NC0004685_Wasteload Allocation_19851125

0
J1
0
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
D
Permit No.: W 4)O Q T,0 8�_ Pipe No.: 0 Q
Design Capacity (MGD) : 0 0 8+S
VV0 a�a�185
Date:-
8
_ County:
Industrial (i of Flow):k C5 (ADomestic (% of Flow):
Receiving Stream: &,�A-e_t� Class: Sub -Basin::
Reference USGS Quad: (Please attach) Requestor: C-� +/
F• +l
ilEM&AMMi Office
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: �^ Drainage Area: Z1. I w Avg. Streamflow:
7Q10: Winter 7Q10: 30Q2:
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall):
Slope:
Velocity (fps): Kl (base e, per day, 200C), K2 (base e, per day, 200C):
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
pk,;
Comments
J
&.-
ZA
146
O.
Effluent
Characteristics
�-
! _, . ..•
.!
Original Alloc tion a
Revised loca iqpI Date(s) of Revision(s)
OY (Please attach previous allocation)
Pr re By: Ck4
I C. Reviewed By: Date: 1112 S-.r

For Appropriate Discha , List Complete Guideline Limitations Below
/,; .x, -g
Effluent
Characteristics
Me}rt4I-r,9A,e�l
Average
Maximum -Daily
Comments
6
3�/3
6 G
� —,T 6,of1
c0`�
i.Z 8
Z r'"
ti
cr�n��r
LZ ,
7-. b'
c-v IAL-
© 8
O,l-
36.
- H the c
—
c , &0
Type of Product Produced
Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
F 6r-- Gam;;
6 G 3 01 y
�l14.
D G C 2 Tt4 to,

Facility Name
Type Of Waste
Receivina Stream
Stream Class
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Recauestor
Drainage Area (sQ mi)
7010 (cfs)
Winter 7010 (cfs)
3002 (cfs)
Recauest No.
WASTEI_OAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL. FORM ------
PPG INDUSTRIES
INDUSTRIAL
BRUSHY CREEK
: C
030804
CLEVELAND
ARO
DOUG FINAN
21.1
5.4
2123
-------------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS--------------------------
Wasteflow (mid)
:
875�
pH (SU)
6-9
TSS (mg/1)
:
20. 146
--4-
TOT. CR. (MG/L)
:
0.2 d&>wj✓
wcl
17.INC (MG/L)
:
0.2
LEAD (MG/L)
:
O.OS9Drop
a.s
..i'dr.._.$ brae
bee.d7�ls a'dk7'�-�� az�
CU (MG/L)
0.06
WO 41-
OIL & GREASE G/L)
to
..,EE ATTACHED REPORT RECOMMEND FECAL AND COD
MONITORING.-0'rLA0m0.
....
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED
( )EXISTING
- ---------------------------._._
(-) NEW
( )
I...IMITS ARE : REVISION
(✓)
CONFIRMATION ( )
OF THOSE F'RFVIOUSIY ISSUED
RECOMMENDED BY:
:_A`u^ LU_C ODATE: _110131 �--
REVIEWED BY:
SUPERVISORY TECH. SUP F' '7
�w
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR -- - - DATE
Approval is ( ) preliminary (x) f'n^:
PERMITS MANAGER // _--- 47e�i-_....__...DATF
Ate•.�?b'2",
cob

PPG Industries Wasteload Allocation
Introduction
PPG Industries discharges to Brushy Creek near Shelby, in the Broad
River basin. The plant is designed to discharge 0.875 mgd. The average
discharge over the past year is 0.57 mgd. The 7Q10 flow of Brushy Creek
is 5.4 cfs. Therefore, the IWC at design conditions is 20%, and at
operating conditions is 14%. A previous toxic screen indicated no
toxicity.
Permit and WLA History
PPG's current permit was initially issued on May 31, 1978. The
final effluent limits in the permit were (from 40 CFR 410.32 Subpart C:
textile dry processing):
Qw: .875 mgd
mg/1
#/D
BOD5
47
343
COD
127
928
TSS
64
464
T. Chromium
0.22
1.6
Zinc
0.53
3.9
Lead
0.53
3.9
Copper
0.11
0.8
Oil and Grease
5.3
38.7
Residual chlorine
0.05
fecal coliform
400/100 ml
NO
Interim effluent limits were also developed, and were water -quality -
based:
Qw = 0.42 mgd
mg/1
#/D
BOD5
20
70
TSS
20
70
NH3-N
5.7
20

T. Chromium
0.4
1.4
Zinc
1.5
5.3
Lead
1.5
5.3
Copper
0.2
0.75
Oil and Grease
10
35
The permit was reissued in August, 1979 after adjudication and
revision, with the following limits (based on the interim limits and
a flow adjustment):
Qw = 0.875 mgd
mg/l
#/D
BOD5
20
146
TSS
20
146
NH3-N
5.75
42
T. Chromium
0.4
3
Zinc
1.0
7.3
Lead
1.0
7.3
Copper
0.2
1.6
Oil and Grease
10
73
Residual Chlorine
0.5
fecal coliform
400/100 ml
PPG does not fall under any existing effluent guidelines.
Self-monitorinq data
Selected self -monitoring data from the past year are presented in
Table 1. The data indicate that PPG complies with the permit limits for
BOD, TSS, NH3N, and metals. Copper and zinc concentrations are elevated.
While 5-day BOD values are low, ultimate BOD approximately equals 6 x BOD5,
as indicated by a 1978 DEM study.
Development of Water -quality -based Wasteload Allocation
Technical Services performed an intensive survey in 1978 to provide
data for the calibration of a water quality model. The study included
-2-

time -of -travel and discharge measurements, water quality sampling, and
a K2 study.
The major shortcoming in using the data for model calibration was
the amount of dilution available. Instream flows were near average
during much of the study. No noticeable concentration gradients were
measured instream; therefore, rate calibration was not possible. The
survey did provide data for estimating velocity, depth, and the CBOD/
BOD5 ratio.
The resulting wasteload allocation for water quality based para-
meters is:
Qw: 0.875 mgd
mg/I
#/D
BOD5
42
306 WQ
NH3-N
5
36 WQ
Total Chromium
0.2
WQ
Copper
0.06
WQ (based on AL)
Lead
0.089
WQ
Zinc
0.2
WQ (based on AL)
While regulations do not require copper and zinc limits based on
action levels, they do allow for the inclusion of these limits in the
event of water quality standards violations. Self -monitoring data
indicate that instream concentrations would violate the action levels
at low flow conditions.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are made in developing effluent limits:
1. Since no effluent guidelines are available for PPG, it is
recommended that no limits be given for BOD5 and NH3-N. One
alternative is to assign water -quality -based effluent limits
(BODultimate = 275 mg/1). Since PPG's historical data indicate
that effluent BOD ultimate concentrations are well below this
level (roughly 50 mg/1), assigning water quality based limitations
-3-

r
has two implications: 1) the entire assimilative capacity is
allocated; and 2) the discharger is encouraged to discharge
concentrations well above the current discharge concentrations.
An alternative is to place limits based on sel-monitoring data
(i.e., BPJ). EPA recommends that no limit be developed for
BOD5 or NH3-N. Self -monitoring for these parameters is
recommended.
2. Metals limits based on mass balance calculations have been
developed. Toxicity monitoring and a reopener clause allowing
for toxics limits are also recommended because of the observed
metals concentrations.
3. A self -monitoring requirement (annual or biannual) for BOD
ultimate is also recommended, based on Technical Services data.
RCD:mlt
Attachment
cc: Steve Tedder
-4-

