20211102 Ver 1_PCN Support Materials for Avery bridge 27 replacement_20230110

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 11
801 STATESVILLE ROAD
NORTH WILKESBORO, NC 28659
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov

January 10th, 2023

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Regulatory Field Office Transportation Permitting Branch
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 1617 Mail Service Center
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Raleigh NC 27699-1617
ATTN: Ms. Lori Beckwith Mr. Dave Wanucha
NCDOT Coordinator NCDOT Coordinator

Subject: Application for Section 404 Regional General Permit 50, and 401 Water Quality
Certification for proposed replacement of Avery Bridge 27, Avery County, North Carolina,
Division 11, WBS 17BP.11.R.122 – State Funded

Dear Lori and Dave,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is scheduled to replace Bridge #27 with a new
bridge at the same location. The existing concrete bridge is 4 spans @ 40’ each, for a total length
of 160’, and includes a concrete support in the middle of the river. The proposed bridge will be 3
spans – 1@40’; 1@95’; 1@40’ for an overall length of 175’. While the new bridge will have two
in-stream supports, both will be on the edge of the river vs. in the middle of the river, as is the
case with the existing bridge.

An on-site detour bridge is proposed since this is a U.S. route with heavy traffic volumes. Rock
causeways will be used to construct both the temporary and new bridge. The two causeways
needed to build and take down the temporary bridge will be phased so only one causeway is in
the river at a time, ensuring that less than 50% of the river flow is blocked. In contrast, since both
causeways needed for the new bridge supports are very small (since these supports are on the
edge of the river), the contractor could install both at the same time and still block less than 50%
of the river flow. All proposed causeways are shown on the permit drawings, and as designed,
will not include a fabric liner. The stream is shallow and very rocky, so the liner would likely rip
up and wash downstream.

While we typically use causeways to control turbidity when removing older bridge supports, in
this case, we propose to remove the old/existing bridge supports without a causeway. While we
will be able to remove the supports on each side of the river without putting equipment in the
water, the middle bent may require a trackhoe to enter the river (assuming we can’t reach this
structure from the riverbank). The river is shallow (1-2’ depth) and rocky at this location, which
should allow for a trackhoe to track out into and back while minimizing the portion of the
riverbed that will be disturbed (see photos). NCDOT will work closely with NCDWR during the
middle support removal, and will ensure all equipment is clean of sediment and
checked/monitored to ensure no petroleum leaks. We propose this method because removing the
existing supports without a causeway will be more environmentally friendly by reducing the area

that will be impacted and the duration of the impact (only a few hours). While instream sediments
may be stirred up, the rocky nature of the river at this location, along with picking a worktime
when flows are low, should result in only a short window of turbidity and this turbidity should
only affect a short reach of stream. On the permit drawings, a “TS” hatching is shown for the
entire river width under the existing bridge, to account for the trackhoe possibly entering the
stream for the middle support removal. However, it should be noted that only a portion of this
area will actually be impacted.

As part of the project, two stormwater outlets will convey stormwater from the bridge and
roadway to the Linville River, just upstream of the bridge. This will involve the placement of rip
rap on the river bank where each ditch outlets, resulting in 14’ of permanent impacts.

Stream Impacts:
Station
Number
Existing
Structure Size
Proposed
Structure Size
Temporary
Dewatering/
Causeway
Riprap
Impacts
(feet)
Total Impacts at
this Station
(feet)

Bridge #27
160’ long x 32’
wide bridge
175’ long x 43’
wide bridge
164’ or
0.13 acres

14

188

Perm. Fill/Riprap Impacts = 14
feet
Total Project Impacts = 188
feet
Note - There is a wetland on the northeast side of the project (0.16 acres), but it will not be impacted.

Protected Species/Section 7
As of 1-9-23, USFWS IPaC lists the following species (no critical habitats in the area):

Gray Bat, Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB), Virginia Big-eared Bat, Tricolored Bat (the
latter is proposed, but not currently listed): The existing bridge was surveyed by NCDOT
biological survey unit on July 14th, 2021. The results of their survey are included with this
application, but no bats or signs of bat usage were observed. A second, follow-up survey was
conducted on August 2, 2022, and again, no bats or signs of bats were observed. A review of the
NCNHP records, updated October 2022, indicates no known records within a mile of the project
for any listed species, however, a Tricolored bat was documented within a mile of the project area
in 2016.

At the time of the bat survey and corresponding bat memo, NLEB was listed as Threatened and
the project was consistent with the final Section 4(d) rule. However, the listing of NLEB has
been changed to Endangered and the 4(d) rule no longer applies. While no signs of bat use were
observed in the bridge, there are trees that will be cut as part of the project. However, these trees
are largely smooth bark species like red maple and ash, and all are immediately adjacent to a busy
roadway with numerous artificial lights. There is also a small grove of shorter (< 20’) conifers
that appear to be Norway Spruce and arborvitae species, but these trees are primarily < 3” DBH,
with a few approximately 5-6” DBH. Regardless, the entire project area is best described as
fragmented, with several businesses and artificial lights/billboards, as well as a nearby rock
quarry and lumber yard. As a result, the project area would not be considered preferred habitat
for any bats species. With that in mind, NCDOT would like to propose a biological conclusion of
MAY AFFECT NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSLY AFFECT, instead of committing to a winter
time tree clearing. However, if a winter tree clearing requirement is necessary to obtain a
MANLAA decision, then NCDOT may be able to commit to that.

Additional information related to potential effects to bats include:

- the nearest NLEB hibernacula record is 6.5 miles northeast of the project and no known NLEB
roost trees occur within 150 feet of the project area.
- No caves or mines are in the area, and closest mine (a surface mine) is > 1 mile to the northeast.
- the project will involve tree clearing (0.9 acres of trees > 3” DBH)
- no artificial lighting or night work will occur.
- percussion activities from mechanized hammers may be needed, but no blasting will occur.

Rock Gnome Lichen
Habitat for this species does not exist within the project study area, as the project area is only
3500’ and there are no vertical cliff faces. Also, a review of NHP records, updated October 2022,
indicates no known occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the lack of habitat and
nearby known occurrences, a biological conclusion of No Effect is suggested for this species.

Bog Turtle
The bog turtle is listed as Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance and is not afforded
protection under Section 7 of the ESA. A review of NHP records, updated October 2022,
indicates a known occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area, but in a separate and much larger
wetland. Regardless, the wetland within the study area will not be impacted.

The following documents are also included as part of this permit application package:

PJD
Permit Drawings
Archaeology, Historic Architecture, and Tribal Coordination
NRTR
NEPA Document
NCDOT Bat Memo
Photos of the project area

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone].

Sincerely,

Kevin Hining
NCDOT Division 11 Environmental Supervisor

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.

ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]

RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]

WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]

INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 3

D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4

By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.

Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date

Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)

I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)

I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.

A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.

I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.

An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).

I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.

G. ALL REQUESTS

Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.

Size of Property or Review Area acres.

The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS

Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________

A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
 North Arrow
 Graphical Scale
 Boundary of Review Area
 Date
 Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
 Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
 Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
 Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
 Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.

Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)

____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 6
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
•PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
•AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
0 1 20.5
Miles
±
Figure 1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION 11
VICINITY MAPWBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Legend
Project Study Area
ESRI World Street Basemap
Date: 08-10-2022
Caldwell
Avery
Watauga
Mitchell
Yancey Burke
Ashe
N.T.S.
Bridge #27
Pin
e
ola
Pineola
BaptistChurch
Linville

