090086_NOV-2020-DV-0402 Packet with Pictures_20200903

NOTICE OF VIOLATION/NOTICE OF INTENT PACKET
FACILITY 2602-1
MURPHY-BROWN LLC
AWS090086
NOV-2020-DV-0402

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE CERTIFIED
MAIL RECIEPT

Certified Mail service provides the following benefits:
• A receipt (this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt, see a retail
• A unique identifier for your mailpiece, associate for assistance. To receive a duplicate
• Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee, present this
delivery. USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receiptto the
• A record of delivery (including the recipients retail associate.
signature) that Is retained by the Postal Service' - Restricted delivery service, which provides
fora specified period. delivery to the addressee specified by name, or
to the addressee's authorized agent.
Important Reminders: - Adult signature service, which requires the
• You may purchase Certified Mail service with signee to he at least 21 years of age (not
First -Class Mail°, First -Class Package Service°. available at retail).
or Priority Mali° service. - Adult signature restricted delivery service, which
• Certified Mail service is not available for requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age
international mail. and provides delivery to the addressee specified
• Insurance coverage is notavallable for purchase by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent
with Certified Mail service. However, the purchase (not available at retail).
of Certified Mail service does not change the • To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt is
insurance coverage automatically included with
certain Priority Mail items.
• For an additional fee, and with a proper
endorsement on the mailpiece, you may request
the fallowing services:
- Return receipt service, which provides a record
of delivery (including the recipient's signature).
You can request a hardcopy return receipt or an
electronic version. For a hardcopy return receipt,
complete PS Form 3811, Domestic Return
Receipt attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece;
accepted as legal proof of mailing, it should bear a
USPS postmark. If you would like a postmark on
this Certified Mall receipt, please present your
Certified Mall Item at a Post Office' far
postmarking. If you don't need a postmark on this
Certified Mail receipt, detach the barcoded portion
of this label, affix it to the mailpiece, apply
appropriate postage, and deposit the mailpiece.
IMPORTANT. Save this receipt for your records.
PS Form 3800, April 2015 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-0004047
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1, Article Addressed to:
MURPHY-BROWN LLC
PO BOX 856
WARSAW, NC 28398
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I\Ill\ 1111111 11111111
9590 9402 5878 0038 2327 83
2. Article Number (Transfer from service label)
7019 0700 0000 3643 1311
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
® Agent
❑ Addressee
C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address diffdrent from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: © No
3. Service Type 0 Priority Mall Express®
o Adult Signature 0 Registered Mail °
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ID Registered Mall Restricted
rt Certified Mall® �Dever Delivery
Receipt for
❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery e MerchaRe ei
❑ Collect on Delivery 0 Signature ConfirmatlonT"
❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 0 Signature Confirmation
Mall Mall Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery
Domestic Return Receipt

U.S. Postal ServiceTM
CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
For delivery information, visit our website at www.w.usps co
OFFICI
Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate)
❑ Retum Receipt (hardcopy) $
❑Return Receipt (electronic)'
$
❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $
❑ Adult Signature Required
['Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $
Total postage and Fees
Sent To
$free[and; 'ptrNo.,orP Box o._____________•._-•
City, State, 1'+�
Postmark
Here
9/3A.aa�
AK — See Reverse for Instructions
PS Form 3800, April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9047

I I
i
i
USPS TRACKING #
II I
II I
11111
i
11111
9590 9402 5878 0038 2327 83
United States
Postal Service
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4© in this box•
NCDEQ — FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
ATTN: STEVE GUYTON— :; � t
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301
itu-irh i
11.111.1.,11111111,11,11111,1111'1111,0111„11111.111111Ili" 1.1

