1_WQC-Homewood-Jordan Buffer Variance documents

VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION
This document is a public record under the North Carolina Public Records Act and may be published on the Town’s website or disclosed to third parties.

Application #: Submittal Date:
Fee Paid $ Check #

Last Updated: July 1, 2021
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Applicant Name(s):
Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: Fax:
E-mail Address:

OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name(s):
Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: Fax:
E-mail Address:

PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Address/Location:
Property PIN:
Acreage: Zoning:

Town Limits: Inside corporate limits In ETJ Outside corporate limits and ETJ

Other contacts:

2 of 6 Variance Permit Application
VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION
This document is a public record under the North Carolina Public Records Act and may be published on the Town’s website or disclosed to third parties.

Application #: Submittal Date:

Last Updated: July 1, 2021
TO THE APEX BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:

I, , hereby petition the Apex Board of Adjustment for a Variance
Permit from the literal provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) because, under the
interpretation given to me by the Director of Planning and Community Development, I am prohibited from using
the parcel of land described in this application in a manner shown by the plot/site plan attached to this form. I
request a Variance Permit from the following provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance (cite the
paragraph numbers):

so that the above-mentioned property can be used in a manner indicated by the plot/site plan attached to this
form or if the plot/site plan does not adequately reveal the nature of the variance permit, as more fully
described herein:

FACTORS RELEVANT TO THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE PERMIT
The Apex Board of Adjustment does not have unlimited discretion in deciding whether to grant a variance permit.
In order to approve an application for a variance permit, the Board of Adjustment shall find the following:
• Unnecessary Hardship. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the Ordinance. It
shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of a Variance Permit, no reasonable use can
be made of the property.
• Hardship Results from Peculiar Conditions. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the
property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting from personal circumstances, as well
as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or the general public, may
not be the basis for granting a variance. A variance may be granted when necessary and appropriate to
make a reasonable accommodation under the Federal Fair Housing Act for a person with a disability.
• Not Result of Action by Applicant. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the
property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify
the granting of a Variance Permit shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship.
• Consistency with the UDO. The requested variance permit is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent
of the Ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved.

4 of 6 Variance Permit Application

March 31, 2022

Ms. Jeri Pederson
Planning Technician
Apex
73 Hunter Street
Apex, North Carolina 27502

Reference: No Practical Alternatives Determination/Riparian Buffer
Pines at Wake Crossing
Parlier Drive
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49:14384

Ms. Pederson,

Please find the attached Riparian Buffer, No Practical Alternatives Determination Application for the
Pines at Wake Crossing Site. The subject of this application is located on Parlier Drive at the Clark
Branch crossing. The site is identified by the Wake County Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs) as
0733133605 and 0733049008 The attached application includes the following support
documentation:

• No Practical Alternatives Determination Application
• Parlier Crossing – Impact Plans
• U.S. Army Corps approved NWP 12 and 14, dated 1/12/2010
• FEMA Correspondence regard Violation Case #17-04-7608P, dated 12/21/2020
• Meeting Minutes, Apex, FEMA, Toll Brother, U.S. Corps of Engineers, ESE Consultants,
ECS Southeast, dated 11/29/2021

The following information describes the overall project, project purpose, alternatives and impact
avoidance/minimization and is included in the No Practical Alternatives Determination Application
document.

Project Purpose

The purpose of the project is to provide corrective action to address the FEMA floodplain violation
(Case #17-04-7608-P) associated with the culvert construction. The corrective action involves the
removal of approximately 1,200 cy from the floodplain. The excavation will lower the base flood
elevation rise created by the previously constructed road crossing over Clark Branch.

Project Description

The excavation of 1,200 cy will result in the temporary disturbance to approximately 0.17 acre of
forested wetland. Following the excavation activities, the disturbed area will be graded to create a
2
reasonably smooth and uniform surface and reseeded with the NC Piedmont Riparian Mix (Ernst
Seed Mix – ERNMX-307). Refer to Sheet 3 of 6 for details regarding site stabilization and
revegetation following excavation activities.

The construction of the project will not necessitate the use of any specialized construction
techniques. Standard construction equipment such as cranes, excavators, dump trucks, and similar
vehicles would be used for the project. Proper erosion and sedimentation control measures would be
employed throughout the project. Typical materials and machinery will be used on-site during the
construction process. Refer to Sheets 5 and 6 for details regarding grading, soil erosion and
sediment control measures.

Project Alternatives

Two other alternatives were considered that would minimize/avoid temporary impacts to the
wetlands and riparian buffer while addressing the FEMA floodplain violation.

1. Remove Culvert: Removing the existing road crossing would decrease crossing of Clark Branch,
create two public roadway dead-ends which would not accommodate first responder vehicle turn
arounds, require re-laying the existing public water main under the stream, re-laying the existing
public power and other dry utilities under the stream and would cut off the stormwater detention
basin facility on the northwest side of Parlier Drive from the stormwater management piping on the
south side of Parlier Drive. Due to elevation changes, the storm pipe cannot be re-laid under the
stream and as a result stormwater would not reach the detention basin for the required treatment
prior to discharge to Clark Branch. Therefore, for safety reasons, loss of stormwater treatment and
extensive re-laying of existing utilities, this alternative was not considered a viable option.

