820014_NOV-2020-DV-0427 Package w Photos_20200929

NOTICE OF VIOLATION/NOTICE OF INTENT PACKET
PINE RIDGE FARM #2
MRS.MICHELE GRADY
AWS820014
NOV-2020-DV-0427

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE CERTIFIED
MAIL RECIEPT

• A receipt (this portion of the Certified Mail label)
■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece.
N Electronic verification of delivery or attempted
delivery.
■ A record of delivery (including the recipient's
signature) that is retained by the Postal Service'
for a specified period.
Important Reminders:
■ You may purchase Certified Mail service with
First -Class Mail®, First -Class Package Service®,
or Priority Mail® service.
■ Certified Mail service is notavaiiable for
international mail.
11 Insurance coverage is notavailable for purchase
with Certified Mail service. However, the purchase
of Certified Mail service does not change the
insurance coverage automatically included with
certain Priority Mail items.
m For an additional fee, and with a proper
endorsement on the mailpiece, you may request
the following services:
- Return receipt service, which provides a record
of delivery (including the recipient's signature).
You can request a hardcopy retum receipt or an
electronic version. For a hardcopy return receipt,
complete PS Form 3811, Domestic Return
Receipt attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece;
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
Its Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
\'IRS. :\✓11(I1I:L1 I GRADY
PO I3OX 428
I ,AISON. NC 8141-0428
1111111 1111
111111
iu
11111
u
9590 9402 5878 0038 2304 51
9 Arri,-ia nh imhPr (Transfer from service label)
X
B. Received by (P(inted Name)
1� \C-he i s G-- (CI
D. Is delivery address different from it
If YES, enter delivery address below:
O Agent
❑ Addressee
ate of Delivery
0-0 -Z�
�? ❑ Yes
0 No
3. Service Type
❑ Adult Signature
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
Certified Mail®
Certified Mail Restricted Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery
0 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
lail
7019 0700 0000 3643 1359 Restricted Delivery
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
❑ Priority Mail Express®
❑ Registered MalITM
o Registered Mail Restricted
Delivery
,Return Receipt for
Merchandise
❑ Signature ConflrmatlonTM
❑ Signature Confirmation
Restricted Delivery
Domestic Return Receipt
Certified Mail service provides the following benefits:
for an electronic return receipt, see a retail
associate for assistance. To receive a duplicate
return receipt for no additional fee, present this
USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the
retail associate.
- Restricted delivery service, which provides
delivery to the addressee specified by name, or
to the addressee's authorized agent.
- Adult signature service, which requires the
signee to be at least 21 years of age (not
available at retail).
- Adult signature restricted delivery service, which
requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age
and provides delivery to the addressee specified
by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent
(not available at retail).
• To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt is
accepted as legal proof of mailing, it should bear a
USN postmark. If you would like a postmark on
this Certified Mail receipt, please present your
Certified Mail item at a Post Office' for
postmarking. If you don't need a postmark on this
Certified Mail receipt, detach the barcoded portion
of this label, affix it to the mailpiece, apply
appropriate postage, and deposit the mailpiece.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt for your records.
PS Form 3800, April 2015 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047

i
i
USPS TRACKING #
i 'I
9590 9402 5878 0038 2304 51
United States
Postal Service
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4® in this box•
\CUFO FAYI-. I TEVILL..E REGIONAL_ _ OFI.ICE
UlVISJO\ OF \\ A. I'FR RFSOLRCES
AE_lN• S.1I:VFGUNTON
225 (GREEN S"TRIIT. St; l"L1. 71
F.AYI:. i .I EVILIl. \C 28301
iIEt�EiEIEhi.. Hid Hid 11tllill3311.10itii111E1EI'#1}i#li�lElE
trf
m
a
m
m
D
0
O
D
7019 0700
U.S. Postal Service'
CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT
Domestic Mail Only
For delivery information, visit our website at www.usps.com®.
i`r<s33$
f
Certified Mail Fee
Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate)
❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $
❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $
❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $
❑ Adult Signature Required $
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $
Postage
Total Postage and Fees
$ LI Cic)
Sent To
. A I` 6-
Street and Apt (je y or Pb f N.
City, State, ZIP
PS Form 3800, April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9047
Postmark
Here
47/,Ze
See Reverse for Instructions

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND/OR
NOTICE OF INTENT

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 29, 2020
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7019 0700 0000 3643 1359
Mrs. Michele T Grady
PO Box 428
Faison NC 28341-0428
Subject: NOTICE OF 'IOLATION/NOTICE OF INTENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2T .1304
NOV-2020-DV-0427
Incident No. 202002634-dv-0427
Pine Ridge Farm #2 Facility Number 82-14
Permit AWS820014
Sampson County
Dear Mrs. Grady:
On September 14 and 15, 2020, staff of the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS)
inspected the Pine Ridge Farm #2 and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank
Mr. Lewis Grady for his assistance during this inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge peirriit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1304,
you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
North Carolina Department of Environmental quality Division of Water Resell ries
Fayetteville R.eq onal OfDce ; 5 Green Street. Suite 714 Fayetteville, North Carolina 2830
DO.4333300

Page 2
Mrs. Michele T Grady
September 29, 2020
Violation 1:
Failure to prevent discharge of waste to surface waters or wetlands. N.C.G.S. 143-215.10C - (Permit No.
AWG100000 Section Conditions I 1).
On September 14, 2020 around 3:45pm, DWR received an email containing aerial photos of your
irrigation system operating around 11:00am with evidence of ponding and runoff.
On September 14, 2020 during a complaint inspection site visit at 7:05pm, DWR staff documented with
pictures that waste was ponded in the spray field behind the lagoon on pull 4C. A high volume of waste
was flowing from the field and entering the woods in the direction of Mill Swamp. DWR staff
documented with pictures that the chain was broken on the reel which prevented the gun cart from
coming in for more than 5 hours. On September 15, 2020, DWR staff collected water samples from the
field, upstream and downstream in Mill Swamp, and results of these samples confil iii that waste from
your spray field discharged into waters of the State.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
If you have not done so, recover all waste and return it to your lagoon and document the amount of waste
recovered. In the future, monitor the permitted spay fields and application equipment during spray events
as required by your permit to prevent the discharge of waste. Explain to farm personnel applying waste
the importance of reporting to you anytime there is any problems with the waste collection, treatment,
storage and application system operated under this General Permit.
Follow the permit requirements for reporting this discharge of waste to the local press, provide DWR with
a copy of the publication, and retain a copy for your records and documentation when you delivered the
information to the press.
Violation 2:
Failure to prevent excessive ponding or any runoff during any given land application event. [15A NCAC
02T- .1304(b)] (Permit No. AWG100000 Section Conditions II 5).
On September 14, 2020 during a complaint inspection site visit, DWR staff noticed evidence of ponded
waste in your spray field on pull 4C. Waste was ponded in several locations and the ground was saturated
in front of gun cart from the spray event documented from an aerial observation documented with
pictures. Waste had flowed from the field to a drainage feature at the end of the field, and then flowed
into the woods to Mill Swamp. The flow of waste was contained around 9:00pm by your faun staff and
documented by DWR staff.

Page 3
Mrs. Michele T Grady
September 29, 2020
Required Corrective Action for Violation 2:
If you have not done so, recover all waste and return it to your lagoon or dry areas of your spray field, and
document the amount of waste recovered. In the future, monitor the permitted spay fields and application
equipment during spray events as required by your permit to prevent the discharge of waste. Explain to
farm personnel the importance of reporting to you anytime there is any problems with the waste
collection, treatment, storage and application system operated under this General Permit.
Violation 3:
Failure of the Operator in Charge (OIC) or a person under the supervision of an OIC to inspect the land
application as often as necessary to ensure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the
CAWMP. In no case, shall the time between inspections be more than 120 minutes during the application
of waste. Inspection shall include but not be limited to visual observation of application equipment, spray
fields, subsurface drain outlets, ditches, and drainage ways for any discharge of waste. (Permit No.
AWG 100000 Section II 17).
On September 14, 2020 during the complaint inspection, DWR staff was able to document the violations
stated above with very little effort. Based on the time stamp of the aerial photo and your irrigation records
documents, the irrigation system was shut off at 5:00pm. The time the gun cart was allowed to operate in
one spot was for around 5 hours. Two inspections were conducted around 1:00pm and 3:30pm with no
one going into the field to look at the application site according to your statements, and in addition no one
noticed the gun carts had not moved in hours. Also, the belt was off one reel and the other reel, the drive
chain was off. Both gun carts had moved less than 200 feet back to the reel. It is reasonable to assume
that whoever operated the waste application equipment should have seen the ponded waste and the broken
chain on the reel if they had conducted the 120 inspection as specified in the permit.
Required Corrective action for Violation 3:
In the future, require the OIC or a person under the supervision of an OIC to inspect the land application
site as often as necessary to ensure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP.
This means they must go into the field and inspect the application site to make sure it is not ponding and
running off and the irrigation equipment is operating as designed.
Violation 4:
Failure to maintain and operate the collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land
application equipment and fields at all times- [15A NCAC 02T.1304(b)]. (Permit No.
AWG100000 Section II 1).

Page 4
Mrs. Michele T Grady
September 29, 2020
On September 14 and 15, 2020 during inspection site visits, it was documented that both of your
reels were not operating as designed. DWR understands that equipment malfunctions at times,
but failure to notice the malfunctions during two inspections does not meet the permit
requirement. In addition, several of the pit boxes at the back of the hog houses have been
allowed to leak and waste is ponded around them. This should have been seen during any
inspection of the waste collection system as required in your permit.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 4:
DWR documented on September 15, 2020 that the reels have been repaired in regards to the belt
and chain being placed back on. In addition, it was noted in the aerial photo that the turban
driven reel did not have the same flow rate as the other reel. Make sure there is no obstruction in
the system, or that the irrigation pump has the capacity to run both irrigation reels at the correct
pressure. Repair the leaking pit boxes and recover any waste back to the treatment system.
Consult with Sampson County Soil and Water about designing some type of containment area in
the spray field next to the woods to prevent an accidental discharge from leaving the field.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action
above, please submit the following items on or before (October 31, 2020):
1. An explanation from the OIC for this farm regarding how these violations occurred.
2. A list from the OIC concerning the steps that will be taken to prevent these violations
from occurring in the future.
3. Provide a copy of the press release and the article placed in the local paper, with
documentation of them receiving this information as required by your permit.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations on or before
October 31, 2020 and to provide a written response to this Notice by October 31, 2020.
Please include in your response all corrective actions already taken and a schedule for
completion of any corrective actions not addressed.
As a result of the violations in this Notice, this office is considering a recommendation for a
civil penalty assessment to the Director of the Division. If you wish to present an explanation for
the
violations cited, or if you believe there are other factors, which should be considered, please send
such information to me in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this letter. Your
response will be reviewed, and, if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, it will be
forwarded to the Director and included for consideration.

Page 5
Mrs. Michele T Grady
September 29, 2020
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Steve Guyton [phone]
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
,i--DocuSSignnedd by: "
''- 5189C2D3DD5C42B...
J. Trent Allen
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
cc: FRO Compliance Animal Files-Laserfiche
Smithfield Farms

INSPECTION REPORT / NOTES

Facility Number
.5
0-Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
///
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: A Arrival Time: 7,' a? r.- Departure Time:
Farm Name: l n w `, uf/e1,1_,
Owner Name: j%%; ����� /; e/0
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
�.'oo
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:3; Region:
t,
Facility Contact: )311-z-�,F— jVHCIL)) Title: %r
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
5,-/ 9 -7.3r— 357P-/
i /0a
Certification Number: )pc` 7,33 7
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
• Design : Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Other
Pou
Design Current
Ca aci Po
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure [Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I 'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
litnr e
dYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: c—N--- e 2 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
19
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes . No 0 NA 0 NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ls ❑ No ❑ NA
xcessive Ponding 121<draulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN 1AN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[/(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA I NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA EKE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable IT Yes 0 No 0 NA EKE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? es ❑ No ❑ NA
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [%6 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 41E
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists n Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E'�lE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [2]NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: f�,�'� - -
(Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑No El NA
EA-Tcr
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ENE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? n Yes 0 No ❑ NA
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑E
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 12<s ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ErSlo ❑NA ❑NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑" NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes Er o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? lEYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ditional recommendations or any other comments.
es as necessary).
C57-
"4'",+zFF.cryo,,/
ht".7-071kifiAlth WA dr.A..„( 6113 ,c 7 ,S1 el-1W
NE
jildA grc. (rTv/ -n - / w; 7 G T,en$ ,� �� �- a/,i-
f TrY "i / - .t T/1" --- e„t-.7 - J-c u-� s
�-�t-��'-C�-, � �-n.��--fir �j � ��►��� �
e_ 7 'o=-�`�`� ��'- i D too— 1
)c.
11T 10, 1-,---1-^d,l-ei-Aaa4 7-1 s� �I�' �G �' dr fil
r �
cif
pumizy if
` .e-tu ry Cb--- i 5-91-0
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
ef-Ii LuL- rC"Sr J1
Phone: %• :3"d3-0:57
Date:
9--, ----,,qt2;;La
2/4/2015

Facility Number
G" bivisian of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ©'compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine
0 Complaint follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: JYa i 5
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: Region:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Owrit.f —
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone: 9-1 o —
Certification Number: / OE) 7_ 3)
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Other
D Poultr
Design Current
Ca aci Po *
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
®"'es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) dYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) © Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑•-Nb ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

I Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: "113-7,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Er--0 ❑ NA
121' o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes Q'No
❑' Yes ❑ No
O Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy. Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
QrNE
®'sE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
O No
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
O NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes 0 No 0 NA
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 11E
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 12rNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA FNE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
�NE
dNE
la E
Li`E
Jo E
❑ Yes
O Yes
O No
❑ No
O NA
❑ NA
JE
[JIVE

(Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �1VE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Er NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA j I i
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document n Yes ❑ NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes RN of ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'NE
0 Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? E"s ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0"-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #
Use drawings of facility;
ex:113%-,— dfi Mod Art, C(1-1W.--4, 1)01i,.e.71:3 12^a "f
C. � t okYdaiRe,„&A—ft22`- Lt l ; 0. 7, y.-�..„ Tb
ii-eAerk Fj-7-11 co ;'1T ' J % 1 k-,-41 - -
fryv; Gid4 back 62), 3 fr"—' ,541-41-) ot
x
72q01 e /1-F k4
7 Mot
n J-vok i ►'1 i"t /�.
AS4-tiv‘t n-e-1 Aki-eel ,./9/771.,--Le. Tho6—= 7-0-70)
"1
7N �y Fri o �j� �/[�/� '�/��[/\)�' es�///{^ {
e..
/" et/
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 17'pie.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
9iP-- ) £ (
2/4/2015

Facility Number: ikt
Date of Inspection
agg .191-5V ‘1,W at( 7-1, CI er);;Ipni"-#3.-- 0,-"'Ll-r•
#101/4-,-- vt. gz.3 ad, a-eie err'
Vat/eV-c-e----TiFrre 2/1) 511-er‘d Z't!'. dek 7-e) '74,„
) Pe/-16:9•4, ‘.4(41/7. ocuk7e- 4- 11;47 t,a-w
PIoZ-
0,0 -2E5 e fp"/ „4-79--,„/ w7"---
Trp-x'cr7-1 4ni TD Ao
Altifteedfri) CO-77Z-2.;4/4 ijy;)-1 /.•t?-/:/
dr 7- /1-1-
Mid - )0d
e,
keel rf7f, 3I
(11j, 4.)c) ikt dtra 7k--c 6T-3 E.23)*Yt-erl-e-ei-,4--i,77
:1) 460dru-y61-Ptiv--57;; .5o .
71f404171t#:e trgr-:
r 6140 le141.-1'LL_'7-,e:j lb) elA,14,7i-,-L--(r),-ta,d1C----bi- a3a) )L-1?-c)
"17-0V;c), Nt] /YID() r.7 PIA'A -51WP610{, ixrerjr-41 IV;
Loa.> ti-Pt--r-e I 0---:aw;20 7 heyr---13 Cft74091-77-,---A-149,043-
frig e,PF aPial-e-reok,CJ
rt
-1----714: Ferit rd 0 ePtF A k
FZZ,1-61 17,adei.
Oar 'Ilk le- NOLi t4-c._ 11) lir- e-of
e41
/ 7 ez- V/ rb f-10a01-1fri
Je-L Vs!)
er&vi 1-e.371-re a/1„4-iv
04.0 t.fro 4-ct (v.( e
e "-qyqe
12L
7-441)CfreneMl"
/zZL
9- j1E-fi-- 17L:
/
4/30/97

Facility Number
Ap
/LI
afirvision of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: erCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint ollow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:/'? Arrival Time:
Farm Name:
f• s--
to; '/3
Departure Time:
Owner Name: '`: ,/
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ze4.' a^
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
/2•`q3
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:�"``,..��-Region: �1
Title: 69't.C1l t • e---
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: MO 73-7
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
e'eder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design ;;Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop,
Layer
Non -Layer
Other
D Pout
Design Current
Ca aci Po
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current .
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure [Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[ 1 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 04
❑ Yes [2`10
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA
D NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page I of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: 9*--14.---,-407-4
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
fYes No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
D Yes Et No ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes [, 3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an inunediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. e Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 1:21'les ❑ No 0 NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 13510 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes HNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? n Yes LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0 Yes L7 S ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
0 Yes �No ❑ NA 0 NE

(Facility Number: - %y
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Er<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes n' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes FrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facilityrequire a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
.................................
Camme
Use drams
stion #): Explainany YES answers
better explain situations (use addit
I r i" L,cv T L& f( A
_57 e e r'r, t�q/ram gt.- coi 1.
u`
/f C) / eid ` -d 7% 1t. c yam : pc f / ri..
9ge
6 five Co f %rC'ht--"--
- Fes)(.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: a i)-3-z' 1 S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: f6:
Page 3 of 3
2/4/2015

/
Facility No. g'-;7-1// Time In �` �J � �
Time Out 1v-� Date --:-2,-
Farm Name Integrator
Owner Site Rep
Operator No.
Back-up No.
COC
Circle: General or
NPDES
Design
Current
Design
Current
Wean — Feed
Farrow — Feed
Wean — Finish
Farrow — Finish
Feed — Finish
Gilts / Boars
Farrow — Wean
Others
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test
Weekly Freeboard
/-PccI-mod
j( .0,-, r),
Wettable Acres
Daily Rainfall
Sludge Survey
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
Date Nitrogen (N)
Pull/Field
Soil
Crop
Pan
Window
�L /
;
` %��'AZA (N". �&
fl/5/lit r
7.-f"VZ,
0:J-- ----
/L CZ (.?fe'�
f ' Can—C°__ - /
0 -- I ( /--- e-« 4— 3 i k 0 w j'
ei
bu cis G e cJl� -
ice" 22 ,t 3 0 a/�7. �--
/
-<siz- 62 c.) t _'
i4.,1-,93 evb,,F1/,---44)
Asr- c,x_e y-s'a--- A ,-- 5 ,-,c-
i' c..,( .=,,,
,- c vi---;-7L-t=
cx.r 0-eLt—r% -7,1_
6- 5 =. 3- . r
30,- a}s 5 i i �� T-""
/`r-c ��- �4,7' h .- fit`
J}�
c�� %_/_ ��
z -
-L ; C.( c !.-(
'`-/k-- Y 6 -cA IP'
/ !/L.7 G ,'__f 4-L--` 4,e,A`
L
a./6 (/ l-l"- 2,...---- --
e�'1,-c� '�
7'- - -- t'
i �ti
t� - - 51 °fit' c �' a--il
it.
�,�p
_.-/--
•�
4
')
v 1�Gt.k. j 64 "vim
l `-I L l
c4_�` 4 / / d' / o
�V C� i �-( L�
l
C.c -
re, �, ,/�
-- A -. ,,____ 0_ `
--tr ,..,a pry-
k

Facility No. f -t
r `,�
Time In / Time Out Date _' `% jA
Farm Name Integrator
Owner Site Rep
Operator No.
Back-up No.
COC
Circle: General or NPDES
Design
Current
Design
Current
Wean - Feed
Farrow - Feed
Wean - Finish
Farrow - Finish
Feed - Finish
Gilts / Boars
Farrow - Wean
Others
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test Wettable Acres
Sludge Survey
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
Weekly Freeboard Daily Rainfall 1-in Inspections
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
Date Nitrogen (N)
Pull/Field
Soil
Crop
Pan
Window
L 7-'
i� m7_ 4(d `/
'>14--,t.
,l�e?i i %'(_ j' ! /.-'<: is
r
f
-: ,,l6%2
r`-
•7-1 U
d/ ►--
r' IA
77x , `

ilf12--
cil°915C
trei3 graj /470 ffrg-
nfr� ka4y,of ke'G/% AO—*rd vrv-62e-1----
4--re) r 7 -4 co-ze,671-,t-. bus 7-7-pvkt./
A72°'r f-It7 11/2/?'"---
/ a--5 '{ % -zt_.-
610104/e/041713(''
Q› . 1 PI ,ale S i -3 ( Z'r i - C17 7-7°
Tidy
`T‘1-) dt--e7A- */*' 01--r>'-'5,p4 re_
et-141C-5°'—(---crtiP
_- c)
cin Ste' "e01-):-7,5 -rett-1 e„,4
/v'1
q3,,,7-ez

