Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150180 Ver 1_401 Application_2015021520 50 Environments Consultants, 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Smte 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone (919) 846 -5900 sandec com To US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Attn David Bailey 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 From Kevin C Martin Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Re High Point University, Centennial Square High Point, Guilford County, NC February, 11 th, 2015 S &EC Project # 12466 NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitttng'Urnt Attn Karen Higgins Archdale Budding — gth Floor 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 On behalf of the applicant, High Point University (Attn Stephen Potter) please find attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U S Army Corps of Engineers that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 18 (impact S3) & 39 (Impacts S1 and S2), a request for approval to utilize general water quality certification 3890 to the N C Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), and a request for an associated buffer authorization from the City of High Point The proposed road crossing to provide the students residing in Centennial Square II a direct route to access university amenities as well as the new parking lot (Impacts S -1, S -2, & B -1) The road widening impact is so the radius can be increased to allow for delivery trucks to adequately maneuver the turn (Impacts S -3 & B -2) The widening is within the 100 year floodplam Please contact me at (919) 270 -7941 if you have any questions or require additional information PR0.IFr:T Rf IMMARY Project Name Centennial Square Project Type University Campus Owner / Applicant High Point University County Guilford Nearest Town High Point Waterbody Name UT Boulding Branch Basin Cape Fear stream index 17 -3 -2 Class WS -IV, NSW IMPACT SUMMARY (see PCN form & Impact Mans for Buffer impact nuanfitiasl Stream Impact (acres) 00128 Welland Impact (acres) 00 Open Water Impact (acres) 0 Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres) 00128 Total Stream Impact (linear feet) 146 Attachments Pre - construction Notification (PCN) Application Form Preliminary JD Request Form (with aquatic resource table) Site Plan /Impact Exhibits (4 pages) FEMA FIRM panel Google Earth Aerial Wetland & Stream Survey cc (via email) Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston -Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs City of High Point Terry Kuneff (Engineering) DWR & High Point Only (USACE previously received) GIS info USGS and Soil Survey Map Site Photos Owner certification /Agent Authorization Upland data form Wetland data form Aerial Photo with topo NC Stream form for linear wetland NC Stream Form for Stream 1 (perennial) NC Certificate of Training (Kevin Martin) E WAIF Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 14 January 2009 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing la Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 18 & 39 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse 1 © Yes ❑ No 1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express © Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes © No If Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mdigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h below ❑Yes ®No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a Name of project High Point University Centennial Square II 2b County Guilford 2c Nearest municipality / town High Point 2d Subdivision name NA 2e NCDOT only, T I P or state project no 3. Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed High Point University 3b Deed Book and Page No 7801402667 (PIN) 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) Steven Potter 3d Street address site 814 East Farnss Ave (mailing 833 Montlieu Ave ) 3e City, state, zip High Point, INC 27262 3f Telephone no 3g Fax no 3h Email address Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 a. A pucant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ® Agent ❑ Other, specify 4b Name 4c Business name (if applicable) 4d Street address 4e City, state, zip 4f Telephone no 4g Fax no 4h Email address 5. AgenUConsultant Infonnation (if applicable) 5a Nlhca artin 5b Bame ironmental Consultants, PA �(ile) 5c Sress of Neuse Rd , Unit 104 5d Czip C 27615 E919-846-9467 5e T no 941 5f F 467 5g Eess andec corn Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property Identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 7801402667 1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) Latitude 35 9738 Longitude -79 99918 1c Property size 435 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project Boulding Branch 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water WS -IV, NSW (stream index 17 -3 -2 2c River basin Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application Existing residential area with remainder, wooded, and surrounded by the existing High Point University facilities 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 0366 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 744 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project To allow students residing in Centennial Square II a direct route to new amenities being constructed amenities as well as the new parking lot 3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used Typical construction equipment for road construction, See Addendum B3d &e and D1 for more details 4. Jurisdictional Determinations N Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments preliminary JD requested with this application 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? © Preliminary ❑ Final 4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company S &EC, PA Name (if known) Kevin Martin Other 4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation On -site meeting with David Bailey of the USACE on 12/9/2014 On 11/7/13 Brian Sullivan and Scoff Ford from High Point evaluated the site for the stream buffer start point 5. Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the pasty ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown 5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions According to records search by David Batley of the USACE there have been no prebious permits issued for High Point University 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes Q No 6b If yes, explain EE Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary 1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area Impacted 2a Wetland Impact number Permanent (P) or —Temporary T 2b Type of Impact 2c Type of wetland 2d Forested 2e Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f Area of impact (acres) W1 Choose one Choose one Yes /No - W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No - 2g Total Wetland Impacts: 2h Comments 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or Intermittent stream Impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites Impacted 3a Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b Type of impact 3c Stream name 3d Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e Type of jurisdiction 3f Average stream width (feet) 3g Impact length (linear feet) S1 P Culvert UT Boulding Branch PER Corps 4 116 S2 P Stabilization UT Boulding Branch PER Corps 45 10 S3 P Culvert UT Boulding Branch PER Corps 2 5 20 S4 Choose one S5 Choose one S6 Choose one _ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 146 31 Comments Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 Page 5 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) —Temporary type 01 Choose one Choose 02 - Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f Total open water impacts 4g Comments 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland purpose of pond (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f Total: 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? E] Yes E] No If yes, permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5j Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a Project is in which protected basin? Neuse C] Tar - Pamlico [] Catawba [] Randleman ® Other Jordan 6b Buffer Impact 6c Reason for impact 6d Stream name 6e Buffer 6f Zone 1_ 6g Zone 2 number – Permanent (P) or mitigation impact impact Temporary required? (square (square feet ) feet B1 P Road Crossing UT Boulding Branch No 7,287 4,272 B2 P Road Widening UT Boulding Branch No 2,042 545 B3 - Yes /No B4 Yes /No B5 Yes /No B6 - Yes /No 6h Total Buffer Impacts. 9,329 4,817 61 Comments Page 5 of 10 D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts In designing project The proposed route has a perpendicular crossing (Impacts S -1, S -2, & B -1) In addition, headwalls are being utilized on both ends of the pipe to minimize the length of impacts, see Addendum Bad &e and D1 for more details 1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques In keeping with recent Corps interpretations, the rock energy dissipater will be constructed such that the post - construction top elevation of it does not exceed the elevation of the existing stream bed We have been advised that this would be considered by the Corps as an impact but not a permanent loss of stream and there fore they would not require mitigation for such impacts Head wails /retaining walls are also utilized on the road crossing to minimize the length of stream Impact 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State 12a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for I I—] Yes ❑X No I Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2b If yes, mitigation Is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Mitigation bank project? ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Choose one Type Choose one Type Choose one Quantity Quantity Quantity 3c Comments 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from In -lieu fee program Is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature Choose one 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation Yes ® No 6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required 6c 6d 6e Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 15 6f Total buffer mitigation required: 6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? F © Yes ❑ No lb If yes, then Is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why Stormwater management plan to be approved by the city of High Point ❑ Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project? 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plans 1 ❑x Yes ❑ No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan The stormwater plan will be reviewed and approved by the City of High Point Approximate BMP locations are shown on the plans submitted with this application 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this Droiect? 3b Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply) 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review High Point High Point © Phase II ® NSW ®USMP Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other ❑ Yes © No ❑Coastal counties 4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply) ❑ ❑Session Law 2006 -246 []Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been --l- 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑X No Q Yes ❑ No © Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the use of public (federal /state) land? ❑ Yes © No lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application? I ❑ Yes n No I 2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes additional development, which could Impact nearby downstream water quality? Q No 3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative Impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2 1 The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative Impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations Centennial Square is a redevelopment of an existing developed site 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility Connection to municipal sewer Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? ❑ Yes Q No 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts ❑ Yes ® No 5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted _ 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? 