20160403 Ver 2_Pen Dell_97079_MY5_2022_Buffer_20221212

ID#* 20160403
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/14/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/12/2022
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Lindsay Crocker
Project Information
ID#:* 20160403
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Pen Dell Mitigation Site
County: Johnston
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Pen Dell _97079_MY5_2022_Buffer.pdf 4.52MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature: *

Monitoring Report- Year 5
FINALVERSION
Pen Dell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Calendar Year of Data Collection: 2022
NCDEQ DMS Project Identification # 97079
NCDEQ DMS Contract # 6824
Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020201)
USACE Action ID Number: SAW-2016-00885
NCDEQ DWR Project # 2016-0403V2
Johnston County, NC
Contracted Under RFP # 16-006477
Data Collection Period:September2022
th
Submission Date:November 30, 2022
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by:

TableofContents
1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Project Background ............................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Project Location, Setting, and Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 1
2.2 Mitigation Project Goals and Objectives....................................................................................... 1
2.3 Project History, Contacts, and Timeframe .................................................................................... 2
3 Project Mitigation Components ............................................................................................................ 2
3.1 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Types and Approaches ....................................................................... 2
3.1.1 Tree and Shrub Planting Approaches .................................................................................... 3
3.1.2 Temporary and Permanent Seeding Approaches ................................................................. 3
3.1.3 Invasive Species Vegetation Treatment ................................................................................ 3
4 Performance Standards ........................................................................................................................ 3
4.1 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 4
5 Monitoring Year 5 Assessment and Results .......................................................................................... 4
5.1 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 4
6 References ............................................................................................................................................ 5

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Tables
Table 1 Project Attributes
Table 2 Project Areas and Asset Summary
Table 3 Project Contacts

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos Vegetation Plot Photographs
Photos Vegetation Problem Area Photographs

Appendix CVegetation Plot Data
Table 5 Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 5a Vegetation Mitigation Success Table

Appendix D NC DWR Correspondence and Approvals

Water & Land Solutions
1ProjectSummary
Water and Land Solutions, LLC(WLS)completed the constructionand plantingof the Pen Dell Mitigation
Project (Project) full-delivery project for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)in April2018. The Project is located in Johnston County,
NCbetween the Community of Archer Lodge and the Town of Wendellat 35.73125,-78.35281. The
Project site is located inthe NCDEQ Sub-basin 03-04-06, in the Lower Buffalo Creek Priority Sub-watershed
030202011504.
The Project involved the restoration, enhancement, preservation,and permanent protection of five
stream reaches (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) and their riparian buffers, totaling 5,064 linear feet of streams
and633,803square feet of riparian buffers. WLS staff visited the site several times throughoutMonitoring
Year 5(MY5) for monitoring activities. MY5data collectionoccurred in September 2022(Table 2).This
report presents the data for MY5. The Project meets the MY5success criteria for vegetation. Based on
these results, WLS proposes closing outthe riparian buffer mitigation project.
2ProjectBackground
2.1ProjectLocation,Setting,andExistingConditions
TheProjectsite is locatedinthe Upper Buffalo Creek Sub-watershed 030202011502 study area ofthe
Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan, in the Wake-Johnston Collaborative Local Watershed Plan, and the
Targeted Local Watershed 03020201180050.
The catchment areais 156acres and has an impervious cover of approximately one percent. The
dominantsurroundingland uses are agriculture and mixed forest. Prior toconstruction, livestock had
access to Reaches R3 and R4,and the riparian bufferswereless than 50feet wideon all reaches except
R5.
2.2MitigationProjectGoalsandObjectives
The following riparian buffer mitigation site -specific goals were developed:
Restore and protect riparian buffer functions and habitat connectivity in perpetuity by recording
a permanent conservation easement,
Implement agricultural BMPs to reduce nonpoint source inputs to receiving waters.
To accomplish these site-specific goals, the following objectives will be measured and included with the
performance standards to document overall project success:
Increase native species riparian buffer vegetation density/composition along streambank and
floodplain areas that meet requirements of a minimum 50-foot-wide and 260 stems/acre after
monitoring year 5,
Prevent cattle from accessing the conservation easement boundary by installing permanent
fencing and reducing fecal coliform bacteria from the pre-restoration levels.
Pen Dell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page1

