20191467 Ver 2_B-5323 Reverification file submittal package 12162022_20221216

(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)
46037.1.1 TIP No.:B-5323 County(ies):Granville Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
No
Design/Future:Year:2025 Existing:Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes N/A
No
N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
ac.
2 @ 9' lanes
1040
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Class BNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
N/ABuffer Rules in Effect:Johnson Creek (Kerr Lake)
mercury (Hg)
520
2 @ 11' lanes, 4' shoulders
Waterbody Information
2013
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
46037.1.1
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
State project B-5323 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #143 on SR 1442 over John H. Kerr Reservoir. Bridge #143 consists of 1@34.9', 1@45', 1@35',
1@44.9' timber floor on I-Beams with timber caps and piles. The proposed bridge consists of 2@45', 2@55' 21" cored slab with 4'-0" caps. The effective FEMA floodplain
mapping indicates that the proposed crossing is located in Zone AE and was studied by Limited Detail Study methods. No deck drains are required for the bridge.
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address:
General Project Information
B-5323
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
Reid Robol, PE-VHBNCDOT Contact:
919-707-6711
Raleigh, NC 27606
Contractor / Designer:
919-754-5005
[e-mail]
Address:
12/12/2022
Granville
Galen Cail, PE
Raleigh, NC 27610
River Basin(s):
City/Town:
0.5
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
Primarily agricultural land and rural residential.
John H. Kerr Reservoir 23-2-(6)
0.3
0.132 miles
Project Description
Proposed Project
Roanoke
None
Supplemental Classification: None
Wetlands within Project Limits?
DAVE WINSTON ROAD - SR 1442
JOHN H KERR RESERVOIR
JOHN H KERR RESERVOIR
DAVE WINSTON ROAD - SR 1442
E
X
IS
T
E
X
I
S
T
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
.
0
8
.
0
4 .
0
7
.
0
4
.0
6
.0
3
.0
5
.0
2
.0
4
.0
1
.0
3
.0
0
.0
2
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
3
.0
3
Road
Williamson
1444
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Tilly
1446
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Winston
Charlie
1437
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Wilkerson
Propus
1441
Road
Jack Yancey
1451
Road
Pittard
1448
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
George Ruff
1454
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Virgilina
Grassy Creek-
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Shiney Rock
VA 723
Road
Williamson
VA 725Road
Henrico
VA 727
Creek
Grassy
Creek
Marrow
Spew
VIRGINIA
NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
END
N.C.

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTHDESIGN DATAGRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
1:
18
:
5
6

P
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
li
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
5
3
2
3
_
H
Y
D
_
P
R
M
_
W
E
T
_
T
S
H
.
d
g
n
e
b
e
r
g
e
r
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
IO
N
T
A TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
=
=
CLASS =
V
SUBREGIONAL TIER
LOCAL
RURAL
450 VPD
60 MPH
PE
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
N/A
VICINITY MAP
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
(GRASSY CREEK RD.)
SR 1431TO
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- POT Sta. 13+65+/-
END BRIDGE
-L- POT Sta. 15+67+/-
-L- POT Sta. 18+00.00
= 0.095 mi.
= 0.038 mi.
= 0.133 mi.
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
GRANVILLE COUNTY
T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
B
-
5
3
2
3
4
BRIDGE NO. 143 OVER JOHNSON CREEK
ON SR 1442 (DAVE WINSTON RD.)
46037.1.1
-L- POC Sta. 11+00.00

VIRGINIA
TO
OFF-SITE DETOUR
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5323
END TIP PROJECT B-5323
B-5323
2018 ADT
=900 VPD2038 ADT
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5323
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-5323
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5323
-L- POT Sta. 20+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
N/A
N/A UTILITIES
ROW
SR 1442 (DAVE WINSTON RD.)
-L-
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
Prepared in the Offices of:
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
COMPLETE:
RIGHT OF WAY
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
MICHAEL BURNS, PE
ANDY YOUNG, PE
NCDOT CONTACT
LISA GILCHRIST, EI
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
www.stewartinc.com
Firm License #: C-1051
T 919.380.8750
RALEIGH, NC 27603
223 S. WEST ST, STE 1100
OCTOBER 31, 2018
-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III.
N/A CONSTRUCTION17BP.5.R.92
17BP.5.R.92
17BP.5.R.92
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
OCTOBER 31, 2019
AUGUST 13, 2020

A
NIL
O
RAC HTRO
N
L
A
NOISSEFO
RP
REENIGN
E
AND
R
EW
. O UNG
YP
034407
SEAL
PR OFESS
IO
N
A
L
E
NG INEER
N ORTH CARO
LINA
SEAL 043870

EID
B. ROBORL
APRIL 12, 2023
VICINITY MAP
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
B
-
5
3
2
3
OFF-SITE DETOUR
Road
Williamson
1444
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Tilly
1446
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Winston
Charlie
1437
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Wilkerson
Propus
1441
Road
Jack Yancey
1451
Road
Pittard
1448
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
George Ruff
1454
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Virgilina
Grassy Creek-
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Shiney Rock
VA 723
Road
Williamson
VA 725Road
Henrico
VA 727
Creek
Grassy
Creek
Marrow
Spew
VIRGINIA
NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
END
SHEET 1 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD ___.
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NAD 83/ NA 2011
SITE 1
Road
Williamson
1444
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Tilly
1446
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Winston
Charlie
1437
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Wilkerson
Propus
1441
Road
Jack Yancey
1451
Road
Pittard
1448
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
George Ruff
1454
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Creek
Grassy
Creek
Marrow
Spew
NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
END
Road
Williamson
1444
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Tilly
1446
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Faucette
Herbert
1445
Road
Winston
Charlie
1437
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Dave Winston
1442
Road
Wilkerson
Propus
1441
Road
Jack Yancey
1451
Road
Pittard
1448
Road
Harry Davis
1443
Road
George Ruff
1454
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Road
Creek
Grassy
1431
Creek
Grassy
Creek
Marrow
Spew
NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
END
NAD 83/NA 2011
DDE = 640 CY
STR. PAY ITEM STR. PAY ITEM
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-1 &
TO STA 13+66 LT
FROM STA 11+50
ROCK PLATING
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-3 &
TO STA 13+66 RT
FROM STA 12+50
ROCK PLATING
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-1 &
TO STA 17+50 RT
FROM STA 15+66
ROCK PLATING
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-3 &
TO STA 17+50 LT
FROM STA 15+66
ROCK PLATING
3' WD RAIL
3' WD RAIL
WD CURB
WD CURB
MTL
MTL
MTL
MTL
SEAT=306.40'
SEAT=306.38'
SEAT=306.29'
SEAT=306.21'
-EL-
-EL-
DAVE WINSTON ROAD - SR 1442
S
S
S
S S
S S
S
S
JOHN H KERR RESERVOIR
JOHN H KERR RESERVOIR WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NO REFERENCE
NO REFERENCE
NO REFERENCE
NO REFERENCE
RIP-RAP
RIP-RAP
RIP-RAP
RIP-RAP
& 3SBWWD RUINS
BRIDGE #143
DAVE WINSTON ROAD - SR 1442
LINES WERE PARTIALLY COMPUTED AND PARTIALLY DIGITIZED
OF ENGINEERS INSTRUMENT NUMBER DA-44-110-CIVENG-60-125
AND DATED OCTOBER, 1959 AND REFERENCED IN U.S. ARMY CORPS
"N.C. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION JONATHAN CREEK KERR RESERVOIR"
AND UNCERTIFIED MAP BY W. F. COOKE, JR. ENTITLED
WERE TAKEN FROM AN EXHIBIT "A" BEING AN UNRECORDED
NOTE: "EASEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES"
EXIST RWEXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
1
1
1
1
.0
3
.
0
5
.0
2
.0
4
.0
1
.0
3
.0
0
.0
2
.0
1
.0
2
P
C
C

S
t
a
.

