Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310821_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20221220Division of Water Resources Facility Number O Division of soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency Type of Visit: IQCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 'e) Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: ArrivalTime: t Departure Time: County: Farm Name: e n 1 P! r P^L Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: /v� Certified Operator: / (' ` n Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Shine Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feede Farrow to Finisl Gilts Boars Other Phone: Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. _ _ Layer I I I Non -La er Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the Ctatr nth,, than from a dicrharae7 Region: Wb Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No [—]Yes No ❑ Yes `jrtt�! to ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Facility Number: Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Structure 1 Identifier: I Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? Structure 5 ❑ Yes ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑No ❑NA ❑NE Structure 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (P No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes tR] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .�] No ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ NA ❑ NE Facilit Number: a Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No the appropriate box(es) below. fe ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes P No 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ip NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [Q] No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA U NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). GCord<, J 60v yv't CV-e,, brv-�PfV7-26a3 '���.1-;'C Reviewer/Inspector Name: ^`Q(In\ pr�Phone: