20120658 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20161220

STREAM AND VEGETATION MONITORING
YEAR 3 REPORT
DUKE UNIVERSITY WATER RECLAMATION
POND STREAM RESTORATION
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 20, 2016
PREPARED FOR:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
T. RYAN LAVENDER, PE
CIVIL ENGINEER
DUKE UTILITY & ENGINEERING SERVICES, FMD
DUKE UNIVERSITY
PREPARED BY:
MCADAMS
Raleigh/Durham 7, 2905 Meridian Parkway ff=� Durham, NC 27713
Charlotte ■ 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd ■ Suite 111 Charlotte, NC 28226
McAdamsCo.com
Designing Fomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

FOR
T. Ryan Lavinder, PE
Civil Engineer
Duke Utility & Engineering Services, FMD
Duke University
STREAM AND VEGETATION MONITORING
YEAR 3 REPORT
Duke University Water Reclamation
Pond Stream Restoration
Durham, NC
Issued: December 20, 2016
by
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Project No. DKU-14060
George Buchholz, REM, PWS
Environmental Consultant/Project Manager Signature
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. I
1.1 Project Location and Description..................................................................................... ...1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives............................................................................................................ I
2.Q Channel Stability Assessment.................................................................................................................2
2.1 Cross Sections ........... —.....................................................................................................................3
2.2 Pebble Counts...................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Longitudinal Profile..........................................................................................................................3
2.4 Crest Stage Gauge............................................................................................................................3
2.5 Bank Pins..........................................................................................................................................4
2.6 Channel Stability Assessment Summary..........................................................................................4
3.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison ............................. ...........
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots.............................................................................................................4
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Sheets........................................................................4
4.0 Invasive Species Monitoring..................................................................................................................5
5.0 Photo Stations..........................................................................................................................................6
6.0 References............................................................................................................................................... 7
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figures 2.1 and 2.2: Conservation Easement Maps
Appendix B: Stream Data
Appendix C.-Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 2: Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Table 3: Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot
Appendix D. Ve ctation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix E: Vegetation Monitoring PIot Data Sheets
Appendix F: Annual Invasive Species Monitoring Document
Spring 2016 Treatment at Sandy Creek Campus Drive
Fall 2016 Treatment at Sandy Creek Campus Drive
Appendix G: Photo Stations
9 MCADAMS

1.0 Introduction
L I Project Location and Description
The Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration project (Stream
Restoration project) is on the main campus of Duke University, in Durham, Durham County,
North Carolina (Appendix A, Figure 1). More specifically, the Conservation Easement (CE)
for the Stream Restoration project is 7.01 acres in size and starts just south of NC Highway
147, runs parallel to Campus Drive, crosses Campus Drive and ties back in to the receiving
waters at Oregon Street (Appendix A, Figures 2.1 and 2.2). The Stream Restoration project
is approximately 1.5 miles from the proposed stream impacts associated with the Duke
University water reclamation pond.
The Stream Restoration project is located within the Cape Fear River Basin USGS
Hydrologic Unit 03030002 (USGS 1974), local watershed 14-digit basin 03030002060110,
and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) sub -basin 03-06-05. The
unnamed tributary flows directly into Sandy Creek (DWR stream index number of 16-41-1-
11) approximately 2.5 miles downstream of the project terminus.
The drainage area of the unnamed tributary is approximately 141 acres at the downstream
end. Based on a detailed watershed analysis, approximately 27 percent (39 acres) of the
watershed area is impervious. The Stream Restoration project is located within the Piedmont
Physiographic Province of North Carolina. A review of the Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina (Griffith et al., 2002) shows the geology of the Stream Restoration project is
comprised of quaternary to tertiary red sandy loam to silty clay decomposition residuum,
sandstone, conglomerate, mudstone, shale, coal, dikes, and sills within the Triassic Basin.
There are currently no agricultural croplands or activities within the watershed; however,
there was stream channelization and relocation associated with the sanitary sewer line
installation adjacent to the unnamed tributary.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The purpose of this Stream and Vegetation Monitoring Year 3 report is to assess the Stream
Restoration project in order to determine restoration success. The monitoring plan to evaluate
the success of the Site is based the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Stream
Mitigation Guidelines (April, 2003) and the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or
Wetland Mitigation (November, 2011). Monitoring of the Site will occur annually for seven
(7) full years.
Construction of the Stream Restoration project occurred in the summer of 2013. During the
month of November 2013, riparian buffer restoration activities began following construction
of the restored active stream channel. Riparian buffer restoration activities included planting
trees and staking vegetation plots within the CE. The goal of the stream restoration project is
to modify the dimension, pattern, and profile of the channel so that a stable and self -
maintaining channel is created by utilizing natural channel design techniques and procedures.
The design was developed utilizing Rosgen-based natural channel design principles (Rosgen,
1996). Preventing future stream bank erosion will be accomplished by fulfilling the
following general objectives:
1) Conversion of approximately 3,459 linear feet of the tributary from an eroding,
degraded channel to a natural, stable system with restored aquatic habitat.
!!JI MCADAMS

2) Reduction of sediment loading to a river system that flows into Jordan Lake - a
recreational water body.
3) Establishment of a riparian corridor that has a restored floodplain, aquatic, and
morphological functions which provide habitat connectivity to the area and will be
protected in perpetuity.
The following specific objectives will allow the restoration plan to succeed in obtaining the
project's goal:
1) Design a channel with the appropriate cross -sectional dimension, pattern, and
longitudinal profile utilizing the existing channel condition survey, and collected
reference reach data as a guide.
2) Improve upon and create bedform and aquatic habitat diversity (riffles, runs, pools,
and glides).
3) Create a nested floodplain (bankfull bench) that will be accessible at the proposed
bankfull channel elevation along the entire reach.
4) Ensure channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in -channel grade control
structures, and native vegetation into the proposed restoration design while also
creating a stable and functional aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
5) Establish a native forested riparian plant community within a minimum of 50 feet
from the proposed top of the bankfull channel along with the removal of exotic
vegetation during construction implementation and the elimination of current
embankment maintenance practices.
2.0 Channel Stability Assessment
Stream geometry will be considered successful if the geometry, profile, and sinuosity are
stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be minimal changes in
the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that may occur
during the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement
toward a more unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, or bank erosion) or are minor changes
that represent an increase in stability (e.g. settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed
material, etc.). Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is
possible to maintain stability and not stay within the design geometry.
Channel stability will be reflected in the surveyed permanent cross -sections, longitudinal
profile, evaluation of bank stability and cover, evaluation of in -stream structure performance
and to a lesser degree pebble counts compared to the as -built and any previously collected
monitoring data. The general trend should reflect a stable or slightly decreasing riffle cross -
sectional area whereas pools may increase and yet be considered relatively stable. The
longitudinal profile will typically adjust depending on the frequency of bankfull or greater
storm events. Normally the constructed channel profile will adjust (especially in a sand
dominated bed) but it will need to function without significant degradation (bed scour),
aggradation (mid -channel bars), or bank erosion.
The Bank Height Ratio (BHR) shall not exceed 1.2 and the Entrenchment Ratio shall be no
less than 2.2. The stream shall remain stable over seven years, through two bankfull events,
as indicated by visual surveys, cross -sections, and bank pins. If monitoring (including
vegetation) demonstrates success by year five (5), a proposal can be issued by the Owner to
terminate monitoring of the site.
2 lI MCADAMS

2.1 Cross Sections
The stream geometry is considered to be successful if the cross-section geometry, profile,
and sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected there will be minimal
changes in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that
may occur during the monitoring period were evaluated to determine if they represent a
movement toward a more unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, erosion, mid- channel bars,
etc.) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (e.g. settling, vegetative
changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.). Deviation from the design ratios will not
necessarily denote failure, as it is possible to maintain stability and not stay within the design
geometry. Morphological data will be collected and reported in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Morphological data used for this report was collected on November 7 and 8, 2016 and is
shown in Appendix B.
2.2 Pebble Counts
The composition of the streambed and banks is an important facet of stream character,
influencing channel form and hydraulics, erosion rates, sediment supply, and other
parameters. The most efficient basic technique in measuring the streambed and banks is the
pebble count method. This requires measuring individuals along a cross section and tallying
the particle size based on class or category. Pebble counts were conducted to determine bed
particle size distribution at each riffle cross section (Cross Sections 1, 3, 6, and 9). Pebble
Counts will be conducted and reported in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Pebble count data used for
this report was collected on November 11 and December 13, 2016 and is shown in Appendix
B.
2.3 Longitudinal Profile
The longitudinal profile will be surveyed in years 1 and 7. The longitudinal profile was not
surveyed as part of Monitoring Year 3 field assessment.
2.4 Crest Stage Gauge
Indicators of overbank flow were observed within Stream Restoration project during the
Monitoring Year 3 field assessment. A Crest Stage Gauge (CSG) was installed during
Monitoring Year 1 field activities to document bankfull events. The CSG was installed at
Station 15+57 near Vegetation Plot 5 (Appendix A, Figures 2.1 and 2.2), and a photograph
of the CSG is provided in Appendix G. CSG measurements will be conducted and reported
in all years of monitoring. On December 13, 2016, data was acquired from the CSG and it
was determined that a bankfull event occurred during 2016 which read a depth of 2.6 feet.
There was a 4.46-inch rainfall event on October 9, 2016 according to the NC-DH-6 Durham
1.2 NW Station of the Community Collaborative Rain, Hail & Snow Network. The NC-DH-6
Durham 1.2 NW Station recorded a total of 5.59 inches of rain for the 3-day period from
October 7 to 9, 2016. Table 1, below, provides a list of bankfull events.
Table 1. Verification of Bankfull Events
Monitoring
Year
Collection
Date
Depth
Rainfall
Dept
Date of
Rainfall
Photo
MY2
10/30/2015
2.4 feet
2.46 inches
10/03/2015
Appendix G
MY3
12/13/2016
2.6 feet
4.46 inches
10/09/2016
Appendix G
3 !jJ1 MCADAMS