11+
0
6
.
4
7
P
T

S
t
a
. 12
+
3
1.3
8
15 2
0
P
O
T

S
t
a
. 2
0
+
4
6
.3
3
11'
11'
11'
+
5
0
.
0
0
+
5
0
.0
0
-L- POC Sta. 11+00.00
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5323
-L- POT Sta. 18+00.00
END TIP PROJECT B-5323
E
X
IS
T
E
X
I
S
T
+
15
.0
0
25'
INC.=
(TYP.)
+
8
5
.0
0
PI Sta 10+53.32
D
L = 106.47'
T = 53.32'
R = 750.00'
PI Sta 11+69.00
D
L = 124.91'
T = 62.53'
R = 1,020.00'
-L-
8:1
8:1
8:1
8:1
(TYP.)
25'
INC.=
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
11'
+
4
7
.2
5
+
7
4
.5
0
-L- POT Sta. 20+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
.
0
8
.
0
4 .
0
7
.
0
4
.
0
6
.0
3
.0
5
.0
2
.0
4
.0
1
.0
3
.0
0
.0
2
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
3
.0
3
BL-4
BM-1
BM-2
B5323-3
B5323-2
S = Exist.e
V = 50 MPHD
S = 4%e
-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
LT. & RT.50' TAPER
LT. & RT.
50' TAPER
LT. & RT.
4' TO 5.75'
50:1 FDPS TAPER
LT. & RT.
4' TO 5.75'
50:1 FDPS TAPER
EST 280 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 205 TONS
ON BENCH
CLASS II RIP RAP
EST 290 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 215 TONS
ON BENCH
CLASS II RIP RAP
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
15
"
15
"
2:
1 D
B
( Not to Scale)
Flatter1.5:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 17+00 TO STA. 20+00 -L- RT
DETAIL 1
B= VARIABLE
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
+87.00 RT
END SBG
+87.00 LT
END SBG
LANDING AREA
45' WIDE BARGE
DETAIL 2
(NOT TO SCALE)
NG
NG
1.5:11.5 :1
1.0'
CLASS B RIP RAP
CLASS II RIP RAP
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
GEOTEXTILE
MIN ELEV=301'
SEE DETAIL 2
TEMP. CAUSEWAY
BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
TO CONDUCT THE WORK IN A DEWATERED AREA WILL BE PROPOSED
ABUTMENTS MUST BE CONDUCTED BEHIND IMPERVIOUS DIKE. THE METHOD
NOTE: REMOVAL OF UNCLASSIFIED STRUCTURE EXCAVATION AT EXISTING
NCDOT BMP METHODS.
REMOVAL OF THE CONCRETE BENTS MUST BE DONE USING APPROVED
THE MUDLINE FOR ALL EXISTING AND OLDER BRIDGE COMPONENTS. THE
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPETELY REMOVE OR CUT OFF AT
4

1:
19
:
4
5

P
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
5
3
2
3
_
H
Y
D
_
P
R
M
_
P
S
H
0
4
.
d
g
n
e
b
e
r
g
e
r
PAVEMENT-BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
NOTE: NOT TO SCALE
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
4
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
B-5323
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
1
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-27
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NAD 83/NA 2011
-L- Sta. 13+53.81
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L- Sta. 13+64.69
BEGIN BRIDGE
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
3
6
'
-
0
"
C
LE
A
R
2
2
'
5
'
-
9
"
-L- Sta. 15+67.31
END BRIDGE
-L- Sta. 15+78.01
END APPROACH SLAB
5
'
-
9
"
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
+87.00 RT
END SBG
+87.00 LT
END SBG
SHORING
TEMPORARY
SITE 1
SHEET 2 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
Runoff = 100'
F
F F
F
F
F
F
F
C
DDE = 640 CY
STR. PAY ITEM STR. PAY ITEM
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-1 &
TO STA 13+66 LT
FROM STA 11+50
ROCK PLATING
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-3 &
TO STA 13+66 RT
FROM STA 12+50
ROCK PLATING
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-1 &
TO STA 17+50 RT
FROM STA 15+66
ROCK PLATING
SEE SHEET 3G-1
SEE SHEET 2C-3 &
TO STA 17+50 LT
FROM STA 15+66
ROCK PLATING
290
2 9 0
2
9
0
2
9
0
2
9
0
2
9
0
2
9
5
295 295
2
9
5
295
295
2
9
5
2
9
5
2
95
2
9
5
295
295
2
9
5
295
295
295
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
3
0
0
3
0
0
300
3
0
0
300
300300
300
3
0
0
300
3003
0
0
3
00
305
305
305
305
305 305
305305
305
305
305
305
30
5
305
305
305
305305
305
3
0
5
305
305
305
3
0
5
310
310
3
1
0
3
10
310
310
310
310
3
10
3
1
0
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
315
3
15
315
315
315
315
315
315
3
15
320
3
2
0
320
320
325
3' WD RAIL
3' WD RAIL
WD CURB
WD CURB
MTL
MTL
MTL
MTL
SEAT=306.40'
SEAT=306.38'
SEAT=306.29'
SEAT=306.21'
-EL-
-EL-
DAVE WINSTON ROAD - SR 1442
S
S
S
S S
S S
S
S
JOHN H KERR RESERVOIR
JOHN H KERR RESERVOIR WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NO REFERENCE
NO REFERENCE
NO REFERENCE
NO REFERENCE
RIP-RAP
RIP-RAP
RIP-RAP
RIP-RAP
& 3SBWWD RUINS
BRIDGE #143
DAVE WINSTON ROAD - SR 1442
LINES WERE PARTIALLY COMPUTED AND PARTIALLY DIGITIZED
OF ENGINEERS INSTRUMENT NUMBER DA-44-110-CIVENG-60-125
AND DATED OCTOBER, 1959 AND REFERENCED IN U.S. ARMY CORPS
"N.C. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION JONATHAN CREEK KERR RESERVOIR"
AND UNCERTIFIED MAP BY W. F. COOKE, JR. ENTITLED
WERE TAKEN FROM AN EXHIBIT "A" BEING AN UNRECORDED
NOTE: "EASEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES"
EXIST RWEXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
EXIST RW
1
1
1
1
.0
3
.
0
5
.0
2
.0
4
.0
1
.0
3
.0
0
.0
2
.0
1
.0
2
P
C
C

S
t
a
.

11+
0
6
.
4
7
P
T

S
t
a
. 12
+
3
1.3
8
15 2
0
P
O
T

S
t
a
. 2
0
+
4
6
.3
3
11'
11'
11'
+
5
0
.
0
0
+
5
0
.0
0
-L- POC Sta. 11+00.00
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5323
-L- POT Sta. 18+00.00
END TIP PROJECT B-5323
E
X
IS
T
E
X
I
S
T
+
15
.0
0
25'
INC.=
(TYP.)
+
8
5
.0
0
PI Sta 10+53.32
D
L = 106.47'
T = 53.32'
R = 750.00'
PI Sta 11+69.00
D
L = 124.91'
T = 62.53'
R = 1,020.00'
-L-
8:1
8:1
8:1
8:1
(TYP.)
25'
INC.=
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
GREU, TL-3
11'
+
4
7
.2
5
+
7
4
.5
0
-L- POT Sta. 20+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
.
0
8
.
0
4 .
0
7
.
0
4
.
0
6
.0
3
.0
5
.0
2
.0
4
.0
1
.0
3
.0
0
.0
2
.0
1
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
3
.0
3
BL-4
BM-1
BM-2
B5323-3
B5323-2
S = Exist.e
V = 50 MPHD
S = 4%e
-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
LT. & RT.50' TAPER
LT. & RT.
50' TAPER
LT. & RT.
4' TO 5.75'
50:1 FDPS TAPER
LT. & RT.
4' TO 5.75'
50:1 FDPS TAPER
EST 280 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 205 TONS
ON BENCH
CLASS II RIP RAP
EST 290 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 215 TONS
ON BENCH
CLASS II RIP RAP
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
15
"
15
"
2:
1 D
B
( Not to Scale)
Flatter1.5:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 17+00 TO STA. 20+00 -L- RT
DETAIL 1
B= VARIABLE
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
+87.00 RT
END SBG
+87.00 LT
END SBG
LANDING AREA
45' WIDE BARGE
DETAIL 2
(NOT TO SCALE)
NG
NG
1.5:11.5 :1
1.0'
CLASS B RIP RAP
CLASS II RIP RAP
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
GEOTEXTILE
MIN ELEV=301'
SEE DETAIL 2
TEMP. CAUSEWAY
BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
TO CONDUCT THE WORK IN A DEWATERED AREA WILL BE PROPOSED
ABUTMENTS MUST BE CONDUCTED BEHIND IMPERVIOUS DIKE. THE METHOD
NOTE: REMOVAL OF UNCLASSIFIED STRUCTURE EXCAVATION AT EXISTING
NCDOT BMP METHODS.
REMOVAL OF THE CONCRETE BENTS MUST BE DONE USING APPROVED
THE MUDLINE FOR ALL EXISTING AND OLDER BRIDGE COMPONENTS. THE
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPETELY REMOVE OR CUT OFF AT
4

