Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171045 Ver 1_KeyMill_100025_MY3_2022_20230109ID#* 20171045 Version* 1 Select Reviewer: Ryan Hamilton Initial Review Completed Date 01/18/2023 Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/9/2023 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Type of Mitigation Project:* Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Matthew Reid Project Information ID#:* 20171045 Existing ID# Project Type: Project Name: County: DMS Mitigation Bank Key Mill STREAM Mitigation Site Surry Document Information Yes • No Email Address-* matthew.reid@ncdenr.gov Version:* 1 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: KeyMill_100025_MY3_2022.pdf 55.45MB Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted... Signature Print Name: * Matthew Reid Signature: * KEYMILLMITIGATIONSITE MONITORINGYEAR3 SurryCounty,NC NCDEQContractNo.7180 ANNUALREPORT DMSProjectNo.100025 USACEActionIDNo.SAW201701504 NCDEQDWRCertificationNo.171045 Final RFP#:16006993(September16,2016) YadkinRiverBasin HUC03040101 DataCollectionPeriod:January2022ΑOctober2022 Submission:December2022 PREPAREDFOR: NCDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality DivisionofMitigationServices 1652MailServiceCenter Raleigh,NC276991652 PREPAREDBY: WildlandsEngineering,Inc. 1430SouthMintStreet,Suite104 Charlotte,NC28203 Phone:704.332.7754 Fax:704.332.3306 December28,2022 Mr.MatthewReid ProjectManager NCDEQΑAshevilleRegionalOffice DivisionofMitigationServices 2090U.S.70Highway Swannanoa,NC287788211 RE:FinalMY3ReportReview KeyMillMitigationSite,SurryCounty YadkinRiverBasinΑHUC03040101 DMSProjectIDNo.100025/DEQContract#7180 DearMr.Reid: WildlandsEngineering,Inc.(Wildlands)hasreviewedtheDivisionofMitigationServices(DMS)comments fromtheDraftMY3MonitoringReportfortheKeyMillMitigationSite.Thereporthasbeenupdated accordingly.TheFinalMY3MonitoringReportandthedigitalareincluded.‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸responsesto5a{͸ reportcommentsarenotedbelowin italics. DMScomment:PleaseensuretheMonitoringPhasePerformanceBondhasbeenupdatedand approvedbyKristieCorsonbeforeinvoicingforTask9. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:WildlandsreceivedanemailconfirmationfromKristieCorsononNovember11,2022, statingthatshehadreceivedtheupdatedbondforTask9(MY4)andthatithasbeenapproved.Wildlands isrequestinganemailconfirmationfromDMSthatwemayinvoiceforTask9uponthereceiptoftheFinal MonitoringYear3AnnualReportfortheKeyMillMitigationSite. DMScomment:Inanefforttoidentifyandresolve propertyissuesearlyduringthemonitoring period,pleaseverifythattheconservationeasementboundaryhasbeenwalked,markingandsignage isuptospec,fencingisintact,andnoencroachmentshavebeenidentified. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Theentireconservationeasement(CE)boundarywaswalkedinJulyof2022,and multipleCEviolationsweredocumented.Thelandownerwascontactedandaskedtoaddresstheissues. AfollowupsitewalkwasconductedinSeptemberof2022.Theissueshadbeenresolvedandtherewere noadditionalCEissuesnotedatthattime.AbriefdiscussionisincludedinSection2.2. DMScomment:2.1VegetationAssessment:Pleaseadddiscussionregarding2022replant.Includeplant species,type(gallonorbareroot),datesandquantity.Pleasealsoincludethereplantareasonthe CCPV. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Adiscussionaboutthereplantingareas,aswellasthespecies,size,quantity,and thewetlandindicatorstatusarelistedinatablelocatedinSection2.2.LocationsareincludedontheCCPV figures.Woodystemplantingsaredepictedaspolygonsandthelivestakeplantingsaredepictedas polylines. WildlandsEngineering,Inc.phone7043327754fax70433233061430S.MintStreet,#104Charlotte,NC28203 DMScomment:2.2VegetationAreasofConcern:Pleaseincludethatinvasivespeciestreatment occurredacrossthesiteinMY3betweenJuly2022andOctober2022.Includeshortdiscussion regardingspeciesthatweretreated. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Wildlandsconductedherbicidalapplicationsonthefollowingspecies:Marsh dewflower(Murdanniakeisak)andcattails(Typhalatifolia)inJuly,treeofheaven(Ailanthusaltissima)in SeptemberandOctober,andChineseprivet(Ligustrumsinese)andmultiflorarose(Rosamultiflora)in October.Noneoftheinvasivepopulationpocketsexceededthemappingthreshold;therefore,nonewere mapped.SeeSection2.3foradditionalinformation. DMScomment:2.4StreamAreasofConcern: DoesWEIhaveplanstorepairthepipingstructure? ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Yes,weplantorepairitinearly2023. DMScomment:CCPV:Figureshowsthefencelinewithintheconservationeasementinnumerous locations.Pleaseverifynofenceisinstalledwithintheconservationeasementandreviselayer,as necessary. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Wildlandsverifiedthatnofencinghasbeeninstalledwithintheconservation easement(CE).TheissueiswiththeGISsymbolusedtoreflecttheplacementofthefence.Thesymbol hasbeencorrectedandupdated,anditnowcorrectlyreflectsthatthealignmentofthefenceisnot withintheCEboundary. DMScomment:CCPV:PleaseincludethepipingstructuresonBullCreekR3onCCPV.Currently,an areaoferosionisshowninthegenerallocation. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:TheCCPVfiguresdepictedtheissueonBullCreekReach3asscourwithintheriffle sincethepipingandthedisplacementofeachlogispartofasinglerifflestructure;however,afterabrief discussionwithDMS,itwasdecidedtodocumenttheissueaspartofasingleengineeredstructure. Therefore,thesymbolwithintheCCPVfigurehasbeenchangedtodepictitasastructureissueand recordedonTable4d.underthechannelsubcategoryasapipingandoverallintegrityissue,ratherthan abedstabilitydegradationalissue.BothTable4dandFigures1aΑ1chavebeenupdatedtoreflectthis change. DMScomment:Table4dBullCreekR3:Tabledoesnotaccountforthepipingstructuresunder3. EngineeredStructures.Pleaserevise. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:SeeWildlandspreviousresponseaboutthestructureissueonBullCreekReach3. DMScomment:Table14:Pleaseaddthe2022supplementalplantingtothetable. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:IthasbeenaddedtoTable14asrequested. DigitalDeliverableComments: DMScomment:Thedatabasefilesubmittedcontainsafilelabeledͻ!h/a—Ћͼwhichmatchesthe visualassessmenttableforMY3andMYCCPV,pleaseverifyDMScanreportthisasMY3. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Thisnamingconventionwasusedinerror.WildlandshasupdatedthisƌğǤĻƩ͸ƭname tocorrectlyreportitforMY3. DMScomment:Thesamedatabasefilecontainsgaugespreviouslysubmitted,pleaseclarifytheneed toincludethisintheYear3dataorverifythisfilemaybedeletedfromthedatabase. ‘źƌķƌğƓķƭ͸response:Wildlandshasupdatedthislayertocontainonlythegagesthatwereaddedtothe projectinMY3,andthislayerwillneedtobeincludedintheYear3data. WildlandsEngineering,Inc.phone7043327754fax70433233061430S.MintStreet,#104Charlotte,NC28203 Asrequested,WildlandshasincludedtwohardcopiesoftheFinalMonitoringYear3AnnualReport, withacopyofourcommentresponseletterinsertedaftertheƩĻƦƚƩƷ͸ƭcoverpage.Inaddition,aUSB drivewiththefullfinalelectroniccopyofthereport,ourresponseletter,andalltheelectronicsupport fileshasbeenincluded. Sincerely, KristiSuggs SeniorEnvironmentalScientist ksuggs@wildlandseng.com WildlandsEngineering,Inc.phone7043327754fax70433233061430S.MintStreet,#104Charlotte,NC28203 EXECUTIVESUMMARY WildlandsEngineering,Inc.(Wildlands)implementedafulldeliverystreammitigationprojectattheKey MillMitigationSite(Site)fortheNorthCarolinaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality(DEQ)Divisionof MitigationServices(DMS).Theprojectrestored,enhanced,andpreservedatotalof7,437linearfeet (LF)ofperennialandintermittentstreamin SurryCounty,NC.TheSiteislocatedwithintheDMS targetedwatershedfortheYadkinRiverBasinHydrologicUnitCode(HUC)03040101110040andtheNC DivisionofWaterResources(NCDWR)Subbasin030703.Theprojectisproviding6,107.300cool streammitigationunits(SMUs)fortheYadkinRiverBasinHUC03040101(Yadkin01). TheSitehasalonghistoryofagriculturalactivityandmostofthestressorstostreamfunctionsare relatedtothishistoricandcurrentlandusepractices.ThemajorstreamstressorsfortheSitewere concentratedagriculturalrunoffinputs,degradedinstreamhabitat,activestreamincision,lackof stabilizingstreamsidevegetation,bankerosionandfailure,andthelackofbedformdiversity.Theeffects ofthesestressorsresultedindegradedwaterqualityandhabitatthroughouttheSitewhencomparedto referenceconditions.TheprojectapproachfortheSitefocusedonevaluatingthe{źƷĻ͸ƭexisting functionalconditionandevaluatingitspotentialforrecoveryandneedforintervention. Theprojectgoalsdefinedinthemitigationplan(Wildlands,2019)wereestablishedwithcareful considerationof2009UpperYadkinPeeDeeRiverBasinRestorationPriorities(RBRP)goalsand objectivestoaddressstressorsidentifiedinthewatershed.Theestablishedprojectgoalsinclude: Improvestreamchannelstability, Stabilizeerodingstreambanks, Excludelivestockfromstreamchannels, Reconnectchannelswithhistoricfloodplains, Improveinstreamhabitat, Reducesedimentandnutrientinputfromadjacentfarmfields, Restoreandenhancenativefloodplainvegetation,and Permanentlyprotecttheprojectsitefromdegradationalimpacts. Monitoringyear(MY)3assessmentsandsitevisitswerecompletedbetweenJanuaryandOctober2022 toassesstheconditionsoftheproject.AllSitewidemeasuresthatwereimplementedinlateJulyof2021 toaddressissuesidentifiedduringtheMY1IRTCreditReleaseSiteWalkonJuly13,2021arestill functioningasexpected.Areasthatweredisturbedduringtheconstruction/implementationofthese measureswerereplantedin2022. Overall,theSitehasmettherequiredstream,hydrology,andvegetationsuccesscriteriaforMY3andis performingasintended.HerbaceousvegetationhasbecomewellestablishedthroughouttheSite.The MY3vegetationsurveysshowanaverageplantedstemdensityof454stemsperacre,andtheSiteison tracktomeettheMY5requirementof260stemsperacre.Geomorphicsurveysshowthatcross sectionaldimensionscloselymatchbaselineconditionswithonlyminoradjustments.TheMY3visual assessmentdidnotidentifyanyareasoflowstemdensity,bareground,ornewstreamareasofconcern. AllmonitoredreachesreceivedatleastonebankfulleventinMY3.Theinstreamflowgagelocatedon UT2recorded261daysofconsecutivebaseflowin2022or100%ofthemonitoredperiodforMY3.Afew smallareasofinvasivespecieswerenotedandtreated.Encroachmentissueshavebeenresolved,and nootherissueswereobservedduringtheSiteassessmentfieldwalkinSeptember2022.Wildlandswill continuetomonitortheseareasthroughoutthesevenyearmonitoringperiod.Ifnecessary,adaptive maintenancemeasureswillbeimplementedtobenefittheecologicalhealthoftheSite. KeyMillMitigationSite ii MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL KEYMILLMITIGATIONSITE MonitoringYear3AnnualReport TABLEOFCONTENTS Section1:PROJECTOVERVIEW.......................................................................................................11 Section2:MONITORINGYEAR3DATAASSESSMENT......................................................................21 