2.5 Bank Pins
Bank erosion rates were measured using bank pins that were installed into the stream banks
during the As -Built. The bank pins were installed so that they can be measured over time in
order to observe changes in the stream bank profile. Bank pin measurements can then be used
to estimate rates of erosion and sediment loading. Bank pin measurements will be conducted
and reported in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Bank pin data used for this report was collected on
November 7 and 8, 2016 and is shown in Appendix B.
2.6 Channel Stability Assessment Summary
Overall, the stream system appears stable and is not migrating toward lateral or vertical
instability. Based on the As -Built comparison using morphological data, it appears that minor
systemic aggradation has occurred within the reach. This condition does not appear to pose
an imminent threat to the overall stability of the system.
3.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
The primary focus of the vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although
shrub and herbaceous species encountered may also be recorded. Vegetation planting success
criteria will be based on the survival of a minimum density of 320 trees per acre (to include
both planted and existing trees) after three (3) years of monitoring. After five (5) years of
monitoring, the density shall be no less than 260 trees per acre (to include both planted and
existing trees). After seven (7) years of monitoring, the density shall be no less than 210 trees
per acre (to include both planted and existing trees). In addition, planted vegetation must
average 10 feet in height in each plot at year seven (7). Vegetation plots will be sampled and
reported in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. If the height standard is met and the stem density is
trending toward success after five (5) years of monitoring, monitoring of vegetation on the
site may be terminated provided written approval is provided by the USACE and NCDWQ.
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
All vegetation monitoring methodologies followed the most current templates and guidelines
provided by DMS (EEP, 2010; EEP, 2011). Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in
accordance with CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, V4.2). All six (6)
vegetation monitoring plots installed by McAdams were located in Monitoring Year 3.
Figures 2.1 and 2.2 (Appendix A) depict the location of the vegetation monitoring plots.
Plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, were recorded
within each vegetation monitoring plot. Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a success summary
for each vegetation monitoring plot. In Monitoring Year 3, the Stream Restoration project
had six (6) vegetation monitoring plots encompassing 0.1483 acres, containing 66 planted
stems, which yielded a density of 445 planted stems per acre. Monitoring Year 3 field
activities were conducted on November 11 and December 13, 2016. The planted vegetation
survival threshold was met for five (5) of the six (6) vegetation monitoring plots. Table 2
(Appendix C) provides a stem count total and planted stem total by each individual
vegetation plot. Table 3 (Appendix C) provides a summary of only planted stem counts as
compared to planted stem counts of the As Built.
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Sheets
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix D. Vegetation
Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix E. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheet provides measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a
respective vegetation monitoring plot.
4 9 MCADAMS

4.0 Invasive Species MonitorinE
Construction of the Stream Restoration project required disturbing land within the CE
resulting in the creation of a highly disturbed early successional ecological system that
contains young tree saplings and shrubs species in addition to naturally occurring early
emergent vegetative species. Over time, tree saplings and shrubs species mature and
proliferate while naturally occurring early emergent vegetative species dwindle.
The new, highly disturbed early successional ecological system created during the
construction of Stream Restoration project resulted in prime habitat for many invasive
species that were known to occur within the CE prior to construction activities, in addition to
the surrounding areas (Invasive Species Management Plan, May, 2014). It is understood that
naturally occurring early emergent vegetative species will thrive within the CE during the
early years of the Stream Restoration project. The early emergent vegetative species can be
aggressive and have characteristics of an invasive species; however, they are generally
accepted as part of a naturally occurring ecological system. Therefore, a definition of what is
an invasive species is warranted.
Invasive Species are defined as non-native alien species that have the potential to negatively
affect the environment. These species occupy habitat within the riparian buffer and
outcompete and suppress native vegetation, thereby inhibiting both the establishment and
natural succession of the native riparian community.
Considerable effort was made to remove the vast majority of the observed invasive species
populations during the construction phase of the Stream Restoration project by both
mechanical and chemical means. Although considerable effort was made to remove the
invasive plants species from within the CE, remnant populations of these invasive species
were recorded in a post construction site visit conducted in May, 2014. Future treatment is
likely to be required for the observed invasive species, but additional invasive species may
expand the list.
As part of the Monitoring Year 3 stream and vegetation monitoring efforts, invasive species
monitoring and management was also conducted (Appendix F, Spring 2016 Treatment at
Sandy Creek Campus Drive; June 16, 2016, and Fall 2016 Treatment at Sandy Creek
Campus Drive report; October 17, 2016). Invasive species monitoring efforts included
recording the approximate location and extent of infestation as noted in figures attached to
each Spring and Fall 2016 Treatment reports (Appendix F). A list of invasive species found
during Monitoring Year 3 activities is provided below. It was determined that the northern
and central sections of the project contained the largest amount of invasive plants, while the
southern section was relatively clean of invasive plants. All species were treated with
herbicide as indicated within the Spring and Fall 2016 Treatment reports (Appendix F).
Continued monitoring and prescribed treatments are recommended by a registered landscape
contractor or a certified plant professional is provided.
List of Monitoring Year 3 Invasive Species — Spring & Fall Treatment
Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (porcelain berry)
Lonicera spp. (bush honeysuckles)
Euonymous fortune (winter creeper)
Hedera helix (English ivy)
Ligustrum sinese (Chinese privet)
Ligustrum japonicum (Japanese privet)
Rosa multiflora (multiflora rose)
Pueraria montana (kudzu)
'J MCADAMS

Wisteria sinensis (Chinese wisteria)
5.0 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success the Bank Parcel. Photos provide a
visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. Photo documentation will be provided and
reported in all years of monitoring. All nine (9) photo stations installed by McAdams were
located in Monitoring Year 3. Figures 2.1 and 2.2 (Appendix A) depict the locations of the
photo stations. Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus FE-115 5.0
megapixel digital camera. Photographs for the photo stations are located in Appendix G.
".� MCADA Ms

6.0 References
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2.
McAdams and Landscape Sanctuaries, May, 2014. Invasive Species Management Plan, Duke
University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration.
Morris, George; River Works; Spring 2015 Treatment at Sandy Creek Campus Drive; May 12,
2015.
Morris, George; River Works; Fall 2015 Treatment at Sandy Creek Campus Drive; September 3,
2015.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration. Available at internet site:
http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/buffers.pdf
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring
Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation.
Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. October 2012. Stream Restoration Plan for the Duke
University Water Reclamation Pond.
US Army Corps of Engineers April, 2013. Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
91MCADAMS

APPENDIX A
Site Maps

® PBD16CT ND. DKU-14060 DUKE UNIVERSITY WATER M THE JOHNLR.McADAMSFILENAME:DKU14060X,DWG RECLAMATION POND COMPNC.SCALE:1�=1,oDD.STREAM RESTORATION �►��•���FIGURE 1. SITE LOCATION MAP)$96ARCH,RIANCIEPQr[EDATE: t7W10-06-14 DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA °0a733-5M-^ ,Jc'`�`ft:C-M

tlNno8vO H1�ON ',ILNnO3 nVHHflU tioz-90-01
gKv�'� dVV4 1N3W3SV3 NOLVA213SN00 47 32 nou ,OOz _ .1
�4{iwM�rt
N011`d2JO1S32d Wb'3�J1S aNOd "°°iOtO°°-"'�•
•• � FrNOLVMV-1038 831VM AiIS83AINn Dina o1 w-n»a �1.60. ■

tlNIlVa: VU KidVN ALNI IV,) RVHtll lu *LOZ-90—OL
m dVN 1N3VGS' 3 N011VA83SN00 :Z'Z 34noi-A OM _ L
NOLV801S32J NV3�J1S GNOd 'MNOOOLQW-^ o.
Fri,NOliVVNV�03?3 831`dM ),ilS233AINn 3 ina oto9o-ma ■
6
b 3 s
of
wCL
s 8
BMW
\ �V W WSJ

APPENDIX B
Stream Data

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Duke Stream Restoration
Reach Name: Upper
Sample Name: xsl-MY3
Survey Date: 11/11/2016
Size (mm)
TOT #
ITEM %
CUM
---------------------------------------------------
0 - 0.062
10
10.00
10.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
10.00
0.125 - 0.25
2
2.00
12.00
0.25 - 0.50
16
16.00
28.00
0.50 - 1.0
0
0.00
28.00
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
28.00
2.0 - 4.0
6
6.00
34.00
4.0 - 5.7
8
8.00
42.00
5.7 - 8.0
0
0.00
42.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
42.00
11.3 - 16.0
10
10.00
52.00
16.0 - 22.6
14
14.00
66.00
22.6 - 32.0
0
0.00
66.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
66.00
45 - 64
18
18.00
84.00
64 - 90
2
2.00
86.00
90 - 128
8
8.00
94.00
128 - 180
2
2.00
96.00
180 - 256
2
2.00
98.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
98.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
98.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
98.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
98.00
Bedrock
2
2.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.31
D35 (mm)
4.21
D50 (mm)
15.06
D84 (mm)
64
D95 (mm)
154
D100 (mm)
Bedrock
Silt/Clay (%)
10
sand (%)
18
Gravel (%)
56
Cobble (%)
14
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
2
Total Particles = 100.

