The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150150 Ver 1_401 Application_20150215cws Carolina Wetland Services February 4, 2015 550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 866 -527 -1177 (office) 704 - 527 -1133 (fax) Ms Crystal Amschler U S Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Ms Karen Higgins NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N Salisbury Street, 91h Floor Raleigh, NC 27604 2 0 1 5 0 1 5 0 Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3 and Water Quality Certification No. 3883 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project Charlotte, North Carolina Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2015 -3532 Dear Ms Higgms and Ms. Amschler The Wmterfield Place Maintenance project is located at 3721 Wmterfield Palace in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached) The purpose of the project is to replace a failing and undersized pipe system and to prevent erosion at the pipe outlet Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water services (CMSWS) has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project Applicant Name: Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Isaac J Hinson, PWS Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: 704 - 336 -4495 Street Address of Project: 3721 Wmterfield Place in Charlotte, NC Waterway: UT to Edwards Branch Basin: Santee (HU# 03050103) City: Charlotte County: Mecklenburg Tax Parcel ID numbers: 13104226, 1310427, 131051 14, 131051 15, and 13105135 (partial parcels) Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35 208256, -80 761414 USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, North Carolina, dated 1991 Current Land Use The project area is approximately 0 5 acre in extent and consists of single family residences with maintained lawns and wooded areas near the creek (Figure 2 Aerial Imagery, attached) Typical on- site vegetation includes willow oak (Quercus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and English Ivy (Hedera helix) I NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA WWW CWS -INC NET Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance 2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storm Water Services 3. Name of Consultant /Agent: Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS *Agent authorization needs to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A 5. Site Address: 3721 Winterfield Place in Charlotte, NC 6. Subdivision Name: N/A 7. City: Charlotte 8. County: Lat: 35.208256 Long: - 80.761414 (Decimal Degrees Please) 9. Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, NC, dated 1991 10. Waterway: UT to Edwards Branch 11. Watershed: Santee (HU# 03050103) 12. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 3 General Permit # Jurisdictional Determination Request Pre - Application Request The following information will be completed by Corps office: Prepare File Folder AID: Assign number in ORM Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site /Waters Name: Keywords: Begin Date ICS am Carolina Wetland Services ..y February 4, 2015 550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD. CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 866- 527 -1177 (office) 704 -527 -1133 (fax) Ms. Crystal Amschler U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Ms. Karen Higgins NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9h Floor Raleigh, NC 27604 Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3 and Water Quality Certification No. 3883 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project Charlotte, North Carolina Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2015 -3532 Dear Ms. Higgins and Ms. Amschler: The Winterfield Place Maintenance project is located at 3721 Winterfield Palace in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The purpose of the project is to replace a failing and undersized pipe system and to prevent erosion at the pipe outlet. Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water services (CMSWS) has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project. Applicant Name: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Isaac J. Hinson, PWS Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: 704 - 336 -4495 Street Address of Project: 3721 Winterfield Place in Charlotte, NC Waterway: UT to Edwards Branch Basin: Santee (HU# 03050103) City: Charlotte County: Mecklenburg Tax Parcel ID numbers: 13104226, 1310427, 13105114, 13105115, and 13105135 (partial parcels) Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.208256, - 80.761414 USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, North Carolina, dated 1991 Current Land Use The project area is approximately 0.5 acre in extent and consists of single family residences with maintained lawns and wooded areas near the creek (Figure 2. Aerial Imagery, attached). Typical on- site vegetation includes willow oak (Quercus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and English ivy (Hedera helix). NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA WWW.CWS- INC.NET 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 and WOC No. 3883 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County' (Figures 3 and 4, USDA -NRCS Current and Historic Soil Survey Maps, attached), on -site soils consist of Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes (CuB) and Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (CeD2). Natural drainage class for both of the on -site soils is well- drained and neither of them is listed as hydric on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg Countyz or as having hydric inclusions on the National Hydric Soils L1St.3 Jurisdictional Delineation On January 29, 2015, CWS scientists Aliisa Harjuniemi and Erin Bradshaw Settevendemio (Project Wetland Scientist) delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands within the project area. This delineation was conducted according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual4, the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebooks, with further technical guidance from the Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement6, dated April 2012. Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) guidance. These classifications included sampling with a D- shaped dip net, photograph documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes classification) within each on -site stream channel. A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of non jurisdictional upland areas has been attached (DPI). The results of the wetland delineation conducted by CWS indicate that there is one jurisdictional stream channel (Stream. A) within the project limits (Figure 5, attached). Stream A is an unnamed tributary (UT) to Edwards Branch. Edwards Branch is a part of the Santee River basin (HU# 03050103)7 and is classified as "Class C Waters" by the NCDWR. According to the NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture." On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 80 linear feet (If). No jurisdictional wetlands are located within the project limits. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2013. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. 2 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA -NRCS North Carolina State Office, Raleigh 3 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2012. 2012 National Hydric Soils List by State, accessed at http: / /www.nres.usda.gov /wps /portal /nres /main /soils /use/hydric/ 'Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. ' USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating Procedures for conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD. USACE Headquarters, Washington, DC. ' US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi. ' "HU #" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. 2 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 and WOC No. 3883 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 1, below. Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Relatively Permanent Waters with Seasonal Flow Seasonal RPWs are those streams that exhibit continuous flow seasonally. This flow regime is the result of a lowering of the water table during dry periods that stops groundwater discharge to the stream channel. Seasonal streams do not typically support aquatic life requiring year -round flow to necessary for reproductive and maturation stages. Stream A flows southwest in the southern portion of the project area for approximately 80 linear feet before continuing off site (Figure 5, attached). Stream A exhibits weak groundwater flow, strong continuity of bed and bank, strong erosion, and major bank failures. Stream A was classified as a Relatively Permanent Water with Seasonal Flow (RPW) according to USACE/EPA guidance. Seasonal RPW Stream A scored 34 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and 29.5 out of a possible 69.5 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP1, attached). Photographs A -C are representative of Seasonal RPW Stream A and Photographs D -F depicts the non- jurisdictional upstream portion (SCP2) of Stream A. Agency Correspondence Cultural Resources A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on January 30, 2015 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. As of the date of submittal, no response has been received from the SHPO. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission10database and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits. Protected Species A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on January 30, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project area. As of the date of submittal, no response has been received from the NCNHP. CWS also reviewed the NCNHP elemental occurrence GIS layer. Based on this review, there are no current elemental occurrences within a mile of the project site. a Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non - Relatively Permanent Waters (Non- RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year -round flow, and seasonal streams that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a 9 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http: / /gis.ncder.gov/hpoweb /. Accessed January 30, 2015 3 Jurisdiction Stream NCDWR USACE Approx. Stream Approx USACE/EPA Jurisdictional Classification Stream Quality Length Acreage Feature Rapanos Intermittent/ Point Classification Assessment Linear (ac.) Classitication8 Perennial (SCP) Score Score Feet (If) Stream A Seasonal RPW Intermittent SCP1 29.5 34 801f 0.01 ac. Stream Total: 801f 0.01 ac. Relatively Permanent Waters with Seasonal Flow Seasonal RPWs are those streams that exhibit continuous flow seasonally. This flow regime is the result of a lowering of the water table during dry periods that stops groundwater discharge to the stream channel. Seasonal streams do not typically support aquatic life requiring year -round flow to necessary for reproductive and maturation stages. Stream A flows southwest in the southern portion of the project area for approximately 80 linear feet before continuing off site (Figure 5, attached). Stream A exhibits weak groundwater flow, strong continuity of bed and bank, strong erosion, and major bank failures. Stream A was classified as a Relatively Permanent Water with Seasonal Flow (RPW) according to USACE/EPA guidance. Seasonal RPW Stream A scored 34 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and 29.5 out of a possible 69.5 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP1, attached). Photographs A -C are representative of Seasonal RPW Stream A and Photographs D -F depicts the non- jurisdictional upstream portion (SCP2) of Stream A. Agency Correspondence Cultural Resources A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on January 30, 2015 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. As of the date of submittal, no response has been received from the SHPO. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission10database and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits. Protected Species A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on January 30, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project area. As of the date of submittal, no response has been received from the NCNHP. CWS also reviewed the NCNHP elemental occurrence GIS layer. Based on this review, there are no current elemental occurrences within a mile of the project site. a Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non - Relatively Permanent Waters (Non- RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year -round flow, and seasonal streams that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a 9 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http: / /gis.ncder.gov/hpoweb /. Accessed January 30, 2015 3 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 and WOC No. 3883 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 Purpose and Need for the Project The purpose of the project is to replace a failing and undersized pipe system and to prevent erosion at the pipe outlet. The existing pipe system is exhibiting significant erosion around and downstream of the outfall. This erosion is threatening adjacent sanitary sewer lines, fences, and trees and is resulting in sanitary sewer ruptures and downstream sediment deposition. Avoidance and Minimization Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. The proposed pipe replacement has been designed to replace the existing pipes with minimal additional piping of stream channel. For the downstream erosion, channel enhancement using natural channel design principles was considered but determined to be inappropriate at this location. Stabilization with gabion structures is proposed because the channel is extremely degraded and the ongoing erosion is compromising adjacent sewer lines, fences, and trees (Photographs A -C). The proposed design will protect property and stop ongoing sanitary sewer overflows and downstream in- channel sediment accumulation. Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3, unavoidable permanent impact to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with this project are limited to a total of 40 linear feet (0.001 acre) of stream channel (Figure 6, attached). The project proposes to replace a failing and undersized pipe system with a 48" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The pipe is being extended by 10.5 feet to eliminate a turn just downstream of the existing outlet, thereby improving alignment and preventing erosion. Downstream of the proposed outlet, 29.5 feet of channel will be impacted by gabion wall bank stabilization and the placement of reno mattresses (a flexible gabion "mat ") within the channel bottom. The reno mattress will protect the footings of gabion walls and are intended to fill in and naturalize over time. Project impacts are illustrated in Figure 6 and the attached plan set. There will also be approximately 10 if of temporary impacts downstream of gabion channel for access and erosion control (Figure 6). Table 2, below, summarizes the unavoidable impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. Table 2. Sum mar of Impacts to On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Classification Impact Type NWP Temporary / Approximate Approx. Feature No. Permanent Length (If) Acreage Pipe extension Permanent 10.5 0.0002 Gabion channel Stream A Seasonal stabilization 3 Permanent 29.5 0.0005 Temporary access and erosion Temporary 10 0.0002 control ItW Stream Impacts (Total) 501f 0.001 ac. in 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 and WOC No. 3883 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 On behalf of Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, CWS is submitting a Pre - Construction Notification Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31 (attached) and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3 and Water Quality Certification No. 3883. Compensatory Mitigation Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been limited to 40 linear feet of impaired stream channel. These impacts are intended to eliminate erosion and sanitary sewer discharges to the channel and should result in improved water quality. Due to the limited impacts, no mitigation is proposed for this project. Please do not hesitate to contact Isaac Hinson at 704 - 336 -4495 or ihinson @charlottenc.gov should you have any questions or comments regarding these findings. Isaac J. Hinson, PWS Gregg Antemann, PWS Water Quality Program Specialist Professional Wetland Scientist Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map Figure 2. Aerial Map Figure 3. Current USDA -NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Figure 4. Historic USDA -NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Figure 5. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map Figure 6. Proposed Impacts Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 3 cc: File Preliminary JD Form NCDWR Stream Classification Forms (SCP1 -SCP2) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP1 -SCP2) USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP 1) Agency Correspondence Photo page (A -F) Complete Plan Set 5 A-- 4 r - t�D _ � {Jr:µ 'ly �, �._ _ � _ � .. s `� , •- ; *�. p ; _ °' r _ 1. - ._ •� 4 Central Avenue' •q_ _ . nr - _ r n ,,,yyyrrrll,;;; q J _ F _ , r , , = -� rwa Winterfield Place ly �� x ,3° ; rF,, �'E�?-�-'4y� �t � ,�'• �, � � � ._ f , � �'• - 1. �, �_ . _ _ L T M1 `i ,j � - � 1, d: - f �• - � J �Fi = °Y fi �W .,. ia'— k Y 4T: /r� ��• '� = � -rte '4,��+'�.-:. � } rr �4.r.. f- J r _ "'� _ ,• :, - � ,, Albemarle Road •.• ,r #f' , _ _ `� my �1— :} _ 3 - , a y ...... Legend Project limits k+ .00 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC USGS QUADRANGEL, CHARLOTTE EAST, DATED 1991 AND MINT HILL, DATED 1996. Ef q SCALE: 1 " 2000' DATE 1 -29 -2015 USGS Si FIGURE- NO. Site Location Map CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY �w 2015 -3532 AVH „aN —�ad5 3721 Wintertield Place Maintenance APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: WW WOWS -� ��, • � �� Cl1ar10tteI NOYth CaY011 r1a GCA CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 6 A i� 1y. 6 V. .` Y �- • Y 1 4 o r ♦ jy* .. Jai R / u 1 %4k, i T � � �•Y r Y 6 Ar T • _ ' �� ,y,i #��t `1r.� �•' r�� •fin � - "S,e�� .r. '� # 71 •� "fit. }+� . fi T + 1 ' 'A' ,emu A� c - _ - T' y ��i,• * fit`' A, Legend Project limits 100 50 0 100 Feet REFERENCE: AERIAL IMAGRY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED JANUARY 2015. SCALE: 11 DATE: 1 100 1 1 -29 -2015 I,� Aerial Map FIGURE NO. CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY. 2015 -3532 AVHw 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance 2 PPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY WWW.CWS- 1NC.NET Charlotte, North Carolina GCA CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 �a tttJ\e� r d q �Or Q) <O�e L > o 0 a u D • E Hanna Ct CeB2 a �� t 9 e��\ \e boy or 6 c f CeD2 Maureen Dr a d \ ezk ood I /A/ H HeB 3 ° ° d�a O C u D 3� 0 O Q Q C O` bT � O o O a r U 03 Wilora Lake Rd �U . m c Y J 4 O B2 h r a 0 <u� co m N -Q moo° Y C Cry O Elkin Ln i 0 O� o Um Qt a� Ur i re 5 �a �a tttJ\e� r d q �Or Q) <O�e L > o 0 a u D • E C r �a _J Centra/ ot�a N A� 2 O CeD2 CeB2 o 31'_ CeD2 Ks t a 6 s \\\ e \\ O a 4r� S� er CeD2 01 Or c CeD2 CeB2 0 o CUB anish Quart r Cr \�oJ �a Ce Ur CeB MO HUB Q�\� ie 4 t dry �liQ CeB2 e\\ OatrP ew Ms �a CeB2 s� so �o �i90 dpt a Winfiel O \ \ a �6 E d �r Q \Noodrt\ °off o Ni M0 O p � Fair Grove e Ln emat\ i Blight Me t e \d < P \b CeB2 A Legend �1rE� Y Sprin s Dr He s /ron Project limits Gate � Soils - Description Roads CeD2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded Cdr. CuB - Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 'QO O o n 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet 7� r REFERENCE: CURRENT USDA -NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, DATED 2013 at o °O t C7 SCALE: 1" : 1000' DATE. 1 -29 -2015 Current USDA -NRCS Soil Survey FIGURE NO. CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: of Mecklenburg County 2015 -3532 AVH [�+a� aNO�a ds Nis 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance PPLICANTNO: CHECKED BY:GCA WWW'CWS-1NC•NET Charlotte, North Carolina y CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 Hanna Ct �c H a Che�d / T/ c C /A/ H HeB 3 ° ° O Q Q C C bT � O O m F W Wilora Lake Rd C �a _J Centra/ ot�a N A� 2 O CeD2 CeB2 o 31'_ CeD2 Ks t a 6 s \\\ e \\ O a 4r� S� er CeD2 01 Or c CeD2 CeB2 0 o CUB anish Quart r Cr \�oJ �a Ce Ur CeB MO HUB Q�\� ie 4 t dry �liQ CeB2 e\\ OatrP ew Ms �a CeB2 s� so �o �i90 dpt a Winfiel O \ \ a �6 E d �r Q \Noodrt\ °off o Ni M0 O p � Fair Grove e Ln emat\ i Blight Me t e \d < P \b CeB2 A Legend �1rE� Y Sprin s Dr He s /ron Project limits Gate � Soils - Description Roads CeD2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded Cdr. CuB - Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 'QO O o n 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet 7� r REFERENCE: CURRENT USDA -NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, DATED 2013 at o °O t C7 SCALE: 1" : 1000' DATE. 1 -29 -2015 Current USDA -NRCS Soil Survey FIGURE NO. CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: of Mecklenburg County 2015 -3532 AVH [�+a� aNO�a ds Nis 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance PPLICANTNO: CHECKED BY:GCA WWW'CWS-1NC•NET Charlotte, North Carolina y CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 2 U8 2 1 IF — CQD I CUB LT) r'eb Has llr -„� CUB J Ell �. J t f CeV - Central Avenue f a WFAr e Winterfield Place -' a Ur YX M CeK l� Cue 4 I .ry Soils - Description CeD2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded CuB - Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes REFERENCE: HISTORIC USDA -NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, SHEET 7, DATED 1976. SCALE: 1" : 1000' CWS PROJECT NO: 2015 -3532 ,APPLICANT NO: CuB 24 o CB2 0 Albemarle Road W w "I Legend Project limits ,.'[ 1 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet 1 -29 -2015 Historic USDA -NRCS Soil Survey FIGURE NO. BY. I of Mecklenburg County I � CWS AVFi �� Wotlantl8orv1� 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance 4 D BY: GCA WWW-CWS- INC.NET Charlotte, North Carolina CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 / 'PftARY R gHECK DAM S30.10 \\ FRACT R TO r VIE CHECK AT PRO CT M LETION O o \ O 2 . G,oa \ \ \\ JO 24" ��N OAK \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ SEPH A. KIAMU 13104226 DB 9799/PG 372 116- O \ \ \\ \\ \ ti s 3721 WINTERFIELD PLACE 24" PIN OAK �<<^ \\ tom, \\ \ \ / / / /� ♦ � . \ \ s l� \ \ / / / ♦ PR F- \\\\ \ \\ // /// ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ -HW6 3" PIN OAK CONTRACTOR TO CLEA XISTING C NEL, REGRADE TO DRAIN. TALL \ � \ \ / ♦ ♦ � CLASS I RIP RAP APRON 30'X 3.75' PROPOSED RENO MATTRE SES A GABION CONFIGURATION. SHEET 2 \ s <\ \ / ♦ F \ � \ \ � � �G X1.5'THK OF 3 GRADE TOP OF SLOPE 3:1 WH RE POSSIBLE. RESEED A APPLY SEMI \PERMANENT MATTING (SC 350) AS NECESSARY TO ST ILIZE FINAL GRADE / \\ % \�\� \ \ ♦ Q AND ALLOW FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE / \ �, �/ \ \ \ ♦ �� o�C' �0� `�, ♦♦ / ^ /�`/ / \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ SANITARY dIaNHO oS TBV = RW EL V _ 736.76' ♦♦ i �Qti SO GARLAND WgLLER ♦� ♦ / / \ \ \ \ \\ \ INV IN NE = 727.04fc,, ,(11 �♦ 13104227 \ \ 11W RV ST = 729.20' \ ' ♦ / \ \ `� \ \ II VV / COQ �� ' ♦♦ 3801 V OUT = 726.87' 18883 /PG 199 \\ \\ \aF\ Q ♦ WINTERFIELD PLACE T� ♦ ♦ \ \\ LEA \ b�, \�s \\ 50/ I ♦♦ \� ♦♦ ♦♦ \VA\ s� �P��VA\ \ \\ PR -MH5 �> r� N ♦ \ \ \ \ / I \ RELOCATE 3" GAS rcF ♦ AVAV V A �� MAIN (BY OTHERS) ♦ ♦♦ RAPHAEL A. CRUZ J +_ ♦♦ i 13105113 \ \� ss � \\ �\\ \ . G ♦ � ' , 6 I / 70 THE ROTECTION 71PG 858 \ ♦ I / FENCECLDS 4��D2 ♦♦ �� DB 2877 VA .V �,�\ ♦ / ♦ '�� 3716 WINTERFIELD PLACE \ r ♦ / I ♦ v �O �I� ♦♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -20 �� \ ♦ �� / s oM ♦ �� -� SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK r V REMOVE AND REPLAC / e% \ F� A P� -HW1 ^` of + - 25.5 TNS. ASPHALT R /� \ \\ 9! CtE PROTECTION PR -C134 F / C S 40.02 DETAIL 2 / ti ♦ / 24" GUM REMOVE ND REPLACE +/- 16 '- 3,J_PICATIONS) / �I o� O TINS. (TOTAL) ASPHALT PER DETAIL 4 �� / / / REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -13 REMOVE AND REPLACE 13 SQ YDS \ \ / 4 tL \ / / SQ. YDS. 6" CONC DRIVE 6" CONIC DRIVEWAY NC STD 848 03 \ +/ -30' TREE o ttlr PROTECTION F CE t CLDS 40.02 t PIN 0 K� 0 v�A" PIN OAK: ' N O N co � N � N N amp C N N y ' td t0 � 5 M M H IT 3 W O R Z V' Z LLI 24 A\\K U �WF a v I•- 18" PIMn. 40' TREE UEEa< LU X OKWO PROTECTION FENCE CLDS 40.02 z o_ 0.. v w Q LO 00 O \ m J - \ n L0 0') LO C S O O O L0 V A O � W MCI N M A � M ■■■■■■■ r��71�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ICI■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�IiyiWl■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■Iiii�i��i1�111■ iilri�ilii ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■L!■ J ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ®I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■_� ■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ 1■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■VI■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ROME • ■■■■■■■■■■ - . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ICI ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■�1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ill ■� - i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�Ii ■. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■ ■I■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■R. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ I i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■Iql ■ ■: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ EMEMEMMENIME - . - - M 11 . - W ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ . - ■ ■i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■; f■ ■ ■ ■ ■li��illi� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■FBI ■_ i■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■!�_ �� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1■I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■! .!! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■I ■1■ ■11 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�Il� ■■ M9 M1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■F.�Ii■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■i� ■ ■ ■11 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■� ■ ■ ■�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■__■� 11 J ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■ ■1■ ■ ■ ■ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■ ■SQ■ l ■ ■ ■■ ■■III1■/�! OR . - ... _. .EQUAL Am REEN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■EMMiMN�� N i3� . t ...� li 1 ■ Wftyj rr■ ■■ 1 1111 M III ■ ■��M■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1MEN ■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■I ■III 1■■■� s��■��■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ! _��■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■li:J ■� LE ■■ ■ii ■!■ 100I 1 MIN - u - ■■�� ■ ■ ■J �1■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■11 ■C� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■%� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■!! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■� ■ ■�J ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ I ■il 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■��'�C ■iii ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ ��:i�ii �i �r� ■iiiiiii /ITN ■ ■■ ■V ■I ■� ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■i ■ ■ ■�1,;,1, "._;;, ------__ __��■■■�■�■■■■■■ NNE .. ■ . RE I ■ ■M ■■ ■■ ■■I ldffi■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■II ■_ ■i■ ■i ■lid ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■ v ■ ■I 1 ■■l��I� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■1 ■ ■IY'�i ■ ■V ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ Ed ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ 'PftARY R gHECK DAM S30.10 \\ FRACT R TO r VIE CHECK AT PRO CT M LETION O o \ O 2 . G,oa \ \ \\ JO 24" ��N OAK \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ SEPH A. KIAMU 13104226 DB 9799/PG 372 116- O \ \ \\ \\ \ ti s 3721 WINTERFIELD PLACE 24" PIN OAK �<<^ \\ tom, \\ \ \ / / / /� ♦ � . \ \ s l� \ \ / / / ♦ PR F- \\\\ \ \\ // /// ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ -HW6 3" PIN OAK CONTRACTOR TO CLEA XISTING C NEL, REGRADE TO DRAIN. TALL \ � \ \ / ♦ ♦ � CLASS I RIP RAP APRON 30'X 3.75' PROPOSED RENO MATTRE SES A GABION CONFIGURATION. SHEET 2 \ s <\ \ / ♦ F \ � \ \ � � �G X1.5'THK OF 3 GRADE TOP OF SLOPE 3:1 WH RE POSSIBLE. RESEED A APPLY SEMI \PERMANENT MATTING (SC 350) AS NECESSARY TO ST ILIZE FINAL GRADE / \\ % \�\� \ \ ♦ Q AND ALLOW FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE / \ �, �/ \ \ \ ♦ �� o�C' �0� `�, ♦♦ / ^ /�`/ / \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ SANITARY dIaNHO oS TBV = RW EL V _ 736.76' ♦♦ i �Qti SO GARLAND WgLLER ♦� ♦ / / \ \ \ \ \\ \ INV IN NE = 727.04fc,, ,(11 �♦ 13104227 \ \ 11W RV ST = 729.20' \ ' ♦ / \ \ `� \ \ II VV / COQ �� ' ♦♦ 3801 V OUT = 726.87' 18883 /PG 199 \\ \\ \aF\ Q ♦ WINTERFIELD PLACE T� ♦ ♦ \ \\ LEA \ b�, \�s \\ 50/ I ♦♦ \� ♦♦ ♦♦ \VA\ s� �P��VA\ \ \\ PR -MH5 �> r� N ♦ \ \ \ \ / I \ RELOCATE 3" GAS rcF ♦ AVAV V A �� MAIN (BY OTHERS) ♦ ♦♦ RAPHAEL A. CRUZ J +_ ♦♦ i 13105113 \ \� ss � \\ �\\ \ . G ♦ � ' , 6 I / 70 THE ROTECTION 71PG 858 \ ♦ I / FENCECLDS 4��D2 ♦♦ �� DB 2877 VA .V �,�\ ♦ / ♦ '�� 3716 WINTERFIELD PLACE \ r ♦ / I ♦ v �O �I� ♦♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -20 �� \ ♦ �� / s oM ♦ �� -� SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK r V REMOVE AND REPLAC / e% \ F� A P� -HW1 ^` of + - 25.5 TNS. ASPHALT R /� \ \\ 9! CtE PROTECTION PR -C134 F / C S 40.02 DETAIL 2 / ti ♦ / 24" GUM REMOVE ND REPLACE +/- 16 '- 3,J_PICATIONS) / �I o� O TINS. (TOTAL) ASPHALT PER DETAIL 4 �� / / / REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -13 REMOVE AND REPLACE 13 SQ YDS \ \ / 4 tL \ / / SQ. YDS. 6" CONC DRIVE 6" CONIC DRIVEWAY NC STD 848 03 \ +/ -30' TREE o ttlr PROTECTION F CE t CLDS 40.02 t PIN 0 K� 0 v�A" PIN OAK: ' N O N co � N � N N amp C N N y ' td t0 � 5 M M H IT 3 W O R Z V' Z LLI 24 A\\K U �WF a v I•- 18" PIMn. 40' TREE UEEa< LU X OKWO PROTECTION FENCE CLDS 40.02 z o_ IN GREENB AR HOLDIN 131051 DB 277 /PG 844 3810 WI ERFIELD PLACE co / NC STD 848.03 S 30S 30S 3a � _ -- / CR \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE 11 PR -MH2 $DE +/ -4 'TREE � PRO CTION FENCE CLDS 4 02 \ Ste' PROP. 185.1 LF 48" RCP +/ -55 LF 2' -0 VALLEY ##*,- /'\\ 848.01 CURB CLDS 10.11 \ \ \\` \\ ♦♦ �� /> \ REMOVE AND EPLACE 8 "\ ♦ �� / \ \ VCP WITH 2 ' +/_ 8" D.I \ ♦ / SDE 5Z /\ PR -CB3 \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE + / -\ ♦♦ \ ♦♦ / c�g8 SDE \\ �\ \ DETAIN �. ASPHALT PER \\ ♦ \ OVE AND REPLACE U 10" \ s e'er \ \ \ \ • \, ♦ g/ / 2s TCE TCE TCE �9\ s "' \ `� ♦ �� / +/- LF 2' -0 VALLEY I±�SS / r�' REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -17 �' \ \\ \ \ \ ♦ ♦� CU LDS ``�� I / R OVE AND SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK Lr\ \ \\ \� \\ \ B" Y.C. PIPE \\ so \ ♦ �� / 2 PVACE +/-83 LF CURB ��' ♦ANC STD 848.01 O ' 4 REMOVE AND REPIL E \ CLDS 10.11 VCP WITH 20' +/- 8 ♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ 12 LF 0 \ ♦ Z -0 VALLEY CURB CLDS 10.11 D.I \ ♦ ♦ \ \ \♦ ♦ HASSAM HASEMLOU �\ \\ \�♦ �♦ 13105114 \\ \ ♦♦ ♦♦ DB 27597/PG 704 \ \♦ ♦ 3810 WINTERFIELD PLACE ss \ \ / BRENNA C. CARPENTER 13104226 DB 9799 /PG 372 3809 WINTERFIELD PLACE VICINITY MAP MIN. 3' ASPHALT BASE COURSE REQUIRED ON THOROUGHFARES AND BUS ROUTES OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,, PROP. 1.5" ACSC, Type S9 -5B At An Average Rate of 168 LBS. Per SY PROP. 5.5" ACIC, Type 119.OB At An Average _ Rate of 313.5 LBS. Per SY In Each Of 2 Layers —►{ 2' -6' C&G 1' -0' 100% DENSITY 1' -6' VARIES 7 VARIES T-5. DENSITY • .J Know what's below. Call before you dig. EXISTING PAVEMENT TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WTH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR AT CURB AND GUTTER WITH STORM DRAINAGE Not to scale DETAIL 4 Degradation Fee Typically Applies NOTES: 1. IF STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE IS OUTSIDE EXISTING PAVMENT WIDTH, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 2. IF THERE IS NO STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 1.5" MILLING & RESURFACING 7.5" ASPHALT PATCH (MIN.) ULEOWN IN PAVEMENT 5' MIN. SC.ES 5' MIN. -(REFER TO NOTES BELOW) *(REFER Tf- 0 NOTES BELOW) EXISTING PAVEMENT \ \�\ EXISTING PAVEMENT 1' -0' 100% . DENSITY ... - VARIES TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 95% DENSITY PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR Not to scale DETAIL 2 *NOTES: 1. FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR IN PLACE OF MILLING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. IF FULL -DEPTH OPTION IS CHOSEN, 5' MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN FROM EDGE OF TRENCH. 2. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE: WINTERFIELD PLACE: CLD STD. 11.01 UNAMED STREET 2: CLD STD. 11.01 ExistingFire Hydrant ............................................. ............................... ExistingYard Inlet ................................................... ............................... ExistingTree ............................................................ ............................... Existing Water Meter .............................................. ............................... WM Existing Water Valve .............................................. ............................... WV D4 ExistingGas Valve .................. ............................ ............................... GV D4 Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole .......................... ............................... OS Existing Storm Drain Manhole ............................... ............................... OD ExistingCatch Basin ............................................... ............................... B ExistingLight Pole .................................................. ............................... # ExistingUtility Pole ................................................. ............................... Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ............................ ............................... • ProposedYard Inlet ................................................. ............................... TreeProtection .............................................. ............................... ----- - - - -- X- - -- TreeRemoval .......................................................... ............................... X Accessible Ramp (NC STD 848. 05) .......................... ............................... wcR 0 20 40 10 30 SCALE: 1"=20' REMOVE 12" K COPPER Z% 0 v�A" PIN OAK: ' GREENB AR HOLDIN 131051 DB 277 /PG 844 3810 WI ERFIELD PLACE co / NC STD 848.03 S 30S 30S 3a � _ -- / CR \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE 11 PR -MH2 $DE +/ -4 'TREE � PRO CTION FENCE CLDS 4 02 \ Ste' PROP. 185.1 LF 48" RCP +/ -55 LF 2' -0 VALLEY ##*,- /'\\ 848.01 CURB CLDS 10.11 \ \ \\` \\ ♦♦ �� /> \ REMOVE AND EPLACE 8 "\ ♦ �� / \ \ VCP WITH 2 ' +/_ 8" D.I \ ♦ / SDE 5Z /\ PR -CB3 \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE + / -\ ♦♦ \ ♦♦ / c�g8 SDE \\ �\ \ DETAIN �. ASPHALT PER \\ ♦ \ OVE AND REPLACE U 10" \ s e'er \ \ \ \ • \, ♦ g/ / 2s TCE TCE TCE �9\ s "' \ `� ♦ �� / +/- LF 2' -0 VALLEY I±�SS / r�' REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -17 �' \ \\ \ \ \ ♦ ♦� CU LDS ``�� I / R OVE AND SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK Lr\ \ \\ \� \\ \ B" Y.C. PIPE \\ so \ ♦ �� / 2 PVACE +/-83 LF CURB ��' ♦ANC STD 848.01 O ' 4 REMOVE AND REPIL E \ CLDS 10.11 VCP WITH 20' +/- 8 ♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ 12 LF 0 \ ♦ Z -0 VALLEY CURB CLDS 10.11 D.I \ ♦ ♦ \ \ \♦ ♦ HASSAM HASEMLOU �\ \\ \�♦ �♦ 13105114 \\ \ ♦♦ ♦♦ DB 27597/PG 704 \ \♦ ♦ 3810 WINTERFIELD PLACE ss \ \ / BRENNA C. CARPENTER 13104226 DB 9799 /PG 372 3809 WINTERFIELD PLACE VICINITY MAP MIN. 3' ASPHALT BASE COURSE REQUIRED ON THOROUGHFARES AND BUS ROUTES OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,, PROP. 1.5" ACSC, Type S9 -5B At An Average Rate of 168 LBS. Per SY PROP. 5.5" ACIC, Type 119.OB At An Average _ Rate of 313.5 LBS. Per SY In Each Of 2 Layers —►{ 2' -6' C&G 1' -0' 100% DENSITY 1' -6' VARIES 7 VARIES T-5. DENSITY • .J Know what's below. Call before you dig. EXISTING PAVEMENT TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WTH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR AT CURB AND GUTTER WITH STORM DRAINAGE Not to scale DETAIL 4 Degradation Fee Typically Applies NOTES: 1. IF STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE IS OUTSIDE EXISTING PAVMENT WIDTH, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 2. IF THERE IS NO STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 1.5" MILLING & RESURFACING 7.5" ASPHALT PATCH (MIN.) ULEOWN IN PAVEMENT 5' MIN. SC.ES 5' MIN. -(REFER TO NOTES BELOW) *(REFER Tf- 0 NOTES BELOW) EXISTING PAVEMENT \ \�\ EXISTING PAVEMENT 1' -0' 100% . DENSITY ... - VARIES TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 95% DENSITY PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR Not to scale DETAIL 2 *NOTES: 1. FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR IN PLACE OF MILLING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. IF FULL -DEPTH OPTION IS CHOSEN, 5' MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN FROM EDGE OF TRENCH. 2. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE: WINTERFIELD PLACE: CLD STD. 11.01 UNAMED STREET 2: CLD STD. 11.01 ExistingFire Hydrant ............................................. ............................... ExistingYard Inlet ................................................... ............................... ExistingTree ............................................................ ............................... Existing Water Meter .............................................. ............................... WM Existing Water Valve .............................................. ............................... WV D4 ExistingGas Valve .................. ............................ ............................... GV D4 Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole .......................... ............................... OS Existing Storm Drain Manhole ............................... ............................... OD ExistingCatch Basin ............................................... ............................... B ExistingLight Pole .................................................. ............................... # ExistingUtility Pole ................................................. ............................... Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ............................ ............................... • ProposedYard Inlet ................................................. ............................... TreeProtection .............................................. ............................... ----- - - - -- X- - -- TreeRemoval .......................................................... ............................... X Accessible Ramp (NC STD 848. 05) .......................... ............................... wcR 0 20 40 10 30 SCALE: 1"=20' N O O 0 N 0 • • V 0 N 0 0 W Emmo Z% N O N co � N � N N amp C N N y ' td t0 � 5 M M H IT 3 W O R Z V' Z LLI O w O lx0 Q to tip O Q. LL. U �WF a v I•- LUw I~-aw2 Z~ o,,( � � O � QZHZ UEEa< LU X OKWO O U W i. 0 m z o_ 0.. v w Q LO 00 O \ m J - \ n L0 0') LO C S O O O L0 V A O � W MCI N M A � M N O O 0 N 0 • • V 0 N 0 0 W W A r f-q O � < Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No ld Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization le Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h below ❑ Yes ® No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a Name of project 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance 2b County Mecklenburg 2c Nearest municipality / town Charlotte 2d Subdivision name N/A 2e NCDOT only, T I P or state project no N/A 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed 3b Deed Book and Page No 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) N/A EEP ZiM 3d Street address 3e City, state, zip L DENR . WATER R 3f Telephone no M�TTf 3g Fax no 3h Email address Page 1 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services 4b. Name: Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS 4c. Business name (if applicable): CMSWS 4d. Street address: 600 E. Fourth Street 4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202 4f. Telephone no.: (704) 336 -4495 4g. Fax no.: (704) 353 -0473 4h. Email address: ihinson @charlottenc.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Gregg Antemann 5b. Business name (if applicable): Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. 5c. Street address: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd. 5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28273 5e. Telephone no.: 704 - 408 -1683 5f. Fax no.: 704- 527 -1133 5g. Email address: gregg @cws- inc.net Page 2 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 13104226, 1310427, 13105114, 13105115, and 13105135 (partial parcels) Latitude: N35.208256, Longitude: - 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): W80.761414 (DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.5 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Edwards Branch proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C 2 F c. River basin: Santee (HU# 03050103) Page 3 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project area is approximately 0.5 acre in extent and consists of single family residences with maintained lawns and wooded areas near the creek (Figure 2. Aerial Imagery, attached). Typical on -site vegetation includes willow oak (Quercus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and English ivy (Hedera helix). According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (Figures 3 and 4, USDA -NRCS Current and Historic Soil Survey Maps, attached), on -site soils consist of Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes (CuB) and Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (CeD2). Natural drainage class for both of the on -site soils is well- drained and neither of them is listed as hydric on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County or as having hydric inclusions on the National Hydric Soils List. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 80 If of seasonal stream 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is to replace a failing and undersized pipe system and to prevent erosion at the pipe outlet. The existing pipe system is exhibiting significant erosion around and downstream of the outfall. This erosion is threatening adjacent sanitary sewer lines, fences, and trees and is resulting in sanitary sewer ruptures and downstream sediment deposition. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3, unavoidable permanent impact to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with this project are limited to a total of 40 linear feet (0.001 acre) of stream channel (Figure 6, attached). The project proposes to replace a failing and undersized pipe system with a 48" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The pipe is being extended by 10.5 feet to eliminate a turn just downstream of the existing outlet, thereby improving alignment and preventing erosion. Downstream of the proposed outlet, 29.5 feet of channel will be impacted by gabion wall bank stabilization and the placement of reno mattresses (a flexible gabion "mat ") within the channel bottom. The reno mattress will protect the footings of gabion walls and are intended to fill in and naturalize over time. Project impacts are illustrated in Figure 6 and the attached plan set. There will also be approximately 10 If of temporary impacts downstream of gabion channel for access and erosion control (Figure 6). 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / El Yes ®No El Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type El Preliminary El Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: CWS Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Page 4 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 5 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: . 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ❑ T Pipe extension Seasonal RPW Stream A ❑ PER ® INT ® Corps ® DWQ 5 10.5 S2 ®P ❑T Gabion channel Seasonal RPW F1 PER ® Corps 5 29.5 stabilization Stream A ® INT ® DWQ S3 ❑ P ®T Temporay acces and erosion Seasonal RPW ❑ PER ® Corps 5 10 control Stream A ®INT ®DWQ S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 50 3i. Comments: Permanent Impacts to Jurisdictional Streams total 40 If (0.001 acre) of stream channel. Page 6 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T 01 ❑P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑ PEI T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary T impact re uired? B1 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P ❑T F-1 Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P ❑T F-1 Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 7 of 13 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. The proposed pipe replacement has been designed to replace the existing pipes with minimal additional piping of stream channel. For the downstream erosion, channel enhancement using natural channel design principles was considered but determined to be inappropriate at this location. Stabilization with gabion structures is proposed because the channel is extremely degraded and the ongoing erosion is compromising adjacent sewer lines, fences, and trees (Photographs A -C). The proposed design will protect property and stop ongoing sanitary sewer overflows and downstream in- channel sediment accumulation. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 8 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 9 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No significant change in impervious area. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW El USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 10 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project will not result in additional future development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 11 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? El Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on January 30, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project area. As of the date of submittal no response has been received from the NCNHP. CWS also reviewed the NCNHP elemental occurrence GIS layer. There are no current elemental occurrences within a mile of the project site. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Fisheries: http: / /sharpfin.nmfs. noaa. gov /website /EFH_Mapper /map.aspx 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on January 30, 2015 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. As of the date of submittal no response has been received from the SHPO. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission database and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710457300K Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS 2 -4 -2015 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 12 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version ATTACHMENT PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 2/4/15 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: City of Charlotte, POC: Mr. Isaac Hinson 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 3721 Winterfield Place (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County /parish /borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.208256, Long. - 80.761414 Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83 Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Edwards Branch Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non - wetland waters: 80 If Cowardin Class: R4UB2 Stream Flow: Seasonal 80 If Wetlands: 0 Cowardin Class: Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non - Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ® Field Determination. Date(s): January 29, 2015 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. 2 This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): ® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant: ® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24,000, Charlotte East, NC, Dated 1991 and Mint Hill, Dated 1996 ® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County Soil Survey. ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA /FIRM maps: ❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):ESRI, accessed 2015 or ® Other (Name & Date):Site photographs of seasonal stream (January, 2015). ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) 4 2/4/2015 Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowardian Class Estimated Aquatic Amount of Resource in Review Area Class of Aquatic Resource Stream A 35.208256 - 80.761414 R4UB2 80 If non - section 10 -- non -tidal NC DW® Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: //2-1/1-5 ProjectlSite: W,��)rT �tjd 4CC Latitude:35.2_0 Lt 32 Evaluator: 1104k GU�J County: %%Gfu(�►rJin / f z 3 Longitude: -96. :n 3b `total Points: Stream is at least intermittent 2, % 5 Stream Determination lrcle one) (ephemeral 41termitten Perennial Other SC 9 Name: if >_ 19 or i2erennial if ? 30* 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg e.g. Quad A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = / J ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 0.5 3 3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 1 Q 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 ® 3 5. Active /relict floodplain 10 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 dro 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 0.5 3 8. Headcuts 0 C0 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No Yes = 3 . artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal= 9 - S ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 Q 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 ® 2 3 14. Leaf litter 6D 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 ® 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes C. Bioloav (Subtotal _ 6 ) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 Q 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed ® 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 dro 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW _ 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other _ 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: NC IOW® Strearnn Identification Form Version 4.111 Date: / �9 2,01 S Project/Site:L4/1,,*y -KYJ .&C, latitude: 3S 2p Y6 3 Evaluator: /g V�� k Ccunty: AAA),a ! longitude: -�0, `dotal Points: / stream is at least intermittent 3 S erm!nation (circle one) Other s cp 2. if ? 19 or erennial if >_ 30 * p emera h Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name: I- A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = 6,_ ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 40 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 ® 2 3 3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 /1 `✓ 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 2 3 5. Active /relict floodplain No 70 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 25. Algae 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 05 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No 0 Yes = 3 artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = I, ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 3 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria ® 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 3 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 2 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No 70 Yes = 3 C. Biologv (Subtotal = - 1 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 ® 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae (Q 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ # SCP1— Seasonal RPW Stream A ■ , ; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ` 1. Applicant's Name: CMSWS 2. Evaluator's Name: AVH & ELBS 3. Date of Evaluation: 1/29/2015 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:30 pm 5. Name of Stream: Seasonal Stream A 6. River Basin: Santee (HUC #: 03050103) 7. Approximate Drainage Area: approx. 1 acre 8. Stream Order: 1 st 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 801f 10. County: Mecklenburg 11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): 3721 Winterfield Place, Charlotte, NC 12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.208256, W80.761414' 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): piping 14. Recent Weather Conditions: clear, sunny, 50s 15. Site conditions at time of visit: clear, sunny, 50s 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV) 17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ED 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 80 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural 20 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other 21. Bankfull Width: 4 -7' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 5' -10' 23. Channel slope down center of stream: x Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %) 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight x Occasional Bends Frequent Meander _Very Sinuous _Braided Channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 34 Comments: Evaluator's Signature Date 1/29/15 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET SCP1— Seasonal RPW Stream A * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 1 0-5 0 — 4 0-5 2 no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points) 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 2 extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0 — 4 0-4 0 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 2 Uno discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points) r* 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0 - 4 0-2 0 no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) .L Entrenchment / floodplain access a (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 0 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 0 no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0 - 5 3 fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 1 >0 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 00 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0 severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints Root depth and density on banks 14 0-3 0 - 4 0-5 2 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) Impact by agriculture or livestock production 15 0-5 0 — 4 0-5 4 substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes 16 0-3 0-5 0-6 3 no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) 17 Habitat complexity Habitat 0-6 0 — 6 0-6 2 or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) Canopy coverage over streambed 18 no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0 — 5 0-5 3 19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max 20 Presence of stream invertebrates 0-4 0 - 5 0 i no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0 O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0 — 4 0-4 0 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 2 no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 34 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ # SCP2 — Ephemeral Conveyance ■ , ; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ` 1. Applicant's Name: CMSWS 2. Evaluator's Name: AVH & ELBS 3. Date of Evaluation: 1/29/2015 4. Time of Evaluation: 1 pm 5. Name of Stream: Ephemeral Conveyance 6. River Basin: Santee (HUC #: 03050103) 7. Approximate Drainage Area: approx. 