Water & Land Solutions
2.3ProjectHistory,Contacts,andTimeframe
The Project will provide riparian buffer mitigation credits in accordance with North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC), “Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule”, Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective
November 1, 2015. Riparian buffer mitigation site viability was confirmed by DWRs April 28, 2016 letter
entitled “Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset –Pen Dell Located Near 2505 Wendell Rd,
Wendell, NC, Johnston County”. The referenced viability letter specified for Reach R1 thatriparian buffer
credits only being allowedoutside of 25 feetoff the top of stream banks.The described site viability
confirmation included a determination by DWR that Project Reaches R2, R3 (Includes Project Reach R4)
and R5 were either intermittent or perennial. A request for Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability
Determination for Project Reach R1, as required in the referenced viability letter, was submitted to DWR
on June 10, 2016. On June 20, 2016 and June 21, 2016 DWR performed the requested determination and
Reach R1 was determined to be intermittent, as communicated in the DWR June 22, 2016 letter entitled
“Subject: Buffer Determination Letter, NBRO #16-180 Johnston County”, therefore confirming Reach R1’s
eligibility for riparian buffer mitigation. See Appendix D for DWR correspondence and approval letters.
The final mitigation plan and PCN were submitted to DMS September 29, 2017,for submission to DWR
and the NCIRT. The Section 404 General (Regional and Nationwide) Permit Verification was issued January
12, 2018. Project construction started on January 29, 2018 and mitigation site earthwork was completed
on April 1, 2018, and mitigation site planting was completed on April 6, 2018, both by RiverWorks
Construction. Trueline Surveying, PC completed the as-built survey in June 2018. WLS completed the
installation of baseline monitoring devices on April 19, 2018,and the installation of survey
monumentation and conservation easement boundary marking on June 7, 2018. Monitoring year 1
occurred between April and November 2018.Monitoring year 2 occurred in between November 2018 and
October 2019. Monitoring Year 3 occurred between September2020 and October 2020.Monitoring Year
4 occurredin September 2021.Monitoring Year 5 occurred in September 2022.
During MY5, WLS discovered that thepowerline right-of-way that was removed from DMS stream credits
had not been removed from buffer credits. The powerline right of way runs along Lake Wendell Road and
overlays themitigationeasement. The conflict was initially addressedat the As-Builtstage andReach R4
wasreduced by 35 feet. WLS has removed the buffer credits in the powerline area,thisresultedin a
reduction of 4,613restoration buffer creditsand 3enhancement buffer credits. With the reductionin
buffer restoration creditsthe amount of preservation credits was also reduced to comply with the buffer
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)(2),that preservation may be no more than 25 percent of the total area. The
new total buffer credits for the project is357,861.800.
The project background and attribute summary arepresented in Table 1. Refer to Figure 1 and Table 2 for
the project areas and buffer asset information. Relevant project contact information is presented in Table
3.
3ProjectMitigationComponents
3.1RiparianBufferMitigationTypesandApproaches
Riparian buffer mitigation included restoring, enhancing and preserving the riparian buffer functions and
corridor habitat. The project included planting to re-establish a native species vegetation riparian buffer
corridor, which extended a minimum of 50 feet from the top of the streambanks along each of the project
Pen Dell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page2

