20160385 Ver 2_Lake Wendell_97081_MY5_2022_Buffer_20221212

ID#* 20160385
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/14/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/12/2022
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Lindsay Crocker
Project Information
ID#:* 20160835
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Lake Wendell Mitigation Site
County: Johnston
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Lake Wendell _97081_MY5_2022_Buffer.pdf 4.07MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature: *

Monitoring Report – Year 5
FINALVERSION
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Calendar Year of Data Collection: 2022
NCDEQ DMS Project Identification # 97081
NCDEQ DMS Contract # 6826
Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020201)
USACE Action ID Number: SAW-2016-00876
NCDEQ DWR Project # 2016-0385
Johnston County, NC
Contracted Under RFP # 16-006477
Data Collection Period: September 2021
th
Submission Date: November 30, 2022
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by:

TableofContents
1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Project Background ............................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Project Location, Setting, and Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 1
2.2 Mitigation Project Goals and Objectives....................................................................................... 1
2.3 Project History, Contacts, and Timeframe .................................................................................... 2
3 Project Mitigation Components ............................................................................................................ 2
3.1 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Types and Approaches ....................................................................... 2
3.1.1 Tree and Shrub Planting Approaches .................................................................................... 3
3.1.2 Temporary and Permanent Seeding Approaches ................................................................. 3
3.1.3 Invasive Species Vegetation Treatment ................................................................................ 3
4 Performance Standards ........................................................................................................................ 3
4.1 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 3
5 Monitoring Year 5 Assessment and Results .......................................................................................... 4
5.1 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 4
6 References ............................................................................................................................................ 6

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Tables
Table 1 Project Attributes
Table 2 Project Areas and Asset Summary
Table 3 Project Contacts

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos Vegetation Plot Photographs
Photos Vegetation Problem Areas Photographs

Appendix CVegetation Plot Data
Table 5 Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 5a Vegetation Mitigation Success Table

Appendix D NC DWR Correspondence and Approvals

Water & Land Solutions
1ProjectSummary
Water and Land Solutions, LLC(WLS)completed the constructionand plantingof the Lake Wendell
Mitigation Project (Project) full-delivery project for the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)in March 2018. The Project is located in Johnston
County, North Carolina,between the Community of Archer Lodge and the Town of Wendell at
-78.3538°. The Project site is located in the NCDEQ Sub-basin 03-04-06, in theUpper Buffalo Creek Sub-
watershed 030202011502.
The Project involved the restoration, enhancement, preservation,and permanent protection of five
stream reaches (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) and their riparian buffers, totaling 4,269linear feet ofstreams
and490,477square feet of riparian buffers. Monitoring Year 5(MY5)monitoring activities occurred in
September 2022(Table 2).This reportpresentsthedata for the fifthyear of monitoring (MY5). The Project
meets the MY5success criteria for vegetation. Based on these results, WLS requests the riparian buffer
mitigation project be closed out.
2ProjectBackground
2.1ProjectLocation,Setting,andExistingConditions
The Projectsite is locatedinthe Upper Buffalo Creek Sub-watershed 030202011502 study area ofthe
Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan, in the Wake-Johnston Collaborative Local Watershed Plan, and in
Targeted Local Watershed 03020201180050.
The catchment areais 102 acres and has an impervious cover less than one percent. The dominant
surrounding land uses are agriculture and mixed forest. Prior to construction, livestock had access to all
Project streams,except R4,and the riparian bufferswereless than 50feet wide.
2.2MitigationProjectGoalsandObjectives
The following riparian buffer mitigation site-specificgoals were developed:
Restore and protect riparian buffer functions and habitat connectivity in perpetuity by recording
a permanent conservation easement,
Implement agricultural BMPs to reduce nonpoint source inputs to receiving waters.
To accomplish these site-specific goals, the following objectives will be measured and included with the
performance standards to document overall project success:
Increase native species riparian buffer vegetation density/composition along streambank and
floodplain areas that meet requirements of a minimum 50-foot-wide and 260stems/acre after
monitoring year 5.
Prevent cattle from accessing the conservation easement boundary by installing permanent
fencing and reducing fecal coliform bacteria from the pre-restoration levels.
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page1

Water & Land Solutions
2.3ProjectHistory,Contacts,andTimeframe
The Project will provide riparian buffer mitigation credits in accordance with North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC), “Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule”, Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective
November 1, 2015. Riparian buffer mitigation site viability was confirmed by DWRs April 28, 2016 letter
entitled “Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset –Lake Wendell Located Near 2869 Wendell
Road, Wendell, NC, Johnston County”. The referenced site viability letter included a determination by
DWR that Project Reaches R1, R2, R3 and R4 were either intermittent or perennial. A separate request
for Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination for Potential Mitigation for Project Reach R5 was
submitted to DWR on May 18, 2017, as required under the referenced site viability letter. On June 1, 2017
DWR performed the requested determination and Reach R5 was determined to be intermittent, as
communicated in the DWR June 8, 2017 letter entitled “On-Site Stream Determination for Applicability to
the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules and Water Quality Standards (15A NCAC 02B.0233)”, therefore confirming
Reach R5’s eligibility for riparian buffer mitigation.See Appendix D for DWR correspondence and approval
letters.
The final mitigation plan and PCN were submitted to DMS August 25, 2017,for submission to DWR and
the NCIRT. The Section 404 General (Regional and Nationwide) Permit Verification was issued October 5,
2017. Project construction started on November 13, 2017,and mitigation site earthwork was completed
on March 13, 2018, by RiverWorks Construction.Mitigation site planting was completed on March 30,
2018, byRiverWorks Construction. Trueline Surveying, PC completed the as-built survey in June 2018.
WLS completed the installation of baseline monitoring devices on April 19, 2018,and the installation of
survey monumentation and conservation easement boundary marking on June 7, 2018. MY1 was
thth
completedon November 24, 2019andsubmitted December 4, 2019.Monitoring Year 2 data collection
th
was completed from June untilOctober 29, 2019.Monitoring Year 3 data collection was completed from
th
September –October15, 2020.Monitoring Year 4 data collection was completed in September 2021.
Monitoring Year 5 data collection was completed in September 2022.
The project background and attribute summaryarepresented in Table 1.Refer to Figure 1 and Table 2 for
the project areas and buffer asset information.Relevant project contact information is presented in Table
3.
3ProjectMitigationComponents
3.1RiparianBufferMitigationTypesandApproaches
Riparian buffer mitigation included restoring, enhancing,and preserving the riparian buffer functions and
corridor habitat. The project included planting to re-establish a native species vegetation riparian buffer
corridor, which extendeda minimum of 50 feet from the top of the streambanks along each of the project
reaches, as well as permanently protecting those buffers with a conservation easement. Many areas of
the conservation easement had riparian buffer widths greater than 50 feet established along one or both
streambanks to provide additional functional uplift. The only exception is at the upstream end of Reach
R1, where the width of the proposed left riparian buffer varies between 20 feet and 29 feet from the left
top of bank. This narrow area of proposed riparian buffer is due to the site constraint caused by an existing
residential structure. For project reaches proposed for restoration and enhancement, the riparian buffers
were restored through reforestation of the entire conservation easement with native species riparian
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page2

