400016_Inspection_20221222

trtataber
er vision. gf i►ter Resourc . .. '
a Diviiibn of Sail and, Water Ckiiservaifork
0 Other Agency
'Type of Visit: Q-eogipliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Olautine 0 Compla
O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
int 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: rival Time:
Farm Name: J ,d-�?'r7 earl
Owner Name: 1;ry gm,fin; j •, �Tvsrt�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
51.
reiri
besign Curi
swin4 ` Co attty . pop..
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
1.
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: -t. Region:
Title: 674[Jh(-4/" Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
v
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
• p • Curr e)4#
Wetpouitry .Capacity Tole.
Layer
Non -Layer
]aeon . Gansu..
D i BD • C poc1Lk
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part o . e operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Struc r ❑ Application Field
❑ Other:
a[gn . 'carat'
• -Ci.rruic fop,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes lo ❑NA ❑NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters f the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume .: t reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the aste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from : iy part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impac • or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA El NE
Ercres ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeslo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 2 V- f L_
Date of Inspection:
/-��-- f2-
Waste Collection & Treatment
• 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
Structure 2 Structure 3
Structure 4
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
Er; ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [-1 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q4lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate marcers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
2'les ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12-Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I 'o ❑ NA
❑ Yes [lo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, 7n, etc.)
❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs.
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
eturzelyoei /
14. Do the receiving crops'fliffer from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
/1J4
❑ NE
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating wast application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certifica of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all componepts of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? f yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeb and ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections [Sludge Survey
❑ Yes [o
©'Qes ❑ No
s ret
❑ Yes elo
❑ Yes [rlo
❑ Yes El'o
❑ Yes [10
❑ 0th :
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
0 NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintaa rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install a d maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Ef-To ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: q%) -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app i cation equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with pe 't conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge sury
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any 1a;
List structure(s) and date of first surve
26. Did the facility fail to provide documenta
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phospho
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose o
and report mortality rates that were highe
29. At the time of the inspection did the facili
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality rep
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard proble
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the fac
❑ Application Field ❑ T.agoon/S u
32. Were any additional problems noted whi
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discus•
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit
❑ Yes g-Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes l?(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
oon
indicating non-compliance:
ion of an actively certified operator in charge?
loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
than normal?
pose an odor or air quality concern?
sentative immediately.
Office of emergency situations as required by the
,I
, over -application)
ty? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
rage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes OT7o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
review/inspection with an on -site representative?
y the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
s
[o ❑ NA
2r o ❑ NA
2-Ko ❑ NA
12esTo ❑ NA
ErNo ❑ NA
1No ❑ NA
g1V o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
`` _.�, 0 :FN i + 1 ou � , an
o4�4,i1. q' *4064. r0l s
'a re ' 1 o 'ltiv.,� l pe4an. iehi liaktit S7ce;ii i '`i � its i"�R4'�tl `�.r 1
uaii0 gd onal /iuges � nee4i4 _ ...1 wr.ti . ' r .. : j' '}� " ' '
i
i ' t
'+
A k‘,3aee ?)1°V
of 5 ,Pry 0 -e of .u.v
e-Pir- yo t( 1/5
- -
I )3 ,.-- k / p-,-f-ip_F-7--- m..-‘,..71- ,7--7-c
/per i %6 ref
7 F 1/0(,e ,�X 0 SS
in e e f a L7C i
l // of � o-,,. 7e
a�s
✓ova
r' /,f ��rD
C. ran _;
lip 4 rl
L- 'g -.3 s, 7�:s Alp Tg• i' v,1� co re-ef>"
Z.Fa 'r!�`�.s/ -fat i�ti- p�-
I' ie r-Yf dzc�
2, F$L disci/ter r; re- C/
/�,3rrnlitio• ��Y/,l .s Gv -Plaee
vtivr Avs .4r-rn j'
( V , each pi �, T/ J l
Tee_ 1,-m-or
7.2-p5-(r-ih:
P7 di
N
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/lnspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9/a—gP- 7967
Date: /�v,7---722"'
5/12/2020