20190157 Ver 3_Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel - Monitoring Year 2 Report_20221221

ID#* 20190157
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/21/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/21/2022
Version* 3
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jason Lorch
Project Information
ID#:* 20190157
Existing ID#
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Perry Hill II Buffer Mitigation Bank
County: Orange
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 3
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel - Monitoring Year
8.62MB
2 Report.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Jason Lorch
Signature: *

December 20, 2022
CREDIT RELEASE REQUEST FORM
To:NCDEQ-DWR Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
From:Jason Lorch, [e-mail], 919.851.9986
Through: Wildlands Holdings V, LLC
We formally request a credit release for the Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel for completion of
Task #5 per the approved credit release schedule, which is included in the Attachments with this
request. The following documents have been submitted to DWR for Task #5 and are pending
review: Monitoring Year 2 Report
Credits requested for release are detailed below:
Credit Type% ReleaseCredit AmountNotes/Comments
(include Units)
22
2
(0.15x 32,882ft=4,932.300ft)minus
Buffer Restoration154,928.300 ft
22
4.000* ft=4,928.300 ft
Buffer Preservation
2
2
Cattle Exclusion. (0.15x11,550.621ft=
Buffer Enhancement151,732.593 ft
2
1,732.593ft)
(0.15x30,600.429lb-N = 4,590.064lb-N)
Generated Nitrogen Nutrient 154,580.463lb-N
minus 9.601* lb-N=4,580.463lb-N
Offset
Delivered Nitrogen Nutrient
Offset (Jordan sites only)
(0.15x1,970.904lb-P = 295.636lb-P)
Generated PhosphorusNutrient 15295.017lb-P
minus 0.619* lb-P=295.017lb-P
Offset
Delivered Phosphorus Nutrient
Offset (Jordan sites only)
*Accounts for MY1 partial credit release before credits were recalculated in MY2.
Signature:
Attachments:
1) Approved Project Credit Table (Monitoring Year 2)
2)Approved Credit Release Schedule (BPDP)
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

Approved Credit Release Schedule (BPDP)
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Bank Parcel Development Package
% Credit Available for
Task Project Milestone
Sale
InstrumentandBPDPapprovedbyDWR,full-deliverymitigationplan
1 approved by DWR, conservation easements recorded and financial 20%
assurance posted
MitigationSite earthwork, planting and installationofmonitoring
devices completed for both the Perry Hill full-delivery site (DMS
2 20%
ID#100093) and the Bank Parcel
3 Monitoring financial assurance posted and approval of As-Built report 10%
Monitoring Report #1 approved by DWR* & financial assurance
4 5%**
Renewed
Monitoring Report #2 approved byDWR*& financial assurance
5 15%**
renewed
Monitoring Report #3 approved by DWR* & financial assurance
6 10%
renewed
Item B(1)of Section X in the Instrument has been completed and
7 5%
approved by DWR
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an
approved land trust or steward
Monitoring Report #4 approved by DWR* & financial assurance
8 5%
renewed
Monitoring Report #5 approved by DWR* and final site visit by DWR has
9
10%
been conducted
Total 100%
*DWR approval provided upon a determination that the Parcel is meeting performance standards contained
within the approved BPDP.
**Percentages adjusted for partial credit release in Monitoring Year 1.

—————
0.0000.0000.0000.0007.1150.000
167.156259.151361.554
Nutrient
1,175.929
Delivered
Offset: P (lbs)
—————
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
N (lbs)
110.467
2,595.2814,023.5985,613.512
Delivered
18,257.571
Nutrient Offset:
NoNoNoNo
YesYesYesYesYes
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Offset?
Nutrient
Convertible to
——————
0.000
Credits
CreditsCredits
201.000
5,752.0004,304.3521,522.0009,901.0001,293.2693,005.0006,093.000
1,984.2331,970.904
12,361.000
32,984.00032,882.00011,618.43611,550.62144,602.43644,432.62130,807.38030,600.429
Riparian Buffer
0
———
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
32,98432,88246,24245,83179,22678,713
Buffer?
590,391586,425
Riparian
Riparian
Square FeetSquare Feet
Buffer Credits
Convertible to
Nitrogen:
1.000002.000006.060611.000001.000002.000006.060611.000001.00000
Ratio (x:1) Ratio (x:1)
Final Credit Final Credit Phosphorus:
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Restoration:
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Preservation:
Enhancement:
Mitigation TotalsMitigation Totals
33%33%33%33%33%33%33%
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
Total Riparian Buffer:
Offset:
Nutrient
% Full Credit% Full Credit
11221111221111
Ratio (x:1)Ratio (x:1)
Initial Credit Initial Credit
)
)
2
2
0
402
0.0%
Total 1,5229,9017,8383,0056,093 Total
11.6%
11,50478,71326,238
12,46312,36126,49826,087
(Creditable) (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ftArea for Buffer Mitigation (ft
):):
)
22
2
2,117
49,73677,108
107,577586,425
353,853349,887
Total Area (sf)
Total Area (ft
Totals:
EC1EC1EC3EC3
UT1UT1UT2UT2UT2UT2
Eligible for Preservation (ft
Preservation Area Subtotal (ft
Perry BranchPerry BranchPerry BranchPerry Branch
Feature NameFeature Name
0-1000-1000-1000-1000-1000-1000-100
/pound)
/pound)
2
101-200101-200101-200101-200101-200101-200101-200
2 Preservation as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation:
Width (ft)Width (ft)
Min-Max Buffer Min-Max Buffer
Ephemeral Reaches as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation:
ExclusionExclusionExclusionExclusion
RestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestoration
Preservation
Mitigation ActivityMitigation Activity
Enhancement via Cattle Enhancement via Cattle Enhancement via Cattle Enhancement via Cattle
Project AreaN Credit Conversion Ratio (ftP Credit Conversion Ratio (ft
I / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / P
EphemeralEphemeralEphemeralEphemeral
Feature TypeFeature Type
)
1
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
YesYesYesYesYesYes
ditch
Subject? Subject?
(enter NO if
ephemeral or
19.16394
297.54099
RuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRural
LocationLocation
40264.785
Neuse 03020201 - Lower Falls Lake
BufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBuffer
9097.72
40264.785
Credit TypeCredit Type
Nutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient Offset
Approved Project Credit Table (Monitoring Year 2)Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 2 - 2022Enter Preservation Credits Below 1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow
some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).last updated 01/17/2020

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR ID# 2019-0157v3
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC’s Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank

Monitoring Year 2 Report
December 2022

PREPARED BY:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.

312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225

Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]

MONITORING YEAR 2 REPORT
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Bank Sponsor .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Project History ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.4 Project Location ...................................................................................................................... 2
1.5 Project Design ......................................................................................................................... 2
2 VEGETATION MONITORING .................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Success Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol ................................................................... 4
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring .......................................................................................... 4
2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management ................................................................................................ 5
2.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 5
3 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 6

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Reporting History
Table 2 Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Table 3 Character/Existing Tree Species
Table 4 Monitoring Plot Summary – Planting (As-Built)
Table 5 Monitoring Plot Summary – Year 2

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1 Project Location Map
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Figure 3 Credit Generation Map
Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map
Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger
Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results
Appendix E: Overview Photographs
Appendix F: Additional Information
Table 8 Updated Project Credits
Preliminary Conservation Easement Plat
Vegetation Areas of Concern Updated Photographs – Conservation Easement Encroachment

1.0Introduction
1.1 Project Description
The Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is part of Wildlands Holdings V, LLC, (Sponsor) Perry Hill II
Mitigation Bank (Bank). The project includes headwater systems that flow directly to Corporation Lake, a
water supply reservoir on the Eno River which subsequently flows into Falls Lake and eventually into the
Neuse River. The purpose of the Parcel is to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits
to compensate for unavoidable impacts in the Neuse River Basin 03020201 Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
within the Falls Lake Watershed. The Bank service area is depicted in Figure 2.
Prior to construction, the Parcel consisted of active pasture used for cattle grazing and some woodlands.
Cattle had access to all streams prior to Site implementation. In general, this area has maintained its
rural, farming character over the last 81 years with only minor changes in land cover. The Parcel was
restored to provide ecological and water quality enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by creating a
functional riparian corridor and restoring the riparian buffer. Originally 15.52 acres were protected
along the project features by the Parcel’s permanent conservation easement. A conservation easement
was recorded on the Parcel in October 2020.
In October 2021, waterlines were installed incorrectly by the tenant farmer within the Parcel’s easement
boundary. After consultation with NCDWR, Wildlands and UP2Save LLC, the long-term steward of the
site, decided that the appropriate solution was to release the area containing the waterlines from the
conservation easement. This will prevent any further easement encroachments due to maintenance of
the waterlines. Approximately 0.1 acres are to be released from the easement, leaving 15.42 acres still
protected under the conservation easement. Project credits have been reduced accordingly. A
preliminary updated conservation easement plat and an updated credit table are included in Appendix
F. Wildlands is currently working with a surveyor to mark and record the updated plat. The updated plat
and release document will be submitted to NCDWR once they are recorded with the Orange County
Register of Deeds.