Section3:METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................31 Section4:REFERENCES...................................................................................................................41 TABLES Table1:ProjectQuantitiesandCredits...............................................................................................11 Table2:Goals,PerformanceCriteria,andFunctionalImprovements.................................................14 Table3:ProjectAttributes...................................................................................................................16 FIGURES Figure1CurrentConditionPlanView(Key) Figures1a 1cCurrentConditionPlanViewMap APPENDICES AppendixAVisualAssessmentData Table4alVisualStreamMorphologyStabilityAssessmentTable Table5VegetationConditionAssessmentTable StreamPhotographs VegetationPlotPhotographs AreaofConcernPhotographs AppendixBVegetationPlotData Table6VegetationPlotCriteriaAttainment Table7CVSPermanentVegetationPlotMetadata Table8acPlantedandTotalStemCounts KeyMillMitigationSite iii MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL AppendixCStreamGeomorphologyData Table9abBaselineStreamDataSummary Table10MorphologyandHydraulicSummary(DimensionalParametersCrossSection) Table11akMonitoringDataΑStreamReachDataSummary CrossSectionPlots AppendixDHydrologyData Table12VerificationofBankfullEvents Table13Verificationof30DaysConsecutiveFlow RecordedBankfullEvents RecordedInStreamFlowEvents MonthlyRainfallData AppendixEProjectTimelineandContactInformation Table14ProjectActivityandReportingHistory Table15ProjectContactTable LISTOFACRONYMS BestManagementPractice(BMP) CurrentConditionPlanView(CCPV) Crosssection(XS) DepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality(DEQ) DivisionofMitigationServices(DMS) HydrologicUnitCode(HUC) InteragencyReviewTeam(IRT) MonitoringYear(MY) NorthCarolinaDivisionofWaterResources(NCDWR) StreamMitigationUnit(SMU) StepPoolStormwaterConveyance(SPSC) UnitedStatesArmyCorpsofEngineers(USACE) UnnamedTributary(UT) YadkinPeeDeeRiverBasinPriorities(RBRP) KeyMillMitigationSite iv MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL Section1: PROJECTOVERVIEW 1.1 ProjectQuantitiesandCredits TheKeyMillMitigationSite(Site)islocatedinSurryCountyapproximately7.2milessouthofCityof MountAiry,NCintheYadkinRiverBasinHUC03040101110040andNCDWRSubbasin030703. LocatedintheSmithRiverAllochthonofthePiedmontphysiographicprovince(NCGS,1985),theproject watershedispredominatelyforestedlandwithsomeareasofagricultureincludingtheSite. TheSiteislocatedononeparcel,bisectedbyKeyRoadcreatingawesternsideandaneasternside (hereinreferencedastheWestsideandtheEastside)totheproject.BullCreekistheprimarystream, whichflowssoutheastthroughthecenteroftheSite.Therearefiveunnamedtributaries(UT1,UT2, UT2AC,UT3,andUT3AC)thatjoinBullCreekwithintheSitelimits.TheWestsideoftheproject containstheupstreamportionofBullCreek(Reaches1A,1B,and2),aswellasUT1A,UT1B,andUT1C. UT1CjoinsBullCreekReach2nearthebottomoftheWestSideoftheSiteandflowsthroughaculvert underKeyRoadintotheeasternsideoftheSite.TheEastSideofthesitecontainsthedownstream portionofBullCreek(Reach3and4),aswellasUT2,UT2AC,UT3,UT3AC. ThefinalmitigationplanwassubmittedandacceptedbyDMSinOctoberof2018andtheIRTinJanuary of2019.ConstructionactivitieswerecompletedinApril2020byCarolinaEnvironmentalContracting, Inc.KeeMapping&Surveying,PLLC.completedtheasbuiltsurveyinJune2020.Plantingwas completedfollowingconstructioninApril2020byBrutonNaturalSystems,Inc.Aconservation easement(CE)hasbeenrecordedandisinplaceon20.8acres. PleaserefertoTable1fortheƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ͸ƭstreamcreditsandthecreditsummarytable.Annualmonitoring willbeconductedforsevenyearswithcloseoutanticipatedtocommencein2027giventhesuccess criteriaaremet. Table1:ProjectQuantitiesandCredits MitigationMitigation ProjectAsBuiltMitigationRestoration PlanRatioNotes/Comments ReachFootageCategoryLevel Footage(X:1) Priority1channelrestoration, BullCreek fenceinstallationforcattle 444421CoolR1.000 Reach1A exclusion,invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation BullCreek 722722CoolR1.000 ofaconservationeasementfor Reach1B protectioninperpetuity. Priority1channelrestorationwith priority2restorationusedwhen transitioningtherestoredchannel totheexistingchannelbed BullCreekelevation,fenceinstallationfor 418418CoolR1.000 Reach2cattleexclusion,invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL11 Table1:ProjectQuantitiesandCredits MitigationMitigation ProjectAsBuiltMitigationRestoration PlanRatioNotes/Comments ReachFootageCategoryLevel Footage(X:1) Priority2restoration,fence installationforcattleexclusion, invasivespecies BullCreek 1,6741,676CoolR1.000removal/treatment,riparian Reach3 plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. Theimplementationofa BullCreek 683683CoolP10.000conservationeasementfor Reach4 protectioninperpetuity. EnhancementIIimplementation includedisolatedpocketsofbank grading,fenceinstallationfor cattleexclusion,replacementofa collapsedculvertwithan appropriatelysizedculverted UT1A829832CoolEII2.500 crossing,profileadjustments whereneeded,invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. Priority2restoration,fence installationforcattleexclusion, UT1B212212CoolR1.000 invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor UT1C257257CoolR1.000 protectioninperpetuity. UT24242CoolR1.000 Priority2restoration,fence installationforcattleexclusion, UT2A315315CoolR1.000 invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation UT2B263263CoolR1.000 ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. UT2C469469CoolR1.000 EnhancementIIimplementation includedisolatedpocketsofbank UT31818CoolEII2.500 grading,fenceinstallationfor cattleexclusion,profile adjustmentswhereneeded, invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian UT3A413390CoolEII2.500 plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL12 Table1:ProjectQuantitiesandCredits MitigationMitigation ProjectAsBuiltMitigationRestoration PlanRatioNotes/Comments ReachFootageCategoryLevel Footage(X:1) Priority2restoration,fence installationforcattleexclusion, invasivespecies UT3B307307CoolR1.000removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. Priority1channelrestorationwith priority2restorationusedwhen transitioningtherestoredchannel totheexistingchannelbed elevation,fenceinstallationfor UT3C412412CoolR1.000 cattleexclusion,invasivespecies removal/treatment,riparian plantings,andtheimplementation ofaconservationeasementfor protectioninperpetuity. CreditSummaryTable Stream RestorationLevel WarmCoolCold RestorationN/A5,535.000N/A EnhancementIN/AN/AN/A EnhancementIIN/A504.000N/A PreservationN/A68.300N/A TotalStreamCredit6,107.300 1.2 ProjectGoalsandObjectives TheSiteisprovidingnumerousecologicalbenefitswithintheYadkinValleyBasin.Theprojectgoalswere establishedwithcarefulconsiderationtoaddressstressorsthatwereidentifiedintheRBRP(EEP,2009). Theprojecthasimprovedstreamfunctionsthroughstreamrestorationandtheconversionof maintainedagriculturalfieldsintoriparianbufferwithintheYadkinValleyRiverBasin,whilecreatinga functionalripariancorridorattheSite. ThefollowingprojectspecificgoalsandobjectivesoutlinedintheMitigationPlan(Wildlands,2019) include: KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL13 Table2:Goals,PerformanceCriteria,andFunctionalImprovements Likely Objective/PerformanceCumulativeMonitoring GoalFunctionalMeasurement TreatmentCriteriaResults Uplift Allcrosssections,exceptfor XS9onUT1BandXS10on UT1ChaveaBHR<1.2.XS9 BHRtoremain hasaBHRof1.2,butthe below1.2and channelincisionisminimal.It entrenchment15Cross istheaggradationwithinthe ratio(ER)tosectionswill Reducefloodplainthathasraised remainabovebeassessed Constructstreamsedimentbankheightsandcontributing 2.2forC/EtypeduringMY1, ImprovethechannelsthatwillinputsfromtoahigherBHR.XS10hasa channelsoverMY2,MY3, stabilityofmaintainstablebankerosion.BHRof1.2;however,thebed themonitoringMY5,andMY7 streamcrosssections,Reduceshearscouratthiscrosssection periodwithandvisual channels.patterns,andprofilesstressonoccurredinMY1.Sincethen, visualinspections overtime.channelnoadditionalbedscourhas assessmentswillbe boundary.occurred.Overall,allchannels showingassessed arestableandhave progressionannually. maintainedtheconstructed towards riffleandpoolsequence.ER stability. resultsaregreaterthan2.2 forallmeasuredcross sections. Fourbankfull eventsin separateyears withinthe76automated yearmonitoringcrestgages,1InMY3,atleastonebankfull period.manualcresteventwasrecordedwithan Continuousgage,and1automatedcrestgageonBull Reconstructstream AllowmorebaseflowmustautomatedCreekReach1BandReach2, Reconnectchannelswith frequentfloodoccureverystreamgageUT1C,UT2C,andUT3Cand channelswithdesignedbankfull flowstoyearforatleastwereinstalledwithamanualcrestgageon historicdimensionsand disperseon30daysofonrestorationBullCreekReach3.The floodplains.depthbasedon thefloodplain.consecutivereachesandstreamgageonUT2recorded referencereachdata. daysduringthewillrecord261daysofconsecutiveflow monitoringflowor100%ofthemonitoring year.This30elevationsandperiod. dayperiodcandurations. occuratany pointduring theyear. KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL14 Table2:Goals,PerformanceCriteria,andFunctionalImprovements Likely Objective/PerformanceCumulativeMonitoring GoalFunctionalMeasurement TreatmentCriteriaResults Uplift Reduce Survivalrateof sediment 320stemsper inputsfromEight(8) acreatMY3, bankerosionpermanent 260planted andrunoff.andFive(5) stemsperacre Restoreandmobileone PlantnativetreeandIncrease atMY5,and enhanceunderstoryspeciesinnutrienthundred85%or11ofthe13 210stemsper nativeriparianzonesandcyclingandsquaremetervegetationplots(6permanent acreatMY7. floodplainplantnativeshrubstorageinvegetationand5mobile)havemetthe Additionally, andandherbaceousfloodplain.plotsareMY3successcriteriaof320 treesineach streambankspeciesonProvidemonitoredstemsperacre. plotmust vegetation.streambanks.riparianduringMY1, average7feet habitat.AddaMY2,MY3, in sourceofLWDMY5,and heightbyMY5 andorganicMY7. and10feet materialto byMY7. stream. Removemanmade impoundmentsandIncreaseand culvertcrossingsdiversify withineasement.available Installhabitathabitatsfor Thereisno featuressuchasmacroinverteb Improve required constructedriffles,rates,fish,andVisual instreamperformanceN/A coverlogs,andbrushamphibiansassessment. habitat.standardfor toesintoleadingto thismetric. restored/enhancedcolonization streams.Addwoodyandincrease materialstochannelinbiodiversity beds.Constructpoolsovertime. ofvaryingdepth. Reduce agricultural Installstormwater andsediment BMPsinareasof inputstothe concentratedThereisno Diffuse project,which agriculturalrunofftorequired concentratedwillreduce diffuseandprovideperformanceN/AN/A agriculturallikelihoodof vegetatedinfiltrationstandardfor runoff.accumulated forrunoffbeforeitthismetric. finesand entersthestream excessivealgal channel. bloomsfrom nutrients. KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL15 Table2:Goals,PerformanceCriteria,andFunctionalImprovements Likely Objective/PerformanceCumulativeMonitoring GoalFunctionalMeasurement TreatmentCriteriaResults Uplift ProtectSiteVisually frominspectthe Permanently Establishencroachmentperimeterof protectthePrevent conservationontheripariantheSitetoNoeasementencroachments projectSiteeasement easementsonthecorridorandensurenoobserved. fromharmfulencroachment. Site.directimpacteasement uses. tostreamsandencroachment wetlands.isoccurring. Visually Installlivestock Reducedmonitor fencingandwateringThereisno Excludeagriculturalfenced systemsasneededtorequired livestockfromrunoffandportionsoftheNocattleobservedin excludelivestockperformance streamcattlesitetoensureeasement. fromstreamstandardfor channels.tramplinginnocattleare channelsandriparianthismetric. streams.enteringthe areas. easement. Reconstructstream Crosssections channelsslatedfor Reduceshouldbe restorationwith sedimentationstableandOverall,allchannelsare stabledimensions.Crosssection Stabilize,improveshowlittlestableandbankerosionis Addbankrevetmentsmonitoring erodinginstreamchangeinminimal.Reacheshave andinstreamandvisual streambanks.habitat,andbankfullarea,maintainedtheconstructed structurestoreachesassessment. bedformandriffleandpoolsequence. toprotect diversity.widthtodepth restored/enhanced ratio. streams. 