,o-
6-
ry a
XS 1-MY3
Partite Size (mm)
S

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Duke Stream Restoration
Reach Name: Upper
Sample Name: xS3-MY3
Survey Date: 11/11/2016
Size (mm)
TOT #
ITEM %
CUM
---------------------------------------------------
0 - 0.062
4
4.00
4.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
4.00
0.125 - 0.25
10
10.00
14.00
0.25 - 0.50
34
34.00
48.00
0.50 - 1.0
2
2.00
50.00
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
50.00
2.0 - 4.0
2
2.00
52.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
52.00
5.7 - 8.0
2
2.00
54.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
54.00
11.3 - 16.0
4
4.00
58.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
58.00
22.6 - 32.0
24
24.00
82.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
82.00
45 - 64
12
12.00
94.00
64 - 90
2
2.00
96.00
90 - 128
2
2.00
98.00
128 - 180
2
2.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.26
D35 (mm)
0.4
D50 (mm)
1
D84 (mm)
48.17
D95 (mm)
77
D100 (MM)
180
Silt/Clay (%)
4
Sand (%)
46
Gravel (%)
44
Cobble (%)
6
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 100.

XS3-MY3
Partite Size (mm)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Duke Stream Restoration
Reach Name: Middle
Sample Name: xs6-MY3
survey Date: 11/11/2016
Size (mm)
TOT #
ITEM %
CUM
---------------------------------------------------
0 - 0.062
22
22.45
22.45
0.062 - 0.125
2
2.04
24.49
0.125 - 0.25
18
18.37
42.86
0.25 - 0.50
16
16.33
59.18
0.50 - 1.0
0
0.00
59.18
1.0 - 2.0
2
2.04
61.22
2.0 - 4.0
10
10.20
71.43
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
71.43
5.7 - 8.0
10
10.20
81.63
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
81.63
11.3 - 16.0
4
4.08
85.71
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
85.71
22.6 - 32.0
6
6.12
91.84
32 - 45
0
0.00
91.84
45 - 64
8
8.16
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.04
D35 (mm)
0.2
D50 (mm)
0.36
D84 (mm)
14.03
D95 (mm)
52.36
D100 (mm)
64
Silt/Clay (%)
22.45
Sand (%)
38.77
Gravel (%)
38.78
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 98.

XS6-MY3
Particle Size (mm)

RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
River Name: Duke Stream Restoration
Reach Name: Lower
Sample Name: xs9-MY3
Survey Date: 12/13/2016
Size (mm)
TOT #
ITEM %
CUM
---------------------------------------------------
0 - 0.062
0
0.00
0.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
0.00
0.125 - 0.25
0
0.00
0.00
0.25 - 0.50
20
20.00
20.00
0.50 - 1.0
28
28.00
48.00
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
48.00
2.0 - 4.0
6
6.00
54.00
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
54.00
5.7 - 8.0
6
6.00
60.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
60.00
11.3 - 16.0
12
12.00
72.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
72.00
22.6 - 32.0
8
8.00
80.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
80.00
45 - 64
16
16.00
96.00
64 - 90
2
2.00
98.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
98.00
128 - 180
2
2.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.45
D35 (mm)
0.77
D50 (mm)
2.67
D84 (mm)
49.75
D95 (mm)
62.81
D100 (mm)
180
Silt/Clay (%)
0
sand M
48
Gravel M
48
Cobble M
4
Boulder M
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 100.

on
Ra
m
XS9—MY3
M._
0 0 0 0 O O V- 0 0
LO 00 (p C-1i c0 O 00
r Co 1 1 r"
' o o ti LO IT 00
N
� N L M O N
O N
O N
Particle Size (mm)

m
w W
a
O
Qi
_N
h W
L
d'r
O
}g
N
7 W
F.
,O
T O, O\ O m
N N N 7 I : Il� O o0 7 00 vt 7 ll� oq [ : [-� 00 N n oq n 7 N
j
r
h h M vt M vt vt v1 vt vl b b b r DD O� O� O\ O
d
M W
L
vri
b m h h
m m m m m M m m M m m m m m m m m m m M M M M M m M M M
m
Q+
CO
--� Vi ^O+�v1OOo0 OO on7 �n
rNi 1ri vq [� 00 �O [ � 00 O\ 7 t�1 � n O h O
M M V
W
N ^l M h
l� 00 h l� O 7 4-:�4n 00 h�n 0v�0 F, 01 a0 00 O� O� O
N
N W
�O �D V1 V1 m m V1 Vl V1 Vl V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 m m m m m m m m m m
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m M M M m m m m m m m M
O m 1� b M MM. as w b O: M .�. M W O VNi N O O
�
vNt
U
W
rrr---yyy
O� oO [R t� 00 l� N M M O Vi 7 Cn 01 00 O O m O
0
N
�O [� 00 �D m [� O N 00 O 00 O: O, 00 O� O O INn �n o0 7 IO O
h Ih h D \O vi O v1 v vi vl , � � � I [ O, O, -+
�D �O Vl Vl Vl Vt Vl Vl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �O
U
a
Y x
GOO
_ _
b M 7 W Obi 7 IO o'0 N O r O M M� b O O, -+
O O l = O\ O, O oC O 7 [-� N l-� oC
N M M m M M M 7 7 7 7 7 a 7 a 7 7 �1 vl b b b
O O w w O\ m M
\/--�
V O\ Vl 00 [� O� �O 0 7 N--� •� N N O O O N N N N ^ O N N N N
W
�d
o v v MM��
m
v1
M M- m m m m m m
U
d
A
FOO
V OOP Mm-m+� n nNN St Sq W a� V q gO\OON7 F� W Otr1 MO, T ON [ n5 ^ V [ OMB NM7r m cl!n oo0 r baN O
O
vi O 00 h Ot O N N N N N N m M m m m 7 7 7 7 7 7 I I, I �O �O �O � �� [� l� r r r 00 00 00 00 a0 a\ O1 O m� [� O N a0 00
7 7 7 7 7 7 V' 7 7 7 7 •7 7 7 7 7 R 7 7 7 V

)
{
�•
I
I
�
�
�
�
�
®
/
`
\
-
R )
�
�
\
^
� §
. \}�
14
i/
In
/
& q § § R § §
bgAgl!
§
§ §
\
�
E
(
§
\
\ �
_ In
k �
i
\
»
/
k
w
§�2e2y6uRƒ/\
0
oq�m
3{uR[��
/=52!n
--�
-m
�>
/\
,@§
�s=$L'—.
®j§\75
EE
-

�o W
i
O
a�
Qi
N
Vl W
L
W
O
4'+
e W
L
O
!!�vlyy---III
N
M W
�O Vt Vl Vl Vt Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vt V1 �/1 V1 Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl V1 �O �D
M M M M M M M M M M m m m M m m m m m M M M M M M M M M M M M
L
W
N In r N C% O� O1 " ^. Ot w N N m n N1 Q\ W m v� t�1 D• � 1 � � wO a b O\ v� �O l'� � O�
00 r b .-� l.- r W M O N M M 7
7
!!!�yy'yyyy
O o0 O a0 w .M. ;- 01 ;+ O M O, m. N. O. N m N m N
l� oq 00 V N O DD b n O: N O\ N m IO O\ O
N
N W
�O Vl V1 V1 Vt V1 V1 V1 V1 Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vt Vt Vt V1 V1 - -V1 -Vl Vl
M M m M m M M M m M m M M M M M M M M M M m M m M m M
N
LL
Y
w �+ 7 O\ I O �O 00 V 00 V1 7 a,1O h O N O\ D\ D\ � N
�i
f+
G
O
0
F
� N m 7 7 7 a' 7 7 vl �n vl vi Vi Vi vi vi vt �O �D 1� W 00
U
�
W
!!!yyy
�O o0 O�
�D
4 44 MMM MNNNN NNM4VO��~D �(V
, -M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
O
mMmmmmmmmmmmMm mm m m
U
�
x
GO
O, O V V O 01 .r. b
G^ o0 r �n M O �n � 0 n N O n O �O N O V O r� M O\ O\ O '+ ]G C 0 0
'
O O DD n N N t�1 vi b or r r w W O\ O O .• .• N M m 7 7 7 v� vi 00 r 7 7 •--i ^i
7
Vl V V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 Vl V1 VI �O �O [� 00 00
�O 7 O v� [� O M N �O O V h O 7 7 EO 7 00 7
V
W
�
n V: .N. 10 Iq
�O �O o0 00 00 Oi 7 O O vl �O O� �O Vi � N (V O O� 00 [ � m m o0 �D IO � .O .O o0 7 Oi .-. I � Oi
3
O
m m m m m m m m m m m.o �o
m m m M M m m M m m M M M M M M M m
aW
�1
0000rnrnov°
�am�moOomvv�rnmv�oNorn�atNrnNroN�A �ta �m v° omo DMa�00ov�
^-� N m m � � 7 7 7 � 7 7 7 7 7 vi v1 vi vl vl vl v1 vi vi vt vi vi vt vt �l Vi b b r r-b W
r�l

