20140422 Ver 1_Hudson_95361_MY7_2022_20230110

ID#* 20140422
Select Reviewer:
Ryan Hamilton
Initial Review Completed Date 01/18/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/10/2023
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
ID#:* 20140422
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Hudson Property EEP # 95361
County: Beaufort
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Hudson _95361_MY7_2022.pdf 15.43MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature: *

Year 7 Monitoring Report
Hudson Property
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Tar-PamlicoRiver Basin (USGS 03020104)
DMS Project ID#: 95361
DMS Contract #: 004638
USACE Action ID#SAW-2012-01394
Submitted: December2022
Submittedto/Prepared for:
NC Department ofEnvironmentandNatural Resources
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by:
ALBEMARLERESTORATIONS, LLC
P.O. Box 176
Fairfield, NC 27826
Tel[phone]Fax [phone]

%¢®³®­¤Ǿ ,,#ȁ
ΓΐΏȁΓΑΏȁΑΕΏΏȨ0ȩ
ΓΐΏȁΓΑΏȁΕΘΗΒȨ&ȩ
December 22, 2022
Mr. Jeremiah Dow
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE:Draft Year 7 Monitoring Report for Hudson Property(DMS#: 95361)(Ecotone #1269)
Mr. Dow,
th
Ecotone, LLC. has addressed the comments made onDecember 7, 2022byDMSforthe above
referenced project.The following is a point-by-point response addressing those comments.
1.
Ecotone Response:Title has been changed.
2.
industrystandard language such as -
Ecotone Response:
-.
3.Section 9 indicates that XS10 was moved 1 foot downstream. A cross section in the
original location should still be completed, and the data/graph provided as normal.
Any new, additional cross sections should be included as a separate graph (not
overlain with years 0 6) with an explanation of what information is intended to be
conveyed with the new data.
Ecotone Response:Addressed in Section 9. Vegetation limited the ability to get laser
level shots directly at the cross section.
4.On the CCPV, please show flow stations that malfunctioned as a different color or
graphic and add to the legend.
Ecotone Response:Thewells are now color-coded to match their status.
5.Please indicate on the photo log heading the date or dates all photos were taken.
Ecotone Response:The date the photos were taken has been added to the Photo Log.
6.In Table 11a, please verify the morphology data, specifically for XS6. The XS graph
shows aggradation, and the max depth has decreased from 0.86 at AB to 0.60 in
MY7, yet the LTOB cross sectional area is shown to have increased since MY0.
Please verify or correct.
&/2%34 (),,
ΐΑΘ )­£´²³±¸ , ­¤
&®±¤²³ (¨««Ǿ -$ ΑΐΏΔΏ
¶¶¶ȁ¤¢®³®­¤¨­¢ȁ¢®¬

\[Hudson Property Stream Restoration\]
\[12/22/22\]
Page 2 of 3

Ecotone Response: A rev
survey overlay file. This slightly decreased LTOB Cross Sectional Area, though they
are still higher than previous years. This is likely because aggradation has increased
channel width. An arrow indicating the Year 7 LTOB has been added to the cross
section 6 chart.

7. Some flow gauges show hydrology that dipped below the thalweg and yet was
counted toward consecutive days of flow (Figure 5 for example). Recommend
recalculating consecutive days of flow for MY7, and all prior years if possible, and

Ecotone Response: Consecutive days meeting flow was recounted for monitoring
year 7 and adjusted on the graphs, as well as in Table 13.
Comment Revisited 1/6/2023: Consecutive days meeting flow was also recalculated
for all 10 wells from monitoring years 1-6. All the changes listed above can be seen
in the updated Table 13.

8. Vegetation data is missing from submission. The summary table has been submitted
but no data sheets/database or excel data tables were submitted. This project is
subject to height requirement as well and no summary or data was submitted.
Ecotone Response: Field data sheet has been added with the summary table. Data was
recorded on the summary table from MY5 (2020).

9. The cross-section submission is missing graphs in many cases.
Ecotone Response: The cross section excel file has been updated to show the correct
cross section for MY7.

10. The Stream visual assessment table for reach 3 indicates 20 feet of scoured and
eroded banks per the table, the submission was missing the required shapefile. This
location needs to be indicated on the CCPV as well. If the area has been revegetated
and/or repaired, or has not shown further signs of instability, please discuss briefly in
Section 9.
Ecotone Response: The shapefile has been added to the CCPV as a yellow line, as per
the CCPV depiction for eroding banks.

Thank you for your consideration of this application. We appreciate your assistance with our
project thus far, and we look forward to working with you to complete the review process. Feel
free to contact us at 410-420-2600.

