20150101 Ver 1_401 Application_20150115

��tiN7.Op O�
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
POSTAL SERVICE CENTER BOX 8003
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA 28533 -0003
IN REPLY REFER TO
5090/18130
LN
January 21, 2015
Ms Karen Higgins
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
401 /Wetlands Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Dear Ms. Higgins
Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point is proposing the
restoration of an unnamed tributary and its riparian area directly
adjacent to the Neuse River located on MCAS Cherry Point within the
Grant's Landing housing area, Craven County, NC. This channelized,
concrete - lined perennial relatively permanent water (RPW) is
approximately 793 linear feet, flows from south to north, and empties
directly into the Neuse River
The project will permanently improve 793 linear feet of perennial
RPW and 212 linear feet of stormwater swales The project will
temporarily impact 1 84 acres of wetlands Temporary Neuse River Buffer
impacts will include 4,048 square feet of Zone 1 and 4,999 square feet
of Zone 2 The United States Marine Corps is not requesting mitigation
credits for this activity
Please find enclosed, five copies of the Pre - Construction
Notification (PCN) form and associated documents for your review and
distribution Permit fees are being electronically transferred If you
have questions or require any additional information, please contact
Mrs Jessica Guilianelli of the Environmental Affairs Department at
(252) 466 -4826 or e -mail jessi.ca gui.lianelli @usmc mil.
Enclosure. 1
2
3
4
5.
6.
Sincerely,
W RPJ (
�Envi nm nt
By d ec i.o
Commands
Affairs Officer
of the
facer
Pre - Construction Notification Form
Figures 1 though 5
Photo Exhibit
Copy of signed JD
Copy of signed DWR Stream Determination
Stream Restoration Construction Drawings

5
i
ERE t
of WA7-F�Jr��6
a
Office Use Only
o�
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
�==
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant information
1 Processing "
1 a Type(s) of approval sought from the X Section 404 Permit /401 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
Corps
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 27 / GC 3885 or General Permit (GP) number
1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes X No
1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 1 e Is this notification solely for the
because written approval is not required? Certification record because written approval is
pp q not required?
No Yes X No No
1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ❑ Yes X No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
1g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h X Yes No
below
1 h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? X Yes No
2. Project Information
2a Name of project Grant's Landing Stream Restoration - MCAS — Cherry Point
2b County Craven
2c Nearest municipality / town Havelock
2d Subdivision name
2e NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
3 Owner Information
3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed MCAS — Cherry Point
75
ri (� '
rQ >
lu
1Z � i U V L_, C,
u
JAN 2 6 2015 t
DRA
401 8 BUFFER PERMITTING
3b Deed Book and Page No
3c Responsible Party (for LLC if George Radford, Commanding Officer Environmental Affairs Officer
applicable) Environmental Affairs Department — Mari% @UUC,4an %faldtt nCommanding Officer
3d Street address PSC 8006
3e City, state, zip Cherry Point, NC 28533 -0006
3f Telephone no (252) 466 -4599
3g Fax no (252) 466 -2000
3h Email address george radfoid@usmc mil

Project Information and Prior Project History
4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
Agent ❑ Other, specify Same as Owner
4b
Name
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
4d
Street address
Property size
4e
City, state, zip
Surface Waters
4f
Telephone no
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
proposed project
4g
Fax no
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
4h
Email address
River basin
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Kevin Yates
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
McAdams Company
5c
Street address
2905 Meridian Parkway
5d
City, state, zip
Durham, NC 27713
5e
Telephone no
919- 361 -5000
5f
Fax no
919 - 361 -2269
5g
Email address
yates @mcadamsco corn
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Parcel ID#
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 34 946478 N Longitude - - -76 866148 W
1c
Property size
2 87 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
proposed project
Neuse River
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Neuse River (SB /SW/NSW)
2c
River basin
Neuse River Basin (HUC 3020204)