1:
2
0
:
2
0

P
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
5
3
2
3
_
H
Y
D
_
P
R
M
_
P
S
H
0
4
_
C
O
N
.
d
g
n
e
b
e
r
g
e
r
PAVEMENT-BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
NOTE: NOT TO SCALE
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
4
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
B-5323
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
.0
1
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-27
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NAD 83/NA 2011
-L- Sta. 13+53.81
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L- Sta. 13+64.69
BEGIN BRIDGE
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
3
6
'
-
0
"
C
LE
A
R
2
2
'
5
'
-
9
"
-L- Sta. 15+67.31
END BRIDGE
-L- Sta. 15+78.01
END APPROACH SLAB
5
'
-
9
"
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
.0
2
.0
2
.0
2
+87.00 RT
END SBG
+87.00 LT
END SBG
SHORING
TEMPORARY
SITE 1
SHEET 3 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
Runoff = 100'
F
F F
F
F
F
F
F
C
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2110
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
320
330
340
RE
VIS
IO
N
S

SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
10
:
3
3
:
3
5

P
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
5
3
2
3
_
H
Y
D
_
P
F
L
0
5
.
d
g
n
t
c
u
l
p
e
p
p
e
r
B-5323
5
/
2
8
/
9
9
5
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
320
330
340
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
240
230
220
210
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
240
230
220
210
350
360
370
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
-L-
FOR -L- PLAN VIEW, SEE SHEET 4
EL. 309.85'
-L- STA. 18+00.00
END GRADE
EL. 308.61'
-L- STA. 11+00.00
BEGIN GRADE -L- STA. 13+64.69
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 15+67.31
END BRIDGE
R/R SPIKE IN 16" OAK
N 23°33'12.24" E Dist 1056.71
BL STATION 5+00.00
N 1013817 E 2114690
BM-2 ELEVATION = 308.71
PI = 12+55.00
EL = 309.54'
(+)0.5968%(-)0.3000%
VC = 180'
K = 201
PI = 16+85.00
EL = 308.24'
VC = 200'
K = 118
(-)0.3000%(+)1.3957%
1.5
:1
1.
5
:
1
(+) 3.7%
E
L
E
V
=
2
9
9
.3
'
S
T
A
=
17
+
0
0
B
E
G
IN

D
IT
C
H

R
T
E
L
E
V
=
3
10
.4
'
S
T
A
=
2
0
+
0
0
E
N
D

D
IT
C
H

R
T
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA

DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 5100
= 25
= 300.1
= 7106
= 100
= 303.7
= 28577
= 500+
= 308.5

= 09/20/2017
= 296.0
NORMAL POOL ELEV = 300.0'
DATE OF SURVEY 9/20/2017
WS ELEV = 296.0'
DITCH LEGEND
RIGHT DITCH
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-27
1.5
:1
1.
5
:
1
(+) 3.7%
E
L
E
V
=
2
9
9
.3
'
S
T
A
=
17
+
0
0
B
E
G
IN

D
IT
C
H

R
T
E
L
E
V
=
3
10
.4
'
S
T
A
=
2
0
+
0
0
E
N
D

D
IT
C
H

R
T
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA

DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 5100
= 25
= 300.1
= 7106
= 100
= 303.7
= 28577
= 500+
= 308.5

= 09/20/2017
= 296.0
NORMAL POOL ELEV = 300.0'
DATE OF SURVEY 9/20/2017
WS ELEV = 296.0'
SHEET 4 OF 5
PERMIT DRAWING
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac)(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 11+33/17+58 L 2@45', 2@55' 21" Cored Slab w/ 4' CAPS 0.22 0.03
1 10+44/13+83 L RT Temporary Causeway (Barge landing area)0.34
TOTALS*: 0.22 0.38 0 0 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Site 1 9583 16117
Total 9583 16117
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 5 OF 5
WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
GRANVILLE COUNTY
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
12/15/2022
Pemanent SW
Impacts
(Sq. Ft.)
Temporary
SW Impacts
(Sq. Ft.)
B-5323

12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 1/14
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction
in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Granville County, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 2/14
Local oce
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Oce
 [phone]
 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Oce Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 3/14
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population even if that sh does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and project-specic information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an ocial
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1
2
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 4/14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are
regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location:
Mammals
Clams
Insects
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is nal critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Monarch Buttery Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 5/14
Flowering Plants
Critical habitats
Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
NAME STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739
Endangered
Smooth Coneower Echinacea laevigata
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Threatened
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
1 2
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 6/14
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation
Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds
on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a
guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the
general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models
detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information
about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly
interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
BREEDING SEASON
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-
incidental-take-migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/les/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.pdf
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 7/14
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project
area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please
make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey eort (see below) can be used to establish a level of condence in the presence score. One can have
higher condence in the presence score if the corresponding survey eort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 8/14
 no data survey eort breeding season probability of presence
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is
the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Eort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys.
To see a bar's survey eort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC Vulnerable
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 9/14
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specied location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 10/14
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your
location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the proles provided for each bird in
your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area,
there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed
in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore
energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also oers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 11/14
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence"
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to conrm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be conrmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject to the restrictions on Federal
expenditures and nancial assistance and the consultation requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Oce or visit the CBRA
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a ow chart to help determine whether consultation is
required and a template to facilitate the consultation process.
There are no known coastal barriers at this location.
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 12/14
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted on the ocial CBRS maps. The
boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the
"CBRS Buer Zone" that appears as a hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an ocial determination by following the instructions here:
https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seaward
extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the oshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, oshore wind
energy or oil and gas projects) may be subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
[e-mail].
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no sh hatcheries at this location.
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 13/14
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on-site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional
information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional dierences in
polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1Ch
LAKE
L1UBHh
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
12/13/22, 11:48 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/4F62LSFRTNAR7A3IDVWU6FFMOM/resources 14/14
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a dierent manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may aect such activities.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS# 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

June 2, 2022

Attention: Chris Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies

From: Mitchell C. Wimberley
Division 5 Environmental Office

Subject: Smooth coneflower update for B-5323 in Granville County: Replacement of
Bridge 143 on SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road) over Johnson Creek (Kerr
Lake)

Mr. Murray,

Please accept this letter as a summary of the efforts made and resulting findings on the part of
NCDOT Division 5 to update the biological conclusion of smooth coneflower for the above
referenced project.

Smooth coneflower: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location. Limited
habitat for smooth coneflower is located within the project study area, particularly within the
portion along the woods edge. A plant by plant survey of the project study area was
conducted on June 1, 2022. No specimens were found during the survey, therefore, a
biological conclusion of No Effect is rendered for this species.

Investigators:

Heather Montague
Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 5

Mitchell Wimberley
Environmental Specialist
NCDOT Division 5

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
[e-mail] or at [phone].

