20210191 Ver 2_Cover_Letter_and_Supporting_Information_Brg35_PE147 RGP50 (003)_20221213

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 10
716 WEST MAIN STREET
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
716 WEST MAIN STREET
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001

December 13, 2022

Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587

SUBJECT: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Regional General Permit 50
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Project
Bridge No. 35 on SR 1134 over Long Creek (Class C), Stanly County, NC
WBS Number: BP.10.PE.147

Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:

We are requesting a Section 404 Regional General Permit (RGP) 50 for work associated with the
replacement of Bridge No. 35 with a new bridge over Long Creek (Class C) on SR 1134 in Stanly
County. This project was previously authorized under a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3 (SAW-2021-01702).
The project has been Let by Division 10 under the existing NWP authorization and utility relocations
have commenced. The permit is being resubmitted in the event that all authorized impacts cannot be
completed prior to the NWP 3 expiration in March 2023. There will be 93 linear feet of permanent stream
impact needed for stream bank stabilization along Long Creek (See Attachment A). Impervious dikes
will be installed on the eastern and western banks of Long Creek to prevent sediment from entering the
stream during the removal of the existing bridge and will be dewatered as needed; these dikes will result
in an additional 10 lf of temporary impacts outside of the permanent impacts. Impervious dikes will
additionally be constructed within Long Creek on the northern side of SR 1134 (Millingport Road) in
order to install a water line, this will cause 20 lf of temporary impacts. A temporary pipe will be placed
from the northern impervious dike to the southern impervious dike to allow flow to continue through the
channel while the water line is installed.

The approximate 120-foot wide bridge will consist of two lanes including two 10-foot travel lanes and 4-
foot paved shoulders on either side of the bridge. The proposed structure would be lengthened from
approximately 91 feet to approximately 120 feet.

There will be no wetland impacts. A delineation of Waters of the U.S. was conducted on November 1,
2019 by STV Environmental Scientist Brandon Philips, CHMM (See Attachment B). As part of the
environmental review, a Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist was completed for the project (See
Attachment C).

Section 106

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires Federal agencies to take into
account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. NCDOT Cultural Resource staff reviewed
the project for Historic Architectural and Archeological Resources. A Historic Architecture and
Landscapes No Survey Required Form was provided by a NCDOT Architectural Historian on January 23,
2019. A No Archaeological Survey Required Form was provided by the NCDOT Archaeologist on
February 14, 2019 (See Attachment D).

Protected Species

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
website lists Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) as endangered and tricolored bat
(Perimyotis subflavus) as proposed endangered within the study area. There is habitat in the study area for
Schweinitz’s sunflower. No Schweinitz’s sunflowers were found during field surveys of the study area
conducted on November 1, 2019, and August 30, 2022. A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database, accessed October 3, 2022, found no occurrences of Schweinitz’s sunflower
within the study area or within 1.0 mile of the study area. A biological conclusion of “No Effect” was
reached for Schweinitz’s sunflower (See Attachment E).

Review of the NCNHP records obtained on October 3, 2022, revealed no known occurrences of tricolored
bat within the study area or within 1.0 mile of the study area. Currently there is not a protocol for the
tricolored bat as it is proposed for listing and is not yet afforded protection under the Endangered Species
Act. The tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) was proposed for listing as endangered by the USFWS in
September 2022. If required, the tricolored bat will be revisited under new guidance set forth by the
USFWS. NCDOT is committed to completing a bat assessment of appropriately sized structures within 30
days of removal. Due to the anticipated future listing the project has a biological conclusion of
‘Unresolved’ for tricolored bat.

Bald eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. A desktop-GIS assessment of
the study area, as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits
was performed. No water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding
sources were identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the study
area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of the
NCNHP database on October 3, 2022, revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of
the study area. Due to no nests or eagles being identified during the survey, no known occurrences within
1.0 mile, and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project will not
affect this species.

If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material please
contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Joel Howard
PDEA Engineer, NCDOT Division 10

Attachment A – Permit Drawings with Stormwater Management Plan
Attachment B – Delineation Materials
Attachment C – Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist
Attachment D – Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form; No
Archaeological Survey Required Form
Attachment E – T & E Supplemental Information

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program
Bridge No. 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP 50

Attachment A

Permit Drawings with Stormwater Management Plan
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)
17BP.10.R.147 TIP No.:R.147 County(ies):Stanly Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
No
Design/Future:Year:2025 Existing:Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes N/A
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
None
None
Supplemental Classification:
Wooded
Long Creek 13-17-31
0.7
0.22
Project Description
Proposed Project
Yadkin-Pee DeeRiver Basin(s):
City/Town:
0.8
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
[e-mail]
Address:
8/2/2021
StanlyRichfield, NC
Garland Haywood
Albemarle, NC 28001
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
STV Engineers, Inc. / Peter WaldronNCDOT Contact:
[phone]
Charlotte, NC 28202
Contractor / Designer:
[phone]
900 West Trade Street, Ste. 715
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
716 W Main St.Address:
General Project Information
R.14717BP.10.R.147
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
The existing 90'8', 3 span bridge over Long Creek on SR 1134 (Millingport Road) is being replaced with a 2 span bridge with a span arrangement of 1@70' (24" cored slab),
1@50' (21" cored slab). The bridge will have 1.5:1 sloping abutments. The bridge will be super elevated to the left at 4% with 10' travel lanes and 3'11" to the left and right
shoulders, 27'10" clear width and 30' OTO width. The existing bridge structure will be removed. Overall drainage patterns will be maintained. There are proposed ditches that flow
towards the stream on both the begin and end sides on the downstream portion of the bridge and on the end side of the upstream portion of the bridge. On the begin side of the
bridge, a traffic bearing grated drop inlet with double frame and grates (2GI) is placed on the left side of the roadway in the shoulder berm gutter to pick up runoff from the bridge.
Class-II riprap abutment protection on both banks of the stream is also proposed to prevent future erosion and stream migration. Deck drains are not required. Impervious dikes
will be used around existing abutments to prevent the sediment from entering the stream during the removal of the existing bridge and will be dewatered as needed. A water line
will be constructed that will require the use of impervious dikes and a temporary 48" pipe will be used to divert the stream.
N/ABuffer Rules in Effect:
None
1300
Bridge: Two 10' lanes, 3'11" to the left and right paved shoulders.
Miller Road: Two 10' lanes, variable shoulders.
Waterbody Information
2014
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Class CNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
ac.
Bridge: Two 12' lanes, 2' to the left and right shoulders.
Miller Road: Two 10' lanes, variable shoulders.
2600
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?Dissipater Pads Provided in Buffer?N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Rd.
SR (1448)Miller Rd
Cro
ssin
g
Rd
Pau
ls
(SR 1
451
)
52
49
49
(SR 1447)
Rd
State
SR (144
6)
Rd
Sunnybrook
SR (1449)
R
o
g
ers R
d
SR
(14
34
)
S
R

(
1
1
3
4
)
Ryan Rd
SR (1450)
R
d
K
e
n
d
alls
C
h
u
r
c
h
S
R (
1
4
3
8
)
Misenhour
R
d
SR (1440)
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
END
C
re
e
k
Long
Long
Creek
Richfield
M
illin
g
p
o
r
t

R
d
SR (11
34)
Millin
gpo
rt Rd
Rd
Frick
S
T
I
M
IL
Y
T
IC
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
PROJECT ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
O
F
TRA NSPORTA
T
IO
N
S
T
A TE O F NORT
H
CAR
O
LI
N
A
1020 20
2001020
4 2 0 4 8
PLANS PREPARED FOR THE NCDOT BY:

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
40
P.E.
40
PROJECT LENGTH
DHV
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=MPH
ADT
=ADT
DESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
SIGNATURE:
ENGINEER
DESIGN
ROADWAY
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DETOUR
NIKKI T. HONEYCUTT, PE
PROJECT DESIGNER
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, & STRUCTURE
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
NORTH CAROLINA

N/A
N/A
2025
CLARK E. GROVES
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
2014
7%
See Sheet 1B For Standard Symbology Sheet
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
STANLY COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE #35 LONG CREEK ON SR 1134 (MILLINGPORT RD)
1300
2600
Scale : 80
35
-L- STA. 12+50.00
BEGIN PROJECT WBS 17BP.10.PE.147
-L- STA. 24+10.00
END PROJECT WBS 17BP.10.PE.147
-L- STA. 19+58.81
BEGIN BRIDGE
-Y- STA. 11+85.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
L
O
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
-L-)DR TROPGNILLIM( 4311 RS
-L-)DR TROPGNILLIM( 4311 RS
US 52
N
C
73
-L- STA. 20+81.19
END BRIDGE
S
R

