The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20201937 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20221226ID#* 20201937 Select Reviewer: Katie Merritt Initial Review Completed Date 12/29/2022 Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/26/2022 Version* 2 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Type of Mitigation Project:* Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Barrett Jenkins Project Information ID#:* 20201937 Existing ID# Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank Project Name: Dead Tree Phase A Mitigation Site County: Edgecombe Document Information O Yes O No Email Address:* bienkins@restorationsystems.com Version:* 2 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: DeadTree Phase A TP01_MY1.pdf 13.6MB Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted... Signature Print Name:* Barrett Jenkins Signature: * Restoration Systems, LLC 1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 Raleigh, North Carolina Ph: (919) 755-9490 Fx: (919) 755-9492 /2022 CREDITRELEASE REQUEST FORM To: NCDEQ-DWR NutrientOffset&Buffer Banking Coordinator , 512.230.0424 From: BarrettJenkins, bjenkins@restorationsystems.com Through:RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC Weformally request acreditreleasefortheDead Tree ANutrientOffset Site (2020-1937v2) for completion of Taskper the approved credit releaseschedule, which is included in the Attachments with this request. The following documents havebeen previously submitted to DWR for Tasks :Creditsrequested for release are detailed below: Credit Type% ReleaseCredit AmountNotes/Comments (include Units) Buffer Restoration Buffer Preservation Buffer Enhancement Generated Nitrogen Nutrient 10%13, lbs Offset Delivered Nitrogen Nutrient Offset (Jordan sites only) Generated PhosphorusNutrient 10%8 lbs Offset Delivered Phosphorus Nutrient Offset (Jordan sites only) Signature: Attachments: 1) Approved Project CreditTable, 2)Approved Credit ReleaseSchedule 11 Pg. ) 1937v2 - 2020 DWR ID#: ( 1 1937v2, Project Credit Table - 2020 , Digit HUC: 0302010 - Bank Parcel Development Plan Pamlico River Basin 8 - Dead Tree Phase A Dead Tree Phase A, Tar : 9 Table ————————————— 318.044 368.541 Nutrient 2,390.4942,173.9961,851.3751,652.031 8,754.481 Delivered Offset: P (lbs) ————— ———————— N (lbs) 4,937.9725,721.997 Delivered 37,115.019 33,753.65428,744.61125,649.579 135,922.832 Nutrient Offset: NoNo Yes YesYesYesYesYes Convertible to Nutrient Offset? ———————— —————————— — 0.000 Credits Riparian Buffer ————————— NoNoNoNoNo NoNoNo Buffer? Riparian Riparian Buffer Credits Convertible to Ratio (x:1) Ratio (x:1) Final Credit Final Credit 33%33%33% 100%100% 100% % Full Credit% Full Credit 11111 11 1 Ratio (x:1)Ratio (x:1) Initial Credit Initial Credit Ephemeral Reaches as % TABMPreservation as % TABM ) ) 22 0000 N/A 0.0%0.0% Area of Buffer Mitigation (ft Area for Buffer Mitigation (ft Total (Creditable) Total (Creditable) ) 2 00000 945 8,700 94,631 711,270646,853109,656550,860491,547 2,614,4622,614,462 Total Area (sf) Total Area (ft ):):): 222 ) for Credit: Totals (ft2): 2 1, 1A-11, 1A-1 1A-E, 1B1A-E, 1B Feature 1D Total Buffer (ft2): Feature NameFeature Name Features 1Ca, 1F Less Than 50-Feet 1A-D, 1Ca, 1D, 1E, 1F1A-D, 1Ca, 1D, 1E, 1F Diffused Flow Deduction Total Nutrient Offset (ft2): /pound) /pound) 2 2 Preservation Area Subtotals (ft 0-1000-100 0-100 101-200101-200 Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft 101-200 Total Eligible for Preservation (ft Width (ft)Width (ft) Total Ephemeral Area (ft Min-Max Buffer Min-Max Buffer RestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestoration RestorationRestoration Mitigation ActivityMitigation Activity Project AreaN Credit Conversion Ratio (ftP Credit Conversion Ratio (ft I / PI / P DitchDitchDitchDitch 0.0000.0000.0000.000 CreditsCredits 8,754.481 EphemeralEphemeral 135,922.832 Feature TypeFeature Type ) 1 0000 NoNoNoNo NoNo Yes Yes NO if ditch Subject? 2,614,462 Square FeetSquare Feet ephemeral or Subject? (enter 19.16394 297.54099 Nitrogen: RuralRuralRuralRuralRural RuralRuralRural Tar-Pamlico 03020101 LocationLocation Phosphorus: TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION Restoration: Preservation: TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM) Enhancement: Mitigation TotalsMitigation Totals Total Riparian Buffer: BufferBufferBufferBufferBuffer Credit TypeCredit Type he Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a). Nutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient Offset T st updated 08/03/2020 Nutrient Offset: Table 1. Dead Tree Bank Parcel - Phase A - Tar-Pam 01, 2020-1937v2, Project Credits Enter Preservation Credits Below 1.la AnnualMonitoringReportMY1(2022) DEADTREEPHASEANUTRIENTOFFSETBANKPARCEL DWRProject#20201937V2 TarPamlicoRiverBasin InAgreementwith: TheDeadTreeMitigationBankingInstrumentfor NutrientOffsetMitigationCreditsPursuanttothe TarPamlicoNutrientManagementStrategy December2022 PreparedBy: RestorationSystems,LLC 1101HaynesSt.Suite211 Raleigh,NC27604 Phone:9197559490 Fax:9197559492 DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBankParcel DWRProject#20201937V2 AnnualMonitoringReportMY1(2022) TableofContents 1.0Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1 2.0ParcelLocation.................................................................................................................................1 2.1ParcelBackground.....................................................................................................................2 2.2ParcelObjectives.......................................................................................................................2 3.0RestorationActivities.......................................................................................................................3 3.1RiparianAreaRestorationActivities.........................................................................................4 3.2ParcelProtection.......................................................................................................................5 4.0MitigationPotential.........................................................................................................................6 5.0MonitoringProtocol&SuccessCriteria...........................................................................................6 5.1MonitoringProtocol..................................................................................................................6 5.2ParcelMaintenance..................................................................................................................6 5.3LongTermManagementPlan...................................................................................................7 6.0FinancialAssurance..........................................................................................................................7 7.0References.......................................................................................................................................7 AppendixA:GeneralFiguresandTables Figure1ParcelLocation/ServiceArea Figure2CurrentConditionsPlanView Table1ProjectComponentsandMitigationCredits Table2ProjectActivityandReportingHistory Table3ProjectContact Table4ProjectBaselineInformationandAttributes AppendixB:VegetationData Table5ΑMY1CVSOutputData VegetationPlotPhotos149 DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelTableofContents MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 1.0 Introduction RestorationSystems(Sponsor)ispleasedtoprovidetheNorthCarolinaDivisionofWaterResources(NC DWR)this AnnualMonitoringReport(MY12022)forthe DeadTreePhaseABankParcel(Parcel).As agreeduponinthe DeadTreeNutrientOffsetUmbrellaBankingInstrument(UBI)andDeadTreePhaseA BankParcelDevelopmentPackage(BPDP),madeandenteredintoonOctober19,2021byRestoration Systems,LLC,actingasBankSponsor(Sponsor),andtheNorthCarolinaDepartmentofEnvironmental Quality(NCDEQ),DivisionofWaterResources(DWR).Thisdocumentdetailstheriparianarearestoration activities,monitoringefforts,andthefinalmitigationpotentialoftheParcel. Measuring65.acres,theParcelisdesignedtoprovidemitigationcreditsforunavoidableimpactsdue todevelopmentwithintheTarPamlicoRiverBasin.NCDWRrepresentativesconductedanonsite determinationforparcelapplicabilityandsuitabilityofSiteFeaturesonDecember30,2020andJanuary 5,2021.ASiteViabilityletterforBuffer&NutrientOffsetwasprovidedbytheDivisiononApril6,2021 andMay11,2021. RestorationSystems(RS)wasgrantedaConservationEasementbytheCityofGreenville,NorthCarolina th onMarch19,2020.TheconservationeasementwasrecordedattheEdgecombeCountyRegisterof th DeedsonApril4,2020;BookNo.3912,Page577600(AppendixD). RSbeganpreparationforrestorationoftheriparianbufferandplantedtheParcelinFebruaryof2022. Riparianbufferrestorationactivitiesincludedripping/beddingoftheparcelwithanarrowsetplow,bare rootplanting,andbroadcastapplicationofapermanentseedmix.DuringSeptember29ΑOctober29, 2022,AxiomEnvironmentalsurveyedfortynine(49)CarolinaVegetationSurvey(CVS)monitoringplots andcollectedYear1Monitoringdata(AppendixB). 