The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFW_ _External_ FW_ U-6018 Buffer Info Carpenter,Kristi From:Parker, Jerry A Sent:Monday, December 12, 2022 4:13 PM To:Conchilla, Ryan Subject:FW: \[External\] FW: U-6018 Buffer Info Ryan, See if this clears things up. Jerry From: Kayla Poulos <kpoulos@rameykemp.com> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:10 PM To: Parker, Jerry A <japarker3@ncdot.gov> Subject: \[External\] FW: U-6018 Buffer Info CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Jerry, Please see below. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything additional. Thanks! — Kayla M. Poulos, PE Transportation Design Engineer D 919 872 3949 | C 919 398 0063 From: Karen Hefner <khefner@mi-engineers.com> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:05 PM To: Kayla Poulos <kpoulos@rameykemp.com> Cc: Linda Johns <ljohns@mi-engineers.com> Subject: Re: U-6018 Buffer Info Kayla, If one were to review the Buffer & Permit drawings, side by side, one might see that there are 3 buffer impacts on Y3Rev and only 1 impact to Stream/Wetland on Y3Rev, which would indicate that there should be 2 less 1 impacts associated with the permit drawings. There is also a site on Y8 that has stream/wetland impacts, but no buffer impacts and there are buffer impacts, but no stream impact at L 44+97 - 46+10 Rt - therefore, those 2 areas are canceling out each other. Kinda summarized below.  Site 1 on Buffer Drawings - has 3 buffer impacts  Site 1 on Permit Drawings – as impacts at same buffer sites  Site 2 Permit Drawings, has NO BUFFER IMPACTS and does not correspond to Buffer Site 2  Site 2 on Buffer Drawing – has impacts but are not associated with Site 2 Permit Drawing  Site 3 on Permit Drawings has only ONE impact, which corresponds to Buffer Site 4 that has 2 impacts – where the little pond is within the buffer on Site 4. There is one impact on Site 4 Buffer that doesn’t have a stream impact and Site 5 on the Buffer has no stream impacts.  Site 3 on Buffer Drawings is at the large pond  Site 4, 5, & 6 on the Permit Drawings are Sites 6, 7, & 8 on the Buffer Drawings  So, there ARE 2 less stream/wetland impacts vs the buffer permit drawings. If there are any other questions, please let me know. Thanks, Karen Hefner, PE Hydraulics Project Engineer MI Engineering, PLLC 1011 Schaub Drive, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27606 Cell: 919-333-8976 Office: 919-851-6606 website: www.mi-engineers.com email: khefner@mi-engineers.com From: Kayla Poulos <kpoulos@rameykemp.com> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 1:46 PM To: Karen Hefner <khefner@mi-engineers.com> Cc: Linda Johns <ljohns@mi-engineers.com> Subject: Re: U-6018 Buffer Info 2 Karen, Have you had a chance to look into this? I just talked to Jerry and he said that he’s going to have to put the permit/project on hold if he doesn’t have an answer by first thing tomorrow morning. Could we get them something today? Thanks! — Kayla M. Poulos, PE Transportation Design Engineer D 919 872 3949 | T 919 872 5115 | C 919 398 0063 On Dec 8, 2022, at 5:40 PM, Karen Hefner <khefner@mi-engineers.com> wrote: I’ll try to look at this in the morning, hopefully… Sent from my iPhone On Dec 8, 2022, at 4:35 PM, Kayla Poulos <kpoulos@rameykemp.com> wrote: See below/attached from Jerry on U6018. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! — Kayla M. Poulos, PE Transportation Design Engineer D 919 872 3949 | C 919 398 0063 \[Text Description automatically generated\] <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frameykemp.co m%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ckpoulos%40rameykemp.com%7C04861ab7774048069c 5e08dad96d319b%7C0a14eb0718334f149619a5b18eac28cf%7C0%7C0%7C6380613602 62206363%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=58yVOK%2Fm0zTl SSEcjiLIHxfN3bXMIKGJVUBHBdw6rCo%3D&reserved=0> From: Parker, Jerry A <japarker3@ncdot.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 7:18 AM To: Kayla Poulos <kpoulos@rameykemp.com> Subject: FW: U-6018 Buffer Info Kayla, 3 Per our conversation, can you provide clarification for the DWR rep. Thanks. Jerry From: Conchilla, Ryan <ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov<mailto:ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov>> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 1:57 PM To: Parker, Jerry A <japarker3@ncdot.gov<mailto:japarker3@ncdot.gov>> Subject: FW: U-6018 Buffer Info Jerry, Thanks for the additional info. In the updated buffer drawings attached, the impact table on page 12 lists 8 impact sites. In the revised permit drawings forwarded yesterday, the impact table listed on page 10 of 11 has 6 impact sites. Can you provide clarification to the difference? Ryan Conchilla, PWS Environmental Specialist II 401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 7+8) Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality 919-707-9111 office Ryan.Conchilla@ncdenr.gov<mailto:Ryan.Conchilla@ncdenr.gov> \[cid:image002.png@01D90A42.DDCA4400\] From: Parker, Jerry A <japarker3@ncdot.gov<mailto:japarker3@ncdot.gov>> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:39 PM To: Conchilla, Ryan <ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov<mailto:ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov>> Subject: U-6018 Buffer Info Ryan, See attached. 4 Jerry Jerry Parker Environmental Supervisor Division 7 North Carolina Department of Transportation 336 256 2063 office jparker@ncdot.gov<mailto:jparker@ncdot.gov> 1584 Yanceyville St. P.O. Box 14996 Greensboro, NC. 27415-4996 \[cid:image001.png@01D90A38.E619B0F0\] ________________________________ Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. ________________________________ Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 5