1.3 ProjectAttributes Priortoconstruction,theSitehadbeenprimarilyusedforagriculture.Landsupstreamanddownstream oftheSitearepredominantlyforestedthoughtherearesomeareasofagriculturallandsandsmall residentialareaswithinthewatershed.AgriculturalactivitieswithintheSitehadledtostreamsin variousstagesofimpairment.MostofthestreamsontheSitewereimpairedfromlimitedtonon existentbuffers,concentratedagriculturalrunoffinputs,degradedinstreamhabitat,activestream incision,bankerosionandfailure,andthelackofbedformdiversity.Preconstructionconditionsare outlinedinTable3andinTable9ofAppendixC. TheSitedrainsapproximately2.15squaremilesofruralland,predominantlyactivelygrazedpasture withthedownstreamextentoftheSiteforested.ValleysthroughouttheWestsidehavemoderately steepwallswithalluvialbottoms,whereasvalleysalongtheupstreamextentsoftheƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ͸ƭEastside tributariesarenarrowwithcolluvialbottoms.DownstreamoftheSite,BullCreekcontinuessoutheastto jointheAraratRiverneartheCedarHillcommunity. Table3:ProjectAttributes ProjectInformation ProjectName KeyMillMitigationSite County SurryCounty ProjectAreaProject 36°23'57.4794"N 20.8 (acres)Coordinates 80°36'11.88"W KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL16 Table3:ProjectAttributes ProjectInformation PlantedAcreage 9.8acres(fullplanting)plussupplementalplanting ProjectWatershedSummaryInformation Physiographic Piedmont RiverBasin YadkinRiver Province USGSHydrologicUSGSHydrologic 30401013040101110040 Unit8digitUnit14digit ProjectWatershedSummaryInformation ProjectDrainage AreaPercentage DWRSubbasin 0307031% ofImpervious Area BullCreekForest(58%),Cultivated (33%),Urban(9%) BullCreekReach1A,1B,& UT1ACForest(70%),Cultivated(21%), 2:(1,146); Urban(9%) BullCreekReach3&4: UT2ACForest(32%),Cultivated(49%), ProjectDrainage2011NLCDLand (1,293); Urban Area(acres)UT1AC:(102);UseClassification (19%) UT2AC:(32); UT2Forest(55%),Cultivated(45%), UT2:(6); Urban(0%) UT3&UT3C:(45) UT3/UT3ACForest(22%), Cultivated(74%),Urban(4%) ReachSummaryInformation BullBull BullBullBull CreekCreek CreekCreekCreekUT1AUT1BUT1C Parameters ReachReach Reach1AReach1BReach2 34 Lengthofreach(linearfeet) 4217224181,676683832212257 PostRestoration Valleyconfinement(Confined, Moderately moderatelyconfined,ConfinedtoModeratelyConfinedConfined Confined unconfined) Drainagearea(acres)1,1461,293102 Perennial,Intermittent, PPPPPPPP Ephemeral NCDWRWaterQuality C Classification MorphologicalDescription F3F3/G3cG4cG4 (streamtype)PreRestoration MorphologicalDescription (streamtype)PostC3C3bC3B4B4a Restoration Evolutionarytrend(Simon's IV/VVIIII/IV Model)PreRestoration UT2UT2AUT2BUT2CUT3UT3AUT3BUT3C Parameters Lengthofreach(linearfeet) 4231526346918390307412 PostRestoration KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL17 Table3:ProjectAttributes ProjectInformation Valleyconfinement(Confined, ModeratelyModerately moderatelyconfined,ConfinedConfined ConfinedConfined unconfined) Drainagearea(acres)63245 Perennial,Intermittent, IPPPII/PPP Ephemeral NCDWRWaterQuality C Classification MorphologicalDescription G4G5G5cG5G5G5c (streamtype)PreRestoration MorphologicalDescription (streamtype)PostB4B4C4bC4B4C4 Restoration Evolutionarytrend(Simon's III/IV Model)PreRestoration RegulatoryConsiderations RegulationApplicable?Resolved?SupportingDocumentation WatersoftheUnitedStatesUSACEActionID#SAW2017 YesYes Section40401504 WatersoftheUnitedStates YesYesDWR#171045 Section401 NPDESConstruction DivisionofLandQuality YesYesStormwaterGeneralPermit (ErosionandSedimentControl) NCG010000 CategoricalExclusion EndangeredSpeciesActYesYes DocumentinMitigationPlan CategoricalExclusion HistoricPreservationActYesYes DocumentinMitigationPlan CoastalZoneManagementAct (CZMA)/CoastalAreaNoN/AN/A ManagementAct(CAMA) NotlocatedinaSpecialFlood FEMAFloodplainComplianceYesN/A HazardArea EssentialFisheriesHabitatNoN/AN/A KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL18 Section2: MONITORINGYEAR3DATAASSESSMENT AnnualmonitoringforMY3wasconductedbetweenJanuaryandOctober2022toassessthecondition oftheproject.Thestream,vegetation,andhydrologicsuccesscriteriafortheSitefollowstheapproved successcriteriapresentedintheKeyMillMitigationPlan(Wildlands,2019).Monitoringfeaturesand locationsareshowninFigures1Α1c.RefertoTable14fortheƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ͸ƭactivityandreportinghistory. AlltheareasthatwerepreviouslyrepairedinJuly2021,asoutlinedinthe{źƷĻ͸ƭAdaptiveManagement Plan,weresuccessfullyreplantedinearly2022andaredoingwell.Wildlandswillcontinueassessing theseareasthroughoutthesevenyearmonitoringperiodfortheproject. 2.1 VegetationAssessment Vegetationplotmonitoringisbeingconductedinpostconstructionmonitoringyears1,2,3,5,and7. Permanentplotsaremonitoredinaccordancewiththeguidelinesandproceduresdevelopedbythe CarolinaVegetationSurveyEEPLevel2Protocol(Leeetal.,2008)andthe2016USACEStreamand WetlandMitigationGuidancetoassessthevegetationsuccess.Atotalof8permanentvegetationplots wereestablishedwithintheprojecteasementareausingeithera10meterby10metersquareplotora 5meterby20meterrectangularplot.Inaddition,5mobilevegetationplotswererelocatedinMY3 throughouttheplantedconservationeasement,asdescribedinthe{źƷĻ͸ƭBaselineConditionsReport (Wildlands,2020).ToevaluatetherandomvegetationperformancefortheSite,mobileplotswill continuetobereestablishedindifferentrandomlocationsinmonitoringyears5and7.Mobile 2 vegetationplotassessmentswilldocumentstems,species,andheightusing100metercircular,square, orrectangularplots.Thefinalvegetativeperformancestandardforallplotsisthesurvivalof210planted stemsperacre,withanaverageheightof10ft,intheplantedriparianareasattheendoftherequired sevenyearmonitoringperiod.TheinterimmeasureofvegetativesuccessfortheSitewillbethesurvival ofatleast320plantedstemsperacreattheendofMY3andatleast260stemsperacre,withan averageheightof7ft,attheendofMY5. TheMY3vegetationsurveywascompletedinAugust2022andresultedinanaverageplantedstem densityof454stemsperacreforallmonitoredpermanentandmobilevegetationplots.Elevenoutof the13plotsindividuallyexceededtheMY3interimrequirementwithdensitiesrangingfrom364to567. ThetwoplotsthatslightlymissedtheMY3targetdensitycriteriawerepermanentvegetationplots2 and5,bothofwhichhadanaverageof283plantedstemsperacre.Themajorityofthesurvivingstems throughoutthemonitoredplotsappeartobethrivingwithavigorof3orgreater(aplanthealth indicatorofgoodorbetter).TheaverageMY3stemheightforallmonitoredplotsis4.4feet,whichis1.8 feettallerthantheaverageheightinMY2.Allplotsareontracktomeetthestemdensityandheight performancecriteriaforbothMY5andMY7. PleaserefertoAppendixAforvegetationplotphotographsandAppendixBforvegetationdatatables. 2.2 VegetationAreasofConcernandManagementActivity Overall,herbaceousgroundcovercontinuestobecomewellestablishedthroughouttheSiteand wetlandvegetationcontinuestofillinthewetseeps,stabilizingthesoil.Areasoflowstemdensity and/orofbareorpoorherbaceouscover,notedduringMY1,weresupplementallyplantedandseeded inearlyMY2.Theseareascontinuetothriveandarenolongerofconcern.Therewerenoareasofbare groundorlowstemdensitynotedinMY3. Additionalsupplementalplantingofwoodyvegetationandlivestakesoccurredin2022torevegetate disturbedareascreatedwhenearthworkwasconductedtoaddressissuesidentifiedduringtheMY1IRT CreditReleaseSiteWalkonJuly13,2021.Thoughtheseareasweresupposedbereplantedinearly2022, KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL21 miscommunicationinadvertentlycausedthedormantwindowinearly2022topass.Though unfortunate,theareashadbeenstabilizedwithbothtemporaryandpermanentriparianseedandwere stnd notexperiencinganybareorerosionalareas.Inhopestooffsetthisoversight,onDecember1 and2, 2022,Wildlandsinstalled100,1and2gallonwoodycontainerplantsandapproximately60livestake cuttingsthatwereharvestedonsite.Thetypeofplantedwoodyspecies,numberofspecies,and containersizeareincludedinthetablebelow.Allofthespecies,exceptforspicebush(Linderabenzoin), hadbeenpreviouslyapproved;however,duetoextremelylimitednurserystock,Wildlandsdetermined thatspicebushwasthebestchoicesincewecommonlyusethespeciesonourprojects,ithasahigh wildlifevalue,andisappropriatefortheplantcommunity.Wildlandsisrequestingapprovalforthe inclusionofspicebushintothe{źƷĻ͸ƭplantinglist.IfforsomereasonspicebushźƭƓ͸Ʒapproved,Wildlands willrefrainfromcountingthespeciesaspartoftheplantedstemdensitiesforvegetativeperformance. SeetheKeyMillMitigationSiteAsbuiltBaselineMonitoringReportRecordDrawings(Wildlands,2020) forlivestakespecies.LocationsofthereplantingareasaredepictedontheCurrentConditionPlanView (CCPV)figures. WoodyVegetation WetlandNumberof ScientificNameCommonNameContainerSize IndicatorStatusPlants Quercusrubra Northernredoak2GallonFACU20 Betulanigra Riverbirch1GallonFACW15 Platanusoccidentalis Sycamore1GallonFACW15 Linderabenzoin Spicebush1GallonFAC15 Fagusgrandifolia Americanbeech1GallonFACU15 Viburnumdentatum Southernarrowwood1GallonFAC10 Hamamelisvirginiana Witchhazel1GallonFACU10 Total 100 DuringMY3,theprojectSitewasassessedforinvasivespeciespopulations.Asinpreviousmonitoring years,invasivepopulationscontinuetoremaininsmall,isolatedpocketsthroughouttheeasement.In efforttokeepinvasivestoaminimum,Wildlandsconductedherbicidalapplicationsonthefollowing species:Marshdewflower(Murdanniakeisak)andcattails(Typhalatifolia)inJuly,treeofheaven (Ailanthusaltissima)inSeptemberandOctober,andChineseprivet(Ligustrumsinese)andmultiflora rose(Rosamultiflora)inOctober.Noneoftheinvasivepopulationpocketsexceededthemapping threshold;therefore,nonewereincludedontheCCPVfigures. InJulyof2022,theentireSiteCEboundarywaswalked,andmultipleviolationsweredocumented.The landownerwascontactedandaskedtoaddresstheissues.AfollowupSitewalkwasconductedin Septemberof2022.AllissueshadbeenresolvedandtherewerenoadditionalCEissuesnotedatthat time. 2.3 StreamAssessment Morphologicalsurveyswillbeperformedoneachrestorationreachformonitoringyears1,2,3,5and7 andwillfollowthe2016USACEStreamandWetlandMitigationGuidance.Rifflecrosssectionsonthe restorationreachesshouldbestableandshowlittlechangeinbankfullarea,maximumdepthratio,and widthtodepthratio.Allrifflecrosssectionsshouldfallwithintheparametersdefinedforthe designatedstreamtype.Ifanychangesdooccur,thesechangeswillbeevaluatedtoassesswhetherthe streamchannelisshowingsignsofinstability.Indicatorsofinstabilityincludeaverticallyincisingthalweg and/orerodingchannelbanks.Remedialactionwouldnotbetakenifchannelchangesindicatea KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL22 movementtowardstability.Substratematerialsshouldindicateaprogressiontowardsorthe maintenanceofcoarsermaterialsintherifflefeaturesandsmallerparticlesinthepoolfeatures. Fifteenpermanentcrosssectionswereinstalledtoassesschanneldimensionsovertime.Morphological surveysforMY3wereconductedinJuly2022.Overall,crosssection surveyresultsindicatethatmostof theĭŷğƓƓĻƌƭ͸dimensionsarestableandfunctioningasdesignedwithminimaladjustments.Changes occurringwithinafewcrosssectionsincludeslightvariationsincrosssectionalareasandwidths,aswell asmeandepths.Bankheightratios(BHR)atsurveyedcrosssectionswerelessthan 1.2forallreaches, exceptforcrosssection9(XS9)onUT1BandXS10onUT1C.XS9hasaBHRof1.2,butthechannel incisionisminimal.Itistheaggradationwithinthefloodplainthathasraisedbankheightsandis contributingtothehigherBHR.XS10alsohasaBHRof1.2;however,thebedscouratthiscrosssection occurredinMY1.Sincethen,noadditionalbedscourhasoccurred.Overall,allchannelsarestableand havemaintainedtheconstructedriffleandpoolsequence.ERresultsaregreaterthan2.2forall measuredcrosssections.Minorchangesincrosssectionalprofilesarenormalforarestoredstreamand areexamplesofhowachanneladjuststomaintainstabilityfromnaturalprocesseslikerainevents,a lackofmaturewoodyvegetationalongthestreambank,herbaceousgrowthalongthebanks,and/or sedimenttransportprocessesortogradingofrepairareas.Theseminorchangesdonotindicatechannel instability.SeeSection2.4forfurtherdiscussionaboutstreamareasofconcern. PleaserefertoCCPVFigures1Α1cforcrosssectionlocations,AppendixAforthevisualstability assessmenttablesandstreamphotographs,andAppendixCforthemorphologicaltablesandplots. 2.4 StreamAreasofConcernandManagementActivity MY3streamandvisualassessmentsrevealedthatover98%ofthe{źƷĻ͸ƭreachesarestableand performingasintended.Therewerenonewstreamareasofconcern(AOC)notedinMY3.ExistingAOCs thatwerenotedMY2,includelocalizedinstancesofaggradation(BullCreekReach1AandUT3C)andthe displacementandpipingoflogswithinalogrollerriffleonBullCreekReach3.Maintenancewiththeuse ofhandtoolsisscheduledtooccurinearly2023torepairthepipinglogwithintheriffle;however, Wildlandsdoesnotplantoresetthedislocatedlogsinceitisnotcurrentlycausinganyissuesof instability.Nomaintenanceisscheduledfortheareasoflocalizedaggradation,either.Sediment accumulationhasceased,andstreamprocessesarestartingtomoveitthroughthesystem.Areasof concernarenotedinFigures1a1c.SeeAppendixAforpicturespertainingtotheAreasofConcern. 2.5 StreamHydrologyAssessment FiveautomatedpressuretransducerswereinstalledinMY0todocumentstreamhydrologythroughout thesevenyearmonitoringperiod.InMY3,anadditionaltransducerandmanualcrestgagewere installedalongBullCreekReach1BandReach3,respectively,toserveasbackupgagesand/orchecks onBullCreekReach1AandReach3,sinceneitherrecordedabankfulleventinMY2.Henceforth,these devicesarereferredtoasͻĭƩĻƭƷgagesΛ/DΜͼandͻƒğƓǒğƌcrestgageΛa/DΜͼforthoserecordingbankfull eventsandͻƭƷƩĻğƒgagesΛ{DΜͼforthosedocumentingconsecutivedaysofbaseflow.Attheendofthe sevenyearmonitoringperiod,fourormorebankfullfloweventsmusthaveoccurredinseparateyears oneachoftherestorationreachesandintermittentchannelshavemaintained30consecutivedaysof baseflowineachmonitoringyear.Pressuretransducersareprogrammedtorecorddataevery2hours andhavecapturedmanyhighfloweventssincemonitoringcommencedinMY1. AveragerainfallinMY3exceededtheamountrecordedinMY2.Automatedcrestgages(CG)1Α4 recordedatleastonebankfulleventoneachoftherestorationreachesinMY3.Thoughthemanual crestgage,1,andtheautomatedCG6wereaddedinMY3,eachrecordedatleastonebankfullevent.At thebeginningofMY3,eachgagewascheckedforaccuracyandreplacedifneededtoensureaccurate readings.Crestgages2and4bothexperiencedmalfunctionsduringthefirst2monthsoftheyear KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL23 possiblyduetobelowfreezingtemperatures.Additionally,UT2,whichismonitoredtoconfirmthe continuationofintermittentbaseflowconditionsontherestoredchannel,recorded261daysof consecutiveflow,exceedingthe30dayconsecutiveflowrequirement.PleaserefertoFigures1Α1cfor gagelocationsandAppendixDforhydrology summarydataandgageplots. 2.6 MY3Summary Overall,theSitehasmettherequiredstream,hydrology,andvegetationsuccesscriteriaforMY3. HerbaceousgroundcoveriswellestablishedthroughoutmostoftheSite,andtheoverallaverage plantedstemdensityfortheSiteis454stemsperacre,whichisexceedstheMY3requirementof320 stemsperacrebymorethan10%for11outof13plots.Overall,geomorphicsurveysindicatethatcross sectionaldimensionscloselymatchbaselineconditionswithsomeminoradjustments,andthestreams arefunctioningasintended.Atleastonebankfulleventwasdocumentedoneachofthe5monitored reachesinMY3,and…Ћ͸ƭbaseflowexceededthe30dayrequirementforintermittentstreams,witha totalof261daysofconsecutiveflow.TheMY3visualassessmentidentifiednonewareasofconcern.A fewisolatedareasofaggradationonBullCreekReach1AandUT3C,aswellasstructureissueswithina log rollerriffleonBullCreekReach3werenotedinthe{źƷĻ͸ƭMY2report.Noareasofencroachment werenotedduringMY3,andonlyafewsmallareasofinvasivespeciespopulationsweretreated. Supplementplantingtorevegetateconstructionaccessareasfromthe{źƷĻ͸ƭAMPhasbeencompleted. WildlandswillcontinuetomonitortheSite,andadaptivemaintenancemeasureswillbeimplementedas necessarythroughoutthesevenyearmonitoringperiodtobenefittheecologicalhealthandgeomorphic stabilityoftheSite. KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL24 Section3: METHODOLOGY GeomorphicdatawascollectedfollowingthestandardsoutlinedinTheStreamChannelReferenceSite: AnIllustratedGuidetoFieldTechniques(Harrelsonetal.,1994)andintheStreamRestoration:ANatural ChannelDesignHandbook(Dolletal.,2003).AllIntegratedCurrentConditionMappingwasrecorded usingaTrimblehandheldGPSwithsubmeteraccuracyandprocessedusingArcGIS.Crestgages,stream gages,andgroundwatergagesaremonitoredquarterly.Monitoringinstrumentinstallationand methodsareinaccordancewiththe2016NCIRTStreamandWetlandCompensatoryMitigationUpdate andNCDMSAnnualMonitoringandCloseoutTemplate(2015).Vegetationmonitoringprotocols followedtheCarolinaVegetationSurveyEEPLevel2Protocol(Leeetal.,2008). KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL31 Section4: REFERENCES Doll,B.A.,Grabow,G.L.,Hall,K.A.,Halley,J.,Harman,W.A.,Jennings,G.D.,andWise,D.E.2003. StreamRestorationANaturalChannelDesignHandbook. Harrelson,CherylC;Rawlins,C.L.;Potyondy,JohnP.1994.StreamChannelReferenceSites:An IllustratedGuidetoFieldTechnique.Gen.Tech.Rep.RM245.FortCollins,CO:U.S.Departmentof Agriculture,ForestService,RockyMountainForestandRangeExperimentStation.61p. Haynes,Kaylie.Phoneconversation.18November.2021 Lee,MichaelT.,Peet,RobertK.,StevenD.,Wentworth,ThomasR.2008.CVSEEPProtocolforRecording VegetationVersion4.2.Retrievedfrom:http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvseepprotocolv4.2lev1 2.pdf. NationalOceanicandAtmosphericAssociation(NOAA).2021.PrecipitationDatafromOctober2020. MountAiry2W,NCUSUSC00315890.https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo web/datasets/GHCND/stations/GHCND:USC00315890/detail NorthCarolinaClimateRetrievalandObservationsNetworkoftheSoutheastDatabase(NCCRONOS). 2022.StateClimateOfficeofNorthCarolina.Version2.7.2.StationIDMtAiry2W,NC.Accessed September2022. NorthCarolinaEcosystemEnhancementProgram(EEP).February2009.UpperYadkinPeeDeeRiver BasinRestorationPriorities. NorthCarolinaDivisionofMitigationServices(DMS).October2015.DMSStreamandWetland MitigationPlanTemplateandGuidance. NorthCarolinaDMS,April2015.DMSAnnualMonitoringandCloseoutReportingTemplate. NorthCarolinaDivisionofWaterResources(NCDWR),2015.SurfaceWaterClassifications. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waterresources/planning/classificationstandards. NorthCarolinaGeologicalSurvey(NCGS),1985.GeologicMapofNorthCarolina:NorthCarolina Survey,GeneralGeologicMap,scale1:500,000.https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy minerallandresources/northcarolinageologicalsurvey/ncgsmaps/1985geologicmapofnc4. Rosgen,D.L.1994.Aclassificationofnaturalrivers.Catena 22:169199. Rosgen,D.L.1996.AppliedRiverMorphology.PagosaSprings, CO:WildlandHydrologyBooks. Simon,A.1989.Amodelofchannelresponseindisturbedalluvialchannels.EarthSurfaceProcessesand Landforms14(1):1126. UnitedStatesGeologicalSurvey(USGS).2020.NationalWaterInformationSystem.StationIDUSGS 362416080334345Ararat,NC.AccessedSeptember2022. USACE.2016.StreamandWetlandCompensatoryMitigationUpdate.USACE,NCDENRDWQ, USEPA,NCWRC. WildlandsEngineering,Inc(Wildlands),2019.KeyMillMitigationSiteMitigationPlan.DMS,Raleigh,NC. Wildlands,2020.KeyMillMitigationSiteAsbuiltBaselineMonitoringReport.DMS,Raleigh,NC. Wildlands,2020.KeyMillMitigationSiteMonitoringYear1AnnualReport.DMS,Raleigh,NC. Wildlands,2021.KeyMillMitigationSiteMonitoringYear2AnnualReport.DMS,Raleigh,NC. KeyMillMitigationSite MonitoringYear3AnnualReportFINAL41 FIGURES APPENDIXA.VisualAssessmentData Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 22100%22100%66100%44100%33100%22100%55100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation125.594%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate33100%Depth Sufficient1250%Length Appropriate22100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: Bull Creek Reach 1AAssessed Length:421 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 88100%88100%66100%66100%55100% 1212100%1212100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate77100%Depth Sufficient88100%Length Appropriate88100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: Bull Creek Reach 1BAssessed Length:722 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 55100%55100%55100%55100%55100% 1010100%1010100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate66100%Depth Sufficient55100%Length Appropriate55100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: Bull Creek Reach 2Assessed Length:418 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 for % Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number as Stable, Intended % Performing of Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number Totals Built Number As in Total as 1515100%1616100%272896%1111100%101191%1717100%2828100% Stable, Number Intended Performing at 1.6 of likely. flow are sill scour are no the of cover resulting to the that exceed and Depth with collapse00100%00100% appears and/or some exhibiting not structures maintaining cover or across substantial logs. upstreamdownstream intact Table the or does arms. Bankfull atat undercutsany : growth wasting or sustainable grade calving, providing (Run)(Glide) structures of within. structures vegetative poor sills 1 mass Depth physicallylacking include boulders habitat. bendbendinfluence centeringcentering appear Appropriate1616100% fromthatof Sufficient1616100% control undercut/overhanging Pool NOT lackingslumping,erosion Assessment forming erosionSection in 2022 Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate1515100%DepthLengthThalwegmeanderThalwegmeanderBanksimplyandBanksextentDoesmodest,providingBankStructuresdislodgedGrademaintenanceStructuresundernea thBankPool~MaxRootwads/logsbaseflow. extent15%. 