NC0000311_Issuance of Permit_20010402

OF W A TF9 Michael F. Easley
A Governor
UY�� qy 40A William G. Ross,Jr.,Secretary
RMENR
--I
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T.Stevens,Director
Division of Water Quality
April 2,2001
Mr.Edwin E.Morrow
M-B Industries,Inc.
P.O.Box 1118
Rosman,North Carolina 28772
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
Permit NCO000311
M-B Industries,Inc.
Transylvania County
Dear Mr.Morrow:
Division of Water Quality(Division)personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North.Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9,1994(or as subsequently amended).
Please note the following changes from the draft permit.
• Part A. (1.) of the draft permit contained an error in the toxicity requirement. The requirement has been changed
from"Chronic Toxicity"to"Acute Toxicity."
• A new section of effluent limits,Part A. (3.)has been added to the permit. It specifies flow and-pollutant limits for
the proposed discharge of remediated groundwater from outfall 003.
If any parts,measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,you
have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty(30)days following receipt of this letter. This request
must be in the form of a written petition,conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes,and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is
made,this decision shall be final and binding.
Pleise note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other
permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this permit,please contact Natalie Sierra at 919-733-5083 extension
551 or via e-mail [e-mail].
Sincerely,
ML FM
Kerr T.Stevens _
cc: Asheville Regional Office/Water Quality Section
GS Unit f
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Point Source Compliance and Enforcement Unit
N.C.Division of Water Quality I NPDES Unit Phone:[phone]
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 fax:[phone]
Internet:h2o.enr.state.nc.us DENR Customer Service Center 1800 623-7748

Permit NC0000311
s►
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
M-B Industries, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
M-B Industries Wastewater Treatment Plant
U.S. Highway 64
West of Rosman
Transylvania County
to receiving waters designated as the West Fork French Broad River in the French
Broad River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective May 1, 2001.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2005.
Signed this day April 3, 2001.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
BILL REID
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0000311
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
M-B Industries is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.030 MGD physical/chemical treatment facility
for the treatment of metal fabrication wastewater (00 1) and to discharge non-
contact cooling water (002) from facilities located at M-B Industries, Inc., U.S.
Highway 64, west of Rosman in Transylvania County, and
2. After obtaining an Authorization to Construct (ATC) from the Division of Water
Quality, operate a 0.1 MGD groundwater remediation system for the treatment
and discharge of contaminated groundwater through outfall 003.
3. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into West Fork French Broad River, which is classified C-Trout HQW waters
in the French Broad River Basin.

otR ,C>
- i-
,.
f ° � �• ` r'' `lam :� r / _40 s:
Point f Discharge
v
peg, rr1 � , ' v
}-�3--
J
NC00000311 - M-B Industries Facility f1.
Latitude: 35°08'15"N Sub-Basin: 04-03-01 Location
Longitude: 82°51'00"W
Quad k: G17NEJRosman
Stream Class: C-Tr-HQW M-B Industries,Inc.
Receiving Stream: West Fork French Broad River / NC0000311
Permitted Flow: 001:0.030 MGD 002: not limited 003: 0.10 MGD O P! i2 Map Not to Scale

Permit NC0000311
a
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001 -METAL FINISHING. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Sample Type Sample
Fre uenc Location'
Flow 0.030 MGD Weekly Instantaneous Influent or Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 31.0 m L 60.0 m /L Weekly Grab Effluent
Oil and Grease 26.0 m /L 52.0 m /L Weekly Grab Effluent
Phenols 2/Month Grab Effluent
Temperature(°C)2 Weekly Grab Effluent,
Upstream,
Downstream
Total Toxic Organics(TTO)3 2.13 m /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Acute Toxicity4 Quarterly Composite Effluent
Cadmium 0.240 m 2/Month Grab Effluent
Chromium 1.71 m /L 2.77 m 2/Month Grab Effluent
Nickel 2.38 m /L 3.98 m /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Copper 2.07 m /L 3.38 m 2/1VIonth Grab Effluent
Cyanide 0.65 m /L 1.20 m L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Lead 0.43 m /L 0.69 m /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Silver 0.24 m /L 0.43 m /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Zinc 1.48 m L 2.61 m /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
1 Sample Locations: Upstream- Upstream 50 feet, Downstream - Downstream 50 feet.
4 The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than 0.50C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed
200C.
3 In lieu of monitoring for TTO, the permittee may submit the following certification statement: Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit
limitation for total toxic organics, I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of
concentrated toxic organics into the wastewater has occurred since the filing of the last discharge
monitoring report.
4 Whole Effluent Toxicity will be assessed using the Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow) Pass/Fail at
90% test. See part A.(4.).

Permit NC0000311
a
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 002 — NON-CONTACT COOLING WATER ONLY.
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
FLUENT"
LIMITS", . . � ` - g. 'MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Sample Type Sample
Fre4d6n6y Location!
Flow Semi-annually Estimate Effluent
Temperature,ov Semi-annually Grab Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine2 Semi-annually Grab -- Effluent :d
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE COOLING
WATER EXCEPT AS PRE-APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL COMPOUNDS
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
1 The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than 0.50C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed
200C.
2 Monitoring requirements only apply if chlorine is added to the treatment system. Discharges shall
be required to meet a daily maximum discharge limitation of 17 µg/L.
The permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division of Water Quality prior to utilizing
any biocide in the cooling water.

i
Permit NC0000311
A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 003-GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Sample
Average Average Maximum Frequency T e Location
Flow 0.10 MGD Continuous Recording Effluent
Cyanide Quarterly Grab Effluent
Cadmium 2 u /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Chromium 1022 u /L 2/1VIonth Grab Effluent
Zinc 2/Month Grab Effluent
Arsenic Quarterly Grab Effluent
Lead 34 u 2/Month Grab Effluent
Selenium Quarterly Grab Effluent
Silver Quarterly Grab Effluent
Cis-1,2 dichloroethene Quarterly Grab Effluent
Trichloroethene 2/Month Grab Effluent
Tetrachloroethene 2/Month Grab Effluent
Chloride Quarterly Grab Effluent
Acute Toxicity' Quarterly Composite Effluent
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
Notes:
1 Whole Effluent Toxicity will be assessed using the Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow) Pass/Fail at
90% test. See part A.(4.).

Permit NC0000311
A. (4.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL LIMIT (Quarterly) '
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a guarterIy basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity
In A Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised-July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring
shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. The effluent
concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as
treatment two in the procedure document). Effluent samples for self-monitoring purposes must be
obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The tests will be
performed during the months of March, June, September and December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGE6C. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch --
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name,, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation,of"No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing,
this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may
be re-opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month
following the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (5.) BIOCIDE CONDITION
The permittee shall not use any biocides except those approved in conjunction with the permit
application. The permittee shall notify the Director in writing not later than ninety (90) days prior to
instituting use of nay additional biocide used in cooling systems which may be toxic to aquatic life
other than those previously reported to the Division of Water Quality. Such notification shall include
completion of Biocide Worksheet From 101 and a map locating the discharge point and receiving
stream.

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
CLIPPING OF LEGAL ADVERTISING NORTH CAROLINA
ATTACHED HERE TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
PUBLIC NOTICE Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of sai,
STATE OF NORTH County and State, duty commissioned, qualified, an
ENVIROONMENTAL authorized by law to administer oaths, personall
MANAGEMENT appeared David Phillips who being first duty swop
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT deposes and says: that he (she) isdA vertisin
RALEIGH,N.C.27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF ManaggL(Owner, partner,publisher, or other office
INTENT TO ISSUE A NPDES or employee authorized to make this affidavit) o
WASTEWATER PERMIT The Transylvania Times, published, issued, an
On the basis of thorough
staff review and application of entered as second class mail in the Town of Brevar,
N.C. General Statute 143.21. in said County and State; that he (she) is authorizer
Public law 92-500 and other to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the
lawful standards and NPDES .Permit Number
regulations, the North Carolina NC0000311, M-B Industries notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy o
Environmental Management(Mitchell Bissel), P.O. Box which is attached hereto, was published in Thi
Commission proposes to issue a 1118, Rosman, N.C. 28772 has Transylvania Times on the following dates:
National Pollutant Discharge applied for a permit renewal for
Elimination System (NPDES) a facility located in January 29, 2001
wastewater discharge permit to Transylvania County
the person (s) listed below discharging treated wastewater
effective 45' days from the into West Fork French Broad in
publish date of this notice. the French Broad.River Basin. and that the said newspaper in which such notice
Written comments regarding'Currently cadmium are water
the proposed permit will be' quality limited: This discharge paper, document, or legal advertisement wa
accepted until 30 days after the may affect future allocations in published was, at the time of each and every sucl
publish date of this notice. All. this portion of the receiving publication, a newspaper meeting all of thi
comments received prior to that stream.
date are considered in the final NPDES Permit Number requirements and qualifications of Section I-597 0
determinations regarding the NCO051021, Eagle's Nest the General Statutes of North Carolina and wa
Proposed permit.. The Director Foundation Camp,43 Hart road, qualified newspaper within the meaning of Sectiot
of the N.C. Division of Water Pisgah Forest, N.C. 28766 has
Quality may'decide to hold a applied for a permit renewal for I-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
Public meeting for the proposed a_ facility located in
permit should the Division Transylvania County This ;i day of 2O0V
receive a significant degree of discharging treated wastewater
public interest. into Little River in the French
Copies of the draft permit .Broad River Basin. Currently
and other supporting fecal coliform and total residual
information on file used to (Signature of person making affidavit
resent in chlorine are water quality
determine conditions
P j limited. This discharge may
the draft Dermic are available j affect future allocations in this Swor4M, me, this
upon request and payment of !portion of the receiving stream. • of'
the costs of reproduction. Mail .2004---1
NPDES Permit Number y
comments and/or requests for NC00048658, Blue Mountain
information .to the N.C. . (Utilities, Inc. (Sherwood Forest
Division of Water Quality at the. ;WWTp), 1 King Road, Pisgah
above address or call Ms. Forest,N.C. 28768 has applied gotary Publi
Christie Jackson at 919-733- ;for a permit renewal for a _ ✓� C�
5083, extension 538. Please facility located in Transylvania My Commission expires: �_✓t�J
include the NPDES permit; County discharging treated
number (attached) in any, wastewater into the Little River
communication. Interested in the French Broad River
persons may also visit the Basin. Currently total residual
Division of Water Quality at chlorine are water quality
512 N. Salisbury Street, limited. This discharge may
Raleigh, N.C. 27604-1148 affect future allocations in this
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. portion of the receiving stream.
and 5:00 p.m. to review m1/29/1tc
information on file.

• DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET ADDENDUM FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No.NC0000311
Facili Information
Applicant/FacilityName: NC0000311—M-B Industries
Applicant Address: Mr.Edwin E.Morrow,P.O.Box 118;Rosman„North Carolina 28772
Facility Address: U.S.Highway 64 west of Rosman
Permitted Flow 0.10 MGD of remediated groundwater
Type of Waste: Contaminated Groundwater
Facility/Permit Status: Class II,Active;Renewal
County: Transylvania
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream: West Fork French Regional Office: Asheville
Broad River
Stream Classification: C-Tr-H W State Grid/USGSQuad: G7NE/Rosman
303(d)Listed? no Permit Writer. Natalie Sierra
Subbasin: 04-03-01 Date: 1/10/01
Drainage Area(mid: 27.2
Summer 7Q10 cfs 27.9T
i
Winter 7Q10(cfs): 04""
30Q2 cfs
Average Flow cfs : 93.8
IWC(%): 0.6 Lat. 350 08'15"N Long. 820 51'00"W
BACKGROUND:
During the draft period of NC0000311,an application was received requesting permission to discharge treated
groundwater from the site through a third outfall 003. Preliminary scans show the water to be contaminated with PCE
(tetrachloroethene)and TCE(trichloroethene)for which a shallow tray air stripper has been recommended by the
consultant as a treatment system. The Groundwater section in the ARO is strongly urging the facility to move forward
with groundwater cleanup measures.
PERMITTING STRATEGY:
Based upon available data from recovery wells,a reasonable potential analysis was run on an array of metals and other
contaminants. Reasonable potential was found for the following.
• Chromium
• Cadmium
• Zinc
• Lead
• Silver
• PCE
All of the above will be limited except zinc and silver,which are action level pollutants.
Based on detection,monitoring will be required 2/monthly for the following:
• TCE
• Zinc
The following will be monitored quarterly to collect effluent data for RPA at the next renewal:
• Arsenic
• Cyanide
• Selenium
• Cis-1,2 dichloroethene
• Chloride
• Siler

• .i
p-_
An sate toCti*test wU be reWkvd quwu dy. This test is of the some fio=su that pekaned an the efEkmidlttwo,,
001.
r.
Ir
zv
a
w
. .. � gip; x• - J
kyr
,
r � ��

Permit NC0084344
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample Location
Average Maximum Frequency
Flows Continuous Recording Effluent
Arsenic Monthly Grab Effluent
Chloroform Monthly Grab Effluent
Lead Quarterly Grab Effluent
Mercury 0.012 L /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Tetrachloroethene 8.85« /L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Toluene Monthly Grab Effluent
Trichloroethene 81 µg/L 2/Month Grab Effluent
EPA Method 6210D Quarterly Grab Effluent
Chronic Toxicity2 Quarterly Grab Effluent
pH 2/Month Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. This facility has been approved as a non-discharge facility with the option of an emergency discharge should
the infiltration gallery fail to handle the load of the treated groundwater. If an actual discharge does not
occur during a month, then report such on the monthly monitoring reports. Sampling only needs to be
completed at the time of a discharge.
2. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) Quarterly, Pass/Fail, 90%; See A.(2.).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, guarterlu monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised-February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months
of February, May, August and November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
88
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple-concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum,
in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised-February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of

i
Permit NC0084344
` "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised-
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity
monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the
aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number,
county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of"No Flow" in the comment area
of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the
address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re-opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

