20230032 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230103

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
11/2/2022
BINS # Assigned* Version#*
20230032 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Old Statesville Road Apartments
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Heath Caldwell
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Andrew Pitner:eads\ahpitner
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
1/3/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Caldwell Station Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.4468 -80.8459
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Charter Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Phil Vetter
2d. Address
Street Address
1520 South Blvd
Address Line 2
Suite 215
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28203
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
John Littlefield
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
175 Davidson Highway
Address Line 2
City
Concord
Postal / Zip Code
28027
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
David and Jessica Henkel
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
17209 Old Statesville Road
Address Line 2
City
Huntersville
Postal / Zip Code
28078
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Shirley Brown
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
2d. Address
Street Address
17303 Old Statesville Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Huntersville NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28078 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Connie Heath

2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
17223 Old Statesville Road
Address Line 2
City
Hutersville
Postal / Zip Code
28078
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Heath Caldwell
4b. Business Name:
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
4c. Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address Line 2
PMB 550
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28277
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
00544330, 00544331, 00544317, 00544318,
00544319
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Caldwell Station Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
2b. Property size:
17.21
State / Province / Region
Country

3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011401
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is located just west of Hwy 115, and just north of Hwy 73, in Hutersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The elevation is approximately 770-810 ft. The site is primarily
covered by single family residences and lawns along Hwy 115 with disturbed wooded slopes to the rear of the site adjacent to a power line right of way.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.045
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
507
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The proposed residential development will include impacts to two wetlands and a stream for grading to meet required fixed intersections per rezoning.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
A complete PJD application is included in this package
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland D
Yes
Corps
0.002
(acres)
W2
Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Corps
0.005
(acres)
W3
Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Corps
0.038
(acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.045
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.045
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (')
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
SI
Road Crossing
Permanent
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
3
Average (feet)
359
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
359
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
359
3j. Comments:
stream width is 3.6 ft
0.029 AC of stream impacts
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots & access
routes.There were limited opportunities to avoid impacts to aquatic features on this site due to fixed required connections per rezoning & existing site
topography challenges. Part of the fill impacts are associated with safety hazard that would be arise from preserving a small section of the stream. The
applicant has demonstrated avoidance & minimization efforts by limiting impacts to the required connections and regulated infrastructure requirements.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 2:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Stream
Quantity:
359
3c. Comments
A 1:1 ratio is proposed due to the deteriorated condition of the stream. Please see NCSAM for details.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No

If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Mecklenburg County
Comments:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to Mecklenburg County but will be designed to meet their
criteria.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown

5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is exempt as described in the attached T&E report. This report has been submitted to FWS for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com
Report from R.S. Webb & Associates
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
www.fema.gov
https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Old Statesville Road Apartments PCN.pdf 22.22MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
A complete PCN package is attached.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Heath Caldwell
Signature
WeaCY &` �/.(esll
Date
1/3/2023

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW - 20 -
Prepare file folder n
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM pi
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Old Statesville Road Apartments
2. Work Type: Private pi Institutional ri
Government n Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
PJD and PCN request for residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Charter Properties
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Heath Caldwell
EI
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
35.4468, -80.8459
-17225 Old Statesville Road, Huntersville, NC 28078
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 00544330, 00544331, 00544317, 00544318, 00544319
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Huntersville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Caldwell Station Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Catawba (03050101)
Authorization: Section 10 n Section 404 n Section 10 & 404 n
Regulatory Action Type:
pind m StaNationwide Permit #
n RegionaldarGeneralPerit Permi29t #
n Jurisdictional Determination Request
H
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
n Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
January 3, 2022
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Andrew Pitner
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -Construction Notification for
NWP #29 for the Old Statesville Road Apartments site in Huntersville, Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina
Messrs. Roden -Reynolds, Pitner, Wojoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit #29 for the Old Statesville Road Apattiuents site on
17.21 acres located along Old Statesville Road in Huntersville, NC. The site is a proposed
residential development and consists of one stream and three wetlands. A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination Request for the proposed project is included in this application.
Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information for information on onsite surface
waters.
This site is adjacent to an existing development. As discussed with USACE in late July of 2022,
the proposed development is a separate and complete site. A portion of the project area was
included in a permit application several years ago, but the proposed development includes
several additional parcels, and will have their own entrance, utility connection, stormwater, and
Charlotte Office:
106 12-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
1
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite I D, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
private amenity. The only connection to the adjacent site is due to required roadway connections
per the City of Huntersville. Please refer to the USACE Coordination section for additional
details.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to one
stream and three wetlands for road crossings and fill for a residential development. Total
permanent impacts proposed include 359 linear feet (0.029 acres) of stream impact (Stream B)
and 0.045 AC of wetland impacts (Wetland A, C, and D). The proposed crossings were
necessary due to a combination of the NCDOT driveway spacing requirements and the required
connection points per rezoning. The proposed fill impacts are, in part, to accommodate the
required road grades and parking requirements. Additional fill is proposed for the preferred plan
due to the safety hazards associated with potential alternative plan. The alternative plan would
only limit impacts to a small section of stream (Sheets WD3.0 and 3.1) through use of large
retaining walls. Additionally, the geometry and location of the required roadway connections do
not allow for safer grading options and would not provide additional avoidance of stream
impacts. Because of the safety complications in using the retaining walls and the required
roadway connections required for the site plan, the impacts associated with the preferred plan
would provide the best avoidance and minimization option while still allowing for project
viability.
Overall impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited
through site selection location, design, and the location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. A headwall is proposed at the end of the stream impact area and 2:1 slopes will be
implemented to limit impacts to site surface waters. The proposed plan is the safest option while
maximizing avoidance and minimization methods. To compensate for the anticipated permanent
impacts to onsite streams, the applicant is proposing payment to the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Program at a 1:1 ratio due to the deteriorated condition of the
stream. Please refer to the enclosed NCSAM for more details.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. This report has been submitted to Fish and Wildlife
Services for concurrence. Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you have
any questions, [phone] or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Heath Caldwell, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Charlotte Office:
106 12-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
2
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite I D, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

USACE
Correspondence
USACE Correspondence

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Ien.rindner44wetlands-epg.com
[phone]
www.wedands-epg.com
Charter Apartments
Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV USARMY CESAM (USA) <[e-mail]>
To: Len Rindner <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Amber Lipsky <[e-mail]>
Mr. Rindner,
Amber Lipsky <[e-mail]>
Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:21 PM
I received the email yesterday and had the chance to speak with Scott today about this project. We are both in agreement that if you can demonstrate the new
proposed project is a single and complete project and does not solely rely on a previous development's existing infrastructure, utility connection, roads, etc. then
the Corps is ok separating this project from a previous project.
Therefore, you can submit a PCN under a Nationwide Permit Program and at that time, the Corps will review all project specific information and make a final
determination as to if the project can be considered a single and complete project and not considered cumulative with the adjacent development.
PLEASE NOTE:
A General Water Quality Certification (GN4256/GN4263) for projects eligible for Corps Nationwide Permit 29/39 is required by the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources. In GN4256/GN4263 states "activities that are eligible for Corps NWP 29/39 qualify for coverage under this
General Certification unless they meet one of the thresholds listed (i.e., thresholds "a" through "j"). Activities meeting any one of the thresholds or circumstances
listed are not eligible for coverage under GN4256/GN4263 and require an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Resources."
Please focus on thresholds "b" and "c"
• "b" which states "total temporary and permanent impacts to streams greater than 150 linear feet"; or
• "c" which states "total temporary and permanent impacts to wetland or open waters equal to or greater than 1/10 acre."
Therefore, if the proposed project exceeds any of the thresholds "a" through "j", then an Individual Water Quality Certification is required as this project will not
qualify for a general Water Quality Certification. In addition, the Corps cannot issue a Nationwide Permit until the applicant receives the Individual Water Quality
Certification from the Division of Water Resources and supplies a copy to the Corps.