OL>
009
££
8El
b't
8
09'
b8/9
at>
SZb
9L
ZS
Z6'0
Ol
89'
t8/L
Ot>
L6b
8L
E6
VI
6
99'
b8/8
bb
819
N
68
0'1
8
99"
b8/6
by
OL9
EE
£91
E"t
8
SV'
b8/01
OL>
009
Lb
OLt
E'L
L
6b'
b8/11
at>
009
L9
8El
Z%
6
tiS'
b8/Zl
Ot>
888
Z8
176L
Z"L
Zl
ZS'
98/l
01>
60L
bE
£OZ
l"L
£t
£S'
98/Z
OL>
80£
Z£
£OZ
9%
8
LS'
S8/b
OL>
00£
at,
£9l
ES"
Ol
09"
SS/9
at>
009
91
Obl
16'
9
ST
98/9
(I/6n)
(I/6n)
(I/6n)
(1/6n)
(q6w)
4/6w)
(P6w)
qd
uZ
ao
n0
N HN
008
MO
Plea 6ulaolluow dlaS 9dd
b

Request No. ZIZ$-----------1
Facility Name
:
PPG INDUSTRIES
'ivpe Of Waste
:
TNDUSTRTAL
Receiving Stream
:
BRUSHY CREEK
Stream Class
C
Subbasin
030B04
Counts
:
CLEVELAND
Regional Office
:
ARO
Reauestor
DOUG FINAN
Drainage Area (sa mi)
:
V.1
7010 (cfs)
Winter 7010 (cfs)
3002 (cfs)
-------------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUFNT LTMTTS--------------------------
Wasteflow (mgd)
wlo
5-Day HOD (mg/l)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/1):
d.r
44-
-9-P;
PH (SU) :
6-9
wa
TSS (mg/1) :
20
146
1'. CR. (MG/L) :
0.2
via
ZINC (MG/L)
0.2
" a
LEAD (MG/L) :
0.089
r8uurvr_r
10,
-____--_____-____--____.--________-_
___________________________________
Cu: (MG/L) 0.06 W dL
�Q
OIL & GREASE (MG/L)I0
RES. CHLORINE (MG/L) 0.5
BPJ BASED ON MAXIMUM MONTHLY
MONITORING
DATA
FROM
8/84-7/85. SFE ATTACHED REPORT.
Qacow....
k
j;; wa a., Cott
-------- —
-_-------------------------------------------------------------------8
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( )
EXISTING (
✓) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE : REVISION ( "') CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RECOMMENDED BY:S—
REVIEWED BY: !!!
SUPERVISORP TECH. SUPPORT
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR :_.____...._..-__... _ __ .__.._......_ _ DATE
Approval is ( ) Freliminars ( ) final
PERMITS MANAGER :__.__.__-_—_----...... __ _.__ BATE :.. _...... _

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Meg Kerr
Supervisor, Technical Support
THRU: Forrest R. Westall
Water Quality Region Supervisor
FROM: James R. Reid, Environmental Chemist
SUBJECT: PPG Wasteload Allocation
Permit Renewal NPDES No. NC0004685
Cleveland County, North Carolina
DATE: October 25, 1985
The Wasteload Allocation Approval Form for PPG Industries, Inc.'s facility
located in Cleveland County, North Carolina, has been reviewed. Changes are
needed for certain of the proposed limitations appearing on the wasteload approval
form.
Zinc and Copper - If the numerical limitations shown on the wasteload for
P.�n1A1� these two parameters are incorporated into PPG's NPDES Permit, the company
p will immediately be in non-compliance with those copper and zinc limitations.
Since the proposed numbers are based upon Action Limits rather than Water
A� �{ Quality Standards, self -monitoring and self -bioassay testing should be the �y9a
tf up methods initially used to address the issue of instream copper and zinc
concentrations. Effluent, upstream, and downstream copper and zinc moni-
toring on a weekly basis is suggested; quarterly, self-bioassa t tin
too -) of PPG's effluent is further recommended. If numerica effluent limits -
If ? tions prove to a needed for copper and zinc, monitoring data can be used
to establish appropriate limits.
Lead - Deletion of PPG's current monitoring requirement for lead is recom-
mended in accordance with Mr. Lacy Ballard's request of December 6, 1984 and
,,, d sJuin accordance with a memorandum from the Regional Office to Mr. Doug Finan
mer" 1..• +sk*4wdated January 9, 1985. d0 not ✓V Pb i s P,0cs-.o
�+0 t' �/ • PN �O V A
Fecal Coliform - The monitoring frequency should be established with a weekly
requirement rather than a daily requirement. The domestic component of
PPG's wastestream is an extremely small portion of the total flow, and years
of monitoring and inspection data show no high fecal counts.
Chlorine - The monitoring requirement and effluent limitation for chlorine
" woes should be deleted since the facility does not add chlorine.
A,a'�

MEMORANDUM TO: Meg Kerr
October 25, 1985
Page Two
If you have any questions, please let me know.
JRR:sb
xc: Dale Overcash

C'reQ k_
5R (32-3 +° o

3-e4j3 Gro,e4c MJJ CdGbf.�
?PC-
P-,� a,, u-i U C-,
�w Se��r� +a
�. ll�
cx Q
C $`l'CQtM.. t.J.n4
*,—
a_ -0
27"Z .4- ,ls
j//J�1
_ � C.I' �..
'�•.�a/n�., Ci4< SV rJ4Lt� W�
[ur�<dJ eJ`E � ti J
Lq3
�
.N.� Aj,
T S
o n
%—C (.-• �'bd W 'e.( qu 4. a.,.n t+.ipSJn'+�.,
nn5.�
� o 2e1�
/�L
a �JI /�e.,l V'AaA,1n<�
Bl
92
83
64
gs
;CV3� Gem Seta
,S+ Q(-.J
V•Ae ^n _ •U I�FM
5 R 1323 - l S�
4 300
S R 39 I + ' $
SR .66
ors I
Sk
uS -}S4 q 1.33
s3-
N�o,,+� } 33

Flo
gc y
B�lb`7K
c'$sz -
2Z.0
1.35 -
- Re-Z +. Bcf
3c S"
o9s8
Z,9.9
- --
1•3 -
acLf le %C.6
g c G
Lz2r
-2-+,.}
.71 -
- gcSro Sect.
gC
-�Y':v-
----3-)L0
1.33
6 -(. B6L
(3Cf°
ISMS
3�-C
-
1.1}
yc? -toRao
a��f}z
35•q
1.w4
- -
-- v
-"LL
4(z 1
8Iz3I
ll.6
l.ti3q
sr.g3
Zte
gc4
ty3e
S.yp
(;22
1f.Z4
z1.5
gas"
g IZ rl�g
}vs
1 �.y
i 3�--_-,met
'ZZ.9
l630
IN.2S"
zsi
I6If0
HY.6
g� ((
1134,
25L92
1.6%
19.6
Zz. o
gc. I
}kY
14.65
'4 36
9, y(
Z3. Y
�(-y
goo
(6.3
I1171
I1.37
zo.s"
F- tw _
o�
,9 uses s►.� a.. _ 1.0;0,. _�A —A _&�L-
y�r` c 2 .1�z s 4voo sa 3z3 �s•z
Z1 tS26'.000 US}�(
2. as 54, k; � ►� cG w
1 , nY
a3' o�I�FK g�•1.. •*S -F•fKew

o
Tr
31
— i�i
152
_ IS. 23
e3
P,Z
O
15.Z
fj3
3eo�
l52
i
6Y
I_�I
19.9 ize• �
11.G
�.
B6
3.14
21.E
zi• 3
-•3
e}
y.66
2y.4S
2s�
+.9Y
Bts
y.ql
zS.v�
Z6.s
4 i.o3
gq
v.qd
25.61
26.7 *
+ I,4'4
goo
S. 94
21.5 AIt-
2.}- 8
+ . 03
30. 6s
2.110
- 1. 65,
(Ab ,
i .. c lbw,. S�-*Q a .,.. T �•.: CX � 3 e r-< <.a-..�. � ��
9,4� o.,PpOu..n Nadrn.4
cSAM- ���« 1