ND\j S-r-el CS
F-A A
+ -eaA
CLA 1�-1 ►*T WIE�I COC-;—) (YPT W--7 TCP— —T -AC
)S �11�1WLC7�j +�t �ve-� rvU tvcDt"1�.
C SOP 06 �-D AT A )
2- 20yrn 3 3,LI C
-j ey 2-03fm ;0�,3 t3 , b
9n -I I 2t)0 M 13A `� d
-Pc E — f5�C� IL
TCE= Lt � IL
��D�oSEt> S� � ���o�i✓ S-�i �
Je
�12D�� �iSPosA = I COaov aR .
�1.K i D SU 1 g�3o M*—Ii ELs.e IS N�

Facility Hasteflow (MGD)
Summer/Hinter (circle one)
- ---------
4:F
a
E I
CD -
Cn '
- I I
Nil -N (mg/1 )
Potential effluent limit. combinations :
BODS NH3-N -

r
Feb. 02 2001 10: 33AM Waters Edge Environmental 919-859-9930 P.2
�. _mss-... ♦a.i V'.i � � 1....� ....r
law profile air strippers
Sstem Performance Estimate
�l and Proposal Information: Model chosen:
Client a p Water Flow Ra . 65.0 gpm' )
4901 Edge Environmental, LLC Air Flow Rate: - I
4901 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 100 Water Temp: 55.0 F
Raleigh, NC 276013
Air Temp: 50.0 F
ANY Ratio: 103.6
Safety Factor: None
Untreated Model 3611 Model 3621 Model 3631 Model 3641 Model 3651
Contaminant Influent Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent
Effluent Target Water Water Water Water Water
Afr(lbslhr) Air(lbwbr) Air(Ibs/hr) Air(lbslhr) Air(lbsthr)
%removal %removal % removal %removal %removal
Teirachlomethylene 369 ppb 18 PPb 1 nnh D,p lDPb 0.01 pp 0 '11p 01
1 ppb 0.0177 15 0.01 g 01S50b 0 018 %
96.9900% 99.9094% 99.9973% 99.9999% 100.0000
Trichloroethylene 4 ppb <1 Bob <1 pppb <1 ppb <1 Bob <1 ppb
1 ppb 0.000125 Q.0130 0.000130 0.000130 0.000130
0095.8285% 99.8260% 99.9927% 99.99970/6 100.0000%
This report has been generated by ShallowTmy Modeler software version 2.1 W.This software Is designed to assist a skilled operator
In prod difig the performance of a ShallowTray air stripping system North East Environmental Products,Inc.isnot responsible
for incidental or consequential damages resulting from the Improper operation of either the software or the air stripping equipment.
Reourt generated:ZWMi
Copyright 1995 North East Environmental Products, Inc. '17 Technology Drive,West Lebanon,NH 03784
Voice:603-298-7061 FAX:[phone]'All Rights Reserved.

Feb. 02 2001 10: 38AM Waters Edge Environmental 919-859-9930 P. 1
WAT CRS EDG B .1NwRoiawNTAL, LLC
4901 WATERS EDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27606
9 [phone]
FAX[phone]
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE: r 41 JOB NUMBER:
FAX To: 1 y Q�Q�1 t 51 t u Ol
FAX NUMBER:
FAx FROM: �O1
SUBJECT: l m
Number of pages to follow: t. (does not include cover)
COMMENTS: 1 Yld 'n - , c ' TA--N
lle-x. ar c\ a�Cv�1_a�t o�n� _jar Thr Npfl�s
"N�\e- se _ eN kis Y�nnw '\V gnu
T
NOTICE: The information foHowing this cover sheet is intended to be confidential to the person
to whom it is addressed. Any information.follaMng Is subject to copyright protection. 14 you we
not able to deliver this communication to the intended recipient or if you are not an agent of the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy or use this information in anyway. Please notify the
sencer immediately by telephone at (9 19) 859-9987.

MB Industries 00311
Subject: MB Industries 00311
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 16:48:17-0500
From: Kristie Robeson<[e-mail]>
To:Natalie Sierra<[e-mail]>
Hey Natalie.
I have reviewed this draft and the only error I found was on the limits
page for tox. In the table on that page it list chronic tox and that
should be changed to acute tox.
Thanks.
I of 1 3/19/01 12:28 PM

ti1'AI'ERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL,1�`IRC)NMENI AL, LI.0
4901'WATERs EDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100•RALEIGH, NC 27606•PHONE [phone]•FAx [phone]
9 9930
February 2, 2001
Ms. Natalie Sierra
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
' NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
Reference: NPDES Permit Application Addendum
M-B Industries, Inc.
US Highway 64 West
Rosman, North Carolina
Waters Edge Job No R 1-17
1 Dear Ms. Sierra:
Based upon our February 1, 2001 conversation, your have requested a couple additional
items to be addressed as an addendum to our January 22, 2001 NPDES permit submittal
by Waters Edge Environmental, LLC (Waters Edge). Based upon our conversation, we
have provided the following information.
' Net Present Value (NPV) of Selected Option and Feasible Alternative
You requested a net present value calculation for the pump and treat alternative (selected
option) as well as the pump and haul alternative which was the only other remotely
feasible options discussed in the NPDES permit. The calculations for both pump and
treat (selected option) and pump and haul (other remotely feasible alternative) are shown
in Appendix A using 9% cost of capital and 5% inflation. Due to the astronomically high
cost of pump and haul, only limited cost estimation was provided in the NPDES permit.
For purposes of submitting NPV estimations, we also attempted to calculate a cost to
contain the water at the facility, which will approach 100,000 gallons per day as well as
costs for disposal. Again, we would comment that the pump and haul option is
essentially infeasible to consider seriously. Finally, since both options will involve the
same amount of ground water monitoring, these were not included in the calculation.
The NPV of pump and treat is $194,524 and pump and haul is 63,551,179.

rNPDES Permit Addendum
M-B Industries
February 2, 2001
Page 2 of 2
' Summary Listing of Constituents of Concern and Predicted Removal Rates
Table 2 in the NPDES permit provides all of the historic results for all monitoring wells
at the site. You have requested a summary of the constituents of concern (COCs). The
COCs at the site are primarily tetrachloroethene (PCE) with minor concentrations of and
trichloroethene (TCE). Based upon the anticipated flow from the respective wells, we
have a predicted influent concentration of 569 ug/L PCE and 4 ug/L TCE (see
calculations in Appendix B). The predicted VOC removal for the shallow tray system
proposed for the site is rated at 99.973% for PCE and 99.9927% for TCE at 65 gallons
' per minute which is the expected flow from the four wells (see Appendix Q. Therefore,
we can comfortably estimate that removal of VOCs will be less than 1 ug/L, which is far
below the practical quantitation limit of SW-846 Method 8260B.
' If you have any questions or require additional information, P lease contact me at
919.859.9987.
Sincerely,
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMEN AL, LLC
Phillip L. Rahn, PG
President
cc: Edwin Morrow—MB Industries
' 01-029/PLR/aht
t

w r w �w r r r a■ ><r aw �r r � l• r r r r w
M-B Industries Project Analysis
Net Present Value of Cost
Pump and Treat Option
Average Cost of Capital= 9% Annual Appreciation= 5%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Annual Capital Outlay $115,600 $15,600 $15,600 $15,600 $15,600 $15,600 $30,600
Real Estate Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Salavge Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PV of Cash Flows Out $194,524
PV of Cash Flows In $0
NPV of Project ($194,524)
Note(s): This analysis does not account for any tax consequences or anticipated lease payments from tenants.
The estimated cost of ground water sampling events is considered equivalent between options,and therefore is not included

r r �r r� rr r� rr air r■i �r rr rr �r rr rr r rr ar err
M-B Industries Project Analysis
Net Present Value of Cost
Pump and Haul Option
Average Cost of Capital= 9% Annual Appreciation= 5%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Annual Capital Outlay $11,664,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,564,560 $11,579,560
Real Estate Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Salavge Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PV of Cash Flows Out $63,551,179
PV of Cash Flows In $0
NPV of Project ($63,551,179)
Note(s): This analysis does not account for any tax consequences or anticipated lease payments from tenants.
The estimated cost of ground water sampling events is considered equivalent between options,and therefore is not included

M-B Industries, Rosman, NC
Cost Analysis
Pump and Haul Option
' Year One
Installation and Startup $100,000
O&M $3,600
' Electricity $3,600
Transport $2,432,360
Disposal $9,125,000
Total $11,664,560
Years Two through Six
O&M $3,600
Electricity $3,600
Transport $2,432,360
Disposal $9,125,000
Total $11,564,560
Year Seven
System Decommission $15,000
' O&M $3,600
Electricity $3,600
Transport $2,432,360
' Disposal $9,125,000
Total $11,579,560

' M-B Industries Cost Analysis
Annual Cost Estimations
Pump & Haul Option
' Annual Costs
Transportation
Gallons produced per day 100,000
Truck capacity(gal) 6,000
Number of trucks per day 17
Cost per loaded mile 1 $2.80
Total miles to Charlotte,NC 140
Total cost per truck per day $392.00
Total cost per day $6,664.00
Total cost per year $2,432,360.00
Disposal
Gallons produced per day 100,000
Disposal cost per gallon Z $0.25
Disposal cost per day $25,000.00
Disposal cost per year $9,125,000.00
Operations
' Electricity costs per year 3 $3,600.00
O&M costs per year° $3,600.00
Total Annual Cost $11,564,560.00
Initial/Final Costs
1 Year One
Pump systems and Temp Storage 5 $100,000.00
Final Year
System decommission $15,000.00
1 =From Shamrock Environmental,Inc.,Greensboro,NC
2=Standard disposal cost per gallon
3=Operation of extraction wells and temporary storage transfer system
4=Maintenance of extraction wells and temporary storage system
5=Installation of extraction wells and 400,000 gallon(minimum)temporary storage pond

M-B Industries, Inc
Untreated Influent VOC Concentrations
' Calculation from Simple Proportional Comparison
' WSW-2 Anticipated Volume(GPM): 20
Proportional
Average Amount 4
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 33.4 668
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 0
' WSW-3 Anticipated Volume(GPM): 20
Proportional
' Average ' - 4 —
Amount
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 506.3 10127
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 13.0 259
i
' EW-11 2 Anticipated Volume(GPM): 20
Proportional
Average Amount 4 _
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 134.9 2698
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 0
EW-19 3 Anticipated Volume(GPM): 5
Proportional
Average ' — -- -- 4-
Amount
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 4700.0 23500
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 0
' Totals Anticipated Volume(GPM): 65
WSW-2 4 WSW-3 EW-11 EW-19 } TOTAL
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 668 10127 2698 23500 569
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 259 0 0 i 4
' 1 =Mean average of previous 3 sampling events(only 1 event for EW-19)
2=Proposed extraction well in vincinity of MW-11
3= Proposed extraction well in vincinity of MW-1 1,Analytical data for MW-
11 used
4=Proportional amount based on anticipated volume from each respective well
' [Proportional Amount=Average(ug/1)'Anticipated Volume(GPM)]

M-B Industries, Inc
Untreated Influent VOC Concentrations
' Mean Average for Respective Extraction Well locations
WSW-2
Sampling Event 8/9/99 2/24/00 10/13/00 Average '
' PCE Concentration (ug/1) 33 26.2 41 33.40
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 0 0 0.00
' WSW-3
' Sampling Event 8/9/99 2/24/00 10/13/00 Average '
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 700 309 510 506.33
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 14 6.9 18 12.97
MW-11 2
Sampling Event 9/17/99 2/24/00 10/12/00 Average '
I
' PCE Concentration (ug/1) 12.7 142 250 i 134.90
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 0 0 0.00
' EW-193
Anticipated Volume (GPD): 5 j Average '
PCE Concentration (ug/1) 4700 4700
TCE Concentration (ug/1) 0 0
' 1 = Mean average of previous 3 sampling events (only 1 event for EW-19)
2 =Proposed extraction well in vincinity of MW-11,Analytical data for MW-11 used
3 = Proposed extraction well inside the western portion of the facility

C711% AN
.0 A& ME
l o w p r o f He e a i r '5t rippers
1
System Performance Estimate
flient and Proposal Information: Model Chosen: 3600
Waters Edge Environmental, LLC Water Flow Rate: 65.0 gpm
4901 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 100 Air Flow Rate: 900 cfm
Raleigh, NC 27606 Water Temp: 55.0 F
' Air Temp: 50.0 F
A/W Ratio: 103.6
Safety Factor: None
Untreated Model 3611 Model 3621 Model 3631 Model 3641 Model 3651
Contaminant Influent Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent
Effluent Target Water Water Water Water Water
Air(lbs/hr) Air(lbs/hr) Air(lbs/hr) Air(lbs/hr) Air(lbs/hr)
% removal % removal % removal % removal % removal
,Tetrachloroethylene 569 ppb 18 ppb 1 ppb <1 ppb <1 ppb <1 ppb
1 ppb 0.017915 0.018468 0.018500 0.018501 0.018501
96.9900% 99.9094% 99.9973% 99.9999% 100.0000%
trichloroethylene 4 ppb <1 ppb <1 ppb <1 ppb <1 ppb <1 ppb
1 ppb 0.000125 0.000130 0.000130 0.000130 0.000130
95.8285% 99.8260% 99.9927% 99.9997% 100.0000%
This report has been generated by ShallowTray Modeler software version 2.1W.This software is designed to assist a skilled operator
dic
t
ting tghe performance of a ShallowTray air stripping system. North East Environmental Products, Inc. is not responsible
cidental or consequential damages resulting from the improper operation of either the software or the air stripping equipment.
port generated:2/2/2001
lopyright 1995 North East Environmental Products, Inc. ' 17 Technology Drive, West Lebanon, NH 03784
oice: 603-298-7061 FAX: [phone] `All Rights Reserved.