Water & Land Solutions
buffer vegetation (Table 5). For projectreach sections proposed for preservation, the existing riparian
buffers arepermanently protected via the recorded conservation easement. Additionally, permanent
fencing was installed along with alternative watering systems to exclude livestock from the restored
riparian buffer and conservation easement areas. The permanent fencing system consisting of woven
wire fencing was installed to NRCS technical standards in the pasture areas along and outside of the
northern conservation easement boundaries of Reaches R1, R2, and R3. Table1 (Appendix A) providesa
summary of the project components.
3.1.1Tree and Shrub Planting Approaches
The riparian buffer planting zonesfor the project included the streambanks, floodplain, riparian wetland,
and upland transitional areas. Plantings were conducted using native species bare-root trees and shrubs,
live stakes, and seedlings that were generally planted at a total target density of 680 stems per acre. WLS
implemented a riparian buffer planting strategy that includes a combination of overstory, or canopy, and
understory species. The site planting strategy also included early successional, as well as climax species.
The vegetation selections were mixed throughout the project planting areas so that the early successional
species will give way to climax species as they mature over time.
3.1.2Temporary and Permanent Seeding Approaches
Permanent seed mixtures of native species herbaceous vegetation and temporary herbaceous vegetation
seed mixtures were applied to all disturbed areas of the project site. Temporary and permanent seeding
were conducted simultaneously at all disturbed areas of the site during construction utilizing mechanical
broadcast spreaders. The as-built re-vegetation plan lists the utilized species, mixtures, and application
rates for permanent seeding.
3.1.3Invasive Species Vegetation Treatment
During the project construction, invasivespecies exotic vegetation was either mechanically removed or
chemically treated both to control its presence and reduce its spread within the conservation easement
areas.
4PerformanceStandards
The applied success criteria for the Project will follow necessary performance standards and monitoring
protocols presented in final approved mitigation plan. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will
be conducted to assess the condition of the project throughout the monitoring period. Monitoring
activities will be conducted for a period of five years. Specific success criteria components and evaluation
methods are described below.
4.1Vegetation
Measurements of the final vegetative restoration success for the project will be achieving a density of no
less than 260, five-year-old planted stems per acre in Year 5 of monitoring. This final performance criteria
shall include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native hardwood tree and native
shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the stems. Native hardwood tree and
native shrub volunteer species willbe included to meet the final performance criteria of 260 stems per
acre.Volunteer species will only be counted toward success if they were included in the approved planting
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page3

Water & Land Solutions
plan and if they are surviving for at least two years. In addition, diffuse flow of runoff shall be maintained
in the riparian buffer areas.
5MonitoringYear5AssessmentandResults
Annual monitoring was conducted during MY5in accordance with the monitoring plan as described in the
approved mitigation plan and was intended to document the site improvements based on restoration
potential, catchment health, ecological stressors,and overall constraints. Allthe monitoring device
locations are depicted ontheCCPV (Figure 1) and MY5monitoring data results are listed in the
appendices. The Project meets the MY5success criteria for vegetationfor all veg plots.
5.1 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring for MY5was conducted utilizing the seven vegetation monitoring plots, with
monitoring conducted in accordance with the CVS-EEP Level I & II Monitoring Protocol (CVS, 2008) and
DMS Stream and Wetland Monitoring Guidelines (DMS, 2017). See Figure 1 in Appendix B for the
vegetation monitoring plot locations. All vegetation plots met MY5success criteria.The surviving planted
stems include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native hardwood tree and native
shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the stems.Plots ranged from 405 to
607 stems per acre (including appropriate volunteers). The number of hardwood tree and shrub species
per plot ranged from 6 to 8 species. The greatest percentage of a single species in a plot was 33 percent.
Summary data and photographs of each plot can be found in Appendix B and C.
The MY5vegetation monitoring was alsoconducted utilizing visual assessment along the Project stream
reaches. The overall results of the visual assessment did not indicate any negative changes to the existing
vegetation community.An area of encroachment approximately 0.009acres was found along R5in MY5,
see Figure 1. This area wasmowed by the farmerand wasvegetated with dog fennel and pasture weeds.
Management of this area began in June 2022and includedadditional t-postsand a physical barrier (horse
tape)to delineate the easement boundary and discourage further mowing.The landowner was contacted
via mail by our attorney.As of September 2022,the farmer has ceased encroachment in this area.
During MY1 an area of concern was observed along R1 buffer as shown on the Figure 1. This area was
utilized as a temporary staging area during construction and contains invasive species vegetation (kudzu)
along the right buffer. This area was managed once during MY5using foliar spray of the limited remaining
stems in Septemberusing a 3 percent solution of Garlon 3A (see table below for treatments). Following
these treatments, the percent cover of kudzu was reduced to approximately one percent.This area was
planted with species from the approved list in the mitigation plan on February 1st, 2021. A random
th
vegetation plot was surveyed on March 30, 2022(see table below for results).Additionally, the visual
monitoring confirmed that diffuse flow of runoff is being maintained in the riparian buffer areas.
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page4

Water & Land Solutions
Kudzu Treatment Table
Monitoring YearInvasive TreatmentDate Treatment Conducted
Kudzu foliar spray and cutAugust 15, 2019
2
Kudzu foliar spraySeptember 24, 2019
Kudzu crown removal(hand-digging)March 18, 2020
3
Kudzu foliar sprayOctober 7, 2020
4 Kudzu foliar sprayJuly 1, 2021
5 Kudzu spray and cutSeptember 8, 2022
Random Veg Plot Results
SpeciesNumber of StemsHeight(ft)
Tulip Poplar62.3, 5.2, 3, 2.4, 2, 4.4
Red Maple38.5, 4.5, 1.5
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page 5

Water & Land Solutions
6References
Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. CVS-NCEEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.1,
2007.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services, Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. 2015. Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan Phase II. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services, 2017. Annual
Report Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance. Raleigh, NC.
Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina,
third approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. NCDENR Division of Parks and
Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y-87-1. Environmental Laboratory. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment
Station. Vicksburg, MS.
___. 1997. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Research Program. Technical Note VN-RS-4.1. Environmental
Laboratory. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS.
___. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District.
Water and Land Solutions, LLC (2017). Lake Wendell Stream and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan.
NCDMS, Raleigh, NC.
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page6

Appendix A:
Background Tables

Table1.BufferProjectAttributes
ProjectNameLakeWendellMitigationProject
HydrologicUnitCode03020201
RiverBasinNeuse
GeographicLocation(Lat,Long)35.7373910N,78.3538050W
SiteProtectionInstrument(DB,PG)85,148
TotalCredits(BMU)354,404.00
TypesofCreditsRiparianBuffer
MitigationPlanDateAug18
InitialPlantingDateMar18
BaselineReportDateNov18
MY1ReportDateDec18
MY2ReportDateNov19
MY3ReportDateDec20
MY4ReportDateOct21
MY5ReportDateNov22

N/A
(lbs)
P
Nutrient
Offset
Offset:
N
Nutrient
to
(lbs)
17,873.412
17,873.412
Nutrient
Offset:
)
Converted
(Yes
If
No
Nutrient
or
Offset
to
Convertible
YesNo
BufferBuffer
(BMU)(BMU)
22,426.00010,410.300
10,410.300
342,525.000 364,951.000375,361.300
CreditsCredits
RiparianRiparian
0
RatioRatio
(x:1)(x:1)
CreditCredit
FinalFinal
33%6.0606133%30.30303
75%1.3333333%3.0303075%2.6666775%13.3333375%6.6666733%15.1515275%4.0000033%9.09091
100%1.00000100%2.00000100%10.0000100%5.00000100%3.00000
CreditCredit
FullFull
%%
)
x:1
(x:1)(
1253
10
InitialInitial
CreditCredit
RatioRatio
60
(sf)*(sf)*
44,852
387,377129,12104,103491,48
342,525104,103
CreditableAreaCreditableArea
Area
44,852
(sf)
342,525104,103
Total
2929292929
A
200200200200200
100100100100100
2002000
20200200
WidthWidth
ARE
TOTALS
101101
101101101
(ft)(ft)
SUBTOTALSSUBTOTALS
BufferBuffer
ID/ID/
PRESERVATION
Cattle
&
Enh
ReachReach
Component
Component
RestorationEnhEx.Preservation
ELIGIBLE
Wendell
TypeType
Lake
Assets:
RestorationEnhancementPreservation
and
t
02B.0295)
Areas
StreamsRestorationStreamsRestoration
NCAC
NonsubjecNonsubject
or
(15A
oror
Project
ect
j
BUFFER
Sub SubjectNonsubject
SubjectSubject
Buffer
2.
or
LocationJurisdictionalLocationJurisdictional
Table
RIPARIAN RuralUrbanRuralUrban

Table 3. Project Contacts
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (NCDEQ DMS Project ID# 97081)
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
Mitigation Provider
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130 Raleigh, NC 27615
Primary Project POCCatherine Manner Phone: [phone]
RiverWorks Construction
Construction Contractor
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCBill Wright Phone: [phone]
WithersRavenel
Survey Contractor (Existing
Condition Surveys)
115 MacKenan Drive, Cary, NC 27511
Primary Project POCMarshall Wight, PLS Phone: [phone]
True Line Surveying, PC
Survey Contractor (Conservation
Easement, Construction and As-
Builts Surveys)
205 West Main Street, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCCurk T. Lane, PLS 919-359-0427
RiverWorks Construction
Planting Contractor
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCBill Wright Phone: [phone]
RiverWorks Construction
Seeding Contractor
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCBill Wright Phone: [phone]
Green Resource
Seed Mix Sources
5204 Highgreen Ct., Colfax, NC 27235
Rodney Montgomery Phone: [phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery (Live Stakes)
Nursery Stock Suppliers
797 Helton Creek Rd, Lansing, NC 28643
Glenn Sullivan Phone: [phone]
Dykes & Son Nursery (Bare Root Stock)
825 Maude Etter Rd, Mcminnville, Tn 37110
Jeff Dykes Phone: [phone]
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
Monitoring Performers
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130 Raleigh, NC 27615
Stream Monitoring POCEmily Dunnigan Phone: [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POCEmily Dunnigan Phone: [phone]

Appendix B:
Visual Assessment Data

10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
10+00
15+00
11+00
16+00
12+00
17+00
13+00
18+00
13+58
19+00
20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00
45+00
46+00
47+00
48+00
49+00
49+15

AcreageAcreage
% of Planted
% of Easement
AcreageAcreage
Combined Combined
00.000.0%00.000.0%00.000.0%00.000.0%
PolygonsPolygons
Number of Number of
Total
ColorColor
CCPV CCPV
DepictionDepiction
Pattern and Pattern and
Cumulative Total
Mapping Mapping
ThresholdThreshold
8.9
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 0.01 acresSolid light blue00.000.0%Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.0.1
acresAreas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.0.25 acres 12 Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).1000 SForange
hatched10.131.1%Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).noneyellow hatched10.0090.1%
3
4
1
2
Table 4.Vegetation Condition AssessmentProjectLake Wendell Mitigation Project (NCDEQ DMS Project ID# 97081) Planted Acreage
Vegetation CategoryDefinitions1. Bare Areas2. Low Stem Density Areas3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorEasement AcreageVegetation CategoryDefinitions
4. Invasive Areas of Concern5. Easement Encroachment Areas

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
1,2,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
01)
00)
(MY
(MY
2018
2018
5,
27,
April
November
2,
1,
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
3,4,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
01)
00)
(MY
(MY
2018
2018
5,
13,
April
November
4,
3,
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
5,6,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
20182018
13,13,
AprilApril
5,6,
PlotPlot
VegVeg

05)
(MY
2022
13,
September
7,
Plot
Veg
00)
(MY
2018
13,
April
7,
Plot
Veg

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
(VPA1),(VPA1),
AreaArea
ProblemProblem
KudzuKudzu
03)03)
(MY(MY
20202020
22,22,
OctoberOctober
(VPA1),(VPA1),
AreaArea
ProblemProblem
KudzuKudzu

