Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0025135_Fact Sheet_20221207NCDEQ/DWR FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT Huffman Finishing Company, Inc. NC0025135 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Huffman Finishing Company, Inc./ Huffman Finishing Company WWTP Applicant Address: P.O. Box 170, Granite Falls, NC 28630 Facility Address: 4919 Hickory Boulevard, Granite Falls, NC 28630 Permitted Flow 0.25 MGD to Catawba River Type of Waste: 95% Industrial, 5% Domestic Facility/Permit Status: Grade II, Major/ Renewal County: Caldwell Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: Catawba River Regional Office: Asheville Stream Classification: WS-IV, B, CA 8-digit HUC: 03050101 303(d) Listed?: No Permit Writer: Sergei Chemikov, Ph.D. Subbasin/Stream Index: 03-08-32/11-(53) Date: September 29, 2022 Drainage Area (mi2): 1090 Lat. 35° 45' 34" N Long. 81° 23' 48"W Summer 7Q 10 (cfs) 40 (min. inst. release) Winter 7Q 10 (cfs): N/A Average Flow (cfs): N/A IWC (%) @ 0.25 MGD: 0.96 % Primary SIC Code: 2252 Background Huffman Finishing, Inc. is a textile plant that historically manufactured hosiery. However, the manufacturing operations have been discontinued and now it only bleaches and dyes textile products. The facility has requested renewal of their existing NPDES permit. The applicable effluent guidelines are 40 CFR 410.52 (Textile Mills, Subpart E, Knit Fabric). The facility has a designed flow of 0.25 MGD and its wastewater is 95% textile dyeing and bleaching process wastewater and 5% domestic wastewater. Huffman Finishing Company WWTP utilizes activated sludge to treat wastewater. Treatment consists of the following components: vibrating screen, flow equalization basin with four floating aerators, lift pumps, oxidation ditch, circular clarifier, sludge recirculation pumps, chlorine contact tank, ultrasonic flow measurement, chemical dechlorination, cascade post aeration, aerobic sludge digester, sludge holding lagoon, sludge drying beds, auxiliary power system. The plant is located in the Subbasin 03-08-32 and discharges to the Catawba River (Lake Hickory) approximately 2.5 miles below Rhodhiss Dam. This segment of the Catawba River is a class WS-IV, B; CA waterbody. The receiving stream is not listed on the 2022 303(d) list as impaired. The outfall is approximately one mile upstream from the water supply intake for the City of Hickory. Page 1 of 5 NPDES Permit Fact Sheet - 12/12/22 Huffman Finishing Page 2 NC0025135 Evaluation of Compliance Data Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) have been reviewed for the period of September 2017 through September 2022. During that time no permit limit violation were reported. The most recent facility inspection was conducted on January 10, 2022. The inspection report stated that "The facility appeared well maintained and operated at the time of the inspection, and in compliance with Permit NC0025135". Evaluation of Instream Data Instream monitoring is not required for this discharge. Development of Effluent Guidelines Applicable effluent guidelines are listed in 40 CFR 410.52 Textile Mills Subpart E, Knit Fabric. Huffman Finishing Company was able to provide three years of yearly average product production (in lbs/day). The averages were: 27,458 lbs/day in 2019, 18,987 lbs/day in 2020, and 21,850 lbs/day in 2021. The highest yearly average (27,458 lbs/day) was used to calculate the Technology Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs) because production during 2020 and 2021 was significantly impacted by COVID pandemic. Table 1 summarizes the proposed limit development based on the federal effluent guidelines. For example, the BOD5 daily maximum limits in lbs per day = 5.0 (pounds per 1000 pounds of product) * 27,458 (lbs/day) / 1000 = 137.5 lbs/day. Table 1. Technology Based Effluent Limitations Calculation Highest yearly average production 4 27,027 lbs/day Pollutant BPT limitations (pounds per 1000 pounds of product) Calculated Limits (lbs/day) Daily Maximum Monthly Average Daily Max Monthly Average BOD5 5.0 2.5 137.5 68.8 COD 60.0 30.0 1650.0 825.0 TSS 21.8 10.9 599.5 299.8 Sulfide 0.20 0.10 5.5 2.8 Phenols 0.10 0.05 2.8 1.4 Total Chromium 0.10 0.05 2.8 1.4 pH 6.0 - 9.0 s.u. Huffman Finishing Company also has 5% sanitary wastewater which could allow for extra allocations for BOD and TSS; however, these additions were minor and were not added in this permit renewal. Reasonable Potential (RPA) Analysis The need for toxicant limits is based upon a demonstration of reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards, a statistical evaluation that is conducted during every permit renewal utilizing the most recent effluent data for each outfall. The RPA is conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44 (d) (i). The NC RPA procedure utilizes the following: 1) 95% Confidence Level/95% Probability; 2) NPDES Permit Fact Sheet - 12/12/22 Huffman Finishing Page 3 NC0025135 assumption of zero background; 3) use of detection limit for "less than" values; and 4) stream flows used for dilution consideration based on 15A NCAC 2B.0206. Effective April 6, 2016, NC began implementation of dissolved metals criteria in the RPA process in accordance with guidance