F
a
l
l
s
±
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION 11
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2021
WBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Legend
Project Study Area
Data Form Location
Potential Non-wetland WOTUS - Intermittent Stream
Potential Non-wetland WOTUS - Perennial Stream
Potential Non-wetland WOTUS - Pond
Potential Wetland WOTUS
Date: 11-17-2022
Figure 2
0 100 20050
Feet
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSPond B +/-0.05 acre
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSStream SB +/-305 LF
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSLinville River +/-449 LF
Potential Wetland WOTUSWetland WA +/- 0.16 acre
DP1
DP2
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSStream SA +/-272 LF
±
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION 11
USGS Topographic Map
USGS Map Server, 2020Newland, NC Quadrangle 1:24K
WBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Legend
Project Study Area
Data Form Location
Potential Non-wetland WOTUS - Intermittent Stream
Potential Non-wetland WOTUS - Perennial Stream
Potential Non-wetland WOTUS - Pond
Potential Wetland WOTUS
Date: 11-17-2022
Figure 3
0 125 25062.5
Feet
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSPond B +/-0.05 acre
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSStream SB +/-305 LFPotential Non-wetland WOTUSLinville River +/-449 LF
Potential Wetland WOTUSWetland WA +/- 0.16 acre
DP1DP2
Potential Non-wetland WOTUSStream SA +/-272 LF
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
No X X
No X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Normal Conditions per Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Cleared area - may have been used as a tree farm in the past (evergreen species surrounding and evidence of cut stumps)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:17BP.11.R.122 - Avery Bridge #27 Pineola/Avery
DP1
5/25/22
NCDOT NC
No
Section, Township, Range:Ryan Elliot, Kim Hamlin
0.5Concaveswale/depression
Datum:NAD83-81.895336.0287LRR N, MLRA 130B
NWI classification:NkA—Nikwasi loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5'
=Total Cover
FAC
FACW
No
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
15
105
15
0
Multiply by:
60
2.25Prevalence Index = B/A =
30
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
35
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
FACYes
1640
Impatiens capensis
Scirpus cyperinus
30
10
15'
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FACW
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15')
80
Ranunculus repens
No
No
Yes
Yes
15
FACW5
Juncus effusus
15Carex lurida OBL
Rumex crispus 5
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30')
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP1
3
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
180
0
80
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
98
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
90 C
Color (moist)
Matrix
C10YR 4/3
10YR 3/3 7.5YR 4/6
7.5YR 4/610-16
0-10
DP1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
PL2
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
Prominent redox concentrations
10 PL
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Normal Conditions per Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Cleared area - may have been used as a tree farm in the past (evergreen species surrounding and evidence of cut stumps)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:17BP.11.R.122 - Avery Bridge #27 Pineola/Avery
DP2
5/25/22
NCDOT NC
No
Section, Township, Range:Ryan Elliot, Kim Hamlin
0.5Concaveswale
Datum:NAD83-81.895236.0287LRR N, MLRA 130B
PEMNWI classification:NkA—Nikwasi loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5'
=Total Cover
FAC
FACW
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
45
0
0
Multiply by:
40
2.43Prevalence Index = B/A =
20
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
15
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
FACWNo
718
5
15'
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15')
35
Juncus effusus
Yes
No
10Impatiens capensis
5Scirpus cyperinus FACW
Ranunculus repens 15
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30')
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP2
2
2
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
85
0
35
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey90C
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 3/2 7.5YR 4/60-12
DP2SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
10 PL
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATI ON
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT_DATE_TRADITIONAL#

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
NC Department of Transportation – Division 11: Kevin Hining, 801 North Statesville Road, North
Wilkesboro NC 28659

C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District – Asheville RFO

D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:). The North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge #27 (WBS Element No.
17BP.11.R.122) on US 221 (Linville Falls Highway) over the Linville River in Avery County.

E. (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC
RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Avery County City: Pineola
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.0288, Long: -81.8961
Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 17S 419264 3987514
Name of nearest waterbody: Linville River
F. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s):

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.

Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resources
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable
Type of
aquatic
resources
(i.e., wetland
vs. non-
wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Linville River 36.0290 -81.8962 449 LF Non-wetland Section 404
SA 36.0287 -81.8968 272 LF Non-wetland Section 404
SB 36.0292 -81.8952 305 LF Non-wetland Section 404
Pond B 36.0294 -81.8951 0.05 ac Non-wetland Section 404
WA 36.0288 -81.8951 0.16 ac Wetland Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and
obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having
discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may
be appropriate.

2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a
permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance
on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic
resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional,
and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or
enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as
practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions
contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33
C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official
determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area,
or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the
Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)

Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 2- PJD Map Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Corps navigable waters' study: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Newland, NC Quadrangle, 1:24K Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: State/local wetland inventory map(s): FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Ae rial (Name & Date): NC OneMap, 2018
or Other (Name & Date): Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: Other information (please specify):

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.

Signature and date of Regulatory staff
member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) 1

1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.
Waters_Name State Cowardin_Code HGM_Code Meas_Type Amount Units Waters_Type Latitude Longitude Local_Waterway
Linville River NORTH CAROLINA R3 RIVERINE Linear 449 FOOT DELINEATE 36.02900000 -81.89620000 Linville River
SA NORTH CAROLINA R2 RIVERINE Linear 272 FOOT DELINEATE 36.02870000 -81.89680000 Linville River
SB NORTH CAROLINA R4 RIVERINE Linear 305 FOOT DELINEATE 36.02920000 -81.89520000 Linville River
Pond 1 NORTH CAROLINA L1 RIVERINE Area 0.05 ACRE DELINEATE 36.02940000 -81.89510000 Linville River
WA NORTH CAROLINA PEM RIVERINE Area 0.16 ACRE DELINEATE 36.02880000 -81.89510000 Linville River
Potential Jurisdictional Features Characteristics

Table 1. Streams in the study area
Stream
Name Map ID Classification Length (ft.)
Bank
Height
(ft)
Bankfull
width
(ft)
Depth
(in)
Linville
River
Linville
River Perennial 449 6 50 8-36
UT to
Linville
River
SA Perennial 272 5 6 2
UT to
Linville
River
SB Intermittent 305 3 4 4

Table 2. Ponds in the study area
Surface Water Map ID of Connection Area (ac) in Study
Area
Pond B Stream SB 0.05

Table 3. Wetlands in the study area
Map ID NCWAM
Classification Forested NCWAM
Rating
Hydrologic
Classification
404/401
or 401
Area (ac.) in
Study Area
WA
Non-tidal
freshwater
marsh
No Moderate Riparian 404/401 0.16

(Version 2.07; Released October 2016)
17.BP.11.R.122 TIP No.:SF-050027 County(ies):Avery Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
No
Design/Future:Year:2016 Existing:Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes N/A
No
N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
ac.
2-lanes at 11' each with 4' paved shoulders before bridge, 4' unpaved after bridge.
5100
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Class BNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
N/ABuffer Rules in Effect:
None
5100
2-lanes at 12' each with 8' shoulders, 2' full depth shoulders
Waterbody Information
2016
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
17.BP.11.R.122
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
This project replaces existing bridge #050027: 4@40’, for an overall length of 160’. The bridge consists of reinforced concrete deck girders on concrete bents with spill through
abutments with an out to out bridge width of 32’. The proposed bridge will be (3)-spans 1@40'; 1@95'; 1@40' for an overall length of 175'. Bridge will use 54" concrete girders
on concrete piers with will thru abutments with an out to out width of 43'-3". No deck drains will be required. Runoff from the bridge will be captured and discharged onto
B rip rap outlet pads. There is a slight increase in the impervious area of the project, however there is no significant increase in the discharge from the roadway runoff.
Side slopes were steepened to 2:1 and the lateral base ditch (Details C and D) was reduced to a 2' 12:1 shelf to pull the ditch in as much as possible in an effort to avoid
impacts to or changing the hydrology of wetland WA.
Forum 1
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
801 Statesville Road Address:
General Project Information
SF-050027
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
RK&K - Seth Jones, EINCDOT Contact:
336-903-9202
8601 Six Forks Road, Suite 700
Raleigh, NC 27615
Contractor / Designer:
984-238-7216
[e-mail]
Address:
4/7/2022
AveryPineola
Heath Slaughter - Division Environmental Officer
North Wilkesboro, 28659
River Basin(s):
City/Town:
0.9
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
Rural
Linville River 11-29-(4.5)
0.7
750 ft. (0.1420 mi.)
Project Description
Proposed Project
Catawba
None
Supplemental Classification: Trout Waters (Tr)
Wetlands within Project Limits?
D
T
=
=
=
=
=
ADT
FUNC CLASS =
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
4
/
7
/
2
0
2
2
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
li
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
0
5
0
0
2
7
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
t
s
h
.
d
g
n
s
j
o
n
e
s
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
IO
N
T
A TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT LENGTH
LETTING DATE:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
8601 SIX FORKS ROAD, FORUM 1, SUITE 700
NC LICENSE NO. F-0112
1-888-521-4455 OR 919-878-9560
& CONST.
PE, ROW, UTIL.
PROJECT ENGINEER
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DESIGN
ROADWAY
4
DHV N/A
MPH
N/A
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURES
17BP.11.R.122
17BP.11.R.122
AVERY COUNTY
50
BRIDGE NO. 050027
17
B
P
.
1
1.
R
.
12
2
V
6%
Brandon McInnis, P.E.
LINVILLE RIVER ON US 221 (LINVILLE FALLS HWY)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 050027 OVER
SR 1518
Old Jonas Ridge Rd
N
S
R
S
2
0
0
7
N
A
D
8
3/
LI
N
VILLE
RI
VE
R
Bridge No. 050027
S
R
1
5
1
9
An
d
y
Cro
w
e

R
d
Linville River
SR 1501
Goose Hollow Rd
H
w
y
1
8
1
J
o
n
a
s
Ri
d
g
e
H
w
y
-
Y
2
-
-
Y
1
-
-DET-
U
S
2
2
1
Li
n
v
ill
e
F
a
ll
s