HL L IVLb
DEQIDWR
OCT 21 Zo2
Date: Oct. 9, 2020
To: J Trent Allen
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Quality
From: Pine Ridge Farm # 2 located @ 3521 Pine Ridge Rd. Turkey, NC 28393
Michele T. Grady
Lewis Grady - OTC
PO Box 428
Faison, NC 28341
WQRO
°::AYET1 F\rl►1 F aPAIO.N. I )FFH(1F
We are replying to your letter dated 9/29/2020 which we received by mail on 10/2/2020. In regards to the
recommendations for enforcement actions that you are considering against Pine Ridge Farm #2
Facility#82-14 located in Sampson county. We will address the issues as stated.
Our response for the 4 violations are as follows:
These violations occurred due to two main accidental factors. The chain on the reel broke causing the gun to stop
moving. The second reel had a belt to jump off the pulley which we determined was
due to trash build up in the turbine and it stopped moving also. Unfortunately in addition to the mechanical errors, the
ground in this area was really hard & packed to the cows and also excessive
rainfall causing more of a runoff.
Dirt was hauled in as quickly as possible to prevent further runoff. All waste that was ponded was recovered as quickly as
possible and returned to the lagoon. We have worked on this pasture land
since the accidental runoff by running a ripper over it which will aid in the absorption of waste water. We have also
contacted the Soil and Water Conservation in Sampson County for help with
suggestions on this spray field to help prevent future problems in the event of other mechanical errors.
All of the pit boxes have been repaired and all waste was recovered back to the treatment system. Employees at all our
facilities have been instructed to report any and all future leaks immediately to us.
All equipment has been repaired, serviced and inspected and will continue to be an important process.
As the 01C, Lewis Grady, I understand more than ever the importance of spray fields and application equipment and my
responsibilities. 1 have emphasized to my employees under my supervision
who help me whenever I am not present the upmost importance to immediately contact me of all problems.
We have owned and operated hog farms for over 25 years. We take care of seven facilities and maintain nine lagoons in
Sampson and Duplin county. In all these years, we have not had a violation.
We are not perfect but we do take pride in our operations. We feel this was a series of unfortunate events that led to the
violations and in no way is a reflection on how we operate. We assure you
that we will continue to do all in our human power in the future to ensure lhat our equipment and spraying is done is a
safe way for the environment, communities and neighbors. I appreciate you
reviewing this and with taking all factors into consideration changing this Notice of Violation to a Notice of Deficiency
because it could continue to be on record as long as the farm is in operation.
Respectfully submitted:
Michele Grady and Lewis Grady

LEGAL NOTICE
The Pine Ridge #2 Farm had a
wastewater spill Sept. 14 2020
of 1000 gals more or less from
a spray field off of Pine Ridge
Rd. Wastewater entered a
small creek that connects to
Mill Swamp.
The Division of Water Re-
sources was notified about the
event on Sept. 14 2020 and is
reviewing the matter. For in-
formation contact the Pine
Ridge #2 Farm.
The Sampson Independent
September 19, 2020.p.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SAMPSON
SHERRY MATTHEWS, GENERAL MANAGER/ADVERTISING Sampson Independent, a newspaper published in Sampson Coun N- DIRECTOR of the
that at the time the attached notice was published in the SAMPSONN N.C. being duly sworn, says
INDEPENDENT, said
newspaper met all of the requirements and qualifications prescribed
by North Carolina General
Statue 1-597; that said newspaper had a general circulation to actual
admitted to the United States mail as second class matter in Sampson County,sand and was
that the atta hed otice w. .ublished in the SAMPSON INDEPENDENT N.C.; further,
NT on
, 2020.
General Manager/Advertising Director
Sw+', to d s}}Abscribed before me this the
G
2020.
NOT • RY PUBLIC
My commission expires: June 20, 2025
day of

hups://thampion.admanage/pro.com: 8263/AMPWebfremporary J:
Champion Media, LLC
PG Box 848 'dies -Barre PA 18703
Michele 210-Grady
210-Grady Farming
P.G. Box 428
Faison, NC 28341
Class Liner Ad #01011 +646 Summary:
Slug Line: LEGAL NOTICE The Pine Ridge #2
Size: 1.00 x 1.79
Publication Cost
Adjustments
Net Cost
Prepaid Amount
Amount Due
Order Detail:
I Publication
$42.56
$5.00
$47.56
$-47.56
$0.00
Payment Date
Amount
Description
Payment Type
Start I Stop
21001 The Sampson Independent
9/19/20
2100R Sampson Website
9/19/20 I
$5 Affidavit Processing Pee i
9/19/20
9/19/20
Ow
E, r -c's
lt . SI * LCD 2 c5...0,,:s c,ciu... ei: 5 0..
* _0W rd -00
CIF:C am .- '-Eca *--4,1, 0, a. „ o _ 0 5 zi,,,_ E.e. 0,..
The Sampson Independent
109 W. Main Street
Clinton, NC 28328
9/17/20
$-47.56
Prepayment from AMPWeb
CC Credit Card
Insertions
Cost
1.
42.56
1
0.00
Adjustments
Total
0.00
42.56
o.o0 [ o.00
5.00
0

40rAartrIgo,,
vir Oleo
411,t4A
Analytical& Consulting Chemists
41
T
NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATION # 94 NCDtitiS: DLS CERTIFICATION # 37729
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Client PP1 PROJECT_NAME_FtkAJS B200 JL1
ADDRESS:
Sampled By: C2 f-eve,
Sample Identification
Collection
Time Temp
CONTACT NAME:
REPORT TO:
COPY TO:
6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405
OFFICE: 910-392-0223 FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
REPORT NO:
PO N(
PHONE/F
email:
SAMPLE TYPE: = nfluent, E = Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stream, SO = Sofl, SL = S
Transfer eiTi e
Temperature when Received:
Delivered By:
Comments:
PRESERVATION
dge, Other:
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
feca,t,
D e Ti e
Accepted:Leda Resample Re ue ed:
Date: rr 2'4
Received By:
T N
Time:
ROUND:

Instrument
41°
Google Earth
orre of fitish it/ BM = 100 ,30

8a-CO/4/
SA /13/).5
oAJ
f-/AJF )1.
9 j/ .s-,/
.E FARM
z o
cV,u,U
�' IA,/
.C,I>` a $
0° F5774.
OS
H,.1
F S
1 F S
-. LE ✓.
cT
$r4-Ri3Ey
A)
kEiT WI)
/7 E -
go's
-
17_
/0_2,5'6
5, o(o
97,31
HI
s
.r's
E LEA)
18
1/ , 9D
97, ( 8
4l
Sri- 1ob,op
.2,543
/02.5$
17
I'
11.(A
97, 9'b
Z.
3 . 5
77, 33
"20
ci. 75
9 Z 83
3
3.-70
9g. Be
2►.
3,78
7
78, D o
2L
3,5Z
77, Div
5
9- 63
7. f...5 ..
23
3. 25-
97, 33
(
4
41,56
97, (00
'
24/
3, L/Z
99, /Co
�
s . o s
97.53
2 ��'
3.39
57, i9
3
4/,869
97, 7Z
24
3.4°'
99,38
9
14,77
9 7, 4 /
27
3. II
77.c17
ID
, a
zg
3,11
97. q
1I
2 ,
q?, �6,
-25
2, ii5_
99. (3
P.
s. ,
7. 3e)
30
2, g i
9/ . 7
) 3
(TTLEVL?.:3S
7,4151
5; IV
'I
1l{
;'. 5 I
97. d -
ERE- -
o R
A4 Pp.p
E. l3oA
AQLEll
Zc ra1/4--1'
',OD / C. TE.7}
T "t oF-
.?TV
SauvE
its,
2 7
Y,
/S
5-, /3
1(0
`-1,?
97, ue
suRval
R EEG()AZ>
- 97, 0
j- /9„..
^
7,
23.I(o ►,
L,,

ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
NCDEQ/DWR-Fayetteville
225 Green Street
Fayetteville NC 28301
Attention:
Lab ID
20-39908
Test
Environme tal Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Lab 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
info@environrnentalchemists,com
Date of Report: Sep 18, 2020
Customer PO #:
Customer ID: 19020022
Report #: 2020-15683
Project ID: AVVS 820014-Pine Ridge 2
Sample ID: NCDENR-Fayetteville Collect Date/Time Matrix
Site: Source
Fecal Co iform
Lab ID
20-39909
Test
Method
SM 9222D MF
Sample ID: NCDENR-Fayetteville
Site: DS
Fecal Coliform
Lab ID
20-39910
Test
ethod
SM 9222D MF
9/15/2020 11:36 AM Water
Collect Date/Time
Results
Sampled by
Steve Guyton
Date Analyzed
>60000 Colonies 100mL 09/15/2020
Matrix
9/15/2020 11:43 AM Water
Results
Sampled by
Steve Guyton
Date Analyzed
13000 Colonies/100mL 09/15/2020
Sample ID: NCDENR-Fayetteville
Site: US
Fecal Coliform
Method
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
9/15/2020 12:29 PM Water Steve Guyton
Results Date Analyzed
SM 9222D MF
Comment:
Reviewed by:
<10 Colonies/100mL 09/15/2020
Report, #:: 2020-15683
Page 1 of 1

Anaytca & Consuting Chemists
TAL
NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATION # 94 NCDHHS: DLS CERTIFICATION # 37729
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28406
OFFICE: 910-392-0223 FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
Client: tJ C- b
ADDRESS:
Fpi
Sampled By: Gf-ev
Sample Identification
Date
GourC12.
Pc
h
Collection
Time
PROJECT NAME: fkkAiS € REPORT NO:
CONTACT NAME:
REPORT TO:
COPY TO:
a
E
(ci
ti)
PO N(
PHONE/FAX:
email:
SAMPLE TYPE: =tnfluent, E = Effluent, W=WeU, ST = Stream, SO = Soil, SL = S udge, Other:
0
E
0
c
2.
0
C
c P
0 Cr,
7 ; E
0
G
Ca ill
co
2
D
PRESERVATION
a
3V°
i5541°1
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
fecaA,
Transfer
2.
Re inqui d By:
Date/Time
I a
12o OL-f
Received By:
Date
Time
2
Temperature when Received: J c Accepted: R ed: Resample Re ue ed:
Delivered By: Received By: Date: IT Time
Comments: T N ROUND:

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
P.O. BOX 1037
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480
Voice: 910-392-0223
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Bill To:
NCDENR - DWQ - FAYETTEVILLE
225 GREEN STREET
SUITE 714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301
PLEASE USE THE P.O. BOX FOR
ALL REMITTANCES. THANK YOU.
Customer ID Customer PO
19020022 AWS
ENVIROCHEM'S FEDERAL ID #
Quantity
REPORT #2020-15683
WATER: AWS 820014-PINE RIDGE 2
DATE SAMPLED: 09/15/2020
CONTACT - TRENT ALLEN, STEVE GUYTON, JIM BARBER
56-1894379
Description
INVOICE NUMBER
174827
Invoice Date:
Sep 21, 2020
Page:
Payment Terms
Net 30 Days
Ship Date Due Date
9/15/20 10/21/20
Unit Price Amount
3.00 FECAL COLIFORM 35.00 105.00
1.00 HOURS TRAVEL/TIME ONSITE 100.00 100.00
EMAIL INVOICE
REPORT HAS BEEN EMAILED.
PLEASE REFERENCE INVOICE NUMBER ON ALL
REMITTANCES IN ORDER TO PROPERLY APPLY TO
YOUR ACCOUNT. CALL TERESA WOLFE OR FRAN
GODLEY @ 910-392-0223 FOR QUESTIONS.
Subtotal 205.00
Payment/Credit Applied
Total Amount Due $ 205.00

Environ ental C emists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 a 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
NCDEQ/DWR-Fayetteville
225 Green Street
Fayetteville NC 28301
Attention:
info@environmentalchernists,corn
Date of Report: Sep 18, 2020
Customer PO #:
Customer ID: 19020022
Report #: 2020-15683
Project ID: AWS 820014-Pine Ridge 2
Lab ID
20-39908
Test
Sample ID: NCDENR-Fayetteville
Site: Source
Method
Collect Date/Time Matrix
9/15/2020 11:36 AM Water
Sampled by
Steve Guyton
Results Date Analyzed
Fecal Coliform
Lab ID
20-39909
Test
SM 9222D MF
>60000 Colonies/100mi_ 09/15/2020
Sample ID: NCDENR-Fayetteville
Site: DS
Method
Collect Date/Time Matrix
9/15/2020 11:43 AM Water
Results
Sampled by
Steve Guyton
Date Analyzed
Fecal Coliform
SM 9222D MF
13000 Colonies/100mL 09/15/2020
Lab ID
20-39910
Test
Sample ID: NCDENR-Fayetteville
Site: US
Fecal Coliform
Method
SM 9222D MF
Collect Date/Time Matrix
9/15/2020 12:29 PM Water
Results
Sampled by
Steve Guyton
Date Analyzed
<10 Co onies/100mL 09/15/2020
Comment:
Reviewed by:
Report 2020-15633
Page 1 of 1