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS# 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

March 7, 2022

Attention: Chris Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies

From: Mitchell C. Wimberley
Division 5 Environmental Office

Subject: Bald eagle and Harperella update for B-5323 in Granville County:
Replacement of Bridge 143 on SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road) over Johnson
Creek (Kerr Lake).

Mr. Murray,

Please accept this letter as a summary of the efforts made and resulting findings on the part of
NCDOT Division 5 to update the status of Bald eagle and Harperella for the above
referenced project.

Bald eagle: IPaC does NOT identify potential for this species at the project location. Habitat
for Bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water
for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 miles of
open water. Based on an examination of aerial photography and the site investigation
conducted on March 2, 2022, potential habitat exists within the project study area due to the
presence of Kerr Lake. A review of NCNHP records, March 7, 2022, revealed no known
occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project location. No bald eagles or nest
trees were observed in the project study area or within 660 feet of the study area during a
visual survey conducted on March 2, 2022. Due to the lack of known occurrences and lack of
species or nest trees observed during the visual survey, a biological opinion of No Effect is
rendered for this species.

Harperella: Habitat for this species does not exist within the project study area. The study
area is comprised mainly of hardwoods and young pines alongside the existing bridge
structure over Kerr Lake which does not consist of rocky, sandy, or gravelly shoals on the
edges of a swift flowing stream system. Additionally, review of the NCNHP database
indicates no known occurrences of the species within 1.0 miles of the study area. Due to the
lack of suitable habitat and no known occurrences, a biological opinion of No Effect is
rendered for this species.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS# 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

June 3, 2019

Attention: Chris Murray, Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
NCDOT Division 5 Project Delivery Unit

From: Heather W. Montague
Division 5 Environmental Officer

Subject: Bald Eagle and Smooth Coneflower Update for B-5323 in Granville County;
Replace Bridge No. 143 over Johnson Creek on SR 1442 (Dave Winston
Road).

Mr. Murray,

Please accept this letter as a summary of the efforts made and resulting findings on the part
of NCDOT Division 5 to update the status of bald eagle and smooth coneflower for the above
referenced project.

Species: Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)

Survey Date: May 31, 2019

Habitat Description/Survey Information: A desktop-GIS assessment of the study area, as
well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits (the
review area), was performed on May 29, 2019 using 2016 color aerial photography. The
study area spans a southwestern leg of John H. Kerr Reservoir (an immersed floodplain of
Johnson Creek), which is large enough and sufficiently open to be considered a potential
feeding source for bald eagle. Trees along the shoreline offer suitable roosting and nesting
habitat for bald eagle. Since there is suitable habitat within the study area, a survey of the
study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was conducted during the May
31, 2019 site visit. No bald eagle nests occur in the study area and withi n 660 feet of the
project limits, and no individuals of this species were identified during the field survey.

Length of Survey: 1/2 Person Hour

Findings: Due to the field survey results and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it
has been determined that this project is unlikely to adversely affect this species

Mr. Chris Murray
June 3, 2019
Page 2

Species: Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)

Survey Date: May 31, 2019

Habitat Description/Survey Information: The day of the site visit, a visit to the Snow Hill
Road location in Durham, NC found smooth coneflower to be in bloom. Habitat for this
species exists within the maintained roadsides and forest edges within the study area. A
systematic survey of all areas of potential habitat was conducted on May 31,2019. No
individuals of this species were identified during the survey.

Length of Survey: 1/2 Person Hour

Biological Conclusion: No Effect, but Habitat Present

Investigators:

Heather Montague
Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 5

Trey Lineberry
Summer Engineering Assistant
NCDOT Division 5

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
[e-mail] or at [phone].

cc: B-5323 project file

Investigators:

Heather Montague
Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 5

Mitchell Wimberley
Environmental Specialist
NCDOT Division 5

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
[e-mail] or at [phone].

