20230011 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221222

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/29/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20230011 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Browning Mill
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Rick Trone
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:eads\ztthomas
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
12/22/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Buffalo Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.750093 -78.352985
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Rhonda and Randy Edwards
2b. Deed book and page no.:
05714/0689
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
2505 Wendell Road
Address Line 2
City
Wendell
Postal /Zip Code
27591
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Rex Vick Jr - Manager
3b. Business Name:
RBV 231, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
3434 Kildaire Farm Road
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27518
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Rick Trone
4b. Business Name:
WithersRavenel
4c. Address
Street Address
115 MacKenan Drive
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27511
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Wendell, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
179200-08-7255, 179200-18-7910, 179200-
28-5089, 179200-29-9030,179200-29-8483
2b. Property size:
±106

2c. Project Address
Street Address
3709 Wendell Road
Address Line 2
City
Wendell
Postal / Zip Code
27591
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Buffalo Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
0302020115
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Currently the site consists of agricultural fields, a pond, dirt roads, one residential home, and forested areas. Land use in the vicinity is primarily agricultural and residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5.71
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
4,216
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to help meet the existing and growing demand for residential housing in Johnston and Wake Counties.
The project consists of the construction of the following:
•82 single-family home lots
•Construction of infrastructure (roads, utilities, stormwater management, etc.)
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed project consists of the construction of an 82-lot residential subdivision and associated infrastructure (roads, sidewalks, open recreational space, utilities, stormwater
management, etc.).
The proposed Browning Mill subdivision consists of a ± 106-acre parcel (PINS: 179200-08-7255, 179200-18-7910, 179200-28-5089, 179200-29-9030, 179200-29-8483) located at 3709
Wendell Road, Wendell, Johnston County (Lat: 35.750093; -78.352985).
The proposed design for the internal roads will result in two road crossings required to reach developable uplands in the eastern portion of the site. "Street A" will cross Stream 1
(intermittent) perpendicularly with a culvert at the location of an existing farm road crossing situated in uplands between Wetlands C and D. "Street B" will cross Stream 2 (intermittent) at a
location between Wetland D and Wetland E. Riprap dissipators will be constructed below the culverts to dissipate flow velocity to prevent erosion and sedimentation of the streams.
Typical earthmoving and construction equipment will be utilized during site construction.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
WR conducted a delineation of the wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers in January and February
2022.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-01349
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Alyssa Ricci
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel

Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
N/A
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Road Crossing/Grading
P
Unknown
Wetland D
Yes
Both
0.013
(acres)
W2
Dewatering/Const.
T
Unknown
Wetland D
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
W3
Rip Rap
P
Unknown
Wetland E
Yes
Both
0.025
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.003
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.041
2i. Comments:
Please see attached impact exhibits.
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.038
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Const. Access
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 1
Intermittent
Both
7
Average (feet)
12
(linear feet)
S2
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 1
Intermittent
Both
7
Average (feet)
47
(linear feet)
S3
Rip Rap
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Stream 1
Intermittent
Both
7
Average (feet)
17
(linear feet)
S4
Const. Access
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 1
Intermittent
Both
7
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S5
Coffer Dam
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream 1/Stream 2
Intermittent
Both
8
Average (feet)
47
(linear feet)
S6
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 2
Intermittent
Both
8
Average (feet)
80
(linear feet)
S7
Rip Rap
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Stream 2
Intermittent
Both
8
Average (feet)
44
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
188
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
252
3j. Comments:
Please see attached impact exhibits.
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
64