2. Add Culvert: In order to restrict the rise between the Corrective Effective 100-year Water Surface
Elevation (WSEL) versus the final constructed 100-year WSEL to approximately 1.0-ft upstream of
the culvert, the existing passage would need to be almost doubled with the addition of a 10 ft width X
5 ft height concrete box culvert.

This additional box culvert would be approximately 110 LF with 20 ft long concrete headwalls
upstream and downstream. The culvert invert would be approximately 20 feet below the road
surface and would require significant trenching and temporary blockage to the roadway. The culvert
would need to cross under existing operating storm pipe, water main and other dry utilities such as
electrical and cable. Installation of the added culvert to avoid excavation within the wetland and
riparian buffer would not be a viable option for remediating the floodplain impacts while avoiding the
temporary wetland/riparian impacts and would result in a additional streambed disturbance.

Minimization of Impacts through Construction Techniques

The construction techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary
and additional erosion control measures shall be maintained throughout the construction process.
Silt fencing will be placed at the bottom of the slopes to deter sediment and control erosion during
excavation activities. Temporary erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior
to and maintained during the entire construction duration and until final stabilization is established.
3

Closing

ECS looks forward to your attention to this request. Please contact the undersigned at your earliest
convenience with questions or if additional information is required.

Sincerely,

Michelle Measday, PWS W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Senior Project Manager Environmental Principal
[e-mail] [e-mail]
(919)-441-2437 [phone]
Applicant is (check one):
Name of Project:
Project Location:
Request for a "No Practical Alternatives" Determination
CONTACT INFORMATION
Owner Information
Agent / Consultant Information (if applicable)
Applicant Information (if different from Owner)
□ Agent □ Other, specify:
E-mail address: Telephone Number:
City, State, ZIP:
Street address:
Responsible Party (LLC if applicable):
Deed Book and Page No.:
Business name (if applicable):
Name:
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Telephone Number: E-mail address:
Telephone Number: E-mail address:
Street address:
City, State, ZIP:
Street address:
City, State, ZIP:
Business name (if applicable):
Name:
Town of Apex Request for a NPA Page 1 of 4 Last updated: 8/7/2019
Property ID / PIN:Property size (acres):
River basin:
Jordan Lake watershed:
PROJECT INFORMATION
Watershed Data
□ Neuse □ Cape Fear
□ Yes □ No
□ Primary □ SecondaryWatershed Protection Overlay District:
Nearest body of water:
Have permits or certifications been obtained for this project
(including all prior phases) in the past? □ Yes □ No □ Unknown
If yes, explain:
Project History
Project Description
If yes, list the dates of the USACE jurisdictional determinations or DEQ or Town determinations and attach documentation:
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
USACE, DEQ, or the Town been obtained for this property? □ Yes □ No □ Unknown
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
□ Agency □ Consultant
□ Other:
Jurisdictional Determinations
Describe the existing conditions and land use in the vicinity of the project:
List the total estimated linear footage of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Explain the project purpose and describe construction techniques to be used (including type of equipment):
Town of Apex Request for a NPA Page 2 of 4 Last updated: 8/7/2019
Reason for impact Mitigation
required?
Zone 1 impact
(ft2)
Zone 2 impact
(ft2)
Zone 3 impact
(ft2)
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
□ Yes □ No
BUFFER IMPACTS
Impacts Summary
Please list all buffer impacts as a line item below. (If any impacts require mitigation, then the Mitigation section of this application must
be submitted.)
Mapping
Call out the total area (SF) of each impact by zone.
Include shading of impact areas by zone (provide a legend for clarity).
Attach a map of each individual impact:
Attach an overall map:
□ Neuse □ Jordan Lake □ Town of ApexBuffers impacted (check all that apply):
Stream name
Calling out each individual buffer impact listed in the table above.
Showing the extent of the project and all riparian buffers on site.
Total buffer impact:
Town of Apex Request for a NPA Page 3 of 4 Last updated: 8/7/2019
Name:Title:
Signature: Date:
Explanation & Justification
Prove that the basic project purpose cannot be practically accomplished in a way that would better minimize buffer
impacts than what is currently designed.
Prove that the impacts shown cannot practically be reduced in area, reconfigured, or redesigned to better minimize
disturbance.
BUFFER IMPACTS
State the practices that will be used to minimize disturbance, preserve aquatic life and habitat, and protect water quality.
Certification
By my signature below, I (as the applicant) attest that the information provided is accurate and meets all criteria as specified
in the Town of Apex UDO.
Town of Apex Request for a NPA Page 4 of 4 Last updated: 8/7/2019
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
BU
F
F
E
R

I
M
P
A
C
T

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
62
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
BUFFER IMPACT AREA
ZONE 1 9,022 SF 0.21 AC 280 LF
ZONE 2 5,088 SF 0.12 AC 270 LF
ZONE 3 8,928 SF 0.20 AC 240 LF
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
© 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G

C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S

P
L
A
N
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
61
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
BU
F
F
E
R

I
M
P
A
C
T

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
62
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
BUFFER IMPACT AREA
ZONE 1 9,022 SF 0.21 AC 280 LF
ZONE 2 5,088 SF 0.12 AC 270 LF
ZONE 3 8,928 SF 0.20 AC 240 LF
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
WE
T
L
A
N
D

I
M
P
A
C
T

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
63
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
WETLAND IMPACT AREA
7,691 SF 0.18 AC
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
RE
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N

P
L
A
N
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 50'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
64
FLOODPLAIN SEED MIX
NC PIEDMONT RIPARIAN MIX
ERNST SEED MIX - ERNMX-307 (OR APPROVED EQUAL)
Mix Composition
29.9% Sorghastrum nutans, 'Scout' (Indiangrass, ‘Scout’)
20.0% Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype (Virginia Wildrye, PA Ecotype)
20.0% Panicum virgatum, 'Carthage', NC Ecotype (Switchgrass, ‘Carthage’, NC Ecotype)
10.0% Panicum anceps, Eastern Shore MD Ecotype (Beaked Panicgrass, Eastern Shore MD Ecotype)
5.0% Chasmanthium latifolium, WV Ecotype (River Oats, WV Ecotype)
5.0% Panicum rigidulum, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Redtop Panicgrass, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
3.0% Chamaecrista fasciculata, FL Ecotype (Partridge Pea, FL Ecotype)
2.0% Carex vulpinoidea, PA Ecotype (Fox Sedge, PA Ecotype)
2.0% Coreopsis lanceolata (Lanceleaf Coreopsis)
2.0% Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan)
0.5% Juncus effusus, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Soft Rush, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
0.4% Vernonia noveboracensis, PA Ecotype (New York Ironweed, PA Ecotype)
0.2% Helenium autumnale, NJ Ecotype (Common Sneezeweed, NJ Ecotype)
SEEDING RATE: 20 LB PER ACRE (WITH GRAIN RYE COVER CROP AT 30 LBS PER ACRE SEPTEMBER 1 TO APRIL 31).
REQUIRED GROUND STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION TIMEFRAME VARIATIONS
-7 DAYS FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND HQW ZONES
-10 DAYS FOR FALLS LAKE WATERSHED UNLESS
THERE IS ZERO SLOPE
STABILIZE WITHIN THIS MANY
CALENDAR DAYS AFTER
CEASING LAND DISTURBANCE
7
14
None
(a)PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITCHES, AND
PERIMETER SLOPES
(b)HIGH QUALITY WATER
(HQW) ZONES
(c)SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
(d)SLOPES 3:1 TO 4:1
(e)AREAS WITH SLOPES
FLATTER THAN 4:1
-7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50' IN
LENGTH AND WITH SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1
-7 DAYS FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND HQW ZONES
-10 DAYS FOR FALLS LAKE WATERSHED
7 None
7
14
ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN SHALL USE THE
NCDEQ STANDARD PERMANENT SEED MIX:
PERMANENT SEEDING NOTES
SEEDING SCHEDULE
PERMANENT SEEDING
DATE TYPE PLANTING RATE
MAR. 1 - AUG. 31 WATER STAR TALL FESCUE 20 LB/ACRE
SARAH BERMUDA UNHULLED 50 LB/ACRE
PENSACOLA BAHAIGRASS 25 LB/ACRE
DURANA CLOVER 10 LB/ACRE
RYEGRAIN 10 LB/ACRE
SEP. 1 - FEB. 28 WATER STAR TALL FESCUE 50 LB/ACRE
SARAH BERMUDA UNHULLED 20 LB/ACRE
PENSACOLA BAHAIGRASS 10 LB/ACRE
DURANA CLOVER 10 LB/ACRE
BROWNTOP OR FOXTAIL MILLET 15 LB/ACRE
CONSULT CONSERVATION ENGINEER OR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CONCERNING OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR VEGETATION OF DENUDED AREAS. THE ABOVE VEGETATION
RATES ARE THOSE WHICH DO WELL UNDER LOCAL CONDITIONS; OTHER SEEDING RATE COMBINATIONS
ARE POSSIBLE.
*NURSE CROP/TEMPORARY - RESEED ACCORDING TO OPTIMUM SEASON FOR DESIRED PERMANENT
VEGETATION. DO NOT ALLOW TEMPORARY COVER TO GROW OVER 12" IN HEIGHT BEFORE MOWING,
OTHERWISE FESCUE MAY BE SHADED OUT.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
1.CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL THREE INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL
CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE.
2.RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO SIX INCHES DEEP.
3.REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY
SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
4.APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SUPERPHOSPHATE UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL
(SEE MIXTURE).
5.CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL A WELL-PULVERIZED, FIRM REASONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED
FOUR TO SIX INCHES DEEP.
6.SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER SEED LIGHTLY WITH SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR
CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING.
7.MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH.
8.INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE
PLANTING SEASON, IF POSSIBLE. IF STAND SHOULD BE OVER 60% DAMAGED, RE-ESTABLISH
FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEEDING RATES.
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
50'0 50'
1" = 50'
25'
PROP. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. SILT FENCE/TREE
PROTECTION FENCE COMBO (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. SUPER SILT FENCE
ALONG STREAM (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
PROP. SILT FENCE/TREE
PROTECTION FENCE COMBO
(TYP.) (SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. STOCKPILE AREA
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PROP. SUPER SILT FENCE
ALONG STREAM (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
LEGEND
EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR
SUPER SILT FENCE
SILT/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
GR
A
D
I
N
G