2.0 ParcelLocation TheParcelislocatedbetweenWhitakersandLeggett,approximately5.5mileseastofthetownof WhitakersinEdgecombeCounty,NC.TheParceliswithintheTarPamlicoRiverBasin14digitUSGS CatalogingUnit03020101130100oftheMiddleAtlanticCoastalPlain(NorthCarolinaDivisionofWater Quality\[NCDWQ\]SubbasinNumber030302)(Figure1,AppendixA). ParcelLocation:(36.093067°,77.621206°) DirectionstoParcelfromRaleigh: -GetonI440EfromCapitalBlvd(2.4mi) -Takeexit14andcontinueonUS64E(43.9mi) -Takeexit464andmergeontoI95NtowardRichmond(6.4mi) -Takeexit145forNC4/NC48towardUS301andturnleftontoNC4N/NC48N (1.0mi) edFarmRd(3.4mi) -TurnrightontoWatsonSe -TurnrightontoNC33E(3.0mi) -TurnleftontoSWhiteSt/WhiteOakSwampRd(0.1mi) -TurnrightontoWPippenStandcontinueontoNC33E(5.4mi) -TurnleftontoRedHillChurchRdanddestinationisontheleft(0.3mi) -Latitude,Longitude:36.093067°,77.621206° DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage1 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 2.1ParcelBackground TheParcelencompasses65.acresoflandoveronetractofforestedandopenhistoricalagricultural fields.PriortoParceldevelopment,landuseisdescribedasagriculturalrowcropproductionincluding cotton,corn,andpeanuts.Thelandownersregularlyappliedfertilizersandherbicidestothefields.Site Featuresaredevoidofwoodyvegetationoutsideofforestedareasduetohistoricandagricultural practices. TheParceliscomprisedofonetractwithhydrologicalfeaturesthatdraintoWhiteOakSwamp approximately1.2milesdownstream.WhiteOakSwampisclassifiedasCandNSWbyDWR.ClassCwaters aredesignatedforrecreationaluse,agriculture,fishingandfishconsumption,andthemaintenanceof biologicalintegrityforwildlife.TheNSWdesignationappliestosurfacewatersthatareexperiencing excessivegrowthsofmicroscopicormacroscopicvegetation. Therewerenoexistingstructuresintheprojectarea.Anexistingutilitylinerunsalongthenorthernedge ofRedHillChurchRoad.TheutilitylinesareexcludedfromthetğƩĭĻƌ͸ƭfootprint.Anadditionalfivefoot offsetwillbeappliedbetweentheutilityrightofwayandthestartoftheconservationeasement boundary. 2.2ParcelObjectives TheprimarygoalsassociatedwiththerestorationofriparianareaswithintheBankParcelfocusedon providingecologicalandwaterqualityenhancementstotheTarPamlicoRiverBasinbyrestoringthe riparianareatocreateafunctionalripariancorridor.Goalswereaccomplishedasoutlinedinthefollowing table. GoalObjective Nutrientinputwillbedecreasedbyfilteringrunofffromthe agriculturalfieldsthroughrestorednativebufferzones.Theoff Decreasenutrientlevelssitenutrientinputwillalsobeabsorbedonsitebyfiltering floodflowsthroughrestoredfloodplainareas,whereflood flowscandispersethroughnativevegetation. Sedimentfromoffsitesourceswillbecapturedbydeposition Decreasesedimentinputonrestoredfloodplainareaswherenativevegetationwillslow overlandflowvelocities. Decreasewatertemperatureand Plantedripariantreeswillshadethestreamsastheymature increasedissolvedoxygen reducingthermalpollution. concentrations CreateappropriateterrestrialRiparianareasadjacenttoditchesandstreamswillberestored habitatbyplantingnativevegetation. Permanentlyprotecttheproject AconservationeasementwillberecordedontheParcel. Parcelfromharmfuluses DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage2 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 3.0 RestorationActivities Riparianarearestorationinvolvedplantingappropriatenativetreespeciesalongthe200footwide ripariancorridorofstreamsandhydrologicallyconnectedditchesatadensityof680stemsperacreon 8ftx8ftspacing.Vegetationmanagementandherbicideapplicationsmaybeneededoverthefirstfew yearsoftreeestablishmentintheriparianrestorationareastopreventencroachmentofundesirable speciesthatmayoutcompetetheplantednativevegetation.Treespeciesplantedacrosstheriparian areasoftheParcelincludedthoselistedinTable6.Stemsweremixedpriortoplantingtoensurediversity ofbarerootsacrosstheplantedarea.AseedmixincludingthespecieslistedinTable7wereappliedto providetemporaryandpermanentgroundcoverforsoilstabilizationandreductionofsedimentloss duringraineventsinareaswithoutexistingherbaceouscover.PlantingtookplaceonFebruary1,2022. TableAΑRestorationPlanActivities Restoration PhaseSpecificActions PlanActivity WithintheSite'sproposedconservationeasements: -TreatmentofBermudaandfescuegrassspecieswithinactivepastureareas(see HerbaceousTreatmentnoteabove). -SitewidediscingofagriculturalandpastureareasaheadofplantingΓdiscing occurredparalleltotheSiteFeatures,promotingfloodwaterattenuationby Riparian increasingfrictionalresistanceoffloodwaterscrossingParcelfloodplains. Restoration -Establishmentofanativeherbaceouscommunityviasitespecificseedmix(see PlantingListΑTableD) -Establishmentofanativehardwoodforestviatheplantingofbarerootsaplings fromthetopofbankoutamaximumof2QB'alongParcelFeaturesΓtƌğƓƷźƓŭList ΑTableC DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage3 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 TableBΑSummaryProtectionActivities 1.) RestorationSystems(RS)wasgrantedaConservationEasementbytheCityof Greenville,NorthCarolinaonMarch19th,2020.Theconservationeasementwas recordedattheEdgecombeCountyRegisterofDeedsonApril4th,2020;BookNo. Parcel protection 3912,Page577600(AppendixD). (65.acres) 2.) RSmarkedtheeasementateverycornerwithaniron,CEcap,andcornertpost. Additionally,easementpostswereplacedevery200feetalongtheParcel boundaries. 