20211267 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20230104

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
11/17/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20211267 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Andrew Pitner:eads\ahpitner
la. Name of project:
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Road)
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wildlands Engineering (POC: Ian Eckardt)
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
1/4/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Long Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
W S-I V
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.337093
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-80.905879

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 27 - Restoration
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 42 - Recreation Facility
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Multiple parcels - see attached Parcel Information Sheet
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Multiple parcels - see attached Parcel Information Sheet
2c. Contact Person:
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management (POC: David Booth)
2d. Address
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
David Booth, Project Manager
3b. Business Name:
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management
3c. Address
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Ian Eckardt
4b. Business Name:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28203
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See attached Parcel Information Sheet
2b. Property size:
Approximately 46.4 acres. This is a linear
project located on multiple parcels; therefore
the size is based on the overall project area.

2c. Project Address
Street Address
4120 Oakdale Road
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28216
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Long Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011403
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located in a developed watershed in northwest Mecklenburg County. Land use in the project area includes wooded floodplain corridors along Long Creek, maintained right-
of-ways, and maintained open space located on the left side of Long Creek closer to Oakdale Road. The maintained open space was previously a golf course purchased by the county for
a future park.
A review of aerial photography indicates the project area and surroundings were largely rural and agricultural through the 1970's with development increasing during the period from the
late 1970s through the 1990s. During the 2000s, the project area saw increased pressure from suburban sprawl with the construction of the 1-485 Outer Loop and associated increases in
housing and development. Long Creek appears to have been historically straightened and within the project area is generally incised and disconnected from its historic floodplain. Bank
erosion is common and bedform diversity is low consisting primarily of long sandy runs with pools developed around debris jams.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (DWR #21-1267) & (SAW-2019-00868)
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5.144 AC (Wetlands & Open waters)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
11,453 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The project is a joint greenway and water quality improvement project. The greenway will provide a linear trail for recreation, fitness, and community connection. Water quality
improvements include stream restoration, enhancement and preservation along Long Creek that will reduce erosion and increase aquatic habitat.

4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project is a continuation of the Long Creek Greenway and proposes approximately 2.4 miles of additional greenway trail and a 8,300 linear feet (LF) of stream restoration,
enhancement and preservation between 1-485 and Oakdale Road. Connector trails are proposed at Primm Road and Riceland Place to provide direct access for surrounding
neighborhoods. The greenway will be a 12-foot wide asphalt path with sections of raised boardwalk and prefabricated pedestrian bridges to cross and/or overlook streams and wetlands.
Boardwalk sections will be supported by timber piers. A couple stormwater outlets are proposed near the downstream end of the greenway corridor near Oakdale Road. These two outlets
will be stabilized with riprap which will be placed on the bank but not in the bed of Long Creek. A trailhead with parking is proposed as an additional altemative at the southwestern
terminus of the project off Oakdale Road.
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) identified the Long Creek corridor from 1-485 to Oakdale Road as a stream enhancement opportunity, concurrent with Meckleburg
County's Asset & Facility Management (AFM) development of the adjacent greenway corridor. North Carolina Land & Water Fund (NCLWF) is a funding partner for the stream
enhancement work. Long Creek is generally incised and disconnected from its historic floodplain throughout the project area. Bank erosion is common and existing stream bedform is
limited to sandy runs and pools that have developed at debris jams. An existing sewer line runs parallel with Long Creek primarily near the left top of bank.
Water quality objectives include decreased nutrient and pollutant levels in storm flows achieved by filtering in -stream flood flow through restored floodplain areas; decreased stream water
temperatures achieved by planting vegetation along riparian corridors for shade; and increased dissolved oxygen concentrations through creating in -stream aeration points and developing
deep pool zones. Ecological objectives include creating in -stream habitat through structure placement, establishing woody vegetation along the stream banks, and diversifying the
bedform; improving terrestrial habitat through invasive species removal and re-establishing a native buffer along the riparian corridor; decreasing channel velocities by increasing channel
roughness with bank vegetation and reconnecting the stream to a floodplain through benching.
Stream restoration and enhancement approaches are based on existing conditions, constraints, habitat and water quality improvement potential, channel evolution stage, and the riparian
condition. Restoration and enhancement will be achieved using natural channel design and successful local stream design projects as reference reaches to inform design. The design
proposes a mix of Priority 2 & 3 approaches, bank stabilization, and preservation. Priority 2 will involve excavation of a new stream pattern, profile, and dimension with associated
floodplain benches to provide flood storage. Priority 3 involves excavating new floodplain benches without altering pattern or profile. Restoration and enhancement will also include the
installation of in -stream structures such as constructed riffles, log sills, rock/j-hooks, log vanes, and brush toes. In areas where constraints limit improvement opportunities, bank grading is
proposed. Other improvements include laying back banks, removing existing infrastructure including old bridge abutments, approximately 280 LF of concrete pipes used as toe protection,
and five golf course bridges. Preservation is proposed to relatively stable sections of Long Creek. Four tributaries to Long Creek (McIntyre Creek and three unnamed tributaries) will also
be impacted for relocation and stabilization purposes as they are reconnected to newly constructed sections of Long Creek. For project purposes the unnamed tributaries have been
identified as Trib J, AA, and BB.
Excavators will be used for channel and floodplain excavation as well as for bank grading and in -stream structure installation, while articulated and track trucks will be used for hauling soil.
A native riparian buffer will be planted along project streams.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
Stream and wetlands were delineated by Wildlands Engineering.
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-00868
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Ian Eckardt
Wildlands Engineering
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Long Creek Greenway is part of the Mecklenburg County greenway system with existing and proposed phases.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(')
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*

W1
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 00
Yes
Both
0.026
(acres)
W2
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland G
Yes
Both
0.043
(acres)
W3
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland H
Yes
Both
0.021
(acres)
W4
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland KK
No
Both
0.013
(acres)
W5
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland KK
No
Both
0.009
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.112
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.112
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0 000
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Enhancement - Benching
Permanent
Excavation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
29
Average (feet)
623
(linear feet)
S2
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
42
Average (feet)
1,177
(linear feet)
S3
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
42
Average (feet)
1,428
(linear feet)
S4
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
3,106
(linear feet)
S5
Enhancment - bank grading
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
77
(linear feet)
S6
Enhancement - bank grading
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
57
(linear feet)
S7
Enhancement - bank grading
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
58
(linear feet)
S8
Enhancement - bank grading
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
155
(linear feet)
S9
Bank stabilization (Rip rap)
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
37
(linear feet)
S10
Bank stabilization (Rip rap)
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
Average (feet)
33
(linear feet)
Si1
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib AA
Intermittent
Both
7
Average (feet)
102
(linear feet)
S12
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib J
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
S13
Construction access
Temporary
Other
Trib J
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
65
(linear feet)
S14
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib BB
Perennial
Both
10
Average (feet)
89
(linear feet)
S15
Construction access - bridge
removal
Temporary
Other
McIntyre Creek
Perennial
Both
30
Average (feet)
52
(linear feet)
S16
Construction access - bridge
removal
Temporary
Other
McIntyre Creek
Perennial
Both
30
Average (feet)
104
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
6,620
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
1482
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
568

3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The greenway design incorporated the location of existing streams and wetlands in order to avoid these features as much as possible. Proposed
greenway crossings of stream and wetlands consist of pedestrian bridges or raised boardwalk to avoid permanent impacts. Bridge crossings will span
top of bank to top of bank. Boardwalk sections will be constructed using driven timber pilings. Stream enhancement is proposed to degraded sections of
stream while relatively stable sections are proposed for preservation and will be avoided. Restored stream alignments were designed to avoid wetland
impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. Construction will be limited to the
immediate project area with silt and/or safety fence demarcating disturbance limits to avoid unnecessary impacts. Boardwalk crossings will be supported
by timber piers that will be driven in to avoid discharge. Enhanced sections of Long Creek will be constructed in the dry as much as possible through
of0ine construction and pump around practices will be utilized where feasible when working in existing online channels. Newly constructed channel
banks will be stabilized using biodegradable coir fiber matting, seeding, and planted with native riparian species. Haul roads, staging areas, and access
routes will be located on uplands as much as possible to avoid impacts and temporary crossings will be minimized. Mud or timber mats will be utilized for
crossing existing wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Compensatory mitigation should not be required because the project intends to increase aquatic resource function and services through stream restoration and enhancement activities.
The greenway design has avoided impacts to stream and wetlands as much as possible using bridge and boardwalk crossings.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes • No
If no, explain why:
The project is located in the Catawba River Basin where only the main stem of the Catawba has associated NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules. The project area is on a smaller tributary
(Long Creek) to the Catawba with no NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? x
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
This is a Mecklenburg County greenway and stream enhancement project which is not subject to NEPA or SEPA requirements.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is within an urban watershed where a majority of surrounding land has already been developed for commercial and residential purposes.
The land within and immediately adjacent to the project is wooded floodplain or future green space owned by Mecklenburg County which will serve as
buffers adjacent to the trail and associated stream enhancement. A NC Land & Water Fund (NCLWF) easement will be recorded on the stream
enhancement project corridor which will restrict future development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
An official species list (Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-WLI_0010) was obtained from the USFWS IPAC on 10/02/2020. A pedestrian survey was
conducted by Wildlands Engineering on 8/25/2021. Result of the survey found summer roosting areas for the Northern Long Eared Bat and suitable for
the Schweinitz's sunflower, the smooth coneflower, and Michaux's sumac. No individuals or populations os the listed species were observed. No suitable
habitat was found to exist for the Carolina heelsplitter. A letter requesting review and comment was submitted to the USFWS on November 5, 2021 with
no concerns for project related impacts to federally protected species. Correspondence with USFWS is enclosed in the Miscellaneous section of this
application.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website (https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted on 10/5/2021 for review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to archeological or cultural resources. SHPO responded on 11/17/2021 stating, "We have conducted a review of the project and are
aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed." Correspondence
with SHPO is included in the Miscellaneous section of this application.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No

8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project is being designed to result in a no -rise in the FEMA regulated base flood elevation. Wildlands is working with the local floodplain
administrator (Mecklenburg County) to obtain the appropriate floodplain development permit prior to construction.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Mecklenburg County NC Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panels 4537 and 4538, with effective dates of September 2, 2015.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Long_Creek_Greenway_&_Stream_Enhancement_ePCN_Supporting_Documentation.pdf 55.16MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
See supporting documentation uploaded.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Lloyd David Booth
Signature
LLOrOP.414i>p'0oTh-
Date
1/4/2023

witm
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
TO: 401/404 Permit Reviewer
FROM: Ian Eckardt, Wildlands Engineering
DATE: December 16, 2022
RE: Pre -Construction Notification - Supporting Documentation
LONG CREEK GREENWAY AND STREAM ENHANCEMENT PHASE 3
(1-485 TO OAKDALE ROAD)
Charlotte, NC
On behalf of Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CWSWS) and Mecklenburg County's Asset
and Facilities Management (AFM), Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is submitting a Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) for the Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485
to Oakdale Road) in north central Mecklenburg County approximately eight miles north northwest of
uptown Charlotte, NC in the Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050101). The project seeks Nationwide
Permits NWP 27 (Aquatic Habitat Restoration) and NWP 42 (Recreational Facilities) and corresponding
Water Quality Certifications 4255 and 4266 for the joint greenway trail and stream enhancement
project. The project proposes 2.4 miles of greenway trail and 8,300 linear feet of stream restoration,
enhancement and preservation along Long Creek. The project is a continuation of the overall Long Creek
Greenway (SAW-2019-00868 & DWR#21-1267).
Supporting Documentation Table of Contents
1 NCDWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request......................................................................................... 2
2 Figures (Vicinity, USGS, Existing Conditions, Soils, & Aquatic Resource Impacts) ....................4
3 Photolog..................................................................................................................................16
4 Landower Authorization Form and Additional Parcel Information ......................................... 21
5 Agency Correspondence (NCSHPO & USFWS)........................................................................ 26
6 Preliminary Jurisdiction Determination Documentation........................................................59
7 Construction Plan Sheets...................................................................................................... 157
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-332-7754 or at [e-mail] should you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
" ��J
Ian Eckardt
Senior Environmental Scientist, PWS

