NC0023086_Wasteload Allocation_19920921

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO023086
PERMITTEE NAME: Peppertree Fontana Village
FACILITY NAME: Peppertree Fontana Village
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor 1
Pipe No.: 001
resign Capacity: 0.30 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
Two WLAs - 001 & 002
Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File
Completed By Permits & Engineering
At Front Of Subbasin
RECEIVING STREAM: the Litde Tennessee River
Class: — I ✓ oc�{
Sub -Basin: 04-04-02
Reference USGS Quad: F 3 NE
(please attach)
County: Graham
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/90 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three mules:
Class change to C trout downstream below Fontana Dam ± 1 mile
Requested by: Charles Lowe Date: 6/8/92
Prepared by: it LL`i Date: 9 9�
Reviewed by: a"- Date: /I 11 a--
Modeler Date Rec. #
DAB z
Drainage Area (mil) Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters Al14
Upstream
Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
6
Wirt
BODS (m )
NH -N (mg/1)
3
rYJD�lrfO✓
D.O. (mg/l)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100 nil)
B1nr1✓
pH (SU)
�''dm,'y�
71(
Pi
n
Comments: _/*°Nr/D2 FW CRtOCIAX e11GY 4WPJ ufEs7
A-5 � O!5/nIGG�rrsf�tl'Y

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6969,6970
Facility Name:
Peppertree Fontana Village
NPDES No.:
NC0023086 (001 and 002)
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
Little Tennessee River (001) and UT to Gold Branch (002)
Stream Classification:
�$ (Little Tennessee River) and C (Gold Branch)
Subbasin:
040402 C-Tre �t
County:
Graham
Stream Characteristic:
oozzvife--
Regional Office:
Asheville
USGS #
03.5150.0110
Requestor:
Lowe
Date:
1990
Date of Request:
6/8/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.15
Topo Quad:
F3NE
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.06
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.07
Average Flow (cfs):
0.38
30Q2 (cfs):
0.09
IWC (%):
9
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility is renewing at existing flow with no change in wastewater characteristics. Permittee -o
should receive same limits as contained in previous permit. Instream monitoring should include i
fecal and conductivity as well as temperature and dissolved oxygen and applies only to the 002 s
pipe.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
I: -..8wIIInT14IT1'1
Reviewed by 4
Instream Assess ent:
Regional S r:.
Permits & Eneineerin
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
SEP 1 7 1992
0
cn
RECEIVED
Water Quality Actiop
AUG 2 5 1992
A Neville Regional 0fM%
kheville, North Carol*

-
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Monthly Average
for 001 pipe
for 002 pipe
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.3
0.004
0.004
BOD5 (mg/1):
30.0
30.0
30.0
NH3N (mg/1):
monitor
8.5
20.0
DO (m81l):
5.0*
5.0*
TSS (mg/1):
30.0
30.0
30.0
Fecal Col. (1100 ml):
monitor
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
monitor
Temperature (°C):
monitor
monitor
monitor
Oil and Grease (mg4):
30.0
MBAS (mg/1):
monitor
*Daily minimum.
Recommended Limits:
L.7ennR.
Monthly Average
for 001pipe
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.3
BOD5 (mg/1):
30.0
NH3N (mg/1):
monitor
DO (mg/l):
TSS (mg/1):
30.0
Fecal Col. (1100 ml):
monitor
pH (SU):
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
Temperature (°C):
monitor 1
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
30.0
MBAS (mg/1):
monitor I
*Daily minimtun. 41� oed
Monthly Average
for 002 pipe UT G-dd Q rarc.ln
Summer
Winter
0.004
0.004
30.0
30.0
8.5
20.0
5.0*
5.0*
30.0
30.0
200
200
6-9
6-9
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed
m
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
Limits Chanas Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
P)r p�Qt 00a-
Upstream Location: UT to Gold Branch approximately 50' upstream of discharge
Downstream Location: UT to Gold Branch at nearest road downstream of outfall
Parameters: D.O., Temperature, Fecal, and Conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
The above locations and parameters are for the 002 pipe only. No instream monitoring is necessary for 00 1
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility de nstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