Sincerely,
Wesley Rhoades

\[Hudson Property Stream Restoration\]
\[12/22/22\]
Page 3 of 3

Environmental Technician
Ecotone LLC
cc. Ed Temple, Albemarle Restorations, LLC

Table of Contents
Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES .......................................................................1
3.0 PROJECT SUCCESS CRITERIA ............................................................................1
3.1 Stream Restoration Performance Standards ................................................................... 1
3.2 Stream Channel Restoration Stability Performance Standards ....................................... 2
3.3 Planted Vegetation Performance Standards ................................................................... 2
4.0 SITE CONDITIONS & DESCRIPTION..................................................................2
5.0 MITIGATION COMPONENTS ..............................................................................2
6.0 DESIGN APPROACH..............................................................................................3
7.0 CONSTRUCTION & PLANTING TIMELINE .......................................................3
8.0 PLAN DEVIATIONS ...............................................................................................3
9.0 PROJECT PERFORMANCE ...................................................................................3
10.0 METHODS AND REFERENCES .........................................................................4
APPENDIX A: PROJECT BACKGROUND TABLES ................................................6
APPENDIX B: VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA ........................................................14
APPENDIX C: MY 7 VEGETATION PLOT DATA (2022) ......................................42
APPENDIX D: MY 7 STREAM MEASUREMENT & GEOMORPHOLOGY .........46
APPENDIX E: YEAR 7 HYDROLOGIC DATA ........................................................68
APPENDIX F: WATERSHED PLANNING SUMMARY PRODUCED BY EEP .80
APPENDIX G: LAND OWNERSHIP & PROTECTION PRODUCED BY EEP...81
APPENDIX H: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS 404/01 PERMITS AND
OTHER RELATED CORRESPONDENCE ................................................................82
APPENDIX I: PROJECT DEBIT LEDGER PRODUCED BY EEP ........................84

Tables and Figures

Figure 1: Vicinity Map........................................................................................................5
Figure 2: Topography Figure - USGS Topo Map .............................................................10
Figure 3: Soils ...................................................................................................................12
Figure 4: Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7: Monthly Rainfall Data with
Percentiles .........................................................................................................................72
Figure 5: Monitoring Well 3 Reach 4 ............................................................................75
Figure 6: Monitoring Well 4 Confluence Reaches 1 & 4 ..............................................76
Figure 7: Monitoring Well 5 Reach 1 ............................................................................77
Figure 8: Monitoring Well 8 Reach 5 ............................................................................78
Figure 9: Monitoring Well 9 Reach 5 ............................................................................79

Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits .........................................................7
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History ................................................................8
Table 3: Project Contacts ....................................................................................................8
Table 4: Project Information ...............................................................................................9
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment (Reaches 1-4) .......................19
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment ......................................................................23
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities (MY 7 2022) (Plots 1-9) ........................43
Table 8: Monitoring Year 7 - Bank Pin Data ....................................................................58
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary (Reaches 1- 4)59
Table 11a: Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters Cross Sections).63
Table 11b: Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary (Reach 1-4)....64
Table 9: Verification of Bankfull Events...69
Table 12: Verification of Baseflow71
Table 13: Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7: Days Meeting Minimum Flow
Requirements.74

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The Hudson Property stream restoration project is 13.49 acres located within a larger 106-acre
property owned by Justin Hill. It is located in Beaufort County, NC and the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin (USGS 03020104). Mitigation components include five stream reaches totalling 2,891
linear feet contained within a Conservation Easement. Construction was completed in 2015 and
planting completed in 2016. The first of seven monitoring years was initiated in 2016. Year7
monitoring was completed October 4-6, 2022.

2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The project goals of the Hudson Property stream restoration project per the approved mitigation
plan are as follows:

Improve and sustain hydrologic connectivity/interaction and storm flow/flood
attenuation.
Reduce nutrient and sediment stressors to the reach and receiving watershed.
Provide uplift in water quality functions.
Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitats (complexity, quality).
Improve and maintain riparian buffer habitat.

The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:

Implement a sustainable, referencebased, rehabilitation of the reach dimension, pattern,
and profile to provide needed capacity and competency.
Support the removal of barriers to anadromous fish movement and to help improve
nursery and spawning habitats.
Strategically install stream structures and plantings designed to maintain vertical and
lateral stability and improve habitat diversity/complexity.
Provide a sustainable and functional bankfull floodplain feature.
Enhance and maintain hydrologic connection between stream and adjacent
floodplain/riparian corridors.
Utilize the additional width of the multi-thread channels to provide natural filters for
sediment and nutrients and diffuse flow from upstream runoff.
Install, augment, and maintain an appropriate riparian buffer with sufficient density and
robustness to support native forest succession.
Encourage water quality enhancement through riparian forest planting and woody
material installation, and increased floodplain interaction/overbank flooding.
Restore the existing ditched streams to single and multithread headwater systems with
forested riparian buffers.
Provide ecologically sound construction techniques that will require minimal grading and
disturbance.

3.0 PROJECT SUCCESS CRITERIA
3.1 Stream Restoration Performance Standards

Single Thread Channels (Reaches 1 4) and Multi-Thread Channel (Reach 5):
Groundwater monitoring wells are installed in and near the thalweg of all five reaches.
The wells are equipped with continuousreading gauges capable of documenting
sustained flow. Per the approved Mitigation Plan, each reach must exhibit water flow for
at least 30 consecutive days during years with normal rainfall (demonstrating at least
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
1

intermittent stream status). All restored channels shall receive sufficient flow through the
monitoring period to maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM). Field indicators
of flow events include a natural line impressed on the bank; shelving; changes in soil
characteristics; destruction of terrestrial vegetation; presence of litter and debris;
wracking; vegetation matted down, bent, or absent; sediment sorting; leaf litter disturbed
or washed away; scour; deposition; bed and bank formation; water staining; or change in
plant community. In addition, two overbank flows shall be documented for each reach
during the monitoring period using continuously monitored pressure transducers and crest
gauges. All collected data and field indicators of water flow shall be documented in each
monitoring report. Seven flow monitoring stations are located on Reaches 1 4, three are
located on Reach 5.