&

E
R
O
S
I
O
N
CO
N
T
R
O
L

P
L
A
N
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
65
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 31,954 SF (0.73 AC)
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
ER
O
S
I
O
N

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
NTS1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
66
U. S. Department of Homeland Security Region IV 3005 Chamblee Tucker Road Atlanta, GA 30341 www.fema.gov December 21, 2020 The Honorable Jacques Gilbert Mayor, Town of Apex 73 Hunter Street P.O. Box 250 Apex, North Carolina 27502 RE: National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) - Community Assistance Visit (CAV) Dear Mayor Gilbert: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region IV has carefully reviewed your remediation options for Violation Case #17-04-7608P Town of Apex, Parlier Drive culvert. During a conference call on October 1, 2020, representatives from FEMA, the Town of Apex, the State, and the project engineer discussed the following remediation options. Remediation Options 1. Remove culvert Removing the existing road crossing would decrease crossings of Clark Branch, create two public roadway dead-ends which would not accommodate first responder vehicle turn arounds, require re-laying the existing public watermain under the stream, re-laying the existing public power and other dry utilities under the stream and would cut off the stormwater detention basin facility on the northwest of Parlier Drive from the stormwater management piping on the south side of Parlier Drive. Due to elevation changes, the storm pipe cannot be re-laid under the stream and hence the storm water would not reach the detention basin for the required treatment prior to discharge to Clark Branch. In the current as-built condition, the 100-year Water Surface Elevation (WSEL) has returned to the pre-developed Corrected Effective elevation prior to the upstream property line boundary. The localized rise in the WSEL is contained on-site and does not impact any insurable structures. 2. Add culvert In order to restrict the rise between the Corrective Effective 100-year WSEL vs the final constructed 100-year WSEL to approximately 1.0’ upstream of the culvert (use Sta 63+15, which is only 60feet upstream of the culvert face) the existing passage would almost need to be doubled with the addition of a 10 feet width x 5 feet height concrete box culvert at invert 292.12 feet ( the existing culvert is a 10 feet width x 6 feet height box).
2 The additional concrete box culvert would be approximately 110 linear feet with 20 feet long concrete headwalls upstream and downstream. The culvert invert would be approximately 20 feet below the road surface and would require a significant trench and temporary blockage to the roadway. The culvert would need to cross under existing operating storm pipe, water main and other dry utilities such as electrical and cable. In our opinion, doubling the size of the existing culvert is not a simple nor reasonable remediation. The additional culvert would drop the 100-year WSEL rise by several feet at the upstream culvert face, but within 500 linear feet. The benefit of the additional culvert is erased when the 100-year WSEL is the same in the as-built condition as if no additional culvert was added (by Station 67+69). In both the current as-built condition and the potential remediation scenario listed above, the 100-year WSEL has returned to the pre-developed Corrected Effective elevation prior to the upstream property line boundary. The short lived, localized rise in the 100-year WSEL created in the as-built condition does not impact any adjoining properties or any on-site structures. 3. Remove material from floodplain By excavating approximately 1 – 4 feet of material along a 60 feet wide swath on the northern banks to approximately 110 linear feet downstream and 120 linear feet upstream of the culvert, total area approximately 14,000 square feet, a total of approximately 1,200 cubic yards of soil can be removed from the floodplain. This would be significantly more than the 860 cubic yards placed in the floodplain to construct Parlier Drive. Increasing the stream conveyance, as indicated above, would decrease the upstream 100-year WSEL by approximately 0.5 foot from the current as-built condition. The excavation would increase the floodplain storage, decrease stream velocities, allow replanting with appropriate riparian buffer vegetation and return the 100-year WSEL at an earlier station. The 100-year WSEL returns to the Corrected Effective elevation prior to reaching the upstream property boundary and the local onsite rise does not impact any existing or proposed insurable structures. Ideally, remediation option #1 is the best option, as it meets both the Town’s Floodplain Ordinance at the time the development occurred and the requirements of the NFIP. Remediation option #2, which results in a reduced rise of approximately 1foot, would be an acceptable compromise to resolve the violation. A major component of the NFIP is regulating development in the Special Flood Hazard Area and more particularly regulating encroachments in the floodway and non-encroachment areas. These violations must be remedied in order to meet requirements for participation in the NFIP.
3We continue to offer any assistance you may require. If you need further assistance on the floodway rise issue or general questions on the CAV, please contact Ms. Valerie Anderson by email at [e-mail]. or Ms. Tammy Hansen at [e-mail],Jason O Hunter, CFM, ChiefFloodplain Management & Insurance Branch Mitigation DivisionCc: Steve Garrett, State NFIP CoordinatorAdam Stephenson, Town of Apex, Floodplain AdministratorSincerely,
ESE of North Carolina, PC 5400 Trinity Road · Suite 204 · Raleigh, NC 27607 [phone] Meeting Minutes Attendees: Please review below notes and respond with comments/revisions by 29 November. Adam Stephenson, PE, Apex Peter Bellantoni, Toll Brothers Ted Pease, Toll Brothers Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS ECS Southeast LLP Tamara Hansen, FEMA Atlanta Valerie Anderson, FEMA Atlanta Steve Garrett, NCDPS Scott Gentry, NCDPS George (Lyle) Phillips, USACOE Wilmington Recorded by: Mark Mayhew, PE, ESE Cc: Justin Brown, ESE Consultants, Inc. Date: 19 November 2021 updated 22 Nov #2 & #6 A.S. Re: Parlier Drive at Clark Branch, Apex, Case #17-04-7608P Attached: Floodplain Comparisons Exhibit dated 11 November 2021 by ESE Consultants, Inc 1. Discussed history of culvert construction and violation and agreed on path to address violation, amend regulated floodplain and issue building permits for Lots 128 and 127. Steps are as follows: 2. ESE and ECS to submit application for NWP #29 to Corps to permit approximately 14,000 sf of disturbance to excavate and remove approximately 1,200 cy from the floodplain as shown on the attached Floodplain Comparisons Exhibit dated 11 November 2021. The excavation will lower but not completely eliminate the base flood elevation rise created by the road crossing. 3. Corps believes proposed work can be classified as temporary impacts to wetlands and purpose is to provide corrective action to the culvert violation. Application will address the impracticability of removing the existing road crossing or adding another culvert. Corps noted there are current restrictions on issuing NWP #29's. Upon lifting of restrictions Corps program provides 30 day review period for completeness and 15 days for issuance. Corps suggest sketch plan be submitted for review with Corps and DWR prior to application submittal. 4. Upon issuance of permit, Toll to perform work, as-built survey and update Topographic Work Plan for FEMA review and issuance of finding removing violation. 5. ESE to update LOMR application with as-built data after excavation work and submit to FEMA and NCDPS for approval. Prior model was reviewed by NCDEP and FEMA and it is anticipated updated data will involve a 60 day review. Issuance of updated FIRM takes 4-5 months after LOMR approval. 6. Apex will issue building permits for Lots 128 and 127 after LOMR approval and prior to revised FIRM issuance.
1
Homewood, Sue
From:Cohn, Colleen M
Sent:Wednesday, August 3, 2022 3:23 PM
To:Homewood, Sue
Subject:FW: [External] RE: Pines at Wake Crossing DWR#20220388
Attachments:22VAR03 PARLIER DRIVE Staff Report.docx; 220516.typical stream xsection showing proposed
excavation.pdf; 49-14384 Pines at Wake Crossing - Stream Photos.pdf; 2202.Parlier Dr Crossing -
Impact Exhibits.pdf
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
From: Michelle Savage‐Measday, PWS <[e-mail]>  
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 5:26 PM 
To: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]> 
Cc: [e-mail]; Mark Mayhew <[e-mail]> 
Subject: [External] RE: Pines at Wake Crossing DWR#20220388 