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be
minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts for construction of the subdivision and infrastructure have been minimized to only those necessary for construction of two
road crossings to access developable uplands within the site and to work around an existing jurisdictional pond while completely avoiding impacts to the
pond. There are no impacts proposed for construction lots, utilities, or stormwater control. All road crossings have been designed to cross streams at the
narrowest points, perpendicularly, and at existing crossings (Impact S2), to minimize stream impacts.
Wetlands bisect the site and impacts to wetlands are unavoidable to gain access to the eastern side of the site while maintaining internal road
connectivity. To minimize impacts to wetlands, both road crossings are proposed to be located where gaps between wetlands exist. The larger of the two
crossings is proposed at a location downstream of the confluence of Streams 1 and 2 to minimize stream impacts. The site has been designed around
Stream 2, Stream 3 and multiple wetlands located near the southern boundary of the site. No impacts are proposed in this area.
Riprap dissipators will be constructed such that the riprap will be installed by burying the riprap such that the top of the riprap matches the pre -
construction contours of the natural stream bed, allowing for the passage of aquatic life and preventing a loss of function of stream channel.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Upon completion of construction, all temporarily impacted streams will be restored to pre -construction conditions and grades, and temporarily stabilized
with biodegradable matting and seeded with a riparian seed mix. No matting will be placed on the stream bed.
Access during construction will occur within uplands. Additionally, sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent functional loss stream impacts total less than the 0.02 ac threshold. The applicant does not propose stream mitigation.
Permanent proposed wetland impacts total less than 0.1 ac, therefore, the applicant does not propose wetland mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Johnston County
Comments:
The stormwater management plan consists of engineered plunge pools and vegetated conveyances at discharge locations that prevent erosive flows. No SCM's are proposed. The
stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by Johnston County as the certified local municipality.
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will not result in any additional development that could impact downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater will be treated by individual septic systems.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/ to identify if there were any known occurrences of
endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any occurrences of federally listed threatened or
endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter.
WR reviewed the USFWS IPAC data, located at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/, to identify the federally listed species and critical habitat known to occur
within the vicinity of the project. The IPaC identified that RCW, Neuse River waterdog, Carolina Madtom, Atlantic Pigtoe, Yellow Lance, Dwarf
Wedgemussel, and Tar River Spinymussel have ranges that extend into the project area. The IPaC specified that there are no critical habitats within the
project area. The IPaC species list has been provided as an attachment to this application.
Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for RCW, Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina madtom, Atlantic Pigtoe, Yellow Lance, Dwarf Wedgemussel
or Tar River Spineymussel. The project is not located within the known range of Michaux's Sumac.
The site is located within the known range of several listed aquatic species. The proposed project is located within the Buffalo Creek drainage area, just
upstream of Wendell Lake. This impoundment would likely prevent migration of these species to sustain viable populations. Additionally, the perennial
stream (Stream 2) within the project area is small and shallow and was not considered potential habitat for Carolina Madtom, Neuse River Waterdog,
Atlantic Pigtoe, Dwarf Wedgemussel, or Yellow Lance. Buffalo Creek flows through the extreme southwestern corner of the site however, no impacts are
proposed to the creek or its buffers. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed project will not adversely affect federally listed species or their
designated critical habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html. There are no
waters classified as EFH in Johnston County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to determine if there were any known
historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The database review did not identify any known resources within or in the
vicinity of the proposed project. SHPO issued a comment letter on October 20, 2021, and indicated they were not aware of any historic resources that
would be affected by the proposed project. Note that the SHPO request for review was requested for both Browning Stables and Browning Mill, two
adjacent but separate projects. See attached SHPO letter.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Maps
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Cover Letter and Attachments.pdf 19.83MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Please see included Cover Letter and Attachments.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Rick Trone
Signature
Date
12/22/2022

-�� WithersRavenel
1 Our People. Your Success.
December 22, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Chris Hopper
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Kelsey Rowland
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Browning Mill - NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Wendell, Johnston County
USACE AID #SAW-2022-01349
WR Project #02210579.10
Dear Mr. Hopper and Ms. Rowland,
On behalf of RBV 231, LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 29 for
the impacts in the table below. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NC DWR for the below
referenced impacts.
The following table presents the proposed impacts:
Proposed Impact Table
Feature
Type of Impact
Impact Area
LF
SF
AC
Stream
Permanent (Functional Loss)
127
594
0.014
Stream
Permanent (No Functional Loss)
61
282
0.006
Stream
Temporary
64
308
0.007
Stream Totals
252
1,184
0.027
Wetland
Permanent
-
1,660
0.038
Wetland
Temporary
-
124
0.007
Wetland Totals
-
1,784
1 0.045
The proposed total permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters are 0.052 acres (see table below)
and therefore the project is eligible for authorization under an NWP 29.
Type of Impact
Impact Area
Stream (Functional
0.014 ac
Loss)
127 If
Wetlands
0.038 ac
1,660 sf
The proposed project consists of the construction of an 82-lot residential subdivision and
associated infrastructure (roads, sidewalks, open recreational space, utilities, stormwater
management, etc.).
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. F-1479
Asheville I Cary I Charlotte I Greensboro I Lumberton I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Southern Pines I Wilmington