3.2 Stream Channel Restoration Stability Performance Standards
Headwater System (Reach 5):
All stream areas shall remain stable with no areas of excessive erosion such as evidence of
bank sloughing or actively eroding banks due to the exceedance in critical bank height and
lack of deep-rooted stream bank vegetation.

Single Thread Channels (Reaches 1 4):
1. Bank Height Ratio (BHR) shall not exceed 1.2 within restored reaches of the stream
channel.
2. Entrenchment Ratio (ER) shall be no less than 2.2 within restored reaches of the stream
channel.
3. The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met
through two separate bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the 7-year post
construction monitoring period.
4. Three bank pin arrays and 11 cross sections are located on Reaches 1 4.

3.3 Planted Vegetation Performance Standards
1. At least 320 three-year-old planted stems/acre must be present after year three. At year
five, density must be no less than 260 five- planted stems/acre. At year 7, density
must be no less than 210 seven- planted stems/acre.
2. If this performance standard is met by year 5 and stem density is trending toward success
(i.e., no less than 260 five- stems/acre) monitoring of vegetation on the site may
be terminated provided written approval is provided by the USACE in consultation with
the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT).
3. Thirteen vegetation plot samples are located within the project area.

4.0 SITE CONDITIONS AND DESCRIPTION
Much of the site has been used for crop production, primarily corn, soybeans, and wheat. As a
result of the lowering of local water tables, and in some cases the complete elimination of ground
and surface water interaction, the degradation of water quality and downstream anadromous fish
spawning/nursery habitat has occurred. Hydric soils are present on site, meaning that the pre-
existing site conditions were appropriate for raising the water table and re-establishing normal
base flow conditions (See Figure 1 -Vicinity Map).

5.0 MITIGATION COMPONENTS
Mitigation components are limited to five reaches: Reach 1: 833 lf; Reach 2: 532 lf; Reach 3: 445
lf; Reach 4: 437 lf; Reach 5: 644 lf, for a total restored stream footage of 2,891 lf (Table 1).
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
2

6.0 DESIGN APPROACH
A natural design approach was used to restore channel sinuosity and flow of headwater streams,
which existed prior to channelization. Grading was designed to decrease sediment load and
erosion rate while allowing for floodplain connectivity and storage for overland flow. Banks were
graded down to distribute flow velocity and the banks and riparian buffers were planted to
stabilize the channel and create habitat. A combination of Priority 1 and Priority II restoration
types were used. Where the proposed channels tied into the existing, non-restored channels,
Priority II restoration was used.

7.0 CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING TIMELINE
Construction commenced in December 2014, with the installation of recommended erosion
control practices, and was completed in May 2015. Planting was officially concluded in early
January 2016. (Table 2 Project History Table)

8.0 PLAN DEVIATIONS
There were no significant deviations between construction plans and the As-built conditions.

9.0 PROJECT PERFORMANCE
The Hudson stream restoration project is currently meeting functional goals and objectives.
Annual monitoring took place in October and revealed the presence of bankfull events, floodplain
connectivity, and lateral and vertical stability. In-stream structures were observed to be
functioning as intended with minimal scouring of the bed or banks. Bankfull events were
observed for Years 1 through Year 7. The site is meeting the bankfull standard for success. The
entire length of the project is currently exhibiting fully vegetated banks with both herbaceous and
woody plants. Overall, woody plantings within the riparian buffer are meeting project goals.
Some dieback of planted stems occurred in previous years, but reintroduction of other woody
vegetation has been noted in all monitoring plots. Tree heights range from 4-20 feet, with an
approximate average of 12 feet (2022 data). Stream gauges indicated base flow and bankfull
events at 5 out of 10 locations. Baseflow and bankfull events could not be confirmed at Wells
1,2,6,7 due to the battery being dead, leading to the data being unreadable. Well 10 could
also not be evaluated because the well cap and logger were disturbed; the base stationalso
malfunctioned during the monitoring effort, preventing download of the annual data. Although
the loggers were not functioning, ordinary high-water marks were present at wells 1,2,6,7, and 10.
Areas around Well 1 showed vegetation matted down and water staining (Current Condition
Photo Log: Photo 14). The area at well 2 showed vegetation matted down and leaf litter
disturbance (Photo 15). The area at well 6 showed matted vegetation and change in vegetation
(Photo 23). The areas around well 7 showed vegetation matted down, water stains, and leaf litter
disturbance (Photo 19). Well 10 was in standing water on the multi-thread reach 5, see Appendix
EWell Data Logger Status for the photograph. Base flow and bankfull events are assumed to
have occurred based on conditions seen during monitoring and information from adjacent wells.

During MY 7, bank pins could not be located due to dense vegetative growth; erosion is therefore
assumed to be minimal given the vegetative stability of the reaches. Bank pins also be
found in MY 5. Aggradation was noted on Reaches 2 and 3 in MY 5, though slightly less than in
MY 3; both reaches remain stable, and no changes were seen from MY 5 to MY 7. In MY 7
stream cross sections are meeting objectives in 11 out of 11 locations. Cross section 10 on reach
one was pulled a foot downstream of previous years due to excessive vegetation at the original
cross section, leading to inability to properly obtain laser readings. The cross section was able to
be pulled a foot downstream of the original, hence explaining the change in the cross-sectional
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
3

profile on page 53, although still functioning properly. The original cross section location visually
represented profiles from previous years.

