Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190755 Ver 2_Cover Letter with attachments_20230113ROY COOPER GOVERNOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION January 13, 2023 Mr. Stephen A. Brumagin U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 SUBJECT: Re-issuance/Renewal Request Notification Pursuant to Non­ Reporting Nationwide 3 NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Project Bridge No. 137 on SR 1132 over Dutch Buffalo Creek (Class C), Cabarrus County, NC, TIP (B-5375) WBS No. 46090.3.1 ERIC BOYETTE SECRETARY Dear Mr. Brumagin NCDOT is requesting your review for project TIP (B-5375), Bridge No. 137 over Dutch Buffalo Creek, a Class C water, Cabarrus County, NC. WBS No. 46090.3.1. An application for this project was originally review by Ms. Nicholle Braspennickx on July 11, 2019. This project was previously authorized under a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3 (SAW-2019-01011). The project has been Let by Division 10 under the existing NWP authorization, utility relocation and bridge removal have begun. The permit is being resubmitted in the event that all authorized impacts cannot be completed prior to the NWP 3 expiration in March 2023. There will be .10 ac of temporary surface water impacts and 80 linear feet of temporary existing stream channel impacts needed to construct this project. (See Attached Plans). Impervious dikes will be installed on the eastern and western banks of Dutch Buffalo Creek to prevent sediment from entering the stream during the removal of the existing bridge and work area will be dewatered as needed. Section 106 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. NCDOT Cultural Resource staff reviewed the project for Historic Architectural and Archeological Resources. A Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form was provided by a NCDOT Architectural Historian on October 25, 2018. A No Archaeological Survey Required Form was provided by the NCDOT Archaeologist on November 5, 2018 (See Attachment). Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AION DIVISION 10 716 WEST MAIN STREET ALBEMARLE NC, 2800 I TELEPHONE (704) 983-4400 FAX: (704) 982-3146 CUSTOMER SERVICE: 1-877-368-4968 WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.GOV LOCATION: 716 WEST MAIN STREET ALBEMARLE, NC 28001 (SR 1132) PROJECT END Miami Church Rd (SR 1006) M t Pleasant Rd (SR 1100) Barrier-G eorgeville R d. ( S R 26 23) Crayto n R d (SR 2685)Shore View Dr ( S R 2 7 0 2) B a ss w o o d Dr (SR 2625)Mauney Rd W agon W heel Ln(SR 1268) ( S R 2 6 7 8 ) R a y Lin k e r R d (SR 2348) Center R d D evelopm ent ( SR 1105) J oyner Rd D u t c h B u f f a lo C r e e k 200 200 PROJECT BEGIN C reek D u tch B u ffa lo 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) RIGHT OF WAY DATE: LETTING DATE: STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 PROJECT ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) D E P A R T MEN T O F TRANSPORTA T IO N S T A TE OF NORT H CAR O LI N A 1020 2001020 4 2 0 4 8 PLANS PREPARED FOR THE NCDOT BY: VICINITY MAP N.T.S. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 40 P.E. 40 NCDOT CONTACT: PROJECT LENGTH DHV D T V = = = = =MPH ADT =ADT DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. ENGINEER HYDRAULICS SIGNATURE: ENGINEER DESIGN ROADWAY W i n d s o W A r : \ h y d r a u li c s \ p e r m i t s _ e n v i o r n m e n t a l\ d r a w i n g s \ p r m s h t \ B - 5 3 7 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h 0 1. d g n 6 / 5 / 2 0 19 NC License Number F-0991 Charlotte, NC 28202 900 West Trade St., Suite 715 STV Engineers, Inc. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED 6% Division Bridge Manager NIKKI T. HONEYCUTT, PE PROJECT DESIGNER 2025 TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, & STRUCTURE NORTH CAROLINA N/A N/A 4 See Sheet 1B For Standard Symbology Sheet See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS CLARK GROVES SUBREGIONAL TIER LOCAL FUNC. CLASSIFICATION:C O N T R A C T : -L- DETOUR B-5375 CABARRUS COUNTY 20 Scale : 50 D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K -L- STA. 15+25.88 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA. 16+86.13 END BRIDGE -L- STA. 13+75.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5375 -L- STA. 18+30.00 END TIP PROJECT B-5375 SR 1132 (MIAMI CHURCH RD) ON SR 1132 (MIAMI CHURCH RD) LOCATION: BRIDGE #137 DUTCH BUFFALO CREEK B-5375 TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5375 = 0.086 MILES LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5375 = 0.031 MILES LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5375 = 0.055 MILES TO NC 601 2012 45 T I P P R O J E C T : B - 5 3 7 5 GARLAND HAYWOOD, PE JANUARY 15, 2020 JUNE 21, 2019 490 980 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II ROW & UTILB-5375 THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT GRAPHIC SCALE 60'0'60' of1 7 Permit Drawing Sheet SITE 1 SITE 1 FIGURE SEE (MIAMI CHURCH RD.) SR 1100 N A 2011 N A D 83 WOODS WOODS EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W WOODS WOODS 6 0 . 