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to 
Report Spam. 

Colleen, 
Thank you for your comments. See below for responses. 
Thank you, 
Michelle 

MICHELLE SAVAGE‐MEASDAY, PWS  | Environmental Senior Project Manager  T 919.861.9910 |  D 919.861.9821 | C 919.441.2437 

5260 Greens Dairy Road  | Raleigh  |  NC  |  27616
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
www.ecslimited.com 

THE NEW ASTM PHASE I STANDARD IS HERE ‐ Contact us to find out more. 

Instagram | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter 
Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient.53195319  From: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>  
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 4:10 PM 
To: Michelle Savage‐Measday, PWS <[e-mail]> 
Cc: [e-mail] 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Pines at Wake Crossing DWR#20220388 

Good afternoon, 

I am reviewing the above referenced project, and in order to complete the review, some additional information is 
required: 

2
1) Please provide additional information on avoidance and minimization of wetlands impacts.  Based on the 
included FEMA letter dated December 21, 2020, there are two other options available, including removing a 
culvert or adding a culvert. Option 1, removing the culvert, was stated as the best option. [15A NCAC 02H 
.0502(c)] 
The two other options were discussed at length with FEMA and subsequent to FEMA’s letter of 21 December 
2020 it was agreed Option 3 would be the best scenario to proceed with.  As was explained to FEMA, Option 1, 
Remove existing culvert, is not a viable option given the safety issues it would create to the public and impact to 
first responders due to the creation of two dead‐end roads.  Removing the culvert would require removing and 
relaying the existing public utilities such as water, power and communications from under the roadway to 
UNDER the stream bed.  Removing the culvert would disconnect the roadway stormwater management system 
and prevent stormwater from reaching the detention basin on the north side and hence from being treated 
prior to stream discharge.   

Option 2, Add an additional culvert would disturb approximately the same amount of wetlands and buffer due 
to the need to regrade (lower) the flood fringe to direct water into and out of the culvert, add appropriate riprap 
and to provide construction access to the upstream and downstream areas.  

2) Please provide additional information on how the proposed excavation of wetland will not cause a violation of 
water quality standards. [15A NCAC .0506(b)(2)] 
The construction techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and 
additional erosion control measures shall be maintained throughout the construction process. Silt fencing will be 
placed at the bottom of the slopes to deter sediment and control erosion during excavation activities. 
Temporary erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and maintained during the 
entire construction duration and until final stabilization is established. Refer to Sheet 5 of the impact exhibits for 
the grading and erosion control plan. Refer to Sheet 4 for the revegetation plan to stabilize the disturbed area. 