Thanks,
Bryan Roden -Reynolds, PWS
Senior Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: [phone]
From: Len Rindner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 1:04 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV USARMY CESAM (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Charter Apartments
Scott and Bryan
One of our long term clients, Charter Properties has asked us to evaluate a site in Huntersville for a multi -family project.
We learned that another developer looked at this site in 2018 and David Shaeffer made a determination that the plan they submitted was associated with another
project in the large Caldwell Station Area of Huntersville. In addition we understand that the proposed impacts were significantly more extensive and would likely
have exceeded the Nationwide Permit thresholds, when associated with the adjacent project. Our understanding is that the earlier plan reviewed by David Shaeffer
would have required an Individual Permit.
However, Charter is looking at this site for their own multi -family development. They are also adding additional parcels that were not part of the previous site plans.
They will have their own entrance; their own stormwater management; and their own private amenity. The plan meets the Town Of Huntersville planning
requirements. They are also proposing only minor impacts to a degraded segment of stream and wetland (photo's attached).

I have attached our preliminary assessment mapping from February 2022; and draft planning information for your review as well. Our client is looking for input
whether this site can potentially be considered a it's own stand alone project and potentially eligible to utilize the Nationwide Permit program.
Please let me know your thoughts and if you have any questions.
Thank you. Len
[Quoted text hidden]

Permit Application
Permit Application

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Old Statesville Road Apartments
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Charter Properties, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Phil Vetter
3d. Street address:
1520 South Blvd, Suite 215
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
pav©charterproperties.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Heath Caldwell
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
5c. Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
00544330, 00544331, 00544317, 00544318, 00544319
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.4468 Longitude: -80.8459
lc. Property size:
17.21 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Caldwell Station Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Catawba/03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is located just west of Hwy 115, and just north of Hwy 73, in Hutersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The elevation is approximately
770-810 ft. The site is primarily covered by single family residences and lawns along Hwy 115 with disturbed wooded slopes to the rear of the site
adjacent to a power line right of way.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.045
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 507
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed residential development will include impacts to two wetlands and a stream for grading to meet required fixed intersections per rezoning.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X No ❑ Unknown
Comments.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A complete PJD application is included in this application.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes X No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Wetlands X Streams — tributaries
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.002
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.005
W3 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.038
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.045
2h. Comments:
W1- Wetland D
W2- Wetland C
W3- Wetland A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Stream B
PER
Corps
3.6
359
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
359
3i. Comments:
S1- 0.029 AC
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots & access
routes.There were limited opportunities to avoid impacts to aquatic features on this site due to fixed required connections per rezoning & existing site
topography challenges. Part of the fill impacts are associated with safety hazard that would be arise from preserving a small section of the stream. The
applicant has demonstrated avoidance & minimization efforts by limiting impacts to the required connections and regulated infrastructure requirements.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 2:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
X Yes ❑
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
fee program
Mitigation
X Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu
❑ Permittee Responsible
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 359
Quantity:
Quantity:
A 1:1 ratio is proposed due to the deteriorated condition of the stream. Please see NCSAM for details.
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
cyo
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to Mecklenburg
County but will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Mecklenburg County
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
X Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes X No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes X No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑Yes ❑ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ No
X Yes
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is exempt as described in the attached T&E report. This report has been submitted to FWS for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com
Report from R.S. Webb & Associates
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes
X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov
https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Heath Caldwell
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
e V2a - *l,
1-3-2023
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Old Statesville Road Apartments
Property Address:
—17225 Old Statesville Road, Huntersville, NC 28078
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 00544330, 00544331, 00544317, 00544318, 00544319
Select one: f am other
Name: Phil Vetter
Company: Charter Properties
Mailing Address: 1520 South Blvd, #215, Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
/ 2 1-1—
Property I ner l (nterested Buyer / Other* Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office:
I0612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. 1
Suite 10, PMB 28_
Asheville, NC 2880!

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Catawba Stream Credits Statement of Availability
December 27, 2022
Charter Properties, LLC
1520 South Blvd, Suite 215,
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Mr. Phil Vetter
RE: Availability of Stream Credits for the "Old Statesville Road Apartments" project
Bank Name: Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Sites: Firestone Mitigation Site / Double Rock Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC
USACE Action ID No.: SAW-2020-01534 / SAW-2020-01532
Permittee: Charter Properties, LLC
Stream Credits Needed: 359 LF
Stream Credits Available: 1,466.25 LF
Catawba 03050101 River Basin
Dear Mr. Vetter,
Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC, owned and operated by Wildlands Engineering, Inc., currently has sufficient stream
credits from the Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Firestone Mitigation Site and Double Rock
Mitigation Site to satisfy the stream mitigation requirements related to the above -mentioned project. The
project is located within the Catawba River Basin of the service area (HUC 03050101) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. It is neither a guarantee of
future credit availability, nor a guarantee of credit pricing. Credits are sold on a first come, first serve basis at
the Bank's price at the time an invoice is requested. Invoices reserve both the credits and the price for a period
of 30 days. Credits and associated pricing may be reserved for up to 6 months with a signed reservation
agreement and a 10% deposit.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the US Army Corps of Engineers
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form approving the Stream and/or wetland mitigation
purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at (704) 332-
7754 x114 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Camden M. Brunick
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Mitigation Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 114
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Amber Lipsky I Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

Maps/Plans

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
CHARTER PROPERTIES
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
HAC
FIGURE
1
2/7/22

I- -L. —4--
— r - -
a_
OWN CIOCI Dr
C., IElm 41.
1
i111
NMI
Ail els
PARCEL ID: 00544330
CALDWELL STATION LLC
175 DAVIDSON HWY
CONCORD, NC 28027
1
Y
PARCEL ID: 00544331
DAVID & JESSICA HENKEL
10040 DEVONSHIRE DR
HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
Parcel Information Provided by
Mecklenburg County GIS 2022
s
5141
+ I t +
PARCEL ID: 00544317
CONNIE HEATH
3500 TALL PINE COURT
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
�r
41
4
ti
-.
,„..„-.1,
..,..., c.....,
_,..
,,..i.
+9
.... a
-„. ,
.....
..... ..... .4.1
. ...
... ...
.... ...a. 5,.. ii,__
....
...
ss ''_ r Or) 1oIf4I
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS if,
17.21 +/- AC
PARCEL ID: 00544318
SHIRLEY KNOX BROWN
14411 STUMPTOWN RD
\HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078 J
4I
0
PARCEL ID: 00544319
SHIRLEY KNOX BROWN
at
�I
r
J�
00
■
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
(e 904-2277
www. .ww et lanan ds-s- e pg. c o m
Prepared for:
CHARTER PROPERTIES
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
PARCEL MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
HAC
FIGURE
2
2/7/22

Aerial Imagery Provided by
Google Images 2022
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
AERIAL MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
HAC
FIGURE
3
2/7/22

LOCATION
Lat: 35.4468 2N
Long: -80.8459 2W
HUC: 03050101
CATAWBA
USGS QUAD
Cornelius, NC 1993
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
CALDWELL STATION CREEK
1
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
17.21 +/- AC
SCALE
1:24,000
CHARTER PROPERTIES
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
USGS MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
HAC
FIGURE
4
2/7/22

NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
Mecklenburg County 1980
Map U IIL S•yr-ll)ul
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
17.21 +/- AC
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOl
CD
Ce82
Cecil sandy clap loam. 2 to B
percent slopes. moderately
eroded
Heh
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 16 to 25
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
17.5
6B_2%
2B_g%
2_g%
100.0%
Wetlands and Environmental Plannin Grou
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
CHARTER PROPERTIES
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
HAC
FIGURE
5
2/7/22

W
0
a
tn
0
3
i
z
0
0
Wa
0
0
a
0
I / I
Y /
EXISTING HIGH
(
TENSION POWER LINE \ 1 I\\\ I\1\ `� \ \ 1� I
\
/
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) 1 1 \\ \ (\ \ \ I
\ 1
I I \ \ \
/ 1 i 1 \\ Hl
1 1)
/ / /' ;�►111//�/I
INTERMITTENT STREAM "B" / / I 111I 1 1 I / / / /
±507 LF, 1,977 SF (0.045 ACC /j/ I I 1 I / // / \
/ / �,//// / /////
A,/// —// / ///�//
WETLAND "Crr� /�//// / //// /
± 207 SF (0.005 AC) / / / / / / /
I / />
INTERMITTENT STREAM(
"B" ORIGIN
WETLAND
±1,660 SF (0.038
GREENWAY TRAIL
PER REZONING
%� / j/ / 7 / / WETLAND "D"
— / / / ) I ; ±106 SF (0.002 AC)
/ / /
//// //f / ///� //-
J\ I�j /J—'i/ ///�/ / ///
// \ 11 // // 7/// / / // / 1
/// / r_. l//1//_ 7 / // //
\-Il// llC 7- �jI / // // / 7 \-I
// / _,-
/ 7 \ ,
AC) I / I II c // f —/ /
/ l 1 \ V / /J 7
\ / / /
7 / / / /
1( ,,/
11 l 1 111 \�\� .......
— _ / / 7
/ / / / H1TE OAK / /WHITE7(OAK
l I — _ ` — f / i /LA MATURING J / /LARGE MATkJR1Al
1 II\ �� i �� SPECIME-N-fREE SPVCIME TREE
J \ / ��EGAN� WILL,RINrOAK/ / `J DBH ` 2$" DBH
PINE
SMALL MATURING
SPECIMEN TREE
19" DBH
WILLOW OAK
LARGE MATURING
SPECIMEN TREE
25" DBH
WILLOW OAK
LARGE MATURING
SPECIMEN TREE
56" DBH
\ f3PECu I FREE SP CIMEN TR
• 14
1 SPECIMEN TR��
�'%DB
PECAN I
LARGE MATJNC,
SPECIMEN TREE
25" DBH
LARGE MATURING
STC1MEN I REE
24" DBH
MAPLE
LARGE MATURI
--- 30" DBH—
MATURING / 1 / / p �/ CED
LARD A-TURING RGE MA f131 �_
PE
LARGE MArTURINGf
SPEC EN EE
DBH
WI(LOW 0
LARGE MATLJNG
MAKE
LScEGE
CI
� PECIME
31" DBH
39" DBH
ATU`ING
TREE
/
/
WILLOW OAK
LARGE MATURING
SPECIMEN TWEE
DBH
WILLOW OAK
-e LAR
E ROAD
SPFCL FN TRF
(NC HWY 115)
PECA 29",Bf 40' DBH / �
LL M4TURfNG
SPECIMEN TREE
21" D84i-\
LAM
LARGE MATURING
SPECIMEN THE
26" DBH /
t ' DBH
\
CEDAR \
SMALL MATURING
SPECIMEN TREE
2" DBH \
EXISTING RAILROAD
d�a
DESIGN
RESOURCE
ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC 28208
70w 4.343.0608
www.drgrp.com
IN
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
60
SCALE: 1" = 120'
1200
PROJECT #:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
278-044
MN
TN
DATE
REVISIONS:
WD1.0
Copyright Qf 2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan or drawing and any accompanying documents or calculations are the property of Design Resource Group, PA; and are intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modification is permitted without written authorization

SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
PER REZONING
0
PRIMARY ENTRANCE
to
IMPACT AREA ENLARGEMENTS
SEE SHEETS: WD2.2 & WD3.1 FOR ENLARGMENTS
TOWNHOMES
TOWNHOMES
411111,11,1111,
TOWNHOMES
1
•
�i►�/��1 •
TOWNHOMES
TOWNHOMES
LiLILll11111111
OPEN SPACE/DOG PARK
d13
DESIGN
RESOURCE
L ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
®2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC28208
704.343.0608
www.drgrp.corn
0
L
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 120'
OD 1200z
PROJECT #: 278-044
DRAWN By: MH
CHECKED BY: TH
DATE
REVISIONS:
WD2.0
Copyright ©2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan or drawing and any accompanying documents or calculations are the property of Design Resource Group, PA; and are intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modification is permitted without written authorization

fn
63
0
F=
EXISTING ROAD STUB
PROPOSED LIMITS OF INTERMITTENT
STREAM "B" STREAM DISTURBANCE
± 359 LF, ± 1,296 SF (0.029 AC)
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
WETLAND "C" DISTURBANCE
f 207 SF (0.005 AC) I\�\
1
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
WETLAND "A" DISTURBANCE
± 1,660 SF (0.038 AC)
REQUIRED FUTURE ROAD
STU B
AMENITY AREA, SEE ENLARGEMENT SHEET WD2.2
PRIMARY ENTRANCE
REQUIRED CONNECTION PER
REZONING & NCDOT DRIVEWAY
SPACING REQUIREMENTS
"CLUB
J
PUBLIC STREET A
TOWNHOMES
I /
/ / • B.M.P.
TOWNHOMES
RESIDENTIAL ALLEY
TOWNHOMES
- TOWNHOMES
TOWNHOMES
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD
PROPOSED GREENWAY TRAIL PER REZONING
(NO IMPACT)
•
PROPOSED END OF IMPACT/NEW
INTERMITTENT STREAM "B" ORIGIN
EXISTING ROAD STUB
-16
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
WETLAND "D" DISTURBANCE
± 106 SF (0.002 AC)
•
•
RESIDENTIAL ALLEY
TOWNHOMES
• I I I I I u I I I l I I I I I
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA:
1,732,236 SF
EXISTING ROAD STUB
•
OPEN SPACE/DOG PARK
dr
DESIGN
RESOURCE
L ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
®2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC28208
704.343.0608
www.drgrp.corn
L
PROPOSED SITE
PLAN & IMPACT
AREAS
BD 7200
Z
SCALE: 1" =120'
PROJECT #:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
278-044
MH
TH
DATE
REVISIONS:
Copyright ©2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan or drawing and any accompanying documents or calculations are the property of Design Resource Group, PA; and are intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modification is permitted without written authorization
WD2.1