S
co
,
�
,
co
\
/
�
a )
/
)
5
m /
\
`
o ]
/
k/m
kk
||~
�
, )�\
i|
mmmm
„ _ mmmmmmmmmm
+RA3[!
(
§
}
\
�
�
§
(
d (
§
/
k
�
k
�
ƒ
k`�
�%
'do
/���~
)/[2C-Nm
3E
.5
4
kM

v
,o frl
i
Y
O
d
Vl W
V
QS
O
R W
.O
ri �O h 7 [h o�
7 M � ll a P� M 7 [l G� O �O .-. .-. V �q W O N V �O
V M N O O O O, O, W W W W 01 W W w 01 O, O O O O 7 N N M
N
W
I I vl vt I vt �n 7 7 7 7�� V V 7 7 7� 7 �/1 vt vi vt vt �n vt vl
m m m M M M M M M M M m m m m M M M M M M M M M M m m m
L
M
IG W .-. M li li .• Vl OG
W O Q. M
7 v1
7 m N O O O, O\ O, w w w W
N
N W
mmm V1 V1 7 V V V 7 7 7 7 V1 h h h
m m M m m m m M M M M M M M M M M m m m M m m M m M
M
i
i"
�O O M r�
V SD Om O
�D [�
m O e0 �D 0 vt M O V O� O� O\
q
U
�
W
!!!yyy
r1 ll ll� r h
m
O O Qi m a� 01 T 0\ W w O O O O N m
�/t vt vi �t V �� V as 77777777 �n �n �n vl �n �n
W
M M M M M M m m m m m m m m m M M M M M M m M M M
V
�
Qi
W V1 v� N M N .r
lq�n
Cp
'
�n o07 N� D %ONc� a�MO�Q�
n rl W �W
O O W00
0Nm,
m7 V7 7Nl-
O� O N N ON� r O N
tl
Ot77�� h^-�
W [- �O V: M C� O� WW[l ['WW W W O� OW� OmO� Wh
n
T M
O O O, O, S W W W W W- w w w W w w W w O, O, O, 6 O O O N N
O W
L
m M m m m m m m m m m M M M m M M M M M m M m M m M m M M m m m m m m M m M
U
�
}
VWi W �D tl� b O M 7 0�0 T�n b o0o a N Vt'� 0� � N� �O T c%

m
)
�
/
\
§
k
1
)
ƒ
400,
\2�
)»b
{
ell %
A—
—
R
w
)j(6'MI
2
)§\2P\@cn
22\��
-2j2)
°w
»`
-S
>
`kk}}/}}\\§
f

Q..
d
v W
a
O
C'.
a>i
Vl W
4
W
,O
a�
N
-
R W
V
O
a�
m W
M M M M M M M M M m M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
4
% Q
�• � O 'o
M b O r b
D
VC,i [� T
O N O M �? vmi O� a-� �D (Y N M0 O� vl
�
`�'�
O N '7 vt vl O� �D vl .-. O �D � M O, M 7 vi m O 'o vi 7 7 'o
O� 10 r IO n 't O oo �O O� 10 N 7 'D h - , O O a 7 7 a 'o \O
1
M (V ^ O\ O\ O1 00 l- r b b 10 � [� [� [� [� r a0 c0 o\ Oi Ci � O ^ ^ N
N
N
m
m m m m m m m m m m m M m M m m m M M m m m m M m m m m
�
O � O m N h o0 O27� D\ r 7 W O N vl 00 7 O O� N
a O
U
�
W
!!!yyy
00 01 0� 7 7- 00 O
O �D �
O�00 ODD �O vi O N I-!N^N M v11l000� a
CO)
)
m N ^ m O, O; Oi Oi w w w O1 O` O\ O\ ^ N
U
�
O O �O V H1 V O V1 tO h
01 O� h � W a
�O O� V 00 \ Cl %D O m op N o0 O D\ O� D1 O
.�-,i
Om r� �D N O O, 00 m M [- 7 V� �O m m v� O, M T N 7
`-�
O� O� vt a0 t� vi N [� m M � V �O oo O� O� O O O O 01 O O O O ^ N m 7. �
W
W
>
N
m N O O� CIO, CIO 'n -
N
0 W
L
m^
�/1 vl vl V R 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 7 7 7 R V V 7 7 h
M M m m m m m m m m m m m m M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M m M m m m m m m m m
U
d
A
C
N Om0 W V P 7 W m O O 7 O� N o�0� ry vN ON OM r ON b n N+ 7 m
'+ N N m r1 M 7 V�O �D O N
m
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m
. N N N

0
N
}
to t0
N N
O Co
N N
III}1 }
1 �
�
O
V
N
O
N
,Z N
C A
m >-
!
m
O
O
Q.
o
o
fn
N
�
!
N
o
�
�
�
�
>
a
U
!
N v
�
`n
v,
!
3
l
I
0
Y�
o
V t�l N O O W 1� O LL7
(g) uoq¢nalg
Q W
F
U
pa
0
N F
w
x
E
a
d
w
t
a
ia
F
CC
0
U CI
OJ
}
r
}
N
NMy1M
M
v
n
^.o
n
o^•
I 3
M
--
N
DONO�O
n
O'er
�m
a
�^�no_,nNU
n
rn
N
n
❑a�—�
ao
03330
��m3�uci��c�c

It;
V
a
C
O
U7
N
Vl W
a
Y x
.o
5
v
a
WI
-O N T h
`III
a0 00 7 O n vt InNl � O� %D .r IO O n .-. m M t-� ll O
09
>
N�
17 T Oi w w vi �O �O -- T O\ a, a, 01 O O
7 V 7 V M M M m m M m m m m m m m m m m m a 7 7 7 7 7
W
m m M m m M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m M M m M m m
L
W
CO
n
O N O l� 7 T T O Vl O 7 00 V M [� 'O T O f O\ O� �O 00
G 7 m N T T o0 m m �O �O o0 O N ^-� 7 V O [�
o0 m �O .
T T T C, 00 OG [- [z b b b 00 T T T O N N 7
N W
M M M M M M M M m M M M M m m m m m M M m m M M m m m m
�a
r o0
�
U
W
CIO
rrr,,,yyy
nO N N O�h N h7 Mt . N N �O m vt � 7 7 I� N
V)
>�6
Vi M 00 M �O 00 N 7 l� 00 T O O O m QO N T O O
I I O?
4 N O c1 O\ w m n n b m m a r m o0 00 00 00 00 00 T T T T O\
Q
N
a 7 7 7 m m m m m m m M M m m m m M M m m m M m m m M M 7 v v 7 v
W
m M M m m m M m M M M m M M M M M M M M M m M m m m M m m
U
Y
F
_
7 �D
o0
M nN O [� 7 O� 7 7 --� O T 7 �D N N N m N vi �O b n 00 T
m Hl 7 N vi n w T O .• m '. 7 7
00 T M R 7 O 'O T N .�. m �O l� �D T �O 00 a,�+ '+
.�..�.
o0 O� IO r v1 a m 7 7 n n IO h o0 I� IO a0 Q� 00 O N N (V 7 I� N IO o0 o0 n O O O
W
m
m w w 00 w 00 T T Ol O O .-. N m m 7
a a a a a m m m m m m m M M m M M M M m m m m M M M m M M m m m m m m m m m m m M m v v v a a a v
U
m
7 vt 00 7 �n [� M V O1 r h 00 l� .-. N1 Iq 7 M N r T 00 77 v1 1! l� Iq a0 .-. T 00 O Ct M T T O o0 l� .-+ v� 7
V b 00 01 �+ � Vl �D [� O N E W (V lO W� N a b t� �--� M O� N O V N N N� 1� O l� 00
l
G, P7 V
�O
[� [� [� [�
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M m 7 v1 �D
',A

0
N
N
N
}
�
r
M t0
O O
N N
O co
W N
} }IfTI
'
U)
I
N
N
(V
C N
�
m Y
I
I
'
�
p
a
�
po.
a
0
0
M
o
a
U
�
�
U
M �
3
�
I
I
I
I
k
O
N
f
o
h
O
f0 V M N O Of OD I� O N
mmmCl) m
(J3� QOlJEAO�'3
a u
ow
F
U
pa
v,
O
N F
w
x
S
}
A
}
a
"noO000�n.0
rn
C ?
} k
N
T
M
��o��MU�aik
a`�i
m�
�•a
o c
N'�
O
H
CI
U
_Y
L
U
a
�
8Ao
JE=

