20230093 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230116

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
10/26/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20230093 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Greenbrook Subdivision (formerly Green Property)
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:eads\ztthomas
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
1/16/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Horse Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-V; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.0345
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Franklin
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.5317

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
29
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Green Property Investments, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2320/239
2c. Contact Person:
Jeff Grote
2d. Address
Street Address
7201 Creedmoor Road, Suite 140
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal /Zip Code
27613
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US- Wake County
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Cory Darnell
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US - Wake County
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Greenbrook Subdivision
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Youngsville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1833-81-7811
2b. Property size:
89
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Sid Mitchell Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Youngsville NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27596 US- Franklin County
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Horse Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-V; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010603
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site is undeveloped and consists primarily of planted row pine and undisturbed forested areas. The tree canopy consists of mature pines in the upland areas and hardwood trees
dominate the drainages. The topography of the Site ranges from a high point of +/- 460 feet above mean sea level (msl) in the northwestern corner of the Site to +/- 400 feet above msl on
the southern boundary. The surrounding properties are mostly single-family residences and undeveloped, wooded land.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.41 Ac
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
5,543 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose is to construct a residential subdivision. Driveways, sidewalks, and roads will be constructed to access multiple parts of the property. Impacts to jurisdictional streams will
result from a roadway crossing to provide inter -connectivity. Impact to riparian buffers will result from a greenway trail that provides pedestrian access to a section of the development that
is bounded by two drainages.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project will cross stream SD with a culvert crossing. Temporary coffer dams are to be installed on the upstream and downstream portions of the stream channel to allow for
the road crossing and culvert construction to be completed in dry conditions. Existing stream channel shall be pumped around the proposed road crossing during construction. Upon
completion of the road crossing, the coffer dams will be removed and the stream will be restored to its original dimensions. A pedestrian, 10-foot wide wooden boardwalk will be
constructed to perpendicularly cross Stream SA. The piers for the boardwalk will be located outside the steam banks. Typical construction activities and clearing of the area will be utilized
to cross the stream. No permanent or temporary impacts are expected for this crossing, just buffer impacts.
Grading, earthwork, and typical construction activities will be utilized in the road construction and proposed stream crossings. Equipment will include excavators, graders, bulldozers, and
other heavy machinery.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
SAGE Ecological Services on 12-14-2021
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-0268
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Cory Darnell, PWS and Isaac Prock
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
E-2 - Road Crossing - Culvert
Permanent
Culvert
SD
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
105
(linear feet)
S2
E-2 - Road Crossing - Riprap
Disspator Pad
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SD
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
18
(linear feet)
S3
E-2 - Road Crossing -
Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
SD
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
19
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0

3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
123
19
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
142
3j. Comments:
Total proposed permanent stream impacts due to the culvert installation equals 105 LF. Total proposed permanent, no loss stream impacts due to
installation of the riprap dissipator pad equals 18 LF. The riprap dissipator pad will be installed so that the riprap is embedded and the top of the riprap
will not exceed preexisting streambed elevations. Total proposed temporary stream impacts due to dewatering to install the culvert equals 19 LF.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
• Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
E-2 - Road Crossing - Allowable Upon
Authorization
P
SD
No
8,610
4,406
E-4 - Greenway/Boardwalk Crossing - Allowable
Upon Authorization
P
SA
No
1,383
875
E-5 - Grading/Clearing for Stormwater -
Allowable Upon Authorization
P
SC
No
0
813
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
9,993.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
6,094.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
9,993.00 6,094.00
Proposed permanent Zone 1 impacts are 8,610 sf and in Zone 2 are 4,406 sf as the result of a road crossing. This road crossing proposes to impact
0.299 acre of riparian buffer; therefore, this impact is considered Allowable Upon Authorization. Proposed permanent impacts to Zone 1 are 1,383 sf and
in Zone 2 875 sf as the result of a greenway/boardwalk that crosses the stream perpendicularly. The greenway is proposed to be 10-ft wide; therefore,
this impact is considered Allowable Upon Authorization. Proposed permanent Zone 2 impacts are 813 sf to construct and maintain a 20-ft wide drainage
easement to convey stormwater to an SCM. This impact is considered Allowable Upon Authorization.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The property contains five streams and four wetlands that are located throughout the Site. The proposed residential subdivision has been designed to
avoid the majority of features on Site. Access to the site will be from Sid Mitchell Road which requires a stream crossing to gain access to the northern
portion of the Site and provide for inter -connectivity required by the municipality. Unavoidable buffer impacts are necessary for the proposed stream and
buffer impacts due to site constraints and lot size requirements. The greenway trail is required by the municipality to provide pedestrian access around
the development.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction equipment including heavy machinery and hand clearing machinery will need to be utilized to install the culvert, boardwalk crossings, and
removal of vegetation in Zone 2. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt
fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed impacts are below compensatory mitigation thresholds.