3.1RiparianAreaRestorationActivities Restorationoftheriparianareaallowsforrecolonizationandexpansionofcharacteristicspeciesacross thelandscape.TheriparianareaswererestoredaccordingtotheConsolidatedBufferMitigationRule15A NCAC02B.0295(2014).Theplantingplanfortheriparianrestorationareaincludedplanting4,0 nativebareroothardwoodsaplingsacross60.acresataParceldensityof+/600stemsperacreand livestakesforstreambankstabilizationwherenecessary.Theplantedspeciescompositionis intentionallydiverseandwhilebasedonthesecommunities,alsoaccountedforlocalobservations andnurseryavailability. Allspecieswereselectedbasedontheirabilityforsedimentstabilization,rapidgrowthrate,theabilityto withstandhydraulicforcesassociatedwithfloodevents,suitabilitytospecificsoiltypes,andParcel conditions.Treespeciesweremixedthoroughlybeforeplantingtoprovideadiverseandrandomplant acrosstheSite.Plantingdensityissettoensuresufficientdiversityanddensityofplantedstemsoutlined inRule15ANCAC02B.0295(2014)of260treesperacreattheendoffiveyears.Noonetreespecieswill begreaterthan50%oftheestablishedstems. ThebarerootplantinglistisprovidedinTableCfollowedbythepermanentseedmixinTableD.Year1 (2022)vegetationdataisprovidedinAppendixB.Year1datawascollectedinSeptemberandOctober 2022byAxiomEnvironmentalandderivedanaverageplantedstemdensityof479stemsperacre. DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage4 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 TableCΑPlantingList CommonName{ĭźĻƓƷźŅźĭbğƒĻ Tree/Shrub*NumberofStemsSpecies%ofTotal Riverbirch Betulanigra Tree3,8.9% Commonhackberry Celtisoccidentalis Tree2,15.0% EasternRedbud Cerciscanadensis Shrub2,15.0% Persimmon Diospyrosvirginiana Tree3,008.6% Greenash Fraxinuspennsylvanica Tree2,15.0% Yellowpoplar Liriodendrontulipifera Tree3,008.6% Southerncrabapple Malusangustifolia Tree5001.2% Mulberry Morusrubra Tree3,008.6% Blackgum Nyssasylvatica Tree2,15.0% Sycamore Platanusoccidentalis Tree2,205.2% Oak(White)Quercusalba Tree3,008.6% Oak(Swampchestnut)Quercusmichauxii Tree3,008.6% Oak(Water)Quercusnigra Tree3,008.6% Oak(Red)Quercusrubra Tree1,002.5% Americanelm Ulmusamericana Tree3,008.6% Southernarrowwood Viburnumdentatum Shrub9002.1% Total12Species4100% TableDΑPermanentSeed CommonNameAmount(inpounds)CommonNameAmount(inpounds) CommonYarrow1.80PerennialGaillardia(Blanketflower)3.00 WinterBentgrass,3.00NarrowleafSunflower2.40 BlueFalseIndigo0.60OxeyeSunflower3.00 PlainsCoreopsis3.00WildBergamot0.60 LanceleafCoreopsis3.00Deertongue,Tioga3.0 Cosmos3.00ClaspingConeflower0.60 RocketLarkspur1.80BlackeyedSusan3.00 ShowyTicktrefoil3.00Purpletop15.00 PurpleConeflower3.00BlueVervain1.20 VirginiaWildrye,'Madison'6.00 Total(pounds)60.00 3.2ParcelProtection DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage5 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 4.0 MitigationPotential OftheParcel's65.acresprotectedundertheconservationeasement,60.0acresareanticipatedto provideNitrogenandPhosphorusNutrientOffsetCreditsequivalentto13poundsofnitrogen offsetcreditand8,7poundsofphosphorousoffsetcredit.Riparianarearestoration,measured fromthetopofbankonParcelstreamsandditches,willincludeatleast50'fromthetopsofbanksand willextendoutwardamaximumof200'fromtopsofbanksandwillgenerateNutrientOffsetCreditsthat arenottransferabletoRiparianBufferCreditpertheapprovedUBI.NitrogenandPhosphorousoffset creditswillbegeneratedfromtheprojectandshownonseparateledgers. 5.0 MonitoringProtocol&SuccessCriteria 5.1MonitoringProtocol RestorationmonitoringproceduresforvegetationateachPhasewillmonitorplantsurvivalandspecies diversity.Quantitativesamplingwillincludefortynine(49)permanent10x10metervegetationplotsas outlinedinthe CVSLevel12ProtocolforRecordingVegetation,Version4.2(Leeetal.2008)andwilloccur noearlierthanFallofeachyear(Figure2,AppendixA).Vegetationplotplacementwilladequately representriparianbuffercreditandnutrientoffsetcreditareas.Areferencephotowillbetakenfromthe originpointofeachplot(AppendixB).Allplantedstemsintheplotswillbemarkedwithflaggingtapeand recorded.Datacollectedwillincludespecies,height,plantingtype(plantedstemand/orvolunteer).Total andplantedstemdensitybyplotandspecieswillbereportedduringmonitoringyears05(Table5, AppendixB).Individualandaveragestemheightdatawillbereportedduringmonitoringyears35. Monitoringoftherestorationeffortswillbeperformedforfiveyearsoruntilsuccesscriteriaarefulfilled. RestorationSystemsshallsubmittoNCDWRannualmonitoringreportsnolaterthanDecember31stof eachyear.Eachreportwilldocumentthesuccessofthevegetationandanymaintenance,supplemental planting,orencroachmentwithintheeasementareas.Successcriteriawithinthebufferwillbebasedon thesurvivalofplantedspeciesatadensityof260stemsperacreafterfiveyearsofmonitoring. Year1(2022)monitoringoccurredbetweenSeptember29andOctober29,2022andresultedinan averageof479plantedstems/acreacrosstheSite.Additionally,47outofthe49individualplotsmet successcriteria(AppendixB). 