WQ0019960_Annual Report_20190125

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM j
MIN
WQ Permit#: WQ0019960
County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
McDowell Year:
City of Marion
Southern Soil Builders, Inc. Phone
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
FJ Yes R1 No - If No, skip Part A, and Part l3 and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
2018
336-957-7871
,bp
3l rliq
Total number of application fields in thepermit:
8
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
0
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
! 0
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
0
rart B - Annual l ompiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2018 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. EJ Yes ( No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, n �x rail ve action
to ken.
,1 ail 2 5 2019
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to acli sv0�r?'U�,ESIIJ�hP or
the limit specified in the permit. 197�
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three
(3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1 105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1 105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1 1 11 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case bf;a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a moni
attached to include appropriate actions and rernediations.
1 1) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was perfc
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property o
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained durin
rrin-g-wel-I-oa_explanati6ns of violations are
:._
med on each site recem-au;cc.ag residuals, ass
nearby surefacw e aersili�a occiirred.
each application of residuals:;
Part C - Certification: °N` ` `"
I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and �belef,_tru.e; accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
��
Permm/`
ittee Nam
e and Title (type or print) �._ Jgiature of Permit Date
ignature
Date Signature of Land Applier
/, rvd w
Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ga'-'wn of Nd dart
— FOUNDED IN 1870
38 CATAWBA AVENUE
OLD FORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28762
January 25, 2019
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
0
RECEIVED
FEB 0 f 2019
k4dwisWn Prceesng Unft
DWQ100G
Subject: Town of Old Fort Annual Bioresiduals report, (calendar
To Whom It May Concern:
Office of the Mayor
i�. IVI^Dien a' Vii or I'iesourc8s '
C,
201,8) FEB 1 1 2019 f
/2.?Pi QLR21F iF S`4^..qic ?T ()peratlons
The Town of Old Fort operates a 1.2 MGD wastewater treatment plant (NPDES #
NC0021229). The Town is no longer required to have a Pretreatment Program due to
the lack of a sizeable industry.
The Town has a bioresidual management permit, # WQ0011260, to process class A
bioresiduals to be sold or given away to the public. The process consists of two 0.075
MG sludge holding tanks, a 0.7 meter belt press and an RDP lime pasteurization process
with a covered storage pad.
The solids are mixed with quicklime to raise the pH up to 12 or higher after two hours
and 11.5 of greater after 22 hours to satisfy the vector attraction reduction requirement,
and heat the solids to 70 degrees Celsius or greater to satisfy the PFRP requirement. The
pH is tested immediately as the final product begins to be discharged from the
pasteurization vessel, after two hours, and again after 22 more hours. The temperature is
monitored at the pasteurization vessel inlet and outlet every thirty minutes.
In March 2018, the Town of Old Fort distributed 26.71 dry tons of bioresiduals that had
been produced in 2017. These residuals were given to a farmer for use on hayfields.
These residuals were sampled for metals and nutrients in December 2017, and fecal
coliform in February 2018.
In all of 2018 the Town of Old Fort WWTP produced 9.41 dry tons of bioresiduals,
which were sampled for metals and nutrients on December 27, 2018. These bioresiduals
will be sampled for fecal coliform in February 2019. As always, untested biosolids are
stored apart from those previously analyzed. In 2018 the Town replaced the electrical
control panel for the belt press. Plans for replacing the electrical control panel for the
lime/sludge handling equipment had to be put on hold becaus�of greater than anticipated
"Colonial America's Western Outpost Until 1756"

wNIt y ►r1�
in a� z Y " m 0
-� ° p ... A a - r
El Cr 0
ID
R. � ° In ^s A o x �
O� m n O
O' .,,
expense. Subsequently, because of control panel trouble the Town was unable to process
bioresiduals from June 2018 through December 2018. During this time activated sludge
was wasted to the WWTP Equalization Basin for processing at a later time. Also, due to
May and September high flows due to rainfall, inflowand infiltration, some activated
sludge was washed into clarifiers that were not in use at the time. This sludge will have
to be manually removed at a later time.
Enclosed with this narrative are copies of the operational logs and laboratory analyses of
the bioresiduals. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact
me at 828-668-4561.
Sincerely,
XX'
Anthony West
Town of Old Fort WWTP ORC
Land Application / Biosolids ORC
38 Catawba Ave
Old Fort, NC 28762
.{�
� �E
IiVWE79 G't r�l?.^,i �(�SOIliC89
4 '
{FEE B 1 2019
iN gert Qijalit;A Operations
r�rnS

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0011260
Facility Name: TOWN OF OLD FORT WWTP--YEAR 2018
Residual Source WQ # or
I NPDES #:
NCO021229
WWTP Name: TOWN OF OLD FORT WWTP
Residual Analysis Data
Laboratory: 1) WATERTECH LABS
2) RESEARCH & ANALYTICAL
3) ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
4)
5)
Parameter
(mg/kg)
Conc.
Limit
(ma a
Sample or Composite Date
12/27/18
12/19/17
12/27/16
12/22/15
12/15/14
Percent Solids (%)
NA
57.5
48.3
45.8
47.7
49.7
Arsenic
75
2.13
< 1.99
< 2.18
< 2.06
<2.01
Cadmium
85
0.1774
0.213
< 0.218
< 0.206
<0.201
Copper
4,300
138 4
166
137
152
f60
Chromium
NA
Lead
840
6.77 1
11.1
9.36
13.1
11.8
Mercury
57
0.1331
0.246
0.127
<0.069
0.213
Molybdenum
75
9.7
10.3
10.4
8.32
4.83
Nickel
420
6.14
4.73
6.07
4.68
4.71
Selenium
100
< 1.72
< 1.99
< 2.18
<2.06
<2.01
Zinc
7,500
166 1
140
126
136
124
Total Phosphorus
NA
11801
1780
1230
204
463
TKN
NA
61901
7650
12700
4420
10700
Ammonia -Nitrogen
-NA
15004
1250
4840
960
1380
Nitrate and Nitrite
NA
72.4
122
70.3
88.15
97.6
For surface disposal facilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for me
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accor ance'w
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware th t *1
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing vi ,laiJ
Signature of Preparer
1/25/2019
Date
are significant
T E B 1 1 2019
Watery [.Qusj'! �f P��=o;�a1 Operations
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
ni=mp rnpro RCCG mg/9nnm

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM B
Report all sampling analysis results for parameters not listed in FORM RSSF that are part of the WQ permit or were analyzed for over the past
calendar year. Use additional forms as needed.
WQ Permit Number: WQ0011260
Facility Name: TOWN OF OLD FORT WWTP-YEAR 2018
Residual Source
NPDES # or WQ#:
NCO021229
WWTP Name: TOWN OF OLD FORT WWTP
Residual Analvsis Data
Laboratory: 1) WATERTECH LABS
2) RESEARCH & ANALYTICAL
3) ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING S.
4)
5)
Parameter
(mpg)
Sample or Composite Date
12/27/18
12/19/17
12/27/16
12/22/15
12/15/14
Aluminum
2820 ,
3410
3000
4400
2900
Calcium
3850004
397000
327000
282000
314000
Magnesium
2530
2600
2600
1990
1850
H
12.07 k
12.70
11.78
12.00
11.57
P.A.N.
223Q
2670
4850.
1610
3580
Potassium
444
496
656
669
559
Sodium
224
171
318
437
634
S.A.R.
0.099 '
0:074
0.152
0.22
0.3
�-� ! A
liar hesou
Y
I
2019
a
er Qua.lity 0-
Aso; jai Oper
ions
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for. submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Pre
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T 1102 (26)
25-Jan
Date
nF:NR FORM RRRF - R (190006)

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM,(02T Rules)
Facility Name: TOWN OF OLD FORT WWTP WQ Permit Number: WQ0011260
WWTP Name: TOWN OF OLD FORT WWTP NPDES Number: NCO021229
Monitoring Period: From 1/1/2018 To 12/31/201.8
Pathogen -Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A: Alit. A (bmemp) 0 1,1 Alt B (Alic'I ment)[ A1L C (PanorTe ng)(3
AILD (No Pfier Test) Process to ]Fuxffier Reduce; Pafpgengs 59
If applicable to alternative pea'ff'mrmnecdi (Clan A emlly) Indicate &Travess to lFunffier Reduce Fatihagens"o
Compost ]lhlDrynmg DeatTa�ent 0 j TJIi�®Plnnlnc
Beta Ray 13 Ana Ray ® Pastemization
Class B: Alt- (1) ]Feel Density Ak (2) Pumesss to Signnficantlly Rye Padaugens
If applicable to alternative perffm (Class B aWy) indicate ul'ivvm to SignMcam r Reduce rathagemsr.-
Lime Stabilization Air Dig [� Comnpmsiing LJ ; Aembic agestiom�
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter Allowable Level Pathogen Density Numb ° Frequency Sample Analytical
in Sludge Wnirnum Geo. Mean axim Units a ofAnalysis Type Tech-nique
2 x 10 to the MPN < 70 0 < 128 MPN/g 0 WYEAR GRAB SM922IE
6th power
per gram of —r
CFu'
Fecal Coliform total solids ll� 1,� k N_
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
Salmonella bacterial 3 MPN per 4 grams
(in lieu of fecal I total solid (dry
Quality
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative-nei�firrirezl`
Alt.1 (VS reduction) M
Alta 2 (40-day bench)
Alt_ 3 (30-day bench) 0
JAIt. 4 (Spec. 02 uptake)
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) 0
Alt. 6 (AIL Stabilization
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) El
Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable)
Alt. 9 (Injection) 0
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) El
No vector attraction reduction alternatives. were performed 10
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
TONY WEST / ORC
Preparer Name and Title (type or print)
1761� L, Litt
Signature of P arer*
TONY WEST / ORC
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
1/25/2019 KTL41/25/2019
Date Signature of La Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

'lz
r
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Project name: Old Fort WWTP
Collection date: 29-Jan-18
Date received: 29-Jan-18
Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 180129.500
Sample identification: Sludge Grab - 5 Sample number:
155722
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 51 0.10 % 29-1.-IS KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure . SM 9221-E <92 92 MPN - 29aan-m _ _ .KEK
Sample identification: Sludge Grab-6 Sample number:
155723
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyzed Analyst Footnotes
%TS SM 2540 G 46 0.10 % 29-.tan-18 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <83 ✓ 83 MPN 29-.►2n-i8 KEK
Sample identification: Sludge Grab - 7 Sample number: 155724
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 39 0.10 % 29-.►an-18 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <70 ✓ 70 MPN 29-Jan-I8 KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
Date reviewed: ®a - ®u •! e
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan
Signature: (N
Divisi y of Was�r Resource9
F E B 1 1 2019 y.«.
Water QLn, llty Pn ,;or,al Operations
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc- Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Old Fort WWTP Project number:
Collection date: 22-Jan-18
Date received: 22-Jan-18
Sample identification: Sludge Grab -1 Sample number:
180122.500
155645
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 71 0.10 % 22-Jan-18 KEK
-- - - ----- ----- Mulitplc-Tube Fermentation-Procedure_—SM-922L-E__.._._
Sample identification: Sludge Grab - 2 Sample number: 155646
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 58 0.10 % 22-Jan-18 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <104 V 104 MPN 22-.lan-ts KEK
Sample identification: Sludge Grab-3 Sample number:
155657
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyzed Analyst Footnotes
%TS SM 2540 G 55 - / 0.10 % 22-Jan-18 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <99 1/ 99 MPN 22-Jan-18 KEK
Sample identification: Sludge Grab - 4 Sample number: 155658
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 43 ' / 0.10 % 22-Jan-18 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <77 V 77 MPN 22-Jan-18 KEK
r@
Dive �cr� o,`'vda� � VIP ��D
cr R�sourcea
Footnotes: F E B 1 1 2019
r
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only-
lttlater Quaq,, / pa , -,al or
eratiorls
Date reviewed-, 09,-Ciao• 16' rUyalkd NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
Signature: KOONC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Im i I R—r sw
For: Water Tech Labs, Inc.
P.O. Box 1056
Granite Fails, NC 28630
Attn: Job •Oeagg.
Report of Analysis
1 /10/2619
Division CJ3 t a:ior Resources
r
FEB 11 2019
Water Qua %, Pep'10Pat OiDerations
'; of
10
a o
.y NC t134 x .
a NC 937701
Client Sample ID: Towri of Old Fort Sludge Lab Sample ID: 60949=01
Site: Water Tech Labs Collection Date; 12/27/2018 8:30
ss'� x 'G `%Cd"'•i 4Y r *s^.� r-., er>.z
IParBmeter s i a i m u ' £ . 1
�Restilt �;�� I1nit's��"� Anal st��Anaivsrs Datefrime�, � »r
SAR -tale 0.099
PAID Calculation =0
% Sotias SM 2540B 574 % AW 1212812Q18
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen SM 4500 N Org 84997.(NH3 6100 mg/kg FK 1/912019
D-1.997)
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D-1997
15b0
mg/kg
FK
1/9/-2019
Total P Psi) Pfr s
SM 4500 P E
1180
mg/kg
BJ
12/31/2018
Nitrate + Nitrite
SM4600 NO3E
72.4
Mpg
DW
117/2019 1230
Aluminium, Total
SW 846 601 OD
2820
mg/4 -
JF
117/2- 019
Arsenic, Total
SW 846 601 OD
2A1
mg/kg
JF
11712019
Cadmium, Total
SW 846 601 OD
0:177
mg/kg
JF
11-7/20 9
Calcium, Total
SW 846 601 OD
;t 385000
mpg
JF
117/2019
Copper, Total
SW 04.6 601 OD
019f2
Lead, Total
SW 846 6010D
6.77
U10*9
JF
1/7/2019
Magnesium. Total
SW 846 6Q1 OD
2530
mg/kg
JF
1171201.9
Molybdenum, Total
SW 846 6040D
9.70
mglkg
JF
1/7/2019
Potassium, Total
SW 846 $010D
444
mglkg
JF
1/712019
Selenium, Total
SW 846 601 OD
<1.72
mg/kg
JF
117/2019
P.O. Boil 473 106 Short Street Kamersbille, North Carolina 272U Tel: 336-9W2841 Fair. 336,996-0326 WAft indatabsxft Page 1
nai�so _ nic noRLvl
f

REsunh & MAIYACAI Report of Analysis
Ubomoitks, lime. 1110/2019
Client Sample 10: Town of Old Fort Sludge Lab Sample I.D: :60949tol
Site: WaterTdch Labs
Collection Date: 9:21274018 -.8130
Zinc; Total 8W 646 6016b 166 mg&g
JF 11712019
Mercury, Total
SW846 7471 B 0.133 mglkg MM - 1/8/2019
Nickel, Total
SW846 Method 6010 C
6.14 mg/kg
Sodium, Total $M46 Method 6010 C 224 mg/kg JF Ift/2010
PH SW846 Met ' 6d 9045 12.07 Std. Units LP 1/7/`2019
-NA =;hdI andlyzed
JF 117JZ019
V --D
ip F--
Djjjsjc)n of Walor R060=88
F E B 1 1 2019
()t)era*!onS
Water 01.10tv Pen?� gal
0.096k 473 1 Od Short Street Kemersville. North darblina 27284- Fai 336-996-0326 mhWhfid a'Eabtxbrm Page 1

AGRONOMIC APPLICATION RATES FOR SIORESIDUALS
After receiving the results from the laboratory analysis of the bioresiduals, the WWTP ORC will calculate
nutrient and other chemical content of the residuals in pounds per dry ton. This will determine the
application rate for the bioresiduals . Because of the high content of lime, the bioresiduals will almost
always be applied according to the lime content and lime needs of the field. Usually this will work out to
be two dry tons of bioresiduals per acre, which would be approximately equal to one ton of pure lime
per acre, the NC Dept of Agriculture recommended amount.
2018 LIME CONTENT:
Sludge dry weight, tons: 4.38
Lime dry weight, tons: 5.03
(1070. pounds lime per dry ton)
Total (sludge + lime) dry weight tons = 9.41
Total (sludge +lime + moisture) wet weight tons = 18.09
2018 NITROGEN CONTENT:
P.A.N. = 2670 mg/kg
i :.
IJ�VIJ1Ci �l p 7/1%t for Resourceg
S
r,,
1
FEB 1 1 2019
..
Water Qu-_alRy Pe �a a3 Oneratione
52.0 % solids
909 kg/ton; 2.20 pounds / kg; 1,000,000 mg/kg;
5.34 pounds PAN / ton, =10.7 pounds PAN / acre;
The smallest Realistic Yield for a soil in McDowell County is Porter's loam, stony which has realistic
nitrogen rate of 120 lb / acre and a yield of 2.8 tons for fescue (hay).
2018 Phosphorus content:
Total phosphorus =1780 mg/kg
3.56 pounds phosphorus / ton; = 7.12 pounds phosphorus / acre;
The smallest Realistic Yield for soil in McDowell County is'Porter's loam, stony which has an estimated
phosphorus removal of 44 lb P205 / acre for fescue (hay).
2018 Potassium content:
Total potassium = 496 mg/kg
0.99 pounds potassium / ton; =1.98 pounds potassium / acre;

c ,t GIMIGUTION PROGRAM
PERMIT# WQQOII260
WORESIDUALS USER AGREENI FT17
By agreeing to accept the built Mass A residuals, it is recognized that the application of these residuals is
allowed under the conditions of this agreement. Land application of Class A residuals is considered the
beneficial reuse of a waste under 1SA MCAC 02T .1100, and has been deemed permitted under 15A
I CAC 02T .1103(4) provided the conditions of this agreement are reset. Any action resulting in damages
to surface water or groundwater, caused by failure to follow the concliitions of this agreement, is subject
to NC Division of dater Quality enfbrcernent action.
Bulk residuals shall not be land applied tinder the following conditions:
a. if the residuals are likely to adversely affect a threatened or endangered species listed under
section 4 of the endangered Species Acts or its designated critical habitat;
b. If the application causes prolonged nuisance conditions;
c. if the land €ails to assimilate the bulk residuals or the application causes the contravention of
surface water or groundwater standards;
d. if the land is flooded, frozen or snow-covered, or is otherwise in a condition such that runoff of
the residuals would occur;
e. Within the 100-year flood elevation, unless the bulk residuals are injected or incorporated
within a 24-hour period following a residuals land application event;
f. During a measurable precipitation event (Le_, greater than 0.01 inch per hour), or within 24
hours following a rainfall event of 05 inches or greater in a 24-hour period;
g. if the slope is greater than '10%for surface applied liquid residuals, or if the slope is greater than
18% for injected or incorporated bulk liquid residuals;
h. If the soil pH is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, unless sufficient amounts of lime are applied to
achieve a final soil pH of at least b.€j, or of an agronomist provides information indicating that the
p14 of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the specifiied crop. Any approved
variations to the acceptable sail pH (6.0) will be noted in this permit;
L If the land does not have an established vegetative corer unless the residuals are incorporated
or injected within a 24 hour period following e. residuals land application event;
j. lfvertical separation between the seasonal high water table and the depth of residuals
application is less than one foot;
k. If the vertical separation of bedrock and the depth of residuals application is less than one foot;
I_ Applicaition excaads agronomic rates_
The person or entity accepting the bull, Mess A residuals shall to the best of their knowledge meet the
following application requirements:
L Residuals stockpiled for more than 14 days shall be covered;
ii. Application of bulk residuals shall riot occur within 100 feet of a public or private water
supply source;
iii. Application of bulk residuals shall not occur within too feet of any well, with the exception.
of Division approved monitoring wells;
iv. Application of bulk residuals shall not occur within 25 feet of
ce vraters:�_ ...a ;--7 ,7 r; D
Uivisian of'.^Jaicr Resource9
� v
2
FEB 11 2019
�µ
v
Water QuPTb, Reglunal Operations
Office

The generator of the Class A bulls residuals shall pm-, de: information on the proper use of the residuals,
including infbrrnation on the nui rient quantities within the reelduais and mcom mended application
rates. A copy of the label or information sheet ached to bags or other contaiirters, as specified in the
labeling requirements under CondiUion 111.7 of the pea rrft is sufficilent
The applicator or party accepting bulk residuals from the Permittee shall supply all third parties
receiving bulk residuals wsith documentation specifying that application shall occur consistent Faith the
utilization agreement.
lnstructions, including contact information for key personnel, shall be provided to the applicator or party
receiving bulls residuals in the event that any requirements specified in the utilization agreement are not
met.
A copy of the Utilization Agreement shall be maintained at the land application sites when bulls residuals
are being applied.
nnassmQa®mo€aooca�a©oe�s�comm�sna�cae3m��c��secevac,me�mas�esa�faam�ac�csdaa®cvrr�rsamQn�Haaav�aas�des
By accepting residuals from the Town of Old Fort Wastewater Treatment Plant, l agree to abide by the
conditions of their application :and use.
Signed / , �' ��7 C�� _ mate 2, P'/,
Print Y
Mailing Address
Old FoTt'ArWTP j Sioresiduals ORC
Siinras \ 1 ,,•� 1,
� A
Print---
�iviF;escaurces
FEB 1 2019
Water Quay!ty Pr�C oral Nera#ions

TOWN OF OLD FORT WI®R IDUAI S WQM— -260
DELIVERYLOG
vr.aw = -3 . t,-> 1 %**�
DATE
DELIVERY
LOCATION!
FIELD USED
FOR
BEGIN
OWHER MILEAGE
END
MILEAGE
L30
vi
0
�
g
I
1 -Ilil! U1 uVi1Yi
-
�"i('.$OIJ�C�t
it
E E B 1
2019
p. i n r.. -•..
fa5t1•_! �i
-� ..i if/'
_ i , Ilnn

LAND APPLICATION SITE INSPECTION — (BEFORE) 03-27-18, 08:00 am
1174 E. Main St, Old Fort NC 28762 Behind Auria facility
Owner— Max Hendley
Approx 20 acres used as hayfield; In good condition with minimal growth;
Only need to allow 25 feet from property lines
LAND APPLICATION SITE INSPECTION — (AFTER) 04-12-2018, 08:30 AM
Site appeared to be in good shape, with no residuals distributed outside of boundaries.
1-:E I ;E:-D
Division Of Wa?sr Resources `
FES 1 1 2019
Water QualityP ?io al C3pera#ions
Asher' r a �rii^.-