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND/OR
NOTICE OF INTENT

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretory
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 2, 2020
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7019 0700 0000 3643 1311
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/NOTICE OF INTENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2T .1304
NOV-2020-DV-0402
26A- 1 Facility No. 09 86, Permit No. AWS090086
Incident number 202002543
Bladen County
Dear Murphy -Brown, LLC.:
On August 20, 2020 staff of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality Regional
Operations Section (WQROS), received a phone call with regard to a discharge at the farm listed above.
On August 20, 21 and 28, 2020, DWR staff inspected the site. Michael Norris of Murphy -Brown and
other staff were present, and we wish to thank them for their cooperation and assistance.
As a result of these inspections, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1304, you have
been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation 1:
Failure to prevent discharge of waste to surface waters or wetlands by using a manmade conveyance.
N.C.G.S. 143-215.10C - (Permit No. AWG200000 Section Conditions I 1).
0n August 20, 2020, the Fayetteville Water Quality Regional office staff received a phone -call -from Mr.
Mike Cudd stating that a recycle line had broken and waste water had flowed into a containment area. At
some point the waste water flowed out and into a ditch that leads off the farm property. Smithfield Land
Nutrient Management (LNM) staff pumped the waste from the containment area back to the lagoon, and
staff cleaned out the ditch close to the containment, but did not think the waste had left the farm site.
Smithfield was notified by a neighbor of the farm around 2:00pm that waste was in a ditch on his
property. Containment and recovery began as soon as possible after this notification. Waste water was
NOinti '1.11E cnr�„� r
ow enved, emw,n»nm awa�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office i 225 Green Street, Suite 714 i Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
910.433.3300

Page 3
Murphy -Brown, LLC.
September 2, 2020
Required Corrective Action for Violation 2:
You stated in your response letter that the LNM staff that failed to make sure the ditch had not discharged
waste off the property have been disciplined according to Smithfield Policy. In addition, all LNM staff
will be retrained on checking secondary containments and ditches downstream during and after an
accidental discharge.
The Division of Water Quality would like to thank Mr. Michael Cudd for providing the items listed
below, received at the Fayetteville Regional Office on August 26, 2020. No additional information is
needed at this time.
1. An explanation from the OIC for this farm regarding how this violation occurred.
2. A list from the OIC concerning the steps that will be taken to prevent these violations from
occurring in the future.
3. Provide a copy of the press release and name of newspapers it was presented too.
As a result of the violations in this Notice, this office is considering a recommendation for a civil penalty
assessment to the Director of the Division. If you wish to present an explanation for the violations cited,
or if you believe there are other factors, which should be considered please send such information to me
in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this letter. Your response will be reviewed, and, if an
enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, it will be forwarded to the Director and included for
consideration.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to
the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more
that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Steve Guyton or me at [phone]
Sincerely,
— DocuSS ignneddby:
"
ikk
`7.51f fdfintliVn
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section- -
Division of Water Resources
cc: FRO Compliance Animal Files-Laserfiche
Smithfield Farms

INSPECTION REPORT / NOTES

Facility No. 7-0 Time In 7 G�5— Time Out
Farm Name Integrator
Owner Site Rep
Operator No.
Back-up No.
COC Circle: General or NPDES
3
Date
Design
Current
Design
Current
Wean — Feed
Farrow — Feed
Wean — Finish
Farrow — Finish
Feed — Finish
Gilts / Boars
Farrow — Wean
Others
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test
Weekly Freeboard
3
Sludge Survey
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
Wettable Acres PLAT
Daily Rainfall 1-in Inspections
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
Date
Nitrogen (N)
Pull/Field
Soil
Crop
Pan
Window
Co-q\,A ; a1,0M4,-
u
7 "1YYK
e --w
1-C f
_
- r! l
a
U
y
Fi% r G, Y,Y

Facility Number
zry
division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and: Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency ©rather 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:' 4;j Arrival Time:
Farm Name: tl L (
Owner Name: ,J7/ '3'f
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
ounty: fLe`Y{2 Region: t— (....)
FacilityContact: y2"'
/e l l_
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
74.
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current ;
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
--,
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
—�
IIIMIUMM
arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
--'
--
--
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current,
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Cattle
Design Curren'
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) la1'es ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? !f��:>✓" ��, �Q.,,; ;-
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number: (-/- - 1.
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑'NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EI NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑"NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q-NE"
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ICIE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload n Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN n PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window n Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Arca
12. Crop Typc(s):
13. Soil Typc(s):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑No ❑NA ErN
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑<E
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAlE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑fNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® E
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists n Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
n Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis n Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
n Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbrcakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
0'NE

