Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout440036_Inspection_20221206Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number:440036 ActiveFacility Status:Permit:AWC440036 Denied Access Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit:Routine HaywoodCounty:Region:Asheville Date of Visit:12/06/2022 Entry Time:10:00 am Exit Time:11:15 am Incident #: Parkins Brothers DairyFarm Name:Owner Email: Owner:Randall S Parkins Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Status: Location of Farm: 1312 DOC Graham Rd Clyde NC 28721 1312 DOC Graham Rd Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Latitude:Longitude: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ I-40 to Fines creek Exit, Turn Right, Go 0.1 miles, Turn Right and go ).5 miles to Farm] Question Areas: 828-627-6120 35° 40' 10''82° 58' 30'' Clyde NC 28721 Randall S ParkinsCertified Operator: Secondary OIC(s): 21360Operator Certification Number: On-Site Representative(s):Name Title Phone Primary Inspector:Timothy R Fox Phone:828-296-4500 Inspector Signature:Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Tim Fox with DEQ, DWR, ARO inspected the site. Randy Parkins assisted during the inspection. The system is designed to collect, store, treat and utilize waste generated by 150 dairy cows and the milking operation. Waste is hauled on corn, hay and cover crops and liquid waste is collected in a holding pond. Waste analysis provided 11/24/2021, 2/10/2022, and 11/10/2022. Spot checked tract 77 8.8 acres. soils done 11/15/2021 calibration done in 2021- due every two years (2023). Page 1 of 6 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC440036 Randall S Parkins 440036 12/06/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: We discussed request for recission procedures (attached). 6 hours of CE credits needed by 1/1/2025 (attached). Page 2 of 6 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC440036 Randall S Parkins 440036 12/06/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Waste Structures Observed Freeboard Designated Freeboard Closed Date Built DateIdentifierType Effective Date Dry Stack 02 01/01/194901/01/1999 Waste Pond 01 01/01/1991 30.00 01/01/1999 Page 3 of 6 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC440036 Randall S Parkins 440036 12/06/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) Page 4 of 6 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC440036 Randall S Parkins 440036 12/06/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay) Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Stocking? Crop yields? Page 5 of 6 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC440036 Randall S Parkins 440036 12/06/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Page 6 of 6