Browning Mill
Wendell, Johnston Co.
NWP 29 PCN Submittal
::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
The proposed Browning Mill subdivision consists of a ± 106-acre parcel (PINS: 179200-08-7255,
179200-18-7910, 179200-28-5089, 179200-29-9030, 179200-29-8483) located at 3709
Wendell Road, Wendell, Johnston County (Lat: 35.750093;-78.352985).
The project is in the Neuse River basin (HUC: 0302020115) and onsite waters drain to Buffalo
Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Buffalo Creek is: C; NSW and the Stream Index
Number is: 27-57-16(3).
Proposed Proiect
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to help meet the
existing and growing demand for residential housing in Johnston and Wake Counties.
The project consists of the construction of the following:
• 82 single-family home lots
• Construction of infrastructure (roads, utilities, stormwater management, etc.)
The proposed design for the internal roads will result in two road crossings required to reach
developable uplands in the eastern portion of the site. "Street A" will cross Stream 1(intermittent)
perpendicularly with a culvert at the location of an existing farm road crossing situated in uplands
between Wetlands C and D. "Street B" will cross Stream 2 (intermittent) at a location between
Wetland D and Wetland E. Riprap dissipators will be constructed below the culverts to dissipate
flow velocity to prevent erosion and sedimentation of the streams.
Proiect History
SHPO issued a comment letter on October 20, 2021, and indicated they were not aware of any
historic resources that would be affected by the proposed project. Note that the SHPO request
for review was requested for both Browning Stables and Browning Mill, two adjacent but separate
projects. See attached SHPO letter.
WR conducted a delineation of the wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers in January and February
2022.
A Jurisdictional Determination request was submitted to the USACE on June 22, 2022. A
Concurrence Letter was received from the USACE on October 17, 2022.
Johnston County conducted an on -site stream determination on September 2, 2022 and issued a
Neuse River Buffer Call Letter on September 6, 2022.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of:
• 0.003 acres of temporary wetland impacts
• 127 If of permanent stream impacts with functional loss
• 61 If of permanent stream impacts with no functional loss
• 64 If of temporary stream impacts
Buffer impacts are under the jurisdiction of Johnston County. All proposed permanent stream and
wetland impacts are necessary for the installation of two road crossings to access developable
uplands in the eastern portion of the site and to work around an existing jurisdictional pond.
Page 2 of 4

Browning Mill ■■ WVithersRavenel
Wendell, Johnston Co. ..
❑urPeople. Your Success.
NWP 29 PCN Submittal
"Street A" has been designed to cross Stream 1 perpendicularly at a location where an existing
farm road crosses the stream. The 48" RCP culvert will be buried 12" below the stream bed to
allow for aquatic life passage. Stream 1 will flow directly into and out of the culvert and no stream
realignment is necessary. A riprap dissipator will be installed below the culvert to prevent erosion
and sedimentation of downstream waters. The riprap will be installed by burying the riprap such
that the top of the riprap matches the pre -construction contours of the natural stream bed,
allowing for the passage of aquatic life and preventing a loss of function of stream channel. A gap
exists between Wetlands C and D where most of the road crossing is proposed, however, some
permanent wetland impacts will occur on the downstream side of the crossing.
"Street B" has been designed to cross Stream 2 perpendicularly at a location where a gap exists
between Wetlands D and E. The 48" and 72" RCP culverts will be buried 12" below the stream
bed to allow for aquatic life passage. Stream 2 will flow directly into and out of the northern
culvert and no stream realignment is necessary. A riprap dissipator will be installed below the
culvert to prevent erosion and sedimentation of downstream waters. The riprap will be installed
by burying the riprap such that the top of the riprap matches the pre -construction contours of the
natural stream bed, allowing for the passage of aquatic life and preventing a loss of function of
stream channel. A gap exists between Wetlands D and E where most of the road crossing is
proposed, however, some permanent wetland impacts will occur on the downstream side of the
crossing.
During construction of the culverted road crossings work will be completed "in the dry" by
constructing temporary coffer dams upstream and downstream of the culverts within the impact
areas and pumping flow around the construction area. Upon completion of construction, all
temporarily impacted streams will be restored to pre -construction contours and the banks will be
stabilized using a biodegradable matting and seeded with a riparian seed mix. No matting will be
placed on the stream beds. Additionally, all temporarily impacted wetlands will be restored to
natural grade and seeded with a wetland seed mix to provide temporary stabilization until natural
revegetation permanently stabilizes these areas.
There are no impacts proposed for lots, utilities, stormwater, or greenways.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts for construction of the subdivision and infrastructure have been
minimized to only those necessary for construction of two road crossings to access developable
uplands within the site and to work around an existing jurisdictional pond while completely
avoiding impacts to the pond. There are no impacts proposed for construction lots, utilities, or
stormwater control. All road crossings have been designed to cross streams at the narrowest
points, perpendicularly, and at existing crossings (Impact S2), to minimize stream impacts.
Wetlands bisect the site and impacts to wetlands are unavoidable to gain access to the eastern
side of the site while maintaining internal road connectivity. To minimize impacts to wetlands, both
road crossings are proposed to be located where gaps between wetlands exist. The larger of the
two crossings is proposed at a location downstream of the confluence of Streams 1 and 2 to
minimize stream impacts. The site has been designed around Stream 2, Stream 3 and multiple
wetlands located near the southern boundary of the site. No impacts are proposed in this area.
Page 3 of 4