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self-Monitoring Summary December 18,2000
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB AFAR APR MAN' JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Mayodaa WWTP Perm chr lim:6%ifpf11.25 1996 Pass - Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Fad
NC0021873iOUl Begin:3/1/1997 Frequency:Q P/T + Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonC'on,p.Single 1997 Pass - Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- - Pass
County:Rockingham Region:WSRO Subbasm:ROA02 1998 -- -- Pass -- -- Lal. Pass - Pass -- - Pass
PF: 3.0 Spen.l 1999 -- - Pass - -- Bt -- -- Pass -- -- Lal.
7QIU:75 IWC(%):6 Order: 2000 Pass - Late Fail 8.5 17 -- -- Pass --
MB Industries Penn 24hr pifac lin:90%flhd Y 1996 -- - Pass -- - Pass - - Paas - - Pass
NCOOM3111001 Begin:2/1/1996 Frequency:Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 -- - Pass -- -- Pass - - Pass - --- Pass
County:Transylvania Region:ARO Subbasin:FRBOI 1998 -- -- Pala - -- Pass - - Pass - -- Pass
PF: 0.030 sped.] 1999 -- -- Pam -. -- Pass - - Pass - -- NR/Pass
7Q10:27.9 IWC(%).-0.17 Order: 2000 - -- Pass -- -- Pass - - NR1Paes -
Mebane W'WTP Penn chr lim:90% Y 1996 Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass --- --
NCW21474/00I BeginA/1/1996 Frequency:QPIF + Jan Apr Jul Ocl NonComp:Single 1997 Pass - - Pass -- - Pass - - Pass -- --
County:Alamance Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 1998 Pass - - Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass -- -
PF:2.5 Spe lal 1999 Pass - -- Pass -- -- Pass -- - Pass -
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100 Order- 2000 Pass - - Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass
Metal Industries PERM 481-IR LC50 AC LIM:779%(GRAB) Y 19% 02.5 >100 17.68 18.95 <125 54.96 22.53 17.68 Late 18.95 17.68 <12.5
NCO057819/00I Begin:6/1/1995 Frequency:Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:STNGLE 1997 17.68 <72.5 02.5 BLBt <12-5 <12.5 02.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 02.5
Counly:McDowell Region:ARO Subbasin:CTB30 1998 <72.5 <72.5 02.5 <12.5 17.7 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 02.5 <12.5 02.5
PF:0.01 SpltiW SOC:3/99-10/1/2000 48hr LCSU ac monit M(1.5,3,6,12.5,25) 1999 12.4.<1.5t <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 <12.5 >25 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1,5 <1.5
7QIU:2.0 IWC(%){1.77 Order 2000 <1.5 <1.5 0.5 >25 45 >25 NR H H H
Miller Brewing Co. Penn chr lun:2.1% 1996 - Pass - - Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass ---
NC0029980/001 Begin:3/1/1997 Frequency:Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1997 - Pass Pass - Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass --
County:Rockingham Region:WSRO Subbasin:ROA03 1998 -- Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass - -- Pass --
PF: 5.2 SN".l 1999 _. Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass -- -- NR/Pass --
7QIO:313 IWC(%):2.51 Order: 2000 -- Pass -- - Pass -- -- BI -- Pass
Mocksville WWTP Bear Creek Penn chr lim:37% Y 1996 - Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass -- --- Pass -
N00050903/001 Begin:I/I/2UW Frequency:Q P/F Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1997 - Pass -- -- NR/Pass -- -- NR/Fad NR Pass Pass --
County:Davie Region:WSRO Subbasin:YAD06 1998 - Pass -- -- Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass --
PF:0.25 Special 1999 - Pass -- -- Pass -- - Pass -- -- Pass --
7Q 10:0.65 IWC(%):37 Order. 2000 - Pass -- --- Pass -- -- Pass -- --
Mocksvillc WWTP Dutchman's Cr. PERM CHR LIM:7% Y 1996 F.ILPass - -- NR Pass -- Pass -- -- Pass -- ---
NCO021491JUUI Begin:7/111994 Frequency:QP/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:SINGLE 1997 Pass -- -- Pass - -- Fail NR7Fall NR Pass -- --
County:Davie Region:WSRO Subbasin:YAD05 1998 NR/Pass -- -- Pass - - Pass -- -- Pass -- --
PF:0.68 Special 1999 Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass -- -- Pass -- --
7QIU 15.0 IWC(%):6.57 Ord- 2000 Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass
Monarch Ilosiery Penn 24hr p/f ac lim:9U°/, Y 1996 -- -- NR Pass -- Pass -- -- NR/Pass --- -- Bt
NCO(X)1210i00l Begin:2/1/1996 Frequency:Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonConp:Single 1997 Pass -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- - Pass
County:Alamance Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 1998 - - Pass -- -- Pass - - Pass -- -- Pass
PF:0.05 Special 1999 - -- Pass -- - Pass - - Pass -- -- Pass
7Q10:47.8 IWC(%):0.16 Order: 2000 - - Pass -- -- Pass -- -- NRlPass ---
Monroe WN TP PERM CHR LIM:90%;PF NOT TO EXCEED I IMGD 1996 -- -- Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass -- -- Pass
NCOU24333/001 Begin:12/1/1994 Frequency:Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:SINGLE 1997 - -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass.Pass - -- Pass
County:Union Region:MRO Subbasin:YAD14 1998 - - Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass
PF:9.0 Special 1999 _. _. Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass
7QIU:0.43 IWC(%):96.18 Order: 2000 -- --- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass --
Monsanto/001,002 Penn 24hr pifn lim:AM,Ithd(combined outfall) Y 1996 -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass - - Pass --
NC0003719/002 Begin:1/1/1996 Frequency:Q PiF + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:Single 1997 -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass --
County:Cumberland Region:FRO Subbasin:CPF15 1998 -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass --
PF: 1.3 Special 1999 -- Pass -- -- Late Pass --- Fail Pass.Pass -- Pass --
7QI0:791.0 IWC(%):0.25 Order 2000 -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass
Moore County WWTP Perm chr lim:41% Y 1996 -- -- Pass --- -- Pass -- --- Pass -- -- Pass
NCO037508/W I Begin:6/l/20W Frequency:Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp:Single 1997 -- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- - Pass -- --- Late
County:Moore Region:FRO Subbasin:LUM50 1998 Pass --- Pass --- -- Pass -- -- Pass -- --- Pass
PF:6.7 sped.] 19% -- --- Pass --- -- Pass -- - Late Pass -- Pass
7QIU:15.2 IWC(%):40.54 Order: 2000 -- -- Passs'g -- -- Pass -- - Pass -
Y Pre 1996 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM=Permit Requirement LET=Administrative Letter-Target Frequency=Monitoring frequency:Q-Quarterly;M-Monthly;BM-Bimonthly;SA-Semiannually;A-Annually;OWD-Only when discharging;D-Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin=First month required 7QIU=Receiving stream low flow criterion(cfs) +=quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure m NR Months that testing must occur-ex.Jan,Apr,Jul,Oct NonComp=Current Compiiimce Requirement
PF=Permitted flow(MGD) IWC%=Instream waste concentration PiF=Pass(Fail test AC=Acute CHR=Chronic
Data Notation:f-Fathead Minnow;•-Ceriodaphnia sp.;my-Mysid shrimp;ChV-Chronic value;P-Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration;at-Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit;bt-Bad lest
Reporting Notation:--=Data not required;NR-Not reported Facility Activity Status:1-Inactive,N-Newly Wued(To construct);H-Active but not discharging;t-More data available for month in question;• =ORC signature needed
31

NC oo 00 ,3'
l
4- Kol;"mpv + NC X�-1
�FAGo X7^-r "D,
-j�c,pfv S-��.vWrr t b ca,Jrcr y
�YZ V D�C G P `f'l ET1A L ST*t'l D 1
SWAN-A i 000)r rt 3v�c� pip
e-ivc-ke
�� ass �-i,�,�t- ��1� ►���P,-s �
rr
�w = b� o3o P76t7
- cx-DvA
CoM�v� O4- 69)
on i -f-6 r o�
y
06-2
ot\�cw of�j iFy �1,� , -� X Z
]>�7�
SS -~� -r-zv� �� �a�t FK-

Permit NC00249 0
�l.
(I.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — D
D ' g the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee i
au red to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permas
u
spec" d below:
EFFLUT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIRE NTS
AC
CHARRISTICS
Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Type Aample Location'
Average Avera a Maximum Frequency
Flow 64.0 MGD Continuous Recordin I or E
CBOD,5-day(200C)2 4.0 mg/L 6.0 mg/L Daily Com ite E, I
April 1-October 31
CBOD,5-day(201C)2 8.0 mg/L 12.0 mg/L Daily Co posite E, I
November 1-March 31
Total Suspended Residue2 15.0 m 22.5 m Daily posite E, I
NH3 as N(April 1-October 31 1.0 mg/L Dailv Composite E
NH3 as N November 1-March 31 .9 mg/L Daily Com site E
Dissolved Oxygen3 Daily Grab E,U,D
Fecal Coliform 200/ 0 ml 4001100 ml Daily Grab E
(geometric mean) j
Total Residual Chlorine4 17 Ily Grab E
Temperature °C aily Grab E,U,D
Total Nitrogen NO2+NO3+TKN /Monthly Composite E
Total Phos horus5 Monthly Composite E
Chronic Toxicily6 Quarterly Composite E
Conductivity Daily Grab E,U,D
Chromium 51 2 /L Weekly Composite E
Nickel 90 1 /L Weekly Composite E
Lindane 0.01 L Grab E
Copper 2Mnth Composite E,U,D
Cyanide? 5 P 15 Weekly Grab E
Lead 26 34 /L Weekly Composite E
Silver 2/Month Composite E
Zinc 2/Month Composite E,U,D
Mercurye 0.012-2q/L Weekly Composite E
Molybdenum 2/Month Composite E
Footnotes:
1 Sample Locations: E- Effluent, -Influent, U-Upstream, D- Downstream. For instream
monitoring requirements, s Part A.(2.).
2 The monthly average efflue CBODs and total suspended residue concentrations shall not exceed
15% of the respective infl ent value.
3 The daily average dissol ed oxygen effluent concentrations shall not be l�s than 6.0 mg/L.
4 The daily average h it for total residual chlorine shall be 28 pg/L.
s See Part A.(4.). for ditional nutrient monitoring information.
6 Whole effluent to city shall be measured by Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/ t 90 %. Samples
shall be taken, uarterly during the months of March, June, September and Decem See Part
A.(3.)/antitation
7 The Dof Water Quality shall consider all cyanide concentrations reported below 10 L to
be "zepermit-compliance purposes only.
8 The q limit for mercury shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 u
shall be considered zero for compliance purposes.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
,'There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

AvE- v�
OC
?i—C! ss ZC fi-�ae,�, ty LAS 3S' CA Y;
CQ,^
►sc Eli n1P sS�1� �v�12 1=�c, 1 ss11 lT` To
;s v , a �
1 l PSS N P�Z%7 GI�i et yolc: !'
T 6 V�v �
L-147 vi-a L--A-n U NJ ( �A 0 N
L 'I '-1 f�SS
W
�-t1=1T LS
O C4" 1"fS by
Y((l�lV �TuC. S

Permit NCO024970
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarter iu monitoring using test p edures
outlined in the " orth Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Proced ," Revised
February 1998, 0 jubsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Wh a Effluent
Toxicity Test Proce re" (Revised-February 1998) or subsequent versions. T tests will be
performed during the onths of March, June, September, and December. E uent sampling for
this testing shall be per rmed at the NPDES permitted final effluent disc a below all
treatment processes.
If the test procedure perfo ed as the first test of any single quarter sults in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then ultiple-concentration testing shall be erformed at a minimum,
in each of the two following m the as described in "NorthCaroli Phase II Chronic Whole
Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure (Revised-February 1998) or sub equent versions.
The chronic value for multiple conce ation tests will be determ' d using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detec ble impairment of reprod ction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectab impairment of repro ction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection meth s, exposure regime , and further statistical methods are
specked in the "North Carolina Phase II C ronic Whole Effl nt Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised-
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of is permi condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the mon t s in ich tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results d P3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following a ress:
Attention:North Caro vision of Water Quality
Enviro ntal ences Branch
1621 M Service nter
Raleig , North Carol 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms s 1 be filed with the nv. nmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the r rting period for whic the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate include all supporting the cal/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, an be certified by laboratory su sor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual hlorine of the effluent toxicity ple must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed f disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge o flow from the facility during a month in\which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will c plete the information located at the top 4,.the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the faci ' name, permit number, pipe number, coun and the month/year of
the report with the notatin of"No Flow" in the comment area of the form_
a report shall be
submitted to the Enviro ental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitorin is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the No Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit ay be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimu
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

2-
P,C c c
-ACca/LD , rv�L`�
p p i` k "AX (row I L� ) 1"( uvV���c A
Ll
1 ` y9,
c`i P-v4 D L ,Zb © - (oS
C) 62- a (1:1
-T-
C `(
�S U, O(o� y� � L -� l� t-c plc S�2 ►NG�I'VT S'�1�.
�� -� Nc Sl s F&P- -T�- wAf�5�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary C D
Kerr T. Stevens, Director -30 � r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
December , 2000
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Mr. George M. Sudderth, III
Town of Boone
P.O. Drawer 192
Boone,North Carolina 28607
Subject:Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO020621
Boone Wastewater Treatment Plant
Watauga County
Dear Mr. Sudderth:
Division of Water Quality (Division) personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal
of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of,
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as
subsequently amended).
After a review of the draft permit,the following change has been made to your final permit:
• The months during which effluent toxicity monitoring should be conducted have been changed to
reflect your facility's current schedule. You will therefore be re uired to monitor for toxicity in
March,June, September and December.
As mentioned in the cover letter to your dr ES permit, a cyanide limit has been added, giving both
weekly average and daily maximum effluent or cyanide. Weekly average limits are assigned to pollutants of
concern to reflect a chronic effect on . Chronic exposure is generally measured as a weekly exposure,
thereby necessitating a weekly limit for pollutants of concern. While the Division agrees that complex for the
Town of Boone to take the appropriate precautions against exceeding a �ye_ekly average 1' -te
n ftmapt.�.: �:,, .��.. ...t ��_=�a__c==�'-=- -- - r,z'�GK i~'�i S � I'• �Cc �is+"c& 1, 4/,,ie
As for the addition of a selenium limit this too mains as in the draft per t. Althou h or 11 data
points were available for analysis, one of these points had a reasonably high concentration of selenium When.
statistical analyses were performed to predict the maximum potential concentration of selenium in your facility'sl
effluent,it exceeded the allowable concentration of selenium instream. Particualary since you are discharging into
the South Fork New River,which is designated as an Outstanding Resource Water by the State of North Carolina,
the Division is concerned that effluent from your facility may have the potential to contaminate the receiving
stream with selenium. After one year of data collection, you may request that the need for a selenium limit be re-
evaluated,but for the time being the limit will remain.
Likewi#*vee
h O monitoring frequency must remain as in the previous NPDES permit. This is due in
�art to the clf e receiving stream, but also the class of your facility. Statewide guidelines exist which
kctate the mofr quency for different wastewater parameters tased upon the class of the facility. All Class
facilities resame monitoring frequency for BOD.
With regard1to mercury, the Division has set up a work group to establish a more sensitive method for
mercury detection. When this information becomes available, you will be notified accordingly. Until this time,
you may consider a non-detect reading for mercury as being in compliance with your NPDES permit.
Lastly, I would also like you to draw your attention to the effective date of the permit. The attached
permit does not become effective until April 1,2001. Until then,you are bound to the conditions of your current
NPDES permit.
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer VISIT US ON THE INTERNET Ue http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