1
4
4
8

(
M
I
LLE
R

R
D
)
-
Y-
OCTOBER 20, 2021
DESIGN EXCEPTION FOR VERTICAL CURVE K VALUE
REGIONAL TIER
MAJOR COLLECTOR
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION:
of1 7
Permit Drawing
Sheet
SITE 1
17BP.10.PE.147
17BP.10.PE.147
P
R
O
J
E
C
T

W
B
S
:

17
B
P
.
10
.
P
E
.
14
7
TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT WBS 17BP.10.PE.147 = .220 MILES
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE PROJECT WBS 17BP.10.PE.147 = .023 MILES
LENGTH OF ROADWAY PROJECT WBS 17BP.10.PE.147 = .197 MILES
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
JANUARY 5, 2021
5
6
4
S
a
u
c
i
e
S
L
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
li
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
o
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
P
r
m

S
H
T
\
R
.
14
7
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
0
1_
t
s
h
.
d
g
n
8
/
2
/
2
0
2
1
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
GARLAND HAYWOOD, PENCDOT CONTACT:
Division Bridge Manager

N
A

2
0
11
N
A
D

8
3
IN
V
=
5
2
4
.
9
4
'
6
'

S
O
I
L
L
O
N
G
C
R
E
E
K
8'
G
R
24" RCP
9' BST
9'
B
S
T
9'

B
S
T
INV=5
2
4
.
9
4
'
DB 379 PG 641
JEFFERY D SPEIGHT
JENCY L MILLER SPEIGHT
30" RCP
TIMBER RET. WALL
TIMBER RET. WALL
BRIDGE NO. 35
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
CULTIVATED
WOODS
19
.
8
'

P
A
V
E
D

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
-
E
Y-
18" RCP
TIMBER RET. WALL
TIMBER RET. WALL
EIP
Inc., Copper
Windstream Com
munications
WOODS
OF OLD MILL
POSSIBLE REMNANTS
LONG
C
R
E
E
K
MTL
MTL
MTL MTL
MTL
6
0
.
0
0
'
R/WEXISTING
21.3' PAVED ROADWAY
R/WEXISTING
I
n
c
.
,

C
o
p
p
e
r
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
W
i
n
d
s
t
r
e
a
m
60.00'
OF OLD MILL
REMNANTS
POSSIBLE
6
1
7
3
DB 1568 PG 429
2
1
JUANITA B MILLER
WARREN A MILLER
DB 1628 PG 465
BONNIE M BROOKS
JED DAVID BROOKS
DB 1628 PG 465
BONNIE M BROOKS
DB 357 PG 4111
JUDY BROOKS ALFRED
DB 1661 PG 1139
RICHARD E CLAYTON
DB 998 PG 506
4
VICKIE S MILLER
JERRY REECE MILLER
DB 998 PG 506
REVOCABLE TRUST
VICKIE S MILLER
JERRY R MILLER
JED DAVID BROOKS SR
JIM G ALFRED JR
P
T
S
t
a
. 17
+
7
1.7
4
P
C
S
t
a
. 2
0
+
6
3
.9
6
11+00
12+00
13+00
18
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
2
1+
0
0
19
+
0
0
-L-
(MILLINGPORT RD)
SR 1134
-
Y
-
GREU TL-3
P0CSta. 11+60.00
G
R
E
U

T
L
-
3
TYPE-III
GREU TL-3
AT-1
M
I
L
L
E
R

R
D
S
R

14
4
8
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
N 85° 54' 05.3" E
TYPE-III
STILLING BASIN
15 x 15 SPECIAL
STILLING BASIN
15 x 15 SPECIAL
RETAIN
REMOVE
(DETAIL B)STA. 14+00 TO 17+00 RT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
EST. 110 CY
TO ELEV 524'
EXCAVATION
ABUTMENT
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 70 TON
STABILIZATION
STREAMBANK
(DETAIL G)
15 CY DDE
50 SY GEOTEXTILE
15 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 18+50 TO 19+92 RT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(DETAIL F)
200 SY GEOTEXTILE
60 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 17+00 TO 18+50 RT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(DETAIL G)
10 CY DDE
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
15 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 20+40 TO 21+04 RT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(DETAIL E)
25 CY DDE
85 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 20+35 TO 21+23 LT
STANDARD BASE DITCH
(DETAIL H)
10 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 20+32 TO 20+40 RT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
(DETAIL H)
10 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 19+92 TO 19+96 RT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 80 TON
EST. 36 CY
TO ELEV 524'
ABUTMENT EXCAVATION
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 160 TON
(DETAIL H)
15 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 20+20 TO 20+35 LT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
EST. 7 S.Y. GEOTEXTILE
EST. 2 TON CL-B RIPRAP
(DETAIL I)
CL-I RIPRAP
20 TONS
(DETAIL D)
90 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 21+23 TO 22+15 LT
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(DETAIL D)
85 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 11+85 TO 12+59
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(DETAIL C)
EST. 80 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 12+59 TO 12+85 RT -Y-
STA. 17+15 TO 18+00 LT -L-
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(DETAIL A)
STA. 13+00 TO 17+75 LT
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
INV=526.5
523.3
INV=
(DETAIL J)
EST. 277 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STREAMBANK STABIIZATION
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
Flatter2:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 21+23 LT TO STA. 22+15 LT -L-
FROM STA. 11+85 RT TO STA. 12+59 RT -Y-
Slope
Cut
DETAIL D
B=2 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
B
d
FROM STA. 20+35 LT TO STA. 21+23 LT -L-
DETAIL E
B=2 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
*When B is < 6.0'
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Geotextile
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
Flatter2:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 13+00 LT TO STA. 17+75 LT -L-
Slope
Cut
DETAIL A
B=3 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM
Ground
Natural
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
Flatter2:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 12+59 RT TO STA. 12+85 RT -Y-
FROM STA. 17+15 LT TO STA. 18+00 LT -L-
Slope
Cut
DETAIL C
B=3 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
(DETAIL D)
90 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 21+23 TO 22+15 LT
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1
D Flatter2:1 or
d
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FROM STA. 17+00 RT TO STA. 18+50 RT -L-
DETAIL F
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Slope
Ditch
Front
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
LEGEND
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES PERMANENT
STREAM PERMIT IMPACT
AREA (AC)LENGTH (FT)
SW IMPACTS
TEMPORARY 123
SW IMPACTS
PERMANENT 930.02
0.03
( Not to Scale)
STREAMBANK STABALIZATION
(MAX)7:1
(
M
A
X)
2
:
1
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING PIERS
PIER
PROPOSED
STREAMBANK
EXISTING
STREAMBANK
EXISTING
ELEV: 520'
ELEV: 518'
NWSEL
CL-II RIPRAP
EXISTING STREAMBED

Type of Liner= 260 TONS CL-II RIPRAP
FROM STA. 20+21 TO STA. 20+47
FROM STA. 19+83 TO STA. 19+92
DETAIL J
MIN
2'
MIN
2'
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
d
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
FROM STA. 20+40 RT TO STA. 21+04 RT -L-
FROM STA. 18+50 RT TO STA. 19+92 RT -L-
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
DETAIL G
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
( Not to Scale)
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
FROM STA. 20+32 RT TO STA. 20+40 RT -L-
FROM STA. 19+92 RT TO STA. 19+96 RT -L-
FROM STA. 20+20 LT TO STA. 20+35 LT -L-
DETAIL H
Grade
Ditch
2 ft.
10'min.