)
Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Client: 1\N",.. —D
Receipt of sample: Delivered I
0 YES
Receipt Checklist
q
Date:
0
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Report Number:b J
Other 0
0 YES 0 NO N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
0 YES 0 NO N/A 2. if custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt °C Coected temperature upon receipt
How temperature taken: 0 Temperature Blank E' Against Bottles
iR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657
❑ YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
kr YES 0 NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
l YES 0 NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
g YES 0 NO 6. Were samples iD's listed on sample containers?
YES 0
YES 0 NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
(4 YES 0 NO
UPS 0 FedEx 0
YES i ❑
C YES f❑
IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
NO 7. Were collection date and time fisted on the COC?
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
d YES I❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑ YES 0 NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? *
❑ YES 0 NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES 0 NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
0 YES 0 NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
0 YES J❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
0 NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
TOC/Volathles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation:
Sample(s)
by adding (circle one):
Time of preservation:
(Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
H2504 HNO3 HCl NaOH
If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s)
COMMENT
were received with headspace

e

•
-• ;•'_•••
-;_ s...5-01 7 • •
•
. 1+4,X, • . ,•-,-_,- .'..•:. -........r. , • _...•••-•-• ••••••,...-4:5 •,,,,-
.:,- . • ---..#, . .. . . ,,. ,,.4.., _ 4,0 ...,,,„..i;.... .,.........„... -
- ,••4 , - -,,.. ,zr, ..
. , . . • _ -. ,..4_ . - ,-•• ,7,,,,,,. . 4...r.,...,..4-.4- - , , _ , 4, , -. , ..... v.., -.1:-.. .., • , . ,. -,,,,,„.... ,„. .. . ,A.,,,..
. , .,-•,,,-,..._ 4,--,...f 4,, ‘,4, - .- •.,- ...„.. . , ..-„,......: .... -,,, -
••_,., : *,.
• 47... . , • . ,- -,3- - . . ,4,',,, - i.,:,',;.-- - - . ,.: ',..•
4:,..., ok.,--. ._...‘ l '. T '"' - ,, , , .t .• .. , i , 'ioitirst, • - • •- ,t-••-• --, -.„.....) ., , ._- .‘, .r., .... ..--,,,,„;;L %: 7iti,\•••
,-,,- . -.'-,:. -, •,-,..: . ' _' - ...........k,...r .# '-r,4"; - • 4- . - * . ,-,.-‘.‘,:,.T,
, . 4. -1'.: l''‘i.r. N'. ;._-'. •• ' ......„6„;_;:sa&ii,,:,...,1.4.,t,iiI4-0,ki.r.., t.clit:- ..,,;.,.. •••
„. •-,-.,•ar:-
. _.....
,-.. .
' ... , • .. ...... • . r, . ,I. ..--)41,1.11. " • - I. : ,••,,' ' .1: • . ,„ ' 8. ,, ..'' k -.." ' : .-, -
-4-, --. „ ,...,
.• '
ott-' . '42.7r,fr •
--. • - 1414."-'
. ? ' • •
• . •
•-
• i., ._ • • •• • -1.te ..
-j,•.--,'f.i4--" 4,2-4 ` ". 1 i,f4I-. ••-!-":'%•:4-4.. 4•:;1"..,...',:'.li''-,.."'.:.-';':,,''1:7:,. -.77:f(L4'' '..;:".-7-1111:::.'7':::::'.::"' ::4.:•
•;.'72.-.:6,':'
sf S.
f.
''':" ..''', .:-.,,,..,enk4,.. k .., ,,...... .'"••,--7 ....L4 It i• , : -- f!.. "-':Z:t'•••"E'''1:L,.'s
' -," s'- . 7 --.....: It •,.. . . : '7'. i?:...... . , .. '4-,---...-s,v,-..,.-.,.:,...,-,--„, . 7 , ,, 41-:"..-\- ,,.......,„ • .:-':. ,''..74.1r24---d'
.1:4-.;::".7 :'3414.11:4tit;'...-:."%.' irqt;i:ZAt.'si.l."....,'..*$.4 -':-.2i i'''-''`'1'; 'r•-•'-'''jilicaSier"3.7;L' .. l,..,...75; ;0-
''' ,::., -''''': . .4,‘,' --..- ,"'„_1;11# :.•- , f.'‘',..... '''' ' .' . ..- ' e • •••-:111. 4- ‘:.r• . -.'....,,,ct.--.',....141
-, - - ,i- :,',, ' ' - ,',••' ,t4-g't,:e:. . .,, ,.\• ', *,‘.:-, •,i :,.T,,.,,,.k'..' ''.,.-.:, ' ...,.'.*44.''" ,f,''.'',-....4„-..,:..•%.,a.;P..,,,.,.;',..'7:7,-`..:.t•c•-,.',•!.-": .._,.7."..1t..1..4.;,..,;..,?•...,t-..?-".r...i,..,'..-i!.i",. 4(1 ,...,,4.,...s,-i-.-t'.o.:,.'1::!,.';.'.,i,.I_.--.t;.1.-.,,7-.„.,.;,,.'"'._,'L. •s' t:,:e.:',-.?:.;' ,':1t.-.,;7.'-_,,'7:,•`,-• :!.'.-..,`'.yw.•1..:.)'.!.'.•.-..'.,,..,7,,-'';.,.;‘-=.,','.,'''.'..:,,-44^.,,,.-".k:,.4N'•,.‹:..4i,.,....4
,..
,X1 ;.-,...-1_.7-,-', :.,11w,;',:.,',,..',,4,•'.:N. .....,-..',.:;.;,"C'....',0.f•..:i..1...
-k";.l•_'ti,•.,:",''',.‘.':.s,'"-'.i""-i',''.'7'4'...4:P:1'
-r
.•...-.1*4', ''''.4
.,
k:t.71z.Ar,/'t.,
l`,i1I:'• '-''r17.•.- ,•
'.;7,..i.;.;f •.- .''1;-11*
,,i,,..' :,(1. i "
- ,:7-,,,,,.v'47.0-
• 1:7•:::1)4•:•-l..;
24 1:-,•'o-ic. .,..)..v,• .a:.--; -, :-
.ci,`•„PP '• '-' . -,,r
.- t:--k.,r , f
,-" -
---- -,.. 7...
• % 'i.i ./' II%

•
/
Gi..}y..
•
a
•
•
4.244t r aw
h y Ft 3� .. -rt* y1 y� `t '" 4' t Y' k.t w.-f* $gyp
A •� . {:O.- - �/.��, ' ... r ti . tic `'° fl`iT''l� ..,
TIFF\((:(\.j ^'} '.4 ...

•
s
•
•
r
r

•
It
74.