H
w
y
SR
1504
Pineola R
d.
U
S

2
2
1
Lin
v
ille

F
a
lls

H
w
y
B
l
u
e

R
i
d
g
e

P
k
w
y
Blu
e
R
id
g
e
P
kw
y
5100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
100
100
50 0 50
50 0 50
2010010
0.142 mi
0.033 mi
0.109 mi
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615-3960
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
Mary Mays Yahl, P.E.
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.11.R.122........
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 17BP.11.R.122.......
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 17BP.11.R.122...............
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
C
H
U
R
C
H

R
O
A
D
P
I
N
E
O
L
A
B
A
P
T
I
S
T
S
R

1
5
0
5
-L-
-L- STA. 10+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT
-L- STA. 12+98.50
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 14+73.50
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 17+50.00
END PROJECT
T
U
T
T
L
E

L
A
N
E
LINVILLE FALLS HWY
US 221
LINVILLE FALLS HWY
US 221
P
I
N
E
O
L
A
R
O
A
D
T
O
S
R
1
5
0
4
NC 194
TO MILLERS GAP HWY
NC 181 S.
TO JONAS RIDGE HWY
See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
REGIONAL TIER
ARTERIAL
-Y2- STA. 10+60.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 11+35.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
TRUCKS = 14%
1. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III MODIFIED.
NOTES:
NorthLi
n
ville
F
a
lls H
w
y
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 1 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
Responsive People | Creative Solutions
NC License No. F-0112
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-3960
8601 Six Forks Road, Forum 1,Suite 700
P: [phone]
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
6
/
2
/
9
9
4
/
7
/
2
0
2
2
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
0
5
0
0
2
7
_
P
E
R
_
D
r
a
i
n
_
D
e
t
.
d
g
n
s
j
o
n
e
s
2D-1
www.rkk.com
Engineers | Construction Managers | Planners | Scientists
ENGINEER
HYDRAULIC DESIGN
17BP.11R.122
DRAINAGE DETAILS
( Not to Scale)
LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1 D
B
b
d
2:1 1"/Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 13+92 TO STA. 16+00 LT
DETAIL C
b=2.0 Ft.
B=4.0 Ft.
Max. d=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=2.0 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0'
Type of Liner= CL I Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
( Not to Scale)
LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1 D
B
b
d
2:1 1"/Ft.
FROM -L- STA. 16+00 TO STA. 18+00 LT
DETAIL D
b=2.0 Ft.
B=4.0 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0'
Type of Liner= CL I Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
ON TEMPORARY BRIDGE SLOPES
FROM STA. 12+07 TO STA. 12+75 RT
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
Fill
Sl
o
p
e
2:
1
or
Flatter
DETAIL E
d=0.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL B Rip-Rap
Geotextile
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
Flatter2:1 or
FROM -L- STA. 12+03 TO STA. 12+67
DETAIL A
B=4.0 Ft.
Max. d=0.5 Ft.
Min. D=0.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Ditch
Slope
Front
Geotextile
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
B
d
FROM -L- STA. 13+35 TO STA. 13+92 LT
DETAIL B
B=4.0 Ft.
Max. d=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=2.0 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
*When B is < 6.0'
Type of Liner= CL I Rip-Rap
Geotextile
SHEET 2 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
P
I
N
E
O
L
A
B
A
P
T
I
S
T
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D.
S
R

15
0
5
T
U
T
T
LE

LN
.
LINVILLE FALLS HWY.
NC 181US 221
GATE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
G
R
E
E
N
H
O
U
S
E
1SFD
GR
GR
BST
BST
BST
BST
R
E
T
.

WA
L
L
J. RUFUS HENLEY
LINDA F. COMBS
AND
DAVID W. HARDING
BESIDE JACK HEAD
5/8" REBAR
5/8" REBAR
MAINTAINED R/W
MAINTAINED R/WMAINTAINED R/W
MAINTAINED R/W
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
R
/
W M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
R/
W
4
0
.
0
0
'
4
0
.
0
0
'
30.00'
LT
LT
22' BST
1
8'
B
S
T
22' BST
COVERED PORCH
NC 194
TO MILLERS GAP HWY.
NC 181 S.
TO JONAS RIDGE HWY.
WD
BST
W/ LIGHT
STONE COLUMN
33.10' LEFT -EL-
AT&T TELEPHONE
PINEOLA BAPTIST CHURCH
CONC.
JUDITH L. BLACKBURN
BRENDA S. STILLWELL
AND WIFE
LARRY R. STILLWELL
CONC.
POWER METER
POST AND
BILLBOARD
CONC.
DWIGHT GENTRY
2SF BUS. PINEOLA INN
12
0
"

C
H
L
B
S
T

T
E
N
N
I
S

C
O
U
R
T
L
P

T
A
N
K

B
S
T
GR
P
R
IVAT
E

D
R
.
GRASS
GRASSGRASS
LW100
3499.05
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
EXISTINGAPPROX. LOCATION OF
4
0
.
0
0
'
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
EXISTINGAPPROX. LOCATION OF
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
POWER METER
POST AND
BILLBOARD
LW100
3499.05
3
6
"
C
M
P
18" CMP
WALL
6" PLASTIC
30" CMP
FLOW
DIR OF
INV=3501.11'
INV=3497.55'HW
ROCK
LINVILLE RIVER
LIN
VILLE RIVER
Responsive People | Creative Solutions
NC License No. F-0112
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-3960
8601 Six Forks Road, Forum 1,Suite 700
P: [phone]
LINVILLE RIVER
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
3
.0
3
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
1
.0
0
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.02
.02
.01.02
.00.01
.00.01
.02
.01
.00
E
X
IS
T
.
E
X
IS
T
.
8
:1
8:1
8:1
PROP SBG
PROP SBG
TYP.
25'
+
3
7
.6
7
TYP.
25'
+
2
7
.5
0
.05
.04
.03
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.01
T
YP
.
15
'
+69.00
+44.00
+38.00
+58.71
T
YP
.
16
.
6
7
'
.01
.01
10'10'
9'9'
12
'
12
'

2
'

P
S

P
S

2
'
12
'
12
'

P
S

2
'
EXIST.
EXIST.
.0
2
.0
2
.0
0
.0
1
TYP.
25'
+
6
5
.0
0
.0
2
.0
2
8:1
AT-1
15+00TYPE III
TYPE III TYPE III
TYPE III
20+00
G
R
E
U
T
L-
3
GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
F
F
F
F
F
F C F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C F
C
F
F
F
F
1
2
3
4
6
7
-Y1- +60.00
EX. R/W, 35.00'
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
4
/
7
/
2
0
2
2
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
0
5
0
0
2
7
_
P
E
R
_
p
s
h
0
4
_
w
o
_
c
o
n
.
d
g
n
s
j
o
n
e
s
www.rkk.com
Engineers | Construction Managers | Planners | Scientists
17BP.11.R.122 04
F
F
F
TYPE III
TYPE III
TYPE III
-DET-
N
A
D
8
3
(
N
S
R
S
2
0
0
7
)
SS
TSTS
TSTSTS
TSTSTS
15"
R
C
P-III
18" RCP-IV W
/2

ELBO
W
S
15
"

C
S
P

SEE DETAIL B
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL D
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
W/ CLASS B RIP RAP
SP. CUT BASE DITCH
W
/2

E
LB
O
W
S
15
"

C
S
P

SEE DETAIL B
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
IN SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
1"=25'
SCALE
SEE INSET A
INSET A
SHEET 3 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
P
I
N
E
O
L
A
B
A
P
T
I
S
T
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D.
S
R

15
0
5
T
U
T
T
LE

LN
.
LINVILLE FALLS HWY.
NC 181US 221
GATE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
G
R
E
E
N
H
O
U
S
E
1SFD
GR
GR
BST
BST
BST
BST
R
E
T
.