1.2 Bank Sponsor
The Perry Hill II Mitigation Parcel is part of the Bank. The Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) for the
Bank was signed in October 2020.
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
Email: [e-mail]

1.3 Project History
Project history is provided in Table 1 below.
Table 1. Project Reporting History
Activity Completion Date
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC MBIOctober 2020
Bank Parcel Development Package Approved October 2020
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1
Monitoring Year 2 Report

Activity Completion Date
Conservation Easement October 2020
Bare Root PlantingApril 2021
As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Document May 2021
Year 1 Monitoring Completed October 2021
Year 2 Monitoring Completed September 2022
Updated Conservation Easement PlatTBD
1.4 Project Location
The Parcel is located in Orange County, approximately 3 miles northwest of Hillsborough, NC (Figure 1).
The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin 14-digit HUC 03020201030020 and DWR Subbasin 03-
04-01. The Parcel was restored for riparian buffer mitigation credit and nutrient offset credits in the
Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201 within the Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 2).
To reach the Parcel, traveling west on I40/85 from Raleigh/Durham, follow I40/85 to exit 161 for US-70
Connector North. Take a right at the bottom of the ramp and continue onto US-70 East (1.0 mile) via US-
70 Connector North. Continue on US-70E (1.9 miles) before taking a left onto Faucette Mill Road.
Continue (1.9 miles) and take a sight right onto Frank Perry Road. The Parcel will be on right (0.5 miles).

1.5 Project Design
Based on the preliminary updated conservation easement plat, included in Appendix F, approximately
15.42 acres are protected under a conservation easement and the Parcel is expected to generate 0.76
acres of Neuse riparian buffer, 1.05 acres of enhancement via cattle exclusion, and 13.46 acres of
nutrient offset credits. No credit is claimed on 0.15 acres due to distance from project features. Parcel
credit generation is illustrated in Figure 3. The revegetation plan for the Parcel included planting of bare
root trees and controlling invasive species growth. Bare root and live stake trees selected for the Parcel
were native riparian, wetland, and upland species typical for piedmont communities as defined by
Schafale and Weakley (1990). Adjacent forested areas were also used as a reference for the Parcel. Tree
species selected for planting on the Parcel as well as size specifications, planting density, and plant
composition are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2. Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Planting Density
Scientific Name Common Name Size (feet)
Planting
(Stems/Acre)
Composition
Bare Roots
Betula nigra River Birch 2-3122 20%
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 2-394 15%
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 2-373 12%
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum2-358 9%
Quercus alba White Oak 2-358 9%
Ulmus alata Winged Elm2-350 9%
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood2-331 8%
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 2-329 5%
Quercus falcata Southern Red Oak 2-329 5%
Oxydendrum arboreum Sourwood 2-329 5%
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2
Monitoring Year 2 Report

Planting Density
Scientific Name Common Name Size (feet)
Planting
(Stems/Acre)
Composition
Bare Roots
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak 2-33
Acer negundo Boxelder 2-33
Ulmus americana American Elm 2-32
Quercus phellos Willow Oak2-32
Asimina triloba Pawpaw 2-32
Acer floridanum Southern Sugar Maple 2-31
Viburnum prunifolium Blackhaw Viburnum2-31
3%
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak 2-3<1
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood2-3<1
Live Stakes (Planted in Wetland Areas)
Salix nigra Black Willow1-3<1
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 1-3<1
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry1-3<1
Salix sericea Silky Willow 1-3<1
Totals 618 100%
Natural recruitment of desirable Character Tree species shall be counted towards the survival and
success rate of the restored site. “Character Trees” are defined as planted or volunteer species
identified from a survey of local vegetation on less degraded sections of the specified stream and from
reference literature that details native species. A list of Character Tree species (other than the planted
species) is included in Table 3.
Table 3. Character/Existing Tree Species
Scientific Name Common Name Wetland Indicator Status
Acer rubrum Red Maple FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum FAC
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash FACW
Celtis laevigata SugarberryFACW
Carya ovata Shagbark HickoryFACU
Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red CedarFACU
2.0Vegetation Monitoring
2.1 Success Criteria
Buffer vegetative success criteria are based upon the density and growth of Character Tree species as
defined in Tables 2 & 3. Vegetative success criteria arebased upon guidelines set forth in the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015) and is defined as
a success rate equivalent to 260 live stems per acre at the end of the 5-year monitoring period.
If vegetative success criteria are not achieved based on acreage density calculations from combined
monitoring plots over the entire restoration area, or if an inspection of a buffer restoration site indicates
that portions of the Parcel do not have sufficient stem densities or are otherwise deficient,
supplemental planting shall be performed with tree species approved by NCDWR. Supplemental
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3
Monitoring Year 2 Report