Section 1:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
NCDWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request

Ian Eckardt
From: 401 PreFile <401 [e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 8:41 AM
To: Ian Eckardt
Subject: Automatic reply: [External] 401/Buffer Pre -filing Meeting Request
This email confirms receipt of your pre -filing meeting request. Please retain this email for your records and
submit this documentation as part of your 401 application (PCN Application) as required by federal law. DWR
will not be able to accept your application without this federally required documentation. 401 applications
received without documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted at least 30 days prior will be
returned as incomplete.
Responses to this email are not monitored.
If you need to contact 401/Buffer Permitting Staff, please use the following link(s) to access of staff contact
Iist(s).
For Non -Transportation Central Staff:
https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/401-buffer-permitting/401-
buffer-permitting-contacts
For Non -Transportation Regional Staff:
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2162034&cr=1
For all Transportation Projects Including NCDOT Projects:
https://deg.nc.gov/about/d ivisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/transportation-
permitting/staff-contacts

Section 2:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Figures (Vicinity, USGS, Existing Conditions, Soils, &
Aquatic Resource Impacts)

M
0
r�

LL
0
N
0
O
t�

Mecklenburg County, NC
z
0
0 —

� r04
�i
cn�j
4

� r04
y
cn�j
r)

n c
o v v v O `o, 0�
W
cu
ry \ ti O N V C
T E of ry
O � � � d
O
-O T E E E E 1 1
a
� Y o 0 0 o w C
_ P a
m o w w W
mp�pp �0�1111�
O c
v
v
4dF1'� w v e V.
Q O E V
O N O C
— a
E N
w m o o
0
EF EF o c
T U U ° O T
� c Y
a V V wm wo 2
m
�w
P
fi 0 0 �Z
a w` q '
w
m
w
� o
x
m
w � N
4
o
W
m o _
U
U
p�
w r m
m w
m
0 W
U LL
_1. ul
c � _ U a 7 rc
u ` L E E E
vi vi vi a m a
O O O
U
F'I
a` a` a` Z
_ o
0�01 --�. t

! ; .
�. . / �
6�
�
«
�
-
-
£ %
.\
, . � •
2
/
��

4

� r04
�i
cn�j
r)

� r04
y
cn�j
1)-

Mecklenburg County, NC
N
N
LL
0
0 —
(0
0
CO
0
15M
04

Section 3:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Photolog

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Pre -Construction Notification —Site Photographs

AA
Az.
T-F
3r
. . . . . . . . . . . .
F,
4r
iL
t.
xvl,

�,
S,i i
�i � •tit iLV
xn �
a
gX..a.
r
'<2 v>.
x YgK�q�?V 8Y`
,n— Q�
I
Yi r
i All: !
I� 1IF
l
.art• � � � � ��s� � � � '.F
W - -
Sk 3 I }
h
4 F aA�
I

-70
Wetland UU
PAM
Open Water 3
Open Water 5
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
VPre -Construction Notification —Site Photographs
Open Water 2
Open Water 4

Section 4:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Landowner Authorization Form & Additional Parcel Information

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to
Oakdale Road) on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 02514123, 02514876, 02514899, 02516106, 02516108, 02516299,
02519398, 02519399, 02522110, 02522111, 02522294, 02524199,
02531270,02531271,02531297,02531299,02533283,02533460,
03311112, 03313221, 03317499, 03318299, 03319199, 03325101,
03325115, 03325116, 03325117, 03327109, 03327334, 03314608,
03325105,03325114,03326105
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Mecklenburg County
600 E. 4t" Street- 11t" Floor & 700 E. 4t" Street- 4t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202 Charlotte, NC 28202
Parcel ID: 02524196
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Department
5841 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: David Booth, Project Manager, Mecklenburg County AFM
Name & Title
aRn_FFF_a7aa
Phone Number:
Signature:
Date: 09/03/2020

1 -
miry
Z
_ W F
- ? o M f .
w OU o y
Z F ... _ AX
Z rn
oom
• ~RI � � � C7 �Atr7
z
OOwooZWUO wF
W Z� � Z N e
Y 0 ry
Y0m mm
wOU o J �00
� � K
• ] Y o
w Z N
y ?', YDM
w OU o
Z N
0 M
OU o
K
N
W I z
ID-
Z
woo
Z Y m >
YDNN YDMI !`Z)� .11-1
w.
Of
woo w000 i_ YAM { 4
g OM
R
a
v-
a
_ _ o

Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road) — Parcel Information
#1.) Parcel ID: 03311112
#2.) Parcel ID: 03313221
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 10455 / 296
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
Finance Dept.
Charlotte, NC 28202
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
#3.) Parcel ID: 03314608
#4.) Parcel ID: 03319199
Deed / Book: 32672/ 90
Deed / Book: 05799 / 291
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#5.) Parcel ID: 03325101
#6.) Parcel ID: 03325105
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
4104 Oakdale Rd.
N/A
Charlotte, NC 28216
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
Finance Dept.
Charlotte, NC 28202
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
#7.) Parcel ID: 03325114
#8) Parcel ID: 03325115
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202

Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road) — Parcel Information
#9.) Parcel ID: 03325116
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
#11) Parcel ID: 03326105
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
#10.) Parcel ID: 03325117
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
4120 Oakdale Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202

Section 5:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Agency Correspondence (NCSHPO & USFWS)

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
October 5, 2021
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Request for Review and Comment
Long Creek Phase 3 — Stream Enhancement (485 to Oakdale Road)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
On behalf of Mecklenburg County Storm Water Service (CMSWS), alongside Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility
Management (AFM), Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to fish and wildlife associated with the Long Creek Phase 3 Stream Enhancement Project (485
to Oakdale Road) in Mecklenburg County, NC. This phase is part of the Long Creek Corridor Project that will expand
the overall connectivity of the Long Creek natural corridor through implementing a greenway system and stream
rehabilitation. The Long Creek Corridor Project consists of three phases: Phase 1, 2, and 3. Each phase of the
project has completed the required agency coordination with the exception of the proposed Phase 3 stream
enhancement along Long Creek. Please refer to the attached figures for a USGS Topographic Map and a Site Map
illustrating the overall Long Creek Corridor project phases and the proposed phase 3 project area. The topographic
figure was prepared from the Charlotte, NC 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is located at
latitude 35 20.380538, longitude -80 53.67820.
The Long Creek greenway and stream rehabilitation project corridor extends 23,000 linear feet (LF) from 1-77 to
Oakdale Road along the Long Creek floodplain. Phase 3 stream work is currently being proposed by CMSWS to
design and implement stream enhancement along Long Creek from the western crossing of 1-485 to Oakdale Road.
The project includes approximately 8,000 LF of Long Creek, and 1,500 LF of McIntyre Creek, as shown in the
attached figures. The stream project will improve bedform diversity, bank stability, floodplain connectivity, and
provide native vegetation within the floodplain corridor. Construction of this project will affect Jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting. Structures within or immediately adjacent to the
project area include sewer lines and manholes, gas line, powerlines, road culverts, commercial buildings, storm
drainage infrastructure, and residential homes. The surrounding land use includes forests, developed open spaces,
shopping centers, and residential communities.
Three NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Lands are located within the phase 3 stream enhancement project
area: Mecklenburg County Open Space — Long Creek Greenway and Mecklenburg County Open Space — Oak Hills
Park. No architectural structures or archaeological artifacts were observed or noted within the proposed phase 3
project limits during preliminary surveys of the site. We ask that you review the site based on the attached
information to determine the presence of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
{E
Kirsten Gimbert, Senior Environmental Scientist
kgimbertCDwildlandseng.com
704.941.9093
Attachments: Figure 1.0 Site Map —Overview, Figure 1.1 Site Map— Phase 3, Figure 2 USGS Topographic Site Map
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

v • .0 0
O I
t
o_ a)
ro
a, • ro m
a)
o
✓ D
v
• > 3
tuD
as
O U
a)
C7
Y
a)
a)
U
no
O
z
v
0
0
0
—
o —
Jo
zw
QZ
QZ
419
Mecklenburg County, NC

y

Q Proposed Project Boundary
r ♦ t.
• ti/OF F.
Gosh^
COUr°SO
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Site Map- Phase 3
w I L. D L. A N D S Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation
ktwr E N G I N E E R I N G Catawba River Basin 03050101
0 275 550 1,100 Feet ( )
1 1 1 1 I Mecklenburg County, NC

