information. Test number. 1 Test number. 2 Test number: 3
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test Species & test method number
EPA 1002.0
EPA 1002.0
EPA 1002.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
2/17114 — 2120114
515114 — 518114
814114 — 817/14
Date test started
2119114
517114
816114
Duration
7 days
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication
4th Edition, Oct 2002
4th Edition, Oct 2002
4th Edition, Oct 2002
Page number(s)
1 - 335
1 - 335
1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlonnation
X
X
X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 15 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number: 1 Test number. 2 Test number: 3
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Ouffall 001
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Ouffall 001
I. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify 'natural' or type of artificial sea setts or brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
I. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
k. Parametersmeasured during the test (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in t00%
effluent
%
%
LCm
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other(describe)
EPA Forn 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 16 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO02390
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Chronic: Test number: 1
Test number: 2
Test number: 3
NOEC
90 %
90 %
90 %
ICH
>90 %
>90 %
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DO/YYYY)?
2/18/2014
5/6/2014
815/2014
Other(describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitonng test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 755" & 7550-22. Page 17 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (continued)
a. Test informabon, Test number: 4
Test Species & test method number
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
Dates sample collected
1113/14-1116/14
Date test started
1115114
Duration
7 days
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Neuse
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
Test number. 5 Test number: 6
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
001
001
2/2/2015 - 215/2016
514/15 - 5/7115
214115
5l6/15
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual tille EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication 4th Edition, Oct 2002 4th Edition, Oct. 2002 4th Edition, Oct 2002
Page numbers) 1 - 335 1 - 335 1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection methods) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite X X X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination x x X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fors 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number. 4 Test number. 5 Test number: 6
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Ouffall 001
Eff Outfall 001
I. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, awte toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Statio-renewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify 'natural' a type of artificial sea salts or bdne used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
k. Parameters measured during the test (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 1DO%
effluent
%
%
%
LCw
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other(descdbe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek
WRF, NCO023906
Chronic:
Test number. 4
NOEC
90 %
Ices
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
Pass
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
Test number: 5
90 %
>90 %
100 %
Pass
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number. 6
90 %
>90 %
100 %
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MWDD/YYYY)?
11/412014
2/3/2016
5/512015
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
❑ Yes ® No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe: NA
EA. Summary of Submitted Blomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted bionwnitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA I NA I NA (MWDD/YYYY)
Summary of results. (see instructions)
EPA Form 3510.2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 20 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (continued)
a. Test information. Test number. 7
Test Spades & test method number
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
Dates sample collected
813115 — 816/15
Date test started
815114
Duration
7 days
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Neuse
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
Test number. 8 Test number: 9
Pimephales promelas
EPA 1000.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
001
001
11/15115-11120115
11116/15-11119115
11/17/15
11/18/14
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication 4th Edition, Oct. 2002 4th Edition, Oct 2002 4th Edition, Oct. 2002
Page number(s) 1 - 335 1 - 335 1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite X X X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlonnation X X X
EPA Form 351 g-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 21 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO0239067
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number: 7 Test number. B Test number: 9
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Elf Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic trnacity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Statio•renewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural° or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 45%
0% & 90%
67.5% & 90%
95% & 100%
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute.
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
Lew
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 351 c-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fomu 7550-6 & 7550-22, Page 22 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RNER BASIN:
Neuse
Chronic: Test number. 7
Test number: 8
Test number. 9
NOEL
90 %
100 %
90 %
IC25
>90 %
>100 %
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
Pass
ChV >100%
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DDIYYYY)?
8/4/2015
11/17/2015
11/17/2015
Other(desonbe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitonng test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MM/DDNYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
EPA Form 3510.2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 & 7550-22. Page 23 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION "Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data'
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (continued) 'Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data'
a. Test information. Test number. 10 Test number11 Test number. 12
Test Species 8 test method number
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Pimephales promelas
EPA 1000.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
211 /16 — 214116
512116 — 5/6116
817116 — 8/12116
Date test started
213/16
514116
819116
Duration
7 days
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication
4th Edition, Oct. 2002
4th Edition, Oct. 2002
4th Edition, Oct. 2002
Page number(s)
1 - 335
1 - 335
1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlonnation
X
X
X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550 6 & 7550-22. Page 24 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
ION REQUESTED:
PERMIT ACTRenewal
RNER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number: 10 Test number: 11 Test number: 12
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
I. For each test, include whether the test was Intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Reoeiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify 'natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
0% & 45%
67.5% & 90%
95% & 100%
k. Parameters measured during the test (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
1. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LCx
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22, Page 25 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NC0023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:7u�
Renewal
BASIN:
Neuse
Chronic Test number: 10
Test number: 11
Test number. 12
NOEC
90 %
90 %
100 %
ICzs
>90 %
>90 %
>100 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
ChV >100%
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxcant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MMIDDIYYYY)?
212/2016
513/2016
8/9/2016
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted bionrondodng test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MMIDDNYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 26 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (continued)
a. Test information. Test number[ 13
Test Species & test method number
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
Dates sample collected
8/8116 — 8111116
Date test started
8110116
Duration
7 days
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Neuse
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
Test number 14 Testnumber 15
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
001
001
10131116-11/03116
2/6117-219117
11/02/16
218117
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication 4th Edition, Oct 2002 4th Edition, Oct. 2002 4th Edition, Oct 2002
Page number(s) 1 - 335 1 - 335 1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite X X X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlonnation X X X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 27 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
ION REQUESTED:
PERMIT ACTRenewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number: 13 Test number: 14 Test number: 15
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Ouffall 001
Eff Ouffall 001
Eff Outfall 001
I. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or bath
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Statiorenewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify 'natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute.
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
LCw
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 28 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Chronic: Test number. 13
Teat number. 14
Test number. 15
NOEC
90 %
90 %
90 %
IC25
>90 %
>90 %
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
Pass
Pass
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
819/2016
11/112016
2/7/2017
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
EPA Form 3516QA (Rev. 1-99). Replacas EPA forms 7550-6 & 755G-22. Page 29 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906 Renewal Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION *Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (continued)
a. Test information. Test number 16
Test Species 8 test method number
Pimephales promela
EPA 1000.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
Dates sample collected
5114/17 — 5/19/17
Date test started
5116117
Duration
7 days
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
Test number. 17 Testnumber. 16
s
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
001
001
5115117 — 5/18117
7131117 — 8/3117
5/17117
812117
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication 4th Edition, Oct. 2002 4th Edition, Oct. 2002 4th Edition, Oct. 2002
Page number(s) 1 - 335 1 - 335 1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite X X X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlodnation X X X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 30 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RNER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number. 16 Test number: 17 Test number: 18
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural° or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 45%
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
67.5% & 90%
96% & 100%
k. Parameters measured during the test (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
ova
%
%
LCw
96% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fors 7550-e & 7550-22. Page 31 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson -Hominy Creek WRF, NC0023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Chronic Test number. 16
Test number: 17
Test number: 18
NOEC
100 %
90 %
90 %
Ica$
>100 %
>90 %
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
ChV >100%
Pass
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DDNYYY)?
5116117
5116117
8I1/2017
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitorirg test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MM/DDNYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
EPA Form 3579-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 32 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (Continued)
a. Test information. Test number: 19
Test Species & test method number
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
Oudall number
001
Dates sample collected
11/6/17 — 1119117
Date test started
1118/17
Duration
7 days
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Neuse
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
Test number. 20 Test number: 21
Pimephales promelas
EPA 1000.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
<24 hours old
<24 hours old
001
001
214118-2/9118
215118 — 218/18
216118
217118
7 days
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual fide
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication
4th Edition, Oct 2002
4th Edition, Oct. 2002
4th Edition, Oct. 2002
Page number(s)
1 - 335
1 - 335
1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite X X X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechkxination X X X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 33 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RNER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number: 19 Test number: 20 Test number: 21
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
Eff Outfall 001
I. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Statio•renewal
X
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type, if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 45%
0% & 90%
67.5% & 90%
95% & 100%
k. Parameters measured during the test (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
PH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LCw
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-ZA (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA foram 7550-0 & 7550-22. Page 34 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RNER BASIN:
Neuse
Chronic: Test number: 19
Test number: 20
Test number: 21
NOEC
90 %
100 %
90 %
IC25
>90 %
>100 %
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
Pass
ChV >100%
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxcant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MWDD/YYYY)?
1117117
216/18
216118
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. if you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MM/DDNYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550E & 7550-22. Page 35 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA (continued)
a. Test information. Test number: 22
Test Species & test method number
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
Age at initiation of test
<24 hours old
Outfall number
001
Dates sample collected
577/18 — 5110/18
Date test started
519118
Duration
7 days
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Neuse
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
*Refer to previously submitted toxicity test data*
Test number: 23 Test number.
Ceriodaphnia dubia
EPA 1002.0
<24 hours old
001
816/18 — 819118
818118
7 days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual We EPA-821-R-02-013 EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of pubtication 4th Edition, Oct. 2002 4th Edition, Oct. 2002
Page number(s) 1 - 335 1 - 335
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Four composite x x
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlodnation X X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 75546 & 7550-22. Page 36 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse
Test number: 22 Test number: 23 Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Eff Ouffall 001
Eff Outfall 001
I. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
X
X
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Soft synthetic water
Soft synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If saltwater, specify 'natural* or type of artificial sea salts of brine used.
Fresh water
X
X
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0% & 90%
0% & 90%
k. Parameters measured dudng the test (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Not applicable
Not applicable
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
ova
LCm
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510.2A (Rev. 1-e9). Replaces EPA forms 755" & 7550-22. Page 37 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
Chronic: Test number: 22 Test number: 23 Test number:
NOEC
90 %
90 %
lcz
>90 %
>90 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
Other (describe) Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
Yes
Yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
518/18
8/7118
run (MMIDDIYYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe: NA
EA. Summary of Submitted Siomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the resuts.
Date submitted: NA / NA / NA (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
NA
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Forth 3510.2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22. Page 38 of 42

.° Asheville, INC 23302
• T
phone: [phone]
1 -- Fa�c: [phone]
EnmmnmansaRosttng 5osmlons, In<. Date: March 01, 2014
Efiluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Facility: Wilson WW'T7 N - 0023906 Pipe b: 001 County: Wilson
C
Comments:
Laboratory Performing Test. Env nmenl9FLestin elUt ons. c.
Signature of 0perator in Responsible C a 44 fi Psnjmc 9638
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: gynp(er. 14021909, 140221 09
Mail Original To: North Ckmlina Depa Sci
DWQ1 En
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample information sam9le I s
nvironment and Natural Resources
Branch
Sort date: End date: Stan taut. 007335
02.19-14 02-26-14 121d
Collection smt date:
02.17.14
02-19-14
Grab:
Composite dmaoon:
24.5-h
25-b
Alkalinity (mr/L CaCOa7
Hardness (mg(L CaC%):
Cwductiviry(Whoslcm):
369
372
Total residual chimme (mr/l.):
eoAo
N.IO
Sample Temp at Receipt CC):
24
0.8
Test Information�-
Control
Co.-[
Ccam
Treatment:
00%
90%
90%
1.20
7.20
124
Initial PH (SU):
7.79
1.11
7.73
7.7
7.
137
71
Final pH (SU):
7.79
1.70
7.85
1,1
7.8
1.1
41
Initial DO(m,91):
8.2
8.7
85
.9
81
16
a u4
Final DO (ml;U;
8.5
8.5
It
6.7
24.9
24.7
24. '
-
Initial Temp. CC):
25.2
2d.8
25.1
24.9
25.
Final Temp. CQ:
24.9
25.2
24.9
24.7
Organism Number
Control Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .ra
Number of Young Produced 29 28 29 32 29 28 29 30 31 29 28 29 29.3
Adult Survival (Live (Dkad L L L L t 1 I
Effluent Percentage 90
... ... __. 4a_.....:e,..a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l l 12 rM+.
„r
Effluent Percentage 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms
3 4
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
4 5 6 7 8___ 9 1_-.- 0 11 r 2
Overall Analysis: 90% ChV: '90a/°
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC:

0
121 fT
4ar :. r
<� Envlrvnmencal Tesaing Solutlonz,Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase If Chronic C',ef2bda(
Asheville,NC 23309
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
t dubia Date; May 23, 2014
i Pipe#: 001 County. Wilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmelt tin s no, Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Pro ecf 9804
Samples: 140507.11 1401w 13
Mail Original To: North Carma Department of vironment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Envi me
ces Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Standele: End date Start time: End lime:
Raleigh,NC 27699-1621 os.or-w os-I4da 16oz 0636 J
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,)
Hardness (mr/L CaCO,):
Conductivity(µmhos/an):
Tool residual chlorine (mgfL):
Sample Temp. at Receipt(°C):
��
";E
Test Information
Treami
Initial pH Out:
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg(L):
Final DO (mg/1.).
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. CQ:
Organism Number
1 7 7 d [ 6 9 R 9 10 11 12 W.
sun
aen..11
R.M..ta
Son
Rnewell
a�+.�3
90%
90%
90%
Control
Controlr24
7.68
7.57
775
777
7.69
7.60
7.77
7.65
7.52
7.69
8.1
8,2
7.9
7.8
7.9
8.0
So
8.1
8o
9.0
25.0
25.1
25.1
24.8
24.9
25.2
24.8
25.0
24.9
2/.9
__.... _. _. e_..._-.._
Number of YoungProduced
32
33
29
31
30
28
29
29
31
29
31
30
30.2
Adult Survival: (Live, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage 9oz
< < a a o 1n 11 17
Number of Young Produced
130129132129134311281291301301281311
29.8
Adult Survival: L)ive, Dead
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
L
I L.1
1
1 1.4
I - -
Effluent Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 '2 d 4 J o r o > ro
Number ofYow Produced
Adults mi al� (L)i a (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 tom,
Number ofYoun Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
%Retwion
Effluent Percentage' I
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Nan
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival L)ive, Dead xaw,<roa
Effluent Percentage=
n < F 7 R 9 10 11 12 aa.�
Treatment o Organism,
-
-
NumberofYow Produced
Adult Survival: Live, Dkad
xRmw
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV: >90%
nwf) r .m 4 r_? (R/91) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%y
0.0
% Cannot with 3rd Broads:
too
Control Reproduction CV:
4.9
48 How Mortality
Control:
0
°f
12
IWC:
0
lot
12
Si ificant7:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No concrntration
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC'.
>90%
Rt,roduetion NOEC:
90
Overall Method
Homamdasict
Normal Distribution:
yes
Method:
shapkrc mwz
Statistic:
0.967
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
yes
Method:
F-Test
Statistic
1.456
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Emunnl%
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
90%

a E�!; Asheville, NC 23302
R Phone: [phone]
[phone]
a�
` Envlronmemal Testln9solutions, Inc Date: August22, 2014
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phasc 11 Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia ---�
Wilson W WTP
NPDE 4: N-0023906 Pipe 1: 001 County: Wilson
Facility:
Laboratory Performing Test Environ ntal Testin
ns, I C. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Chu pmlCec 10023
signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Samples: 140806.13,140808.12
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources End �e
DWQIEnvironmental Sciences Branch start date: Fnddata St"ttlnl` obit
1621 Mail Service Center 08-06-Id 08-13-1d 1335
Raleigh,NC 27699-1621
Sample information Sampler Sample2 Control
Test Information a+^ "^°"I` ""`ni11 a.n aae..la a
Collection start date: OBA4-Id OB-OG-Ia �� �� 70S Control Cuntml Cmvo
Treaunene 7.16
Grab: Initial pH (Sin: 7.62 1.71 7.68 1.70 7.64
245-h 255h r .: 7.38
Composite davation: 1.75 7.72 7 56 1.60 7.28
Alkali
CaCO3) j 31. 35 Final pH MY: B.0 i.9 17
Hard,niry(nng lL Initial DO (mgd); 8.1 8.0 7.9
- 39, 38 1.1
Hardness (mrjL CaCOJ: -'8.2 19 7,g 8.1 8.0
Conductivity (Pmllaskm): 408 T a69 111.156.159 Final DO (mp/L):
NO 10 4 10 Initial Temp. (`C): 25.0 25.0 25.1 24.9 25.1 24.9
Total sample Temp. at Recept cc):
Final Temp. CC): 25.2 25.1 24.9 T5.1 25.1 25.2
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°Q: 0.9 0.1 -
Control
Effluent Percentage 90
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms _
Plumhrr, of Young Produced
Effluent Percentage=
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12
30.4
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 rMan
3�
2 3 4 5 6 7
2 3 4 5 6 7
1 l0 11 12
-FT=
9 10 It 12
�T=
o In 11 12
Overall Analysis: 9o°/a ChV:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90°/a NOEC:
>90%

r
.A,h.1'il NC 3881)S
Phone t328) 330.9364
A
Fax. (8_8)350-9368
as
FnvnontsmntM T¢sshss�SuWrrons, Inc
CeriollapJrafa dubia
Uma: November 17, 20I4
--r1
Efi]neaS Aquatic Toxicity Report Form -Phase it Chronic
NPDES H:
C- 0023906 Pipe N: 001
County -Wilson
Facility: WilsonWW-fP -.l _
Comments:
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Tesun olu'
Signature of Operator in Responsible charge:"-'si.
10237
Pruizct
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor Smspls; 141105.19, I411u7.17
r
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
date'.
DWQ1 Environmental Sciences Branch
stag dam.
b'd date,
start tune:
End
1621 Mail Service Center
n-0s-I4
n-a-Id
632
0828
Raleigh,NC 27699.1621
el sampk2 Coatret
Sample Information Sam d -, Test Information
sat vast p�nrl
Cadm1
Collection scan date: II-03-14 11-0514
9p% �%
gpg Cannot Como'
cy _ Treatmane
Grab: g _' Initial H (SU): 7.71 7,71
>�s- P
7 92 737 7.62 7.36
7.45 7.40
24 25-h 24 5 h
Composim duration: 7.82 7.98
Final PH
7.95 7.43
19 7.8
42, 38 Initial W (mr/LY 7.8 7.8
Alkalinity(mg/L CaCOO: 42,38 (tag
7.8 7.9
7.9
Hardnesa(m8n-C8COt):
Final DO lmBn-I: 7.8 7.9
80 7.9 7.9
25.0
5-7 iss. ise.in
Conducdv(ry (ptnhosktn): initial Temp- (°C): 25.0 25.0
25.0 25.0 24.9
24.9
<0.10 <0.1a
Total residual chlonne (MgM: Finil Temp. (°C): 25.2 25.1
24.9 24.9 25.1
Sample Tanp. at Receipt CC): 0.9 I4 -
Organism Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 taus
u an 711 28 1 29 31 29 27 28 29 27 28 28.8
Effluent Percentage Gov.
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Orgasi5m5
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
z 4 9 6 7 8 9
Overall Analysis: >90% NOEC: 90% ''ChV: >90
Result: PASS LOEC:

_ e iti i.33i)i
'hone: l` 3i '50-9364
x =_
r
l8 S) 350-9368
Environmental Testln9 Saloons, inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Ceriodaphnia daoia Daze: February 20. 2015
Facility: Wilson WWTP 1NPDE."v': C-0023906 Pipe#: 001 County: Wilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Envirottm tiny olut Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Char- a
04311
Signature of Laboratory Superrisor. pmjecr ,
-t- twsn?n4.t5. 150206.14
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
Stan date'
End dam
Sun time,
a
1621 Mail Service Center
07.04-15
o2-u-Is
1333
0835 l
Raleigh, NC 27699.1621
Sample Information sample) I
Sample 1 Control
Test Information
'an,
a'""'�'
�
Collection son date: 02.02.15
02-04-15
90%
90%
90%
Control
Conn,
COan4
Groh:
Treatment:
Initial H 5
P (U):
758
7.53
7.78
7.75
7.75
7.90
2475-h
Composite duration: 24-h
- 34.34
Real PH(SU):
7.82
7.82
7.73
7.65
1.73
7.61
Alkalinity(mg/L C4C%Y
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.8
Hudness(my/L CaCOr): 4 x __ 40,40
.
initial DO (mg4.):
7.6
7.6
7.7
Conduc&lry (pmhos/cm): 379
380 150. ua.156
Final DO (mg/L):
7.7
7.9
7.7
24.9
25.0
247
Initial Temp. CC):
152
24.9
25 0
Total raidual ch,odne (mp/i.Y <0.10
.0.10
Final Temp. CC):
2d.9
25.2
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.8
Sample Temp. a Receipt CC) 0.7
1.3
Organism Nomber
1 2 3 4 5 6 7_ 8 9 10 11 12
31.0
Effluent Percentage 90%
Treatment 2 0 anisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I l 12 mace
Number of YourProduced 36 32 37 32 38 35 33 36 37 35 30 32 34.4
iAdult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead I L I L i L I L I L I L I L 1 1. 1 L I L I L I L
xa�
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 may
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms 1
(Number of Young Produced
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 6 Oreanisms I
4 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ma
%0.a6e
4 5
6
7
8
9
10
It
12
m..,
3 4 5 6_ 7 8 9 10 Il
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV:
17Wn form AT-3 (8191) Rev. 11195
>90%

t0
P�-onO: (a 3; -OA364
� Fu.:: (878� 35U-9368
-Z� Ermimnmem ITIng5olutlans,1nc.
Daze: iVlay 18, 2015
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form -1 ase 1I Chronic Cerfodaphnia dabsa --�"
Facility: Wilson WWTP NPC S R: NC- 00^3906 Fipe l: 001 County: Win
Laboratory Performing Test: Enviro a I Testin Sol I . ` Conunents.
i' t7'7
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charg . prolece 10624
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor. Samplos: 150506.13. 150503 17
Mail Original To: No Carolina Department n,ir, mcnt and Natural Resources
D1YQ) ences Branch
1623MailServiceCenter Son date: Enddan: Surttime. Enddmo:
05-06-15 OS-I3-Ii 1450 08d0
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
Sample information I Simple simple control aeenbl aenr.tl sun a.esl RBI
Collation start dam: 05.04-15 05-o" Test Information s �� 90N. Control Co
Coma
Trtmslene 717 7.21
Grab: 24-h 24.21•h Initial PH (SU): 7.34 743 1.76
7.32
Composite duration: 7 73 7,43 7.34 7.25 7.19 7.12
Alkalinity(mp(L CICOs): 32, 3I, 30 Final pH (SU):
a2.44, 40 initial DO (mg/L): 8.0 8.2 82 7.9 7.9 8.0
Hardnest(mgIL CaCOs): 79 1.9 8.0
Condactivo(pedhos/cm): 403 400 Is0.lKtsr Final DO(m9fL): B.0 8.3 al
e0.10 4.10 Initial TempM: 23.0 241 24.8 2a.7 25.0 25.0
Total residual ahlonne (mFJL): Final Tempi (`C): 25.2 25.1 25.2 250
25.1 II.i
Sample Temp. at Recoil[ (°C): 2.3 1.1
Organism Number
Control Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 rxm
Number of Young Produced 29 26 29 26 28 29 28 �Ln
Adult Survival (L)lve Dad L L L L L L L
Effluent Percentage i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Id
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 w.
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms
Effluent Percentage)
Treatment 5 Organisms
Nnmher of Youna Produced
Effluent Percentage=
2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 567
Overall Analysis: >90%
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90/ ChV:

Ashevi(Ie,NC 23302
> Phone: [phone]
ass x±tt fr-y= _,
Fax: (SZS) 350-9368
Environmental Testing S°lutlons, Inc
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase Il Chronic Cerli�aphnfa duhia Date: August2l, 2015
Facility: Wilson WWTP NPDE-Oo239o1i Pipe 4: DOI County: Wilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Enviro to s C. onvnents:
Signal= of Operator in Responsible ge:
Signature of Laboratory Su or. Ptni«r 10821
SaoPla: 150805.19, 150807.1H
Mail Original To: Carolina Departm Environment and Natural Resources
DW ciences Branch
1623 Mail Service Center Stded dte: Stan
tmEt
ene
o-0s-Is -2.15
0920
Raleigh,NC 27699-1623 E
Sample Information Semple)
Collection am data: 08.03.15
Gab:
Composite duration: 2415-h
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,): Ez,� - ,
Hudness(mg/L CaCOO: r' _
Conducdvity(pmhoa/cm): 579
Taal moduel chlorine (mg/L): No 10
Sample Temp. m Receipt (°C): La
Organism
t o m d
Control
Test Information
+-, Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
32, 34, 33 Final pH (SU):
36.36,38 lninal DO(mg/L):
i,s. in, 133 Final DO (mgfl:
- initial Tamp. CC):
Final Temp. (°C):
7 8 9 10 It 12
Sample 1
08-05.15
'-425-h
_
547
Q.10
0.9
Number
t 6
l-VI441 V4 V4�a44V,,,a
Number ofYoun Produced
33
33
29
30
29
29
30
29
33
32
30
32
30.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, Dkad
I L
I L
I L
I L.1
L
I L
IL
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage 90/
c c 7 a n In 11 12
I ree[menac yr antanu
Number ofYoun Produced
4
135
-
1 33
-
1 33
1 34
-
30
-
1 34
34
33
31
31
36
34
33.2
Adult Survival: L)ive, Dead
I L
I L
ILI
L
I L
I L
L
L
I L
L
L
L
a -7 9
Effluent Percentage
c � a o in 11 17
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 z j - -
lNurnberol'Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, Dkad +vase
I ... t Perrenta¢el
Treatment Or anisms I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Number of YoungProduced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead I I I I -
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Or anisms I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 si—
N ,mher of Youne Produced
rrn,,.nt Prrrrneaoel I
Overall Analysis: >9o°/a
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90 /° ChV:
DWQform AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11195

EffluentTusiciti Report Form-F''hr^nic Fathead Tasz
F'cilhy: lAlilson - �NIPCE3.4 Pipet CC!
oratory: Mentech,1¢c. !`T_ % Comment
x
County: Wilson
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Water Sciences Section
4
r >
.Aquatic Tonicology Branch
Division of Water Resources
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
Test Initiation Date/Time 11/17/2015 4:27 PM
%. Eff. Rapt 1 2 3 4
Avg WI/Surv. Ccntr0l 0.747
7-1
Control Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
10
101
10
1 10
10
10
10
0.731
0.765
017010
0.752
F-45--j Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
67.5 Surviving #
Original#
WUodginal (mg)
8
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
0.693
0.826
0.667 10.841
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.809
0.823
0.659
1 0.794
® Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
95 Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
F1-0-0-1 Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
ater Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) InlUFin
DO (mglL) InitiFin
Temp (C) InillFm
High Concentration
pH (SU) IniUFin
DO (mglL) Init/Fin
Temp (C) InitiFin
10
110
10
10
0
10
10
10
0.925
1 0.141
1 0.926
0.745
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
% Survival 100.0
Avg IPA (mg) 0.747
% Survival 92.5
Avg Wt(mg) 0.757
% Survival 100.0
Avg Wt 09) 0. 771
% Survival 100.0
Avg WR (mg) 0.834
% SurvivalF 100.0
Test Organisms
i Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 11/16115
Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
0.788
0.813
0.862
10
10
0.823
10
10
0.984
Day
Avg Vvt (mg) 0.822
% Survival 100.0
Avg WA (rng) 0.820
10
10
10
10
0.914 0.653
0
8.02 1 7.86
1
8.05 17.68
2
8.02 17.86
3
8.07 1 7.99
d 5 6
8.39 18.23 1 ! 8.13 7�.76 1 7.99
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg1L)
Alkalinity (mglL)
Conductivity (umhoslcm)
Chlorine(mglL)
Temp at Receipt (°C)
2 3
Survival
Normal
i(
Horn. Var.
ri.
NOEL
IN
LOEC
>100
ChV
.100
Method
Steel's
Conc.
Dilution H2O Batch # 948 949 950 P
45
Hardness (mglL) 48 44 42 [fl 67.5Alkalinity (mglL) 57 55 82 90Conductivity (umhoslcm) 218 202 239 95
1
00
Irk
Growth
ri
ri
100
>100
>100
Dunnett's
Calculated
Cnucal
14
2.41
18
2.41
18
2.a1
18
2.41
Overall Result
ChV >t00
Calculated
-0.1496
-0.3722
4 3391
-1.1434
-1.1127