W
A
L
L
J. RUFUS HENLEY
LINDA F. COMBS
AND
DAVID W. HARDING
BESIDE JACK HEAD
5/8" REBAR
5/8" REBAR
MAINTAINED R/W
MAINTAINED R/WMAINTAINED R/W
MAINTAINED R/W
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
R/
W M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
R/
W
4
0
.
0
0
'
4
0
.
0
0
'
30.00'
LT
LT
22' BST
1
8'
B
S
T
22' BST
COVERED PORCH
NC 194
TO MILLERS GAP HWY.
NC 181 S.
TO JONAS RIDGE HWY.
WD
BST
W/ LIGHT
STONE COLUMN
33.10' LEFT -EL-
AT&T TELEPHONE
PINEOLA BAPTIST CHURCH
CONC.
JUDITH L. BLACKBURN
BRENDA S. STILLWELL
AND WIFE
LARRY R. STILLWELL
CONC.
POWER METER
POST AND
BILLBOARD
CONC.
DWIGHT GENTRY
2SF BUS. PINEOLA INN
12
0
"
C
H
L
B
S
T

T
E
N
N
I
S

C
O
U
R
T
L
P

T
A
N
K

B
S
T
GR
P
R
IVAT
E

D
R
.
GRASS
GRASSGRASS
LW100
3499.05
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
EXISTINGAPPROX. LOCATION OF
4
0
.
0
0
'
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
EXISTINGAPPROX. LOCATION OF
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
POWER METER
POST AND
BILLBOARD
LW100
3499.05
3
6
"
C
M
P
18" CMP
WALL
6" PLASTIC
30" CMP
FLOW
DIR OF
INV=3501.11'
INV=3497.55'HW
ROCK
3 4 9 5
34953495
3
4
9
5
3
4
9
5
3495
3495
3495
3495
3495
3
4
9
5
3
4
9
5
3495
3495
3495
3495
3
5
0
0
3500
3500
3500
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500 3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3500
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3
5
0
0
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
35 00
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3500
3500
3500
3505
3505
3
5
0
5
3505
3505
3505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3
5
0
5
350
5
3505
3505
3505
350535053505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3505
3
5
0
5
3505
35053505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505 3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3
5
0
53505
3
5
0
5
3505
3505 35053505
3505
3505
3505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3510
3
5
10
3
5
1
0
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
3
5
1
0
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
35 10
3515
3
5
15
3515
3515
3
5
15
3515
3515
3515
3
5
1
5
3515
3520
3
5
2
0
3520
3
5
2
0
3520
3520
3520
3
5
2
0
3520
35253525
3525
3525
3525
3
5
25
3
5
2
5
352535253
5
3
0
3530
3530
3
5
3
0
3
5
3
0
3530
3535
3535
3535
3535
3
5
3
5
3
5
4
0
3
540
3540
3545
3
5
4
5
3545
3560
3565
3575
3495
3495
3495
3495
3495
3
5
0
0
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3505
LINVILLE RIVER
LIN
VILLE RIVER
Responsive People | Creative Solutions
NC License No. F-0112
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-3960
8601 Six Forks Road, Forum 1,Suite 700
P: [phone]
LINVILLE RIVER
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
3
.0
3
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
1
.0
0
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.02
.02
.01.02
.00.01
.00.01
.02
.01
.00
E
X
IS
T
.
E
X
IS
T
.
8
:1
8:1
8:1
PROP SBG
PROP SBG
TYP.
25'
+
3
7
.6
7
TYP.
25'
+
2
7
.5
0
.05
.04
.03
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.01
T
YP
.
15
'
+69.00
+44.00
+38.00
+58.71
T
YP
.
16
.
6
7
'
.01
.01
10'10'
9'9'
12
'
12
'

2
'

P
S

P
S

2
'
12
'
12
'

P
S

2
'
EXIST.
EXIST.
.0
2
.0
2
.0
0
.0
1
TYP.
25'
+
6
5
.0
0
.0
2
.0
2
8:1
AT-1
15+00TYPE III
TYPE III TYPE III
TYPE III
20+00
G
R
E
U
T
L-
3
GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
F
F
F
F
F
F C F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C F
C
F
F
F
F
1
2
3
4
6
7
-Y1- +60.00
EX. R/W, 35.00'
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
4
/
7
/
2
0
2
2
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
0
5
0
0
2
7
_
P
E
R
_
p
s
h
0
4
_
c
o
n
.
d
g
n
s
j
o
n
e
s
www.rkk.com
Engineers | Construction Managers | Planners | Scientists
17BP.11.R.122 04
F
F
F
TYPE III
TYPE III
TYPE III
-DET-
N
A
D
8
3
(
N
S
R
S
2
0
0
7
)
SS
TSTS
TSTSTS
TSTSTS
15"
R
C
P-III
18" RCP-IV W
/2

E
LBO
W
S
15
"

C
S
P

SEE DETAIL B
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL D
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
W/ CLASS B RIP RAP
SP. CUT BASE DITCH
W
/2

E
LB
O
W
S
1
5
"

C
S
P

SEE DETAIL B
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
IN SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
1"=25'
SCALE
SEE INSET A
INSET A
SHEET 4 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
-EL-
-EL-
-
E
Y
-
-
E
Y
1-
P
I
N
E
O
L
A
B
A
P
T
I
S
T
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D.
S
R

15
0
5
LINVILLE FALLS HWY.
NC 181US 221
GATE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE
G
R
E
E
N
H
O
U
S
E
1SFD
GR
GR
BST
BST
BST
BST
R
E
T
.

WA
L
L
BETTE
AND HIS WIFE
TROY ODELL CLARK
J. RUFUS HENLEY
LINDA F. COMBS
AND
DAVID W. HARDING
BESIDE JACK HEAD
5/8" REBAR
5/8" REBAR
N 66°22'00" W
160.57'
MAINTAINED R/W
MAINTAINED R/WMAINTAINED R/W
MAINTAINED R/W
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
R
/
W M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
R/
W
4
0
.
0
0
'
4
0
.
0
0
'
30.00'
POWER = MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC
LT
LT
N
0
4
°
0
5'
2
1"
E
6
6.
2
6'
3
1.
4
7'
S 11°28'47" E
152.56'
N 17°58'50"
W
198.40'
22' BST
1
8'
B
S
T
22' BST
COVERED PORCH
NC 194
TO MILLERS GAP HWY.
NC 181 S.
TO JONAS RIDGE HWY.
WD
BST
W/ LIGHT
STONE COLUMN
BM #1
BM #2
19.82' RIGHT -EL-
MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC POWER20.80' RIGHT -EL-
MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC POWER
22.02' RIGHT -EL-
MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC POWER
33.10' LEFT -EL-
AT&T TELEPHONE
LEFT -EL-
26.23'
POWER
ELECTRIC
MOUNTAIN
-EL-
53.23' LEFT
POWER
ELECTRIC
MOUNTAIN
PINEOLA BAPTIST CHURCH
CONC.
JUDITH L. BLACKBURN
BRENDA S. STILLWELL
AND WIFE
LARRY R. STILLWELL
CONC.
POWER METER
POST AND
BILLBOARD
CONC.
DWIGHT GENTRY
2SF BUS. PINEOLA INN
L
P

T
A
N
K

B
S
T
G
R
GRASSGRASS
18
2
.
5
7
'
S

2
2
°
0
0
'
4
9
"
W
LW100
3499.05
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
EXISTINGAPPROX. LOCATION OF
4
0
.
0
0
'
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
EXISTINGAPPROX. LOCATION OF
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
ROW BASED ON AERIAL
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING
INV=3500.04'
INV=3498.50'
3
6
"
C
M
P
18" CMP
WALL
6" PLASTIC
30" CMP
FLOW
DIR OF
INV=3501.11'
INV=3497.55'HW
ROCK
3495
3495
3495
3495
3495
3
4
9
5
3
4
9
5
3495
3495
3495
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500 3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3500
3500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
35003500
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3
5
0
0
3500
3
5
0
0
3500
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3505
3505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3505
3505
350535053505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3505
3
5
0
5
3505 3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3505
3
5
0
53505
3505
3505 35053505
3505
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
10
3
5
1
0
3510
3510
3510
3510 3510
3510
3
5
1
0
3510
3510
3510
3510
3510
3
5
15
3515
3515
3
5
15
3515
3515
3515
3520
3
5
2
0
3520
3520
3520
3525
3525
3525
3525
3
5
25
3
5
2
5
3
5
3
0
3530
3
5
3
0
3535
3535
3540
Responsive People | Creative Solutions
NC License No. F-0112
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-3960
8601 Six Forks Road, Forum 1,Suite 700
P: [phone]
LINVILLE RIVER
LIN
VILLE
RIVE
R
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
GROUND
EXISTING
PROPOSED GRADE
.
0
2 .0
1
.0
0
.0
1
.0
2.0
3
.0
4
.
0
4
.
0
3
.
0
2
.
0
1.
0
0
.
0
2
.
0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
1
OF TRAFFIC
FOR MAINTENANCE
TEMPORARY SHORING
8:1
+68 RT
BEGIN SBG
PROP SBG
.03
.02.03
10
'
10
'
2
'
1
0'
1
0'
+
5
5
.
0
0
INC
17.5'
+
5
5
.0
0
+
5
5
.0
0
IN
C
17.5'
IN
C
17.5'
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
4
/
7
/
2
0
2
2
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
0
5
0
0
2
7
_
P
E
R
_
p
s
h
0
5
.
d
g
n
s
j
o
n
e
s