5.2ParcelMaintenance IftheParceloraspecificcomponentoftheParcelfailstoachievethesuccesscriteriaoutlinedinSection 5.1,adaptivemeasureswillbedevelopedand/orappropriateremedialactionswillbeimplemented.Site maintenancewillbeperformedtocorrectanyidentifiedproblemsontheParcelthathaveahighlikelihood ofaffectingtheprojectsuccess.Suchitemsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,fire,flooding,drought,or insectsthatcauseexcesstreemortality.Anyactionsimplementedwillbedesignedtoachievethesuccess criteriaandwillincludeaworkscheduleandupdatedmonitoringcriteria.Anyparcelmaintenance performedwillbeincludedinthemonitoringreportforthatyear.Arigorousherbicideschedulemayneed tobeimplementedinthefirstfewyearsoftreeestablishmentintherestorationareastopreventthe establishmentofinvasivespeciesthatmayoutcompetetheplantednativevegetation.Theonly herbicidesusedontheParcelwillbeaquaticapprovedherbicidesthatwillbeappliedinaccordancewith NorthCarolinaDepartmentofAgriculturerulesandregulations. Theeasementboundarywillbecheckedannuallyaspartofmonitoringactivities.Easementboundary conditionsandanymaintenanceperformedwillbereportedintheannualmonitoringreportstoDWR.If mowingisdeemednecessarybytheSponsorduringthemonitoringperiod,theSponsormustreceive approvalfromDWRpriortoconductinganymowingwithinTarPamlicoBufferZones1and2toensure thatnobufferviolationshaveoccurred. DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage6 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 5.3LongTermManagementPlan Theconservationeasementwillpreserveallareasandprohibitalluseofthepropertyinconsistentwith itsuseasanutrientoffsetandriparianbuffermitigationproperty,includinganyactivitythatwould materiallyalterthebiologicalintegrityoftheSite/Parcel.RSwilltransferorassigntheconservation easementanditsinterestsinperpetuitytoaqualifiedholderunderNCGeneralStatute("GS")12134et seq.and170(h)oftheInternalRevenueCodepriortothesubmittaloftheAsBuiltReport.Theholder shallbealandtrustorstewardshipprogramthatisaccreditedbytheLandTrustAccreditationCommission and/orhasbeenapprovedbyDWR.Alandtrustmustbecertifiedunder501(c)(3)oftheInternalRevenue Code. 6.0 FinancialAssurance RSsecuredallfinancialassurancesaccordingtotheapprovedUBI.Nobondshallbelessthan$150,000to covercostsofconstructionandnolessthan$100,000initially,tocovermonitoringexpenses.Performance bondsformonitoringshallberenewedatleastannuallytocoverthenextyearsmonitoringperiod,with confirmationofrenewalprovidedtoDWRwitheachannualmonitoringreportwhenapplicable.DWR reservestherighttoalterthecreditreleasescheduleifmonitoringreportsaresubmittedwithoutproof pplicable. ofbondrenewalswhena 7.0 References ConsolidatedBufferMitigationRule15ANCAC02B.0295(PublishedNovember17,2014) Lee,M.T.,R.K.Peet,S.D.Roberts,andT.R.Wentworth.2008.CVSEEPProtocolforRecordingVegetation. Version4.2.NorthCarolinaDepartmentofEnvironmentandNaturalResources,Ecosystem EnhancementProgram.Raleigh,NorthCarolina. Schafale,M.P.andWeakley,2012.AClassificationoftheNaturalCommunitiesofNorthCarolina,Fourth Approximation. USDepartmentofAgriculture(USDA),2021.WebSoilSurvey(online).Available: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm\[AccessedJuly19,2021\]. USFishandWildlifeService,2021.EndangeredSpecies,ThreatenedSpecies,andCandidateSpecies,Wake County,NorthCarolina(online).Available: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html(AccessedJuly19,2021). DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelPage7 MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 Appe ndixA:GeneralFiguresandTables Figure1ParcelLocation/ServiceArea Figure2CurrentConditionsPlanView Table1ProjectComponentsandMitigationCredits Table2ProjectActivityandReportingHistory Table3ProjectContact Table4ProjectBaselineInformationandAttributes DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelAppendixA:GeneralFiguresandTables MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 ————————————— 318.044368.541 Nutrient 2,390.4942,173.9961,851.3751,652.031 8,754.481 Delivered Offset: P (lbs) ————— ———————— N (lbs) 4,937.9725,721.997 Delivered 37,115.01933,753.65428,744.61125,649.579 135,922.832 Nutrient Offset: NoNo YesYesYesYesYesYes Convertible to Nutrient Offset? ——————————— ——————— — 0.000 Credits Riparian Buffer ————————— NoNoNoNoNoNo NoNo Buffer? Riparian Riparian Buffer Credits Convertible to Ratio (x:1) Ratio (x:1) Final Credit Final Credit 33%33%33% 100% 100% 100% % Full Credit% Full Credit 1111111 1 Ratio (x:1)Ratio (x:1) Initial Credit Initial Credit Ephemeral Reaches as % TABMPreservation as % TABM ) ) 22 0000 N/A 0.0% 0.0% Area of Buffer Mitigation (ft Area for Buffer Mitigation (ft Total (Creditable) Total (Creditable) ) 2 00000 945 8,700 94,631 711,270646,853109,656550,860491,547 2,614,4622,614,462 Total Area (sf) Total Area (ft ):):): 222 ) for Credit: Totals (ft2): 2 1, 1A-11, 1A-1 1A-E, 1B1A-E, 1B Feature 1D Total Buffer (ft2): Feature NameFeature Name Features 1Ca, 1F Less Than 50-Feet 1A-D, 1Ca, 1D, 1E, 1F1A-D, 1Ca, 1D, 1E, 1F Diffused Flow Deduction Total Nutrient Offset (ft2): /pound) /pound) 2 2 Preservation Area Subtotals (ft 0-1000-100 0-100 101-200101-200101-200 Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft Total Eligible for Preservation (ft Width (ft)Width (ft) Total Ephemeral Area (ft Min-Max Buffer Min-Max Buffer RestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestoration Mitigation ActivityMitigation Activity Project AreaN Credit Conversion Ratio (ftP Credit Conversion Ratio (ft I / PI / P DitchDitchDitchDitch 0.0000.0000.0000.000 CreditsCredits 8,754.481 EphemeralEphemeral 135,922.832 Feature TypeFeature Type ) 1 0000 NoNoNoNo NoNo Yes Yes NO if ditch Subject? 