T-MP t Q 0 2 cmc �av�
kA

If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable •
to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following
receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Cha ter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 M Service Center,
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made,this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements
to obtain otherpermits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the
Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning thispermit, please contact Natalie Sierra at telephone number 919)
733-5083, extension 551. The Division commends the Town of Boone on the excellent efforts it has made to
maintain water quality in the New River Basin.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office/Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit
Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit
EPA Reg ion IV,Roosevelt Childress
Aquatic Toxicology Unit

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Prepared by: Natalie Sierra, 119/01
Facility Name = M-B Industries
NPDES# = NC0000311
Qw(MGD) = 0.03
QW WS) = 0.046416
7Q10s (cfS)= 27.9
1 WC(%) =1 0.17
Chronic CCC w/s7Q10 dil. Acute CMC w/no dil. Frequency of Detection
Parameter FINAL RESULTS, ug/I FINAL RESULTS, ug/l #Samples # Detects
Phenols
Max. Pred Cw 410.3
Allowable Cw 0.0 360 93 41
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw 64.0
Allowable Cw 240.4 15 93 6
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw 2666.4
Allowable Cw 30050.0 1022 93 90
Lead
Max. Pred Cw 544.0
Allowable Cw 15025.0 34 93 4
Copper(A.L.)
Max. Pred Cw 88.8
Allowable Cw 4207.0 7.3 93 15
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw 1065.4
Allowable Cw 52888.0 261 93 2
Silver(A.L.)
Max. Pred Cw 338.2
Allowable Cw 36.1 1.2 93 17
Zinc (A.L.)
Max. Pred Cw 1526.2
Allowable Cw 30050.0 67 93 88
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw 1530.1
Allowable Cw 3005.0 22 93 88
Oil and Grease
Max. Pred Cw 60.3
Allowable Cw 15626.000 NA 92 74
Total Residue
Max. Pred Cw 23.3
Allowable Cw NA NA 93 28
Modified Data: Use 0.5 Detection Limit for non-detects

M-B Industries,Inc.
PO Box 1118
Highway 64 West
Rosman.,NC 28772
Mr. Charles H. Weaver,Jr. i MAR 1 6 2000
NCDENR/Water Quality/NPDES Unit
1617 Mall Service Center DENR - WATER QUALITY
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Date: March 14, 2000
Subject:Permit Renewal Permit#NC0000311
Dear Mr. Weaver,
Please accept my apology for the tardiness of this Renewal Application.During
physical year of 1999 there were no changes made to the waste water
treatment facility.
All sludge passes through filter press,dried to a powder consistency,then
barreled ready for shipment to landfill. All sludge is labeled F006 under RCRA
requirements.
Could someone in your office please send to me Appendix A to Title 40 of the
CFR Part 122.21 so that we may gain an understanding of Priority Pollutant Analysis.
Upon receipt of that information we shall complete that requirement. If you have any
questions please call me at 828-862-4201 and/or Fax [phone].
Sincerely Yours
Ija ,� ,r,dG/a,-t.�
Edwin E. Morrow
Vice President
enc.

a
s
'MQTERS EDGE EIWIRONMENTAL, LLC
�-
4901 WATERS EDGE DRIVE, SUITE 100•RALEIGH, NC 27606•PHONE [phone]•FAx [phone]
January 22, 2001
Mr. David Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 ` Reference: NPDES Permit Application
M-B Industries, Inc.
RO1 US Highway 64 West
Rosman,North Carolina
Waters Edge Job No R 1-17
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
Waters Edge Environmental, LLC (Waters Edge) is pleased to submit the following
NPDES permit application for the above referenced facility.
If you have any questions or require additional information,please contact me at
919.859.9987.
Sincerely,
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
v Lr
Phillip L. Rahn, PG
President
cc: Edwin Morrow-MB Industries
01-004/PLR/aht

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
O January 22, 2001
01-004
2 Engineering Alternatives Analysis
L General information
A.
Facility Name M—B Industries, Inc.
County Transylvania
Facility Address US Highway 64 West
Post Office Box 1118
Rosman, North Carolina 28772
Facility Telephone Number [phone]
Report Preparer's Name Waters Edge Environmental, LLC
Report Preparer's Address 4901 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
B.
The subject M-B Industries, Inc. (M-B) owns and operates a metal
working/fabrication facility located along US Highway 64 west of Rosman,
Transylvania County, North Carolina. Typical processes at the facility include;
chrome plating, zinc plating, cyanide brine heat treating (ceased in December 1980),
and various machining activities. Presently, wastewater is treated by a permitted
wastewater treatment system that discharges to the West Fork of the French Broad
River. M-B is currently classified as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The primary hazardous
materials shipped off site are F006 wastes associated with electroplating operations.
M-B also generated solvents from cleaning activities (F001 wastes) in the past. M-B
presently uses a Safety-Kleen application for cleaning activities at the facility.
On August 16, 1995, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR), Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) conducted a RCRA
inspection of the M-B facility. Laboratory analytical results from four water supply
well (WSW) samples obtained on September 29, 1994, by the HWS indicated that
WSW #1 and WSW #2 demonstrated elevated levels of trichloroethene (TCE) and
tetrachloroethene (PCE). However, samples obtained on August 16, 1995, by the
HWS indicated that WSW #2 and WSW #3 had elevated levels of TCE and PCE,
similar to the September 1994 laboratory results. Based on the RCRA inspection and
WSW analytical results, a Notice of Violation (NOV), dated February 22, 1996, was
O issued. As a result of the NOV, Aquaterra Engineering, Inc. (Aquaterra) commenced
site analysis activities in March of 1996.
Page 3 of 8

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
O January 22, 2001
01-004
During the initial site investigation, performed on May 21-23, 1996, twelve soil
borings were advanced in regions designated as potential source areas in the NOV.
Further inspection of the soil in two areas of concern was performed on October 10,
2000. Historic soil concentrations for the constituents of concern (COC) at this site
indicate high levels of PCE in an area inside the southwestern portion of the original
building, in an area formerly used for drum storage. More detailed information
regarding the soil sampling events can be found in Table 1.
During the initial site investigation in May 1996, each of the four WSW were
sampled, and effluent samples were obtained from each of two septic systems located
on site. Subsequent studies have been performed on the four WSW on March 3,
1998, August 9, 1999, February 24, 2000, and October 13, 2000. As a supplement,
ten shallow and four deep monitoring wells were installed on the site between August
1999 and February 2000. Each well was sampled shortly after installation, with a
complete sampling event performed on October 12-13, 2000.
An analysis of the most recent analytical results for the ground water sampling event
on October 11 & 12, 2000, indicates the continued presence of PCE in WSW #2 and
#3, as well as an apparent migration downgradient to encompass monitoring wells
O MW-8, MW-10, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, and MW-17. The highest concentration
of PCE, 510 µg/L, was found in well WSW #3. The continued presence of TCE has
been detected in wells WSW #3 (at a concentration of 18 µg/L) and MW-13. Further
information regarding the historic ground water analytical results can be found in
Table 2, with the analytical report for the results from the most recent sampling event
presented in Appendix A.
Following the decision by Aquaterra to cease all environmental consulting activities
within North Carolina, the responsibility for managing the remediation of the M-B
facility had been transferred to Waters Edge Environmental, LLC (Waters Edge).
Waters Edge agrees with the original Corrective Action Plan and Corrective Action
Plan Addendum set forth by Aquaterra, in which remediation of the site will be
achieved through the use of a pump and treat system, supplemented by an additional
soil vapor extraction(SVE) system (Appendices B and Q.
The design of this remediation system is based on the hydraulic conductivity of the
subsurface soil and partially weathered bedrock (PWR), the chemical properties of
the compounds to be removed, and the air and water discharge requirements. The
hydraulic conductivity of the PWR was estimated using data from the October 12,
2000 pump tests performed on WSW #2 and #3.
As shown in Figure 2, the pump and treat system will utilize four extraction wells. Of
these wells, two will be new ground water extraction wells: EW-19, a shallow well in
the source area in the southeastern portion of the original building which will be set at
Page 4of8

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
01-004
the partially weathered rock interface (estimated at a depth of 40' below ground
surface (bgs); and EW-11, a new deep extraction well (approximately 100' bgs) with
a 30 to 50 foot-screened interval located near monitoring well MW-11. Two of the
existing water supply wells will also be incorporated into the pump and treat system;
WSW #2 and #3 (See Figure 2). Waters Edge feels that this will both target the
source area and limit the downgradient migration of the COC. Based on Waters
Edge's knowledge of this site, along with the pump tests and experience with
chlorinated solvents, each extraction point is estimated to have an effective radius of
influence of approximately 100-150 feet; however, this will be verified by a limited
drawdown test conducted during system startup. The ground water with elevated
VOCs will be sufficiently encompassed by the radii of influence. It is anticipated that
this initial action will reduce the PCE concentrations in the downgradient wells
sufficient to eventually allow natural attenuation supplemented with carbon filtration
systems attached to several of the existing private supply wells to reduce VOC
concentrations to below North Carolina Groundwater Standards (NCGS).
The pump and treat system will utilize a shallow tray aeration treatment system, with
an initial throughput of approximately 60 gpm, with a maximum capacity of 160
gpm, should adjustments be deemed necessary from subsequent sampling events (see
Manufacturers specifications in Appendix D). Waters Edge has proposed this
areduction from Aquaterra's original 250-gpm capacity system to more reasonably
reflect field experience with pumping capacity for multiple wells located within the
same aquifer. The system is being designed to provide for the efficient removal of
PCE, thereby eliminating the need for secondary carbon treatment to meet the
NPDES discharge limits (Appendix E). Treatment system upgrades such as bag
filtering to remove some isolated incidents of elevated chromium and lead
concentrations may be added at a later date pending evaluation of additional ground
water sampling data.
To supplement the active removal of the COC in the source area, Waters Edge will
install a Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) system in the delineated source area in the
southeastern portion of the original building (Appendix Q. The SVE system will
initially consist of two SVE wells installed approximately 25 feet apart (See Figure
2). The wells will be 2 inches in diameter, drilled to approximately 2-feet above the
water table (approximately 8-feet bgs), and screened a minimum of two feet above
the water table. Based on data from the boring logs included in Aquaterra's
Corrective Action Plan and Addendum (Appendix B and C), it is assumed that a 25-
foot radius of influence can be achieved by these SVE wells. This will also be
verified by a pilot test conducted during installation.
The SVE system will consist of a Roots 36 URAI 10 HP blower (or equivalent),
moisture separator, vacuum relief valve, Warrick level switches, and inline
O filter/silencer, and transfer pump from moisture separator to air stripper. The blower
and motor has been sized to produce 200 ACFM airflow at 12" of Hg. The SVE
Page 5 of 8

w
NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
O January 22, 2001
01-004
system is oversized to allow for additional SVE wells to be installed if warranted.
Based on worst-case soil data and air emissions calculations from the system, the
SVE system will not require an air permit. From 15A NCAC 2D.0518, total volatile
organic carbons must be less than 40 lbs./day. Air emissions presented in Aquaterra's
Corrective Action Plan Addendum were calculated to be less than 15-lbs./day total
VOCs. All liquid produced by the SVE system will be discharged to the air stripper
for treatment.
The piping from the wells to the SVE will be Schedule 80 PVC and will either be
trenched under the concrete slab or piped along walls and/or overhead pipe racks
throughout the interior of the building. Upon reaching a point of access to the
exterior grounds, the piping will be trenched across the remaining distance to the
treatment system according to accepted procedures. Each SVE effluent pipeline will
be constructed with a ball valve and vacuum gauge, located at the system manifold
connection. This will serve as a throttling device for the vapor recovered from the
SVE points, to allow for precise adjustment of the flow rates.
C.
Existing facilities will not be used in conjunction with the pump and treat or SVE
systems.
D.
The pump and treat and SVE systems will not be constructed in separate phases.
II. Evaluation of Disposal Alternatives
A. Connection to a Sewer System
A.1 Rosman, North Carolina
The Town of Rosman does not provide water or sewer services to the
facility, as it lies outside the municipal boundary (see Appendix F).
Furthermore, it is not feasible to construct a connection to the nearest
available spur at a distance of approximately 4 miles from the facility
through mountainous terrain. Regardless, the Town of Rosman would not
be capable of handling the increased load, as they are currently operating
at 90% capacity.
A.2 Haul and Discharge to a City that Will Accept Ground Water
Since the Town of Rosman does not provide an outlet for the treated
ground water, another alternative is to employ a permitted transportation
company in the service of hauling the treated groundwater to a city with
the capacity to accept the discharge. Waters Edge has obtained an
Page 6 of 8

NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
O January 22, 2001
01-004
estimate from Shamrock Environmental from Greensboro, North Carolina
to remove the water at a cost of$2.80 per loaded mile, to Charlotte, North
Carolina for disposal. Based on the proposed output of 100,000 GPD,
utilizing 6000 gallon tank trucks for transport, approximately 17 loads
would need to be transported approximately 140 miles to Charlotte. This
results in a daily cost of approximately $6,664. The estimate for seven
years of treated water disposal is approximately $ 17,026,520. As such,
this is not a feasible option for the disposal of the treated groundwater at
this facility.
B. Land Based Disposal
B.1 Disposal on Land Currently Owned by the Facility
The property on which the M-B facility is located encompasses 26.93
acres. The soils present consist of loamy fine sand underlain by cobbles
and gravel at a depth of approximately 6 to 7 feet below grade. According
to the Soil Survey of Transylvania County, North Carolina performed by
the US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service & Forest
Service in 1974, the Suncook loamy soils located in this area have a low
available water capacity, with a shallow water table (averaging 3 feet
below grade), and are subject to frequent flooding. As a result, an
infiltration gallery in this area is not feasible for the disposal of 100,000
gpd.
a. A description of the facilities including a site plan can be found in
Figure 2, and Appendices B and C.
b. See Soils Report in Appendix G.
C. Due to the site characteristics, calculations of infiltration rate are
not applicable.
d. A reduction in design flow has been implemented, resulting in a
proposed discharge of 100,000 gpd. Aquaterra's Corrective Action
Plan and Corrective Action Plan Addendum for M-B Industries,
Inc. initially proposed a discharge of 250,000 gpd (Appendices B
and Q.
a. A Present-value-of-Costs Analysis for land-based disposal is not
feasible due to the volume of water produced. Therefore, we feel that
this calculation is not warranted.
Page 7 of 8

' NPDES Permit Modification
M-B Industries, Inc.
January 22, 2001
O 01-004
B.2 Acquisition of Adjacent Lands
There is not sufficient land available for purchase adjacent to the project
site to support land-based disposal methods. As the site is located within
mountainous terrain, little adjacent land is available in which an
infiltration gallery could realistically be installed.
C. Wastewater Reuse
A portion of the wastewater generated by the remediation system will be required by
M-B to maintain current operating procedures. This results from the incorporation of
WSW #2 and #3, which normally provide water for a number of manufacturing
processes, into the remediation system. Of the overall discharge, approximately
25,000 gpd will be reused by the manufacturing processes.
D. Surface Water Discharge
1. 7Q10 = 25 cfs / 30Q2 = 43 cfs. Information provided by Curtis Weaver, North
Carolina DENR for the West Fork of the French Broad River at Rosman,
upstream from the confluence with the North Fork of the French Broad River.
Site I.D. # 04338881. Drainage area = 29.4 sq. mi.
2. Discharge with and without tertiary filtration. The shallow tray stripping
systems is more than adequate to treat the VOC affected ground water. No
tertiary filtration system is necessary as no solids are generated in manufacturing
or during wastewater treatment.
3. See Appendices B and C
4. See II. B. 2 above
5. Present Value of Costs analysis- Due to the infeasibility of the other stated
options and the excessively high costs, calculation of a net present value does not
appear to be warranted.
E. Disposal Combinations
See discussions above. The most economical option that results in minimal
environmental impact is discharge to the West Fork of the French Broad River.
Page 8 of 8

/� N
MW-9
WSW-3
MW-10
MW-16
MW-7
MW-8 MW-12
WS -2SB-9
P-1 SB-10 (�
o to so me
Scale In Feet
� � LEGEND
MW-1 q-
-SVE Proposed SVE Paint Location
Exlsting -1�1_Waste ater
Treatment Pi t % 4 Solt Boring Location (1996)
SW-1 C7 SB-9 Sall Boring Location (2000)
���/ ���� / / /�� • Deep Well (Top of Bedrock)
E sting/futf Il SW
MW-6 / ® Water Supply Well
� / jgf Shallow Well
LP TANK MW-5 /
pose9 Du�fall Proposed Recovery Well
Ground Water Remedlatlom Bullding pQ�N Air Distribution Line
and Sall VApor Extraction System p�E l
� Groundwater Distribution Line
NOTE,
Discharge from the Ground Water Treatment — — — Property Line
Bullding (GWT-BLd) will be connected to
/ �•• existing discharge from the Waste Water — — — River Bed
Treatment Plant CWWTP) Former River Bed
Author Drawing layers Date Title
mbb 201400 11-6-00 Pump do Treat Recovery Wells
WATERS EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC Outfalls do SVE Point Locations
Job No. Revision Figure Scale pr olleat
201400 11-8-00 2 1' - 100• iINDUSTRIES
Transylvania County, North Carolina

Table 1. Soil Laboratory Analytical Results-M-B Industries,Rosman,North Carolina
May 22,1996 Soil Boring ID(Sample Depth)
Parameter SB-1 SB-1 SB-2 SB-2 811-3 SB,3 SB4 SB4 SB-5 SB-5
(0-1 ft) (4-5 ft) (0-1 ft) (1-2 ft) (0-1 fit) (1-2 ft) (0-1 ft) (4-5 ft) (0-1 ft) (34 ft)
Inorganics(mg/kg)
Aluminum 8,600 7,600 9,490 5,700 6,800 5,600 9,800 8,200 8,700 10,000
Total Cyanide 0.66 <0.10 0.43 0.31 0.39 1.02 0.05 0.23 0.47 0.12
Zinc 66 39 35 32 110 480 23 24 26 26
Arsenic <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Barium 37 27 32 20 28 21 29 39 27 42
Cadmium <I.0 <I.0 <1.0 <I.0 <1.0 <1.0 <I.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1
Chromium 40 6.6 53 34 20 31 7.4 8.2 7.8 8.4
Lead 16 3.9 8.5 9.3 6 4.8 5.1 4.3 4.3 4.4
Mercury <0.10 <0.I0 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.I0 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Selenium <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Silver <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.1 <I.0 <1.0 <1.0 <I.0 <I.0 <1.0
SVOCs(Pog) No Compounds Detected Above Method Detection Limits
VOCs(pg/kg)
Tetrachloroethene <l <I 19 11 8 <6 <7 36 <7 <6
Oil do Grease(mg/kg) 34 27 29 <10 70 <10 <10 <10 <10 41
SB soil boring
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram or parts per million
pg/kg micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion
SVOCs semtvolattle organic compounds according to SW-846Method8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
ft feet below ground surface

Table 1(cont.) Soil Laboratory Analytical Results-M-B Industries,Rosman,North Carolina
May 22,1996 Soil Boring ID(Sample Depth)
SB-12
Duplicate
Parameter SB-6 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 of SB-11 BG-1
(0-1 ft) (2-3 ft) (1.5-2 ft) (34 ft) (34 ft) (34 ft) (7 ft) (7 ft) (1.5-2 ft)
Inorganics(mg/kg)
Aluminum 10,000 11,000 4,300 10,000 8,300 12,000 10,000 11,000 14,000
Total Cyanide 0.27 0.14 0.15 0.16 ND 0.72 ND 0.29 0.22
Zinc 29 36 24 48 52 53 86 100 55
Arsenic <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Barium 28 29 27 34 29 40 36 35 35
Cadmium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <I.0 <1.0 4.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Chromium 41 24 3.4 8.8 17 63 8.3 10 8.1
Lead 5.6 5.6 2.2 7.9 5.6 12 4.9 4.8 16
Mercury <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Selenium <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Silver <1.0 <1.0 <I.0 <1.0 <I.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
SVOCs(,Ug/kg)
Di-n-octyl phthalate 430 430 430 430 460 <330 430 430 NA
VOCs(AWAg)
Tetrachloroethene <7 <6 <6 4 <7 <6 <6 <6 NA
Toluene <7 <6 <6 <8 11 17 <6 <6 NA
Oil do Crease(mg/kg) 68 52 <10 <10 <10 <10 16 302
SB soil boring
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram or parts per million
,Ug/kg micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846Method 8260
,Jt feet below ground surface
NA not analyzed

• �I
• • •
Table 1(cont.) Soil Laboratory Analytical Results-M-11 Industries,Rosman,North Carolina
October 10,2000. Soil Boring ID(Sample Depth)
Parameter P-1 P-2 P-3 P4 P-5
Soil Water Soil Water soil Water Soil Water Soil Water
(8-9 ft) (5-6 ft) (5-8 ft) (4-5 ft) (6-7 ft)
Inorganics (mg/kg) (µSI-) (mg/kg) (µBI-) (n►BItB) (µBI-) (m8/k8) (µBI-) (m8/k8) (µBI-)
Chromium 120 5.4 250 31 87 12 20 0.38 17 0.24
Lead 24 0.88 7.5 0.72 8.8 0.41 9.3 0.25 10 0.16
YOCs (µ8/k8) (µSIL) (µ8/k8) (µBI-) (g&g) (µBI-) (µ8/k8) (µBit-) (tgft) (µBI-)
Tetrachloroethene <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6000 4700 740 500
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 100 <5.0 <54 <5.0
Total Xylenes <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 200 10 <54 <5.0
P=Probe Designation
njr*g(L)=milligrams per kilogram(liter)or parts per million
jug/kg(L)=micrograms per kilogram(liter)or parts per billion
VOCs=volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
ft=feet below ground surface

0 0 0 .
Table 2. Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results-M-B Industries,Rosman,North Carolina.
Iaeorganaic,Owl) VOC's(Pg/4 SVOCs
Sample ID Sample Date Adanuuun TOW 7mc Assam: Bnmm Csdmean Hexavalent Chroaman Led sa am m Silva cis-1,2 9"kMethmm Te4aohlesoedwae (/tg/L)
Cyanide CMomuan dwhiaoedwne
WSW-1 3/3/98 <0.05 0.002 0.032 <0.005 <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.010 <0.005 <0.005 <0.010 <5 <S -5 ND
8/9/99 <0.25 <0.002 0.022 <0.01 -0.005 <0.001 <0.05 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02 <0.002 Q Q Q NA
2/24/00 <0.20 NA 0.25 <0.005 <0.01 x0.001 NA <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 <0.10 -0.005 <0.005 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
WSW-2 3/3/98 -Z.05 <0.002 <0.01 <0.005 <0.010 <0.010 NA 0.2 <0.005 -0.005 -0.010 <5 <5 53 ND
8/9/99 <0.25 <0.002 <0.01 x0.01 <0.005 <0.001 0.13 0.12 <0.01 <0.02 <0.002 Q Q 33 NA
2/24/00 <0.20 NA 0.022 <0.005 <0.01 <0.001 NA 0.125 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 26.2 NA
10/13/00 <0.10 0.13 0.07 <5.0 <5.0 41
WSW-3 3/3/98 0.08 0.002 3.6 0.008 <0.010 <0.010 NA 0.011 0.21 -0.005 <0.010 <5 5 150 ND
8/9/99 <0.05 0.003 <0.01 -0.01 <0.005 <0.001 <0.05 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02 <0.002 Q 14 700 NA
2/24/00 <0.20 NA <0.02 <0.005 <0.01 -0.001 NA 0.03 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q 6.9 309 NA
10/13/00 <0.10 0.012 -0.005 <5.0 18 510
WSW-4 3/3/98 <0.05 <0.002 0.08 <0.005 <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.010 0.043 <0.005 <0.010 0 <5 <5 NA
8/9/99 <0.25 <0.002 0.016 <0.005 <0.01 <0.001 <0.05 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02 <0.002 Q <2 Q NA
2/25/00 <0.20 NA 0.089 <0.005 <0.005 <0.001 NA <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 Not Sampled
WSW-5 3/3/98 <0.05 <0.002 0.043 <0.005 <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.010 0.018 <0.005 <0.010 NA NA NA ND
(Duplicate 8/9/99 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
of WSW-4)
NC Ground Water Quality
Standard NA 0.154 2.1 0.05 2 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.015 0.05 0.018 7 2.8 0.7 NA
WSW water supply well
mg/L milligrams per liter or parts per million
/eg/L micrograms per liter or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
NA not applicable
ND non detect
Numbers in bold indicate concentrations over the NC Ground Water Quality Standards

Table 2(cont.) Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results-M-B Industries,Rosman,North Carolina.
Inorganics 019/4 VOC's(Itl:14 SVOC"s
Sample ID Sample Date Aluminum ToW Tnc A== Baium Caduu m Hexavalent ( mutq Lead Selenium Silver oia-1,4 11irLloroemau T*whbwdham (09/4
CYa& Chromium
MW-5 8/18/99 0.225 <0.010 <0.020 <0.005 0.141 <0.001 <0.01 <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
2/23/00 5.6 NA 0.025 <0.005 0.095 <0.001 NA 0.007 0.007 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 0.17 0.041 0.056 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
MW-6 8/18/99 0.196 <0.010 <0.020 <0.005 0.016 <0.001 <0.01 <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
223/00 49.3 NA 0.132 0.007 0.0821 <0.001 NA 0.027 0.074 <0.005 <0.005 <2 Q Q NA
10/13/00 0.19 0.05 0.13 <5.0 <i.0 <5.0
MW-7 8/18/99 0.269 <0.010 <0.020 <0.005 0.028 <0.001 2.00 2.18 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 3.9 NA
2/24100 7.35 NA <0.02 <0.005 0.054 <0.001 NA 0.199 0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/12/00 <0.10 1.3 <0.005 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
MW-8 8/18/99 <D.05 <0.010 <0.020 <0.005 0.018 <0.001 <0.01 <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q $8.3 NA
223/00 90.8 NA 0.325 0.012 1.84 0.002 NA 0.048 0.08 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 0.60 0.14 0.19 <5.0 <5.0 30
MW-9 9/17/99 0.326 <0.010 6.31 <0.005 0.123 <0.001 <0.01 <0.005 0.022 <0.005 <0.005 <2 Q Q NA
2/25/00 0.096 NA 1.21 <0.005 <0.01 <0.001 NA <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 4.9 <0.005 0.008 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
MW-10 9/17/99 0.553 <0.010 0.18 <0.005 0.028 <0.001 <0.01 0.006 0.006 <0.005 <0.005 4 48 515 NA
2/23/00 0.085 NA 0.138 <0.005 <0.01 0.005 NA <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 9.7 NA
10/12/00 <0.10 <0.005 Q.005 <5.0 <5.0 19
MW-11 9/17/99 6.27 <0.010 0.043 <0.005 0.035 <0.001 <0.01 <0.005 0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 12.7 NA
2/24/00 16.40 NA 0.034 <0.005 0.075 <0.001 NA 0.012 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 1.42 NA
10/12/00 0.15 0.030 0.046 <5.0 <5.0 250
MW-12 9/17/99 1.57 <0.010 <0.020 <0.005 0.04 <0.001 3.7 2.74 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 7.7 &2 20.8 NA
2/24/00 51.2 NA 0.077 <0.005 0.167 <0.001 NA 2.26 0.028 <0.005 <D.005 Q Q Q NA
10/12/00 <0.10 1.9 0.046 <5.0 <5.0 8
WSW water supply well
mg/L milligrams per liter or parts per million
ftg/L micrograms per liter or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
NA not applicable
ND non detect
Numbers in bold indicate concentrations over the NC Ground Water Quality Standards

