Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFW: Sassarixa Swamp MY 2 ReviewBaker, Caroline D From: Hamilton, Ryan Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 4:50 PM To: Baker, Caroline D Subject: FW: Sassarixa Swamp MY 2 Review Hi Caroline, Please file Laserfiche Upload: Email DWR#: 2019-0661 Doc Date:01/18/2023 Doc Type: Mitigation monitoring Report Review Doc Name: Same as email subject Thanks, Ryan Hamilton 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (704) 651-0357 Cell Location: 512 N. Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, NC 27604 ��D- E 6�yirar�ri a inMYorrwui Grh�� Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Hamilton, Ryan Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 4:49 PM To: Jason Lorch <jlorch@wildlandseng.com> Cc: Andrea Eckardt <aeckardt@wildlandseng.com>; Merritt, Katie <katie.merritt@ncdenr.gov> Subject: Sassarixa Swamp MY 2 Review Hi Jason, DWR has reviewed the Year 2 Monitoring Report for the Sassarixa Swamp Site. Comments on the report are provided as follows: 1. Supplemental planting over 5.4 acres of the site was conducted in February 2022. Neither the Year 1 report summary, the plot data collected in September of 2021, nor any comments from DWR review on the Year 1 report, suggested issues warranting the need to provide such extensive supplemental planting along T6. Additionally, there was not an Adaptive Management Plan submitted to DWR for review and approval. Explain why Wildlands was prompted to perform adaptive management and why Wildlands did not consult with DWR prior to implementation. 2. Extending comment #1: Based on plot data in the Yr 2 report along T6 (plots 16-19), performance standards exceeded 526-809 stems/acre for year 2. Plot data alone for Year 2, does not suggest poor performance of stems in this T6 tract area. Are the plots representative of the area around them? Did Wildlands plant inside the plots during their planting efforts in February 2022? 3. Extending comment #1: The parcel adaptive management section of the Yr 2 report states the additional stems from the Feb. 2022 replant, were planted across the T6 tract, but there were no figures included in the report showing the replant. Provide a clear map depicting where along the site Wildlands performed supplemental planting in 2022. Lastly, the provider is required to notify DWR of all adaptive management, including extensive supplemental planting efforts, and receive approval prior to implementation. Explain why Wildlands did not engage DWR on the supplemental planting effort prior to implementation. 4. Please provide more information on the proposed 8.1 acres of adaptive management proposed for Winter 2022-2023. This is a substantial supplemental planting effort, yet little was provided in the year 2 report explaining why Wildlands needs to replant (example: tree mortality, Encroachment, Cattle access, Fescue competition, ???). Additionally, the monitoring report says, "along various tributaries" and the maps do not provide any indication of planned adaptive management. Describe where the intended replanting effort will take place specifically, and provide an explanation as to why the replant is necessary considering the plot data is not supporting the need to replant? Include in your response, a detailed figure depicting anticipated areas for replanting. Any replant not necessary within the Bank's conservation easement boundary does not need to be depicted. 5. It is highly suggested that thinning of lobolly pine and sweet gums are included in the adaptive management plan, especially in plots 4,9 and 13, despite there not being issues with over -competition at this time. 6. DWR is also curious if similar issues are present within riparian restoration areas of the Sassarixa Swamp Phase I DMS Full Delivery site. Explain. 7. Vigor data is required for all plots and should be included in future monitoring reports. Once DWR receives a response to all comments above, DWR will consider issuance of a partial credit release with the remaining credits to be released upon confirmation that the AMP has been fully implemented. Additionally, confirmation of bond renewal through next year's monitoring period will also be required before the issuance of a credit release. Thank you for your patience, Ryan Hamilton 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (704) 651-0357 Cell Location: 512 N. Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, NC 27604 _..�D�- Q y Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.