affluent ToXi Cit7 XspC_t ?J= -
Work Order:
on-4- =ass;`Fail and Acu=a LC50 Data: 11/30;15
NFDEs;#: MC0023906 Pipe#: 001 Councy: WT-LSON
LABS, INC.
Comore_^ts:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
e PASSED: -7.53% Reduction��
1NVater Sciences Section -Aquatic
Toxicology Branch
Division of Water Resources
1623 Mail Service Center 621
Ra eieh.N. 23
hron 9c Test Results
Calculated t = -1.729
Tabular t = 2.624
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SO 11 12 % Reduction = -7.53
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced - 18 27 22 19 24 22 25 28 27 28 26 26 0.00 24.33
Control Control
Adult Wive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 0.00 26.17
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 90
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 contrrool CV PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 25 24 26 27 26 28 26 26 26 28 24 28 % control orgs
X
producing 3rd brood ICheck One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 10096
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 11/18/15
Control 7.94 7.98 8.00 7.90 7.96 7.88 Collection
1: II/L6/15 Date
Sample 2: 11/18/15
end
Treatment 2 7.56 8.01 7.76 8.03 7.80 7.95 Sample Type/Duration 1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D S S
t e t e t e
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24.4 hrs U M M
r d r d r d g 23.7 hrs T P P
t t t Sample 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Rardness(mg/1) 42 '•••••
D.O.
Control 8.19 8.14 8.07 8.42 8.26 8.06 Spec. Cond.(pmhos) 160 400 421
Treatment 2 8.51 8.15 8.54 8.49 8.42 8.19 Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 0.6 0.3
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) Note: Please
Concentration Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start/end start/end
EE
on Control
it
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs): _
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Ashevdle.NC 23302
to F-- uq Phone: [phone]
J Fax: [phone]
�- Environmental Testing SON[lons, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Cerio pl pia dubia Date: February 22, 2016
Facility: Wilson W11'"1-P PI7ES'k"P4 02C«D,,, S906 Pipe Al: 001 County: ilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Envimr
Sienatlne of Operator in Responsible
Signature of Laboratory Supervis
Mail Original To: North tarolina Department of
DWQ1'finvirommental Scienc
1621 Mai
Raleigh,NC 27699-1623
Sample Information
Collection start date.
Grab:
Composite durtiom:
Alkalinity (mg/ CKC)i):
Hardness (mg1L CaCO,):
Conductivity (pmbos/rn1):
Total residual chlorine (mgL):
Sample Temp. m Receipt (°C):
Comments:
and Natural Resources
Stan date: EM date Stan fire: End itme:
02-03-16 0_-10-16 1309 0717
sample 1 I
Sample 2
=
38a
M
1"
Organism Number
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SUI:
Initial DO (mill):
Final DO(mgl):
Initial Temp. l"C):
Final Temp. MY
!ontrol Organisms 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lu
11 IL M.
lumber of YoungProduced
31
31
32
31
29
29
29
32
32
30
33
30.6
Ault Survival, (L)i a (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage 90x
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms
Ftl)nent Percentaecl I
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 *n.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 arm
Effluent Percentage
Or anisms I 2 3 4 6 7 S 9 10 11 12
Treatment S nwn
w�mher of Young Produced
Ffflnent Percentage) I
pverall Analysis: >90°/ NOEC: 90 / Chv: >90%
Result: PASS LOEC:
DN•'0 form AT-3 W91) Re'. 11195

y
s) Environmental Teating5olutlona•Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Cerio phnia dubia
Facility: Wilson WWTP Y NC- 023906 _
Laboratory Perfonning Test: Enviro +n ntar uns nc. Comments: _
Signature of Operator in Responsible C -
Signature of Laboratory Supervi pm)era: u435
.Asheville. NC 25802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
2016
Mail Original To: North lina DepartmentoKnvironment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Enviro ciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start data. Emi dal: Stan tune: End tine'
Raleigh, NC 27699.1621 os-04-16 05-1 I.16 1222 0755
Sample Information
Collection Stan date:
Grab'.
Composite duration
Alkalinity (mg4. CaCO,):
Hardness (mill, CaCOS):
Cooductiviry (µmhos/c n):
Toil residual chlorine (mg/L):
Smnple Temp. u Receipt (°C):
Sample I I
Sample 2 1
Control
05-02-16
0544-16
24.25-h
26 5 h
r •-+Teti,
32
ao
425
397
15L mu. in?
4.10
4010
0.5
06
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
initial Temp. ('C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Organism Number
< L v R Q In 11 12 Me.
l:ontrot vrganisms
NumberofYoun Produced
32
-
28 32
27
-
26
-
30
26
24
30
26
27
29
28.1
Adult Survival: Wive, Dead
L
L L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Pin neat Percentage 90Z
Treatment 2 Organisms
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10 It
12
My
Number of Young Produced
32
28
30
31
29
30
31
27
28
28
29
29
29.3
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
1.
L
L
L
L
L
-4.5
x amvewn
Effluent Percentages
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 12 Mu
Effluent Percentages
Treatment 4 Organisms 1
Numberof Youn Produced
Adult Survival: Wive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentages
Treatment S Organisms I
Number of Young Produced
Effluent Percentages
Treatment 6 Organisms
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Overall Analysis: a 90% ChV: >90%
Result: PASS LOEC: >90 /a NOEC:
OWO form AT-3 (R/91) Rn•. f 1i95
Mam

s m i M 'as
s >
LI
y I
y Environmental Testing Solutians.inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic FathepO'Ain
Facility: Wilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Envir
Signature of Operator in Responsibl
Signature of Laboratory Supmisor.
Mail Original To: North Caroii
DWQI Envv
1621 Mail S,
Raleigh, NC
Control
Organisms
% EMuent
46
Center
1 and Natural Resources
Replicate number
3 a
Survivi¢ numblarvx
er ofmb.
10
10
10
10
Ori inu nuof larva
I0
1 10
1 10
I 10
wei Vori nal (ma4arvx)
0.689
I 0.627
I 0.707
I0.662
Survivin number oflarvx
IIO
LO
10
10
i
Ori Ind number aflarvx
I 10
10
10
10
wei hVori inal (m arvaz)I
0.588
1 0580
0.642
V.666
PO Box 7i65
A.ihevine.NC 23802
Phone: (US)3=0-9364
Fax: [phone]
E-mail, [e-mail]
Date: Auaust26.2016
tration Test
Pipek: 001 County: Wilson
Start due: Fnddue: Start time: EN time:
0g-09-16 OB-16-Ib III-<7 I103
Test Organisms
Sumvd(%)
100.0
oasida tut, li.
Avenge wt (mg)
0.671
ti-house C.I.
Av. xgem)
0.671
Start parch:
Oe-08-16 Ibld
sun•iving (mg)
End parch:
O34946 0630
Survivd(%)
100.0
Average w (mg)
0.616
%Effluent
Survw numb. o((arvxI
10
10
10
10
6T5%
odgwlnumbvoflarvx
10
IO
IO
10
Survive(%)
100.0
0.643
Wei heori mal(m arvae)
0.701
0.640
0.611
0.621
Averagc w(ng)
% Effluent
9a %
burvivin numb. o(larvu
IO
10 1
10
1 10
longing numb. of larva
10
10
10
I 10
wei Vori inal(m;(larvaz)
0.658
0.623
0.634
0.638
%Effluent
Survivin numb. aflarvae
10
10
IO
10
96 %
Ori final numb. oClarvae
10 IID
10
10
wei hVongind (-¢!larvae)
I 0.718 10.665
0.637
0.727
%Effluent
Survivin¢number otlarvaz
l0
10
9
l0
100%
0' iml numb. oflarvx
10
10
10
10
Wei hdori fine (mgnarvu)
0.670
0.687
0.684
O.Si7
Water Quality
Data
Coutr
PH (:
DO(
Tcm
Nigh
PH(
DO
Tem
Sample Ini
Collectiot
Grab:
Compos l
Analin,p
Hardness
Conducti
Total res
Sample!
Survlvd(%) 100.0
Avenge vrt(mg) 0.638
Survival(%)F 'Woo
Avenge vn(mg) 0.681
5wivd (%) 97 TI
Avenge wgmg) 0.625
Overall Analysis: ---
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%