Browning Mill :: WithefsRavenel
Wendell, Johnston Co.
❑urPeople.Your Suaess.
NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Riprap dissipators will be constructed such that the riprap will be installed by burying the riprap
such that the top of the riprap matches the pre -construction contours of the natural stream bed,
allowing for the passage of aquatic life and preventing a loss of function of stream channel.
Upon completion of construction, all temporarily impacted streams will be restored to pre -
construction conditions and grades, and temporarily stabilized with biodegradable matting and
seeded with a riparian seed mix. No matting will be placed on the stream bed.
Access during construction will occur within uplands. Additionally, sediment and erosion control
measures will be installed prior to construction.
Mitigation
Permanent functional loss stream impacts total less than the 0.02 ac threshold. The applicant does
not propose stream mitigation.
Permanent proposed wetland impacts total less than 0.1 ac; therefore, the applicant does not
propose wetland mitigation.
Stormwater Management Plan
The stormwater management plan consists of engineered plunge pools and vegetated
conveyances at discharge locations that prevent erosive flows. No SCM's are proposed. The
stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by Johnston County as the certified
local municipality.
Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information to complete
your review.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
Rick Trone
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization Forms
• Aerial Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Johnston County Soil Survey
• Parcel/Owner Exhibit
• Johnston County Soil Survey
• Parcel/Property Owner Info
• Wetland/Stream/Buffer Delineation Exhibit
• USACE Concurrence Email
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• USFWS IPaC Species List
• SHPO Comment Letter
• Preliminary Site Plan
• Impact Exhibits
Page 4 of 4

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7F269C53-70CF-4126-B3FD-OF36E757AB44
10- WithersRavenel
A. Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PROPERTY ACCESS
The undersigned owner(s), Randy & Rhonda Edwards, do(es) hereby authorize WithersRavenel, Inc. to
access the following parcels below, located in Wendell, NC for the purpose of environmental regulatory
agency review (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal
Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, local Municipalities, etc.) and approvals (i.e. wetland delineation,
stream/buffer determination, environmental permitting, etc.) at the request of the contract purchaser.
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-08-7255, ±25-acre parcel, located near 1488 Stotts Mill Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-18-7910, ±22-acre parcel, located near 1620 Stotts Mill Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-28-5089, ±39.43-acre parcel, located near 3709 Wendell Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-29-9030, ±21.56-acre parcel, located at 3709 Wendell Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-29-8483, ±1.0-acre parcel, located at 1892 Stotts Mill Road
This authorization does not bind the current property owner(s) to financial responsibility for services
rendered on the subject property by WithersRavenel, Inc.
This agreement shall continue in effect until completion/termination of the purchase contract for the subject
property.
Contract Purchaser's Agent Info:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
5/16/2022
Date:
Signature of Owner(s):
Randy Edwards
Name - Print Title
d - d w-rh
Signature
2505 Wendell Rd
Mailing Address
Wendell NC 27591
City State Zip
9194496437
Phon
Email: [e-mail]
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. F-1479
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

DocuSign Envelope ID: D31 BD229-2261-4030-B9F5-7AE6C1 71230D
10- WithersRavenel
A. Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, RBV 231, LLC (Client) does hereby appoint
WithersRavenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the following parcels, located in Wendell,
NC:
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-08-7255, ±25-acre parcel, located near 1488 Stotts Mill Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-18-7910, ±22-acre parcel, located near 1620 Stotts Mill Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-28-5089, ±39.43-acre parcel, located near 3709 Wendell Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-29-9030, ±21.56-acre parcel, located at 3709 Wendell Road
• NC PIN (Johnston Co.): 179200-29-8483, ±1.0-acre parcel, located at 1892 Stotts Mill Road
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
2/28/2022
Date:
Signature of Client:
Rex Vick Jr. Manager
Name - Print) (Title)
D-Sig-d y:
(Signature)
3434 Kildaire Farm Rd Ste 135
Mailing Address
Cary NC 27518
City State Zip
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. F-1479
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AERIAL
EXHIBIT

AERIAL (2021)
BROWNING MILL
NORTH CAROLINA
JOHNSTON COUNTY
SWAMI .11S131.1 - Sell. LEW 'S vuawernra,...is-wumweaN-04.0o ...191 ....41-011LSO rOLSO-12,2%

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUADS

sr� o V
oo
AFM
ad NH3d7 tl�v37 � �
/
ADHARRIS WILSON AD �) y/
i Q 300
t _
o
III
n
n
v� aor�
,i
f
v t C'
\Pb 173 i� �•_�
WENPELL0.P
RD
� A
b03110,
—250
A7.70hj
-
Cx
T W
\ c CJC
bQ3MY7is- G Z
py\YO i/,7b� O
0
300 ZZ 10
Z
7 F \ m
Q o (\ fiPGCE ROCR P \\ OH 0350
lyj,3(f
o
o
0
ao
E J
s
- t
�2 \
s
KS OR 0 WILEY (l1
1 J �
OAKS

