20221788 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221219

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
11/10/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221788 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Standley Ridge SD
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Krissina Newcomb
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
12/19/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Jumping Run Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.220942
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.954532

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
CONCORDE I LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4101:0509
2c. Contact Person:
Pablo Koe-Krompecher
2d. Address
Street Address
4008 BARRETT DR STE 101
Address Line 2
City
RALEIGH,
Postal /Zip Code
27609-6621
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Krissina Newcomb
4b. Business Name:
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 400
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Lillington NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27546 USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Standley Ridge
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Spring Lake
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0513-35-4139
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Creeksville Church Road
Address Line 2
City
Spring Lake
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Jumping Run Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
c
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040406
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
34
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is wooded/undeveloped. Land use in the vicinity is wooded and residential. At the time of this application, vegetation clearing and surveying had begun for the roads.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2 Acre
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
700
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To construct a single-family residential subdivision connected by a road and utilities (38 Lots)
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
At the proposed road crossing, a 76 LF 60" RCP with headwalls @ 1.3% slope will be installed in the stream under the roadway. The culvert will be buried 1 foot below the stream bed. A
rip -rap energy dissipator (20' X 8' X 24") will be installed at the outlet of the culvert. The water line will be concurrently installed in the road right-of-way. The area will be back filled, the
roadway paved, and side slopes stabilized. Typical construction equipment such as excavators, loaders, dump trucks, and graders will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes • No
Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No future phases are planned. Lots in subdivision were designed to exclude wetlands and streams. No future wetland impacts/permits are anticipated beyond the scope of this application.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
road crossing/culvert
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.047
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.047
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.047

3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
road crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
94
(linear feet)
S2
road crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
UT
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
114
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
114
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Lots were configured to exclude wetlands and streams.
Headwalls will be used at the road crossing to minimize or impacts.
The road format was designed to maximize lot count while considering site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, and accessibility.
The road was sited perpendicular to the drainageway to minimize impacts.
Sediment and erosion controls were sited completely outside of wetland and stream areas.
The culvert will be buried to maintain aquatic passage and to maintain passage during drought or low flow conditions.
Shoulder slopes along the road are typically 3:1, but were reduced to 2:1 at the stream crossing.
Utilities will be grouped in the road right-of-way where possible to minimize impacts.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used, such as silt fencing, to protect water quality. Construction limits will be clearly marked through
wetlands. No clearing will occur in wetlands outside of the proposed impact area. Construction and fill materials will be stored in upland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent and temporary wetland impacts less than 1/10 acre and stream impacts less than 3/100 acre. Proposed impacts are below the threshold for mandatory compensatory
mitigation and would result in minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) is not subject
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
U
Yes No

2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This residential development is relatively small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Single family residential homes will utilize onsite subsurface sewage waste disposal, each system designed to treat and dispose of 360 to 480 gallons of
effluent per day.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ ). NC Natural Heritage Program (https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/).
"Long Valley Farm" district is located about 1/2 mile away from subject site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)

8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.nc.gov/iris/ )
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Standley Ridge_PCN attachments.pdf 17.97MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Krissina Newcomb
Signature
1�fLflllilL Icare
Date
12/19/2022

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
19 December 2022
Mrs. Liz Hair
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
Standley Ridge SD (Proposed)
Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Hair,
This Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
project. The subject site contains 34 acres and is located on the southern side of Creeksville
Road, Spring Lake, NC. The subject site is located in the Jumping Creek Subwatershed (HUC
03030004-0406) in the Cape Fear River Basin. A wetland delineation was conducted for the 34-
acre tract by Hal Owen & Associates Inc. staff in November 2021.
The proposed development is for a 38 lot single family residential subdivision named
Standley Ridge. The plan proposes a single road crossing that will result in 0.047 acre of
permanent wetland impact and 114 linear feet of permanent stream impact. This pre -
construction notification is being submitted pursuant to USACE Nationwide Permit 29 and
NCDWR Water Quality General Certification 4256.
Attachments include:
• Appendix A: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Appendix B: Site Plans and Impact Maps
• Appendix C: Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat
• Appendix D: State Historic Preservation Office Map
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
/�� r&7C�
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
CC: Danny Blackburn
Pablo Koe-Krompecher
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Mi ssions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CounlyLocator. aspx
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Creeksville Church Road
City, State:
County:
Spring Lake, NC
Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0513-35-4139
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Krissina Newcomb. Hal Owen & Assoc
Mailing Address: PO BOX 400
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-8743
[e-mail]
Li I am the current property owner.
W] I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: CONCORDE I LLC
Mailing Address: 4008 BARRETT DR STE 101
RALEIGH, NC 27609-6621
Telephone Number: 919-335-6894
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
i Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina Newcomb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
8 December 2022
Date
Signature
0 Authorized Agents
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
LFI intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
✓❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 34 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
W]
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.220942
Longitude:-78.954532
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro aam/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
A Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
W] Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/does/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.arM.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and onthe Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for anAJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Project Name:
Standley Ridge
Address:
Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake, NC
PIN:
0513-35-4139.000
County:
Harnett
OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Concorde I, LLC
Mailing Address:
4008 Barrett Dr. Unit 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone Number:
919-335-6894
E-mail Address:
[e-mail]
APPLICANT INFORMATION (if different from owner)
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property
identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the
property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revolted by the
Date
(Please legibly print name here: Pablo Krompecher