N
tn
In
1-
0
J
a
t;
0
6
Ja
0
0
OC
0
U
0
0
a
0
SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
PER APPROVED REZONING
i I
PROPOSED LIMITS OF INTERMITTENT I
STREAM "B" STREAM DISTURBANCE`
± 359 LF, ± 1,296 SF (0.029 AC)
i
■
■
■
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
WETLAND "C" DISTURBANCE
± 207 SF (0.005 AC)
\
■
■
MAX ROAD GRADE REQUIRES
FILLING
■
■
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
WETLAND "A" DISTURBANCE
± 1,660 SF (0.038 AC)
'L
PARKING PROVIDED PER
MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS
REQUIRED CONNECTION
POINT PER REZONING
•/
■
•
■
11
i
J
/ BYPASS AND SUBSURFACE
� CONVEYANCE WILL DAYLIGHT
AT/DEAR END OF IMPACT/NEW
STREAM ORIGIN
MUNICIPAL REQUIRED CROSSING.
ROAD GEOMETRY REQUIRED
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
WETLAND "D" DISTURBANCE
± 106 SF (0.002 AC)
REQUIRED CONNECTION
POINT PER REZONING
•
dr
DESIGN
RESOURCE
L ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
®2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC28208
704.343.0608
www.drgrp.corn
L
PROPOSED
IMPACT AREA
ENLARGEMENT_
0 30
SCALE: 1" = 60'
60�
PROJECT #:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
278-044
MH
TH
DATE
REVISIONS:
WD2.2
Copyright © 2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan o drawi g and any accompa ying documents or calculations ere the property of D
n Resource Group, PA; and ere intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modificetbn is permitted without wrttten euthor¢efion

RETAINING WALL TO
LIMIT IMPACTS
3
C9
Z
1-
I �j'
j
5 7'
r
I
31'-6"
-ROPOSED BUILDING
HEAD -IN
PARKING
•
1
1
-PRO"
6'
10
10
'
7'
5
7 I 16 11.5'
2'
2
1•
EXISTING INTERMITTENT STREAM "B" E
EXISTING INTERMITTENT
STREAM "B" ORIGIN
REFER TO NCSAM RATING FOR
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT
OF THE IMPACT AREA
PROPOSED END OF
DISTURBANCE/NEW
INTERMITTENT STREAM
"B" ORIGIN
ELEVATION OF PROPOSED IMPACT TO INTERMITTENT STREAM
VIEW NORTH
dr
DESIGN
RESOURCE
ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC28208
704.343.0608
www.drg p.com
v!
Z
5W
L
/Q
0
0
0
w
J
J
Q
0
HUNDERSVILLE NORTH CAROLINA
U
Z L°
N
W
• H
W o
I= co CNI
LLN 0NN
W IIUn
a_W LLZP N..OJL-�
1�
� 004
a m a
cC 1-_
W
1_ p U
< Nis)
'-
0
PROPOSED
IMPACT AREA
_ENLARGEMENT_
PROJECT #: 278-044
DRAWN BY: MH
CHECKED BY: TH
DATE
REVISIONS:
WD2.3
Copyright ©2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan or drawing and any accompanying documents or calculations are the property of Design Resource Group, PA; and are intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modification is permitted without written authorization

•
•
N
cn
W
W
F
O
a
re
0
0
JH
0
a
U
K
LY
x
U
bn
a
N
OFFSET FROM
PR OPQSEOWALL
// / S 1 PI/BLI 82 / y=.�. )
/ T—
30' STREAM BUFFER 90 / / / / y TOP OF WALL: 790.00
_ --- i=iMMIMIli,-;..9"
/miigym ri'�
TOP OF WALL: ▪ 790.00 j
BOTTOM OF WALL: 782.00
(8' HEIGHT)
BOTTOM OF WALL: 772.00
(18' HEIGHT)
TOP OF WALL: 790.00
BOTTOM OF WALL: 778.00
(12' HEIGHT)
TOP OF WALL: 790.00
BOTTOM OF WALL: 774.00
(16' HEIGHT)
/ I 1
Copyright © 2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan o drawi g and any accompa ying documents or calculations ere the property of D
n Resource Group, PA; and ere intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modificetbn is permitted without written author¢efion
d13
DESIGN
RESOURCE
L ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
®2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC28208
704.343.0608
www.drgrp.sorn
I—
W
2
CC U
Q Z_
^ Z N
I.< - o i
0
N0LU
• > Z v
I.V O - J H
W v
• moh
J� CeH_
W U
>o �CD
o
CD z
W Q�
Q U
I—
0
J
0
L
-STREAM IMPACT
AVOIDANCE
_ALTERNATIVE
30
SCALE: 1" = 60'
60�
PROJECT #: 278-044
DRAWN By: MN
CHECKED By: TN
DATE
REVISIONS:
WD3.0

3
03
N
LJ
W
tit
Lai
J
a
CC
JN
WR'
U
G
C9
SAFETY
ZONE
m
D
_
>
r
ACCESS
AND MAINTENANCE
AND INVASIVE
WOULD CREATE
RESIDENTS,
IN THE AREA.
RETAINING WALL
CENTER —LINE OF EXISTING STREAM
42" GUARDRAIL
SAFETY
ZONE
42" GUARDRAIL
NOTE:
1. RETAINING WALL
NECESSARY STREAM
INCLUDING REMOVAL
SPECIES.
2. REQUIRED HEIGHT
POTENTIAL SAFETY
PETS AS WELL AS
xi
m
D
o W
>
I-
STREAM BUFFER LINE
FOR
STREAM BUFFER LINE
EXISTING GRADE
WOULD RESTRICT
CLEANING
OF TRASH
OF WALL
HAZARD FOR
ANY WILD LIFE
A SECTION A —A'
GUESTS,
SECTION A —A' OF STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVE
VIEW NORTHWEST
dr
DESIGN
RESOURCE
ROUP
LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2459 Wilkinson Blvd, Ste 200 Charlotte, NC28208
704.343.0608
www.drg p.com
HUNDERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM IMPACT
AVOIDANCE
ALTERNATIVE
PROJECT #: 278-044
DRAWN BY: MH
CHECKED BY: TH
DATE
REVISIONS:
WD3.1
Copyright ©2022 Design Resource Group, PA This plan or drawing and any accompanying documents or calculations are the property of Design Resource Group, PA; and are intended solely for the use of the recipient noted. No third party use or modification is permitted without written authorization

Jurisdictional
Determination Information

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
(For Jurisdictional Status and Identifying Wetlands and Other Aquatic Resources)
I. PROPERTY AND CONTACT INFORMATION
A. Site Details/Location:
Site Name/Number: Old Statesville Road Apartments Request Date: 1/3/2022
County: Mecklenburg Acreage: 17.21 Latitude*: 35.4468 Longitude*:-80.8459
Parcel ID Number(PIN)#(s): 00544330, 00544331, 00544317, 00544318, 00544319
Property Address: 17225 Old Statesville Road City: Huntersville State: NC Zip Code: 28078
File number(s) of previous determinations associated with the site:
*Coordinates must be provided in decimal degrees ONLY.
B. Property Owner Information (if there are multiple property owners, complete an additional owner sheet)
First Name: Shirley Last Name: Brown
Company Name (if applicable):
Address: 14411 Stumptown Road City: Huntersville State: NC Zip Code: 28078
Daytime Phone: Email:
C. Requestor of Jurisdictional Determination/Delineation 0 Same as Property Owner
First Name: Phil Last Name: Vetter
Company Name (if applicable): Charter Properties
Address: 1520 South Blvd, #215 City: Charlotte State: NC Zip Code: 28203
Phone: [phone] Email: pave charterproperties.com
D. Agent Acting on Behalf of the Requestor (must include an agent authorization signed by requestor):
First Name: Heath Last Name: Caldwell
Company Name (if applicable): Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Address: 10612-D Providence Road City: Charlotte
State: NC Zip Code: 28277
Phone: [phone] Email: heath.caldwellAwetlands-epg.com
II. REASON FOR REQUEST
Jurisdictional Determination Request for a Residential Developement
III. TYPE OF REQUEST: (check all that apply)
I —(Approved' Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
I—IPreliminary2Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
I-1 I am uncertain and request and require additional information to inform my decision
Approved —An AJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, an AJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the presence or absence of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site, including their accurate location(s) and boundaries,
as well as their jurisdictional status. AJDs are valid for 5 years.
Preliminary — A PJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, a PJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the approximate location(s) and boundaries of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site that are presumed to be subject
to regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. Unlike an AJD, a PJD does not represent a definitive, official determination that there are, or that
there are not, jurisdictional aquatic resources on a site, and does not have an expiration date.
1 January 2020

