HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230072 Ver 1_02_Princeton SouthPine_PJD Package_20230112Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Princeton Drainage Improvements
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Town of Princeton- Princeton Drainage Improvements
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Town of Princeton
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Axiom Environmental, c/o Scott Davis
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Princeton, NC near the intersection of Massey -Holt Road and New Ballpark Road
Lat. 35.458671 °, Long.-78.164020
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: N/A multiple
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Johnston
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Princeton
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Beaverdam Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit 4
Regional General Permit 9
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: (828) 271-7980
Fax Number: (828) 281-8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554-4884
Fax Number: (919) 562-0421
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251-4610
Fax Number: (252) 975-1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: (910) 251-4025
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Town of Princeton
City, State: Princeton, NC
County: Johnston
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple -see attachment
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Scott Davis
Mailing Address: 218 Snow Ave
Raleigh NC, 27603
Telephone Number: 919-696-3045
Electronic Mail Address: sdavis@axiomenvironmental.org
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Town of Princeton
Mailing Address: 503 Doctor Donnie H. Jones Jr Blvd. V\
Princeton, NC 27569
Telephone Number: 919-936-8171
Electronic Mail Address: m.king@myprincetonnc.com
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Scott Davis
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
1-12-2023
Date
Scott Davis
Signature
❑✓ Authorized Agents
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3
Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 12.4 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4
Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.458671
Longitude:-78.164020
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5
Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Scott Davis, Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Town of Princeton- Princeton Drainage Improvements
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Johnston County City -Princeton
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.458671 °, Long.-78.1640200
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaverdam Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 5,853 linear feet: 1-6 width (ft)
Cowardin Class: R4SB/R6
Stream Flow: Intermittent/Ephemeral
Wetlands: 0.004 acres
Surface waters: 0 acres
Cowardin Class:PEM
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: 0
Non -Tidal: 0
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
2
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Princeton, NC
(2019) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Web Soil Survey (online at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov), and Soil
Survey of Johnston County (1994),
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap 2021 Orthoimagery.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
1-12-2023
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
Cowardin Estimated amount Class of
Class of aquatic resource aquatic
Site number Latitude Longitude in review area resource
SEE ATTACHED TABLE
Town of Princeton Drainage Improvements
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
Table ofAauatic Resources
Site number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Estimated amount of aquatic resource in
review area
Class of aquatic resource
River Basin
Buffer
NWW-A
35.461894
-78.164355
R6
1707feet length, 6 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-A
35.458496
-78.163828
R4SB
1218feet length, 3 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Subject
NWW-B
35.458477
-78.161129
R6
1674feet length, 3 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-C
35.464147
-78.166712
R6
37feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-D
35.464181
-78.166555
R6
48feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-E
35.462669
-78.165461
R6
47feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-F
35.462529
-78.164929
R6
31 feet length, 1 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-G
35.461998
-78.164568
R6
49 feet length, 4 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-H
35.461627
-78.164181
R6
20feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-1
35.461730
-78.164088
R6
42 feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-J
35.461524
-78.164095
R6
39feet length, 0 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-K
35.461600
-78.164031
R6
15 feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-L
35.460335
-78.163729
R6
33 feet length, 1 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-M
35.460089
-78.163871
R6
50 feet length, 4 feet avg width
non -section 10—non-wetland
Not Subject
NWW-N
35.458785
-78.164175
R6
47feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-O
35.458717
-78.164013
R6
49 feet length, 2 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-P
35.458654
-78.164219
R6
49 feet length, 0 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-Q
35.456391
-78.164775
R6
600 feet length, 0 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-R
35.458244
-78.163170
R6
38feet length, 1 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-S
35.458401
-78.163198
R6
32 feet length, 1 feet avg width
non -section 10 — non -wetland
Not Subject
NWW-T
35.457764
-78.161516
R6
28feet length, 1 feet avg width
non -section 10— non -wetland
Not Subject
Wetland DA
35.462465
-78.164970
PEM
.004 acre
non -section 10—wetland
Not Subject
Y
W
w
U)
}Z,
N N
O
�o
`mz
Q
O +�+
ci
i
T ° o
c
C f4 Q in
p
J
ae;
�Ovo 0,
��
a
in
F
v Z -
mNT-oo
z a 0 C7 U
0
ZO
v
a
0
LL
// • SaR S C -;,�iC '17
AL,7r
.. Rid
old Woc°n
�`��,• . ,� � � � � tar
•�� ���-,;;�� " �� - tea° � qs �` r
Gp
r
i JI ,b l e/
1f Y 9
ts
' r
- S
4 0
L
Apo
/� Mas'ay�Nd` N
nbe6pi Byor _ C O
r•�4J
Z + �
o
Z N O
U O O
W ❑ OM
O
- J p
Y
W
�F
ui Qi
c
U
2 m Z
t
Q
e
C V
y
N y
C U
T° s o
m o, as
7
c
U > $
7
w :5 N
ME o v
� N
r L D
C
v —
a`
O ul N
U-
v
F
0
ao`a
vZ
v mNT-oo
z a° C7 U
Z
v
LL
Alf,
P,,F'
L
a W N C
!