°
�j0000
00
000
0000000
O In
O
In O
W
a
O
N
Z
0w
W
0
M(A
°pa
IN a
cn
NZ
i
NQ
J
~
m o
ri
N
°
� W S
In
N
O
..mi
v 0
W
NUJ
W na
ap F
>»
J
N
z
nm�
»»
1 oa
J
W;
m
=
>
Neu
Oo
M NIL
J
p
°
Q
a}U}}x
a
w
z wl
Ln OZ
0
0
LLI
p V
��
Za W J
V K
0000000Ip/1
Q
Q
W
~
O
W
N
N
O F
UQ�
O
ce p
Q ace
Q Q
Va
J� V
Q1�
a
NOS .-i
W a
W Wy
° C[°
2i F2i
°
2i
° °
2i 2i
° °
W
2i w
O
Z
J
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
1 °
M~
W
d'7
W n
V
[�
0 Q
J
V ce Q V
W W
D a
.- i W O
a p F
Q
a J
N
M
>
w l
Vl
N .-i
N N
Oi i0
0 0
In m
0 0
(n
W
Q V i
W V
>>
J p
Q W W
J .-i .i
Q
O S
0
W Q
°>
a
Z
Yi
O
g
O
J
W J
>>
W yd J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
X
Q
J
_
N W
V
a W
>
a>
= LL>
Q
° 0
m
C
0
V 11
J
V Q>H
Wcc
W
VI LO
HW W
aW aW
ti 0
0
h V
ti
O
WL.
W
O
porn
�0J
O K F
a O cnQ
O
O
F
LL °Y
p Z
J X O'
N\g
��
W W Ca
Vl7
>J
a'� wQ
Q W W cn>
pWrnoom.,
>
>
a
H
Vla
p
_
N
m
W
U
m O H
asLLJ
Q Q
Q
a>HazaaFw�
(jJJ °J
Da0000000
W
OZnLn
O DNN
^
pZ
U
L
LU
°W
as
aaa
o�>w��
�X°U,Ia
�Yoo�MCD
p.,o�o
U
a°
a
�(
W
C[
U
a aa'9
W W Q 0
p p~
HH
00
H H
HHH
000
H H H
m z� W O
m O d°
li
IL D
O m
V V
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
N n Q
J
H
o
_
m
0
p
oa
O
LY
W
z �
m
W
W UU)�
Q U)
zCL
Z Y
7
U
Q
F
Q
O0
00
°
g
W
0) Oi
a�
m
z
Z
J
m
N Q
7
m
00
J IL
00
0� O�
O
o
Q
o U
a
1
01 01
z W
O N
OoU
zoo
Z
=O
1
00
pa'
Za
g
< O
av�
Uk
U rn F
lIJ
(7
a a
G
J
m
y
�~
W
(9Z00
UJ�
V
00
00
O
z 0
^ J
m
Q
O
V
~MOO
Z W
O O
SLL
H a'
O
oc
p H
Z V
o0
o
z
OU
u
U)
WG
0
O O
g LL
o
o
J
1"1
Z
0 -1
pp
cn
w
W
F
cc
c
a
Z O
o
F
00
Q Q
0
Ji
(7 cn
X
U
_
w O C e
U)
W
S W
H N
O
=
~
O N
ae cn N
0 "Lcul�U
G
WLO
o
a �
pa p
a'
00
J
N •--�
p
2
a
W cC
awz}
O
V
02:
O
Z
LLI
°
Y
[0
=
W
CCQ�°
c
Z
O
0<UJ
G
U
z
a
O
O
Lu
°°mow
Z
U
Z
ILL
a>p
O
O
oCL
J�
U
~
a
QW QW
UZ
'o
g o
o
a
as
OO
o 0
J N
Q�
cL
(7
O
o
U
~w
W
pW
n
°
�No
a
N
� .. N
S
s
m
U
U
JU
U)
0
i�,
c
Z
U,N
xo
K C
~ D F
W
~
W
LL
Z
O
M
H
W
Co
5
n
N
lIJ
D
W U 0 ti
V
a 0
z
X
V l
2
Z uj
W
H
J N
W
Q
O
coO
O
Z
W
d
i O
Zo
>m� af0i 0
cn
W
J�
Q
p
..
W
2
..
i
J
J
n'f
~
o
O�
ZWNO m 0
W o >
M
O
0
0
a°
p
z
C7
N
o
Q
H
Q
H
O
U UZ.i �Q
=
U
O-
a
g
2
°°
O

A14
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Map Legend
L5E'd
0 County Boundary
Haunett County Cumberland Co Roads
Harnett Co Roads
Map for reference only.
0 Subject Site
Not a survev. 1A
MCKAY n,,
RAINEY
HARNETT
Y
o CUMBERLAND
Standley Ridge SD
Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake
PIN 0513-35-4139
,Y
,yo
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
12/8/2022
0
N/ =c,

Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
Standley Ridge SD
Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake
PIN 0513-35-4139
Map Legend
0 County Boundary
Harnett Co Roads
Subject Site
Figure 2
Aerial Photograph
(Google Earth 2022)
12/8/2022

#
`27?'
M
1 � � • O ' r A
. ram.
�If WP
Z � �
r
•• • • 210
r
• .,: raffle ' "'0
ro `160 •�: Park
41
Map Legend
0 1,000 2,000 ft - - s• �f
Harnett Co Roads
Map for reference only.
Not a survev. Subject Site
Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Standley Ridge SD Figure 3
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 USGS 7.5' Topographic Map
www.halowensoil.com Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake Quadrangle: Manchester, NC
919-893-8743
PIN 0513-35-4139 12/8/2022

Wetland
Form #2
W5/A4
A5/A10
Wetland A
Wetland
Form #4
Photo C
C21 Wetland B
Wetland
Form #1
Photo A
Wetland
Form #3
Photo B
Wetland Delineation Flags
W1-W5 to A4-A5 to A10-A58 and C1-C27
This map represents our professional opinion but does not represent the exact
wetland boundaries or concurrence by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
0
300
600 ft
Not a survey.
stream
wetlands
Site Boundary
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Jaylin Oaks Ph2
Creekside Church Rd
8 December 2021
Figure 4
Potential Streams and Wetlands
identified at subject site