'Threatened /Endangered Species have not been identified within the project area via a NC- Natural Heritage Programs Data Search 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes Q No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? The NOAA Habitat Conservation /Habitat Protection National Marine Fish Service, Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project 7 Histonc or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in Yes ED No North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources? Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed No structures were observed during the wetland evaluation and no structures are identified on the NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service within the project area 18. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑X Yes ❑ No 8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements Road crossings are allowed within floodplains, the city of High Point administers the flood plain ordinances in this area and will be required to approve these plans Only the impact associated with the widening of the existing road is within the 100 year floodplain The new proposed crossing is outside the 100 year floodplain 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA firm Panels and Wake county GIS (copies attached) C; AL AINI Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided ) Page 10 of 10 zliilis Date ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Kevin C Martin, SBEC, PA, 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 814 East Farnss Ave, High Point, NC (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State NC County /parish /borough Guilford City High Point Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 972896 °N, Long -79999643 ow Universal Transverse Mercator Name of nearest waterbody Boulding Branch Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area Non - wetland waters 744 linear feet vanes 2 to 5 width (ft) and /or acres Cowardin Class Stream Flow Perennial Wetlands 00366 acres Cowardin Class headwater Forest Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters Tidal Non -Tidal E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date W] Field Determination Date(s) 12/9/2014 SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): 0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant Survey & Impact maps/site plans by Jamestown Engmeenng ❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the app nt/consultant Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps ❑ Corps navigable waters' study ❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas ❑ USGS NHD data ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑✓ U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name High Point East, 1° =2000' ❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Guilford County Soil Survey ❑ National wetlands Inventory map(s) Cite name ❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s) ❑✓ FEMA/FIRM maps 37107801001 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is 8351' (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑✓ Photographs ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date) Google Earth 4/5/2013 ❑ Other (Name & Date) ❑ Previous determinations) File no and date of response letter ❑ Other information (please specify) 2 or I The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time 2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C F R 331 5(a)(2)) If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later *urisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) rd Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Aquatic Resource Tahle te Latitude Longitude Cowardin Estimated amount of aquatic resource in Class of aquatic mber Class resource Lwe:tl review area ar 35 971266 -79999218 PEM29 0 0025 acre Non - section 10 —tidal and Linear wetland 35 972386 -79999226 R3UB2 402 linear feet Non - section 10 — non- wetland stream W2 35 972557 -79999214 PFOI A 0032 acre non - section 10 — wetland W 1 35 972660 -79999230 PFOI A 0 031 acre non - section 10 — wetland S2 35 973090 -79999233 R3UB2 342 linear feet Non - section 10 — non- wetland stream Environmental Consultants, 9412 h &; of Neuce Road, Cutte IIM Raleigh, :Vf: 27615 • Phme (919) 946- 59411) under CAM PR®PERTV OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION Project Name /Description. Excel Center /Centennial Square 11 Stream lmprov S &EC Project # 12466 Date: November 14.2014 The Department of the Army U.S Ann), Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn David Bailey Field Office. Raleil' i I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project. NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting pnor to visiting the site. PARCEL INFORMATION Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN) 0190072 (pin 7g 1402667) Site Address _814 i; Earriss Avenue _ Cit,., County, State _High Point Guilford Gounh, NC PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION High Point University 833 Mlontlieu Ave High Point, NC 27262 -, --SIC phen Potter _ _November 14,,,1 014 Property Owner (please print) Date Property Owheir Signature We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Home County Home MdDS Tax Debt Home Tax Bills Record Card Tax Rates Search Results New Search Property Search Go Guilford County Real Property Data Property Summary Data last updated on: 11/15/2014 Ownership current as of- 11/13/2014 Parcel Number 0190072 PIN # 780140 2667 Location Address Property Owner HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY Owner'; Mailing Address Property Location Address 833 MONTLIEU AVE 814 E FARRISS AVE HIGH POINT NC 27262 Administrative Data Transfer Information Property Value Map# CS 7801.00 7801819 Deed Date Deed Book 01/15/2010 Total Appraised Land Value $22,60 Township p HIGH POINT Deed Page 007093 Total Appraised Building Value $449,30 Planning Jurisdiction HIGH POIN7 Revenue Stamps 01102 Total Appraised Outbuilding Value