!' •
•
•
•
.
•
wfJ•I
1� 1 1 I ,ne
•_
•
•
• •.i
4
i

_♦ .
"�
Y •�'�,
•

210
7,4p, •
LT
•
Joit

•
1
. `
r
ti sibikrito.
n.. • ;fir s: �l
•
:

•
f
f ircr
I..
♦ i
aei
a
--r _
„4
4 �
1 Jr,
•
r
• Ir
•rWr ti ►
•
fit
0
raj
••
_f .
•
•
•
r
d,
•
1
t
ti
.44
• i i
_r
do
ale
Pk1Ar.dc
i
t
•
•
•
r
•
•
•
•
rs
•
•
V
t
•
r
A
.'I.'s
se
.4R;ate
ita
3w _
ett
I. • .,..
•
•
-1 1

4611
e
44.
IP
•
pfr,
1
4'
1
•A
•
•
•
la
r
•a
•
•
'4,, •;; r
•
•
••
•
ii.t&, ! 'a Z
'
r--. ', _.:
e
r
.Ilamp •
•
r
1
•
„ea4
4.
• • •
.4 SAL
1
i I+A
Ii •
.^ as
•
e4
i ♦.
1114.
)9.. Y Y/
s1• r�
c
•
i14‘,Y •
v
•
•
.♦•
• r
6
A. r
•� y# • -
11
. • •
'.
, 1. • ._
• it
r
•
•
•o ••� . �s
r� .• 4
•
•
4,
yl » � •
%+0!,►3jS,
•
•
•
•
/ •14
•••• •
- a ♦ a
• 1
,
-
r-a�r or
�� t R a
4
v
•
♦
•
•
•
t
44.
• -,
1
•
ri
4
•
y
a
i
. r
F
111
11 ••
41 ,.et •1
- *1
• M alke, - •rfr
4
... 4 .4 sates 4,
Sr
is�,• a • AT �•
it r
fre
•
' elf gib
•••
•
ti
#< de
Ns
f..
•
-
4 ` -
k-
4Ain
•
r
�lr
414
tr
r
1
f shies
I
-16
*11
Vs 4 ), _ .... - .• it
i ,�! ,,, a
• At
t
z-

•
•
M• V i
J}r_ •
ti• •
.
1 _a of
•
•
"
•
•
•
•
•
-

R
•
1
4104
o
wr
•
W �.
♦

`» . n T `. -'.t•
4 Al
: r r a f :' Ci ` 3

ihk_

140,40/4e .,.. + m
•*• • * •e ♦ Ise& +R+ •Si son
v es y +Mnlr • . •II0 M • fie
%. •• •..+. •.4611014.14•044 it
4 , «.... «..v 4. 411 4 s. •A .r rA 144114
♦ we+ ! • a ern sfw Mii s .
! Stets14/44
pN •tiseis•!I►a4r.*eisave •s rass ttam Ili
„ ... • *be ... f+v • . • Si w .:f...SOS 4 11404 eh ...r1 S Ihn Sao
•e♦••N 11• 40t11101k
• se w ••.I•t% 4.11+4nit* 0 *
lain f 4 •e.! • •!A'. `, i•es.III d, •♦O,San -a E '
r. in us *1.• •. PIN •
snit A
si J rr Mlobe44
held th 'V nine
.0, *SI44 LW. 471100
► at dkita4114111 SOS
4i.1* 440 %'$ t a*41.41/01`.
1*.t k ' la
• 4ta►.�
-fa; .41 wit S'I 4 MN OM
rn

•
•1
r
r

-St 1. rL`-
#- # L t -
I,L1 r'4,
i --0-
1

itst
* \
t •••I'\tik, \i II-kt)l-1 R1<I.
1.4tik Itt t1 tIKCA1-
ItVLSI titt lltll IIt.%
t ] rkltrol: i{\Cxn
hkt MN I11k %flIL
Iq t IIl,I k.l \t;
l t1\m(,I1 st 1.1 U71kIts
--t1 AU ` Ill Yt'1 I tllki
1 Lb - 1 kl i1 111_1A1�
6ri,t tiVAG=_ t
I.Ittl\C DI%CNCACt IC C tilt
%C%.t flux..(. Li IOtil lC-
Sl l F1't i}ft t p� i t. (TCl
St AI l_ \kt tt &
MU It II MY h W IN Mil\I, �.
1. NN't\ll itCINI 1 t\�\
( llilYl l 11 t QIk tls AI
II167,.1U1\S I \
LARNE. CAC at C.l DRl\ k Roc
tvCRY t\GACC in l 1-1
t:'.
t+t (llnt 11 ltr LE \Sr olt{ M i{ e+l \l
ltns[ (fSI s Vl,l 11 llR\b\ •\lLit till

b•

1

•
tt
it
•
—
•
S.
6` •
ij I a ;
•w .
•
y
fratist
• t.- 1
4
wsi
.41

es • ti
I*.
Te'tj,
6
r

fdr

ivy
`•
Zgb
4

a

it
•

yuA rE984
.r.

__SCi.�ti

_
a*Nt

r-21
- '
4•
A
l r
'ram - :.• - . ( a,. ...,
'.it Jr e-, '
•
+` u
,-a• _
E..
ain
•
•
9. •- y
N 1 • V
•
a "•
•
ail .
•
. ti .
1 • ..� - . - la.
4, • 1 ~Atatrtn..4 u•jj
•
• N
'4ter i
A
a .i
.y
s
•
• -a.,
-lett
J,
y J � •
rads _ rA3u 11frt+ Maiso
•J
• �y �f - 4
• ^I"
;�•f{� • ' . •'•
•
� � . 1. ' 1
th;Nolo
6st
•
•`
�:!
•itral. f+
♦ Y
•
a
•
s
A
1
•
•
•
i
J
41
-• 1
4ba f `Ir r:
.\
�VP �ti IL- • l\•\,.

•
•r
;4't. 'r +.. mot`
I••
r t •
014
ti .
! aNC:4•o .
4W
Ave
aALit"t ,,ro
v-
Alryr "ton jr >or

•
•
cJJww
4 � 4 r "�r41��
t
r
Matt
4".
- `.I r, Y-
i•.1la•.. :�
in '13
i
r' `-'to "--•-
enrires lAl
jaggiteilfait
�y •
-,t•, •
.a 'rot - `3d_. ..4 .-,lf� ..04.~1
•
1 �, ;.I
.fi
} iA-t
flits

bow r
sk
'R'ryf11, Si
N+r
r r»
'e ,k µn1 `' '4Ni
` Iw`
rid, 5. y ..!.
A�x°f
1 = - _
eti .r_`ar t«.4 a'a �
•
If Y
•
• }f
.ti_ Y. Y _ a- I r .•.
• . m::: 1/4;. : ..... we ' ;04 446e -
v a

k
�y -
�.2 O'
•—� �- ari.J„ys _ • 1!r
•1 Z•i �u'. a
odi
1
1
7
jj Jam` rt- -'
+a,�
loa
eVr
•
• �.l�n.
�. 'a `al •-.1
fY4
w
a e$
•
cps e
—
r�

r
Iona r
/ 4.,
7 '-
.
f �r r or
• `..S
ass_._
•
._...•
f r
i
r•
i Jam.
. '-
•
. .f .. _
ti
i
•
1
•
.
i
Perimeter
__—*WIMP
basitsmetw_ & cm 11
FIELD
IA
1B
l.0
1D
lE
1F
1G
1H
4A
4B
4C
4D
4E
4F
4G
err
akin
IMIND
Of's'
wararra-
'Mita
*Ng -
ACRES
0.81 - 2.410-612- 5
5.33
0.75
4.65-'
0.75 --
4.40
0.81
►.81
4.37
6.30
4.49 i--
3.53
se-
1 .73 --
1.89'-
6 •'?'0
11111
jeer'
'rigs
soritasit
10!rr
1c
lc
f f,
tl
ct
cc
CO9101020814

q 11'7
FORM 1RR-1
Farm Owner
Operator
Tract &
Field #
ID
4D
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
i
PINERIDGE #2
i
BENNY GRADY
(mm/dd/yr)
7/18/2020
7/20/2020
7/21/2020
9/4/2020
j
� 4G
4G smz
9/7/2020
17
I
B 1
COASTAL
COASTAL
COASTAL
COASTAL
9/8/2i
9/8/2020 1
9i8i2020
9/9/2020
� 4G I 9/9/2020
4C
I 4E
f 9/14/2020
COASTAL
COASTAL
COASTAL
COASTAL
9/10/2020 COASTAL
9/10/2020 COASTAL
9/11/2020
9/11/2020
9/14/2020
COASTAL
COASTAL
COASTAL
COASTAL
LAGOON
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Start Time
11:00 AM
11:00 AM
11:00 AM
11:00 AM
11:00 AM
11:00 AM
11:00AM.
11:00 AM,
11:00 AM
11:00 AM
11:OOAM
i 11:00 AM
11:OOAM,
11:00 AM
Irrigation Time
End Time
6:00 PM
6:00 PM
6:00 PM
1:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
6:00 PM
5:00 PM
Total Minutes
420
120
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
420
420
360
5:00 PM
360
Facility Number
i
821
114
2020 COASTAL
# Sprinklers Operator *Weather
Operating Initials Code
1 BG PC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
BG
BG
BG
BG
BG
BG
BG
BG 1
BG 1
BG
**Inspections
(initials)
LEWIS GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC 1
* Weather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Cloudy, CI -Cloudy, R-Rain, S-Snow/Sleet, W-Windy
** Persons completing the irrigation inspections must initial to signify that inspections were completed at least every 120 minutes.
NniP • If rnnrlifinnc hc3/nnri fFla r inrrrvl+iran1e+ nrnn4r,I k1- net or.aA :11a. SL — " A \ A Ill All
LEWIS GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
LEW I S GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
LEW I S GRADY
LEVVIS GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
LEVY I S GRADY
LEVVIS GRADY
LEVY I S GRADY
LEWIS GRADY
1
311412003

FORM IRR=
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
*'Nutrient
Source
Owner's Phone
Crop Type:
T-3408
Lagoon Irrigation Fields rd
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field # f 4-4C
4.49
Benny Grady - Pineridge Farm #2
P.O. Box 428
Faison, NC 28341
9102674481
Coastal Bermuda
(1)
(2)
Date
mm/dd/yy
Start Time
r , 6/512020 � 11:0O:OOAM
6/29/2020
7/18/2020
9/11/2020
9/14/2020
11:00:00 AM
11:00:00 AM
(3)
End Time
From Waste Utilization Plan
(4)
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
6:00:00 PM 420.00
6:00:00 PM 420.00
6:00:00 PM 420.00
11:00:00 AM
11:00:00 AM
6:00:00 PM
5:00:00 PM
420.00
360.00
Facility Number
Irngation Operators
Operator's Address
Operator's Phone #
82-14
Lewis Grady
P.O. Box 428
Faison, NC 28341
Recommended PAN Loading
(lb./acre) = (B)
(5)
(6)
Irrigation
# of Sprinklers
Operating
1
Flow Rate
(gal./min.)
120.00
1
1
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
1
1
120.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
Crop Cycle Totals
4110010141 Adak
Lewis Grady
(7)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
50,400.00
50,400.00
50,400.00
50,400.00
43,200.00
244,800.00
(8)
Volume
per Acre
(gal !acre)
(A)
11,224.94
11,224.94
11,224.94
11,224.94
9,621.38
91 09350122
(9)
284
Waste Analysis PAN
(lb./1000 gal.)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
(10)
PAN Applied
(lb./acre)
(8) x (9)
1000
16.50
16.50
16.50
8.64
7.41
Nitrogen Balance
(lb !acre)
(B)-(10)
267.50
251.00
234.50
225.85
65.55
1007337
NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting Column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10 from column (11) following each irrigation event.
218.45

FORM IRR-4
s
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
T 3408
1.73
Lagoon Irrigation Fields F and
Field c
One Form for Each per p Cycle
Field # I4-4E
Benny Grady - Pineridge Faun #2
P.O. Box 428
"`Nutrient
Source
7
Crop Type
(1)
Date
mm/dd/yy
Faison, NC 28341
9102674481
Coastal Bermuda
(2) (3)
Start Time
End Time
+ 9/14/2020 11:00:00 AM 5:00:00 PM
Owner's Signature
aorta
From Waste Utilization Plan
(4) (5) (6)
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
360.00
Irrigation
Facility Number
Irrigation Operators
Operator's Address
Operator's Phone #
82-14
Lewis Grady
P.O. Box 428
Faison, NC 28341
9109350122
Recommended PAN Loading
(lb./acre) = (B)
284
(7)
(8)
# of Sprinklers
Operating Flow Rate
(gal./min.)
120.00
Crop Cycle Totals
40)
Certified Operator (Print) Lewis Grady
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gal./acre)
(7)
(A)
43,200.00 24,971.10
43,200.00
(9)
Waste Analysis PAN
(lb./1000 gal.)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
(10)
PAN Applied
(lb./acre)
(8) x (9)
1000
19.23
19.23
Nitrogen Balance
(lb./acre)
(B) - (10)
1007337
' NCDA Waste Analysts or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting Column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10 from column (11) following each irrigation event.
264.77

Irrigation Equipment Field Calibration Form
Farm Name
Date of Field Calibration
Flow Meter Serial Number
Equipment Number
Measured Rin Size
Isr�.ngsize within 0,01" of origional
manufactured size?
Pineridge Farm #2
8/8/2018
MO70780504
SN##20-T03 31
Pressure Gau;e Readin s:
At Pump
At Traveler
At S • rinkl.er/Gun
Expected oFl w Rate (from manufacturers
chart) --- - - - - --
Measure Flow Rate (from flow meter)
Flow rate variance greater than 10%?
Expected Wetted Diameter (from the
wetted aceragedetermination)
Measured Wetted Diameter
Wetteddiameter variance greater than 15%
and/or measured flow variance greater than
/1O%
Explanation of Find.inp:
Calibrator's Signature
Yes orb _l No
rin•
■
Yes or No
0.86 rin : Inches
If "no", replace
100 Psi
90 Psi (if applicable)
60 Psi
125 GPM
120 GPM
260 Ft.
260 Ft.
Yes or U No If "yes", then
Contact a technical specialist or irrigation
dealer for assistance. Explain findings in
box below.

- c