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Standley Ridge SD City/County: Sanford, Harnett County Sampling Date: 12/16/2022
Applicant/Owner: Concorde I LLC State: INC Sampling Point: 1
Investigator(s): Jocelyn Prouxl and Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, IVILRA 137 Lat: 35.219623 Long:-78.956837 Datum: NAD83/NC
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Near wetland flag C3
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑. Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
II
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (1310)
0
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
E Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
21 Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑. Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 140' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Pinus taeda
35
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2
Acer rubrum
25
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Magnolia vir iniana
g g
20
N
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Liriodendron tulipifera
15
N
FACU
5
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
N
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6
Quercus nigra
5
N
FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
105
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 52.5
20% of total cover:
21
FACW species x 2 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 140' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Magnolia virginiana
20
Y
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
2
Cyrilla racemiflora
10
N
FACW
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3 Ilex opaca 8 N FAC
4
Quercus nigra
10
N
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Vaccinium corymbosum
5
N
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
53
= Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 26.5
20% of total cover:
10.6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 70' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
35
Y
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
35
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 70' )
1
Smilax laurifolia
5
Y
FACW
2
Smilax glauca
2
Y
FAC
3
Vitis rotundifolia
1
N
FAC
4.
Toxicodendron radicans
1
N
FAC
5.
Hydrophytic
9
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 4•5
20% of total cover:
1.8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/2 100
SL
6-18 10YR 4/1 97 10YR 4/6 3 C M
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑,
Histosol (Al) .❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑,
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑,
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑,
Stratified Layers (A5) .Q
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑,
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑,
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑,
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑✓,
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑,
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑,
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑,
Stripped Matrix (S6) .❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑,
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Standley Ridge SD City/County: Sanford, Harnett County Sampling Date: 12/16/2022
Applicant/Owner: Concorde I LLC State: INC Sampling Point: 2
Investigator(s): Jocelyn Prouxl and Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): linear Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 12
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, IVILRA 137 Lat: 35.219650 Long:-78.956702 Datum: NAD83/NC
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑. Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
F] Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
El Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑. Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Ilex opaca
20
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2
Quercus rubra
15
Y
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3
Quercus nigra
15
Y
FAC
10
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Pinus taeda
15
Y
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 32.5
20% of total cover:
13
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
Saplina/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
FAC species 85 x 3 = 255
1
Quercus nigra
10
Y
FAC
FACU species 18 x 4 = 72
2
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 113 (A) 347 (B)
3
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.07
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X. 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
10
Y
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Pteridium aquilinum
3
Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
13
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 6.5
20% of total cover:
2.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1
Gelsemium sempervirens
10
Y
FAC
2
Smilax glauca
7
Y
FAC
3
Vitis rotundifolia
8
Y
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
25
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 12.5
20% of total cover:
5
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/3 100
SL
4-12 10YR 4/4 99 10YR 5/6 1 C M
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑,
Histosol (Al) .❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑,
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑,
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑,
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑,
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑,
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑,
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑,
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑,
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑,
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑,
Stripped Matrix (S6) .❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑,
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Standley Ridge SD City/County: Sanford, Harnett County Sampling Date: 12/16/2022
Applicant/Owner: Concorde I LLC State: INC Sampling Point: 3
Investigator(s): Jocelyn Prouxl and Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, IVILRA 137 Lat: 35.220494 Long:-78.953460 Datum: NAD83/NC
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: R4SBC
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
observation point located in drainageway at proposed road crossing.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑. Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
0
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
0
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
21 Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑. Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
small floodplain adjacent to
stream
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 3
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 140' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Quercus nigra
30
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Y
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Y
FAC
10
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Pinus taeda
15
N
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
100
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
20
FACW species x 2 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 140' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Magnolia virginiana
20
Y
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
2
Cyrilla racemiflora
12
Y
FACW
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3 Ilex opaca 8 Y FAC
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
40
= Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 70' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
2
Y
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Ilex opaca
1
Y
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
3
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1.5
20% of total cover:
0.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' X 70' )
1
Smilax laurifolia
4
Y
FACW
2
Smilax rotundifolia
4
Y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
8
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 4
20% of total cover:
1.6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 100
SL
3-8 10YR 4/1 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M
SL
8-16 10YR 4/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑,
Histosol (Al) .❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑,
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑,
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑,
Stratified Layers (A5) .Q
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑,
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑,
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑,
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑,
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑,
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑,
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑,
Stripped Matrix (S6) .❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑,
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Standley Ridge SD City/County: Sanford, Harnett County Sampling Date: 12/16/2022
Applicant/Owner: Concorde I LLC State: INC Sampling Point: 4
Investigator(s): Jocelyn Prouxl and Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): shoulder Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, IVILRA 137 Lat: 35.220650 Long:-79.953317 Datum: NAD83/MC
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑. Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
F] Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
El Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑. Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Quercus alba
40 Y FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2 Quercus rubra
30 Y FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Quercus nigra
10 N FAC
6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Liquidambar styraciflua
12 N FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
92 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 46
20% of total cover: 18.4
FACW species x 2 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Quercus nigra
15 Y FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Ilex opaca
3 Y FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
1 Y FAC
2 Smilax rotundifolia
1 Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover: 1
20% of total cover: .4
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/2 100
LS
6-12 10YR 5/3 100
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑,
Histosol (Al) .❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑,
Black Histic (A3) .❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑,
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑,
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑,
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑,
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑,
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑,
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑,
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) .❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑,
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑,
Stripped Matrix (S6) .❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑,
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc., PO Box400, Lillington NC 27546
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC county/parish/borough: Harnett City: Spring Lake
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.220942 Long.:-78.954532
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Jumping Run Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
35.220492
-78.953493
1.2 aC
wetland
404
B
35.218953
-78.956119
0.4 aC
wetland
404
UT
35.220492
-78.953493
700 LF
stream
404

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Manchester, NC
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: websoil survey
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): Figure Google Earth (2022)
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Landscape Photos 12/16/2022
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
0-�
-.� . fiJ&7COr
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

CAB
f
F�na
Bn
Bn1BErn
D
y VaD
y �,
3b
B
m
°
9B SnHBiNB
'l ARNETT
o�
SnRl
aa /W
GZB
F
3
-°
L
R
LJ `r
Pn
ne
6 GaS
Bn
G*D
p Ga
Bb
G a � BF�D
+i7
BnD
CUMBERLAND
Map Legend
0 1,000 2,000 ft Harnett Co Roads
Map for reference only.
Not a survey. IL Subject Site
Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Standley Ridge SD Figure 5
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 NRCS Soil Survey (1994)
www.halowensoil.com Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake Harnett County NC; Sheet 14
919-893-8743
PIN 0513-35-4139 12/8/2022

