440036_Inspection_20221206 (2)

40 Division of Water: Resources
Facility Number ® - O Division of Soft and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: r/�ry`/ /' "` Arrival Time:
/ r�2,�s n Departure
Time: F(' .ic. County: � /�JtL�C'Region:
Farm Name:—'�-r�1j--t�`.i—�� r1JC ��,�[� I / i �(r//� D/ f F- / Owner Email: T
Owner Name: a>�[/]g_pd� [LPk--P Phone:-/'�U-��
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: `` tJU, -�- Title: Phone: �I/
���tc�de.YC d2..-$3 -y
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
FOP L L`�"Itj .-fz'lelo F-rv-/ i —0- / /Lce �e..f•
—n'OE�/ 2,kf 6.5- /M"to--e— y-n C l�w1z _ Cl2ea1e —
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of
[:]Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Z.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
F;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
511212020 Continued

Facili Number: IDateoflns ection: /J—
-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes'Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�Stmectur{.7Tl J,,, Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
t�C
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:_
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes 2� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste AUnlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yea ED'No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement? �"
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ISµ1No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Chound ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.))
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Pare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): .cJ v r
❑ NE
❑ NE
13. Soil Type(s): /,)`7,�P_ ai,&'_ ,siz,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
®-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�ZLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E':2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
mil No
i�
❑ NA
❑ NE
Remitted Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E71_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall
Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on it equipment?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
214120I5 Continued

Facili Number: IDate of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JANo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes gNo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes WNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes M-No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONc
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E�ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[$No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [T_No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes O-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA El NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any XES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawines of facility to better exolain situations fuse additional mares as necessarvl.
<c�SYeri^ rs -i Ja
i— way— ����� b�
tL&, t �
iwS�lrz�T1 au3,
afi
lhste i3 Kat'[re 1 OF- C)20v It" 7
11ov H it at�lk6�c au�.
PMIde-d 1112WZ? Zlr 7_11bIZ-2,?
5'gos cP�cPcpd `I t %% v.18 -,eve-5
So,`rs dog i I / 15 / aflzr
hllll20�d C><mlJe- I,u ZuZ[-
(��
dec &- " '" rG'�2..(L2.23'.
�eG i SSi aa� plvzae feS et
de�I/lIZa2.5 OlYe GeW .
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 'B2-!R—Z�6
Date:
/Z
5/12/2020

Asa cattle facility that is below threshold for more than 3 years and is in compliance, you are eligible to
request rescission of your permit without closing the waste storage structure prior to rescission. Your
facility would then be considered deemed permitted as long as you stay below the 100 confined cattle
threshold. If you ever wish to increase your herd to exceed the 100 confined cattle threshold, they
would be considered a new facility and would be required to meet the standards in place at that
time. The waste structure must be maintained to prevent any discharge to surface waters, but no
specific records are required. Once no longer needed/in use, the structure will eventually need to be
closed to NRCS standards. The timing of that closure is completely at the discretion of the owner.
As a deemed facility, they would not be subject to routine inspections, etc. However, the rules for
deemed facilities 15A NCAC 02T.1303 does require that the waste be applied at no greater than
agronomic rates. You have an existing waste plan, so you know what agronomic rates are, but you will
need to take waste samples for analysis and track application rates to be sure you are not over applying.
Those records would not be required for us to review, but would be for their own benefit and to
demonstrate compliance should a problem ever arise.
Below is the address to send a request for a rescission of your permit if you choose to do so.
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636

Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
Operator Continuing Education Hours & Invoice Payment Status
Parkins, Randall S
County: Haywood
Current Renewal Invoice: 2022RE009099
Renewal Invoice Status: Paid
CE Hours CE Hours
Active Certifications Required Earned
AWB 21360 6.0 0.0
IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
CE Hours CE
Needed Due Date
6.0 1/1/2025
Animal waste operators who fail to renew their oertificate(s) within the 30 days following 12/31/2022, shall be
considered invalid and shall be required to take and pass the examination for certification in order to become
recertified, in accordance with NCGS 90A-47(b).
Wastewater operators who fail to renew their certificate(s) by 12/31/2022, must pay a $50.00 late penalty in addition
to the $50.00 renewal fee for a total of $100.00, in accordance with NCGS 901
Run Date: 12/6/2022