Project Information and Prior Project History
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The Grant's Landing Stream Restoration project is located north of Pierce Drive, within the "U- shaped" area
formed by Pierce Drive, Washington Drive, and Adams Drive, on the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS)
Cherry Point, in Cherry Point, NC This channelized, unnamed perennial RPW (Relatively Permanent Water)
is located within Grant's Landing, a single family residential housing area, flows from south to north, and
empties directly into the Neuse River (Figures 1,2) This feature was determined to be non - subject to the
Neuse River Buffer Rules in an on -site determination dated May 20, 2013
The Grant's Landing RPW is located within a drainage swale and confined within a constructed concrete
channel which is mostly blocked with sediment at its confluence with the Neuse River There are also four
concrete lined stormwater outfalls which empty untreated stormwater into the main channel which contributes
the amount of sediment choking the system at the confluence with the Neuse River Although this is a
mapped stream feature on the Craven County Soils Survey and located in a natural valley, it is acting more
like stormwater ditch since it was lined with concrete (Figures 3,4 /Pies 1 -7) There is no natural dimension,
pattern, and profile, nor benthic habitat due to the concrete lined bed and bank The RPW consists of 793
linear feet
The RPW and stormwater outfalls convey stormwater runoff from the surrounding residential homes and
discharges into the Neuse River The drainage swale surrounding the stream was recently delineated as being
jurisdictional wetlands, totaling 1 84 acres per confirmation by US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) staff,
and can be characterized as a maintained /disturbed vegetative community that consists of areas that have had
previous human disturbances and are subject to periodic mowing and other maintenance activities Species
observed within the maintained /disturbed drainage swale include various lespedeza species (Lespedeza spp )
and various grass species (Festuca spp ) Species observed along the slopes of the drainage swale include
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicerajaponica), longleaf pine (Pinus taeda), scrub pine (Pinus virginiana), black
cherry (Prunus serotina), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinesense), blackberry (Rubus argutus), greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia), red maple, red cedar (Juniperus virginlana), sweet gum, and live oak Located at lower
elevations of the drainage swale near the Neuse River the soil consisted of a larger percentage of soil particles
and species observed include groundseltree, marshpennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), tussock sedge (Carex
stricta), smartweed (Polygonum punctatum), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina
patens) Although the soils are mapped as Suffolk Loamy Sand (Figure 2) The soils within the riparian area
are hydric and were a contributing factor to this area being considered jurisdictional
The RPW and riparian wetlands within the project area drain directly to the Neuse River DWQ has assigned
this unnamed tributary and this section of the Neuse River stream index number 27 -(104) and water quality
classifications of (SB) primary recreation, (SW) swamp waters, and (NSW) nutrient sensitive waters
Land use within the vicinity of the proposed project is mostly single- family resident dwellings and
recreational activities
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
There are 1 84 acres of riparian wetlands within the project area
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
The project area contains 793 linear feet of perennial RPW
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the proposed project is to restore an RPW to the Neuse River, enhance adjacent wetlands,
restore the floodplain, aquatic, and morphological functions, and improve overall water quality to
downstream waters

B Project Information and Prior Project History
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
This RPW to the Neuse River and its adjacent riparian areas have been selected for restoration by MCAS
Cherry Point because of its highly degraded state and its direct discharge of stormwater to the Neuse River
Complaints regarding the poor drainage and functionality of this drainage spawned further investigation
which resulted in this being identified as a project for drainage system improvements To maximize benefit,
the MCAS Cherry Point staff would like to return this channel section back to a "naturalized" state,
comparable to its condition prior to hardening and channelization. There are no mitigation credits being
requested. The effort to restore this system is to improve water quality, functionality, and provide
environmental uplift to the downstream receiving waters
Based on site observations, the degraded condition of the RPW are the result of historic channelization,
hardening of the stream banks, periodic dredging, and past vegetation maintenance practices, and storm water
runoff onto the site from the incremental increase in impervious surface associated with previous upstream
residential development The actual drainage area to this RPW is quite small, approximately 22 acres based
upon existing topographic survey data, however base flow was noted in this section of the channel on the
afternoon of September 15, 2009, and every subsequent site visit This is likely due to the influence of
stormwater and groundwater leaching into cracked drain pipes, along with the sediment plug at the
confluence with the Neuse River The length of the existing channel section to be restored to a "naturalized"
state is approximately 793 linear feet, with approximately 212 linear feet of stormwater outfalls being
incorporated into the project The overall restored length of channel will be 1,218 linear feet, which includes
852 If of the main channel, incorporating another 366 if of the stormwater outfalls
Restoration of this RPW and its riparian areas pose an excellent opportunity to integrate stormwater and
nutrient removal measures that would otherwise not be implemented The project goal for this restoration plan
is to modify the current dimension, pattern and profile of an existing stream channel so it will be stable and
self - maintaining by utilizing natural channel design techniques and procedures The design has been
developed utilizing Rosgen -based natural channel design principles ( Rosgen, 1996) and designed to be an E5
channel based on the Rosgen classification scale Preventing future stream bank erosion, restoring
connectivity with the historic floodplain and providing nutrient removal to previously untreated stormwater
will be accomplished by fulfilling the following objectives
1 Design a channel with the appropriate cross - sectional dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile
utilizing the existing channel condition survey, and collected reference reach data as a guide
2 Remove the existing concrete lined channels Create bed form and aquatic habitat diversity (riffles,
runs, pools, and glides)
3. Create a nested floodplain (bankfull bench) that will be accessible at the proposed bankfull channel
elevation along the upper end or raise the bed elevation of the current stream so the bankfull elevation
matches the current floodplain elevation (Priority I)
4 Ensure channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in- channel grade control structures, and
native vegetation into the proposed restoration design while also creating a stable and functional
aquatic and terrestrial habitat
5 Enhance the existing maintained riparian wetland with establishment of native forested riparian plant
community within a minimum of 50 feet from the proposed top of the bankfull channel along with the
removal of exotic vegetation during construction implementation and the elimination of current
embankment maintenance practices
Typical construction equipment will be utilized such as a front -end loader, long -arm trackhoe, bull - dozers,
dump trucks, and water pumps