M „64,9S o8L
I
M „Tb,LS o8L
Z
- Z
O-
002662C 0OZ662C 009668E 009662C OOb668C 000662C 0OZ562C ON66R£
008668E 0OZ668E 009668E 009668E OOV668E 0006680 0OZ5680 ON668E
z z
_
N (h
N w
M „64,9S o8L O O
2 N
O)
d
T
N
U
Uo
U
� o
�
0 0
() Q
o
U
m
8
0
o
d
w
x
m
8
Q
N
O
O
p
C.�
O
N
0
O
•0
N +�
>
� N
C
z�
ZU
M „Tb ,LS o8L
��1

Z
O
CQ
G
O
LL
Z
Ca
G
0
Z
/W
V
W
J
a
O O �
7
U O O
U y N
U O
O
��'
O) E
� U a3 a3 Q M —_
O_ O (6
U O C E C
y E (u y Zi
y o)" O O
O C N
(6 (U O- p
U a3 = a)
= U) E V)
> L O O a)
C >
cu
Q O
a)
(I O Q 6
> Q a3 U
as cn E
E o o a) as
a3
as E �� N
O C a3 a) y
U (i) N E o)
C
O E a) U
C N
E 2
y a) 0 m
WE.�Uvpi
O
N
UU) y
O-
M
N
U)
C
U
O L
6
°'
a3
pn
N
y 7 0
_
cu
�y2)E
O
�_8Y)E
U
'O
o
o U
,2
ccLO
°' (U U) a
p a3
U
E
E
E
N
Q
y o
(1) y
Q
p
N
a) C7
O Q N
'O
Z
U N
N
U E N '6
(n U)
a) -p a3
)y
Q
O
Uy
!E
))
wd
Oa
om aao)
sQ
No
Z Q
(6
Q`y°
so wcuU
a)
O
5.c
(u
O(u
'2a
aaa>5U)
+
Q—
EO()
O O
Q
E a3 y
O
U
a)
7 u) U O N
U)�
O Q
w _6
76 O
"" O
N
aS -0 O a3
Zn
O
y
N
0
E O
N .y
C 2
a)
N
O C
30
J
((1) CL
U)
Q C
Utl)
a3 i
=
-0
U)
t C
N
a)
a5
Z E
Q U
a) Q o
a)
aaci a)
a3
a)
a)
rn
0 O
>+
L N N jp
O) N
-O
a3 0
a5 �
E
O
C y
Q a) U)
a) (6 (6 7
,U)
C
N Q
U) (6
O '6 O Q
p o
g 3 U
U)
as F
U .o
Q as
C
m
s� (n E
�+ E
`) `)
a)
C
N
E 0 7 p
D O a) N>
7 N
7 0
N
O
0 (6
v'i
O
U
U
y" N m
Q o
7 >+
c� a)
O O
E c
N
y N
O)
o z o�
M m
O
Q .� a) 3
U
(n
— L
— O
O
N
a) O) .—
E a3 15
FL E
U U
2 Q'O Q om
H O
U U
U—
in(3
H U. U)
y
� y
4 O R Q
L
Q (i O L
>. 0
a) Q O J R a) O O O L
Q U) O Q R R p m d
.O
O N L y a U
U) in > O U) in g S v Q
� R C
R � �
a)
iu
LL }{ O O
* R 4 R5 R
F m
y
C O
O y Q
0 .� U)
a° a° N cL
N a
Q a
U C C C a) Q Q R O > O` ° Q
> > > o w U) 3 y o > w o 0 w _ 0
O Q Q Q R a Q o a > O o O m (n >.
o R R R y 3 a = `o E O a) O o U)
a R — 3 O T w > > a R w o coi Y o a
y o 0 0 O o R O > R y o o m R o a o
Q (n (n (n o m m U U c7 c7 J J a m U) U) U) in U) U)
w a
R
cun
Q co
Uo
� (n
� a)
as
'o �
cn Q
_a O
U
m
0
m
Z

Soil Map —Harnett County, North Carolina
Bndry
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb soils, frequently flooded
4.2
12.4%
BnB
Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
9.3
27.7%
GaB
Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
20.1
59.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
33.5
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

a
0 1,000 2,000 ft
y RPM %SAY
Map Legend
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwaker
1-1 Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
1-1 Freshwater Forestedf Shrub Wetland
CUMBER D Freshwater Pond
. Lake
other
R.iverine
Q County Boundary
baseroad
I I I stream
Map for reference only.
Not a survev. Q Bndry
Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Standley Ridge SD Figure 6
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 USFWS National Wetland
www.halowensoil.com Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake Inventory
919-893-8743
PIN 0513-35-4139 1 12/8/2022

Y
�o
GT
y
RE
/W
W
R
1'Y
4
�y
�rV 3
q< U
0
c z
ti
PANEL
372DO513DOL
LAKE MEAff. GMAM7
DOW
1R
Map Legend
baseroad
Bndry
Flood Hazard Zones
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway
PANEL
A 61181207 Special Floodway
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
0 1,000 2,000 ft Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
Map for reference only. Area with Risk Due to Levee
Not a survev.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Standley Ridge SD Figure 7
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 FEMA Flood Hazard Zones
www.halowensoil.com Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake
919-893-8743 12/8/2022
PIN 0513-35-4139

INITROMMINns • • rap
•hoto:ra .h A 16 December 2022 . View of wetland B near wetland determination data form #1

INITROMMINns • • rap
'hoto•ra.h B 16 December 2022 i- i .f - I.n. A .n. r-.m T n-.r - I.n. -rmin. i.n .. . firm •