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Franklin County
Comments:
The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the locally delegated authority. The applicant requests the 401 Certification approval be conditioned to require the
stormwater management plan be approved before any impacts may be conducted.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e. existing residences, and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e. sewer, water, electricity, etc.). The project drains to Horse Creek, which is Water Supply V, Nutrient Sensitive Waters (WS-
V; NSW), (i.e. not HOW or ORW). We anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Residences will be served by individual septic systems.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)

5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved? *
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
On December 10, 2021, we received correspondence from the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). Based upon their review, no federally listed T&E
species are documented on or within 1.0 mile of the Site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The proposed project is in Franklin County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat which would support EFH (i.e., salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
We reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) database. The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. No
historic structures were found on the Site. Two properties are listed within 1.0 mile of the Site, including the House (FK0997 and House (gone)) which is
listed
as "Surveyed Only, Gone."
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Online database: panel 1833, effective date: 4/16/2013.
Miscellaneous u
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Greenbrook Subdivision - PCN Application and Documents- Submittal - 1-16-23.pdf 8.59MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.

Full Name:
Cory B Darnell
Signature
Date
1/16/2023

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
E5
.21116
January 16, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Ms. April Norton
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Jim Westcott
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Greenbrook Subdivision (formerly Green Property)
Request for NWP 29, GC 4256 Authorization, and Riparian Buffer Authorization
SAW-2022-00268
Sage Project #2021.181
On behalf of Greenpoint Development Corporation (applicant & owner), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the Greenbrook Subdivision (Project)
may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and General Certification 4256 (GC 4256). A riparian buffer
authorization for impacts to Neuse River riparian buffers is also being requested.
Protect Purpose and Location
The Project includes the construction of a residential subdivision. The Site is +/- 89-acres and is located south of
the intersection of Sid Mitchel Road and Green Road in Franklin County, NC. The coordinates of 36.0345°N,
78.5317°W generally correspond to the center of the Site.
Protect Detail
The proposed Project consists of the construction of a residential development with associated utilities and roads.
Homes will be on individual septic systems and will tie into existing public water systems.
Access to the Site will be provided via Sid Mitchell Road. Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation
projects (e.g., backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur on the Site according to the NC Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) Database. (See attached report dated December 10, 2021).
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. Two historic properties are listed within
1.0 mile of the Site.
Protect History
The Site is approximately 89 acres and is currently undeveloped and consists primarily of planted row pine and
undisturbed forested areas. The tree canopy consists of mature pines in the upland areas and hardwood trees
dominate the drainages. No structures were identified on the Site. The topography of the Site ranges from a high
point of +/- 460 feet above mean sea level (msl) in the northwestern corner of the Site to +/- 400 feet above msl
on the southern boundary. The surrounding properties are mostly single-family residences and undeveloped,
wooded land.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed stream crossing, boardwalk crossing, and buffer impacts are aligned to cross the channels as
perpendicularly as possible. Riparian buffer impacts in Zone 2 for the stormwater conveyance were minimized to
the maximum extent practicable. Streams are not crossed multiple times by roads. Lots were positioned to avoid
Greenpointe Subdivision Page 1 of 2

additional fill in wetlands and streams. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and
prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from
stormwater runoff. General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor
and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be used to prevent
sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
Protect Impacts
Impact 1 is a proposed road crossing at Stream SD and will result in 123 linear feet of permanent stream impact,
19 linear feet of temporary stream impact associated with culvert crossing. At this crossing, buffer impacts were
unavoidable. Zone 1 will be impacted 8,610 SF and Zone 2 will be impacted 4,406 SF. Impact 2 is a proposed
boardwalk crossing and will result in 1,383 SF of Zone 1 impact and 875 SF of Zone 2 impact. Lastly, along
Stream SC, buffer Zone 2 will be impacted 813 SF for grading and maintenance of a stormwater conveyance to
an SCM.
Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not required for this project as the thresholds of the proposed impacts have not been
satisfied.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
can Clark (74
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Franklin County Tax Map
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — PJD Sketch Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
USFWS Ipac Report
NCNHP Database Report
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter (NBRR)#22-013)
SAW-2022.00268 PJD Concurrence Email
Impact Maps
B. 6'WL"
Cor arnell, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Greenpointe Subdivision Page 2 of 2