/' ' kr /S,
Yx�
14 el Jib1 — -
wie*-ieGye�(cr/�%�i _
rr2�d
_ — l
-_-- --:�1s GIRTG �S�B3yl�if Yly %ia1a+L��.f

TO:
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
DATE: May 11, 1992
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION _� ��
COUNTY Graham
PERMIT NUMBER NCO023086 MQy
15 1992
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
2.
3.
4.
5.
7
0
0
TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH
Facility and Address: Peppertree Fontana Village
Highway 28 Post Office Box 68
Fontana Dam, North Carolina 28733
Date of Investigation: May 5, 1992
Report Prepared By: Kerry S. Becker
Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Lamar Williams, ORC
704-498-2211
Directions to Site: From the intersection of NC 28 and 19, travel
north on NC 28 approx. 28 miles to Peppertree Fontana Village on
the left.
Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 350 26' 48" (001) Latitude: 350 26' 30" (002)
Longitude: 830 49' 04" (001) Longitude: 830 47' 55" (002)
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No, 149 NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Fontana Dam, NC
Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
Pipe 001: 1-2 acres
Pipe 002: < 1 acre
Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Pipe 001: flat, not subject to flooding
Pipe 002: rolling to steep
Location of nearest dwelling: > 500 feet for both facilities
Page 1

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
(001) Little Tennessee River (002) UT to Gold Branch
a. Classification: (001) C Trout (002) C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: LTN 04-04-02
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: fish and wildlife propagation and maintenance
secondary recreation
agriculture
hydroelectric power generation (001)
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 100 % Domestic
Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: MGD (Design Capacity)
(001) 0.300 (002) 0.004
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater:
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day:
a. Highest month in the past 12 months: lbs/day
b. Highest year in the past 5 years: lbs/day
3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and
applicable CFR Part and Subpart:
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): (001):
Existing facility consists of bar screen, aeration, clarification,
sludge and skimmer returns, sludge digestion, dr-ying beds,
chlorination chamber (disinfection does not occur) and standby
power.
(002) Existing facility consists of an extended air package plant
with bar screen aeration, clarification, sludge and skimmer
returns, and effluent chlorination.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: (001) Sludge digestion and
sludge drying beds. There is no plan regarding final disposal of
dried sludge. Because of low flows in the past several years,
neither WWTP has generated enough solids growth to warrant solids
wasting.
6. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):
(001): Grade II (002): Grade II
Page 2

i. SIC Codes(s): (001): 7011 5812 (002.): 7999
Wastewater Code(s): Primary (001): 10, 13 (002): 13, 45
Main Treatment Unit Code: (001): 052-0 (002): 062-0
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds
(municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring requests:
3. Additional effluent limits requests:
4. Other:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Asheville Regional Office recommends renewal of NPDES Permit
Number NC0023086, provided a sludge management plan is submitted
and approved by the Division.
Signat e of Report Preparer
r Qualitty Regional Supervisor
(�—Ifll?
Date
Page 3

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0023086
PERMITTEE NAME: Peppertree Fontana Village
FACILITY NAME: Peppertree Fontana Village
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 002
Minor -V
Design Capacity: 0.004 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
J Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
Two WLAs - 001 & 002
11
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to cold Branch
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-04-02
Reference USGS Quad: F 3 NE (please attach)
County: Graham
Regional Office:_ Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/90 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three miles:
Class change to WS-III & B downstream at Little Tennessee River+
1 2 mile
Requested by: Charles Lowe
Prepared by: /
Reviewed by:
�wN�OU Wa JA,0
Date: 6/8/92
Date: 9 9 92i
r1_ Date: i�_
9� y
Modeler
Date Rec.
I #
Drainage Area (mil ) p./S Avg. Streamflow (cfs): b. 3ii
7Q10 (cfs) 0. (( Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 6-7 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC %
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream �f`T�o o/
Acute/Chronic
Location
✓t
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
36
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
.7rr
Zo
D.O. (mg/l)
- D
S b
TSS (mg/1)
3C
jp
F. Col. (/100 nil)
o c o
Loo
pH (SU)
Cl4/�i.K �/
r✓�GYI��i.�
rnon�%N
Comments:
s