�` n��A• � r, '..�E`�s�s. �m�i."�'+�,'�`4.�„_'`,..`'�-v�•u..,,� 'r'`._Y-� .. - '?4xK'r=g c,:�v.��..- _.
SO
�..�-�-�_:nz.■..--.----
rAPT,
a�� � i�K =' `"+t v tf .` <-r L -� x � .. F rr9 u�'� '� �• % x�'
F
0„l7
jw'69 9. SP / 7t"XY xFjy
�� ar r¢ 1�� kxf�. �,� a�V�M.+�a«��, ._ e•�c�.�i�J ��., 5���
�. ,y �s�E.�, `!ate= � ts,7`_��• � x �"�. —
Il+.�+.y

Q
CA
rhLhl^^
O
O
a

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLANS
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

vxvwII¢udep.F-qv g3E.v,QP 006Z_S94 (616) rr�� //((a�n�'I 3�Qe8�0r0�N/0�0�7�T
OdOM2 am NSSY8 S06 ► oam At`1 am W� o 9
sTBo d HI�NB �I�LRt1SNoa tl�t1�,7HRH viva WS if a x EJilII�Il1 ( (4`a
J
O
O
M
(n Mo
Q
M N
l< a
F- �
Iwi
Q W
�U � a
J
O LO N
E�' 0
O
nm a OJ
O O W
J C J J W Z
QW
U I
Q C = - o O ¢;ZZ
i- M w= U-)
Q "of o'o Qo'o oawg,-aj
I OOcO o (n�NOOW
MZF-.N UON� F-LZ+1a I �a>
r,�WO I w0� LZ l o
W �z W�ZcO �0Q U 0_
I— o f ¢= n a=n aLdX I >_ w
0] OD] M O O�SW
(n I w00w wcow j� wa¢ztQzw
Z �OQ WOQ� Ld 0=�Oq
0_0Itx 0d-0'O) Oa. F-N�tU
n
n
m
of
M �
M 0
M O �
� N O
v of 0
N v
W W �}
U U
nQ Nw
,. ,-
O0 N QQ� O LL
Napo COO Q
MC4 00 QMM mMO'r)
U) WM-NN
z V) M
(O 0 U
¢N
} _= w Z
� : wp~pFN Ul
wwJO m o
�U �OOOOL,J
Q J J J J Q
U� C=OZ��� -0 :D Q=C)
E�-»0Lilo4 WQ
LLJ
w m
0'd W�ZZZ�W z0OWOW
d0 Z<Cg:2:2Z<C U_ U) w0N
m
I
L`:'�ii► .:ill%,:
■lid/i�
mu
s
J
U
00
zW
Paz
©�a
�Qz
J 0 Q
Q Cf)
W
m
(n W J
zF=-i
wz=W
W
(nQ�
W 0 Lj
Z LL
�Q I,
Q(nm
zw
:;j�Qn
� U) 0 <
(n O
I— W Z
oIZQ>-
zo-Jm
Z
0
F- m
U
V
w
W
CY �
F-
J U
U
..
>- C)o
-1 ' }t�t493il DIY.}g p
S CS
cC_;� =in w
pMla,tOta�••••
a
U)
n v' O
rn
{l) m rn
Z�m oll
OvU �Lo(n
Qa 00000
¢o 300
�
U) F cn N
U Ci Oo II
M —j O
J N
U7
Q d N InU 0 0 -
�0
o
aof
J
D a w
O W�o�N�
0 U)U
dz00Z<
LL.J z W o F-
> W > > J
_ a�z��F
CD
z
LLJ
V)
W
W
NDN
orf
F-
N
Z
L).J
ry
D
V)

—Igdsp.M.Q=.q%..jqV 006?-659 (6TS) on I 3aaoma
099LZ OR 'HOUVID
J33M mm im
emo-a DNIHZMDM unmnsmoa xHaEmDm
( KmLvmma mn%m ma mu us
FA
IN
ROO:
i"MOM mob-NOM-15-W40

moa-BandspuFmYTvnQR�e[0.P 0063-£SS (6T6) �Tii T aQa00R0J �, x
oasaa ON woueso '.I`JQI2I a
mays amr am 90s �
ST30—A JHImm!)Na JffiEI moo mmimiarm ssoup `Jmsm iY aym d am "
O
<n = o z
v ¢ W Q�w_ o ��z
IL_ o W Z \oo=mm0L,
p �r—o
61) a
W<< C)N ad n.. WO ZI-zm�mm
>Q2JZw
¢W Sf4-WW3:,. F-
Wwzz MZ) Q W �oML ¢UC) w
~moo J Ii Yz cn� ��cn
F_(—JQ—zQoaF
z�UCJ7-0�0� j m �3oomc°m�—�i-
Q� Z x r N Q pw 7 N M
Lj
W CJ --
I—V—WJ
J 'iCzO Chin _IZZ>1
w
UV�rn~LOB
QOQ¢w�Q¢
n 0 � z
��c~nv~iv�c~nc~n
O
4L
� 0 ,era
y �
y y 3
y y y
y y 3 y
y y
y y y y y y
y y
W vs!
n
Aj J
(n () 8!
raj I— m
HOW-,
Q Z
z V`n)
OV,O f"
U
W U
Ljj
U?I—
OJ
rY 7)
UU
d-
N

—IapdgmV g—g4.o IQP 0O63-M (6i6) /�a}n I a(m0000�mo}o
oZSLZ 3H 'AOZLVIO ��� AIQi1 I = m
Liam HM im SOB
eizo,a �xi�tuo� ozns�coo e�iasso� se aoxa asagas I
n�0
■�i
�■�ei
�iwii�u�i'����
■�'�
�p
iiiiiin�i

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0023097
Project Name: Standley Ridge SD
December 08, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

12/08/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

12/08/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

12/08/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

12/08/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0023097
Project Name: Standley Ridge SD
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Proposed SFR development on Creeksville Ch Rd
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.2209137,-78.95392929203012,14z
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