S)
Ja1oc,4 _.
Ti a _ veSLm e
y
kz
1
++ va —� `tQ ..e
��a.4.�rel
/ psW
., AeKaFy /A!J![.`M�a"'�i
-Tkr- yQ--J�¢

U.S.6 S
AX—
rrII
�OCf.�WOY�
sR �3z3
O
59-
,8
IsA
t,gl
.2
Lit
k) }4
sgy
4'
r- 16w C.i `Faw �42$
SY
21.1
IYtz
S.s
ZZ
t4}3
s'.
z 2
r4-�
2T
t�F3
Q naG A,.
k-c ,J

.iF love f i a1ac.
map
- ,. , 4",j
(t 5
I_IZ
2,57 -
61
2 k --
t. 16
• 17
1. 35,
3.13
.77
3.3q
/.33
1,30
a,Ggk
U- aQV�
-J, -LP e n t k "F "'l- ;_ I oXo-�
:,7,o6.Ag Z.zz nos �.is
- -•tea —yes _ - , 9 y • by
V-
0,6
q
e-
,.
,3yS
.24�
S8�
.239
zys
q 51
eY Z61.
�Pv 4y-
I
At

0
flow
l4."r
1 -7, r�
- 5 h3
7 7
£S�ZY--------
--I9•Ss7
-9%29
- _ 7 z
�i
7
137
2,61
-.55
----
5'2
Sy
2.'73
cz
Y 6
2-5 3 __.
-. v
ss_
2,43—
s9
77
�6
3.09
.: gce� b! tr.-- `'F�Q lI�' ,rem,.-e.`�' � _•Q -^_�Q� - e- lv../,K--�+�+ / /ac(� a.� � (�__ .
'I n

Low
y7
Dz: 46 6
�� ��,._ __ 1 _'1-� __,rim-a�- �.a„e�r�,�_�-s�•�.•e �s--�-�._
6.,
-.001 Z

gy
�8-23
.SZ
Qy
g_Zlt_
26
-�3
z3,,
i
), z
0
F31-
g►l
I
1
I �

�0

TLr
g 7s
4z
'04
-73 1 YYYiif---
- �-__�r..�c'�^.�_ _-C^-u�- _ (k,,�J - ink! cue.—'L�w`% PP(,-• - -
�s U--�As_—__._�
�y}S/ _ T:s-•' _ rw�/j�ESny,�_-_s�.s J /i C (L� .,(u 3•'0^/
-
n
,�„ •..t..,-� �,Q,R;�,�a..�. C �e..�..-fir:,..

9E S° 14L Z

----------
MODEL RESULTS -----------
nr.sC..EIEIARGER PEG
G:E:.CVE STREAM BRUSHY CREEK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THE END D.D. IS B.AA MOIL
i__...._..__..._._..--_.._.._..----_..________.-.-__....._......._..--._____.-_.._.._..____..____________.-_.._--.___--_.---_._..____--____
THE END C.:BOD IS 3.09 MG/L_
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
THE END NBOD 15 0.00 MOIL
--------------------------------------------------------
THE D.D. MIN. OF SEGMENT I IS 7.75 MG/L..
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 0.00
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
1.
IS
47
MG/L..
OF CBDD
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
I
IS
0
MG/L.
OF NBOD
THE:.
REQUIRED EFFLUENT 0.0.
IS
6.9
MG/L..
TIME
WASTEFLOW ENTERING
SEC 1.
REACH
I
IS .5
Mf D
THE:.
WLA FOR SEGMENT 1
REACH
C
IS
0
MG/L..
OF [: SOD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
7
IS
0
MG/I...
OF NBOD
THE:
REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O.
IS
0
MG/I...
THE
WASTEFLOW ENTERING
SEC 1.
REACH
2
IS 0
MCD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT i
REACH
8
IS
O
MC/L..
OF CBDD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
9
IS
0
MOIL
OF NBOD
THE::
REQUIRED I::.1-T'"LUENT 0.0.
IS
0
MG/I_.
THE
WASTEFLOW ENTERING
SEC I
REACH
3
IS 0
MCD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
4
IS
0
MG/I...
OF C:BOD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT 1
REACH
A
IS
0
MOIL
OF NBOD
THE
REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O.
IS
0
MG/I...
TT-IE.
WASTEFLOW ENTERING
SEC I
REACH
A
IS 0
MCD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
5
IS
1.1.0
MC/L..
OF CBOD
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
5
IS
0
M(;,/I._
t.1E= NBOD
THE:.
REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.D.
IS
O
MC/L..
THE
WASTEFLOW ENTERING
SEC I
REACH
5
Is .06
MGD

F
*** MOUE_(._ SUMMAI:ZY DATA ***
f):i. s:charcl ear
M% C;
SUbba.S:i.n O1080A
IZett:: c=:i.v i.nd S4.r•eiam
13RU!5HY
CII EK
!i Y. r•[:a:n.m
CIRFAS: C
7(4:L O
`.i . •41
W i. ri t e+r1
7 (:(:1. 0
Oe!sd.gri
Teml:)rr•ia4,i.t
I'.0
23
°1 C:
30(42
1LENGTHISLOPE 1
VELOCITY
(DEPTH 1
KI I Kl 1 K2 !
K2 !
KN
1 KN 1 KNR 1
KNR 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 tile Iftlmi I
fps
1 ft 1
Iday 18200 1 Idag 1
8200 I
Idag
1 8200 1 /day 1 8200 1
Segment 1
1
1 1.80: 14.601
1.120
1
10.52 1
1
1.11 ! 0.97 114.94 114.001
0.00
1
1 0.00 1 0.00 1
1
0.00 1
Reach 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 i !
1
1
1
1 1
1
Segment 1
1 1.301 14.601
0.690
10.52 1
0.84 ! 0.73 114.94 1
14.00:
0.00
1 0.00 1 0.00 1
0.00 !
Reach 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 1
! 1
i
1 1
1
Segment 1
! 1.501 14.601
1.160
1 0.52 1
1.14 1 0.99 114.94 1
14.00:
0.00
1 0.00 1 0.00 !
0.00 1
Reach 3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 !
1 !
i 1
1 !
i
Segment 1
1 0.30! 14.601
0.970
1 0.52 !
1.02 1 0.89 :14.94 1
!
14.00:
0.00
1 0.00 1 0.00 1
0.00 1
Reach 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 i
1
!
1 1 1
Segment 1
1
1 4.101 14.601
0.970
! 1
1 0.52 1
1 1 1
1.02 1 0.89 114.94 !
14.00:
0.00
1 1 1
1 0.00 1 0.00 1
1
0.00 1
Reach 5
1 i 1
1 i
1 1
1
i 1
*** INPUT DATA SUMMARY ***
1 Flow 1 CBOD I NBOD 1 D.O. I
1 efs 1 mgll 1 mgll 1 ■gll 1
Segment 1 Reach 1 i i ! 1 1
Waste 1 0.775 1 47.000 1 0.000 1 6.900 1
Headwaters! 13.100 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.800 1
Tributary 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
t Runoff 1 2.370 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.800 1
Segment 1 Reach 2 1
1 1 1 1
Waste 1
0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 ! 0.000 !
Tributary 1
0.000 ! 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 !
f Runoff I
2.370 1 2.000 1 0.000 I 7.800 1
Segment 1 Reach 3 1 !
Waste ! 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 ! 0.000 1
Tributary 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
i Runoff 1 2.370 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.800 !