Previous corrective measures included regrading Reach 5 to raise the stream invert to create a
wider multi-thread channel. This was identified during a field meeting with NC Division of
Mitigation Services and the USACE in June 2017 and completed in October 2017. A field
meeting with NC Division of Mitigation Services and the USACE in April 2018, identified two
monitoring wells that required repair; repair was completed. Year 1 Monitoring identified some
areas where woody survivability was low; these areas were spot planted in December 2017. In
Year 3, Vegetation Plot 6, and other small areas on Reach 1 and 2, appeared to have slightlylow
woody survivability. These areas were spot planted in October 2019, though the areas were
smaller than 0.1 acres and were not included in the CCPV. Also, approximately 20 feet of minor
bank scour was present on Reach 3, starting at cross-section 2 and moving downstream on the left
bank. There are no signs of further instability. No additional corrective measures are necessary.

10.0 METHODS AND REFERENCES
Monitoring methodology did not differ from the approved Mitigation Plan. Cross-section
dimensions were collected using standard survey methods. Vegetation assessment was done
according to the Level 2 protocol specified by the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Hydrology
monitoring wells were installed per ERDC TN-WRAP-00-
Wells/Piezometers in We dated 2000. Groundwater levels were recorded using the U20-
001-01 water level data loggers manufactured by Onset Computer. The loggers were installed in
ions.

Vegetation plot data for 2022 was recorded in the field on the previous years
and DensitiesIf the counts differed from those on the previous years chart, the new count
was penciled in. A scanned sheet is provided in Appendix X that shows MY5 counts, with the
new counts from MY7 penciled in.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
4

N

)
Project (Red)
(Yellow

ess
Hudson
Acc

ap
M

, NC
t
Vicinity

por
#95361

:
Re
ct
1
ream Mitigation Project
toring
S Proje
Moni
dson St
7
ar
Figure HuDMBeaufort County

1

Ye
on
t

ity
ersection
ject # 9536
n left
t
owin
ur
T
oc

.
Track Road.
toration Projec
MS Pro
Ch
o project is 1.1

es
D

om its in
To
2022
um

h NC 33.
ive south on US 17, 4.6
Stream R
iles on left
oss
ber
Drmiles frwitPEntrance tm
em

Hudson Dec5

APPENDIX A: PROJECT BACKGROUND TABLES

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History

Table 3. Project Contacts

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes

Figure 2: Topography Figure USGS Topo Map

Figure 3: Soils
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
6

Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Hudson Property, Beaufort County
EEP Project Number: 95361
Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian wetland Buffer Nitrogen Phosphorous

wetland Nutrient Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals 2,891

Project Components
Project Existing Approach Restoration Restoration Mitigation
Stationing/Location
Component Footage/Acreage (PI, PII etc.) or Footage or Ratio
or Reach ID Restoration Acreage
Equivalent
Reach 1 766 LF PI 833 LF 1:1

Reach 2 516 LF PI/PII 532 LF 1:1

Reach 3 611 LF PI/PII 445 LF 1:1

Reach 4 503 LF PI/PII 437 LF 1:1

Reach 5 689 LF PI 644 LF 1:1

Total 3,085 LF 2,891 LF

Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetland Buffer Upland
Restoration Level
(linear feet) (acres) Wetland (acres) (square feet) (acres)
Riverine

riverine
Restoration 2,891 LF

Enhancement

Enhancement I

Enhancement II

Creation

Preservation

BMP Elements
Element Location Purpose/Function Notes
FB Adjacent to stream Buffer 100 feet on either side of stream centerline
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
7

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Hudson Property- EEP Project Number 95361
Activity, Deliverable, or Milestone Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery
Project Institution N/A June 2012
Mitigation Plan July 2014 Oct 2014
Permits Issued March 2013 May 2014
Final Design Construction March 2013 May 2014
Construction N/A May 2015
Containerized, Bare Root, and B&B Planting N/A January 2016
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 - Baseline) January 2016 August 2016
Year 1 Monitoring September 2016 Final: January 2017
Year 2 Monitoring November 2017 Final: January 2018
Year 3 Monitoring October 2018 Final: March 2019
Year 4 Monitoring October 2019 Final: January 2020
Year 5 Monitoring October 2020 Final: December 2020
Year 6 Monitoring October 2021 Final: February 2022
Year 7 Monitoring October 2022 Final: November 2022

Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 3: Project Contacts
Hudson Property- EEP Project Number: 95361
Primary Project Design POC Ecotone, LLC.
Scott McGill [phone]
129 Industry Lane, Forest Hill, MD 21050
Construction Contractor POC Riverside Excavation, Inc.
Car Baynor [phone]
Survey Contractor POC True Line Surveying
Curk Lane [phone]
Planting and Seeding Contractor Carolina Silvics, Inc.
POC Mary Margaret McKinney [phone]
908 Indian Trail Road, Edenton, NC 27932
Seed Mix Sources Ernst Conservation Seeds, LLP, Meadville, PA
Nursery Stock Suppliers Carolina Silvics, Inc.
Monitoring Performers Ecotone, LLC.
Stream and Vegetation POC Scott McGill [phone]
129 Industry Lane, Forest Hill, MD 21050