12/08/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063

12/08/2022
4
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
STATUS
Candidate
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly Neonympha mitchellii francisci Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5419
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

12/08/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Sep 30
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6177

12/08/2022
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferns Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Aug 20
and Alaska.
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)

12/08/2022
3
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

12/08/2022 4
American Kestrel 1+1+ 1111 11m1 ,+�I 1111 F
m ++ 11 +++1 Jill Jill 1� 1 ++11
BCC -BCR
Bachman's Sparrow BCC Rangewide ++++ +++m +++J mill 11111111
III ON 11"+ +++ +++ +
���
(CON)
Bald Ea
Non-BCCe ++++ dR PP MI gqtl glTq IN ++++ ++11 lgl1111P 1111
Vulnerable
Brown -headed Nuthatch Jill Jill Jill Jill joik will pill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide '771JIl Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill 111
(CON)
Eastern Whip -poor- ++++ ++++ +++ + + ---+ ++++
Will
m ++*+ ++mm 11 1 :: 1-4-1+.��1 J'+++ +++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Lesser Yellowlegs + ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ +m++ ++++
(CON)
Prairie Warbler JJii Jill Jill J + 1 1 J +1 J J
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ ++++ ­+ ++++
(CON) —
Prothonotary Jill Jill 11+1 I*'■
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker 11111+J+ 1111 Jill I i mil 110 Jill IJIl Jill Jill
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird ++++ ++'m 1m1+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ---+ ++++
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush + + +1 fiii ill+m 111 11 BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ + ++++ ++++ ++ ­+ ++++
(CON) ��� ���� ���i r■L
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidins7-and-minimizins7-incidental-take-mis7ratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf

12/08/2022
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding.
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL)Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point

12/08/2022 6
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. 'BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no

12/08/2022
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

12/08/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Hal Owen & Associates
Name: Krissina Newcomb
Address: PO Box 400
City:
Lillington
State:
NC
Zip:
27546
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9108938743

Roy Cooper, Governor
�■■EW INC DEPARTMENT CF
■■mom NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
0 ■■■
December 8. 2022
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27S46
RE: Standley Ridge SD
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20242
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.ciov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerCc ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
p 121 1N. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 * 16S1 HAIL SERvICE CENTf R, RALEIGH, rfr_ 27G9!)
OFC 919,707.9120 • FAX [phone]

U
N
N
N
N
m Z
M
N
N'
N
M
M
U)
N
U)
N
M
5
M
M
U)
U)
U)
U)
U7
U)
m
U)
N
Ln
M
M
U)
co v
4 C
Ln
M
M
U LL
CD
C7
C7
U
U
U
U
U
�
T
>,
>,
>,
>,
>,
>,
>,
>,
V
U
U
U
U
+' +�
r6 U
U L
U
V U
0 U
U L
r6
U
U 0 U
L U L
M
U
U@
L U
U M U_
L U L
U
U U
M U
U L
M U
U L
i
i
U)
6
Q U
�
Q O
C�
C�
n
U) U
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
� U
U
L
U)
W
U)
U)
U)
U)
UJ
U)
U)
U)
O
�
N
L
75
r,r
IL U)
75
U
C
—
W
>
E
E
E
E
E
E
u
-C
T
T
T
-D
J
U
U
U
J
=
>
O>
O> O
U
J
J
=
U
rV
J L
J J
N
U
r6
U
C C
U -
-
L- W
C..
W
c-
C..
U
C..
C`.
C`.
W
W
W
Q
Q
rb
r'
I
I
I
0�
I
I
I
Z
Q
IN
U)
U
W O
N N
O
U ON N
� O
c
O
O
QD
U
U
U
CO
O
lD
M
L 1
U
i
N
N
0
a
a
a
1
-
-
O
uO�
N
-
o
1
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
C
Qo
o
N
-o
0O
U
—
-0
�
O
OO
O
O
O
O
OUZ
U
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
<
Q
OL
o
�
L
_
a)
_0
_0
o
r6
Z
p
U
Q
D
U
_0
m
—
i
m
i
r6
i
—
U
O
U
U
U
U
cn
ro
O
Q�
I
W
W
U
U
Q
C
U
6
O
6
U
O
m
i
3
V
n
i
>
L
>
L
cn
—
U
C
U
E
V
i
Z5 E
U
T Q
L
U
Q
U
D-
N
D-
C
—
Q
u
E
O U
cn Q>
Q
Q
Q
+�
O
V
O
O
(D
ll�
r6
m
-Y
O U)
(D1�2-0
0�
U) W
O
U
O
U
-E
U)
r6
U)
O
LL >-
Q
Q
U
m
rn
_
M
m
6
O
't6
U
V
m
�
U
U
>
—
�
CD
+�
C
+�
T U
Q
V
>>
L
_
W
i
U
O
>
—
c6
-
c6
�
m
i
E
� Q
m
Ln
r6
`6
n
U
to
N
to
U
_0
O
O
U
L
+ V
O
LLLn
i
m
cn
U
+
L
.0
+
L
U
r6
r6 .�
cn
i
d
U
X
U
U
U
C
D
L
-
6
r6
U
T
V
T
V
O
C U
6 O
C cn
6
D
+
.�
O
LL m
r6
� N
Q
=
U
E
x
co
O,
—
r6
c6
p
E
D- U
�'
m
V
cn
+
to T
-
r5
�
O
O
t6
C
4
-D
V
Q
D-
Q
Q
U)
U)
o U)
0� U)
U)
Q C
U
U
co
LL U)
m
O
o
o
o
O
CO
D
N
CO
CO
CO
F
M
Ln
C
MU,
l0
�
M
M
M
m
z
'
M
U
M
Qo
N
M
N
M
M
M
M
Ih'M
M
N
L
-E
V
L
L
L
LL
U
O
O
O
L
U
6
T>>
T T >,
T
i
T
i
T
i
0
O
0
O
N 0
O
ro
_
r6
_
r6
C
_
r6
C
E
Q
rn
E 0'
rn rn
E "' E
�
-C
-C
D
D
E D
E
U
E
L
L
i
m i
r6 i m
cD
O
O
m O
m
O m
O
W
Q
Q
Q Q
Q Q Q
LL
:T
:T
Z U
Z
U Z
U
rl,
O
N
N
0)
a