0.5 acre 8. Stream Order: 1 st 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1001f 10. County: Mecklenburg 11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): 3721 Winterfield Place, Charlotte, NC 12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.208634, W80.761978' 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): N/A 14. Recent Weather Conditions: clear, sunny, 50s 15. Site conditions at time of visit: clear, sunny, 50s 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV) 17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES (E)19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES G) 20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 80 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural 20 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other 21. Bankfull Width: 14' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 0.5' -5' 23. Channel slope down center of stream: x Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %) 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight x Occasional Bends Frequent Meander _Very Sinuous _Braided Channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 24 Comments: Evaluator's Signature Date 1/29/15 This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET SCP2 — Ephemeral Convevance * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 1 0-5 0 — 4 0-5 0 no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points) 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0 — 4 0-4 2 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 0 Uno discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points) r* 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0 - 4 0-2 0 no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) .L Entrenchment / floodplain access a (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 0 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 0 no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0 - 5 1 fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 1 >0 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 00 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 2 severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints Root depth and density on banks 14 0-3 0 - 4 0-5 2 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) Impact by agriculture or livestock production 15 0-5 0 — 4 0-5 4 substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes 16 0-3 0-5 0-6 0 no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) 17 Habitat complexity Habitat 0-6 0 — 6 0-6 2 or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) Canopy coverage over streambed 18 no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0 — 5 0-5 2 19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 1 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max 20 Presence of stream invertebrates 0-4 0 - 5 0 i no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0 O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0 — 4 0-4 0 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 24 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. WETLAND DETERMINA` TON DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Proiar,tI.Rits -, .3112-1 V14'1_*if'CJJ Pi« City /County: / reCj4,b `j Sampling Date: 112' 9/l s Applicant/Owner: G MS State: Sampling Point: 0 to Investigator(s): ig1 �2— S Section, Township, Range: -C Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): AiL&%s Lo I relief (concave, convex, none): �'<< Slope ( %): s ��✓D Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 444 � 3G Lat: 3-5- ZU `a 2' Long: 0. 1412 S Datum: /v/� 0 3 Soil Map Unit Name: t!Gf.� .k ^�5' L �'Y �'� —� %zCNt A. NWI classification: N/If Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yesl Z l No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No I V M Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No ®r within a E'Vetiand? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No I y Remarks: tCp�4sc.,jpttjt_ -- �� 1� ct.7e► ■ : ;r, s, Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; ®Surface Water (Al) check all that apply) =True Aquatic Plants (B14) ®Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) =High Water Table (A2) ®Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) [�Drainage Patterns (B10) =Saturation (A3) =Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (1316) =Water Marks (131) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) =Dry-Season Water Table (C2) =Sediment Deposits (B2) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) =Crayfish Burrows (C8) =Drift Deposits (B3) =Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09) ®Algal Mat or Crust (134) Other (Explain in Remarks) ®Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) =Iron Deposits (65) Geomorphic Position (D2) =Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ®Shallow Aquitard (D3) =Water-Stained Leaves (139) ®Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ®FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes= No Depth (inches): j� Present? Yes Ise Y Saturation Present? Yes= No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology l� includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) ® Use scientific manes of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. okcyce -f A)-[./f °S 20 y r,-r4 2. L i 3. Q1't.CYL1,$ G /bC1 �U fA V S = Total Cover Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 3. 4. 5. 7 Sampling Point: r) P1 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species CC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: J (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: l (B) Percent of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: v (A/B) Prevalence Indus worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: = Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) = 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1, =2 - Dominance Test is >50% 2 L i1 }��n 1t�G �c�c.�. -e ! 5 /�,qCU =3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0' 3. =4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) DProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 7. 30 = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 30 Fi3C fit, 2. 6 _ 4. +Yi2hC /Y1 rI V N f} 5. 0 9. 10 11 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. nitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. 1G Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Lo-n ' avr- P� n,' cg _30_ FAC 2._ /*14*, 1601110 /0 _� F 3. 7a- C GC -&--I d,ra -. r ACC-. S 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. Present? Yes= No 4-Q = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 0 e Profile Descriptions (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix =Dark Surface (S7) Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Toe Texture Remarks V- Z -7. S X Y2 t U c =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) s!L 140 c tt =2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) =Redox Dark Surface (F6) =Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) =Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) I y e: G =Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: =Histosol (Al) =Dark Surface (S7) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: =2 Muck 147) =Histic Epipedon (A2) =Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) cm (A10) (MLRA =Coast Prairie Redox (A16) =Black Histic (A3) =hin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) =Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) =Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) =Stratified Layers (A5) =Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) =2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) =Redox Dark Surface (F6) =Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) =Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) =Depleted Dark Surface (F7) =Other (Explain in Remarks) =Thick Dark Surface (Al2) =Redox Depressions (178) =Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, =Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) =Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) =Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and =Sandy Redox (S5) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, =Stripped Matrix (S6) =Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No Remarks: ?'resU. 4. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 �.1 550E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD. CWS CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 704 - 527- 1177(v) Carolina Wetland Services 704 -527 -1133 (fax) January 30, 2015 Ramona Bartos Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -4617 Subject: Request for Records Search 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenace Charlotte, North Carolina CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 Dear Ms. Bartos: On behalf of our client, Charlotte Storm Water Services, we are hereby contacting the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office regarding the presence of any historic properties or cultural resources within the referenced project area. The project area is approximately 0.5 acre in extent and is located at 3721 Winterfield Place in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The attached USGS Site Location Map (Figure 1) was prepared from the Charlotte East, NC Quadrangle, dated 1991. The site consists of single family residences with maintained lawns and wooded area near the creek. The purpose of the project is to replace a failing and undersized pipe system and to prevent erosion at the pipe outlet. Construction of this project will cause unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting. Based on a review of SHPO's online GIS Mapping Application', there are no historic properties listed within the project limits. Photographs A -D (Figure 2, attached) are representative of the site. Please provide a written response concerning your determination regarding the presence of any historic properties or cultural resources within the project area. Feel free to contact me with any questions at 704- 626 -9850 or at aliisa @cws- inc.net. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Aliisa Har uniemi Staff Scientist II Attachments C. �_ Gregg Antemann, PWS Principal Scientist Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map Figure 2. Aerial Map Photopage http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb /. Accessed January 29, 2015. NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA WWW.CWS- INC.NET CWS Caro ina Wetland Services January 30, 2015 550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD. CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 704 - 527- 1177(v) 704 - 527- 1133(fax) Ms. Allison Weakley North Carolina Natural Heritage Program North Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural Resources 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601 Subject: Request for Records Search 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Charlotte, North Carolina CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 Dear Ms. Weakley: On behalf of our client, Charlotte Storm Water Services, we are hereby contacting the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program regarding the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered or threatened species, or Critical Habitat within the referenced project area. The project is located at 3721 Winterfield Place in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The attached USGS Site Location Map (Figure 1) was prepared from the Charlotte East, NC Quadrangle, dated 1991. The project area is approximately 0.5 acre in extent and consists of single family residences with maintained lawns and wooded area near the creek. The purpose of the project is to replace a failing and undersized pipe system and to prevent erosion at the pipe outlet. Construction of this project will cause unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting. Please provide a written response via email to aliisa @cws- inc.net concerning the presence of federally - listed, or candidate endangered or threatened species or Critical Habitat within or near the project area. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Aliisa Har uniemi, Staff Scientist II Attachment: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map Figure 2. Aerial Map C. Gregg Antemann, PWS Principal Scientist NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA WWW.CWS- INC.NET 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 CWS Project No. 2015 -3532 Photograph A. View of Seasonal RPW Stream A, facing upstream. Photograph B. View of Seasonal RPW Stream A, facing downstream. 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 ax r � 7 Photograph C. View of eroded bank of the Seasonal Stream A and failing pipe system, facing west. Photograph D. View of non jurisdictional ephemeral conveyance, facing northwest. 2 3721 Winterfield Place Maintenance Project February 4, 2015 Nationwide Permit No. 3 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3532 Photograph E. View of non jurisdictional ephemeral conveyance, facing southeast. Photograph F. View of non jurisdictional ephemeral conveyance, facing northwest. 3 t ro a � �rrd 1 Yt i �'JQy[} }y{■ � '�,p _ Photograph E. View of non jurisdictional ephemeral conveyance, facing southeast. Photograph F. View of non jurisdictional ephemeral conveyance, facing northwest. 3 'PftARY R gHECK DAM S30.10 \\ FRACT R TO r VIE CHECK AT PRO CT M LETION O o \ O 2 . G,oa \ \ \\ JO 24" ��N OAK \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ SEPH A. KIAMU 13104226 DB 9799/PG 372 116- O \ \ \\ \\ \ ti s 3721 WINTERFIELD PLACE 24" PIN OAK �<<^ \\ tom, \\ \ \ / / / /� ♦ � . \ \ s l� \ \ / / / ♦ PR F- \\\\ \ \\ // /// ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ -HW6 3" PIN OAK CONTRACTOR TO CLEA XISTING C NEL, REGRADE TO DRAIN. TALL \ � \ \ / ♦ ♦ � CLASS I RIP RAP APRON 30'X 3.75' PROPOSED RENO MATTRE SES A GABION CONFIGURATION. SHEET 2 \ s <\ \ / ♦ F \ � \ \ � � �G X1.5'THK OF 3 GRADE TOP OF SLOPE 3:1 WH RE POSSIBLE. RESEED A APPLY SEMI \PERMANENT MATTING (SC 350) AS NECESSARY TO ST ILIZE FINAL GRADE / \\ % \�\� \ \ ♦ Q AND ALLOW FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE / \ �, �/ \ \ \ ♦ �� o�C' �0� `�, ♦♦ / ^ /�`/ / \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ SANITARY dIaNHO oS TBV = RW EL V _ 736.76' ♦♦ i �Qti SO GARLAND WgLLER ♦� ♦ / / \ \ \ \ \\ \ INV IN NE = 727.04fc,, ,(11 �♦ 13104227 \ \ 11W RV ST = 729.20' \ ' ♦ / \ \ `� \ \ II VV / COQ �� ' ♦♦ 3801 V OUT = 726.87' 18883 /PG 199 \\ \\ \aF\ Q ♦ WINTERFIELD PLACE T� ♦ ♦ \ \\ LEA \ b�, \�s \\ 50/ I ♦♦ \� ♦♦ ♦♦ \VA\ s� �P��VA\ \ \\ PR -MH5 �> r� N ♦ \ \ \ \ / I \ RELOCATE 3" GAS rcF ♦ AVAV V A �� MAIN (BY OTHERS) ♦ ♦♦ RAPHAEL A. CRUZ J +_ ♦♦ i 13105113 \ \� ss � \\ �\\ \ . G ♦ � ' , 6 I / 70 THE ROTECTION 71PG 858 \ ♦ I / FENCECLDS 4��D2 ♦♦ �� DB 2877 VA .V �,�\ ♦ / ♦ '�� 3716 WINTERFIELD PLACE \ r ♦ / I ♦ v �O �I� ♦♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -20 �� \ ♦ �� / s oM ♦ �� -� SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK r V REMOVE AND REPLAC / e% \ F� A P� -HW1 ^` of + - 25.5 TNS. ASPHALT R /� \ \\ 9! CtE PROTECTION PR -C134 F / C S 40.02 DETAIL 2 / ti ♦ / 24" GUM REMOVE ND REPLACE +/- 16 '- 3,J_PICATIONS) / �I o� O TINS. (TOTAL) ASPHALT PER DETAIL 4 �� / / / REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -13 REMOVE AND REPLACE 13 SQ YDS \ \ / 4 tL \ / / SQ. YDS. 6" CONC DRIVE 6" CONIC DRIVEWAY NC STD 848 03 \ +/ -30' TREE o ttlr PROTECTION F CE t CLDS 40.02 t PIN 0 K� 0 v�A" PIN OAK: ' N O N co � N � N N amp C N N y ' td t0 � 5 M M H IT 3 W O R Z V' Z LLI 24 A\\K U �WF a v I•- 18" PIMn. 40' TREE UEEa< LU X OKWO PROTECTION FENCE CLDS 40.02 z o_ 0.. v w Q LO 00 O \ m J - \ n L0 0') LO C S O O O L0 V A O � W MCI N M A � M ■■■■■■■ r��71�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ICI■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�IiyiWl■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■Iiii�i��i1�111■ iilri�ilii ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■L!