lile- NC ? -8 302
Phone:
t828)350-9364
FaN:
[phone]
Envimrun*ntai T—Im so'ut'ons'Mc.
Coriodajohnitt labia
[)a,,:
August 29, 2016
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic
C. 0o23906 pipe 9: 001
County:
Wilson
Facility: WilsonwwTP
Comments:
Laboratory Performing Test: ---------------
-, , 'I
Signature of Operator in Responsible Cha-rRct!---
11704
Signature of Laboratory SuPervisaw,
16D810.14
. . . . . . . . . .
Nlail original To: North& milina Depart, , d Enviroment and Natural Resources
Sc,
C sciences Branch
Stan dale:
start time:
End MO.
1621 Mail Service Center
OS-10-16
EEE
jEnd](dWe:
0 1 7-16
08-17'�
1249
0800
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample laformation s.,*i Sample2 Control
Test information S.
.—a I 9.e"
ARAZI6 03-10-16
C,Ilecfiw sta" date. 90% 90%
muol r...i Conn]
Tmarcmt:
Grab: Initial PH (su): 7.80
7.75
7.60 769 772
C�mpogje duration. 24.5-h
Fine PH (SU) 7.98
T93
7.54 7.62 7M
31.35
Alk,14HUY (11191L CaCol�
40 juiu.1 Do j,�#!L): 9.0
MR
8.0
7.8 7.9 7A
4,
Hardnen Ma/L CaCO3):
Final Do ouz"L) 9.0
8.1
7.9 7.9 9.0
...... 5
Conducti"Y 523 Immil Temp (T) 149 24.9
24.8
24.8 24.7 24.3
T,111 midud chlorine ('911-1: <oAo <0.10 Fuel Temp. ('Q7-
Sample Temp. at Receipt (*Q: 0.6 2.0
Organism Number
— - - - -
Chronic
— - — — -
Test Results
g 9 10 11 12 m-
2 3 4 5 6 7 . �-_-4177777.77
'oo
27.7
Effluent Percentage EEI
Treatment 2 O"ARiSMS 1 7 3 4 5 6
Effluent Percentage 1 1 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 to 11 12
Treatment 3 Organisms
Effluent Percentage= 6 7 it 9 10 It 12
. - . - , 1 3 4 -
Effluent Percentage 4 5 6 '7 9 9 10 11 11
5 Organisms ol'mtnl
Number or Produced
Adult 4
1 Adult Sun? al (L)ive. (1))e3d I I I I
Effluent Percentage= 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 [1 12
-treatment 6 Organisms
-
Number of fount Produced
Adult SurviVal; (L)im tend
Overall Analysis: 90% NOEC: 90% ChV: >90%
Result: PASS LOFC:
111195

\shet 'Ic NC SaL_
z1 I'houc; 11i°3} ; 5il `93u4
(82g) 3so-9368
�A 'L
' Environmental Teslmg 5olu[lana.Inc Dafc: November
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report form - Phase 11 Chronic Ceriuduphuia dnhin
, 1 1'tmn .l,• Nilson
Facility: Wilson WlComments:
Y'1T ,�pIN S UOv9U6 pip,: nU'
i
Laboratory Performing Test: Enviromiieo ul 7zstin Sul onr•,'
Signature of Operator in Responsible Char
,, n s96
Signature of Laboratory Supe 'iso nai�y..a� Smap es: 161102.t9, 161104.16
Mail Original To: No Carolina Department or Gllvir0dlm
pWQ nvironnic Sciences nr ch
1621 Mal arsic '
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information MR.
Comp
Collection Stan date
Grab:
Compo4tedaation:
'_. 30,Aleatlnity (meJL CaCO;):2.4{Hardness (InF%L CaCOIr
"L l'iConductivity (µlnWsoon):
l'onl residwl ddorine 0nr/L):
Sample Temp, at aeceipt ('C): 04 0.9
and Natural Resources
Fiul due: clan lime. End tune:
5tul due: 1316 07R
11-02-16 I I-09•Ib
Test Information
s.'
90./.
90x
90°/.
Cpnnal
Cwaol
Coln
7.44
7.65
1.33
7.44
757
InitlalpH(SUF
1,53
765
734
741
734
Final PH 15U1:
7.64
734
8.1
a.0
Ltilid DO UnP/U:
19
7.9
79
79
so
Final D06nr/Lk
8.0
80
8.1
19
T7
N,t
Initial Temp. (.C)_
25 0
24.9
bF.B
24,8
-49
149
241
Final TrnlP. ("C):
24.7
35.0
25.1
20
0,plasin Ntmlber
1 Organisms
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 hi—
t ,a 77 :U 0 31 3U 26 26 29 27 30 28.Z
Effluent Percentage Sox 7 4 5
7
Effluent Percentagee 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 at"'
Treatment 3 Organisn 1 2
Effluent Percentage= _ < 7 g 9 10 11 1-2—
Effluent Percentage 6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 nloa
Treatment 50rganivns 1 2 3 4 5
nhlmher Of Yoanl; Produced
Effluent Percentage= q 5 6 7 8 9 10
Treatment 6 Oreanisms l 2
Overall Analysis: >go% NOEC: 9o% ChV: >90%
Result: PASS LOEC:

� <.:� a >"'1 ':`. :e he•.'.I SIC ooti2
Phone: ; a-
ly Fu::: 18231 »p 9.u8
Fnvlronanamal Tesrin95olunons, :nc Date: Febntarp'_1.2017
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic CeriodaPhIlin ;IuBiu
-"^-NRR1 S #: NC- 0023906 Pipe #: 001 Counn: Wilson
7'V NWTP - p
rming TestEnvironmental Testing SOlutior�•Inc.
Comments:rator in Responsible Charge:oratory' Supervisor. F--i .G samdex 170209.'-5.170210.224
Mail Original To: North Caro kina-Deperatie of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQi Environmental Sciences Branch
start date
End daze. gran time:
End tune
1621 Mail Service Center
02-08-17
0?-15-17 1341
a75g
Raleigh, NC 27699.1621
! Cuntnn
Sample Information
7
Test Information
Control Cpnm1 Caere
Collecaon start Lau::
90:b 90%
90%
Treatment;
751 7 50
Grob:
h
Initial Pit 7yt 1.78
756 7.Id
736 77i 7.48
7.b3Alkalinity(myL
Composite duranon.1
32. 30.31
M
SM: 767 761
Final pll (SL):
80 7.9
CaCO,r
d0, 40.40
Initial 00 lmg/L): S.o 80
7.7
8.0Hardness
79
(merL CaCOt);
Final DO On;"LY.80
7.8 79
8.08DConductivity
Inc. us. l5a
Ipmhos'cml:
Initial Temp. f°C): 2d.9 2
18
2;.9.0
Total residual chlorine lm�21:
Final Tanp. t°CI: 25.0 2;9
2i1 23.0 '_5.1 2if
Sample Temp. at Receipt CC): 0.6 0.5
Organism Number
Chronic Test Results
d 5 6 7 8 9
10 l l 12 stm
... _, _.,.,_,. a o
Control
Effluent Percentage 90%
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentagca
Treatment 5 Organisms
(Number of Young Produced
Effluent Percentage=
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 am
Overall Analysis: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV: >90%
ReSdt: PASS LOEC:

.. _m nuM intin9 ioiwwnxlnc
Chronic Whole Effluent Tovcity Test (EPA-321-R-02-013 Method 1000.0)
Species: Pintephales promelas
Client: Wilson WWTP County: Wilson
NPDES #: NCO023906 Outfall #: 001
Project#: %-LADb 1WC: 90%
Daily feeding and renewal fnjorntatron:
Day
Date
Morning feedin;
Time Ann
0
Oi-16-17
Nos
1
05-17-17
Ot.10 1
2
0i-1s-17
0605
3
Oi-19-17
(j'10D
4
05-20-17
00
5
05-21-17
tT•l0%
6
05-22-17
ObSS
7
05-23-17
Afternoon feeding
11.10
VINQ
initiation, ew renal, Simple I SSW
n. r.rmination number used batch used
1
-105Zo. od oyit• 0
SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision I 1-01-14

- - - Fax: [phone]
�'- :nrtronmenrat iezn,g ioltrzlons. !nc Gate: Mav 3 1. 2017
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubin
Facility: Wilson Wl4'TP NPDLS 4;.4NC- 0033906 Pipes: 001 Coum : lti llsmr
-+''-( Comments:
Laboratori Performing Test Environmental Testins Solutt9nsi ne./'
Signature of Operator in Responsible Chaqer:__=z.a..
Pro,, 124I4
$Igtta[ureof Ldb9[3[ory Supervisor:. i,mmles: 170511.05.17051906
Mail Original To: North Carolim'D perm, I of Environment
and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
Stan date: Etddare:
Stmnmc:
End time
1621tV'[all$zrviceCenter
05.17-17 05-24-17
1130
0719
Raleigh. NC 27699.1621
Sample Information e2 Conirm
a="">t'
any=
su"
nunai
a nd
Collection start date: 11
Test information
sm
90$
Cannot
CanariaGrab:
-
Tnaimene
90.90°L
7.70
7T-
7.82Canpasne
772
7.86
779
dtwtion: r
Initial pH ISUY.
7.81
13i
7.85
7.81
7.78
781
lmg'L CaCO,)'33. 31, 3iEinai
ER
Phi lSl; 1:
8.0
7.5
1.8Hardness
7.3
77
,Alkalmiry
38.10.41
ung4. CaCO,I:
Initial DO ling'LI:
$'1
g0
g0
77
19
7.8
Condnuiviry (pnd7os'an)o 8 na. tax. enNutt
DO tm_JLI:
79
24.9
2i0+J9
Total residual cblomre (mg'L): 10
Initial Tanp.(°C1:
EinalTemp.l°Cl:
24.3
'_i.l
25.0
2J.9
i.
-Sample
_v9
Temp. n Receipt (°Ct
Organism Nnmber
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 >�
l,t 79 32 32 33 32 30 29 33 29 31 32 313
Effluent Percentage 9o'a
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organism, 1 7
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 99 10
2
3
4
5
6
7 9
l 2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 456 8
Overall Analysis: ° 90 /e Chv: >90"�
Result: PASS LOEC: >90 / NOEC:

-_ - �� Phone lu_h) 35(1.95(r1
, ) F c [phone]
Envuon n.mai Tgsrin9 5glurlona, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Ceriodnphnia dn6iu Caw: Auausc 2'_. 2017_
Factiv: Wilson R'WTP NPDES m' NC. 0023906 Pipe 4: 001 Count,,: Wilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Enviranmenia4.iestina-Salutiens� Inc: Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Cltargea.
Signature of Laboratory Supmisor: f---V vr� Project: 12609
H Similar 170802.I7. Ro8U4.17
Mail Original To: North CarotinDepartm t of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQi Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center FSEandase. I Ent date: I Sanumc I Fnd titm
Raleigh, NC 27699.1621 0s-02-L7 1 0S.0947 1 1949 1 0736
Sample Information
Coll uimt start dare:
Grab:
Composite duration,
Alkalinin• (mgL CaCO,):
Hardness (mgrL CaCO,):
Conducti vi ry (pndlos en l:
Total residual chlorine ImgtLl:
Sample Temp. at Reccip(M):
Samplel
Sample2
Control
07-31-17
0&02-17
24.75-11
24.5-11
33
38
516
566
taa ua. ca
<Uo
s0.10
0.9
1 0.3
-rest Information
Treatment.
Initial PH [Sul:
Final pH (Sul:
Initial DO Im_L):
Final DO (me0s:
Initial Temp. t°Cl:
Final Temp. fCl:
atn
Arnex�l�
nrnc.n_
son
n:nn.i:
90%
90%
90%
Control
Control
Camrol
7.71
7.74
7.85
7.35
7.53
755
792
7.93
7.91
7.61
7.66
7.63
3A
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.3
7.8
8.0
3.1
8.0
77
7.8
7.6
25.1
24.9
'_S.l
'J.7
24.8
?5.0
24.9
25A
252
f'S.0
25.1
25.1
Organism Number
Control Organisms I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 It 12 asw
Number of Younp Produced
123
29
32
29
29
31
28
25
30
27
127
28
286
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent PercentageEN--]
T..vt......t 7 n.... 1...,v 1 ] I 1 i 6 7 R 9 10 11 17 ua
Number of Young Produced
136
33139
1 35
1 37
137
137
135
132
136
34
37
35.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive.(D)ead
I L
L
I L
L
LL
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I I
i 1
1 -24.5
Effluent Percentage=
'reatment 3 Organisms t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Iu It 12
lumber of Young Produced
Auk Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 st,
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive,(D)ead
Effluent Percentage=
reatment5Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 as
lumber of Young Produced
dult Survival: (L)ive (D)ead
-wvm.
Effluent Percentage=
•reatment 6Ot g an isms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 It 12 smn
lumber of Young Produced
Wall: Survival: (L)ive (D)cad
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV: >90%
DWQ form AT-3 (8191) Rev. 11195
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Ndonaliry I%I:
0.0
%Control wins 3rd Bra
too
Conant Repmducrion CV:
&6
48 Hour llanaliry
Control:
0
or
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Sienificam".:
No
Final Monalire Significant ac
No concennalton
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>90T
Reproduction NOEC:
90%
Ovesatl Method:
Homonc drnxt
Normal Distribution
Yns
Method'
shaplro-\till's
Statistic
0.960
Critical Value:
o.8s7
Egiwl Variances:
Yes
N9edtod:
F-Tess
Statistic'
1.054
Critical Value:
5.320
Non-Pammenic Analysis of applicable)
Viclhod:
Effluent°/
Rall:Sam
Critical Stan
90%

_. M• L oo .O.1i63
i
Environmental Tasting Soluilons, Inc
Effluent Aqua tic To-,' city Report Form -Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphill a dubld Cate: Novamber'_2.>UI
NPDES' NCI0023906 Pipe 001 Counu: R'ilsun
Facility: Wilson IV1Y"CY - ,
Cotnmenm
Laboratory Performing Test: Lnvironment9 Tasting Solutions.-1uc_..
-.i✓
Signature of Operator in Responsible Champ: `?-�'
PmJeer I'_Sil
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor.
/r Svnides; I'.I lO3.18. 171110.16
[ail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
Swn dote: End dnrc. Swn time'. End Mitt
e:
1621 flail Service Center 11-05-17 11"13.17 16ffi
Raleigh. NC 27699.1621
Sample Information
Collection start date'
Grab:
Cwnposite duration:
Aukaliniry Ung4 CaCO,r.
Hardness Img'L CaC0�1:
ConductiWY i µlnhos%rnn:
Total residual chlntbm ImeLl:
S,,Plc Tainp. at R,ceipt IT I:
Control
Effluent Percentage 9oi
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Organisms
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 5 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)c
Test information
,en-
'rmannait:
90%
90%
901,;
Cannel
Contra
Initial pH ISU1:
7.91
1.74
S.DI
187
182
Final P14(SU:
7.90
8.04
791
768
7.6"
Initial DO lmyL):
90
3.0
SO
73
7.9
Final Do (mgtL):
9.0
3.1
So
7,7
7.6
InitInitiall'mnp. 1"C 1:
2i2
r .i
-a
2e.S
24.8
2a8r
Final Temp. 1"Cl:
25.1
75.2
24.9
�n
Organism Nmnber
t 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 s
ti I 79 113, 134 1 34 1 30 131 30 29 28 30 29 30.7
7 8 9 10
1 0 3 J 3 6
7 8 9
10
11
12
alu
I 7 3 y 5 6
7 8 9
10
11
12
ua
k+
n i 6
7 8 9
10
I1
12
Effluent Percentages
Treatment 60r anisms I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival (L)ive, (D)cad
Overall Analysis: >90%
Result: PASS LOEC: >go NOEC: 90% ChV:
4

�>--�; -4
-`ram-t
1 i
Environmental Tasting Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fath
Facility: Wilson WNVT? _... NPDFi.
Laboratory Performing Test: Envir
Signature of Operator in Responsibl
S ignature of Laboratory Supervisor:
,Mail Original To: North Carolina CA..QPartmet
DWQ/ Envimnmen-31SCi
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699.1621
Control
Organisms
%Effluent
45%
Effluent
675%
%Effluent
90
Effluent
95
% Effluent
200/
Pi, Lr 756i
Phone:
(3" d
o; le) 3
ne: 3 U 9364
Fax: (373)��0 9363
E-mail:limiiietenclab.com
Date: February 21. ^_013
'Minnow hfulti-Concentration Test
NC-0023906 Pipe#: 00t COILING Wilson 3
and Natural Resources
Replicate number
2 3 4
$rvvrvin number of arvae
10
1 10
10
10
Ongiml camber a flarvu
1 10
1 10
1 t0
i
I 10
wels:ha'oneual(melarvu)
1 0.801
1 0.790
1 0.312
0.304
S,"wing number of larvae
10
10
10
1 t0
Ori fret nwnberoflarvu
t0
1 I 10 1
1 10
1 10
wei dori inal (ine2tarvae)
0.808
t 0.752
1 0.775
1 0.804
Sierm.na nsanber of lance
10
10
10
1 10
Oniial mamberoflarvu
1 10
10
10
1 10
Wei9bvori ual (,ro arvati
1 0.679
1 0.312
1 0.743
1 0.316
stnivin numbaaFlarvae
10
1 10
1 10
1 10
Oriinal number oflarvu
1 10
1 10
1 IO
1 10
weiWW0n imllm,tarnel
1 0.846
1 0.811
1 0.813
1 0.337
smvivina number oFiarvae
10
t0
10
10
Oninal munbcroflarvu
10
l0
t0
10
Weiahc'wi inai (mp/larvne)
10.687
0.745
0.811
0.723
$urvs•in mm�ber of larvae
l0
10
10
10
Ori roil num6eroflarvu
10
10
l0
10
weiandari anal(mal.)
0.7?8
0.695
0.739
0.750
Water Quality Data
Control
PH (SU):
DO (mg(L):
Temp. ('Q:
High Cancenl
pH (SO)
DO (sn®'L):
Temp. (Q:
Smc dare: End dam: Stan time Ed time:
82-0b18 02-li-IS 1145 ( to52
Tut Organisms
surviwl (K)
100.0
Oms,de
rap lieo
Average m l MIX)
0.807
In-harae Chhue
Average ml
1 0.807
sury ivin, (aid
aegmhazch:
02-05-181545
End hatcht
02 0013 0 000
survival (%)
100.0
Avenge m(1ar)
1 0.785
swvival (%) 100.0
Average mbr40 0.763
Stwivil (%) 100.0
Maiepm(na) 0.326
Survival ( e) [Ell
Asmyemba3) 1 0.743
smvivi Dsl 100.0
Aamgem(rg) 0.741
7.91
1 7.55
1 7.70
1 746
1 7.70
1 7.38
1 776
1 759
1 279
1 7.39
7.73
7.58
761
7.55
80
7.6
1 7.8
1 7.7
1 So
7.2
1 9.0
7.5
1 1.9
1 6.9
77
7.5
7.9
72
24.7
24.3
1 246
1 244
1 24.8
242
1 24,7
244
1 24.7
1 243
1 24.b
11242
247
242
r a7.20
7.51
1 765 1
7.
76
6
80
79
3.0
744
1
i7b
78d
.
668
S90
L7
0
6.7
25.0
1 244
1 24.7
243
1 250
1 244
1 249
1 24.6
1 25.0
1 246
1 24.6_.l
24d
1 249
1 241
Sample Information
Collection Stan daze:
Grab:
Composite dusalion:
Alkalinity (mp'L CSCOs)'
Hardness (mgtL CaCO]):
Conductivity 4unhoslem).
Toni residual chorine (m#L):
Saznple Tnnp. at Receipt CC):
Sam Is I
Saznple 2
sun le 3
Conhol
02.04-I8
0746.19
02.08-1
2e-h
24-h
23.75-h
-
30
34
4S
30-i3
36
36
36
38-d2
391
391
466
I W-1 S7
40.10
<0.10
40.10
I.5
0.7
Analyses
Nouns
Hom Vat
NOEL
LOEC
Chv
Method
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >100% NOEC: 100% ChV: >100%
DWO form AT-5 4103)
Sswivai
Grovrth
Y45
Yes
Yes
Yes
10%
t00%
>I00%
>I00%
>100%
>100%
Visual lop.
Dunncn's
Sur;m]
Growth
Ye EOluetn
Cdtid
Calculazed
Cdriul
Calalued
45%
2410
0773
675 %
2410
1554
90%
'L410
.0.658
95%
2.410
2248
100%
2..-
2327