19, Stability evaluated units) CategoryMetric are Pool Position Run Sub Stability Integrity they September Control Condition Wasting Protection and Morphology 3 since Piping VerticalRiffleMeanderThalwegScoured/ErodedUndercutMassOverallGradeBankHabitat Channel 1.(Riffle2.3.Condition4.1.2.3.1.2.2a.3.4. riffles 2022 Reach Site Stream 3 100025 assessment: Creek No. Year Visual Length:1,676 Channel 1 constructed visual Mitigation Bull 4d. Category of Project Mill Major BedBankEngineered Excludes TableDateReach:Assessed KeyDMS Monitoring 1.2.3.Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 99100%99100%88100%88100%88100%00N/A88100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate99100%Depth Sufficient99100%Length Appropriate99100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT1BAssessed Length:212 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100% 00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 99100%88100%88100%33100% 1010100%1111100%1111100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate99100%Depth Sufficient1010100%Length Appropriate1010100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)2. Riffle Condition3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT1CAssessed Length:257 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 20221. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 22100%22100%22100%22100%22100%00N/A22100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate33100%Depth Sufficient22100%Length Appropriate22100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4g. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT2Assessed Length:42 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 22100% 1010100%1111100%1212100%1010100%1010100%1212100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate1111100%Depth Sufficient1111100%Length Appropriate1111100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4h. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT2AAssessed Length:315 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 88100%88100%88100%88100%44100% 1212100%1212100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate88100%Depth Sufficient88100%Length Appropriate88100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4i. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT2BAssessed Length:263 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 22100%22100% 1111100%1111100%1313100%1111100%1313100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate1212100%Depth Sufficient1111100%Length Appropriate1111100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position4. Habitat 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4j. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT2CAssessed Length:469 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 55100% 99100% 1111100%1616100%1111100%1111100%1616100% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Aggradation00100%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate1212100%Depth Sufficient1111100%Length Appropriate1111100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4k. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT3BAssessed Length:307 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Adjust % for Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Footage with Woody Stabilizing Vegetation Number with Intended % Stable, Performing as Footage Unstable Amount of 00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100% Unstable Segments Number of Totals in As-Built Total Number 99100%99100%88100%88100%77100% 1515100%131587% Stable, Number Intended Performing as 1.6 . Aggradation210275%Degradation00100%Texture/Substrate81080%Depth Sufficient7978%Length Appropriate99100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapse00100%00100%Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sillStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. Pool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow. Channel Sub-CategoryMetric 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position 2. Riffle Condition1. Scoured/Eroded2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat 1 Category Major Channel Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in Section 1 Table 4l. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022Reach: UT3CAssessed Length:412 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022 1. Bed2. Bank3. Engineered Structures 1 AcreageAcreage % of Planted % of Easement AcreageAcreage Combined Combined 00.00.0%00.00.0% PolygonsPolygons Number of Number of Total 0.100.00.0%0.100.00.0% Mapping Mapping Threshold (SF) Cumulative Total Threshold (acres) Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material0.100.00.0%Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 5, or 7 stem count criteria.Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).1,00000.000.0%Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).none00.000.0% Vegetation CategoryDefinitionsVegetation CategoryDefinitions Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment TableDate of visual assessment: September 19, 2022 Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025 Monitoring Year 3 - 2022Planted Acreage9.8Bare AreasLow Stem Density AreasAreas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorEasement Acreage20.8Invasive Areas of ConcernEasement Encroachment Areas STREAMPHOTOGRAPHS BullCreekReach1AΑReach4 MonitoringYear3 PhotoPoint1 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint1 Αlookdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint2 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint2 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint3 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint3 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint4 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint4 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint4A Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint4A Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint4B Αlookingnorth(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint4C Αlookingwest(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint4D Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint4D Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint5 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint5 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint6 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint6 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint7 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint7 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint8 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint8 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint9 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint9 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint10 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint10 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint11 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint11 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs STREAMPHOTOGRAPHS UT1AΑUT1C MonitoringYear3 PhotoPoint12 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint12 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint12A Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint12A Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint13 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint13 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint14 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint14 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint14A Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint14A Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint14B Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint14B Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint15 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint15 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs STREAMPHOTOGRAPHS UT2ΑUT2C MonitoringYear3 PhotoPoint16 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint16 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint17 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint17 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint18 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint18 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint19 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint19 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint20 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint20 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs STREAMPHOTOGRAPHS UT3AΑUT3C MonitoringYear3 PhotoPoint21 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint21 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint22 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint22 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint22A Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint22A Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint23 Αwetlandlookingnorth(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint23 Αwetlandlookingeast(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint23 Αwetlandlookingsouth(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint23 Αwetlandlookingwest(04/14/2022) PhotoPoint24 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint24 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs PhotoPoint25 Αlookingupstream(04/14/2022)PhotoPoint25 