• • 0 •
Table 2(cont.) Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results-M-B Industries,Rosman,North Carolina.
I-9-i-(ng/L) VOCs(AW'4 SVOC"s
Sample ID Sample Date Alummum Total Tine Arsenic Bum CiAni mt Hexavalent Chromium Lad Selenium Silva cis-1,2 Tn*bmethm Teft6itwottlwk (Ild/L,j
Cant& Chromium &ddomedww
MW-13 11/17/99 4.75 <0.010 0.04 <0.005 0.051 <0.001 <0.01 0.005 0.005 <0.005 .0.005 Q 6.9 83.7 NA
224/00 0.15 NA 0.125 <0.005 <0.01 <0.001 NA <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q 5.8 61 NA
10/12/00 <0.10 <0.005 x0.005 <5.0 8 100
MW-14 11/17/99 15.8 <0.010 0.075 <0.005 0.082 <0.001 <0.01 0.018 0.014 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 46.6 NA
2124/00 64.0 NA 0.356 0.009 0.38 0.004 NA 0.069 0.053 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q 57.5 NA
10/12/00 0.16 0.038 0.038 <5 <5 130
MW-15 11/17/99 6.4 <0.010 0.045 <0.005 0.08 Q.001 <0.01 0.007 0.004 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
2124/00 11.5 NA 0.123 <0.005 0.098 <0.001 NA 0.014 0.009 x0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 <0.10 0.009 0.008 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
MW-16 11/17/99 1.42 <0.010 0.025 <0.005 0.018 <0.001 <0.01 ®.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
2123/00 11.1 NA 0.44 <0.005 0.117 <0.001 NA 0.009 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/13/00 0.27 0.052 0.094 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
MW-17 2/25/00 0.95 ND <0.02 <0.005 0.01 <0.001 ND <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 Q.005 Q Q 6.4 NA
10/12/00 <0.10 <0.005 <0.005 <5.0 <5.0 12
MW-18 2/25/00 2.42 ND <0.02 <0.005 0.019 <0.001 ND <0.005 <0.003 <0.005 <0.005 Q Q Q NA
10/12/00 0.17 0.032 0.024 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
NC Ground ater u 'ty
Standard NA 0.154 2.1 0.05 2 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.015 0.05 0.018 7 2.8 0.7 NA
WSW water supply well
mg/L milligrams per liter or parts per million
ftg1L micrograms per liter or parts per billion
SVOCs semivolatile organic compounds according to SW-846Method8270
VOCs volatile organic compounds according to SW-846 Method 8260
NA not applicable
ND non detect
Numbers in bold indicate concentrations over the NC Ground Water Quality Standards

TOWN OF' HOSIMAN
POST OFFIC T BOX 636
ROSMAN, NIC 28772
7W
828-884 .6859
December 21, 2000
Mr, Jared Edwards
Watcr.4 Edge Envirownental
Via: Facsimile-919-M-9930
Dcaj-Mr. Edwards.
Pet your request I submit the following inlitimmijon.
J�=
0
The availability fbr water and sewer services,at this time,extend to the mcognind limitK 7
-
of our'Fowil
We are in the proccss of upgrading our wastewater lAcility with funding to be roceived
'Wig
from the.Federal Government,with additional monetary assimijulce from the state we
would he ahle In t.-xtcnd our set vices beyond our fiftis anti accommodate Your fCtlUj;3(of
MR additional 100,000 GPD.
• Should you have any farther questions,or need additional information,please feel five in
contact me.
sincerely,
OWN OF ROSMAN
Of,f
Johnny H. KogLm
Mayor

r BvE (Joins sheet 27) 33
w 4.5
o3 FEET AnF - _ —-- -
GdE
a •• +� TsD � � - 75E r'. St � fi� •Rs � .. � N
C� m.. Rs WaF FaE_ a Fad n:
S aRo jai ry FaF
AnF"' Roy Ro r . FaE'�
cE BvC ' Ts
Rs CeG_r
TSE ,:%-
yF"�° 'l '� 'f y, `.cit .� � :' y x.•. .Gb
ChE
} A
1
.4
TSE g� S �.�. •�xr,. a .FaF ?S O
TeD �'/ !. n � Er FaF o
\ y i o
TsE
CrE CeG
AnF
Ro
CeG. FaF.
\ HdE F �; j
! \ Ant
C� arG
TUE
q CrE - iti CdE i•. _�
- ''TuE :.
t
AnF A
! Tu F CdE
ChE ..Y..
CeG `
,' A
TeD )
ChE POF -
' ChF � it °I ;•�; � -
n
ChF \ FaE CeG
.,- 8vE CrE CeG v
we AnE
c" r :r > •... 1 r C CeG; 18vF TuF m
w,
Ro
Ro ` - _ _ -•`� / 4 uo
D Til„
00
TsD Lr)
HaE
IaFe
�'.
AnF. A TcG
F. Ro
1' Tn WaE
s� aECdE H - _ . l`o-'r
t �l r • �, •� � < `ir
� l� \ •� � �cc CSC' B� �� y _
_�� „r TeD
zo AnE < a Tn
T 10, .q c
F TsE AnF
HaE TaF TcG
c Y
Ta o
St HaF' tom" FaF ° o
TsD TcG :C,
_ CrF N,I Anf AjF : TaF ` T,:G ,\
Ro
'ceRoAtte ^
t14
ChE
AnF J 3 ? or,
AnE Pp
u
Y
TeB 7aD v^ � f f' r� dY J �• tiG � �`

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U. S. FOREST SERVICE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
SOIL LEGEND WORKS AND STRUCTURES BOUNDARIES SOIL SURVEY DATA
Highways and roads National or state .............. Soil boundary
The first capital letter is the initial one of the soil name. A second capital letter, A, B,C,D,
E, F,or G,shows the slope. Most symbols without a slope letter are those of nearly level Divided County ......................... and symbol Dx
soils,but some are for land types that have a considerable range of slope. A final number,3, 1
in the symbol indicates That the soil is severely eroded. °
Goad rotor ................. Minor civil division ............. Gravel -„_,....,................
w
SYMBOL NAME Poor motor .................. a--------________ Reservation _._ ._ (Stony
0
Stoniness00B o
Trail ,y
----- Land grant _„_, Very stony ..........
AeD Ashe fine sandy loom,6 to 15 percent slopes cl'
AeE Asha fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes ° +
AeF Ashe fine sandy loam,25 to 45 percent slopes Highway markers Small park, cemetery, airport... -------------------- Rock outcrops ..................
OF Ash@ stony sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
AhG Ash*stony sandy loom,45 to 70 percent slopes National Interstate .......... Land survey division corners ... III1 + Chert fragments °•�•
AnD Ashe and Edn*yvill*soils,6 to 15 percent slopes
AnE Ash*and Ednsyville soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes
AnF Ash*and Edneyville soils,25 to 45 percent slopes U. S. •,,., vv clay spot
AuA Augusta fire sandy loam,cool variant, 1 to 4 percent slopes
State or county DRAINAGE Sand spot ''
Br-r Brandywine stony soils, 15 to 45 percent slopes
BrG Brandywine stony soi is,45 to SO percent slopes
Railroads Streams,double-line Gumbo or scabby spot ........ • " `
BvI3 Brevard loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
BvC Brevard loam,6 to 10 percent slopes
BvE Brevard loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes Single track -4 ��_t_„t_ Perennial Made land - +res"
.................
BvF Brevard loom,25 to 45 percent slopes
ByG Burton stony loom, 25 to 60 percenr slopes Multiple track �" Severe) eroded spot
Intermittent "'` . y ...........
CdE Chandler loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Abandoned .................. + + -+--� + Streams, single-line Blowout,wind erosion ..........
C@G Chandler stony loam,45 to 70 percent slopes v X
CfF Chandler and Fannin soils,25 to 45 percent slopes
�•_.i`-'
ChD Chester NPerennial n*sandy loam,6 to 15 percent slopes Bridges and crossings ••••••-••••••••••••• Gully ........................... J`UN •u
ChE Chester fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
ChF Chester fine sandy loom,25 to 45 percent slopes RoadIntermittent S61 sample site O
CrE Chester stony loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes """" " f
CrF Chester stony loom,25 to 45 percent slopes Crossable with tillage
Trail implements �•'`�'
DeB D*)onto fine sandy loam,2 to 6 percent slopes Not crossable with tiilage
Railroad implements .............. 1"--••.� -� `
• EdG Edneyvill*stony toam,45 to 70 percent slopes
Ferry .. Fy Unclassified ..............
FoE Fannin loam, IS to 25 percent slopes "'•""'--"""""'
FaF Fannin loom,25 to 45 percent slopes
FoG Fannin loam,45 to 70 percent slopes Ford eOR ce Canals and ditches ,,,,,,,, _._._.—.— '
FFD Fletcher and Fannin soils,6 to 15 percent slopes
' xr
FFE Fletcher and Fannin soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes Grade Lakes and ponds
HoD Hayesville fine sandy loam,6 to 15 percent slopes
fie- Hayesville fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes R. R. over ................... Perennial ....................
HoF Hayesville fine sandy loam,25 to 50 percent slopes -IIS- r
HcE3 Hayesville clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes,severely eroded R. R. under .................
Intermittent ... ------
HdE Haywood stony loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes •-••
HdF Haywood stony loom,25 to 50 percent slopes `` ' +•
r�
Buildings „-„••............... Falls and rapids t _, I '"•'
Pm Ponzer muck,cool variant r `
ei
P.E Porters loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes School l Marsh or swamp °
PoF Porters loom,25 to 45 percent slopes I _
PrF Porters stony loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes Wet spot
Church ...................... Z ,
Rk Rock outcrop
Ro Rosman fine sandy•loom Mine and quarry ............... s8 Drainage end or alluvial fan ... �•— �'�►
Rs Rosman soils e
Gravel pit ...................... W
Sc Stony colluvial land
St Stony landPower line
Su Suncook loamy sand RELIEF
ToF Talladega silt loam,25 to 45 percent slopes Pipeline f-f I--I 1--i F•-1 t--•t t- Escarpments
TcG Talladega channery silt loom,45 to 70 percent slopes
TeB Tate fine sandy loom,2 to 6 percent slopes '} - v•°•••••v I
TeD Tate fine sandy loom,6 to 15 percent slopes Cemetery I Bedrock v,v+•+•+++
TeE Tote fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Tn Toxowoy silt loom Dams Y� .......................
Other ,..^n^^'rrnrrrrrrmrf^nm
To Toxoway soils �...�r
Tr Transylvania silt loam Levee .......................... Short steep slope. ............... '•-
TsD Tusquitee loom,6 io 15 percent slopes
TsE Tusquitee loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes ® 3 rf
TuD Tusquitee stony loam,6 to 15 percent slopes Tanks • Prominent peak
TuE Tusquitee stony loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
• TuF Tusquitee stony loam,25 to 45 percent slopes Well, oil or gas A Depressions Large Small
WaD Watauga loom,6 to 15 percent slopes Forest fire or lookout station ... * a.
Crossable tillage 4i,to”
C
WoE Watauga loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes n
WoF Watauga loom,25 to 45 percent slopes Not Crossable with tillage f'� t`•�;�.
Windmill ....................... .e, implements .."•".......... ;. 3 e
r
Pni r.
Contains water most of
the time
Tunnel, road.................... 'K
� ` •