No excavation is proposed below the OHWM. See attached stream section showing limits of excavation and 
stream photos. 

3) Please provide additional details on the buffer impacts. This area appears to be under the Town of Apex’s 
jurisdiction, but it is unclear what item in the Table of Uses you are proposing the activities fall under. [15A 
NCAC .02B .0267] 
              The Town of Apex has reviewed and will be issuing a variance for the riparian buffer impacts. Upon receipt of the 
variance, a copy will be sent to you. The variance is expected to be approved at the next Apex Board of Adjustment 
Meeting in June. Attached is the Town of Apex Staff Report on the    variance request. If the variance request is granted 
by Apex, the applicant will then move to the NC EMC for approval for the Zone 1 impacts. 

4) If the US Army Corps of Engineers requests any additional information, please provide the Division with a copy 
of your response to the USACE. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)] 
              Will comply. 
Thanks, 

Colleen Cohn
Environmental Specialist II
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office: 919-791-4258

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT #22VAR03
May 17, 2022

Page 1 of 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Application: #22VAR03
Location: 0 Parlier Drive
Applicant/Owner: Ted Pease, Toll NC II LP./Green Level Crossing Community Assc. Inc.
PINs: 0733133605 & 0733049008
Current Zoning: LD SF-CU (#05RZ22)
Current Use: FROM UDO SECTION 4.3.1(N), Single-Family Residential
Town Limits: Corporate Limits

ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Application
3. Master Subdivision Plan
4. Final Subdivision Plat
5. Riparian Buffer Map

BACKGROUND:
The subject properties include portions of the platted Open Space surrounding Parlier Drive for the Pines
at Wake Crossing Phase 2 Subdivision. This subdivision sits south of Roberts Road, east of Green Level
Church Road, north of Greenmoor Subdivision, and west of Interstate 540. The Construction Drawings
for the Master Subdivision Plan, then known as The Hunt at Green Level Crossing, were approved in 2007
and platted, as The Pines at Wake Crossing in 2017. A significant portion of the subject properties lie
within the 100’ Riparian Buffer required by the Watershed Protection Overlay District.

• July 16, 2007 - Master Subdivision Plan approval
• July 23, 2007 – Property sold to Toll Brothers, LLC
• August 23, 2017 - Final Subdivision Plat recorded
• August 1, 2000 - UDO Adopted
• March 23, 2021 - UDO Amendments to Section 6.1.13.E.2 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts,
Modifications by Variance, Standards
• February 8, 2022 – Property deeded to Green Level Crossing Community Association, Inc.
• April 11, 2022 - Applicant submitted variance application

VARIANCE REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 6.1.11.G Uses Permitted Within the Riparian Buffer
to allow for improvements to provide corrective action to address the FEMA floodplain violation
associated with the culvert construction. The corrective action involves the removal of approximately
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT #22VAR03
May 17, 2022

Page 2 of 4
1,200 cy (cubic yard) from the floodplain. The excavation will lower the base flood elevation rise created
by the previously constructed road crossing over Clark Branch. The proposed remedy will create
additional flood storage adjacent to Clark Branch, which is the preferred alternative, supported by FEMA.
The FEMA violation must be remedied to meet requirements for participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP), in which Apex is a participant. A major component of the NFIP is regulating
development in the Special Flood Hazard Area and more particularly regulating encroachments in the
floodway and non-encroachment areas.

The excavation impact will result in the temporary disturbance to approximately 0.17 acre of forested
wetland. No impervious surfaces will be introduced into Zone 1 or Zone 2. Following the excavation
activities, the disturbed area will be graded to create a reasonably smooth and uniform surface and
reseeded with the NC Piedmont Riparian Mix (Ernst Seed Mix – ERNMX-307). The construction of the
project will not necessitate the use of any specialized construction techniques. Standard construction
equipment such as cranes, excavators, dump trucks, and similar vehicles would be used for the project.
Proper erosion and sedimentation control measures would be employed throughout the project. Typical
materials and machinery will be used on-site during the construction process.

The applicant proposes to minimize impacts through construction techniques. The construction
techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and additional erosion
control measures shall be maintained throughout the construction process. Silt fencing will be placed at
the bottom of the slopes to deter sediment and control erosion during excavation activities. Temporary
erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and maintained during the entire
construction duration and until final stabilization is established. The floodplain seed mix will allow the
area to re-establish itself. Zones 1 and 2 shall remain vegetated. Section 6.1.11.G of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) reads:

6.1.11.G Uses Permitted Within the Riparian Buffer. This Section shall apply to activities
conducted within, or outside of with hydrologic impacts in violation of the diffuse flow
requirements set out in Sec. 6.1.11.E upon, a riparian buffer regulated by this Section. The
Town shall issue an approval for new development only if the proposed development will
avoid impacts to riparian buffers regulated by this Section or, if an impact to any such buffer
is proposed, in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 6.1.11.G.1 or 2 below, as applicable,
the applicant has demonstrated that: (i) the proposed activity is exempt, (ii) the proposed
activity is allowable or allowable with mitigation, and the requirements of this Section for
proceeding such designated use have been met, or (iii) a variance authorizing the proposed
activity has been obtained.