0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
0
00
N
A
D
8
3/
N
S
R
S
2
0
0
7
-DET--Y1_DET-
100
100
50
50
50
50
10 2010
050027 5
3,510
3,520
3,500
3,490
3,480
11 12 1310 14 15 16 17 18 19
3,510
3,500
3,490
3,480
3,470
10
www.rkk.com
Engineers | Construction Managers | Planners | Scientists
1
2
5
3
4
7
3,450
3,460
3,470
3,480
3,490
3,500
3,510
3,520
3,499.9'
10-YR WSEL.
PI = 13+70.00
EL = 3,509.06'
(-)0.3525%(+)0.3000%
VC = 70'
K = 107
V = 53 mphEL = 3,509.74'
-DET- STA. 11+76.33
BEGIN GRADE
EL = 3,510.10'
-DET- STA. 17+17.16
END GRADE
V = 28 mph
PI = 10+65.00
EL = 3,508.46'
(-)4
.4
8
0
1%
(-
)6.
25
05%
VC = 30'
K = 17
EL = 3,509.34'
-DET- STA. 12+77.65, 10' LT
-Y1_DET- STA. 10+45.38 =
BEGIN GRADE
EL = 3,507.21'
-Y1- STA. 10+85.00
-Y1_DET- STA. 10+85.00 TIE TO
END GRADE
*
AT-1
TEMP.
GREU TL-3
TEMP.
GREU TL-3
TEMP.
TEMP. GREU TL-3
C C
F
F
F F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
TO BE EXCAVATED
SEE DETAIL E
TOE PROTECTION
0408
0404
0403
0409
W
/
(
2
)

E
L
B
O
W
S
1
5
"

C
S
P
18" RCP-IV
SEE DETAIL B
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL D
W/ CLASS I RIP RAP
LATERAL BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
W/ CLASS B RIP RAP
SP. CUT BASE DITCH
IN SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
SHEET 5 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NCDOT
TEMPORARY WORK PAD DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
3/17/2022
ASHE COUNTY
PROJECT: 17.BP.11.R.122 (050027)
BRIDGE NO. 27 OVER
LINVILLE RIVER
(LINVILLE FALLS HWY)
ON US 221/NC 181
SHEET 6 OF 7
1.5:11.5:1 CLASS B RIP RAP
CLASS II RIP RAP
CHANNEL BED
FLOW
'
NWS EL.=3,492.8'
WIDTH OF BRIDGE + 2' EACH END
SHEET 6 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- 12+70 LT Bank Stabilization due to ditch < 0.01 < 0.01 7.2 11.2

2 -L- 13+50 LT Bank Stabilization due to ditch < 0.01 < 0.01 5.3

3 -L- 12+92 to 14+01 Detour Bridge Work Pads 0.05 43.2

TOTALS*: < 0.01 0.13 12 164 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised September 2014 SHEET 7 OF 7
0.90 ac of Tree Clearing within the project limits. Includes area impacted by Temporary Detour and power lines within the R/W.
Lateral base ditch & ROW adjusted to avoid impacts to wetland at -L- 16+30 LT.
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Avery County
17BP.11.R.122
SF-050027
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
3/25/2022
110.0 0.07 Bridge Work Pads /
Existing Bridge Removal-L- 13+25 to 14+394
Project Tracking No.
16-02-0087

NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: County: Avery
WBS No: 17BP.11.R.122 Document: Minimum Criteria Checklist
Federal Aid No: Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3
Project Description: Replace Bridge 27 on US 221 over the Linville River in Avery County.
The Area of Potential Effects (A.P.E.) is approximately 201 meters (660 ft.) long and 18 meters
(60 ft.) wide. No easements required. No design plans provided.

SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The review included an examination of a topographic map, the Avery County soil survey, an
aerial photograph, and listings of previously recorded sites, previous archaeological surveys, and
previous environmental reviews at the Office of State Archaeology (O.S.A.). The bridge is
oriented approximately east-west.

The topographic map (Newland, N.C.) shows the A.P.E. is located in a wide river valley with
level floodplain on each side of the bridge. SR 1505 (Pineola Baptist Church Ln.) intersects with
US 221 a short distance to the west of the bridge. The floodplain on both sides of the bridge is
depicted as cleared (for agriculture or pasture? [in 1978]), indicating the soils are probably
suitable for agriculture (well-drained). One structure is depicted adjacent to the A.P.E. in the
northwest quadrant. Well-drained floodplain landforms near streams have a moderate to high
potential for archaeological sites.

The Avery County soil survey shows the soils in the A.P.E. are Rosman sandy loam (0-5%
slopes) and Statler loam (0-6% slopes) on the west side of the bridge, and Rosman loam (0-3%
slopes), occasionally flooded, and Nikwasi loam (0-3% slopes), frequently flooded, on the east
side of the bridge. Rosman sandy loam is a well-drained soil found on floodplains. Statler loam
is a well-drained soil found on stream terraces. Rosman loam is a well-drained soil found on
floodplains. Nikwasi loam is a very poorly-drained soil found in depressions on floodplains.
Landforms with well-drained soil next to streams have a moderate to high potential for
archaeological sites.

The aerial photograph shows the northwest quadrant is a narrow strip of wooded land, then the
intersection with SR 1505, then a structure and parking lot along the west side of SR 1505. The
southwest quadrant is a narrow wooded strip of land along the Linville River, then a narrow strip
of cleared land, then the intersection with Tuttle Lane, and then a parking lot. The A.P.E. in the
southeast quadrant is a partially wooded tract. There is a driveway to what appears to be a farm
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 6
Project Tracking No.
16-02-0087
complex at the east end of the A.P.E. The northeast quadrant is an undeveloped section. It
might be a Christmas tree farm.

A review of information at the O.S.A. shows there are no previously recorded archaeological
sites in the vicinity. The A.P.E. is not within any areas that have been previously surveyed for
archaeological sites. The A.P.E. is not within any projects that have been reviewed by the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO).

Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably
predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The A.P.E. of the project is narrow and will not impact much land outside of the existing right-
of-way. The landforms in the A.P.E. have a moderate to high potential for archaeological sites.
Most of the soil types in the A.P.E. are well-drained. Much of the northwest and southwest
quadrants appear to be disturbed by development. The southeast quadrant might include some
undisturbed area, although there is a farm complex nearby. The northeast quadrant appears to be
undeveloped. If the bridge is to be replaced in-place (with an offsite detour?), then no
archaeolgical survey is recommended. If the project will include a wider A.P.E. then the
project's potential impacts to archaeological sites should be re-evaluated.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
Caleb Smith 4/17/2017
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II Date

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 6

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 6

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 6

SR 1504
A.P.E.
US 221
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 6

A.P.E.
Bridge 62
SR 1504
US 221
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 6

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 11
801 STATESVILLE HWY
NORTH WILKESBORO, NC 28659
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov

December 18th, 2019

Dr. Wenonah Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Catawba Indian Nation
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, SC 29730

Dear Dr. Haire,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is starting the project development,
environmental, and engineering studies for the replacement of bridge #27 on US 221 over the
Linville River, Avery County, North Carolina.

The US Army Corps of Engineers is the lead agency and a permit is anticipated under the Section
404 process with the USACE.

The project vicinity map is attached, and the coordinates are 36.028874, -81.896121.

We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a
NEPA/SEPA Environmental Document, in accordance with the State and/or National
Environmental Policy Act.

Please respond by January 20, 2020 so that your comments can be used in the project development
process. If you have any questions concerning this project, or would like any additional
information, please contact me at [phone] or email [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Kevin Hining
Division Environmental Officer- NCDOT, Highway Division 11

Cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT Archaeology Team Lead
Cc: Lori Beckwith, USACE Regulatory Project Manager

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 11
801 STATESVILLE HWY
NORTH WILKESBORO, NC 28659
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov

December 18th, 2019

Whitney Warrior
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
PO BOX 1245
Tahlequah, OK 74465

Dear Whitney,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is starting the project development,
environmental, and engineering studies for the replacement of bridge #27 on US 221 over the
Linville River, Avery County, North Carolina.

The US Army Corps of Engineers is the lead agency and a permit is anticipated under the Section
404 process with the USACE.

The project vicinity map is attached, and the coordinates are 36.028874, -81.896121.

We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a
NEPA/SEPA Environmental Document, in accordance with the State and/or National
Environmental Policy Act.

Please respond by January 20, 2020 so that your comments can be used in the project development
process. If you have any questions concerning this project, or would like any additional
information, please contact me at [phone] or email [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Kevin Hining
Division Environmental Officer- NCDOT, Highway Division 11

Cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT Archaeology Team Lead
Cc: Lori Beckwith, USACE Regulatory Project Manager

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 11
801 STATESVILLE HWY
NORTH WILKESBORO, NC 28659
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov

December 18th, 2019

Elizabeth Toombs
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
PO BOX 948
Tahlequah, OK 74465

Dear Elizabeth,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is starting the project development,
environmental, and engineering studies for the replacement of bridge #27 on US 221 over the
Linville River, Avery County, North Carolina.

The US Army Corps of Engineers is the lead agency and a permit is anticipated under the Section
404 process with the USACE.