IV. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (agents/environmental consultants only) — please list the number and date of all
figures/maps/datasheets included in the delineation report — all sources must be properly cited on the figure/map.
Delineation Map Figures (4/4/22) FEMA/FIRM Maps
USGS TopoFigure4(2/7/22) USGS NHD
NRCS Soils Survey Figures (2/7/22) USGS HUC
USFWS NWI Navigable waters' study
Aerial Imagery Figure 3 (2/7/22)
Wetland Datasheet (data point labels) USACE Wetland Data FormA (4/4/22), USACE Wetland Data Form Upland DP1 (4/4/22)
Photo Log Photos 1-6 (4/4/22, 11/3/22)
Other sources: Vicinity Map (Figure 1, 2/7/22) ; Parcel Map (Figure 2, 2/7/22) ; DWR Stream Form B (4/4/22)
V. AGENT/REQUESTOR CERTIFICATION (agent or requestor listed in Section 1 (C) or (D) of this request)
By signing below, I certify that the information in this document and any attached documents is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.
Heath Caldwell 1/3/2022
Signature Printed Name and Date
VI. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY (owner listed in Section 1(B) of this request - if there are multiple property owners, complete
an additional owner sheet)
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a
jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record or easement holder of the property identified
herein or have other legal or statutory authority to allow right -of entry onto this property.
Signature
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
Please use the Asheville Field
Office phone contacts for the
Charlotte Regulatory Field
Office until further notice
Add Aquatic Resource Table
Printed Name and Date
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
General Number: [phone]
Add Additional Owner Sheet
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
General Number: [phone]
Add Agent Authorization Sheet
Validate and Submit
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project
area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
2
January 2020

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES WITHIN REVIEW AREA
Waters
Name
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Quantity
of
resources
in review
area
(number)
Measurement
Type
Cowardin
Code
Geographic
authority (i.e.,
404 and/or 10)
U.S. State
Rapanos
Waters Type
(For AJDs
only)
Wetland A
35.4464
-80.8957
0.038
acre
RP
404
NC
Intermittent
Stream B
35.4470
-80.8467
456
feet
R4
404
NC
Wetland C
35.4466
-80.8461
0.005
acre
RP
404
NC
Wetland D
35.4469
-80.8464
0.002
acre
RP
404
NC
PrincipalPurpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to
federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a
public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),
which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor can a
jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY
I. p$QM@IY,OWNER JNFORM flQ1
First Name: It - Last Name: VErr -
Company Name: Ci1A R Pct 0PE42-1-1 65, IN c-
Address: 6.2-o Sdu“H PA-vn f srE. 2ts City: G140.4t.LbSn1. State: Mc- Zip Code:L.3z-0;
Phone: 104- bob - t%Os Email: PAv (PcaAp-cce-+-('tz-4 5 ., C.A.nn
Property PIN #(s) 00s44;5 o , too s 443s t i o0 5443 11 / uo 544118 I D0SA4-3 t 9
II. LEG9L.RIGHIQE_ENI13Y
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein.
41:-e 0—
Signatu Date
it la.. / 2't—
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area
subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local govemment agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY
I. pI OJERTY OWNER INFORMATION
First Narne: John E Last Name: Littlefield
Company Name: Caldwell Station LLC
Address: 175 Davidson Hwv City: Concord State: NC Zip Code: 28027
Phone: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
Property PIN #(s) Parcel ID 00544330 Lega Desc L2 M 49-733
Address 17155 Old Statesville Rd Huntersville NC 28078
II. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein.
11/11/2022
Date
Pr}ncipai Purpose, The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area
subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the requestfor a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

U.S, Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
First Name .1)(A 1jtd C it tSCR
Company Name.
Address
Phone 1
Property PIN #(s)
Last Name ell
City State ip Code:
Email-
II. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein
Li,/ 2- 2-
Date
Principal Purpose The information that you provide wig be used In evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources wtthrn the project area
subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authonies referenced above
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state and local government agencies, and the pubic, and may be made
availab!e as part of a public notice as required by federal law Your name and property location where federal junsdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional detemunation (.LJD), which will be made available to the public on the Distrid's website and on the Headquarters USACE websrte
Disclosure_ Submission of requested information is voluntary. however, if information is not provided, the request tor a jurisd ctional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued
January 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY
I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
First Name: Shirley Last Name: Brown
Company Name:
Address: 17303 and 17301 Old Statesville Road City: Huntersville State: NC Zip Code: 28078
Phone: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
Property PIN #(s) 00544318 and 00544319
II. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein.
6011/12/2022
Jun Overcash (Nov 12, 2022 20:46 EST)
Signature Date
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area
subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local govemment agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY
1. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
First Name: Connie
Company Name:
Last Name: Heath
Address: 17223 Old Statesville Road
Phone: [phone]
Property PIN #(s) 00544317
City: Huntersville State: NC Zip Code: 28078
Email: cwh0804550vahoo.com
II. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein.
C
11 /11 /2022
Connie Heath ov 112022 22:29 EST)
Signature Date
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area
subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local govemment agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for ajurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

ii �_I • , t
LEGEND
El Project boundary study limits
1V Stream
© Welland
Landscape photo+direction
r
INTERMITTENT
STREAM B
—507 LF
WETLAND C
—0.005 AC
Feet
-mil
WETLAND D
—0.002 AC
WETLAND A
—0.038 AC
zi
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
USACE WETAND
FORM D
� � o `MiTi + , 't9e3Q1,'19 033,rb0RARID, ION, Fn°.
1,La r u]Gi r gm, .G _ -1 &11.)
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Prepared for:
CHARTER
PROPERTIES, INC
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
DELINEATION MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ Verification
Drawn By:
NRN
Reviewed By:
ALL
FIGURE
6
4/4/22

PHOTO 1 - VIEW INTERMITTENT STREAM B
DATE/TIME 2022:04:04 - 12:21:00
COORDINATES: 35.4468, -80.8462
WEPG
PHOTO 2 - VIEW INTERMITTENT STREAM B
DATE/TIME 2022:04:04 - 12:41:00
COORDINATES: 35.4470, -80.8467
Old Statesville Road Apartments
Mecklenburg Co., NC — 4/4/22
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

PHOTO 3 - VIEW WETLAND A
DATE/TIME 2022:04:04 - 12:15:00 COORDINATES: 35.4464, -80.8957
PHOTO 4 - VIEW WETLAND D
DATE/TIME 2022:04:04 - 12:45:00 COORDINATES: 35.4469, -80.8464
WE PG
Old Statesville Road Apartments
Mecklenburg Co., NC — 4/4/22
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