■ J ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ®I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■_� ■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ 1■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■VI■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ROME • ■■■■■■■■■■ - . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ICI ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■�1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ill ■� - i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�Ii ■. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■ ■I■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■R. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ I i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■Iql ■ ■: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ EMEMEMMENIME - . - - M 11 . - W ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ . - ■ ■i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I�i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■; f■ ■ ■ ■ ■li��illi� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■FBI ■_ i■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■!�_ �� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1■I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■! .!! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■I ■1■ ■11 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�Il� ■■ M9 M1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■F.�Ii■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■i� ■ ■ ■11 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■� ■ ■ ■�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■__■� 11 J ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■ ■1■ ■ ■ ■ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■_ ■ ■SQ■ l ■ ■ ■■ ■■III1■/�! OR . - ... _. .EQUAL Am REEN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■EMMiMN�� N i3� . t ...� li 1 ■ Wftyj rr■ ■■ 1 1111 M III ■ ■��M■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1MEN ■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■I ■III 1■■■� s��■��■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ! _��■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■li:J ■� LE ■■ ■ii ■!■ 100I 1 MIN - u - ■■�� ■ ■ ■J �1■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■11 ■C� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■%� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■!! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■� ■ ■�J ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ I ■il 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■��'�C ■iii ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ ��:i�ii �i �r� ■iiiiiii /ITN ■ ■■ ■V ■I ■� ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■i ■ ■ ■�1,;,1, "._;;, ------__ __��■■■�■�■■■■■■ NNE .. ■ . RE I ■ ■M ■■ ■■ ■■I ldffi■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■II ■_ ■i■ ■i ■lid ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■ v ■ ■I 1 ■■l��I� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■1 ■ ■IY'�i ■ ■V ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ Ed ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ 'PftARY R gHECK DAM S30.10 \\ FRACT R TO r VIE CHECK AT PRO CT M LETION O o \ O 2 . G,oa \ \ \\ JO 24" ��N OAK \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ SEPH A. KIAMU 13104226 DB 9799/PG 372 116- O \ \ \\ \\ \ ti s 3721 WINTERFIELD PLACE 24" PIN OAK �<<^ \\ tom, \\ \ \ / / / /� ♦ � . \ \ s l� \ \ / / / ♦ PR F- \\\\ \ \\ // /// ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ -HW6 3" PIN OAK CONTRACTOR TO CLEA XISTING C NEL, REGRADE TO DRAIN. TALL \ � \ \ / ♦ ♦ � CLASS I RIP RAP APRON 30'X 3.75' PROPOSED RENO MATTRE SES A GABION CONFIGURATION. SHEET 2 \ s <\ \ / ♦ F \ � \ \ � � �G X1.5'THK OF 3 GRADE TOP OF SLOPE 3:1 WH RE POSSIBLE. RESEED A APPLY SEMI \PERMANENT MATTING (SC 350) AS NECESSARY TO ST ILIZE FINAL GRADE / \\ % \�\� \ \ ♦ Q AND ALLOW FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE / \ �, �/ \ \ \ ♦ �� o�C' �0� `�, ♦♦ / ^ /�`/ / \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ SANITARY dIaNHO oS TBV = RW EL V _ 736.76' ♦♦ i �Qti SO GARLAND WgLLER ♦� ♦ / / \ \ \ \ \\ \ INV IN NE = 727.04fc,, ,(11 �♦ 13104227 \ \ 11W RV ST = 729.20' \ ' ♦ / \ \ `� \ \ II VV / COQ �� ' ♦♦ 3801 V OUT = 726.87' 18883 /PG 199 \\ \\ \aF\ Q ♦ WINTERFIELD PLACE T� ♦ ♦ \ \\ LEA \ b�, \�s \\ 50/ I ♦♦ \� ♦♦ ♦♦ \VA\ s� �P��VA\ \ \\ PR -MH5 �> r� N ♦ \ \ \ \ / I \ RELOCATE 3" GAS rcF ♦ AVAV V A �� MAIN (BY OTHERS) ♦ ♦♦ RAPHAEL A. CRUZ J +_ ♦♦ i 13105113 \ \� ss � \\ �\\ \ . G ♦ � ' , 6 I / 70 THE ROTECTION 71PG 858 \ ♦ I / FENCECLDS 4��D2 ♦♦ �� DB 2877 VA .V �,�\ ♦ / ♦ '�� 3716 WINTERFIELD PLACE \ r ♦ / I ♦ v �O �I� ♦♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -20 �� \ ♦ �� / s oM ♦ �� -� SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK r V REMOVE AND REPLAC / e% \ F� A P� -HW1 ^` of + - 25.5 TNS. ASPHALT R /� \ \\ 9! CtE PROTECTION PR -C134 F / C S 40.02 DETAIL 2 / ti ♦ / 24" GUM REMOVE ND REPLACE +/- 16 '- 3,J_PICATIONS) / �I o� O TINS. (TOTAL) ASPHALT PER DETAIL 4 �� / / / REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -13 REMOVE AND REPLACE 13 SQ YDS \ \ / 4 tL \ / / SQ. YDS. 6" CONC DRIVE 6" CONIC DRIVEWAY NC STD 848 03 \ +/ -30' TREE o ttlr PROTECTION F CE t CLDS 40.02 t PIN 0 K� 0 v�A" PIN OAK: ' N O N co � N � N N amp C N N y ' td t0 � 5 M M H IT 3 W O R Z V' Z LLI 24 A\\K U �WF a v I•- 18" PIMn. 40' TREE UEEa< LU X OKWO PROTECTION FENCE CLDS 40.02 z o_ IN GREENB AR HOLDIN 131051 DB 277 /PG 844 3810 WI ERFIELD PLACE co / NC STD 848.03 S 30S 30S 3a � _ -- / CR \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE 11 PR -MH2 $DE +/ -4 'TREE � PRO CTION FENCE CLDS 4 02 \ Ste' PROP. 185.1 LF 48" RCP +/ -55 LF 2' -0 VALLEY ##*,- /'\\ 848.01 CURB CLDS 10.11 \ \ \\` \\ ♦♦ �� /> \ REMOVE AND EPLACE 8 "\ ♦ �� / \ \ VCP WITH 2 ' +/_ 8" D.I \ ♦ / SDE 5Z /\ PR -CB3 \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE + / -\ ♦♦ \ ♦♦ / c�g8 SDE \\ �\ \ DETAIN �. ASPHALT PER \\ ♦ \ OVE AND REPLACE U 10" \ s e'er \ \ \ \ • \, ♦ g/ / 2s TCE TCE TCE �9\ s "' \ `� ♦ �� / +/- LF 2' -0 VALLEY I±�SS / r�' REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -17 �' \ \\ \ \ \ ♦ ♦� CU LDS ``�� I / R OVE AND SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK Lr\ \ \\ \� \\ \ B" Y.C. PIPE \\ so \ ♦ �� / 2 PVACE +/-83 LF CURB ��' ♦ANC STD 848.01 O ' 4 REMOVE AND REPIL E \ CLDS 10.11 VCP WITH 20' +/- 8 ♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ 12 LF 0 \ ♦ Z -0 VALLEY CURB CLDS 10.11 D.I \ ♦ ♦ \ \ \♦ ♦ HASSAM HASEMLOU �\ \\ \�♦ �♦ 13105114 \\ \ ♦♦ ♦♦ DB 27597/PG 704 \ \♦ ♦ 3810 WINTERFIELD PLACE ss \ \ / BRENNA C. CARPENTER 13104226 DB 9799 /PG 372 3809 WINTERFIELD PLACE VICINITY MAP MIN. 3' ASPHALT BASE COURSE REQUIRED ON THOROUGHFARES AND BUS ROUTES OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,, PROP. 1.5" ACSC, Type S9 -5B At An Average Rate of 168 LBS. Per SY PROP. 5.5" ACIC, Type 119.OB At An Average _ Rate of 313.5 LBS. Per SY In Each Of 2 Layers —►{ 2' -6' C&G 1' -0' 100% DENSITY 1' -6' VARIES 7 VARIES T-5. DENSITY • .J Know what's below. Call before you dig. EXISTING PAVEMENT TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WTH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR AT CURB AND GUTTER WITH STORM DRAINAGE Not to scale DETAIL 4 Degradation Fee Typically Applies NOTES: 1. IF STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE IS OUTSIDE EXISTING PAVMENT WIDTH, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 2. IF THERE IS NO STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 1.5" MILLING & RESURFACING 7.5" ASPHALT PATCH (MIN.) ULEOWN IN PAVEMENT 5' MIN. SC.ES 5' MIN. -(REFER TO NOTES BELOW) *(REFER Tf- 0 NOTES BELOW) EXISTING PAVEMENT \ \�\ EXISTING PAVEMENT 1' -0' 100% . DENSITY ... - VARIES TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 95% DENSITY PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR Not to scale DETAIL 2 *NOTES: 1. FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR IN PLACE OF MILLING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. IF FULL -DEPTH OPTION IS CHOSEN, 5' MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN FROM EDGE OF TRENCH. 2. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE: WINTERFIELD PLACE: CLD STD. 11.01 UNAMED STREET 2: CLD STD. 11.01 ExistingFire Hydrant ............................................. ............................... ExistingYard Inlet ................................................... ............................... ExistingTree ............................................................ ............................... Existing Water Meter .............................................. ............................... WM Existing Water Valve .............................................. ............................... WV D4 ExistingGas Valve .................. ............................ ............................... GV D4 Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole .......................... ............................... OS Existing Storm Drain Manhole ............................... ............................... OD ExistingCatch Basin ............................................... ............................... B ExistingLight Pole .................................................. ............................... # ExistingUtility Pole ................................................. ............................... Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ............................ ............................... • ProposedYard Inlet ................................................. ............................... TreeProtection .............................................. ............................... ----- - - - -- X- - -- TreeRemoval .......................................................... ............................... X Accessible Ramp (NC STD 848. 05) .......................... ............................... wcR 0 20 40 10 30 SCALE: 1"=20' REMOVE 12" K COPPER Z% 0 v�A" PIN OAK: ' GREENB AR HOLDIN 131051 DB 277 /PG 844 3810 WI ERFIELD PLACE co / NC STD 848.03 S 30S 30S 3a � _ -- / CR \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE 11 PR -MH2 $DE +/ -4 'TREE � PRO CTION FENCE CLDS 4 02 \ Ste' PROP. 185.1 LF 48" RCP +/ -55 LF 2' -0 VALLEY ##*,- /'\\ 848.01 CURB CLDS 10.11 \ \ \\` \\ ♦♦ �� /> \ REMOVE AND EPLACE 8 "\ ♦ �� / \ \ VCP WITH 2 ' +/_ 8" D.I \ ♦ / SDE 5Z /\ PR -CB3 \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE + / -\ ♦♦ \ ♦♦ / c�g8 SDE \\ �\ \ DETAIN �. ASPHALT PER \\ ♦ \ OVE AND REPLACE U 10" \ s e'er \ \ \ \ • \, ♦ g/ / 2s TCE TCE TCE �9\ s "' \ `� ♦ �� / +/- LF 2' -0 VALLEY I±�SS / r�' REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ -17 �' \ \\ \ \ \ ♦ ♦� CU LDS ``�� I / R OVE AND SQ. YDS. 4" CONC SIDEWALK Lr\ \ \\ \� \\ \ B" Y.C. PIPE \\ so \ ♦ �� / 2 PVACE +/-83 LF CURB ��' ♦ANC STD 848.01 O ' 4 REMOVE AND REPIL E \ CLDS 10.11 VCP WITH 20' +/- 8 ♦ REMOVE AND REPLACE +/ 12 LF 0 \ ♦ Z -0 VALLEY CURB CLDS 10.11 D.I \ ♦ ♦ \ \ \♦ ♦ HASSAM HASEMLOU �\ \\ \�♦ �♦ 13105114 \\ \ ♦♦ ♦♦ DB 27597/PG 704 \ \♦ ♦ 3810 WINTERFIELD PLACE ss \ \ / BRENNA C. CARPENTER 13104226 DB 9799 /PG 372 3809 WINTERFIELD PLACE VICINITY MAP MIN. 3' ASPHALT BASE COURSE REQUIRED ON THOROUGHFARES AND BUS ROUTES OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,, PROP. 1.5" ACSC, Type S9 -5B At An Average Rate of 168 LBS. Per SY PROP. 5.5" ACIC, Type 119.OB At An Average _ Rate of 313.5 LBS. Per SY In Each Of 2 Layers —►{ 2' -6' C&G 1' -0' 100% DENSITY 1' -6' VARIES 7 VARIES T-5. DENSITY • .J Know what's below. Call before you dig. EXISTING PAVEMENT TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WTH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR AT CURB AND GUTTER WITH STORM DRAINAGE Not to scale DETAIL 4 Degradation Fee Typically Applies NOTES: 1. IF STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE IS OUTSIDE EXISTING PAVMENT WIDTH, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 2. IF THERE IS NO STORM DRAINAGE OR SUBGRADE DISTURBANCE, NO DEGRADATION FEE APPLIES. 1.5" MILLING & RESURFACING 7.5" ASPHALT PATCH (MIN.) ULEOWN IN PAVEMENT 5' MIN. SC.ES 5' MIN. -(REFER TO NOTES BELOW) *(REFER Tf- 0 NOTES BELOW) EXISTING PAVEMENT \ \�\ EXISTING PAVEMENT 1' -0' 100% . DENSITY ... - VARIES TRENCH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 95% DENSITY PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES) PAVEMENT REPAIR Not to scale DETAIL 2 *NOTES: 1. FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR IN PLACE OF MILLING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. IF FULL -DEPTH OPTION IS CHOSEN, 5' MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN FROM EDGE OF TRENCH. 2. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE: WINTERFIELD PLACE: CLD STD. 11.01 UNAMED STREET 2: CLD STD. 11.01 ExistingFire Hydrant ............................................. ............................... ExistingYard Inlet ................................................... ............................... ExistingTree ............................................................ ............................... Existing Water Meter .............................................. ............................... WM Existing Water Valve .............................................. ............................... WV D4 ExistingGas Valve .................. ............................ ............................... GV D4 Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole .......................... ............................... OS Existing Storm Drain Manhole ............................... ............................... OD ExistingCatch Basin ............................................... ............................... B ExistingLight Pole .................................................. ............................... # ExistingUtility Pole ................................................. ............................... Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ............................ ............................... • ProposedYard Inlet ................................................. ............................... TreeProtection .............................................. ............................... ----- - - - -- X- - -- TreeRemoval .......................................................... ............................... X Accessible Ramp (NC STD 848. 