HomeMy WebLinkAbout#554-final
INSPECTION REPORT ROUTING SHEET
To be attached to all inspection reports in-house only.
Laboratory Cert. #: 554
Laboratory Name: Fortron Industries
Inspection Type: Industrial Maintenance
Inspector Name(s): Todd Crawford
Inspection Date: August 24, 2011
Date Report Completed: September 1, 2011
Date Forwarded to Reviewer: September 1, 2011
Reviewed by: Tonja Springer
Date Review Completed: September 19, 2011
Cover Letter to use: ___ Insp. Initial X Insp. Reg. Insp. No Finding Insp. CP __ Corrected
Unit Supervisor: Dana Satterwhite
Date Received: September 19, 2011
Date Forwarded to Alberta: September 27, 2011
Date Mailed: September 28, 2011
_____________________________________________________________________
On-Site Inspection Report
LABORATORY NAME: Fortron Industries
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 327
Wilmington, NC 28402-0327
CERTIFICATE #: 554
DATE OF INSPECTION: August 24, 2011
TYPE OF INSPECTION: Industrial Maintenance
AUDITOR(S): Todd Crawford
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Jonathan Corbett, Dale Moore, Gary Nixon and James Roberts
I. INTRODUCTION:
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for the analysis
of environmental samples.
II. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory was clean and well organized. The facility has all the equipment necessary to perform the analyses.
The requirements associated with Findings B, D, E, H, I and J are new policies that have been implemented by
our program since the last inspection.
III. FINDINGS, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Documentation
Comment: For several analyses, the laboratory stores calibration and quality control (QC) results on a computer
and sample results on a paper benchsheet. The fact that the calibration and QC data are not with the analytical
results makes data validation cumbersome and time consuming.
Recommendation: It is recommended that benchsheets be designed to allow the documentation of both
standards and samples in the order that they are analyzed. The sheet must also state the concentration
acceptance ranges for standards or the percent recovery acceptance range and space to show the percent
recoveries of the QC standards.
Comment: The documentation of the temperature sensor verifications do not include the serial numbers (or other
traceable identifier) of the meters that are being checked.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the temperature sensor verification documentation include the serial
number (or other traceable identifier) of the NIST traceable thermometer used for the verification and the
manufacturer, model and serial number of the meter being checked.
A. Finding: Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) have not been reviewed and/or updated since 2001.
Requirement: Each laboratory shall develop and maintain a document outlining the analytical quality
control practices used for the parameters included in their certification. Supporting records shall be
maintained as evidence that these practices are being effectively carried out. The quality control document
shall be available for inspection by the State Laboratory. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7). Submit the
updated SOPs for review by December 31, 2011. A written response is required.
Page 2
#554 Fortron Industries
General Quality Control
B. Finding: The use of purchased and prepared standards and reagents are not documented in such a way
as to provide a traceable history from analysis to manufacturer.
Requirement: All chemicals, reagents, standards and consumables used by the laboratory must have the
following information documented: Date received, Date Opened (in use), Vendor, Lot Number, and
Expiration Date (where specified). A system (e.g., traceable identifiers) must be in place that links
standard/reagent preparation information to analytical batches in which the solutions are used.
Documentation of solution preparation must include the analyst’s initials, date of preparation, the volume
or weight of standard(s) used, the solvent and final volume of the solution. This information as well as the
vendor and/or manufacturer, lot number, and expiration date must be retained for primary standards,
chemicals, reagents, and materials used for a period of five years. Consumable materials such as pH
buffers, lots of pre-made standards and/or media, solids and bacteria filters, etc. are included in this
requirement. Ref: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Policy.
C. Finding: The analytical balance is not being checked with one class S, or equivalent, standard weight
each day used and at least three standard weights quarterly.
Requirement: The analytical balance must be checked with one class S, or equivalent, standard weight
each day used and at least three standard weights quarterly. The values obtained must be recorded in a
log and initialed by the analyst. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (K).
Residue, Suspended – Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 2540 D
Comment: The desiccator used for solids had an electronic dehumidifier but its operation could not be verified
and the owner manual could not be located. The humidity gauge indicated that the air was dry but the moisture
indicating desiccating granules indicated that it was not. The amount of moisture indicating desiccant (a ¾ full 100
ml beaker) alone is not enough to absorb the moisture from cooling samples. If you want to use granular desiccant
as a color indicating backup, it must be replaced or recharged regularly. The color indicating desiccant turns pink
when exhausted. Regenerate to the original blue color by heating in an oven at 218°C (425°F) for 1 hour or by
following the manufacturer's instructions. When the color indicating material no longer returns to the original blue
color, the desiccating capacity of the material also becomes questionable. Desiccant must be replaced when this
occurs.