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
X Yes ❑ No
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Partial / Final
of determination was made?
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Geo- Marne, Inc
Name (if known)
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
A wetland delineation was conducted by Geo - Marine, Inc and approved by Mr William Wescott, of the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) — Washington District on December 18, 2013 (AID 2012- 00382)
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
Yes X No
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b
If yes, explain

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
X Wetlands X RPWs- tributaries Buffers
Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P)
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
or Temporary
T
Figure 4
Overall Impact
Temporary
(access & stream
Riparian
(Maintained in
No
XCorps
1 84 acres
Map (NWP 27)
rest)
grass and
XDWQ
herbaceous)
2g Total wetland impacts
1 84 acre
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER)
Type of
Average
Impact
number -
or intermittent
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent(P) or
(INT)?
(Corps - 404, 10
width
(linear feet)
Temporary (T)
DWQ — non -404,
(feet)
other)
Figure 4
Overall Impact
Stream
Restoration
UT to Neuse River
Perennial RPW
XCorps
XDWQ
4 1 f
793 If
Map (NWP 27)
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
793 If
31 Comments
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U S then individual) i list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
NONE
5f Tota I
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
Yes If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) Project not located within Buffered River Basin
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below if yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
Project is in which protected basin?
X Neuse Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for
impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
1 (T)
Re- grading
UT to Neuse River
No
4,048
4,999
6h Total buffer impacts
4,048
4,999
61 Comments Temporary Impacts from construction and regrading of the stream channel and buffer Buffer will be replanted

C Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1
Avoidance and Minimization
la
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Impacts to riparian wetlands along the old channel during construction will be the minimal necessary,
while limiting tree removal to the greatest extent practicable Currently denuded areas will be utilized,
while avoiding forested areas, to the greatest extent practicable during construction
The goal of this restoration project is to modify the current dimension, pattern and profile of an existing
channel so it will be stable and self - maintaining by utilizing natural channel design techniques and
procedures The design has been developed utilizing Rosgen -based natural channel design principles
( Rosgen, 1996) Preventing future stream bank erosion will be accomplished by fulfilling the following
general objectives
1) Conversion of the concrete lined channels to a natural, stable system with restored aquatic habitat
2) Reduction of sediment loading to a river system that flows directly into the Neuse River - a
recreational water body
3) Establishment of a riparian corridor that has a restored floodplam, aquatic, and morphological
functions which provide habitat connectivity to the area and will be protected in perpetuity
lb
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
- The temporary construction corridors required for the project will be within currently cleared areas of
the property, minimizing temporary impacts from construction All in- stream structures and /or
disturbance will be carried out from high- ground, during dry conditions to minimize sedimentation
- Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and
installation as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheet All work will take place during dry conditions
and can be facilitated from high, non jurisdictional, stable ground adjacent to the project The contractor
shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, clearing only as
necessary to install these devices All erosion and sedimentation control measures will be checked for
stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every
week Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed An erosion
control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative
2
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Yes No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
DWQ Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?