v
�o W
i.
0
5
v
in W
to
,o
a>i
e W
0
--- O O- m- M Vl t� MCI a,l- n N 00 Vl O O\ O M
V M 0 7 C\ b N h �D N h %O �O �O h t- O N d: OO N m W O N -0 O
O, w 10 a 7 a t+f c�1 rf N N N N- N cif m m m a a a vi vt vl l�
y
7 7 m M m m m M M M M M M m M M M m M M M M M M M M M m
m M M M M M m m M m M M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
F
% Q
O M r N M O O m� 7 �O � [� 7 a0 N O 00 ^-� 7 N 0 '+
--- b b b--
O—
— N N N N N N N N M M a 7 7
>
O l� � 7 7 M m m t�1 N N N N m t�f of N1 nt nl 7 7 7 vi v1 l�
y
N W
a m M M M m M M M M M M M M m m m m M M m m m m m
m M m m M m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
0 7
U
W
mil
`-1I
[� O� 7 N O�
O O O, O�
Cn
o0 7 00 �O O
M 1 N [ �cn
Q
N
m 7 M M M M M M M M M M M M tNl m M M M tM�1 M m tm�1 M M m c��f M m cM�1 m m
W
M M m M m m M M m m m M m m m m m m M m M m M M M M M M M
ci
C
� � O N l� I T
O
ID m .�-•i.Ni a0 O\ y O " N (V M V � b n r 00 O
O t O Ommm
WQ
W
M M m m m cm�t Rmf m m m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m M M m M tm�f M M M m M M M M M M M m M M M M M
a�
U
d
A
0 0 h 0 M b m 0 m vO b O N N 7 b W T 7 Vm ND 0 ONO O Nir h n W O O N a v� OMO M N v� O l� N
y
aooriroi����'^`O`D`o`�`D�������00
000000000000ayaa aaao:000000d o�-�-yaro�oomm

a
0
N
N
I
�
M
O
O
O
N
N
O
(M
0
N
}PL
I
}I1TI
I
�
O
p
N
[7
Y
�
(Cp
N
}
m
�
N
�
�
'ob
o
i
o
I
GJ
fn
I
N
.J
>
o
r
3
�
Go
d
O
O
O
W. [O M V'M N
N
[.
M
M M � fm�7 M M[M'1
($)-!jUAal9
W
0
A
U
�p
Ca
j
w
N F
� U
W
�
F
G
i+ Pan
a
U V
}
M
Y
a
N
Y
�M
DO-
vON�p
� v7N
—
M
O
M
[d
ID
7
O
9
,0
O
OCi
L
V N_JE

A
v
�o W
ti
,o
a
v
in [il
L
.o
a W
Y
as
i+ x
.o
A13
b O1 T m 00 O P � b O rO 7 Nr N O
rl
t� �� m O :
O �O v1 N 1� O N [ : 1 I% O
Y
W
m O r O ^ N O D\ 7
`-j
T 00 00 M 00 v� O � M M 00 l� 7 l� O� O: N �D O 7 l� m 7 r1
:
� 't � �
�
N
vi 7 00 vi tit N1 cif N N N N ^-� N N M m m M v1 [� 00
V 7 M M M M m M M M M M M m M M m M M M M M m m m m
N W
m M M M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m m
�
Z
In
N 00 T OOO 0 0 r N N N m
U
W
N M t C, O\
m m O O M W M m O N N N n N N O N^ O h� M
�
�
7 7 7 m m m M m m m M m M M M M m M M M M M M M m m m m M m m M m m m
V]
0
�
d
m m m m m m m m m m m m M M M M M M M M M m m m m m m m m m
W
L
O N N �O O, m 00 7
i d
r N r oG m V n O\ 00 7 O m T D1 M N �O M[,� 00 Vi N r h m 0 7 O O
n
D1 O O O h O, m O, O: Ol Ol P O O c1 N T o0 a0 00 r 00 00 T ,� 7 Vl �O ,� l� h O M N �D 7 �O m ^ m
16 m
m M M M M Mm M mm
W
N
M M m M M M M M M M M M M M M m m m m M M M m M M M M M M M m m m m m m M
W
O W
L
�y
U
L
O l O ^ m 00 O 7 a 7 a0 a0 D^ r a0 b y m O M ^ O, T h 7 00 a� W v 7^ 7 v >D M N a 00 Q N
A
"O 'O 1 V n 7 T �/1 1% O m vl N 7 N` b o0 O V t+1 n O r1 C o0 O
O V [ N h 00 Q O O O m O m N N m m m 7 7 I I I O D t [ M 00 00 m O, O1 O\ O\ O O 7 a r h r 7
q
^ N N N N M M M m M M m M m M m m M m m M m m M M M M m M

}
}\
■
ff
\|
®
k(
10
!f
||i
1
�
2
\
|
19
u
I
)
® /
)
)
U }
~
�A,Aaa��RRRRRRRRRq
§ �
§
�
�
S
§
§
»
k
»
\
�
\
3 3
cq
1
m
In
@
\Qy9�27u9§ii
-q
>----m©
_
§32
OE
M5-�Ee
X
EE
�)jj7{}))/§

x
� w
�x
.o
v
�n W
i.
m
0
9
Q W
� x
.a
9
vi-�N�ornC+V oomo0aonIacnoCnov-q—O
O� 0oli�o
O O �n 00 ^ 0 Vl �--� � ^ T 00 Vl v� n� m 7 O m � O O ID 00 VJ b
M
N
M W
m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M m M
m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m m M M m M m M M M
4
0
M
00
CO
,� V b O O b ,-. h O 00 O O 00 OO r O Nl v1 N^ 00 r
7 C, O ^
!!�yy
Q, 00 O, O,
00 19
b 7 N O T Q: m 00 1, w O
N
N W
m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M
mM M m M m m M M M M m m M M M m
m m m m ...
W
b
C� .N. O [l V7 M N .N-i v�i �p b fh IN
U
�
W
h 10 7 h l� V1 W l� N 7 m 7 M N O� M^ '+ N v� �O R N v m 00 m y
[/]
O T O 01 �n ^ l� O t� 7 �n N N N--� ^-� r O o0 �O O� V t� N-+ ,..i IO ID
Ln
rn
�^
V7 7 of O Qi Oi 00 00 [� [� l� [� l� h [� h N l� b b b r n 00 O� m M 7
M M m M N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N m m m
j
MMMmMM mmmmmmmmmm m---mmmm mm
U
�d
O
a�
m M M M M N N N M N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N m m m m
m m m M M M M M M M M M M m m m m m m m m m M m M M M
W
O w
U
d
O M a0 h v ul m V O O M N V V7 C, 7 'D m m 00 00 00 M N 7 O 7 00 [ V 00 V 7
ll� 00 O T n r 00 ^ M
O^ h 00 .ti m v1 vt M 00 00 O, M 0, m Q O O O O R V 00 r .-
Q

�s
C N
O �
A
C
E
O
v
E
E
E
E �t
r
t
i
�
a
O
N O
6
O
N
7
Y
N �YJ
U
v
v
3
M
O O
O t�
�Eo
N
' N
Y
C l0
r
it
O
()J) ao!;enajg
00
a
Q ui
Q
W
] Qz
3
o
U
Oa
W)
N E.
W
r
ry'
N cc
CV
N
N
N
NN00M
^"NNU
N
� oa
n-
M
ISO
�b�x
N3„E�.ww
x�
ru V
N p
E
�mmm3r��mm�c
AAA

2.
v
�o W
a
0
m
v� W
4
,O
a W
ae
i+ x
,o
0 [� O� In m m N M O
CD o0
v� h a0 O
00 T O O �O 7 0 t� 00 00 O� � vt O m N N 7
h %R
N
m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M
Hf W
M m M M M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m m m m m m
L
� x
^ N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M m 7 7
g'cr m 7 M [� m N O O N N M O, O, n 10 7^
O� IO R N o0 ID 7 lD r� r� lD [l o0 00 O M T N 7
d
M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M
N W
m M M M m m M m m m M m M m m m m m M M M M M M M M
a
�.
Z
llaMOr,moo�oanov,q
T O O
U
�
W
vt M 7 m N 7 m .-. M �O .-. V1 vi w .-. 7 7 7 V1 l� O% .-. oo 'O
M 7--� ^-� 00
�•.-.
M 00 �O �O �O------- V N a N N V 77 a s 77 ---- O
M M N N N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N N N M
Oj
M m m m m m m m m m m M m M m m m M M M M M M M M M
m rn oo ao a, �o m to M oo
%
Ili
14 �O O\ .-� Vi n 4 lD o0 I:[l .-. O� M [� � �
M
h m W N Q\ cn
c0 O r� oq
00 Vl [� � O W [� [- r b b b�� r h n n W 00 00 � [� l� � W n � O W N O� l� vt N m
4 4 n
^,
�•
m D\ n b b M 7 7 7 7 7 a 7 7 7 N N 7 7 R 7 7 7 7 N�� N 7 R N�� m N �D [� M O�
W
=
W
o w
'O OR O n %O e0 ^ %O 0G O N Vl h O\ O N V 'O Jq O V � � � .-� b O 7
A
06
O N 7 0 N N M M M R R 7 7 n N I �n �D o N lD DID l r n[ r b W o0 N N M D h^ N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m M m 7 7
z
�

E
1
!
!
i
N
i
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
LO
N
CG
I
x
�
0
I
I
m
a
0
U
N
Qyy
0
�
�
a
x
�
o
0
�
N
U
v
�o
�
}
m fo
n
3
0 0
N N
O M
`m `m
O
N
o
N
w N
C
'n
l0
I�
O
(g) u !1-121
C1 W
m
U
A
W
0
e� F.
r a
F
r4
A
U ri
}
N
}
}
���NrYW�Nnia
a��
N
VOmN
nN�NW'.Mnaa.
ONE--'
7
W
}NNE
o'^nQ
}
N
m�/iM
cl
o
❑
o
❑
a�Q
JS