planting shall be performed as needed until vegetative success criteria are met. No quantitative
measurements of herb assemblages will be required to meet the vegetative success criteria.
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
The quantity of monitoring plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling
(CVS) Protocols (Level II) such that at least 2 percent of the Site is encompassed in monitoring plots. A
total of 11 plots (10 meters by 10 meters) were established within the credit generation area. PVC pipe
was used to mark the four corners of the plots. Monitoring plot locations are shown in Figure 4. GPS
points were taken at each of the corners. A reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of
each plot (Appendix D). All planted stems within the plots were marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Total numbers of tree species planted within the monitoring plots as well as planting density and plant
composition are detailed in Table 4.
Table 4. Monitoring Plot Summary – Planting (As-Built)
Total Stems Calculated Planting Density
Scientific Name Planting Composition
Flagged(Stems/Acre)
Betula nigra 29 107 19%
Diospyros virginiana 13 489%
Nyssa sylvatica 14 529%
Oxydendrum arboreum 9 336%
Platanus occidentalis 22 8114%
Populus deltoides 16 5911%
Quercus alba 17 6311%
Quercus falcata 8 295%
Quercus rubra 8 295%
Ulmus alata 17 6211%
Totals 153 563 100%
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring
The 11 vegetation plots were sampled in September 2022 at the end of the growing season. A reference
photo was taken from the southwest corner of each plot, which can be found in Appendix D along with
the stem count raw data. Total numbers of tree species identified within the monitoring plots as well as
density and composition are summarized in Table 5. Vegetation result tables with planted stem density,
and stem count by plot and species are summarized in Appendix C.
The 2022 vegetation monitoring resulted in an average planted stem density of 475 stems per acre,
which is well above the final requirement of 260 stems per acre. All vegetation plots individually exceed
the final stem density requirement by more than ten percent; with planted stems per acre ranging from
405 to 607. No one species comprises more than 50 percent of stems and all plots include 6 or more
planted species. Volunteer stems include desirable species, such as American persimmon (Diospyros
virginiana), hickory species (Carya spp.), and winged elm (Ulmus alata).
Table 5. Monitoring Plot Summary – Year 2
Total Stems Calculated Planting Density
Scientific Name Planting Composition
Flagged(Stems/Acre)
Betula nigra 25 9219%
Diospyros virginiana 13 4810%
Nyssa sylvatica 12 449%
Oxydendrum arboreum 2 8 2%
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4
Monitoring Year 2 Report

Total Stems Calculated Planting Density
Scientific Name Planting Composition
Flagged(Stems/Acre)
Platanus occidentalis 22 8117%
Populus deltoides 165913%
Quercus alba 8296%
Quercus falcata 8 296%
Quercus rubra 7 265%
Ulmus alata 16 5913%
Totals 129475100%
2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management
As was discussed in Section 1.1, 0.1 acres were released from the conservation easement due to the
installation of waterlines in October 2021. The disturbed area was seeded and herbaceous vegetation
has grown over the disturbance. The soil is stabilized, and Wildlands does not anticipate any future
problems in these areas. Updated pictures of the areas are included in Appendix F.
While planted trees are growing well, pasture grasses are still thick. To ensure planted trees remain
competitive, herbicide ring sprays were applied around the base of trees where necessary in April 2022.
Southwest of the lower crossing, thick agricultural weeds were also mechanically removed from around
planted trees to reduce competition. Areas where blackberry (Rubus spp.) was competing with trees
were treated with a foliar spray application of triclopyr. Wildlands plans to re-apply herbicide in rings
around planted trees in areas of thick herbaceous competition and treat aggressive blackberry growth
as needed in spring of 2023.
Additionally, follow up treatments were done on the intermittent Tree-of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima)
stems via cut stump application of triclopyr in August 2022. Occasional resprouts of Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) were treated in March 2022.
Wildlands will continue to monitor for invasive species resprouts and additional treatments will be
applied as necessary.
Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented in the event
the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in the BPDP.
Parcel maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include but are not limited to; excess tree mortality
caused by fire, flooding, drought, or insects. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria.
2.5 Conclusions
Vegetation across the Parcel is thriving and exceeding performance standards. Monitoring Year 2 data
shows an average density of 475 planted stems per acre across vegetation plots, with individual plots
ranging from 405 to 607 planted stems per acre. When including volunteer species, the average stem
density increases to 556 stems per acre with individual plots ranging from 405 to 728 stems per acre.
The Parcel is on track to exceed the final success criteria of 260 stems per acre at the end of Monitoring
Year 5. Desirable volunteer species, such as American persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), hickory species
(Carya spp.), and winged elm (Ulmus alata) are establishing themselves. Herbaceous vegetation is also
flourishing across the Parcel. Wildlands will continue to monitor the health of planted trees and invasive
species and treat them as necessary. Wildlands is in the process of recording a new conservation
easement plat to correct the conflict with the waterline. The final plat and partial release document will
be submitted to NCDWR as soon as they have been recorded with the Register of Deeds. Wildlands
anticipates this will be done in early 2023.
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5
Monitoring Year 2 Report

