PCN_U-6018 Buffer Info

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Conchilla, Ryan
Sent:Tuesday, December 13, 2022 10:52 AM
To:Parker, Jerry A
Subject:PCN_U-6018 Buffer Info
Attachments:20210663 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20221110.pdf
PCN

Ryan Conchilla, PWS
Environmental Specialist II
401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 7+8)
Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9111 office
[e-mail]

From: Parker, Jerry A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:13 PM
To: Conchilla, Ryan <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: \[External\] FW: U-6018 Buffer Info

Ryan,

See if this clears things up.

Jerry

From: Kayla Poulos <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:10 PM
To: Parker, Jerry A <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] FW: U-6018 Buffer Info

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

Jerry,
1

Please see below. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything additional.

Thanks!

—
Kayla M. Poulos, PE
Transportation Design Engineer
D 919 872 3949 | C 919 398 0063

From: Karen Hefner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:05 PM
To: Kayla Poulos <[e-mail]>
Cc: Linda Johns <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: U-6018 Buffer Info

Kayla,
If one were to review the Buffer & Permit drawings, side by side, one might see that there are 3 buffer impacts
on Y3Rev and only 1 impact to Stream/Wetland on Y3Rev, which would indicate that there should be 2 less
impacts associated with the permit drawings. There is also a site on Y8 that has stream/wetland impacts, but
no buffer impacts and there are buffer impacts, but no stream impact at L 44+97 - 46+10 Rt - therefore, those
2 areas are canceling out each other.

Kinda summarized below.
 Site 1 on Buffer Drawings - has 3 buffer impacts
 Site 1 on Permit Drawings – as impacts at same buffer sites
 Site 2 Permit Drawings, has NO BUFFER IMPACTS and does not correspond to Buffer Site 2
 Site 2 on Buffer Drawing – has impacts but are not associated with Site 2 Permit Drawing
 Site 3 on Permit Drawings has only ONE impact, which corresponds to Buffer Site 4 that has 2 impacts –
where the little pond is within the buffer on Site 4. There is one impact on Site 4 Buffer that doesn’t
have a stream impact and Site 5 on the Buffer has no stream impacts.
 Site 3 on Buffer Drawings is at the large pond
 Site 4, 5, & 6 on the Permit Drawings are Sites 6, 7, & 8 on the Buffer Drawings

So, there ARE 2 less stream/wetland impacts vs the buffer permit drawings.
If there are any other questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Karen Hefner, PE
Hydraulics Project Engineer
2

MI Engineering, PLLC
1011 Schaub Drive, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Cell: 919-333-8976
Office: 919-851-6606

website: www.mi-engineers.com
email: [e-mail]

From: Kayla Poulos <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Karen Hefner <[e-mail]>
Cc: Linda Johns <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: U-6018 Buffer Info

Karen,

Have you had a chance to look into this? I just talked to Jerry and he said that he’s going to have to put the
permit/project on hold if he doesn’t have an answer by first thing tomorrow morning. Could we get them something
today?

Thanks!
—
Kayla M. Poulos, PE
Transportation Design Engineer
D 919 872 3949 | T 919 872 5115 | C 919 398 0063

On Dec 8, 2022, at 5:40 PM, Karen Hefner <[e-mail]> wrote:
I’ll try to look at this in the morning, hopefully…

Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2022, at 4:35 PM, Kayla Poulos <[e-mail]> wrote:

See below/attached from Jerry on U6018. Let me know if you have any questions.

3

Thanks!

—
Kayla M. Poulos, PE
Transportation Design Engineer
D 919 872 3949 | C 919 398 0063

\[Text Description automatically generated\]
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frameykemp.co
m%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Ckpoulos%40rameykemp.com%7C04861ab7774048069c
5e08dad96d319b%7C0a14eb0718334f149619a5b18eac28cf%7C0%7C0%7C6380613602
62206363%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC
JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=58yVOK%2Fm0zTl
SSEcjiLIHxfN3bXMIKGJVUBHBdw6rCo%3D&amp;reserved=0>

From: Parker, Jerry A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 7:18 AM
To: Kayla Poulos <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: U-6018 Buffer Info

Kayla,

Per our conversation, can you provide clarification for the DWR rep. Thanks.

Jerry

From: Conchilla, Ryan
<[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:57 PM
To: Parker, Jerry A <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: FW: U-6018 Buffer Info

Jerry,
Thanks for the additional info.
In the updated buffer drawings attached, the impact table on page 12 lists 8 impact
sites.
In the revised permit drawings forwarded yesterday, the impact table listed on page 10
of 11 has 6 impact sites.
Can you provide clarification to the difference?

4

Ryan Conchilla, PWS
Environmental Specialist II
401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 7+8)
Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-9111 office
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

\[cid:[e-mail]4400\]

From: Parker, Jerry A <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:39 PM
To: Conchilla, Ryan <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: U-6018 Buffer Info

Ryan,

See attached.

Jerry

Jerry Parker
Environmental Supervisor
Division 7
North Carolina Department of Transportation

336 256 2063 office
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

1584 Yanceyville St.
P.O. Box 14996
Greensboro, NC. 27415-4996

\[cid:image001.png@01D90A38.E619B0F0\]

5

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.
6