AooRESS REPLY TO;
DISTRICT ENGINEER
U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGi NEERS
P. 0 .. BOX 8fl9
.SAVAtOf~, GEORGIA
REFER TO FILE HO.
r ! .. ,/
u·. s: ARMY ENG I NEER DI STR I CT,
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
200 EA.ST ST. JULI AN STREET
SAVANNAH, GEORG I A
CHANGE ORDER.NO.
TO
SAVANNAH
/'
INSTRUMENT. NUMBER DA-44-110-Cl VENG-6o.;.,125
. JOHN H. KERR DAM & RESERVOIR
(HEREIN DES I GNATED AS NO. DA-09-133-CI VENG-62-281)
WHEREAS, ·on ..,--"--""'1...,l._·...,Ma=pr.y..,.....1 .... 9.,.6"'!'0--=-------' the Government.did grant unto
. (date)
a . Easement. on Tract No. ct-161,3tJ~•H. Kerr Dam &
(lease, permit, 1 i cense, easement).
Reservoir for 'improvem.en·t of road
· (pu.rpose of instrument)
for· a per i od · of -----"""l.,.n="=e=f=i=n=i=te--.'f .... e=a=r...,s""---------"-----· comme_n c i n g on
(term in months or years)
_ _.1 .... 1.._ . ..,M..,a.~~'--""'1.,.96KOIWI.-_________ • arid ending IndeftnU:.e · ; and
WHEREA~, the U~ S. Army Engineer District, Savannah, has been assign~d real
estate responsibility in li.eu of U.S. Army Engineer District, Norfolk, effective
1 July 1961~ for the administration of ·this instrument; and .
WHEREAS, it has been adminfstratively determined to be expedient for control
purposes· to assign a ne~ number to the aforesaid instru~ent; and
WHEREAS, the captioned instrument provided for payment of rental due under.
the terms of this instrument to District Engineer, Norfolk, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, it has been administratively determined tha.t payment of rental due
under the terms of the instrument shall be paid to the District Engineer, U. S.
Army Engineer Di stri c,t, Savann_ah •
. NOW THEREFORE~ it is hereby ordered that effective as of 1 Ju 1 y 1961:
a. _T,he sai~ i nstr~men~ is. hereby numbered DA-09-133-Cl VENG-62-mn_..
b. Any renta 1 due under. the terms of· the instrument sha 11 be paid to
the District Engineer; U. S.-~rmy Engin~er District, Savanoah, P. 0. Box 889,
Savannah, Georgia.
THIS
'·.
DISTRIBUTION:
RE Fi le .
Grantee
/Res Mgr
,/ Wi l DE
31~U: day of ---·1-u..-:il)I'-" --~--h-~--~­
~ ~DLE, JR.~ .
AREM Chief, Real Estate Division
F&A
P&C
M&D
SASVE FORM 651, 20 JUL 61 (ONE-TIME)
1~ l . \
DEPARTMENT OF TH~.'A·R:ivl\:
. Contract No. EASEMENT FOR ROAD o~ sr'~El;T ' DA-~-1 IO-CIVENG;..60-125
·; ~.
. JOHN H •. ,!<ERR DAM & RESERVOIR PROJECT• VA-N .. C. . '. '• PN ' _________________________________________________________ : _____________________________ . _________ : ________________________ _
··.·.,:· .... ' .) .
THE SECRET ARY OF THE ARMY, under and by virtue of the authority vested in him by Title
10, United States Code, Section 2668 hereby grants to
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION
hereinafter designated as the grantee, an easement for a 'right-of-way for a road or street over, across,
in, ·and upon lands of the United States described as follows:
ALL THOSE CERTAIN strips or parcels of land• aggregating 0.95 acre, more or
less, located In the Granville County, North Carol Ina portion of the John H.
l<err Dam & Reservoir Project where the Dave Winston Road crosses Jonathan .
Creek, b!ln~.portlon~ ?f .Tracts.9-,161~, 9-1~.•.7~i'ln~ 9-1648,,~m;t.,11_1c;>r~.,Pf!i;"ticularly
descrl.bed ! and:·'delf neated· 1 n l red·"on-inapt·marked 'Extlib it' "A" attachea 1 hereto and
made .a part hereof •
. i ~ '.: :. \. t'' , .. f' \.
RESERVING unto \the: Government~ however, in· connection wittl the ·operatio'n' ant:f
maintenance of the John H. Kerr Dam & Reservo Ir Pro Ject, the r I ght to f I ood
the·~··right ··cH ''way· 'here:in 9tanted''~nd ~ny .struc::.~~r:·e pl a.9ed, ~hetc:!pn,• .... \ , ..
~~E:xhihit..; .. ~ : ."'attaohed,,.hf%~t~iyujpm,ade.(lpparA;.hieiPe&f,.-·
'1 ~ ' ~ > -' • ' • ' • ' ' ' ' \ • • ,. •
. 'fHI$ EASEMENT ~ granted subject to the following pr9visioris and con4itions :. : · , .
' \ 1. The constriictio~, Use, a'n.d .maintenance of said road or str.eet, including, ~Ul'Q(}rts a;w,'~the~
1 1. : . ·,\ . > ,,, 1 • ' • •' .··,. ., • .,\ '
drainage facilities, ·shall be performed without cost or expense to the United States, under the gen-
rpr:al supervision arid subiect to the approval of the officer having immediate jurisdiction over said
' ' . .
premises.
2. f he· grantee shall ·at all times maintain . said road or· street in. 'tJo~d co~.d~tion and shall
promptly 111'ake all repairs thereto needed to preserve a smooth-surface highway. '
, 3. Any property of the United States damaged or destr.oyed by the. grantee, .~ncident to the
use dnd ·Occupation of the said prerrJ,ises shal.l be promptly repaired oi'.repwced ,by f;'llfe grp,ntee t9 th?
sattsfaction .of the said officer, or in lieu of such repair or replacement the grantee shall, if so r.equired
by said officer, pay to the United States money in an amount sufficient Jo. co.mp~~te for the .. '/Pss
~~tained by the United States by reason qf damages to or destruc#on.of G-over~1fbf31"',~ property~·;
,' •1 -. . ,
. • ~ • . ' '. . . • ' • ' ' ' . ' l \ . ' ' • ' -. . • ' ' \ c. '\"
4. The use ·and occupation of said lands of the United States for the purposes authorized by
thif? instwment shall be .subject to ·such rules and regulations as the said officer may prescribe from
time'io ti;;;,~ in.order to.properly protect the interests of the United States.
5. Th(3 United States .shal.l in no. case be lf,able for any dq,magef! or inj'lfr.ies .to the' said roail
0
or
street ivhich may be caused by ·Or result from any ope:rQ,tiori,s undertake.n by the Government,. and,
no c'lairrJ, or right to compensation shall accrue from su~h:(]µmag~ or injuries. . , ... ·.·, •. '. ..
' • • • -, • --"t
I
I
ENG FORM 547 1 NOV 56
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE 16-73035-1 I
I
I
6. The United States reserves the right fo make such connections between the road Qr street
herein authorized and roads and streets on said lands as the Chief of Engineers may ,#om time to
tirne consider necessary, and also reserves to itself rights-of-way for ctll purpose[/;ct~~ds~~:,'<!J;.~[;
and/or un.der the right-of-way hereby gr.anted; provided, however, that such rights shall' be used
in a manner that will not c;reate unnecess.ary inter! erence with the use and enjoyment by the grantee
of said right-of-way f9r highway purposes. , .·. ",,/' '·• ... , .'. : .. ~~· ..
7. It is to be understood that this instrument is effective only insofar as the r.i;hts ~'/the if~ited
S.tates in the property over which the said road or street is to be extended are concerned,\a,~d ,.that
ihe grantee shall obtain such permission as may be neoe.ssary on account of ·any otlif:r f3~.isii~i ciu~t§• . ., . . . . ~
. 'i ' ~t' ':1 . ' . . ', .':. .. :.-~'
8. All or any part of such right-of-way herein .granted may be terminated by tJre,S_~c'f'>f!t.a.riJ, of
the Army for failure to comply with any or. all of the terms or conditions of this griant, Qr,jor;~n~if,~
use for rci two-year period ·or abandonnient of rights granted herein. · ·
9. It is understood that the provisiOns of Conditions Nos. 1 and 5, supra, slyall n,ot abrogat<q or,,
interfere with any agreements or commitments made or entered into between the grantee and any
other agency of the United States with regard to ·financwl aid to the gr.antee in oonnection with
the construction, maintenance, or repair of the 1Foad or street describ·ed herein.
10. The United States shall not be responsible for damages to property or injitr~es· to P,ersons
which may arise from or be .incident to the use and occupation of the said premises, nor /Qr.damages
to the pr.operty of the grantee, or for iniuries to the person of the grantee (if an individwal), nor for
damages to the property or injuries to the person of the grantee's officers, agent;, '.iiervants, or
f(.7J1,PfOY~es, or others wfi<J niay be on said premises at their invitation or. the invitation ·of. any one
of them, arising from or incident to governmental •a,ctivities, ~f}ro-'flif;ee-s:'bfJibb-hf>lii-tihe-Ynif;eiJ.r-
~States ... ha)rmf:eitI"'fffmlrany•an.drf.tll~s®hJclaims..-· : : · · · · · . ! ' · · •
' ' I l ! ~ • •
11. The United States shall not be responsible {or' damages to property or' infu/ries to ii~rs~iis
which 1nay arise from or be incident to the construction, mainte'J'llance, and use of said road or street.
•I
' I
./
This ~:~s·e;,_ent is not subject to Title 10, Unite.d Sfotes Code,' Section 2662.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand this , //.d... / .
day of /J1.4f 196"',, by dred.£..,,v ofl 7'k ,As.fr&r.a .... -1-
<P fl -It~ /J,.""f,
U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 16-73035-:1'
.y J?. F /J/e~audler_ er:::: ~/-c:.~.,tl.,,.4'er
~41ve.I, Gs
~,/fr ve-
t) ;i/ S'/f cNi ·;fF}
'. ~ : 1,
COM&AOM'fr!Al TH OF Vi RGI NI A )
) SS
COUNTY OF ARl I NGTON )
On this the B Ith day of __ ..,.,;.,M.ay,__ ___ ........ 1960.,
persona I I y appeared _____ R;.;;."...-F' .. --.A_•.e .... x..,.an:\ ... , d.e.._f' ______ ~· knovm
to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
instrumeint and acknov1ledgedl that ,he executed the same for the
purposes therein contatined~
In witness whereof a hereunto set my hand and officlai seal.
My Comm1ssion Explresa
Lloyd T. Ford$ Notary P~bUc
County of Arlington
State of Virginia
A~y Commission Expires 17 Sept. 1960
(SEAL)
s/ Lloyd Te Ford
Notary Pub I ic
Ar.I ington County., Virginia
-
I
I
I
/

Mr. Christopher Murray
North Carolina Deaprtment of Transportation
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:

Coast Guard review of your proposed project as provided in your letter and in your email dated
January 25, 2022, is complete.

Based on the documentation provided and our research, it is determined that a Coast Guard
Bridge Permit will not be required for the proposed highway fixed bridge – SR 1442 (Dave
Winston Road) across Johnson Creek/John H. Kerr Reservoir/Roanoke River, at location
[36.534198, -78.610343] near Stovall, Granville County, NC.

The project will be placed in our Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 exemption category for
the location and structure described above and is valid for five years from the date of this
letter. The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 exempts bridge projects from Coast Guard
Bridge permits when the bridge project crosses non-tidal waters which are not used, susceptible
to use in their natural condition, or susceptible to use by reasonable improvement as a means to
transport interstate commerce. The following conditions apply to this determination:

a. If the construction project on the above bridge does not commence within this time, you
must contact this office for reaffirmation of this determination.

b. Future bridge projects along the above waterway will have to be independently evaluated
before they may be considered for placement in the Coast Guard Authorization Act of
1982 exemption category. This includes modification, replacement and removal of the
above bridge, following its initial construction.