SAGE
€:COLOG[CAL
SER VtCE5
EST.* 2016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name:
Address: oe
Phone:
Email:t
Project Name/Description: Green Property (Greenbrook)
Sage Project 11 2021.181
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: April Norton
Field Office: Raleigh RFO
NC Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attn: Zachary Thomas _
Regional Office: Raleigh RO
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under
Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby
designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit
applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage rrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site. A
BY: BY:
Pant Name of Landowner or Si ature ando or
Legal Representative AegaWpresentative

1 /29/22, 8:52 AM
Franklin County, NC
Parcel Report
Detailed Parcel Report
Saturday, January 29, 2022
Parcel ID
027777
PIN
1833-81-7811
Owner Name
JACK AND SHIRLEY GREEN LLC
Owner Mailing Address
403 COVE VIEW DR
SAVANNAH, GA 31406
General Information
Approximate Acres
Land Value
Zoning
LAST SALE
Date
4/17/2003
88.97 Map Reference
$521,280.00 Building Value
FCO R-30
f&FUnklin Franklin in County
ounty 215 E. Nash Street
°R1-1°""A Louisburg, NC 27549
A Research Triangle Region Community
Price Book
$0.00 1328
$0.00
Page
906
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
This map is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction, and is
compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map
are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be
consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The County and mapping
company assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map.
https://maps. roktech.net/Franklin_GM4/Reports/UserDefined/parcelReport. cfm?objectids=3607589&visLayers=4,6,8,9,10,44&bbox=-8742671.765271... 1 /1

Franklin County Public Access
https: //www. franklincountytax.us/Datalets/PrintDatalet. aspx?pin=027...
PARCEL ID: 027777
January 1 Owner(s): JACK AND SHIRLEY GREEN LLC
January 1 Owner(s):
Parcel
PIN
1833-81-6872
Physical Address
SID MITCHELL RD
Unit
City
YOUNGSVILLE
Zip Code
27596-
Neighborhood
B05
Class
Vacant
Land Use Code
00
Acres
88.97
Land Type
A
Frontage Width and Depth
- -
Zoning
FCO R-30
Street1/Street2
Paved /
Topo1/Topo2/Topo3
Level//
Util1/Util2/Util3
Electric//
Restrict1/Restrict2/Restrict3
Legal
Sub Name
Lot No.
Township
Tax Jurisdiction
Plat Book/Page
Deed Book/Page
Current Owner Details
Owner 1
Owner 2
In Care Of
Mailing Address
City/State/Zip
Solid Waste Fee
REDDICK/GREEN TR
D
Youngsville
YGSF
PRF 3 / SL 92-203
2320 / 239
GREEN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC
933 OLD KNIGHT RD
KNIGHTDALE/NC/27545
Tax Year: 2022
1 of 1 1/5/2023, 11:37 PM

OR
Feature A
`\ Feature G
1 1 1 J~
� c � �„c.� it
11136) �� I
sis
Project Study Area
USA Topo Maps
Map Location USGS Topo Map Figure 1
1
VANCE WARREN Green Property
.r HALI FAX Sage Project # 2021.181 -
GRANVILLE SAGE
FRANKLIN Grissom, NC Quadrangle ECOLOGICAL
USA TopoMaps 2021 SERVICES
DURHAM Map Prepared by P. Beach
NASH December 9, 2021
WAKE Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
0 0.25 0.5 Office:919-335-6757
JOHNSTON-,--' W LSON Miles Cell: 919-559-1537

16
� rrr
-�
APB Feature E Feature D
Feature F
�a
j] LEA Feature C P�4� ) �
it 1 ^:+`'�' - � �
Feature G '~e Feature B
4 �.•r r -.
Feature H Feature A
4rtt� t CIO,
+• ' ` r M1
c—■i * :�
U --92 01P2
am
% ~ Lo ; ti arm
4+ 4_ Project Study Area
Or
Map Location NRCS Soils Map Figure 2
1
VANCE WARREN Green Property
.r HALI FAX Sage Project # 2021.181
F.DURHAM
N
SAGE
RANKLIN Franklin County NC Soil Survey ECOLOGICAL
EST. 2016
Sheet #8 SERVICES
Map Prepared by P. Beach
NASH December 9, 2021
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
0 0.15 0.3 Office:919-335-6757
JOHNSTON / WILSON Miles Cell: 919-559-1537