titled NPDES Implementation oflnstream Dissolved Metals Standards, dated June 10, 2016. A reasonable potential analysis was conducted on effluent toxicant data collected between November 2017 and July 2022. Pollutants of concern included toxicants with positive detections and associated water quality standards/criteria. Based on this analysis, the following permitting actions are proposed for this permit: • Effluent Limit with Monitoring. The following parameters will receive a water quality -based effluent limit (WQBEL) since they demonstrated a reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria: None • Monitoring Only. The following parameters will receive a monitor -only requirement since they did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria, but the maximum predicted concentration was >50% of the allowable concentration: Silver. • No Limit or Monitoring: The following parameters will not receive a limit or monitoring, since they did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria and the maximum predicted concentration was <50% of the allowable concentration: Cadmium, Total Phenolic Compounds, Chromium, Copper, Cyanide, Nickel, Lead, Mercury, Selenium, Zinc, Sulfide, and Antimony. Attached are the RPA results and a copy of the guidance entitled "NPDES Implementation of Instrearn Dissolved Metals Standards Freshwater Standards." Comparison of TBEL and WQBEL A comparison table of proposed technology based effluent limits (TBELs) and water quality based effluent limits (WQBELs) is reflected in Table 3. For parameters subject to both TBELs and WQBELs, the more stringent limit shall be applied. In order to compare both effluent limits, the concentration based limits (water quality limits) have been converted to the mass based limits using a permitted flow of 0.25 MGD. As shown in the Table 2, bolded parameter limits are more stringent limits and they will be applied in the permit renewal. Table 2. Comparison of TBEL and QWBEL Parameter TBEL (lbs/day) WQBEL (mg/L) WQBEL (lbs/day) Daily Maximum Monthly Average Daily Maximum Monthly Average Daily Maximum Monthly Average BOD5 137.5 68.8 - - - - COD 1650.0 825.0 - - - - TSS 599.5 299.8 - - - - Sulfide 5.5 2.8 - - - - NPDES Permit Fact Sheet — 12/12/22 Page 4 Huffman Finishing NC0025135 Phenols 2.8 1.4 - 31.3 - 65.0 Total Chromium 2.8 1.4 1.4 (Cr VI) 1.1 (Cr VI) 2.9 (Cr VI) 2.3 (Cr VI) Fecal Coliform - - 400# /100 mL 200# /100 mL - - TRC - - 28 ug/L - - - pH 6.0 - 9.0 s.u. Mercury TMDL Evaluation As required, the Permittee performed a low level effluent mercury test for submittal with the permit renewal application. In accordance with the 2012 Mercury TMDL NPDES Guidance the permittee needs to show annual mean effluent concentrations below both the Water Quality Based Effluent Limitation (WQBEL) of 1250 ng/L and the Technology Based Effluent Limitation (TBEL) of 47 ng/L. The effluent sample (5.74 ng/L) was below both the WQBEL and the TBEL, therefore, no mercury limitation is required. Guidance for industrial wastewater treatment facilities does not require a Mercury Minimization Plan if no limitation is needed. The permittee will be required to continue monitoring mercury as part of its permit renewal, using EPA method 1631 E. Toxicity Testing Current Requirement: Chronic P/F @ 0.96% using Ceriodaphnia dubia. Recommended Requirement: Chronic P/F @ 0.96% using Ceriodaphnia dubia. This facility has passed all toxicity tests during the previous permit cycle, please see attached. Basis for Permit Effluent Limits • The limits for BOD, COD, TSS, Total Chromium, Sulfides, and Phenols are based on the requirements codified in 40 CFR 410.52. • The pH limits (Outfall 001) are based on the North Carolina water quality standards (15A NCAC 2B .0200). • The TRC limit (Outfall 001) in the permit is based on the North Carolina water quality standards [15A NCAC 2B .0211]. • Chronic Toxicity Limit in the permit is based on the 15A NCAC 2B .0200 et seq. • Fecal Coliforms limits in the permit are based on the North Carolina water quality standards [15A NCAC 2B .0211]. Summary of Proposed Changes The following permit changes are proposed for this permit renewal: 1. Updated the electronic DMR requirement. 2. Updated the WET language. 3. The effluent limitations requirements for BOD5, TSS, COD, total chromium, sulfide, and phenol were recalculated based on the current production. NPDES Permit Fact Sheet - 12/12/22 Huffman Finishing Page 5 NC0025135 Proposed Schedule of Permit Issuance Draft Permit to Public Notice: Permit Scheduled to Issue: October 11, 2022 (estimate) December 2, 2022 (estimate) NPDES Division Contact If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at (919) 707-3606 or by email at sergei.chernikov@ncdenr.gov Changes in the Final Permit • The requirement to repair the outfall pipe was added to the Final Permit to address the colored plume issue and in response to the Public Comments. • The Division is unable to implement a color limit of 50 PCU requested by the Catawba Riverkeeper because this standard was specifically designed for the brown -yellow colors typically discharged by the pulp and paper facilities. Textile facilities discharge variety of colors that are not well suited to the PCU method.