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
8

Table 4: Project Information
Table 4: Project information
Hudson Property- EEP Project Number: 95361
Project name HUDSON PROPERTY
County BEAUFORT
Project Area (ac) 13.4 AC
Project Coordinates (Lat and Long) W / N
4.1 Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic province INNER COASTAL PLAIN
River basin RIVER BASIN
USGS Hydrologic
03020104 USGS Hydrologic 03020104010010
digit
DWQ sin CHOCOWINITY CREEK HORSE BRANCH
Project Drainage Area (acres) 190.86
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
1.2 % (2.24 acres)
Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification 2.01.01.07 Annual Row Crop Rotation
4.2 Reach Summary Information
Parameters Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4 Reach5
Length of reach (linear feet) 766 516 611 503 689
Valley classification VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII
Drainage area (acres) 40.51 74.63 35.21 150.35 190.86
NCDWR stream identification score 20.75 20.75 20.75 20.75 28
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C;NSW C;NSW C;NSW C;NSW C;NSW
Morphological Description (stream type)
Evolutionary trend Early (CEM) Early (CEM) Early (CEM) Early (CEM)Early(CEM)
GoA & CrB CrB & Ly CrB & Ly CrB CrB & Me
Underlying mapped soils
MW
Drainage class MW & SP MW & SP MW MW & P
Soil Hydric status Hydric Hydric
Slope (ft/ft) 0.009 0.006 0.008 0.004 0.003
FEMA classification N/A N/A N/A N/A AE/X
Native vegetation community Pasture/Crop Pasture/Crop Pasture/Crop Pasture/Crop Pasture/Crop
Percent composition of exotic invasive
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
vegetation
4.3 Regulatory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation Applicable? Resolved?
Documents
YES Supporting Documents
Waters of the United States Section 404 YES
YES SAW-2012-01394
Waters of the United States Section 401 YES
YES NA
Endangered Species Act NO
YES NA
Historic Preservation Act NO
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ YES
NO
NA
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
YES NA
FEMA Floodplain Compliance NO
Essential Fisheries Habitat NO YES NA

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
9

Figure 2: Topography Figure - USGS Topo Map

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
10

Figure 3: Soils

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
12

Ly
GoA
Legend
Project Limits
Parcel Boundary
CsC2
Soils
GoA
GoA
Me
CrB
GoA
Ly
Ly
GoA
CrB
GoA
Mapped Soils Legend
SymbolSeriesHydric
CrB
Cravenfine sandy
CrBNo
loam, 1-4% slopes
GoA
Goldsboro fine
GoANo
sandy loam , 0-2%
slopes
Le
Lynching fine sandy
LyNo
loam
Muchalee loam,
Me
Yes
CrA
frequently flooded
05001,000
Feet
GoA
±
1 inch = 500 feet
SCALE:
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
EXHIBIT C
HUDSON PROPERTY
WETLAND RESTORATION,
EEP# 004638
STREAM RESTORATION,
TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
NRCS SOIL SURVEY
& WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION
CHOCOWINITY CREEK TLW
(HUC: 03020104010010)

APPENDIX B: VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA

Current Condition Plan View

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment (Reach 1-4)

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table

Pre-Construction Photo Log

Current Condition Photo Log

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
14

4)
-
(Reaches 1

ssessment
logy Stability A
ho
: Visual Stream Morp
5
t
le
por
Re
Tab

toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec19

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec20

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec21

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec22

ssment
: Vegetation Condition Asse
6
ble
Ta
t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec23

Pre-Construction Site Conditions
(Photos from 2011)

Photo 1: High flow drift lines after storm on proposed Reach 3.

Photo 2: Facing upstream confined flow path causing erosion from existing crop field.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
24

Photo 3: Reach 1.

Photo 4: Culvert at the end of reach 4.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
25

Photo 5: Facing upstream at the end of proposed Reach 1 and 4 confluence.

Photo 6: Facing upstream towards existing forest stand at proposed Reach 1.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
26

Photo 7: Facing downstream showing stream bank soil profile.

Photo 8: Horse Branch floodplain downstream of Reach 5.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
27

Photo 9: Facing upstream at upstream limits of proposed Reach 1.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
28

Hudson Current Condition (MY 7) Photo Log
th
Photos Taken on October 5, 2022

Photo 1: Culvert at the top of reach 1.

Photo 2: Clear Cutting at the top of reach 1, outside of project boundary.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
29

Photo 3: Veg plot #1.

Photo 4: Veg plot #3.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
30

Photo 5: Veg plot #4.

Photo 6: Veg plot #5.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
31

Photo 7: Veg plot #6.

Photo 8: Veg plot #8.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
32

Photo 9: Veg plot #9.

Photo 10: Veg plot #10.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
33

Photo 11: Veg plot #11.

Photo 12: Veg plot #12.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
34

Photo 13: Veg plot #13.

Photo 14: Cross section #1.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
35

Photo 15: Cross section #2.

Photo 16: Cross section #3.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
36

Photo 17: Cross section #4

Photo 18: Cross section #5.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
37

Photo 19: Cross section #6.

Photo 20: Cross section #7.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
38

Photo 21: Cross section #8.

Photo 22: Cross section #9.
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
39

Photo 23: Cross section #10.