05) .......................... ............................... wcR 0 20 40 10 30 SCALE: 1"=20' N O O 0 N 0 • • V 0 N 0 0 W Emmo Z% N O N co � N � N N amp C N N y ' td t0 � 5 M M H IT 3 W O R Z V' Z LLI O w O lx0 Q to tip O Q. LL. U �WF a v I•- LUw I~-aw2 Z~ o,,( � � O � QZHZ UEEa< LU X OKWO O U W i. 0 m z o_ 0.. v w Q LO 00 O \ m J - \ n L0 0') LO C S O O O L0 V A O � W MCI N M A � M N O O 0 N 0 • • V 0 N 0 0 W ROW 3 (729. ROW 2 ( ROW 1 (724 CL ROW 3 (730.0) ROW 2 (72 ROW 1 (724.0) ROW 3 (730.0) ROW 2 (727 ROW 1 (724.0) SECTION C —C STATION 0 +29.5 ,+ D' LI.I cn SECTION B —B STATION 0 +15.5 SECTION A —A STATION 0 +00.0 DOSED STANDARD SINGLE PIPE 3 DESIGNED BY STV FOR THE OF CHARLOTTE SWS. V 731.85) OACAFFERRI GEOTEXTILE MACTEX 847.1 OR APPROVED EQUAL STONE OR APPROVED 511 L A STONE OR APP DUAL NE OR APPROVED EQUAL GABION TABLE GABION DIMINSION GABION TAG QUANTITY OF GABIONS VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME 6'x3'x3' A 2 2cy 4 9'x3'x3' B 4 3cy 12 12'x3'x3' C 6 4cy 24 6'x3 x1.5' D 2 1.0cy 2 9'x3'x1.5' E 4 1. 5cy 6 12 Y3'xl.5' F 2 2cy 4 6'x3'x1.0' G 5.2 12'x3'x1.0' H 4.5'x3'x3' I GRAND TOTAL 1 20 52 RENO MATTRESS TABLE GABION DIMINSION GABION TAG QUANTITY OF GABIONS VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME 9'Y6'W Q ONE 1.Ocy 1 12'x6'W R 1N0 Z o + O R QN w U �WF F dU 9'x6'x9" T ONE 1.50y 1.5 12'r6'W' U W 12'x6 x12" Z ONE 2.7cy 2.7 GRAND TOTAL i 3 STANDARD SINGLE PIPE HW 5.2 ROW 1 ROW 2 ROW 3 STATION 0 +29.5 STATION 0 +15.5 STATION 0 +00.0 0 5 10 2.5 7.5 SCALE: 1"=5' Em=4 tip I� N O N 00 N 10 N 0op N to co to 03 M M H Z O � W LL n G W O (7 Z 1N0 Z o + O R QN w U �WF F dU w � � � � Uwt~AO z 0 W c a i STANDARD SINGLE PIPE HW ROW 1 ROW 2 ROW 3 STATION 0 +29.5 STATION 0 +15.5 STATION 0 +00.0 0 5 10 2.5 7.5 SCALE: 1"=5' Em=4 tip I� N O N 00 N 10 N 0op N to co to 03 M M H Z O � W LL n G W O (7 Z 1N0 Z o + O R QN co 2 a R }tea U �WF F dU W ►~-awl ZW. °od wo U of <ZWZ Q UW�i� X LL V OZWZ C7 m >- 0Om Uwt~AO z 0 a w ° ° 0 z NO oc)G Lo CD c Z _ _J J LO ° oM (D C cy) Q O Uj O .F-I O � N c� � M N M UNPACKING & ASSEMBLY PROCESS M-fiPM 00" Am D~sd To rho job SU 1, 1. Own And UW The WbIons Ow By Dv.d" h9VAmC4,VwsvdA,Id 1, 7N FaA� 0- On A R.. W.H S�.. Eii�. M Fd& D. T. T� Pk�ins. 2 1 Up TIa 51*� And The Diwph� To IF= OW �. R. SI,. TII. T� U IF- TI. && A. Al TII� S- L.� �ihfteih� Wi� M T� Mal UNL And Th. DiWW.Q.. Afi.�Q Tne 1 -111-1 T"'E"C"T" f S. -3 e e e 0 0 Q) Assembled Gabion Basket LI D 0 FOLDING PROCESS o o o 1EwU MII k nix Maccaferri Inc. assumes no responsibility for the drawings and calculations it provides, as Title: they must be intended as a general indication to suggest the proper use of its products- W, f. Unils: ked: Scale: 3/4 Feet NTS Date: Maccarferri. Inc. 10303 Governor Larve Blvd. Wil I isimsport, MID 21795-3116 USA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ph. (301) 223-69 10 Fax (301) 223-6134 CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR MACCAFERRI PVC COATED GABION STRUCTURES 1. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 1.1. PVO GABON$ ARE BASKET$ MANUFACTURED FROM U10 DOUBLE TWISTED HEXAGONAL WOVEN STEEL WIRE MESH. HFAVI LY GALVAN ZED THEN PVC COATED, AS PER ASTM Ws-97 I FI I - 4 1. GASIONS ARE FILLED WTH STONE$ AT THE PROJECT SITE TO FORM FLEXIBLE, PERMEABLE. MONOLITHIC STRUCTURES $UCH AS RETAINING WALLS. CHANNEL LININGS. AND WEIRS FOR EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. THE STEEL WIRE USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF THE GABION 16 HEAVILY GALVAN IZED SOFT TEMPER STEEL. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ME -WIRE ARE SHOWN IN TA13LE 2. THE GABION IS DIVIDED INTO CELLS BY DIAPHRAGMS POSITIONED AT APPROXI MATELY 3 ft (0.9�) CENTERS (FIG. 2 ). TO REINFORCE THE STRUCTURE, ALL MESH PANEL EDGES ARE SELVEDGED WITH A V41RE FWANG A GREATER DIAMETER ITABLE 3 ). DIMENSIONS AND SIZES OF PVC COATED GABIONS ARE SHOWN IN TABLE I GABIONS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED AND SHIPPED WITH ALL COMPONENTS MECHANICALLY CONNECTED AT THE PRODUCTION FACILITY. 2. MATERIALS 2.1. aACKFILL MATERIAL SPECIFIED BELOW SHALL BE FREE DRAINING. BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWN ER OR OWNEITS REPRESENTATIVE, AMID SHALL MEET THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES REQUIREMENTS SH DEFINED IN SECTION 7.1, AN LI ALL BE CLEAN. FREE DRAINING CRUSHEI� $TONE. ZZ. 0O$eI MATERML SMALL BE A CLEAN CRUSHED STONE OR GRANULAR FILL MEETING THE FOLLOWING GRADATION PER ASTMQ422! Table 0 Rock Sizing for Gabions se�e Size Peroenill ssIng 11=11eighiff(m) 100% 4' ot05% 3 (0.g) 2 106 0. 46 3.70 0.087 0-IC-6 3 12 (3-6) 3 (041) 3 (0-91) Fill 6 0.8) 3 (MI) 1,5 (0.45) 2 S (2.7) 3 (0s) IS (0.46) 3 12 (3e) 3 (O.S) 1.5 (0.46) 4 8 (1.8) 3 (0.9) 1 (o.3) 2 9 (2.7) a (0.9) 1 ((1.3) 3 12 (3.6) 3 (0.g) 1 (c.3) 4 4.5 11.4) 3 (G.g) 3 4'-0" PROPOSED (UP"TO F,X - 115'_U") 8" i'_0" 2'- 4" GROUNDLINE @ 9 MAX. CTRS. _S BARA 1 Hw 1MIN. BEARING PRESSURE (ABOVE) H� >= 14'-0") #5 @ 12" 1 2000 PSF 11 Z �T_ 2" CLR. '11'-0" 1 2500 PST 5'- 1 4-#5 CONSTR. JT. FRONT _FTYP) 4'-6" 1 1 -0j, 1 1 - -, I - WITH FACE- iY2" x 3)12" FILL FACE 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SOIL CONDJIONS MEET THE MINIMUM X 3" CLR. < M KEYWAY 8'-5" BEARING PRESSURE BY DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION (DCP) TESTING PERFORMED BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL. IF BEARING PRESSURE DOES #4 @ 12" BOTTOM OF B C NOT MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A V-10" BETWEEN THE WALL AND ANY UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. CONSTR. " GEOTECIENICAL ENGINEER DETERMINE A SUBGRADE MODIFICATION TO 5'-D" V_0" 1 -6, 9 BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE GRANULAR SOIL USE LIGHT OR V-0" S-2" #5 @ 12" 11-51, 8,-0" 9'-5" #5 @ 12" 1EwU MII k nix Maccaferri Inc. assumes no responsibility for the drawings and calculations it provides, as Title: they must be intended as a general indication to suggest the proper use of its products- W, f. Unils: ked: Scale: 3/4 Feet NTS Date: Maccarferri. Inc. 10303 Governor Larve Blvd. Wil I isimsport, MID 21795-3116 USA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ph. (301) 223-69 10 Fax (301) 223-6134 CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR MACCAFERRI PVC COATED GABION STRUCTURES 1. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 1.1. PVO GABON$ ARE BASKET$ MANUFACTURED FROM U10 DOUBLE TWISTED HEXAGONAL WOVEN STEEL WIRE MESH. HFAVI LY GALVAN ZED THEN PVC COATED, AS PER ASTM Ws-97 I FI I - 4 1. GASIONS ARE FILLED WTH STONE$ AT THE PROJECT SITE TO FORM FLEXIBLE, PERMEABLE. MONOLITHIC STRUCTURES $UCH AS RETAINING WALLS. CHANNEL LININGS. AND WEIRS FOR EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS. THE STEEL WIRE USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF THE GABION 16 HEAVILY GALVAN IZED SOFT TEMPER STEEL. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ME -WIRE ARE SHOWN IN TA13LE 2. THE GABION IS DIVIDED INTO CELLS BY DIAPHRAGMS POSITIONED AT APPROXI MATELY 3 ft (0.9�) CENTERS (FIG. 2 ). TO REINFORCE THE STRUCTURE, ALL MESH PANEL EDGES ARE SELVEDGED WITH A V41RE FWANG A GREATER DIAMETER ITABLE 3 ). DIMENSIONS AND SIZES OF PVC COATED GABIONS ARE SHOWN IN TABLE I GABIONS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED AND SHIPPED WITH ALL COMPONENTS MECHANICALLY CONNECTED AT THE PRODUCTION FACILITY. 2. MATERIALS 2.1. aACKFILL MATERIAL SPECIFIED BELOW SHALL BE FREE DRAINING. BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWN ER OR OWNEITS REPRESENTATIVE, AMID SHALL MEET THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES REQUIREMENTS SH DEFINED IN SECTION 7.1, AN LI ALL BE CLEAN. FREE DRAINING CRUSHEI� $TONE. ZZ. 0O$eI MATERML SMALL BE A CLEAN CRUSHED STONE OR GRANULAR FILL MEETING THE FOLLOWING GRADATION PER ASTMQ422! Table 0 Rock Sizing for Gabions se�e Size Peroenill ssIng 11=11eighiff(m) 100% 4' ot05% 2.3. GABON WALL U IN ITS SHALL TYPE AS PER ASTM A976-97. .1 G HEXAGONAL DOUBLE TWIST VARE MESH Table 1 Sizes for Gabions U=Lengthft(m) W=VVidIhft(Tn) 11=11eighiff(m) # F C.11. 6. O-S) 3 (G.D) 3 (0.g) 2 106 0. 46 3.70 0.087 0-IC-6 3 12 (3-6) 3 (041) 3 (0-91) 4 6 0.8) 3 (MI) 1,5 (0.45) 2 S (2.7) 3 (0s) IS (0.46) 3 12 (3e) 3 (O.S) 1.5 (0.46) 4 8 (1.8) 3 (0.9) 1 (o.3) 2 9 (2.7) a (0.9) 1 ((1.3) 3 12 (3.6) 3 (0.g) 1 (c.3) 4 4.5 11.4) 3 (G.g) 3 4'-0" Table2 Standard Galvanized Mash Wins Mesh Type 'o- in hnIpn) T�IeNnos Wim Dia. in (mm) 8XIO; GaNwtzed 3.25 183) ±10% 0.1 �2.70� PvG Preforned Suftnm 106 0. 46 3.70 Table 3 Standard Wire Diameters SLIDING Laci Mfth SAI�fta Wire f BACKFI ILL SOIL Wire Wire Preforned Suftnm Wire Dar-M, 0.087 0-IC-6 0.134(3.4) Inf. 0 in (�) (2-20) (2-70) P;f kN,'dll Wi. Td 0.004 0.004 0.004 (o.10) (±) 0 in (nn.) (0.1c) (0.11)) l' 011 - M in- Zim Oily. ozv w-') 0.70 (214) 0.8D (244) UBE (259) I FV�' 0 17� 1. I 11, 1 1 (1 174 (4.4) 1 1 ':n§ .in,_ (, M411 � A#4 BAR 24. WIRE -- ALL TESTS ON N RE MUST BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING THE MESH. ALL WIRE SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTIM A975-9T. WIRE USED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF GABIONS AND THE LACING WIRE, SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 75,000 pi (515 MP.) AS PER ASTIM A64 IIA041 M-03. SOFT TEMPER STEEL Maccafern I nc. assu mes no responsibi I ity for the d rawi rvgs and ca cu lations it provides, as Drav, they must be intended as a general indication to suggest the proper use of its products. Title: 2.5. WOVEN WIRE MESH TYPE BX1� --ME MESH AND WIRE CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A975-97 TABLE 1, MESH TYPE OX10. THE NOMINAL MESH OPENING D = 3.25 in. (93 -)(FIG. 11. & 111by THE MINIMUM MESH PROPERTIES FOR STRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY SHALL BE IN ADOORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING MESH TENSILE STRENGTH SHALL BE 29M Wit (43.3 kNi.)MINIMLIM WHEN TESTED INADCORDANCE WITH ASTM A&75-97 SECTION 13.1.1. PUNCH TEST RESISTANCE SHALL BEA MINIMUM OF S300 lb P3.6 kN) WHEN TEST D IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM A975-97 SECTION 13.1.4. CONNECTION TO SELVEDGES SHALL BE 1200 b1ft (17-5 kid.) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE W17H ASTM A979-0. 3. FOUNDATION PREPARA71ON $.1. THE FOUNDATION ON WHICH THE CASIONS ARE TO BE P1,ACEDSHALL BE LEVEL, AND GRADED TO THE ELEVATION$ AS SHOWN ON THE PROJEC1 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. THE FOUNDATION FOR GASIONS SMALL BE LEVEL. SMOOT". AND FREE OF SURFACE FREG 3ULARITIElS, LOOSE MATERIAL AND VEGETATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. APPROPRIATE MEASURE"HALL BE TAKEN FOR FILTERING AND DRAINAGE OF THE FOUNDATION i AS PER THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS (FILTER CLOTH. DRAIN WORKS, _AB ETC.). GEOTEXTILES REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLE13BEMINDC ION STRUCTURES SMALL GOMPLYWrrH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE APPLICATIONS. 4. CONSTRUCTION 4.1. ASSEMBLY -- OPEN AND UNFOLD EACH GABION ON A FLAT, HARD SURFACE AND REMOVE ANY SHIPPING FOLDS IF HIECES97ARY. THIS CAN BE DONE BY PLACI NG THE FOLD OVER A 2� X 4' BOARD AND WALK114G ALONG THE 81 DES. LIFT UP THE SIDES, EN DS A14D DIAPHRAGMS INTO A VERTICAL POSITION TO FORM AN OPEN BOX SHAPE (FIG. 3). CON14E T THE EDGES OF THE GA1310H AND DIAPHRAGMS BY USING EITHER LACING WIRE OR RING FASTENERS (FIG. Sat Sh)TMF USE OF PLIERS TO AIDASSEMOLY AND TYING OF THE VN in USING THE LACING WIRE SUPPLIED WITH THE 4:ASIoN$IS NORMALLY RECOMMENDED. 4.2. -- WH EN USING LAI-ING WIRE, CUT OFF A PIECE OF WIRE APPROXIMATELY 1.$ TIMES THE LE INGTH OF THE EDGE TO BE TIED. LONGER rDSES SMALL RE JOINED BY SEVERAL LENGTHS OF WIRE. TIE WI RE$ SHALL BE SECURED ARGUN D THE SELVEDGE WIRE OR HEAVIER EDGE WIRE, WHERE PRESENT. BY LOOPING AND TWISTING TH LACING WIRE AROUND ITSELF- PROCEED TYING V19TH ALTERNATE DOUBLE AND SINGLE LOOPS. DOUBLE LOOPS SHALL BE MADE AT INTERVALS NOT GREATER THAN 5 in. 115D rrrn). PULL BASKETS TIGHTLY TOGETHER DURING THE TYING OPERATION. THE OTHER END OF THE THE WIRE SHALL BE SECUREDBYAGAIN COPING AND TWISTING THE WIRE AROUND ITSELF. WHEN STEEL RING FASTENERS ARE USED, THE USE OF EITHER A MECHANICAL OR A PNEUMATIC FASTENING TOOL IS REQUIRED. SPACING Or THE RINGS SHALL BE IN ACOORDANCE WITH ASTM A975-97. TABLE 2 h6nkn- &-*h Rqinff U..ft.nd C-.hbn.. IN ANY CASE, RING FASTENERS SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 in. (150 -�. RINGS SHALL BE INSTA LEO AT T14E END AND CENTER DIAPHRAGMS AMID ALONG ALL EDGES. CARE SHALL BETAKEN TO ENSURE THE STEEL RING FASTENER IS COMPLETELY CLOSED AFTER INSTALLATION. 4.2. jB!N��LING -- GABIONS SMALL OF CONN ECTED Toq�;IETHER AND ALIGNED BEFORE MILING THE ROCKS FOR GASIONS MAY Of PRODVGeo BY MY $IJ TABLE QUARRYING METHOD. AND BY THE USE OF MY DEVICE THAT YIELDS THE ReQUI RE 0 SIZES; WITHIN THE GRADATION LIMITS CHOSEN. ROCKS $MALL SE HARD, ANGULARTO ROUN D. DURABLE AMC) OF SUCH QUALITY THAT THEY SHALL P401 DISINTEGRATE ON EXPOSURE TO WATER OR WEATHERING DURING THE LIFE OF THE STRUCTURE. GABION ROCKS SHALL RANGE BETWEEN 4-8 in. (100-200 m.). THE RANGE I N SIZES MAY ALLOW FOR A VARIATION OF 5% OVERSIZE ANDVOR 5% UNDERSIZE ROCK. PROVIDED IT IS NOT PLACED ON THE GABION'S EXPOSED SURFACE. IN ALL GASES. THE OVERS LZE ROCK SHALL 140T BE LARGER THAN 10 in. (250 nwn�. AND THE UNDERSIZE ROCK SHALL NOT BE SMALLER THAN 2 in. (5) -)- DURING THE FILLING OPERATION SOME MANUAL STONE PLACEMENT IS R OU IRED TO MINIMIZE VOIDS. THE EXPOSED FACES OF VERTICAL STRUCTURES MAY BE CAREFULLY HAND PLACED TO GIVE A NEAT, FLAT, AMD COMPACT APPEARANCE. THE CELLS SHALL BE FILLED IN STAGES SO THAT LOCAL DEFORMATION MAY BE AVOIDED. THAT IS, AT NO TI ME. SHkLL ANY CELL BE FILLED TO A DEPTH EXCIEFINNG 1 fI PM mnn� HIGHER MAN THE ADJOINING CELL IFIG. 14a 14,). STIFFEN ERS OR CROBSTIES $FIALL BE INSTALLED AS INDICATED (FIGS. 12a & 12h, 1,U 4lIL 13b). FiXEDAT V3 AND M OF THE HEIGHT FOR$ It OR Im GASIONS AS THE CELL IS BEING FILLI IN 1.5 4 (500 mm� HIGH UNITS STIFFENERS MAY BE FIXEDATTHE HALF HEIGHT LEVEL. IFREOUIRED. PREFORMEDCORNER STIFFENERS ARE INSTALLED AT 45'TO THE FACEISIDE OF THE UNIT. EXTENDING AN EQUAL DISTANCE ALONG EACH SIDE BEING BRACED �APPRDXIMATEILY I N [300 ml). WHEN MORE THAN ONE LAYER OF GABIONS IS REQUIRED, IN ORDER FOR THE INDIVIDUAL UNITS TO BECOME INCORPORATED INTO ONE CONTINUOUS STRUCTURE, THE NEX LAYER OF GABIONS MUST BE CONNECTED TO THE LAYER UNDERNEATH AFTERTHIS LAYER HAS BEEN SECURELY CLOSED (FIG. 15). 