NOTE: Features depicted herein must be
field verified by the USACE and /or
NCDWR, or its delegated authority
before being valid. Location, shape and
size of depicted features on the
evaluated site are approximate and
should be surveyed by a licensed NC
surveyor for final site planning.
NOTUS`-' WE +/-1
S!"SDA+/-32 L
potential Non=wetland
VOTUS�SA+/-648 LF
Potential Wetland
WOTUSt WA+/-0:16
Potential Non -wetland
WOTUSF_+/-11683A
Project Study Area
O Data Point Location
• Flag
.... .... Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Intermittent Stream
Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Perennial Stream
Potential Wetland WOTUS
1' Contour
Map Location
E
WOTUS7'SD +/-526 LF.
Potential Non--wetlam
wnTi ic'!co +�-�'�11'
WOTUS"�SC +/-962 LF
WDP80
-- rAi, ml�
• .I
NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 201911
PJD Sketch Map Figure 3
Green Property
Sage Project # 2021.181 N
Map Prepared by K. Hamlin
February 1, 2022 040w
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
0 400 800 Office: 919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

NCSHPO Data Downloaded
9/15/2021 from
http://www.ncdcr.gov r Woaasp'
nii:ro4ae
I
I
� I
i
0
4nn8W006 91
3 �as°n
SIR
q
Z
a
S
a
6
�pOrgetown W nods
o,
qS 4,C
Kenzinp�°n SlyOJa �Y
John Mitch �l Ra °hr M1scn°r��a
4 _
i
ward nr
Harris Rd
m
Deerfield Cr
m
T
S.
�n3
G=eeetxr.
a �
eCrr `y �4
r s House (Gone)
FK0357
Mofden RU lk"' pr 4 e - Stiltwo°d C•-
n A
Ia
J v
C Rb A I�Gr 6
Traylee far
Q
4
� am aontl Oro' Mead°'+r
�4en Ar
m ,
� aY � a nh411R
3 �
B � u
Q Project Study Area
Q 1-Mile Project Buffer
NCSHPO Status
Surveyed Only
a
• Surveyed, Gone x
House - Rq
FK0997 sunsetnr Q.a
4
0l rC
,may
Cc Y
C
g� 9urhac. I t 1
b
hf 13M� �
D°nfin fir
os es �
'' 9rasan I� Tanner...
h
IV142P LVGQIIVII
Vance Warren
Granville
Franklin
Nash
Wake
0
NCSHPO Map
Green Property
Sage Project # 2021.181
Map Prepared by K. Hamlin
December 16, 2021
2,000 4,000
Feet
RC land 11111. i•.: At
Figure 4
0 1'140�lbhh'
11
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

12/10/21, 1:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
1pa(' rocnl irro lict
IPaC is experiencing problems with the National Wetlands Inventory map x
This re service and you may get an "Unexpected error" dialog if you have that iabitat
(collet layer displayed or add that layer to your map. We are working on the issue
jurisdi and hope to have it resolved soon. fhe list
may al Jally be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Franklin County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
18 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 1/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
o�SJ��r
G
FO
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 2/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries )
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Amphibians
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 3/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
STATUS
Endangered
Insects
NAM E STAT
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus idate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this speci
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus mi auxii Endangered
Wherever foLl-id
No ritic habitat has been designated for this species.
p gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 4/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ e4A
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
......................................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
..............................................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
..........................................................................................
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
..................................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
........................................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
...................................................................................
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
..........................................................................................
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 5/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
.............................................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
........................................................................................................
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
`lik
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
i
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 6/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar-\
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
i�
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe ; , _,0
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES ]AN FEP,
probability of presence
MAR APR MAY JUN
breeding season I survey effort — no data
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 7/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
lPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
........................
Vulnerable (This is
..................................................
not a Bird of
...................................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC) in
............................................... .b u t isarea, e a
....................................
warrants attention
because of the
.............
........................................ Eagle Act or for
...........................................
potential
........................
susceptibilities in
offshore areas
.....................................
� o' Mce , '' " r, t a" i ntypes '' 'pes
................................................... of development or
....................................................
activities.)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
. . i .......................
B
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
.................................
continental USA
............................................
and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
......................................... i O
B
...................
Conservation
....................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
.................................
continental USA
............................................. a n a.) s k a
...................................
Proth 0 notar
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............
(CON) (This is a
. B . i �TOT .......................
...................
Conservation
....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
.................................
continental USA
............................................. and a s a.)
IIII IIII IIII n1 mill dill Ills - -- Jill IIII IIII IIII
---- ---- ---- -- 1111111111 mi III - ---- ---- ----
--- 0 1111111 lill
---- ---- ---- -
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 8/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Red-headed
---- ---- ----
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
_Bir............
doT.. .......................
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental USA
.............................................
and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
_.........................................
Bird o..
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
.......................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental USA
.............................................
and Alaska.)
I 1141 ---- - All IF
-A 1111IIIIIIII--
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JIO51ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 9/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, yo may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrativistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer 41tinental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 10/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Ref---- system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATI N.
Fish hatcheries
\00*
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
}
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very
large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at
this location.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JI051ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 11/12