C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
3
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a
Name of Mitigation Bank
3b
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h
Comments
5
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes X No
6b
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone
1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h
Comments

C Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
(There is no new impervious surface proposed )
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Yes No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes X No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why There will be no stormwater
management requirements at this time due to the lack of new impervious surface
associated with the
prod ect
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes E] No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Yes ❑ No

F. Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes No
❑
letter )
Comments
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
No, the project will not result in additonal development The housing area is fully built out and no future development will
occur
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
TThe U S Fish and Wildlife Serive web site (http / /www fws gov /nc -es /es /countyfr html) was accessed on March 3, 2014
to determine threatened and endangered species which may potential occur within Craven County Based on field
surveys coducted within the project area, it is believed threatened and endagered species and their habitat are not
present
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
A 2007 report titled "Essential Fish Habitat Assessment and Study of the MCAS Cherry Point's Areas of Responsibility"
was utilized for the EFH assessment While there is the potential that EFH exists in the vicinity of the project, in the Neuse
River, the tributary to be restored does not contain EFH It is unexpected that the project will have an effect on EFH
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
No historic or archeological resources have been identified in this location This project will not impact any historic or
archeological resources Data used to make this determination is the MCAS Cherry Point Integrated Cultural Resources
Management Plan 2008 -2013
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements There will be no permanent fill placed above the current grade of
the 100 -year floodplain within the project area, therefore there is considered to be no impact to the 100 -year floodplain
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCFIRM Panel 372074900J
o?l 0 ?U/
-
George W Radford
y„ R F D
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
nim ()fflnpr
Date
t;A9 it i� Flt tending Officer
(Agent's signature is vale only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )

PROJECT AREA
SuD
uD '
S`
NoB SuD, O
idn l N NuB
N o A.�;
NoA
NoB
Nell SuD No _.N
No NoB
NoB ,. PF's,SuD ,�SE
GoA Ud
�
GoA M M
®.A.� SuD
GoA Cj
NoB
1-Y 1 �L�� NoB
GuA
Ly I
GoA
LI R a R%,
GRAPHIC SCALE
C 1000 0 500 1000 2000
1 inch = 1000 ft.
■ r"scr NO. SLT -1low FIGURE 2: SOILS MAP ''' •>s�o■r><>�■�
rnnula: SLT- 11000 -SOLS i'RAV� OOURIY SOQa �T PWf�i 16 _ _ ■ O4� m
°CA`s 1 1000 Nem - CH� POM sas X.�_�iia PM miew kdows 4m 03 -19 -2014 CRAB COUNN. PC M�/�INjg

STORM Ol
LEGEND:
�i
EXISTING CHANNEL (955 LF)
UEXISTING
WETLANDS (1.84 AC.)
EXISTING ZONE 1 BUFFER
(10,624 SF)
_
EXISTING ZONE 2 BUFFER
(7,080 SF)
— —�
PROJECT LIMITS
SUBMITTED PICTURE LOCATION
NO STREAMS AND WETLANDS DELINEATED BY
GEO- MARINE, INC. AND VERIFIED ON
12/18/2013 BY MR. WILLIAM WESCOTT.
GRAPHIC SCALE
700 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
n
01.11
n
V
z
0
O��z
z
C3
L�.
o
° o
° _° o
I °o
J °
o �
z w
U
a w m c
MCAU Ms

STORM
8.
T�
LEGEND:
g
PROPOSED PERMANENT d`�z
CHANNEL IMPACTS (955 LF)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
D WETLAND IMPACT (1.84 AC.)
® EXISTING ZONE 1 BUFFER �
(10,624 SF) �+
PROPOSED ZONE 1 TEMPORARY A
BUFFER IMPACTS (4,048 SF) Q
EXISTING ZONE 2 BUFFER
� U
(7,080 SF)
® PROPOSED ZONE 2 TEMPORARY
BUFFER IMPACTS (4,999 SF)
— - PROJECT LIMITS
PROPOSED LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
SUBMITTED PICTURE LOCATION I1
NOTES: Z
1. STREAMS AND WETLANDS DELINEATED BY
CEO- MARINE, INC. AND VERIFIED ON W R4
12/18/2013 BY MR. WILLIAM WESCOTT.
O
a moo
0� z
o
O 0
H p
J
U) =
GRAPHIC SCALE z
100 0 50 100 200 o z F
1 inch = 100 ft. 'JMCAnwMS