Sheep Knob -00 U I N C� eR 0
L, . .
P.A
T\�
e (:Op
.4i
- w-t-
,t' Z
:X
-3
SR
r
..........
TL V c
X em� AM
.-0
r
1 �3
Nil
J.
M 87,
rl :1)
4
—�n
, P�r-{
Wa
A. 2` r
A
I?
.Welsh ok\ 01
00
Knob Go
y u, T'.. t.. ch pcl..,:.,
sul'SIM",
31
F ta�ra Villa
ge i age "v
p 0)
tT
20-.199
C EN TRA F
Green Gap IbE (�Pp
Roobi
Walkbr Gap

Iy[•11I.`l:t i Ild 3r.'/•I. 0 0 7��r•�N:Q.I►1
Request # 6969,6970
Facility Name:
Peppertree Fontana Village
NPDES No.:
NC0023086 (001 and 002)
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
Little Tennessee River (001) and UT to Gold Branch (002)
Stream Classification:
WS—Hfw" (Little Tennessee River) and C (Gold Branch)
Subbasin:
040402
County:
Graham
Stream Characteristic:
ooz,vrr'c--
Regional Office:
Asheville
USGS #
03.5150.0110
Requestor:
Lowe
Date:
1990
Date of Request:
6/8/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.15
Topo Quad:
F3NE
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.06
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.07
Average Flow (cfs):
0.38
30Q2 (cfs):
0.09
IWC (%):
9
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility is renewing at existing flow with no change in wastewater characteristics. Pemiittee
should receive same limits as contained in previous pemrit. Instream monitoring should include
fecal and conductivity as well as temperature and dissolved oxygen and applies only to the 002
pipe.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Reviewed by U G
InstreamATssess
nt: (Z��R� Date:
Regional Sr- // Date:
Permits & EngineeringL, ,& Dater
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
SEP 17 1992
cn
RECEIVED
Water Quality Slction
AUG 2 5 1992
}heville Regional Offei
Jftheville, North Carofin

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg4):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature (°C):
Oil and Grease (mg/l):
MBAS (mg/l):
*Daily minimum.
' :. $ - 476E _rim
LJennR
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
N113N (mg/1):
DO (mg/l):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature (°C):
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
MBAS (mg/1):
*Daily minimum
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
for 001 pipe
0.3
30.0
monitor
30.0
monitor
6-9
monitor
monitor
30.0
monitor
Monthly Average
for 001 pipe
0.3
30.0
monitor
30.0
monitor
6-9
monitor
monitor
30.0
monitor
J� u50
Monthly Average
for 002 pipe
Summer
Winter
0.004
0.004
30.0
30.0
8.5
20.0
5.0*
5.0*
30.0
30.0
200
200
6-9
6-9
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Monthly Average
for 002 pipe 01 6-old Q My Jl
Summer
Winter
0.004
0.004
30.0
30.0
8.5
20.0
5.0*
5.0*
30.0
30.0
200
200
6-9
6-9
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
I",
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite tonicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
for pp19t 002-
Upstream Location: LIT to Gold Branch approximately 50' upstream of discharge
Downstream Location: UT to Gold Branch at nearest road downstream of outfall
Parameters: D.O., Temperature, Fecal, and Conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
The above locations and parameters are for the 002 pipe only. No instream monitoring is necessary for 00 1
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Has the facility de nstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.