4.4. LLOSING -- TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT, LEVEL OFF THE FILL 1 -1.5 in. (25-40 ..) ABOVE THE TOP OF THE MESH. FOLD THE LID DOWN AN D PULL THE EDGES OF THE PANELS TO BE CONNECTED USING AN APPROPRIATE TOOL SUCH AS A LID CLOSER (FIG. 9). THE LID$ SHALL BE TIGHTLY LACED ALONG ALL EDGES. ENDS AND DIAPHRAGMS IN THE SAME MANNER AS DESCRIBED FOR ASSEMBLING UNITS (FIGS. fiiii 4% 6b, 10. & 10b). ADJACENT LIDS MAY BE SECURELY ATTACKED SIMULTANEOUSLY. ALL END MRIES SHALLTHFIN BE TURNED IN TO AVOID PROTRUSIONS. 4.�. TE$TING METHODS -- TESTING METHODS AMID FREQUENCY, AND VERIFICATION OF MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS AND COMPACTION SHALL BE THE POSPONOISILITY OF THE OWNERS GEOTECHNICA. ENGINEER, UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. THE SMEAR STRENGTH TESTING OF REINFORCED BACKFILL SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 1 NO CUBIC YARDS PLACED OR IF THE NATURE OF BACKFILL SOIL VISUALLY CHANGES. 5. TECHINICAL REQUIREMENTS 5.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RAVE AN APPROVED SET OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND CONTRACT SPECIR IONS ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE GABON WALL STRUCTURE. 5.2. GABION SHALL BE PLACED AT THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROJCET DRAWING SHEETS. 5.3. TRACKED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE OPERATED DIRECTLY ON THE GASION WALL. A MINIMUM FI ILL THICKNESS OF 6 in. (1 SO-) IS REQUIRED FOR OPERATION OF TRACKED VE141CLES OVER THE GA13ION WALL. TURNI NG OF TRACKED VEHICLES SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM TO PREVENT DISPLACING ME FILL AMID OR THE GABION WALL Construction Notes # 3/4 Feet �NuTl uS: P"d F'"'d' M: af 1 111. DRAINAGE al. THE SACKFI ILL SURFACE SHALL SO GRAIDED AWAY FROM THE WALL PA):;E A MINIMUM OF 2 PERCENT SLOPE AND A, TEMPORARY SOIL SEFIM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED NEAR THE WALL CREST TO PREVENT SURFACE AND WATER RUNOFF FROM OVERTOPPING THE WALL. GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. 6.2. AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, BACKFILL SURFACE SMALL BE COMPACTED WITH A SMOOTH WHEEL ROLLER TO MI N IMIZE PONDING OF WATER AND SATURATION OF THE BACKFILL 6.3. THE ENGINEERING, DESIGN ANALYSIS, DETAILING AND MITIGATION OF BOTH SURFACE DRAINAGE AND SEEPAGE OF GROUNDWATER SHALL BE THE RESPIONSI BILITY OF THE OWNER OR THE OWNETS REPRESENTATIVE 6.4. PERMANENT SURFACE WATER DFVER ION AND f OR 0OULECTION SHALL BE AS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE- 7. DESIGN PARAMFTERS 7.1. DESIGN OF THE GABION WALL STRUCTURE IS BASED 044 THE FOLLOWING ASSUMED SOIL PARAMETERS Table 4 Assumed Soil Parameters SLIDING EFFECTIVE FRICTIONANGLE EFFECTIVE COHES1014 MOISTUNITWEIGHT BACKFI ILL SOIL DEGREES BEARING CAPACITY Pof (--- klhin,3) RETAINEDSOIL DEGREES (TYR.) P1f i--- KIN113) FOUNDATIONSCIL I DEGREES WALL- P;f kN,'dll 7.2. MINIMUM REQUIRED FACTOR OF SAFETY IFS): 7-2.1. WALL CHECKS Table 5 Minimum Safety Factors - Wall Checks SLIDING 1.5 INTERNAL STABILITY 1.5 OVERTURNING 1.5 BEARING CAPACITY 2.0 1-22. IiXT5FINAL STABILITY Tabl a 6 M I, i.u. Safety Factors - External Stabi I ity GUCEIAL STABILITY 1.3 7.$. TRAFFIC SURCHARGE 2%0 7.4. QBQUMOVAUS 1�&E -GROUNDWATER �PHRIIATIO SURFACES NOT OON$IDeREO IN WALL DESIGN. WATER SURFACE ASSUMED TO BE SUFFICIENTLY BELOW BOTTOM OFWALLASNOTTO INFLUENCE INTERNALAND EXTERNAL STABILITY. 7.5. SEISMIC LOADING MONE 5. SPECIAL PROVISIONS B.I. THE DESIGN PRESENTED HERE IN IS BASED ON SOIL PARAMETERS, FOUNDATION GONCITONSGROUNDWATER CONDITION. AND LOADING STATED IN SECTION 70 AND SMALL BE VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 8.2. WALL ELEVATION VIEWS AND LOCATIONS AND GEOMETRY OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND GRACE ABOVEAND BELOW THE WALLS MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE OWN ER OR GWNEFrS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.3. MACCAFERRI, INC. ASSUMES NO LABILTY FOR INTERPRETATION OR VERIFICATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS, SUITABILITY OF SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS AND INTERPRETATION OF SUB-SURFACE GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. SA THE OWNER OR OWNER'$ REPRESENTATIVE I$ RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND vERiFYiNG THAT THE ACTUAL $11E CONDITIONS ARE AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7.0 PRIOR TO AND DURING CONISMUCTION. -THE OWNER OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE ON-SITE TO ASSURE THE PROVISCN$ IN THE CONSTRUCTION NOTES ARE FOLLOWED. 8.5. IF ANY ROCK FORMA71ONS AND I OR GROUNDWATER ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THIS WALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE OWNER OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE- 8.6. ANY REVISIONS TO DESIGN PARAMETERS STATED IN SECTION 7.0 'DR STRUCTURE GEOMETRY SMALL REQUIRE: DESIGN MODIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. Maocaferri, Inc. 10303 Govemor Lane Blvd. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Williamsport. MD 21795-3116 USA NOTE: CLEAR HEIGHT REGION 3" S BARS (FILL FACE) SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM PROPOSED #4 BARS (FRONT FACE) R ABOVE OF 2 BARS IN EA. FACE G OUNDLINE CONTINUOUS ABOVE PIPE TOP OF WALL (LEVEL) CONST. JT. IN WALL FOR OPTIONAL L-S APE WALL- IT FF L L7 EA I 2" CLR� �14 DI'AR LONG NOTES: #4 A (TYP. PIPE EA�H FACE) "L� W� b BARS SPACES (72"0 MAX.)- (VI[I OPTIONAL 2'-0" (TYR.) L-SHAPE 3,600 Fs IN ACCORDANCE WTH CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND 4'-10" WALL- 31 -61, - 2'-0" (MI Y-n" (NAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. 6. WEEP HOLE DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE 3"0 SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLID T PROPOSED 7__ 7-4 1 5'-7" GROUND l' 011 - Lw BAR (TYP.) 0 SLOPE IN P 3. CHAMFER ALL EXPOSED CORNERS %" OR HAVE A RADIUS OF 1". C FRONT OF WALL EXTEND WALL 5'-0" 6'-.3" LbBARS WEEP HOLES UNTIL GROUND SLOPE A#4 BAR 6" ABOVE FLOW LINE (TYP.) rj BOTTOM OF FOOTING (LEVEL) P S SHOWN @ 12" MAX CTRS. VARIES THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM BEARING PRESSURES: CONST. JT. IN WALL FOR OPTIONAL L-S APE WALL- IT FF L L7 EA I SINGLE PIPE HEADWALL ELEVATION (Lw, S AND #4 BARS PLACED AROUND PIPE SHALL BE 2" CLR. FROM PIPE) (D BARS AND tF408ARS IN FOOTING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, SEE TYPICAL SECTION) R BAR SPACINGS AND SIZES, SEE BILL OF MATERIAL) C Ww B MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTHS 2" CLR� MIN. SPLICE NOTES: #4 l'-4" "L� W� b BARS SPACES 1. CONCRET SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (f'c) ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM BEARING PRESSURE. 2'-0" (TYR.) #7 3,600 Fs IN ACCORDANCE WTH CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND 4'-10" #8 31 -61, - _ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. 6. WEEP HOLE DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE 3"0 SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLID a,_oll 7__ 7-4 1 5'-7" 2. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 60 AND CONFORM TO ASTIM A615. l' 011 - Lw BAR (TYP.) I P 3. CHAMFER ALL EXPOSED CORNERS %" OR HAVE A RADIUS OF 1". WALL CONFORMING TO ASTM D1785 AND SHALL HAVE A SLOPE OF 1:12 EXTEND WALL 5'-0" 6'-.3" #5 @ 12" #4 9 12 UNTIL GROUND SLOPE A#4 BAR _Lw BAR A PROPOSED 4. SOIL BELOW THE PROPOSED FOOTING SHALL BE CAPABLE OF RESISTING 1'-7" IN FRONT MEETS @ 12" MAX CTRS. GROUNDLINE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM BEARING PRESSURES: 4'-0" PROPOSED (UP"TO F,X - 115'_U") 8" i'_0" 2'- 4" GROUNDLINE @ 9 MAX. CTRS. _S BARA 1 Hw 1MIN. BEARING PRESSURE (ABOVE) H� >= 14'-0") #5 @ 12" 1 2000 PSF 11 Z �T_ 2" CLR. '11'-0" 1 2500 PST 5'- 1 4-#5 CONSTR. JT. FRONT _FTYP) 4'-6" 1 1 -0j, 1 1 - -, I - WITH FACE- iY2" x 3)12" FILL FACE 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SOIL CONDJIONS MEET THE MINIMUM X 3" CLR. < M KEYWAY 8'-5" BEARING PRESSURE BY DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION (DCP) TESTING PERFORMED BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL. IF BEARING PRESSURE DOES #4 @ 12" BOTTOM OF B C NOT MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A V-10" BETWEEN THE WALL AND ANY UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. CONSTR. " GEOTECIENICAL ENGINEER DETERMINE A SUBGRADE MODIFICATION TO 5'-D" SINGLE PIPE HEADWALL ELEVATION (Lw, S AND #4 BARS PLACED AROUND PIPE SHALL BE 2" CLR. FROM PIPE) (D BARS AND tF408ARS IN FOOTING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, SEE TYPICAL SECTION) R BAR SPACINGS AND SIZES, SEE BILL OF MATERIAL) C Ww B MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTHS 2" CLR� MIN. SPLICE WI TH 1 Y2 #4 l'-4" 9 EQUAL b BARS SPACES 4 1 ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM BEARING PRESSURE. 2'-0" (TYR.) #7 RE Y Y;A3 4'-10" #8 31 -61, - _ 3" CLR, 6. WEEP HOLE DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE 3"0 SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLID a,_oll 1 #10 1 5'-7" 1 lo'_111 l' 011 - Lw BAR (TYP.) I P (TYBT. WALL CONFORMING TO ASTM D1785 AND SHALL HAVE A SLOPE OF 1:12 1'-3" 5'-0" 6'-.3" #5 @ 12" #4 9 12 1 V, 2'-4" #4 9 12" TO DRAIN. MAX. SPACING BETWEEN WEEP HOLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1'-7" r'j 4-#5 0.27 5'-0" 4'-0" 2" CLR. 6'-0". 8" i'_0" 2'- 4" #4 @ 12" (TYP.) 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FOLLOW ANY AND ALL 7'-3" #5 @ 12" #4 0 12" 11 2'-4" R 3'-6" OSHA AND STATE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF 5'- 1 4-#5 0.32 6'-0" 4'-6" 1 1 -0j, 1 1 - -, I - THE HEADWALL. i -o" 2'-8" X 3" CLR. 1'-5" 14BARS PLA CED 8'-5" 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS #4 @ 12" BOTTOM OF < - M TTYP7 #4 0 12" I AS SHOWN V-10" BETWEEN THE WALL AND ANY UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 4-#5 < SHEAR KEY 7'-0" 5'-D" V_0" 1 -6, 9 BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE GRANULAR SOIL USE LIGHT OR SINGLE PIPE HEADWALL ELEVATION (Lw, S AND #4 BARS PLACED AROUND PIPE SHALL BE 2" CLR. FROM PIPE) (D BARS AND tF408ARS IN FOOTING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, SEE TYPICAL SECTION) R BAR SPACINGS AND SIZES, SEE BILL OF MATERIAL) C Ww B MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTHS BAR SIZE MIN. SPLICE S BAR MIN. SPLICE #4 l'-4" #5 11-811 3'-0" #6 2'-0" S-7" #7 2'- 8" 4'-10" #8 31 -61, - 6'- 4 #9 4'-4" a,_oll 1 #10 1 5'-7" 1 lo'_111 P BARS SHALL NOT BE SPLICED BAR BENDING DIAGRAM d 41 I,,,"D R �eA S-6" #4A BAR E R X I (ALL DIMENSIONS ARE OUT-TO-OUT� PIPE (72"0 MAX.) 2'-0" (M FILL FACE FRONT FOR OPTIONAL FACE CONST. JT. IN FOOTING L-SHAPE WALL FRONT FACE (REINFORCING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) SINGLE PIPE HEADWALL PLAN (L-SHAPE WALL OPTIONAL) Wf HAND-HELD COMPACTION EQUIPMENT WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE WALL. 10. ALL HEADWALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH LEVEL BACKFILL AND DECAL SECTION NO ALLOWABLE SURCHARGE. (PIPE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) (JSEE HEADWALL ELEVATION FOR PIPE LOCATION) OUND SLOPE IN FRONT OF WALL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, SEE HEADWALL ELEVATION) ACONTRACTOR SHALL CUT BARS 2" CLEAR OF PIPE. 1'-0" 7 30 PVC SCH 40 WEEP HOLE PROPOSED EDLINE GROU PROPOSED GROUNDLINE ABOVE PIPE #78M STONE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC SECURELY TIED AND 0 6" ABOVE FLOW LINE OR AS SHOWN IN ELEVATION (F TAIL .1 11IN4. "41ERYFIUAL SECTION) Z #4A BAR (TY E30q Df Kh- W� B C S BARS E F S BAR LENGTH 0 CONST. JT. R D BAR LENGTH IN WALL X 0 P BAR NGTH Lb BARS CY FT S BAR (TYP.) - FILL l' 011 - Lw BAR (TYP.) I FILL FACE S BAR (TYP.) L� BAR (TYP. C 4 Ej - Wf I 6� BAR (TYP-) (TYR) M - CONST. JT. IN FOOTING BAR #4 DOWEL ADDITIONAL #4 DOWEL BARS @ 12" CTR& WHERE APPLICABLE WALL CORNER DETAIL (FOR L _SHAPE (#4A BARS TO BE ALIGNED WITH HORIZONTAL BARS IN WALLS) (#4 DOWEL BAR SHALL BE PLACED IN FOOTINGS. CENTER WITHIN FOOTING DEPTH.) (ALL REINFORCING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) BILL OF MATERIAL Hw Wf Df Kh- W� B C S BARS E F S BAR LENGTH Lw BARS D BARS R D BAR LENGTH P BARS X y P BAR NGTH Lb BARS CY FT 4'-0 3'-6" l' 011 - V-0" 8" V-0" V-10" #4 @ 12 1'-3" 5'-0" 6'-.3" #5 @ 12" #4 9 12 1 V, 2'-4" #4 9 12" 3'-0" 1'-7" 4' 7� 4-#5 0.27 5'-0" 4'-0" i'_O" V_0" 8" i'_0" 2'- 4" #4 @ 12" 1'-3" 6,-0" 7'-3" #5 @ 12" #4 0 12" 11 2'-4" #4 0 12" 3'-6" V-7" 5'- 1 4-#5 0.32 6'-0" 4'-6" 1 1 -0j, 1 1 - -, I - 10" i -o" 2'-8" #4 @ 12" 1'-5" 7'-0" 8'-5" #5 @ 12" #4 @ 12" 1 -1,, 2'-7" #4 0 12" 4'-0" V-10" 5-10 4-#5 0.41 7'-0" 5'-D" V_0" 1 -6, 10" V-0" S-2" #5 @ 12" 11-51, 8,-0" 9'-5" #5 @ 12" #4 @ 12" 1 -ill 2'-7" #5 @ 12" 4'-6" 2'- 1 " 6'-7" 5-#5 0.46 81-01, 6,-0" V-S, '_15, 1'-0" 1'- 0" 4'-0" #5 @ 12" 1'-7" 9'-S' 10' - 10" #5 @ 12" #4 @ 12" 11-61, 3'- 2 #5 (9) 12" 5'- 6 2'-4" 7'-10" 7-#5 0.64 10'-0" 7'-6" V-3 1,-6" 1'-3" V-13" 4'-9" #5 @ 12" 2'-4" il'_3" 13-7 #6 @ 12 #4 @ 12 11-91, mmmim� 3'-6" #6 (91 12" =1IIlIIIk"IIIIIIIIIII 7 1- 0" 2'- 4 mmmiin� 9'-4" 8-#5 Y.. I, 1 3 1'-6" 5'-3" 12 �2" 27;; 21 14' -1 D" #6 @ 12" @ 2" 2'-0" 3'- 10" 6 @ 2" 1 7' 1, 2' -10" 1 10 4" 8- 6 1�03 1 8,:", i, I'- 14 1 7 " 1 !;:-: F 1 '-1" 5 -0" #6 5 � 2; 7 1 16'-1" #6 @ 12" 4 @ 12"' 2" 3" 4'-3" #6 @ �2" 776' 1 3'-7" 1 - 11, 1" 8- 6 1.22 �'-6 3'-0' �'-6 2'-6' 5'-0' 1 #5 4 12" 1 T-T 14'-6� 18'-1" #6 @ 12" 2'-3" 4'-3" Ll 172;' L 1 2 4��71�� 172'-7" 9- 6 1.34 4-0 19 0'-0 3'-0" 1 2'-6" 5--g" #6 @ 9" 1 S-10" 15'-9" 19'-7" #6 @ -" #5 @ 9" 2'-9" 4'-11 #' @ -10" 11-#6 1�68 i I F �q 11' 1" Y6 (d) 11" V-' 2' #6 9 9" 1 10'- 0' 1 5'- 1 1 15�-1- 6 180 #4A BAR LENGTH 7'-0" E �2 Z� 1 0' LL1 0 > rLu (n �w 0 (9 ozx (if zoolm 0 _j W FO 1wn 0 Ir Z 0 0 w Cn o BILL OF MATERIAL Hw Wf Df" Kh Ww B C S BARS E Emmm4 S BAR LENGTH Lw BARS D BARS R D BAR LENGTH P BARS X Y P BAR LENGTH Lb BARS CY/FT 8'-C)" 6'-0" 1'-3" V-6" V-0" 1'-0" 4'-0" #5 @ 12" 1'-7" -3" 10'-10" #6 @ 12" #4 @ 12" V-6" 3'- 2 #5 @ 12" 5'- 6 2'- 4" 7'- 10" 7-#5 0.64 #4A BAR LENGTH 7'-0" TW=731.E TF=723.lr V-011 1110 HEADWALL DIMENSIONS(NIS I HEADWALL LENGTH OVERALL 15'- 0 IN aj Emmm4 04 C14 00 041 Lo 0 C" C') F Z ;;- U3 0 = 0 2 t� LLI 0 0 Z Z < 0 ILL! a X Z CD 0 It U) CD = ILL w OIL F U) LU uj > Z JO: LFL- ILL, F-LU 0 V) LU _j 06 of q wo o LLI < Z < LU X U uj Z V 0 Z 2 >_ It- U LLI in LL� 14 1� d LO 00 _j -:0 Z _j 0 C-4 IJ0 C� C) 0) 0 (::) to