HomeMy WebLinkAbout#5052_2012
INSPECTION REPORT ROUTING SHEET
To be attached to all inspection reports in-house only.
Laboratory Cert. #: 5052
Laboratory Name: Progress Energy Carolinas – Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
Inspection Type: Field Maintenance
Inspector Name(s): Todd Crawford
Inspection Date: May 22, 2012
Date Report Completed: June 1, 2012
Date Forwarded to Reviewer: June 1, 2012
Reviewed by: Jeff Adams
Date Review Completed: June 4, 2012
Cover Letter to use: Insp. Initial Insp. Reg. Insp. No Finding Insp. CP _X_ Corrected
Unit Supervisor: Dana Satterwhite
Date Received: June 5, 2012
Date Forwarded to Linda: June 7, 2012
Date Mailed: June 7, 2012
_____________________________________________________________________
On-Site Inspection Report
LABORATORY NAME: Progress Energy Carolinas – Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
NPDES Permit #: NC0007064
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 10429
Southport, NC 28461
CERTIFICATE #: 5052
DATE OF INSPECTION: May 22, 2012
TYPE OF INSPECTION: Field Maintenance
AUDITOR(S): Todd Crawford
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Marty McGowan, Chuck Nelson and Charlie Wilson
I. INTRODUCTION:
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for
the analysis of environmental samples.
II. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory was clean and well organized. The facility has all the equipment necessary to perform
the analyses. The system for traceability of consumables and standards was in place but cumbersome
to navigate. Proficiency Testing (PT) samples have been analyzed for all certified parameters for the
2011 proficiency testing calendar year and the graded results were 100% acceptable.
Please be reminded that acceptable PT results must be received in our office before September 30,
2012 in order to satisfy the 2012 PT requirements.
Contracted analyses are performed by Environmental Chemists, Inc. (Certification #94).
The laboratory is reminded that any time changes are made to laboratory operations; the laboratory
must update the Quality Assurance (QA)/Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) document(s). Any
changes made in response to the Findings, Recommendations or Comments listed in this report must
be incorporated to insure the method is being performed as stated, references to methods are
accurate, and the QA and/or SOP document(s) is in agreement with approved practice and regulatory
requirements. In some instances, the laboratory may need to create a SOP to document how new
functions or policy will be implemented.
III. FINDINGS, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Documentation
Comment: The preparation of Proficiency Testing (PT) samples is not documented. The Proficiency
Testing Requirements, February 20, 2012, Revision 1.2 document states: PT samples received as
ampules must be diluted according to the PT provider’s instructions. The preparation of PT samples
must be documented in a traceable log or other traceable format. The diluted PT sample becomes a
Page 2
#5052 Progress Energy Carolinas – Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
routine environmental sample and is added to a routine sample batch for analysis. This requirement is
a new policy that has been implemented by our program since the last inspection. Mr. McGowan stated
during the inspection that they would date and initial the vendor’s instruction sheet and store it with the
other related documentation. Further notification of acceptable corrective action (i.e., copy of
Supervisor Guidance memo to employees instructing them to document in the operator log that all PT
sample preparations were performed as per vendor instructions) was received by email on 5/24/12. No
further response is necessary for this finding.
pH – Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 H+ B
Comment: The units of measure are not documented on the benchsheet. The North Carolina
Administrative Code, 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (g) (1) states: Data pertinent to each analysis must be
maintained for five years. Certified Data must consist of date collected, time collected, sample site,
sample collector, and sample analysis time. The field benchsheets must provide a space for the signature
or initials of the analyst, and proper units of measure for all analyses. Notification of acceptable
corrective action (i.e., copy of Supervisor Guidance memo to employees instructing them to document
that pH is in Standard Units on the benchsheet) was received by email on 5/24/12. No further
response is necessary for this finding.
Comment: Data values are reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report to 0.01 S.U., not 0.1 S.U. as
required by the method. Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 H+ B. (6) states: A variance of ± 0.1 pH
unit represents the limit of accuracy under normal conditions, especially for measurement of water and
poorly buffered solutions. For this reason, report pH values to the nearest 0.1 pH unit . Notification of
acceptable corrective action (i.e., copy of Supervisor Guidance memo to employees instructing them to
report pH on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) to 1 digit to the right of the decimal point) was
received by email on 5/24/12. No further response is necessary for this finding.
pH – SW-846 Method 9040 C
Comment: The time of sample collection is not documented. The North Carolina Administrative Code,
15A NCAC 2H .0805 (g) (1) states: Data pertinent to each analysis must be maintained for five years.
Certified Data must consist of date collected, time collected, sample site, sample collector, and sample
analysis time. The field benchsheets must provide a space for the signature or initials of the analyst, and
proper units of measure for all analyses. Notification of acceptable corrective action (i.e., copy of
Supervisor Guidance memo to employees instructing them to document pH sample collection and
analysis time on the sludge lime method 9040C benchsheet) was received by email on 5/24/12. No
further response is necessary for this finding.
Comment: Sludge samples are collected from two different tanks. The identification of those tanks was
not documented. The North Carolina Administrative Code, 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (g) (1) states: Data
pertinent to each analysis must be maintained for five years. Certified Data must consist of date collected,
time collected, sample site, sample collector, and sample analysis time. The field benchsheets must
provide a space for the signature or initials of the analyst, and proper units of measure for all analyses.
Notification of acceptable corrective action (i.e., copy of Supervisor Guidance memo to employees
instructing them to document the tank location designation on the sludge lime method 9040C
benchsheet) was received by email on 5/24/12. No further response is necessary for this finding.
Temperature – Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 2550 B
Comment: The units of measure are not documented. The North Carolina Administrative Code, 15A
NCAC 2H .0805 (g) (1) states: Data pertinent to each analysis must be maintained for five years.
Certified Data must consist of date collected, time collected, sample site, sample collector, and sample
analysis time. The field benchsheets must provide a space for the signature or initials of the analyst, and
Page 3
#5052 Progress Energy Carolinas – Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
proper units of measure for all analyses. Notification of acceptable corrective action (i.e., copy of
Supervisor Guidance memo to employees instructing them to document all temperature measurement
units on Attachments, benchsheets, or logbooks) was received by email on 5/24/12. No further
response is necessary for this finding.
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
The paper trail consisted of comparing laboratory benchsheets and contract lab reports to Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. Data were
reviewed for December, 2011 and January and February, 2012. No transcription errors were detected.
The facility appears to be doing a good job of accurately transcribing data.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
All findings noted during the inspection were adequately addressed prior to the completion of this
report. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its assistance during the inspection and data review
process. No response is required.
Report prepared by: Todd Crawford Date: June 1, 2012
Report reviewed by: Jeff Adams Date: June 4, 2012