6 � STAT£
r� Qunr-n •nog%'•
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
November 17, 2021
Kirsten Gimbert kgimbertgwildlandseng com
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Re: Construct Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation,Treyburn Drive to Oakdale Road,
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 20-2193
Dear Ms. Gimbert:
Thank you for your letter of October 5, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
�] State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
October 5, 2021
Byron Hamstead
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Request for Review and Comment
Long Creek Phase 3 — Stream Enhancement (485 to Oakdale Road)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Hamstead:
On behalf of Mecklenburg County Storm Water Service (CMSWS), alongside Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility
Management (AFM), Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to fish and wildlife associated with the Long Creek Phase 3 Stream Enhancement Project (485
to Oakdale Road) in Mecklenburg County, NC. This phase is part of the Long Creek Corridor Project that will expand
the overall connectivity of the Long Creek natural corridor through implementing a greenway system and stream
rehabilitation. The Long Creek Corridor Project consists of three phases: Phase 1, 2, and 3. Each phase of the
project has completed the required agency coordination with the exception of the proposed Phase 3 stream
enhancement along Long Creek. Please refer to the attached figures for a USGS Topographic Map and a Site Map
illustrating the overall Long Creek Corridor project phases and the proposed phase 3 project area. The topographic
figure was prepared from the Charlotte, NC 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is located at
latitude 35 20.380538, longitude -80 53.67820.
The Long Creek greenway and stream rehabilitation project corridor extends 23,000 linear feet (LF) from 1-77 to
Oakdale Road along the Long Creek floodplain. Phase 3 stream work is currently being proposed by CMSWS to
design and implement stream enhancement along Long Creek from the western crossing of 1-485 to Oakdale Road.
The project includes approximately 8,000 LF of Long Creek, and 1,500 LF of McIntyre Creek, as shown in the
attached figures. The stream project will improve bedform diversity, bank stability, floodplain connectivity, and
provide native vegetation within the floodplain corridor. Construction of this project will affect Jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting. Structures within or immediately adjacent to the
project area include sewer lines and manholes, gas line, powerlines, road culverts, commercial buildings, storm
drainage infrastructure, and residential homes. The surrounding land use includes forests, developed open spaces,
shopping centers, and residential communities.
Based on a resource list generated from the US FWS IPAC website there are five (5) Federally Threatened or
Endangered Species that may be present in or near the proposed phase 3 project boundary. They are the Northern
long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), the Michaux's sumac (Rhus
michauxii), the Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and the smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata).
No critical habitat has been designated for the Northern long-eared Bat (NLEB), the Michaux's sumac, the
Schweinitz's sunflower, nor the smooth coneflower. Critical habitat has been designated for the Carolina
heelsplitter; however, the project resides outside of the critical habitat. A pedestrian survey was conducted within
the Phase 3 project boundary on August 25, 2021. Results of the survey found areas of potential summer roosting
for the NLEB and areas of suitable habitat for the Schweinitz's sunflower, the smooth coneflower, and the
Michaux's sumac. No suitable habitat was found to exist for the Carolina heelsplitter. Per the NCNHP, there are
documented occurrences of the Schweinitz's sunflower and the Michaux's sumac within 1 and 2 miles of the
project area, respectively. No individuals or populations of any of the above referenced species were documented
on -site.
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Please provide review and comment concerning the above referenced species, as well as any possible issues that
might emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds, or other trust resources from the proposed
project. If we have not heard from you in 30 days, we will assume that you do not have any comments regarding
associated laws or information relevant to this project at the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any questions
that you may have concerning this project.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Gimbert, Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
704.941.9093
Attachments:
USFWS NLEB 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form
Figure 1.0 Site Map —Overview
Figure 1.1 Site Map — Phase 3
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Site Map
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

Northern Long -Eared Bat 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form
Federal agencies should use this form for the optional streamlined consultation framework for the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB). This framework allows federal agencies to rely upon the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) January 5, 2016, intra-Service Programmatic Biological Opinion (BO) on the final 4(d) rule for the
NLEB for section 7(a)(2) compliance by: (1) notifying the USFWS that an action agency will use the streamlined
framework; (2) describing the project with sufficient detail to support the required determination; and (3) enabling
the USFWS to track effects and determine if reinitiation of consultation is required per 50 CFR 402.16.
This form is not necessary if an agency determines that a proposed action will have no effect to the NLEB or if
the USFWS has concurred in writing with an agency's determination that a proposed action may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect the NLEB (i.e., the standard informal consultation process). Actions that may cause
prohibited incidental take require separate formal consultation. Providing this information does not address
section 7(a)(2) compliance for any other listed species.
Information to Determine 4(d) Rule Compliance:
YES NO
1. Does the project occur wholly outside of the WNS Zone'?
❑
0
2. Have you contacted the appropriate agencyZ to determine if your project is near
❑X
❑
known hibernacula or maternity roost trees?
3. Could the project disturb hibernating NLEBs in a known hibernaculum?
❑
❑X
4. Could the project alter the entrance or interior environment of a known
❑
❑X
hibernaculum?
5. Does the project remove any trees within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum at
❑
❑X
any time of ear?
6. Would the project cut or destroy known occupied maternity roost trees, or any
❑
❑X
other trees within a 150-foot radius from the maternity roost tree from June 1
through July 31.
You are eligible to use this form if you have answered yes to question 41 or yes to question 42 and no to
questions 3, 4, 5 and 6. The remainder of the form will be used by the USFWS to track our assumptions in the
BO.
Agency and Applicant' (Name, Email, Phone No.): Wildlands Engineering on behalf of Storm Water Service,
alongside Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management
Project Name: Long Creek Phase 3 — Stream Enhancement (485 to Oakdale Road)
Project Location (include coordinates if known): latitude 35 20.380538, longitude -80 53.6782
Basic Project Description (provide narrative below or attach additional information):
The Long Creek greenway and stream rehabilitation project corridor extends 23,000 linear feet (LF) from I-77 to
Oakdale Road along the Long Creek floodplain. Phase 3 stream work is currently being proposed by CMSWS to
design and implement stream enhancement along Long Creek from the western crossing of I-485 to Oakdale
Road. The project includes approximately 8,000 LF of Long Creek, and 1,500 LF of McIntyre Creek, as shown in
the attached figures. The stream project will improve bedform diversity, bank stability, floodplain connectivity,
and provide native vegetation within the floodplain corridor. Construction of this project will affect Jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting. Structures within or immediately adjacent to the
project area include sewer lines and manholes, gas line, powerlines, road culverts, commercial buildings, storm
drainage infrastructure, and residential homes. The surrounding land use includes forests, developed open spaces,
shopping centers, and residential communities.
1 http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/pleb/pdf/WNSZone.pdf
Z See http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/pleb/nWsites.httnl
s If applicable - only needed for federal actions with applicants (e.g., for a permit, etc.) who are parry to the consultation.

General Project Information
YES NO
Does the project occur within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum? (-79 miles)
❑
Does the project occur within 150 feet of a known maternity roost tree'?
❑
❑X
Does the project include forest conversion'? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑X
❑
Estimated total acres of forest conversion
—25 ac
If known, estimated acres' of forest conversion from April 1 to October 31
If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 316
Does the project include timber harvest? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑
Estimated total acres of timber harvest
If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31
If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June 1 to July 31
Does the project include prescribed fire? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑
Estimated total acres of prescribed fire
If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from April 1 to October 31
If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June 1 to July 31
Does the project install new wind turbines? (if yes, report capacity in MW below)
❑
Estimated wind capacity (MW)
Agency Determination:
By signing this form, the action agency determines that this project may affect the NLEB, but that any resulting
incidental take of the NLEB is not prohibited by the final 4(d) rule.
If the USFWS does not respond within 30 days from submittal of this form, the action agency may presume that
its determination is informed by the best available information and that its project responsibilities under 7(a)(2)
with respect to the NLEB are fulfilled through the USFWS January 5, 2016, Programmatic BO. The action
agency will update this determination annually for multi -year activities.
The action agency understands that the USFWS presumes that all activities are implemented as described herein.
The action agency will promptly report any departures from the described activities to the appropriate USFWS
Field Office. The action agency will provide the appropriate USFWS Field Office with the results of any surveys
conducted for the NLEB. Involved parties will promptly notify the appropriate USFWS Field Office upon finding
a dead, injured, or sick NLEB.
Signature: Date Submitted:
' Any activity that temporarily or permanently removes suitable forested habitat, including, but not limited to, tree removal
from development, energy production and transmission, mining, agriculture, etc. (see page 48 of the BO).
s If the project removes less than 10 trees and the acreage is unknown, report the acreage as less than 0.1 acre.
6 If the activity includes tree clearing in June and July, also include those acreage in April to October.

v • .0 0
O I
t
o_ a)
ro
a, • ro m
a)
o
✓ D
v
• > 3
tuD
as
O U
a)
C7
Y
a)
a)
U
no
O
z
v
0
0
0
—
o —
Jo
zw
QZ
QZ
419
Mecklenburg County, NC

y

Q Proposed Project Boundary
r ♦ t.
• ti/OF F.
Gosh^
COUr°SO
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Site Map- Phase 3
w I L. D L. A N D S Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation
ktwr E N G I N E E R I N G Catawba River Basin 03050101
0 275 550 1,100 Feet ( )
1 1 1 1 I Mecklenburg County, NC

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/couMfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0010
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
Project Name: Long Creek Greenway
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
October 02, 2020
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc counties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" species that could
potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also
available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant survey.html
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be
requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/assessment guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: h=.//
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow
the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www. fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 3
http://www.towerkill.com; andhttp://www.fws.gov/migrator3birds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
VA
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0010
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
Project Name: Long Creek Greenway
Project Type: ** OTHER **
Project Description: Greenway and stream enhancement project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/35.337056387022905N80.90497661114603W
w.. ,tr.x. '•ak
4h�rry �Y•wv t'
AP
1',, LL} '.
A...i
�j'fff
Counties: Mecklenburg, NC

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 4
Flowering Plants
NAM L- STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus
Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
to Jun 30
(BCRs) in the continental USA

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Apr 28
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 20
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/297
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferns Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Breeds
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention elsewhere
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 3
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 4
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle Non -BCC Vulnerable �0+111111111 W$1011Ili. I.1�1111 1 1+11 m11111111 L�j I I io+
Blue -winged yy
Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ +T�� I I1 + ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC -BCR
LL gmmm ,�
Cerulean Warbler +++� I I I r+++ +� I I I +++ ++ + ++++ ++++ +++.I ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON) LL +yy yy
Eastern Whip -poor -
Will I I I I I I I I r+*T �+++ 0+++ +♦++ ++++ -1 11 I 1 I I t-
� '
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Golden Eagle +++ 11 I I 1 1++d +� I I Jill 1 1 1+++++ + 1 1 1 1-+++ ++++ ++ 1 1 1 1 4-4-
Non-BCC Vulnerable yy
Kentucky Warbler +++ I I++ ++++ +++T ++++ ++++ Jill 11-4-h+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON) yy do Mood
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON) ++++ ++++ +++T �111 Jill 11++ „1+ 111, HIM
i T+++ ++++ ++++
Prothonotary
Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON) b6.—
Red-headed Woodpecker NON +000 1+1+ =* *�
I� *3 C I ZZ 1 3++ 01+1 mill 1111 1110 111+
BCC Rangewide (CON) J ---- ----
Rusty Blackbird BCC Rangewide (CO ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
IF
;g wid (CON) ++++ ++++ ++++ +11111�� 9111111 ----
Wood+++I1 H* ++++ ++++
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/
management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migrator3Lbirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures. pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 5
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 6
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. 'BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00015 1
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
• PEM1A
• PEM1C
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
• PF01A
• PF01C
FRESHWATER POND
• PUBHh
RIVERINE
• R2UBH
• R2UBHx
• R4SBC

ua
United States Department of the InteriorSERVIM
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 5, 2021
Kirsten Gimbert
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
kgimbertgwildlandseng com
Subject: Long Creek Phase 3 Stream Enhancement; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Kirsten Gimbert:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) reviewed the information provided in your email
correspondence dated October 5, 2021 wherein you solicit our comments regarding project -
mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the proposed project intends to enhance stream habitat
along 8,000 linear feet of Long Creek and 1,500 linear feet of McIntyre Creek in Charlotte,
North Carolina. The proposed action would require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers for impacts to Waters of the United States. Site development plans have not been
prepared and/or provided at this time.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the action area
(50CFR 402.02) for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (*otis septentrionalis).
However, the final 4(d) rule, (effective as of February 16, 2016) exempts incidental take of
northern long-eared bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a
known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during
the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Based on the information provided, the project would occur at
a location where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under
the 4(d) rule for this species. Although not required, we encourage the Applicant to avoid
any associated tree clearing activities during this animal's maternity roosting season from
May 15 — August 15.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is present within the action area for the
federally endangered Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii), and smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata). However, targeted surveys
conducted during the appropriate timeframe (August 25, 2021) did not detect evidence for these