�o W
a
0
�W
eW
'O O,
y
O� IO Nl O� 00 M IO 0 00 lO vt IO IO [-: h h OO T M IO T
O O,
d
M W
M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
m M M M m m m m m m m m m m M M M M M M M M m M M M M m M M M M m m
V
�DMM00n^-�vlO vj ONqr:pm-NM m -
n
In
7 [ : M [-
h t.1 O� O (V 7 �D vi 7 �D O O M , �^ 00 00 00 00�O+O-��
'+ -� Nyyy
mil
On O� r e0 t� v� . 'O C, O 7 N O, �D O� v1 00 N O O �O O
N 00 v� .. O� 00 7 N "I�D ZO O� .-. 7 00 r O� .-.
l 1 10 w O,
N
M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
M M M m m M M M M M M M M M m m M m m m m m m M
O
ri W
%y
'O C, O\
O
�
O O \p .~-� � vi � [� 00 00 � D\ O '+ (V tV Ht V Vi O\ �D .-• N N
U
�
Cl)
4D\
GO
h
T
j
M M N N m N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N M N M M N N30
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m M m m m m m m':
nn
U
W
pip
Y
O N h O\ O\ l- O\ 7 'O vl v1 00 00 'r r 7 a0
O O\ N 'O O 00 IO 7 a M O 00 l� � N O O O O�� r h
6
m m m N N N N m N m N N N N N N N M M N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N
j
M M M M M M M M M M M m m M m m M M m M m m m m M M M M
O W
U
L
O
O O\ O M �--� �-+ O\ � Vl � O N Vl O\
r
1

I
� K
\
�S
LO
LO
k )�2
\|
k(
f®
�|»
_
�
R
i
F
/.
�
` .
I
]
�
[
)
�
m e
�
G
�
|
q
i
\
|
f
cq
/
§ / A ] ) q ] A q
«s
§ /
(
� ®
�
\ d
\
§ �
■
�
j
»
k
»
7
y
2
C
flul'i
a
(©�\7k
c,«
k
)
5
W2
§[,
kk

Bank Pin Monitoring Data
Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 3 Report
Durham, North Carolina
DKU-14060
November 7-8, 2016
Bank Pin Monitoring Methodology:
Two sets of bank pins were installed in the outer bend of each of five pool cross sections (Cross
Sections 2, 4, 5, 7, and 10). Each set of bank pins consists of two bank pins installed near the
water line with one pin approximately 6 to 12 inches above the other. In each cross section, the
lower of the two pins in a set is referred to as `Pin 1', and the upper pin is referred to as `Pin 2',
as depicted in the cross sectional schematic below.
At each cross section, the two sets of bank pins were installed with the first set a few feet
upstream of the center of the bend, and the second set a few feet downstream of the center of the
bend, as depicted in the following plan view schematic.
N
Cross Section
2
.s
---------- ---------
r��
F]

XS4-1 Bank Pins
0 Pin 2 (upper)
Pin 1 (lower)
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0
Exposed pin length change (in.)
1 Year-2, 2015 ■ Year-3, 2016
XS4-2 Bank Pins
0
1�
2
-16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2
Exposed pin length change (in.)
WYear-2, 2015 ■Year-3, 2016
XS5-1 Bank Pins
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0
Exposed pin length change (in.)
■ Year-2, 2015 ■ Year-3, 2016
Pin 2 (upper)
Pin 1 (lower)
Pin 2 (upper)
Pin 1 (lower)
2

XS10-1 Bank Pins
0 Pin 2 (upper)
. Pin 1 (lower)
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2
Exposed pin length change (in.)
WYear-2, 2015 1m Year-3, 2016
XS10-2 Bank Pins
7 Pin 2 (upper)
0 Pin 1 (lower)
0
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2
Exposed pin length change (in.)
■Year-2, 2015 0Year-3, 2016

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration Site
Durham, NC
MONITORING YEAR 3
McAdams Project #: DKU-14060
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Threshold Met?*
Tract Mean
1
Yes
83 %
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
NO
5
Yes
6
Yes
* Target density is a minimum of 320 trees (both planted and existing) per acre after three years of monitoring, 260 trees (both
planted and existing) per acre after five years of monitoring, and 210 trees (both planted and existing) per acre after seven years
of monitoring, according to the "Stream Restoration Plan for the Duke University Water Reclamation Pond", October, 2012.

r
F �
M
z
dti
Iz
^y O
M
a
z
NN
N
oo
N
N
Vl
N
M
Vl
O
N
z
6
M O
W
N
N
O
,-•
CD,-.
oo
N
CDO
M
vl
^
O
N
z
�
N
n
>
'"
o
N
7
N
O
N
po
vl
�
°
c
M
M
N
a
�
O
a
�
M
M
M
N
O
�
Ap
F
p
iN/1
O
a
d
�
�
A
E
o
o
to
a
a
c
ai
y
N
p
y
1--1
Y
b
4.
13
.
d
e
a
Q
0
0.:
a
y
a'
r
o
z
z
o
o
o
'�
a
tl
OI
a
v
4

Table 3. Planted Species Comparison by Vegation Plot
Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration Site
Durham, NC
MONITORING YEAR 3
McAdams Project #: DKU-14060
VP-1
VP-2
VP-3
VP-4
VP-5
VP-6
Monitoring Year 3 Planted Stem Count Total
11
11
13
6
10
15
As Built Planted Stem Count Total
18
13
14
14
11
17
Planted Stem Difference from As Built
-7
-2
-1
-8
-1
-2
Surivabilit Rate %per Monitoring Plot
61 %
85%
93%
43%
91 %
88%
Note: The difference between planted stems from the As Built and Monitoring Year 3 is due to species which were deemed
"missing" or "dead" at the time of monitoring. One possible explanation for "missing" species is due to thick herbaceous
growth obscurring the species from identification during Monitoring Year 3. Therefore, it is possilbe "missing" species could
grow larger than the herbaceous layer and allow for their identification and measurment in subsequent monitoring years. In
addition, species which were deemed "dead" could survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant
at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species are surviving below ground. Therefore, in subsequent years the
species could grow under more favorable conditions.

APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 3 Report
Durham, North Carolina
DKU-14060
November 11 and December 13, 2016
Vegetation Plot Photos:
Vegetation Plot 1: View facing 62°NE
Vegetation Plot 2: View facing 51 °NE

Vegetation Plot 3: View facing 278°W
Vegetation Plot 4: View facing 250°W

Vegetation Plot 5: View facing 258°W
Vegetation Plot 6: View facing 222°SW

APPENDIX E
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 1
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11 /11/2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 1
X-axis:
Plot Location:
102°
sea sketch below
CURRENT
MONITORING
YEAR DATA
MY2 MONITORING
DATA
X
Y
ddh
Height
cm
DBH
cm
Vigor
Notes
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
Scientific Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
mm
cm
cm
1
Quercus michauxii
9
0.3
0.4
Missing
5.89
51
2
Fraidnue pemsjdvanica
B
0.7
3.1
Missing
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8
0.8
4.7
Missing
4
Fraldnus penns lvanica
9
0.7
5.1
Missing
5
Platanus occidentalis
9
0.2
5.6
275
1.237
3
160
0.450
6
Quercus michauxii
8
3.8
9.11
Missing
7.70
83
7
Platanus occidentalis
8
2.8
4.3
163
0.304
3
7.65
97
8
Quercus michauxii
8
4.8
1.5
Missing
6.40
75
9
Quercus michauxi
B
5.6
3.5
Missin
6,40
56
10
Quercus michauxii
B
5.8
8.4
9.12
54
3
Deer
9.30
83
11
Platanus occidentalis
B
7.4
0.4
360
2.260
3
12
Platanus occidentalis
B
8.2
3.1
14.23
150
0.320
3
13
Quercus michauxii
B
8.1
5.8
10.88
36
3
Deer
5.00
51
14
Quercus michauxii
8
7.9
6.5
7.60
45
3
15
Quercus michawdi
B
9.9
9.4
8.87
56
3
4.50
36
16
Quercus michauxii
B
9.5
6.9
10.64
97
3
9.05
79
17
Quercus michauxii
B
9.4
4.1
7 91
57
3
4.65
56
18
Quercus michauxii
B
9.7
1.2
9-361
77
3
6.10
40
B = bare root
C= containerized
• ` • ` y
0.0 x
` Campus
♦ `
Volunteers
<50 cm
50.100 c100+cm
Li uidambar styraciflua
5
8
12
Pinustaeda
d
30
30
10
Liriodendron tuli ifera
3
Quercus launfolia
1

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11/11/2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 1
X-axis: 102'
10
9
8
7
6
O
1
5
4
3:
2
2
V`
1
lJ
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10
Fraxinus pennsylvanlca OPlalanus occidentalis O Quercus michauxii O Missing

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 1
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11/11/2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No: 2
X-axis:
Plot Location:
94°
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING
YEAR
DATA
MYz MONITORING
DATA
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
Vigor
Notes
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
Sclsntlfic Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
cm
cm
mm
cm
cm
1
Quercus phellos
B
0.0
1.5
7.59
121
3
6.90
62
2
Quercus phellos
B
4.3
1.0
192
0.581
3
9.05
97
3
Quercus phellos
B
6.8
1.6
4.50
70
3
5.55
33
4
Platanus occidentalis
B
9.7
1.4
607
4.610
3
360
1 A48
5
Cersis canadensis (s0 not on Dlanting list)
C
7.9
4.5
350
2.545
3
340
2.720
6
Quercus phellos
B
5.4
4.0
INlssin
7
Fraxinus Dennsylvanica
C
2.9
3.3
315
3.053
31
298
2.610
8
Platanus occidentalis
B
2.7
5.7
280
1.812
3
9.35
189
9
Quercus michauxii
B
5.6
6.2
152
0.450
3
9.40
118
10
Comus florida
C
9.8
7.8
265
2.930
3
234
1 760
11
Alnus serrulata
B
5.6
B.8
Dead
4M
29
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
C
2.8
8.0
500
4.214
3
350
3.230
13
Platanus occidentalis
B
8.1
97
170
0.460
3
9A0
t t t
B = bare root
C= containerized
Volunteers
<50 cm
50-100 cm
100+ cm
Li uidambar styraciflua
10
25
1
Lifiodendron lull ifera
1 7
13
Pinustaeda
20
15
0
C
E
u