/ ®
/\\\I
< a o 2 x
w / 3
/ 0 m
a�
o \
\ E 0)
.\ z \
} \
E \ E
} ®
z
0
m
\
1- \\\
L-»\\\f3
/\ƒ//\\
0
\ %
\
\ a \
c \ 2
s o c
\0 0 o c 0
.g .g .g e a
m > > >.g e
e IL
\ \ \ \ \
2 0 0 0 0®±
4 =222c�
.0 5 3 3 = e
0\ \ \ \) \
\\\/� CD d e e m 9
3 /\\\/Z
0 2 E 2 2 2 2
./U m m m U U
Z255zz
\
3
0
\
( � \
0 E %
e a Z
_ / 2
\ \ u
>
\ /c
11 E \ \ y y y .m
= e o (D 0® E
\ (\ \ \ \ 2 \
Z U) U)
\\%«««0
<< E o o o c°
s s ©a a s .2 U o
m - _ _
\ \
c c> 2 2 2 > z
0
//////ƒ
US
�{
z\
:\
4%
0
\
/

�a
�e
Co
Srady
S p l Z ?pM 46,H ,
N
I
I
1
1
1
1 Mf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
� 1
�s
-rdpLin H
w
Z+
mZSNH
f0
Q
W C
Q O
m `
v (V -0
C
Q a` o
m
N
�
N
f0 7 O
Z m a
000
O
a