(Facility Number: 9 -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
D Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) 4pd date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ No ❑NA NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? n Yes
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑No ❑NA NEE
❑ No ❑ NA [a'NE
❑ No DNA ia-
❑ No ❑ NA ❑]E
▪ o ❑NA ❑NE
IET-C;--
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑'
nYes No NA ❑NE
❑ Yes Er o ❑ NA ❑ NE
es 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IComments refer to question it): Fxplain any YES answers and/or any additional reeomnitendattons or any other roxnments.
Use'drawings of facility to better'' explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
L J__ s r d ' . / - Fi g
To 01- lam!? na 1 t %,J a T5 c/ /Gl 111 1 �i
SI;;FF byrai6,--)
p in ! AbvrTv c�,��i a�7z�--E- rc5 ��u� i2
L. i.J J' l :5"7'�� ?�� f�rv�` `,L7- /..iGi �j �--� �T � c It "T a. tJ.� �� Lr�-z.
U �F 1 ne r7
f Lof t ncLerT
Y Ce"7'" A'f�i f ` — D -r
Cv✓Y'`/
Uv1�Yvrri�a�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
V4/2n1s

()Division of Water Resources
Q Division of Soil and Water Conse
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:,�i�;i Arrival Time:
Farm Name: -; 247 C f
Owner Name:
/j i21ltr�<:1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
_ :F L �_
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
r-•,k„.
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:,. Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
ry
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Dry Poultr Ca aci Po . .
Layers --
Non -Layers
Pullets --
Turkeys --
Turkey Poults --
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ri Structure ❑Application Field n Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑'Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ycs [ NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number:
-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
•
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9 D art of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
•Does
any p
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
n Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
n PAN n PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare
n Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
n Yes Q'No ❑
❑ Yes
0-No ❑
health or environmental threat,
n Yes 0-No ❑
n Yes [ No ❑
❑ YesNo ❑
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
n Yes
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
notify DWR
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA L"NE
NA LINE
Soil
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
n Ycs ❑ No
❑ NA Q'NE
❑ NA LINE
❑ NA 0-NE
n Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-N
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑"NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑Yes El No ❑NA EINF
r—i .r _ . 1-1 TIC r-1 7,1 A I-L NrI

Facility Number
zry
division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and: Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency ©rather 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:' 4;j Arrival Time:
Farm Name: tl L (
Owner Name: ,J7/ '3'f
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
ounty: fLe`Y{2 Region: t— (....)
FacilityContact: y2"'
/e l l_
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
74.
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current ;
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
--,
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
—�
IIIMIUMM
arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
--'
--
--
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current,
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Cattle
Design Curren'
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) la1'es ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? !f��:>✓" ��, �Q.,,; ;-
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number: (-/- - 1.
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑'NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EI NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑"NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q-NE"
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ICIE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload n Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN n PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window n Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Arca
12. Crop Typc(s):
13. Soil Typc(s):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑No ❑NA ErN
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑<E
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAlE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑fNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® E
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists n Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
n Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis n Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
n Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbrcakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
0'NE

(Facility Number: 9 -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
D Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) 4pd date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ No ❑NA NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? n Yes
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑No ❑NA NEE
❑ No ❑ NA [a'NE
❑ No DNA ia-
❑ No ❑ NA ❑]E
▪ o ❑NA ❑NE
IET-C;--
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑'
nYes No NA ❑NE
❑ Yes Er o ❑ NA ❑ NE
es 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IComments refer to question it): Fxplain any YES answers and/or any additional reeomnitendattons or any other roxnments.
Use'drawings of facility to better'' explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
L J__ s r d ' . / - Fi g
To 01- lam!? na 1 t %,J a T5 c/ /Gl 111 1 �i
SI;;FF byrai6,--)
p in ! AbvrTv c�,��i a�7z�--E- rc5 ��u� i2
L. i.J J' l :5"7'�� ?�� f�rv�` `,L7- /..iGi �j �--� �T � c It "T a. tJ.� �� Lr�-z.
U �F 1 ne r7
f Lof t ncLerT
Y Ce"7'" A'f�i f ` — D -r
Cv✓Y'`/
Uv1�Yvrri�a�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
V4/2n1s