D. Finding: Filters are not weighed to constant weight prior to sample analysis, nor is a dry filter blank
analyzed with each set of samples.
Requirement: If pre-prepared filters are not used, the method requires that filters must be weighed to a
constant weight after washing. Repeat cycle of drying, cooling, desiccating, and weighing until a constant
weight is obtained or until weight change is less than 4% of the previous weighing or 0.5 mg, whichever is
less. In lieu of this process, it is acceptable to analyze a single daily dry filter blank to fulfill the method
requirement of drying all filters to a constant weight prior to analysis. Ref: North Carolina
Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Policy based upon Standard Methods 20th Edition 2540
D. (3) (a).
E. Finding: The samples are not weighed to constant weight, nor is an annual multiple weighing study to
verify the adequacy of the drying time performed.
Requirement: Constant weights must be documented. The approved methods require the following:
“Repeat the cycle of drying, cooling, desiccating, and weighing until a constant weight is obtained or until
the weight change is less than 4% of the previous weight or 0.5 mg, whichever is less.” In lieu of this, an
annual study documenting the time required to dry representative samples to a constant weight may be
performed. Verify minimum daily drying time is greater than or equal to the time used for the initial
verification study drying cycle. Drying cycles must be a minimum 1 hour for verification. Ref: North
Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Policy based on Standard Methods 20th
Edition, 2540 D. (3) (c), 2540 B. (3) (b), and 2540 C. (3) (d).
Page 3
#554 Fortron Industries
Comment: North Carolina allows for an annual drying study in lieu of the requirement above to repeat the
drying cycle for every sample. A random full set of samples should be used f or the drying study. The
repeated drying time in the oven should be at least 1 hour long. The time used for the annual drying study
is the minimum time that samples are to be dried until a new drying study is performed.
F. Finding: A quarterly check standard is not being analyzed.
Requirement: Excluding Oil and Grease, all residue parameters, leachate extractions, residual chlorine,
and coliform, analyze one known standard in addition to calibration standards each day samples are
analyzed to document accuracy. Analyze one suspended residue, one dissolved residue, one residual
chlorine and one oil and grease standard quarterly. For residual chlorine, all calibration standards required
by the approved procedure in use and by EPA must be analyzed. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (B).
Ammonia Nitrogen – Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 NH3 F
G. Finding: The laboratory’s mechanism for recording quality control standards does not adequately reflect
that the calibration blank and calibration verification standard are analyzed at the appropriate intervals.
Requirement: The calibration blank and calibration verification standard (mid-range) must be analyzed
initially (i.e., prior to sample analysis), after every tenth sample and at the end of each sample g roup to
check for carry over and calibration drift. If either fall outside established quality control acceptance
criteria, corrective action must be taken (e.g., repeating sample determinations since the last acceptable
calibration verification, repeating the initial calibration, etc.). Ref: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater
Laboratory Certification Policy based upon Standard Methods, 20th Edition, 1020 B. (10) (c), 3020 B. (2)
(b), and 4020 B. (2).
Requirement: All analytical data pertinent to each certified analysis must be filed in an orderly manner so
as to be readily available for inspection upon request. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (A).
Comment: The laboratory is documenting quality control data but it is entered directly into a computer
spreadsheet. This manner of record-keeping does not adequately demonstrate that the requirement
associated with Finding G is being met. Documentation of quality control samples with environmental
sample data in a manner that allows for sequential reconstruction is considered pertinent information.
H. Finding: A calibration blank and calibration verification standard (mid-range) are not analyzed at the end
of the sample group.
Requirement: The calibration blank and calibration verification standard (mid-range) must be analyzed
initially (i.e., prior to sample analysis), after every tenth sample and at the end of each sample group to
check for carry over and calibration drift. If either fall outside established quality control acceptance
criteria, corrective action must be taken (e.g., repeating sample determinations since the last acceptable
calibration verification, repeating the initial calibration, etc.). Ref: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater
Laboratory Certification Policy based upon Standard Methods, 20th Edition, 1020 B. (10) (c), 3020 B. (2)
(b), and 4020 B. (2).
Comment: The calibration verification standard is prepared from the calibration stock standard solution.