tile, NC
q qr
�`�� Phone (828l 350-9=04
ai
Fax' [phone]
i. Envnonmenral Tesitng Solutions.Inc.
Date: February 23. 2013
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
Facility: Wilson MNNTP--��NPDESN: NC-0023906 Pipe 8: 001 County: Wilson
Laboratory Performing Test: Emnvirontal Tea4t a Solutions`I Comments: signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: -
rcoieu.
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor. 1+
leo7077
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Envirom
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-I621
Sample Information
Collection Stan date'.
Grab:
Composite duration'.
.40:aliniry (mg'L CaCOO:
Hardness (mg/L CACOO:
COnduttiviry(µmhoycm):
Total residual chlonne(mg/L):
sample Tmnp. at Receipt CC):
Control
Effluent Percentag 907.
Treatment 2 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
and Natural Resources
Slav dare: Ulm Sran time. End twe
02.07-18 02.14.18 1423 0758
Test Information
wa
R�^v'
a°'n'n`
Treatment:
90%
90%
909
Comroi
Control
Cony
Initial PH(su):
743
728
772
7,70
776
767
Final PH(SU):
772
777
7.91
770
772
7.16
Initial DO(mg9.l:
7.8
9.1
79
78
9.0
79
Final DO (mg/U:
78
7a
79
7.6
7.6
79
Initial Temp (`C):
348
24a
24.9
21.7
24.3
25 (
Final Temp. (`C):
25.2
25.0
24 7
24.8
248
2d.1
Organism Number
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 —
i0 29 27 32 31 29 32 32 31 2a 2a 29 29.8
3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 rwA
EfIluent Percentages ^ 4 R 7 a 9 10 11 12 nw�
Effluent Percentages 10 11 12
. tits
_-_._.... A n—knna 1 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 9
Effluent Percentages
Treatment 5Or a
ntnisms
INnber of Young Produced
Effluent Percentage=
__. 1 ....___:.m. 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 B
9
10
It
l2
N.
a: RN[I
7 8
9
10
11
12
sw�.
Overall Analysis: a >90%
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90 /o ChV:

Ca:: 13 iu it-?: o3
Envtronmental Testing Soludcns, lnc
Dale; Ala\• ?i, _1118
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form . Phase I1 Chronic Cerioilaphnia dilbiu
Facilin-: Wilson \\R"1'P
NPDES!i: NC-0023906 Pipe 9: 001 County: Wilson
r Convnents:
Laboratory Performing Test Enviremr.entl "Cestinx SolutiCris.sc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Chug - t
Signature of Laboratory Sup en isor-( A tsstl..��' Sander: IaoittgA4 180411.I3
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
Stan dire
End dart:
Stan time:
Eml time:
1621 Mail Service Center
05.00-13
05-16-19
1a13
0733
Ralcigh.NC 27699-1621
Sample Information Sample t sample'_ Control��
yeni11
am,ug±
o5-07-IS 05-09-t3
CoOecdon snrt dare'.,e
Test Information
m
90..;
90'e
[wsrol
Cmnrol
Conval
TK:1mLL'r:l:
C.:mpusit. dtaasien. 71 i-L _l t
Iniial PH IS" :
7.80
7.3'_
7.80
7.73
7,66
7.56
i2.33
AlWlinisy ImgL CaC0,1:
Final pH iSQ:
8.0
9i
82
Ba
7.3
8.0
HaMncss lmNL CaCO,e 40.38
Initial DC( raw
8.-
8'
7.3
7.7
3.1
Coaducticiry sunilhai:cml: J7a SO 11, u!. 1a1
Final DO ungU
8''-
2a.6
21.8
21.9
217
2a.a
T,i,imidual chlorine killLr N.10 <0.10
initial T<mp. Cts:
Final T,"P l'CI:
15.0
2i.1
25.0
2b.8
2i'1
2-
5.0
24.8
Sample Temp. at Receipt (-"Cl* LI 0.1
Effluent Percentage 9g/
Effluent Percentage=
Organism Nutaber
l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 ma,n
:n :1 74
23 26 2b 29 29 23 27 26 29 27.8
7 3 4 5 6 I 7 8 9 10 11 12
. a , R n t0 11 12 n�
Effluent Percentage= 7 8 9 10 11 12 c�
Treatment 4 Oreanism5 I 2 6
Effluent Percentage=
Effluent Percentage=
4 5 6 77 8�r
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 r.,a
Overall Analysis: NOEC: 9o°/a ChV: >90%
Result: PASS LOEC: >90 �°
_ _ ._...... ... r r.ne

„-: Enelranmenral Testing solutions. Inc
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase Il Chronic
Facility. Wilson WwTP
�I I'C'�G`
Laboratory Performing Test: Environme
s SoIolut�ion,..,^Fe/t-E/
Signature of Operator in Responsible Chaff'
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: /
..het iil�. �i also;
i7ac 1333) 3it1-9363
^ioJep6ni,t;(uyp7 Uale: AueusL24.7_01
Nr. 00i tlob Pipe 9: 001 County: Wilson
Comments:
180310
Mail Original To: North Carolina Coaawiedof Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Scan time End dmc Slanli,c End wed
Raleioh,NC 27699-1621 os.oe-ta oa-ls-la 1520 og3a
Sample Information
Coliealon .tart daie:
Gmtr
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (ng/L CaC01):
Hardness (mgil CaCO,I:
Canduaiviry (pmhos'atn:
Total residual chlorine (mWL)
Sample Temp. at Receipt("C):
Sample)
sample]unv•I
oa-�6-1a
oa-os-la
21
33, 33.
34. 34. 36
409
427
151. 14u. iP
.ern'
Test Information r77- sve•tl1 s,�.e-
Treatment:
9P'a
90%
90%
Control
Control
Connol
Initial pH (SU1:
743
758
771
768
772
769
Final PH (Sul:
775
7.76
772
7.69
767
761
Initial DO(mg/L):
79
s0
So
7.3
7.9
S0
Final DO(mglL):
1.9
8.1
79
77
8o
7.8
Initial Temp. ("Q:
24.9
14.7
25.1
247
24.8
246
Final Tonp. l"C):
25.1
24.3
24.8
249
25.1
247
Organism Number
n a 5 7 2 9 10 11 12 Mwe
e.onrrol vrgamsms
Number of Youne Produced it
—
35
34
29
27
32
28
30 23
31
30
27
29.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive, Dead L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
Effluent Percent2ge i
e a o in 11 12 blo.
t reatment4 Ur amsms
NumberofYoun Produced
I
1 31
<
36
I
32
-
33
-
30
-
31
I
33
-
36
-
32
35
33
35
33.5
Adult SurvivaL (L)ive,(D)ead
L
j L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
I L
.-12.0
Effluent Percentage=
Treatment 3 Orsanisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 aas
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 5 Or2anisms 1 2 3 4 5 ( 7 3 9 10 ll 12 ate.
Effluent Percentage=
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 arae
Overall Analysis: a >90%
Result: PASS LOEC: >90% NOEC: 90% ChV:
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11195