Type of Liner= 12 TONS,CL II Rip-Rap
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
Elevation
Natural Bed
STA. 12+56.50 LT -Y-
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
(Variable)
Channel Bed
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL I
1.5'

Type of Liner= CL-I Rip-Rap - Keyed-In
Length= 20 Ft.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
93 LF. / 0.02 ACRES
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
BANK STABALIZATION & PERM.
10 LF / 0.02 ACRES*
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPERVIOUS DIKES TEMP.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
20 LF / 0.01 ACRES*
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPERVIOUS DIKES TEMP.
12" CL50 DIP WATERLINE
PIPE
TEMPORARY
PIPE
TEMPORARY
PIPE
TEMPORARY
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
FF
F
F
FF
C
C
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
F
C
C
C
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
8
/
2
/
2
0
2
1
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
o
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
P
r
m

S
H
T
\
R
.
1
4
7
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
0
2
.
d
g
n
S
a
u
c
i
e
S
L
Scale : 20 517BP.10.PE.147
SEE SHEET 8 FOR -L- PROFILE
of2 7
Permit Drawing
Sheet
SITE 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'40'40'
N
A
D

8
3

N
A

2
0
11
5
1
5
5
1
5
515
515
5
1
5
5
1
5
5
1
5
520
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
520
5205
2
0
525
5
2
5
5
2
5
5
2
5
5
2
5
5
2
5
5
2
5
525
5
2
5
525
5
2
5
5
3
0
530
530
5
3
0
5
3
0
5
3
0
5
3
0
530
5
3
0
530
5
3
0
5
3
0
5
3
0
5
3
0
5
3
5
535
535
5
3
5
5
3
5
5
3
5
535
5
3
5
5
3
5
535
540
5
4
0
54
0
5
4
0
540
540
540
5
4
0
5
4
5
545
5
45
5
4
5
5
4
5
545
545
545
545
5
4
5
550
550
550
5
5
0
550
555
555
5
6
0
560
560
560
565
570
IN
V
=
5
2
4
.
9
4
'
6
'

S
O
I
L
L
O
N
G
C
R
E
E
K
8'
G
R
24" RCP
9' BST
9'
B
S
T
9'

B
S
T
INV=5
2
4
.
9
4
'
DB 379 PG 641
JEFFERY D SPEIGHT
JENCY L MILLER SPEIGHT
30" RCP
TIMBER RET. WALL
TIMBER RET. WALL
BRIDGE NO. 35
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
CULTIVATED
WOODS
19
.
8
'

P
A
V
E
D

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
-
E
Y-
18" RCP
TIMBER RET. WALL
TIMBER RET. WALL
EIP
Inc., Copper
Windstream Com
munications
WOODS
OF OLD MILL
POSSIBLE REMNANTS
LONG
C
R
E
E
K
MTL
MTL
MTL MTL
MTL
6
0
.
0
0
'
R/WEXISTING
21.3' PAVED ROADWAY
R/WEXISTING
I
n
c
.
,

C
o
p
p
e
r
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
W
i
n
d
s
t
r
e
a
m
60.00'
OF OLD MILL
REMNANTS
POSSIBLE
6
1
7
3
DB 1568 PG 429
2
1
JUANITA B MILLER
WARREN A MILLER
DB 1628 PG 465
BONNIE M BROOKS
JED DAVID BROOKS
DB 1628 PG 465
BONNIE M BROOKS
DB 357 PG 4111
JUDY BROOKS ALFRED
DB 1661 PG 1139
RICHARD E CLAYTON
DB 998 PG 506
4
VICKIE S MILLER
JERRY REECE MILLER
DB 998 PG 506
REVOCABLE TRUST
VICKIE S MILLER
JERRY R MILLER
JED DAVID BROOKS SR
JIM G ALFRED JR
P
T
S
t
a
. 17
+
7
1.7
4
P
C
S
t
a
. 2
0
+
6
3
.9
6
12+00
13+00
18
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
2
1+
0
0
19
+
0
0
-L-
(MILLINGPORT RD)
SR 1134
-
Y
-
GREU TL-3
P0CSta. 11+60.00
G
R
E
U

T
L
-
3
TYPE-III
GREU TL-3
AT-1
M
I
L
L
E
R

R
D
S
R

14
4
8
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
N 85° 54' 05.3" E
TYPE-III
STILLING BASIN
15 x 15 SPECIAL
STILLING BASIN
15 x 15 SPECIAL
RETAIN
REMOVE
(DETAIL B)STA. 14+00 TO 17+00 RT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
EST. 110 CY
TO ELEV 524'
EXCAVATION
ABUTMENT
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 70 TON
STABILIZATION
STREAMBANK
(DETAIL G)
15 CY DDE
50 SY GEOTEXTILE
15 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 18+50 TO 19+92 RT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(DETAIL F)
200 SY GEOTEXTILE
60 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 17+00 TO 18+50 RT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(DETAIL G)
10 CY DDE
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
15 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 20+40 TO 21+04 RT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(DETAIL E)
25 CY DDE
85 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 20+35 TO 21+23 LT
STANDARD BASE DITCH
(DETAIL H)
10 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 20+32 TO 20+40 RT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
(DETAIL H)
10 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 19+92 TO 19+96 RT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 80 TON
EST. 36 CY
TO ELEV 524'
ABUTMENT EXCAVATION
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 160 TON
(DETAIL H)
15 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 20+20 TO 20+35 LT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
EST. 7 S.Y. GEOTEXTILE
EST. 2 TON CL-B RIPRAP
(DETAIL I)
CL-I RIPRAP
20 TONS
(DETAIL D)
90 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 21+23 TO 22+15 LT
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(DETAIL D)
85 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 11+85 TO 12+59
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(DETAIL C)
EST. 80 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 12+59 TO 12+85 RT -Y-
STA. 17+15 TO 18+00 LT -L-
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(DETAIL A)
STA. 13+00 TO 17+75 LT
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
INV=526.5
523.3
INV=
(DETAIL J)
EST. 277 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STREAMBANK STABIIZATION
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
Flatter2:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 21+23 LT TO STA. 22+15 LT -L-
FROM STA. 11+85 RT TO STA. 12+59 RT -Y-
Slope
Cut
DETAIL D
B=2 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
B
d
FROM STA. 20+35 LT TO STA. 21+23 LT -L-
DETAIL E
B=2 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
*When B is < 6.0'
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Geotextile
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
Flatter2:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 13+00 LT TO STA. 17+75 LT -L-
Slope
Cut
DETAIL A
B=3 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM
Ground
Natural
d
2:
1
B
D
( Not to Scale)
Flatter2:1 or
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 12+59 RT TO STA. 12+85 RT -Y-
FROM STA. 17+15 LT TO STA. 18+00 LT -L-
Slope
Cut
DETAIL C
B=3 Ft.
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
(DETAIL D)
90 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 21+23 TO 22+15 LT
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:
1
D Flatter2:1 or
d
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FROM STA. 17+00 RT TO STA. 18+50 RT -L-
DETAIL F
Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap
Slope
Ditch
Front
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
LEGEND
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES PERMANENT
STREAM PERMIT IMPACT
AREA (AC)LENGTH (FT)
SW IMPACTS
TEMPORARY 123
SW IMPACTS
PERMANENT 930.02
0.03
( Not to Scale)
STREAMBANK STABALIZATION
(MAX)7:1
(
M
A
X)
2
:
1
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING PIERS
PIER
PROPOSED
STREAMBANK
EXISTING
STREAMBANK
EXISTING
ELEV: 520'
ELEV: 518'
NWSEL
CL-II RIPRAP
EXISTING STREAMBED

Type of Liner= 260 TONS CL-II RIPRAP
FROM STA. 20+21 TO STA. 20+47
FROM STA. 19+83 TO STA. 19+92
DETAIL J
MIN
2'
MIN
2'
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
d
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
FROM STA. 20+40 RT TO STA. 21+04 RT -L-
FROM STA. 18+50 RT TO STA. 19+92 RT -L-
Type of Liner= CL-B Rip-Rap Max. d=1.5 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
DETAIL G
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
( Not to Scale)
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
FROM STA. 20+32 RT TO STA. 20+40 RT -L-
FROM STA. 19+92 RT TO STA. 19+96 RT -L-
FROM STA. 20+20 LT TO STA. 20+35 LT -L-
DETAIL H
Grade
Ditch
2 ft.
10'min.

Type of Liner= 12 TONS,CL II Rip-Rap
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
Elevation
Natural Bed
STA. 12+56.50 LT -Y-
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
(Variable)
Channel Bed
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL I
1.5'

Type of Liner= CL-I Rip-Rap - Keyed-In
Length= 20 Ft.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
93 LF. / 0.02 ACRES
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
BANK STABALIZATION & PERM.
10 LF / 0.02 ACRES*
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPERVIOUS DIKES TEMP.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
20 LF / 0.01 ACRES*
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPERVIOUS DIKES TEMP.
12" CL50 DIP WATERLINE
PIPE
TEMPORARY
PIPE
TEMPORARY
PIPE
TEMPORARY
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
FF
F
F
FF
C
C
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
F
C
C
C
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
8
/
2
/
2
0
2
1
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
o
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
P
r
m

S
H
T
\
R
.
1
4
7
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
0
3
.
d
g
n
S
a
u
c
i
e
S
L
Scale : 20 517BP.10.PE.147
SEE SHEET 6 FOR -L- PROFILE
of3 7
Permit Drawing
Sheet
SITE 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'40'40'
N
A
D

8
3

N
A

2
0
11
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
8
/
2
/
2
0
2
1
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
o
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
P
r
m