I. Finding: The laboratory is not analyzing matrix spikes.
Requirement: Unless the referenced method states a greater frequency, spike 5% of samples on a
monthly basis. Laboratories analyzing less than 20 samples per month must analyze at least one matrix
spike each month samples are analyzed. Prepare the matrix spike from a referenc e source different from
that used for calibration unless otherwise stated in the method. If matrix spike results are out of control,
the results must be qualified or the laboratory must take corrective action to rectify the effect, use another
method, or employ the method of standard additions. When the method of choice specifies matrix spike
performance acceptance criteria for accuracy, and the laboratory chooses to develop statistically valid,
laboratory-specific limits, the laboratory-generated limits cannot be less stringent than the criteria stated in
the approved method. Ref: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Policy.
Page 4
#554 Fortron Industries
J. Finding: Composite samples are not being preserved to a pH <2 within 15 minutes of the addition of the
last aliquot.
Requirement: For a composite sample collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24-hour
composite sampler; see 40 CFR 122.21 (g) (7) (i) or 40 CFR Part 403, Appendix E), refrigerate the
sample at ≤6 °C during collection unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s). For a
composite sample to be split into separate aliquots for preservation and/or analysis, maintain the sample
at ≤6 °C, unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s), until collection, splitting, and
preservation is completed. Add the preservative to the sample container prior to sample collection when
the preservative will not compromise the integrity of a grab sample, a composite sample, or an aliquot split
from a composite sample; otherwise, preserve the grab sample, composite sample, or aliquot split from a
composite sample within 15 minutes of collection. Ref: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136;
Federal Register Vol. 72, No. 47, March 12, 2007; Table II.
K. Finding: Samples are not allowed to come to room temperature before analysis.
Requirement: Maintain the same stirring rate and a temperature of about 25°C throughout calibration and
testing procedures. Ref: Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 NH3 F. (4) (b).
L. Finding: Laboratory reagent blank concentrations are not being documented.
Requirement: For analyses requiring a calibration curve, the concentration of method and reagent blanks
must not exceed 50% of the reporting limit, unless otherwise specified by the reference method. Ref:
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Policy.
Requirement: Any time quality control results indicate an analytical problem, the problem must be
resolved and any samples involved must be rerun if the holding time has not expired. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H
.0805 (a) (7) (F).
Comment: Only the “absorbance” reading of the blank is being documented. Only the concentrations of
the standards are being documented. Without similar units of measure, there is no way to determine from
the documented information whether or not the blank concentration is less than half that of the lowest
calibration standard and whether corrective actions need to be taken.
pH – Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 H+ B
Comment: The QC limits for the pH 7 check buffer on the benchsheet, and in the SOP, are incorrectly stated as 7
± 0.7 pH units. The correct limit is ± 0.1 pH units. No exeedances of the limit were observed.
M. Finding: The pH 10 buffer solution expired in July, 2011.
Requirement: Adherence to manufacturer expiration dates is required. Chemicals/reagents/
consumables exceeding the expiration date can no longer be considered reliable. If the expiration is only
listed as a month and year (with no specific day of the month), the last day of the month will be considered
the actual date of expiration. Monitor materials for changes in appearance or consistency. Any changes
may indicate potential contamination and the item should be discarded, even if the expiration date is not
exceeded. If no expiration date is given, the laboratory must have a policy for assigning an expiration date.
If no date received or expiration date can be determined, the item should be discarded. Ref: North
Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certif ication Policy based upon Standard Methods, 18th
Edition, 1070 C. (3) (c).
Comment: Be mindful that the pH 10 buffer usually has a shorter shelf life than the pH 4 and pH 7 buffer
solutions.
Dissolved Oxygen – Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 O G
Comment: It was mentioned by Mr. Corbett, during the inspection, that the facility was considering replacing their
current meter with a Luminescent Dissolved Oxygen meter. Please be reminded that North Carolina
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (c) (7) states: A certified laboratory must submit a written amendment to
Page 5
#554 Fortron Industries
the certification application each time that changes occur in methodology, reporting limits, and major equipment.
The amendment must be received within 30 days of such changes.
N. Finding: The temperature sensor on the D.O. meter has not been verified annually against a National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable thermometer.
Requirement: All thermometers must meet National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
specifications for accuracy or be checked, at a minimum annually, against a NIST traceable thermometer
and proper corrections made. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (O).
Comment: This meter is used for regulatory measuring of the effluent temperature.
O. Finding: The time that meter is calibrated is not being documented. This is considered pertinent
information.
Requirement: All analytical data pertinent to each certified analysis must be filed in an orderly manner so
as to be readily available for inspection upon request. Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (A).
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
No paper trail performed.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
Correcting the above-cited findings and implementing the recommendations will help this lab to produce
quality data and meet certification requirements. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its
assistance during the inspection and data review process. Please respond to all findings.
Report prepared by: Todd Crawford Date: August 24, 2011
Report reviewed by: Tonja Springer Date: September 19, 2011