•�' Jjs �j .
O
N OC OC O O p
\\•�
O
M
� f6 f6 (6 E CO �
U C O 0
m ❑
pn2 11)
�
�{� •• JS
aQio;
le
�
_
z
2S
S
41
Y
W
C C
f6
o E U
Z
Q
�a
O C
L
ao o
v —
a
O N
i LL
a',
v
F
- U
F g
�U�--
Nvz
v mT-8
z a C7oU
0
Z
v
a
0
0 LL
V
0
0
0
`
O
2S
( r
0
tlo
Z
Y
W
O�
N5) C
Q
E
��� t%
mmmm
L
•C
E
O •L
L O c
O N m CL
U v(
LL
~a
L
ao o
d'L O
�LL�
o.Z u
r0
Y
Z
mw
-
a`
F
z
r
O
O LL
N
C
W E O
E 0
L N
Q C
W .
� a a
� m m
o 0 o O
O
f6 IF m M
U
� W W N ❑ O
V a - - a O z
c a a z
0100��
Y
W
w
N N 0
C 0
f6
w�E
ycn
�m
Q
N
e
O
C V
U
w Ca N c
O
C V2! o
mZ
L
> Q
41� 7d'N
E1vv
Ha
L
d� o
a
�ii rn
F
Yvv
mo5:
z 0nu
0
—
z
a
2
0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project(Site: C r '� n C6 6 e% td1''r Q&t' P . City/County: P i ' I (ICt f0A Z+T:)" ampling Date: e 2/ 1 5 2
Applicant/Owner: TOvM 1k fjiAC04ft Stater Sampling Point: t'aW•\n►GA-
Inves�tigator(s): 5C,vk4' 1'Aji)AA, Section, Township, Range: 0d0A f
V
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): G/CO- ' COO- CreA. Local relief (concave, convex, none): ""�.°►'he_, Sk)pe (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): �3 Let: 35, 4�1415 Long: - 7 a M 1164 q '%�' Datum:
Sal Map Unit Name:.. R A
A 1DQ.-%— jr)p? +o 2 Pt0,* S - r' NWI classification: I EI"
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soit , or Hydrology ( 0 significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ K No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology NO naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that aouly)
— Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation 03)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
x Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
s Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
s Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
[includes camllary trinoe]
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
'EGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: m1-0
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test viorksheet:
(Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant �t
3 Species Across All Strata:
4. Percent of Dominant Species 4 O q 0�
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: V (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheets 4
7.
Total % Cover of: Multinl by.:
8•
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover:
e
zo
20% of total cover:
FAC species x 3 =
SaolinalShrub Stratum (Plat size:
1. ��J CIJr'1 5 i ✓1 a i`
)
FACU species _ x 4 =
or +-i.nc,}o e''A
O `I flC
UPL species x 5 =
2.
Column Totals: (A) — (B)
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = B(A = _
5.
HydrophyHc Vegetation Indicators:
g
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
�� = Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover.
w
4O 20% of total cover:
Herb Stra Plot size: ,• )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
O
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
2
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5.
g
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7
8.
Herb -Ali herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
9
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: —
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: � )
1
2.
3. —
4. —
5. —
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
- Hydrophytic
Vegetation
- Present? Yes Y\ No
L.-- -- -- — -- - — --- — - -- -- --
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version.2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point:k
e Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
[incheM Color imoistl%
Redox Features
I
Texture Remarks
Color (moistI % Type Loc`
4 3 3 I000b
!aa►+%
101 A 513 Ll' 4 -7. 5'49 S ! 6 c Pt.
'-("y (ocs
l0' ' 4 d 2 � �' G/ f 15-011, C M
C Lft
'Type_ C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. _
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sons':
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
1� Depleted Matrix (F3) s
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P,
T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150S)
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_
SYrinnwrl Us%triY ISM
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: _ Phi"no+' _ � City/County: r�i� � 7'dh'ff _ a Sampling Date: 1? 6! 2-1
ApplicantlOwner: LLA J Qf Pill ACtfr^ State: ; C, ', Sampling Point: W �'
Investigator(s)•. SC �f t �0.t11r� ! A xf d ^^ Section, Township, Range:.. Q011 � fft
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): CIA ` �QPD rw1, Local relief (concave, convex, none): td vt.� Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLR�tA): Let: -35-q6L4
❑ Long: 7 " G b`1 Ci 5 Datum:
Sal Map Unit Name: �*'_ �D= d z' FrC �_ Sid l NWI dassification: ' lA
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
No x Is the Sampled Area
No 7C I within a Wetland?
M—
Primary Indicators minimum of one is reguirecL
check all that I
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3)
r Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in. Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (65) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_, Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No k Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No % Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes No /
Surface Soil Cracks (80)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Pattems (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No YL._
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: i 'w_
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: o ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species ��11
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
2. -�
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. - That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0- (A!B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50°16 of total cover:
SaDlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: -3_
1. 3,; n� PGr�?3 �
20% of total cover:
)
ark
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =8
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2. Li rv'" rrnSe
I D % At C
3. R o "_ S_pP
30 °lp 1
Column Totals: _ (A) (B)
4.