2,614,462 Square FeetSquare Feet ephemeral or Subject? (enter 19.16394 297.54099 Nitrogen: RuralRuralRuralRuralRural RuralRuralRural Tar-Pamlico 03020101 LocationLocation Phosphorus: TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION Restoration: Preservation: TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM) Enhancement: Mitigation TotalsMitigation Totals Total Riparian Buffer: BufferBufferBufferBufferBuffer Credit TypeCredit Type Nutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient Offset Nutrient Offset: Table 1. Dead Tree Bank Parcel - Phase A - Tar-Pam 01, 2020-1937v2, Project Credits Enter Preservation Credits Below 1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).last updated 08/03/2020 Table2.ProjectActivityandReportingHistory Activity/MilestoneBPDPProposedDateActualDate BPDPApprovedNANovember16,2021 ParcelProtectionNARecordedApril5,2022 PlantingFebruary,2022February,2022 AsbuiltDataCollectionMarch,2022April27ΑMay5 ConstructionCompletionWalkthroughNAJune21,2022 AsbuiltReportSubmittalNAAugust,2022 MY1ReportSubmittalNADecember,2022 Year25MonitoringDecember20232026Onschedule Table3:ProjectContact FirmPOC&Address 1101HaynesStreet,Suite211 Raleigh,NorthCarolina27604 FullDeliveryProvider RestorationSystems,LLC GeorgeHowardandJohnPreyer 919.755.9490 RaymondHolz:919.755.9490 Designer/Permitting:RestorationSystems,LLC1101HaynesStreet,Suite211 Raleigh,NorthCarolina27604 JoshMerritt:919.755.9490 PlantingContractor:RestorationSystems,LLC1101HaynesStreet,Suite211 Raleigh,NorthCarolina27604 MatthewHarrell:919.755.9490 SeedingContractor:RestorationSystems,LLC1101HaynesStreet,Suite211 Raleigh,NorthCarolina27604 NurseryStockSuppliers:ArborGen1.888.888.7158 GrantLewis;919.215.1693 BaselineDataCollection AxiomEnvironmental,Inc.218SnowAve.Raleigh,NC 27603 GrantLewis;919.215.1693 VegetationMonitoring:AxiomEnvironmental,Inc.218SnowAve.Raleigh,NC 27603 Table4:ProjectBaselineInformation&Attributes ProjectInformation ProjectNameDeadTreePhaseA CountyEdgecombe ProjectArea(acres)65.44 ProjectCoordinates(latitudeandlongitude)36.093067ºN,77.621206ºW(NAD83/WGS84) ProjectWatershedSummaryInformation PhysiographicProvinceInnerCoastalPlain RiverBasinTarPamlico USGSHydrologicUnit8digit03020101USGSHydrologicUnit14digit03020101130100 DWRSubbasin030302 ProjectDrainageArea,TotalOutfall(acres)256 ProjectDrainageAreaPercentageofImpervious <5% Area DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelAppendixA:GeneralFiguresandTables MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 AppendixB:VegetationData Table5ΑMY1CVSOutputData VegetationPlotPhotos149 DeadTreePhaseANutrientOffsetandBufferMitigationBankParcelAppendixB:VegetationData MY1MonitoringReportΑDecember2022 0010 01 1 allT 0.02 222 000922010_01 01 6.1526.1364.2364.2364.2 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 444444444111 000822010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 777111222111 000722010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111333666 000622010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 2022) 0.02 111 (MY1 Data 000522010_01 Plot 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 Current 111444111 000422010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 000322010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 222555666111333 000222010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 000122010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 444222111111333111444222333333222444111111555444333333444555444444444666 101010999555999131313999141414131313131313999 22010_01 404.7404.7404.7364.2364.2364.2202.3202.3202.3364.2364.2364.2526.1526.1526.1364.2364.2364.2566.6566.6566.6526.1526.1526.1526.152 PnoLSP ACRE countcount (ares) Type (ACRES) Species per TreeTreeTree size 01 Stem size Species Tree Stems k % % oa % k 10 10 Name Dead 10 oa y than sycamoreTree222elmTree arrowwoodShrubthan hackberryTreepersimmonTreered than redbudTree111111 chestnut Species Name: oakTree ashTree oakTree less birchTree111333 more less mulberr and %by by by 10 Project Plot but by by StemsNameCommon 22010_01. tulipiferatuliptreeTree222requirements,requirements dentatumsouthern virginianacommon Density occidentalisAmerican pennsylvanicagreenalbawhitemichauxiiswampnigrawaterrubranorthern Total requirementsrequirements, Code meetmeet rubrared nigrariver americanaAmerican canadensiseastern sylvaticablackgumTree 5. occidentaliscommon for toto Scientific TableProject