12/10/21, 1:21 PM
Data limitations
IPaC: Explore Location resources
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
4
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JIO51ZOCINGNVM7T6P7YYHVYMQ/resources 12/12

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
r ■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
December 10. 2021
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Green Property; 2021.181
Dear Kim Hamlin:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
IN WE IMS FDTM NOUN
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

/
\ /
U
0
-0 \
e
/
\
0 e
? ®
3
e
9
z
CO
ƒ
\
>
z
u
\ e
}
0
CO \
\
/ \
\
g/
\2y2
(J-)
\:
�
7\
0
\\
\
CO
s2
:_
2
/s
//
E
\/
^2
6
/
\
2
>
>
/
u
L
Ln
?
\%
\
(
/
\(®
6\
\
E \
/ ƒ
ƒ
z
4
//®
%/
\ysoƒ
%&
G
§\
s=&a
ceo
/
© - /
0
ƒ)
0 2
2
6 6/
&
/
E
/ \ \
e®\e&
* \ \
\ \
\
\
4
\ \
`
/
4
±.e / g
/
o
o
/
t
ƒ \
/
3 0 e z
u g
a
a
g
e
0
_
-
\
O
3
s
y
\2
%
Z
m
0 E
g
%
_
0
\
z
Ln
/
}
�
�z
\
/
D
»
\\
u
\
5=
CO
g
CO
\
\ /
/
\
\
§
zE
2
&
»
/
)T
\
\/
/
/
/
}
\\
z
=
O
\
»
}
O
CO�\
/
CO
�
/
/
H
2e
C
\
co
y
/\
°
s
\ COu
®
\
\
\
\ \
`
s
m?
%
? e
s
3
\
t
CO
y
e
f
±
°E
&
®
��
a)�(
\
E.±
E \
E
=
_
//
\
/\
/
0
10
CO
Z
0
2
0
\ g
\
/
\
\
\
o
//
/
\
ƒ
x
�\
CO
\
/
\
\
g
\
\
/
o
/
//\\\
COig
\/
CO
/
\\\mi\\\\
/
/
\\
§
/

�L\
^W
O
^^LL
I..1.
C:
^'
^
^W
W
(Ln
V
6
M
r
r)
2
Z
U
Z
W a
ra 4.-o file,
po
O NMWI Rd
s
F�
O
� E
tieM awry ti�b S
o
a ce Ln
c
�a�wp
/
r
rc
0
/
/
s o
/
c
/
i�aleW acj NIINNV2J
rp isa/lpopM ul sm e2yy �i amol/uu.,•
/ a
IQ
/ E O
4y
a ,j
_ Ill
W
ve+-d.,�
s � /
�n gel I •�_
M
O
M