species at that time. Based on the information provided, we believe that the probability for
inadvertent loss of these plant species is insignificant and discountable and we would concur
with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect'' determination from the action agency.
We believe that suitable habitats do not occur onsite for the federally endangered Carolina
heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) or any other federally protected species, and we require no
further information at this time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this
identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the
identified action.
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Stream Channel and Bank Restoration
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated sediment bed load while maintaining channel features and neither degrading nor
aggrading. Alterations to the dimension, pattern, or profile of the stream channel as well as
changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input can significantly
alter this equilibrium.
We offer the following recommendations for the Applicant's consideration:
Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream
restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site
conditions. Live dormant stakes may be used to reestablish root structure in riparian
areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole -tree revetment
or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand, and dirt are not
recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend above the bank -full
elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural floodplain begins).
Deep -rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks where any channel
work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no greater
than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as wide as practical
but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel.
2. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to
accomplish necessary reconstruction. Restoration plans should account for the

constraints of the site and the opportunities to improve stream pattern, dimension, and
profile with minimal disturbance.
Reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are based
on the bank -full, or channel -forming, stage of the stream. Bank -full stage maintains the
natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over time. Natural
channel conditions should be identified using a reference reach (nearby stream reaches
that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the pattern,
dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project's success.
4. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures
should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures should
be removed as soon as the work area is stable.
5. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary. Machinery
should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance to woody
vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant residue prior
to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to ensure there are no
leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants) prior to and during
construction.
6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any
ground -disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic
resources. In North Carolina, non -cohesive and erosion -prone soils are most common in
the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions. Therefore,
reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be stabilized with
seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion -control matting prior to the end of
each workday. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or, wherever
possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed
establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along
slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or
other geotextile material and surrounded with silt fencing).
Pollinator Habitat
Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, and other insects, including moths and
butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and production of most
fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops are
pollinated by these types of fauna. Declines in wild pollinators are a result of disease and the
loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat.
We have records of rare species in the area, including monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus
plexippus), a federal candidate for listing.' Monarch butterflies east of the Rocky Mountains
'" Taxa for which the [Fish and Wildlife] Service has on file enough substantial information on biological
vulnerability and threat(s) to support proposals to list them as endangered or threatened. Proposed rules have not yet
been issued because this action is precluded at present by other listing activity. Development and publication of

have declined by approximately 80 percent. Loss of habitat due to genetically modified crops,
overuse of herbicides and insecticides, urban, suburban and agricultural development, disease,
climate change, and overwintering site degradation are the leading causes of monarch decline.
Adults use a wide variety of flowering plants throughout migration for nectar and breeding.
However, milkweed plants (Asclepius spp.) are essential to monarch breeding as these are the
only genus of plants that can host monarchs in their larval form. For a regional and seasonal list
of plants important to monarch butterflies, please visit the Xerces Society website at:
http://www.xerces.org/monarch-nectar plants/.
Although the provisions of section 7 of the Act do not currently apply to candidate species or
other non -listed pollinators, we would greatly appreciate your assistance in determining if
monarch butterflies or suitable habitat for the species is present on the proposed project site. If
individuals or suitable habitat is present, impacts should be avoided. Additional information
about monarch butterfly can be found at the Service website dedicated to the species at:
https: //w ww. fws.govlsavethemonarchl.
To reduce development impacts to monarch butterflies and other pollinators and/or to increase
the habitat and species diversity within the project area, we recommend the following measures
be incorporated into project designs:
Throughout the site, avoid non-native seed mixes and plants. Instead, sow native seed
mixes and plant species that are beneficial to pollinators.
a. Avoid seed mixes and plants that have been pre-treated with insecticides, such
as neonictinoids.
b. Taller -growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery
of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the
summer months. Taller plants, not mowed during the summer, would provide
benefits to pollinators, habitat for ground-nesting/feeding birds, and cover for
small mammals.
c. Native low-growing/groundcover species should be planted in areas that need
to be maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also
minimizing the amount of maintenance, such as mowing and herbicide
treatment.
d. Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species is especially beneficial for
monarch butterflies. The following website provides additional information
and a comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
http://www.xerces.org/pollinator-resource-center/mid-atlantic. We also offer
our assistance with developing seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with
fast growing erosion control seed mixes for overall soil stability and pollinator
benefits.
e. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator
habitat requirements can be provided upon request.
proposed rules on these taxa are anticipated. The Service encourages State and other Federal agencies as well as
other affected parties to give consideration to these taxa in environmental planning" (Federal Register, February 28,
1996). Taxa formerly considered as "Category 1" are now considered as "candidates."
0

2. Mowing and grounds maintenance, including pesticide use, should be scheduled to not
interfere with monarch breeding or nectaring at project sites that occur along the
migration route. To reduce harm, we advise mowing in the fall or winter when
flowers are not in bloom.
3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs
for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend project designs include a diverse array of
habitats to accommodate varied pollinators. For example:
a. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs.
b. Many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants.
c. Most bees nest in the ground and in wood or dry plant stems.
d. For additional information and actions that can be taken to benefit pollinators,
please visit the following website: https:Ilwww.fws.gov/pollinators/.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail] if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-22-401.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

Section 6:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Documentation

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Road)
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
This is the third phase of the Long Creek Greenway from I-485 to Oakdale Road in northern Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Project
components include approximately 2.4 miles of greenway and approximately 8,300 linear feet of stream enhancement and preservation on
Long Creek. The greenway will provide a linear trail for recreation, fitness, and community connection. Stream enhancement on sections of
Long Creek will include bank stabilization and Priority 2 and 3 enhancement to provide floodplain access and stable channel dimension, and
diversity of in -stream habitats for functional uplift. Preservation is proposed to relatively stable stream sections.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management - POC: David Booth
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000, Charlotte, NC 28208
phone: [phone] email: [e-mail]
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (POC: Ian Eckardt)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: 2019-00868
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Coordinates: Lat: 35.337093 Long:-80.905879
Site Address: 4120 Oakdale Rd, Charlotte, NC 28216
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Multiple -see attached parcel information
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Long Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba River - 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 4
Regional General Permit 9
L✓J Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

kt�
WILDLANDS
E N G I N EER I N G
November 11, 2022
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
SAW-2019-00868 (Phase 2)
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Roden -Reynolds:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is submitting a request for written verification from the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) regarding the extent of potential waters of the United States within the assessment area of
the subject project, which is a continuation of the Long Creek Greenway (SAW-2019-00868) of approximately 2.4
miles between 1-485 and Oakdale Road. In conjunction with the greenway, approximately 8,300 linear feet of
stream enhancement and preservation are proposed along Long Creek. Stream enhancement on sections of
Long Creek will include bank stabilization and Priority 2 and 3 enhancement to provide floodplain access and
stable channel dimension, and diversity of in -stream habitats for functional uplift. Preservation is proposed to
relatively stable stream sections. The current assessment area is an expansion of a previously verified
delineation performed by Wildlands in 2021.
The following attachments are included with this preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) request packet:
• Figures (Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, Soil, & NWI)
• Jurisdictional Request Form
• Agent Authorization Forms & Agent Authorization Form Parcel Map
• Mecklenburg County Property Cards
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
• Representative Site Photolog
• USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms & NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
• USACE Antecedent Precipitation Data
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-332-7754 ext. 108 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Ian Eckardt, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 1

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Figures (Vicinity, USGS Topographic,
Delineation, Soil, & NWI)

•��u�`IVa
n5 r_
� o 0
�` 30YP
- AMMd. = � J � _
ad• VTI sam earl
1 U
l � .FuA'•;i
\= i
•l � F �udl, AstY Ln ,
ref—
\ \
V
i
•\,\
V
dam/
-
J
b
ell
0\
�
m
y
y
i
,tea`
•`I
� '"
o Kd
N
E V
N
a
t�

v ,
, }
• Iv � � ti ! �
9p O
I, • N
s � II/� Mmw
�\ t fp
i 4
MAi
^"-"ice I ' =:�. �? . ��/ •
4-0
vt
a
Ip• y 1 f) ` i,� l u
7
I ,� „� s - - •� �Ia
cow _ I no _
o 0 m h r'• `^' • m
w m m
C� J '•s 1. J O �i 1 �• •• �� c
/ t
�.9 s'@�` `� ., • �` as
1• y
3
v
L7
ii
O
0
0
O
t�

— v
-
., v a
a 3
E E E
v v v v
v n
d ¢ 3 0
v v v v v v v
I 1 i1
T
A
3
c
v
v
C7
o�
e�

;- w
C
l
0

I
;- w
C
l
L!7

J c
0 v a E^ o
m ° v 2 m Y u
m w m ° v n n O o 0 3 s
m
0 0— a U \ Q O •O C w
m eo o' o' to Y O u
0 C
O E W ti N Gl Gl = O
w a ° aT E E E E 5 L
1 Y O v' O O O p A
O r
d ° 3 3 3 3 v
a C
L �
W
m >•
v e v
- v o
o 1
N N y
o W O c Q T C
j N E E E I N
o m m w
o E E o o
o 9
a a
m a m• o� �� � ,� � y
m
o o v o
-ov
" }.. a u u = g
Wo:�
.-
m
w �
Q o m
}, wo o
t o
o
1 ul a'
MW
m x
w
ON
p W C
m m h+l
W = U �
0
u v v v v v c v v v aU
a ¢ O vI vI vI O ¢ O m a ^^ Z
m m m m m m Gl 0 U I --I w
N N N N N N O N N N N
N U
a a a a a a a Q a a a a FBI
mWV
m-
= l�

a
� r04
y
cn�j
0

a
I
� r04
�i
cn�j
4

W. /
4�
r -
v
AM ¢ O vi vi vi ry O vi
N
O � �
a a a a
Li
0
v
0
0
9w
OBE
cn9y
R�l
Q�
z�
W
Q Z
40
Z
Ial w
t�

str
1
1
a
o�
t�

a
I
� r04
�i
cn�j
r)

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Jurisdictional Request Form

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.gr y.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProgram/Contact/Coun!yLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 4120 Oakdale Rd.
City, State:
Charlotte, NC, 28216
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple (see attached information)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Ian Eckardt - Wildlands Enqineeri
Mailing Address: 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Telephone Number:
Charlotte, NC, 28203
704-332-7754
Electronic Mail Address: ieckardt9wildlandseng.com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Mecklenburg County
Name: POC: David Booth (Mecklenburg Asset and Facilities Management, Project Manager)
Mailing Address: 3205 Freedom Dr. Suite 6000
Charlotte, NC, 28208
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: David. Booth C�mecklenburgcountync.gov
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Ian Eckardt
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
11/10/2022
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
I I review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 90 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.337093
Longitude:-80.905879
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatoiy-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. ational Wetland Inventory Ma Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, loodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
�J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Agent Authorization Forms &
Agent Authorization Form Parcel Map