Photo 24: Cross section #11.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
40

Photo 25: End of reach 5 (multi-thread channel) looking upstream.

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
41

APPENDIX C: MY 7 VEGETATION PLOT DATA (2022)

Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities

Scanned Field Data Sheet
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
42

9)
-
) (Plots 1
t
por
Re
Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities (MY 7 2022
:
7toring
Moni
Table
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec43

ns)

13 & Annual Mea
-
10

Plots
(

)
2
2
20

7
(MY

Continued

t
por
Densities

Re
and

s
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
on Plot Count
t
ati
ject # 9536
Veget
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec44

APPENDIX D: MY 7 STREAM MEASUREMENT AND
GEOMORPHOLOGY

Cross Sections with Annual Overlays (XS 1-11)

Table 8: Bank Pin Data

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Reach 1-4)

Table 11a. Monitoring Data Dimensional Morphology Summary

Table 11b. Monitoring Data Stream Reach Data Summary (Reach 1-4)
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
46

.

n
tion
tation
getatio
der bends
egetation
vegetation

e vegee ve
ens
dense
& dense vegetation& d& dense v& dense vegetation& dense vegetation& dense vegeta& dens& dense vegetation&

along mean

on
ion
e

ation
sure
adat
osur
rad
+95
2+6932+73

xpo
am banks
aggradationaggradationaggaggradatiaggradation
ExpExposureE

tiontionor aggradation
anor
ttation
StaSS
minor aggradationminor aggrminor minor miminorminor aggradationminor min

---------

d
2 21

findfindfindfinfind

each
not findnot

Bank Pin Data
ReachReachR

-
ld not ld not
---
ulduld
S 5
CoCouCould not findCould not findCould not findCouCould not CoCould not
XS 9

@

1 @ X3
y #
ree pins located in the middle of stre
Array #2 @ XS 4
Monitoring Year 7
t
:
of th

8
Pin
por

ist
Re

n

Table Bank Pin Array #BankBank Pin Arra
n
s cons
toring

am Pin
rray
in
ream Pi
Moni
PPinPin
ddle Pi 7
tre
ar

Middle PinMiMiddle Pin
1
Pins a
Upstream PinUpsUpstream Pin
Ye
Downstream PinDownstream PinDownst
t
ject # 9536

toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec58

4)
-
1
(Reaches

Data Summary
ne Stream
i
t
: Basel
por
10
Re
Table
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec59

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec60

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec61

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec62

ns)
Cross Sectio

-
rameters
a

t
por
Re
Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional P

toring
-
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
Monitoring Data
:
ject # 9536
1a
1
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D
Table

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec63

4)
-
Stream Reach Data Summary (Reach 1

-
ta
t
por
Re
itoring Da
toring
Mon

Moni
7
11b:
ar

1
Ye
t
Table
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec64

ditional
ad
as intended and creating
unctioning
ower, it is f
to the floodplain, similar to that of Reach 5. Not expected to be an
t
por
Re
ater spreading in
w
to
toring
e
u
d

Moni
7
ar

1
Ye

Reach 2
t
in.
a
for
l
the addition of the channel getting wider and shall
p

ject # 9536
is low

e flood
toration Projec
MS Pro
th

es
D
ratio

2022

Stream R
ber
in the future. With

enchment
em

Entrissuewetlands along Hudson Dec65

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec66

t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec67

APPENDIX E: YEAR 7 HYDROLOGIC DATA

Table 9: Verification of Bankfull Events

Table 12: Verification of Baseflow

Figure 4: Monthly Rainfall Data with Percentiles

Table 13: Cumulative Days Table

Well Data Logger Status

Figures 5-9: Stream Surface Water Hydrology (Well 1-9)