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6BBA8A2F-60A6-4C07-8822-61511935A402
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Jack and Shirley Green LLC
403 Cove View Dr.
Savannah, GA 31406
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 23, 2022
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO#22-013
Franklin County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Project Name: Green
Location/Directions: The proposed project area is off Sid Mitchell Rd, in Youngsville, Franklin
County
Subject Stream: UTs to Horse Creek
Determination Date: 2/16/2022 Staff: Cheng Zhang
Stream
E/I/P
*
Not Subject
to Buffers
Subject to
Buffers
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
A
I &P
X
DWR flag
X
X
B
E
X
X
C
I
X
DWR flag
X
D
I
X
DWR flag
X
E
E
X
X
F
P
X
X
*EII/P = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
* * Wetland
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Franklin County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
r1orD �� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NOAnicnaouNa �
o,�„meae�wm�mawiowi\ r 919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6BBA8A2F-60A6-4C07-8822-61511935A402
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a
determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or
from the date the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing If sending via US
Postal Service c/o Paul Wojoski DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit I6I7Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC
27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.) Paul Wojoski DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting
Unit, 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty
(60) days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State,
and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
(stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries
should be directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army
Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Cheng Zhang at [phone].
Sincerely,
DOCUSigned by:
BCDA9D825D4A46D...
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
QEQNorth;: Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NORTH CAROLINA
niu""Ihy� 919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6BBA8A2F-60A6-4C07-8822-61511935A402
RRO Project # 20-013 Green Property, CZ 2/16/2022
A: subject
G: off property
F-r
IMML.
+- J r
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NCR`H CAROLIN4
o"s ..Iae.m—m WQ..ri 919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6BBA8A2F-60A6-4C07-8822-61511935A402
'00n N
N441-
Feature A
(EE: subject
--tf = 00. P)
�r A: subject
C*I
RRO Project # 20-013 Green Property, CZ 2/16/2022
0 -_
D E QA) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NGR`H Cn�OLINA
o�smamae.m—m WQ..ri 919.791.4200

3/3/22, 12:42 PM
Mail - Ian McMillan - Outlook
SAW-2022-00268 (Green Property) PJD Concurrence
Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Thu 3/3/2022 12:35 PM
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sean Clark <[e-mail]>
0 1 attachments (1 MB)
SAW-2022-00268 Wetland Sketch Map.pdf;
Dear Ian McMillan,
Reference is made to Corps Action ID: SAW-2022-00268. Please reference this number on any correspondence
regarding this action.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-mail,
are confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate
and reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified review area. The
location and extent of these aquatic resources are shown on the delineation map entitled, "Wetland Sketch Map"
and dated 12/16/2021.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01
https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org utils getfile/collection/p16021coII9/id/1256 provides guidance for
Jurisdictional Determinations (JD) and states, "The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type where no JD
has been requested." Currently, we are only verifying the delineation. This delineation may be relied upon for
use in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. This verification does not
address nor include any consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be
interpreted as such.
This delineation verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an
AJD, which is an appealable action.
If you wish to receive a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD), or an Approved Jurisdictional
Determination (AJD) please respond accordingly, otherwise nothing further is required and we will not provide
any additional documentation.
**Due to workload volume, it may take 90 -120 days or more for the issuance of a standalone JD; however, you
may use the delineation for planning and permitting purposes.
April R. Norton
Regulatory Division
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADUzY2ExYThmLW13ZDctNDM2NS1 iZjc2LW15NmMzYjA1 OWMONQAQAEAoX7F64UMepvXupt3Q%2F... 1/1