To
A
416_

Grant's Landing Stream Restoration
(Existing Conditions)
Pic 1: From Pierce Drive facing north toward Neuse River (summer)
Pic 1: From Pierce Drive facing north toward Neuse River (winter)

Grant's Landing — MCAS Cherry Point
Page 2 of 4
Pic 2: Facing downstream — main channel, stagnant stormwater & debris
Pic 3: Stormwater outfall coming from Grant's Landing
5LT -11000

Grant's Landing — MCAS Cherry Point
Page 3 of 4
Pic 4: Stormwater outfall leaching during dry times
Pic 5: West side Stormwater outfall, with trash, debris, algae
SLT -11000

Grant's Landing — MCAS Cherry Point
Page 4 of 4
Pic 6: Channelized Main Channel facing Neuse River.
Pic 7: Sediment plug at confluence of main channel and Neuse River
SLT -11000

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id SAW 2012 -00382 County Craven US G S Quad Havelock
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point ALent. Geo- Marine, Inc.
Attn Mr George Radford Attn. Mr David Moose
Address PSC Box 8006 Building 4223 Access Rd. Address 561 Country Club Road
MCAS Cherry Point, NC 28533 Mount Olive, North Carolina 28365
919- 223 -0905
Property description Area D This section of MCAS Cherry Point is partially forested and partially developed Area D
contains 411.06 acres of jurisdictional wetlands 0 05 acres of isolated "etlands, 1.79 acres of turisdretional waters, and
34,523 linear feet of stream channels
Size (acres) 2350 Nearest Town Havelock
Nearest Waterway Hancock and Slocum Creels River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020204 Coordinates 34 929631 N - 76.866918 W
Location description MCAS Cherry Point is located in the Citv of Havelock between US Hwy. 70 and the Neuse
River The specific project area (Area D) consist of four sections as outlined in the information package submitted
October 21 2013 by Gco -Maine Inc
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) Jurisdiction To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1) If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
B. Approved Determination
X There aie Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law
or our puhlrshed regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fiom the date of
this notification
X 1 here ai e waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 tJSC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law of our published
ie`ulatton,,, this determination may be iclied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
We sti ongly suggest you have the wetlands on voui property delineated Due to the size of your property and /or our
present Ntiorl. load, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a more timely
delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant 1 o be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps
_ The waters of the U S including wetlands on youi project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the C of ps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subje,_t to
CWA jurisdiction on youi property which, provided there is no change in the law of our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
X 3 lie watets of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 12/18/2013 Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fi om the date of this
notification
Page I of 2

_ There are no "aters of the U S , to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
Published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X I he property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, dt (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and /or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 131 1) if you have any questions regarding this
determination and'or the Corps regulatory progiam, please contact William Wescott at910- 251 -4629.
C. Basis For Determination Section 10: Hancock Creel., Slocum Creek and Neuse River have marked navigation
channels and are subject to tidal influence Section 404• Areas exhibit the three parameters specified in the
regional supplement to the 1987 USACC Wetland Delineation Manual. Features identified as Waters of the US
exhibit an OHWM
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This del meation /determinatioil has been conducted to identity the limits of Corps* Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request The delmeation /determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Piogram participants or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved Jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
1 his correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site Ifyou object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form if you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room lOMt5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RI A to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331 5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RI^A form, it must be received at the above address by 2/25/2014
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA limn to the Division Office Ifyou do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
Coips Regulatory Official,
Date 12/18/2013 Expiration Date 12/18/2018
fhe Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help its ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http i /per2 nwp usace army nul /survey Mint to
complete the survey online

ti
ter
Applicant MCAS Cherry Point- -Area D File Number SAW 2012 -00382 1 Date 12/18/2013
AttemkAd icy s.,,, 5rc.11wI bt-tow
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ermission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL
® APPROVFD JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRFLIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION F
SECTION 1- The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http / /www usace army mil /inet /functions /ew /cecwo /res? or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you snag sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization It you received a better of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved Jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• OB IECT It you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain tei ins and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accoidutgly You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After
evaluating your objections, the disti ict engineer will send you a proffered permit for youi reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPi If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization if you received a Letter of Permission (I,OP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standas d Permit of acceptance of the I OP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• APPEAL 11-you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because Of Certain terms and conditions therein
You may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by commpleting Section II of
this foinn and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice
C PERMI F DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this torn and sending the form to the division engineer fits form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED IURISDIC I IONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information
• A(,CLP I You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD I�atlure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, mean that you accept the approved JD in its entirety. and waive all rights to appeal the appioved JD
• APPEA1. If You disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Admsnv,trative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district enginee► 1111" form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice

F, PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETFRMINAI ION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary ID. I he Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD
SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
RF,ASONS FOR APPEAL OR OB,IEC f IONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
protteied permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this Corm to clarity where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I he appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
c,lai ify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record
I lowever, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that i4 already in the administrative
record
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
It you have questions regarding this decision and /or the
It you only have questions iegarding the appeal procetis you may
appeal process you may contact
also contact
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr Jason Steele, Admtni,,trative Appeal Review Ofl7cer
Attn, William Wescott
CESAD -PDO
2407 West 5'h Street
U S Army Coips of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Washington, North Carolina 27889
60 Forsyth Street Room l OM 15
910 -251 -4629
Atlanta Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone [phone]
RICH f OI FNTRY Your Signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engmeeis personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a l5 day
notice of an_y site investigation, and will have the opportuni y to participate in all site investigations
Date
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to-
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Dn ision, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrate Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

VIA
RE E14R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
David Moose
561 Country Club Road
Mr Olive. NC 28365
Charles Wakild, P E
Director
John E Skvada III
May 20, 2013
DWQ Project # 1.2 -0596
Craven-County
Subject Property* MCAS Cherry Point, Area D
Neuse River Basin (NEU 10), Neuse River (27- (104), SB, Sw, NSW),
Tucker Creek (27- 112 -6. SC, S%v, NSW), Anderson Creek (27- 112 -7;
SC. Sw, NSW), Slocum Creek (27 -112, SC. Sw, NSW)
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Dear Mr Moose
At your request this Office conducted an on -site determination to review drainage
features located within Area D for applicability to the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A
NCAC 213 0233). "The features are labeled on the attached maps, highlighted in red and
blue, and initialed by me on May 20, 2013
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the surface waters
labeled as 11AZ-01 through GY -01" (see Enclosed Stream Origin Determination
List) on the attached maps and highlighted in red are not subject to the Neuse Buffer
Rule. The streams highlighted in glue are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules (AZ -01,
GW -01a, iK -01, IL -01, IL -02, IP-01, ZD -02, ZF -01, ZT -01). initial stream origin
points were set by staff of Geo -Manne and conformation of these stream origin points,
for applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules, was performed by DWQ staff
Please be advised that although the subject features lughlighted in red are not subject to
the Neuse Buffer Rules these features may be considered waters of the U S. and/or waters
of the State and activities there within may require Nationwide Permits from the US
Army Corp of Engineers and General Certifications from the State of North Carolina It
is recommended that Mr William Wescott with the US Army Corp of Engineers,
North Carolina Dn tsion of Water Quality IntemeL AWV &LAatMp14yArL,
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone] One
W,ishmgion NC 27889 1AX 252 -946 -9215 NofthCarofina
An Equal Opportung/Affirrnative Aaron Employer - 50% Recycledli 0% Post Consumer Paper Naturigliff

Page 2 of 2
Washington Field Office, (910- 251 -4629) and Roberto Scheller with the Division of
Water Quality, Washington Regional Office (252 -948- 3940), should be contacted if any
constriction within these areas is proposed.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of
this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property This on -site
determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a
determination by the Director A request for a determination by the Director shall be
referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh,
NC 27699 -1650 Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an
adjudicatory hearing You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter
Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start until
the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this
decision DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be
certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition. which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes
to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N C
27699 -6714 This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within
60 days
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within the buffers Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the
United States or Waters of the State If you have any additional questions or require
additional information please call Roberto Scheller in the Washington Regional Office at
252- 948 -3940
Sincerely
For Char es Wakild, P E
Enclosures USGS Topo maps
Soils maps
Aerial Photos
Stream Origin Determination List (Area D)
cc DWQ Webscape Unit
File Copy
Filename 12 -0596