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RNER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works haveor is subject toan approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 4 Total 13 are covered by a CIU classification but are not subject to CIU limits)
b. Number of CIUs. 8 Total (7 Categorical Industrial Users, but one has 2 permitted categorical discharges)
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.S and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: 'Refer to Attachment A'
Mailing Address: 'Refer to Attachment A'
'Refer to Attachment A•
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
*Refer to Attachment A•
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): 'Refer to Attachment A'
Raw material(s): 'Refer to Attachment A'
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (god) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
See attached gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (god) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
See attached gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following: See attached
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and wbcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 39 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RNER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek VVRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU mused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ID No If yes, describe each episode.
'Refer to Attachment A`
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number AmountUnits
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATIONICORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRAIor other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets it necessary.)
FA 5. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide informaton about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22. 'age 1) or 2

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Attachment
0
Supplemental Application Information
Significant Industrial User Information
Part F
Items F3 — F8

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Page 1 of 12
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Ardagh Glass Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 1757
2200 Firestone Parkway
Wilson, NC 27893
Item F.4. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Manufacture of glass containers from raw and recycled materials
Item F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Glass containers
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
111,300 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
37,800 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 426, Subcategory H
Item F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Page 2 of 12
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations
Address: P.O. Box 1139
3001 Firestone Parkway
Wilson, NC 27894
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Mixing, milling, extruding, calendaring, forming, and cutting of rubber components to
assemble steel radial tires.
Item F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Steel radial tires for passenger cars and light trucks
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
67,000 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
66,000 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? 40 CFR, Part 428, Subpart A; however, no pretreatment limits.
Item F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Page 3 of 12
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each Stu
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Evans- Mactavish-Agricraft, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 3408
5123 Ivy Court
Wilson, NC 27893
Item F.4. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Cleaning, etching, and powder coating of metal products
Item F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Various metal products for various local industries.
Material handling equipment for tobacco, agriculture, food,
and similar industries.
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
300 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
1,000 gpd- Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 433, Subcategory A
Item F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson Page 4 of 12
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Fresenius Kabi
Address: 5200 Corporate Parkway
Wilson, NC 27893
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Manufacturing of pharmaceutical products (prefilled drug delivery systems), Quality
Control laboratory and Stability laboratory.
Item F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes and
raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Prefilled drug delivery system.
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
8,800 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent)
12,100 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
C. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 439, Subcategory D
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson Page 5 of 12
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Linamar Forging
Address: P.O. Box 370
2401 Old Stantonsburg Road
Wilson, NC 27893
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Manufacture of bearing rings, hub rings, and forgings utilizing the following processes:
forging, machining, grinding, and heat -treating.
Item F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Bearing rings, Hub rings, and Forgings
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
17,500 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
3,700 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
9. Local Limits? - Yes
d. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 433, Subcategory A
Item F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Page 5 of 12
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Purdue Pharmaceuticals, L.P.
Address: 4701 Purdue Drive
Wilson, NC 27893
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SfU's discharge.)
Manufacturing, packaging, and laboratory analysis of tablets, and capsulated
pharmaceutical products.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Pharmaceutical tablets, caplets, and capsules
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
87,700 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
62,820 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 430, Subcategory D
Item F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Page 7 of 12
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Refresco Beverages
Address: 4843 International Boulevard
Wilson, NC 27894-0728
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Manufacture and bottling of soft drinks. Washing of plastic bottles after being formed by
a plastic blow molding process.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Canned soft drinks in 12 ox size
Bottled soft drinks in 1, 2, & 3 liters sizes
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
50,800 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
600 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
C. Categorical pretreatment standards? - No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? 40 CFR, Part 463, Subpart B.
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
two

Facility Name: City of Wilson Page 8 of 12
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Sandoz Pipe 001
Address: 4700 Sandoz Drive
Wilson, NC 27893
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Manufacturing, packaging, and laboratory analysis of tablets, caplets, and capsulated
pharmaceutical products.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Pharmaceutical tablets, caplets, and capsules
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
65,806 gpd — Intermittent
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
17,887 gpd - Intermittent
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
d. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 439, Subcategory D
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SiU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson Page 9 of 12
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Sandoz Pipe 004
Address: 4700 Sandoz Drive
Wilson, NC 27893
Item F.4. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance and Stability Laboratory.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Pharmaceutical tablets, caplets, and capsules
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
40 gpd — Intermittent
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
675 gpd - Intermittent
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 439, Subcategory D
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SW -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
IM

Facility Name: City of Wilson Page 10 of 12
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp.
Address: 2401 Wilson Boulevard
Wilson, NC 27893
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Processing of pork bellies into bacon. Processing consists of the injection of flavoring
and pickle solution, smoking utilizing smokehouses, slicing, and packaging.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Bacon
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
75,000 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
20,800 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? - No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR, Part 432, Subpart F; however, no pretreatment limits
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
No

Facility Name: City of Wilson Page 11 of 12
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: Sun River Services Corporation
Address: 2018 Beeler Road
Wilson, NC 27893
Item FA. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Processing of poultry, pork, and fish organs into pet food ingredients.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Pet Food Ingredients
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
27,200 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
4,000 gpd - Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards? - No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - N/A
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
IM.

Facility Name: City of Wilson
Permit Number: NC 0023906
Supplemental Application Information
Part F. Industrial User Discharges (Significant Industrial User Information)
Page 12 of 12
Item F.3. Significant Industrial User Information - (Provide the name and address of each SIU
discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary.)
Name: United Technologies Systems/Kidde Aerospace and Defense
Address: 4200 Airport Drive
Wilson, NC 27896-9643
Item F.4. Industrial Processes - (Describe all of the industrial processes and raw materials that
affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Manufacturing and servicing of fire detection and fire suppression systems for
commercial and military aircraft. The following processes are utilized: degreasing,
anodizing, and phosphotizing.
Item F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s) - (Describe all of the principal processes
and raw material that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.)
Principal Product(s): Smoke detectors, heat sensors, flame detectors, electronic
control units and fire extinguishing systems for aircraft and
military vehicles.
Raw Material(s): Too numerous to list
Item F.6. Flow Rate
a. Process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of process
wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and
whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
8,115 gpd — Continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate - (Indicate the average daily volume of
non -process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.)
15,040 gpd — Continuous
Item F.7. Pretreatment Standards - (Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following)
a. Local Limits? - Yes
e. Categorical pretreatment standards? - Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
subcategory? - 40 CFR Part 433, Subcategory A
Item F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to the Waste Discharged by the SIU -
(Ilas the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the
treatment works in the past three years?)
IM

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906
Renewal
Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS *Not Applicable*
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G. *Not Applicable*
GA. System Map. Provide a map indicating the followng: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or w a separate drawing. of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined server system.
c. Locations of ir0ine and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge ooint.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Ouffall number NA
b. Location NA NA
(City or town, If applicable) (Zip Code)
NA NA
(County) (State)
NA NA
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) NA ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) NA ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO? *Not Applicable*
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year? NA
GA. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
NA events (F_] actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event
NA hours (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 41 of 42

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Wilson - Hominy Creek WRF, NCO023906 Renewal Neuse
C. Give the average volume per CSO event
NA million gallons actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
NA Inches of rainfall
G.S. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water.
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forts 7550-6 & 7550-22, Page 42 of 42

END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510.2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fom 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 43 of 42

f i YfTfl�fl; uV►CUJ Dlu 13 ad WJa
HOMINY CREEK WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
Biosolids generated at the Hominy Creek facility are stabilized to a Class B residual by
anaerobic digesters or to a Class A residual by an alkaline sludge stabilization process
prior to disposal by land application or disposal to a regional compost facility.
Anaerobically digested sludge (ADS) is pumped from the sludge holding tanks and
conveyed to two (2) belt filter presses (BFP) located in the dewatering building. Liquid
polymer feed facilities provide effective dewatering of the ADS. Dewatered sludge is
discharged from the BFP directly onto a conveyor belt and then to the sludge storage pad
or to the alkaline stabilization facility. The dewatered sludge cake has a solid
concentration of 20 to 25 percent.
Alkaline stabilization is provided in order to produce a Class A biosolids product under
the 40 CFR Part 503 sewage sludge regulations. A series of conveyors deliver the
dewatered sludge cake to the alkaline stabilization facility. Lime and supplemental heat
are added to the sludge cake in a lime -sludge blender to raise the temperature and adjust
the pH. Supplemental heat is added to boost the temperature to pasteurization levels.
Temperature is maintained at or above pasteurization temperature levels during passage
through a plug flow pasteurization vessel conveyor. Lime is stored in a 66-ton lime silo.
Dewatered and stabilized biosolids are land applied to permitted privately -owned
farmland or transported to a privately -owned composting facility. A 32,000 sq. ft.
covered storage pad provides storage for periods when solids cannot be land applied.
Granville Farms, Inc operates the City of Wilson land application program. The program
requires full time operation,^rmally 5 to 6 days per week and 8 to 12 hours per day.
Jimmy Prid9fn
Water Recla#iattnt Facility Manager
(Rev. 11-2018)