3.0References
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. October 2004.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from
http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
Peet, R.K., T.R. Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S. 1990. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation.
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC. 2020. Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient and Buffer Banking
Instrument. NCDWR, Raleigh NC. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6
Monitoring Year 2 Report

YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Met?*
Threshold
Vegetation
76866676769
Species
Number
of Planted
607728567445445526567688607405526
Acre
Stems per
Total Living
607486486405405486486526486405445
Planted Living
Stems per Acre
1518141111131417151013
Total
Living
Stems
06211124302
Stems
Volunteer
12134412321
Stems
Missing
1512121010121213121011
Living
Stems
Planted
Easting
1962933.901962384.481962024.661961676.381961215.821961392.831960858.541961526.391961904.681962340.471962200.32
Northing
85165.9585966.90
858380.89857930.51857716.59857670.66857287.05857389.06859118.40858518.78859193.07
22222222222
Year
123456789
1011
Plot
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 2 - 2022
*Target density is a minimum of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period.

T 2321326
13
526
2221326
1
12
486
P-all
0.02
VP 6
2221326
12
486
PnoLS
21131127
T
11
445
2131126
1
10
405
P-all
0.02
VP 5
2131126
10
405
PnoLS
T 21111237
11
445
2111236
1
10
405
P-all
0.02
VP 4
2111236
10
405
PnoLS
T 2223111119
14
567
223111118
1
12
486
P-all
0.02
VP 3
Current Plot Data (MY2 2022)
223111118
12
486
PnoLS
1312213212
T
1810
728
3132126
1
12
486
P-all
0.02
VP 2
3132126
12
486
PnoLS
31332127
T
15
607
31332127
1
15
607
P-all
0.02
VP 1
31332127
15
607
PnoLS
size (ares)
Stem count
size (ACRES)
Species count
Species Type
Shrub TreeTreeTreeTreeShrub TreeTreeShrub TreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree
Stems per ACRE
Common Name
SilverlingRiver BirchHickory sp.Mockernut HickoryNorthern HackberryAmerican PersimmonLocust sp.Honey LocustBlack WalnutSweet GumBlack GumSourwoodSycamoreEastern CottonwoodWhite OakSouthern
Red OakNorthern Red OakWinged Elm
Scientific Name
Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
All Planted Stems
All Woody Stems
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 2 - 2022 BaccharisBetula nigraCarya sp.Carya tomentosaCeltis occidentalisDiospyro
s virginianaGleditsia sp.Gleditsia triacanthosJuglans nigraLiquidambar styracifluaNyssa sylvaticaOxydendrum arboreumPlatanus occidentalisPopulus deltoidesQuercus albaQuercus falcataQuercus
rubraUlmus alata Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than
10%Volunteer species included in total AbbreviationsPnoLS - P-all - T -

1121111122
T
1310
526
1111111229
1
11
445
P-all
0.02
VP 11
1111111229
11
445
PnoLS
2122126
T
10
405
2122126
1
10
405
P-all
0.02
VP 10
2122126
10
405
PnoLS
222221138
T
15
607
22221127
1
12
486
P-all 0.02
VP 9
22221127
12
486
PnoLS
Current Plot Data (MY2 2022)
341214118
T
17
688
3314116
1
13
526
P-all
0.02
VP 8
3314116
13
526
PnoLS
322211218
T
14
567
32211217
1
12
486
P-all
0.02
VP 7
32211217
12
486
PnoLS
size (ares)
Stem count
size (ACRES)
Species count
Species Type
Shrub TreeTreeTreeTreeShrub TreeTreeShrub TreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree
Stems per ACRE
Common Name
SilverlingRiver BirchHickory sp.Mockernut HickoryNorthern HackberryAmerican PersimmonLocust sp.Honey LocustBlack WalnutSweet GumBlack GumSourwoodSycamoreEastern CottonwoodWhite OakSouthern
Red OakNorthern Red OakWinged Elm
Scientific Name
Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
All Planted Stems
All Woody Stems
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 2 - 2022 BaccharisBetula nigraCarya sp.Carya tomentosaCeltis occidentalisDiospyro
s virginianaGleditsia sp.Gleditsia triacanthosJuglans nigraLiquidambar styracifluaNyssa sylvaticaOxydendrum arboreumPlatanus occidentalisPopulus deltoidesQuercus albaQuercus falcataQuercus
rubraUlmus alata
Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species
included in total AbbreviationsPnoLS - P-all - T -