()Division of Water Resources
Q Division of Soil and Water Conse
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:,�i�;i Arrival Time:
Farm Name: -; 247 C f
Owner Name:
/j i21ltr�<:1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
_ :F L �_
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
r-•,k„.
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:,. Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
ry
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Dry Poultr Ca aci Po . .
Layers --
Non -Layers
Pullets --
Turkeys --
Turkey Poults --
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ri Structure ❑Application Field n Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑'Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ycs [ NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number:
-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
•
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9 D art of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
•Does
any p
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
n Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
n PAN n PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare
n Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
n Yes Q'No ❑
❑ Yes
0-No ❑
health or environmental threat,
n Yes 0-No ❑
n Yes [ No ❑
❑ YesNo ❑
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
n Yes
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
notify DWR
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA L"NE
NA LINE
Soil
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
n Ycs ❑ No
❑ NA Q'NE
❑ NA LINE
❑ NA 0-NE
n Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-N
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑"NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑Yes El No ❑NA EINF
r—i .r _ . 1-1 TIC r-1 7,1 A I-L NrI

Date of Inspection:' ,S'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA f NE
Li Yes ❑ No ❑ NA F NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field n Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑" NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-NE
n Yes ❑'l4o ❑NA ❑NE
n Yes ❑- No 0 NA ❑ NE
n Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recom
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
'
— t-,1 f� c
1 4 5
I
'j {
1
Gf;
/1.�.''7 ''
7- 1-1. .rr,rI1
t.�-. id o,.
T.d
i
n Yes ❑ No
n Yes No
n Yes Q No
❑ NA
❑ NA
O NA
dations or any other comments.
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:

Date of Inspection:' ,S'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA f NE
Li Yes ❑ No ❑ NA F NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field n Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑" NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-NE
n Yes ❑'l4o ❑NA ❑NE
n Yes ❑- No 0 NA ❑ NE
n Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recom
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
'
— t-,1 f� c
1 4 5
I
'j {
1
Gf;
/1.�.''7 ''
7- 1-1. .rr,rI1
t.�-. id o,.
T.d
i
n Yes ❑ No
n Yes No
n Yes Q No
❑ NA
❑ NA
O NA
dations or any other comments.
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:

a /'- vrt-
Facility Number
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Cause:
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ©-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0-Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ;? -4 Arrival Time:
Farm Name: ,54,' /
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
County: Li 1, , (;-� Region: I" -
Facility Contact: lf"{ ['� ?« /� Title: ( Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator: k. j
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Capacity Pop. Cattle
Design Curren
D Poultr Ca i ac t Po..:'
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field I Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) f"Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
es
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0-Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE

ity Number:
Date of Inspection:;-,
e Collection & Treatment
torage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
gored Freeboard (in):
rved Freeboard (in):
there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
, large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a
to management or closure plan?
of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
n Yes Q No ❑ NA R 1E
n Yes No El NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
my of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
s any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
itenance or improvement?
Application
there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
intenance or improvement?
here evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes D No El NA ONE
Yes D No NA [ 1 L
Yes El No ❑ NA [1 lQ-E
Yes No ❑ NA [ -i ii
I es D No D NA El NE
Yes El No ❑NA Q"NE
Yes El No NA ['Ni
Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload [l Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. fl Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
kutside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
p Type(s):
l Type(s):
the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
:s the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
s determination?
s the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
sere a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ed Records & Documents
the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
s the facility tail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
appropriate box.
❑ WUP n Checklists n Design T] Maps n Lease Agreements
s record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
:e Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis
fall El Stocking n Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Yes No D NA
El Yes No El NA
[] Yes ❑ No D NA
Diat
EINE-
IE
[� Yes No El NA [1'1VE
ri Yes No D NA El-NE-
ElYesNo El NA Q"1<IE
f Yes El No NA D-'N1
['Other:
Yes El No D NA 13"1VE
El Waste Transfers El Weather Code
El Sludge Survey
the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes El No D NA FT -NE
iected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ❑ No NA Q''NE

ty Number:
d the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
[he facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA j `•NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
1 the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
l the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Issues
the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
report mortality rates that were higher than normal? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
he time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No
es, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. ❑ NA ❑ NE
the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0rSlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
nit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
;ubsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑"'NE
Lpplication Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑lcE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
e any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
No
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑�
❑ NA ❑ NE
the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Ei Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
tits (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
wings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
(. is 1177_,
if71.7 '
c
P r
f7 c',i t (
1
1
I
yr/-.,L` lip
417
ki
(v.
0 LY 1
br
�._. C . s
No
nspector Name:
nspector Signature:
Phone:
Date_ -/