PHOTO 5 - VIEW INTERMITTENT STREAM B
DATE/TIME 2022:11:03 - 08:40:00
COORDINATES: 35.4466, -80.8460
WE PG
PHOTO 6 - VIEW INTERMITTENT STREAM B
DATE/TIME 2022:11:03 - 08:45:00
COORDINATES: 35.4466, -80.8462
Old Statesville Road Apartments
Mecklenburg Co., NC —11/3/22
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard 5_ Rindner, PLLC.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
4/4/22 Evaluator: NRN/LSR
Easting:
-80.8464
Project:
Old Statesville Road Apartments : Intermittent Stream B
Northing:
35.4469
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
26.0
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
11.5
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdrolo
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
9.5
C. Biolo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
5.0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from
Origins.
NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Caldwell Station
Applicant/Owner: Charter Properties
Investigator(s): NRN
City/County: Huntersville/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 4/4/22
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4464
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB: Helena sandy loam
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Long: -80.8457
NWI classification:
Slope (%):
Datum:
2-8
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes x No
Yes x No
Yes x No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Above average rainfall conditions.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C9)
_
x Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_True
x High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) x Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
x Saturation (A3) x Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
x Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
_ _ _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland A
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Carpinus caroliniana
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
35 Yes FAC
35 Yes FAC
25 Yes FAC
95 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover: 19
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Carpinus caroliniana
4. Sambucus nigra
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
10
10
10
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Juncus effusus
2. Microstegium vimineum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
45
30
Yes
Yes
75 =Total Cover
FACW
FAC
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
(Plot size: 30' )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 165 x 3 = 495
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 210 (A) 585 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.79
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wetland A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-4 7.5YR 6/1 50
4-20 7.5YR 6/1 75
7.5YR 6/8 50 C PL/M
7.5YR 6/8 25 C PL/M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes x No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Statesville Road Apartments
Applicant/Owner: Charter Properties
Investigator(s): NRN
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4463
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB: Helena sandy loam
City/County: Huntersville/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 4/4/22
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Long: -80.8458
NWI classification:
Slope (%):
Datum:
2-8
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No x
Remarks:
Above average rainfall conditions.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
(B8)
(C9)
_
Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface
_Surface _True
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
_ _ _
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Other _Stunted
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Acer rubrum
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
30 Yes FACU
30 Yes FAC
30 Yes FAC
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Asimina triloba
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
35
Yes
Yes
45 =Total Cover
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Allium vineale
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
25
Yes
25 =Total Cover
FACU
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
75
Yes
75 =Total Cover
FACU
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
FACU species 165 x 4 = 660
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 235 (A) 870 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.70
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-4 10YR 4/3 100
4-20 10YR 6/8 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
N
U
c
Oct
2021
Coordinates
35.4468, -80.8459
Observation Date
2022-04-04
Elevation (ft)
785.54
Drought Index (PDSI)
Moderate drought
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Wet Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
4104
AA Ili
r6_ iir
Jan
2022
2022-03-05
2-02-03
f‘V.V -
A.1\/
ri, . [it ril ,, II
Feb
2022
Mar
2022
2022-04-04
Apr
2022
n _ nri,
inn
May
2022
kdo‘
,i-vn
fl
Jun
2022
fl
- Daily Total
- 30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
ir
-1W IF -
ul
2022
Aug
2022
..n
Product
30 Days Ending
30th %ile (in)
70th %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
g
2022-04-04
1.969291
4.240945
5.232284
Wet
3
3
2022-03-05
2.609843
4.21378
2.145669
Dry
1
2 1
2022-02-03
2.536417
3.699606
1.980315
Dry
1 1
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted L
Days (Normal) r}iaRatifidAIZ et2n
MT HOLLY 4 NE
35.3339, -80.9867
609.908
11.124
175.632
6.96
10846
86
HUNTERSVILLE 0.6 ESE
35.4138, -80.8351
768.045
2.36
17.495
1.103
82
0
HUNTERSVILLE 0.7 SSE
35.4063, -80.8404
811.024
2.815
25.484
1.339
0
2
HUNTERSVILLE 2.0 W
35.4177, -80.8801
748.032
2.784
37.508
1.357
35
2
CORNELIUS 1.4 W
35.4806, -80.8939
806.102
3.571
20.562
1.68
9
0
DAVIDSON 0.8 W
35.4993, -80.86
800.853
3.713
15.313
1.728
11
0
DAVIDSON 3.4 ESE
35.4745, -80.7946
680.118
3.464
105.422
1.924
2
0
DAVIDSON 0.8 W
35.4993, -80.8601
716.864
3.714
68.676
1.927
9
0
MOORESVILLE 3.5 SSE
35.5322, -80.7875
731.955
6.754
53.585
3.401
15
0
CONCORD 9.4 W
35.4315, -80.7419
655.84
5.949
129.7
3.449
37
0
WESTPORT 1.8 S
35.4814, -80.9728
808.071
7.531
22.531
3.559
11
0
MOORESVILLE 1.9 SSE
35.5531, -80.801
824.147
7.767
38.607
3.795
147
0
ENOCHVILLE 3.8 W
35.5249, -80.7332
714.895
8.326
70.645
4.335
16
0
MOUNT HOLLY 4.4 ENE
35.3302, -80.96
729.003
10.306
56.537
5.22
93
0
MOUNT HOLLY 4.8 E
35.3073, -80.9469
674.869
11.193
110.671
6.275
1
0

NCSAM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Old Statesville Road Apartments 2. Date of evaluation: 11/3/2022
3. Applicant/owner name: Charter Properties 4. Assessor name/organization: H.Caldwell/WEPG
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Caldwell Station Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.44659N/-80.846087W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream B 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 7 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (>_ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
▪ Section 10 water
❑ Essential Fish Habitat
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ Classified Trout Waters
▪ Primary Nursery Area
❑ NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Water Supply Watershed (01 Oil ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑ Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑ Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑ Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑ Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑ B No flow, water in pools only.
❑ C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑ A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑ B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑ B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑ A < 10% of channel unstable
❑ B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑ A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑ C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑ A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑ B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑ D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑ J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑ A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑ B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑ Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
❑ C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑ E Little or no habitat
reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑ F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
❑ G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑ H Low -tide refugia (pools)
❑ 1 Sand bottom
❑ J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑ K Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑ B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑ C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
• ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
• ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
• ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑ A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑ C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑ A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑ B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑ N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑ A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑ C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑ D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑ A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑ B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑ D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑ E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑ F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑ B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑ C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑ B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑ C ❑C ®C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑ D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑ E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure
Consider for left
LB RB
❑ A ❑A
®B ®B
❑ C ❑C
❑ D ❑D
❑ E ❑E
— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
Mature forest
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
Maintained shrubs
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet
LB RB LB RB
❑ A ❑A ❑A ❑A
❑ B ❑B ❑B ❑B
❑ C ❑C ❑C ❑C
❑ D ❑D ❑D ❑D
30-50 feet
LB RB
❑ A ❑A
❑ B ❑B
❑ C ❑C
❑ D ❑D
Row crops
Maintained turf
Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑ B ❑B Low stem density
❑ C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑ A
®B
❑ C
®A
❑ B
❑ C
The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑ A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑ C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Dominant urban setting with historic alteration of stream and surrounding riparian area. Adjacent, historic SCMs and very incised stream profile.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Old Statesville Road
Apartments
Date of Assessment 11/3/2022
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization H.Caldwell/WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4) Microtopography MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM
(3) Substrate LOW
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

Threatened & Endangered Species
Report
a--+
L
O
Q
cc
v)
a)
u
a)
Q
cn
75
aV
s_
aV
01
C
(11
75
C
w
06
75
aV
C
aV
"ICES'
s_
H

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Old Statesville Road Apartments
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney, Biologist
Field investigation on September 28, 2022
Charlotte Office:
106 12-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. ca m
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Old Statesville Road Apartments - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Old Statesville Road Apartments site (+/- 17.21 acres) is located just west of
Hwy 115, and just north of Hwy 73, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina. The site can be found on the Cornelius USGS Topographic
Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.4468 °N, longitude is -80.8459 °W. The
elevation is approximately 770-810 ft. The site is primarily covered by single
family residences and lawns along Hwy 115 with disturbed wooded slopes to the
rear of the site adjacent to a power line right of way. (Figures 1-4).
Figure 1: USGS MAP
CALDWELL STATION CREEK
LOCATION
Lat: 35,4168 °N
Long: 80.8459 °W
H U C: 03050101
CATAWBA
VVEPG#01085
USGS QUAD
Cornelius, NC 1993
Prepared For:
CHARTER PROPERTIES
SCALE
1:24,000
PROPfRTV BOUNDARY
STUDY OMITS
17.21 a/- AC
■
if
�+ ■ ,1
frirsrli
- r
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
USGS MAP
for study purposes only - Su6ject to USAGE verttcatiarl
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
FIGURE
1
2/7122
2
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Old Statesville Road Apartments - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2: VICINITY MAP
Wahnas wi.dEmoironmenti Plarv:rp Greco
LeOnad S. Wnaxr. ftLC.
Ien.rindber@?werlands-epg.com
I./041.901-22ff
www.neda ,pg.com
Prepared for;
CHARTER PROPERTIES
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Meckien bui g Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE verification
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
17.21+/-AC
J
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
FIGURE
2
2/7/22
WEPG 401085
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
3
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Statesville Road Apartments - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 3: AERIAL MAP
i
■
- N Aerial Imagery Provided by
11
Mecklenburg County GIS 2022
WctWiA and Enn emrned Plann,na crow
Lewwd S. R:.d,e, PU.0
I.n.HAAJmr y vwrtelwpg.can
crwaea•xxn
wwwwellandimepe.tem
Prepared for:
CHARTER PROPERTIES
WEPG 401085
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
khja'rrr::iff1/4444.
J
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS '4-1
17.2111-AC
,f.
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
AERIAL MAP
For study purposes only- Subject to USAGE verification
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
�AdAr
FIGURE
3
2/7/22
4
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Statesville Road Apartments - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 4: NRCS SOIL MAP
gitiL5eopillaikb.EICade
E Ei L PROPERTY BOUNDARY
1.
k y STUDY LIMITS
17.21+/-AC '}
GeB�
rl•.
ti
HeE3
PaF
N
NRCS Sail Survey Manuscript
Mecklenburg County 1980
■
•'and Err.4.anmer.tal Plum6n5
Leawrd S. , d r. PLLC.
len.rindnenSwrduds.cMoera.
RBI) 9041777
www.wvt6mE-epg.com
Prepare I for:
CHARTER PROPERTIES
CeQ2
Map Unit Symbol
Hsp Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CcE3�
He8
PaE
Ceal sandy day loam, 210 E3
percent slopes. moderately
eroded
Helena sandy loam. 2 to A
percent elopes
Paroled sandy loam. 15 to 25
percent slopes
9
0.5
2a9 4
1 Totals for Area of Interest
k `I p.lt- "1. i
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD APARTMENTS
Mecklenburg Co., NC
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USAGE veriftrnrron
17.5
Drawn By:
ALL
Reviewed By:
100.0%
FHGURE
4
217122
WEPG 401085
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
5
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Statesville Road Apartments- Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC website
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3Q22K7LBOZGXRP3B6TBV7OMWQA/r
esources was referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened,
Endangered and Protected species for the Old Statesville Road Apartments site,
the results of which are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs
were assembled, and the site was investigated on September 28, 2022.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
the Cagle Avenue site
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC
**Data search on September 28, 2022
Group
Name Status
Vascular Plants Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus Endangered
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) Endangered
Vascular Plants Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) Endangered
Vertebrate Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) Proposed Endangered
Vertebrate Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act
WEPG 401085
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
6
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Statesville Road Apartments- Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Three plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring on
the subject site:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clear cuts, dry limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring
abundant sunlight and little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered,
requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species
requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology.
Two animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring on
the subject site:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
• Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus), proposed Endangered, is often
found in caves, abandoned mines, and road culverts during winter. During
the spring, summer, and fall, tricolored bats are found in forested habitats
where they roost in trees. Tricolored bats face extinction due primarily to
the range wide impacts of white -nose syndrome, a deadly disease
affecting cave -dwelling bats across the continent.
RESULTS:
The site is primarily covered by single family residences and lawns along Hwy
115 with disturbed wooded slopes to the rear of the site adjacent to a power line
right of way.
The residential properties have typical turf grass lawns that blend into the road
and utility right of way along Hwy 115. Fescue (Festuca sp.) is dominant, and
the area is maintained by frequent mowing.
VVEPG O1O85 _ _ 7
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Old Statesville Road Apartments- Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Tree species present on the disturbed wooded slopes include Shortleaf Pine
(Pinus echinata), Virginia Pine (P. virginiana), Willow Oak (Quercus phellos),
White Oak (Quercus alba), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), American Elm
(Ulmus americana), Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Green Ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), and Cottonwood (Populus deltoides). Shrubs present are
Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense), Russian Olive (Elaeagnus umbellata),
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and Sacred Bamboo (Nandina domestica).
Vines include Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Catbrier (Smilax sp.),
Trumpet Creeper (Campsis radicans), and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
The herbaceous layer is dominated by Japanese Stilt Grass (Microstegium
vimineum) and includes Panic Grass (Panicum sp.), Christmas Fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides), and River Oats (Chasmanthium /atifolium).
The power line right of way and transitional areas are covered with mixed herbs
and blackberry and woody vine thickets. Dominant species include Broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus), Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Ragweed
(Ambrosia artemisiifolia), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Beggars Ticks (Desmodium
sp.), Blackberry (Rubus sp.), Russian Olive, Japanese Honeysuckle, Catbrier
(Smilax sp.), Poison Ivy, and Porcelain Berry (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower along the roadside, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Schweinitz's Sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) does not occur on the site.
• All potential habitats for Smooth Coneflower along the roadside, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Smooth Coneflower
(Echinacea /aevigata) does not occur on the site.
• All potential habitats for Michaux's Sumac along the roadside, utility rights -
of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Michaux's Sumac (Rhus
michauxii) does not occur on the site.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles. WEPG concludes Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus /eucocepha/us) does not occur on the site.
• Existing guidance for Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) as of the report
date indicates no action is required under section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act for the Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus).
VVEPGO1O85 _ 8
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Old Statesville Road Apartments - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on the site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
October 11, 2022
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
WEPGO1O85 _ 9
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Old Statesville Road Apartments - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 65,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Found Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
This discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This
population has become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in
Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
WEPG O1O85 _ 10
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Cultural Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
November 28, 2022
Ms. Amber Lipsky
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review
Old Statesville Road Apartments Development Tract
Caldwell Community, Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 22-649-201
Dear Ms. Lipsky:
BACKGROUND
During November 2022, R. S. Webb & Associates (RSWA) conducted a cultural resources literature
review for the Old Statesville Road Apaitiuents development tract in the Caldwell community of
Huntersville in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The project area covers approximately 17.2
acres located west of State Route (SR) 115 (Old Statesville Road), approximately 550 meters (m)
north of its intersection with SR 73 (Sam Furr Road) in northern Mecklenburg County (Figure 1).
For this study, a cultural resource is defined as a discrete area of human activity that is at least 50
years old. Cultural resources include, but are not limited to, archeological sites, historic structures,
military earthworks, mines/mining features, historic cemeteries and historic landscape features. The
purpose of the current study was to determine if previously recorded cultural resources are located
within the project area.
METHODOLOGY
Through the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB database, information was
reviewed regarding National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-listed historic properties,
Mecklenburg County surveyed -only historic resources, local landmarks, state study -list sites and
historic resources determined by the SHPO to be eligible for the NRHP. Historic county maps were
examined online through North Carolina Maps, a collaboration of the University of North Carolina,
the State Archives of North Carolina, and the Outer Banks History Center. Historic aerial
photography and additional historic maps were accessed through Historicaerials.com,
Earthexplorer.usgs.gov, Legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ and/or Alabamamaps.ua.edu.
Research on recorded archeological sites and projects was performed at the North Carolina Office
of State Archaeology (OSA) by Commonwealth Heritage Services, Inc., who then provided RSWA
with pertinent information via email regarding archeological sites located within 1.6 kilometers (km)
of the project area. Provided site information includes available site forms, site/project area location
maps and partial or full reports.