_ -lepeit 1 Reach 4
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
Tributary 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
I Runoff 1 2.370 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.900 1
Segment 1 Reach 5 1
Waste 1 0.093 1110.000 1
Tributary 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
R Runoff 1 2.370 1 2.000 1
S Runoff flow is in cfs/wile
1
0.000 1 0.000 1
0.000 1 0.000 1
0.000 1 7.800 1

bACHARC,IiE:R
RECEIVING STREAM
THE END D.O. IS 6.1.6 MOIL
THE END CBOD IS 36.13 MG/I.-
"
pro oc.4.T, ✓v.
•-•-• MODEL RESULTS --------
PPIC
BRUSHY CREEK
'T'F•II:' END NBOD IS 0.00 MOIL
THE: D.O. MIN. OF SEGMENT I IS 0.09 MG/1...
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MIL-EPOINT 1.60
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE.
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
I
IS
275
MG/L. OF CBOD
THE
WI._A FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
1.
IS
0
MG/I.-
OF NBOD
THE:
REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O.
IS
`.i
MG/L.
THE
WA STEF'LOW ENTERING
SEC I
REACH
1
IS .875
MOD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT :I.
REACH
2
IS
0
MG/L.
OF CBOD
THE
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
2
IS
0
MOIL
OF NBOD
THE:
REQUIRED EFFLUENT 0.0.
IS
0
MG/I_
THE
WASTE.F'I..OW ENTERING
'.SI::C I
REACH
2
IS 0
MOD
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
3
IS
0
MOIL
OF CBDD
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
3
IS
0
MG/L
OF NBOD
THE:
REQUIRED EFFLUENT 0.0.
IS
0
MOIL
THE
WAST'EFI.OW ENTERING
SEC I
REACH
3
IS 0
MOD
THE.
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
4
IS
0
MG/I._
OF CBOD
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT 1.
REACH
4
IS
0
MOIL-
OF NBOD
THE
REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O.
IS
0
MG/I...
THE:
WASTIE?:FLOW ENTERING
SEC I
REACH
4
IS 0
MCI)
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT 1.
REACH
5
IS
11.0
MOIL
OF CBOD
THE:
WLA FOR SEGMENT I
REACH
5
IS
0
MOIL-
OF NBOD
THE
REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O.
IS
0
MG/L.
TI-II:-
WASTE.F'LOW ENTERING
SEC 1
REACH
5
IS .06
MOD

. t Ak(ac"- (O n r
•
Nt Nc Nc M013M._
5(.1MM0 1:4Y
DA T A
>1(**
D J.!s r_ I7 t!t r•
51 F? r•
f•)f'C.,
1:i t.t b l)-F.k5i J. rt
bc)0830 �I
RFecceiv:i.nd
S2rc:a.m
13M.15H'IY CI:zIcEK
S4.r•etam ('J:1.rt.!:a:
C
7 W:10
5.A
W:i. rt 8e r• 7Cd:I.0
D ta!t::i.pn
'i camhc rya t. t.i
r•e
23 0(::
30(42
.
ILENGTHISLOPE !
VELOCITY
!DEPTH I
KI 1
KS I K2 1
K2 I
KN !
KH I KNR 1 KNR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
; mile Iftlmi 1
fps
1 ft 1
/day !
@200 I /day I
@200 1
/day I
@200 1 Idag ! @200 !
Segment 1
1 1.801 14.601
0.900
10.45 !
1.06 1
0.92 112.81 1
12.00:
0.00 1
0.00 ; 0.00 1 0.00 ;
Reach 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
i
;
t r r
Segment 1
I 1.301 14.60:
0.560
10.45 1
0.81 10.71
:12.81
12.001
0.00 !
0.00 1 DAB 10.00 I
Reach 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
i
i i
Segment 1
I 1.50: 14.60:
0.940
! 0.45 !
1.09 10.95
112.81 I
12.00!
0.00 10.00
10.00 1 0.00 I
Reach 3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i i
i
Segment 1
1 0.30: 14.60:
0.640
1 0.45 10.87
10.76
:12.81 112.00I
0.00 !
0.00 ! 0.00 ! 0.00 !
Peach 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
i
Segment 1
! 4.101 14.60I
0.670
10.45 10.89
;
0.78 112.81 112.00;
0.00 I
OA0 1 0.00 1 0.00 1
Reach 5
i i
i
i i
*** '[Nl-'(.1'T 1')A"T"A !: UMMAFY ***
I Flow 1 CBOD I NBOD I D.O.
cfs ! mgll I mg/I ! mgll I
Segment I Reach 1
Waste 1 1.356 :275.000 1 0.000 I 5A00 I
Headwaters! 5.400 I 2.000 1 0A00 1 7.800 I
Tributary ! 0.000 ! 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 1
Y Runoff I 0.333 ! 2.000 ! 0.000 1 7.800 I
Segment 1 Reach 2 i i
Waste ! 0A00 I 0.000 ! 0.000 ! 0.000 I
Tributary I 0.000 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I
f Runoff I 0.333 2.000 I 0.000 ! 7.800 I
---------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1 Reach 3 i
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 ! 0.000 I 0.000 !
Tributary 1 0.000 1 0A00 I 0. 000 ! 0.000 I
* Runoff 1 0.333 ! 2.000 1 0A00 1 7A00 1

Segment i weacn a
., Waste 1
0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 1
- Tributary 1
0.000 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 1
_ t Runoff 1
0.333 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.800 i
SegBent 1 Reach 5 1
i
Waste 1
0.093 1110.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
Tributary 1
0.000 1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
i Runoff 1
0.333 1 2.000 1
0.000 1
7.800 1
* Runoff flow is in cfslgile