City Fire District High Point Package Sale Date 0.00 Total Appraised Value $471,90 Package Sale Price Spec District 1 Land Sale Date Spec District 2 Land Sale Price Other Exemptions $471,90 Land Class RESIDENTIAL History Parcel Number 1 Improvement Summary History Parcel Number 2 Use Value Deferred Acreage 1 0 Historic Value Deferred Permit Date Total Living Area 13,077 Total Deferred Value Permit # otalAssessed Value Per North Carolina General Statute 105- 285 -287 (d), all real property in North Carolina is subject to listing and valuation annually as it exists on January 1 Real Property assessments are based on market values as of the date of the last countywide reappraisal in 2012 Prints best in landscape mode Sunday, November 16, 2014 ^ �850 -'r pl* Ig Poin Uni E%Wuabon Area /'0 BARBEE AVE wi L L.0 W, P L 0 150 300 600 goo - 1.200 IN Pt 5-6; Guilford County. NC Soil Ik Environmental Consultants, PA I'- 30a 5ource: ----------- --------------- _ ------- - ----' - --`` �` �♦,` - {- --------- ------------------ ., \, -------------------------- - - - -- _ \` ; -.1 ; - -- -__`----------- R- , --- - - - - -- - If `�\ 1 i ; i I' 1 i t i , +I �- ``1 i ly i •!!y `� /.' i l7 Y 1•' I , I ! 1 I ' 1 ' ' I I / i• ` ::9991.7,11 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet., S& EC ���� �"�_ •` _ �: �� `� u rt; - � �' ,� �\ t` GRID NORTH kLE 1" = 600' (1 : 6,000) 250 300 750 1,0n0 FEET METERS PANEL 7801J FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NORTH CAROLINA PANEL 7801 (BEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX GUILFORD COUNTY 370111 7801 HIGH POINT, CITY OF 370113 7801 ,I Nahoe to Cher. The Map Number moM oetow etlould be UW Minn p19-9 map omen. me Communtty Nurnear W— above M IC be M.0 on Ir SuM— 40—fl— to Iar the .011" I u,dy EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER JUNE 18, 2007 3710780100J tAay State of North Carolina Federal Emergency Management Agency This K an t31M1c121 copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was extracttsd using F-MfT On -Une. This map does not reflect changes Or amendmeton which may have been made subsequent to the date on the 80*001 o, JOINS PANEL 7800 title dock. For the latest product InAm., ation about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mec.tema.g, ". 41- S.6 a JL I ;ll Ilk t AI q4 1) r eY. Ilk - ,, 4pr o i- IV 'fat AL tv l2i\ Ac ;�t:y. - ��,TS. y��`� ,e V is IF, A ; 4V I Ac c ♦ \ 'Y ) y .ice � ,..,�+ ry 5 � \.� r'}"�1' �=�t • . Y �� � _ Nom.,., '' `��� ' •�. .� _7�.�����e� ' I (.�•� � �_ Y �;�y.{ �.•� =• .i�� J � �> +�.5" � ' ,Y {� � � _ -�*_•c -mss R \Y � j~y -•��S t��.�,. -�,', I � !. y � /,may � \ "�1 • mod. A '`^'l• _' -� . Ado lid SL �`� � `, � ♦gyp y1kS•` k'\ *� \'.� •� `?� ��. , V411 ZI, \ ON, .„' � a .\ a c w \ ♦ " Al • .$ . ♦ _' or ;S t r _ ,, �j w 4 „�'�,y '` �' "1 ' "'• .. — ..r+' ' ' s.... +y '.. ice:_.. , _ t roe AQV r , AAW IBC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and [� Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 S Lrj - ewr w L , ate - NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 -1; e�!, ,;-4- j`� rVtA,4ctAf- Date: t Absent Project/Site� ,� Latitude: j� Evaluator: . � N�-- � l` _ s� t% County. `�}� Longitude: �6� Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent , Stream Determination (circle one Other r - d2 19 or erennral rI z 30' Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name. A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Stro 18 Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 1 3 3 In- channel structure ex nffle -pool, step -pool, 2 3 n le- ool se uence 0 l 2 3 4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 5 Active /relict floodplam 0 1, 2 2 3 6 Depositional bars or benches 1 3 7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9 Grade control 0� 05 2 1 3 10 Natural valley 0 05 1 15 11 Second or greater order channel No 0 1 5 artificial ditches are not rated, see di cussi ®ns in manual Yes = 3 B -Hydrology Subtotal = , c 12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 i 2 Leaf litter 15 1 5 3 15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 [14 16 Organic debns Imes or piles 0 0 5 1 1 15 17 Soil -based evidence of high w- ater table? No = 0 1 5 C Biology Subtotal = Yes 3 18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) p 1 0 21 Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22 Fish 0/ 0 5 2 1 3 1 5 23 Crayfish 0 05 1 15 24 Amphibians 0 1 25 Algae 0 5 1 15 26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other 15 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual Notes Sketch V�L� � �,r�� I� = V%' 41 V� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site 814 E Farnss Ave /count cit High Point/Guilford Applicant/Owner High Point University y y g Sampling Date 11/11/14 State NC Sampling Point near fig 7 Investigator(s) Kevin Martin Section, Township, Range Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) toe slope Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %) 2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA) P Lat 35 9739 N Long -79 99918 W Datum Sod Map Unit Name Enon NWI classification Are climatic / h drolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Sod �, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Sod �, or Hydrology D naturally problematic? tt (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations. transacts. imnnrtant faati orcc oto- Hydrophytic Vegetation Presents Yes �� No� Is the Sampled Area Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes = No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v t No= Remarks n T UKULU" Y Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) ❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑✓ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Saturation ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑✓ Drainage Patterns (610) (A3) ❑ Water Marks (B1) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) Inundation Visible ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) on Aerial Imagery (137) D Water - Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Fauna (1313) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ,❑Aquatic ❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes Q No 0 Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches) 8 Saturation Present? Yes [= includes capillary fringe) No= Depth (inches) 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L..L Non, Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants W L_ Sampling Point near fig 7 Tree Stratum (Plot size ) Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet ° Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y FAC+ Number of Dominant Species 7 2 Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A) 3 Platanus occidentalis 20 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata 8 (B) 4 5 Percent of Dominant Species 6 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 875 (A/B) 60 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet 50% of total cover 30 20% of total cover 12 Total % Cover of Multiply by Sapling Stratum (Plot size ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Platanus occidentalis 5 Y FACW FACW species x 2= 2 FAC species x 3 = 3 FACU species x 4 = 4 UPL species x 5 = 5 Column Totals (A) (B) 6 Prevalence Index = B/A = = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators 50% of total cover 20% of total cover ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 Ligustrum sinense 10 Y FAC ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0' 2 ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 4 ® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 5 6 'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 40 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata 50% of total cover 20 20% of total cover 8 Herb Stratum (Plot size ) Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody canes, 1 Eulalia ylminea 30 Y FAC+ approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) 2 3 Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 4 than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH 5 Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 6 approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including 8 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody 9 plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height 10 11 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 15 20% of total cover 6 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC 2 Hedera helix 10 Y FACU 3 4 5 1 5 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation n 50% of total cover 7 5 20% of total cover 3 Present? Yes No Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VA_ ne r 'vim Sampling Point Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators ) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Tyae Loci Texture Remarks 0 -2 10YR 4/3 100 SL 2 -14 2 5Y 411 93 7 5YR 4/6 7 C PL CL Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix iH�ydric Soil Indicators- Indicators for Problematic Hydric So1Is3 LJ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) D Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148 ) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loam Gle ed Matrix F2 ❑ y Y ( ) ❑Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) ❑ Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) D Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) E3 Redox Depressions (F8) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Sandy MLRA 136) Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed) Type Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ProjecUSite 814 E Farriss Ave Applicant/Owner High Point University ary/county High Point/Guilford Sampling Date 11/11/14 State NC Sampling Point near flg 7 Investigators) Kevin Martin Section, Township, Range Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Subregion (LRR or MLRA) P Lat 35 9739 N Long -79 99918 W Sod Map Unit Name Enon NWI classification _ Are climatic/ hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes i v t No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Sod �, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Are Ve etation S I ❑ Slope ( %) 7 Datum Yes= No= U of , or Hydrology naturally problematic? N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations. transects- irnnnrtant fpat, orac ot," Hydrophytic Vegetation Presents Yes 0 No � Is the Sampled Area ❑ Hydnc Sod Present? Yes LLf No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓ Wetand Hydrology Present? Yes No. _7 L n r urcvwu r Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) D Surface Sod Cracks (66) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) p Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) p Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) p Inundation Visible ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Shallow Aguitard (D3) nAquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (134) ❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes Q No 0 Depth (inches) � 18 Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ' Depth (inches) > 18 includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No El Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants U, � L Sampling Point near fig 7 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size ) 1 liquidambar styraciflua % Cover Species? 