BetulaCeltisCercisDiospyrosFraxinusLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusoakTree222QuercusQuercusQuercusQuercusUlmusViburnum Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails 0020 01 1 allT 0.02 001922010_01 01 3.3283.3323.7323.7323.7 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 22010_01 0018 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111222444 001722010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 001622010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 2022) 0.02 111111111111333444111 (MY1 Data 001522010_01 Plot 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 Current 001422010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111333111111 001322010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 22010_01 0012 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 444333222111222333222777555555111333333222222 001122010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 222222111111111333888131313141414121212111111101010101010111111777888555666444666333777555555444444 22010_01 323.7323.7323.7526.1526.1526.1566.6566.6566.6485.6485.6485.6445.2445.2445.2404.7404.7404.7404.7404.7404.7445.2445.2445.2283.328 PnoLSP ACRE countcount (ares) Type (ACRES) Species per TreeTreeTree size 01 Stem size Species Tree Stems k % % oa % k 10 10 Name Dead 10 oa y than sycamoreTreeelmTree111 arrowwoodShrub111than hackberryTree111persimmonTree222333red than redbudTree111111 chestnut Species Name: oakTree222 ashTree oakTree111 less birchTree more less mulberr and %by by by 10 Project Plot but by by StemsNameCommon 22010_01. tulipiferatuliptreeTreerequirements,requirements dentatumsouthern virginianacommon Density occidentalisAmerican pennsylvanicagreenalbawhitemichauxiiswampnigrawaterrubranorthern Total requirementsrequirements, Code meetmeet rubrared nigrariver americanaAmerican canadensiseastern sylvaticablackgumTree111 5. occidentaliscommon for toto Scientific TableProject BetulaCeltisCercisDiospyrosFraxinusLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusoakTree333333333111QuercusQuercusQuercusQuercusUlmusViburnum Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails 0030 01 1 allT 0.02 444777 002922010_01 01 6.1526.1688688688 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 444111333 002822010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111333333111111222 002722010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 555333555444111111 002622010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 2022) 0.02 111111 (MY1 Data 002522010_01 Plot 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 Current 111777444222 22010_01 0024 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 002322010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 222111 002222010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 002122010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111333333111111555444222666666444555555666777 111111101010333131313141414888131313131313131313171717 22010_01 445.2445.2445.2404.7404.7404.7121.4121.4121.4526.1526.1526.1566.6566.6566.6323.7323.7323.7526.1526.1526.1526.1526.1526.1526.152 PnoLSP ACRE countcount (ares) Type (ACRES) Species per TreeTree444Tree size 01 Stem size Species Tree Stems k % % oa % k 10 10 Name Dead 10 oa y than sycamoreTree444222elmTree111111 arrowwoodShrub222111111111than hackberryTree111444222persimmonTree222111111red than redbudTree chestnut Species Name: oakTree333333 ashTree222 oakTree less birchTree111111 more less mulberr and %by by by 10 Project Plot but by by StemsNameCommon 22010_01. tulipiferatuliptreeTreerequirements,requirements dentatumsouthern virginianacommon Density occidentalisAmerican pennsylvanicagreenalbawhitemichauxiiswampnigrawaterrubranorthern Total requirementsrequirements, Code meetmeet rubrared nigrariver americanaAmerican canadensiseastern sylvaticablackgumTree 5. occidentaliscommon for toto Scientific TableProject BetulaCeltisCercisDiospyrosFraxinusLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusoakTreeQuercusQuercusQuercusQuercusUlmusViburnum Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails 0040 01 1 allT 10121012 0.02 222 22010_01 0039 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111111 003822010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111111555111666 003722010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 003622010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 2022) 0.02 666111111 (MY1 Data 003522010_01 Plot 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 Current 111 003422010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 003322010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 003222010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 333222888111222333666 003122010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111111111222333222222222333222111222555333111111888222222444222444777777555666444555444444999666 