An amendment to Sec. 6.1.13.E.2-3 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts, Modifications by Variance,
Standards was approved in order to allow property owners to request a variance from the standards of
the Watershed Protection Overlay Districts regardless of when the property was purchased. The
previous standard required the Board of Adjustment to find that the property owner did not purchase
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT #22VAR03
May 17, 2022

Page 3 of 4
the property after Sec. 6.1 was codified with the adoption the Unified Development Ordinance in 2000.
Below are the March 23, 2021 amendments to Sec. 6.1.13.E.2-3:

6.1.13 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts, Modifications by Variance
…
E) Standards
… 2) In order to approve an application for a variance permit, the Board of Adjustment
shall make a finding of fact as to whether the standards of Sec. 2.3.8D.1-3 Variance
permit, Standards are met.
3) The Board of Adjustment shall make a finding of fact as to:
… a) whether the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
the Town’s Watershed Protection Overlay Districts and preserves its spirit;
and
b) whether in granting the variance the public safety and welfare have been
assured, water quality has been protected and substantial justice has been
done.

STANDARDS FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS:
To approve a variance permit, the Board of Adjustment must find that all the following standards as
listed in Sec. 2.3.8(D) are being met. In the alternative, to deny the variance permit, the Board of
Adjustment must find that any of the following standards are not being met:

1) Unnecessary Hardship. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application
of the ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the
variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property.

2) Hardship Results from Peculiar Conditions. The hardship results from conditions that
are peculiar to the property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting
from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are
common to the neighborhood or the general public, may not be the basis for granting a
variance.

3) Not Result of Action by Applicant. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the
applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that
circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a
self-created hardship.

4) Consistency with the UDO. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose,
and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is
achieved.

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT #22VAR03
May 17, 2022

Page 4 of 4
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The Final Subdivision Plat for The Pines at Wake Crossing Phase 2 was recorded on August 23, 2017. The
existing structure has remained since its original construction serving residential development. The
property was deeded to applicant February 8, 2022. The applicant purchased property subject to the
Watershed Protection Overlay District. The Watershed Protection Overlay District has been in place
since the adoption of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) August 1, 2000. The UDO was
amended by Town Council on March 23, 2021 to allow for owners of property located within riparian
buffers to apply for a variance. The applicant filed the variance petition on April 11, 2022 in an effort to
remedy the FEMA violation. Should no improvements be permitted on the subject site then it will
remain in violation of FEMA regulations, Town of Apex Floodplain regulations, and may not meet
requirements for participation within the NFIP. According to Water Resources staff, the proposed
improvements are the overall least impactful solution for mitigating the violation of FEMA regulations.
If the variance is granted, the applicant will then move to the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission (NCEMC) for further approval for Zone 1 impacts.
1 -Downstream view
2 -Upstream view
May 16, 2022 ECS Southeast, LLP
ECS Project # 49:14384
3 -Evidence of slight undercutting of channel at approx. 3.5 to 4.0 feet bl TOB
4 -North facing view of stream bank
May 16, 2022 ECS Southeast, LLP
ECS Project # 49:14384
5 -Streambank
6 -Closer to Culvert
May 16, 2022 ECS Southeast, LLP
ECS Project # 49:14384
OHWM 292.3+/-
Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) shown per
observations by Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS,
ECS Southeast, LLP, 13 May 2022.
© 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G

C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S

P
L
A
N
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
61
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
BU
F
F
E
R

I
M
P
A
C
T

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
62
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
BUFFER IMPACT AREA
ZONE 1 9,022 SF 0.21 AC 280 LF
ZONE 2 5,088 SF 0.12 AC 270 LF
ZONE 3 8,928 SF 0.20 AC 240 LF
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
WE
T
L
A
N
D

I
M
P
A
C
T

E
X
H
I
B
I
T
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
63
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
WETLAND IMPACT AREA
7,691 SF 0.18 AC
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
RE
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N