S
H
T
\
R
.
1
4
7
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
0
4
.
d
g
n
S
a
u
c
i
e
S
L
Scale : 20 817BP.10.PE.147
519
523
527
531
535
539
543
547
551
515
18+00 21+0019+00 20+0017+00
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
495
499
503
507
511
555
559
563
567
571
575 -L-
SEE SHEET 5 FOR PLAN VIEW
22+00
519
523
527
531
535
539
543
547
551
515
495
499
503
507
511
555
559
of4 7
Permit Drawing
Sheet
ELEV: 516.2'
TEMP. IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
PI = 18+00.00
EL = 529.54'
(-)
8.
918
0
%
(+)1.2389%
VC = 300'
K = 30
PI = 21+60.00
EL = 534.00'
(+)1.2389%
(+)8.4800%
VC = 190'
K = 26
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 19+53.75
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 20+76.25
S
R

14
4
8

(
M
IL
L
E
R

R
O
A
D
)
DS = 25 MPH*DS = 25 MPH*
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BM-1 BM-2
BL-4
-L- STA 19+13.41
LOW POINT
EL = 531.17 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE
BM-2
EXCAVATION
EST. 50 CY UNCLASSIFIED STRUCTURE
EXCAVATION
EST. 60 CY UNCLASSIFIED STRUCTURE
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 150 TON
-L- STA. 18+60.21=
EL = 531.65
-Y- STA. 13+17.65
2500
3634
100
11000
25
522.3
523.8
531.4
514.2
07/10/2018
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
500+
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 70 TON
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
P
I
=
17
+
0
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
3
6
.3
4
1'
(
-
)
6.7688%
(-)5.3
3
6
0%5
3
0
.2
8
9
(-)4
.9
3
3
4%
(-)4
.7
3
9
2%
5
3
0
.4
8
5
(+)4.5650%(+)9.9261%P
I=
2
1+
19
.4
9
0
E
l
.=
5
2
6
.9
6
3
'(+)15.4054%
(+)7.3097%
(+)14.1364%
P
I=
18
+
5
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
2
9
.0
14
'
(-)2
.9412%
(
-
)
6.7316%
(-)
9.
4
0
5
7
%
5
17
.0
0
0
P
I=
17
+
5
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
3
2
.9
5
7
'
P
I=
17
+
5
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
3
2
.8
5
4
'
P
I=
19
+
0
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
2
5
.6
4
9
'
P
I=
18
+
0
0
.0
0
0
E
N
D

'
V
'

D
I
T
C
H

L
T
E
l
.=
5
3
0
.2
8
9
'
P
I=
2
0
+
5
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
17
.6
9
6
'
P
I=
2
0
+
7
6
.2
5
0
E
l
.=
5
2
0
.3
0
1'
P
I=
2
2
+
0
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
3
2
.8
4
8
'
P
I=
2
2
+
14
.6
6
0
E
N
D

B
A
S
E

D
IT
C
H
E
l
.=
5
3
4
.9
2
0
'
P
I=
2
0
+
3
4
.7
6
0
B
E
G
IN

B
A
S
E

D
IT
C
H
E
l
.=
5
17
.0
0
0
'
PI=19+91.950
END 'V' DITCH RT
El.=517.000'
P
I
=
2
0
+
5
0
.0
0
0
E
l
.=
5
16
.2
16
'
(+)9.7378%
(+)12.6829%
(+)7.3494%
E
l
.=
5
18
.7
7
2
'
P
I
=
2
0
+
7
6
.2
5
0
E
l
.=
5
2
2
.2
3
5
'
P
I
=
2
1+
0
3
.5
5
0
P
I=
2
0
+
4
0
.2
6
0
E
l
.=
5
15
.5
0
0
'
5
1
5
515
515
5
1
5
5
1
5
520
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5
2
0
5205
2
0
525
5
2
5
5
2
5
5
2
5
5
2
5
525
5
2
5
525
530
530
5
3
0
5
3
0
530
5
3
0
L
O
N
G
C
R
E
E
K
9'

B
S
T N
1
6
°
3
5'
4
9
"

W
S

1
6
°
4
3'
2
2
"
E
1
0
0
.
2
2'
N 58°18'35"
W
143.76'
11
TIMBER RET. WALL
TIMBER RET. WALL
BRIDGE NO. 35
WOODS
WOODS
TIMBER RET. WALL
TIMBER RET. WALL
EIP
0.16' EIP-R/W
WOODSMTL
MTL
MTL MTL
MTL
6
0
.
0
0
'
R/WEXISTING
21.3' PAVED ROADWAY
R/WEXISTING
I
n
c
.
,

C
o
p
p
e
r
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
W
i
n
d
s
t
r
e
a
m
-L-
(MILLINGPORT RD)
SR 1134
GREU TL-3
G
R
E
U

T
L
-
3
TYPE-III
AT-1
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
DRAIN
GRADE TO STILLING BASIN
15 x 15 SPECIAL
STILLING BASIN
15 x 15 SPECIAL
REMOVE
EST. 110 CY
TO ELEV 524'
EXCAVATION
ABUTMENT
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 70 TON
STABILIZATION
STREAMBANK
(DETAIL G)
15 CY DDE
50 SY GEOTEXTILE
15 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 18+50 TO 19+92 RT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(DETAIL F)
200 SY GEOTEXTILE
60 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 17+00 TO 18+50 RT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(DETAIL G)
10 CY DDE
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
15 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 20+40 TO 21+04 RT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(DETAIL E)
25 CY DDE
85 SY GEOTEXTILE
30 TON CL-B RIPRAP
STA. 20+35 TO 21+23 LT
STANDARD BASE DITCH
(DETAIL H)
10 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 20+32 TO 20+40 RT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
(DETAIL H)
10 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 19+92 TO 19+96 RT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 80 TON
EST. 36 CY
TO ELEV 524'
ABUTMENT EXCAVATION
CL-II RIPRAP
EST. 160 TON
(DETAIL H)
15 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STA. 20+20 TO 20+35 LT
RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT
EST. 7 S.Y. GEOTEXTILE
EST. 2 TON CL-B RIPRAP
(DETAIL I)
CL-I RIPRAP
20 TONS
523.3
INV=
(DETAIL J)
EST. 277 TON CL-II RIPRAP
STREAMBANK STABIIZATION
LEGEND
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES PERMANENT
STREAM PERMIT IMPACT
AREA (AC)LENGTH (FT)
SW IMPACTS
TEMPORARY 123
SW IMPACTS
PERMANENT 930.02
0.03
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
93 LF. / 0.02 ACRES
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
BANK STABALIZATION & PERM.
10 LF / 0.02 ACRES*
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPERVIOUS DIKES TEMP.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
20 LF / 0.01 ACRES*
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPERVIOUS DIKES TEMP.
12" CL50 DIP WATERLINE
PIPE
TEMPORARY
PIPE
TEMPORARY
PIPE
TEMPORARY
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
C
F
C
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
8
/
2
/
2
0
2
1
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
o
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
P
r
m

S
H
T
\
R
.
1
4
7
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
p
s
h
0
5
.
d
g
n
S
a
u
c
i
e
S
L
17BP.10.PE.147 5Scale : 10
SITE 1of57
Permit Drawing
Sheet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'20'20'
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.NAMES ADDRESS
1
PROPERTY OWNERS
8/2/2021
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
#
SHEET 6 OF 7
of6 7
Permit Drawing
Sheet
PROJECT: 17BP.10.PE.147
(MILLINGPORT RD)
ON SR 1134
LONG CREEK
BRIDGE 35 OVER
2
3
6
7
JOHN WILLIAM RODGERS
JUANITA B MILLER
WARREN A MILLER AND
RICHARD E CLAYTON
JOHN WILLIAM RODGERS
AND JEFFERY D SPEIGHT
JENCY L MILLER SPEIGHT
STANLY COUNTY
RICHFIELD, NC 28137
10617 MILLINGPORT RD
RICHFIELD, NC 28137
40743 MILLINGPORT RD
RICHFIELD, NC 28137
40492 MILLINGPORT RD
RICHFIELD, NC 28137
40970 MILLINGPORT RD
RICHFIELD, NC 28137
40716 MILLINGPORT RD
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
1 19+90.73 \ 20+33.88 2 CORED SLABS (70' & 50')0.02 0.02 93 10
1 19+94.51 \ 20+23.77 342' 12" CL50 DIP WATERLINE 0.01 20
TOTALS:0.02 0.03 93 30
NOTES:
1 TEMP. IMPACTS LENGTH TOTAL = 123 FT. (93 FT. COVERED UNDER PERMANENT IMPACTS)
ATN Revised 3/31/05
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS
SHEET 7 of 7
BRIDGE #35 OVER LONG CREEK
ON SR 1134 (MILLINGPORT RD)
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STANLY COUNTY
12/13/2022
PE.147
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program
Bridge No. 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP 50