Water & Land Solutions
reaches, as well as permanently protecting those buffers with a conservation easement. Many areas of
the conservation easement had riparian buffer widths greater than 50 feet established along one or both
streambanks to provide additional functional uplift. The only exception is at the upstream end of Reach
R2, where the width of the proposed left riparian buffer varies between 20 feet and 29 feet from the right
top of bank. This narrow area of proposed riparian buffer is due to the site constraint caused by an existing
residential driveway. For project reaches proposed for restoration and enhancement, the riparian buffers
were restored through reforestation of the entire conservation easement with native species riparian
buffer vegetation. For project reach sections proposed for preservation, the existing riparian buffers are
permanentlyprotected via the conservation easement. A significant area of the existing northern riparian
buffer for Reach R2 was incorrectly described as “Native hardwood forest, closed canopy” in the
referenced site viability letter, as this area of the buffer was a fescue lawn. WLS proposed this area for
riparian buffer restoration in the approved mitigation plan (Figure 11 Riparian Buffer Mitigation).
Additionally, permanent fencing was installed along with alternative watering systems to exclude livestock
from the restored riparian buffer and conservation easement areas. Table 1 and Figure 1 (Appendix A)
provide a summaryof the project components.
3.1.1Tree and Shrub Planting Approaches
The riparian buffer planting zones for the project included the streambanks, floodplain, riparian wetland,
and upland transitional areas. The as-built planting boundaries are shown on the as-built vegetation plans
in Appendix Eand Figure 1. Proposed plantings were conducted using native species bare-root trees and
shrubs, live stakes, and seedlings. Proposed plantings predominantly consisted of bare-root vegetation
and were generally plantedat a total target density of 680 stems per acre. WLS implemented a riparian
buffer planting strategy that includes a combination of overstory, or canopy, and understory species. The
site planting strategy also included early successional, as well as climax species. The vegetation selections
were mixed throughout the project planting areas so that the early successional species will give way to
climax species as they mature over time.
3.1.2Temporary and Permanent Seeding Approaches
Permanent seed mixtures ofnative species herbaceous vegetation and temporary herbaceous vegetation
seed mixtures were applied to all disturbed areas of the project site. Temporary and permanent seeding
were conducted simultaneously at all disturbed areas of the site during construction utilizing mechanical
broadcast spreaders. The as-built re-vegetation plan lists the utilized species, mixtures, and application
rates for permanent seeding.
3.1.3Invasive Species Vegetation Treatment
During the project construction, invasive species exotic vegetation was either mechanically removed or
chemically treatedboth to control its presence and reduce its spread within the conservation easement
areas. During MY5vegetation assessment, no areas of concern was observed within the conservation
easement boundary.
4PerformanceStandards
The applied success criteria for the Project will follow necessary performance standards and monitoring
protocols presented in final approved mitigation plan. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will
be conducted to assess the condition of the project throughout themonitoring period. Monitoring
Pen Dell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page3

Water & Land Solutions
activities will be conducted for a period of five years. Specific success criteria components and evaluation
methods are described below.
4.1Vegetation
Measurements of the final vegetative restoration success for the project will be achieving a density of not
less than 260, five-year-old planted stems per acre in Year 5 of monitoring. This final performance criteria
shall include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native hardwood tree and native
shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the stems. Native hardwood tree and
native shrub volunteer species willbe included to meet the final performance criteria of 260 stems per
acre. Volunteer species are only counted if they are at least 12” tall.Volunteer species will only be
included if surviving for at least two years and are included were included in the approved planting plan.
In addition, diffuse flow of runoff shall be maintained in the riparian buffer areas.
5MonitoringYear5AssessmentandResults
Annual monitoring was conducted during MY5in accordance with the monitoring plan as described in the
approved mitigation plan and was intended to document the site improvements based on restoration
potential, catchment health, ecological stressors and overall constraints. Allthe monitoring device
locations are depicted on the CCPV (Figure 1) and MY5monitoring data results are listed in the
appendices. The Project meets the MY5success criteria for vegetation.
5.1Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring for MY5was conducted utilizing the seven vegetation monitoring plots, with
monitoring conducted in accordance with the CVS-EEP Level I & II Monitoring Protocol (CVS, 2008) and
DMS Stream and Wetland Monitoring Guidelines (DMS, 2017). See Figure 1 in Appendix B for the
vegetation monitoring plot locations. All veg plots meet thevegetative success criteria of at least 260
planted stems per acre at the end of MY5 and the site is on trajectory to remain successful. Vegetation
plots ranged from 324to 849 stems per acre. The number of hardwood tree and shrub species ranged
from 4 to 10 species per plot. The greatest percentage of a species in a single plot ranged from 19 percent
to 50 percent. Summary data and photographs of each plot can be found in Appendix Band C.
The MY5 vegetation monitoring was also conducted utilizing visual assessment throughout the easement.
A small encroachmentarea(VPA1) of approximately 0.05 acres was found along R1 left floodplain during
a spring MY4 site visit. No trees were damaged due to mowing, only herbaceous vegetation.During MY5,
encroachment in this area has stopped. Three additional encroachments were discovered during MY5.
VPA2 (0.006 acres) and VPA3 (0.012 acres) are small encroachments due to mowing along the farm field
of the right floodplain of R1. VPA4 (0.003 acres) is a small encroachment caused by mowing along the
driveway adjacent to the easement near R2. All encroachments have been marked with additional t-posts
and horse tape. These areas will be monitored closely in MY6 to ensure encroachments have ceased.
An area along R1 with dense pine volunteers was identified during MY5 (0.58 acres). During MY6, pine will
be thinned to allow desirable volunteer and planted species to further establish. Pine will be thinned by
hand. The results of the visual assessment did not indicate any additional significant negative changes to
the existing vegetation community.
Pen Dell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page4