Αlookingdownstream(04/14/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataStreamPhotographs VEGETATIONPHOTOGRAPHS MonitoringYear3 PermanentVegetationPlot1(08/11/2022)PermanentVegetationPlot2(08/11/2022) PermanentVegetationPlot3(08/11/2022)PermanentVegetationPlot4(08/11/2022) PermanentVegetationPlot5(08/11/2022)PermanentVegetationPlot6(08/11/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataΑVegetationPhotographs PermanentVegetationPlot7(08/11/2022)PermanentVegetationPlot8(08/11/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataΑVegetationPhotographs MobileVegetationPlot1(North)(08/11/2022)MobileVegetationPlot2(North)(08/11/2022) MobileVegetationPlot3(North)(08/11/2022)MobileVegetationPlot4(North)(08/11/2022) MobileVegetationPlot5(North)(08/11/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataΑVegetationPhotographs AREAOFCONCERNPHOTOGRAPHS MonitoringYear3 BullCreekReach1A:aggradationatstation104+00Α104+25Αlookingupstream(09/19/2022) BullCreekReach3:logrollerriffleatstation164+00withpipingBullCreekReach3:logrollerriffleatstation164+00withoneof underoneoftheƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻ͸ƭlogsΑlookingupstreamitsheaderlogsdislocatedfromitsfooterlog(09/19/2022) (09/19/2022) UT3C:aggradationatstations408+52Α408+87&409+08Α409+75Αlookingupstream(09/19/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixA:VisualAssessmentDataΑAreaofConcernPhotographs APPENDIXB.VegetationPlotData 85% 2022) (MY3 Mean 75% 100% Tract (Y/N)(Y/N) MetMet CriteriaCriteria SuccessSuccess Attainment Criteria PlotMY3 PlotMY3 Plot 2022 Site 3 100025 1Y2N3Y4Y5N6Y7Y8Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y Vegetation Vegetation No. Year Vegetation Mitigation 6. Mobile Project Permanent Mill Table KeyDMS Monitoring Veg MY3 Mill finished\\Key excluded. when are stems. stems location missing original to and natural/volunteer dead return all & plot; and each. folder each excluded. by stems, this for are in planted stems Work impacted data. all combined) etc.). stakes. Datastems missing project stakes, live Veg and total and live missing, of volunteers dead Access excludes stems, includes plot;natural project(s)percent This of This and dead and each year. for year. stems, summaryeach (planted a each plots. for (live species occurrences all and for Inc\\Desktop\\Microsoft of species data acre, each for species. NC. of acre, per by each pernumber stems of stems summary Engineering worksheets,County, species.plot. forlisted stems with stems stems and living each each MY3.mdb Surry report classesclasses in forfor classes living Mill Wildlands PLANTEDTOTAL the location itsits vigorvigor typetype Key PLANTEDtotal file, project ofof byby ofof with damage withwith Site v2.5.0 talliedtallied countcount listedlisted database 1 isis mitigation frequent ofsurveyed thethe distributiondistribution 11:1 Metadata ofof values 8values Mitigation entrytool Ortega plotsmost projectproject Plot Milldelivery DOCUMENT ofof eep matrixmatrix Freddy9/2/2022cvsC:\\Users\\fortega\\OneDriveFREDDY20227414988DescriptionEachEachListFrequencyFrequencyListDamageDamageAA100025KeyFull13 THIS IN Vegetation Spp spp and 2022 Site y and Plot WORKSHEETS B 3 100025 by Permanent OF Plot No. Year SppPlot by Name stems NameLocation CVS SUMMARYPlots Spp byby Mitigation Stems CodeName Prepared 7. by Prepared Project plantedtotal r Mill SizeStems Table KeyDMS MonitoringReportDateDatabaseDatabaseComputerFileDESCRIPTIONMetadataProj,Proj,PlotsVigoVigorDamageDamageDamagePlantedALLPROJECTProjectProjectDescriptionSampled rule. rule. 50% 50% the the over 4 3,4,5 over 8 Plot stems Plot stems allTallT 11 0.0247 planted planted 111111111111111 the Permanent the and 2 and 3 7 10 volunteers) stakes Plot Plot stakes and allTPnoLSPallTPnoLSP live live 0.0247 stakes, 111222 Permanent Permanent live excluding including 1 2 6 stems stems, stems Plot Plot allTPnoLSPallTPnoLSP planted planted 0.02470.02470.0247 planted of (All of 111333222333111111 Permanent Permanent 2832839315265261,700405405486 stems Number MY3. Number 1Permanent5 in 37413 Total MY3. all: 2022)2022) inPnoLS:P MY3. PlotPlot MY3. in 111111 (MY3allTPnoLSP(MY3allTPnoLSP in rubra 0.02470.02470.0247 MY3. DataData rubra in pennsylvanica PermanentPermanent 22233444433366622311122233311111122288944433455522222222211211167551212169922121217335667667999 1515697723131342101012 6076072,7922432832,226486486647364364890486486688 PlotPlot PnoLSPPnoLSP Quercus saccharinum as Morus Fraxinus as negundo Acer ACREACRE count(ares)countcount(ares)count TypeType as as (ACRES)(ACRES) TreeTreeTree111Tree222TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree perper Acer VegetationVegetation sizesize StemStem identified as sizesize SpeciesSpecies identified StemsStems was identified identified was was PermanentPermanent identified were was virginiana CurrentCurrent pennsylvanica rubrum nigra saccharinum Acer as AlderShrubAlderShrub FraxinusAcerDiospyrosBetula NameSpeciesNameSpecies asasasas OakTreeOakTree111222 HollyShrubHollyShrub bananaShrubbananaShrub HazelHazel RedRed PepperidgeTree445PepperidgeTree111 mislabeled IndianIndian Alder,Alder, MapleTreeMapleTree mislabeledmislabeledmislabeledmislabeled treeTree115111173321222treeTree3413444111116 Gum,Gum, ChristmasChristmas BirchTreeBirchTree AshTreeAshTree OakTreeOakTree SoftSoft SouthernSouthern RedRed RedRed BlackBlack PlanePlane SmoothSmooth10% previously PersimmonTreeBeechTreeHolly,PersimmonTreeBeechTreeHolly, RedRed Pawpaw,Pawpaw,10% 10%T: Oak,Oak, woodShrubwoodShrub Ash,hazelShrubAsh,hazelShrubpreviouslypreviouslypreviouslypreviously Counts Maple,Maple, WillowTreeWillowTree Birch,Birch, PoplarTree4PoplarTree1than Gum,Gum, than MapleTreeMulberryTreeMapleTreeMulberryTree Alder,Alder, stems than stemstemstemstem less Stem BoxelderTreeRedSilverTagCommonRiverIronwoodShrubAmericanAmericanWitchAmericanTulipRedSourSycamore,SpanishNorthernBlackArrowBoxelderTreeRedSilverTagCommonRiverIronwoodShrubAmericanGreenWitchAmericanTu lipRedSourSycamore,SpanishNorthernBlackArrow GreenAmerican more less total by byin by planted 10% Total plantedplantedplantedplanted 1,2 but by aaaatwo 3 2022 and Site6,7,8,8,8, included 2,5 3 100025 NameCommonNameCommon PlotPlotPlotPlotPlot 1 4 requirements,requirements tulipiferatulipifera 53 No. 4 Year virginianavirginiana Planted species dentatumdentatum virginianavirginiana Density carolinianaoccidentaliscarolinianaoccidentalis pennsylvanicapennsylvanica falcatarubrafalcatarubra Mitigation trilobatriloba requirementsrequirements, meetmeet Scientific rubra Scientific rubra nigranigra 8a. sylvatica grandifoliagrandifoliasylvatica serrulataserrulata for Project negundorubrumsaccharinumnigranegundorubrumsaccharinumnigra toto Mill opacaopaca PermanentPermanentPermanentPermanentPermanent InInInInIn Table KeyDMS Monitoring AcerAcerAcerAlnusAsiminaBetulaCarpinusDiospyrosFagusFraxinusHamamelisIlexLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusQuercusSalixViburnumAcerAcerAcerAlnusAsiminaBetulaCarpinusDiospyr osFagusFraxinusHamamelisIlexLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusQuercusSalixViburnum 12345 Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFailsVolunteer APPENDIXC.StreamGeomorphologyData 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 1.1 11111 1024.0 87.3/137.0/ 0.3/1.8/8.9/ N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A <1% 11111 .06040.01080.0527 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 256.0 B4B4a1735 6.86.91.01.04.46.21.1 212257 1.312.0353.094.00.160.16 UT1BUT1C 11111 0.03490.0407 /101.2/ N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 0.3/6.4/12.8/45.0 R3 C3 1.3 0.922.02 Creek 1,676 362.0 0.0092 96.0/146.7/ 1.61.81.01.04.75.1 157184 0.2/0.5/19.0/ Bull 19.621.233.536.010.713.456.456.942.047.0 R2 Built/Baseline As 2.50.91.33.43.54.91.06.61.2 151418 C3b 55.723.634.02.1789.01.79 Creek 135.933.956.2512.0 0.0249 SC/0.3/11.0/ 222.4/346.7/ 1% R1B C3 1.72.93.91.05.61.2 166722 17.367.629.710.182.260.01.68 362.0 Creek 0.0124 151.8/256.0/ 0.1/5.6/28.5/ Bull R1ABull C3 1.50.60.82.83.61.03.81.2 107421 19.470.128.213.429.01.63 107.3230.4362.0 Creek 0.0071 1.82.61.82.91.93.21.74.13.54.63.14.62.84.31.95.2 113.8/171.4/ 68.889.453.481.345.069.239.0108.435.050.032.050.030.050.536.085.60.1/5.6/20.7/ 192.2207.2179.2199.8149.3171.4177.0312.4 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 0.61.44.822.93.95.7 257 0.0425 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A <1% 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 94119B4B4a 8.58.316.40.65.33.84.11.11.1 212 13.814.511.811.78.31.191.500.160.1619.019.00 UT1BUT1C 0.03350.04580.0316 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A R3Bull 80 1.53.91.3 130922 21.031.11.020.661.32 Creek Bull 0.00760.0114 1.0 Design R2 1.21.2 140119418 C3bN/A 16.019.313.31.761.792.0299.0 Creek 0.0295 Bull 1% R1B 77 C3C3 3.95.2 7221,674 17.523.2>2.2>2.21.68 Creek 1112020 1,4841,159 R1ABull 49C3 1.61.33.21.3 444 19.530.212.613.214.20.640.981.6390.090.0116.0 Creek 0.00860.01500.01180.00690.0123 1.82.61.82.91.93.21.74.13.54.63.14.62.84.31.95.2 68.889.453.481.345.069.239.0108.435.050.032.050.030.050.536.085.6 Bull 192.2207.2179.2199.8149.3171.4177.0312.4 0.01000.01480.01620.02030.01720.03180.01030.01710.03140.08010.00800.05260.00500.01400.01330.02580.02740.03770.00370.01970.02850 2.63.21.7 <1% 180.0 2.61.11.3 G4cG4 0.160.16 UT1BUT1C 0.02400.03700.01400.04400.0242 0.3/8.0/13.5/33.6/75.9/ floodplain. 