WQ0019960_Application_20010509

r V&
GROUNDWATER SECTION
MEMORANDUM
May 30, 2001
TO: Tom Cadwallader
Permits Group
Raleigh Central Office
THROUGH: Landon Davidson, Regional Groundwat S viso
Asheville Regional Office
FROM: Qu Qi��
Asheville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Land Application of Residual Solids
City of Marion - Corpening Creek WWTP
GW 01081
McDowell County, North Carolina
I have reviewed the subject permit application and visited the proposed locations. There are a
few modifications need to be made:
(1) Fields 1 through 9 at Site Q (Frank Queen) are not ideal sites because: (a) these fields are in
the flood plain of the Muddy Creek; (b) seasonal high water table is shallow, only 14 inches at
some locations; (c) numerous complaints were received from- the local residents about the odor
from the chicken manure, which is routinely applied at these fields. I have talked to Ms.
Caroline Edwards (consultant for the applicant) about these concerns. After discussions with the
applicant, they agree to give up these nine fields and are in the process of finding more tracks of
land. They will submit information about the new fields and an evaluation will be made when
the data become available.
(2) 400 foot buffer from the habitable residence is not met at the Site C, Site R, and Site K. The
buffer zone should be widened to meet the 400 foot requirement.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] ext. 228.

YL q
ff
LOW 20MAL'
P"V7 JUT
w
12,03
om
A
Jaw
Isis I A
nib
_,J
__ --- --------
AIN CAN 23
T1 M
it -no
maz

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: YES NO
IF YES, SOC NUMBER
TO: NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ATTENTION: Theresa Nartea
DATE: May 22, 2001
NON -DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY McDowell
PERMIT NUMBER WQ19960
PAIN I -GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: City of Marion
Post Office Box 700
Marion, North Carolina 28752
2. Date of Investigation: - May 19, 2001
3.
Report
Prepared By:
Larry Frost
4.
Persons
Contacted and.
Telephone Number: none
5. Directions to Site:
Cosby property - south of Marion on 226, just north of the Dysartsville Church.
Ross property - south of Marion on NC 226, turn southwest on Walker Road, propert is
north of the intersection of Walker, Pierce, and Cowan Roads.
Khang property - south of Marion on NC226, turn southwest on Landis Lane, the
properties are east and south west of the intersection of Landis Lane
and Pierce Road.
Queen property - south of Marion -on NC 226, turn east 'on Pinnacle Church Road, turn
lefts on Muddy Creek Road, the properties are along Muddy Creek
Road.
6. size (land avai 1 abl a for expansion and -upgrading) : There appears to be
some property available for expansion at each site.

7.
Topography (relationship to 100 year flood plain included):
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate facility site.
Cosby property
U.S.G.S. Quad No.
Field 1 Latitude:
Ross property
U.S.G.S. Quad No.
Field 1 Latitude:
Khang property
U.S.G.S. Quad No.
Field 1 Latitude:
Field 2 Latitude:
Queen property
U.S.G.S. Quad No.
Field 1 Latitude:
Field 2 Latitude:
Field 3
Field 4
Field 5
Field 6
Field 7
Field 8
Field 9
Field 10
Latitude:
Latitude:
Latitude:
Latitude:
Latitude:
Latitude:
Latitude:
Latitude:
U.S.G.S. Quad Name
Marion East, NC
350 38' 18.0" N
U.S.G.S. Quad Name
Dysartsville, NC
350 34' 42.6" N
U.S.G.S. Quad Name
Dysartsville, NC
350 34' 57.7" N
350 34' 41.1 " N
U.S.G.S. Quad Name
Glen
Alpine,
NC
350
39'
19.6"
N
350
39'
11.3"
N
350
39'
05.3"
N
350
40'
00.4"
N
350
139'
42.6"
N
350
39'
56.3"
N
350
40'
08.3"
N
350
40'
18.5"
N
350
40'
30.6"
N
350
40'
07.0"
N
Longitude: 810 53' 25.9" W
Longitude: 810 51' 20.8" W
Longitude: 810 51' 52.2" W
Longitude: 810 52' 11.0" W
Longitude:
810
51' 26.8" W
Longitude:
810
51' 27.4" W
Longitude:
810
51' 17.0" W
Longitude:
810
51' 47.3" W
Longitude:
810
51' 28.6" W
Longitude:
810
51' 23.5" W
Longitude:
810
51' 25.3" W
Longitude:
810
51' 28.8" W
Longitude:
810
51' 29.6" W
Longitude:
810
52' 03.6" W
8. Any buffer conflicts with location of nearest dwelling and water
supply well? Yes No -X_ If Yes, explain:
9. watershed Stream Basin Information:
Cosby Property
a. watershed classification: C
b . -River Basin and Subbasi-n No.: Catawba River/Large Bra nch/1 1-32-2-10-1
-2-

C. Distance to surface wate.r from disposal system: 200 feet
Ross Property
a. watershed Classification: WS-V
b. River Basin and subbasi n No. : Broad River/Cane Creek/9-41-12-(0.3)
c. - Distance to surface water from disposal system: 500 feet .
Khang Property
a. watershed classification: C
b. River Basin and subbasi n No. : Catawba River/South Fork Hoppers Creek/11-
32-2-9-1
C_ Distance to surface water from disposal system: 100feet
Queen Property
a. watershed Classification: C
b. River Basin and subbasi n No.: Catawba River/South Muddy Creek/11-32-2
c. Distance to surface water from disposal system: 100feet
PART,II - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. volume: MGD (Design capacity)
Residuals: 800 tons per year
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: N/A
C. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Treatment Facilities:
a. what is the current permitted capacity of the facility?
800 tons per year
b. what is the actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(design volume) ?
800 tons per year
C. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities:
Currently the city is land filling their sludge in a lined mono -fill, there is no more
permitted capacity .
d. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities:
Proposed- PSRP - Lime stabilized class B bio-solids
3. Residuals handling and'utilization/disposal scheme:
-3-

a. If Residuals are being land applied, please specify pwQ Permit
Number
Residual Contractor
Telephone Number.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP — PFRP OTHER
C. Landfill: existing - monofill
d. other disposal/utilization scheme (specify):
4. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):
zzz
5. SIC code(s):
wastewater code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular facilities
i.e., non -contact cooling water discharge from a metal plating
company would be 14, not 56.
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds
(municipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring requests: The Queen properties are currently being used as
sites for the land application of chicken litter and should be monitored for all nutrients or
avoided as application sites.
3. N/Aortant SOC, Joc or Compliance schedule dates: (Please indicate)
Date
submission of Plans and specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
` 4. Other Special Items:
-4-

PART IV - EVALUATION�AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Ross, Cosby and Khang properties appear to be appropriate,sites for the application of
residual solids, there appear to be no issues.,
The Queen properties have been used as application sites for dry litter chicken waste
application for many years. Fields 3 and 9 should be completely avoided due to their proximity
to Muddy Creek (adjacent to the creek) and their location in the 100-year flood. plain. It is the
recommendation of the regional office that the remaining (fields 1,2,4,5,6,7,8 and 10) sites
not be used for the land application of residual solids from the City of Marion, unless:
1)The fields are monitored for all nutrients, including those related to animal waste and
residual solids.
2) The application of dry litter chicken waste is suspended..
signat)fre of Report Preparer
r
. ater Quaff i ty Regional Supervisor._ ...
Dat
-V-

1- 52' 0.00" W, P81 . 51' 0.00" W1 I 1 1 P81- 50'0.00" W1 I
i C)
I
Co 16-
A
O ,xt�itJ
X 9044 w NAL��
;II�2
N.1 w.,
A- ;N1
)-kK
L qg
�_k CU4
2
z
V!
C13 MA
. P - 5.
�-k
PH
-R
'gig
jee
roll
z
z
f o .f` -. ri" Y. U
e
M ti�3`�lJ`__ _:. � n� v k .: M'i;�•\ ... �. s �'j' �+u�,�7_�t�5�i s t +•y .fi' i�. ^` � S�� -� j.7_� j'� d... .: M
LO
Cq
Cr)
-7. Yg '40,
iix � 'svr "rw � l�•S z i !1� 1 + R fit' +t � �.: �' •ram'` � G+. �:1
52-10.00- 681!" 51'10.00" w 81 0.00,.
Name: GLEN ALPINE Location:. 035* 39' 36.2" N 081 50'46.4" W
Date: 5/21/101
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet

52- 0.00" W, P81. 51' 0.00" -W, P81- 50- 0.00- wl I
N
-49
-W4 SS
4 W.
W
--tz,
CO
7(r
1-7
,N4
I sz,
VV
JS
MMINM-i
14�
N 45.
IMF.
M

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director .,NCD-ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
May 9, 2001 10�C @_ � 0 T R--
CITY OF MARION
MAY l' 0 2001
J. ROBERT BOYETTE, CITY MANAGER - . --
P O BOX 700 N1t,R Ii1n�i!�Y St;sli�S
HEV!L? t '� iCt! al_. 0 F CE
MARION, NC 28752 _
Subject: Application No. WQ0019960
Additional Information Request
City of Marion
Land Application of Residual Solids
McDowell County
Dear Mr. Boyette:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has conducted a preliminary review of the subject permit application
package. Additional information is required before we may continue our review. Please address the
following items no later than June 11, 2001. As an aside, don't be discouraged, you submitted an
excellent package, and it should not be difficult to obtain the additional information.
1. Please have Toua Khang (nephew) sign under "Lessee" on the Land application
agreement (page 18 of 18), or have him sign on the Owner line. He is listed as the
Owner and Operator on the Site K "Site Summary Sheet."
2. Provide the missing residuals sampling data; within the application (page 32) you stated
that you would turn this item in by "May 11, 2001."
Please provide the missing Reactivity, Ignitability, and Corrosivity analyses required in
Application Item IV. 1. b. (page 2 of 18).
4. Confirm that the Hydro Analytical Laboratories fecal analysis is reported as Most
Probable Number (MPN) per gram of total dry solids. These units are not explicity
shown on the report page, have the laboratory re -print the results page so the units show
"MPN/g total dry solids." Also have them report the geometric mean of samples A
through G.
5. Application Item V. 1. b. 5., (Page 4 of 18), please provide documentation showing this.
additional pathogen treatment option. Please be aware that you need only select the most
appropriate selection of any of the given options, and then provide the needed
documentatiopyforrthat option.
6. Please provide the Organic nitrogen mineralization calculations (over five years),
requested on the omitted page 12 of 18, at the bottom of Section C. 3. I enclosed an
example calculation.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Please use the Calculation Work Sheet provided in the application form, page 11 through
14 of 18. These were intentionally omitted by the applicant, however we require you to
complete and submit them with the application. Otherwise your application will remain
incomplete.
Application Items V. 2. a., c., f., i., and j. (Page 4 of 18), please provide documentation
showing these selected Vector Attraction Reduction options. Please be aware that you
need only select the most appropriate selection of any of the given options, and then
provide the needed documentation for that option.
Please have licensed soil scientist, Caroline J. Edwards sign each "Site Evaluation
Sheet." It is currently the Division policy that the following be met (from Application
Item VII.2.): "For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soil scientist
(the evaluation must be signed by the soil scientist) which addresses soil color, the depth,
thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the prescence or absence of seasonal high
water table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residual
application..."
Please note that comments from the Regional Office / Groundwater Section are pending at this time, and
additional requests may be necessary to address these comments. Please be aware that you are
responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and regulations. Any
oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the responsibility of the
applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items may result in future requests
for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. Three copies
of all revised and/or additional documentation should be signed, sealed, dated, and submitted to my
attention at the address below.
NCDENR-Non Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may
result in your application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone],
extension 375. Thank you for your cooperation.
Since;ely,
Theresa Narte , Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
CC (w/o enclosures): Asheville Regional_Office,__Water Quality -Section
Groundwater Section, Central Office
Caroline J. Edwards, Earthwise Designs (with enclosures)
Permit Application File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 8, 2001
CHARLES ABERNATHY, COUNTY MANAGER
MCDOWELL COUNTY
60 EAST COURT STREET
MARION, NC 28752
Dear Mr. Abernathy,
1 kTZ?';WAJ •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Permit Application No. WQ0019960
Land Application of .Residuals
McDowell County
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has received a permit application package from the
City of Marion, for the land application of residuals to sites in McDowell County. The Division
will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced.
Maps of the sites are available at the Division's. Asheville Regional Office. Please contact the
Water Quality Supervisor at 828-251-6208, if you would like more information. Should you
desire to comment on this permit application as it relates to your interests, please do so no later
than June 8, 2001.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 919-733-5083, extension 375.
Sincerely,
//
Theresa Nartea, Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Ash e Regional Office Wa er Qu`a�l'tyi y S ce tion­,,
Permit Application File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CITY OF MARION
J ROBERT BOYETTE
P0BOX 700
MARION NC
May 3, 2001
28752 - —
j MAY 7 200f
I(
WiEi< nLI1LIFY SECTIM
ASHEVILLF OFFICE t.
Dear Mr. Boyette.
1 • •'
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No.
WQ0019960
Land Application
McDowell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of
your permit application and supporting materials on April 23, 2001. This application package has been
assigned the number listed above.
Your application package has been assigned to Theresa Nartea for a detailed review. The reviewer will
contact you with a request for additional information if there are any questions concerning your
submittal.
If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Nartea at 919-733-5083 extension 375., If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail, and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES
ON THIS PROJECT.
Sine I
Colson, P.E.
Supervisor, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Permit Application File WQ0019960
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer `: ' 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CITY OF MARION
J ROBERT BOYETTE
P0BOX 700
MARION NC 28752
Dear Mr. Boyette:
I T"WA / • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MAY .— 7 200
�I -
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No.
WQ0019960
Land Application
]McDowell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of
your permit application and supporting materials on April 23, 2001. This application package has been
assigned the number listed above.
Your application package has been assigned to Theresa Nartea for a detailed review. The reviewer will
contact. you with a request for additional information. if there are any questions concerning your
submittal.
If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Nartea at 91.9-733-5083 extension 375. If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail, and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES
ON THIS PROJECT.
Sinc 1
Colson, P.E.
Supervisor, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: A-Rshe:ville Regional -Office; Water.LQualityaSect on:
Permit Application File WQ0019960
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
A— C7-...J /1---s.._.�.. Atc:-�_a:.-- ^—i'-----I -- --- —1 ---. _._ . i......

Division of Environmental Management
Date
MEMQRANDUM.
-r-o- v�reS+- W 4�GI
To: Bob —Cheek, Supervisor
Permits & Compliance Unit
-Groundwater—Seetion — vQ i a-va
From:I�W$A ° I GW CG . ,% Project
Permits &1 1 Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Engineer
MPS
� O-Kd OJ-C-I'CP'
Subject: krldwater— Review
Non -Discharge � pli ation No.
Facility Name: l
County: ,� �b -te_o
Attached you will find plans, specifications, and supporting information
for the above project.
Please let me know whether you will or will not be conducting an
extensive review of the subject project by ' — 11 - O 0 .
If I can provide additional information, please contact me at ext. --3-7E .
.. 0 ..... ..... o .... a....... • • • ..........0 0 * o o 0 . o o o * 0..... o . .
Dii P gam.�'C will
(1) The -Groti dwater- Section 0 will not* conduct an extensive
review of the subject.
*�--Groundwater--Section will..not r,(�, ie application—foc-i e—r-Qasan
—listed below:
(2) A request for additional information will be forwarded to you by the
reviewer listed below.
—GW R ewer: Date:
9/6/90

Division of Environmental Management tit."
Date
MEMORANDUM
To: Project Engineer t'"V,
i
Permits & Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
From:
Permits & Compliance Unit
Groundwater Section
Subject: GGQ/ dwater -Review
Non -Discharge A�?plication No.
Facility Name: t
County:
Attached you will find plans, specifications, and supporting information
for the above project.
Please let me know whether you will or will not be conducting an',
extensive review of the subject project by -- 1 ) _ p ( .
If. I can provide additional information, please contact me at ext.
..........................................................
�ij ►`v' �./ c �, 0 will
(1) The-Grorhdwarer- Section will not* conduct an extensive
review of the subject.
* --Groundwater Section —will notQreiie,w—application...for_the-xeason-
-lis`te-d­b-e-rdw:
(2) A request for additional information will be forwarded to you by the
reviewer listed below.
—Reviewer: Date: f=�
i
9/6/90

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROtNDWATER SECTION
ATE NIORAND IFNI
TO: �L{61C116cl L)QUfdSOA
Regional Office
FROM:
SUBJECT: Application for Permit Renewal,
New Permit
COilliTIENTS: 46E44
Facility Name: / l d �__L �_ o V'Peo tnt;
County: t�C 0 oW e-O'
.MAY I 12001 �
Permit Antendnrent
Repair/Alteration of Exist. Disposal System [DEH]
Type of Project: �om W /I o
00 Iq9 &o
APPLICABLE PER 11T NO.s: W GbV 0� ©S
DEH
EPA (CONST. GRANTS)
ANIMAL WASTE (DWQ)
AtoC
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE, (1) copy of the referenced permit application. A copy of the
application should have been sent to your Regional Water Quality Supervisor, so please use that copy for
your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED N THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE LET ME
KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (il copy of the referenced permit application. A copy of the
application should have been sent to , DEH's Regional Soil Specialist, so please use
that copy for your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED N THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE
LET ME KNOW.
The Groundwater Section received two (2) copies of the referenced permit application. One copy of the
application documents we received is attached.
Please review the application materi is for completeness. If you feel additional information is necessary, please
let me know no later than �p A copy of any formal request for additional information
will be forwarded to you.
If you do not�' eed any final additional information to complete your review, please provide your comments
by S%n,3o 40 / If you request and/or receive additional information, your final comments
\9-98TRAN.SHL (rev. 9/29/98)

It .
Division of Environmental Management
Date
MEMORANDUM Q,
To: Bob— C-heek-;— Supervisor
Permits & Compliance Unit r.
Groundwater Section,
E5
From /t L,40SAI � / Project Engineer
Permits & Engineering Unite
Water Quality Section
Z
yC/
Subject: Groundwater Review' s
Non -Discharge p 'catin N oo.6Z
Facility Name: � i ("iMr^
County: 2n -
(GW # j
Attached you will find plans, specifications, and supporting information
for the above project.
Please let me know whether you will or will not be conducting an
extensive review of the subject project by - l ! - f) d .
If I can provide additional information, please contact me at ext. - 7
z will
(`1) The Groundwater Section will not* conductrtPi,c,Ve
review of the subject.
* Groundwater Section will not review application for the reason
listed below:
(2) A request for additional information will be forwarded to you by the
reviewer listed below.
GW Reviewer: _7V�— C U *,/ Date:
9/6/90

16

724 Duncan Road Rutherfordton, NC 28139 828)247-0067
April12, 2001
To: Shannon Thornburg, Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality, NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Request for Land Application of Residuals Permit
City of Marion, McDowell County
Re: Permit #WQ0003698
Dear Ms. Thornburg:
The City of Marion hereby applies for a land application of residuals permit
as described in Performance Standard I. 1. in the above referenced permit
dated January 10, 2001. Enclosed are five (5) copies of the permit
application and a check for $675.00.
The City of Marion and Earthwise Designs appreciates your assistance in
extending the period for submittal due to the delay in receiving soil test
results from the NCDA - Agronomic Division.
On April 1, 2001 a change occurred in management of the Wastewater
Treatment Plant from HydroManagement Services to the City of Marion. A
new residuals analysis is being prepared and will be submitted by May 11
as an amendment to this package. The City believes this will give a more
accurate description of the biosolids from the plant.
If you need further information concerning this application please contact
me at 828)247-0067; Larry Carver, Superintendent of the Corpening Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant at 828)652-8843; or J. Robert (Bob) Boyette,
Marion City Manager at 828)652-3551.
Thank you very much for your assistance,
Caroline J. Edwards
Licensed Soil Scientist #1220
Certified Land Application of Residuals Operator #23884
cc: J. Robert Boyette, City Manager

CITY OF MARION
P.O. Drawer 700
Marion, North Carolina 28752
March 30, 2001
RECEMEo
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit WA7rP0(1 LrryS1-C770N
Division of Water Quality, NCDENR APQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Non'Discharge Permitung
RE: Application for New Permit — Land Application of Residuals Solids
City of Marion Corpening Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
in reference to Permit #WQ0003698
Dear Non -Discharge Compliance Unit Personnel:
Enclosed please find five (5) copies of the non -discharge permit application
and the application fee of $675.00. This is submitted by April 1, 2001 as
requested by the Permit #WQ0003698. You are .aware of the importance of
timeliness of this application and we appreciate your efforts on. our behalf to
expedite this prior to the closure of Pit No. 11 as described under the above
referenced permit no.
If you need additional information concerning this, please contract Caroline
J. Edwards of Earthwise Designs at 828-247-0067; or Larry Carver,
Superintendent of the Wastewater Treatment Plant at 828-652-8843.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
. Robert (Bob) Bo to
City Manager
JRB/dws
OFFICE OF THE
CITY MANAGER

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF MARION
CORPENING CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
APPLICATION FOR A
NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT
LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
April 2001
Letters and check page no.
Outline of Sections A. - D.
A. GENERAL
Introduction i
North Carolina Form LARS 02/95 4
Application Rate Evaluation 22
Wastewater Treatment Process Description 2 (V
Latitudes/Longitudes/Landowner Contact Information Zq
Spill Control Plan 30
B. ANALYSIS S I
Total Sludge, TCLP, Fecal Coliform Analysis
C. SITES 4 5'
Summary Sheets, Site Maps, Landowner Agreements,
Buffer Waiver Agreements
1) Site C Curtis Causby
2) Site R Wayne Ross
3) Site K Tura & Tong Khang
4) Site Q Frank Queen
D. SOILS Jos
Soil Scientist Report and Soil Test Results
AGRONOMY
Agronomist Report

CORPENING CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
APPLICATION FOR A NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT
LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
SECTION A

I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Marion hereby applies for a non -discharge permit for land
application of residuals produced from the Corpening Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant as described herein.
The City proposes to generate up to 500 dry tons annually of biosolids
and permit 152 acres of farmland. The four landowners have agreed to
utilize the biosolids application program as described in the permit
application. This program will result in an economic savings to these
landowners in McDowell County by providing important nutrients
necessary for crop growth. These landowners have eagerly agreed to
have biosolids applied to their land at agronomic rates to be used as a
fertilizer supplement.
II. OUTLINE OF APPLICATION INFORMATION
A. GENERAL
This section contains general project information including the State of
North Carolina Form LARS 02/95; and calculations and application rate
evaluations generated by the applicant in lieu of pages 11 - 14 of 15.
Due to the change in management of the wastewater treatment plant and
certain parameters not measured in the year 2000, the SAR calculation
and an Application Rate Evalution for residuals from the primary digester
is not included as of this date but will be submitted prior to May 11, 2001.
Also in this section is the Spill Control Plan, Landowner contact
information and Latitudes and Longitudes, for each site; and the
Wastewater Treatment Process Description.
B. ANALYSIS
This section contains reports on Total Sludge, TCLP, and Fecal Coliform
Analysis.
C. SITES
This section contains information on the fields identified for biosolids
applications: topographic maps, aerial photos, a soil map, and a vicinity
4

map. Also included is information on the soil types and hand auger
boring investigations. Detailed information on the soils profile
descriptions is located in the SOILS section, as are the soil test results
for each field. The completed NC-DEM Agreement for Land Application
of Waste Sludge to Private Lands can also be found in this section; and
also residential buffer wavier agreements.
D. SOILSIAGRONOMY
This section contains the Soil Scientist's Report and the Soil Test
Results for each field. A description of each soil type existing on each
site is found in this section including profile descriptions. The information
on soils series mapping units was taken from the McDowell County Soil
Survey and verified through field hand auger borings symbolized by an
"x" on the site maps.
This section also contains the Agronomist's Report with
recommendations for nutrient use for particular soils found at each site
including loading rate recommendations for nutrients and dry
tonnages/ac for particular crops produced at each site. Additional
recommendations taking into account RYE data are being compiled for
the fields and will be used at the time of land application.
2

III. OPERATIONS
A. FIELD
The project manager will contact the landowner to schedule
applications. Prior to spreading operations, the project manager will flag
the site according to the buffer zones listed in the permit.
SURFACE APPLICATIONS
Surface applications are planned to occur on these farmlands. The
spreader surface applies an even application of the stabilized residuals
between 10 to 50 cubic yards or wet tons/ac, depending on the amount
of dry tons allowed by the permit and the percent solids of the biosolid.
Calibration of the spreader has been predetermined through a
procedure that involves adjustment of both the speed of the vehicle and
the size of the gate opening. Generally, the operator begins at the back
of a field working to the front to avoid getting "painted into a corner."
This continues until the field is completed.
B. ACCESS CONTROL
Since the biosolids will be applied
allowed on any of the sites. Fencing
and rotations.
IV. REPORTING
to private lands, no trespassing is
is in place to allow for cattle control
A report showing the date, drytonnage, gallons, field numbers, acres
and pounds -per -acre applied of nutrients and metals will be generated
for each application event. Copies of these reports will be submitted to
the City of Marion and the landowner. An annual report will be generated
as required in the permit.
3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management RECEIvEC
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form WAir.0 ni 1l11 iiY ��enoN
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) APR 3 2001
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS barge Pemlling
This application is intended for residuals which will be regulated under 40 CFR
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.):
City of Marion
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
J. Robert (Bob) Boyette. City Manager
3. Mailing address: P. O. Box 700
City: Marion State: NC Zip: 28752
Telephone Number: [phone]
4. Application Date: March 2001
5. Fee Submitted: $ 675.00 [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).]
6. Specify whether these residuals will be land applied to: _ X agricultural lands, forest, public contact sites,
reclamation sites; (Please be advised, if these residuals will be distributed for lawn or home garden use, the
application for the "DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS" should be completed rather than this application.)
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, please complete the
application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in
a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
N/A
8. For Class B Residuals (or Class A Residuals to be land applied on a dedicated site), please specify the number of acres on
which residual solids are to be land applied under the authority of this permit:
proposed in this application: 152.0 acres; total (current and proposed): 152.0 acres
9. County(ies) where residuals will be land applied: _h=owell
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application No. (will be completed by DEM):
2. Specify whether project is: X new; renewal*; , modification
* For renewals, complete all sections included in the application, in addition, please submit updated cumulative loadings
for the ten (10) pollutants and.updated owner's agreement forte site.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit
number and its issue date
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 1 of 18

III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated or prepared City of Marion WWTP
2. Facility permit number. NCO031879 ; facility permit holder. City of Marion
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: federal; private; state; X local government.
4. Specify facility design flow: 3.0 MOD; facility average daily flow: 0.800 MOD;
Type of residual storage: 1 Sludge Thickening Tank- 1 Extended Air Tank
Volume of -residual storage: -130.000 gal in sludge thickening„tank: ext air tank holds 0.78 MG
Length of residuals storage at facility: 30+ * days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days, storage in units that are
separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers; aeration basins, etc.); (holding tank, etc.)
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 90 (est.) days. *Plant storage capabilities are being
upgraded to meet the needs of the land application of residuals program*
Estimated volume of residuals: 800 (dry tons/yr.);
5. Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above, currently on site: Yes, X No.
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Larry Carver WWTP ORC
7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 828 ) 652-8843 at WWTP
8. Location of treatment facility: Marion. NC State; McDowell County
9. Mailing address: City of Marion
P. O. Box 700
Marion. NC 28752
10. Latitude/Longitude: WWTP: 350 39' 11" 8105712211
11. Specify the source of the residuals: X treatment of domestic wastewater; �X _ treatment of industrial wastewater;
other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process. *Attached
12. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program?_2L Yes; No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority)
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? Yes; X _ No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; XNo.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
Corrosivity for each residual.
otg; If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure. Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page Z, of 18 Jr

PPM
Arsenic
5.0
Benzene
0.5
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chromium
5.0
m-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
Endrin
0.02
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lindane
0.4
Methoxychlor
10.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pyridine
5.0
Silver
5.0
Toxaphene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
pH (2:1 vol./wt.): >2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
PPM
Barium
100.0
Cadmium
1.0
Chlordane
0.03
Chloroform
6.0
o-Cresol
200.0
p-Cresol
200.0
2,4•D
10.0
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Lead
5.0
Mercury
0.2
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Selenium
1.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE,
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely, characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system.
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Selenium
Copper
Zinc
Lead
Aluminum
Mercury
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Calcium
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Potassium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
% Total Solids
TKN
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
3. Wastewater residuals_ shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals (attach lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Arsenic
75
0.050 (3/3/00)
Cadmium
85
0.008
Chromium
3000
0.283
Copper
4300
3.225
Lead
840
0.550
Mercury
57
0.917
Molybdenum
75
0.450
Nickel
420
0.142
Selenium
100
0.042
Zinc
7500
8.833
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 3 of 18

V . PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach additional pages for
additional sources of residuals):
1. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503, a residual can not be land applied if it does not meet one of the following alternatives
for Class B pathogen reduction.
a.b5 Please specify a, bl, b2, b3, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each.
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total dry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP).
1. Aerobic Digestion - residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a specific mean cell
residence time and temperature between 40 days at 200 C and 60 days at 150 C.
2. Air Drying - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or unpaved basins for a minimum of three months.
During two of the three months, the ambient average daily temperature is above 00 C.
3. Anaerobic Digestion - residuals are treated in the absence of air for a specific mean cell residence time and
temperature between 15 days at 350 C to 550 C and 60 days at 200 C.
4. Composting using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
of the residuals are raised to 400 C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days, the temperature in
the compost pile exceeds 550 C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact.
c. The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens"(PSRP),
as determined'by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
2. In addition, when residuals are being land applied, at least one of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a,
b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, or j) described below must be met.
a. c, f. i. i Specify the letter(s) of the vector attraction reduction requirement that have been met (submit lab results, test
results and calculations). Any variation of the below must be described in full detail and attached.
a. Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion, - The mass of volatile solids are reduced by at least 38%. Volatile solids reduction is,
measured between the residuals, prior to stabilization, and the,residuals ready for use or disposal. This criterion should
be readily met by properly designed and operated anaerobic digestors, but not as readily met by aerobic digestors.
Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may need to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through 18c or
18d.
b. Anaerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be
demonstrated by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals in a bench scale unit for an additional
40 days at 300 C to 370 C. If, at the end of the 40 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17%, vector
attraction reduction is achieved.
c. Aerobic Digestion. - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be demonstrated
by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals that have a solids content of 2% or less in a bench
scale unit for an additional 30 days at 200 C. If, at the end of the 30 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than
159o', vector attraction reduction is achieved.
d. Aerobic Digestionr - The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shall be equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygen
per hour per gram of total dry solids at 200 C.
e. Aerobic Processes - The temperature of the residuals for at least 14 days shall be greater than 40° C. During this time,
the average temperature shall be greater than 450 C.
f. Alkaline Stabilization - The pH of the residuals is raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of
more alkali, remains at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 4- of 18 7

g. Dl ing (stabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that do not contain unstabilized solids, and which are generated
in a primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 75%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
h. Dr nng (unstabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that contains unstabilized solids, and which are generated in a
primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 90%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
i. Injection - Liquid residuals are injected below the land surface, with no significant amount of residuals present on the
land surface after 1 hour, unless the residuals are Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case, the residuals shall be
injected within 8 hours after being discharged from the pathogen treatment process.
j. Incorporation - Residuals that are surface land applied shall be incorporated into the soil within 6 hours of application,
unless the residuals are Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case, the residuals shall be incorporated within 8 hours
after discharge from the pathogen treatment process.
VI. RESIDUALS TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION:
1. How will the residuals be delivered to the application sites (leak proof trucks, etc.)? Transported to sites and applied there
by industrial spreader trucks
2. What type of equipment will be utilized for land application? _Industrial spreader trucks
3: How will the application of the residual be controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site?
Precal'ibration of application equipment
4. Will the land application operation utilize a contractor who specializes in Residuals Management or will the permittee
management the program? X Contractor; Permittee. If a contractor is utilized, provide the name of the firm, a
contact, address, and telephone number. A Certified Contracter as vet unchosen will be used
VII. SITE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED LOADING RATES:
1. The following sites are to be used for land application under this permit application [please attach map(s),see La.]:
Application Area [acres] Maximum slope
Site No. County Owner/Lessee (excludinn buffers) (in percent)
See Individual Site Sections
Note: If more than ten (10) sites are to be covered by this application, please attach a form listing all of the sites along
with the information listedbelow:
a. A vicinity map must be attached. This map must show the location of each site in relation to at least two
geographical references and major intersection (numbered roads, named streams/rivers, etc.).
b. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached delineating both total and buffered acres.
This map must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet or 25% of total site relief
(whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines; all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways
and all dwellings within 500 feet of the land application areas; and all buffers.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 5 of 18 8

Note: At least the following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the sites, larger buffers may be
re9uirect
1. 400 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for surface residual application,
200 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for subsurface residual injection.
2. 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply source, all streams classified as WS or B,
waters classified as SA or SB and any Class I or Class II impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking watent
3. 100 feet between any surface residual application area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way,
50 feet between any subsurface residual injection area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.t
4. 50 feet between the residual application area and property lines for both surface and subsurface application (i f the
original permit was issued with the buffer distance to property line as 100 feet, updated
maps must be submitted and new acreage delineated for the buffer to be reduced).
5. 10 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (upslope).
6. 25 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (downslope).
7. 25 feet between the disposal area and any groundwater lowering and surface drainage ditches.
t SPECIFY THE NAME OF AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE SURFACE
WATERS (as established by the Environmental Management Commission) TO THE LAND APPLICATION
SITE(S). USE THE ATTACHED INFORMATION SHEET (PAGE 9 OF 18) TO OBTAIN THIS
INFORMATION.
Note: The maximum slope for land application of residuals is 10% for surface application and 18% for subsurface
application.
2. For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soils scientist (the evaluation must be signed by the soil
scientist) which addresses soil color; the depth, thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the presence or absence of a
seasonal high water table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residual application; pH and cation
exchange capacity. If the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is less than three feet, please also attach a demonstration,
using predictive calculations or modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in the contravention of classified groundwater standards as contained in
NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the separation be less than one foot. This report must be signed by the soil
scientist and submitted with application.
3. For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of liquids, solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any
other contaminant know to be in the residual. A part of the agronomists recommendations must be a crop management
plan. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the site(s), when they should be grown and how they should be
harvested and marketed. This report must be signed by the agronomist and submitted with application.
4. Attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the following parameters, along with
any other significant parameter that has been shown to be contained in the residual:
Standard Soil Fertility Test (which includes): pH
Phosphorus
Potassium
Acidity
Calcium
Manganese
Magnesium
Zinc
Copper
% Humic Matter
Sodium
Cation Exchange Capacity
Base Saturation (by
calculation)
And the following Metals: Arsenic
Lead
Nickel
Cadmium
Mercury
Selenium
Chromium
Molybdenum
5. In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the calculations contained in the
attachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet" (beginning on Page 11 of 18). If more than one residual is to be covered by
this permit, additional worksheets must be attached.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page to of 18 Ot

VIII. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Five (5) complete copies of the permit application and five (5) copies of all required supporting information, including
cover letters must be submitted or the application package will be returned as incomplete.
2. Please explain how access to the land application sites, by both people and animals, will be controlled following the
application of residuals: Sites are privately owned and Hosted farmland
Cattle are restricted by cross fencing
a. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sites within 30 days after the application of residuals.
b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during the active site use and
for 12 months following the last application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at the site.
3. Please explain the procedures that will be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the application process (i.e. will
the sites be flagged): Buffers will —be prior to application
4. Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private Lands" for each land application site
that is not owned by the applicant. A copy of the DEM approved form is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, prior approval must be received from DEM.
5. Each application site must be assigned a site identification number.
6. Attachments may be utilized to provide the information that is requested in this application form; however, if attachments
are utilized, their location should be so indicated on the application form. All attachments must be numbered to correspond
to the individual parts of the application that require the attachment. If the attachments are part of a larger document, a
table must be provided that lists the locations of the required information.
Applicant's Certification:
I, J. Robert Boyette, 01y Manger , attest that this application for Land Annlication
of Residual Solids
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be retumcd,.as incomplete. _
Signature
WENT=
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFF%KI BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 7 of 18 10

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Regional WQ Super.
Interchange Building
59 Woodfin Place.
Asheville, NC 28802
704/251-6208
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
'Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancy
Jackson
WQ Super.-- Forrest Westall
Fayetteville Regional WQ Super.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
910/486-1541
Anson Moore
Bladen Robeson
Cumberland Richmond
Harnett Sampson
Hoke Scotland
Montgomery
WQ Super.-- Mike Wicker
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Super.
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107-2241
9101771-4600
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
WQ Super.- Steve Mauney
Washington Regional WQ Super.
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, NC 27889
9191946-6481
Beaufort
Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
WQ Super.-- Roger Thorpe
Mooresville Regional WQ Super.
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
704/663-1699
Alexander
Mecklenburg
Cabarrus
Rowan
Catawba
-Stanly
Gaston
Union
Iredell.
Cleveland
Lincoln
WQ Super.-- Rex Gleason
page 10 of 18
Raleigh Regional WQ Super.
3800 Barrett Dr., Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
919/571-4700
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
WQ Super.-- Judy Garrett
Wilmington Regional WQ Super.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910/395-3900
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
WQ Super.-- Dave Adkins
jNCDEHNR
512 N. Salisbury Street
(Raleigh, NC 27604
11

- Instructions:
Processing of this application will not be initiated until five (5) copies of all of the following
items have been submitted in addition to five(5) copies of the completed application form. If
any of the below items have been excluded from the package, please explain.
9. Is a gelocation map included?
ner
YES or NO .�.
2. Is a site map (drawn to scale) included which delineates total and buffered acres and
shows all property lines, buffers, existing wells within 500 feet, topography, drainage
features, and any surface waters?
YES `. or NO
3. Is a vicinity map enclosed which clearly indicates the projects location with respect to
State roads and named Surface waters?
YESy or NO
4. Is a signed soil scientist report included which defines the following:
a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
b) depth and thickness of soil horizons,
c) presence of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
d) depth to seasonal high water table,
e) the hydraulic conductivity,
f) recommended loading rate for the site,
YES / or NO
5. Is a signed agronomist's report included which identifies the crop and loading
recommsndtions for N•P•K?
YES 1/ or NO
6. Is the Crop Management Plan included in the application package?
YES or NO
7. Has the Land Owner's agreement been completed and signed?
i YES or NO
8. Appropriate fee in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5)-(eff. February 1, 1993);
New Applications, Modifications or Late Renewals $4e&.O& W757. 00
' Timely Renewals without Modifications $250.00
YES l/ or NO
9. Five (5) copies of all reports, evaluations, agreements, supporting calculations, etc, must
be inclued as a part of the application package.
19,
FORM: LA RS 06/94 Page 8 of 18

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division
of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you
must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
subject surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters
(waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may
not be submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
City of Marion
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: City of Marion PO Box 700
City: Marion State: NC Zip: 28752
Telephone Number. ( 828) 652-3551
3. Project Name: City of Marion - Corpenina Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 800 dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters: a- GrQ-e- `?:,, (y,v\'r- �
v
6. County(s) where land application site is located: McDowell
7. Map name and date: 1 a. -1 ►� has t- 1 � 2..
8. Applicant Signature: ` (lb 1 ")DU
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will
occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface
-41UJr // . //- J Z - Z -- / O -
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable:.
Signature of regional office personnel:
FORM LAORS 06/94
Page 9 of 18
Date: 3 //5/D l
13

n
'XI
P
X1355-h,
3948
J
0
0
>ZI�7
A
>
92cs.on. 401
it
Cerr,'
garr�o�y Grove C 3947
e
43
'14%88
jt
7�
lt—l�s" V
67
Z
% �
1411
d
3946
0
a 'o
_4
0
0 IS
let
`Dixon _ Z..0
so
Urn,
X 46, Llfil-e- --Mtn -'­ I
3945
A
/4
r
4AO6
A
46
01
I K,
N
L
1 7. 3944
sa,rtsville Ch
c�
7
\IX
00 11A A000
D�uii A,
B
132. •000m.N.
.5unnj- Grove Chi
em
5;;/ 1418 419000-E.'I 0 INTERIOR —GEOLOGICAL. SURVEY. WASHINGTOW 0 C —1973 03713011
DYSART-SVILLIE J.O m/. 81052'30"
SHELBY 36 M/. rO 1 +
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Heavy-duty.. Light -duty..,......

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division
of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you
must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
subject surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters
(waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may
not be submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
City of Marion
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: City of Marion PO Box 700
City: Marion State: NC Zip: 28752
Telephone Number: ( 828 ) 652-3551
3. Project Name: City of Marion - CoMening Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied,, 800 dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters: (Yew
6. County(s) where land application site is located: McDowell
7. Map name and date:
8. Applicant Signature:.-�a�D
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will
occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface w
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): !J Jr—y
Proposed Classification, if
-4 /A
Signature of regional office personnel: Date: 3."lS U /
i
FORM LAORS 06/94
Page 9 of 18
V5

K
. . . . . . . -----
3942=1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
940 . airts I e
257
00 4,
viart
N
F5
351 — a�
Q
1937
.....
.....
Col

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are'required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division
of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you
must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
subject surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters
(waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may
not be submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please ;specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
City of Marion
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: City of Marion PO Box 700
City: Marion State: NC Zip: 28752
Telephone Number: ( 828.1 652-3551
3. Project Name: City of Marion - CoWening Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 800 dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters:
6. County(s) where land application site is located: McDowell
7. Map name and date: .1_) \1 --,GYAK 19 (D-
8. Applicant Signature:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where"these land application activities will
occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if
Signature of regionaloffice
FORM LAORS 06/94
Page 9 of 18
1-1
WA

r 3-''' � r� ,`Q�' 300 � � � � / d �, Y °' � r % T� Si 1• :� 1 �,, � � 4" '.t t
t r� i
{% k I ii ryo r
to
o � - � ooSP 1. r ;:. �:. --� ' � ' � � : i �;•
ti; r r
2 X /352 -
t
v \boo.
4O s \ a
Dysarisvtl e
rot
It
} }l
�/� CI t,�4�u�,a F��•, .... \\\ ( "Ai. � i r r � err~ f /
...y1. . tk aw ,..�{. �� 1 N T�.4.'. :,� .� knrt7,� j sz ��rr y. � ✓ tS�/ 1.
1.. m#
l7
3937
-; 3936
^� fill
�' o

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division
of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you
must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
subject surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters
(waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may
not be submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
if
701
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
_amity of Marion
Name and Complete Address of Applicant: City of Marion PO Box 700
City: Marion , State: NC Zip: 28752
Telephone Number: (_ 8281 652-3551
Project Name: City of Marion - oroening Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Volume of residuals to be land applied: 800 dry tons per year
Name of closest surface waters: b( C�
County(s) where land application site is located:
Map name and
Applicant Signature: ' —
V
McDowell
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will
occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters:
0
// -32-2
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): C'
Proposed Classification, if
Signature of regional office personnel: - Date:
101
FORM LAORS 06/94
Page 9 of 18
FA
IQ

39487
Beth I.Ch
14
3947
V1,II
fl:
0
i3lk
394 rV oax-
cly
cli
394
WMIMA
R-� f
g7
MAll YO
�X
ptpwa
-------------
- 4V
26 M M,
W.
KI !
oil
'k _j

SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS, INC.
Roaring River, NC
Pages 11 of 18 through 14 of 18 are the site life calculation forms
developed by NCDEM. They have been left out intentionally and
replaced with the following pages which compute Site Life, hydraulic
loading at certain dry tonnages, nutrient and metal loadings, PAN and
SAR calculations. The formulas used in these calculations are below.
Pages 15 of 18 thru 18 of 18 are the Landowner Agreement Forms, and
are enclosed with each Site Section.
DRY TONS/YR = (Gallons) (%Solids as a decimal) (8.34 lbs/gal) -
2000 lbs/ton
TOTAL PAN/YR = (PAN/dry ton) (total dry tons per year)
TOTAL ACRES
NEEDED PER YEAR = TOTAL PAN/YR
PAN REQUIRED FOR CROP/ACRE
SITE LIFE CALCULATIONS FOR INOR ANIC POLLUTANTS OR METALS•
LBS/AC OF METALS = (dry tons/acre) (Ibs/dry ton of metal)
SITE LIFE = allowable cumulative Ibs/ac
lbs/ac/yr applied metal
2z

Earthwise Designs
Rutherfordton, NC
Project: City of Marion WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CALCULATION WORK SHEET - Class B
SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO (SAR) - Class B
AND
APPLICATION RATE EVALUATION for Class B
This data will be submitted prior to May 112001 and based on the
residual samples submitted for analysis in April 2001
23

Earthwise Designs
Rutherfordton, NC
Project: City
of Marion WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
PLANT
Sample Date:
11/29/00 - class A sludge
% SOLIDS:
78.8
pH: 7.10
CONVERSION TABLE
PARAMETER mg/kg = ppm dry wt x 0.002 =1bs/dry ton
Nit. TKN
6091..
Phosphorus
1206.
2.4.
Potassium
1370.
2.7
Calcium 300,000. §
600.
Magnesium
7280.
14.5
Sodium
234.
0.5
Ammonia N
89.
Nitrate N
102.
Ceiling
Iron
na
Concent.
N
Aluminum
6670
ppin
13.34
Copper
51.4
4,300.00
Cu
0.1028
Zinc
120
7,500.00
Zn
0.24
Cadmium
<1.51
85.00
Cd
<0.0030,
Chromium
na
3,000.00
Cr
Nickel
5.75
420.00
Ni
0.0115
Lead
11.8
840.00
Pb
0.0236
Arsenic
<1.51
75.00
As
<0.0030
Mercury
0.152
57.00
Hg
0.0003
Selenium
<1.51
100.00
Se
-<0.0030
Molybdenum
6.96
75.00
Mo
0.0139
§ Estimate of lime slurry
to be added prior to land application
PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN CALCULATION (PAN)
TKN - AmN x 30%
+ 1/2 AmN + NO3N
x 0.002 = lbs. PAN/dry ton
Surface 3.89 lbs PAN/dry ton
*Figured on Class A sludge, limed and heat treated
24

Project: City of Marion WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Sample Date: 11/29/00 - class A sludge % SOLIDS: 78.8 pH: 7.10
Example: Surface Application Rate for Fescue Hay ly and
9 3.89 lbs. PAN(plant avail.N/dry ton Class A);
in lime slurry: 600 lbs Calcium/dry ton (est.)
*Spread 4 Dry tons/Ac
lbs./acre
PARAMETER applied
Nitrogen (PAN)
15.6
Phosphorus
9.6
Potassium
10.8
Calcium
2400.
Magnesium
58.
EPA cumulative
Site Life
Sodium
2.
Limits
in years
Calcium Carbonate
na
lbs. /acre
Iron
na
(per CFR 503)
Aluminum
53.36
Copper
0.4112
1339
3,256
Zinc
0.96
2500
2,604
Cadmium
<0.012
34
2,833
Chromium
na
2679
Nickel
0.046
375
8,152
Lead
0.0944
267
2,828
Arsenic
<0.012
36
3,000
Mercury
0.0012
15
12,500
Selenium
<0.012
89
7,416
Applicaton rates are based on the most recent biosolids analysis.
na = data not available
Approx. BIOSOLIDS VALUE $$ per acre:
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) at $.15 per lb. $ 2.34
Phosphate (22#P205) at $.15 per lb. 3.30
Potash (13#K20) at $.10 per lb. 1.30
Spreading Cost per ac. 5.00
Lime (CaCo3) at 1.2 ton/ac.: 36.00
Total value per ac. $47.94
2�-

Earthwise Designs
CITY OF MARION
P.O. Drawer 700 OFFICE OF THE
WASTE TREATMENT
Marion, North Carolina 28752 PLANT SUPERVISOR
I" to► -ek- 23, 2oe1
Re: Description of Disposal Process for Residual Solids for The City of Marion
Corpening Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
The following is a description of the wastewater treatment plant operation. After
screening, flows are sent through two primary clarifiers (.40 mg each) for primary
settling,then treated biologically using the activated sludge process (extended air , .78
mg) after which it goes through the final clarification process, each unit holds .40 mg
each, then through tertiary filters to remove any fine solids that may not settle in the final
clarifiers, after this process the effluent passes through a chlorine contact basin for
removal of any bacteria that may be present. Then it passes through the outfall toward the
receiving stream.
The settled sludge both primary and secondary are wasted to the two thickeners ( .065 mg
each) located on site then passed through two vaccum filters to remove any excess water
to produce a sludge concentration of 1 Ito 16 % solids before transferring to the lime
stabilization mill .
For final processing.
We are now using one of the extended air tanks ( .78 mg ) as a aerobic digestor to help
aid in the solids removal process and proposing to use the sludge thickeners as a lime
slurry to help us achieve our goal in producing a land applicable product. Earthwise
Designs and Southern Soil Builders are working with us in our goal to be able to land
apply in Mcdowell County.
Larry Carver ,Superintendant
City of Marion Wastewater Treatment
Zp

BASIC INFORMATION
POTW NAME: City of Marion WWTP
P. O. Drawer 700 Oc>
Marion, NC 28752
[phone]
CONTACT PERSON*: Mr. Larry Carver
* Plant Superintendent
NPDES PERMIT No.: NCO031879
NC SOLID WASTE LANDFILL PERMIT No: WQ0003698
NC CLASS A RESIDUALS DISTRIBUTION PERMIT No.: WQ0008681
PROCESS DESCRIPTION (Brief Narrative):
The Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is a tertiary activated sludge
treatment plant, processing a combination of industrial and domestic wastewater. The
treatment scheme includes grit removal, parshall flume; two primary clarifiers with
chemical phosphorus removal, two activated sludge basins with secondary clarifiers,
and tertiary filters. The treated water is chlorinated and re -aerated prior to discharging
into the Corpening Creek. Excess biological sludge from the clarifiers is dewatered by
vacuum filtration and disposed of in a sludge landfill adjacent to the plant site. This
facility has installed a lime stabilization facility to further the process of pathogen and
vector attraction reduction.
A process schematic illustration of the City of Marion WWTP is presented on the
.following page.
a7

FIGURE I
CITY OF MARION WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
VOLUMETRIC CAPACITIES
2 Primary Clarifiers @ 0.40 MG, each
2 Aeration Basins @ 0.78 MG, each � it
2 Secondary Clarifiers @ 0.40 MG, each
2 Sludge Thickening Tanks @ 0.065 MG, each \3oy 6 DO ���

SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS, INC. Roaring River, NC
LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE
Landowner
Site/Field
No Topo Map
Latitude
Longitude
Curtis Causby
C1
Marion East
350 38'
20"
N
810
53'
33"
W
Wayne Ross
R3
Dysartsville
350 34'
40"
N
810
51'
24"
W
T. Khang
K1
Dysartsville
350 34'
43"
N
810
51'
48"
W
T. Khang
K2
Dysartsville
350 34'
43"
N
810
51'
58"
W
Frank Queen
Q1
Glen Alpine
350 39'
19"
N
810
51'
39"
W
Frank Queen
Q2
Glen Alpine
350 39'
13"
N
810
51'
39"
W
Frank Queen
Q3
Glen Alpine
350 39'
06"
N
810
51'
36"
W
Frank Queen
Q4
Glen Alpine
350 39'
45"
N
810
51'
32"
W
Frank Queen
Q5
Glen Alpine
350 40'
00"
N
810
51'
32"
W
Frank Queen
Q6
Glen Alpine
350 39'
58"
N
810
51'
26"
W
Frank Queen
Q7
Glen Alpine
350 40'
05"
N
810
51'
26"
W
Frank Queen
Q8
Glen Alpine
350 40'
12"
N
810
51'
32"
W
Frank Queen
Q9
Glen Alpine
350 40'
28"
N
810
51'
32"
W
Frank Queen
Q10
Glen Alpine
350 40'
00"
N
810
51'
59"
W
LANDOWNERS' ADDRE E IEW:
Curtis Causby
9090 Hwy. 226 South Nebo, NC 28761
828) 652-6549 hm. 652-6462 bus.
Wayne Ross
2545 Pax Hill Road Morganton, NC 28655
828) 437-9660 hm. 828)205-0615 mob.
Toua D. Khang, Tong Khang
129 Pierce Road Nebo, NC 28761
828)659-8773 farm [phone] hm. [phone] x276 bus.
Frank Queen
5351 Patton Road Morganton, NC 28655
828)584-1235
2q

SPILL CONTROL PLAN - City of Marion WWTP
In the unlikely event of a spill, the following action shall be taken immediately:
1. Halt source of the spill - overturned truck, leaking valve, ruptured tank.
2. Contain spill. Use straw bales to form a barrier. In addition to straw bales, use
shovels to form an earthen barrier to augment straw bales.
3. Cleanup. Employ vacuum equipment to remove as much spill material as
possible. Complete clean-up by scattering straw from straw bales, soaking up
remaining materials. Pick up straw manually, and dispose in landfill.
4. Final cleanup. Flush roadways with water as necessary to clean. Allow to dry and
incorporate if spill occurs on a non -paved and tillable area. In the event a spill
occurs on private property, final cleanup should be completed immediately to the
satisfaction of the owner and lime spread as necessary.
5. Notification. As soon as possible after the spill occurs, notify:
A: Marion VWVTP: Larry Carver [phone]
Marion City Manager: Bob Bovette [phone]
B. NC Dept. of ENR, Asheville: [phone]
C. County Sheriff Dept.: 911
D. Fire Dept. -if assistance is required for wash down, etc. 911
E. Contractor: not yet determined
6. Management of cleanup efforts. The project manager shall take immediate
charge and initiate cleanup activities. Additional labor shall be requested from
the plant as needed. The project manager shall also communicate with the
public on the scene answering and advising of cleanup activity.
7. Reporting. The project manager shall detail how the spill occurred and all action
taken; in a written report to the Mooresvile Regional Office as soon as possible
and within 24 hours of spill, or the next working day.
8. Spill prevention. Project manager shall take the immediate following steps:
A. Ensure loading personnel watch tanker while loading.
B. Ensure valves and lids are closed and latched while transporting.
C. Inspect lid seals monthly, and replace as necessary.
30

CORPENING CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
APPLICATION FOR A NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT
LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
SECTION B
31

NEW RESIDUALS SAMPLING DATA FOR
CLASS B WILL BE PROVIDED
BY MAY 11 2001.
3�,

1LI L 0 / z w V y 13: OU
33blbbL314
HYDROANALrICAL
PAGE 12
gEl
HYDRO ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
SM Ramada Drive, Box C-2
Mmmons. NO 27012
[phone]
F&X [phone]
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
December 14,.2000
c- �A� Siva
CLIENT NAME
HMS MARION
CLIENT NUMBER
$0000399
SAMPLE NUMBER
200752
COLLECTED DATE
11/29/00
RECEIVED DATE
11/29/00
DESCRIPTION
CORD CRK
CLASS IA
SLUDGE
TEST
UNITS
RE�$ '
% SOLIDS
%
1i.B
ALUMINUM
MG/KG
0670
AMMONIA-N
MG/KG
as
ARSENIC
MG/KG
0.51
CADMIUM
MGIKG
0.51
CALCIUM
MGIKG
358,000 -
COPPER
MG/KG
61.4
LEAD
MG/KG
11.8 -
MAGNES1UM
MG/KG
7280
MERCURY
MG/KG
0,152
MOLYBDENUM
MGIKG
0.96
NICKEL
MGIKG
5.76
NITRATE S. NITRITE
MGIKG
'102
PLANT AVA. NITROGEN
MGIKG
1947.1 -
POTASSIUM
MGIKG
1370 -
SELENIUM
MG/KG
c1.51
SODIUM
MGIKG
234
TKN
MG/KG
091 -
.TOTAL_ PHOSPHORUS
MG/KG
1206
ZINC
MGIKO
120
CERTIFICATION 9
NC 103
NC 37733'
CERTIFIED BY:
MI�.-�
HAEL SHELTON
LAB MANAGER
33

• -• ��� -�• -••�-^-••r� ����+-+ nY uftUWVF1LY I iLt-1L 1'fiUC 11
HYDRO ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
6300 Ramada Drive. Box 04
Clemmone, NC 27012
[phone]
Fax [phone]
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
December 14, 2o00
C l� A -
1�ersk�S
CLIENT NAME
HMS MARION
CLIENT NUMBER
80000399
SAMPLE NUMBER
206753 206753
205763
206763
206753
206753
206753
COLLECTED DATE
11129/00 11129100
11/29f00
11129100
11129100
11/29/00
11129MO
RECEIVED DATE
11129►00 11/29100
11/29100
11/29100
11/29/00
11f29100
11/29/00
DESCRIPTION
CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CRK
CORP CRK
CLASS A CLASS A
CLASS A
CLASS A
CLASS A
CLASS'A
CLASS A
SLUDGE SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
A S
C
D
E
F
REBULTS RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS M-ULTS
RESULTS
% SOLIDS
% 12.1 70.1
74.7
72.2
82.5
73.9
7D.2
FECAL SLUDGE
XGRAM 9 .. 3
c3
. p
<2
<3
6
CERTIFIcATiON 0 NC 103
NC 37733 u..�y
CERTIFIED BY: r`
ICHA L SHELTON
LAO MANAGER
Papa 1
34

L41 X0/C9OYJ 1 z; QtJ 3J41OOL,.I14 HYDRUANALYTICAL FACE IU
HYDRO ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
6300 Ramada Drive, Box C-2
Clemmone, NC 27012
[phone]
Fax (336) 76&2314
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS ctaS _ S �
December 14, 2000
CLIENT NAME
HMS MARION
CLIENT NUMBER
80000399
SAMPLE NUMBER
206754
COLLECTED DATE
11/29100
RECEIVED DATE
1.112900
DESCRIPTION
CORP CRK
CLASS B
SLUDGE
TEST
UNITS
RESULTS
% SOLIDS
%
14.4
ARSENIC
MG/KG.
<7.06
BARIUM
MG/KG
1080
CADMIUM
MO/KG
<7.06
CHROMIUM
MGlKG
40.9
LEAD
MG/KG
59.3
MERCURY
MG/KQ
1.65
NICKEL
MG/KG
24.0
PH
SU •
7.10
SELENIUM
MQlKQ
9.88
SILVER
MG/KG
77.6
CERTIFICATION 0
NC 103
NC 3"33
CERTIFIED BY:
MICHAEL SHELTON
LAB MANAGER
35

March 3, 2000
CLIENT NAME
CLIENT NUMBER
SAMPLE NUMBER
COLLECTED DATE
RECEIVED DATE
DESCRIPTION
TEST
% SOLIDS
FECAL SLUDGE
CERTIFICATION #
CERTIFIED BY:
HYDRO )kNALYTICAL LABORATORIES
6300 Ramada Drive, Box C-2
Clemmons, NC 27012
[phone]
Fax [phone]
-
C
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
HMS MARION
80000399
190523
190523
190523
190523
190523
190523
190523
219/00
2/9100
219100
219/00
2/9/00
219/00
2/9100
219100
219100
219100
2/9/00
2/9/00
219100
219/00
CORP CRK
CORP CRK
CORP CRK
CORP CRK
CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CRK
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
UNITS RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
% 12.4
13.8
15.7
13.6
17
13
16
#/GRAM 24,194
652,1741,019,108,280
1,176,470,588
100,000
17,692
50,000
MAR 0 7 2000
Page 1
No

1LJ101.4t3o 7 1.1: 010 J,:$bIbb1.714 NYUHUANALYiICAL PAGE 09
HYDRO ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
6300 Iiemmd6 Drive, box C-2
Clemmons, NC 27012
[phone]
Fax [phone]
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Decombw 14, 2000
GlZs 4e-cmts
CLIENT NAME
HMS MARION
CLIENT NUMBER
88000899
SAMPLE NUMBER
COLLECTED DATE
209765
208788
206755
206755
.20018
.206755
206755
RECEIVED DATE
11129/00
11/29/00
11129M
11/29/00
11/29100
11/29/00
11/29/00
1112910D
11129/00
111291013
11/29100
11129/00
11/29/00 .
11/29/D0
DESCRIPTION
CORP CRK
CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CORK
CORP CRK CORP CRK CORP CRK
CLASS 13
CLASS E
CLA33 5
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
CLASS B
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
SLUDGE
A
!!
C
D
E
F
G
TEST
WITS RESULTS
RESULTSgESULTS ItESULI§
RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS
% SOLIDS
FECALSLUDGE
% 19.3
51GRAM 31,000
15.2
14,s
15.9
14.5
14.8
14.6
20,000
8,000
1,300
8,000
16,000
6,000
CERTIFICATION 0 NC 103
NC 37733
CERTIFIED BY:
MICHALI-L-8-HELToN
LAB MANAGER
f
11

HYDRO ANALYTICAL L.ABORAToRiES
6800 Ramada Drive, Boras C-2
010mewao, N0 27012
[phone]
Fix [phone]
March 27, 2001
CLIENT NAME
CLIENT NUMBER
SAMPLE NUMBER
.COLLECTED DATE
RECEIVED DATE
DESCRIPTION
TEST
% SOLIDS
NITRATE & NITRITE
TKN
'TOTAL NITROGEN
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
HMS MARION
80000399
212104
3/26/01
3126/01
CORP CRK
SLUDGE
U IT$ RED
%
30.9
MG/KG
30.9
MCA/KG
14499
MG/KG
14629A
MG/KG
8033
1
CERTIFICATION # NC 103
NC 37733
CERTIFIED BY; ,•�
r
TO 39vd 7b3IL4-l7Nt70HGAH bTEZ99L9EE TE;LT T00Z/LZ/E0

d3/0211296.1 15:37 33b7bb2314 HYDROANALYTICAL PAGE UJ
Testlimerica
ANALYTICAL REPORT
HYDAO ANALYTICAL 2392
MIKE• SHELTON
6300•RAMADA DRIVE
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
Project: L0153
Project Name: HYDRO ANALYTICAL ,LABS
Sampler:
T= Results
a(o I
Lab Number: 01-A19834
Sample ID: #210106
Sample Type: Solid waste
Site ID:
Date Collected: 2/13/01
Time Collected:
Date Received: 2/15/01
Time Received: 9:00
Matrix Spike
Analyte Result Units log Limit Recovery ( ) Date Time Analyst Method QC Hatch
ArSenie
barium
< 0.100
mg/l
5.0
106
9/16/01
12:49
G.Robinson
6010E
3469
Cadmiun
` 1.00
mg/1
100
102
2/16/01
12:49
G.Robinson
6010E
3469
Chromium
0 0.100
mg/l
1.0
99
2/16/01
12:49
G.RabinSon
6010E
3469
Lead
c 0.500
og/1
5.0
98
2/15/01
12:49
G.$obinson
6010E
3469
Mercury
K 0.500
Uff/1
5.0
102
2/16/01
12:49
G.Robinson
6010E
3469
geleniva
K 0.0100
mg/l
0.20
106
2/16/01
13-36
M.Schott
7470A
3295
silver
a 0.100
mg/1
1.0
117
2/16/01
12:49
C.Robimon
60102
3469
Eeazene
< 0.100
Wg/1
5.0
102
2/16/01
12149
G.Robinson
6010B
3469
Carbon tetrachloride
s 0.0200
0,0200
08/1
0.3
96
2/24/01
6:32
C.Bates
9260
7976
Chl'orobenzene
K
t 0,0200
mg/l
0.5
98
2/24/01
6:32
C.Bates
$260
7976
Chloroform
c 0,0200
mgGl
100
96
2/24/01
6:32'
C.Bates
8260
7976
1,2-Dichlorcethane
c 0,0200
mg/l
6.0
100
2/24/ol
6:32
C.Bates
8260
7976
1,1-Vichlorcethene
0,0200
mg/1
0.5
102
2/24/01
6:32
C.Bates
0260
7976
Methylethylketone
e
0,340
mg/l
0.7
106
2/24/01
6:32
C.Bates
0260
7976
Tetrachloroathene
0.0200
Mg/1
200
115
2/24/ol
6:32
C.Bates
8260
7976
Trichlproothana
.c
0.0200
mg/l
0.7
94
2/14/01
6!32
C.Bates
8260
7976
Vinyl Chloride
R
a 0.0200
mg/1
mg/l
0.5
0.2
i02
2/24/01
6:32
C.eates
6260
7976
Cresols
0.824
m /1
Y00
104
2/24/01
6:32
C.Bgtes
8260
7976
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
K 0.0100
mg/1
7.5
92
2/20/01
13:37
J.Gott
8270
5830
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
K 0,0100
m8/1
0.13
92
2/20/01
13:37
J.Gott
8270
5830
Hexaehlorobetizene
< 0,0100
mg/1
0.13
110
72
2/20/01
13:37
J,Gott
8270
5830
itexchlor-1,3-butadlen
rt 0.0100
mg/1
0.5
2/20/01
13.37
J.Cott
8270
5830
Hexachloroathane
K 0,0100
mg/1
3.0
94
90
2/20/01
2/20/01
13:31
J.Gott
5270
5830
Nitrobenzene
K 0.0100
mg/l
2.0
98
13:37
J.Gott
0270
5830
2/20/0.
13:37
J.Gott
8270
5830
Semple repgrt continued .
i
2860 FOSTRR CRPIGHT1111Y DRIVE / NASIIVILI.B.TN 37204 / 615-726-0177 / iF,u: 615-726-0954 / 800-105-0880
3q

03/02/2001 15:37 3367662314 WDROANALYTICAL PAGE 04
TestAmerica'
f NCORroeAree
�`o l
ANALYTICAL
REPORT
Laboratory
Number:
01-A19834
Sample ID:
f210106
Project: L0153
Page 2
TCLp.Aeoulta
Matrix Spike
Analyte
Result
Units
Reg Limit
Recovery (X) Date
Time
Analyst
Method
QC Satch
Pentachlorophenol
c 0,0100
mg/1
100
113
V20101
13:37
J.Gott
0270
5836
Pyridine
a 0.0100
ng/1
5.0
92
2120/01
13:37
J.Gotc
8270
5830
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
t 0,0100
mg/1
400
106
2/20/01
1307
J,Gott'
8270
5830
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
z 0.0100
mg/1
2.0
106
2/20/01
13:37
J.Cott
0270
5830
Chlordane
0,0002
erg/1
0,030
124
2/20/01
16:20
H. Cauthen
8081A
4791
2,4-D
c 0.100
mg/1
1010
75
2/20/Ol
16:19
R. Hunt
8151A
5567
Endrin
a 0.0002
mg/1
0.02
117
2/20/01
16:20
M- Cauthen
8081A
4791
Heptachlor
c 0.0002
mg/l
0.008
82
2/20/01
A t20
M. Cauthen
8081A
4791
Lindane
t 0.0002
mg/1
0.4
96
2/20/01
16:20
M. Cauthen
8091A
4791
Methoxychlor
c.0.0002
mg/1
10.0
ill
2/20/01
16:20
M. Cauthen
8081A
4791
Taxaphene
t b.0050
mg/1
0.50
103
2/20/01
16,20
M. Cauthen
0081A
4791
S11Vez
0,0100
mg/1
1.0
73
V20101
16.:19
R. Hunt
8151A
5567
Heptachlor epoxide
0.0002
mg/1
0.008
98
2/20/01
16t20
H. Cauthen
8081A
4791
TCLP'Extraction
Initiated
2/1541
16:00
K. Stewart
1311
2792
Zero neadapace Extraction
Initiated
V15/01
16:00
K. Stewart
13)1
2792
ND - Not detected at the report limit.
Matrix Spike Recovery for
TCLP analptes reported
from Batch Qc
TCL:P Prepartior f011Ov$ method 1311. SW-846 Revision 3.
----- r- ------------------ ---------•------------------ -- .---- ------
SampleExtraction Data
Wt/Vo1
Parameter Extracted Extract Vol pate Time Analyst Method
TOLD Herbicides 5.0 m1 5.00 m1 2/17/01 O.-Yeager 3510
TCLP Pesticides 100, ml 5.00 m1 2/16/01 J. RuddeX% 3510
Tom' BRA'$ 500. ml 1.0 ml 2/20/01 J,Cott 3510
Sample report continued . . .
2960 FORIFIt CRE1011torl DRIVE / NASHVILi..g.TK 37204 / 615-726.0177 / FAX: [phone]
rOe

be/U4'21ab1 15:3/ 33b/bb2314 HYDROANALYTICAL PACT- bb
.erica,
f o
►1 GD1F0VA T e0 a( t
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Laboratory Number: 01-A19834
Sam3la ID: #210106
Project: L0153
Page 3
Surrogate
`----. ------
X Recovery
Ran Target e
$ $
BTLVGRO Surr., a,a.a-Tr
111.
VOA Surr. 1,2.DCA, d4
109_
VOA Burr. Toluene d8
71. - 136.
VOA Surr, 4-BFB
109.
122.
Surr-Vltroaenzene•d5
98•
65.
. l22.
Surr-2-Fluorobipbenyl
73
10, - .
136.
Surr-Terphenyl d14
$2'
10. - 13
e�+x'z'-Phenol d5
64.
10. - 119.
®urr-2-Fluorophenol
67.
10. - 69.
surr-2,4,6-Tribromophencl
70
10. - 144.
pest surr-a
TC
94.
. - 1
surr-D1butylch10rendate
40.
2-
3. 150,
surr-DCPAA
20
l0. - 1.
1 + Recovery outside Laboratory hiatorical
73.
10. - 16161.
limits.
All rbsult8 reported on a vet weight basis_
These results relate only to the items tested.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full and with
permission of the laboratory.
Report Approved By:
Paul E. Lane, Jr., Lab Director ri
Michael H. Dunn, M.S., Technical Director
Johnny A. Mitchell, Dir. Technical Serv.
Eric S. Smith, Assistant Technical Director
End of Sample Report.
Report Date: 2/44/01
Gail. A. Lage, Technical Serv.
Glenn L. Norton, Technical Serv.
Kelly S. Comstock, Technical Serv.
Pamela A. Langford, Technical Serv.
Laboratory Certification Number: 387
2960 Fos?tit CRBIGHTON DRIVP,' / NASHV1u E.TN 37204 / 615-726-0177 / F,tk! 615-776-0954 / 600-765-0980
yl

ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP.
Mr. Mike Shelton
Hydro Analytical Laboratory
6300 Ramada Drive, Box C-2
Clemmons, NC 27012
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
(615) 758-SBSB
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS November 27, 2000
ESC Sample # : L29874-01
Date Received November 17, 2000
ESC Key
Description Water
Site ID
Sample ID 206296
Project #
Collected By K. Kulow
Collection Date 11/15/00 12:10
Result
Det. Limit
Units
Method
Date
Dil.
Parameter
1.0
mg/l
9060
11/21/00
1
TOC (Total Organic Carbon)
BDL
BDL
0.0050
mg/1
6010B
11/24/00
11/24/00
1
1
Arsenic
Cadmium
0.0023
0.0020
mg/l
mg/1
6010B
6010B
11/24/00
1
Chromium
0.010
BDL
0.0020
0.010
mg/l
6010B
11/24/00
11/24/00
1
1
Copper
Iron
8.1
0.020
0.0050
mg/1
mg/l
6010B
6010B
11/24/00
1
Lead
07
0.01
0.007
0.010
mg/1
6010B
11/24/00
1
Zinc
Volatile Organics
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
Benzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
mg/l
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1
Bromodichlorometlane
BDL
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
Bromoform
Bromomethane
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1
n-Butylbenzene
BDL
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
sec-Butylbenzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
mg/
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1
Chlorobenzene
BDL
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
Mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Chloroethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
-11/20/00
'1
Chloroform
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1
Chioromethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
2-Chlorotoluene
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1
4-Chlorotoluene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
BDL
0.0010
Mg/l
mg/1
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1 .
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
Tre/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
,1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
]
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene11/20/00
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
6230D
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
BDL
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
BDL - Below Detection Limit
bet. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL)
Laboratory
Laboratory
Certification
Numbers-
PH-0197,
FL - E67487,
GA - 923, IN -WV
C-T
- 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA -
NC ENV375,DW21704,
I-2327, CT-
ND - R-140,
SC - 84004, TN - 2006,
VA -PageO1�of 6-33 233
.KY - 90010, MST - 0016, -
All.

ENVIRONMENTAL
SC I ENCE CORP .
Mr. Mike Shelton
Hydro Analytical Laboratory
6300 Ramada Drive, -Box C-2
Clemmons, NC 27012.
Date Received November 17, 2000
Description Water
Sample ID 206297
Collected By K. Kulow
Collection Date 11/15/00 12:38
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
767-5859
Fax [phone]
Fax (
Tax I.D. 62-OB14289
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
• November 27,
2000
'ESC Sample #
L29874-02
ESC Key
Site ID
Project #
Parameter
Result
Det. Limit
Units
Method
Date
Dl.
TOC (Total Organic Carbon)
1.5
1.0
mg/1
9060
11/21/00
1
Arsenic
BDL
0.0050
mg/1
mg/1
6010B
6010B
11/24/00
11/24/00
1
1
Cadmium
0.0028
'0.012
0.0020
0.0020
mg/1
6010B
11/24/00
1
Chromium
BDL
0.010
mg/1
6010B
11/24/00
1
Copper
43.
0.020
mg/1
6010B
11/24/00
1
Iron
Lead
0.021
0.0050
mg/1
6010B
11/24/00
11/24/00
1
1
Zinc
0.082
0.010
mg/1
6010B
3 Volatile Organics
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Benzene
Bromobenzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1.
Bromochloromethane
BDL
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Bromodichloromethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Bromoform
Bromomethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
n-Butylbenzene
BDL
0.0016
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1
sec-Butylbenzene
BDL
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
Chlorobenzene
BDL'
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
623OD
11/20/00
1
Chlorodibromomethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6290D
11/20/00
1
Chloroethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Chloroform
Chloromethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
2-Chlorotoluene
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1
-Chlorotoluene
BDL
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1`
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1
l,l-Dichloroethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/l
6230D
11/20/00
1.
1,2-Dichloroethane
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,1-Dichloroethene'
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
BDL
0.0010
mg/1
6230D
11/20/00
11/20/00
1
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
BDL
0.0010
0.0010
mg/1
mg/1
6230D
6230D
11/20/00
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
BDL
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation
Limit(EQL)
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789,
Laboratory Certification
AL - 40660, CA - I-2327, CT-
Numbers:
PH-0197,
FL - E87487, GA -
923, IN -
C-TN-01
233
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC
- ENV375,DW21704,
ND - R-140,
SC - 84004,
TN - 2006, VA
-Page03,of 6-
44

CORPENING CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
APPLICATION FOR A NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT
LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
SECTION C

KEY TO SITE SECTIONS:
y ------------------------------
Curtis Causb 1
Wayne Ross ----------------------------------- 2
T. & T. K h a n g------------------------------------ 3
Frank Queen ----------------------------------- 4
KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS:
RESIDENCE/DOMESTIC WELL SUPPLY
PLACE OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY up
WELL (SEPARATE FROM RESIDENCE)
FIELD NUMBER 2 •
AUGER BORING 0
BUFFERED AREA
FENCE ` 4 K
GATE 0 A

1 \ A .
v Mar
•lyS
6N0 MTN. 1552
', 1 IS7a5n ;`C)
_./�
900 1554 )Hankins ' 1501.6 N .Vpp lsw —i �-�, •'�
ITt,\ 1SS0 1•3�0 \\; `\ 1y10 i3M t\•^I 1567 1 '\
\In09'� 1301. SN^Rdd '9 ��� \ �4 N' y�1 S66. OT •`\\
1 W 1635 1583
,• •\ Nebo i569 '\ •al
GARDEN CREEK—
� � 8 $WTHERN LiI1I9
• �\ Mm. ,
70 A
t I ,'s 1762 •1
ti•, \fir —
EAST ON \�odap
2 i 'rop. 1,E11 \/
if1.0
l
ry I= O \ A
`i MARION ' b /
IM
1765 � � .� -► �r G11� ii Q u.ee v�
IB
�. )p 1756
` J • G 04Nf , O \ \ �s 1B.i5 1 N .<
'WESrJ
_1 POP. 1A1,596 1764 6 1 /A ♦ /� c `f
\.IDMNC.) \•.\ \ 0 IL f 1764 •.' /...r.- c•\76a1 C,><�r-��5 CGtu5�7Y
1758
17961767
YVaYN� �y5
b C 17991799
Glenwood
1798
\ / ili
Dytartve ino /1nz • • r 1' PILOT MTN.
N \. „yam,;,•
1eo2 ,n1 Il l �)N
10011 1163 �pp •"/ r\ J 1/66t
' .�•' r•• 1777 '�•'1773
1292
'• _ i .a 177 0 1
9 1�35 \ 1784 1783 9 / r 1777
o \ J 1775 1 35•7s'
.1.1147
Vi
v• b 1 �•� . '\ p 1783 1802 r �o BOLIN
z / KNOB e+�i'r_
1779 2 G7 •�T
I. •
/©
1147 I ro i � 1775 j
`o
\ K IA
/ I 1780.
I ♦ n \ •—.._..
. GRASSY �._.__._._ .�
MTN. `•� I 1781 �• 64 \ .
• RICH MTN.
• 221 .
C O U N T Y

SITE SUMMARY SHEET
County McDowell Site C
Owner Curtis Causby
Operator
Address 9090 Hwy. 226 South Nebo, NC 28761
Phone [phone] hm. 828)652-6462 bus.
FIELDS
TOTAL ACRES
EST. APPLICABLE
ACRES
CROPS
1
24.5
9.5
fescue-hayland
Total:
24.5
9.5
BUFFERS:
Fd. 1: There are numerous houses and a church with wells buffered at 400 feet; one residence
with a signed buffer wavier to 100 feet; 50 feet to the public right of way (Hwy 226) buffer
and property line buffer; two drainageway buffers; and excessive slope buffers.
DIRECTIONS/COMMENTS: From Marion VWVfP go South on Hwy. 226 about 5 miles, turn
right into field just before Dysartsville Church.
Additional residential buffer waivers may be acquired in the future.

�a S.. �j ,� rY��+r � � ��:�t�� ^ �,�"�• �?�!'w„', ��*�6,P ���g�'���t? •*'Ya"� . TM": ��� =4T i
s s� wt' UY
M_�zr -�,`' r17 xwf �a "yy � v :� ��• •.•.� <..; e" b- a r.•,,�•''.��+rw
�" ��i,�`/'��f�,i���xF:A" h, �,� 'w.��,, `2e � � •�� � �t .f'4�r sr ti i�� � r " rF`+ a'i,.
�n�.eSi`� ��� F �t�� f�:i r J 4 j �` r 3 ".��.�,�•��. � .`r� r'�' �t; r� ,^# • I r .
-
�,
r �* 'M'"' �6,k•�„` ! lre, i,^.'.,,y, k t ` r T>a'* -
��t,4��`•.�}�i,r,
471
t ..,t , "r.0. � .•
_ i. s '�4z r? �-���,'F� t. ,.t t �. ,..i,{,1�#•s��� .r.-r ��, {^�'wY - y ! - t r: •�'''y:.' .,,y �,'
> ���� F� '' 1-a Fp f' �'•� r{� r Jf `es; t ?# S {`
�:: s t i .,• " , r +tf:n �"k" a r ? Y,y -4('ry,
�. xa d Y`' ., x,W � s �s•��{. • � q a t•i' .+`�v ''f e`
Yy; i;, 5T�5k�;�ri1t-°h.-FCe •,•i � �"e4. : 4°�+�'`' 4 3 `�.-cYa�,,.�,, i��S�3t,,.+:�a's".y ��'�r r {,� +rr !
S x {+� F �:PS'•%#,r' ter,®
gov" ��c 'i.� � � _ r ��a •� °i r fit f. � -
�.*'' fir, r0;, ,t'dF;s' {? : r
j s R k� y t �i}� }fin aSsy.* y rt' r ri t ! In t y
�
red j�pka'. Vtty�4~� Tl . J
*141
IF
w11 yy Y =.. !• �- x� �~ 4Y 4� t\ i Y >
y� f! � t I }�.,,,- . i .`-'�.` Eq, J!",.� ! �.� � }i�y:�• {"4 it 1 •.
1r I. � a, 4 � x'.r w � ... .\? `�q�«`�'^�. ``�.y�. ; t � t �-` i +.r� �.L • �} • .
�M�� ter,"_^:+,;���LL¢ t' s., •� � � �� � ` t Pt_�'s�'� a ® r tS^�-�L v ,
� r7�� td`'° y AF` w' 3 �_ hrr ^",`.�` " >rt "+���, as a.rt � >� ,A 4�� . +, Iv •�� >
;F
: Afto
r' t#
'. �e-,�� � �e; � .bt'S'.,�, "' � V ?+`'+-'�,.�„ s { .r � 1�.,� �'*.� �, - rr �r� s �•�': �7"� �,�� A,,.��A ^'(y�t'F�.i`��•���.at�.
,�::� °ta'+�' ' rye. � f.r e'r•+t�_ - . c „� ` - ,>r F' -t:c � �j'� '
\'- i t , •.,. * ;
. d .� •tw�i�,4� � ,�' xv.�'r thy. +` s �._ .,t; '< '�'t •� . t - y �'
at. 3�',# " y r F`} •� rr� try` i
'Are,-
fo �A 5",
�
i,..ly k � i E �#w 7� � wx4 � `.F• : ,.y, - ,rS ..�'' i t!• t�i•ti
���•��, qy ! x,• �u-'.{S,w � �,�,`�P���, �.h t -�t�Tv .x` a 4 .i' + � . , '�� , ,,.L� �*
YIN
"ti. 3ey t•. 'M } '3'4 9 y+ W ,y. > r� Yc b 7,,, :+. ro y,. .y, ^
J�..r �11 r`'''... Y:'kg •, ` �' �`.�a`� ar��
�Sv�v..,t�.,Xc -
�:� � ,'r1�"y� c���"� � �-y7 r •`r'�`i,.`��r��r��-. *'�..,n� x aR �fi :+�F,�' e;;.. �:�. _ �
L `�� r ei� Rt � s k"'r�S � hY yy .yt ' efxt F �sr � T_' C r t ,+f � � �i 1., • '
fir 7F,...Y`�,Fty}� �,A�, ua,r,�r` �;,� �C''',+&� '�� •�.'Cp �.�x3.�y� r :�'r+: �; - ..�
i � wZ �.. .� �� �,�'is�sdas �'Ztf3Lv�,sw�'3:'X.;$r•� Y1. 1 • x•"9� �
v$" r• } y +° wt.."`�t� � `t^i.T Tj, .y�,` v �rW' r'�1 4�� s. an-'"-`-'---..cr,,•e a, 4y'� "c.i"i�
nr"F"'�•p
4'Y'�a+fGl f�� ems, 3�`ya
y=rSjt 4. _ ��' a. ^.xi, • ""t � �'�
� �" �'«. ''�� ";fe. - ;r�;a--ro.�r"a.3" K-- � ' °}�y1.•m K} Y yam* `t �
},"� ,. �• i'M0" �R ��4M 6..' Fes. "•*.�8 . . Y `vlr�iayr"�r � �a+`�_�S,�.t• ��

iP.,
D
/278
3945
X
N
4 05"
0
V
. . . ............. ....
3944
..D'vsartsvillia-C-h
ToFD MCI?
\Ar
Z-
L)OD
Co+..Tyt+. 40
D qa V
rus
Ch
A
39430OOm.f
S unn� Grog e Ch
...... .. ........ . . . ....
26
,,e m
2
D
1 NTER I OR -5 593 7'
—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY.. WASHINGTON. D. C.-1973
41900om-E. 1 !--% \,' 1 8 1 c52"" 0"
S A" R Ir.5 V I L L E i P 1.

cC2
1.0000 Feet . a%kst7%j
,3Kilometer5
p0C
SHEET NO. 7 OF 10

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:
Field#: I5��d ` Date:
Predominate Soil Series: t (L- l 0, 1)
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table: ��P e LQ
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone: YJ r=)(AE-2 L -e 02;Of'-
JJ
Slopes C' r) C)1t1 'b:u
©C ` Field Anaksis of Soils
De th — Texture Structure Matrix Color Mottle Color
CA
�l
b�
ITS �'lV
Q,
5-42
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
I - loam
sc - sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Type of Crop
Y
Leizend
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
C�VI & t A

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: City of Marion
Contact Person: J. Robert Boyette City Manager
Address of Permittee: P.O. Box 700 Marion NC 28752
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: City of Marion Corpening Creek WWTP
Site ID Number. C
Field Number: 1
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site): McDowell
County
Owner of Property used for residual application: Curtis Causby
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns: Hayland
Intended use or disposition of crops: not for human consumption: livestock feed
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits City of Marion
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Landowner's Agreement..
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page IE of 18

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of. Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access
to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following
residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third -
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
FORM LARS 06/94 Page 16 of 18

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with
reference to the subject matter of this Agreement
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized. officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place
on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another
municipality, contractor, or, other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement. The land
application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this
permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
Residential Buffer Waiver Signed by John Kirby, noted on Site Map
as D 1; agreement signed to reduce distance to as little as 100 feet.
FORM LARS 06/94 Page 17 of 18

* t t t r t t r r* r .t t r*** t* t** t r r* r r* r r r**** r t t r r r t• r*• r r r t t** r*
I,
Vkv have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
t.
Lana wner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, ��� COUNTY,
1, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that lure
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
My commission Expires
SEAL:
Caroline J. Edwards
o � Ul
IC
utheriford (County,NC
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * r * * * * * * * * * * * * * * r * * * * * * * * r * r * * * * r r r
1, have read this land uwner'a agreement and du hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
t * * * * * * t * * * * * * * * t * * * t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as speci ed herein.
P -
Data;
FORM: LAORS 06/94 Page 18 of 18

EARTHWISE DESIGNS RUTHERFORDTON, NC
City of Marion, North Carolina
Land Application of Biosolids Project
WAIVER AGRE
iResiAQv.ce. owned by: . U
�S C h
Owner of Residence:
Address: 14
agree that the City of Marion may apply biosolids (sludge) at agronomic rates to
within 1 00 feet of my residence (minimum of 100 feet). I
understand that a 100 foot buffer zone will be maintained around any wells,
ponds or streams which may be on my property; and a 50 foot distance to
property lines.
Date:
Field Number:

A 1 N n O o
a
IY
i
�Q�Y1 11 •9 �� l
' BONY
NR09
.CC.fC
� 0
fLL
d ;
Ir
'N_Ln M"
�m•J.
i�
Y
N �
�naaY1 � �ytba� A181
i
Z
ld'OIrI i 4.l U 1')I A
'N11V '
WIN
tissvas
i

SITE SUMMARY SHEET
County McDowell 54-e- '>-,
Owner Wayne Ross
Operator -
Address 2545 Pax Hill Road Morganton, NC 28655
Phone [phone] hm. 828)205-0615 mob.
SUFFERS:
Fd. 01: There is a tenant house with well owned by Mr. Ross at 150 feet of the field; 50 foot
public right of way (road) buffer and property line buffer; two drainageway buffers; and
excessive slope buffers.
DIRECTIONS/COMMENTS: From Marion WWTP go South on Hwy. 226 about 8 miles, turn
right on Walker Road, go 1 mile, first field on right, gate at far end of field across from barn.

IVA M Ar I

zii
—7bg
.HeD
IoA . , , - 1: . .,
EwEs
Dysartvi 16 .4 1 ,;
HcC2 03 HeD
rC2
j HC;C2 IoA HcC2
r
ep-
wafer'
t
"C
W.1
1772 HcC
14 �
KCGZ P.2 '.EWE
'71
.0
HcC2
7 EWE
HcC2 EcF
D'�
H
HcC2 VD
1171 -—,u
mew
HcC2 EwF-:.
eD H HA HcC2
1776
r E
EWF- ...
W HcC2 EcF C.F
keD .12
CC2
wE Ew& e dri
MJ
Ec F Co EWE
EWE
aD
AdU EcF.
EWE".-
c F"
H
HcC2
C A
kr?
'W 11;r
"WiO A
EWE
E PVF-
j7- Or rllzJ w
C a
r-v V, c
A
4-1
.1
0 7
'A
Y.
�,E
GHeD -'E E
EwE�-'
EWE
),Oi k7
EvD
F'7�,
wE rw Ec
.firwo
EvD-
.—Yr t.,E -2.000
Evu
E4
Ec F�
0--
EcD�

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
operator:
�} Date:
Field#: I
Y t
Predominate Soil Series:
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:
Slope:
Field Anal sis of Soils
Matrix Color Mottle
De th Texture Structure
2 S -
Lend
g
Texture: s - sand
Structure: g - ranular
is -loamy sand wsbk - weak subangular blocky
sl -sandy loam msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
scl -sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
I - loam
sc - sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Type of Crop
k

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: - My of Marion
Contact Person: J. Robert Boyette. Cijy Manager
Address of Permittee: P.O. Box 700 Marion NC, 28752
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: City of Marion Corpening Creek WWTP
Site ID Number: R
Field Number: 1
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site): McDowell
County
Owner of Property used for residual application: Wayne Ross
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): --
Land use or cropping patterns: Harland
Intended use or disposition of crops: not for human consumption:. livestock feed
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits City of Marion
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Landowner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 18

TIPULATIONS:
" 1. The landowner or hi representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established Incnitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or h s representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, . and
I twelve (12) months a1er termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued b the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental .Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
i
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
_ the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
S. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access
to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following
residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
FORM LARS 06/94 Page 16 of 18

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with
reference to the subject matter of this Agreement
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
J gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place
on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another
municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement. The land
application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified by this
permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
Residence across from field is owned by Wayne Ross, buffer reduced
to 150 feet at his request.
FORM LARS 06/94 Page 17 of 18

t•*•• i s i••• f s s* 6 i•• s•• i s•• i• A 1► r_tr • f• t r r r*+• r r r r r r r r r• f„* r ._
` have read this land owner's agreement anti do hereby grant permission
I,
au L&. Perrnl apply sludge/residual w my lands as specified herein. L.1
W
jAna Owiky
NORTH CAROLINA, C � � �' COUNTY,
1, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that , ► � ����
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of nOJ LS.;— � , 499
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission Bxpires L _-)-� -A-057A—
SEAL
Caroline J. Edwards
Notary Public
Rutherford County, NC
r * • i i ■ * * * • * * * • • i * • i f * R * * i s * * * f * * * * • f * * • f * * • • • i f ■ * • • * r r f •
1. have read Wis land uwncr'b agrtemcnt and Ju hemby age:: to abide by
the s ipulauons and restrictions as specified herein.
Dale
r b! A*� r s r r** s r*• f i* i f r f* r r ,r s r r r+ e r r# r r �► r r•• r r• r r r � r r a. r r
I have read this Lind owner's agmCmeni and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as s cified herein,
FCC -
FORM: LAORS 06/94 Page 18 of 18

1577
! _G.
.---1600 t95a •)Hankins ' 1�Ot.a "' `� -IJC� � 1� Isae •
26
- • Iss¢ q P'1„ �' � �
1950 190 \\ . IS{a I543
1036 / • • •• • • \ J ♦ \
1Ea9'� 1701. so. fpm'9 \�•� 17{O a 1595 •`' \
T ' tr W' lx�� 1536 1583 19E5 %iSC6•\ T, y \'�.
Nebo 9
I.
GARDEN CHEEK/" 3 1, a • 70 ro •orwnw —
KW 1,1{7
NNacl 8 SWrNERN ' , o
Little O
\ i 70 \ Mtn.
aI _
\ EAST ON
1. 0
MARION
/ rm. 411M
/ / '1• 17 1763
v.eevk
V
WFSfJAW110S1 � .
-
: {: ib .. /.\ �6a 1 Mi -V% L
1758
1796
KX 1798 ` e
U . \ / ' • 1 1797 / 9\ • 176711769
\q\ I7m 1
Glenwood MQY'�Oti O 'C 1799
\ 111
Ina n I 1
1798 �i 769
Dysaliville tno !Im . / 1 PILOT MTN.
\ --
N \.,
•,\, I r --- wlron ---ula.—._-- 1 .Ieao•; -•, , 1
scots' 1163 / 1802 1771 I 1 Q
�! o I
1292
9 1135
II47 .` 1784 1 1783 9 /� Im •J IT7 1
BOLIN
KNOB
17-78
1147
— i 1775
oil c
I
•'I tas .
v.(n Mtn.
1780
• •� 1781 �' f 4
._.: MTh'. MTN�J
221`'f
e I
C O U N T Y
e
s e

SITE SUMMARY SHEET
County McDowell 5;-4 - K
Owner Toua Khang, Tong Khan - nephew, uncle
Operator Toua Khang
Address 129 Pierce Road Nebo, NC 28761
Phone [phone] (farm)
FIELDS.
TOTAL ACRES
EST. APPLICABLE
ACRES
CROPS
01
24.0
16.0
fescue -pasture
02
44.0
38.0
fescue -pasture
Total:
54.0
ZY
BUFFERS: Fd. 1: The owner's residence is buffered at 100', see landowner agreement form.
Seven residences along Landis Lane have signed waiver agreements, attached and
as follows:
Dwellings D1 and D2: owned by Ruby Kelly, waived to 100 feet.
Dwellings D3 and D4: owned by Sy Thao, waived to 200 feet.
Dwellings D5 and D6: owned by Chia Kee Yang, waived to 200 feet.
Dwelling D7: owned by Kenneth VanBuskirk, waived to 200 feet.
There are also 50 foot public right of way (road) buffer and property line buffers; two
drainageway buffers; and excessive slope buffers.
Fd. 2: Dwellings D3 through D7 buffers are waived to 200 feet, see above. There are 50 foot
public right of way (road) buffer and property line buffers; 100 feet to the ponds and
streams buffers; the garden is fenced out. No excessive slope on this field.
DIRECTIONS/COMMENTS: From Marion WWTP go South on Hwy. 226 about 7.5 miles', turn
right on Landis Lane, go 1.2 mile, field 1 on the left, field 2 on the right.
Field 2 is being cleared of apple trees, converted to pasture this spring.

VQ
�73 , _ C
on
r
V . 1 .118I`
;j-,A
71
11
35
- `
` t 1
-
•.ci �_ L 1111
� � ':� ±. 's � '1. 'F, j .fir; ±,� ! �� ` - ` jc•i
i
4 T I _ `rk9./�
�} r �' s p. , r�..f ..,+.., , t'*i .�?x S i �(t„ >.... ^.-as 4jx a+s: C �� �� S • f.
Et _r
j
. L t T _� �.0 � 11� V yk�J"�'fi �•t� bb _�Yu� '-.Yr r � 1 � Eu� S ,�: Fd � 3r t -t �`i. ;�Ff� _
ptk
- - ;t.�,.� F - -f r -�T Z� '-- �-r�--. a.? �. " r�5.. �r�.'� �•a ;f F=��.f rt'� 4's ��v �' �ii�\�\'��.7i:
�- ii ,'� I � *,.F`+ a-.... _., � '�"' C... .� F ,. r .'�' �`'�3 'i tA�l�: a '� : -r: �,•
".' r� � �r�•• -..•�'�L •1 r F 'h� ,a'� Trt Tom- '..r ��.� - ��J +t � .. k i ..YV"�Jy :l eR- �i
��*--. '^1'i-rr ,�•_ r� ar __ _. .J�• -,y� Z CAM ^.� j i �' x `* _
;:-*:=Y�+ vs d E�r-`3•., p s^ _ ��i � t _F�-w:... sT,,t_ � ����-r�' xir'` � at,:�'�:: ,,,�2 �+r__r �t>�,;`,r � r r t ""z r/�j }� t �)
r7s -i^ r'� . k r -�(� �� xsT +-t 3^ r a,, �.. �., ,L.l•t;tt1~3 ' '� c._.. r.. + '7�� .,: .�j * 1� `t j ' r
?
1 -.-.. r•. ,f.. ` t _ 'a- .� � —� r`a. ate!' �.t. `�,r"1>S:s3��`Z . � '4 t�� L_ r F- �, ;r �.' -
' ��..t xi � _ Ys� s r.. };; � `7' ° r i - � z��r,LS.t �- i•��"r`c ?? �i �'�- -r' . p �' � P = ° � .- �' +�
. '� ,, 3.�, -Qr r.l�-�i r ��'`- .r1�. t .� 3. k :cam- . .-i�� •�ti�1_ '. .,`�.-J. � - t t -,} 11 � s
dJ. )Il I . ;� '.T- r- _!� F+ -. L� - + f +.�-, �� . ' t.F,-�:—.��'."' t J i. •1 .5 . Y �, 1 :..�, _ ._-._ =Ysa .u^. _ .-:: .�.- .. _: rL..-:^ice• .%-T . i�-_r✓ - `. ._/ i

�m
HeD E
-'-
-Dysurtvilli 10A
IoA
\Z:V,
'�,132
11 B021
HeD.
HcC2
/' HcC2
IoA
BrB:
water`
7
YX e
10 He
HcC2 7-EXE
pc�2
�He
rc
2
0 rieu
�H2
4*
4i '-,E,:,E HcC2
"tHicp
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HcC2
lilt
He
EEO W�
HcC2
Heb EwE
Hc6�w HcC2 6F
F1 7 776
E
EwE"
EwE
-cF -Ca
H D'
wE E 6, CV
6nt
..HeD
EwE
Co t
L t., `EwE
HeD
N EcF,'
CaF.'-
CC2
-�x
�eip
0
.7\
C)
EwE
E
EwE
EWE'-
Ew
EwE --`7;,
....... .......
may
Ev
WE- K hom
EwE a
945t KI
.4,* EwE
EwE 4'
cci
co
�L4
2-00
tvD A
Eci
E F
EwE
E�YE'.
'0
C11 Xi
E-'
EvD
41
Ci
E cF,, F,,
-EcD

C12
SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator: j
\ �- ;�Cx,.� Date:
Field#: ,
a \
Predominate Soil Series:
0 ° v-o 2
�I
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:LO
Slope:
z -,
Field Analysis of Soils
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
sc sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Type of Crop
it.i..t.4v rnlnr Mottle Color
Leese=
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:�aa
Field#: (__1_ i{- C�`-' ' Z Date:
Predominate Soil Series:
GC SU � i`•-� � �� G�_1i �YbC�'�' C�
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table: ` `l
� 3P
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:
P
- Slope:
Field Analysis of Soils
�Y� h Texture Structure Matrix Color Bottle Color
O
De t — N 1/!�
�J
Ck
3
C-
es \_( 44
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
se -sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Type of Crop
Legend
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
n

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
1
Permittee: City of Marion
Contact Person: J. Robert Boyette. Cily Manager
Address of Permittee: _ P.O. Box 700 Marion, NC 28752
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: City of Marion Corpening Creek WWTP
Site ID Number: K
Field Number: 1.2
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site): McDowell
County
Owner of Property used for residual application: Tong and Toua Khang
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): ------
Land use or cropping patterns: _ Hayland. Pasture
Intended use or disposition of crops: not for human consumption: livestock feed
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits City of Marion
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Landowner's Agreement-.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
•• 1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee; County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, .and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment; Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Pernttee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public access
to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period following
residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site. agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
FORM LARS 06/94 Page 16 of 18
I

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with
reference to the subject matter of this Agreement
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credential's, enter and inspect any property, premises or place
on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with another
municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement. The land
application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified, by this
permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
Landowner residence at field 1 is owned by Toua Khang, buffer reduced
to 100 feet at his request.
Seven residences along Landis Lane signed buffer waivers, see attached.
FORM LARS 06/94 Page 17 of 18

f7ino , 4 - have read this land ownds agreement and do hereby grant permission
w the: Par-rolucc w apply'sludgetrasiduai to my lands as specified harein.�
Lama Qwner
3Z- � ao
NORTH CAROLINA, m,CNu- Ql COUNTY,
I. the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that ' bua
personally appeared before me this day and acknowiedgad lhe.due execuu of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of e = -'-jq-
My commission Expires —
SEAS.:
Caroline J. Edwards
No' inj Public
ith .;�r�ord County, NC
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * a a * * * A. ■ * * * * * * tit A ■ * * P P * * * * • ■ f ■ * * a * * ■ * * *.
j, have road this JWjd uwnt:r's agro MML and Diu hereby ahrw io abide: by
the sdpuladons and re:slrictions as specified herein.
i7atc:
* * * * * * * * * * a * * * * * * * * * * ! * * * * * * * * * * • * Y ' ■ * * * * a * * * * * * * & * a a 1 f *
i, . _ have read this land owner s agrccAlem and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as pecifwd herein.
_. J
-
Dwa
FORM: LAORS 06/94 rage 1S of 18

EARTHWISE DESIGNS RUTHERFORDTON, NC
City of Marion, North Carolina
Land Application of Biosolids Project
'P-e.S1'8'e1fCL5' -Dl , b 2
RESIDENTIAL BUFFER WAIVER AGREEMENT
Application Site owned by: TO i--11-[ 4
Owner of Residence: , \�-�'�'}� Le k u �
Address:
V 0 C. ,� rl G f
I
c9ignature)
agree that the City of Marion may apply biosolids (sludge) at ,agronomic rates to
within 100 feet of my residence (minimum of 100 feet). I
understand that a 100 foot buffer zone will be maintained around any wells,
ponds or streams which may be on my property; and a 50 foot distance to
property lines.
Date: —IZ—O I
Field Number: )L'!� I

EARTHWISE DESIGNS RUTHERFORDTON, NC
City of Marion, North Carolina
Land Application of Biosolids Project
RESIDENTIAL BUFFER WAIVER AGREEMENT
Application Site owned by: -' 4 L 1116eLl
Owner of Residence:/ (V) P-C)
Address:
%lid �?rl /WC
(signature)
agree that the City of Marion may apply biosolids (sludge) at agronomic rates to
within _ 2 DD feet of my residence (minimum of 100 feet). I
understand that a 100 foot buffer zone will be maintained around any wells,
ponds or streams which may be on my property; and a 50 foot distance to
property lines.
Date:
l
Field Number:

EARTHWISE DESIGNS RUTHERFORDTON, NC
City of Marion, North Carolina
Land Application of Biosolids Project
R-euSid2vtce5 IbS,
RESIDENTIAL BUFFER WAIVER AGREEMENT
Application Site owned b : U��i v-1
PP y .
Owner of Residence:
Address:
t'�
I
(signature)
agree that the City of Marion may apply biosolids (sludge) at agronomic rates to
within an feet of my residence (minimum of 100 feet). I
understand that a 100 foot buffer zone will be maintained around any wells,
ponds or streams which may be on my property; and a 50 foot distance to
property lines.
Date: " - f ;2 -y I
Field Number: K Z

EARTHWISE DESIGNS
RUTHERFORDTON, NC
City of Marion, North Carolina
Land Application of Biosoiids Project
?,AS dMA— `D 7
RESIDENTIAL BUFFER. WAIVER AGREEMENT
C — %1 GC
Application Site owned by: L& � �V\.G
J
Owner of Residence: �,� .� ;� t✓'C''�- �- v''�, ;v' ?5:, e ;, r °' •
Address: L - r. j 1, 2 C
(signature)
agree that the City of Marion may apply biosolids (sludge) at agronomic rates to
within 11_-_� b' feet of my residence (minimum of 100 feet).. I
understand that a 100 foot buffer zone will be maintained around any wells,
ponds or streams which may be on my property; and a 50 foot distance to
property lines.
Date:
Field Number: i� Z

Isa
GARDEN CREEK/-
/ ro�.,aer
;� 1UN�Wt.I 8
a1
I G G4AW
ST ) MAXON
TOf 159e
�ro C
�1
�raKii Q �.eev�
181b
1• N
1 ,176, 1 & \ lt76s :{:
j 1758
•.� N I• 1
eV .®� • > J . � t767 '� . •1
•� 1739 1798 O
�l ', v 1 S' '•1 1797 •9\' \. 1767 /. f 1769
rvg,, / •dry •••.'.` ':•l\ 1768 `..1
Glenwood may-, o 6 1799 i �•.\
Ie00 � \••Yu�'
lit
y' l 769
„9e 1 .J — i
/ Dysartville 1770 �,m • / 1 PILOT A(rN.
IODI 1163 j law ' 1771
�o \ 7
71
i A ti3s
178a ., /� 'p 177 1
J.•/ 1167 1_; •( nµ 'v 1 ,� 1777 3675'
0
1783 1802 /.: • _ n o BOLIN
I I . •v.. 1' 1778 2 `� KNOB
1147
I I 1775
•'t 143 ® II EE.. Yk .
�•' �i
1 \ Vein Mtn.GRASSY
MTNN 18
'� 1781
•,oH A?N.
at
1
C O U N T Y �
Ulf]
Mtn.
D _
"�•./••� 1803
I .'a•
r
' n
'•\ \ dS 1776
1 Y`ec\co, sQe��e�'0.+c$
(—'rvm VNW -r j' oho So��h a� w� '�.�� 11
0, lam- or i1nV�ac�.�_ C.. % rCVI.
�-ww� 1�e-� � � i�lciS or '�.� q�� • .

SITE SUMMARY SHEET
County McDowell Site Q
Owner Frank Queen
Operator
Address 5351 Patton Road Morganton, NC 28655
Phone [phone]
FIELDS
TOTAL ACRES
EST. APPLICABLE
ACRES
CROPS
01
15.0
7.0
fescue -hay
02
9.0
5.5
sm.gr./corn sil.
03
80.0
6.8
sm.gr./corn sil.
04
8.8
4.4
fescue -hay
05
16.1
7.3
fescue -hay
06
7.5
6.5
sm.gr./corn sil.
07
7.7
6.0
sm.gr./corn sil.
08
14.7
10.0
sm.gr./corn sil.
09
10.5
8.0
fescue -pasture
10
14.3
11.0
fescue -hay
Total:
183.6
72.5

City of Marion Land Application Proiect
Site Q, fds: 1 -10 Buffer Explanation
Field 1: 400' to residence and place of business; 100 ft. to stream; 50' to Road
right of way (ROW); excessive slope buffers.
Field. 2: 400' to residence and place of business; 100 ft. to stream; 50' to Road
ROW.
Field 3: 100 ft. to stream; 50' to Road ROW.
Field 4: 400' to residence; 50' to Road ROW.
Field 5: 400' to residence; 100 ft. to stream; 50' to Road ROW.
Field 6: 100 ft. to stream.
Field 7: 100 ft. to stream.
Field 8: 400' to residence; 100 ft. to stream.
Field 9: 100 ft. to stream; 50' to property line.
Field 10: 50' to property line; excessive slope buffers.
No residential buffer waivers have been signed as of this application date but
may be in the future and if so will be submitted.

�- ,�-•
,".,• .. r,. �, .t c ,Qv
—47
Al
c
VAI
rp
Yi 4y
r+- • r!'? '^�" u^I .C.Lt 4 t .�.-ti � � id+'"- i� 2 - i�
,}�`{ `` «Lwnr-�j A-:S,.i`•Os7"'�1. a'` ta``.{s
F '
�R
9 L
'�•p R
a
9
L
OK
2468
,E (510
-
1041
t
I
-7
c+ -P011N l

ow
E 1,150,000,5-XI7(p
IMUSINN M�t, -&ALI
'44r-80
Eb
E 1, 152,000
4 —MIN

+
Y, {.y ^Tc-�' S` 2y[�1$ �t,�'sC•, INDEX j��f'#�� �1'� £ta'L°"a r.'�' Y � ^' • . ¢ �� � 9 ay .•{j",S T �r
1`fF ¢3.y ;a .ryY ,�'r¢ 1 •, m n y+ .r. �Y3 t ter. v..
�-",cr e. L£r p.,. �p..` n+4 :i `S ' ti- !' fir 2 '•• soil w
1 ,,• 't` fJ�rP'eti114�•1 .ye.
l .� as "� ag-+ ytx
r
' i3 ^ y ' r ,_� - •T" < -
b. y,a. �, <aS � �w , e' '�+ tom+ 4 -� � �, `r`,� 5-� e.t'• ,,F' A ��d�-�• �c,��y �7`,,, � p.3}y� xs. r� J:. � ^F'r 'n'" u �- r� t ., -i-; � F"$•�� �a, .'�.,
�4 r � �j'�����°G � ' _�� •fit �' �. � � -.r Y - � � ,». A,. �` `:5.�� `. �--�....._
'•.k;^�'�-,. �l��t;,�J'J Te .t � �A��.1i' �'.: � 1` s:', a,r ,i �i� u
90
� y`3'♦ -�. 1's: � J � i.1
rS,� e:,{ei'° '4•��;q.w dT"- .k '� q'�' r � s'� •z �� _ C i)
at
�
`�{ r
I�
�yj,
St.t7 !•A' yjp' F'i c' ' T y S , :tf� I &CP_ \ �••* �•k Y ". ry
�� ����'t 3 3��5 ? h , ;°.3 � -••.x 4 � y ' b » J � y`�yi..k�a-a �i J • h'I 17 '
� .. .r. .pit G(".ia--t`rq � ; _ �� 'is ...'3i �Cy �: •tea ',6 , ,.
•� 5 .v I".�{w '�'a�'�'q ` 7r=! .'fie < s .:>`t'�,x'' -a -
F _ •- ,,,.„_{
JIV
4It
-s"I�•�k ,� Sa'� � •�'�m�xy aE'. d��'y r �¢ g�'{,
S p
y-�•�,+� ,ar � Y ,� -. ^r. .d\.. cue
,a i'^ x � � ��� 'a,_,�J'�a,.a� I Y`� r � .,'i -. • "a .Y��"���aJ�lt y _ CP .Y.
+^p r ' � �' � shy.' a��� y'�"36�.y'tT�"Y i. 4:' .�i �. ���� a y ,. .. � ':. � , J�••'3
J35nn +•t \ . + 7
p'i�,`*�s�,r'r.r•c1lr,�V s•. ^•'� ', r'�. '�! O^ /, d
,C 4r yrj V• a ..pQ� �r F q.
.r to ,c•�'�, . -<t_. t �la�r TrSt
gi
Auh 1 S� .a 4' •a�.# �` y r'��itj'. r� x � i �
VAR
ti�, uae S� ::• qIX ti PFiv.
4' r.•s•' ,. t�- t sf'`���$ •� •f `L M
� fir. d:♦ xv�'' . .
.dyttT•i ram, it � ���• �
,fir ti>.pn M.k� 'mac r•+.
y
NS e-1
F S,�� �9w�T y "�','��^•{�j� r�li4� 9i � ddil5�� r�i, �' 'p^ � , c 1
mm,
R ltt_ 4-vpt
' 50 !00
�. v'�

E 1 , 1 48,000 1, 1 50,000
a E 1-7 io
i �•y rx r�-,., �y'� � I�� .,� ,d0-7-TO-le
MIS
rSG �� ���� �; � ( , � ' ��5���,.��,,�.`}��I�i 7L ; 1NiR Y% i�84I9 i, �. � a• l",.
r � G:'��,pP�FP�e l�.'y.r �;���i'-:i+':���.•'.�' �jr�f4-�}.r�'���T.� 'i k�et�.- '� ..�! 4,. .�I "�.
��• s ,��'y�.�i x4 � s �� t�✓u ? ".F Gt �7,y,�. � �� � t�, c y M' � •� 1� r .w
�t dp a !=S^ @�{, s rfd�� �, ", sz t FrF � �P•.''s > ,�'�` � Yi'-�.{+� � t' •<' -
�rsi5
�yz
�t 9r $ Y 7�`�. ;• y�y„ i •� 73t1 yr. y'' '�a i ii x
`erx rFd lY?tt ro 1�� h �.c %444 3Fa fi. p.d .tb � a`a. r •. q •:
' P i ua•`, rr iP + �r x r+ `1 A.. :. Sts j x J r t .t a +�iJ r ' f' �'
Bit,
{. �E7••'.�1-%�. !i� + rr. P I
Ii t-•s ���,�, .Y. �,, . r v rl `,`if. M 12e , , r7i,E 3�...1P . `� . t'�• v ,,,,,,- +el{,%{ it , n,t : t �'7'•3r+a:T ��n` ' ��� � �58L �� �,�
``• •a. . i Y- Pr 'te.7`> arn.,. •N,1' u r .r
r \ S .Lix >r A • 1 r•1 Yri tjyNi-.� �' +l• i i� s�q••
..Y A a i h 7!t t , �:rl�+S J. ..,•.a'.r 'i.� r V - 'l '• '�6�s s '-f-, MA -pv t
� `s ! �� v`f - r � p�+ •� l� ,'s4 �{�; _ - j � �;��xy •i' -'f Jt ^a�v�� � ., '• ""Y 1 _
�°•,� � # . •emu a ��,� 4 , PS �Fl:�i P d��,,{t' .:� i•'?F ` i � �-/.L& �` C£.G ' '.a"�
�a.�=�•`,{ rStaT�.`i7 t "."`jji ' t'2�. ; "u ' '. v- �•Fn, r / } � 4
yy •�, Y` !l "° _alma, 5 '1(^�, - ,r';. .Ft�',/,jjj3q`•!F r
51. r.�n#v ay < t' Y y r -�°4, x• AY '°4�' '''6 4:4v d i /�{ g
-' ��� :l: A' i Y rr •+aT°i a 1 *..'� t1 d ,..tFl a F ! ��'e +�rYX rz ti
Y � � 3 - 1 r^v � y O• !c. ;, s� � S' -47' w 7 `N 4.; �' �+a r � "Li av � � ���� Y�y�g�"-
a e• : � x.. x,, �. : >ti �e7a�� r. - k •�. `��, 1: � 5.�--,yam
P����j � •'' '! �;. .:�' '•J -,� C•1V u-�Z,� .-t0 1�CFA� *�.'j µr''�'ti,: •ham.. 3tT •'�••4�sts".• y�^��.s�A� �'s�
d tI r{J♦, Zt' Y:• rt ® ��"ar ..,��� � { 7 �•.� f�� 3��%&�&p -i42r � ty�2 •t� s
i�s�,.� �. }�� th,. tt, ��• ! j4J ..� J(�+?i;" i .;a.�`t°* �, "1�'e' J•t. _
CI- 41
s
1 'r�'SS. y .J ^. e r+t•$ r ': { R 7.� f 7�y�Y• • y�,a
R3, j . s L • j , . ,��,! rny� r ��CR'' v1
/i`!'T .i � h f Y9 .�',i�"x}'F'Z 4 �� �``.�.y �� 7 tY33f•,��� i
v'ry r✓ 3`a.`°,�a T. j'4�' tt�-•a��
i��`'�t . "M - � � � sY,t ,IM $k •���Y ,�t t��.•'�^`�i�. •• J �.� �.�`x '+�?� �r��+ �
3 . ,y.. n . . �xsi •+. { 1-. i. - `+_ h „ i, +.t ".'+d{;.tt '� s t-a �., : i rt � A e�� SSrr-- � � .
� k,. ���x-�F�''1 ,�''�v"���(C"t �F�rbk F_ic �'•� ', }= ti'�� U.t'' �::' --i"<`'-{j? `l".1 ��'Fs x. 3.�'?'r ` 1
• ,.�4 �'�• T_ ,g� rt,�rtPRf¢. 'ery�,� � '' t ci`�h tr 1-t.�e...F�,s '
+
t � 7
r� ,y
F v,
r ,• t ;%° ;e pia Ai � '6 .d_ •iyt �di
� i' � ��,'�,:���,.�]�.l�,'j, �.. 5 .,yam .) ) - [ a. .�aa-z:•t -S' '�
i+ p�� ��frr u'1� i� n.V ��., �Wi, � I �',� r 1 J`4 '%'a � q{.(„ 4f64 .. � U x 1�•
1 };!' r 9^t:<„ C i-_' ra 'u'�S .i..v ti '" � S � ./.'>,%���,'•'' D;i : �� ��.
.41
�• to •tt�7f °'l ;� �` � ` i'c
IV
,YCrr(Y.'-e•C lY .Q�t'Se�'�' �� y�, +'a•*�``�`�°t4� S a y x
� �, .�.� .pit ,t�' ,• n �. > ,.r ,
�•- . , � rt ' t'. fit ra :i'ad P
MAP
Yr/L vv K a txQe tr
4- 4. 10. - 11 acres
1.&
�
�` RiM air "F
��{ t.:�_a.{Tb„�•,� lis°"Si��'l5itrt-iEt ' -.°�`x A �`�� ''�
sr..:Y �.Pxr ri ,6at`- +. •'} ` t w4 _ .Ttj- _

3948
3946
(D
cli
ti
CJ
N
3945
000
EET
3944
lei Ch it,
ZY,
�20
-f3
atte
lu
Sm, ba - I — m — — d "WIV
IN W
"kL
gk Nsz �Mlm
M.,
..........
CNNsr'It!
g

�o�ls Mai
�. Qaeev.
�; cads
l —to
t". zpoo'

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:
Field#: Date:
Predominate Soil Series:
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table: C4 , ! -
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:
Slope: \f 4 IL) �"Lo_ fit- PJLc
Field Anaksis of Soils
Depth - I Y1ckkA— Texture
Structure Matrix Color Mottle Color
01
1
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
se -sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
of Crop
Legend
Structure:
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:'^
Field#:
Predominate Soil Series: S i rl be r�
Date: ^ _ L— o \
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table: ? t�
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:
Slope: r — �
Field Analvsis of Soils
YUMh A rL n C Trrtnrr Rtmehtre Matrix Color Mottle Color
o
s
�2.
c4..
412
Texture: s - sand
Is - 'loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
sc -sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Leaend
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
Type of Crop . 5'( GL \ 4va,2,. — U\4
a

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:+
Field#: Date: � --' - — C 1
Predominate Soil Series: 1;1 V' a i t uAt u\,,- -
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone: -
Slope: P — 2— o / C)
__ Field Anaksis of Soils
Death \ 4\ cv'U C Texture Structure Matrix Color Mottle Color
VA -
VRYIq
ovaYlZ
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
sc -sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
of Crop
Legend
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
n

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:
12-q Field#: Date: �I L
Predominate Soil Series:
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:
Slope: 61 b
Field Anal°sis of Soils
rla.,th Tavt..na Ctnirt.rrw Matr iv rninr kInttle Color
-�
�.
ss b
CIS 1R
Lee
end
Texture: s - sand Structure:
It - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
I - loam
sc -sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Type of Crop CISILL-. l —
Cr - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
a

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator: • �_AA
Field#: Date: 2�
Predominate Soil Series: St n bG`cam �S " ., vNa'1a-
Depth of Seasonal HigYi Water Table: "
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone:
Slope:
Field Anal°sis of Soils
npnth �- . n Texture Strttrture Matrix Color Mottle Color
CA
ssbYA
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
sc - sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
of Crop L I Dv \
LeiZend
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
i

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator: - r
Field#: �Q Date: Zc4 © i
Predominate Soil Series:
> -Z '�'k
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone: A c
Slope: — 4A Ot 0
Field Analysis of Soils
i]enth i v\ Texture Strnrtnre Matrix Cnlnr Mnttle Color
©^
Ap 0
C \
ss.b
3 0
S C
s b
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
sc - sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
of ` Crop
Legend
Structure: g = granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
in - massive

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:
Field#: Date:
Predominate Soil Series: jx _bc) V�) . CAA C."
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
a
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone: 1 1 n
Slope: C� _ ©� O
Field Analysis of Soils
Denth o. Texture Ctrurfitre Matrix t nlnr Mnttla rAnr
2�-4�
SC
IOV1 SDI
p� �12
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 -loam
sc - sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Legend
Structure: g -' granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
m - massive
of Crop \K\ N��v �M 1 C_c'� V-\ -'�' ��a�

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Operator:
Field#: `�©�^� Date: 2-Lj 1 L t
Predominate Soil Series:
Depth of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth, Type of Restrictive Zone: �--()
Slope: (�; — 01 0
ac,�-k Field Analysis of Soils
Death Texture Structure Matrix Color Mottle Color
0 -
1
Ssb
C) 5/
y- o
SO
msb
?D\lt`Z (P /LQt
��2
Texture: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl - clay loam
1 - loam
sc - sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c - clay
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
of 'Crop
Legend
Structure: g = granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
m - massive

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
ate Soil Series:0" SOIV
Date: -- 3 2-(d 1
JI A lc OLk \n . n0C&,Z��C4�clPd
of Seasonal High Water Table:
Type of Restrictive Zone:
r,-D- 7jln
nenth ,n Texture
Field Analysis of Soils
Ctrnnfiira M.4Av rnlnn Mn4An Vn[nn
a4%
O `
i, t(A
C-A
r�Ns b V,
0 'R 13
101 7i 2
712
JL—
I
Texture: s - sand
Is
- loamy sand
sl
- sandy loam
scl
- sandy clay loam
cl
- clay loam
1
- loam
sc
- sandy clay
sic
- silty clay
c
- clay
sil
- silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Legend
Structure: g = granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
m - massive
of Crop �& 4A'C-`� �9.5 I U� V\ S l E,

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
Date: ,2y 0 1
Late Soil Series: o\ S GtV1am .- ncc_ w,
of Seasonal High Water Table: >� z� k
, Type of Restrictive Zone: n o na
Pe:� '- D
,L
Field Analysis of Soils
Depth � k A Texture Strnetnre Matrix Cnlnr Mnttle Cnlnr
� G
i
ms)0
vw b
Texture: s -
sand
Is -
loamy sand
sl -
sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
cl -
clay loam
1 -
loam
sc -
sandy clay
sic - silty clay
c
- clay
sil
- silt loam
sicl
- silty clay loam
of Crop
Legend
Structure: g granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
in - massive

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
. \�k 'e-e. V\
` Z Date: 2-ci I O
Soil Series:
of Seasonal High Water Table: ,l�
Type of Restrictive Zone: ► 1 ©� e-
0 - a olo
Field Analysis of Soils
TPEt1Ire Ctrnrtnra Mah4v Vnlnr X4nttle %nlnr
Ok
Cc\
t%
Texture: s - sand
Is
- loamy sand
sl
- sandy loam
scl
- sandy clay loam
cl
- clay loam
1
- loam
sc
- sandy clay
sic
- silty clay
c
- clay
sil
- silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Legend
Structure: g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
m - massive
of 'Crop - 5�) as

SITE EVALUATION SHEET
tor: e 10 VNI
�) Date: '5 12ci 1 C9
Soil Series:
i
i of Seasonal High Water Table: --
i, Type of Restrictive Zone: 1n'�
Denth -_ k t,. Texture
Field Analysis of Soils
Rtrurture Matrix Cnlnr Mottle Cnlnr
sc
L__),
2.S Y s/
I
Texture: s
-'sand
Is
- loamy sand
sl
- sandy loam
scl
- sandy clay loam
cl
- clay loam
1
- loam
sc
- sandy clay
sic
- silty clay
c
- clay
sil
- silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
of Crop 1rtSCAJ4_ 1 U rc-
Legend
Structure: g = granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
m - massive

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
e: City of Marion
Person: J. Robert Boyette. City Manager
of Permittee: P.O. Box 700 Marion. NC 28752
isj of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: City of Marion Corpening_Creek WWTP
Site ID Number: O
Field Number: 1 - 10
ion of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site): McDowell
of Property used for residual application: Frank Queen
of Property (if appropriate):
use or cropping patterns: Hayland. Cropland
led use or disposition of crops: not for human consumption: livestock feed: commodity crops
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits City of Marion
ifter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
rner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
ds while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
�d of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
nmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
pe711lowing
't is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
modifies or cancels this Landowner's Agreement..
of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 18

1.
Q
0
9
P
WA
A
a
The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit.
The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after teinunation of, this Agreement.
The Pemuttee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
1 L Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
131 The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
: LARS 02/95 Page 16 of 18

17.
This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
FOjRM: LARS 02/95 Page 17 of 18

t t t t i i i i t� i/ t i t i i i i i i t f i t i* i t i t** i*•• f• t• i• f• t f• f f f f t••• f
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
Sthe PermitteC to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
Lana Owner.
5-2- �l
Date
ORTH CAROLINA,\_ • COUNTY,
the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that �—,\r0.V,V Qu,eev1
rsonally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
ITNESS my hand and official seal this day of Kmc�\ �
CARY PUBLIC
commission Expires s — 3' ac)G4-
SIEAL:
Caroline J. Edwards
Notary Public
Rutherford County; NC
t * t * * i * * * * * * i i * • i f * * * f * * i i * * * * * • * * * • * * * * * * * * * • * • * f f • • • * •
1. have read this land owner's agreement and du hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and reslrictiuns as specified herein.
Date
* * * * * * * * * t * * * * * * * i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
P illcc
Data;
FORM: LAORS 06/94 Page 18 of 18

CORPENING CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
APPLICATION FOR A NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT
LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
SECTION D

'T REPORT
GRICULTURAL UTILIZATION / LAND APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS
armland in McDowell County is proposed as sites for land application of biosolids from
ie City of Marion Corpening Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. McDowell County has a
ublished Soil Survey. Utilizing information from the survey along with the soil profiles
aken at each site the following report has been compiled.
'here are four (4) proposed application sites: Site Code C (Causby); R (Ross); K (Khang);
nd Q (Queen). Three of the sites (C, R, and K) are all upland sites mapped as Hayesville
lay loam, 6-15% slopes, eroded (HcC2); also mapped HcC2 is field Q10. Fields 1 through
on the Queen tract (Site Q) are lower slope and floodplain soils: Braddock clay loam, 6-
5%, eroded (BrC2); Elsinboro. loam, 14%, rarely flooded (EsB); and lotla sandy loam, 0-
%, occasionally flooded (IoA).
site Q, Fields 1 through 9 in the Muddy Creek floodplain are now protected from major
ooding due to two upstream Watershed Control Structures.
,II of these soils are suited for land application of biosolids at agronomic rates, once
lopes above 10% are buffered out; and during the drier months of the year for the wet
atured soils in the floodplain. There was no evidence of a restrictive bedrock layer at any
f these sites where biosolids are proposed to be applied.
,pplying biosolids at agronomic rates means applying only enough biosolids to meet the
itrogen requirements of the crops to be grown. This is similar to what is done by the
verage farmer who fertilizes a crop every year, except with biosolids applications, 6buffer
ones are employed to protect surface water and groundwater. In addition to buffer zones,
ie slow release nature of organic nitrogen (mineralization) ensures groundwater
rotection. Chemical fertilizers, on the other hand, contain forms of nitrogen which are
;adily available and cannot be assimilated by plants all at once, increasing the chances of
itrate migration to groundwater.
brief description of each soil type is provided below. Information obtained from the
atural Resource Conservation Service Soil Survey was verified through auger borings in
ach field. The auger boring sites are indicated on the site map with an Y, and numbers
ne and two where more than one profile was described. Descriptions of the borings are
rovided on the enclosed site evaluation sheets. Soil samples were taken from each field
nd the analyses are included in the section for each site.

yesville clay loam, 6-15% slopes, eroded; mapping unit symbol: HcC2
ipped on Sites/Fields C1, K1, K2, R1, Q10.
is is a very deep, well drained upland soil common throughout the upper Piedmont and
i mountains. The profile description for the borings is found in the site section for each
d, generally two borings per field. This soil type has derived from residuum weathered
m gneiss or schist. It is classified as a clayey, kaolinitic, mesic Typic Kanhapludult.
ks found in field boring 1 for Site C1 described in the Soil Evaluation Sheet in the Site
>ection, the eroded surface layer is a reddish brown clay loam 3 inches thick. Some
surface pebbles were observed, having been brought to the surface by bulldozing and
:learing (conversion of this woodland to hayland). The subsurface layer is red clay to clay
c)am to 48 inches. Highly weathered, the shrink -swell potential is low, with a medium to
strongly acid reaction. Hydraulic conductivity is moderate, ranging from 0.6 - 2.0 inches/hr
upper 48 inches). At this upland site the seasonal high water table is more than 6 feet
)elow the surface and bedrock is typically found at depths greater than 6 feet.
Braddock clay loam, 6-15% slopes, eroded; mapping unit symbol: BrC2
lapped on Sites/Fields Q1, Q4 - Q8.
his is a very deep, well drained soil that formed from old stream sediments. Slopes are
;ss than 10 percent on all these fields. Certain areas of fields Q4 - Q8 are level with
luddy Creek and more wet -natured as described below under Elsinboro soils. Fields Q1
nd Q4 are on a higher elevation and should have no limitations for the timing of biosolids
pplications. The profile description for the borings is found in the site section for each
aid. Braddock is classified as a clayey, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludult.
ks found in the field boring described for field Q1 in the Soil Evaluation Sheets in the Site
Section, the eroded surface layer is a dark reddish brown sandy loam 4 inches thick. The
Subsurface layer is reddish brown clay to clay loam to 32 inches; then sandy clay loam to
$4 inches. Highly weathered, the shrink -swell potential is moderate in the subsoil..
-lydraulic conductivity is moderate, ranging from 0.6 - 2.0 inches/hr (upper 60 inches). At
his site the seasonal high water table is more than 6 feet below the surface and bedrock
s typically found at depths greater than 6 feet.
lsinboro loam, 1-41/6 slopes, rarely flooded; mapping unit symbol: EsB
Mapped on Sites/Fields Q2, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8.
Phis is mapped a very deep, well drained soil found on stream terraces that formed in old
,tream sediments. It is classified as a fine -loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludult. At the
>ite of the soil borings in Fields Q2, Q5, Q6, Q7, and Q8 a shallower depth to wetness was
)bserved than the typical Elsinboro soil profile would indicate. These areas of wetter
nclusions (lotla) will limit the usage of biosolids to the drier months of the year, which
vould be expected due to the level elevation and close proximity to Muddy Creek and its
ributaries. The profile descriptions for the borings are found in the site section for each
found in the field boring described for field Q2 in the Soil Evaluation Sheets in the Site
;tion, the surface layer is a dark brown sandy loam 10 inches thick. A layer of loamy

and occurs from 10 to 16 inches, then a silty loam layer from 16 to 24 inches with a
hroma of 2 and oxidized stains in root channels. Loamy sand occurs again at 24 inches.
brink -swell potential is typically low in the subsoil. Hydraulic conductivity ranges from
ioderate (0.6-2.0 in/hr) to rapid (6.0 - 20 in/hr), depending upon depth and duration of
andier layers. Atthe lowest elevations of fields Q2, Q4, Q6, Q7, and Q8 the seasonal high
rater table is less than 36 inches from the surface but greater than 12 inches; and
edrock is typically found at depths greater than 6 feet.
otla sandy loam, 0-29/6 slopes, occasionally flooded; mapping unit symbol: IoA
Vlapped on Sites/Fields 02, Q3, Q5, Q6,1 Q7, Q8, Q9.
Phis is mapped a very deep, somewhat poorly drained soil formed in recent stream
,ediments. Found in floodplains, it is classified as a coarse -loamy, mixed, non -acidic,
nesic Aquic Udifluvent. Atthe site of the soil borings in Fields Q2, Q3, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8 and
)9 a depth to wetness of less than 36 finches but greater than 12 inches was observed
and described in each Site Section. These areas will limit the usage of biosolids to the
irier months of the year, which would Ibe expected due to the level elevation and close
)roximity to Muddy Creek and its tributaries.
ks found in field boring 2 described for field Q9 in the Soil Evaluation Sheets in the Site
Section, the surface layer is a brown sandy loam 10 inches thick. A layer of sandy clay loam
)ccurs from 10 to 18 inches, then a brown loamy layer from 18 to 24 inches with a chroma
)f 3. Sandy loam occurs again at 24 inches with a chroma of 2 and oxidized stains in root
;hannels. Shrink -swell potential is typically low in the subsoil. Hydraulic conductivity
-anges from moderate (0.6-2.0 in/hr) to; rapid (6.0 - 20 in/hr), depending upon depth and
iuration of sandier layers. At the lowest elevations of fields Q2, Q4, Q6, Q7, and Q8 the
>easonal high water table is less than 36 inches from the surface but greater than 12
riches; bedrock is typically found at depths greater than 6 feet.
Auger borings in each field are fairly consistent with the soil survey mapping including
nclusions; see boring descriptions with each Site Section. However the soils in fields Q4
and Q5 have been sufficiently graded and smoothed such that the natural profile is
somewhat altered. There were no restrictive horizons due to rock; slopes steeper than 10%
are buffered out.
3roundwater Description:
%ll water supply wells are at a sufficient distance from all sites such that there is minimal
)otential for groundwater contamination to occur. The slow release nature of organic
iitrogen (mineralization) also ensures groundwater protection. Only small amounts of the
available forms of nitrogen are released into the soil solution over several months, allowing
he crops to utilize it throughout the growing season. No monitoring wells should be
iecessary.
oper calibration of spreader equipmf
portant to ensure that biosolids are
ould be monitored to avoid applicatii
t and monitoring and timing of land application are
3plied evenly and remain onsite. Weather patterns
in advance of severe rainfall.