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to
Oakdale Road) on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 02514123, 02514876, 02514899, 02516106, 02516108, 02516299,
02519398, 02519399, 02522110, 02522111, 02522294, 02524199,
02531270, 02531271, 02531297, 02531299, 02533283, 02533460,
03311112, 03313221, 03317499, 03318299, 03319199, 03325101,
03325115, 03325116, 03325117, 03327109, 03327334, 03314608,
03325105,03325114,03326105
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Mecklenburg County
600 E. 4th Street- 11th Floor & 700 E. 4th Street- 4th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202 Charlotte, NC 28202
Parcel ID: 02524196
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Department
5841 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: David Booth, Project Manager, Mecklenburg County AFM
Name & Title
QAn_FFF_a7aa
Phone Number:
Signature:
Date: 09/03/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement: Tre burn to
Oakdale on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 03307405
Street Address:
N/A
Listed Owner:
Oakdale Harris Holdings LLC
9000 Statesville Rd.
Charlotte NC 28269
Responsible Party:
r /JZ V6,
Name & Title
Phone !Number:
Signature:
Date:
�C�

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement: Treyburn to
Oakdale on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 03327107, 03327199
Street Address: N A
Listed Owner: Mary Morgan Parker
2742 Miranda Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: ) VIA YC]a�h `diQ Wh ,
Name & Title
Phone Number: 704 1399 134- I is
Signature:
Date: �' a

PI
z }�
ZFo UOo i _ V Oo -ir
■ .,-_.
zry w w
� 0 h
wooIs
- k� a _
7"OH!,
wzoNwoNV-z.-o.NNm-.-oo
UUow miry w 4
z~ W ++
F. .r YON .
no I
W
d
w {
Z F o i
W Z
0 n
Y O ry
I
Y m U U o
- mFN ~ W C7
W Z N ? mNO N > Z m F rn
w OUo ZFm W Uo ~O N y 'y '-
W k
JZm ow YON _
v U U o O W F
yy YON • C7 UKZ�o W
C7U W
_y w Fi �>rn wm Q
}YL Z z o N r+
YON
I C7 m> S UU o cl_ -
_ K Z� W Y -
Fk ZzYON
'� a} UYoN wUp
++ Uo Z '
� �o wm q
z C a 7
o
O
U m k Z¢
K
m h O Y z> o etq
Zo ��..
Y
o WoM y _ YOM
C7' d • •'.
mD
- K
' ADM sitYOM
Cft UUo
W
k 7 Z Z n
_
-
Z z ,
wD
o
y �' IIR• W U o-
- mzw
Z
Won
W U o
m F rn .
,oM
` o
�L w
v C7 2E m Y o C7
zz� K
m> o W D m>
m Y o M Z z
Z z v in +
w M U U o w D mN 4 +
wl
w mFo
z z
wD in
o
UUo ! t r
W
m o 2E f-^
Z Z �
UUo �,T
• z C7 C7 {i `
K
m
+ 2E YO n YOM . WoM-..✓��.
UUo U U o
O o
W
o-
4
a
1 1 �
m
N

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Mecklenburg County Property Record Cards

IVIECKLENBURU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y RELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02514123 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
REAMES RD CHARLOTTE NC 600 E FOURTH ST $73,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
T1a ML OC11- eW
Land Use Code 9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
23.1815 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020
Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$73,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$73,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
-
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
-
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
-
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
-
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 23.1815
ACRE
C501
$73,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$73,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$209,200
11/15/2003
2003
CORRECTION OF LAND AREA:AC/SQ FT/DIM
$473,600

IVIECKLENBURU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02514876 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
AINSWORTH ST CHARLOTTE NC 600 EAST FOURTH ST $110,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Land Use Code
8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
8.73 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description39-968
_
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
_
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$110,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$110,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
-
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
-
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
-
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
i -
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 8.73
ACRE
C501
$110,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$110,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$100,100
07/24/2004
2004
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$128,100

IVIECKLENB IRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02514899 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
NCALKSTONE RD CHARLOTTE 600 EAST FOURTH ST $115,900
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
9.2016 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
_ Special District
NA
Legal DescriptionREENWAY M43-971
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$115,900
Building Value i
$0
Features
$0
Total
$115,900
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area - Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story - Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation - External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) - Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 9.2016 ACRE
C501
$115,900
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$115,900
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$49,400
04/11/2006
2006
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$31,600

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — FRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD FROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02516106 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
8508 BEATTIES FORD RD /FINANCE DEPT $317,800
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
12.613 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description M3-345
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$317,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$317,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 12.613
ACRE
C501
$317,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$317,800
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$241,200

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — FRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD FROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02516108 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE
8604 BEATTIES FORD RD /FINANCE DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$107,700
C501
6.84 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Land Value $107,700
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $107,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use
Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120
6.84 ACRE C501
$107,700
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$107,700
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$90,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — FRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD FROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02516299 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
NCEATTIES FORD RD CHARLOTTE /FINANCE DEPT. $131,000
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
9.24 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description M26-276
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$131,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$131,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 9.24 ACRE
C501
$131,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$131,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$184,800

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — FRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD FROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02519398 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
WOODFORD BRIDGE DR /FINANCE DEPT $8,300
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
2.65 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M24-41
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$8,300
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$8,300
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 2.65
ACRE
C501
$8,300
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$8,300
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$14,200

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02519399 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
BELSTEAD BROOK CT /FINANCE DEPT $12,600
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
3.99 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M24-8&711 BELS
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$12,600
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$12,600
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 3.99
ACRE C501
$12,600
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$12,600
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$9,500

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02522110 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
W W T HARRIS BV CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
9612
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
COUNTY
P5 M54-390
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
Total Appraised Value
$125,700
RE07
329749.2 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$125,700
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$125,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built Built Use / Style
Story
Heat Fuel
Foundation
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
9612 329749.2 SQUARE FEET RE07 $125,700
FEATU RES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$125,700
02/06/2015
2013
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$164,900
06/06/2013
2013
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$164,900

MECKLEN13URG CUUNTYr — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARE) PR'UPER f SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02522111 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
NC T HARRIS BV CHARLOTTE 600 E 4TH ST $101,700
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 9612
Neighborhood
RE07
Land Use Desc 100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
279943.2 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
NA
Legal Description
P5 M54-390
_
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real
Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$101,700
Building Value i
$0
Features
$0
Total
$101,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
-
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
-
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
-
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
-
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 279943.2
SQUARE FEET
RE07
$101,700
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$101,700
02/06/2015
2013
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$140,000
06/06/2013
2013
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$140,000

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02522294 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
REAMES RD CHARLOTTE INC /FINANCE DEPT. $24,800
600 E 4TH ST 1TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
7.87 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
_
Legal Description GREENWAY M25-914 M26-48 &586 &610
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$24,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$24,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 7.87 ACRE
C501
$24,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$24,800
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$21,500

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02524199 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
AMBLESIDE DR CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $27,700
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
8.8 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M25-646
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$27,700
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$27,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 8.8
ACRE C501
$27,700
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$27,700
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$23,700

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARE) PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531270 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
KIMMEL LN CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $0
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R311
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc CONDOMINIUM COMMON AREA
Land
1 LOT
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description GREENWAY M29-123
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$0
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$0
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R311 1 LOT C501
$0
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$0

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531271 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
TREYBURN DR CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $21,000
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
6.68 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M29-304
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$21,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$21,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 6.68
ACRE C501
$21,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$21,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$100

IVIECKLENBURU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531297 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
TREYBURN DR CHARLOTTE NC 600 E FOURTH ST $3,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
1 LOT
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M34-312
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$3,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$3,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 1 LOT
C501
$3,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$3,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$15,000
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$2,000

IVIECKL€NBURU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531299 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TREYBURN DR CHARLOTTE NC 600 EAST FOURTH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$300
Land Use Code 9600
Neighborhood
C501
_
Land Use Desc WASTELAND, SLIVERS, GULLIES, ROCK
Land
1 LOT
OUTCROP
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description INA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$300
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$300
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9600 1 LOT
C501
$300
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$300
07/12/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$200
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$200
05/19/2008
2008
CLERICAL CORRECTION IN VALUE
$200
07/24/2004
2004
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$1,700
12/12/2003
2003
CORRECTION OF LAND AREA:AC/SQ FT/DIM
$1,700

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PREP€R7 Y kELURB CARE) PROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02533283 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
SHENINGTON PL CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $14,100
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
4.48 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M27-964
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$14,100
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$14,100
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 4.48
ACRE C501
$14,100
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$14,100
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$66,800

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02533460 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
CINNABAY DR CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $66,200
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
21.03 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M27-853, 854 &855
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate
Assessed Value
Land Value
$66,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$66,200
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 21.03
ACRE C501
$66,200
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$66,200
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$300

IVIECKILENB IRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03311112 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
6322 MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE 600 E FOURTH ST $53,000
RD UNINC NC CHARLOTTE NC28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
- ACREAGE Land
3.5696 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price -
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description TRACT 3 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$53,000
Building Value �
$0
Features
$0
Total
$53,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.5696 ACRE
D301
$53,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$53,000
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$42,100
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$42,100
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$181,300

IVIECKL€NBUI U LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03313221 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
PRIMM RD UNINC NC /FINANCEDEPT $819,300
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
- ACREAGE Land
37.93 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price -
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$819,300
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$819,300
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style
-
Story
Heat -
Fuel
-
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s)
-
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s)
-
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 37.93 ACRE
D301
$819,300
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$819,300
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$1,048,700

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03317499 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE
TROTTER RD CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
Legal Description
P GREENWAY M24-626 & 25-119
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$12,500
D301
9.2659 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Land Value $12,500
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $12,500
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built - Built Use / Style -
Story Heat - Fuel -
Foundation External Wall - Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) - Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 9.2659 ACRE D301 $12,500
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$12,500
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$307,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03318299 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE
TROTTER RD CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
Legal Description
P GREENWAY B3 M25-366
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$6,500
D301
2.41 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Land Value $6,500
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $6,500
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use
Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120
2.41 ACRE D301
$6,500
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$6,500
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$9,400

IVIECKILENB IRU LUUN I Y — FRCP€R7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03319199 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
PRIMM RD UNINC NC /FINANCEDEPT $30,200
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R100
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Land
22.39 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price -
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$30,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$30,200
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND _
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R100 22.39 ACRE
D301
$30,200
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$30,200
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$694,800

IVIECKLENBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPER7 r kELURD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325101 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
4104 OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FL $62,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
_
Land
2.17 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
TRACT 2 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $62,000
Building Value _ $0
Features $0
Total $62,000
No buildings to show.
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 2.17 ACRE D301 $62,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
01 /14/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
07/24/2004
01/02/2003
Effective for Tax Year
2019
2011
2011
2004
2003
Reason for Change
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
ED
0
New Value
$62,000
$172,100
$216,200
$185,000
$266,300
1:1

IVIECKLENBURU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325115 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 E.4TH ST 11TH FLOOR $75,800
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
T1a ML OC11W OW
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
_
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
3.51 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description TRACT 4 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
_
2020 Real Estate
Assessed Value
Land Value
$75,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$75,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) -
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.51 ACRE
D301
$75,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$75,800
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$39,900
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$92,200

IVIECKL€NBURU LUUN I Y — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325116 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 E.4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
IA-Y&IL OC11TWO] i
Total Appraised Value
$400
Land Use Code 9600
Neighborhood
D301
_
Land Use Desc WASTELAND, SLIVERS, GULLIES, ROCK
Land
1 ACRE
OUTCROP
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description TRACT 1 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$400
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$400
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9600 1 ACRE
D301
$400
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$400
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$500
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$500

