440058_Inspection_20221206 (2)

AR Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Date of Visit: I UsiArrival Time: Departure Time: /L=y' County: / dbAegion: AP-0
Farm Name: Ag cc -mod DA-t Owner Email (2 (�/�([J_ry'A-"4 (�2 D2��
Owner Name: `L��EAnU %lQzt"�fur� Phone:
Mailing Address:��rj�
Physical Address
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
?To e t NZ.Cqq
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 4yJB ;V35�3
Certification Number:
Latitude: ,i 4 r, r�- Gr Longitude: Fotp�3 1 arp 0
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No EM NA [% NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ER�NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
rfNE
Page 1 of 51122020 Continued

Facility Number: - 5'g Date of Inspection: t27 z a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
E. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 tract rc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 8-2, tr
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
®. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
C,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
�, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
/
it No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
l0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
�/
NE
EA
maintenance or improvement?
T`
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
4NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Hue Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Types)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. De the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
<LINE
15. Dees the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[5 NE
acres determination?
17. Dees the Facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[ENE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EINE
Resulted Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA En -NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA [Ri NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Dees record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA [�3-NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Cade
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA aNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain randreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA fjkNE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: IDate of Inc ection:
`L8'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA E�_NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA Of NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structures) and date of first survey indicating noncompliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA 51�NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphoms loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA [ZtNE
TT
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA 6 - E
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA Z_NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA 54NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
,,,,,,______,,,,,,((((((
❑ NA ry� NE
''rr
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA E,2�NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ONE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA R�NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
51
I�e /k +emu £� hvyas7SGw� Cmu�I� 1�0^ c��s
/. eCav 1..UefMcow`� )ti` ?lntcl — fJt-tccF�
`7i3caS�d �e c 3S1�. � uoe-p �u�d u re5° �ct i�c�•� J -
Reviewer/lnspec[orName: � N +—O\,c Phone: �zfs-aRb"�i�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � � Date: 12-(C'/2'V>_�
Page 3 of 3 51121 020

Asa cattle facility that is below threshold for more than 3 years and is in compliance, you are eligible to
request rescission of your permit without closing the waste storage structure prior to rescission. Your
facility would then be considered deemed permitted as long as you stay below the 100 confined cattle
threshold. If you ever wish to increase your herd to exceed the 100 confined cattle threshold, they
would be considered a new facility and would be required to meet the standards in place at that
time. The waste structure must be maintained to prevent any discharge to surface waters, but no
specific records are required. Once no longer needed/in use, the structure will eventually need to be
closed to NRCS standards. The timing of that closure is completely at the discretion of the owner.
As a deemed facility, they would not be subject to routine inspections, etc. However, the rules for
deemed facilities 15A NCAC 02T.1303 does require that the waste be applied at no greater than
agronomic rates. You have an existing waste plan, so you know what agronomic rates are, but you will
need to take waste samples for analysis and track application rates to be sure you are not over applying.
Those records would not be required for us to review, but would be for their own benefit and to
demonstrate compliance should a problem ever arise.
Below is the address to send a request for a rescission of your permit if you choose to do so.
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636