Attachment B

Delineation Materials

Appro ve d By:Drawn By:Chec ked By:
STV Engin eers, Inc. Project No.
TPO
USGS TOPO GRAPHICMAPMAI
#Leg end
Project Stu dy A rea (~ 3.5 acres)^_
FIGURE 1
0 1,000 2,000500Feet
.
Monda y, Ap ril 12, 2021
Ref. USGS 7 .5 Minute Topography Quadrangle Map [Richfield, NC]US GS The National Map Topo Base M ap
Richfield Quad
JL K
4019567
Division 10Bridge ReplacementSR 1134 Over Long Creek17.BP.10.PE.147Bridge No. 035Stanly County, NC
SR 1134 (Millingport Rd)
Richfield
G o F
G o F
B a D
O a A
B a D
T b B
B a B
T b B
B a B
B a D
Long Creek
Appro ve d By:Drawn By:Chec ked By:
STV Engin eers, Inc. Project No.
TPO
NRCS SOIL S ERIES MAPMAI
#Leg end
Pro ject Study Area (~ 3.5 acres)
FIGURE 2
Sources : NC One Ma p, NC Cente r for Ge ograp hic I nformation and Analysis , NC 911 Board ; NRC S Soil Se rie s DataStanly Co unty, NC (2014)
Badin c hann ery silt lo am, 8 to 15 percent slopesBaDGoldston v ery ch annery silt loa m, 15 to 45 percent slopesGoF
Mapped Soil Units Within the PSA
Nation al Hydro gra phy Dataset (NHD)
.
0 200 400100Feet
Monda y, Ap ril 12, 2021
4019567
JL K
Stanly County, NC
Hydric Rating by M ap Unit
Non hyd ric (0%)
Pred ominantly nonhydric (1 to 32%)
Pa rt ially hydr ic (33 to 65%)
Pred ominantly hydric (66 to 99%)
Hydric (100%)
Not rat ed or no t available
^_
Division 10Bridge ReplacementSR 1134 Over Long Creek17.BP.10.PE.147Bridge No. 035Stanly County, NC
SR 1134 (Millingport Rd)
£¤52
Oa kboro silt loam, 0 to 2 pe rce nt slopes, frequently floodedOaA
Richfield
Approved By:Drawn By:Checked By:
Frida y, August 6, 2021
STV Engineers, Inc. Proje ct No.
TPO MAI
FIGURE 3APPROXIMATE PO TENTIAL WATERS OF TH E U.S. AND WETLANDS BOUND ARY MAP
Sourc e: NC OneMap, NC Ce nter for Geograph ic In fo rmation and Analysis, NC 911 Board
Data Point Location
Photograph Location
Project Study Area (~ 3.5 Acres)
Legend
0 150 30075Feet
.
Perennial Stream
Flow
P2P1
4019567
JL K
Notes:1. Potential waters of the U.S. were delineatedby ST V E ngineers, Inc. during field reviewsconducted on Novem ber 1, 2019. Potentialboundaries have been m arked in the field withblue and white striped tape and mapped usinga Trimble Geo7X hand-held GPS unit capableof subfoot accuracy. This map is intended forplanning purposes only.
2. Boundaries of the potential waters of theU.S . have not been verified by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers and are subject to changefollowing verification.
3. No potential wetl ands were identified in theStudy Area.
Division 10Bridge ReplacementSR 1134 Over Long Creek17.BP.10.PE.147Bridge No. 035Stanly County, NC
S R 1 1 3 4 (M i l l i n g p o r t R d )P3
P4
DP1
Flow
Long Creek (~150 lf)(35.439931° N, -80.274209° W)
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement April 20, 2020
Bridge 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP #50

Photograph 1 – A view of the SR 1134 (Millingport Road) crossing of Long Creek looking to the
east.

Photograph 2 – A view of Long Creek at the SR 1134 (Millingport Road) bridge looking
upstream to the north.
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement April 20, 2020
Bridge 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP #50

Photograph 3 – A view of Long Creek at the SR 1134 (Millingport Road) bridge looking
downstream to the south.

Photograph 4 – A view of Long Creek looking south and downstream to the SR 1134 bridge.
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program
Bridge No. 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP 50

Attachment C

Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist

02/10/21 1
NCDOT MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST

WBS No.: 17BP.10.PE.147 (formerly 17.BP.10.R.147)

Project Location: Bridge No. 35 carrying SR 1134 (Millingport Road) over Long Creek
in Stanly County.

Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT),
Division 10, plans to replace Bridge No. 35 carrying SR 1134 (Millingport Road) over
Long Creek in Stanly County, North Carolina. Built in 1970, Bridge No. 830035 is an
approximately 30-foot wide structure with two approximately 11-foot travel lanes and
approximately 4-foot paved shoulders. The bridge is approximately 91 feet in length. The
existing bridge is a channel beam structure with no sidewalk or bicycle facilities. Existing
right-of-way width is approximately 60 feet along SR 1134 (Millingport Road). SR 1134
(Millingport Road) is classified as a Major Collector with a 45-mile per hour design
speed.

The proposed project is state funded and proposes replacing the existing bridge in-place
with a three-span cored slab bridge approximately 120 feet long. The proposed bridge
would be a 30-foot wide structure with two 10-foot travel lanes and 4-foot shoulders. The
proposed grade across the profile of the new bridge structure is approximately 5 feet
higher than the existing bridge profile in order to increase the design speed. The proposed
approach roadway includes two 10-foot wide travel lanes with approximately 2-foot
paved shoulders. The proposed approach roadway extends approximately 700 feet from
the western end of the new bridge and approximately 330 feet from the eastern end of the
new bridge. The project also requires a tie in at the intersection of SR 1134 (Millingport
Road) and Miller Road located approximately 50 feet west of the proposed bridge
structure. The tie-in to Miller Road would extend 120 feet north of the intersection and
would include two 10-foot travel lanes with 3-foot shoulders. The total length of the
project is approximately 1,160 feet (0.2 miles). Additional improvements include tie-ins
to two existing driveways, one located approximately 25 feet east of the proposed bridge
and one located approximately 150 feet east of the proposed bridge; further coordination
may be required with property owners to ensure property access during the construction
phase.

The proposed right of way varies from approximately 85 feet to 110 feet and would
require approximately 0.15 acres of proposed right-of-way acquisition and 0.90 acres of
proposed temporary construction and permanent drainage easements. Residential and
business relocations are not anticipated. The project is scheduled for right-of-way in
April 2021 and has a LET date of May 5, 2021.

An eight-mile off-site detour would be required for the full duration of construction. The
detour route would take vehicles on SR 1134 (Millingport Road), SR 1449 (Sunnybrook
Road), SR 1434 (Rogers Road), SR 1451 (Paul’s Crossing Road), and SR 1447 (Frick
Road).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 2

Purpose and Need: NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 35
has a sufficiency rating of 33.52 out of a possible 100. The bridge’s status is identified as
Structurally Deficient in the Structure Safety Report published by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) from an inspection conducted on 05/02/2017. The purpose of
the project is to replace the structurally deficient bridge.

Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: It is anticipated that a Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3 Maintenance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) will be needed for the discharge of fill material into waters of the U.S. associated
with the project. Due to a Section 404 NWP No. 3 being needed, a corresponding Section
401 Water Quality General Certification No. 4132 from the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) would also be required. Pre-Construction Notification to the
USACE and NCDWR will be completed, as needed, based on permanent and temporary
impacts to streams resulting from final design. If mitigation is required then it is anticipated
that the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services’ (DMS) in-lieu fee program will be used.

Cultural Resources: NCDOT Cultural Resource staff reviewed the project for Historic
Architectural and Archeological Resources. A No Survey Required Form for Historic
Architecture and Landscapes was provided through ETRACS by a NCDOT Architectural
Historian on January 23, 2019. Additionally, a No Archaeological Survey Required Form
was provided by a NCDOT Archaeologist on February 14, 2019.

Threatened and Endangered Species: STV Engineers, Inc. (STV) conducted field
reviews of an approximate 3.5-acre study area on November 1, 2019. Prior to the field
reviews, STV reviewed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) online databases for information related to the
occurrence of federal and state protected (threatened or endangered) species in Stanly
County. The USFWS Raleigh Field Office online protected species database, updated June
27, 2018, lists three federally protected species as occurring or having the potential to occur
in Stanly County including the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which is protected
under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. As of June 12, 2019, the NCNHP lists no
occurrences of federally protected species within one mile of the study area.