MECKLEN13URG CUUNTf — PRUPER7 Y kELURB CARE) PR'UPER f SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325117 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 E.4TH ST 11TH FLOOR $731,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
T1a ML OC11W OW
Land Use Code
R100
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Land
54.147 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
TRACT 2 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$731,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$731,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) i -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R100 54.147
ACRE D301
$731,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$731,000
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$70,400
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$281,800
07/24/2004
2004
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$201,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I Y — FRUPER7 Y kELURB CARD FROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03327109 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
NCEATTIES FORD RD CHARLOTTE /FINANCE DEPT $43,200
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
- ACREAGE Land
31.97 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$43,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$43,200
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 31.97 ACRE
D301
$43,200
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$43,200
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$251,100

IVIECKLENBURU LUUN I Y — FROF€R7 Y kELURB CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03327334 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
FOX THORNE DR CHARLOTTE NC 600 EAST FOURTH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
T1a ML OC11- eW
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
_
Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description
GREENWAY M30-905
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Total Appraised Value
$4,800
D301
3.52 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$4,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$4,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story I -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) i -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.52
ACRE D301
$4,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$4,800
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$0
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03314608 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD 600 EAST FOURTH ST
UNINC NC CHARLOTTE NC28201
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
R120
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
COUNTY
TRACT 2 M63-23
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
Total Appraised Value
$310,400
D301
19.1594 ACRE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
LONG CREEK
FIRE SERVICE A
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $310,400
Building Value $0
Features $0
Tota 1 $310,400
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 19.1594
ACRE D301
$310,400
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$310,400
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$107,600
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$107,600
07/24/2004
2004
COMBINED REAL ESTATE
$496,200
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$200,700

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325105 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRIMM RD UNINC NC 700 EAST4TH ST4TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$71,000
Land Use Code
R120 Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
2.63 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$71,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$71,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built Built Use / Style
Story Heat Fuel
Foundation External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 2.63 ACRE D301 $71,000
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$71,000
11/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$28,500
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$28,500
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$21,000

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325114 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
4600 OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 700 EAST4TH ST4TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$131,600
Land Use Code
R120 Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
10.8285 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
TRACT 5 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$131,600
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$131,600
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 10.8285
ACRE D301
$131,600
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$131,600
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$97,200
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$97,200
10/18/2003
2003
REVISED NOTICE
$153,700

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03326105 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRIMM RD UNINC NC 700 EAST4TH ST4TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$1,493,100
Land Use Code
R120 Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
55.2985 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$1,493,100
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$1,493,100
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built Built Use / Style
Story Heat Fuel
Foundation External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 55.2985 ACRE D301 $1,493,100
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
01 /14/2019
11/09/2014
03/17/2011
04/08/2005
03/15/2003
Effective for Tax Year
2019
2011
2011
2005
2003
Reason for Change
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
New Value
$1,493,100
$354,000
$354,000
$386,400
$542,700

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02524196 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARKS AND
AMBLESIDE DR CHARLOTTE NC RECREATION DEPARTMENT
5841 BROOKSHIRE BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
R111
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - COMMON
COUNTY
C/A M25-509
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
C510
1 LOT
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$0
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$0
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Tota 1
$0
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R111 1
LOT C510
$0
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
12/23/2013
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$0
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0

Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
PARCEL ID: 03307405 OAKDALE HARRIS HOLDINGS LLC Total Appraised Value
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 9000 STATESVILLE RD $658,600
CHARLOTTE NC 28269
1291►11617iAF-1111 P►
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
44.35 ACRE
Exemption / Deferment I -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
06/15/2004
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
1$364,000
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description I M43-195
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2021 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $658,600
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $658,600
LAND
USE UNITS TYPE
R120 44.35 ACRE
BUILDING
BUILDING (1)
NEIGHBORHOOD
D301
ASSESSMENT
$658,600
Finished Area
-
-
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
0
Full Bath(s)
0
Half Bath(s)
0
Bedroom(s)
-
Total (SgFt)
FEATURES
No data to display
111111111104111./10410411
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a
property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible
that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County
Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
DATE OF VALUE CHANGE
01/14/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
04/11/2006
07/12/2003
O1/02/2003
EFFECTIVE FOR TAX YEAR
2019
2011
2011
2006
2003
2003
REASON FOR CHANGE
NEW VALUE
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
8898,100
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$415,600
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$1,238,900
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
8711,900
EQUALIZATION OF VALUE
$710,600
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$1,068,400
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are
provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
Mecklenburg County — Property Record Card Property Search
PARCEL ID:03327107 PARKER MARY MORGAN
BEATTIES FORD RD LINING NC 2742 MIRANDA RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
Exemption / Deferment -
Municipality
Last Sale Date
07/21/1992
Fire District
Last Sale Price
$0
Special District
Legal Description
M35-007
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2021 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
Building Value
Features
Total
LAND
USE UNITS TYPE
R120 1.02 ACRE
BUILDING
BUILDING (1)
NEIGHBORHOOD
D301
Total Appraised Value
$43,400
D301
1.02 ACRE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
LONG CREEK
FIRE SERVICE A
ASSESSMENT
$43,400
$43,400
$0
$0
$43,400
Finished Area
-
-
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
0
Full Bath(s)
0
Half Bath(s)
0
Bedroom(s)
-
Total (SgFt)
FEATURES
No data to display
1111111111041:/1►[al:0
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a
property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible
that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County
Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
DATE OF VALUE CHANGE
01/14/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
01/02/2003
EFFECTIVE FOR TAX YEAR
2019
2011
2011
2003
REASON FOR CHANGE
NEW VALUE
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$43,400
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$48,800
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$48,800
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$50,500
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are
provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
Mecklenburg County — Property Record Card Property Search
PARCEL ID: 03327199 PARKER MARY MORGAN Total Appraised Value
BEATTIES FORD RD LINING NC 2742 MIRANDA RD $18,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R100
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Land
0.15 ACRE
Exemption / Deferment I -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date 07/21/1992
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price $0
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description LB M35-007
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2021 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$18,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$18,000
LAND
USE UNITS TYPE
R100 0.15 ACRE
BUILDING
BUILDING (1)
NEIGHBORHOOD
D301
ASSESSMENT
$18,000
Finished Area
-
-
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
0
Full Bath(s)
0
Half Bath(s)
0
Bedroom(s)
-
Total (SgFt)
FEATURES
No data to display
111IDIOM a1►[al4'7
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a
property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible
that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County
Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
DATE OF VALUE CHANGE
01/15/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
01/02/2003
EFFECTIVE FOR TAX YEAR
2019
2011
2011
2003
REASON FOR CHANGE
NEW VALUE
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$18,000
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$14,400
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$14,400
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$12,000
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are
provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form

O.PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11/11/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wildlands Engineering, Inc., Ian Eckardt, 1430 S.
Mint Street, #104, Charlotte, NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Long Creek Greenway and Stream
Enhancement Phase 3 (I-485 to Oakdale Rd.), SAW-2019-00868 (Phase 2)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 4120 Oakdale Rd., Charlotte, North
Carolina 28216
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.337093 Longitude:-80.905879
Universal Transverse Mercator: UTM 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Long Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 10/7/21 — 10/25/21.

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAYBE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated
Geographic
amount of aquatic
authority to which
Type aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
resources in
r
resources (non
the aquatic
Site Number
(decimal
(decimal
review area
resource "may be"
wetland vs. non -
degrees)
degrees)
(acreage and
subject (i.e., Section
wetland waters)
linear feet, if
404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Non -wetland
1.) Long Creek
35.338784
-80.903373
9,064 LF
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
2.) McIntyre Creek
35.330604
-80.904561
1,468 LF
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
3.) Trib J
35.338228
-80.898274
103 LF
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
4.) Trib AA
35.338496
-80.895432
149 LF
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
5.) Trib BB
35.337905
-80.905993
355 LF
Section 404
waters
6.) Wetland H
35.337475
-80.896638
0.051 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
7.) Wetland 1
35.337911
-80.898104
0.289 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
8.) Wetland PP
35.336380
-80.906931
0.271 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
9.) Wetland QQ
35.334211
-80.907622
0.112 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
10.) Wetland RR
35.333399
-80.908016
0.207 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
11.) Wetland TT
35.337795
-80.895368
0.026 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
12.) Wetland UU
35.337938
-80.895112
0.062 AC
Wetland waters
Section 404
13.) Open Water 4
35.337211
-80.906632
0.764 AC
Open Waters
Section 404
14.) Open Water 5
35.336475
-80.907153
0.116 AC
Open waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification"
(PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit
applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that:
(1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not
make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing
a permit authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit
rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be
necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on
any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic
resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or
enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the
applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable.
Further, an AID, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or
individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during
an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AID to
accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the
U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and
identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based
on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: GIS figures including Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, Soil, & NWI
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Mountain Island & Derita
7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Web Soils Survey Website
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI Wetland Mapper Website (USFWS)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): 2019 aerial on GIS figures with submittal.
or ®Other (Name & Date): Representative site photos with submittal.
® Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW-2019-00868
❑ Other information (please specify
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
DATE
4� 11/11/2022
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Representative Site Photolog

Long Creek - Perennial
Trib AA - Intermittent
Wetland H — additional area
McIntyre Creek - Perennial
Trib BB - Perennial
Wetland I — additional area
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification

A M 010
lk
r x T+r^ g -
dq
1
-' [f ��� t.1i',�� rtl „� da`�i _. ���" �-� „�yz, �� icy Je � �@•�' � ettY;...
-� � k'�i���•=L" ' �. �v»
rr
a.
� K a
i' �

✓g
dr
S s
b +_
pC
�y
� •tit.+ 4 .:,_a" �
v'
i
Open Water 5
-
s
.
r,
Data Point 1— Wetland RR Soil Profile
Data Point 2 — Upland QQ/PP/RR Soil Profile
L
�a
A.6
Data Point 3 — Wetland QQ Soil Profile
Data Point 4 — Wetland PP Soil Profile
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification

Data Point 5 — Wetland UU Soil Profile I Data Point 6 — Upland UU Soil Profile
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
USACE Wetland Determination Forms &
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3, 1-485 to Oakdale Rd. City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/25/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt / Ella Wickliff (Wildlands Engineering) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.333397 Long:-80.908022 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of Wetland RR in the right floodplain of Long Creek which is a subtle concave depression with mud crack and crayfish
burrows. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced drier than normal conditions in the three month period leading
up to the sampling date with moderate drought conditions present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) -Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
40 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Betula nigra
20 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
1. Acer rubrum
50 Yes
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
10 No
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5 No
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 125 (A) 350 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.80
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
65 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-17 10YR 4/1 75 7.5YR 3/4 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control A 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3, 1-485 to Oakdale Rd. City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/25/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt / Ella Wickliff (Wildlands Engineering) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.333841 Long:-80.907781 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetlands QQ, PP, and RR. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has
experienced drier than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date with moderate drought conditions present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) -Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 33
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Asimina triloba
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 23
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
If
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicerajaponica
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
65 Yes FAC
65 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 13
40 Yes FAC
5 No FACU
45 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
9
5 Yes FACU
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1 = 0
FACW species 0
x 2 = 0
FAC species 105
x 3 = 315
FACU species 10
x 4 = 40
UPL species 0
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 115 (A) 355 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.09
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-13 5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control A 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3: (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/25/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt / Ella Wickliff (Wildlands Engineering) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.334280 Long:-80.907595 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of Wetland QQ which is a relict ditch feature that is three to five feet deep. During the field delineation the feature was dry
but exhibited secondary hydrology indicators including sparsely vegetated concave surface and geomorphic position. The USACE Antecedent
Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced drier than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date with
moderate drought conditions present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) -Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Platanus occidentalis
20 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Asimina triloba
5 Yes
FAC
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
5 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 30 (A) 70 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 4/1 65 5YR 3/4 35 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-15 7.5YR 4/6 100 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control A 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3, 1-485 to Oakdale Rd. City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/25/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt / Ella Wickliff (Wildlands Engineering) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.336436 Long:-80.906940 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of Wetland PP located in between two open water features. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site
has experienced drier than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date with moderate drought conditions present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) -Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 52 x 2 = 104
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50 Yes
FACW
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
15 No
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3. Salix nigra
15 No
OBL
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4. Platanus occidentalis
2 No
FACW
Column Totals: 97 (A) 209 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.15
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
82 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
41 20% of total cover:
17
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum
15 Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type'
LoC2
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 4/1
75
7.5YR 5/6 25 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
3-8
5YR 4/4
80
7.5YR 3/1 20 D
M
Loamy/Clayey
8-17
5YR 4/1
65
7.5YR 4/6 35 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control A 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3: 1-485 to Oakdale Road City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/25/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP5
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt / Ella Wickliff (Wildlands Engineering) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.337950 Long:-80.895284 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of Wetlands TT and UU (collected in Wetland UU). Both features are linear depressions in the left floodplain of Long
Creek. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced drier than normal conditions in the three month period leading up
to the sampling date with moderate drought conditions present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) -Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5
HDsowie uommant Inolcato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Persicaria pensylvanica
20 Yes
FACW
2. Microstegium vimineum
5 No
FAC
3. Pilea pumila
2 No
FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
27 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
14 20% of total cover:
6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
2 (A)
2 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1
= 0
FACW species 42
x 2
= 84
FAC species 5
x 3
= 15
FACU species 0
x 4
= 0
UPL species 0
x 5
= 0
Column Totals: 47
(A)
99 (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A
= 2.11
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/2 70 7.5YR 4/6 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-13 10YR 5/3 60 5YR 4/6 40 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control A 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 3: 1-485 to Oakdale Road City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/25/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP6
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt / Ella Wickliff (Wildlands Engineering) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.338084 Long:-80.895219 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of uplands in adjacent to Wetlands TT and UU. Wetland hydrology and vegetation is present however the area lacks
hydric soil indicators. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced drier than normal conditions in the three month
period leading up to the sampling date with moderate drought conditions present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) -Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP6
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Quercus michauxii
30 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2. Quercus alba
15 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Liguidambarstyraciflua
10 No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4. Acernegundo
10 No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5. Acer rubrum
10 No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
1.
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 75 (A) 210 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.80
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
X 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-13 7.5YR 4/6 85 7.5YR 5/2 15 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SCP1
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectiSite: Lem terf..k
Latitude: � H a
Evaluator: -'
County: pNe,_J., ,Ar
Longitude: - go, got sti 1
Total Points:
Stream De te circle one)
Other 'Trm6 A
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =�_}
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 ",Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
CD
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
C9
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain i�c..s jh,LA--
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = S. 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 3
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
M
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
^an
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: +rg -1
?,,:t �� P
f 4ii0 3 "*kJ kJ
C.1 0L, $S S p
p wp t {$
Sketch:

SCP2
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: j 01l 1 I ;. 1
ProjectlSite:
Latitude: �m
Evaluator: _LE
County: ,, f
Longitude: _ M'90 51q 3
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (c' a one
Ephemeral Intermittent
other 'Tr, b IRS
Name:
if>_ 19 or erennial if>_ 30`
erennial
e.g. Quad
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 "Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
ri-5
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0 5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = ffi
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
A.
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8m-5 }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 COther = 0
no rae
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 1,19 6 6 . w: €Ver
s 1
ca. 100 - t dO- 4' r CP re
Sketch:
Met`*. tic Sc4 6A&
C.tJ o L1�r�� •rV'lec �
E' o-^I . Sd.jJ, _T110R Ox Jt &%'A ct'P Ylgit Rtt�j Tie} & 484a �r� Sa'(1 ",f"'%'
et o ri eti s £a oc s. W t.+ Clow VC9 e "63 f c � �3e� '��s' a S
�ropen��s%.a,��

Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement
Phase 3 (1-485 to Oakdale Rd.)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
USACE Antecedent Precipitation Report

i N
1p N
N
W N
W �
C N
t7 p
N
u �
y N
o
I
O N
z�
u N
Oa
d r
W N
(n �
l lr
I N
Q
V M N H D
70
2 r
oC
z
R
N
N
L m N r-I
O
aj
t
c
O
N - '-I '-I
7
O
70
C
0
U
c
C
O
N
C
N
O r
N N tO
70 N Ol l0
N to 01 07
L M h ul
IV O N
9
O
M m N
N
� In rn rn
O
r
N N o7
lO to N
m m N
N N m
_ ul ul N
a fl l0 C]
N N
O
M
a N N N —
C N N N �
C r O O
W
N N N
O O O
❑ N N N
O
m
y
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
70
UJ
N
Q
T
❑
lO
N
N
M
rl
ri
�
N
N
O
co
M
O
~
z
T
❑
O
C)
Q
N
Ol
M
Ol
N
In
m
oo
W
C
o7
m
m
ul
to
to
N
tp
to
Ill
rl
h
I�
Ol
M
O7
Ill
v
w
O7
M
N
OJ
O
l
IC!Ill
Lq
m
to
'Im
y
U
C
�
M
M
M
u1
lO
lO
O]
I�
CO
i
=
m
m
M
m
N
ul
M
D]
CO
w
o
0
�o
m
O
al
o
al
O
O
o
O
�
O
I�
N
Ol
�
u1
lO
O
Il1
N
ai
N
W
i
l
Ol
N
O
Ill
Il1
Ill
�
m
a
a
��
c-
o
m
c1
o�
In
c3�
rn
c�
c
cR
o
m
m
m
'
m
m
0]
O
O]
o
m
w
o7
N
op
o;
of
w
CO
M
o
M
M
h
O]
ID
O
ofr-I
m
V
-
m
n
M
r-I
h
to
m
�
m m
M
O
07
rl
M
r-I
N
O
N
Ill
M
Ill
M
Ill
M
I!1
M
M
Ill
M
M
I!1
M
I!1
M
N
W
W
W
W
W
W
O_
E
z
m
z
Ul
O]
ll1
W
z
z
Q
�
W
�
o
z
Ln
Z
CO
O
J
J
Y
N
W
J
J
J
W
m
m
O
r❑
V`
y
2
O
J
o
J
J
_
i
^
Q
J
W
W
O
❑
>
M
O
O
w
❑
f-
C
W
�
❑
❑
J
ai
_
z
=
=
U
=
V
Q
V
(sayDul) 112JU1pxd

Section 7:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Construction Plan Sheets

Section 7:
Long Creek Greenway & Stream Enhancement Phase 3
(1-485 to Oakdale Road)
Construction Plan Sheets

A
�Y
3
�
$
V
W
`i
0
w
a
F-
z
W
m
ui
i^i.�
m
IL �°m.'v,g� j
em ar c' mom, o�,N aa`ri mom
p rva� drym mui
o
- J
m�V.m-o CJCoup _nV� V M mVYa WE
� V ?N WiyN�
�2mm a2 c('J2 g W 2Eg 2 2 g ncV v
am_m m�Acm Qz
o `o ❑ `❑ t° o V o w r`°
g kOUVb ��n[�c°�aS`�[�c°�a ��c�ic�ia u�iwi❑Va w��oa Vw�o`a
a
J W z wow pow aw
3 a� mto sZ
Z.z V6 ==UWJ l] d
iW Z
� o � d �
f a
w
LU
W.
zJ
W
LU
W - -- -
W�
LL w N W U)
C.)w
C 1) Q LL ( Z / �� `
co
k
o z = ww z
J Z C) o 0-
; �

N
a
N
F
Wfflffl
" Zs
Cal.........
o
W r d U o
Q
d
m
r
Zww0
p w� a a
gg aa�
,2��INIM
S
a
aJ.3
�
a.aasaa�-^a-�-^••
3�3a3�o$�a"�3o"303�3
5�85�85��8
�
�
n
dnaf��3a9aFn�aSa�qp
�
��a��a$�
u
J d
i1 d
0��
d�
rt
0. 5
i1 J
6�
i1 J
J tl
if S
d O
S S
d d J

gg Giz .�a ���i. ry W 4 J W J € w g
Oy -<�° '9f i's_ 5a ry 0_' a 7 W 11
p m z
C
0 hill.
�g
ag 1 O�� 1 3 0 W g Paz :
HIM
WIN oil
�� i ao ism
�n-z-i�&
!gql lilt
ell
Ml ME ;H10-1 ill 11 1 i
F
1
i og E1 i�: jl E� i � � x I eg
ill Nil i
°9 xW o '! sc !ill el ill ¢
€f�° UJIMI gal! �``aa�x� � Nv o�s��
$s WHEN�g a Gg3w€�s°�° _€g� a g>te°a
�� s 110. ��W� � �HiI 11 b
� w�sg �� Ho xW �
n w3€€asga#�i�° -i°�aa a�x9g��aE
s_�=� � ����W�s w -J°l`$�������s5�
"Rig g � HIP o a: ° o
H
����� #��� �`��=aaH10 a�M
s�o

¢
a1
pa t��i
&O
1
4=
`o ARuu„rrti
,ilia:.:., o
W H
W T U
Lo
?O
g
111
FO
S'
r
,
z w w a 0
2
J C' ONO
oc
u'S O
LI p rfl
N.
�� \ r �v ; � 4 � ► s I
rl � \, 1 ♦ f
� r f �♦I ;, f
I�
►000
1
I

¢ a1 pr
YzWW wZQ3wrJ4K~=W> oMH0--80
hj! s.A,
�w
Lu
tam ak a u
�
n
r
�g
33�
r
o$m
aye
f1 �
oz4
f
--`- 4O b�� -\-
O
� L'1

a 'a W Y w z
Z W W R� 0
x�r�iltlli111�\ / il� O Lu C¢ a 0-
N cc a b
cc$ = HE
\
•s
E I
a � t
o-
4 8 �
r � III
\
gl
I.
\
=1
1 \ \
11v v
o nlI
$ I
11 II\
a�
1
n
1 1
gg
1 I
1
1 1 r f
I I
3 �r
it r I
II 1
-
r�
/ r
a,
J
6
w
o9w-
nug
LLj�F
01uti
z
I,
I.
I
III
\ \ 1
Jae

Y
�
j'�'! R r
i
E V
�4111\[ iluio ry W Q J= Q Oz
` d,6 v,� o W Q W ♦- C � zd F � fh
07w00
Zs s sow r
�
W WW i ¢
t
F
E @
, 4 1
l\
\
I
I
/
� f
I [
i
I
\\ Il I
1' p
a �
1
�
moo'o f r
o
[
I
6��
/1
R--,
O m9
,
4
9
1
I I II I,II
I I I II II
I
1 II I I I I 1
I
-
I
t e t
i
CE
f

q
I�
�
I/1
1 '
.I
�I JI
I ^9. r / � •
4111L iluip N W Q J L Q O�
„�•g _ r k`, � Q� w w P z o N O
U��i
Lu
zz w w e c 4 c w
¢ HE
JC7 may— a �' o
/
1,
/ r
ill!'
�I
0=3v 10
3 "k'a
ffwLLh��w 19.