VIOLATORS RESPONSE AND NOTES

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone
[phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
p FVE9n007371
'cuur 14'+4 Predictive
o4s ;.. �oIc
Client: Mike Cudd
Murphy Brown
325 McKay St
Laurinburg, N
Bladen County
Sampled: 06/23/2020
P
Received: 06/26/2020
Completed: 07/16/2020 PALS #: 4029'6
Advisor: DEQIDWR
LLC / Laurinburg
AUG 31 Zozd
28353
r �}}[�
�`-`�\l�V
AYETTEVI LE c �rin[uq�O�FIGE
PALS #:
F I •p
PJ �, 7
ti ,
6UNDED,'''11
Waste
Links to Helpful Information
Report
Farm: 26021
Sample Information
Nutrie
46
t Measurements
P
1 57.3
SS
(105 S/cm)
-
are given in units of parts per million (ppm),
K Ca Mg S Fe
733 82.7 38.6 60.2 2.25
EC pH BD
(mS/cm) (Unitless) (Ib/yd3)
- 7.52 -
unless
n
.19
CCE
(%)
-
otherwise specified. 1Other Results
Zn Cu B Mo C Al Na CI
0.38 0.11 0.99 - - 0.51 205 -
ALE C:N DM
(1000 gal) (Unitless) (%)
- - -
ID: 26021
Nitrogen (N)
Code: ALS
Description: Swine
Lagoon Liq-
Grower Comments:
Not Provided
Total N:
Total Kjeldahl N:
Inorganic:
NO3-N
Application Method:
Irrigation
Estimate
N P205
1.94 1.10
of Nutrients Available for First Year (IbV1000
K20 Ca Mg S Fe
7.34 0.69 0.32 0.50 0.02
Mn
0.00
gal) Other Results (lb/1000 gal)
Zn Cu B Mo Al Na CI
0.00 0.00 0.01 - 0.00 1.71 -
North Carolina
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission
Reprogramming of the laboratory -info
Thank you for using ag
mation-management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
onomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner ofAgriculture.

SMitVielda
6coot °.bt.
August 26, 2020
Steve Guyton; Bill Dunlap
NCDENR — Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street- Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
RECEIVE ,
DEQIDWp
AUG 31 20.7.E
WITM9R1F hh4A1-(11tfUE
RE: Farm 26021
Facility # 09-086
Accidental Discharge 8/20/20
This letter is the follow up to the accidental discharge at Farm 26021 that was reported to the
Division on August 20, 2020.
Sequence of Events:
1) Farm called LNM staff about 6:00 am 8-20-20 to report spill and water in secondary
containment. The farm had a recycle line that had broken and was the cause of the spill.
LNM staff pumped water out of secondary containment back to the lagoon. He also saw
where secondary containment went over and was not sure about ditch because of
vegetative cover. Secondary containment has some sediment from farm construction built
up in the bottom.
2) Second LNM staff went to check ditch and reported everything was ok about 12:00 noon.
(As we will see further in this response, this was not the case and the LNM employee has
been disciplined according to Smithfield Policy)
3) Jerry Hairr got a call from the neighbor that he had water in the ditch about 2:00 pm and
notified Mike Norris. LNM staff responded and found there was wastewater further down
the ditch. The neighbor had some heavy equipment and stopped the flow in the ditch on
power line close to the creek.
4) It was determined that some of the water was passed the dam in the ditch and reached
unnamed tributary of Smith Mill Pond Run. Most of this water was pulled back and
reclaimed with remediation efforts, this being known by the pumps pulling clear water
back.
5) Remediation efforts began and continued into the night. Remediation efforts were
continued the next two days, 8-21-20 and 8-22-20. The closer water was returned to the
lagoon and the water from the neighbor's ditch was applied to the power line field.
6) The site and ditches were checked again 8-23-20 and I met other LNM staff there Monday
8-24-20.
Estimate of discharge:
A) With the freeboard level before and after spill, and size of the lagoon, it is estimated
total of about 60,000 gallons. With size of containment and amount recovered from
the ditch on the property, we are estimating 10,000 gallons to 15,000 gallons left the
property.