988
T
2913142216171710
153563
988
2913142216171710
11
153563
P-all
0.27
MY0 (2021)
988
2913142216171710
153563
PnoLS
11887
T
2813132216171712
151556
887
2813132216171710
11
149548
P-all
0.27
MY1 (2021)
Annual Means
887
2813132216171710
149548
PnoLS
11221822887
T
25171222161717
151556
2887
25131222161610
11
129475
P-all
0.27
MY2 (2022)
2887
25131222161610
129475
PnoLS
size (ares)
Stem count
size (ACRES)
Species count
Species Type
Shrub TreeTreeTreeTreeShrub TreeTreeShrub TreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree
Stems per ACRE
Common Name
SilverlingRiver BirchHickory sp.Mockernut HickoryNorthern HackberryAmerican PersimmonLocust sp.Honey LocustBlack WalnutSweet GumBlack GumSourwoodSycamoreEastern CottonwoodWhite OakSouthern
Red OakNorthern Red OakWinged Elm
Scientific Name
Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
All Planted Stems
All Woody Stems
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 2 - 2022 BaccharisBetula nigraCarya sp.Carya tomentosaCeltis occidentalisDiospyro
s virginianaGleditsia sp.Gleditsia triacanthosJuglans nigraLiquidambar styracifluaNyssa sylvaticaOxydendrum arboreumPlatanus occidentalisPopulus deltoidesQuercus albaQuercus falcataQuercus
rubraUlmus alata Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than
10%Volunteer species included in total AbbreviationsPnoLS - P-all - T -

Veg Plot 1 - Year 2
Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
1 Ulmus alata 0.51.6103
2 Platanus occidentalis 0.3 4.0 82
3 Populus deltoides 0.1 6.1 190
4 Diospyros virginiana 0.0 8.6 82
5 Nyssa sylvatica 2.08.3109
6 Betula nigra 2.6 5.8 126
7 Platanus occidentalis 3.3 3.6 300
8 Nyssa sylvatica 4.1 1.4 55
9 Ulmus alata 8.8 0.2 97
10 Nyssa sylvatica 8.11.190
11 Quercus alba 7.3 2.7 88
12 Betula nigra 6.9 6.1 136
13 Populus deltoides 6.2 5.2 216
14 Platanus occidentalis 5.5 8.1 220
15 Betula nigra 9.1 8.2 150
16 Betula nigra 9.7 6.8 Missing
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 2 -Year 2
Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
17 Platanus occidentalis 0.2 3.2 213
18 Ulmus alata 1.42.390
19 Betula nigra 2.2 1.5 78
20 Populus deltoides 3.3 0.2 283
21 Platanus occidentalis 8.8 0.4 232
22 Quercus alba 7.4 2.0 Missing
23 Populus deltoides 6.13.5236
24 Quercus falcata 5.0 4.5 97
25 Ulmus alata 3.0 6.4 75
26 Platanus occidentalis 0.98.1270
27 Betula nigra 5.6 9.4 85
28 Quercus alba 6.8 8.2 Missing
29 Nyssa sylvatica 7.8 7.2 57
30 Betula nigra 9.2 6.0 79
Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 3 - Year 2
Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
31 Ulmus alata 3.2 0.2 160
32 Betula nigra 1.5 1.4 75
33 Quercus rubra 0.3 2.8 130
34 Platanus occidentalis 1.28.4400
35 Diospyros virginiana 2.6 6.9 210
36 Quercus falcata 3.8 5.6 105
37 Platanus occidentalis 5.43.9300
38 Nyssa sylvatica 6.7 2.9 Missing
39 Diospyros virginiana 8.3 1.6 65
40 Betula nigra 9.4 5.1 141
41 Platanus occidentalis 7.8 6.5 290
42 Quercus alba 6.3 7.8 88
43 Populus deltoides 4.8 9.1 370