In addition, the requirement to display navigational lighting at the aforementioned bridge is
hereby waived, as per Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 118.40(b). This waiver may be
rescinded at any time in the future should nighttime navigation through the proposed bridge be
increased to a level determined by the District Commander to warrant lighting.

Commander United States Coast Guard Fifth Coast Guard District
431 Crawford Street Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004 Staff Symbol: dpb Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] 16591 16 MAR 2022

16591
16 MAR 2022

2
The fact that a Coast Guard Bridge Permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of the project.

If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Michael Thorogood at the above listed
address or telephone number.

Sincerely,

HAL R. PITTS
Bridge Program Manager
By direction

Copy: CG Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Federal Highways Administration, Raleigh, NC

1 Updated 4/7/17
Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion Action
Classification Form
STIP Project No.B-5323
WBS Element 46037.1.1
Federal Project No.BRZ-1442(3)
A. Project Description:
The proposed project involves replacing Bridge No. 143 on SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road)
over Johnson Creek/John H. Kerr Reservoir in Granville County. The replacement
structure will be a bridge approximately 170 feet long providing a minimum 33-foot six-inch
clear roadway width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes and five-foot nine-inch
offsets. The proposed offsets and 42-inch rails will accommodate bicycles. The bridge
length is based on preliminary design information and is set by hydraulic requirements. The
roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing
structure.
Project construction will extend approximately 270 feet from the southern and
approximately 240 feet from the northern end of the new bridge. Two 11-foot lanes will be
provided along SR 1442 within the project limits. Minimum two-foot wide grass shoulders
are required (seven-foot wide shoulders are required if guardrail is utilized). Eight-foot six-
inch shoulders (four-foot paved) with guardrail will be provided if rock plating is required.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure 1).
B. Description of Need and Purpose:
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace an obsolete bridge. The bridge is
considered functionally obsolete due to a structural evaluation appraisal of 3 out of 9 and a
deck geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9 according to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
standards.
Bridge No. 143 was built in 1960. The bridge is 161 feet long, with a clear roadway width of
approximately 19 feet. The bridge has a timber floor on I-beams. The substructure consists
of timber caps, concrete pier caps, timber piles, and concrete columns.
NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 143 has a sufficiency rating
of 30.87 out of a possible 100 for a new structure.
The superstructure and substructure of Bridge No. 143 have timber elements that are fifty-
seven years old. Timber components have a typical life expectancy between 40 to 50
years due to the natural deterioration rate of wood. Rehabilitation of a timber structure is
generally practical only when a few elements are damaged or prematurely deteriorated.
2 Updated 4/7/17
However, past a certain degree of deterioration, most timber elements become impractical
to maintain and upon eligibility are programmed for replacement. Timber components of
Bridge No. 143 are experiencing an increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer
be addressed by reasonable maintenance activities, therefore the bridge is approaching the
end of its useful life.
In addition, components of the concrete substructure have experienced an increasing
degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by maintenance activities. The
posted weight limit on the bridge is 12 tons for single vehicles and 16 tons for truck-tractor
semi-trailers. Replacement of the bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
☒TYPE I
☐TYPE II
D. Proposed Improvements.
28. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the
constraints in 23 CFR 771.117(e)(1-6).
E. Special Project Information:
Cost:The proposed project is included in the 2016-2025 State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP). Right of way acquisition and construction are scheduled for
federal fiscal years 2017 and 2018, respectively. The estimated costs for the project,
based on the current STIP, are as follows:
Construction Cost $1,500,000
Right of Way Cost $ 238,000
Total Project Cost $1,738,000
The total cost for the project included in the approved 2016-2025 STIP and draft 2017-
2027 STIP is $1,738,000. This total includes $238,000 for right of way acquisition and
$1,500,000 for construction.
Estimated Traffic:
2018 (Let Year)-223 vpd
Year 2038 -314 vpd
TTST -1%
Dual -5%
3 Updated 4/7/17
Accidents:Crash records for a recent ten year period indicate one single-car accident
occurred in the vicinity of the project. The accident involved a vehicle that ran off the road
and struck the face of the guardrail, resulting in injury and property damage. Alcohol was
suspected to be a factor. Bridge geometry was not noted as a factor.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations:This portion of SR 1442 is not a part of a
STIP bicycle project. In addition, the Granville County Comprehensive Transportation
Plan does not identify this portion of SR 1442 as an existing or recommended designated
bicycle route. Furthermore, the Kerr Tar Regional Council of Governments’ North Carolina
Lakes District Regional Bike Plan does not identify any existing or proposed bicycle
facilities along this portion of SR 1442. However, in coordination with the Kerr Tar
Regional Council of Governments, NCDOT has agreed to provide 42-inch rails on the
bridge to accommodate bicycles. The proposed five-foot nine-inch offsets will
accommodate bicycles.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 143 includes a superstructure
composed of timber and steel and can be removed by standard techniques with no
resulting fill. The substructure is composed of two end bents constructed of timber caps on
timber piles and two interior bents on concrete piers. A temporary causeway will likely be
used to remove the interior bents, which will result in temporary fill in the stream.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build –The no build alternative would result in eventually closing the road which is
unacceptable given the volume of traffic served by SR 1442.
Rehabilitation – The bridge was constructed in 1960; the concrete and timber
components of the bridge substructure are reaching the end of their useful life.
Rehabilitation would require replacing the concrete and timber components which
would constitute effectively replacing the bridge.