189 6-13-77 Water Regulations
9601-9
yykl'�
J ?
CFR 128.133 shall be amended to read
as follows:
In addition to the prohibitions set forth
In 40 CPR 128.131. the pretreatment standard
for Incompatible pollutants Introduced Into
a publicly owned Vestment works shall be
the standard of performance for new sources
specified In 40 CFR 41025; provided that, if
the publicly owned treatment works which
receives the pollutants In eommltled. In Its
NPDEB permit, to remove a specified per-
centage of any Incompatible pollutant, the
pretreatment standard applicable to users of
such trestmeut works shall, except in the
case of standards providing for no discharge
of pollutants, be correspondingly reduced In
stringency for that pollutant.
Subpart C—Dry Processing Subcategory
[1191661.751
§ 410.30 Applicability; description of
the dry processing subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plicable to process waste water dis-
charges and to the iutmtluclioo of pollu-
tants into treatment works which are pub-
licly owned resulting front the following
types of textile mills: \arR martin actor
yarn texturizing, unfinished abric man-
ufacture, fabric coating, fabric laminat-
ing, tire cord and fabric dipping, and car-
pet tufting and carpet backing. Rubber-
ized or rubber coated fabrics regulated
by 40 CFR Part 428 are specifically
excluded.
[1410.30 amended at 42 F. R. 2G979. 5-2677.1
[1191661.80)
§410.31 Specialized definitionA.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the gen-
eral definitions, abbreviations and meth-
ods of analysis set forth in 40 CPR Part
401 shall apply to this subpart.
(b) The term "product" shall mean
the final material produced or processed
by the mill.
(119166I.851
§ 410.32 Effluent Iimilaiions ,euideli.r.
representing live degree of e0luent
reduction allninable by the Applica-
tion of the be t nrartiralle control
technology currently available.
In establishing the limitations set forth
1n this section. EPA took Into account all
information it was able to collect, de-
velop and solicit wtih respect to factors
(such as age and size of plant, raw ma-
terials, manufacturing processes, prod-
ucts produced, treatment technology
available, energy requirements and costs)
which can affect the Industry subcate-
gorization and e0fuent levels established.
It Is, however, possible that data which
would affect these limitations have not
been available and, as a result, these
limitations should be adjusted for cer-
Pollution Control Guide
tatn plants In this Industry. An Individual
discharger or other Interested person
may submit evidence to the Regional
Administrator (or to the State, If the
State has the authority to Issue NPDFS
permits) that factors relating to the
equipment or facilities involved, the
process applied, or other such factors re-
lated to such discharger are fundamen-
tally different from the factors con-
sidered in the establishment of the guide-
lines. On the basis of such evidence or
other available Information, the Re-
gional Administrator (or the State) will
make R written finding that such factors
are or are not fundamentally different
for that facility compared to those specl-
❑ed in the Development Document. If
such fundamentally different factors are
found to exist, the Regional Administra-
tor or the State shall establish for the
discharger eMuent limitations in the
NPDES permit either more or less strin-
gent than the limitations established
herein, to the extent dictated by such
fundamentally different factors. Such
limitations must be approved by the Ad-
ministrator of the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. The Administrator may
approve or disapprove such limitations,
specify other limitations, or initiate pro-
ceedings to revise these regulations. The
following limitations establish the quan-
tity or quality of pollutants or pollutant
properties, controlled by this section,
which may be discharged by a point
source subject to the provisions of this
subpart after application of the best
practicable control technology currently
avRilablc:
r:mn.,,t umnan„nr
e.M.,. 1 AvnnyroofdWly
huco-rv, 61. .Narinnun art vWnro for thirty
n,.y ono L, ror.,Nvo days
1hau i.t .es•d
pl.adr unify kRAUK M pedu•t
TFa. .. 1.4......... 47
20
Frrnl 1\�111unn MI'N Jell not
N,umvnts 4m
Inc
Hm nd.
pll ... wrang l.0 ---------------
19
9.0.
(Fligliah uni La) I11101U Ilr,d prahht AJ
Rnl)6 .......
1.4.-..........
it
7`4a ...... ...
1.4...... -
..
d 7
-.B ............
1.4
p„nm t�n lditn...
MI-N dull nutat ..
..-
rrc,•od 4m
p,J
i\IaI10,
m uu.
pII
Wrthm ihr ..
...-.--
rnure es m
s o.
v
5 410.32 1f 9166I
a 4 l� p u�
S-tti 9
0

9601-10
Regulations
189 6-13-77
[119166I.901
§ 410.33 Effluent limitations guideline,
representing she degree of effluent
reduction auainabae by the applica-
tion of the
uneconounic.11Y a li ve
The following limitations establish the
quantity or quality of pollutants or pol-
lutant properties, controlled by this sec-
tlon, which may be discharged by a point
source subject to the provisions of
this subpart after application of the
best available technology economically,
achievable:
E0a9at Ilmitauau
El tt,.t Avas¢n of dully
rhuacdristia A4sslmnm for value(w thirty
any on, dsy osneeeuu.. day.
shalt not exceed
olotric urdb) kg/kkt of Modoet
EnDS............ _
0.4.............. a_
Tss................
0.4..............
COD..............
0.9.. ......... n 4
Fecal Co4amu....-
WN shall not
exceed 4W
counts par
Ito mi.
Ig
(Kng U,hu._-Ib/Inglhafllrudnrt
nunb_....... -...
4..... ._. ... n:
T85........... .....
A-. ....
VIA)— - ----__
a_. n.4
F.xol Cohl..,n.
IPN Shull nnl ___.__.-_-
,crtwl 400
vimts i r
to ud.
pll ...... _..
N'ilhhl rho _._.._._-.-
'
nw9+out„
n.9.
11191.361.951
,r; 410.31 Pretreatment .landard. for rx>
i.ling Sources.
For the purpose of establishing pre-
treatment standards under section 307
(b) of the Act for a source within the
dry processing subcategory, the provi-
sions of 40 CFR Part 128 shall not apply.
The pretreatment standards for an ex-
isting source within the dry processing
subcategory are set forth below.
is) No pollutant for pollutant prop-
erty) introduced Into a publicly owned
treatment works shall Interfere with the
operation or performance of the works.
Specifically, the following wastes shall
not be introduced into the publicly
owned treatment works:
(1) Pollutants which create a fire or
explosion hazard in the publicly owned
treatment works.
(2) Pollutants which will cause corro-
sive structural damage to treatment
11 9166I S 410.33
works, but In no case pollutants with a
pit lower than 5.0, unless the works is
designed to accommodate such pol-
lutants.
(3) Solid or viscous pollutants in
amounts which would cause obstruction
to the flow In sewers, or other interfer-
ence with the proper operation of the
Publicly owned treatment works,
(4) Pollutants at either a hydraulic
flow rate or pollutant flow rate which is
excessive over relatively short time l)e-
rlods so that there Is a treatment process
upset and subsequent loss of treatment
efficiency.
(b) Any owner or operator of any
source to which the pretreatment stand-
ards required by paragraph (a) of this
section are applicable, shall be In com-
pliance with such standards upon the
effective date of that subsection.
11410.34 added at 42 F. R. 26979. 5-26-77.)
[119166I.100)
§ 410.15 Standards of prrforn.anre fur
Or. E(rurer,,
The following standards of perform-
ance establish the quantity or quality of
Pollutants or pollutant properties, con-
trolled by this section, which may be
discharged by a new source subject to
the provisions of this subpart:
F.Iflucnt limimtlanx
F.fllueut Avarap.o(daly
rhnrn� Welsh, Ahtximum Inc ,shim Inc thh Ly
wry ale day no.enuve days
Mall not eared
Ilbtdc units) kt/kk9 of mo,luet
nuDC.......
._. ld............ _ n i
Wit ..............
1.4.............. n.7
CUD...
.._ . -. 2K............. 1.4
Ficnl I'Wfknin. .-.. AfFN shall not __.. _..
exetad 400
counts per
100 ad.
FIT
within tho .....-_.._._ _._
lane, 6.0 to
9.0.
i }:nyllah unlb) Itele Ib of pnxtuvt
11nD6...------
.-- 1.4-........... . 0.7
TW--_---......-
1.4............. a7
Cun-----.... -
2.9.............. s ley
Fecal Colifwm.....
MPN xhsllnM _-.-__-.-
,xe,ed sta
connu per
Igo nd.
p11.-....... ...
WLLhbl lhr-_._._.. ...
rage 6.0 to
9.0.
(119166I.1053
§ 410.36 Prenvabncm .I:vula rd, far nrr
sources.
The pretreatment standards under
section 307(c) of the Act for a source
© 1977, Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
,fir go
It

f' •
I
✓lear� • r

Le..r�l r•3
Z10 -
2,K 1':5
110
aks 2Z c C�i� a�¢X £f�16)
2,37 l

*** MODEL_ SUMMARY DATA ***
Di.s;charge:!r PPG S U b b a.; J.n 03080A
1Q<nr..eiviiiq 5tre:!am stream G7.;ar!;: C
7Q1.0 5.4 Wi.rttear 7(''410
I:leasign Teinperatt.tre 23 0O :3OG12
1LENGTH15LOPE 1 VELOCITY ;DEPTH I Kl 1 Kl 1 K2 K2 I KN ! KN 1 KKR 1 KKR 1
1 mile Mimi 1 fps 1 ft I Idag 1 1200 1 Idag 1 9200 1 Idag 1 8200 1 Idag 1 0200 1
Segment 1 1 4.901 14.601 0.384 1 1.15 1 0.51 1 0.45 110.77 1 10.091 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 i i i i t i 1 i
1
Segment 1 1 2.801 14.601 0.325 1 1.35 ! 0.48 1 0.42 1 9.12 1 8.541 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 i i i i '
*** xrfPU'f' DATA 51JMMAf;Y ***
1 Flow 1 CBOD 1 WOOD 1 D.O. 1
efs 1 mg/1 1 mg/l 1 0911 1
Segment I Reach 1 i 1 1
Waste 1 1.356 1169.000 1 0.000 1 5.000 1
Headwaters! 5.400 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.800 1
Tributarg 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
t Runoff 1 0.333 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7.800 1
Segment 1 Reach 2 i i
Waste 1 0.093 U10.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
Tributarg 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
t Runoff 1 0.333 1 2.000 1 0.000 1 7A00 !
i Runoff flow is in cfslaile

• ___.___.__..__.___ MODEL RESULTS -----------._..
D.r.SC:HARGER PPG
RECEIVING STREAM BRUSHY CREEK
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE END D.O. IS 7.88 MG/L_
---------------------------------------------------------------
TH END CBOO IS 1.9.51 MG/L
---------------------------------------------------------------
T'HE:: END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/L
------------------------------------------------------------------------
THEi D.U. MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 7.15 MG/L
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 0.60
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1.
THE WLA FOP SEGMENT I REACH 1 IS 169 MG/L.. OF CBOD
THE. WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH I IS 0 MG/L_ OF NBOD
THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS 5 MC/L..
TT"IEi. WASTEF'L..OW ENTERING SEC 1 REACH I IS .875 MCI)
THE: WLA FOR SEGMENT I REACH 2 IS 1.10 MG/L.. OF CBOD
THE. WLA FOR SEGMENT 1. REACH 'r.''_ IS 0 MG/I... OF NBOD
THE. RE:WUIREO EFFLUENT D.O. IS 0 MC/I-
THE WASTF_F'LOW ENTERING SEC 1 REACH 2 IS .06 MGD

Intensive Survey Report
Brushy Creek
P.P.G. Industries
Subbasin 03-08-04
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Environmental Planning
Technical Services
April 1979

Intensive Survey
Brushy Creek
P.P.G. Industries
Subbasin 03-08-04
Introduction
An intensive survey was conducted on a 7.73 mile reach of Brushy
Creek from SR 1323 (Cleveland County) to Brushy Creek's confluence with
the First Broad River. P.P.G. Industries' Shelby Plant has a .35 mgd
outfall located 150 feet downstream SR1323, and the Ora Mill Company has
a .04 mgd outfall located upstream of SR1308. A time -of -travel study was
done on 8-16-78, the water quality sampling was done on 8-24-78, and
a reaeration study was done on 9-13-78. The purpose of the study was to
obtain data for the calibration of water quality models for wasteload
allocations.
Results:
Location map - Figure 111 & IA
Station locations - Table 111
Time -of -travel study - Table #2
Discharge measurements - Table #3
Physical and chemical data - Tables #4, #5, A6, #7
Long term BOD data - Table #8
Reaeration rate data - Table $9
Graph of BHkr ratio - Figure #2
Time -of -travel during reaeration rate study - Table #10
Discharge measurements during reaeration rate study - Table #11

i`� I N. i ry 111 i t
IqT WI Of 1 `
1
DOVER METCAIF
o
SCALE

Station Locations
TABLE 1
B-1 SR1323
B-2 PPG effluent
B-3 Mix -located 300 feet downstream
B-4 SR1341
B-5 SR1342
B-6 Cow pasture fil - located midway between SR1342 & SR1305
(3.14 miles downstream outfall)
B-7 SR1305
B-8 Ora Mill effluent
B-9 SR1308
B-10 U.S. Hwy 74
B-11 Cow pasture ill - located .2 mile upstream the mouth of Brushy Creek

1:Lr_ Vr JKAVZL MUU1
TABLE 2
REACH:Brushy Creek from SR1323 to its confluence with the 1st Broad River
Sta.
No.
Location
Date
Peak
Time
Travel
Time,
hrs.
Cum.
Time,
hrs.
Veloc-
ity,
ft/sec.
Length,
mi.
Dist.
from
Injec-
tion,
mi.
Stream
Dis-
charge,
cfs
Slope
ft/mi.
BC-1
(Cleveland
SR1323 Count
8-16-78
0
20.1
BC-2
PPG Effluent
8-16-78
Dye Dump
0800
0
1,50'
465,000
gpd
BC-4
(Cleveland
SR1341 Count
8-16-78
0852
52 min.
52 min.
1.35
2 0' mi
4200'
mi
22.0
BC-5
(Cleveland
ISR1342 Count
8-16-78
0958
1 hr 6 min.
1 hr.
58 min
1.36
5400'
1 2 mi
9600'
BC-6
Cow pasture #1 midway
between
4 hr.
7000'
16600'
BC-6
(Cleveland
SR 305 County)
6 hr.
8000'
24600'
BC-10
US Ilwy, 74
8-16-78
1545
1 hr.40min.
7 hr.
4
7000'
31600'
Cow pasture #2 .2 mi
the mouth
8-16-78
1 1720r
m
9 hr.
8200'
39800'
r1upstream
Mouth
f Brushv Creek
1000'
189 mi
7.73 mi

DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS
TABLE 3
Shelby PPG
REACH Mrushv Creek - Cleveland Co.
Station
N4mt er
location
Date
Time
Velocity
-t//;ec
Are
� (T }
Cross -Sectional
� Width i;c^;rae
B-1
SR1323
8-23-78
1350-1420
1.439 ft/sec
8.83 ft.2
23.8 ft.
13.6 cfs
B-2
PPG Effluent
B-4
SR1341
8-23-78
1430-1456
1.322 ft/sec
11.24 ft.2
21.5 ft. 15.49 cfs
B-5
SR1342
8-24-78
1745-1800
1 1.34 ft/sec
11.86 ft.2
22.9 ft. 16.403 cfs
B-6
Cow pasture Ill
B-7
SR1305
8-24-78
1030-110
1 1.204 ft/sec
14.25 ft.2
25.9 ft.
18.768 cfs
B-10
US H 74
8-24-78
1640-1705
20.4 ft.2
44.0 ft.
19.874 cfs '
B-11
Cow pasture
.2 mile upstream mouth
8-24-78
1930-1955
1.08 ft/sec
19.6 ft.2
22.0 ft.
25.722 cfs
B-1
SR1323
8-24-78
0745-0810
1.436 ft/sec
9.41 ft.2
23.8 ft.
14.65 cfs
B-4
SR1341
8-24-78
0900-0920
1.179 ft/sec
11.39 ft.2
20.5 ft.
16.3 cfs
i
L
I
- - r-

• ill PPG - Shelby
TABLE 4 - Physical and Chemical Data
Feca'_
RESIDUE SERIES (mg/1)
N SERIES (mF/l) j�
P SERIES (mg/i;
F.F. D.O. Temp. Colitorm
Tot. Tot. Vol.
i R��3-ZN
I�
Static: Date rime iit.i (m_r,_la ( C) (4/100 ml),
!Tot. t01. Sus. Sus.
NH,-N TLN N --N
Tor. P Ortho
_ 8-24
0830 I_- _
8.6
17.7 L 10
54
lO
8
3
4.05 .1
1.1
4,05
B-2
"
--r
0800
7.5
27 40
kOOQ
465
8
6
.27 19.4'
.26
.06
B-3
"
0810 !
1 8.4
118
430
57
20
10
2
<,05 .2
.94
<.05
J
B-4
if 0900
8_2
18.6
210
87
49
12
3
4-.05 .2
1.0
I< .05 J
B _5 r " 1000
--t
7.13
19.5
170
87
43
14
4
.05 3 95 .05
--
B-6 " 1230
--� -
I 7.2
120.6
I 230
77 131
16
'3
--
!<.05 <.05
B-7 " 1415 -�--
77.1 -
22.7
10
80
32
25
7
.3 .76
<.05 .73 <.05 -- -- -
B-8 1445 ?
T -
.2�-
4.5
24.8
10
419
264
7
6
3.0 5.4. 12 + 3.0
B-9
" 1445
7.85
23.25
150
104
42
21 5
14.05 1.2 1 .76 'e-.05
B-10
I " 1600
7.3
; 9.0
'122.7
23.6
1420
NS
76 j23
79
41
21 8
11 4
j C OS
05 �,3 ' .76 4,05
B-11
" 17300 - -�--
LO5 .1 1.1 I e,05
B-1
8-24
0955
8.2
18.3
.21 18.7
.21 .06
B-2
1000
-�-
7.1 ,27
---
I OS .8 .98 < .05
B-3
"- 101-10
--�--�-
8 8.35 1.3
B-4
"
1100
9 -
19.5
;;<.OS6 ! .89 <.OS - -----�
B-5
"
1200
r-
7.55
20.5
(L 05 ; .5 I .73 ' < .05
B-6
1430
7.2
23.5
-
4.05 .3 .73 <.05
B-7
"
1615
6.75
23.5
4-.05 2 , .69 j<.05
B-8
"
1655
4.95
25.5
1.6 4.1 12 3.0
B-9
"
1700
�7.0
23.4
["-.05 1.2 , .74 <.05
B-10
" 1800
--r--- -
8.1 23.7 <.05
- --I
- _ --, u4,04_ * ---- -
-�
B-11
" 1841
<OS 2 74 <.05

ill PPG - Shelbv
TABLE 5
Physical & Chemical Data
BOD COD
Station Date Time imi!!3 ) (rog,*! _
METALS (ug/1)
Tot. Cr Cd cu Fe - Pb Mn N,i Zn
PiBAS phenols PH
0830
0.6
< 10
<50
< 50
740
600
1,C10()
50
100
1450
<0.1
< 5
6.6
0800
6.7
380
< 50
<50
.680
700
<100
140
100
700
0.1
10
6.7
0810
3.5
22
< 50
< 50
360
600
<100
50
1100
50
<0.1
< 5
6.8
VB-7
0900
0517
< 50
< 50
110
900
4100
90
100
90
<.1
< 5_1000
0.7
17
<50
< 50
80
900
<1oo
100
100
60
<0.1
< 5
6.7
1230
0.5
38
< 50
<50
26n
90o
100
90
100
<50
C0.1
< 56 8
1415
1.0
12
< 50
<50
60
900
<100
80
100
'(50
40.1
< 5 6.9
B-8
1445
11
310
<50
<50
250
500
100
50
100
50
0.6
'1 7 6.8
B-9
1445
NS
13
< 50
50
70
700
<100
60
<100
<50
40.1
< 5 6.7
B-10
1600
0.8
13
<50
<50
50
700
<100
So
4100
50
<O.l
< 5 I 6.7
B-11
1730
NS
to
<50
<50
60
500
< 100
50
4100
450
0.1
< 5 6
B-1
8-24
0955
0.6
B-2
1000
13
B-3
1010
5.0
B-4
1100
1.9
B-5
"
1200
1.1
B-6
1430
0.4
B-7
1615
0.6
B-8
1655
2.0
B-9
1700
0.3
B-10
1800
0.5
- 4
---
1845
6.5

#2 PPG - Shelby
TABLE #6 - Physical & Chemical Data
Fecal �IRESIDL'E
SERIES (mg/i)
N SERIES (mg/1) i P SERIFS (gig/:)
R.P. D.O. Temp. Col if0M.
Tot. Tot. Vol.,
SO -N I
Static: mate Tire (M^!l) (o_) (f/l00 ml)
- (`i. )
Tot. Vol. Sus. Sus.
-
NH3-V TYti -,3=;+ Tct. P !:tho :'
_
-
_
B-1 ! 8-24
1200
-�
8.6
20.75
200
56 18 7 5
4.05 .1 .8 { .05
B-2 it
1200
6.7
27
10
107n
472
1 12
11
.33
4.51
1.05
.08
B-3 "
1200
8.2
21.25
300
126
61
7
5
.07
.4
.74
.OS
i -~
B-4 " 1300
8.3
21.8
1200
111
62
9
3
<.05
.3
i 79 { .05
B-5 - g ; 1400
8.0
23.5
240
97
50
13
i 5
<.05
.3 .75
�{ .05 I
B-6_ Wes'-' 1630
( 6.5 24.1 220
-� -- -i --
95 1 21
; 7
__
;4.05 .4 .78 05
{:----
-
7.2 ''24.1 200 85 33 4 13
3
B-7 1815
<I OS i.3 71 },.OS
B-8 184- 0
4.1 126
< 10
409 : 245 8
7
1.9 4.�I 13 3.2
B-9 ! 2000
6.82 1233
840
89 28 13
4
<.OS
B-10 2000
6.82 23.3
840
91 35 I 13
2
14.05 1.2 .71 j .05
B-11
1945
! 7.2
23.2
--L -- -- -- -
B-1 8-24 1410 I
7.9
122.8
K .OS .1 78 ;!j .OS --�
B-2 1400
"
6.5 j26 8
i'
.42 4.3;4 .05 ;i .11
I< .05 .3 1 .80 1 � .05
B-3 l 1405
7. 75 f 2 8
I
I
B-4
"
1500
8.0 !2- 4.2 T
i <.05 y.3 .76 ; , j .OS ---- ---'
B-5
"
1600
7.7
24.8
��-
4.05 2 i .74 ; j .05 - ,----~
B-6
1830
6.4
24.1
.05 .2 .68 05
B-7 P
2015
6.4
23.5
I
I4,.05 .2 ! .78 II { .05
B-8
"
2040
3.8
124.2
1.5 3.6� 12 3.0 - -
B-9
"
2045
6.5
23.2�-
I
1
OS 1.3 .71 { .OS
-
1
B-10
"
2200
-.-
7.4 ,23.5 1 ,,1.05 !.3 1.2 I; 2.05
-�7.5 '24.1 <.05 .2 .72 �.05
B-11
"
2300
S PPG-OMA: 8-24 0800 .31 9.4 L .05 .07