The project vicinity map is attached, and the coordinates are 36.028874, -81.896121.

We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a
NEPA/SEPA Environmental Document, in accordance with the State and/or National
Environmental Policy Act.

Please respond by January 20, 2020 so that your comments can be used in the project development
process. If you have any questions concerning this project, or would like any additional
information, please contact me at [phone] or email [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Kevin Hining
Division Environmental Officer- NCDOT, Highway Division 11

Cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT Archaeology Team Lead
Cc: Lori Beckwith, USACE Regulatory Project Manager

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 11
801 STATESVILLE HWY
NORTH WILKESBORO, NC 28659
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov

December 18th, 2019

LeeAnne Wendt
PO BOX 580
Okmulgee, OK 74447

Dear LeeAnne,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is starting the project development,
environmental, and engineering studies for the replacement of bridge #27 on US 221 over the
Linville River, Avery County, North Carolina.

The US Army Corps of Engineers is the lead agency and a permit is anticipated under the Section
404 process with the USACE.

The project vicinity map is attached, and the coordinates are 36.028874, -81.896121.

We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a
NEPA/SEPA Environmental Document, in accordance with the State and/or National
Environmental Policy Act.

Please respond by January 20, 2020 so that your comments can be used in the project development
process. If you have any questions concerning this project, or would like any additional
information, please contact me at [phone] or email [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Kevin Hining
Division Environmental Officer- NCDOT, Highway Division 11

Cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT Archaeology Team Lead
Cc: Lori Beckwith, USACE Regulatory Project Manager

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 11
801 STATESVILLE HWY
NORTH WILKESBORO, NC 28659
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov

December 18th, 2019

Russell Townsend
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
2077 Governors Island Road
Bryson City, NC 28713

Dear Russell,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is starting the project development,
environmental, and engineering studies for the replacement of bridge #27 on US 221 over the
Linville River, Avery County, North Carolina.

The US Army Corps of Engineers is the lead agency and a permit is anticipated under the Section
404 process with the USACE.

The project vicinity map is attached, and the coordinates are 36.028874, -81.896121.

We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a
NEPA/SEPA Environmental Document, in accordance with the State and/or National
Environmental Policy Act.

Please respond by January 20, 2020 so that your comments can be used in the project development
process. If you have any questions concerning this project, or would like any additional
information, please contact me at [phone] or email [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Kevin Hining
Division Environmental Officer- NCDOT, Highway Division 11

Cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT Archaeology Team Lead
Cc: Lori Beckwith, USACE Regulatory Project Manager

January 14, 2020

Kevin Hining
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division 11
801 Statesville Highway
North Wilkesboro, NC 28659

Re: Bridge 27 Replacement on US-221 over Linville River

Mr. Kevin Hining:

The Cherokee Nation (Nation) is in receipt of your correspondence about Bridge 27 Replacement
on US-221 over Linville River, and appreciates the opportunity to provide comment upon this
project.

The Nation maintains databases and records of cultural, historic, and pre-historic resources in this
area. Our Historic Preservation Office reviewed this project, cross referenced the project’s legal
description against our information, and found no instances where this project intersects or adjoins
such resources. Thus, the Nation does not foresee this project imparting impacts to Cherokee
cultural resources at this time.

However, the Nation requests that the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
halt all project activities immediately and re-contact our Offices for further consultation if items
of cultural significance are discovered during the course of this project.

Additionally, the Nation requests that NCDOT conduct appropriate inquiries with other pertinent
Tribal and Historic Preservation Offices regarding historic and prehistoric resources not included
in the Nation’s databases or records.

If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Wado,
Elizabeth Toombs, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office
[e-mail]
918.453.5389

NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT

Replace Bridge 050027 on US 221 (Linville Falls Highway) over the Linville River
Avery County, North Carolina

WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Division 11

November 2022
Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

1 November 2022
1.0 INTRODUCTION

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
050027 on US 221 (Linville Falls Highway) over the Linville River (WBS Element No.
17BP.11.R.122) in Avery County (Figures 1 and 2). The following Natural Resources
Technical Report (NRTR) has been prepared to assist in the preparation of the appropriate
environmental documentation.

2.0 METHODOLOGY

All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Environmental Coordination and
Permitting’s Preparing Natural Resources Technical Reports Procedure and the latest
NRTR Template (September 2021). Field work was conducted on September 20, 2022.
Water resources identified in the study area have not been verified by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The
principal personnel contributing to the field work and document is provided in the
appendix.

3.0 TERRESTRIAL COMMUNITIES

Three terrestrial communities were identified in the study area. Figure 3 shows the location
and extent of these terrestrial communities. Terrestrial community data are presented in the
context of total coverage of each type within the study area (Table 1).

Table 1. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area
Community Dominant Species (scientific name) Coverage
(ac.)
Mountain Levee Forest American sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis)
tag alder (Alnus serrulata)
blackberry (Rubus spp.)
0.5
Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh soft rush (Juncus effusus)
creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens)
shallow sedge (Carex lurida)
0.2
Maintained/Disturbed Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense)
Grasses (Poaceae spp.)

4.6
Total 5.3

4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES

4.1 Endangered Species Act Protected Species

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists the following federally
protected species within the study area, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (Table
Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

2 November 2022
2). For each species, a discussion of the presence or absence of habitat is included below
along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area.

Table 2. ESA federally protected species within the Study Area1
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Myotis grisescens gray bat E Yes MA-NLAA
Myotis septentrionalis northern long-eared bat T Yes Unresolved
Perimyotis subflavus tricolored bat P Undetermined Unresolved
Corynorhinus
(=Plecotus) townsendii
virginianus
Virginia big-eared bat E Yes MA-NLAA
Gymnoderma lineare rock gnome lichen E No No Effect
Glyptemys muhlenbergii bog turtle SAT No Not Required
Danaus plexippus monarch butterfly C Yes Not Required
1 IPaC data checked on November 4, 2022
E - Endangered
P - Proposed
T - Threatened
SAT – Similarity of Appearance, Threatened
MA-NLAA - May Affect – Not Likely to Adversely Affect

Gray bat
USFWS optimal survey window: May 15 – August 15

Biological Conclusion: May Affect – Not Likely to Adversely Affect
On July 14, 2021, NCDOT biologists assessed bridge No. 27 for potential bat
habitat. Crevices suitable for roosting were present. No evidence of bats (bats,
staining, or guano) was observed. No caves or mines are located within the project
footprint or within line of sight of the bridge. Based on the bridge type, lack of bat
evidence and the lack of caves or mines in the project vicinity, the proposed project
will have a biological conclusion of MAY AFFECT NOT LIKELY TO
ADVERSELY AFFECT for gray bats. A review of NHP records, updated July
2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.

Northern long-eared bat
USFWS optimal survey window: May 15 – August 15

Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
This information will be provided by the NCDOT Biological Surveys Group
(BSG). A review of NHP records, updated July 2022, indicates no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.

Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

3 November 2022
Tricolored bat
USFWS optimal survey window: May 15 – August 15

Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
This information will be provided by the NCDOT Biological Surveys Group
(BSG). A review of NHP records, updated July 2022, indicates one known
occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area.

Virginia big-eared bat
USFWS optimal survey window: May 15 – August 15

Biological Conclusion: May Affect – Not Likely to Adversely Affect
On July 14, 2021, NCDOT biologists assessed bridge No. 27 for potential bat
habitat. Crevices suitable for roosting were present. No evidence of bats (bats,
staining, or guano) was observed. No caves or mines are located within the project
footprint or within line of sight of the bridge. Based on the bridge type, lack of bat
evidence and the lack of caves or mines in the project vicinity, the proposed project
will have a biological conclusion of MAY AFFECT NOT LIKELY TO
ADVERSELY AFFECT for Virginia big-eared bats. A review of NHP records,
updated July 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study
area.

Rock gnome lichen
USFWS optimal survey window: year round

Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat for rock gnome lichen is not present in the study area. Elevations in the
study area are below 5,000 feet above mean sea level. A review of NHP records,
updated July 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study
area.

Bog turtle
USFWS optimal survey window: April 1 – October 1 (visual surveys); April 1 – June 15
(optimal for breeding/nesting); May 1 – June 30 (trapping surveys)

Biological Conclusion: Not Required
Habitat for the bog turtle is not present in the study area. Additionally, the bog turtle
is listed as a Similarity of Appearance - Threatened species and is not currently
afforded protection under Section 7 of the ESA. A review of NHP records, updated
July 2022, indicates one known occurrences within the study area. The occurrence
is within the Pineola State Natural Area located west of the study area. The
proposed roadway design does not impact the site.

Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

4 November 2022
Monarch butterfly
USFWS optimal survey window: May 15 – August 15

Biological Conclusion: Not Required
Habitat for the monarch butterfly is present in the study area in the roadside rights-
of-way and maintained lawn areas. However, the monarch butterfly is listed as a
Candidate species and is not currently afforded protection under Section 7 of the
ESA. A review of NHP records, updated July 2022, indicates no known occurrences
within 1.0 mile of the study area.