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11 /11 /2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 2
X-aps: 94°
10.0
9.0
8.0
`17y
7.0
9
6.0
5.0
5
4.0
6
7
3.0
2.0
� O O
0.0 —
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
0Quercusmichauxii OAlnusserrulata 0 Cersis canadensis
O Cornus florida Fraxinus pennsylvanica O Platanus occidentalis
OQuercusphellos 0Missing XDead
z

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 1
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11 /11 /2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 3
X-axis:
Plot Location:
306°
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY2 MONITORING
DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
mm
Hei ht
cm
DBH
cm
Vi or
Notes
ddh
Height
I DBH
Map ID
Scientific Name
Source
mm
cm
cm
1
Fraxinus Penns Ivanica
13
1,2
2.8
7.79
71
3
9.05
65
2
Vibumum dentatum
B
2.7
1.9
7.7
9
2
Deer
4.20
33
3
Platanus occidentalis
9
17
4,5
170
0.569
3
7.70
105
4
Platanus occidentalis
B
1.1
5.5
Missing
4.80
74
5
Platanus occidentalis
B
3.7
7.6
7A
97
3
4.50
70
6
Platanus occidentalis
B
1 4.4
8.1
6.11
68
3
5.85
61
7
Platanus occidentalis
B
1.8
9.9
6,16
65
3
5.80
65
8
4uercus michauxii
B
4.5
5.9
6.47
53
3
Deer
6.20
66
9
Ouercus michauxii
B
4.6
3.1
7.97
30
3
Deer
6.40
48
10
Vlbumum dental Gm
B
5.7
1.5
7.92
62
3
5.90
39
11
Fraxinus eennsylvanica
B
7.5
3.3
9.36
59
3
9.95
57
12
Platanus occidentalis
B
9.0
2.5
4.34
33
3
Deer
4.25
49
13
Vlbumum dentatum
B
9.4
7.0
6.08
36
3
Deer
5.85
54
14
Platanus occidentalis
B
9.8
9.2
6.12
55
31
6.66
52
e = Dare root
C= containerized
♦
y
u
9
0,0 x
Volunlears <50 an 50-100 cm 100• cm
Liquid arnbar s reci0ua 20
Pines leads 5010

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11 /11 /2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 3
X-axis: 306°
10
7
9
$
s
7
k3
6
g
4
5'
4
3
8
1
2
2i
1
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
OPlatanusoccidentalis OFraxinuspennsylvanica OQuercusmichauxii Vibumumdentatum OMissing
278°

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 1
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11/11/2016
Area: 20x5
Vag Plot No.: 4
X-axis:
Plot Location:
278°
see sketch below
CURRENT
MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY2 MONITORING
DATA
X
Y
ddh
Height
cm
DBH
cm
Vigor
Notes
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
Scientific Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
mm
cm
cm
1
Platanus occidentalis
B
1.1
1.2
10.74
99
3
7.30
83
2
Lindera benzion
B
2.2
3.2
317
31
1
3
Comus amomum
B
3.3
02
Missing
3.25
31
4
Platanus occidentalis
B
5.6
3.5
10.64
55
3
Deer
7.20
75
5
Comus amomum
B
6.8
4.9
Dead
6
Lindera benzion
B
8.4
2.9
Missing
3.50
66
7
Platanus occidentalis
B
11.3
3.1
Missing
6-251
67
8
Vibumum dentatum
B
13.9
2.9
3.23
58
3
3.30
56
9
Platanus occidentalis
B
14.2
4.9
12.76
129
3
520
84
10
Asimina triloba
B
17.1
49
Missina
310
26
11
Lindera benzion
B
17.2
3.6
Dead
12
Vcl umum dentatum
B
19.1
0.3
Dead
13
Lindera benzion
B
19.6
3.2
Dead
4.40
83
14
Platanus occidentalis
IB
19.4
5.0
7.651
80
3
625
55
ti = Dare root
t C= containerized
t �
00
00
t
y
0.0 - - -
Volunteers
<50 cm
50-100 cm
100+ cm
Li uidambar styraciflua
20
Liriodendron tuli ifera
15
Pinus taeda
1 50
-x-

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 11 /11 /2016
Area: 20x5
Vag Plot No.: 4
X-axis: 278'
4
O
3
b
8.
2
1
1
3
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
O Platonus occidentalis OAsimina triloba OCornus amomum OVlburnum dentotum O Undera benzion X Dead O Missfng

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 1
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 12/13/2016
Area: 10x10
Veg Plot No.: 5
X-axis:
Plot Location:
296'
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING
YEAR DATA
MY2 MONITORING DATA
X
Y
j ddh
Height
I DBH
cm
Vi or
Notes
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
SCfentitic Narllo
Source
meter
motorl
mm
cm
mm
cm
cm
1
Comus amomum
B
2.8
3.1
Dead
2.90
35
2
Liriodendron tuli ifera
D
2.1
5.0
10.92
86
3
5.26
54
3
Liriodendron tuli ifera
B
5.2
6.6
5.94
43
3
3.20
21
4
Alnus serrulata
B
26
7.3
921
54
3
Deer
7,80
55
5
Platanus occidentalis
B
99
8.4
280
1.394
3
6AD
130
6
Viburnum dentatum
B 1
8.6
9.1
7.69
45
3
9A5
44
7
Alnus serrula[a
B
1 5.8
8.9
12.661
64
3
Deer
9.50
74
8
Fraxfnus pennsylvanica
B
8.5
9.4
8.88
61
3
Deer
6.35
67
9
Frabnus pennsylvanica
B
9.9
9.6
9.39
89
3
6.65
79
10
Ftnus enns Ivanica
B
4.4
9.8
5.96
56
3
5.06
16
11
Fra>anus pennsylvanica
B
1 01
9.51
5.82
23
3
Deer
5. DO
55
u = Dare roof
C= containerized
0.0
Volunteers
460 cm
Lf uidambor sl roci0ua
10
Liriodendron tuli llera
5
Platanus occidentali s
3
Pinus taeda
70
x

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 12/13/2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 5
X-axis: 296'
10
1
^
9
6
9
7
5
8
O
7
Q
6
5
2
4
3
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
OPlatanusoccidentalis OFraxinuspennsylvanicaOAlnusserrulata Viburnum dentatum
Ocornusamomum 0 Uriodendron tulipifera XDead

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 1
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 12/13/2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No: 6
X-axis:
Plot Location:
264°
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING
YEAR DATA
MY MONITORING
DATA
X
Y
ddh
Het ht
DBH
cm
Vigor
Notes
ddh
Height
DBH
Ma ID
Scientific Name
Sourco
meter
meter
mm
cm
mm
cm
cm
1
Comus amomum
B
0.2
1.2
Dead
2
N ssa s Ivatica
B
3.3
1.1
4.47
50
3
458
48
3
Comus amomum
B
6.3
0.8
Missing
4
N ssa s Ivatica
B
9.1
0.8
7.94
67
3
Deer
6.50
68
5
Quercus michaubi
B
4.9
2.5
7.49
49
3
Deer
620
62
6
Quercus michaubi
B
0.8
3.3
7.48
56
3
5.05
54
7
Quercus michaubi
B
2,8
3.7
6.34
59
3
Deer
5.10
61
6
Quercus michaubi
B
6.0
4.0
9.64
52
3
Deer
6.50
68
9
Quercus michaubi
B
9.2
4.2
7.84
67
3
Deer
6.50
69
10
Quercus michaWai
B
1.7
59
5.09
45
3
4,75
45
11
N ssa s Ivatica
B
4,4
6.6
6.22
64
3
4.99
59
12
Quercus michauxi
B
5.7
7.7
6,11
60
3
4.85
59
13
N ssa s Ivatica
B
7.5
6.8
6.22
62
3
5.10
60
14
N ssa s Ivatica
B
9.6
7.2
5.92
60
3
Deer
5.89
61
15
Quercus michaubi
B
9.9
9.1
7.8
61
3
5.90
60
16
Quercus michaubi
B
7.0
9.3
5.98
52
3
Deer
4,79
55
17
Quercus michaubi
113
1. 3.81,
9.21
6.04
47
1 3
Deer
1 5.95
49
U = Oulu ruvi
C= containerized - , - . -
' .
s
I
Y
I
0,0 x
i .. ....a y ........ '%............ I..............
.............. ...
forest edge
Volunteers
<50 cm
Li uidambar styraciflua
8
Platanus occidentalis
5
Pinus laeda
60