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 4 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
44 Oxydendrum arboreum 0.92.0Missing
45 Quercus alba 2.5 2.3 112
46 Ulmus alata 4.0 2.3 151
47 Quercus alba 5.3 2.3 Missing
48 Betula nigra 7.52.3109
49 Ulmus alata 8.9 2.3 105
50 Populus deltoides 8.7 7.2 415
51 Quercus alba 6.9 6.9 131
52 Betula nigra 5.3 6.8 50
53 Nyssa sylvatica 3.86.880
54 Ulmus alata 2.4 6.7 167
55 Platanus occidentalis 0.5 6.6 315
56 Quercus rubra 0.3 4.3 Missing

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 5 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
57 Quercus falcata 0.94.294
58 Ulmus alata 2.5 3.4 98
59 Platanus occidentalis 4.1 2.8 176
60 Nyssa sylvatica 5.6 2.2 Missing
61 Ulmus alata 7.21.7107
62 Diospyros virginiana 8.8 1.3 127
63 Platanus occidentalis 8.7 5.2 260
64 Betula nigra 7.2 5.6 92
65 Quercus rubra 5.6 5.8 86
66 Platanus occidentalis 3.76.4127
67 Quercus alba 2.4 7.1 Missing
68 Betula nigra 0.9 7.1 73
69 Oxydendrum arboreum 7.2 9.5 Missing
153 Betula nigra 8.7 9.0 Missing

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 6 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
70 Nyssa sylvatica 1.40.487
71 Diospyros virginiana 3.1 0.3 89
72 Oxydendrum arboreum 4.6 0.1 Missing
73 Oxydendrum arboreum 6.2 0.2 Missing
74 Betula nigra 7.80.1Missing
75 Betula nigra 8.4 4.1 129
76 Populus deltoides 6.4 4.2 224
77 Platanus occidentalis 4.0 4.1 260
78 Quercus falcata 2.0 4.2 179
79 Populus deltoides 0.54.2332
80 Nyssa sylvatica 1.0 8.0 74
81 Diospyros virginiana 2.4 7.8 80
82 Populus deltoides 3.9 7.8 279
83 Quercus alba 5.4 8.0 Missing
84 Betula nigra 7.2 7.8 47
85 Quercus falcata 8.7 7.7 94

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 7 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
86 Betula nigra 1.2 2.8 97
87 Ulmus alata 3.2 2.0 79
88 Quercus rubra 5.6 0.8 23
89 Nyssa sylvatica 10.0 2.2 80
90 Quercus alba 8.23.3Missing
91 Quercus rubra 6.7 4.1 109
92 Betula nigra 5.0 5.0 147
93 Diospyros virginiana 2.35.9139
94 Nyssa sylvatica 0.6 7.0 52
95 Platanus occidentalis 4.29.7305
96 Populus deltoides 6.3 9.0 400
97 Betula nigra 8.0 8.3 155
98 Diospyros virginiana 9.8 7.4 125

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 8 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
99 Oxydendrum arboreum 9.20.4Missing
100 Platanus occidentalis 10.0 4.7 123
101 Populus deltoides 8.9 4.0 101
102 Diospyros virginiana 7.6 2.9 68
103 Ulmus alata 5.92.3111
104 Platanus occidentalis 4.1 1.8 290
105 Diospyros virginiana 2.6 1.2 111
106 Betula nigra 0.9 0.5 Missing
107 Betula nigra 0.4 4.0 68
108 Diospyros virginiana 1.45.157
109 Oxydendrum arboreum 2.9 5.9 44
110 Betula nigra 4.4 6.9 87
111 Betula nigra 5.7 7.6 83
112 Platanus occidentalis 7.4 8.6 245
113 Platanus occidentalis 0.7 8.5 227

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 9 -Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
114 Betula nigra 0.41.191
115 Betula nigra 8.9 0.2 100
116 Oxydendrum arboreum 7.3 1.2 Missing
117 Quercus alba 5.4 2.5 74
118 Nyssa sylvatica 3.63.955
119 Populus deltoides 1.7 4.9 133
120 Ulmus alata 0.3 5.7 81
121 Oxydendrum arboreum 0.6 9.0 Missing
122 Nyssa sylvatica 1.9 8.8 49
123 Populus deltoides 3.87.7126
124 Quercus alba 5.5 6.6 74
125 Quercus alba 7.3 5.5 Missing
126 Quercus alba 9.0 4.6 65
127 Quercus rubra 9.0 8.6 94
128 Quercus falcata 7.5 9.5 143

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 10 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
129 Diospyros virginiana 0.23.768
130 Quercus falcata 1.8 3.8 97
131 Quercus alba 3.8 3.9 70
132 Populus deltoides 6.2 4.1 98
133 Platanus occidentalis 8.35.0115
134 Betula nigra 8.4 8.1 54
135 Ulmus alata 6.2 7.5 Missing
136 Populus deltoides 3.7 7.2 110
137 Quercus alba 1.3 6.8 Missing
138 Betula nigra 0.16.790
139 Platanus occidentalis 0.2 9.6 250
140 Quercus falcata 2.1 9.8 85