P
L
A
N
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 50'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
64
FLOODPLAIN SEED MIX
NC PIEDMONT RIPARIAN MIX
ERNST SEED MIX - ERNMX-307 (OR APPROVED EQUAL)
Mix Composition
29.9% Sorghastrum nutans, 'Scout' (Indiangrass, ‘Scout’)
20.0% Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype (Virginia Wildrye, PA Ecotype)
20.0% Panicum virgatum, 'Carthage', NC Ecotype (Switchgrass, ‘Carthage’, NC Ecotype)
10.0% Panicum anceps, Eastern Shore MD Ecotype (Beaked Panicgrass, Eastern Shore MD Ecotype)
5.0% Chasmanthium latifolium, WV Ecotype (River Oats, WV Ecotype)
5.0% Panicum rigidulum, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Redtop Panicgrass, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
3.0% Chamaecrista fasciculata, FL Ecotype (Partridge Pea, FL Ecotype)
2.0% Carex vulpinoidea, PA Ecotype (Fox Sedge, PA Ecotype)
2.0% Coreopsis lanceolata (Lanceleaf Coreopsis)
2.0% Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan)
0.5% Juncus effusus, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Soft Rush, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
0.4% Vernonia noveboracensis, PA Ecotype (New York Ironweed, PA Ecotype)
0.2% Helenium autumnale, NJ Ecotype (Common Sneezeweed, NJ Ecotype)
SEEDING RATE: 20 LB PER ACRE (WITH GRAIN RYE COVER CROP AT 30 LBS PER ACRE SEPTEMBER 1 TO APRIL 31).
REQUIRED GROUND STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION TIMEFRAME VARIATIONS
-7 DAYS FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND HQW ZONES
-10 DAYS FOR FALLS LAKE WATERSHED UNLESS
THERE IS ZERO SLOPE
STABILIZE WITHIN THIS MANY
CALENDAR DAYS AFTER
CEASING LAND DISTURBANCE
7
14
None
(a)PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITCHES, AND
PERIMETER SLOPES
(b)HIGH QUALITY WATER
(HQW) ZONES
(c)SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
(d)SLOPES 3:1 TO 4:1
(e)AREAS WITH SLOPES
FLATTER THAN 4:1
-7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50' IN
LENGTH AND WITH SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1
-7 DAYS FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND HQW ZONES
-10 DAYS FOR FALLS LAKE WATERSHED
7 None
7
14
ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN SHALL USE THE
NCDEQ STANDARD PERMANENT SEED MIX:
PERMANENT SEEDING NOTES
SEEDING SCHEDULE
PERMANENT SEEDING
DATE TYPE PLANTING RATE
MAR. 1 - AUG. 31 WATER STAR TALL FESCUE 20 LB/ACRE
SARAH BERMUDA UNHULLED 50 LB/ACRE
PENSACOLA BAHAIGRASS 25 LB/ACRE
DURANA CLOVER 10 LB/ACRE
RYEGRAIN 10 LB/ACRE
SEP. 1 - FEB. 28 WATER STAR TALL FESCUE 50 LB/ACRE
SARAH BERMUDA UNHULLED 20 LB/ACRE
PENSACOLA BAHAIGRASS 10 LB/ACRE
DURANA CLOVER 10 LB/ACRE
BROWNTOP OR FOXTAIL MILLET 15 LB/ACRE
CONSULT CONSERVATION ENGINEER OR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CONCERNING OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR VEGETATION OF DENUDED AREAS. THE ABOVE VEGETATION
RATES ARE THOSE WHICH DO WELL UNDER LOCAL CONDITIONS; OTHER SEEDING RATE COMBINATIONS
ARE POSSIBLE.
*NURSE CROP/TEMPORARY - RESEED ACCORDING TO OPTIMUM SEASON FOR DESIRED PERMANENT
VEGETATION. DO NOT ALLOW TEMPORARY COVER TO GROW OVER 12" IN HEIGHT BEFORE MOWING,
OTHERWISE FESCUE MAY BE SHADED OUT.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
1.CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL THREE INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL
CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE.
2.RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO SIX INCHES DEEP.
3.REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY
SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
4.APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SUPERPHOSPHATE UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL
(SEE MIXTURE).
5.CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL A WELL-PULVERIZED, FIRM REASONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED
FOUR TO SIX INCHES DEEP.
6.SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER SEED LIGHTLY WITH SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR
CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING.
7.MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH.
8.INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE
PLANTING SEASON, IF POSSIBLE. IF STAND SHOULD BE OVER 60% DAMAGED, RE-ESTABLISH
FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEEDING RATES.
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
50'0 50'
1" = 50'
25'
PROP. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. SILT FENCE/TREE
PROTECTION FENCE COMBO (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. SUPER SILT FENCE
ALONG STREAM (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
PROP. SILT FENCE/TREE
PROTECTION FENCE COMBO
(TYP.) (SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. STOCKPILE AREA
50
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
30
.
0
0
'
ZONE 1 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3 B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE 3

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
1

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
2

B
U
F
F
E
R
ZONE
3

B
U
F
F
E
R
30
.
0
0
'
20.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PA
R
L
I
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
30
.
0
0
'
20
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
PROP. SUPER SILT FENCE
ALONG STREAM (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
134
133
129
128
127
126
125
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
EXIST. STREAM(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
LEGEND
EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR
SUPER SILT FENCE
SILT/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
GR
A
D
I
N
G

&

E
R
O
S
I
O
N
CO
N
T
R
O
L

P
L
A
N
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
1" = 40'1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
65
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40'0
1" = 40'
40'20'
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 31,954 SF (0.73 AC)
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ES
E

C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

•

P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G

•

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G

•

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
ES
E

o
f

N
o
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
,

P
C
54
0
0

T
r
i
n
i
t
y

R
o
a
d

•

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
4
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
7
T:
9
1
9
-
3
2
1
-
4
8
0
0
Lic
e
n
s
e

#

C
-
2
9
7
3
JOB NO.:FILE NAME:
DA
T
E
RE
V
.
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
SCALE:
DRAWN:DESIGN:
DATE:
OFSHEETNO.:
ER
O
S
I
O
N

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
PI
N
E
S

A
T

W
A
K
E

C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CA
R
Y
,

W
A
K
E

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
NTS1/21/22
KNBBMM
2202
66