Offsite Detour –Bridge No. 143 will be replaced on the existing alignment. Traffic will
be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the construction period. The offsite detour was
evaluated using the NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Bridge
Replacement Projects and was found to be acceptable.
The offsite detour for this project would include SR 1431 (Grassy Creek Road), SR
1445 (Herbert Faucet Road), SR 1448 (Pittard Road), SR 1443 (Harry Davis Road), VA
723 (Shiney Rock Road) and VA 725 (Williamson Road).The speed limit on all routes
along the detour is 55 miles per hour. The detour for the average local road user living
on SR 1442 in the project vicinity would result in up to approximately six minutes
additional travel time (up to 5.25 miles additional travel). The detour for the average
4 Updated 4/7/17
through-traffic road user would result in up to approximately 3.5 minutes additional
travel time (up to three miles additional travel). Up to a 12-month duration of
construction is expected on this project.
Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that the preference of an offsite
detour requires a stronger evaluation of other project variables. In this case, Granville
County Schools Transportation Crew Lead has indicated that an offsite detour is
acceptable. Granville County’s Emergency Management Coordinator has indicated that
the project would have a moderate impact on emergency response if the bridge were
closed for up to 12 months.
Onsite Detour – An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence of an
acceptable offsite detour.
Staged Construction –Staged construction was not considered because of the
availability of an acceptable offsite detour.
New Alignment – Given that the alignment for SR 1442 is acceptable, a new
alignment was not considered as an alternative
Agency Comments:
As part of project scoping, comments were requested from state, federal and local
agencies.
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), in a memorandum dated April 27,
2017, recommended that highly protective sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices (BMPs) be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to
Johnson Creek. NCDOT will implement BMPs for erosion and sedimentation control to the
maximum extent practicable.
In addition, the DWR memorandum requested that dewatering and access measures be
discussed in the Categorical Exclusion. While construction access is determined by the
contractor once design is finalized, in general, construction access to the interior bents
and piles or shafts would be obtained by temporary riprap causeway, temporary timber
pile causeway, or floating barge. Dewatering at the vertical abutments would likely not be
required if the abutments are located outside of the lake limits.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Lakes Branch, in an April 25, 2017 e-mail,
indicated the project must be evaluated for impacts to the USACE-owned land in the
project area in accordance with the Non-Recreation Outgrant Policy (ER 1130-02-550,
Chapter 17). NCDOT will coordinate with the USACE and submit a Non-Recreation
Outgrant Request prior to final design.
5 Updated 4/7/17
The United States Coast Guard (USCG), in a letter dated April 14, 2017, indicated that a
USCG bridge permit will not be required for the bridge replacement on SR 1442 over
Johnson Creek, and noted that the project will be placed in the Coast Guard Act of 1982
exemption category.
Public Involvement:
A letter was sent to all property owners affected directly by this project. Property owners
were invited to comment but no comments were received.
In addition, a newsletter has been sent to residents living along SR 1442 in the project
study area and along the detour route. Two comments expressing support for the bridge
replacement have been received to date.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S.
The project would result in an estimated 117 linear feet/0.45 acre of permanent impact to
Johnson Creek/Kerr Reservoir resulting from placement of fill in the lake to widen the
causeway and stabilize the embankments. Impact totals are based on functional design
and extend to 10 feet beyond slope stakes. In addition, approximately 0.10 acre of
temporary impacts to Johnson Creek/Kerr Reservoir are anticipated resulting from
construction access. Impact totals will be refined upon final design.
Permits Required:
It is expected the proposed project will require a Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 23
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The lake impacts are based on an area 10 feet
outside the slope stakes per the functional design. A Nationwide Permit No. 33 may also
apply for temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or
temporary causeways that are often used during bridge construction or rehabilitation. The
Corps of Engineers holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize
project construction. If a Section 404 permit is required, then a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification from the NC Division of Water Resources will also be required.
In addition, the project will require Corps of Engineers approval pursuant to the Non-
Recreation Outgrant Policy (ER 1130-02-550, Chapter 17) for impacts to USACE-owned
land. The Non-Recreation Outgrant Policy requires no net loss of maximum storage
capacity of the reservoir. Therefore, it is anticipated that excavation will be required
somewhere in the reservoir to offset the volume of fill placed in the reservoir in order to
achieve no net loss of maximum storage capacity.
6 Updated 4/7/17
F. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:
Type I & II - Ground Disturbing Actions
FHWA APPROVAL ACTIVITIES THRESHOLD CRITERIA
If any of questions 1-7 are marked “yes” then the CE will require FHWA approval.Yes No
1 Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)?☐☒
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)?☐☒
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
reason, following appropriate public involvement?☐☒
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to
low-income and/or minority populations?☐☒
5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a
substantial amount of right of way acquisition?☐☒
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval?☐☒
7
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic
Landmark (NHL)?
☐☒
If any of questions 8 through 31 are marked “yes” then additional information will be required for those
questions in Section G.
Other Considerations Yes No
8
Does the project result in a finding of “may affect not likely to adversely affect”
for listed species, or designated critical habitat under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA)?☐☒
9 Does the project impact anadromous fish?☐☒
10
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water
(ORW), High Quality Water (HQW),Water Supply Watershed Critical
Areas, 303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?
☐☒
11 Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated
mountain trout streams?☐☒
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual
Section 404 Permit?☐☒
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) licensed facility?☐☒
7 Updated 4/7/17
14 Does the project include a Section 106 of the NHPA effects determination
other than a no effect, including archaeological remains?☐☒
Other Considerations (continued)Yes No
15 Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills?☐☒
16
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a
regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood)
elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and
23 CFR 650 subpart A?
☒☐
17
Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and
substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
☐☒
18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit?☐☒
19 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a
designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area?☐☒
20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources?☐☒
21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS),
USFWS, etc.) or Tribal Lands?☒☐
22 Does the project involve any changes in access control?☐☒
23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or
community cohesiveness?☐☒
24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption?☐☒
25
Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning
Organization’s (MPO’s) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where
applicable)?☐☒
26
Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish
Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA), or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in
fee or easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions or
covenants on the property?
☐☒
27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
buyout properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)?☐☒
28 Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)?☐☒
29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy?☐☒
30 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by
the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)?☒☐
31 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that
affected the project decision?☐☒
G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F
Question 8 – Northern Long-Eared Bat:
Although not listed for Granville County, the US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed
a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
8 Updated 4/7/17
Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT for the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers
the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and
activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May
Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB
and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years
for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Granville
County.
Question 16 – Floodplains/Floodways:Granville County is a participant in the
National Flood Insurance Regular Program. Johnson Creek is included in a limited
detailed flood study, having a regulated non-encroachment area. The Hydraulics Unit
will coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to determine
if a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a subsequent final Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) are required for the project. If required, the Division will submit sealed
as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon project completion certifying the
project was built as shown on construction plans.
Question 21 – Impact to Federal Lands: The project area impacts John H. Kerr
Reservoir and land immediately adjacent to the Reservoir, which are owned by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. NCDOT will coordinate with the USACE prior to final design,
in accordance with the Non-Recreation Outgrant Policy (ER 1130-02-550, Chapter 17).
Questions 30 – Prime and Important Farmland Soil:As required by the Farmland
Protection Policy Act, Form NRCS-AD-1006 (for point projects) has been completed
according to FHWA guidelines. Since this project received a total point value of less
than 160 points, this site falls below the NRCS minimal criteria and will not be evaluated
further for farmland impacts.
10 Updated 4/7/17
I.Categorical Exclusion Approval
STIP Project No.B-5323
WBS Element 46037.1.1
Federal Project No.BRZ-1442(3)
Prepared By:
Date Nicole Bennett, Consultant Project Manager
WSP USA
Prepared For:
Reviewed By:
Date April Annis, Project Planning Engineer
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Unit
☒Approved
If all of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of
Section F are answered “no,” NCDOT approves this
Categorical Exclusion.
☐Certified
If any of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of
Section F are answered “yes,” NCDOT certifies this
Categorical Exclusion.
Date James McInnis, Jr., PE, Project Engineer
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Unit
FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature
required.
N/A
Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
North Carolina Department of Transportation
8/3/2017
8/3/2017
8/3/2017
ú
(S
R
-
1
4
4
8
)
Harry Davis Rd
Herbert Fa
u
c
e
t
t
e

R
d
Ti
l
l
e
y

R
d
Pi
t
t
a
r
d

R
d
Vaugh
a
n

R
d
Charli
e

W
i
n
s
t
o
n

R
d
Grassy Cree
k
-
V
i
r
g
i
l
i
n
a

R
d
Wi
l
l
i
a
m
s
o
n

R
d
Farm Rd
Geor
g
e

W
i
n
s
t
o
n

R
d
Jack Yancey Rd
Grassy Creek Rd (
S
R
-
1
4
3
1
)
Herbert Faucette
Rd (SR-1445)
D a ve W i n s t o n Rd (SR-1442)
S
h
i
n
e
y

R
o
c
k
R
d

(
V
A

7
2
3
)
Harr
y

D
a
v
i
s

R
d (SR-
1
4
43)
Propus Wilk i n s o n R d
H
e
n
r
i
c
o

R
d
W
i
n
s
t
o
n

R
d
Red Store Rd
Bla
c
k

C
h
e
r
r
y

R
d
W illi a m s o n Rd (V A 7 2 5 )
Legend
ú B-5323
Detour Route
Streets
State Boundary
Water Body
0 0.5 1Miles [
Figure 1 Replace Bridge No. 143 on
S.R. 1442 (Dave Winston Road) over Johnston Creek
TIP Project B-5323
Granville County
Date: April 2017
Vicinity Map
Project Area
B-5323
VIRGINIA
NORTH CAROLINA
Study Area Map
Replace Bridge No. 143 on SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road)
over Johnson Creek
TIP No. B-5323
Granville County
Date: June 2017
Figure 2
1 Updated 4/25/17

NCDOT NEPA/SEPA Consultation Form

NCDOT STIP Project No. B-5323
WBS Element 46037.1.1
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1442(3)

A. Project Description, Location and Purpose:

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes bridge replacement
of Bridge No. 143 on SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road) over Johnson Creek/John Kerr
Reservoir in Granville County. The purpose of the proposed project is to replace a
functionally obsolete bridge. The replacement structure will be an approximately 200-foot
long, four-span, cored slab bridge with two 11-foot lanes, and five-foot nine-inch offsets
with 42-inch rails that will accommodate bicycles. The roadway approaches will have two
11-foot lanes and four-foot paved shoulders. The design speed is 60 mph. The project
length is approximately 702 feet.