20 Y Status FAC+ Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A) 2 Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC 3 Quercus phellos 20 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 5 Species Across All Strata (B) 4 5 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 60 (A/B) 6 60 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet Cover of Multiply by 50% of total cover 30 20% of total cover 12 Total °% OBL species x 1 = Sapling Stratum (Plot size ) FACW species x 2 = 1 2 FAC species x 3 = 3 FACU species x 4 = 4 UPL species x 5 = 5 Column Totals (A) (B) 6 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) 1 Bambusa vulgans 40 Y FACU 2 3 4 5 6 40 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20 20% of total cover 8 Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 Lonicera japonica 5 N FAC - 2 Hedera helix 70 Y FACU 3 4 5 Remarks (Include Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0' p 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ElProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydrnc sod and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover 37 5 20% of total cover 15 Present? Yes n No= rs here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 SOIL 4"Mfi r Camnimn Dn,nr IA' / Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators ) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 -5 10YR 5/4 100 SL 5 -14 7 5YR 6/8 100 CL 'Type C= Concentration, D =De lehon, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydnc Sod Indicators ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods3 ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) ❑ Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Thick Dark Surface ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) (Al2) D Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) ❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Soils Flood lain F19 p ( )(MLRA 148) of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) .❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed) Type Depth (inches) Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 11 � 17 ivy; 0WQ Strepin Identification Form Version 4.11 V\eQ j QZ- 4�ufL -V ' a Date ` ( 13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 14 Leaf litter 15 Sediment on plants or debris 16 Organic debris lines or piles 17 Soil -based evidence of high water table? S 3 3 Pro�ect/Site �<<S �', U ° d Latitude "4 Evaluator. e U c Y� % l d , 1 County �w � Longitude -7 Total Points: Stream �s at least intermdtent S 1 Stream Determination (cir j Other ' 'r '�G d 2 19 or Perennial d a 30' b 1 Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e g Quad Name. o�e d T (_ ftveomor ho lo (Subtotal= L r Contmuty of channel bed and bank 2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, n le- of se uence Absent 0 0 0 Weak 1 1 Moderate 2 2 G 13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 14 Leaf litter 15 Sediment on plants or debris 16 Organic debris lines or piles 17 Soil -based evidence of high water table? S 3 3 2 0 5 1 1 Yes 3 4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 5 Active /relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3 3 9 Grade control 0 0 5 1 15 10 Natural valley 0 05 1 1 5 11 Second or greater order channel No 0 Yes = 3 e 9ItffiCIA1 riitchac nro nnf —4e.l .. .....,,...__.__ B Hydrology (Subtotal = 5 ) 12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 14 Leaf litter 15 Sediment on plants or debris 16 Organic debris lines or piles 17 Soil -based evidence of high water table? 0 1 1 5 1 0 5 0 6_5 No = 0 2 0 5 1 1 Yes 3 0 15 1 5 3 41 i "all OA Certificatenuober': ° yv'5341{J08 I-V WE IMPACTS S -3 & 8 -2 Wetland & Stream Impact Map OVERALL SITE PLAN CENTENNIAL SQUARE II IE�iK-FARK. CROSSING y' r " _ _ yI CITY OF HIGH POINT I `� ,_ �►lI � A== � � •, J'f IGUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ��~ ��t\ - J`�i: , i �, �- . �i ► =- -` —_ ` - '1' i � r+ k ,/ ,r / _ i "_- '/. - _- , `fir f "�' / � - u�/ �s�� ° � - 1, r ' `' 4 � ' t/' r � ` ��' t�,''t, `\ e�" � f � � � " .�� • "i � � - "`� i r ! r , / l � \ ' �, � ; .. Q 4%,44"'RdAo ' tr' ' + % ' n. �' _ � .j��t ./. / 5 r I ( I -A ;1�1 WIc�1 „(SDID; N �� a,rl;,f: Y �,`, �i,, ; �''�, ; r� �1� �� /• kv ,Ift it I -AV f , lf t •� t � /. ”, r t 7 it '� ��j�= ��''. °`,1; jlli; < / /� t „ ; „� f % /';`,� ;�I;;'S},(( /• L�.''`1tr ,,{ ,t, , =r'/ �; �'�•'� jam" EXISTING PARKING LOT I..' " �1i \ �/ �\ v � 1'tfl ' 1J�rI 1. /y1 \ t� !t ,t r.lt -`` ( ✓� `l� , i,1 ,, ,} j / � �;t {! 1 , � i . / f r .�.i k ' /_� /�{ v ' ' /�/ t `i It'i`��Iri•HI ��d1 �7t,'`i �lJti t�`Y�'"" t` ° -t\'J3 I {1' ,t! ! 4r.1 t ITS �1 \1, (�`f, ^�3 f/ O�� • \\ , _ I � ,11 , 1 ',ll '► i '� k)1 ! its ; r r ti ,�i � � _ •'111', _ )' !� 'fi ;;t`` �- � : t� ,� � \ � !II ,ji,l � ��'1, � . � ..; `. �� It `, 1�1 '�t4 1 t L t f y• 11 1 u `� +� � z . \�` / ry�i � \s�jt l 'i`t{ ri {' tlr, r++ kt'; { flt•li � I r:—�- ^J` S� i°t" , of { i k1 `� -t. _! /•J `` , I l' 71�`ip X11 , j�'r •[' � � � � 1 ti �� , � %` r � r J� �fi�t�` +\ 77•'�s1�r\��.G�1�J 1 � r / J� � � � ��� ^~� � \ � `per.. _ / ` -� �� _ z't � `�`�y` � '.�' .'/ i� `� -� j ✓.,, / le t • ; _ __ ) �c 'fir �' * �' %� „ ; 12V 60' 0 IV, 240' 360' AS Al SCALE: 1 " = 120' w. IV [,as PAN .w ide oy a 61 No ■■ u_ i jjj m-ma■ moan Room Boom 0 RA g ■■ ■■ No FU Wetland & Stream Impact Map IMPACT S -3 & B -2 CENTENNIAL SQUARE II CROSSING CITY OF HIGH POINT GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLI 20' 0 20' 40' mommm SCALE: 1 " = 20' N � E_ X SJREAM TOP OF �I I FAR�ISS AVE. _3 NI1 _ STR IMPACT: x I P POSE, 0 L.F. I CONVERT EX. Cl CURB GUTTER �, TO DMH END OF EX. 24" RCP AD OP ® �® 4 B -2 B R IMPACTS ®r qp ZONE I: 2,042 SF /i ' ` / ®�� y, ONE 2: 545 SF NEW / \ \ ®A44, l CI #1 \ I it \\ /0 SILT ENCE \ / (•) Ill - -_ -- I 4,11 �r 0 �1 I I� �Op4a� ` - -- 1 I Vj -AW I"— I-" I Ld UJ 1f'II1Tm . 8S �_ rs TO 1) Z O so w N I c ./1 t r-.r COPPER COATED ROD #1507 7l / t-f 001, 1 NOV. 23, 2007 GPS 1110, • .� ��6`. NAD83 — SPC (320ONC) COORDS 200' 100' 0 200' 400' SCALE: 1" = 200' NX i Point Northing Easting 1507 810,446.35' 1,705,189.98' OMBINED FACTOR 0 9999148 'i r' - y Wetland Delineation Survey For HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY Sheet 1 of 5 HIGH POINT TOWNSHIP — GUILFORD COUNTY HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NUMBER 2014115 January 20152 0 1 5 0 1 8 P` Z 0 SITE .o HIGH POINT N 9y UNIVERSITY N Ni .tk,�Sl VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE A ONTROL POINT #27763 "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the GROUND COORDINATES boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Point Northing Eastin as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a 9 g change in the law or our published regulations, this determination 27763 809,929 41' 1,704,311 16' of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Monu " MAD(Regulatory Official) v ioN (Title) p15 � gEAL (Date) FEB ' L,g3b6 O y OUR1NG (USACE Action ID No.: MIS .A ,tip