eSSZ-OH (616) var OSZ=„ I NVId 11Vd3AO - dVA 1JVdA1
Ot,SZZ JN 'S9NIl1dS A11OH A9 NMV'dO :3lV2)S
1l1nOJ 311 V13SO), £II
NOISM aNVI alONW var SI-ZI-ZZOZ JN'A1NnOJ NII)INVa3
a:A9 N91530 81Va
1 V NOMI8N331J9
0
-
E \
J
11,_
� f '✓,, rt
\tile-_�ifil', "11;��-��;
,
(O' --IF
-' _ - \ram n \ \ `
® y�j *-- I '' '6�,,--I-�T �` •`. i \a i!J 11 L-_____-== IV%'��� `•,� O;" I i 11 li 't \,
pD
\
/' �` `F- � _ _'� �f '\3-•• �%�-� i� \.._i'�l\ '�\ \.' � \\. i, Irk\ ,
_ h
If
C_. 1 s! ,qa, •<e { ry _air � _ ,,,, _��. � "',
} i
\l
wo; •j 1�/ii i/ f ' = it
v t•„/ y// a
f �, �i;'�/��,�/ '/ i%/_' •��.� .\; '',J' i9 ,-'� a omz mom,
o
t'/Y�/'//I�<w,/h.\_f�. .♦; a"';';' a� I ( \\ \ z < �z °uz
uo
/ i` 1 1 I III f //. 6✓ O �• /i \'Y f- ' ./, z i 1 \` o m. z �:; m
va3,vA � vI� a/ ice'= •,� % i� III %/t�I- - ( �--_ � <z � oo�ooa <o
/ 711`�
u.FL'-i // 1 lxlj/%\`\ --' i w w _Fz mmo o�
Y' {3I /��,�-��\ i z¢oazo�z aZ
QI I uIf
�z »x
'= T�rL111', \ \ \ ! r yr w > a C a a m m
l i //\\' 11 �� \ \ 1 ¢ a W d a o
It) ' II 1 Q i l r� a C LL o Z a a rr o
r'--7r'J /�!!��//,/; / \\\\1\'. \ / , _ _ W z _ m u
\ Q w 3 r Y S r=I=I \! Iu (( 11 \'' \ O a m
rt!!" \ - !f �; u�;_lr_ , > LL yr ¢ LL No
--I-1;-h i� ,. / v� F a LL U z a rr
i,-. - 1 111-11 III ) \ 1 1 1 I C , Z z m z a z
filrlr-r1=miry nlllliil {1\iIi\\{,I ! a M m 0 o��azp� o-
l '1,1 -r\\�`--__�IIiLF-'-' -�,_ 5111Q�w0
i.l'/ 1 �
IPr\ mN o ¢
�E�I m U W
,t I\� �-
lI;ELu
ms_{�a ° Z dz, >z="
,,, ¢ z w o a
I, : ��---.(� \ \. I I: l \ \ \' •, \ \ 1- I I I // // y_ I V z w m N vi
U Q n z ¢ W 0
�/�' vv, v.x z Z �'-'� ra rr-�
yJi;nSl ,/ \ \ \`\\� \ ¢ z izwaa�o
j. �,1 ✓1 I�I I,, \ '} \ \ I l l I� ,/;//II!i!/ /� \ �`,\ u ¢

\
eSSZ-OH m : awm3vw,a a«wa+m
+z a'SDN, mVd(I >
anOD a a m
N qs]O ONE O]ONW m = a' Nm_,I V :1,11 N911111 :31VC1
\�
«
]OMIBN]]IJD
._
0ID ; 2
±ml2 =e
\ \\\
$
)\ \
/
m
�
�

eSSZ-OH(616)
var
OS=J
3113OU A3AIAD „OS„ INVRUS -dVW 1JVdWl
ObSZZ JN'SDNI9dS AIIOH
19nOJ 311W3SOA £LL
:A9 NMVN(J
:3lV2)S
var
ST-ZL-ZZOZ
JN'A1NnOJ NII)INVa3I
NOIS3a aNVI alONW
N
:1,9 N91530
81Va
W NJ
a V
NOMI8N33b9
0
a a a
o
�
�
0
a
¢ �
� z
o —
a
0
a a o
O
O
z
m
�
o
-
w
- y
m
c
o
� z
rc y
a a a
0
i
a
a
o
a a~

eSSZ-OH(616)
var
OZ=„L
1JVdNI ,VS,, WVRiS -ddW 1JVdNi
ObSZZ JN'SDNI9dS AIIOH
19nOJ 311W3SOA £LL
:A9 NMVNa
:31VDS
var
ST-ZL-ZZOZ
JN'A1NnOJ NII)INVa3
NOIS3a aNVI alONW
aI V
:1,9 N91530
81Va
NOMI8N33b9
W NJ
�LL
/Zm
� =Q
,gym a
zQ
a-
Qa
u
r
u
< SS
W
aka
a
LL
H
LLJ
LL
n
r
U
m
a
z
z�
W
W
�
Ln
w
0
a
H
Ln
w
/
/ az
1tl
1\ /.
U U `
O
M /Z � / /
O / /
Q
W o
N a
/CH

zSSZ-OH(616)
ObSZZ JN'SDNINdS AIIOH
19nOJ 311W3SO), £LL
NOIS3a aNVI alONW
var
:A9 NMVN(I
OS=„L
:31VDS
d3ddn9AV3HiS-dVAlDVdWI
u+
var
ST-ZL-ZZOZ
JN'A1NnOJNII)INVa3
A9 N91530
31Va
W NJ
G I v
NOMI8N33b9
\ � ANNNMPRIEWNY
\ LL \
m
\ �z—zci I
°� mo
N�
LL a \ z \
\ z
\ oa wLL
0z
3\ a
o� a
vai a
N o m w
� \ice LL o
\ No \
\ �z
I\N w
-.1,
A F
a
a
a
w