Review of the NCNHP element occurrence records on June 12, 2019 revealed no
documented occurrences or populations of Schweinitz’s sunflower in the study area or
within one mile of the study area. STV Environmental Scientists conducted field surveys
for the presence of Schweinitz’s sunflowers on November 1, 2019 during the flowering
season and USFWS-designated optimum survey window. Suitable habitat was found along
the SR 1134 (Millingport Road) roadside and woodland edges, but no sunflowers were
observed. Based on the literature review and field survey conducted during the flowering
season, it is determined that the project would have no effect on Schweinitz’s sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii).

Based on review of the USFWS Asheville Field Office’s online database on June 12,
2019, no known NLEB hibernation or maternity sites have been documented within
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 3
Stanly County. A review of the NCNHP records obtained on May 6, 2019 revealed no
known occurrences of NLEB within the study area or within one mile of the study area.
Field reviews conducted by STV on November 1, 2019 concluded that no caves or mines
(potential hibernacula) exist in the study area and no evidence of bats was discovered
upon inspection of the bridge; however, potential foraging and roosting habitat, including
trees and the air space above Long Creek, is present.

Since this project is state funded, the USACE will act as the lead federal agency for issues
related to the NLEB. The USACE has developed a Standard Local Operations Procedure
for Endangered Species (SLOPES) to address Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) when they
are the lead agency, which NCDOT will follow for this project. This procedure applies to
projects in NCDOT Divisions 9-14. The requirements of the SLOPES for the NLEB will
be completed prior to Let and will be submitted USACE. Based on the findings and in
conforming to SLOPES procedures it has been determined that the USACE’s Alternative
Local Procedure (ALP) Situation 1 would be applicable. The biological conclusion for
NLEB is May Effect, however, NLEB is exempt due to consistency with the 4(d) rule.

Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act: The bald eagle is protected under the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act as regulated by the USFWS. Habitat for the bald
eagle primarily consists of mature forests found in association with rivers and other large
bodies of open water utilized for foraging. Large dominant trees, typically located within
one mile of these waters, are used as nesting sites. Prior to conducting field reviews, a
desktop-GIS assessment of the study area and an area within a one-mile radius of the
project limits was performed. Specifically, aerial photographs were reviewed to identify
any areas of potential foraging habitat. No water bodies large enough to be considered
potential foraging habitat for the bald eagle were identified within the study area or one-
mile radius; therefore, it has been determined that no field surveys for the species are
necessary. Review of the NCNHP element occurrence records obtained on June 12, 2019
revealed no known occurrences of bald eagle within one mile of the study area. Based on
the desktop review and NCNHP element occurrence records, it is determined that the
project would have no effect on the bald eagle.

Special Project Information:

Floodplain: This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-
regulated stream, Long Creek, which is classified as an AE floodplain and is at high risk
of flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program. Consequently, the Hydraulics
Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), to determine
status of project regarding applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement, or
approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter
of Map Revision (LOMR).

Environmental Commitments: Greensheet Commitments are located at the end of the
checklist.

Estimated Costs (FY 2021):
Utility $ 20,000
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 4
Right-of-Way $ 47,500
Construction $ 1,265,000
Total $ 1,332,500

Traffic Information:
Current (2019)* 1,400 vpd
Year (2045)* 1,800 vpd
TTST 1%
DUALS 2%
(Source: STV Bridge No.35, Millingport Road/R No. 17.BP.10.R.147 AADT Growth Memorandum AADT
Growth Memorandum, June 2019)

Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: There are no existing bicycle facilities along
SR 1134 (Millingport Road). Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are not proposed for this
project. SR 1134 (Millingport Road) is identified as Route #2 in the Stanly County
Bicycle Route Map. The Stanly County bicycle route system consists of signed bike
routes which do not include any special accommodating bicycle facilities such as paved
shoulders or bike lanes.

Farmland: According to Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil-survey,
approximately 4.11 acres of Prime Farmland, 2.54 acres Prime farmland if drained and
either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season and
11.80 acres of Farmland of Statewide Importance are within the Project Study Area.

Preliminary design plans indicate that the proposed ROW acquisition and proposed
temporary construction easements and permanent drainage easement would impact
approximately 0.17 acres of soil classified as “Prime farmland if drained and either
protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season.”

Based on spatial information from the Stanly County GIS Department accessed on March
27, 2020, there are no Voluntary Agricultural Districts (VADs) or Enhance Voluntary
Agricultural Districts (EVADs) within the Project Study Area. Based on aerial imagery
and local input, it appears there is existing cultivated farmland within the Project Study
Area. Proposed temporary construction easements may impact existing cultivated areas
along SR 1134 (Millingport Road) on the eastern approach of the project. Farming
operations in the vicinity of the bridge may be affected temporarily during construction
by using the proposed eight-mile offsite detour route.

Alternatives Discussion:

No Build – The no build alternative would not replace a structurally deficient
bridge, and thus is not a viable option.

Rehabilitation – Rehabilitation would not address the structurally deficient
nature of the bridge.

Onsite Detour – An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the feasibility of the
offsite detour.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 5

New Alignment – Given that the existing alignment for SR 1134 (Millingport
Road) is acceptable, a new alignment was not considered as an alternative.

Offsite Detour – An approximately eight-mile off-site detour would be required
for the full duration of construction. The detour route would take vehicles on SR
1134 (Millingport Road), SR 1449 (Sunnybrook Road), SR 1434 (Rogers Road),
SR 1451 (Paul’s Crossing Road), and SR 1447 (Frick Road).

Other Agency Comments:
A Tribal Coordination Letter was sent out on January 13, 2021 to the representative of
the Catawba Indian Nation, per the NCDOT Tribal Coordination Guidance (dated
6/26/19). To date, no responses have been received.

A Local School Input Form was sent to Stanly County School System Transportation
Director on 11/5/2019, with follow up emails on 1/10/2020 and 3/12/2020. No comments
were received.

Local EMS Input Forms were sent to the Stanly County Emergency Management
Director and the Stanly County Emergency Medical Services Manager on 11/5/2019,
1/10/2020 and 3/12/2020. No comments were received.

A Planner Input Form was sent to Stanly County Planning and Zoning Department on
11/5/2019. The Stanly County Planning Director indicated SR 1134 (Millingport Road)
has no bike lanes but is popular route for bicyclists. Also noted in the input form were
active agricultural operations within the vicinity of the project including Sunnybrook
Farm as well as other leased fields in the general area surrounding the bridge.
Sunnybrook Farm is listed as an Agricultural District with a large field operation and is
located approximately 0.75 mile west of the bridge location outside of the Project Study
Area. Additionally, farm support services within the general vicinity of the project were
noted but are located outside of the Project Study Area. Stanly County Planning Director
checked that replacing Bridge No. 35 would have a low overall impact for local planning
objectives but also noted that bridge closure would be significant as SR 1134
(Millingport Road) is utilized as a major connector road.

Response: According to the Bicycling Stanly County Map, identifies SR 1134 (Millingport
Road) as a bike route (Route #2). As noted in Stanly County Bicycle Route Map, the bike
routes are signed, on-street routes that predominately utilize local roads and do not
include any special accommodations for bicycles, such as paved shoulders or bike lanes.
There are no adopted local plans or proposed projects that identify constructing bicycle
facilities along SR 1134 (Millingport Road).

Based on spatial information from the Stanly County GIS Department accessed on March
27, 2020, there are no Voluntary Agricultural Districts (VADs) or Enhance Voluntary
Agricultural Districts (EVADs) within the Project Study Area. Sunnybrook Farm is
located approximately 0.75 to 1 mile west of the Bridge No. 35 on Sunnybrook Road.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 6
Farming operations and supporting facilities in the vicinity of the bridge may be affected
temporarily during construction by using the proposed offsite detour route. Coordination
would occur through the NCDOT and the owners of the agricultural properties that may
be impacted by the project.

Public Involvement: Public involvement was not requested by NCDOT Division 10 for
this project.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 7
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA

Item 1 to be completed by the Engineer. YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required?

If the answer to number 1 is “no”, then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.

If yes, under which category? #9 (Reconstruction of existing crossroad or
railroad separation and existing stream
crossings, including, but not limited to,
pipes, culverts, and bridges.)

PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS

Items 2 – 4 to be completed by the Engineer. YES NO
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?

3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health
or the environment?

4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?

Item 5-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or
unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational,
archaeological, or historical value?

6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?

7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?

DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 8
YES NO
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats?

PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS

Items 9- 12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer. YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?

10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
fill in waters of the United States?

11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?

12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?

Items 13 – 15 to be completed by the Engineer.
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?

Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an “effect” on a property or site listed on the
National Register of Historic Places?

15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?

Response to Question 9: The USFWS Raleigh Field Office online protected species
database, updated June 27, 2018, lists three federally protected species as occurring or
having the potential to occur in Stanly County including the bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) which is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. As of
June 12, 2019, the NCNHP lists no occurrences of federally protected species within one
mile of the study area.