Smit
6crod. fowl ibI
i.
August 26, 2020
Steve Guyton; Bill Dunlap
NCDENR — Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street- Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
RE: Farm 26021
Facility # 09-086
Accidental Discharge 8/20/20
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
N CEIUEL
DEQIDWR
AUG 31 202e)
letVCROt
WITTIT-1I t cJ ,M �11'HeE
This letter is the follow up to the accidental discharge at Farm 26021 that was reported to the
Division on August 20, 2020.
Sequence of Events:
1) Farm called LNM staff about 6:00 am 8-20-20 to report spill and water in secondary
containment. The farm had a recycle line that had broken and was the cause of the spill.
LNM staff pumped water out of secondary containment back to the lagoon. He also saw
where secondary containment went over and was not sure about ditch because of
vegetative cover. Secondary containment has some sediment from farm construction built
up in the bottom.
2) Second LNM staff went to check ditch and reported everything was ok about 12:00 noon.
(As we will see further in this response, this was not the case and the LNM employee has
been disciplined according to Smithfield Policy)
3) Jerry Hairr got a call from the neighbor that he had water in the ditch about 2:00 pm and
notified Mike Norris. LNM staff responded and found there was wastewater further down
the ditch. The neighbor had some heavy equipment and stopped the flow in the ditch on
power line close to the creek.
4) It was determined that some of the water was passed the dam in the ditch and reached
unnamed tributary of Smith Mill Pond Run. Most of this water was pulled back and
reclaimed with remediation efforts, this being known by the pumps pulling clear water
back.
5) Remediation efforts began and continued into the night. Remediation efforts were
continued the next two days, 8-21-20 and 8-22-20. The closer water was returned to the
lagoon and the water from the neighbor's ditch was applied to the power line field.
6) The site and ditches were checked again 8-23-20 and I met other LNM staff there Monday
8-24-20.
Estimate of discharge:
A) With the freeboard level before and after spill, and size of the lagoon, it is estimated
total of about 60,000 gallons. With size of containment and amount recovered from
the ditch on the property, we are estimating 10,000 gallons to 15,000 gallons left the
property.

Notice of Discharge of Animal Waste
DEQ/J,VVR
A U G
FAYE1TEV1« 610NALOFFICE
On August 20, 2020, Farm 2601-2, located at 7301 N.C. Hwy 210 West, Garland, NC,
experienced a discharge of swine wastewater. As soon as the discharge was discovered, farm
personnel took immediate steps to both stop the flow and contain and return wastewater to
the farm's permitted system. NCDENR was also notified. The discharge resulted from a break
in a recycle line on the farm. The volume of the discharge was estimated to be between 10,000
and 15,000 gallons. The wastewater entered an unnamed tributary of Smith MiII Pond Run.
Remediation efforts have been successful in capturing and land applying the majority of the
discharged material.
This notice was required by North Carolina General Statutes, Article 21, Chapter 143.2215C
Kraig Westerbeek
[phone]

SITE PHOTOS

4

,
. ,
„r; -*#
- • \ %‘ °II'
.641
..Z14" Lti'lliTi4.1 81114'1
414
471,

-w •
,414
2 Le.
4, I
t
. i
e'• •

yT
n

td
t

4i7
V*41 'Wkl'
1
.:04*-4:
le* k
11411C4, - 4 Ail a
- -,--,-.
..-
;.1 11 .
‘,10' I,so."- •- ,, , --....
'......‘ ty:' .* •-•-,---"` .4`re-'41**‘ _ -.....ga,'` - -7--
fciirr.- ---74t - li'"-Sr•:. 4 „ , 4 . iiza ' ...3 Os Ab......
V 4 -e r Orb. 141•• • ,t11964:',..
IL .".. -...--„Ia
- elf ,
id '..41 r. WAS
. -
it A!, let'
111°
_At°
ISPC'