Site: Duke Sandy Creek Restoration
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY3
Date: 12/13/2016
Area: 10x10
Vag Plot No.: 6
X-axis: 264°
10
9
a
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
2zr
flq�
11�
13
0
9
Q
H
2
3
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Nyssa sylvatica OCornus amomum OQuercus michauxil X Dead O Missing

APPENDIX F
Annual Invasive Species Monitoring Document

It!VERoxxs
To: George Buchholz
JR McAdams Company, Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
From: George Morris
River Works, Inc
6105 Chapel Hill Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
Subject: Spring 2015 Treatment at Sandy Creek Campus Drive
Date: October 17, 2016
During the week of September 18th , River Works conducted a site visit and invasive plant treatment for
the buffer along the Sandy Creek Campus Drive stream restoration. An initial assessment of the species
encountered was conducted and the following species were encountered within the buffer: Lonicera
japonica (Japanese Honeysuckle), Ligustrum sinense (Chinese Privet), Ligustrum japonicum (Japanese
Privet), Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (Porcelain berry) and Wisteria sinensis (Chinese Wisteria).
Wisteria and Ampelopsis continue to be most prevalent in the Northern sections of the buffer. All
species encountered were treated with herbicide.
As noted in previous visits, large populations of invasive species were located outside the buffer and
encroachment of invasive species will continue until these populations are addressed.
A site map with approximate locations of the invasive populations, as well as pesticide application
reports, is included with this report.
Thank you for allowing us to assist you in reaching your goals. If there are any questions, feel free to
contact me at 919-818-3984.
George Morris
Botanist/Vegetation Specialist
River Works, Incorporated

1N3M3SV3 r �. _-_ 9' lo,d '03A '
83M3S MIVHana
d0 AID 'X3
30nV0 30VIS IS383 I
os
fan I ! .—j
l3NNVHO 1
- AV3&S a3HO1S38 Jr
HNVB 30 dOl f!
a MIV32LLS a3VOIS38 f
1N3w3SV3 NOLVAU3SNOO -- (, ' 7, Hl I o S
XNV9 30 d01
MIV3211S 031JO1s311
1N3W3SV3
83M3S MIVHmna
i 30 ub 'X3'�—
'' £f 103d '03A
2 + .01 1
WV3uls a32oim
1�
- iN3' V3 NouVA83sNoa ('3V � 0 Z ) 1 d zil N I O
�f41.J,
I v r
t
1 f r 1 XNV8 30 d01
- MI MUS ❑3aO1'SM 7 !�
� 'IX
l/ 1Old 'O3A �` f
1N3MMV3 NOl1VAH3SNO0 09
• � (.:Dv
r
r f f 997) HiWN

FKWX1►D"m
0
m
m OC
zz
N �m
���
m D
D D
;
o o ..l
OZ mm
n m —4
n '' U ;�7
z yM
z -� r
O�
D
u D
O
z
L
77 001 = goui I
ooz nat ax 0 ant
agV3S :)IHdVHf)
S1N
30nvo 3svls 153w
stivin 1Nwosv3 NOl1VAM3SNOO
SLOId NOLIV1303A
1N31M35Y3
83M3S MIVHMna 30 Alq JNLLSIX3
('DV 10*1 - V3MV
IV101) 1N3MOSV3 NOILVAiMNOO
3LS LAW*"
,Am Grod
(INHIDH'I
f
' 1N3W3SV3
f 83M3S WVHana
J jb KLIO 'X3
l3�[NVHO�-'t
YVVTILS 03HOIS38
l�
IIVM0V3H 30 d01"--\\ x . �XN .,\ I--- /- -'\ 1-1
r
f� 1

River Works, Inc
Vegetation Management Report Form
Site -
Crew leader J
H❑ rs-
Crdw members
-0 — Sc
fy1� u j ea
'Chemicals,Spr yed
Areas completed
Target species
Fat;72-3
Applicators License #
Method of removal
q-lk45
Weather Conditions I

'J M; : A DA M-S
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 20, 2016
To: Mr. Ryan Lavender, PE
Duke Utility & Engineering Services, FMD
Duke University
From: George Buchholz, REM, PWS
Re: Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration;
Stream & Vegetation Monitoring;
2016 Spring Stream Visual Assessment
Monitoring Year 3
DKU-14060
As part of Monitoring Year 3 (2016) Stream and Vegetation Monitoring
activities, McAdams conducted a spring stream visual assessment on May 16,
2016. The purpose of the stream visual assessment is to initially assess the
restored stream for the upcoming fall monitoring activities and to determine if
immediate corrective actions are required. A spring invasive species
inspection and treatment was also conducted during the week of May 15a',
2016 (attached Riverworks letter dated June 16, 2016). Based on the spring
invasive species inspection and treatment, invasive species infestations were
observed and were treated. Invasive species encountered include: Japanese
honeysuckle, Chinese privet, Japanese privet, porcelain berry, and Chinese
wisteria.
The entire stream restoration project was visually inspected, photographs were
taken, and field notes were recorded. Below is a summary and
recommendations based on the visual inspection. In addition, attached are the
field notes.
Stream Visual Assessment Summary:
The John R. McAdams
Company, Inc.
- All structures are in place. No damage or movement of structures was
observed.
Raleigh / Durham, NC
- During the MY2 monitoring period, it was reported there were some
2905 Meridian Parkway
areas of minor erosion and it was recommended that these areas
Durham, North Carolina 27713
[phone]
needed to be watched to determine if vegetation would take hold.
nee
During the MY3 2016 Spring Stream Visual Assessment it was
determined that vegetation has grown and thrived. The vegetation is
Charlotte, NC
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd,
Suite 111
Charlotte North Carolina 28226
[phone]
McAdsmsCo.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

Mc -A DA N4 S
Mr. Ryan Lavender, PE
Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration;
Stream & Vegetation Monitoring; 2015 Spring Stream Visual
Assessment; Monitoring Year 3
June 20, 2015
Page 2 of 2
taking hold and there are very minimal areas of erosion. Continued
monitoring is recommended.
There are a few log vanes (in the North Section) in which water flow is
going under the vane and not above the vane. It doesn't appear that
the log vanes are undermined at this point, but recommend watching
them.
DKU-14060

r#VE R P� -
r4
To: George Buchholz
JR McAdams Company, Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
From: George Morris
River Works, Inc
6105 Chapel Hill Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
Subject: Spring 2015 Treatment at Sandy Creek Campus Drive
Date: June 16, 2016
During the week of May 15th, River Works conducted a site visit and invasive plant treatment for the
buffer along the Sandy Creek Campus Drive stream restoration. An initial assessment of the species
encountered was conducted and the following species were encountered within the buffer: Lonicera
japonica (Japanese Honeysuckle), Ligustrum sinense (Chinese Privet), Ligustrum japonicum (Japanese
Privet), Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (Porcelain berry) and Wisteria sinensis (Chinese Wisteria).
Wisteria and Ampelopsis were most prevalent in the Northern sections of the buffer. All species
encountered were treated with herbicide.
As noted in previous visits, large populations of invasive species were located outside the buffer and
encroachment of invasives will continue until these populations are addressed.
A site map with approximate locations of the invasive populations, as well as pesticide application
reports, is included with this report.
Thank you for allowing us to assist you in reaching your goals. If there are any questions, feel free to
contact me at 919-818-3984.
George Morris
Botanist/Vegetation Specialist
River Works, Incorporated

n 0 r �
C�1
a7l�o �i
n
D Z
M,
A
Z
y
g �
00
�
]p / 2. ! �� D I
o y
� r
o � �
r
Tll
L41
r f
1 i - � •�
� � r
i
a f
! P'l >Ra g� .
' vR
d rm
� ~
C � �
S � �
p�pr i
! 9f
c
�— OKu-0=0 DUKE UNIVERSITY WATER RECLAMATION
��:•=i x� �� POND STREAM RESTORATION
FIGURE 2.2: CvNSER'ATfON E +5EVENT IlAAP �,..:.�.
,r n. 10-00-2074 _. ..•:.v —NA Mr'ADAMS �

River Works, Inc
Vegetation Management Report Form
Site
Crew, lead
Hours
_t r ' 1?� Vu .ic
Crew members
��O AGPri
Chemicals Sprayed Rate
!yea
El
Areas completed
k
I� i�'
1.r cc �C`',ainS
Date: 711i,16.
Applicators Lice se #a
0 CL. ✓C ' J y.7
Method of removal
Weather Conditions
Targett1 species
.rAif K, 2L�`'i�5lt l ^.e� �lNin�r L✓?t�����r�c,15�n ��.I �t�l:

APPENDIX G
Photo Stations

Duke University Water Reclamation Pond Stream Restoration
Monitoring Year 3 Report
Durham, North Carolina
DKU-14060
November 11 and December 13, 2016
Photo Station Photos:
Photo Station 1: View facing downstream
,.r, �� �1� F •� .i
3
Photo Station 2: View facing upstream

Photo Station 2: View facing downstream
Photo Station 3: View facing upstream

Photo Station 4: View facing upstream
Photo Station 4: View facing downstream

Photo Station 5: View facing upstream
Photo Station 5: View facing downstream

Photo Station 6: View facing upstream
Photo Station 7: View facing downstream

Photo Station 8: View facing upstream
• "�✓-.. _ ice' 1*r
Photo Station 8: View facing downstream

� ©���j�%m
A(
� ��/\<k� ���;��\/
Photo Station 9 View facing upstream
Photo Station 9: View facing downstream

Photo of Crest Stage Gauge (CSG)