0 0 ' DANIEL GILLON BARRIER PB 69 PG 37 DB 775 PG 432 THOMAS E PORTER TRUSTEE DB 2718 PG 148 D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K THOMAS E PORTER TRUSTEE DB 2718 PG 148 MELISSA GRAHAM PB 69 PG 37 DB 6827 PG 251 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W WOODS WOODS 1 2 1 3 18 + 0 0 14 + 0 0 (SR 1132) MIAMI CHURCH RD -L- 16 + 0 0 17 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 -L- MIAMI CHURCH RD (SR 1132) LEGEND TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY STREAM PERMIT IMPACT AREA (AC)LENGTH (FT) SW IMPACTS TEMPORARY 0.1 80 NC License Number F-0991 Charlotte, NC 28202 900 West Trade St., Suite 715 STV Engineers, Inc. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 5 / 2 0 19 r : \ h y d r a u l i c s \ p e r m i t s _ e n v i o r n m e n t a l \ d r a w i n g s \ p r m s h t \ B - 5 3 7 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h 0 2 . d g n W i n d s o W A Scale : 20 2B-5375 N A D 83 N A 2011 SITE 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 0'40'40' of2 7 Permit Drawing Sheet SITE 1 FIGURE SEE 80 FT IN SURFACE WATER TEMPORARY IMPACTS =S1 F F C F C F C F C F F F F F LEGEND TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY STREAM PERMIT IMPACT AREA (AC)LENGTH (FT) SW IMPACTS TEMPORARY 0.1 80 4 8 5 4 8 5 4 8 5 485 490 4 9 0 4 9 0 4 9 0 4 9 0 4 9 0 4 9 0 4 9 0 4 9 0 490 4 9 5 4 9 5 495 495 4 9 5 4 9 5 495 495 495 4 9 5 495 495 495 495 4 9 5 495 495 495 500500 500 500500500 WOODS WOODS EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W WOODS WOODS 6 0 . 0 0 ' DANIEL GILLON BARRIER PB 69 PG 37 DB 775 PG 432 THOMAS E PORTER TRUSTEE DB 2718 PG 148 D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K THOMAS E PORTER TRUSTEE DB 2718 PG 148 MELISSA GRAHAM PB 69 PG 37 DB 6827 PG 251 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W WOODS WOODS 1 2 1 3 18 + 0 0 14 + 0 0 (SR 1132) MIAMI CHURCH RD -L- 16 + 0 0 17 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 -L- MIAMI CHURCH RD (SR 1132) NC License Number F-0991 Charlotte, NC 28202 900 West Trade St., Suite 715 STV Engineers, Inc. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 5 / 2 0 19 r : \ h y d r a u l i c s \ p e r m i t s _ e n v i o r n m e n t a l \ d r a w i n g s \ p r m s h t \ B - 5 3 7 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h 0 3 . d g n W i n d s o W A Scale : 20 3B-5375 N A D 83 N A 2011 GRAPHIC SCALE 0'40'40' of3 7 Permit Drawing Sheet SITE 1 80 FT IN SURFACE WATER TEMPORARY IMPACTS =S1 SITE 1 FIGURE SEE F F C F C F C F C F F F F F DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 5 / 2 0 19 r : \ h y d r a u l i c s \ p e r m i t s _ e n v i o r n m e n t a l \ d r a w i n g s \ p r m s h t \ B - 5 3 7 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h 0 4 . d g n W i n d s o W A 4 480 484 488 492 496 500 504 506 508 476 15+00 18+0016+00 17+0014+00 NC License Number F-0991 Charlotte, NC 28202 900 West Trade St., Suite 715 STV Engineers, Inc. 456 460 464 468 472 512 516 520 524 528 532 -L-B-5375 480 484 488 492 496 500 504 506 508 476 456 460 464 468 472 512 516 of4 7 Permit Drawing Sheet NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED EL = 500.52' STA. 13+75.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5375 END TIP PROJECT B-5375 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GROUND -L- STA 16+86.13 END BRIDGE -L- STA 15+25.88 BEGIN BRIDGE HIGH POINT ELEV = 501.12 -L- STA 15+79.08 PI = 16+20.00 EL = 501.30' (+)0.3184%(-)1.2143% VC = 140' K = 91 PI = 17+60.00 EL = 499.60' (-)1.2143%(-)0.6199% VC = 140' K = 236 EL = 499.17' STA. 18+30.00 DS = 80 MPH DS = 50 MPH W.S.E. ON (07-09-2018) = 486.9' 1.5 :1 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE CL-II RIPRAP (TYP.) EST. 28 TON CL-II RIPRAP (TYP.) EST. 34 TON (+)0.1656% EXIST (-)0.3222% EXIST BM-1 5305 12092 100 5800 10 498.4 501.8 499.1 486.9 07/09/2018 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DATE OF SURVEY W.S. ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY FT = = = = = = = = = = = 10+ 1. 5 : 1 P I= 14 + 0 0 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 6 .3 1' P I= 14 + 5 0 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 4 .10 ' E L = 4 9 3 .7 0 ' P I = 15 + 0 0 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 3 .4 0 ' P I= 15 + 2 5 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 3 .0 0 ' E L = 4 9 2 .9 0 ' P I= 15 + 6 4 .0 0 L T P I = 15 + 5 0 .0 0 L T 0.80% 4 .4 2% 1.20%1.60%0.71% P I= 16 + 7 7 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 1.7 0 ' P I= 17 + 0 0 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 1.8 0 ' P I= 17 + 5 0 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 2 .0 0 ' P I= 18 + 0 0 .0 0 L T E L = 4 9 2 .4 2 ' 0.84%0.40%0.43% EST. 45 CY TO ELEV.=495.0' STRUCTURE EXCAVATION UNCLASSIFIED EST. 124 CY TO ELEV.