Eire-
it
Og
c-11f,...11:4111r- .40r.
aver
sup
.4141
*Nair *MP
N
CANI
w
ilt _
J._ .
7
.1*.etviTkr pLSI
%"411* 1/4 # "41411L% 14144
41
4 tpiN
raft
4 i

b
Ittutp•
14 law Agir
IC
'1;„64str.'
&eft
A
�. sari.*
pre
4116*.4
1
Y
;Wit
1
4
In
MO
44
4

is at
0
74166'
AS 4
I' Fah
Froz.4,A.
AP
4
i I ji ItZt
' ,k
*,1
1,,
4 031,14,4 II% apii
Mit
ditiv, I IF 110:441111
Mir it IP
Amp
'
e;""
4" 4iiL
I% Atb 1
10 lir 4 41 14 104:
11671% cal--4%%-vi
/1 • Paw' —
1
9
aiRbito
1,1 III I 14S
V P
, qk 4:11441AN.,akVtatilltr.:, (VIZ "444:711/76 1.%414014 4tak
tiPei NFL
4
4
N10:4:110
th‘161%
st Alt 410 j
4/141
101
a.
A
Nt111141
,C*****7 '1.41Z1.441141
F
414114
40 ab dalift4b *AP
"R e
100
AI
1
rir
iirr
111: 41r,
StILL lb
or 1
A.

■
1
1
■
lr.

1
ioi•or
1
a
}
10:
;1:14
114
316' -I

7:22 PM Thu Aug 20
Maps
AFC Lagoon Location
GPS accuracy 16.4 ft
c 48% ))
1••

A
l
_
kva
em44111110
1�
00'
yob /

4
:NSF*
'r
44
*le it
•
t
dr,
j
:OP
ipP
AN& NIT

•
s
.a
11; *1/21kr*.
war
irkilliinb dr---744
41111141tA
1

Pi
orprist
4111. -.7;";10,
14116111a
kb, II
VIP* Sep ,wh
,Niitervis biz 406 impapahh.
NP
.11.4i"
. �a� ' r as
. -dr iv - - _It 7 _ -.. 4:41011".< '
s -
_ti- _
r_ : ,, i s ' + air
s. `
s
.&.447-4 ' ' NO e 41,4111 !IS: . 'W. ' '-.... re ,a,-
.... , 41r, 7_ lar'--ar.'.........70:,, 1.6.7...10..._%„_ ,,, , ir:.
44
akfisa..,
60,4k.:
. 9 'a ay r - a. -.. F ,
e v #�s ' �" , T• �aa r`� , .�E a - •1 *• e ' -fir j k.,
ilii
...ices ! _
tea• c L` • _ " "a 16'`�
Nok,
fir .r
41)
41
4014
7,4„;:g - .14‘,if. - %'(
%'r r - W
lie
AL I
Ina
N-1.)7
„41 EJ
k
t
fi
Iv" AiL
1

1161, IF4
ximitfr ei r`w 4u, I
44takk, klkS- likgral, 0Ao,
*n0
Lit
I
or'
' # •'s,,i' 7 .
iel
40 ' _ `* _r
4
tOito kt
.01
1111.11
Ttisior
44ir
•
war
W
•AFS-AtE -ealt
:itokjp 4,711P4rtibir\uills
44r471
;g0700/b.k
R
+„
►`r
INN
vi
7frab
de loiourideMA

1

•
4
411,4241211;
lha%.4511141 Lt
'6-• • '"
41.
e /
711 -
•
Iri,'401. 1 .
V. w,,,," 4ab •14, — 1.--.:
t ;04 .._ I le -71 • Ai,. 44, •
millPf". N 4' r'.17,"Milk\46:No.„....... . .,- • y
„.'* '..--.1.
, 7.1.411--.
I *
r, 4e' 'I'd till
'
.!#4•43 J 4 .- .. - iii . 1 t1
;1,
-
Nit
1
•
zif
die.. *Air
4
... j.
le , 'int .
• I li LI .. _ i i 0.
....
-iv
*411,74.0
Or,
dr
-41111LNIm- —
444(0.4
— Alt
4UI
—di