.1
,r
&�I
3:w
DAW
CJ
U
Z
Z
0
af
m

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
JOHNSTON COUNTY
SOIL SURVEY

I w0'
O N
QD
r ' W
W >�
03
IIAL
a 1 Ly
s � -,
.{
m
N
co
Z
0
r
z
Q
•
�
ZD
`
1
1
J
JC>
<
`
z
U O
Z z
_
O
Z
opq
O
- � 3
t
■
�a�a
IL I

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PARCEL/PROPERTY OWNER INFO

y }
\�
2 \
o=
�� \\
5!
§ \
/ C/) AFM
k\2�
..mop
pLLJCC�U) k
:)zLU d
oz�_j
z}�§§ �)
°�2Z` (�2�
Z0LO ''2LU
°mom
_� >-L���
o« z�-J§)
z� 0§2-� E
L) 0C')
} z! j
§C�
\c \
Cl)z 0
cli
§
0CC \
(
>-§§§E
k kLU <
oZ0-"t
uoz -
_
[§§§%
Z§�� >
\cc
2 )
zco
2 sCC
� §CC2�
B� /Lu§�§
�� z«_j§u
<
�kk§ Sk§-°
pLucc�E =LuL]
:) LU < F- LU 2
S0 germ■ %§
z=LULU §2~ S 3°
222z+1 z/
z LO \ cli\
k) z j�
�
§
/

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WETLAND/STREAM/BUFFER
DELINEATION

V � �
= Z N
Q Q a no
J WENOE« `ro
Uo
W
Z O C
F 0' vv
N �0
Qrm wm A_ G ��
W wQr0 Q AFM
2
Nam 2 w 1 \ J
z m I W
Zo
O i
N
m
z Z
Q
W wocc
m
!- W W N i w =
w
c
Z
w z , w
O
O w
z w
LL
LL
Q I 1\ \\
Z
LU
1 \\ Q CC W O W-, Q / I I r� c Q� Q
N 2 w N
C7 w ccNwm ( W �O >w
U- p N Q r o I cca u >
W
z m a Fzw \ yam
O z o W- m
U a W N
0[ � W
F- a w
Z
F �� O
O OV O y \\
r z =w `' o
a oNzo �� �� z
p Z N U
2
a 0 26 Q
oz zzwa 2
No a0 aLU
cVW WZmN �LL
oN J� 7 W lL
°am o[OUZm W m
N W Z z W
oa w w Oz
NX mZa� �
oO
z=a> z
p[— EL OUW
0¢ ammo ab N z o
?� W do
m��owrOZwEdcnoa
N 2
aLLaN
m
O
Er OC WOa MEZ2�am
W�N >o>°°wz w�O
-a�O Ir>af
F
�oJwOzp>>�
z¢�
LDLLwov��
F
R D
a m 9 F
OW W m 10
w oramU)o a
Z P m 7 W N
W O Z>- En mEr
0
LWL
¢_ r w Z
w1 D 3
W W a W a J
mv~ic�700uiwp w
zzaNwz0a
aa�zaW
F F C,L N J
W W Z 7 2 W
m OFo
W
OWN (h V O
Z

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USACE CONCURRENCE LETTER

From:
Hooper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
To:
Ricci. Alvssa; Rex Vick Jr.
Subject:
SAW-2022-01349 / Browning Mill / RBV231, LLX / Wendell / Johnston County, NC - DELINEATION
CONCURRENCE
Date:
Monday, October 17, 2022 11:08:50 AM
Attachments:
SAW-2022-01349 Delineation Exhibit.pdf
Dear Alyssa,
Reference is made to ORM ID SAW-2022-01349, please reference this number on any
correspondence regarding this action.
On June 22, 2022, we received information from you requesting the Wilmington District,
Regulatory Division review and concur with the boundaries of an aquatic resource
delineation.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by
copy of this e-mail, are confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by
the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and reliable representation of the location and extent of
aquatic resources within the identified review area. The location and extent of these aquatic
resources are shown on the delineation map, labeled Aquatic Resource Delineation Exhibit
and dated 06/20/2022.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01
his://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/utils/getfile/collection/pl602lco119/id/1256 provides
guidance for Jurisdictional Determinations (JD) and states "The Corps generally does not issue
a JD of any type where no JD has been requested". At this time we are only verifying the
delineation. This delineation may be relied upon for use in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. "This verification does not address nor
include any consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be
interpreted as such.
This delineation verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not
an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR
Part 331).
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
O: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated
Customer Service Survey can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web

browser: https://reQulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey(. Thank you for taking the
time to visit this site and complete the survey.