As of June 27, 2018, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) county page
lists three federally protected species, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for Stanly
County: Schweinitz’s sunflower, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) and the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act.

Review of the NCNHP element occurrence records on June 12, 2019 revealed no
documented occurrences or populations of Schweinitz’s sunflower in the study area or
within one mile of the study area. STV Environmental Scientists conducted field surveys
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 9
for the presence of Schweinitz’s sunflowers on November 1, 2019 during the flowering
season and USFWS-designated optimum survey window. Suitable habitat was found along
the SR 1134 (Millingport Road) roadside and woodland edges, but no sunflowers were
observed. Based on the literature review and field survey conducted during the flowering
season, it is determined that the project would have no effect on Schweinitz’s sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii).

Based on review of the USFWS Asheville Field Office’s online database on June 12, 2019,
no known NLEB hibernation or maternity sites have been documented within Stanly
County. A review of the NCNHP records obtained on May 6, 2019 revealed no known
occurrences of NLEB within the study area or within one mile of the study area. Field
reviews conducted by STV on November 1, 2019 concluded that no caves or mines
(potential hibernacula) exist in the study area and no evidence of bats was discovered upon
inspection of the bridge; however, potential foraging and roosting habitat, including trees
and the air space above Long Creek, is present. The project may require tree clearing or
pile driving but no blasting or percussive activities are anticipated. Based on the findings
and in conforming to SLOPES procedures it has been determined that the USACE’s
Alternative Local Procedure (ALP) Situation 1 would be applicable. The biological
conclusion for NLEB is May Effect, however, NLEB is exempt due to consistency with
the 4(d) rule.

Response to Question 10: A Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 3 from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) is anticipated. It is estimated that there would be
approximately 131 linear feet of temporary stream impacts. No permanent wetland or
stream impacts are anticipated. Stream relocations and/or channel modifications are not
anticipated. No jurisdictional wetland areas were identified and delineated within the
study area.

Potential permanent fill impacts due to bridge construction may occur to Long Creek but
will be avoided if possible and minimized if necessary.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1

02/10/21 10

Prepared by: Date:
Jacob Elliott, AICP
STV Engineers Inc., Transportation Planner

Reviewed by: Date:
Larry Thompson, PWS, LSS
Division PDEA Engineer

Date:

Garland Haywood, PE
Division Project Development Engineer

DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1
2/10/2021
2/10/2021
2/10/2021

02/10/21 11
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Bridge No. 35, SR 1134 (Millingport Road) over Long Creek
WBS No. 17BP.10.PE.147

FEMA Coordination
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program
(FMP), to determine status of project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S
Memorandum of Agreement, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).

This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-regulated
stream(s). Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans
to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the
drainage structure(s) and roadway embankment that are located within the 100-
year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally
and vertically.

Stormwater
NCDOT “Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters” will
be utilized throughout the life of the project. Erosion and sediment will be
controlled through the specification, installation, and maintenance of more
stringent erosion and sedimentation control methods.

Agricultural Land Use
Farming operations in the vicinity of the bridge may be affected temporarily
during construction by using the approximately 8-mile offsite detour route.
Additionally, existing farmland could be impacted by proposed temporary
construction easements along the project’s eastern approach along SR 1134
(Millingport Road). Coordination between NCDOT and the owners of the
agricultural lands that are temporarily impacted by the offsite detour should occur
through right of way.

Property Owner Coordination
Continued coordination may be required with property owner during construction
for tie-in to two driveways east of the bridge location on SR 1134 (Millingport
Road).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 34EFF0BC-B250-4488-8B7C-CF376FA8FBC1
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program
Bridge No. 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP 50

Attachment D

Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form; No
Archaeological Survey Required Form
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 10
19-01-0008

NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No: na County: Stanly
WBS No: 17BP.10.R.147 Document: MCC
F.A. No: na Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: USACE

Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 10 intends to
replace Bridge No. 35 on SR 1134, Millingport Road, over Long Creek southwest of Richfield. No
preliminary designs were available at the time of the archaeological screening, but a study area for the
project was submitted that measured 713.35 feet (nearly 217.43 meters) long and 200 feet (60.96 meters)
wide. This study area encompasses nearly 3.28 acres (almost 1.33 hectares). The establishment of an
area of potential effects (APE) for the proposed project is discussed below.

SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW

Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
In 2015, a request for archaeological screening was submitted for the proposed replacement of Bridge No.
35 on SR 1134, Millingport Road, over Long Creek (TIP No. B-5537; PA No. 15-02-0048). On March
26, 2015, a reconnaissance investigation was recommended for the proposed bridge replacement project.
At that time, aerial photography and historic mapping were interpreted to suggest an earlier road crossing
or mill features to the north of the existing transportation features. It was also noted that the project was
in close proximity to the recorded locations of the Miller House (ST0079), The Alonzo Miller Roadside
House (ST0081) and opposite the study-listed Henderson Rogers Farm. This assessment was further
reinforced by the results of the historic architecture survey, which was conducted in July 2015 by
NCDOT architectural historian, Kate Husband, who noted the remains of a mill dam “just north of the
bridge”. Those remains were note considered to be an eligible resource for the purposes of the historic
architecture survey.

This archaeological reconnaissance survey was conducted on March 10, 2017, by NCDOT archaeologists
Shane Petersen and Brian Overton. The investigation included a visual inspection of the entire proposed
APE. The existing 60-foot ROW along SR 1134 is characterized by severe disturbances associated with
the construction and maintenance of the extant transportation facilities. These disturbances include
grading, ditching, and cut banks, as well as presumed areas of fill. In the areas immediately adjacent
existing ROW, much of the APE is dominated by sloped landforms with a narrow alluvial terrace at the
base of the slope. No subsurface testing was deemed necessary for the proposed APE, and it is
considered very unlikely that any archaeological resources of significance would remain intact within
those areas.

As reported by Husband, the remains of a mill complex are clearly visible to the north of Bridge No. 35.
An examination of historic mapping isn’t definitive about the date that the mill first appears; the mill
pond can clearly be seen on the 1920 Rural Delivery Map for Stanly County and the structures that are
presumable associated with the mill building are illustrated on the 1938 State Highway Map for Stanly
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 10
19-01-0008
County straddling Long Creek. The earliest mapping identified depicting the mill pond, however, was the
1916 Soil Map for Stanly County. There is some evidence that Millingport road may have been
originally oriented slightly farther north than the existing alignment (at least of the eastern side of Long
Creek) prior to 1970, when the existing bridge was constructed. Some of the earlier mapping, including
earlier United States Geologic Service maps, suggests the alignment might have been further north. The
area immediately adjacent ROW to the north of SR 1134 and east of Long Creek appears to be graded as
if it was once a road bed. Additionally, along the north side of SR 1134, but to the west of Long Creek,
an old ROW marker was noted roughly 17 feet (more than 5 meters) from the edge of pavement along
Millingport Road.

In any case, extant features observed included remnants of the stone dam, the stone and concrete mill
foundation (including what appeared to be a possible turbine bay), and concrete piers. No mill machinery
was observed on site. These features, recorded as site 31ST243**, were photographed and mapped via
GPS. Site 31ST243** was originally determined to lay well outside the proposed project area for B-
5537; the closest feature (a concrete pier) is located more than 67 feet (nearly 21 meters) north of the edge
of pavement on SR 1134 and nearly 33 feet (about 10 meters) north of the then-proposed APE. The
exception to this earlier assessment lies in the mill dam. The westernmost end of the dam extended into
the proposed ROW for B-5537 and ties into the existing easement along SR 1448, Miller Road. Cut-and-
fill lines depicted on designs for the B-5537 project were located immediately adjacent the mapped end of
the dam. Impacts associated with improvements to the SR 11334/SR1448 intersection to the mill dam
based on the B-5537 designs were considered insignificant in 2017 (though a very small portion will be
located in the new ROW).

To the southwest of Bridge No. 35, a cinder-block retaining wall/foundation remnant was observed at the
outside edge of the proposed APE (but outside proposed cut-and-fill lines). It is likely that these
structural remains are a good deal younger than the mill on Long Creek, although it is possible that the
structure was related at some point in the past. These structural remains were photographed and mapped
via GPS in the same way that 31ST243** was recorded, although they were not considered likely to be
impacted by the B-5537 designs either.

The current study area for the bridge replacement is considerably larger than the 1.9-acre area
encompassed by the APE in 2017 based on the B-5537 designs. Based on consultation with engineering
staff at NCDOT Division 10 (vis email on January 16, 2019), the APE for B-5537 will be considered to
be the current APE rather than the submitted study area for the purposes of this archaeological screening.