elds Q2, Q3, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, & Q9 were historically subject to occasional flooding due to
oximity to South Muddy Creek. These areas are now protected from such flooding due to
ro upstream Watershed Control Structures. Biosolids application is appropriate during the
owing season but should be avoided on these fields during the wet winter months
m.cember through April. Fields Q1, Q4 and Q10 are on a higher elevation and need no
nitations for the timing of biosolids applications.
is land application project will provide valuable organic matter and nutrients to the
)posed sites without creating negative public health or environmental impacts. The
3anic nitrogen in the biosolids is less likely to cause groundwater pollution than
emical nitrogen fertilizers because available forms of nitrogen are mineralized slowly
er time. The soils are suitable for biosolids applications at agronomic rates.
.aroline J. Edwards
icensed Soil Scientist #1220
�ertified Land Application of Residuals Operator # 23884
� V��
� �o s rc s.
Fay
Go. d �,4 as ��► �� ��.C�r�. ��, a0v 1
�1220
�NORTMC

Agi_______iic L_._.,ion 0 RCre� -__._ ad .....Agh,,...__276_, -165..
Soil TestRePort
6/2001 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
_655
Marion, t o -
Land Application Biosolids Sites
O-B-o�10 - --
Marion, NC 28752
Farm:
_-epo. 31
Ce :es w-Soutnern Son Buildel
Edwards, Caroline
Agronomist Comments: C -- 12, 3
Soil pH is lower than desired in some sample areas. Phosphorus is low in some samples. The heavy metal concentration is within the limits of acceptable levels and should pose no threat to
crops grown on this land. The heavy metal results are shown on a separate report. Follow soil test recommendations for lime and fertilizer application rates. Note zinc level in sample Q8. This
zinc level may cause problems with crop growth, if the zinc level continues to increase.
T. Kent Yarborough, Agronomist
FieldInf6rinAtio Aliplied.Lime .'Recommendations -._
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N AO5 RO Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
Cl 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,E 2.1T 50-70 140-160 20-40 0 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 14o-160 60-80 0 0 0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI Cri-I S-I SS -I NO1-N ML-N Na
MIN 0.76 0.99
5.4 57.0
2.3 5.3 0 36
38.0 16.0
164 108 108 35
35 83 127 0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations.,_
_ J
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N R05- ICO
Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
Kl Fes/00/fim,M
1st Crop: Fes/OG/I'im,M .
0
120-200 0 0
0 0 0 0 12
2nd Cron:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SW
NC$-N ML-N Na
MIN 0.7 0.7
10.8 82.0
1.9 6.1 87 94 63.0
15.0
308 200 166
166
73 60
0.1
Field Information
lied Lime
' Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N AO5 KO
Mg Cu
Zu B
Mn
See Note
K2 Tree, Shade
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Pim,E
1.8T
50-70 110.-130 0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Cron: Fes/0G/I'im,M
0
120-200 100-120 0
0 0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS -I NCB-N NIh-N Na
MIN 0.97 1.01 8.6 76.0 2.1 5.8 13 113 56.0 14.0 479 297 297 158 158 34 47 0.1

A _ _ Mica . ,on RK' ire --ad :i h,_---- 2-7$ 165, 9 _.. 55 .,:,__owe_- --aria_ -_., of--.., _ e o . _ 3( P
Field=lnforrnation 1red-tAme Recommendations
4 fa, 4j
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N + R05 KO Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
=Ri Fes/OG/ im;M -1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M .5T 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
2nd Cron:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI Cu-I. S-I SS -I NOs-N ML-N Na
MIN 1.14 0.85 11.3 83.0
1.9 5.8 122 124 54.0 23.0
157 ill 155
155 54 109 0.3
Field Information
lied-Linie
. Recommendations -t-= ;::_
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N A05 KO
Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
Ql Fes/OG/Tim,M
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0
120-200 0 0
0 0 0 0 12
2nd Cron:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SS -I
NQ3-N AB-N Na
MIN 0.71 1.09.10.7 79.0
2.3 6.1 340 90
59.0 15.0
161 112 456
456
492 48
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations.,
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N A05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
Q2 Small Grains
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 0 10-30
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SS -I
NO3-N NIL-N Na
MIN 0.76 1.06 10.2 7.0
2.1 6.0 301 103 62.0 12.0
768 478 471 346
346
470 55
0.1
Field Information °. ;.
lied_ Lime
Recommendations#, `'
Sample No. Last Crop
o Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N R05 KO
M Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
Q3 Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Small Grains .3T
80-100 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Corn,Silage 0
180-220 0 0-20
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SS -I
NC$-N NIh-N Na
MIN 0.92 0.7
8.8 78.0
1.9 5.9 301 119
58.0 13.0
501 311 318 324
324
432 55
0.1
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations: ;
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N R05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
Q4 Tree, Shade
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,E
LIT
50-70 90-110 0-20
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
0
120-200 80-100 40-6o
0 0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac p1l P-I K 1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NB-N Na
MIN 0.27 1.18 3.9 69.0 1.2 5.6 20 45 49.0 15.0 175 114 114 52 52 92 143 0.1

WKAg
1d-lnfon
rmple No.
Ric on ;
Crop
'OR Cre .ad
lied=_Lime -Recomme
Yr T/A Crop or Ye
1st Crop: F
2nd Cron:
27( 165' - :9 655 __ owc_ _ ___aria__, of
Lime N A05 KO Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
MIN 0.51 0. 2 12.3 85.0
Ac pH P-I K-I
1.8 6.0 365 118
Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
63.0 18.0 443 283 865
Zn-AI
865
Cu-I S-I
836 51
SS -I NC3-N NIL-N Na
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Q6 Small Grains
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
2nd Crop: Small Grains
Lime N R05 ICO
0 180-220 0 0
0 80-100 0 0
Mg Cu
0 0
0 0
Zn B
0
0
Mn See Note
0 3
0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SS -I
NO3-N ML-N Na
MIN 0.66 0.8 12.1 88.0
1.5 6.2 408 133
70.0 12.0 514 322 315 530
530
603 65
0.1
Field Information
lied -Lime
-Recommendations ,
.. y
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime N R05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
Q7 Legume,Misc.
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0 180-220 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0 80-100 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) 7n-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SS -I
N3-N NIL-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.06 11.7 94.0 0.7 6.8 231 168
77.0 10.0
1178 712 705 332
332
223 134
0.1
Field Information.
Appliedlime
-Recommendations„'-
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N A05 ICO
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
Q8 Legume,Misc.
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N ML-N Na
MIN 1.08 1.10
15.8
97.0
0.5 7.1 337 225
78.0
12.0
513 308 301 2593
2593
302
126
0.2
Field Information
liWAimi
-100mmendations,;u �.
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N A05 ICU
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
Q9 Fes/OG/Tim,M
1st Crop: Fes/OG/fim,M
0
120-200 0 0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC
BS%
Ac PH P-I K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
C11-1
S-1
SS -I
Not-N AU-N Na
MIN 0.66 0.90
11.4
84.0
1.8 6.1 341 146
63.0
15.0
246 163 481
481
549
49
0.1

___i Ag nic _ _. __ion
Field Inf6rmation
Sample No. Last Crop
Q10 Fes/OG/Tim,M
10 R___, Cre___ __-jad
Ist Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
2nd Crop:
Lime N P.
0 120-200 0
owe ari( _ Iy of
0-20 . 0 0 0
. 31
B Mn See Note
0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cat -I S-I SS -I N01-N NIA-N Na
MIN 0.66 0.98 12.6 85.0 1.9 6.3 396 81 69.0 13.0 338 215 398 398 502 46 0.1

-ICI'_- -. grc iic 1 viol P Ka Cre, - -log eigl '- .2° -64 9) 7 65! PL
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION
Marion, City of Report #: 30693
Land Application Biosolids Sites
PO Box 700
Marion, NC 28752
McDowell County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd
Ni
Pb
Se
Cr Al
As
Sample
Cadmium
Nickel
Lead
Selenium
Chromium Aluminum
Arsenic
ID
mg/dm3 (PPm)
C 1
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.20
8.50
K1
0.10
0.20
1.30
0.10
0.00
7.50
K2
0.00
0.20
7.70
0.00
0.00
7.90
Q 1
0.10
0.30
1.00
0.00
0.10
6.80
Q 10
0.00
0.30
1.70
0.70
0.10
8.00
Q2
0.00
0.40
2.80
0.00
0.10
7.80
Q3
0.10
0.30
0.70
0.00
0.20
7.70
Q4
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.20
8.50
Q5
0.10
0.40
3.70
0.00
0.10
6.60
Q6
0.10
0.40
2.00
0.00
0.20
8.00
Q7
0.00
0.30
2.60
0.00
0.10
7.70
Q8
0.10
0.40
6.50
0.50
0.30
6.90
Q9
0.10
0.50
0.90
0.00
0.20
6.80
R1
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.10
7.40

REPORT NUMBER:
R074-172
A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] MAtLA
Fax No. [phone]
SEND SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
TO:
950 HOOTS RD
ROARING RIVER NC 20669
03/15/01 3
DATE OF REPORT PAGE
CITY OF MARION NC
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCT _
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED C E D W A R D S
BY:
DATE RECEIVED 03/14/01
DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/15/01
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potassium
Sulfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
SAMPLE
LAB
N
phP s
K
S
Ca
Mg
Na
Fe'
Al
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitroget
(DENT.
NO.
mglkg
m P
mglkg
mglkg
mg/kg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
07
11634
Q8
11635
09
11636
010
11637
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
LAB
Cd
Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nitrogen
pH
C.E.C.
NO.
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
(meg1100g)
11634
<-:0.01
MEHL
CH EX
RAC"
11635
<0.01
11636
<;0.01
11637
<0.01
This�report a iles�onI tq )tee pies are
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made retaia pimu� 6f tMn O teto the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A&L *AGRICU LAB TORIES, INC.

onT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 0 7 4 -17 2 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone] AtL
A C C•T -
SAMPLES
SEND SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS CITY OF MARION NC SUBMITTED C EDWARDS
TO: GROWER: BY: ,
95B HOOT-S RD
RORRIN6 RIVER NC 28663
DATE RECEIVED 03/14J01
03/15/01 2 SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/151101
!E OF REPORT PAGE
Nitrogen Phos- Potassium SuBur Calcium Magnesium Sodium Iron Aluminum Manganese Copper Zinc Ammonia Nitrate
SAMPLE LAB N phorus K S Ca Mg Na Fe Al Mn Cu Zn Nitrogen Nitrogen
p mg�g mglkg mg�g mg/kg mg g mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg
(DENT. NO. mglkg mglkg mg1kg mg/kg .
2 11629
3 11630
4 11631
15 11632
16 11633
LAB Cadmium Chromium Nickel Lead Arsenic Mercury Selenium Organic Total
Cd Cr Ni Pb As Hg Se Nitrogen pH C.E.C.
NO. mglkg mglkg mgfkg n►g/kg mglkg mglkg mglkg mglkg (meqtlOCg)
L1629 ti0.01 MEHL CH Ex RACT C
11630 <0.01
11631 }0.01
11632 {0.01
ii633 <0,01
ur reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
flip wnrk. the rest ilts. or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
This report ap lie my t is hf� tepc Ples are
retained�n of th �` t e i g.
A&L EP(5TgF1 ICULTURA TORIES, INC.

°R' """"g�" A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] fkQt�LLIA
Fax No. [phone]
:3t.Nn SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
O.
958 HOOTS RD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
03 /15/01 1
ATE OF REPORT PAGE
CITY OF MARION WC
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
A'C C T O
SAMPLES C E D Y� R R D S
SUBMITTED
BY: COPY TO EARTHWISE DESIGNS
DATE RECEIVED 03/14/01
DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/15101
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
phorus
Potassium
Sulfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
N
P
K
S
Ca
Mg
Na
Fe
Al
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
IDENT.
NO.
mglkg
mg/kg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
C1
11624
K1
11625
K2
11626
R1
11627
ql
11b-28.
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
Cd
Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nitrogen
pH
C.E.C.
NO.
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
(meq/100g)
11624
<0.01
MEHL
CH Ex
RACT
1162�
f0.01
1162f
<-0.01
11627
<:0.01
11628
<0.01
his report applie my tq� s� t�� �ples are
ur reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made retaine ax' Of thfi4d2s te�ti�2`'
� the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A&L�� RA B ATORIES, INC.

AGRONOMIST REPORT
CItW of Marion Corpenin_q Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION / LAND APPLICATION OF EIOSOLIDS
Fields C1, K1, K2, R1, Q1, Q4, Q5, Q9, and Q10 are managed as pasture and hay for
cattle feed with the cool -season grasses fescue and orchardgrass as the primary
forages.
Fields Q2, Q3, Q6, Q7, and Q8 are double -cropped, that is, producing two crops in one
year. The primary crop is corn for silage, followed by a small grain usually barley. In
alternate years it is followed by a winter soil -building cover crop such as Austrian winter
peas.
The use of wastewater biosolids in the agricultural community as a fertilizer
supplement to grow crops is a common biosolids management practice utilized by
cities and industries nationwide and abroad. The organic matter, nutrients (micro and
macro) and in some cases lime, will, when used in a properly managed program,
serve as a soil amender and fertilizer source at a tremendous cost savings to the
farmer.
Few biosolids will provide all of the nutrients and lime required for ideal hay and crop
production. The wastewater treatment plant biosolids, if applied at a full agronomic rate,
will provide much of the grass and other crop requirements for nitrogen, phosphorus
and potash. It will also be an excellent source of sulfur, calcium, and magnesium as
well as lime.
As with any agricultural practice, soil pH is very important to monitor and adjust when
necessary for proper nutrient utilization. For biosolids applications, it is recommended
f. that the soil pH be adjusted to 6.0 to ensure proper nutrient utilization and heavy metal
retention. The City of Marion will monitor the amount of lime equivalency applied in the
lime stabilized biosolids to see that the proper amount of lime is applied based on
recommendations given in the soil test results.
Loading rate recommendations and agronomic suggestions for various crops
produced on the sites are detailed in the following pages.
Caroline J. Edwards
Licensed Soil Scientist #1220
Certified Land Application of Residuals Operator #23884

SUGGESTED AGRONOMIC APPLICATION RATES FOR:
PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PHOSPHATE (P251,
AND POTASH (K20)
CROP AVERAGE PAN P205 K20
YIELD/AC. (lbs/ac.) (lbs/ac.) (Ibs/ac.)
Corn Grain 100 bu. 160 100 50
Corn Silage 20 tons 200 120 120
Small Grains 65 bu. 100 20 40
Soybeans 45 bu. 150 80 40
Fescue,
Timothy, 4.0 tons 250 45 90
Orchard -
Grass Hays
Coastal 4.0 tons 350 40 160
Bermuda
Sorghum,
Millet, Sudan, (23 tons) 180 - 220 80 80
& Milo: Hybrids (65 bu.)
(Silage,Grain)
bu.=bushels P205--(P)(2.29) K20=(K)(1.2)
LITERATURE CITED
Suggested rates are based in part on the following references:
Crop Fertilization Based on North CaroliLna Soil Tests, NCDA, Agronomic Division.
1991 NC Agricultural Chemicals Manual, NCSU, College of Agriculture and Life Science.
General Guidelines for Land Treatment of Sludge. WRRI, NCSU, 1983.
Agronomy Handbook. A&L Agricultural Laboratories, Richmond, VA.
Soils. 5th Edition, R.L. Donahue, R.W. Miller, J.C. Shickluna, Prentice -Hall, Inc., Englewood
Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
Land Application of Wastewater Sludge, American Society of Civil Engineers, NY, NY, 1987.

CROP MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FESCUE and ORCHARDGRASS
Hayland and Pasture
Nitrogen Loading: Usually a general recommendation of 100 to 250 pounds per acre
based on "Plant Available Nitrogen" or PAN is given for these forage crops. When RYE
data is used, then 40 to 50 lbs. of N per ton of hay produced is an acceptable rate. For
areas that are grazed and not utilized as hayland, then a nitrogen reduction of 25
percent is recommended. For these four farms in McDowell County RYE data is being
compiled and will be used in conjunction with most recent residuals analysis such that
land application rates of biosolids will be beneficial to the crop without posing a threat
to the environment from over -application. In no case will N loading rates be in excess of
the general rates given in the above chart.
Nitrogen requirements. are usually given in broad ranges for these grasses because
this element can be used10 control the amount of pasture or hay produced. If maximum
amounts of pasture or hay are not required, reduced biosolids volume, as based on the
PAN rate, may be applied without appreciably affecting the stand and potential of the
grass. Peak production will be affected by the amount of PAN and the timing of the
biosolids application. Split applications, spring and fall, will give very good results.
Hay baled from biosolids amended fields is suitable for the hay market.
Animals should not be allowed to graze for at least thirty (30) days after biosolids
application.
CROP MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR
Corn for Silage No Tilled and Double -Cropped with Small Grains
(Barley; alternate years, Austrian winter peas)
Nitrogen Loading: a range of 260 to 320 Ibs per acre per year would fall within the
agronomic needs of the double -cropping system during the year that both corn and
barley are produced; however it is unlikely and unfeasible that the biosolids stabilized
with lime will be applied at such a rate. Rather, the amount of biosolids land applied
will also need to fit the needs of the landowner's cropping schedule, the soil moisture
content at the time of land application, and the lime equivalency of the lime stabilized
biosolids. During the year that corn is followed by Austrian winter peas, a maximum N
loading of 220 Ibs/ac/yr is recommended.
Best Management Plans include no -tilling corn into small grain stubble; after corn
harvest either barley or winter peas are no -tilled into the corn stubble. This continuous
no -tilling provides excellent erosion control. Timing of the land application events will be
crucial in the limited window of opportunity between corn harvest and no -till of the
following crop. Since these cropped fields are in the floodplain and have an apparent
high water table in the winter months, land application operations should be planned
for immediately after corn harvest.
Nitrogen loading is based on "Plant Available Nitrogen" or PAN.