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT
STANDLEY RIDGE SUBDIVISION (PROPOSED), SPRING LAKE
HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Federally listed Endangered and Threatened species are protected under the provisions of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. In addition, the American Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) has federal protection status through the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (BGEPA).
As of 15 December 2022 the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Environmental Conservation Online System lists seven (7) threatened, endangered, or candidate
species that may occur in the proposed project area and/or may be affected by the proposed
project (See Species Conclusion Table). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements
follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area.
Habitat requirements for each species are based on the current best available information from
referenced literature and/or USFWS. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
database was searched for known occurrences of federally protected species within 1 mile of
study area.
Qualifications of Investigator
Krissina Newcomb is an Environmental Scientist with Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. She
received a bachelor's degree from North Carolina State University in Natural Resources with
Coastal Concentration in 1998. She has worked for Hal Owen & Associates since 1998
specializing in wetland investigations, permitting, and state riparian buffer assessments. In
addition, she has trained under Mr. Owen to conducted Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments
and Environmental Evaluations for NCDOT Borrow/Waste Sites.
Site Description
The subject site contains 34 acres and is located on the southern side of Creeksville Road,
Spring Lake, Harnett County, North Carolina. The site is wooded/undeveloped. An overhead
electric line crosses the western corner of the site. An abandoned single-family residence is
located in the north central portion. Upland portions of the site are dominated by mixed
hardwood forest containing white oak, water oak, and red oak trees. Two drainageways
containing headwater wetlands cross the site. Vegetation in the wetlands was dominated by
Tulip Poplar, Water oak, Loblolly Pine, and Sweetbay Magnolia in the overstory and Switch
cane in the understory. A stream forms in the drainageway in the central portion of the site.
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Species Conclusion Table
Project Name: STANDLEY RIDGE SUBDIVISION Date: 15 December 2022
Species / Resource Name
Status
Conclusion
ESA Section 7
Notes / Documentation
/ Eagle Act
Determination
Tricolored Bat
PE
potential
may affect
Habitat assessment indicates
Perimyotis subflavus
habitat present
potential habitat (forest). Survey
and no current
for individuals within project area
survey
was not conducted.
conducted
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
E
No suitable
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no
Picoides borealis
foraging of
suitable habitat present. NCNHP
nesting habitat
element occurrence within 1 mile
resent
of project
American Alligator
SA/T
no suitable
Not Applicable
Habitat assessment indicates no
Alligator mississippiensis
habitat present
No effect
suitable habitat present. NCNHP
element occurrence within 1 mile
of project
Cape Fear Shiner
E
no suitable
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no
Notropis mekistocholas
habitat present
suitable habitat present
Monarch Butterfly
C
no suitable
Not Applicable
Habitat assessment indicates no
Danaus plexippus
habitat present
No effect
suitable habitat present
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly
E
suitable habitat
may affect, not
Habitat assessment indicates
Neonympha mitchellii francisci
present and no
likely to
potentially suitable habitat present
current survey
adversely affect
in power line right of way;
conducted
however it is located in open space
outside of development area.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
E
suitable habitat
may affect, not
Habitat assessment indicates
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
present and no
likely to
potentially suitable habitat present
current survey
adversely affect
in power line right of way;
conducted
however it is located in open space
outside of development area.
Critical habitat
no critical
no effect
habitat present
Bald eagle
unlikely to
no Eagle Act
No nest within action area
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
disturb nesting
Permit required
bald eagles
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used
all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about impacts in the immediate and
surrounding areas.
Signature /Title
15 December 2022
Date
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Species Habitat Requirements
Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus), Proposed Endangered
Habitat: During the spring, summer and fall - collectively referred to as the non -hibernating
seasons - tricolored bats primarily roost among live and dead leaf clusters of live or recently
dead deciduous hardwood trees. In the southern and northern portions of the range, tricolored
bats will also roost in Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides) and Usnea trichodea lichen,
respectively. In addition, tricolored bats have been observed roosting during summer among
pine needles, eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), within artificial roosts like barns,
beneath porch roofs, bridges, concrete bunkers, and rarely within caves. Female tricolored
bats exhibit high site fidelity, returning year after year to the same summer roosting
locations. Female tricolored bats form maternity colonies and switch roost trees regularly.
Males roost singly.
During the winter, tricolored bats hibernate - which means that they reduce their metabolic
rates, body temperatures and heart rate - in caves and mines; although, in the southern United
States, where caves are sparse, tricolored bats often hibernate in road -associated culverts, as
well as sometimes in tree cavities and abandoned water wells. Tricolored bats exhibit high
site fidelity with many individuals returning year after year to the same hibernaculum.
(https://www.fws.gov/species/tricolored-bat-perimyotis-subflavus )
Biological Conclusion: May Effect. Habitat assessment indicates potential habitat (forest)
present. No mines, caves, or culverts noted at site. Survey for individuals within project area
was not conducted.
The Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
Habitat: For nesting and roosting habitat, red -cockaded woodpeckers need open stands of
pine containing trees 60 years old and older. RCWs need live, large older pines in which to
excavate their cavities. Longleaf pines (Pinus palustris) are preferred, but other species of
southern pine are also acceptable. Dense stands (stands that are primarily hardwoods, or that
have a dense hardwood understory) are avoided. Foraging habitat is provided in pine and
pine hardwood stands 30 years old or older with foraging preference for pine trees 10 inches
or larger in diameter. In good, moderately -stocked, pine habitat, sufficient foraging substrate
can be provided on 80 to 125 acres. (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es red -
cockaded_ woodpecker.html)
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Habitat assessment indicates no suitable habitat present.
Site is dominated by mixed hardwood forest. NCNHP element occurrence within 1 mile of
proj ect.
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Similarity of Appearance (Threatened)
Habitat: This once -endangered reptile occurs in refuge marshes, slow -moving streams, and
manmade canals. They prefer areas where the water turbidity is low and the water quality is
high, with the presence of an adequate food source.
(hLtp://www.fws.gov/refuge/Alligator River/wildlife and habitat/american alligator.html)
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No suitable habitat present in the project area. The stream
at this site is small and shallow. NCNHP element occurrence within 1 mile of project.
Species listed as Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance are not subject to Section 7
consultation with the USFWS.
Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Endangered
Habitat: Small rivers to medium-sized creeks near the Fall Line; areas of moderate gradient
and riffles alternating with long deep pools, and substrate a mixture of sand -gravel, rubble,
and boulders. Occurs in slow pools, riffles, slow runs. Juveniles occupy slackwater, areas
near rock outcrops, and flooded areas.
(https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT GLOBAL. 2.104147/Notropis_mekistoc
holas)
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No suitable habitat present in the project area. At the road
crossing, the small stream is shallow with a silty bottom. No fish were observed in the
channel.
Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate
Habitat: Whether it's a field, roadside area, open area, wet area or urban garden, milkweed
and flowering plants are needed for monarch habitat. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of
many flowers during breeding and migration, but they can only lay eggs on milkweed plants.
(hlt2s://www.fws.gov/species/monarch-danaus-plexippus )
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. The project area does not contain suitable habitat for this
species. The site is forested and lacks significant areas of milkweed and flowering plants.
Candidate species are not subject to Section 7 consultation with the USFWS.
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii francisci), Endangered
• Habitat: The habitat occupied by this small, dark brown butterfly consists primarily of wide,
wet meadows dominated by a high diversity of sedges along small stream corridors. These
meadows are often remnants of beaver activity and/or periodic wildfires. Additionally,
subpopulations of the satyr occur in artillery ranges on Ft. Bragg where the lack of roads,
frequent fires, and beavers have allowed butterfly habitats to persist.
(https://www.fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/insects/saint-francis-satyr/ )
• Biological Conclusion: May Effect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect. An overhead power line
crosses the western corner of the site and contains potentially suitable habitat for this species.
However, this area is located in the common area and will not be impacted by development.
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia), Endangered
• Habitat: This plant generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine uplands
and pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty, poorly
drained soil) on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying
sand. Rough -leaf loosestrife has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub community of
large Carolina bays (shallow, elliptical, poorly drained depressions of unknown origin). The
grass -shrub ecotone, where rough -leaf loosestrife is found, is fire -maintained, as are the
adjacent plant communities (longleaf pine - scrub oak, savanna, flatwoods, and pocosin).
Suppression of naturally -occurring fire in these ecotones results in shrubs increasing in
density and height and expanding to eliminate the open edges required by this plant. Several
populations are known from roadsides and power line rights of way where regular
maintenance mimics fire and maintains vegetation so that herbaceous species are open to
sunlight. (hiip://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es rough -leaf loosestrife.html )
• Biological Conclusion: May Effect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect. An overhead power line
crosses the western corner of the site and contains potentially suitable habitat for this species.
However, this area is located in the common area and will not be impacted by development.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
• Habitat: Bald Eagles live near rivers, lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple
food. Bald Eagles will also feed on waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small
animals and carrion. Bald Eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites.
Their habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter,
the birds congregate near open water in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for
sheltering. Eagles mate for life, choosing the tops of large trees to build nests, which they
typically use and enlarge each year. Nests may reach 10 feet across and weigh a half ton.
They may also have one or more alternate nests within their breeding territory. In treeless
regions, they may also nest in cliffs or on the ground.
(http://www.fws. Gov/birds/management/managed-species/bald-and-golden-eagle-
information.php)
• Biological Conclusion: No Eagle Act Permit required. The bald eagle was removed from the
federal list of Threatened and Endangered species on August 8, 2007. However, the species
is still afforded protection under the Migratory Bird Species Act and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act. No bald eagle nests were observed within 660 feet of the site.
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE MAP
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

0
Long Valley Farm
0 1,000 2,000 ft
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
HARNETT
y9,o�
l0 �C-114�14Z
CUMBERLAND
Map for reference only.
Not a survev.
Standley Ridge SD
Creeksville Church Rd, Spring Lake
LAKEVIEW
Map Legend
QCounty Boundary
baseroad
Site Boundary
HPOWEB
O NCHPOpoints
NCHPO_NR_SL_DOE _Boundaries
0 Local —District —Boundaries
NC State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) Listings
12/14/2022
PIN 0513-35-4139