Water & Land Solutions
6References
Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. CVS-NCEEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,Version 4.1,
2007.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services, Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. 2015. Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan Phase II. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services, 2017. Annual
Monitoring Report Format, Data and Content Requirement. Raleigh, NC.
Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina,
third approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. NCDENR Division of Parks and
Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y-87-1. Environmental Laboratory. US Army EngineerWaterways Experiment
Station. Vicksburg, MS.
___. 1997. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Research Program. Technical Note VN-RS-4.1. Environmental
Laboratory. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS.
___. 2003. Stream MitigationGuidelines, April 2003, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District.
Water and Land Solutions, LLC (2017). Pen DellStream and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan. NCDMS,
Raleigh, NC.
Pen Dell Mitigation Project(Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL Monitoring ReportYear 5 Page5

Appendix A:
Background Tables

Table1.BufferProjectAttributes
ProjectNamePenDellMitigationProject
HydrologicUnitCode03020201
RiverBasinNeuse
GeographicLocation(Lat,Long)35 ȴ ЍЌ͸ЎЋ͵ЎЊ͸͸N78 ȴ ЋЊ͸ЊЉ͵ЊЋ͸͸W
SiteProtectionInstrument(DB,PG)85,148
TotalCredits(BMU)0
TypesofCreditsRiparianBuffer
MitigationPlanDateNov18
InitialPlantingDateMar18
BaselineReportDateNov18
MY1ReportDateDec18
MY2ReportDateDec19
MY3ReportDateNov20
MY4ReportDateOct21
MY5ReportDateNov22

0
(lbs)
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.000 0.00
P
Nutrient
Nutrient
to
Offset:
Offset
N
(lbs)
Converted
14,729.435 14,729.435
IfNutrient
Offset:
)
(Yes
No
Nutrient
or
Offset
to
Convertible
YesNo
00 0 0 00
0.0000.0000.0000.000
BufferBuffer
62,042.5013,545.30
13,545.30
282,274.00 344,316.50357,861.80
CreditsCredits
RiparianRiparian
0
000000
RatioRatio
(x:1)(x:1)
CreditCredit
FinalFinal
CreditCredit
FullFull
%
%
)
x:1
357,861.800.
(x:1)(
areas.
1100%1.0000133%3.0303233%6.060610.000533%15.151520.000333%9.090910.000
1033%30.303030.000 is
InitialInitial
CreditCredit
R+E/0.75.
Ratio
Ratio
credit
4
92
creditable
(sf)*(sf)*
buffer
equation
282,27135,45310100%10.0000
406,35135,453135,453541,81
the
AreaArea
as
CreditableCreditable
the
total
47
credit
(sf)(sf)
with
ratios
new
TOTALS
AreaArea
offset
way
credit
SUBTOTALSSUBTOTALS
of
Total
Total
calculated
best
00000
29175%1.333330.00029275%2.666670.000291075%13.333330.00029575%6.666670.00029375%4.0000
nutrient
right
A
100282,2720100124,085124,0852100%2.000020100222,82201005100%5.0000201003100%3.000020
the
back
20
for
WidthWidth
ARE
is
101
(ft)
(ft)
with
wide
area
powerline
BufferBuffer
50'
areas
the
total
be
the
in
Enh0
PRESERVATION
must
where
area
select
Exc.
ReachReach
the
area,
buffers
area,
ID/Component
ID/Component
Cattle ELIGIBLE
total
credit,
of
removing
TypeType
ttt
25%
After
preservation
buffer
than
s
eligible
riparian
more
for
no
total
362,631.200.
Asset
be
the
wide
StreamsRestorationStreamsRestoration was
and
may
02B.0295)
20'
NonsubjectRestoration20NonsubjectRestorationRestoration0NonsubjectRestoration101NonsubjectEnhancemenNonsubjectEnhancemenNonsubjectEnhancemenNonsubjectPreservation20NonsubjectPreservation0NonsubjectPr
eservation101
credit
exceed
ororororororororor
Areas
NCAC
areas
buffer
minimum
(15A
preservation
at
Project
total
be
for
BUFFER
year
Buffer
must
UrbanSubjectUrbanSubjectUrbanSubjectUrbanSubjectUrbanSubjectUrbanSubject
preservation
2.
eligible
orororororor
LocationJurisdictionalLocationJurisdictional
Table RIPARIAN RuralRuralRuralRuralSubjectPreservation20RuralSubjectPreservationPreservation0RuralSubjectPreservation101RuralNonsubjectPreservation20RuralNonsubjectPreservation0*Area*Buffers*When*Pre
vious
RuralRuralRuralRuralNonsubjectPreservation101UrbanSubjectUrbanSubjectUrbanSubject