20 SOIL SURVEY
• (10YR 5/2) mottles in lower parts; massive; very More than half the acreage is in pasture or cultivation,
friable; cosh b u Hae mica flakes; strongly acid; and the rest is in goods. These soils are fairlywell suited
clear, smooth boundary. to most locally r ]
1104-50 to 6i0 inches. stratified sand and gravel; single g o-wii crops. The major limitations in
grain; strongly ncld. using these soils are very frequent flooding and seepage
The Rosman soils are 3.5 to 60 inches thiel: and are under- water from adjoining sloes. Artificial drainage is needed
lain by unconforming material. The A horizon is fine sands oil t11e wet aretls. (Capability unit IIw-1; woodland suit-
loam and loam.10 to 20 inches thick and is very dark grayish ability group 1; wildlife suitability group 3)
brown to dark brown. The C horizon is loam, fine sandy
loam, or silt loam 25 to 40 inches thick and is brown to dart:
yellowish brown. Few to many gray mottles occur at a depth Stony Colluvial Land
below 20 inches in places. The IIC horizon is stratified sand,
loamy sand. silt, and gravel or stones. Stony colluvial land (Sc) consists of areas in which 25 to
Rosman fine sandy loam (Ro).—This nearly level soil 70 percent of the soil mass is made up of stones. It occurs
is on stream flood plains. The areas are irregular in shape; in cores and on toe slopes in association wit11 steep,
and are between the stream and adjoining uplands or stony upland soils. The soil material filling the spaces
the stream and a more poorly drained soil.
between the stones is dark brown to yellowish-brn►vii
This soil has the profile described as representative of loam, fine sanely loam, or clay loam.
the series. The surface laver is very dark grayish-brown. Stoniness makes this land type unsuitable for cultiva-
or dark-brown fine sandy loam 10 to 20 inehes thick. tion. It is fairly well suited to pasture glasses, but malu-
1'lie nest layer is brown or dark yellowish-brown loam, ageinent that requires the use of equipment is iiiipractical.
fine sandy loam, or silt loans 25 to 40 inches thick. It is prIlctically all in forest., predominantly yellow-
Inclucled with this soil in mapping- were small areas of lioplal% yellow rind black birches, and northern red oak.
similar soils that are somewhat poorly drained. (Capability unit Vs-1; woodland suitability group 11;
Most of the acreage is cleared duel is in pa.tigt.ur,or culti- not placed iii a wildlife suitability group)
vat:ion. This soil is easy to keep in good tilth and can be
worked throughout a.'-wide range of inoisture content. Stony Land
It is well suited to most locally grown crops. The major
limitation to the use of this soil is very frequent floodiil,g Stone land iSt) consists of upland areas where exposed
(lig. 6). (Capability unit IIw-1; woodland suitability bedrock or loose stones (fig. 7) cover 25 to 90 percent
group 1;wildlife suuitability group 3) of the surface. It is mostly on the steeper slopes in the
Rosman soils(Rs).—This undifferentiated group consists more mounta.inolls areas paiticularly along the southern
of nearly level soils on stream flood plains acid along 11111-1of the county and the northern section.
•
(11;einalrem-ays. It occurs, as long, narrow strips 4 to 12 Stones and roA: outcrops are sufficiently numerous to
a(•res in size, More than 40 percent of the unit is Rosman illake the areas unsuitable for cultivation. The soil be-
soils, which have a very dark graS-ish-brown to dark- tavern the stone varies in. tllicl iless, but in most places
brown fine sands= loam and loam surface layer 10 to 20 it is thin—
inches thick. Relow this is brown to dark yellowish- Most of the acreage is in trees, primarily low-quality
brown loam, fine sandy loam, and silt loam 25 to 40 hardwoods. A good use for this land type is trees or wild-
inclies thick. The rest of the acreage includes soils that. life. (Capability unit VIIsrl; woodland suitability
are, similar in texture but are somewhat poorly drained group 11; not placed in a wildlife suitability group)
1 Y p.
and poorly drained.
Included with these soils in mapping were small areas Suncook Series i
Of '['oxaway soils.
The Srmc K)k series consists of excessively drained,
nearly level soils on stream flood plains. They are sub-11
'
♦ s * r h s x
R
j^ 1X _i pp
twers• f. 1 lo41ding in a field of young pole beans. The soil is
Rosman fine sandy loam. Figure 7.—An area of Stony land.

TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
veli, frequent flooding,of very brief duration.They Talladega I soils are very low t0 low in nature r,•r t,i r r
[ur in recent alluvial deposits. Depth to bedrock is and low to medium in organic-matter content. 'Cir,., i!t
nsore than 5 feet. The seasonally high water table is at a low in available water capacity and have <> shall ,_
depth of about 3 feet. moderately deed, effective root zone. They have mtr.l
In a typical profile, these soils have a Clark-brown erate permeability and low shrink-swell potential.
loamy sand surface layer about 6 inches thick. The under- Most of the acreage of these soils is 1n foresi, 4,r
lying layers, to a depth of more than 50 inches, are dark dominantly low-quality hardwoods and scattered ++Ir:t,
yellowish-brovvrl and dark-brown loamy fine sand.and pitch, and shortleaf pines. Slope and droughtine;S :,a
fine sand. `l.'hey are underlain at some depth by gravel the major limitations to the use of these soils for cri,rts,
or stones. Representative profile of Talladega silt loam, 25 to A.,
Suncook soils are very low in natural fertility and low percent slopes, 5 miles northeast of Brevard., 1.6 milv.,
to medium in organic-matter content. They have low north of IT.S. I-Iirllwav -No. 64, in wooded area, 30 fvvi
available water capacity and a love shrink-swell. poten- south of State Road 1501:
tial. Permeability is rapid. 02-1. inch to 0, decaying leaves and twigs; mass of abuu-
"Vost of the acreage is cleared and used for pasture dnnt small roots.
or crops. The major limitations to the use of these soils A1-0 to 2 inches, dark-brown (10YR 4/3) silt loam: mod-
are very frequent•flooding and droughtiness. erste, fine and medium; granular structure; friable;
Representative profile of Suncook loam sand, i).5 mile mans small and medium roots; 3 percent small hard
y schist fragments; eery strongly acid; clear, smooth
cast of Penrose Yost Office. 1,000 feet east of bridge on boundary.
State Road 162-18, in cultivated field, 100 feet north of the A2-2 to 4 inches, dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) silt
French Broncl Fl iver: loam; moderate. dine and medium. granular strue-
tore: friable: ninny small and medium roots; 5 per-
Ap—A) to Il inches, dark-brown (10YR 4/:31) loamy sand; sin- cent stuall bard schist fragments; very strongly
gle grain; I(x)se; strongly acid; gradual, wavy acid: clear, +wavy boundary.
boundary. I;2t-1 to 18 inches, strong-brown (7.5YR 5/6) channery silty
C1-6 ti, 12 inr-hes, dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) loamy clay loans; weak, medium, subangular blocky struc-
fine land; single gratin; loose; common mica: tare; friable; common small roots; thin, discontinu-
strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary. ous clay films; 40 percent conrse hard sebtst
C2-12 to 50 inches;, dark-bro+vu (7.5Y11 4/4) line sand; fragments; very strongly acid; clear, irregular
single grain: loose; common mica; strongly acid. boundary.
.['lie Ahorizon Is 6 to 1`1 inches thick and Is dark brown or
C-18 to 40 inches, strong-brown (7.5YR 5/6) weathered
1Wal: velle-wish brown. The C horizon is loamy fine sand or schist that crushes esistly to channery silt loam;
ny sand to wand 30 to 75 inches or more In thickness and rock structure; friable; 60 percent course schist
dart: brown or dark yell(nvish brown to yellowish brown. fragments; very strongly arid; clear, irregular
These soils are underlain ret some depth by gravel or stones. boundary.
R-40 inches +, moderately hard schist rock.
Suncook loamy sand (Su).—`l'his nearly level soil is oil The solum ranges from 10 to `_3 inches in thickness. The A
stream flood plains and is subjects to very frequent flooding horizon is silt loam or channery silt loam 3 to 10 inches thick
Of vel;v 1)1.1(.fduration.It.has a surface layer of dark-brown and is dark brown to dark yellowish brown. The B horizon
to dark yellowish-brown loamy sand 6 to 12 inches thick. is 7 to 18 inches thick and is chaunery silt loam or channery
Silty clay loam that contains many coarse schist fragments. It
In places the surface laver is ;and and is very dark grav- is yellowish brown to yellowish red. The C horizon consists of
ish brown. The. underlying layers are dark-brown to yellowish-brown or strong-brou'ri to yellowish-red channery
Yellowish-brown loamy tine sand Or loamy sand to sand allt loam or channery silty clay loam in crevices between
30 to 7.5 inches or more thick.
weathered schist fragments.
The soil is fairly easy to keep in good tilth and can be Talladega silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes (TaF).—
worked throughout. a ~vide range of moisture content. This soil is on uneven mountain side slopes. Areas are
A large percentage of the ncreare. is in pasture. The irregular in shape and are 6 to 50 acres in size.
refit is in roxv crops or trees. Thissoil is only fairly well This soil has the profile described as representative for
suited to locally grown crops. Very frequent flooding and the series. The surface laver is dark-brown to dark
droughtiness are major limitations to the use of this soil. yellowish-brown silt loans to 10 inches thick. The sub-
(Cal,abilit.v unit IIIc--l; woodland suitability group 3: soil is yellowish-brown to yellowish-red channely silt
wildlife !;uitabi.lity grout, 3) loam or channery silty clav loam 7 to 18 .inches thick. It
contains many coarse schist fragment,,.
Talladega Series Included with this soil in snapping were areas where
the slope is less than 2:i percent. Also included were small
The ':I':lllade�;at series consists of well-drained, steel, t.o areas that have a eltannery surface layer, as well as areas
ver'v Acr(•h :oils on narrow convex ridgetops anal uneven of Rork outprop.
side slopes. '1'11.ese soils formed under forest vegetation Practically all of the acreage is forested.. A sma11 Per-
in residuum from schist. Depth to bedrock is 1 to 4 feet. ventage is cleamd and in pasture. Because of slope and
The seasonally high water table is below 5 feet. low available water capacity, this soil. is unsuited to culti-
Li a t�-pica.l profile, these soils have a sul•faee later of vation and poorly suited to 'pasture... _ good use for this
,lark-brown and dark yellowish-brown silt loam about soil is tines. (Capability emit FIIe-1: woodland su.itabil-
4 ii +s think. The subsoil is strong-brown, friable than its group 0; wildlife suitability croup 2)
IRAWIL loans or c1>annery-silty clay loam about I l in(:hes Talladega channery silt loam,4.5 to 70 percent slopes
thick. Below this laver, to a depth of about 40 ruche.,, is ,TcGI.—This soil is on mountain side slopes. Thin, flat
strong-brown channery silt loam. schist frauments make up 15 to 50 percent of the surface

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Ina
L D.Number MW-5 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 8/17/99 Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments Water detected in 7 foot zone. French Broad River is approximately 20 feet to the southeast of boring.
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 4" 01-1' Gnsss and topsoil
Riser Type PVC 1=4' Brown,silty weathered rock.moist
Diameter 2" 4'-1 S' Brown,silty weathered rock,becoming more moist
Screen Type PVC 15'-22' Same as above but wet
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 01- 7' Boring terminated at 22'
Screen Interval 7'-22' Ground water encountered at 15'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 01-10
Bentonite Type no
Interval 1'-3'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 3'-22'
Total Depth 22'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L Below R.P.
8/17/99 10.01
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.
•

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number MW-6 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 8/17/99 Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(M)
Borehole Dia. 4" 0,10 1, Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC 1'-13' Brown,siltyfine sand,moist
Diameter 2" 13'-17' Same as above but wet
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2" Boring terminated at 17'
Riser Interval 01-21 Ground water encountered at 13'
. Screen Interval 2'-17'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0.5'-0'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 0.51-11
Filter Pack sand
Interval P-]7'
Total Depth 17'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L Below R.P.
8/17/99 11.00
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type H-Style L
0

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number MW-7 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 8/17/99 Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments H2 S smell
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments @ Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 4" 0'to I' Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC P to 3' Brown,siltyfine sand,moist
Diameter 2" 3'to 15' Brown,weathered rock with sandy clay
Screen Type PVC 15'-20' Same as above but wet
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0'-4' Boring terminated at 20'
• Screen Interval 4'-19'. Ground water encountered at 13'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0'-1'
Bentonite Type na
Interval P-2'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 2'-20'
Total Depth 20'
R.P. Elevation -
Datum -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L. Below R.P. -
8/17/99 8.85 -
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type H-Style I.
•

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number MW-8 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project Na 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 8/17/99 Complete Date 8/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(M)
Borehole Dia. 4" 0'to 1' Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC P to S' Brown,siltyfine sand
Diameter 2" 5'to 7' Same as above
Screen Type PVC 7'to 20' Same as above but wet
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0'-S' Boring terminated at 20'
Screen Interval 5'-20' Ground water encountered at 7'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type no
Interval 01-11
Bentonite Type na
Interval 11-31
Filter Pack sand
Interval 3'-20'
Total Depth 20'
R.P. Elevation na -
Datum na -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L Below R.P. -
8/17/99 6.75 -
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM= Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type 11-Style 1.

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Ina
L D. Number MW-9 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Chris Randazzo Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 9/13/99 Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments Nit bedrock at 19,set 6"casing at 21'
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8" 0'to P Grass and topsoil
Riser Type metal 1,10 5, Brown,silty sand,some gravel
Diameter 6" 5'-19' Same as above with rounded cobbles(creek rocks)
Screen Type na 19'to 25' Bedrock
Diameter na 251 to 183' Brown mud
Riser Interval na
• Screen Interval na Boring terminated at 183'
Slot Size na Ground water encountered at 10'
Grout Type na
Interval 0'-21'
Bentonite Type na
Interval na
Filter Pack na
Interval na
Total Depth 183
R.P. Elevation
Datum -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L Below R.P. -
9/17/99 8.85 -
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type 11-Style 1.

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Ina
L D. Number MW-10 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Chris Randazzo Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 9/13/99 Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary and hollow stem auger
Comments Did not hit any solid areas down to 100'
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Sol]/Rock Description/Comments @ Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8" 0'to P Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC 1'to 10' Brown,silty sand,some gravel and weathered rocks
Diameter 2" 10'-60' Brown mud,no bedrock yet but many rounded cobbles
Screen Type PVC (creek rocks)
Diameter 2" 60'to 130' Brown mud
Riser Interval 0'-120'
Screen Interval 120'-130' Boring terminated at 130'
Slot Size 0.2 Ground water encountered at 10'
Grout Type na
Interval 01-110,
Bentonite Type na
Interval 1101-115,
Filter Pack sand
Interval 1151-130,
Total Depth 130'
R.P. Elevation -
Datum -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L Below R.P. -
9/17/99 9.59 -
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM= Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type H-Style 1.