05)
(MY
2022
13,
September
(VPA3),
Area
Encroachment
05)
05)
(MY
(MY
2022
2022
30,
14,
June
March
(VPA3),
VPA1,
in
Area
Plot
Veg
Encroachment
Random

Appendix C:
Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data

7
(2018)
allT
0.17
111888
911
(2018)MY0
allTPnoLSP
0.17
MY1
18
77
(2019)
allTPnoLSP
0.17
Means
1612
Annual
(2020)MY2
allTPnoLSP
0.17
MY3
92
21
(2021)
allTPnoLSP
0.17
81112111
20
(2022)MY4
allTPnoLSP
0.17
888888888111111999121212222333333333444555444222222222222333222222222222222222444444444444444444999888888777777777
0007MY5
1777
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
43
0006001
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111111333333333333222333222
001
22222225512664166686625666277722
0005
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111111111111222778777778888131313272727444111333111111111111111111111111121212181818333333111111111111111111111999101010111111
2022)
(MY5
0004001
allTPnoLSP
01
Data 0.02
223222555111111111111222333444444999
Plot
41
Current
0003001
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111444
212223
0002001
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
333111222111111111999666777777888888
211
10
0001001
111111
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
1111112222221113331111111111111111111112228822991512121714141512121812121910101076761157373142757516777771078383150125125125771155877966677108810666131318131318131316131316131316151515

001
324324890364364607486486688567567607486486728486486769405405405439439665422422821434434965445445619480480867723723723
PnoLSP
ACRE
countcount
Type(ares)
(ACRES)
TreeTree111TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeVine
per
size
Stem
size
Species
TreeTreeShrubShrubTreeShrubTreeShrubTreeShrubTreeShrub
e
k Stems
ChTree
Oa
Ald
Field
treeTree
GumTree
BirchTree
AshTree
Old%
NameSpecies 10%
Red
Swamp
10%
RedPaddle
Red
10
y
Plane
Smooth
Persimmon,
SpicebushShrub
Pine,ElmTree
than
RoseShrub
OakTree
Oak,
than
Oak,
Ash,Gum,
than
WillowTree
Birch,
DogwoodShrub
Counts
Alder,
less
more
less
TagRiverWinterberrNorthernLoblollyWaterSwampBlackWinged
by
by
by
Stem
10%
but
by
Total
and
NameCommon
tulipiferarequirements,requirements
styracifluaSweet
virginianaAmerican
virginiana
Density
caroliniana
occidentalisSycamore,
pennsylvanicaGreenmichauxiiBasketnigraphellosWillow
Planted requirementsrequirements,
benzoin
amomumSilkymeetmeet
serotina
nigraalata
5:
serrulata
taeda for
Scientific
copallinum
palustris
Wendellnegundorubrumnigra
toto
verticillata
Table LakeAcerAcerAlnusBetulaCarpinusCornusDiospyrosFraxinusIlexLinderaLiquidambarLiriodendronMagnoliaPinusPlatanusPrunusQuercusQuercusQuercusRhusRosaSalixUlmus Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails

Table5a:VegetationPlotMitigationSuccessSummaryTable
Greatest
NumberofNumberof
Percentage
Stems/Acre
HardwoodSpecies
PlantedVolunteers/Total
Plot#SuccessofaSingle
Stems/AcreAcreStems/AcreShrub/TreeSuccess
CriteriaMetSpeciesby
SpeciesCriteriaMet
Plot
132481405Yes8Yes20%
2364121485Yes6Yes25%
34860486Yes7Yes33%
456740607Yes6Yes33%
548681567Yes8Yes21%
64860486Yes8Yes25%
74050405Yes6Yes30%
Project
44546492Yes7Yes27%
Average

Appendix D:
NC DWR Correspondence and
Approvals