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
68

Table 9: Verification of Bankfull Events
Greater
Date of
Dates of Occurrence Method than Qbkf
Observation
Stage?
Reach 1 (Well 5, 6)
Well 5 Only: 1/3-1/6/2022, 1/9-1/23/2022, 1/26-2/19/2022, 2/21-3/2/2022, 3/9-
10/4/2022 Data loggerY
3/19/2022, 3/24-3/27/2022, 4/5-4/8/2022, 6/12/2022, 7/9/2022,
10/27-10/28/20, 11/1-11/8/20, 11/12-11/30/20, 12/1-12/6/20, 12/8/20-1/13/21,
10/28/2021 1/17-1/21/21, 1/23-1/31/21, 2/4-3/3/21, 3/5-4/5/21, 4/10/21, 6/4/21, 6/7 & 8/21, Data loggerY
6/10 & 11/21, 6/22-6/29/21
10/28/2020 Various, including: 11/11-12/22/19, 1/4-4/26/20 ,5/20-6/24, 9/15-9/21 Data loggerY
10/23/19 Various, including: 11/11/18-4/6/19, 6/7-6/15/19 Data loggerY
Various, including: 12/8-4/6/18, 5/05-5/10, 5/30-6/6, 6/14, 7/24-8/8, 8/22-8/26,
10/5/18 Data loggerY
9/13-9/20
Various, including: 9/29/2016-10/17/2016, 10/21-10/24, 7/16-7/17, 8/11, 8/13-
11/17/17 Data loggerY
8/14, 9/6- 9/8/2017
9/29/16 2/7-2/13/16, 3/7-3/9/16 Data loggerY
Reach 2 (Well 7)
10/4/2022 NA (Data Unreadable) Data loggerNA
10/27/20-5/9/21, 5/12-5/15/21, 5/29-7/17/21, 7/19-7/23/21, 7/27-8/30/21,
10/28/2021 Data loggerY
9/3/21, 10/23-10/25/21
10/28/20 Various, including: 11/24/19-6/23/20, 9/18-10/28 Data loggerY
Various, including: 10/5/18-5/5/19, 6/7-7/2, 7/12-7/25, 8/16-8/24, 9/6-9/14,
10/23/19 Data loggerY
10/22
10/5/18 1/7-1/16/18, 1/25-2/23, 2/27, 3/24-3/27, 3/21, 4/9-4/15, 8/2-8/5, 9/13-9/20 Data loggerY
9/29/2016-10/16/2016, 10/25, 12/18-12/28, 12/30-1/3, 1/5-1/19, 1/30-1/31, 2/1-
11/17/17 2/6, 2/20-2/21, 3/3-3/6, 3/19-3/27, 3/29-3/30, 4/1-4/3, 4/13, 4/18-4/20, 4/28-Data loggerY
4/30, 5/30/2017
9/29/16 1/29-2/1/16, 2/2-2/8/16 Data loggerY
Reach 3 (Well 1, 2)
10/4/2022 NA (Data Unreadable) Data loggerNA
Various, including: 10/27-12/6/20, 12/8/20-1/14/21, 1/17-1/31/21, 2/3-4/10/21,
4/13-4/14/21, 4/19-4/24/21, 4/26-4/28/21, 5/1/21, 5/12-5/13/21, 5/29-6/11/21,
10/25/21 Data loggerY
6/18/21, 6/20/21, 6/22-7/1/21, 7/5-7/16/21, 7/19/21, 7/22-7/23/21, 7/27/-
7/29/21, 8/2-8/19/21, 8/24-8/29/21
10/28/20 Various, including between 12/14/19-3/10/20 Data loggerY
Various, including: 11/4/18, 11/11-11/15, 12/24-12/28, 12/30-12/31, 1/7/19,
10/23/19 Data loggerY
1/15-1/23, 1/31-2/02. 3/13, 3/19-21, 3/27-3/28
10/5/18 12/27/2017, 1/1/18, 1/6, 1/16, 1/25-2/5, 3/27, 9/13-9/18 Data loggerY
11/17/17 9/29/2016-11/3/2017 Data loggerY
9/29/16 2/5-6/16, 2/18/16, 5/29/16, 6/7/16 Data loggerY

Reach 4 (Well 3)
1/3-1/5/2022, 1/9-1/10/2022, 1/12-1/13/2022, 1/16/2022, 2/7/2022, 2/17/2022,
10/4/2022 3/9/2022, 3/12/2022, 4/7/2022, 5/23-5/24/2022, 6/3/2022, 6/8/2022, 6/12/2022, Data loggerY
7/9/2022, 7/31/2022, 8/22-8/24/2022, 8/27-9/15/2022, 9/17-10/4/2022
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
69