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCN H P PROJECT REVIEW LETTER

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
r ■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
August 4, 2022
Rick Trone
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Browning Mill; 02210579.10
Dear Rick Trone:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

■
\
CO \
CO «
ss�\/
CO/ \
\ \ . \
/f//
\%t99
= U<z
\
}
e
ea
n
CO ( \
\
s 2
n
\
/
\ /
\ �
\
_
_
/
3 d
®
/ \
\
/
®`
az
%2
\\
LL
<§
__
\
\ \
O
u e
2 s
E CO
Y
e %
\\
\
\
U
/
o ©
®
\(®
ee
©±
6mo
/ ) co
— -
30
/
0
} �\
»/
\
r \co
�\
\\\\Ln
n
\
�\
0
|
/
%
a
\
:
C
-
e
CO
E
E
\\
CO
e=
:z
Z
cn
/ t
�
\e
$
a)\
0\
CO
0
\/
:
/
m
\
E
(
\
.`
/
\
ƒ
?
g /EE\
\z
\\//\
e
y
g
/
/
\/
%
§ \ \ 2
/
/ E u /
\
E
\ \
\{
\
\
co/
ƒ
x
»`
o
e
%\
>
\e\
\
E
z
4y_
CO\\
co
coa
z
\
CO
.0
D
E
2
\
®
\
\ \ \
/
/
/ \
/
\ /
§
/

CO
°'
v
% /
®
®
/
\ \
e
/
/
o e
g 2
g
g
2
m
\
>
\
J
CO ±
CO
±
O
2 \
= m
=
co
T
y 2
y
2
/
7
7
\
0
/
co
��
CO
\ CO�\
2
\
\\
\
6
\
O
»®
/
24.2
>
>
e
® a
\
\ /
\
\
®
}
0)2
CO/
§
u
\
e
e
\
&
./
w o
> s
/
\
» »
/
\2
\(®
6mu
\
\
\\\
©
\
«
»®
\\
�\
\
_ \ \ /
G
y y
\.z
ƒ /
E
m
\ \ /
^ e —
_
2
/ /
2
.E o « 2
±
e e
±
&
2 0
) \
= 2
m w\
*\\\\
\
y
//
2\
CO
«
\
`
\
.g
\ = g
4
/
u
o
a
o
a
s
k
e
« «
\
CO
e z
g
E
ƒ
\
/ \
\
\ \
«
z
\
\
\
= _
\ \
\
.2 .2
\ \
O
\
\
\ °
co co\
c
2 2
^
/
%
E
® \ }
/
d d
\
\
/
5®
E
®
®®
/t
=
e =
°
CO
©
>
±
®
E
%
o a) e
§
e e
-0 _0e
7
z
2 2
Z Z
�Z
\
E\E
/
Cl
0
\
O
O
§e
2
e
e
®
\\
=
2
7
~
a)0
(
»
§
E
COi
}
\ \
\ \
\
2 e
CO6
\
»
CO
/
`
E E
/
\
cn �
CO
°
§
co ° /
CO
E
\ \
% 2
©
\.g
\
%
7 ®/
\ « S
»
\ \
%
= v
e
o.9
a
e = / &
0
e
\
% %
®
: :
z
e t
z
%
s)
®
\
2 E
\
E.±
D
E\%
E\> 2
_
/ /
/
/
\ /
/ / /
\
t
® ®
\ \
CO
0
/
E
/ {
z
% —
g
v
g
e
g
a
E
z
.\ .\
e%%
o
»
m
=
/
E.2.2
/
\
/
±
/
\
\
/
o
e » »
Z
x :
g
%
\
/
\
/\ 0
%\
° u
0�
y
CO
± 3
4
4 z z
�»
©
©
\
<E
-OT—OT
)\
\ / z
D
\ \
»
\
\ \
E
\ / \
s
//©©
s 2 .-
{ \
?§
E°
CO E»
CO
E 2
E
2 e E
/ \ \
/
/ /
/
/ / \
/
/ / /
\ /
mi
ra
s
/

N
C—
O
/ML-
AVJ
11—
y\
00
W
Z
U
Z
a �
z
o
ro
v u
v o S
a
a
N N r CO
m
N IL p
,q7 z m IL
a
01
QI