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number MW-11 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Chris Randazzo Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 9/13/99 Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rotary
Comments
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8" 0'to 1' Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC P to 3' Brown,silty sand,some gravel
Diameter 2" Y-10' Brown,silty sand,wet
Screen Type PVC 10'-22' Brown mud
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0'- 12' Boring terminated at 22'
Screen Interval 12'-22' Ground water encountered at 10'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 0'. 7'
Bentonite Type na
Interval 7'-10'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 10'-22'
Total Depth 22'
R.P. Elevation -
Datum -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L Below R.P. -
9/17/99 8.82 -
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.
•
i

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number. MW-12 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Chris Randazzo Driller Bill Lambert
Start Date 9/13/99 Complete Date 9/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary
Drilling Method Air rota
Comments
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments ®Depth(tt.)
Borehole Dia. 8" 0'to P Grass and topsoil
Riser Type PVC 6'to 10' Brown,silty sand,some gravel
Diameter 1" 10'-25' Brown mud
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2" Boring terminated at 25'
Riser Interval 01-15, Ground water encountered at 10'
Screen Interval 15'-25'
Slot Size 0.2
Grout Type na
Interval 01-10,
Bentonite Type na
Interval 10'-13'
Filter Pack sand
Interval 13'-25'
Total Depth 25'
R.P. Elevation -
Datum -
Water Level Information -
Date W.L Below R.P. -
9117199 9.56 -
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.
i

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number MW-13 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201401 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson/TifTany Whitson Driller Todd
Start Date 11/15/99 Complete Date 11/17/99 Equipment Air Rotary/Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger-6 S/8'to 34'bgs
Comments Air Rig from 34'to 135'bgs
Grass Surface Cover
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments @ Depth(ft.)
Borehole Din. 6518 01 to 5' Dark bramm silt
Riser Type PVC 5'to 10' Dark brown sandy silt w/gravel&cobbles(wet)
Diameter Z" 10'to 15' Water encountered at 13'during drilling
Screen Type PVC 15'to 20' Same as above
Diameter 2" 20'to25'
Riser Interval 0'to 115' 25'to 30'
Screen Interval 115'to 135' 30'to 35'
Slot Size 0.010" 35'to40'
Grout Type Portland cement 40'to 45' Same as above
Interval 0'to 106' 45'to50'
Bentonite Type Holep/ug 50'to55'
Interval 106'to 11155'to 60'
Filter Pack Filter sand 60'to 70'
Interval 111,10 135, 70'to 80' Same as above
Total Depth 135' 80'to90'
R.P.Elevation 90,to 100'
Datum 1001 to 120'
Water Level Information 1201 to 130'
Date W.L Below R.P. 130'to 140' Encountered bedrock @ 135'
11/17/99 6.54'
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Ina
L D.Number MW-14 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201401 Registration No.
Geologist Erik SvensonITitfany Whitson Driller Todd/Mark
Start Date 11/15/1999 Complete Date 11/15/1999 Equipment Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger Rig to 20'
Comments Grass Surface Cover
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(tt.)
Borehole Dia. 6518 01 to 5' Dark brown sandy silt;moist
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2" S'to 10' Same as baove w/cobbles
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2" 10'to 15' Bro%Wgrey coarse sandy silt
Riser Interval 0'to 10'
Screen Interval 10'to 20' 15'to 20' Same as above:water encountered 16'during drilling
Slot Size 0.010" 20' Boring terminated @ 20'
Grout Type Portland cement
Interval 0'to 6'
Bentonite Type Hole lug
Interval 6'to 8'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 8'to 20'
Total Depth 20'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L Below R.P.
11/17/1999 7.57
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type H-Style 1.
•

Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D.Number MW-15 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Pmject No. 8201401 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson/Tiffmy Whitson Driller Todd/Mark
Start Date 11/15/1999 Complete Date 11/15/1999 Equipment Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8 to 25'bgs
Comments Top of bedrock well;up gradient
Grass surface cover
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments tQ Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia 6518 01 to 5' Dark brown sandy silt
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2" 5'to 10' Brown/dark/light coarse sand silt w/pebbles and stones;
Screen Type PVC moist
Diameter 2" 10'to 15' Same as above
• Riser Interval 0'to 10'
Screen Interval 10'to 25' 15'to 20' Light brown sandy silt;water @ 151 during drilling
Slot Size 0.010"
Grout Type Portland cement 20'to 25' Partially weathered granitic rock
Interval 0'to 6' 25' Boring terminated @ 25'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 61 to 8'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 8'to 25'
Total Depth 25'
R.P.Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L Below R.P.
11/17/1999 3.91 `
RP. =Reference Point W.L. Water Level TBM Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.

a
•
w Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc
-
L D.Number MW-16 Purpose Monitoring Wells
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201401 Registration No.
Geologist Erik Svenson/fiffany Whitson Driller Todd/Mark
Start Date 11/15/1999 Complete Date 11/15/1999 Equipment Auger B-58
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8 to 16'bgs
Comments Top of bedrockl3hallow well
Gross surface cover
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(M)
Borehole Dia. 6518 01 to S' Dark brown sandy silt w/cobbles
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2" Y to 10' Same as above
Screen Type PVC
Diameter 2" 10'to 15' Same as above
• Riser Interval 0'to 6' 16' Auger refusal at bedrock contact;No xrrter encountered
Screen Interval 6'io 16' during drilling
Slot Size 0.010"
Grout Type Portland cement
Interval 0'to 2'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 2'to 4'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 4'to 16'
Total Depth 16'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.I.Below R.P.
11/17/1999 8.44
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.
•
l

•
Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Inc.
L D. Number MW-17 Purpose Monitoring Well
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201401 Registration No 1175
Geologist Cliff lundgren Driller Todd
Start Date 2/24/00 Complete Date 2/24/00 Equipment Auger B-58/Air Rotary
Drilling Method Auger-6 5/8"to 1 S.S'bgs Air Rotary-8"from 1 S.S'to 122'bgs
Comments Surface Cover Cleared-Sand
20'from bank of former river channel
subsurface material description based on driller's and/or geologist's observation
of drilling equipment resistance to penetration FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Q Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8" 0'to 7' Dark brown silty micaceous fine to medium sand
Riser Type PVC 7'to 13' Dark brown silty sand w/gravel&cobbles(wet)
Diameter 2" (Water encountered at 12'during drilling)
Screen Type PVC 13'to 15.5' Partially weathered rock-Auger refusal at 15.5'
Diameter 2" 15.5'to 17' Boulder/rock lens(Begin air rotary)
Riser Interval 0'to 112' 17'to 78' Partially weathered rock described as brownish tan silty sand
Screen Interval 112'to 122' (drillers describe as sanstone)
Slot Size 0.010" 78'to 115' Partially weathered rock described as grey
Grout Type Portlan&Bentonite w/rock fragments,harrier drilling
Interval 0'to 107' (water/bearing zone beginning at 78.est. 5-10 gpm)
Bentonite Type Holeplug 115'to 122' Hard rock described as grey biotite/granite gneiss
Interval 107'to 110' rock fragments,hard,fresh(assume bedrock)
Filter Pack Filter sand 122' Boring terminated @ 122'
Interval 110'to 122'
Total Depth 122'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information "
Date W.L Below R.P.
2/25/00 7.60'
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.
i

I
Boring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra, Ina
L D.Number MW-18 Purpose Monitoring Well
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Geologic Exploration
Project No. 8201401 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff lundgren Driller Todd/Mark
Start Date 2/24/00 Complete Date 2/24/00 Equipment Air rig
Drilling Method Auger Rotary to 20'
Comments Surface Cover Cleared-Sand
20'from bank of former river channel
15'southwest ofMW-17
FID/PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments ®Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 8" 0'to 7' Dark brown silty micaceous fine to medium sand
Riser Type PVC
Diameter 2" 7'to 16' Dark brown silty sand w/gravel&cobbles(wet)
Screen Type PVC (Water encountered at 12'during drilling)
Diameter 2"
Riser Interval 0'to 10' 16'to 20' Partially weathered rock/oulder/rock lens
Screen Interval 10'to 20'
Slot Size 0.010" 20' Boring terminated @ 20'
Grout Type Portland/Bentonite
Interval 0'to 6'
Bentonite Type Holeplug
Interval 6'to 8'
Filter Pack Filter sand
Interval 8'to 20'
Total Depth 20'
R.P. Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L Below R.P.
2/25/00 8.47'
R.P. =Reference Point W.L. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL =Mean Sea Level
Refer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type H-Style 1.

s
•
OBoring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquateme,Inc
L D.Number P-1 Purpose former cesspool soil&water samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundgrcn/I omy Clark Driller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 8'-9'
water sample interval 8.5'-12.5' VOC 260 and Pb,Cr 6010E
sample time 11:50 PID
Weft Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soft/Rock Description/Comments @ Depth ft.)
Borehole Dia. 2" 01 to 0.5' concrete 1.0' Ippm
Riser Type 0.5105 11-clay.sandSill 3.0' ND
Diameter 5,108, residual-BN Si fine to coarse sand w/rock 3.0' ND
Screen Type 8'to 10.S' gravel, wet 7.0' ND
ameter 10.51to 12' sapprolite 9.0' ND
Riser Interval 11.0' 6ppm
Screen Interval
Slot She
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
R.P.Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L.Below R.P.
10/10/00 8.5'
R.P. -Reference Point W.L. -Water Level TBM—Temporary Benchmark MSL—Mean Sea Level
•efer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style 1.

i
r
Shoring /Well Construction Log
Aquaterra,Inc
Well Construction Permit Number
Purpose former cesspool soil&water samples
I.D.Number P-2
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff LuodgredLamy Clark Driller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
Drilling Method eo robe
Comments
soil sample interval 5'-6'
water sample interval 9.5'-12.5' VOC 260)and Pb,Cr 6010B)
sample time 12:25 PID
Wen Construction Depth (PPM)
Informs on From-To Sohl/Rock Descrh thin/Comments Depth(ft.)
Borehole Dia. 2" 01100.51 concrete 1.0' 0.2ppm
Riser Type 0.5105 ill-claysantsilt 3.0' 0.2ppm
Diameter 5,108, residual-BN Sifine to coarse sand w/rock 5.0' 0.6ppm
Screen Type 8'to 12' gravel,wet/rock is 7.0' ND
ameter 9.0' 0.2
Riser Interval 11.0' 0.4ppm
Screen Interval
Slot Size
Grout T
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 11'
R.P.Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L.Below R.P.
10/10/00 8'
R.P. —Reference Point WL. = Water Level TBM=Temporary Benchmark MSL=Mean Sea Level
Defer to Standard Well Construction Schematic Type II-Style I.
1

i
43oring /Well Construction Log
Wen Construction Permit Number Aquaterra,Inc
L D.Number P-3 Purpose former cesspool soil&water samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundg=4 omy Clark Driller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
DrOM Method geo robe
Comments
soil sample interval 5'-8'
water sample interval 9.5-13.5' VOC 260 and Pb,Cr(6010B) �'��
sample time 1300 `J'PID
Weil Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Depth(ft)
Borehole Dia. 2" 0,10 0.51 concrete 1.0' ND
Riser Type 0.5105 ll-claysanitsill 3.0' 0.4pp m
Diameter 3'to 8' residual-BN Sijbre to coarse sand w/rock S.0' ND
Screen Type 8'to 11' Pwr/roek U-wet 7.0' ND
iiameter 11'to 13' sapprofile 9.0' ND
Riser Interval 11.0'ND
Screen Interval 13' ND
Slot Size
Groat Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
RP.Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L.Below R.P.
10/10/00 8'
R.P. -Reference Point W.L. - Water Level TBM-Temporary Benchmark MSL-Mean Sea Level
af.,to Standard WeU Construction Sekentatic Type II-Style 1.

t •
OBoring /Well Construction Log
Welt Construction Permit Nmnber Aquaterra,Inc
I.D.Number P-4 Purpose former black oxide finishing area samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundgren omy Clark DrMer
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
DrMinj Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 4'-5' Also: 140m1 at 1'
water sample interval 8'-12' VOC 260)and Pb,Cr 6010E
sample time 1400 FI /PID
Weff Construction Depth (PPM)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments @ Depth ft.)
Borehole Dia. 2" 0'to 0.51 concrete 1.0' 200ppm
Riser Type 0.3'10 1.S' dark browonfine sand 3.0' IOOPPM
Diameter 1.5'to 6' tan ne to medium sand 5.0' 100ppm
Screen Type 10.3 Pwr/rock ra is 7.0' 80ppm
ameter 11' Wet 9.0' 60ppm
Riser Interval 11.0' 2ppm
Screen Interval
Slot Size
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
` F iter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 12'
R.P.Elevation
Datum
Water Level Infornation
Date W.L Below RP.
10/10/00 8'
R.P. —Reference Point W.L. —Water Level TBM—Temporary Benchmark MSL—Mean Sea Level
10efer to Standard WeU Construction Schematic Type 11-Style L

Woring /Well Construction Log
Well Construction Permit Number Aquaterra,Inc
L D.Number P-5 Purpose former black oxide finishing area samples
Project Name M-B Industries Contractor Probe Technologies
Project No. 8201400 Registration No.
Geologist Cliff Lundgrarkq"iny Clark Miller
Start Date 10/10/00 Complete Date 10/10/00 Equipment
Drilling Method geoprobe
Comments
soil sample interval 6'-7'
water sample interval 8'-12' VOC 160 and Pb,Cr 6010E
siunWe time 1435 FID PID
Well Construction Depth (ppm)
Information From-To Soil/Rock Description/Comments Depth ft
Borehole Dia. 2" 0'to 0.51 concrete 1.0' goppm
Riser Type 0.51101.5, dark brown ne sand 3.0' 30ppm
Diameter 1.5'to 6' tan ne to medium sand 5.0' 50PPM
Screen Type 10.5 Pwrlrock ra is 7.0' 70ppm
Hamster ll' wet 9.0' JORPM
Riser Interval M 0'ND
Screen Interval
Slot Site
Grout Type
Interval
Bentonite Type
Interval
Filter Pack
Interval
Total Depth 11'
R.P.Elevation
Datum
Water Level Information
Date W.L-Bebw R.P.
10/10/00 8'
RP. -Reference Point W.L. =Water Leve! TBM-Temporary Benchmark MSL-Mean Sea Level
*If.,to Standard Wen Construction Schematic Type II-Sty41.
1