10/31-11/2/2020, 11/4-11/9/2020, 11/12-11/15/2020, 11/18-11/21/2020, 11/24-
11/26/2020, 12/3/2021, 12/13-12/16/2020, 12/18-12/20/2020, 12/22-
12/24/2020, 12/27/2020-1/3/2021, 1/10-1/12/2021, 1/24/2021, 1/26/2021,
10/25/21 1/28/2021, 1/28-1/31/2021, 2/8-2/22/2021, 2/25-2/28/2021, 3/2/2021, 3/7- Data loggerY
3/12/2021, 3/16 &17/2021, 3/19-3/22/2021, 3/30-4/4/2021, 4/10/2021,
5/29/2021, 6/2-6/4/2021, 6/7/021, 6/10/2021, 6/25-6/27/2021, 6/29/2021,
08/1/2021, 8/3, 4, 6 & 7/2021, 8/15 & 18/2021
10/28/20 Various, including between 12/7-12/22/19, 1/8-1/22/20, 2/6-2/24 Data loggerY
Various, including: 10/17-10/26/18, 11/4, 11/9, 11/11-11/23, 12/5-12/16, 12/25-
10/23/19 Data loggerY
1/2/19, 1/21-2/4, 2/8-2/11, 2-16-3/14, 3-19-3/21, 3/25-3/31, 4/1-4/7, 9/6/18
10/5/18 11/9, 11/17-11/22/17, 3/24-4/24/18, 5/22-6/10, 9/11-9/19 Data loggerY
9/29/2016-10/2, 10/6-10/12, 10/14-10/16, 10/25-10/29, 11/1-11/2, 11/5-11/8,
11/12, 12/4-12/5, 12/9-12/28, 12/30-1/3, 1/6-1/17, 2/2-2/6, 2/10-2/11, 2/21, 3/2-
11/17/17 Data loggerY
3/31, 4/2-4/3, 4/9-4/20, 4/24-4/26, 4/29-4/30, 5/5, 5/25, 5/30, 6/21, 6/24-6/25,
7/5, 7/18, 8/13-8/14, 9/9-9/11/2017
9/29/16 2/4/16, 2/18/16, 5/3/16, 6/7/16 Data loggerY
Reach 1&4 Confluence (Well 4)
12/30/2021-1/3/2022, 4/8/2022, 5/17-5/18/2022, 5/23-5/31/2022, 6/4-6/6/2022,
10/4/2022 6/8-6/17/2022, 7/9-7/17/2022, 7/31-8/2/2022, 8/12-8/14/2022, 8/22-8/24/2022, Data logger Y
9/11-9/13/2022, 9/30-10/3/2022
10/31-11/9/20, 11/12-11/29/20, 12/2-12/4/20, 12/10-12/20/20, 12/22/20-1/4/21,
1/6-1/7/21, 1/9-1/13-21, 1/18-1/20/21, 1/23-1/31/21, 2/4/21, 2/6-2/28/21, 3/2-
10/25/21 3/3-21, 3/6-3/23/21, 3/25/2021, 3/29-4/4/21, 4/10/21, 6/3-6/4/21, 6/7-Data loggerY
6/10/2021, 6/12/21, 6/25-6/29/21, 7/11/21, 8/3-8/4/2021, 8/7-8/8/21, 8/15/21,
8/18/21
10/28/20 Various, including between 12/19-12/22/19, 1/8-1/23/20, 2/14-2/24, 3/7-3/23 Data loggerY
Various, including: 10/18/18, 11/3, 11/8, 11/11-11/18, 11/21-11/23, 12/5-12/15,
10/23/19 Data loggerY
12/24-12/31, 1/31/19-2/2, 2/18-2/27, 3/6-3/14, 4/1-4/5, 6/10, 7/12, 9/5
11/13, 11/17, 12/12, 12/26, 12/31/17, 1/10/18, 2/13-2/15, 3/24-3/26, 4/22, 5/31,
10/5/18 Data loggerY
6/1, 7/24, 7/29, 8/8, 9/12, 9/16
10/7-10/9/16, 12/19-12/20/16, 1/2/16, 1/7-1/10/17, 1/13-1/14/17, 3/5/17, 3/23-
11/17/17 Data loggerY
3/24/17, 4/24-4/25/17, 5/5/17, 5/23/17, 5/25/17, 6/24/17, 9/6/17
9/29/16 2/4/16, 2/18/16, 5/3/16, 6/7/16 Data loggerY

Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
70

Table 12: Verification of Baseflow
Table 12: Verification of Baseflow
30 Consecutive Days
Minimum Flow Requirement
Well (Reach) Dates of Occurrence Met? Notes
1 (Reach 3) NA NA Data Unreadable
2 (Reach 3) NA NA Data Unreadable
3 (Reach 4) Various Y On-site data logger
4 (Confluence Reach 1 & Reach 4) Various Y On-site data logger
5 (Reach 1) Various Y On-site data logger
6 (Reach 1) NA NA Data Unreadable
7 (Reach 2) NA NA Data Unreadable
8 (Reach 5) Various Y On-site data logger
9 (Reach 5) Various Y On-site data logger
10 (Reach 5) NA NA Data Unreadable
Hudson Stream Restoration Project Year 7 Monitoring Report
December 2022 DMS Project # 95361
71

onitoring well 10, on the

each 5.
R

Logger dislodged at m
thread channel
-
Photo 1: multi

us

Logger Stat

n
y
Data
b

See
string
ts.
r
Well
dislodged
iremen
e logge
u
t
q
ell was situated i
por
and th

Re
he w

.
T
a
rology re
toring
data.

ut
t hyd
out data.
Moni
dislodged,

7
d out datter flow.
me

r cap could have been
ar

1
Ye

5
t
33
well was
Logge

ch 1
ould have
ject # 9536
could not read out data.could not readcould not read ocould not rea
Reach

Reach Reach ReaReach 2
.

er could not read out data. When the logger was

ger g
ht
and w

1210
toration Projec
MS Pro
l
ll ll 7
es
D
el

to the rig
2022
OBO Log

HOBO Logger HOBO Logger HOBO Logger HOBO LogH
ring Wering W
Stream R
o
ber
as not fully extended.
toring Well

-----retrieved, the cap of thewanimal activity, or from high wastanding water photo
em
onitoring We

Monit Monito Monitoring Well 6 M Moni Hudson Dec73

ad batteries.

e devices having de
h
t

Year 7: Days Meeting Minimum Flow Requirements

ta could not be retrieved from the device due to
t
por
Re
that the logger da

toring
Moni
7
indicate
ar

1
Hudson Stream Restoration Project
Ye
lls

t
13:
le
ject # 9536
Tab
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

*Yellow highlighted ce
Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec74

DUCED BY EEP
PRO

NG SUMMARY
t
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
APPENDIX F: WATERSHED PLANNI Ye

t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec80

PRODUCED BY EEP

t
por
Re
G: LAND OWNERSHIP AND PROTECTION
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
APPENDIX
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec81

TS AND OTHER RELATED CORRESPONDENCE

t
ERMINATIONS 404/01 PERMI
por
Re
toring
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
H: JURISDICTIONAL DET
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

PENDIX
2022

AP
Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec82

PRODUCED BY EEP

ECT DEBIT LEDGER
t
por
Re
toring
PENDIX I: PROJ
AP
Moni
7
ar

1
Ye
t
ject # 9536
toration Projec
MS Pro
es
D

2022

Stream R
ber
em

Hudson Dec84