Given the location of the significant portions of 31ST243** well outside the proposed APE, this site is
not expected to be impacted by the current project. As per the conclusions of a meeting with the review
staff at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on April 20, 2017, a site for m will be
completed and submitted to OSA. But, neither further archaeological or documentary investigations, nor
attempts to determine the eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places of 31ST243** will be
undertaken as a result of the bridge replacement project as currently proposed. The bridge replacement
project, as currently proposed, will be considered to be compliant with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and North Carolina General Statute 121-12(a).

No further archaeological investigations are required for the project within the area established as the
current APE. Should the project change to include a larger footprint than covered by the current APE,
further consultation will be necessary. If the proposed project expands into the core portions of the mill
site, a full evaluation of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility will be required for site
31ST243**. In the unlikely event that archaeological remains are encountered during the bridge
replacement project, work should cease in that area and the NCDOT Archaeology Group should be
notified immediately.

Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 10
19-01-0008
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The original APE was subjected to archaeological examination on March 10, 2017 and cultural features in
that vicinity were documented. This original APE, as outlined above, is considered to be the current APE
for the proposed project. No additional archaeological resources of significance are expected within this
area and no further investigations should be necessary as long as the APE does not expand from the 2017
limits.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Other: soil map

FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED

February 14, 2019
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 10
19-01-0008

Aerial photograph with 2-contours of the location for the APE (light green lines) for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 35 on SR 1134; note the APE for B-5537 (red lines), cultural (structural)
features including at site 31ST243** (orange crosshatched polygons), the old ROW marker (yellow dot),
and the historic Miller House location (blue dot).
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 10
19-01-0008

View of Bridge No. 35 and the proposed APE at the intersection of Millingport Road and Miller Road
(facing east).

View of Bridge No. 35 from the north side of SR 1134 adjacent the Miller House property (facing west).

Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 10
19-01-0008

Cinder-block foundation cut into the ridge-slope southwest of Bridge No. 35 (facing southwest).

View of mill remains from deck of Bridge No. 35 (facing north).

Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
7 of 10
19-01-0008

Detail of the 1920 Rural Delivery Routes Map illustrating the location of the millpond along Long Creek
(red circle) at the project location.

Detail of the 1938 Stanly County Highway Map illustrating the location of the mill complex on Long
Creek (red circle) at the project location.
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
8 of 10
19-01-0008

Detail of the 1916 Soil Map for Stanly County illustrating the location of the mill pond along Long Creek
at the project area (red circle).

View of the eastern terminus of the proposed project adjacent the Miller House and a possible earlier road
cut at the crossing of Long Creek.

Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
9 of 10
19-01-0008

View of concrete support piers south of the concrete and stone mill foundation (facing north).

Concrete mill foundation wall, stone dam, and possible turbine bay (facing west).
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
10 of 10
19-01-0008

Rock wall mill foundation along Long Creek with Bridge No. 35 in background (facing southwest).

Stone mill dam along Long Creek at breach (facing southeast).

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program
Bridge No. 035 on SR 1134 over Long Creek – PCN for RGP 50

Attachment E

T & E Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information – Stanly 035
Supplemental Information
ePCN Form – NCDOT Division 10 – SR 1134 (Millingport Road) over Long Creek
Project Number 17BP.10.PE.147

Endangered Species and Critical Habitat

STV Engineers, Inc. (STV) conducted field reviews of an approximate 3.5-acre study area on
November 1, 2019 and August 30, 2022. Prior to the field reviews, STV reviewed the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) online
databases for information related to the occurrence of federal and state protected (threatened or
endangered) species in Stanly County. The USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) was used to obtain an official species list on October 26, 2022. IPaC lists one federally
protected species as occurring or having the potential to occur in the study area (Table 1) as well
as the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act. Additionally, the Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) has been proposed
endangered and is included although the species is not currently protected. As of October 3, 2022,
the NCNHP lists no occurrences of federally protected species within one mile of the study area.
A brief description of each species, including habitat requirements and physical characteristics,
and biological conclusion rendered based on surveys of the study area follow. Habitat requirements
for each species are based on current available literature and/or the USFWS.

Table 1. ESA federally protected species potentially occurring within the study area
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz’s sunflower E Yes No Effect
Perimyotis subflavus Tricolored bat PE Yes Unresolved
E – Endangered
PE – Proposed Endangered

Schweinitz’s sunflower
USFWS optimal survey window: Late August - October

Schweinitz’s sunflower is a perennial herbaceous plant species limited to the Piedmont regions
and counties of North and South Carolina. The plant grows from one to two meters tall originating
from a cluster of tuberous roots. The plant’s flower consists of yellow disk and ray flowers formed
on small heads less than 1.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter. The petals, or modified leaves, are two
to three cm long. The lanceolate leaves are arranged in an opposite pattern within the lower two-
thirds of the stem transitioning to alternate within the upper third. The typical habitat for
Schweinitz’s sunflower includes periodically maintained roadsides and utility line rights -of-way
(R/Ws), old pastures, edges of upland woods, and other disturbed open areas. Soils associated
with suitable Schweinitz’s sunflower habitat generally include thin upland soils clayey in texture
(and often with substantial rock fragments) which have a high shrink-swell capacity. Flowering
occurs from August to the first frost of the year.

Supplemental Information – Stanly 035
STV Environmental Scientists Joshua Kotheimer, PWS conducted field surveys for the presence
of Schweinitz’s sunflowers on November 1, 2019, and August 30, 2022, during the flowering
season and USFWS-designated optimum survey window. Suitable habitat was found along the SR
1134 roadside and woodland edges, but no sunflowers were observed. Review of the NCNHP
element occurrence records on October 3, 2022, revealed no documented occurrences or
populations of Schweinitz’s sunflower in the study area or within one mile of the study area. Based
on the literature review and field survey conducted during the flowering season, it is determined
that the project would have ‘No Effect’ on Schweinitz’s sunflower.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect

Tricolored bat
USFWS optimal survey window: Undetermined

The Tricolored bat is one of the smallest bats native to North America with a body length of 3-3.5
inches. The Tricolored bat is distinguished by its unique tricolored fur that is dark at the tip and
base and lighter in the middle. Tricolored bats often appear orange to a pale yellow but may also
appear black, chocolate brown, or silvery-gray. Young Tricolored bats appear much darker than
the grayer adults. The range for the Tricolored bat stretches from Central America to Canada
including central and eastern United States. During the winter, Tricolored bats are found in mines
and caves. Where caves are sparse like the southern United States, Tricolored bats have been found
roosting in road-associated culverts, tree cavities and abandoned water wells. During the fall,
summer, and spring Tricolored bats are found in forested habitats. Tricolored bats primarily roost
among dead and live leaf clusters of live or recently dead deciduous hardwood trees. In the
southern portion of their range Tricolored bats will roost in Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides)
Other roosting spots include, eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), barns, beneath porch roofs,
bridges, and concrete bunkers. Female Tricolored bats often return to the same summer roosting
locations year after year. In early evenings Tricolored bats forage at or above the tree level. Later
in the evening the Tricolored bat is more commonly found foraging over waterways and forests
edges.

Review of the NCNHP records obtained on October 3, 2022, revealed no known occurrences of
Tricolored bat within the study area or within one mile of the study area. Currently there is not a
protocol for the Tricolored bat as it is proposed for listing and is not yet afforded protection under
the Endangered Species Act. The Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) was proposed for listing
as Endangered by the USFWS in September 2022. If required, the Tricolored bat will be revisited
under new guidance set forth by the USFWS. NCDOT is committed to completing a bat assessment
of appropriately sized structures within 30 days of removal. Due to the anticipated future listing
the project has a biological conclusion of ‘Unresolved’ for Tricolored bat.
Biological Conclusion: Unresolved

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The bald eagle is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act as regulated by the
USFWS. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests found in association with
rivers and other large bodies of open water utilized for foraging. Large dominant trees, typically
located within one mile of these waters, are used as nesting sites.

Supplemental Information – Stanly 035
Prior to conducting field reviews, a desktop-GIS assessment of the study area and an area within
a one-mile radius of the project limits was performed. Specifically, aerial photographs were
reviewed to identify any areas of potential foraging habitat. No water bodies large enough to be
considered potential foraging habitat for the bald eagle were identified within the study area or
one-mile radius; therefore, it has been determined that no field surveys for the species are
necessary. Review of the NCNHP element occurrence records obtained on October 3, 2022,
revealed no known occurrences of bald eagle within one mile of the study area. Based on the
desktop review and NCNHP element occurrence records, it is determined that the project would
have no effect on bald eagle.