NCDWQ STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION FIELD VISIT
PACKAGE FOR GMl PROJECT AREA D OF
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CHERRY POINT
C
�y
t
'i
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CHERRY POINT
HAVELOCK, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
CONTRACT No.N40080 -06 -D -0492
TASK ORDER: ON 18

Project Description
GMi was contracted by Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Washington, to
conduct a wetland delineation and stream origin identification at Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Cherry Point in project areas identified by MCAS Cherry Point The site is located off
US Route 70 and Highway 101 in the town of Havelock. NC GMI has four project areas at
MCAS Cherry Point Area A (2,470 acre), Area B (1,597 acre). Area C (1,840 acre) and Area D
(1,434 acre), with a total acreage of 7,341 (Figure 1) As of May 29`h, 2012, NCDWQ has
identified 6 perennial stream and 3 intermittent stream origins that are subject to the Neuse River
buffer riles in Project Area D (Figures 2 through 12 and the NCPLS Ongins Table) USACE has
verified 37 additional WoUS features that are not subject to the Neuse River buffer rules in
Project Area D (Figures 2 through 10 and the NCPLS Origins Table)
Stream Origin Determination Methodology
Ongins of intenn►ttent and perennial streams were located using the Methodology for
Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins, North Carolina Division
of Water Quality ( NCDWQ 2010). NCDWQ and GMI staff conducted stream origin
determinations in Project Area D on May 29`i' 2012 All of the GMI identified USACE
jurisdictional features (WoUS) verified by the USACE Washington Field Office were re- visited
by NCDWQ and GM1 NCDWQ determined stream origins for the Neuse River buffer subject
features, as well as. venfied the non - subject status of the additional USACE WoUS features in
Project Area D
All subject stream origins and non - subject WoUS origins were NCPLS surveyed after
verification by NCDWQ and USACE The NCPLS Origins Table provides origin
determinations of the Neuse River buffer subject and non - subject features in GMI Cherry Point
Project Area C for planning and permitting purposes and are valid for five years from the date of
NCDWQ signature

GROUP, P.A.
f' Land Design, GPS, 018,
t
Sedimentahan B Erosion
Control, Environmental,
Marine & Land Surveying
NCDWQ Stream Ongin'DeterZntnatIon: GMI °Pro ect Area "0" MCAS Cher Point
Ori Ins
Determination
Neuse River Buffer
Northittjt
Easting
latitude
longitude
AZ -01
Perennial Stream
Subject
3868319 2222
329348 7347
N34 9430
W76 8687
DL -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
38684713308
328438 2293
N34 9442
W76 8787
DM -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868329 2005
328410 40118
N34 9430
W76 8790
DM-04
USACE WoUS
Non-Subject.
38683614909
32844S 4191
N34 9433
W76 8786
DR -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868519 2772
3295410839
N34 9449
W76 8666
DU -01
USACE WoUS
Non-Subject
3868439 3399
329750 0975
N34 9442
W76 8643
DU -02
USACE WoUS
Non- Subject
3868478 9754
329784 6519
N34 9445
W76.8640
DV -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868342 1062
329828 8422
N34 9433
W76 8635
DV -03
USACE WoUS
Non- Subject
3868375 7154
329842.1155
N34 9436
W76 8633
ED -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
38683341143
3287511140
N34 9431
W76 8753
ED -08
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868459 7361
328785 9072
N34 9442
W76 8749
EF -01
USACE WoUS
Non- Subject
38684219577
328867 1692
N34 9439
W76 8740
EG -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868533 9555
328950 8206
N34 9449
W76 8731
EG -02
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868527 9455
328852 8810
N34 9448
W76 8742
FH -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868563 9034
326929 3740
N34 9448
W76 8952
FI -01
USACE WoUS
Non- Subject
3868795 7056
327140 0850
N34 9469
W76 8930
FI -03
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3868789 0382
327128 0716
N34 9469
W76 8931
FX -01
USACE WoUS
Non- Subject
3868540 0103
327258 0821
N34 9447
W76 8916
FZ -01
USACE WoUS
Non-Subject
3866312 4374
329347 8522
N34 9249
W76 8683
FZ -02
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3866376 3336
329316 3496
N34 9255
W76 8687
GW 01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3867174 5276
329334 5247
N34 9327
W76 8686
GW-
01a
Perennial Stream
Sub ect
3867419 2033
329360 9369
N34 9349
W76 8684
GY -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3867901 6115
329705 5724
N34 9393
W76 8647
IC -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3865134 8950
325935 5300
N34 9137
W76.9054
IK -01
Perennial Stream
Subject
3863036 8401
326550 2843
N34 8949
W76 8982
IL -01
Intermittent Stream
Subject
3866459 1413
3297213078
N34 9263
W76 9643
IL -02
Perennial Stream
Subject
3866533 6128
329702 7920
N34 9270
W76 8645
IN -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3861893 0070
325572 6390
N34 8845
W76 9087
IP -01
Perennial Stream
Subject
3861976 9360
3258514180 1
N34 8853
W76 9057
N8 -61 I
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3866264 0364
330444 2462
N34 9247
W76 8563
YS-01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3856208 0840
328843 0530
N34 9239
W76 8738
YG -01
USACE WoUS
Non -Sub
3866580 5446
328679 8040
N34 9272
W76 8757
YG -16a
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject 1
3866742 4532 1
328913 1182
N34 9287
W76 8732
f;J