Bridge No. 143 will be replaced in-place with an offsite detour. The offsite detour will begin
from SR 1431 (Grassy Creek Road), to SR 1445 (Herbert Faucet Road), to SR 1448
(Pittard Road)/VA 723 (Shiney Rock Road), and end at VA 725 (Williamson Road)/SR 1442
(Dave Winston Road); approximately 4.4 miles.

B. Consultation Phase: (Check one)

☒ Right-of-Way
☐ Construction
☐ Other:

C. NEPA/SEPA Class of Action: (Check one)

☒ FHWA TYPE I A CE August 3, 2017

Additional Notes:
The CE was approved
and signed by NCDOT

Changes in Proposed Action & Environmental Consequences:
There have been no substantial design changes. However, it has been more than one year
between the CE signing in August 3, 2017 and submittal of right-of-way plans in October
31, 2018.

The Proposed/Endangered/Threatened list for Granville County has been revised to include
the following species (with appropriate biological conclusions): Bald eagle (No Effect,
Environmental Memo dated May 19, 2017), Atlantic pigtoe (Unresolved), Dwarf
wedgemussel (No Effect, Freshwater Mussel Habitat Assessment memo update dated
February 1, 2018), Yellow lance (No Effect, Freshwater Mussel Habitat Assessment memo
update dated February 1, 2018), Harperella (No Effect, Natural Resource Technical Report
2 Updated 4/25/17

dated June 2013) and Smooth coneflower (No Effect, Environmental Memo dated May 19,
2017). The Atlantic pigtoe is not covered in the Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) for
Bridge and Culvert Replacement/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina,
NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 13, 2018). Consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) may be necessary.

The design will remove portions of the existing causeway and require additional permanent
right-of-way (ROW), permanent drainage easement (PDE), and temporary construction
easement from US Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) property at John H. Kerr Lake.
Permanent and temporary easements may impact open water habitat and reservoir
storage. Forest habitat, timber, wetlands, and recreation impacts are not anticipated. A
USACE Non-Recreation Outgrant Request (in accordance with the Non-Recreation
Outgrant Policy (ER 1130-02-550, Chapter 17) for additional permanent ROW, PDE, and
temporary construction easements was submitted to the USACE in March 2019.

A Boater Safety Plan was completed in March 2019 to address on water construction and
safe vessel operation at Bridge No. 143.

D. Conclusion:
The above NEPA/SEPA documentation has been reevaluated (as required by either 23
CFR 771 or by NC General Statute Chapter 113A Article 1). The current proposed action
is essentially the same as the original proposed action. Proposed changes, if any, are
noted below. It has been determined that anticipated social, economic, and environmental
impacts were accurately described in the above referenced document(s) unless noted
otherwise herein. Therefore, the original Administration Action remains valid.

E. FHWA Appendix C Criteria:

If any of questions 1-7 below are marked “yes” then please review NCDOT and/or FHWA
procedures prior to approval. Yes No
1 Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)? ☐ ☒
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)? ☐ ☒
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
reason, following appropriate public involvement? ☐ ☒
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to
low-income and/or minority populations? ☐ ☒
5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a
substantial amount of right of way acquisition? ☐ ☒
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval? ☐ ☒
7
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic
Landmark (NHL)?
☐ ☒

3 Updated 4/25/17

F. Coordination
NCDOT personnel have discussed the current project parameters with qualified NCDOT
representatives. The Project Manager (Lisa Gilchrist) hereby verifies the involvement of the
following staff and the incorporation of their technical input:

Design Engineer: David Ruggles, STEWART January 2019
FHWA Engineer: N/A
Environmental Specialist: April Annis, Planning Engineer January 2018
Other: Chris Murray, Project Engineer January 2019

G. Consultation Approval for NCDOT Project B-5323

Prepared By:

Date Ray Magsanoc, Consultant Project Manager STEWART

Prepared For:

Reviewed By:

Date Chris Murray, PWS - Project Engineer – Planning & Environment
NCDOT Division 5

☒ Approved
In adherence with 23 CFR 771 (NEPA) or NC General
Statute Chapter 113A Article 1 (SEPA), NCDOT approves
this Consultation.
or
☐ Certified If any of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of Section F
are answered “yes,” NCDOT certifies this Consultation.

Date Ben Upshaw, PE - Division Project Delivery Team Lead, NCDOT Division 5

FHWA Approved: FHWA signature required for Projects where an additional threshold
has been exceeded or for any Type III CE, FONSI or ROD.

N/A
Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Lisa B. Gilchrist, EI - Bridge Program Manager, NCDOT Division 5
3/13/2019
3/13/2019
3/13/2019
4 Updated 4/25/17

H. Project Commitments

Granville County
Replacement of Bridge No. 143
On SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road) over Johnson Creek/John Kerr Reservoir
Federal Project No. BRZ-1442(3)
WBS No. 46037.1.1
TIP No. B-5323

NCDOT Hydraulics Unit:

FEMA
The project may encroach but will not adversely affect the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA)-regulated stream. The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with FEMA to determine
if a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a subsequent final Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) are required for the project.

NCDOT Division 5:

Proposed Threatened & Endangered Species
The Atlantic pigtoe is not covered in the PBO-Bridge; NCDOT will schedule informal
consultation with the USFWS to confirm its biological conclusion.

USACE Non-Recreation Outgrant Request
NCDOT will continue to coordinate with the USACE for approval of the Non-Recreation
Outgrant Request.

NCDOT Division 5 Construction:

Roadway Closure
NCDOT will contact the Director of the Granville County Office of Emergency Services at 919-
603-1310 at least one month prior to road closure to allow first responders to prepare for road
closure.

NCDOT will contact the Granville County Schools Transportation Crew Lead at 919-693-6412
at least one month prior to road closure to allow school buses to prepare for road closure.

NCDOT will contact the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) South Hill Residency
Administrator at 434-744-2306 at least one month prior to road closure to allow VDOT to
prepare for road closure and to ensure no detour route access concerns on Virginia roads.

FEMA
If a CLOMR and a subsequent final LOMR are required for the project, NCDOT will submit
sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon project completion certifying the
project was built as shown on construction plans.

Hazardous Materials
The GeoEnvironmental Section will be notified immediately should construction activity
discover sites not recorded by regulatory agencies.

Page 1 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2013-00251 County: Granville County U.S.G.S. Quad: Clarksville South
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Applicant: Philip Harris III
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699
Telephone Number: 919.707-6152 (C.Rivenbark)

Size (acres) N/A Nearest Town Bullock
Nearest Waterway Roanoke River River Basin Roanoke
USGS HUC 03010102 Coordinates Latitude: 36.53418; Longitude: -78.61034
Location description: TIP B-5123; Bridge No. 34 over Johnson Creek (Kerr Lake) on SR 1442 (Dave Winston Road),
north of Stovall, NC.

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination

X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.

B. Approved Determination

There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area delineated. As the Corps may not
be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on ______________. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW-2013-00251

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer at [phone] X 23 or
[e-mail].

C. Basis For Determination: The project area contains jurisdictional waters of the US, Kerr Lake, a Section 10 water, with
ordinary high water marks, and abutting wetlands (non-Section 10).

D. Remarks: This JD was confirmed by desktop review. The drawings on the attached Figure 3, ”Jurisdictional Features Map,
Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR), Bridge No. 143, TIP B-5323, On SR 1442 Dave Winston Rd, Crossing Johnson Creek,
GRANVILLE COUNTY”, submitted by e-mail on 6 /23/2017, generally depicts the approximate boundaries and locations of potential
jurisdictional waters of the US within the study area.

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

Date: August 24, 2017 Expiration Date: N/A

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Copy Furnished (by e-mail): Sandy Smith
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC, 27603

Page 2 of 2
SAW-2013-00251

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: NCDOT, Philip Harris III File Number: SAW-2013-00251 Date: August 24, 2017
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SAW-2013-00251

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Eric Alsmeyer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403