UR 4U� 13 "9►,� JAMESTOWN ENGINEERI ROUP, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5 117 EAST MAIN STREET 20t� P.O. BOX 365 JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 Er Telephone (336) 886 -5523 C -0626 Job No. 2014 -115 F r v ` Wetland Delineation Survey For lot MIME" afto ftmft �° �- = = — HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY NNIAI S'mt IMP ®� TOP FRBA -- — — _ — 1 \I �E J� Sheet 2 of 5 ft& -� " -IS ®� HIGH POINT TOWNSHIP - GUILFORD COUNTY AST � � ��� � °` � r -- -- -- 90 HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NUMBER 2014115 _ — ,� e�► / - -� / - ' `®° �_ January 2015 ® _ J - 40' 30' 20' 10' 0 40' 80' 7646 SCALE: 1"=40P At "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the Jo 6,g "1 J TI ; \ a I ' _ `- boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act �, as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a e _ _ change in the law or our published regulations, this determination �s, ��� �J- id, y \ 556.3 ! r /�, _ _ - _ of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to \ , ,_ , . - — ` _ _ ' �i ',' exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed '�765Y e1 '�� this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual " It, / r1j!- 41. - = -� - #7g07 - - - - - - (Regulatory Official) (Title) (Date) -ei, 41 11 - � , � y - _ -_ -- - - (USACE Action ID No.: t so C. ' \S'TR A' #2, �\ ` ` - -- l - -- - - _ _ SEAL \ �E`Nt�T'H ' '' ' �\ i cp /, f I . ' �j ` , _ - - " /' `ss�a SU 0 Rif IN v �fi !r �Ci FEB Y1 2015 t / RC �i ��!! 1 `' /; `', /�,' / - " -- JAMESTOWN ENGINEE e� - -' 4�;ir, 4Cl f / , ( ./J - ! CONSULTING E VEERS '� ��r ��/�6 #. J�RCI / r / { /" / / , - I �� F i / ' / *� rct 117 EAST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 365 p ' ' r i I ' - r j _ I I �a9 ► ) 'j , I ,' ` JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 Telephone (336) 886-5523 tnc ;SH E#3 c —os2s Q Job No. 2014 -115 1, SHEET #2 SEE Wetland Delineation Survey For HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY 4v \ \ �\ gb to -pM H; i W �' , tK Sheet 3 of 5 ( HIGH POINT TOWNSHIP - GUILFORD COUNTY 4 ` `1 a '01,4 �d 8 E89LZ J 1 HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA i276�� 12 It k if c°v 1 i , I 1 ( JOB NUMBER 2014115 11\' 27693 101nk flag January 2015 gs� Q—; a E+ ' ({ ` i -A I L 3 6 ( ao' so' 20' 10' o �. I g89i i S6 1 ao �1_� Lr4 27692 11 -ST P CH L4 7�9 /nk k 1-1 3 1 SCALE: 1"=40' iL4 5,, tt4 60 j >Iwd L 1,8912 lam' -S'2 ( This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the 7j0� l } 't \ 9� 96912 Cry boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act 704 Q!_�l t i ,-+C2 1112 as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a �; () (� . ' -'� ;_ ; ; �69L2 change in the law or our published regulations, this determination 1 t ;, 1 . {f ��.` �ilq_ 27705 dl , (� (✓ 27691 12 pi k flag of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for period not to �// +1..:' �� :' '� WETLAND T ' ' g0 L' 12 ��, 1-5t�1 ( ' ; ; , � U_ 1-111 ' j Y P P I i�,l�: �, !' �; = P l , << 7706 6' cl I , ' I '9 8692 exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed I; r,l � ,' AREA' = ,,14f q. t 1 t 493 'y I ,� \ \ )�_ S �11p this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to 1,l `yi�,d� E�flLGZ �9, X7714, 6'- r;l i ' \ ` ` 66 [z i the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." 11 1� i i 4 }lrt,�0t[,L9 P7 1Sli t \ , o, \\ (Regulatory Official) 4 9 LZ DD t 1-5 X2771 `''Clt ( I 6n1� xuid 9 SS o I ``� \ 1 / % / ' /,6 4f -ct ) ` ( '` L42 L41 L40L39 \ (Title) t r' ' / f j7j'17 y "L/ l ) 9ggL N� cow 27690 13 pink lag 7)718 5'- t' / ' (i . 3 11,5 � akp \\ (Date) 1-5 � � N 146 � D 5;; Fc) I c��� �s g \ (USACE Action ID No.: t + L47 �� �, \ LEGEND 1 2015 �• ,� _ - / \ \ '` \ ! \ 1 to 271721'4 ct 87g22i 4' Cl , INSET 'A' < StRE'AMI �11 III IJt 7723 a'_� r ' (; WETLAND POCKET #1 `.LENGTH $ 4 ' I i N , �' ,' c� , AREA = 1,342 Sq. Ft. ) r 1 ' Z772f4 3 r ` 20' 0 20' 40 tt25I 4' `C , t I r I �27172(i 4 r trr +f j t) J SCALE: 1" = 20' .27727,E 4'fc� a7728, 4' -El 2772'33 -1 I Z773pct�jt� ` P -7731 2 t ) �2 733 3,f6l \ t 17n'5121 3 4 L3� -ct' i 1 c1 79 Alt b,,c� 6+ 77� 781 7411 4'Lci1 1 I 1 LTl7�I 2 k 4'''ci 'L8 X774!3 4 1745 "3,-9-i 47 46' 4y -fl / ) 1-8 tk7747 3'-Cl J' ) a�A (UTZp� 3' - Cl CENTERLINE OF STREAM 3' IN WIDTH DENR - WATER RESOURCES 4018, BUFFER P&-tmITTiNG 2'W LW 2 FOOT WiDE LINEAR WETLAND o EIP EXISTING IRON PIN FOUND OCM CONCRETE MONUMENT • NIP NEW IRON PiN SET oR /W DISK RIGHT OF WAY DISK (Z CENTERLINE 'PP POWER POLE R/W RIGHT -OF -WAY ,TP TELEPHONE POLE Sq Ft SQUARE FEET DS 'i„p LIGHT POLE DEED BOOK P B PLAT BOOK • POLE POLE P P POWER POLE [3CB CATCH BASIN RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE OGV GAS VALVE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE PDA QSSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROTECTED DRAINAGE AREA ELECTRICAL oco SEWER LINE CLEAN OUT E U E UTILITY EASEMENT OSDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE MBL MINIMUM BUILDING LINE E]YI YARD INLET M OCB CATCH BASIN Do 01 OHYD FIRE HYDRANT 01V WATER VALVE iE OWELL WELL Z o 3 JAMESTOWN ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS a F 117 EAST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 365 N LL JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 m L, Inc Telephone (336) 886 -5523 C -0626 Job No. 2014 -115 ' ' ( �EE ' SHEEP � ' , Lti r 7�47 3' -�� f ) �X ' ` I i ; I #! ', Ids 3, {�{ Wetland Delineation Survey For 7 L544§ t I 10 I , I ; t ► t' \ . L8 127751/4"-qt 150 �'-r6' IV I I ; ; ; I I " �- - HIGH POINT UNERSITY o yS • -t�ft, , , , i I ' 1 I I `� i r 1 ' r . Sheet 4 of 5 8E6IN\ �U'S iStOkAM As 7 ! I \ i \ �' i� i4 +cb' 00 CW) i ) _ t •0z,' ^ � 01 HIGH POINT TOWNSHIP — GUILFORD C OUNTY -Pt, HIGH POINT. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NUMBER 2014115 ➢NE��&l T4 p I o z ARE4' a January 2015 40' 30' 20' 10' 0 40' 80' \\ ! I I I I 4> do �9- LJ 9 �\ �$ 'koC? I t �,S'~ "I•. fi �; G SCALE: 1"=40' �L / 1� -,� 766 1 j i,q� =i��3•b � I`'f \ � l t ®! � , I � , '�,`,tr �� 'i :� f' "ri. 1r • `i y - '� ' This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act w 36e r / I , c; as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a -al ! I i I change in the law or our published regulations, this determination ; o i 1 < 1 I i t `n of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to i `O �' ° ' ' J # ' t ""n; exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed \ , ! 1 �t r + r r `' --J Jar" �p'0•( / y 1 r' r ' ;� • t t a this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." f \ \ I �/ \ \ `� t ,` \ \ \ s\ \ \ \ ` \ ``�- _ D�• -} / ' i I "� I (Regulatory Official) ,��o\ ;;A (Title) (Date) (USAGE Action ID No.: X89 t t _ \0� \\ `` •,ttt \',`1 '' �� \ 1 s t �� ` `�ltl,��t t `�ti _'���; 1`i�li•�, �/ ., // / ,� 9d #S� \V `-�-' -= _. , _ y _t �' i, % /. �. "` • - - �QrrE5sto s� SEAL 1-33AS 4tr 'y� {p q� I I su ae as D vt r• � JAMESTO WN ENGINEERING GROUP, UP, INC. ,6 " C.1 w L ­,4H-V CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4 �J 117 EAST MAIN STREET � -.-�;: j" ' %'ti • _ s / , ' i 4 P.O. BOX 365 M' �\Gq-- -C-eIs ' / ® t� , -� ; �\ ,' Er JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 m _ - " _ me Telephone (336) 886 -5523 �\ I �� t 1 \ \ 1 - %' .o '. ) ah'' - - C -0626 Job No. 2014 -115 Line Bearing Distance Line Bearing Distance B i Dit Wetland Delineation Survey For L1 S 18'- 40' -44" W 551, L61 S 19'- 09' -20" W 12 47' _ T F L3 S 50*- 5l' =20� W ' 2 56' 1' L63 S 15'-10'-28" W 17.29' , HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY L5 S 22'- 44' -31" W 118.32' L65 S 18'- 570' -23" W 819' Sheet 5 of 5 M L6 S 17'- 43' -59" W 9.91' L66 S 42'- 27' -20" W 10 97' co L7 S 33'- 15' -10" W 22 52' L67 S 24- 25' -25" W 7 16' L8 S 24'- 23' -04" £ 13.73' L68 S 11'- 45' -07" E 10 87' HIGH POINT TOWNSHIP — GUILFORD COUNTY L9 S 29'- 04' -21" E 14 75' L69 S 21'- 02' -39" E 4 34' HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA L10 S 47'- 30' -53" W 12 99' L70 S 50'- 45' -29" E 7 51' p L11 S 39'- 25' -54" W 7 37' L71 S 32'- 15' -45" E 4 74' JOB NUMBER 2014115 Z L12 S 50'- 53' -16" W 6 79' L72 S 9'- 12' -45" E 4 81' L13 S 51'- 55' -07" W 10 87' L73 S 2'- 15' -37" W 3.36' January 2015 L14 S 35'- 17' -46" W 14 49' L74 S 5'- 38' -01" E 8 92' '4 c� L15 S 10'- 02' -52" E 10.27' L75 S 31'- 18' -01" E 11.51' 100' S0' 0 100' 200' b L16 S 12'- 08' -27" E 11 16' L76 S 33'- 07' -27" E 7 34' L17 S 13'- 28' -16" W 816' L77 S 17'- 49' -50" E 5 07' L18 S 9'- 28' -34" W 20.02' L78 S 7'- 21' -58" W 9 59' SCALE' 1 " = 100' 1-19 S 4'- 06' -19" E 9 02' L79 S 20'- 01' -12" W 516' mid N 1-20 S 42'- 42' -39" E 12 57' 1-80 S 37'- 44' -33" W 4 92' "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the L21 S 41'- 20' -48" E 5 13' L81 S 21'- 32' -32" W 11.28' boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act L22 S 9'- 51' -55" W 1311' L82 S 0'- 39' -50" E 8 04' 1-23 S 25'- 43' -21� W 14 16' 1-83 S 5'- 00' -50" E g 31' as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a L24 S 31'- 00' -56 W 15 03' L84 S 7'- 07' -14" E 8 02• change in the law or our published regulations, this determination L25 S 21'- 32' -40" W 10 20' L85 S 27'- 34' -09" E 5 98' of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to �+ L26 S 16'- 09' -25" W 11 38' L86 S 40'- 14' -34" E 7 19' exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed L27 S 15'- 48' -46" W 10 50' L87 S 22'- 32' -26" E 5 07' this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to L28 S 17'- 38' -42" W 8 07' L88 S 5'- 27' -16" E 6 70' the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." L29 S 29'- 53' -23" W 8 35' L89 S 10'- 56' -18" W 4 21' L30 S 38'- 33' -48" W 6 87' L90 S 31'- 13' -27" W 5.16' (Regulatory Official) a L31 S 7'- 56' -24" E 8 68' L91 S 78'- 13' -31" W 3.55' L32 S O' -18 —26" W 5 07' L92 N 86'- 07' -54" W 4 41' L33 S 15'- 00' -39" E 2513' L93 S 0'- 27' -56" W 9 92' (Title) % L34 N 85'- 08' -55" E 13 84' L94 S 58'- 05' -39" E 9.64' .ties * L35 S 27'- 25' -08" E 14.29' L95 S 36'- 18' -59" E 5.41' (Dote) L36 S 6'- 44' -16" E 10 87' L96 N 12'- 38' -11" E 18.17' ^.� L37 S 15'- 22' -48" E 1611' L97 N 23'- 50' -32" E 9.06' (USACE Action ID No.: \ / L38 S W- 03' -47" E 2314' L98 N 18'- 22' -15" E 5.69' L39 N 79'- 11' -38" W 7 67' L99 N 42'- 06' -14" E 13 08' L40 S 81'- 03' -44" W 5 12' L100 N 40'- 57' -13" E 9.36' NOTES: p�tpi° 4 L41 N 80'- 29' -03" W 342' L101 N 7'- 27' -28" W 11 65' 1. CONTROL FOR THIS SITE ESTABLISHED BY GPS USING A TOPCON L42 N 42'- 59' -48" W 10 83' L109 N 21'- 59' -12" E 13 20' HIPER PLUS AND RESULTING NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY OPUS L43 N 12'- 03' -48" W 24 05' L110 N 21'- 24' -54" E 512' SOLUTIONS AND CONVENTIONAL TRAVERSE WITH TOPCON GTS -310 13� \ L44 N 10'- 41' -47" W 26.20' 1-111 N 2'- 28' -12" E 6 64' SERIES INTRUMENT. FIELD DATA ADJUSTED USING STAR *NET LEAST arm \ L45 N 62'- 58' -44" E 5 46' L112 N 7'- 44' -36" W 6 48' SQUARES ADJUSMENT. PROJECT AVERAGE COMBINED FACTOR OF r L46 S 16'- 43' -33" W 814' L113 N 26'- 37' -59" W 6.25' 0.9999148 USED. L47 S 13'- 03' -07" W 6 69' L48 S 22'- 35-59" W 6 94' 2. CONTROL POINT HELD FIXED FOR THIS SITE IS CONTROL IRON L49 S 2'- 43' -11" W 6 42' #1507. COORDINATES ESTABLISHED ON #1507 ARE FROM A 4 HOUR L50 S 15'- 30' -31" E 10.61' GPS SESSION ON NOV. 23, 2007, NORTHING = 810,446.35 FEET, L51 S 1'- 14' -04" E 8 59' EASTING = 1,705,189.98 FEET. STATE PLANE COORDINATES (3200 NC) L52 S 17'- 13' -33" E 13 76'� $ee ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE GROUND COORDINATES. L53 S 5'- 27' -14" W 6 70 Ra"eii 3. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS LIDAR AND WAS OBTAINED FROM L54 S 2'- 19' -20" W 7 68' �� THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WEBSITE. �►".,�° L55 S 21'- 24' -12" W 15.16' �o a na L56 S 3'- 36' -35" W 5 12' , @Q��.iQ e ar`-a" L57 S 16'- 28' -34" E 14 55' mW,d L58 S 11'- 00' -06" E 4 20' $Fl1`L D .� L59 S 15'- 09' -30" E 8 73' L.3u8 L60 S 9'- 27' -21" W 6.59' o — � � �� �yo y�� FEB 11'2015 g7m� n DENR -WATER RESOURCES 401 & BUFFER PERMITTING JAMESTOWN ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 117 EAST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 365 JAMESTOWN, N.C. 27282 m r Inc Telephone (336) 886 -5523 C -0626 Job No. 2014 -115