4.2 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is enforced by the USFWS. Golden eagles do
not nest in North Carolina. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests
in proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized
for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water.

A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.0-mile
radius of the project limits, was performed on September 15, 2022, using 2018 color
aerials. The Linville River is large enough and sufficiently open to be considered a
potential feeding source. A survey of the project study area and the area within 660 feet of
the project limits was conducted on September 20, 2022. No individuals or nests were
observed. Additionally, a review of the NHP database on November 4, 2002, revealed no
known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the
lack of observed individuals, known occurrences and minimal impact anticipated for this
project, it has been determined that this project will not affect this species.

5.0 WATER RESOURCES

Water resources in the study area are part of the Catawba River basin [U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03050101]. Three streams were identified in the study
area (Table 3). The location of each stream is shown in Figure 4.

Table 3. Streams in the study area
Stream Name Map ID
NCDWR
Index
Number
Best Usage
Classification
Bank
Height
(ft)
Bankfull
width
(ft)
Depth
(in)
Linville River Linville River 11-29-(4.5) B;Tr 6 50 8-36
UT to Linville River SA 11-29-(4.5) B;Tr 5 6 2
UT to Linville River SB 11-29-(4.5) B;Tr 3 4 4

There are no designated High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource Waters
(ORW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within, or within 1.0 mile
downstream of the study area. The North Carolina 2022 Final 303(d) list of impaired
waters does not identify any streams within the study area as an impaired water.
Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

5 November 2022
One surface water was identified in the study area (Table 4). The location of each surface
water is shown in Figure 4.

Table 4. Surface waters in the study area
Surface Water Map ID of Connection Area (ac) in Study
Area
Pond B N/A 0.05

6.0 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

6.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S.

Three streams were identified in the study area (Table 4). The location of these streams is
shown on Figure 4. All streams in the study area have been designated as cold water
streams for the purposes of stream mitigation.

Table 4. Status of streams in the study area
Map ID Length
(ft.) Classification Compensatory
Mitigation Required
River Basin
Buffer
Linville River 449 Perennial Undetermined No
SA 272 Perennial Undetermined No
SB 305 Intermittent Undetermined No
Total 1,026

One wetland was identified within the study area (Table 5). The location of this wetland is
shown on Figure 4. All wetlands in the study area are located within the Catawba River
basin [USGS Hydrologic Unit 03050101]. USACE wetland determination forms and
NCWAM forms for each site are included in a separate Jurisdictional Determination
Package.

Table 5. Characteristics of wetlands in the study area
Map ID NCWAM
Classification Forested NCWAM
Rating
Hydrologic
Classification
404/401
or 401
Area (ac.) in
Study Area
WA
Non-tidal
freshwater
marsh
No Moderate Riparian 404/401 0.16
Total 0.16

6.2 Construction Moratoria

Surveys conducted by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission showed the
Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

6 November 2022
presence of wild, self‐sustaining trout within the project area. Therefore, a mandatory trout
moratorium is required from October 15 to April 15. The project will incorporate Designs
Standards for Sensitive Waters.

6.3 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules

There are no state-regulated riparian buffer regulations in effect where the study area is
located.

6.4 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters

No streams in the study area have been designated by the USACE as a Navigable Water
under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.

Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

7 November 2022
7.0 REFERENCES

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y-87-1, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, Mississippi.

Harrar, E.S. and J.G. Harrar. 1962. Guide to Southern Trees. New York: Dover
Publications. 2nd ed. 709 pp.

N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2020.
Surface Water Classifications. Catawba River Basin.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-planning/classification-
standards/river-basin-classification

N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2021.
2020 NC 303(d) List – Category 5 Final. July 21, 2021.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/TMDL/303d/2020/NC_202
0_Category5_303dlist.pdf

N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
2022. Geographic Information System (GIS) data. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC.
Updated July 2022. https://www.ncnhp.org

N.C. Department of Transportation. 2019. T&E Plant Habitat Descriptions. NCDOT,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section.

N.C. Department of Transportation. 2012. Invasive Exotic Plants of North Carolina.
Cherri Smith. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural
Environment Section.

N.C. Department of Transportation. 2019. TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. NCDOT,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section.

N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2016. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM) User Manual. Version 5, February 2016. N.C. Department of
Transportation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.

Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb’s Wildflower Guide. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
490 pp.

Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1183 pp.

Natural Resources Technical Report Draft WBS Element No. 17BP.11.R.122, Avery County, N.C.

8 November 2022
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR. Raleigh, North Carolina. 325 pp.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Guidance
(Version 2.0), ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, ERDC/EL TR-10-
20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2020. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.5.
http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2005.
Soil Survey of Avery County, North Carolina.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2020.
Hydrologic Units-North Carolina (metadata). Raleigh, North Carolina.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022. Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Avery County, North Carolina.

United States Geological Survey. 2020. Newland, North Carolina, Topographic
Quadrangle (7.5-minute series).

0 1 20.5 Miles
±
Figure 1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYSDIVISION 11
VICINITY MAPWBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Legend
Project Study Area
ESRI World Street Basemap
Date: 08-10-2022
Caldwell
Avery
Watauga
Mitchell
Yancey Burke
Ashe
N.T.S.
Bridge #27
0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet
¯Legend
Project Study Area
USGSTopo BasemapNewland, NC Quadrant, 1:24K
Figure 2
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYSDIVISION 11
USGS Topo Map Date: 08-10-2022WBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Bridge #27
Pin
e
ola
Pineola
Baptist
Church
Linville Falls
±
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYSDIVISION 11
Natural Communities Map NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2021
WBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Legend
Project Study AreaNatural Community TypeMountain Levee ForestNon-tidal Freshwater MarshMaintained/Disturbed
Date : 09-30 -2022
Figure 3
0 100 20050
Feet
DP1DP2
Pin
e
ola
Pineola
Baptist
Church
Linville Falls
±
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYSDIVISION 11
Environmental Features Map NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2018
WBS #17BP.11.R.122Avery Co.Replace Bridge No. 27 on US 221(Linville Falls Hwy) overLinville River
Legend
Project Study AreaData Form LocationIntermittent StreamPerennial StreamWetlandPond
Date : 09-30 -2022
Figure 4
0 100 20050Feet
Stream SB
Stream SA
Wetlan d WA
Po nd B
Linville River

Qualifications of Contributors

Principal
Investigator: Kim Hamlin, PWS
Education: M.S. Natural Resources, 2011
Experience: Environmental Scientist, Sage Ecological Services, 2021-present
Environmental Consultant, Independent Contractor, 2019-2021
Environmental Scientist, TGS Engineers, 2016-2019
Environmental Project Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2012-2016
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineation, natural communities assessment,
T/E species assessment, GIS surveys and mapping, NRTR
document review

Investigator: Ryan Elliott
Education: B.S. Biological Sciences, 2014
Experience: Environmental Scientist, Sage Ecological Services, 2021-present
Environmental Scientist, TGS Engineers, 2018-2021
Environmental Scientist, Mogensen Mitigation, 2015-2018
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineation, natural communities assessment,
T/E species assessment, GIS surveys and mapping, NRTR
document preparation

Investigator: Nicole Thomson, PWS
Education: B.S. Marine Biology, 1996
Experience: Senior Environmental Scientist, Sage Ecological Services, 2021-
present
Environmental Scientist/Project Manager, Kleinfelder, 2018-2021
Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering, 2013-2018
Responsibilities: NRTR document review

Investigator: Philip Beach, PWS
Education: B.S. Natural Resources, 2006
Experience: Environmental Scientist, Sage Ecological Services, 2021-present
Environmental Consultant, Independent Contractor, 2017-2021
Environmental Scientist / Project Manager, SEPI Engineering,
2006-2017
Responsibilities: NRTR document review

04/15/22 1 of 4
NCDOT MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST

The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is
required to prepare SEPA environmental documents for state-funded construction and
maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either
“Yes” or “No”. Complete Part D of the checklist when NCDOT’s Minimum Criteria
Rule categories #8, 12(i) or #15 are used.

TIP Project No.:N/A

State Project No.: 17BP.11.R.122

Project Location:The proposed project involves replacing Bridge No. 27 over
Linville River on US 221 in Avery County.

Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation is
scheduled to replace Bridge #27 with a new bridge at the same location. The
existing concrete bridge is 4 spans @ 40’ each for a total length of 160’. The bridge
has reinforced concrete deck girders on concrete bents with spill through abutments
with an out to out bridge width of 32’. The proposed bridge will be 3 spans –
1@40’; 1@95’; 1@40’ for an overall length of 175’. We will utilize 54” concrete
girders on concrete piers with spill through abutments with an out to out width of
43’-3”.