ZA -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
38672218499
329576 7765
N34 9332
W76 8660
ZC -OS
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3866919 0632
329408 6690
N34 9304
W76 8678
ZD-01
USAGE WoUS
Non - Subject
3864746 4980
324162 3380
N34 9099
W76 9247
ZD-02
Perennial Stream
Subject
3864S86 6506
324268 9160
N34 9085
W76 9235
ZF -01
Intermittent Stream
Sub ect
3864639 5590
324254 5130
N34 9090
W76 9237
ZH -01
USAGE WoUS
Non - Subject
3863576 9810
325350 3620
N34 8996
W76 9115
L -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3862987 2760
325850 9100
N34 8944
W76 9059
W -01
USACE WoUS
Non-Subject
3862919 0480
325212 0400
N34 8937
W76 9129
ZN -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3863094 4710
325086 9610
N34 8952
W76 9143
ZP -01
USAGE WoUS
Non-Subject
3862452 8850
325367 5140
N34 8895
W76 9111
ZQ -01
USACE WoUS
Non - Subject
3862346 6320
325432 0590
N34 8885
W76 9103
ZT -01
Perennial Stream
Subject
3861712 5870
325594 3110
N34 8828
W76 9084
ZW -01 I
USACE WoUS I
Non Subject 1
3868273 8175 1
327659 8686 1
N34 9423
W76 8872
I, John A Rudolph, certify that these NCDWQ Stream Origin Coordinates were compiled under
my direct supervision from an actual survey made under my direct supervision, that the
regulated area is located upon Federal land within MCAS Cherry Point, that the purpose of this
coordinate sheet is to delineate the origins of streams and does not conform to NCGS 47 -30,
that stream origin flags are per USACE standards dated May 10, 2013 and established with
conventional and GNSS surveying methods; that the GLASS survey methods were performed by a
Topcon Hyper -lite Plus RTK System and Thales Navigation Promark II Static Receivers, all stream
origin locations as flagged by Geo- Marine, Inc wetland scientists, all verified flag locations were
found to meet or exceed sub -meter accuracy standard with 95% confidence per Geospatial
Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 3, National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (FGDC -STD-
007 3 -1998)
SURVEYOR L-4194
Nom,, ; rv%r-:i T m ~:r�i mvtt j
MCM:9cment t,ornmisoton
Djrision of Water Quaity
For r`t VA Bt!ffer
Date_
Ravlewed by,,
-0 CARa'f
ES
r
SEAL =
c_ = L -4194
-o-
f
O;
��''9SyL EY �v0

.o,-, -

Figure 3. MCAS Cherry Point Wetland/WoUS Project Area D (Soil Survey)

Figure 5. MCAS Cherry Point Wetland/W"oUS Project Area D

Figure 7. NlC XS Cherr% Point Wetland /Wol'S Project Area D
$Sw�
Reviewed b;

Figure 9. MICAS Chery Point Wctland/Wol-'S Project Area D (Soil
SurNev)
For B 9n D:tier
Reviewed by`

1'
c,r+*we 11. MCAS Cherry Point Wetland /WoUS Project Area U (Soil
Dvision of Water Ou. try
Survey)
For fo rffer
I

References
NC .Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.