°
Prevalence Index = B(A =
5.
HydrophyHc Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_
2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
8.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
g 0 = Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50°% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I
Herb Stratum (Plot size:, ) D `
1.-.effucq S 6407
-3 10N
3. Akk it) M J 1 R N
4. D�'�^QS nt 1�► ►� win FPrC V
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8•
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
10.
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: Ali 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vie Stratum (Plot size:
0% )
1.
a
2.
3.
4.
5.
HY droP hytic
= Total Cover
G 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
Remarks: (If
Vegetation
Present? Yes No JG�
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: W —0
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features _
(Inches) Color (molstl
%
Color (moist)
% Type Loc
0_3 io u /
-7,S- 5A
I0% c. m
3 - I l 7, iR 5/4
/1
64,
/R�
I D71� b f {
46% nm
12-116 _ op g 4:1
as `IR 4 / b
—
. to
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Texture
i d C%"
I�wsoy
10 OLM
Remarks
location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric S<
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 an Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (ifobserved): j
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Nox
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
NWW-G
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ( 2�/ / C Z 1
Project/Site: x
Latitude: ? F. 4415,ry
Evaluator: 5 alb 1$ 1AP0t O'v%
County:. f " ^
Longitude:
T
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent /(l
I
Stream Determination (circle one)
hemeral tenmittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name. Princeton
if z 19 or perennial if z 30" 1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 'r
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0)
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
l �
l%
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
rlcD
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
r'0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
r 0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
` 0
- 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
211LIIILold! UILLi11CJ d1C IIUL IGLCU, bUU U1 AIUIIJ III IIId11UG1
B. Hvdroloov [Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
10
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
T5
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = 0
Yes
C. Bioloov [Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0' ,
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
{
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
010 ;
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Ot
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
r
�� I
I
NWW-A
NC DWO Ctrenm identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1 2 'OS i Z
Project/Site: 4��
Latitude:�y®�Z
Evaluator: S , 60, vis Aq ,0"h
County: j h v to.,,
Longitude: r'7- e
Total Points:
am ermination (circle one)
Other Princeton
Stream is at least intermittent
if Z 19 or perennial if z 30*
hemeral I termittent Perennial
-
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = q )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank N
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0,
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
D'^)
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
e artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrlrnlnn►► tSi ihtntal = 7 ti 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2 _
3
14. Leaf litter o
1.5
1
10
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
w
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0f
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
='3
r^ Rinlnn►e M Intntni = - 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 J
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
/ 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 ,
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
TO
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
l 0, '
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Oth = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
\� r
J
af-'0-7 ew
eR0:2r--
NWW-A
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: (2�� y�Z( Project/Site: PA02 Latitude: 35Y6 B$4
Evaluator: Od►�.5 )(Jor^ County: f Ol1ns {Z Longitude: -Z
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one Other
Stream is at least intermittent I �.� Ephemeral ermitten eeenni"I e.g. Quad Name: Princeton
if;, 19 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri e- of se uence
0
/mil
(�
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
A ;'
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
- �'
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
I/V
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5_
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No R 0
Yes = 3
R_ H►.drnlonv (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow,
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
r1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
L (�'Ov
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C_ Hiolnn►► ISuhtntal = 4.r75 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
7T
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: (�6-v tv�3 117
��LIC t7
NWW-A
NC DWO Stream Wentltication norm version 4.11.
Date: �� �rj Project/Site: In, Ct .� 1 f9i Latitude: 35. `a 7
Evaluator: 5 aJ �XI4/1ti County: 10hy14ty Longitude: 7X1JV115
Total Points: Stream Determina#on (circle one) Other Princeton
Stream is at least intermittent I Gf ? Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or; erennial if z 30* '
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = V )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank ",
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
-
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
_ 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No,- 0
Yes: 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual �J
Q U ,.1...1.. i G .4,+..+� - , 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high ate table?
-
No = 0
Yes 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
l 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)CV
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5 =
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.25; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
6` 2�
eVIRWIRMU9.
Nr DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Z� ��
Project/Site:!!',�]
Latitude:
Evaluator: D4%4jj l AX f O f1\
County: S' [7 h � : 4-ell
Longitude: - -71. i 6 k Z
Total Points: s� 2
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Princeton
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30'
emery Intermittent Perennial
�A
e.g. Quad Name:
_
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank "'
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
/0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3 _.
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
_ 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
f ..
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ; 0
Yes='3
" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R HvrImInnV Muhtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1..
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Rinlnn►► tSuhtntal = 14 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
i 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =i6.7 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: n C ip
NWW-B
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Siteor
Latitude: 35,% 7$4
Evaluator: �
County: TO(�,� ,�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Dermin ation (circle one)
Other Princeton
Stream is at feast intermittent 2
if a 19 or )erenniai if z 30* '
L phemeral ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t( )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Ila' Continuity of channel bed and bank A -IV
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
/��
v
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
-1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
:o
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0} ,
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.,
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 /
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = G ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
i
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0'
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 73'
C_ Biology (Subtotal = /1 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Ot -
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
�
- _
Mu sir
r,
►r) 'eP
ZP
���''
�3rfi�'