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Old Statesville Road Apartments Development Tract Page 2
November 28, 2022
The following primary sources were found to be useful in searching for historic resources within and
adjacent to the project area:
1910 USDA Soil Map of Mecklenburg County
1911 County Commissioner's Map of Mecklenburg County
1912 Rural Delivery Map of Mecklenburg County
1938 and 1969 State Highway and Public Works Commission Map of Mecklenburg County
1956, 1965, 1968, 1978, and 1983 aerial photographs of Mecklenburg County
1970 and 1993 USGS Cornelius, NC 7.5-Minute quadrangle
1993-2022 Google Earth aerial photography.
RESULTS
Previous Archeological Investigations: Records of OSA indicate at least four archeological survey
projects completed within 1.0 km of the project area, two of which were corridor or corridor -related
surveys performed within 500 m of study tract boundaries (Abbott 1991; Luchsinger et al.
2005:Figure 1).
Previous Architectural Investigations: According to SHPO personnel, the North Carolina HPOWEB
database is the definitive source of architectural survey information for Mecklenburg County.
National Register of Historic Places: There are no NRHP-listed historic properties located within
1.0 km of the current study tract.
Mecklenburg County Historic Resources: The HPOWEB database shows that Resource No.
MK1284, Caldwell Station School (400 m northeast) was added to the State Study List in 2001,
determined eligible for the NRHP in 2006, and was designated as a Local Landmark in 2010. The
database shows six additional historic buildings located within 1.0 km of the study tract, four of
which are within 500 m of the project area (Figure 1; Resource Nos. 145-148). These resources
were identified and evaluated as part of a proposed North Corridor commuter rail project (Alexander
2005). All of the recorded buildings were recommended ineligible for the NRHP. Two of these
resources, Resource Nos. 146 and 147, were recorded within the project area. Resource No. 146 is
still present and appears to be a 19t' to early 20t' century I -house. The HPOWEB database gives
these resources no individual number designation and provides a link to the Alexander (2005) survey
report.
Recorded Archeological Sites: OSA identifies five recorded archeological sites within 1.0 km of the
project area, the closest of which, 31MK586, is situated approximately 280 m southeast of the
project area (Figure 1). Site 31MK586 is a sparse, prehistoric lithic scatter recommend ineligible
for the NRHP.
Revolutionary War Actions/Features: Following their capture then abandonment of Charlotte late
in the year 1780, the British army passed across northern Mecklenburg County en route to their final
defeat at Yorktown, Virginia. As the eastward campaign commenced, battles were fought on
February 1, 1781 as the British crossed the Catawba River at Cowan's Ford (9 km west) and then
again as American militia attempted to regroup at Tarrant's Tavern (10 km north). Though
marching, bivouacking or foraging could have taken place nearby, no miliary activity is known to
have occurred within the project area (Lewis 2021).

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Old Statesville Road Apartments Development Tract Page 3
November 28, 2022
Civil War Actions/Features: Review of the official military atlas for the Civil War (Davis et al.
1983) revealed that no significant Civil War military activity occurred in present-day Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. Union forces, following the capture of Columbia, South Carolina on
February 17, 1865, moved north to the vicinity of Lancaster, South Carolina (79 km southeast), his
armies then turned to the northeast and moved toward Laurel Hill and Fayetteville, North Carolina,
thus bypassing the project region (Davis et al. 1983).
Historic Cemeteries: The USGS topographic maps reviewed show no cemeteries mapped within 1.0
km of the project area.
Structures on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs: Maps from 1907 to 1970 depict an
intersection at or near the southeast project area corner with as many as four dwellings and one large
outbuilding in the project area (Figure 1). These buildings include recorded 2005 Resource Nos. 146
and 147, and two dwellings dating to 1952 and 1955, per county tax assessor records. Maps from
1993 indicate that the southern -most dwelling (2005 Resource No. 147) was no longer present;
instead, a modern building was present near its location.
Aerial photographs from the period 1956 through 1978 show multiple outbuildings in the vicinity
of Resource No. 146 (17303 Old Statesville Road) and Resource No. 147 (17209 Old Statesville
Road), located in the north and south portions of the project area. Between these properties were the
circa 1955 and 1952 dwellings with one outbuilding each. There were sparse woodlands near the
occupation sites in the east part of the study tract, while the remainder of the project area was under
cultivation. Open land in the west part of the project aera was maintained as pasture throughout the
20th century; reforestation was under way by circa 2004. The maintenance of grounds at Resource
No. 147 (southeast project area corner) ceased as early as 1983, but the dwelling remained present
until after 2016. As of early 2022, four dwellings were still standing within the study tract, including
the aforementioned I -house (Resource No. 146).
CONCLUSIONS
There are no NRHP-listed properties, determined -eligible properties, study -listed resources,
designated local landmarks, or mapped cemeteries located within the study tract. Two late-19th or
early 20th century dwellings were recorded in the study tract in 2005; both were recommended
ineligible for the NRHP and one of them (No. 146) remains present. Also present in the project area
are two dwellings dating to the middle 20th century. Historic maps and aerial photographs indicate
four occupation loci in east part of the study tract and cultivation or pasturing of the remainder of
the project area throughout the 20th century.

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Old Statesville Road Apartments Development Tract Page 4
November 28, 2022
CLOSING COMMENTS
Ms. Lipsky, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB ASSOCIATES
4
1/. L/
Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachments: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Abbott, L.E.
1991 Management Summary: Archeological Consulting Services/Intensive Sample Survey:
NCDOT Project R-2632: Davidson -Cornelius Bypass Environmental Assessment,
Mecklenburg and Iredell Counties, North Carolina. New South Associates, Inc.
Mebane, North Carolina.
Alexander, F.P.
2005 Phase II Architectural Resources Survey Report: North Corridor Commuter Rail
Project, Charlotte Area Transit System, Mecklenburg and Iredell Counties. Mattson,
Alexander and Associates, Inc. Charlotte, North Carolina.
Davis, G.B., L. J. Perry and J. W. Kirkley, compiled by C. D. Cowles
1983 Atlas to Accompany the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
Reprint of the 1891-1895 edition. The Fairfax Press, New York.
Lewis, J.D.
2021 The American Revolution in North Carolina. Internet -Online. Found at:
http://www.carolana.com /NC/Revolution/home.html. Accessed February 2022.
Luchsinger, H. and T. Bailey, L. Lautzenheiser, and B. Hall
2005 Archaeological Survey of the Proposed North Corridor Commuter Rail Project
(NCCR), Charlotte Area Transit System, Charlotte, North Carolina. Coastal
Carolina Research, Inc. Tarboro, North Carolina.

Resources
Circa d,955-
N1`
'tl Project
Circa) 1952ti
/\\
♦ Structure on Historic Maps and Aerials
• Recorded Historic Resource
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangle
Cornelius (1993), NC
• Recorded Archeological Site
Previous Cultural Resource Project
Scale
0
0
Figure 1 Project Area and Recorded Cultural Resources
610 meters
2000 feet