=495.0' UNCLASSIFIED STRUCTURE EXCAVATION D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K D U T C H B U F F A L O C R E E K 16 + 0 0 17 + 0 0 15 + 0 0 LEGEND TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY STREAM PERMIT IMPACT AREA (AC)LENGTH (FT) SW IMPACTS TEMPORARY 0.1 80 NC License Number F-0991 Charlotte, NC 28202 900 West Trade St., Suite 715 STV Engineers, Inc. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 6 / 5 / 2 0 19 r : \ h y d r a u l i c s \ p e r m i t s _ e n v i o r n m e n t a l \ d r a w i n g s \ p r m s h t \ B - 5 3 7 5 _ h y d _ p r m _ p s h 0 5 . d g n W i n d s o W A 5B-5375 N A D 83 N A 2011 GRAPHIC SCALE 0'20'20' of5 7 Permit Drawing Sheet Scale : 10 SITE 1 SITE 1 FIGURE SEE 80 FT IN SURFACE WATER TEMPORARY IMPACTS =S1 C F C C FF NAMES AND ADDRESSES PARCEL NO.NAMES ADDRESS 1 PROPERTY OWNERS 6/5/2019 NCDOT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS # SHEET 6 OF 7 of6 7 Permit Drawing Sheet 2 3 MELISSA GRAHAM DANIEL GILLON BARRIER CONCORD NC 28025 4455 MOUNT PLEASANT RD S SALISBURY, NC 28144 306 W MARSH ST CABARRUS COUNTY MT. PLEASANT, NC 28124 4207 LONG RUN FARM ROAD PROJECT: B-5375 (MIAMI CHURCH ROAD) DUTCH BUFFALO CREEK ON SR 1132 BRIDGE 137 OVER THOMAS E PORTER WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design (ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft) 1 15+25.88 / 16+86.13 CORED SLAB - 1@ 40', 1@ 70', 1@ 50' - 30' OTO 0.10 80 TOTALS:0.10 80.00 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS BRIDGE #137 OVER DUTCH BUFFALO CREEK ON SR 1132 (MIAMI CHURCH ROAD) CABARRUS COUNTY B-5375 ATN Revised 3/31/05 SHEET 7 of 7 6/5/2019 Project Tracking No.: “No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 3 16-02-0046 NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: B-5375 County: Cabarrus WBS No: 46090.1.1 Document: PCE or MCC F.A. No: BRZ-1132(010) Funding: State Federal Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3 or 14 Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 10 intends to replace Bridge No. 137 on SR 1132, Miami Church Road, over Dutch Buffalo Creek northwest of the Stanly County line. An original study area that measured 600 feet (182.88 meters) long, 150 feet (45.72 meters) wide, and was estimated to encompass 2.07 acres (roughly .84 hectare) was proposed in 2016. Recently, a revised request for archaeological review was submitted that expands the study area to 712 feet (nearly 217.02 meters) in length and 200 feet (60.96 meters) in width. For the purposes of this revised review of the project, this new study area with be considered to be the archaeological area of potential effects (APE). Thus, the proposed APE encompasses an area of approximately 3.3 acres (about 1.34 hectares). SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: The original review of the site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology was conducted on March 7, 2016. No previously identified archaeological sites are recorded within the proposed APE, nor are any archaeological sites recorded within .5 mile of Bridge No. 137. An examination of the data presented on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service reveals that only one historic property, the John Teeter House (CA0580), is recorded within the same radius. Examinations of historical mapping for Cleveland County (including the 1875 Thomas C. Harris map of Cleveland County, the 1910 U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Map of Cleveland County, and the 1938 State Highway and Public Works Commission map of Cleveland County) suggest no particular properties of interest within the proposed APE, though the Thomas map does suggest that a number of gold mills were located along Dutch Buffalo Creek. The Furr family cemetery is located approximately .2 mile (roughly .33 kilometer) northeast of Bridge 137, along Barrier-Georgeville Road. Interestingly, a monument to the Furr family occupation of the area in the eighteenth century was erected nearly 130 feet (just over 39 meters) from the bri dge in 1954. Furr family members, in partnership with the Friendship United Methodist Church, have maintained the monument since that time. The marker has gained some notoriety as “the Bleeding Tombstone” by occult/urban legend enthusiasts. Soils mapped for the APE at Bridge No. 137 in Cleveland County include: Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA) and Kirksey silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes (KkB). No further archaeological investigations are required for the project within the 300-foot corridor established as the current APE. Should the project change to include a larger footprint than covered by Project Tracking No.: “No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 2 of 3 16-02-0046 the current APE, further consultation will be necessary. In the unlikely event that archaeological remains are encountered during the bridge replacement, work should cease in that area and the NCDOT Archaeology Group should be notified immediately. Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: As noted above, this project was originally screened for archaeology on May 11, 2016, when a No Archaeological Survey Required form was produced. While no archaeological sites have been recorded within a reasonable distance of Bridge No. 137, a broader look at known archaeological sites along Dutch Buffalo Creek reveals a patter in this portion of Cabarrus County. Archaeological sites, such as 31Ca52, 31Ca53, and 31Ca54 to the south of Bridge No. 137, are all located on ridgetoes overlooking the Dutch Buffalo Creek floodplain. A similar pattern is suggested in the historic mapping: structures are located on higher ground along the drainage basin. The exception being the mill site reported to the north of Bridge No. 137 on Barrier Store Road (site 31Ca197**). This pattern suggests that the floodplain areas located within the proposed APE is unlikely to possess archaeological resources. Based on this information the original (2016) screening result was produced. The revised APE does extend the potential footprint of the project, but it does not do so to an extent that would change the overall conditions suggesting that archaeological resources are unlikely. References Cited: Cabarrus County NCGenWeb 2016 FurrMonument. Web page, http://ncgenweb.us/nc/cabarrus/furr-monument, accessed March 8, 2016. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence Other: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED November 5, 2018 NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date Project Tracking No.: “No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 3 16-02-0046 Aerial photograph with 2-foot contours illustrating the location of the proposed revised APE (orange lines) for the replacement of Bridge No. 137 on SR 1132; note the extent and location of the original (2016) APE for the project (yellow lines). Soil Map—Cabarrus County, North Carolina (Revised Replacement of Bridge No. 137 on SR 1132) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/5/2018 Page 1 of 3 39 1 0 6 0 0 39 1 0 6 3 0 39 1 0 6 6 0 39 1 0 6 9 0 39 1 0 7 2 0 39 1 0 7 5 0 39 1 0 7 8 0 39 1 0 6 0 0 39 1 0 6 3 0 39 1 0 6 6 0 39 1 0 6 9 0 39 1 0 7 2 0 39 1 0 7 5 0 39 1 0 7 8 0 550190 550220 550250 550280 550310 550340 550370 550400 550430 550460 550490 550190 550220 550250 550280 550310 550340 550370 550400 550430 550460 550490 35° 20' 20'' N 80 ° 2 6 ' 5 2 ' ' W 35° 20' 20'' N 80 ° 2 6 ' 3 9 ' ' W 35° 20' 13'' N 80 ° 2 6 ' 5 2 ' ' W 35° 20' 13'' N 80 ° 2 6 ' 3 9 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 20 40 80 120 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,490 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2018 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 18, 2011—Nov 25, 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Cabarrus County, North Carolina (Revised Replacement of Bridge No. 137 on SR 1132) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/5/2018 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI ChA Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 2.7 81.0% KkB Kirksey silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 0.2 6.4% W Water 0.4 12.6% Totals for Area of Interest 3.3 100.0% Soil Map—Cabarrus County, North Carolina Revised Replacement of Bridge No. 137 on SR 1132 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/5/2018 Page 3 of 3 January 12, 2023 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Ecological Services Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, NC 28801-1082 Phone: (828) 258-3939 Fax: (828) 258-5330 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2023-0033596 Project Name: B-5375 Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is accurate or obtain an updated species list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)) (NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other 01/12/2023   2    ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur “but for” the proposed action.. Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review- process-overview. If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, proposed critical habitat, and at-risk species be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation- handbook. Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project- related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds. We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter. Attachment(s): Official Species List USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries Migratory Birds Wetlands 01/12/2023   1    Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Asheville Ecological Services Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, NC 28801-1082 (828) 258-3939 01/12/2023   2    Project Summary Project Code:2023-0033596 Project Name:B-5375 Project Type:Bridge - Maintenance Project Description:NCDOT is in the process of replacing the bridge located over Dutch Buffalo Creek on Miami Church Road, Cabarrus County. Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@35.3382077,-80.44597328143489,14z Counties:Cabarrus County, North Carolina 01/12/2023   3    1. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 Proposed Endangered Insects NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Candidate Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849 Endangered Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 1 01/12/2023   1    USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish Hatcheries Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. 01/12/2023   1    1. 2. 3. Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31 Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25 Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 1 to Aug 20 1 2 01/12/2023   2    1. 2. NAME BREEDING SEASON Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds May 10 to Aug 31 Probability Of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 01/12/2023   3    3. no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season () Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide (CON) Eastern Whip-poor- will BCC Rangewide (CON) Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Prothonotary Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) 01/12/2023   4    ▪ ▪ ▪ Wood Thrush BCC Rangewide (CON) Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Migratory Birds FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? 01/12/2023   5    1. 2. 3. The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. 01/12/2023   6    Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. 01/12/2023   1    Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. WETLAND INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS GENERATED. PLEASE VISIT HTTPS://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML OR CONTACT THE FIELD OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 01/12/2023   2    IPaC User Contact Information Agency:North Carolina Department of Transportation Name:Joel Howard Address:716 W. Main Street City:Albemerle State:NC Zip:28001 Email jmhoward@ncdot.gov Phone:7049834400 Lead Agency Contact Information Lead Agency:Federal Highway Administration NCNHDE-20503 January 12, 2023 Joel Howard NCDOT 716 West Main Street Albemarle, NC 28001 RE: Replacing the Bridge over Dutch Buffalo Creek on Miami Church Road, Cabarrus County; B-5375 Dear Joel Howard: The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map. The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler@ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area Replacing the Bridge over Dutch Buffalo Creek on Miami Church Road, Cabarrus County Project No. B-5375 January 12, 2023 NCNHDE-20503 No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database. No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area* Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Cabarrus Soil and Water Conservation District Easement Cabarrus Soil and Water Conservation District Local Government Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Easement US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Easement US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Federal NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State *NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project. Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on January 12, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q3, October 2022. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 5 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Replacing the Bridge over Dutch Buffalo Creek on Miami Church Road, Cabarrus County Project No. B-5375 January 12, 2023 NCNHDE-20503 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic Group EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Observation Date Element Occurrence Rank Accuracy Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Natural Community 25974 Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2016 C 3-Medium ------G4G5 S4 Natural Community 25898 Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2019 C 2-High ------G4G5 S4 Vascular Plant 34577 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 2013-10-10 D 3-Medium ---Special Concern Vulnerable G4 S3 Vascular Plant 7670 Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's Sunflower 2017-10-19 D 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G3 S3 Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating Miami Church Hill Rare Plant Site R3 (High)C5 (General) Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Cabarrus Soil and Water Conservation District Easement Cabarrus Soil and Water Conservation District Local Government Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Easement US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Easement US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Federal NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on January 12, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q3, October 2022. Page 3 of 5 Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 4 of 5 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 5 of 5