474.
411
1.
Frr
fir
6414,4fp
gip 'me
0
1
a AIL
1
•i)
go
N A116,
4
1
44%
Yst kb I V 4. t
y�l
L41,1"a Ki/ $ a .4
t
a,
471,
q
110
4
44Ab
'1
w
TitlA
tol
irirr441
4
1
041111,
' a
AWNS* ler,
11417,
111
d

411
7101
41.
r
N talk
SN-

CLEAN UP / REPAIRS

AP • V
r-- •
•
II'

.
DIkelaC4f:.
_

'1 Alt
tikir
Ottrell
ram' x
i} Y
_ /1._•.�
tits u

,k
--Sky
_ ta •
•
414 ,
‘'••

r
-4
At
gash
A-
-1,-.
ice.. 1
1,0„, vb., ilk
.
::z
mi
VIk !Tir 410IV
tti
41
Ikeda
,- y
r �'-
4111
'. too, r,
Ilia.F-Y 7, ahips.Vt.% ',
szNui. 9
411
F
+1.07 `7
y -"of
1.61
emu,
ANIL
741114111111
ri.
AN.L4

Pi 4
111
ke
y_ i .
Cr
-2, i ?i, -
'Cr
aeb#-
or
et- A.
re
4
04
.12
1
41
•

It 4i
4101.

Nis
-
3144
1
•
r
a
IrAr
' Or�,. Wir
MLA T4
i
f
.14
•
i
•
M
14.
r
AMI
Nor
kitLL
• -
1Yzraw *in
r s
lo- NAIL
♦ _
r
•
1
Eriro 4
,• 4,Ith
{
-v
!. • -R 1 - .rt
i
•
dia
N=�J
41
f •
1
u
I•
Ogre
Y
�._ "4
*F
1 sr
�
•
•
•
•
ffir
der
r
rim
prAli
i
•- 4..4.
II- ;▪ 1'
F `mii
der
4144
1 1 k
444
7
Sop
1
akin
•
I► +
•
ry
-14
Vow
R 4
I
1)11
1104.4„44
-446
-yyti �2�
•

i
*A.
lan
4
nann
e t
ay
4
4.4
4.
5
1M`
an
API
y
F x +R
- 5"T.- ..,ram �►
dom.
' "` ,, 1121..401.14.4.0015
APVIN
y *•� i- .� -ems ;
4a
! - 1
' • -
� ;. F, .s8,4
lam
CAL*
,
POP
w
!YMr
&LIPP la
-2161116
%kW,
44.
411,
-4A
it
--
die
R
at+F=
--
4-=WO
anl
rot —
Atat
_ — :
a * ;
alrik&m. As.
! ~
1
t
A IBM
41010.1,.
Flo
*
�-i
or 'lby
- i"
s - g4• •t
ol at •ar,•
.111114
- —
7
r
Ate.
•
•
'As
M
a
al OF
OP
AIL AL
3 i _
i
ti.
04,
r.
s
• AAP
dPie R
.ram+iM
�■F
,. :z::
..1:11:7:
milt • - QUNAVS ' i
.1' R
" -_
A Ili
� ti "'
....-. . ibt. ir ..., **
14 Alp A. iffr
. _ ..r ramit
idb.
lei et ii
1161114,--...diim ili NAN.:
Gyre rr Jii ^ '�' aril
-
-:
Mao
41,
-01
._
taw
Asa
fise
lM L I*
"IPP.dratio
1410175104
0
t'
410
lika-
4 46-
.4 1r
407
a 1
A,
441e4.
+1e� " , 1
4_ r
4111
jib
r
4
gig
x•
s
4
r
Alta
�,a 111
i .r J 4.4
-VighigtNia
•
_terJoAt
Nit
644
11Psii
ask
rw- ,ftipAir.
_is .0v
ti
-11/2„,
11
1
.1/44104