#2 PPG Shelby
TABLE 7
Physical and Chemical Data
BOD COD
METALS (agil)
i
Station Date Time ( /1) (m^'1)
Iot. Cr Cd Ca Fe Pb Mn Ki Zn
B-1
8-24
1200
0.4
G 10
< 50
<50
60
400
10
0
100
0
.8
<
"
1200
17
350
< 50
450
210
1700
< loo
180
100
6.q
<
B-3
"
1200
1.9
53
G 50
< 50
<50 80
<50 70
700
60
< 100
< 100
60
0
100
90
!7
6.7
0.3
<
<
B-4
1300
1.9
_
28
<
B-5
1400
1.6
19
< 50
<50 60
700
< 100
1120
100
50
1 6.8<0.1
5
B-6
1630
0.6
16
< 50 i<50
70
900
< 100
190
<100!
0
6 7_
<0.1
B-7 UJ
"
1815
0.9
13
< 50 iL50
60
800
L100 70
<100
0
6.6
<OA
L 5y
B-8
"
1840
it
280 1<
50 < 5n
90
400
L 10n
0 100
7
-1
B-9
"
1845
0.9
120
< 50 1450
70
1 700 < 100
60 100L50
6
<
B-10
"
2000
0.8
13
< 50 :< 50
60
600
L 100 50_ <-100
0
7 IC
0.1
<5 _
B-11
"
1945
1.0
-—
B-1
8-24
1410
0.6
— !
B-2
"
1400
28.0
—.—I
B-3
1405
2.7
B-4
"
1500
1.4—
r
—
B-5
"
1600
0.8
1
B-6 p
"
1830
0.5
B-7
"
2015
0.4
B-8
2040
10—
B-9
"
2045
0.3
B-10
"
2200
0.5
B-11
"
2300
Missy
samples d
a to vehicle bre
kdown
—�50-
PG compos_
8-24
0800
15
360—
50 620 700
100 -160
! 100�700?!_
_
_ __—_. _ .-
12

TABLE #8
Long Term BOD's
PPG
PPG
PPG
PPG
Ora Mill
Ora Mill
Dilution
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Eff
Day
HZ
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-2
C12
Cl2
B-8
B-8
First Broad
0800
0800
1200
1200
1445
1445
at SR 1121
8-24
8-24
8-24
8-24
8-24
8-24
8-25-78
100%
50%
100%,
50%
100%
50%
3
.27
3.0
4.5
7.1
9.9
1.2
1.7
5
.60
5.9
7.3
11.8
15.1
2.4
5.1
10
1.57
11.2
12.6
20.9
29.5
10.1
11.5
13
1.57
15.1
19.4
26.5
34.8
12.7
13.5
16
1.90
19.0
24.9
32.5
40.8
16.1
16.1
20
2.10
26.0
31.6
39.1
48.2
18.3
17.8
25
2.43
32.1
39.7
48.6
56.9
21.3
19.9
30
2.83
38.3
47.7
56.1
64.2
24.9
23.7
'
No C1
No Cl
B-1
B-2
B-2
B-8 2
B-8 2
Dilution
1730
1730
1745
1745
HZ
9-13
9-13
9-13
9-13
1730
100%
50%
100%
50%
9-13
5
.1
12.7
18.7
11.2
21.5
11
.37
29.2
34.4
24.1
49.6
18
1.2
45
47.6
38
74.8
25
1.9
71.2
85.1
64.1
97.1
32
1.9
78.8
94.9
69.8
101.5
Ora Mill Ora Mill
Eff
Eff
C12
C12
B-8
B-8
100%
50%
.93
1.67
1.5
3.7
5.1
8.5
8.8
11.2
12.5
13.2
15.1
15.2
18.3
17.2
21.4
20.6

Reaeration Rate Data
TABLE 9
Tw (Day-1)
(Day-1)
0
20 (Day-1)
K
k
KTW
K
°
C
Stretch
r
o
2
o
2
Tw Average
B3-B-5
12.26
14.77
14.95
19.450
B3-B6
11.06
13.33
13.27
20.20
B3-B7
11.13
13.41
13.19
20.32
B5-B6
10.12
12.19
11.98
20.8
B5-B7
10.60
12.77
12.39
21.4
B6-B7
11.32
13.64
12.98
22.270
85
TF (hrs.)
KR
S
Station
Mean Ratio 3H
Time of Peak
Tw °C
B-2 (Dose)
0815
B-3 (Assay)
1.713
0822
19.1
2.217(.092)
8-5
.5544
1035
(.092)2.217
19.8
2.833(.118)
B-6
.168
1325
(.210)5.05
21.8
1.917(.080)
B-7
.0679
1520
(.290)6.967
22.75

Time of Travel During K2 Study
TABLE 10
REACH: Brushy Creek - KZ Study
13 September 1978
Dist.
frcm Stream
Travel
Cum.
Veloc-
Injec- I Dis- I
Sta.
Peak
Time,
Time,
ity,
Lenn'n, i tion, charge, i Slope
No.
Location
Date
Time
hrs.
hrs.
ft/sec.
^i. I mi. ` cfs i ft/mi.
B-2 Dose 9-13-78 0815 ----- 0
B-3
Assay
9-13-78
0822
7 min.
7 min.
.71
.057 (300')
.057
B-5
SR-1342
9-13-78 1
1035
2 hr.13min.
2hr.20mir
1.14
1.73
1.79,
f
F
B-6
Cow pasture hl
1 9-13-78
1325
2 hr.50min.
5hr.1.0mi
.688
1.33 I
3.12
B-7
i B-11
SR-1305
Cow pasture #2
9-13-78
9-13-78
1520
1940
7hr.55min.
4hr.20min.
7hr.5min
11hr25min
1.16
.97
1.521
12.88
4.64
7.52
i
i
I

DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS - During K2 Stud%
TABLE 11
REACH; Brushy Creek
Station
Number
Location
DateTime
Velocity
Are4
(F-?
Cross -Sectional
dih,
I Discharce
B-1
SR-1323
9-12
1830-1000
1.24
8.82
19'
10.92
B-1
SR-1323
9-13
0835-0847
1.29
8.80
19.1' 10.08
B-4
SR-1341
9-13
1340-1352
1.18
10.67
20' I 12.86
B-5
SR-1342
9-13
0911-0925
1.62
9.21
i 17.1' 15.34
B-6
Cow pasture ill
9-13
1010-1032
1.32
13.01
23.9'
17.59
B-7
SR-1305
9-13
11645-1712
1100-1130
1.38
12.61
27.2'
18.77
B-11
Cow pasture #2
9-13
1.18
18.16 �
32.3'
i
21.98
i
i