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USFWS IPaC SPECIES LIST

8/4/22, 3:20 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species %444\,
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
kO
�}�0n1
t nM¢
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
Q [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 1 /16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
MAILING ADDRESS
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
�o�
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 2/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required. -V %
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly. 440 -J
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 3/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Endangered
STAT
US
US
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi . Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of th
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME .`I STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Endangered
STATUS
Threatened
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 4/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Tar River Spinymussel Parvaspina steinstansana Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolate Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/4511
Insects
NAME 6NTATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found v4
Xb
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/9743
Critical habita0\A*6
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acts and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 5/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gQv//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your t
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
...................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
...................................................................................................
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
...................................................................................................
IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
............................................................................................
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
..............................................................................................
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
.................................................................................................
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
................................................................................
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT
.................................................................................................
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 6/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/1626
Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
AREA.)
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
_N
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Oft Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its 1\60)
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 7/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25. -
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort ( )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 8/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR
Bald Eagle IN 17
Non -BCC
.........................
Vulnerable
(This is not a
...................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
in this area, but
............................................
warrants
.........................
attention
..........................
because of the
.........................................
Eagle Act or for
...........................................
potential
.........................
susceptibilities
in offshore
areas from.
certain types of
development r
o activities.)
........................
Black -billed
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOVWJC
W 1 14+ ++++ ++I+ +
++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 '.++ ++++ ++++
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 9/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
PaC: Explore Location resources
Chimney Swift ++++ ++++ +++10 1111 Jill Jill Jill +111 Mill I . . . . . . . . . .
BCC Rangewide
...........................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
.......................
Alaska.)
pooEaster-rn Whip
++++++++ ++++ ++I+JillJill Jill+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
l
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
..................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
.................................
continental
...............................
USA and
.......................
Alaska.)
......................
Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warbler
" Jill ' + ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
..............
Conservation 11
Concern (BCC) %OF
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
.................................
continental
...............................
USA and
....................... Aka - )
Pra
irie r ­i-r-..ie warbler
I ++++ ++++ ++++ 0+1+ IN . . . . . . .
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
........... ............................
Bird of
..................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
.......................
Alaska.)
......................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 10/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
Rusty Blackbird
BCC - BCR (This
...........................................
is a Bird of
..............................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
only in
...................
particular Bird
........................................
Conservation
.....................................
Regions (BCRs)
..........................................
in the
continent
........................
USA. ")
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ 1PIPME IMME MEii Boni ii++ ++Mm
--- ---- ---- ----
++++ ++++ +++1 111111111111
1-+++ ++++ ++++ +++ i
++++ 1+++ 111+ 000+ +++ I �, A+ +++I ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
.......................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 11 /16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Frr _*
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and
citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
https://i pac.ecosphere.fws. gov/location/45J5J P3 H LRDXH EYRI KATSRKD24/resources
12/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
Islands);
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 13/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation —
process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations 4
\\4
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
'IOU%
Data exclusions 11 -,4,
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location
of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
[e-mail].
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 14/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations �0
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 15/16

8/4/22, 3:20 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
�o�
FOB
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/45J5JP3HLRDXHEYRIKATSRKD24/resources 16/16

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
SHPO COMMENT LETTER

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
October 20, 2021
Troy Beasley
WithersRavenel
219 Station Road, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28405
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
TBeasley(2withersravenel.com
Re: Construct Browning Stables subdivision, 35.756172,-78.352926, Wendell, Johnston County,
ER 21-2296
Dear Mr. Beasley:
Thank you for your letter of September 20, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
�Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 225 450
1 inch = 450 R.
s�.,e 1 � e
* �T
MIXED HARDWOOD/PINE t —
FOREST
4�, Y t a:
i n
MP.IN HORSE •
OLD BARN/HORSE CY ?�r
STABLE HORSE 9 (f '
IL
T
1 r +
� HORSE r fy��s
PASTURE �L,-777�� �'
mil
Lel
AGRICULTURAL
HOUSE
SHEDS
0
FIELD
f
-
HOUSE
AGRICULTURAL
- -
SHED
HOUSE & SHED
W
STORAGE
J
BARN
TOBACCO
—
m
REVIEW AREA TOBACCO
DRYERS
BARNS
Q >
HOUSE
f
l}
&SHED $
Imo
I,, 0
T`
+
V z
Z10J
I J
Z z
�
AGRICULTURAL
'*., i'�ry
-�
O
� -- w ` AGRICULTURAL
,•„ '.: - . FIELD
MIXED HARDWOOD/PINE Y
FOREST ,•j i..-`
f. ♦t►_._ NY i µ.
` P
assin ixw - ro zc.ai.zi imz si ww•wx aw,�wz m•w oaxs\ao\wu.,�s-+v+oiwnVan-(ns .a�wal ..pms ae•.we-uwizWam-iz\izVz