48.0262.048.0262.096.0111.080.0101.074.676.755.8149.020.054.020.027.076.6110.159.399.260.8187.819.963.018.251.5 the R3 across Condition N/A 64.0 Creek 256.0116.0 F3/G3c 1.12.10.71.00.71.01.32.92.42.52.42.52.24.66.37.82.83.32.72.94.34.71.52.34.05.63.54.83.96.51.31.84.35.03.14.63.34.23.05.40.92.01.22.4 width 109.5/166.9/ 0.5/3.4/13.3/ the R2Bull Restoration 1.34.91.21.21.2 1.792.0299.019.019.0 Creek 362.0 0.02700.00800.01600.0190 assuming Pre of 100.0/180.0/ Bull 0.5/9.2/13.7/ 1% lieu in Creek F3F3 1.34.9 R1B 0.0120 Bull section, >2048 cross the Creek F3 1.11.11.11.34.91.21.2 4358764032,291188332 R1A 52.052.052.01.631.6890.090.0 of 0.01000.01300.0090 21252125212527531417141742.997.538.587.535.280.046.2105.012.019.012.018.094.099.0 Bull 1.82.11.82.11.82.11.62.71.01.51.01.52.02.81.72.41.41.91.82.40.71.00.71.12.73.03.74.13.74.13.74.11.92.85.07.95.07.94.84.94.84.94.84.94.24.33.55.03.55.0 MinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMax 16.219.116.219.116.219.118.025.45.67.05.67.018.721.618.721.618.721.626.239.53.96.83.96.814.116.814.116.814.116.28.522.57.38.17.38.191.696.691.696.625.837.217.724.217.724.2 0.3/2.8/34.3/167.3/287.3/ width the N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A on )) 222 channels 23 100 yr)yr) (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) (%) (ft(ft (cfs) 2 (fps) (SM) RatioRatio/D lb/ft based Riffle(mm)(2 Ratio(ft/ft)(ft/ft)(ft/ft)type RatioW/m Profile Width 95 (1.2 B 50 Pattern bankfull are Sinuosity Area/D D WidthDepthDepthDepthMannings Area Length LengthLength WidthatLength ParameterGage 84 Spacing and SlopeSlopeSlope Width ParametersParameters Q Volume Estimate Height Classification Velocity Beltwidth /D Curvature MaxMaxDischarge 50 Summary Pool Riffle Meanof type Pool regression (Capacity) Substrate Max Pool Riffle /D A BankValley Bankfull sectionalRc/Bankfull Reach Width/DepthCover 35 DrainageThalweg Pool particles (Competency)parameters Meander EntrenchmentmobilizedRosgenNFF Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% extrapolation for Data and Meander /DBankfull Channel Transport Floodprone Q BankfullRadiusBankfull 16 Power BankfullCross D Stress and(mm) SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% USGS Channel diameter Bankfull/Channel Q Additional Stream 2022 Impervious size Stream applicable Bed Site Shear mm Dimension provided Bankfull 3 100025 not part is not No. Year baseline/monitoring Reach <0.062 Baseline Max was data Applicable Watershed Mitigation Substrate, the 9a. Project Not Data for Mill Silt/Clay ): PatternER Table KeyDMS Monitoring 1.2.SC:(N/A: .0249 6.3 11.3 148.1/256.0 1.62.92.26.0 17.244.812.022.065.2118.0 0.1/0.3/4.0/73.4/ 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 0.50.8 11111 0.8/4.2/9.4/ N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 64.0/165.3/362.0 124.6/256.0 SC/0.1/8.9/92.5/ <1% Built/Baseline As 1.21.31.11.2 SC/0.1/1.3/ 2.02.51.92.53.24.33.34.9 19.02623.034.012.015.013.017.056.076.073.090.0 85.4/137.0/256.0 11111 64.0/ N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 6.88.17.86.98.83.44.85.83.56.84.43.56.23.1 0.040.050.050.070.07 11111 85.4/128.0 1.42.21.62.21.42.10.92.61.82.5 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A SC/0.1/0.8/ 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A B4B4C4bC4B4C4 N/A30.332.048.221.455.8N/A0.81.11.10.81.3N/AN/A13.911.710.513.4N/A58.669.349.021.128.2N/AN/AN/A 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A >2.2N/A 1.62.92.26.0 17.244.812.022.065.2118.0 11 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 3.32.4N/A3.63.73.34.23.4 1.130.55N/A0.740.690.590.990.66 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 1.0N/A1.01.01.01.01.0 <1% Design 9 40298942N/A36.035.028.050.028.062102 6.06.87.07.5N/A2.42.27.07.012.012.0N/A12181915231.21.31.11.2N/A1.1 26346930741242315263469307412 C4bC4B4C4 13.312.913.712.00.520.380.050.050.070.070.01 UT2BUT2CUT3BUT3CUT2UT2AUT2BUT2CUT3BUT3C 0.02340.01790.03290.01530.02000.0135N/A0.02370.01840.01340.03170.0132 2.02.51.92.53.24.33.34.9 19.026.023.034.012.015.013.017.056.076.073.090.0 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 6.00.52.71.3 13.3 UT2A 11111 0.0272 22.033.023.044.030.047.024.029.031.058.018.639.920.544.126.155.919.530.417.479.9 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 0.02290.03870.03040.03630.01210.0146 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 3 848342315 B4B4 3.50.20.50.50.50.6N/A0.50.60.70.92.63.23.64.71.61.41.51.61.9N/A3.02.73.07.0 N/AN/A1.1 UT2 14.221.01.061.050.010.04 0.07310.0580 11111 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A 0.04570.06810.02870.04140.01350.04090.01350.04490.03850.04880.01980.02660.00460.03470.00540.03710.01320.05100.01130.05300.00810 0.71.2 G5c296 0.0712.0 UT3C 0.0170 G5 0.71.5 414 0.0712.0 UT3B 0.03600.01600.0230 floodplain. G5 5.31.1 223 the 0.0200 Condition across <1% width the Restoration 7.0 1.2 G5c299 0.050.05 0.03100.0170 Pre assuming SC/0.1/0.2/8.4/12.5/32.0SC/0.5/5.9/21.0/100.0/256.0 of lieu G5 in 7.07.01.1 349 0.05 0.02900.0190 section, cross the 61 G4 5.35.35.33.01.1 N/A UT2UT2AUT2BUT2C 0.01 of 0.06400.04700.0220 841128411284112841129149145.08.08.013.013.030.015.034.010.015.016.537.5SC0.1SC1.1SC2.1SC3.13.66.43.66.4 5.77.45.77.45.77.45.77.42.84.12.84.11.41.91.41.91.41.91.41.92.73.82.73.8 MinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMax 16.021.216.021.216.021.216.021.21.63.51.63.51.42.22.85.75.07.55.16.63.16.0 width the N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A on )2)22 channels 23 100 yr)yr) (ft)(ft) (ft)3.95.73.95.7(ft)1.11.41.11.41.11.41.11.4(ft)1.92.01.92.01.92.01.92.00.81.20.81.20.30.40.50.70.50.70.60.80.60.80.81.0(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) (%) (ft(ft (cfs) 2 (fps)1.92.21.92.21.92.21.92.24.04.24.04.2 (SM) /D based Ratio3.74.83.74.83.74.83.74.85.47.85.47.8Ratiolb/ft Riffle(mm)(2 (ft/ft)type (ft/ft)(ft/ft) Ratio RatioW/m 95 Profile Width (1.2 B 50 Pattern bankfull are /D DSinuosity Area WidthDepthDepthDepthMannings Area Length LengthLength 84 Length ParameterGage Width at and Spacing Slope Parameters SlopeSlope Parameters Width VolumeQ s Estimate Height/D ClassificationVelocity Beltwidth Curvature Discharge 50 Summary MaxMax Pool type Riffle Mean Poolof regression (Capacity) Substrate Pool/DMax Riffle A Valley BankfullBank Reach sectionalRc/Bankfull 35 Cover Width/Depth particle Thalweg parameters Drainage Pool (Competency) Meander Data NFF Rosgen for Entrenchment Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%mobilized /D extrapolation and MeanderBankfull Channel Transport Floodprone 16 Q Bankfull BankfullRadius Power D Cross Bankfull Stress and SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% (mm) USGS diameter Channel Stream 2022 Bankfull/Channel Additional Q Site applicable Impervious Bed Stream size mm 3 providede Shear 100025 Dimension Bankfull not is part not No. Year baseline/monitoring <0.062 Baseline Reach was data Applicabl Max Mitigation the Substrate,Watershed 9b. Project Not forData Mill Silt/Clay ): PatternER Table KeyDMS Monitoring 1.2.SC:(N/A: Pool Riffle 8, 4, Riffle 12, Section Section Cross Cross Section 3 2 Cross Reach Reach Creek Creek 3.43.13.63.41.01.11.01.0 55.755.655.655.6 PoolBull RiffleBull 3, 7, RiffleUT2B Riffle Section 11, 15, Section Cross Cross Section Section 3 1B Cross Cross Reach Reach Creek Creek . Bull comparison easier t for . up height lined 4 bank Measuremen low sections Riffle RiffleBull 2, 6, Standard cross current RiffleUT2ARiffleUT3C the that the in 10,14, so Section Section on based Cross Cross described adjusted SectionSection 3 as 1B was area Cross Cross plot Reach calculated Reach the were sectional Creek Creek cross therefore Bull parameters (MY0) lain. p locations; 4.74.64.74.74.33.63.94.61.01.00.91.01.00.90.90.8 built 99.099.098.998.684.084.084.083.9 pin As flood dimension the the on section section across cross based cross width the MY1 of the Riffle PoolBull and g calculated 1, 5, is MY0 Section) RiffleUT3B RiffleUT1C assumin the remainder Ratio 9, of Section13, Section further. Cross The lieu Height in between Cross, Cross extend Section Section 3 Bank 1A (9/2018). may section MY7 Cross Cross alignment Parameters Reach width Reach NCDMS cross MY1 UT1B UT2C and the section valley Creek area. Creek of but NCIRT Bull cross Bull width (Dimensional the the sectional sectionthe in by on cross shift 3.63.44.34.53.93.93.64.11.01.00.90.91.01.01.00.93.93.72.65.85.78.07.77.53.43.13.02.94.84.53.93.83.54.33.24.64.95.54.85.34.44.33.64.04.03.53.33.81.01.00.81.21.01.31.21.21.00.90.90.91.01.01.01.05.85.85 .05.33.56.14.83.86.86.45.45.76.26.16.06.23.18.36.34.46.36.67.07.01.01.00.91.01.01.41.21.01.01.00.90.9 cross 70.170.069.569.567.667.666.267.528.226.722.622.029.727.329.324.456.884.579.983.022.929.021.325.149.050.348.851.333.531.730.731.136.029.227.725.855.145.742.330.623.626.918.833.734.035.434.935.230.331. 430.029.032.030.928.029.848.250.046.148.421.461.343.629.755.855.855.455.6 BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY 7 1106.411106.621106.651106.621099.361099.301099.261099.371098.701098.921098.831098.851088.011087.721087.701087.781079.641079.571079.481079.601079.351079.511079.461079.531073.271072.901072.761072.88106 8.531068.201067.991067.451101.941102.091102.131102.011089.271088.911088.901088.971096.251096.441096.481096.431088.431088.531088.491088.511081.591081.671081.591081.671084.571084.341084.521084.681081.1 31081.261081.241081.33 of Summary MY0based provided slight )))) 1231123112311231 is 2222 a (ft)1.51.31.41.41.71.61.61.52.32.82.72.71.41.61.41.5(ft)1.81.91.81.91.61.51.51.51.81.21.31.41.91.41.91.5(ft)0.60.60.50.80.81.21.11.10.50.40.40.40.60.50.50.5(ft)0.70.70.60.70.50.80.70.60.80.80.70.7 (ft)19.420.616.115.417.317.218.416.324.430.430.130.416.417.915.616.3(ft)2.82.82.52.62.92.73.02.65.36.05.95.72.52.92.32.6(ft)27.026.226.727.521.221.420.921.019.623.521.318.429.332.222.220.1(ft)3.74.84 .85.02.72.42.32.43.02.52.52.34.33.83.93.2(ft)6.86.35.87.46.96.47.36.66.87.38.27.38.18.88.57.8(ft)0.91.20.91.51.31.91.91.90.80.70.60.71.11.00.91.0(ft)7.88.27.77.86.97.46.96.88.88.47.98.0(ft)1.11.21.11 .10.81.71.31.01.31.41.31.4the (ft)(ft(ft)(ft(ft)(ft(ft)(ft width in Ratio13.416.011.510.810.110.811.611.010.510.911.311.211.811.011.410.6Ratio14.913.614.614.813.414.514.314.210.718.916.513.115.622.711.613.2Ratio11.710.812.89.58.35.26.95.813.917.322.518.613.417.118.61 5.8Ratio10.511.612.011.513.48.99.912.111.311.111.511.1 on RatioRatioRatioRatioRatioRatioRatioRatio the AreaAreaAreaArea Elevation1106.411106.541106.311106.231099.361099.161099.241099.061098.701098.921098.831098.851088.011088.081087.601087.90Elevation1079.641079.571079.481079.601079.351079.421079.331079.421073.271072.6 21072.371072.361068.531068.201067.991067.45Elevation1101.941102.051101.931102.291089.271089.291089.211089.271096.251096.401096.431096.361088.431088.571088.451088.46Elevation1081.591081.681081.481081. 