161616151515171717101010111111121212121212181818161616252525 22010_01 647.5647.5647.5607607607688688688404.7404.7404.7445.2445.2445.2485.6485.6485.6485.6485.6485.6728.4728.4728.4647.5647.5647.51012 PnoLSP ACRE countcount (ares) Type (ACRES) Species per TreeTreeTree111 size 01 Stem size Species Tree Stems k % % oa % k 10 10 Name Dead 10 oa y than sycamoreTree111222222elmTree arrowwoodShrubthan hackberryTree111555111101010333persimmonTreered than redbudTree222111 chestnut Species Name: oakTree ashTree oakTree111 less birchTree more less mulberr and %by by by 10 Project Plot but by by StemsNameCommon 22010_01. tulipiferatuliptreeTree111111requirements,requirements dentatumsouthern virginianacommon Density occidentalisAmerican pennsylvanicagreenalbawhitemichauxiiswampnigrawaterrubranorthern Total requirementsrequirements, Code meetmeet rubrared nigrariver americanaAmerican canadensiseastern sylvaticablackgumTree222 5. occidentaliscommon for toto Scientific TableProject BetulaCeltisCercisDiospyrosFraxinusLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusoakTree111222QuercusQuercusQuercusQuercusUlmusViburnum Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails (2022) allT 49 1.21 Means Annual (2022)MY0 allTPnoLSP 49 1.21 MY1 303030393939 0049 01 6.1526.1479479479557.5557.5557.5 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111252525232323111110110110123123123 22010_01 0048 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 222222545454505050 004722010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 004622010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 444111222444444545454111282828383838111111111111363636363636111111555555 2022) 004522010_01 (MY1 01 1 allTPnoLSP Data 0.02 111333111222222505050333222262626242424333111333232323262626111111777111272727313131 Plot Current 004422010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 004322010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 111111111222242424404040333111 22010_01 0042 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 004122010_01 01 1 allTPnoLSP 0.02 444222111555111111555555606060333333555444777999444666888161616161616 222222999888888111111141414101010101010131313580580580675675675 22010_01 890.3890.3890.3364.2364.2364.2323.7323.7323.7323.7323.7323.7445.2445.2445.2566.6566.6566.6404.7404.7404.7404.7404.7404.7526.152 PnoLSP ACRE countcount (ares) Type (ACRES) Species per TreeTree171717Tree size 01 Stem size Species Tree Stems k % % oa % k 10 10 Name Dead 10 oa y than sycamoreTreeelmTree555111 arrowwoodShrub111222181818171717than hackberryTreepersimmonTreered than redbudTree chestnut Species Name: oakTree111222111222535353595959 ashTree oakTree less birchTree more less mulberr and %by by by 10 Project Plot but by by StemsNameCommon 22010_01. tulipiferatuliptreeTree222111requirements,requirements dentatumsouthern virginianacommon Density occidentalisAmerican pennsylvanicagreenalbawhitemichauxiiswampnigrawaterrubranorthern Total requirementsrequirements, Code meetmeet rubrared nigrariver americanaAmerican canadensiseastern sylvaticablackgumTree 5. occidentaliscommon for toto Scientific TableProject BetulaCeltisCercisDiospyrosFraxinusLiriodendronMorusNyssaPlatanusQuercusoakTreeQuercusQuercusQuercusQuercusUlmusViburnum Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails Dead Tree Phase A Site MY1 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October 2022) Plot 1Plot 2 Plot 3 Plot 4 Plot 5 Plot 6 Plot 7Plot 8 Dead Tree Phase A SiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022 Dead Tree Phase A Site MY1 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October 2022) Plot 10 Plot 9 Plot 12 Plot 11 Plot 13 Plot 14 Plot 15 Plot 16 Dead Tree Phase ASiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022 Dead Tree Phase A Site MY1 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October2022) Plot 17Plot 18 Plot 19Plot 20 Plot 21 Plot 22 Plot 23Plot 24 Dead Tree Phase A SiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022 Dead Tree Phase A Site MY1 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October 2022) Plot 25Plot 26 Plot 27Plot 28 Plot 29 Plot 30 Plot 31Plot 32 Dead Tree Phase A SiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022 Dead Tree Phase A Site MY1 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October 2022) Plot 33 Plot 34 Plot 35 Plot 36 Plot 37 Plot 38 Plot 39Plot 40 Dead Tree Phase ASiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022 Dead Tree Phase A Site MY1 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October 2022) Plot 41Plot 42 Plot 43 Plot 44 Plot 45Plot 46 Plot 47Plot 48 Dead Tree Phase ASiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022 Dead Tree Phase A Site MY0 (2022) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken September-October 2022) Plot 49 Dead Tree Phase ASiteAppendix A: Visual Assessment Data MY1 Monitoring Report –December 2022