NC0000094_Waste Load Allocation_19830622

,?,- C!

For Appropriate Dischargers, list Complete Guideline limitations Below
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Maximum Daily
Average
Comments
30�
b I 4P�`
�0 3� 8
st
heKo�
S
—rlpirlt CIC
Type of Product Produced
Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
X — oV `e— '
/5-./,4960
O CFS 0.

REQUEST N0. 568
##################### WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM #####################
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7010 S 328 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
CRANSTON PRINT WORKS
TEXTILE
S HENDERSON
ASHEVILLE
FRENCH BROAD R.
W7910 2 403
2 550 SQ.MI.
REQUESTOR
SUBBASIN t
CFS 3092 !
STREAM CLASS
R. BAIRD
040302
597 CFS
A -I I
######################*# RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ########################
WASTEFLOW(S)
BOD -5
NH3-N
D.O.
PH
FECAL COLIFORM
TSS
COD
SULFIDE
TOTAL CR
Me; (Y Mo.A�,! ou tr
(MOD) i �v •2 • �•5
(MID) S 1016, 2032.8
(MG/L)
(MG/L) S
(SU)
2
6-
(/IOOML):
(L#Sla)
S
2741.
482.4
LBS/D
2
13244
26488
LBS/D
S
30.
61.6
LBS/D
S
15.
30.8
PHENOLS ARE WO LIMITED IF
WATERS ARE A -IIS
0.085 MG/!.(MONTHLY AVG.)
IF: W * 1E RS RAS► M idlef
Ptl jewol:s W L6•. 1SE 8Pr �iH�T�O=
1S.'f
*/0^7
30.4 avoo y
o << . 00e�l
FACILITY IS t PROPOSED I EXISTING ( NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE S REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION < ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY**
MODELER
SUPERVISORYMODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR 1�
PERMITS MANAGER
S. --- - --DATE :_✓`ZS��
-
A T E
4/q/E3
i �__ 412 --DATE--

..,.�
oy
0OF
1 C
POOP
-•----.----�.._.� _ .�,c���cy..-:' --s
oopt
-P-
-- —
7 _taw
F.
�- r� -- -. lli -�► .tis.- • .v.. ,.— /.IjQ - _ � -y LI _ . �- ~a�i� ✓ --.
Y �r�!�•`.�- _ ..Ir.r./.� __ � - ..-N �•�-. r.sYa _. _ •.r.s/.-. r.. +s.MM�w-� a.•_r..ur.F+�•+M.s- -s -ter cM�... •�+•�t•.+ . v s
-•.mow. , F `
... � _ . ..._._ - .•rte- � � ��. _ .,., f - a �r.�..rs•.. �. ... ^ �,,-..•�.c.-.' k,4,.». �.� -.a.,i .
_ w.... --..11:..•�,�+•�;,,1� ..__.s �:y.ti._ :r.._._ ..,�.' ..,.,..:.;.i__....--..ri.i-f'.�.o.�.._.._�.». :i:,:.... �.�r-..-...,....-.,�e� .. .:.«.. .... ._.-.

13
f,vl 111 --�O , --�-
A-_
p 3q Lot,
oA 00
Ito13
107110 `' �o
Pr -1 , + w or I -S

ror pckrjoc-sr- wf lic
v 1 r h OR (X-
vm
cc -r1ow c a:4—
wt k -c, lo u) ptt All,
J�
Ca n� Ctr-< a /� xC
-74`
-- 2
i

Tkc�
kyuk-
,...._�, ,
74
cr
4-
0.6%
(4r
CtX-
c t 4 -

t,�.�af -,� 6t,
1 s<�n-F
P-La� -I-
FloFI ct,r
ur - Z32,-4- -Fs
6 D 4rov,-
,p Di, n
ty e/— D, 9
L.. 3 r 9 ►.
Ila- - , f, z ;
l� Z ►�►'
���a�� t�
Z? x)
19
ons ; z
u

M

oig
�14�31913
FL,J, FSP i C- = ((S: �)/(%, 3rX a �s� = D. -738
cam`
o t 3 C3C -t✓ (3, T �)(�)
VW Cote— Y\ - 0 , ?3 7 Qok:-

�u FO Tulip: ►1�FBI r1w
TO: Forrest Westall, Head
Operations Branch
THROUGH:
FROM:
Roy M. Davis, Regional SL
Division of Environmental
Heath P. Dobson, Regional
Water Quality Section
Gary T. Tweed, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 9, 1983
SUBJECT: Proposed Reclassification of French Broad River
Over the past several months the Asheville Regional Office has discussed
with both Permits and Wasteload Allocations Staff the proposed reclassifica-
tion of the French Broad River to A -II and the effects this will have on dis-
charge limitations of facilities in the sub -basin. In order to properly dis-
cuss this matter at the public hearing on reclassification and with each
point source a review of allocations is necessary. Please review the follow-
ing facilities allocations with respect to the reclassification.
Faci 1 i ty
Receiving Stream Design
Flow MGD
Proposed A- I I Stream
CP&L
French Broad
1.9
Yes
Cranston Print
French Broad d
2.5
Yes
Hendersonville
Mud Creek
2.3
No
General Electric
Bat Fork Creek4OA -
1.5
No
Brevard
Kings Creek Q,K
1.5
No
Olin
French Broad
27.3
No
DuPont
Little River 441L;v
2.5
No
U.S.F.S.-Lake
Powhatan
Bent Creek
.015
No
Bent Creek Sub-
ub-
division
division
Wesley Creek
0.10
No
The proposed point of water intake for Asheville is tentatively just
downstream of the confluence of Bent Creek with the French Broad River.
The upper limit of reclassification is tentatively N.C. Highway 191 Bridge
over the French Broad. It is already known that phenols will be an issue
at Cranston Print Works. The Staff will be obtaining data on phenol dis-
charges in the Basin from other major sources. Please provide this infor-
mation as soon as possible. You may wish to discuss this with Lloyd Tyler
with respect to the reclassification.
GTT/mkd
cc: Lloyd Tyler

'v %/'^'�' Vii• �' �
o
Heri
ca / G BBMCBMBE CB
�s
{ o a Cr- ` Ashworth rth �4� P, A
Br
_ 9
Cr
U 3 , L �r��e d r' Cr
/1ye66 Cr-�3} BryJ C.
/J J' Cu sh o� E
o
1 Fur g a, �• �_-.,
FRi`.1'CI,r Bre a Gay
j ./] IIS i� � ' C .► � T• .
Pole
o�w v ✓ ¢t5 gw y a._ 1 Le) of.
c.
" ( I" Q
[• }
u G �4' ' r.
BQ
� o fi ��? o\\� i` ill Po 0 i
/c
21 G oQ rte-
. G` c Z` � 4t
` moo►` fezoA r i� fGq� Shaw r v
i!!o ale
w i
y
c' W ,kill
Oe
�Jt wW South / ° o o ill Cr cr P
aa,vyo Stone10
C
V,
�
c CrGt acv C'
41 c
ef
00
oRVi
v
• � � z -
Catheys Cr a� a
iv.
`ugh
Carson Cr
t 4 p\�
1 V eve
� l _c• r \ }\ ��