611084.571084.801084.741084.731081.131081.211081.071081.20 DepthDepthDepthDepthdocument WidthDepthWidthDepthWidthDepthWidthDepth ElevationElevationElevationElevation WidthWidthWidthWidth Hydraulic arameters based p fromresulted HeightHeightHeightHeight g MaxMaxMaxMax BankBankBankBank are MeanMeanMeanMean and MY1 BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull BankBankBankBank BankfullSectionalBankfullSectionalBankfullSectionalBankfullSectional Width/DepthWidth/DepthWidth/DepthWidth/Depth LowLowLowLow Parameter EntrenchmentEntrenchmentEntrenchmentEntrenchment riffles 2022 Site calculated FloodproneFloodproneFloodproneFloodprone monitorin BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull during / for is 3 100025BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull CrossCrossCrossCross SubstrateSubstrateSubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3 MY4MY5MY6MY7 BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull No. BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull Year width andandandand Morphology Monitoring baseline elevation Mitigation BankfullBankfullBankfullBankfull conducted BHR 10. the Project Mill for the of BankfullFloodproneERRepairs Table KeyDMS MonitoringDimensionDimensionDimensionDimension 1234 (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 102+89 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (10/2019) 102030405060 MY0Bankfull 11101108110611041102 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 110+04 Area) MY0 on in (Based MY1 (12/2020)adjusted shift and was MY1Bankfull comparison. slight a plot MY0 in easier the the for up resulted between therefore lined MY1 during alignment locations; sections pin cross section conducted the (07/2020) section cross that 10203040506070 MY0Bankfull thecrossso *Repairs 11041102110010981096 (ft)Elevation Bankfull (06/2022) MY3 (ft) Pool (08/2021) Width MY2 110+48 in MY1 (12/2020) and it was shown during data MY1 XS3 cross plot, as XS3 for of section section 110+48 repaired bank number cross the cross left Station MY1 the MY0 as station shows on the the the line of on Also (07/2020) reported plot conducted MY1 MY0 been collection reported plot. profile. The werethe have to 010203040506070 above sectional priorphotos.incorrectlyshouldthe *Repairs 11011099109710951093 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 115+88 Area) MY0 to plot on itshould number prior MY1 plot, (Based MY1 station aboveplot. (12/2020) the the section during photos.The in Also MY1Bankfull XS4 cross and of shown MY0 data profile. as bank the on right section 115+88 sectional the cross on cross reported Station MY1 as the repaired of conducted incorrectly the reported (07/2020) were was 01020304050 shows collection XS4 MY0Bankfull thelineforhavebeen *Repairs 10921090108810861084 (ft)Elevation Bankfull (06/2022) MY3 (ft) Pool (08/2021) Width MY2 152+97 (12/2020) MY1 (06/2020) MY0 1020304050607080 10821080107810761074 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 153+52 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (06/2020) 102030405060708090 MY0Bankfull 10841082108010781076 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 161+14 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (07/2020) 1020304050607080 MY0Bankfull 107810761074107210701068 (ft)Elevation Bankfull (06/2022) MY3 (ft) Pool (08/2021) Width MY2 164+78 (12/2020) MY1 (06/2020) MY0 1525354555657585 107210701068106610641062 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 209+24 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull aboveplot. reported the in incorrectly itshouldhavebeen shown was as plot, XS9 209+24 section cross Station numberfor as MY0 (07/2020) station the 10203040 MY0Bankfull onreported *The 11041103110211011100 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 213+12 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (07/2020) 0102030 MY0Bankfull 109210911090108910881087 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 300+77 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (06/2020) 515253545 MY0Bankfull 1098109710961095 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 304+78 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (06/2020) 81828384858 MY0Bankfull 10911090108910881087 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 309+26 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (06/2020) 01020304050 MY0Bankfull 10841083108210811080 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 406+50 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (06/2020) 152535455565 MY0Bankfull 10871086108510841083 (ft)Elevation (06/2022) MY3 Area (08/2021) MY2Floodprone (ft) Riffle Width 408+51 Area) MY0 on (Based (12/2020) MY1Bankfull (06/2020) 01020304050 MY0Bankfull 108410831082108110801079 (ft)Elevation APPENDIXD.HydrologyData Table12.VerificationofBankfullEvents KeyMillMitigationSite DMSProjectNo.100025 MonitoringYear32022 ReachMonitoringYearDateofOccurrenceMethod 5/28/2020 8/5/2020 MY1AutomatedCrestGage BullCreekReach2 11/12/2020 12/2627/2020 (CrestGage#1) MY2 MY37/9/2022AutomatedCrestGage 8/5/2020 8/15/2020 10/29/2020 MY1AutomatedCrestGage 11/1112/2020 UT1C 12/3/2020 (CrestGage#2) 12/19/2020 12/2527/2020 MY29/2122/2021AutomatedCrestGage MY36/19/2022AutomatedCrestGage 8/15/2020 10/29/2020 MY1AutomatedCrestGage 11/12/2020 UT2C 12/30/2020 MY29/2122/2021AutomatedCrestGage (CrestGage#3) 1/16/2022 MY3AutomatedCrestGage 2/5/2022 2/7/2022 8/5/2020 8/15/2020 MY1AutomatedCrestGage 8/21/2020 UT3C 10/29/2020 (CrestGage#4) 12/2526/2020 MY29/2122/2021AutomatedCrestGage MY37/9/2022AutomatedCrestGage 5/28/2020 8/5/2020 MY1AutomatedCrestGage BullCreekReach3 8/15/2020 (CrestGage#5) 11/12/2020 MY2 MY3 BullCreekReach3 MY35/25/20229/19/2022ManualCrestGage (ManualCrestGage#1)* BullCreekReach1B MY37/9/2022AutomatedCrestGage (CrestGage#6)** *ManualCrestGage#1wasinstalledinMY3on5/25/2022. **CrestGage#6wasinstalledinMY3on4/14/2022 Table13.Verificationof30DaysConsecutiveFlow KeyMillMitigationSite DMSProjectNo.100025 MonitoringYear32022 SummaryofInStreamGageResultsforMonitoringYears1through7 SuccessCriteriaAchieved/MaxConsecutiveDays(Percentage) Gage MY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7 Yes/256daysYes/351daysYes/261days UT2SG#1 (100%)(100%)(100%) 0.545inches BullCreekReach3:ManualCrestGage#1BankfullDocumentation(9/19/2022) KeyMillMitigationSite AppendixD:HydrologyDataΑAdditionalBankfullDocumentation (in)Precipitation 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 2) Bankfull Reach Level Creek 2022 3 Water (Bull #1 Year Gauge Monitoring Crest Precipitation Mill: Daily Key Plot Events 2022 Bank 3 100025 No. JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Year Bankfull 2.01.00.01.02.03.04.0 Mitigation (ft)LevelWater Project Mill Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring (in)Precipitation 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 Bankfull XS10) Level 2022 (UT1C, 3 #2 Water Year Gauge Crest Monitoring Mill: Precipitation Key Daily 02/22/2022 Plot Malfunction; Events 2022 Gage Bank 3 100025 01/01/2022 No. JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Year Bankfull 1.00.01.02.03.04.0 Mitigation (ft)LevelWater Project Mill Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring (in)Precipitation 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 Bankfull XS13) Level 2022 (UT2C, 3 #3 Water Year Gauge Crest Monitoring Mill: Precipitation Key Daily Plot Events 2022 Bank 3 100025 No. JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Year Bankfull 2.01.00.01.02.03.04.0 Mitigation (ft)LevelWater Project Mill Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring (in)Precipitation 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 Bankfull XS15) Level 2022 (UT3C, 3 #4 Water Year Gauge Crest Monitoring Mill: Precipitation Key Daily 02/06/2022 Plot Malfunction; Gage Events 2022 Bank 01/01/2022 3 100025 No. JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Year Bankfull 2.01.00.01.02.03.04.0 Mitigation (ft)LevelWater Project Mill Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring (in)Precipitation 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 XS7) Bankfull 3, Reach Level 2022 Creek 3 Water (Bull Year #5 Gauge Monitoring Precipitation Crest Daily Mill: Key Plot Events 2022 Bank 3 100025 No. JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Year Bankfull 2.01.00.01.02.03.04.0 Mitigation (ft)LevelWater Project Mill Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring (in)Precipitation 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 Bankfull 1B) Reach Level Creek 2022 3 Water (Bull Year #6 Gauge Monitoring Crest Precipitation Mill: Daily Key gage; 4/14/2022 on Installed Newly Installed Plot Events 2022 Bank 3 100025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec No. Year Bankfull 2.01.00.01.02.03.04.0 Mitigation (ft)LevelWater Project Mill Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring (in)Rainfall 4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0 Dec Nov Oct Sep Bankfull Aug (UT2) Thalweg #1 2022 3 Gage Jul Year Level Stream Water flow Mill: Monitoring Jun Key stream Rainfall May consecutive of days 261 Apr Mar Events Feb Flow 2022 Site 3 100025 stream Jan No. Year In Mitigation 1,1021,1011,1001,0991,0981,0971,096 Project Mill (ft)Elevation Recorded KeyDMS Monitoring Percentile 2022) 70th (1992 normal 2022 climate in yr 30 (315890) on NC Rainfall based W, for 2 Percentile AIRY Graph percentiles Month 30th (315890); MOUNT NC Percentile W, 70 2 Station: 30 AIRY Mill WETS (315890) MOUNT Key NC W, Station: 2 Rainfall AIRY WETS 2022 from MOUNT collected Station: data WETS 2022 Bank Data rainfall from 3 100025 No. Year JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember collected percentile Rainfall Mitigation 9876543210 70th 10 Rainfall Project (in)Precipitation Mill and Monthly KeyDMS Monitoring Annual30th APPENDIXE.ProjectTimelineandContactInformation Table14.ProjectActivityandReportingHistory KeyMillMitigationSite DMSProjectNo.100025 MonitoringYear32022 ActivityorReportDataCollectionCompleteCompletionorDelivery May2019May2019 404Permit MitigationPlanJanuary2017January2019January2019 FinalDesignConstructionPlansMay2019May2019 June2019April2020April2020 Construction 1 June2019April2020April2020 TemporaryS&Emixappliedtoentireprojectarea 1 April2020April2020 Permanentseedmixappliedtoreach/segments Barerootandlivestakeplantingsforreach/segments April2020April2020 BaselineMonitoringDocument(Year0)July2020October2020 InvasiveTreatmentAugust2020 August2020 StreamRepairs(WestSide)November2020 November2020 Year1Monitoring StreamSurveyDecember2020 February2021 VegetationSurveyOctober2020 Seeding(Sitewide) February2021February2021 SoilAmendments StreamRepairs(EastSide) March2021March2021 SupplementalPlantings Year2MonitoringLiveStakeInstall InvasiveTreatments(Sitewide)June2021November2021 ImplementationoftheIRTCreditReleaseSiteActionPlanJuly2021August2021 StreamSurvey August2021November2021 VegetationSurvey SoilAmendments(Restorationportions:BullCreekR3&UT3) June2022 June2022 StreamSurveyNovember2022 Year3MonitoringInvasiveTreatments(Sitewide)July2022October2022October2022 VegetationSurveyNovember2022 August2022 SupplementalPlantings December2022December2022 StreamSurvey Year4Monitoring VegetationSurvey StreamSurvey Year5Monitoring VegetationSurvey StreamSurvey Year6Monitoring VegetationSurvey StreamSurvey Year7Monitoring VegetationSurvey 1 Seedandmulchisaddedaseachsectionofconstructioniscompleted. Table15.ProjectContactTable KeyMillMitigationSite DMSProjectNo.100025 MonitoringYear32022 DesignersWildlandsEngineering,Inc. AaronEarley,PE,CFM1430SouthMintStreet,Suite104 Charlotte,NC28203 704.332.7754 ConstructionContractors CarolinaEnvironmentalContracting,Inc. 150PineRidgeRd MtAiry,NC27030 PlantingContractor BrutonNaturalSystems,Inc. POBox1197 Fremont,NC27830 CarolinaEnvironmentalContracting,Inc. 150PineRidgeRd SeedingContractor MtAiry,NC27030 SeedMixSourcesCarolinaEnvironmentalContracting,Inc. NurseryStockSuppliers BrutonNaturalSystems,Inc. BareRoots LiveStakes WetlandPlants,Inc. HerbaceousPlugs MonitoringPerformersWildlandsEngineering,Inc. KristiSuggs Monitoring,POC (704)332.7754x.110