Table 3. Project Contacts
Pen Dell Mitigation Project (NCDEQ DMS Project ID# 97079)
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
Mitigation Provider
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130, Raleigh, NC 27615
Primary Project POCCatherine Manner Phone: [phone]
RiverWorks Construction
Construction Contractor
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCBill Wright Phone: [phone]
WithersRavenel
Survey Contractor (Existing
Condition Surveys)
115 MacKenan Drive, Cary, NC 27511
Primary Project POCMarshall Wight, PLS Phone: [phone]
True Line Surveying, PC
Survey Contractor (Conservation
Easement, Construction and As-
Builts Surveys)
205 West Main Street, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCCurk T. Lane, PLS 919-359-0427
RiverWorks Construction
Planting Contractor
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCBill Wright Phone: [phone]
RiverWorks Construction
Seeding Contractor
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POCBill Wright Phone: [phone]
Green Resource
Seed Mix Sources
5204 Highgreen Ct., Colfax, NC 27235
Rodney Montgomery Phone: [phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery (Live Stakes)
Nursery Stock Suppliers
797 Helton Creek Rd, Lansing, NC 28643
Glenn Sullivan Phone: [phone]
Dykes & Son Nursery (Bare Root Stock)
825 Maude Etter Rd, Mcminnville, Tn 37110
Jeff Dykes Phone: [phone]
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
Monitoring Performers
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130, Raleigh, NC 27615
Stream Monitoring POCEmily Dunnigan Phone: [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POCEmily Dunnigan Phone: [phone]

Appendix B:
Visual Assessment Data

10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
26+00
27+00
31+30
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
1,2,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
20182018
12,12,
AprilApril
1,2,
PlotPlot
VegVeg

05)
05)
(MY
(MY
2022
2022
13,
13,
September
September
3,
4,
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg
00)00)
(MY(MY
20182018
12,12,
AprilApril
3,4,
PlotPlot
VegVeg

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
5,6,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
20182018
12,12,
AprilApril
5,6,
PlotPlot
VegVeg

05)
(MY
202
13,
September
7,
Plot
Veg
00)
(MY
2018
12,
April
7,
Plot
Veg

05)05)
(MY(MY
20222022
13,13,
SeptemberSeptember
Floodplain,Floodplain,
LeftLeft
R1R1
(VPA1),(VPA1),
EncroachmentEncroachment
04)
04)
(MY
(MY
2021
2021
14,
17,
March
September
Floodplain,
Floodplain,
Left
Left
R1
R1
(VPA1),
(VPA1)
Encroachment
Encroachment

05)05)
Floodplain(MYFloodplain(MY
RightRight
R1R1
(VPA2),(VPA3),
EncroachmentEncroachment
05)
05)
(MY
(MY
Floodplain
RightFloodplain
Right
R1
R1
(VPA3)
(VPA2),
Encroachment
Encroachment