An on-site detour bridge is proposed since this is a US route with heavier traffic
volumes.

Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: A Regional General Permit
50/General Certification 4135 from the USACE may be required for temporary
construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary
causeways that are often used during bridge construction. THE USACE holds the
final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project
construction.

Special Project Information:
Environmental Commitments:
The list of project commitments (green sheets) is located at the end of the checklist.

04/15/22 2 of 4
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA

Item 1 to be completed by the Project Manager. YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed
under the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental
documentation is not required?

If the answer to number 1 is “no”, then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state Environmental Assessment is required.

If yes, under which category? 9
If either category #8, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.

PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS

Items 2 – 4 to be completed by the Project Manager. YES NO
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?

3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health
or the environment?

4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?

Item 5-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on
wetlands; surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries;
parklands; prime or unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized
scenic, recreational, archaeological, or historical value?

6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?

7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?

8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats?

If any questions 2 through 8 are answered “yes”, the proposed project may not qualify as a
Minimum Criteria project. A state Environmental Assessment (EA) may be required. For
assistance, contact the Environmental Policy Unit at (919) 707–6253 or [e-mail].
04/15/22 3 of 4

PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS

Items 9- 12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer. YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?

10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
fill in waters of the United States?

11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?

12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?

Items 13 – 15 to be completed by the Project Manager.
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?

Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an “effect” on a property or site listed on the
National Register of Historic Places?

15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?

Questions in Part “C” are designed to assist the Project Manager and the Division
Environmental Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or
federal resource agency may be required. If any questions in Part “C” are answered
“yes”, follow the appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project
construction.

04/15/22 4 of 4

PART D:( To be completed when either category #8, 12(i) or #15 of the rules are
used.)

Items 16- 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.

16. Project length: N/A

17. Right of Way width: N/A

18. Project completion date: N/A

19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground
surface:

N/A

20. Total acres of wetland impacts: N/A

21. Total linear feet of stream impacts: N/A

22. Project purpose: N/A

Reviewed by: Date:
Project Manager

Date:
Division Environmental Officer

04/20/2022
04/20/2022
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Avery 27
Bridge No. 27 over Linville River on US 221
Project No. 17BP.11.R.122

NCDOT Hydraulic Design Unit – FEMA Coordination
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP) to determine the
status of the project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement, or approval
of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).

Division Construction - FEMA
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-regulated stream(s). Therefore,
the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of
project construction, certifying that the drainage structure(s) and roadway embankment that are
located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both
horizontally and vertically.

Division 11 Construction – Trout Moratorium
Surveys conducted by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission showed the presence
of wild, self-sustaining trout within the project area. Therefore, a mandatory trout moratorium
is required from October 15 to April 15.

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 6

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1598
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
1000 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27610

August 10, 2021

TO: Kevin Hining, Division Environmental Officer
Division of Highways, Division 11

FROM: Melissa Miller, Environmental Program Consultant
Biological Surveys Group, EAU

SUBJECT: Section 7 survey results for the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis),
Virginia big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus) and gray bat
(Myotis grisescens) associated with the replacement of Bridge No. 27 over
Linville River on US 221 in Avery County, TIP No. 17BP.11.R.122.

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT, Division 11) proposes to replace
Bridge No. 27 over Linville River on US 221 in Avery County, TIP No. 17BP.11.R.122. The
existing bridge is a four span structure with concrete beams, deck, end walls and guard rails and a
clearance of 22 feet over the water surface. The overall length of the structure is 160 feet.

Northern long-eared bat
The project to replace Bridge No. 27 has been reviewed for effects on the northern long-eared bat
(NLEB). As of May 4, 2015, NLEB is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as
“Threatened” under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. As of August 10, 2021, NLEB is listed
in IPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/) as occurring in Avery County. USFWS also established a
final rule under the authority of section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act that provides
measures for the conservation of NLEB. The USFWS has tailored the final 4(d) rule to prohibit
the take of NLEB from certain activities within areas where they are in decline. This incidental
take protection applies only to known NLEB occupied maternity roost trees and known NLEB
hibernacula. Effective February 16, 2016, incidental take resulting from tree removal is
prohibited if it 1) occurs within a ¼ mile radius of known NLEB hibernacula; or 2) cuts or
destroys known occupied maternity roost trees or any other trees within a 150-foot radius from
the known maternity tree during the pup season (June 1-July 31).

According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Biotics Database, most
recently updated April 2021, the nearest NLEB hibernacula record is 6.5 miles northeast of
the project and no known NLEB roost trees occur within 150 feet of the project area.

NCDOT has also reviewed the USFWS Asheville Field office website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html) for consistency with
NHP records. This project is located entirely outside of the red highlighted areas (12-digit HUC)
that the USFWS Asheville Field Office has determined to be representative of an area that may
require consultation. The closest 12 digit (030501010502) red HUC is approximately 1 mile away
(Upper Wilson Creek).

For the proposed action, NCDOT has committed to the conservation measures listed below:

1) No alterations of a known hibernacula entrance or interior environment if it impairs an
essential behavioral pattern, including sheltering northern long-eared bats (January 1
through December 31);
2) No tree removal within a 0.25 mile radius of a known hibernacula (January 1 through
December 31); and
3) No cutting or destroying a known, occupied maternity roost tree, or any other trees within
a 150-foot radius from the known, occupied maternity tree during the period from June 1
through and including July 31.

NCDOT has determined that the proposed action does not require separate consultation on
the grounds that the proposed action is consistent with the final Section 4(d) rule, codified at
50 C.F.R. § 17.40(o) and effective February 16, 2016. NCDOT may presume its determination is
informed by best available information and consider Section 7 responsibilities fulfilled for NLEB

Virginia big-eared bat
The project to replace Bridge No. 27 has also been reviewed for effects on the Virginia big-eared
bat (COTO). As of November 30, 1979, the Virginia big-eared bat was listed by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) as “Endangered” under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. As of
August 10, 2021, the Virginia big-eared bat is listed in IPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/) as
occurring in Avery County.

According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Biotics Database, most
recently updated in April 2021, COTO have been documented in Avery County. USFWS, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) and NHP data indicate that the closest
known* occurrence of COTO is approximately 6 miles northeast of the project site (2020).
(*There is an historical occurrence (1989) of COTO 5 miles northwest of the project site).

On July 14, 2021, NCDOT biologists assessed bridge No. 27 for potential bat habitat. Crevices
suitable for roosting were present. No evidence of bats (bats, staining, or guano) was observed.
No caves or mines are located within the project footprint or within line of sight of the bridge.
Based on the bridge type, lack of bat evidence and the lack of caves or mines in the project
vicinity, the proposed project will have a biological conclusion of MAY AFFECT NOT LIKELY
TO ADVERSLY AFFECT for the Virginia big-eared bat.

Gray bat
The project to replace Bridge No. 27 has also been reviewed for effects on the gray bat (MYGR).
As of April 28, 1976, the gray bat was listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as
“Endangered” under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. As of August 10, 2021, MYGR is
listed in IPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/) as occurring in Avery County.

According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Biotics Database, most
recently updated in April 2021, MYGR have been documented in Avery County. USFWS, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) and NHP data indicate that the closest known
occurrence of MYGR is approximately 7 miles northwest of the project site.

On July 14, 2021, NCDOT biologists assessed bridge No. 27 for potential bat habitat. Crevices
suitable for roosting were present. No evidence of bats (bats, staining, or guano) was observed.
No caves or mines are located within the project footprint or within line of sight of the bridge.
Based on the bridge type, lack of bat evidence and the lack of caves or mines in the project
vicinity, the proposed project will have a biological conclusion of MAY AFFECT NOT LIKELY
TO ADVERSELY AFFECT for gray bats.

If you need any additional information, please contact Melissa Miller at 919-707-6127.

Aerial of Avery bridge 27 and US HWY 221 (36.028869, -81.896166). While there are larger tracts of woods in the
project vicinity, most of the area is composed of commercial businesses (motel, nursery, campgrounds, rock quarry,
lumberyard, etc.), residential dwellings, church, and several artificial streetlights/billboard lights. Area is best described
as very fragmented, largely developed, and noisy.

Southeast quadrant of bridge - predominately bamboo thicket

N

Southwest quadrate – small number of ash and maples (smooth bark trees)

Northwest quadrant – much of area already cleared due to powerline

Northeast quadrant – much of area cleared due to powerline, trees are primarily composed of thickets of < 3” DBH
arborvitae with a handful of 20’ tall Norway Spruce

Middle and Eastern bridge supports – very shallow, and should be easy to remove from shore or with minimal
equipment in the water, and without installing a causeway

Western bridge support – very shallow, and should be easy to remove from shore or with minimal equipment in the
water, and without installing a causeway.