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 11 - Year 2

Tree IDSpecies X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
141 Quercus rubra 6.61.6100
142 Ulmus alata 7.9 3.8 80
143 Quercus alba 9.4 6.0 93
144 Oxydendrum arboreum 7.8 9.7 65
145 Nyssa sylvatica 6.67.744
146 Betula nigra 5.3 5.4 86
147 Platanus occidentalis 4.1 3.6 144
148 Populus deltoides 2.6 0.8 98
149 Ulmus alata 0.9 4.6 93
150 Quercus alba 2.16.8Missing
151 Quercus rubra 3.3 8.4 150
152 Diospyros virginiana 4.1 9.9 71

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

—————
0.0000.0000.0000.0007.1150.000
167.156259.151361.554
Nutrient
1,175.929
Delivered
Offset: P (lbs)
—————
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
N (lbs)
110.467
2,595.2814,023.5985,613.512
Delivered
18,257.571
Nutrient Offset:
NoNoNoNo
YesYesYesYesYes
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Offset?
Nutrient
Convertible to
——————
0.000
Credits
CreditsCredits
201.000
5,752.0004,304.3521,522.0009,901.0001,293.2693,005.0006,093.000
1,984.2331,970.904
12,361.000
32,984.00032,882.00011,618.43611,550.62144,602.43644,432.62130,807.38030,600.429
Riparian Buffer
0
———
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
32,98432,88246,24245,83179,22678,713
Buffer?
590,391586,425
Riparian
Riparian
Square FeetSquare Feet
Buffer Credits
Convertible to
Nitrogen:
1.000002.000006.060611.000001.000002.000006.060611.000001.00000
Ratio (x:1) Ratio (x:1)
Final Credit Final Credit Phosphorus:
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Restoration:
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Preservation:
Enhancement:
Mitigation TotalsMitigation Totals
33%33%33%33%33%33%33%
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
Total Riparian Buffer:
Offset:
Nutrient
% Full Credit% Full Credit
11221111221111
Ratio (x:1)Ratio (x:1)
Initial Credit Initial Credit
)
)
2
2
0
402
0.0%
Total 1,5229,9017,8383,0056,093 Total
11.6%
11,50478,71326,238
12,46312,36126,49826,087
(Creditable) (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ftArea for Buffer Mitigation (ft
):):
)
22
2
2,117
49,73677,108
107,577586,425
353,853349,887
Total Area (sf)
Total Area (ft
Totals:
EC1EC1EC3EC3
UT1UT1UT2UT2UT2UT2
Eligible for Preservation (ft
Preservation Area Subtotal (ft
Perry BranchPerry BranchPerry BranchPerry Branch
Feature NameFeature Name
0-1000-1000-1000-1000-1000-1000-100
/pound)
/pound)
2
101-200101-200101-200101-200101-200101-200101-200
2 Preservation as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation:
Width (ft)Width (ft)
Min-Max Buffer Min-Max Buffer
Ephemeral Reaches as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation:
ExclusionExclusionExclusionExclusion
RestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestorationRestoration
Preservation
Mitigation ActivityMitigation Activity
Enhancement via Cattle Enhancement via Cattle Enhancement via Cattle Enhancement via Cattle
Project AreaN Credit Conversion Ratio (ftP Credit Conversion Ratio (ft
I / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / PI / P
EphemeralEphemeralEphemeralEphemeral
Feature TypeFeature Type
)
1
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
YesYesYesYesYesYes
ditch
Subject? Subject?
(enter NO if
ephemeral or
19.16394
297.54099
RuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRuralRural
LocationLocation
40264.785
Neuse 03020201 - Lower Falls Lake
BufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBufferBuffer
9097.72
40264.785
Credit TypeCredit Type
Nutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient OffsetNutrient Offset
Table 8. Updated Project Credits Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 2 - 2022Enter Preservation Credits Below 1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches
to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).last updated 01/17/2020

VEGETATION AREAS OF CONCERN UPDATED PHOTOGRAPHS
Conservation Easement Encroachment

Perry Branch R2– CE EncroachmentSeeded and Stabilized (10/19/2022)

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix F: Vegetation Areas of Concern Updated Photographs – Conservation Easement Encroachment

Perry Branch R4– CE EncroachmentSeeded and Stabilized (10/19/2022)

Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix F: Vegetation Areas of Concern Updated Photographs – Conservation Easement Encroachment