WHIHrc w Q J= ¢ o z
o w�c F� to
C Q w w 15 o N O
w 1u KC� 0 O is $g R u
LUaIt
N tltl i
v a]
u� Z; i=
s L

®® v
a1
W
1 4111E ilu,n� ry W Q J = Q ? O�
W Q W HC a F� CO
U�Ci>p0
cc Ex w
1
l
I
li l I
a
gg�tl
4
_ n
`1
{ Y1 1
qp
y
\
�5kA �
\

a
a1
REM
82j�17
33 1
lia
® w
Yzi=� wa s q�
t �41111I Ilililrr N W Q J= Q Oz
.d6
sg tee= = r k = T LU V LULUg
Z W W � O
/�i1ii111\t` i�N 0 L' CL d ONO 5 0. o V
f
. r
W
$�w
1pr
m�U
z

0)
uLjil 2,2
........
......
W Q
L A OO
0 2 w z 0 0, 0
Lu Lu W a
Lu -
vo

v
zji
yZ�� J w a `_
ARuwln°lu.l°. `C7Jf
sho� T i U y
z Lu L u o c c ova i
..i"Ir1411to°°O c0 Ai
c m w o

U, a
C CIA
2-1
uuu L i o W T Q W V C � id 2
l
�
I
"iiiil iiii i,ii ICI � '�„ �.
� �r•m'��

v
� z;
�
•tea
i�
Q
l
11.11
V
-, - X.
r
p �'�m U�ii>,p �3 9 r
g: 0 Z WOO O Van I
xIx
/& W
I
gaw
S
a�?.®
{
I
�
1i a
aI
gig " 4
obga
§9 A
I
I
I
1
I
" 1
I
I

v
�
11
lV
C
.S�!
3
�
°s a -
s o.
Y Ey
E ff .s
yyytr ro waaW �a_N
_g�Lu a-
0 Q
%.r�'�+n.a?y� �ni \` \ Z W W ly O
J o: w o

Lu
Lu
a _ -ccv.e= "ww, ry Zwwaa0
3 •4J n+^° ���- OJ m - w
i
as 0
d€3aStu=ewes'.9s'��
� �$g iw �egi"�°mdsui36 �FFF f'" �>Fm° 7uW
?90 $ a g ua S a-LL
°$us ����_d op'oa AD€- s��m
o is y6 �5s u asMa-IN
} rc Ego" & 8e
Ho=a€ ���s���
9a g z zyo� aaM o 9.�Gop a
gowo �n " 3� s' qRCD
dFra $
agN�zHUHNZ.
g-
Bayg
tom= - a
3�=- 5€E" 4 = Q5€W EWE big
'fiye 04. s,8NH �° HH- o�
p�Q 3i gy t7- Via¢ �w �°= 9xuZo� "W INH
��e;M.J-- Fsts �p "�W
�3.8 ape 99�� 55"` 8 w�°`""dimes&8o s M ss 40
g+� wpam ago,
tax w6ow s�W""y o5gaoa
z== "W$pog o uffl
o ° +3UT 66 ez� �M ogee a�
�€ _° € a=yes" fl
e Bg 3
It go 151& Jd �»€Ed RHyy z$g£3g m :�.ooag°° u
aI!R °pp9 Q -
eb Ab°4 p e� •P .. Y }
b ��•4 s.=a>== um p wi
s a �_'.�"
ggi
iMffl
z
a 4dg v��i Wa"m€°$s°=°GW"="-WNWw
N p 0
RR5�fW5°'"� 3'6
I-q-
o``H "HUM
°
z
obs boa=< g1fe„ ° a ga�u�
WW
� �` FaeoLLs Nya ps`o�f
fli
LLJ
�z fob
cW�3a2109W50� 8m"pm 'W
3n8 63WgW��
�R 8
asp ce a'�� 'M
m woy� 08�€ma
i >. a� a 5 gsgeq a ^a�
sg<" pg �
V�
��q a M "��`°' ow;u wt$ 3 a &gig= i
"i��4�Q-�03— SLL°"r g3ot°°LLg'
.- W8 ,='
INI "R"+
B
g-�§ow.��°w��WoW" ��=�g��s�a� i
n zBCEbsg5«Wb°gje�€�wSdC
`�J u rs�&= ss�F�n &o :k &W m�g.�am 9'MA

n LU0 WC a w a
10
x La
ta
zwwwa0 ci i� U

to
�
3
�
p W
�1111�11111�, N W Q� Z Q
0 W y CL
CL
0
Z
co
0
U
z
z
w
4
LUq
S
�E
F�
n
Uf
w
W
0
¢z
0Of
a.
2 M
H Q
LL
NLn
h
of
W
2
,O'N `HO131"
SAVMHE) 30 NOISIA[0 k�
NOUVIU0dSNW1 d0 1d30
VNI10VVO H'HON tl3Itldtl9 313tlON00 318tl1tlOd . r
30 31V1S €p.� UO3 ONIWVSO 11V130 0IS1311
E4 o3B
n.
e
a
-w
g o9
ii o �o
STATE OF T-OM METRIC DETAIL DRAWING FOR
NORTH CAROLINA ` O
PORTABLE CONCRETE BARRIER
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION - O
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS C�
MLEIGH, N.C.
n

N0)
(]
9�
1110u
a s
zWW°�=oLu
��
U
c
-
�itlm
Fill gal
g4$�$EEs1ti _g�1
Rik,
4
V)
pg
ua
It
g•a �S� � 535$��6�a�-p�
G
i4
n4�a
�s��8�%
�y'�2y gF�
Sq6$` Fi-
y,
z
e6�ryyeeEEr ix
39eia
�_55 aa�i Y
Eli
3 4 9 g3'
�Ie�EdBe$a
ffi�ffiy c
tls FE?E5
gg5pi%Ryypp S=g
•
E'�+pR{{
'�
� @-�
�i p aa
flae
�Jp E�SF€;
d
S§§E�
H11
d
.�
F
lip!
�g�
p i
5 ?F�`s�
ppgggg
mil
5
g @
E€
�
MI
1
g$J
& jj
g
���
d3@ x'
6� gp ffi
ra2-1
77
�
I In
pE
I
IlP-

�q zz r�y .�m a�q�l4�lunp�r L
as _ \o W a 4
Nil 02 aOW �
paH Op
��m o
3~ cc w

3� C �S1 nuw'rr rc W Q J W Q y w
Is
lffldk
co
17
IN
0 p O �i o
U' a w' 0, 0 0 �
s=
s�
a(
a�aoo

I
L31
g ji
�V
G
E
HT
{ sg_
�a��gya
I
ly
2 L
Z W WF'B hg
W F m a O i
o:
mg F
1
888
t I � G. G �
t 9�
Via. � � � a
W e HE E� dli I'm
fm

u iS1
CLA
oV
O
,O
0 2 w 0
�
��g
e
N
AF
I
-
a•
�
;Qy6F
WE
�
�L-j
Gdi•
gg
g�_
I
�
I
e
I,
all
Arv�;
LLU
1 ���
qgy qry q
1'
o
5
47 !
I,
Y�
m
l
�
�
pp
r
'r
a
1
ey
1 �
1

I
L31
g ji
C z
gs
E1O
e
xG�
t
o
g
IW¢ iJ Y 4 W U.
Q�
V
F
Q
Z I2 W W ly 0
GiL
14 k
CV
3
�
szsac R
eLroG M1
4-L�
------
areot S
ooi t
f

u
iS1
w 0 p
OK¢aan ° Ci
e��
"777-
xR�
-
B°'Rl
�
I
I
_
1
1#
I
Ft
�
I
I
�
i
4
$
y
BB'Bll
.lip —
�d
�m
111
41
WmI
m'lW
_ _
G� 9k

v
9 C
�
ZJi
C_Y
g �il R,
l
V
3
�
w Lum
N
zwLU W.zo
g
t
rg
Eo
m�'�F
�aka�}g w
p8c�g8�
\\I
--------------
I
b
's
I
I
R R 4 R R R
}
i
ag ft
sus
I
'tlR ➢R Wx Ali
I
F p

U iS1A Z J ® w
0? 0 O keg g (V
Lu
a#� z w w 0tw
L tg a
I�
wj
—
gee_
—- ca•a,2-a
i
� .
ar�
w
�
1
f
a"
ap
I
-
eoyee
-
w•R �.e
s=g
.,y�B�Ri
oka
-
-
tt�veB
-
k:ay
e
� x
��e
aroe
iL'tlB
95
-fig_
$
06'a6B

�Q �mnl n w¢7w�ca r...... o t U �
IO
N
w I 1
�p9
R i
� � 4 : 4 5 � I ;p �
g:
M1y
Ra S�
_:�9::
� �
_l�
r1
a
e ._�
og� WE YHE
FRI
1
BBBBg€g�
f
@
sy..
_ t1 Pry 1
A
onwa
5 e
I
11 + y
1 f
�

I
Oai
3
c
WHIHw
.s_ MyKOO >u o wz CV
w O
8
'g�8m
Illlll
ul _
wR
m �
G
— I
S"�
l
tl _
-
i
tt
I
§ce
G o
EERtl
L
Am
Qai
R e ass Eig; 6
�s

cooan'.,. .� o W 4 J W H G m LD
Ou =� m .+�:_ = 1L5 ass � 1'a W W Q °c '� � �
HOC �§ - = U $ d O m !0.
iii CV
IS �. n zwww 0 'a
Qj cr.
d.. s" ?e
C
alzo
mam
6
nw—
a
�'.8•_y
-
_
gay
�
oA
I
F-7
it
s
se
11
° lx laa$y $e Y
f -fib, o
Ar
az ua
i,
ro
/3

v
�
9 § IS m 1 § I
waCN
Lu ¢LuWY a e CO
0213,00z0cc
$ s L
�ry/l�liiinlo_ N c
sip
-E-
a
l
�I
Y g
691,
R
Il
6 �jg
pd
reeve
f�WB
x a8 es
[ka4.a—LL
a€�
I
s F�d.r
-
1
I _ 1
SYmB
fL'�9
B009B
1
11 �)
1 I
11
f 1
. IRE
o
i
I,
°pw
MMMUll
, I
yE
I
p, 1,W l i
C gi5k'�
°a Ag y'
8ar
s !
ge, \ 1
gg
a
♦ _ {:,.
—1
a
J/y