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

'"........... ...... VNI108VD HRiON'A1NnOD NO1SNHOf
CCo z'e^e
S,DAatiNs S,aNNP]a SJaaNL�3N3 O� NV]d
�auane�s�ayaiM /1 IIIW �NINM02f9 NOISIAlClonsIlVd3n0
uj o Go U
i
WENDELLR.ID Ism„ml _
WEND ELL ROAD
-- \
a
i f
> a
u,
s

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
M PACT EXHIBITS

ssanns.noA . aid-d... r.
Jauanebs..iayai/\A
1
SdVIN iDVd W l
IIIW 9NINM0218

ssanns.noA . aid-d... r.
Jauanebs..iayai/\A
1
O
a
0
z
o
U
�
O
z
O
Z
LL
WLU
o
LL
U
o
o ?
J
a
a w
w
w
U
m
m
m
0
0
W
J
U
L I
N
0 �J I
O Lrl
� I I
II
C
C
Q
LuW
H
Z
O
0
N
W
J
::D c
U c
I L¢
U
VV� < ::D
N
LU
> >��
C�
u < 0
aa�z za
�
FF H a 0 2
Q V 9 O
— Z o w
Z�
z 0 LL \ r+iO
�v / w0
a0 Qv I
i
I cv
1
SdVIN iDVd W l
IIIW 9NINM0218
O
O
O
cv
0690E
z w
H O
wo
�
=
SS SOE
m
/ Z EOE
Ob00E
A-�o
0
o
o
cv
SS lOE
Ob bOE
Na
3
09 OOE
m
w
b6 Z0E
w m
o�
110666
m
w
zZ V 1~
M
M
N
6b00E
�— A aN
Y
U
mop
oNo
QO
�Z
a
B
o��g3
3
-_
aap
rt>w
MM
A
o`s
I..0
Ira
J
�
LU
o
a
O
s�gW
+ Z
g
U
N
ao
L>
F�
O
O
J
oUomcv
�s �vm
a
Q z
w
0
a
a
p e
a_

ssanns.noA . aid-d... r.
Jauanebs..iayai/\A
1
0
N
O Q
Z W
LU
W
> O
J 0
U
c
C
Q
W
U)
W d
J ::D
Z
U
O
Z
c
SdVIN iDVd W l
IIIW 9NINM0218
N
0
N
N
J a \
u OD
01 M C O
n @)
sb l8Z
89 E8Z
m
O wo
cow-
�a
N�—
w
9Z 8LZ
E8 98Z
N
�
N
oro ^
N N
� r
N N
EE E8Z
90 b8Z
(9 w
Z m
F4w
w O
m
p
w
Zb b8Z
m
m o
0�
f°
m
Op
m
8b 6LZ
b698Z
LL a O
OD
u'1 d
M N r
�
Z
Q
w
�
N
oro ^
N N
16 bBZ
w
1 am
New I
) wo
( Iwo --Q
LL
zm, oo ,L$b tig0� V Q
g a
Y
U
mpg
oNo
Qp
Z
3
-
aap
rtw
U
N
N
N
b8 88Z
LL d
u1 C
M _
�v@J
A
OD
O
sz s8z
s8 bez
ow wo
0.0
o
a
zQ
10
SsSBZ
N
N N
O
LL a \
J V m
SZ E8Z
LZ E8Z
C1 dO
M _ �y
V @
m
0
m wo
0-
95 O8Z
p
o
m
Caw H�
zQ �
�Z V Ci
N
m
N
�] ^
N
08 18Z
\\lT
o
gaw � � )) �� �g /
g
o o a 3 1 1444��� /// o w57<
W
51�1�1�1111'
w
®//
W
�
U
a
2
zO
O
1` 3
M
HZ o
zzZ
N
N
N
W
� 1
Z
N
00�
W
�.n � • W � G �
O w
o
W
U
two\
3
ry
u \
z
w
w J
::D
_ ��
0
¢0
0
z
O
U
z
O
Z
LL
WLU
o
LL
J
a a
w
w w
O
O
u 0 � 1 9

k¥wiDd IN
gH9N wmo8
@\!6 NI-
7< / :@®!
(§)! \`)\
:: )
§ // y (
): :
\mo \ ® \\ } °\}
.^2 \� ~CS
e ;i :- §\\ )
w .z HiGlAf0 9
I
_ . �.
Jauak\ds ajj!/\A
00�
T
co
>
,7<
:
\\/�\�
!
\\
\
\
- \m\k
((�� \
,
\
yƒe/
»
2
j
=:
LU
z
/
\\
/
)§(\ �
�
--
}�
\
o0
\)
Ed
\\\\m
\/
:
\OM
o
-
Ed o
:_
Z
�
/
Z
z
Z
/
Z
Z
-
/
Z
�
((