05)
(MY
driveway,
adjacent
R2
(VPA4),
Encroachment
05)
(MY
driveway,
adjacent
R2
(VPA4),
Encroachment

Appendix C:
Vegetation Plot Data

7
(2018)
allT
0.17
111
13139
7
(2018)MY0
allTPnoLSP
0.17
543175323
7
(2019)MY1
allTPnoLSP
0.17
Means
2
14
Annual
7
(2020)MY2
allTPnoLSP
0.17
111111222222111222333131313
261
10
7
(2021)MY3
allTPnoLSP
0.17
7133314
10
7
(2022)MY4
allTPnoLSP
0.17
3333333333333333335555555555559910101010111333333333333333333223115226222555131313
MY5
101015999999999111111141414101010101010101010999111111999
1441233383330331444122333
0007
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111333334333444666666222666777777666888141414
002
23
0006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111111333111111555555555666888888
2471
0005002
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111333445444111111112111111111111111111141414141414
2022)4336
(MY5
0004002
1
allTPnoLSP
01
Data 0.02
222112334444445444333999111
Plot
31131111113
Current
0003002
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111114224111333111222111222222222222101010101010101010101010101010101010222333222
002
213
0002
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
333223111111222222
2242
0001002
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
1113331112228810881712122512122599122020307715767613474741387777129787810610010027913213213255644888117710556101013557141420131320151518151520151523161616
002
3243244053243246884864861012486486101236436448680980912142832836074394397754284287984454457464514516135785781613763763763
PnoLSP
ACRE
countcount
Type(ares)
(ACRES)
Tree111TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeVineVineTreeTreeTree
per
size
Stem
size
Species
TreeShrubShrubShrubTreeTreeShrubTreeShrubTreeTreeTreeShrubShrubShrubShrub
s
e
k Stems
P
ChTree
Bu
Oa
Aldy
ElmTree
Field
treeTree
GumTree
BirchTree
AshTree
tide
Raisin,
Old%
Red
NameSpecies 10%
Red
Swamp
10%
RedPaddle
Red
10
y
Plane
Smooth
High
Persimmon,
SpicebushShrubWild
Elderberr
Elm,
Pine,ElmTree
than
RoseShrub
OakTree
Oak,
than
Oak,
Ash,Gum,
than
WillowTree
Birch,
DogwoodShrubWillowShrub
Counts
Alder,
less
more
less
TagRiverHickoryWinterberrNorthernLoblollyWaterSwampBlackSilkyWingedSlippery
by
by
by
Stem
10%
but
by
Total
and
NameCommon
tulipiferarequirements,requirements
styracifluaSweet
canadensisCommon
virginianaAmericannudumSouthern
halimifoliaSilverling,
virginiana
Density
caroliniana
occidentalisSycamore,
pennsylvanicaGreenmichauxiiBasketnigraphellosWillow
Planted requirementsrequirements,
deltoides
benzoin
amomumSilkymeetmeet
:
nigraalatarubra
serrulata
taeda for
Scientific
copallinum
carolinapalustris
rubrumnigrasericea
toto
Dell
verticillata
Table PenAcerAlnusBaccharisBetulaCarpinusCaryaCornusDiospyrosFraxinusIlexLinderaLiquidambarLiriodendronMagnoliaPinusPlatanusPopulusQuercusQuercusQuercusRhusRosaRosaSalixSalixSambucusUlmusUlmusViburnu
m Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails

Table5a:VegetationPlotMitigationSuccessSummaryTable
Greatest
NumberofNumberof
Percentage
Stems/Acre
HardwoodSpecies
PlantedVolunteers/Total
Plot#SuccessofaSingle
Stems/AcreAcreStems/AcreShrub/TreeSuccess
CriteriaMetSpeciesby
SpeciesCriteriaMet
Plot
13240324Yes5Yes38%
2324121445Yes4Yes27%
3486243729Yes8Yes22%
4486162648Yes7Yes25%
536440404Yes5Yes50%
680940849Yes10Yes19%
728340323Yes5Yes22%
Project
43992532Yes6Yes29%
Average

Appendix D:
NC DWR Correspondence and
Approvals