3 - 2 2 -)-`.
'TOWN OF OLD FORT BiORESIDUALS MANAGEMENT FACILITY OPERATIONS LOG
DATE: PERMIT* VVQ0011260
f33aO
>ior s of VJuiar Resources
I Water uailty Replonal Operailons
PASTEURIZATION VESSEL TIME FROM INLET THERMO
TIME FROM OUTLET- THERMOMETER T4 DISCHARGE: TO OUTLET' THERMOMETER; 27.�, y;
ANY PRODUCT NOT MEETING i1 p P
DIGESTER START: i� REQUIREMENTS IS RECYCLED T HROUGH L#ME PROCESS.
DIGESTER ;Ldl END: TOTAL GAL:
7
UME @ START: , 4 SLUDGE TOTAL DRY WET LBS:_ 3 "I 7
LIME END: I f TOTAL LBS• 07 7
% SOLIDS FROM SELT
1.19
PRES$: % SOLIDS OF FINAL PRODUCT: y /. i
TOTAL VOLUME OF SloRESIDUALS + UME + MOISTURE, IN TONS.-
IMMED AFTER y '
-- - _-- ■ . avGa70 nuiv.
It I yr L+vcs I.t" BEFORE

TOWN OF OLD FORT BIORESIDUALS MANAGEMENT FACILITY OPERATIONS LOG
DATE: PERMIT * W00011260
030
:ED
* F
IRLBASTEIHR
iLBSr%
jWT. ;
TART
FIRST
REACHES PAST.
VESSEL INLET
?
_
q l s
1
141
41<
)41
lllY
I 41
I S-< I Lf I
.V. P.V.. -
ILET OUTLET
144
K;
w'
Vr
f
VAX=
a` ^�:
�ivir si n of � i"
�a oResources q4,
r F
5 All 8 1 1 201911
Li ► 3 !�✓j va er C�ua r{ , Peplo aa► ODPra�ions
PASTEURIZATION VESSEL TIME FROM INLET THERMOMETER TO OUTLET THERMOMETER 7 -41 ixJ
TIME FROM OUTLET THERMOMETER TO DISCHARGE:
ANY PRODUCT NOT MEETING TIMEREMP REQUIREMENTS IS RECYCLED THROUGH LIME PROCESS.
DIGESTER 0 START: 3 y DIGESTER @ END: J`a H TOTAL GAL- % 3 Syy
SLUDGE TOTAL DRY WT LBS: -2. 3 1, U 7
LIME @ START.- LIME @ END. , fr& 94) TOTAL LBS: � L/ U t ) • d-O
%A SOLIDS FROM BELT PRESS: I6 -) % SOUDS OF FINAL PRODUCT: t4 9 • S-
TOTAL VOLUME OF BIORESIDUALS + LIME + MOISTURE, IN TONS: f 2'
IMMED AFTER
COLLECTION AFTER 2 HRS AFTER 24 HRS. /
FINAL PRODUCT PH: 1 a ko 1 ;). Sl Z U 12.86
TIMEIDATE COLLECTED: .e&1r 0 9 -14 -
®old EI -l-f -1 -&-
0&0
if
TIMEIDATEANALYZED:
t-1-k -►
1 - 4' 't
D t
- -►
TEMP. *C OF SAMPLE
a I
d t?
TEMP. CORRECTION TO 2r C:
0
_ 01)2
0 e 1
OPERATOR INITIALS:
AMOUNT OF SLUDGE PROCESSED IS MEASURED BY MEASURING DEPTH OF DIGESTER BEFORE
AND AFTER BELT PRESS RUN.

I
L-)-26-I�-
6 W50- t.� -i P � �-
LLIrSGcl
TOWN OF OLD FORT WORESUDUALS MANAGEI'dIENT FA
DATE: CILITY OPERATIONS LOG
°10 SOLIDS uu±c ®.. PERMIT* W00011260
PAS ON GVatPE'PnF
DEL TIME FROM fop �. MOM RSt1C V;; e p ona►
TIME FROM OUTLET THERMO{ INLET' O�� �ERNdOMETER: � 7
ANY PRODUCT MOT MEETING ET _R TO DISC Ha�RGE. -
OIGESTER START E� DIGESTER I9MWE T'C yLED THR0UGH F paS.
ND: -7 TOTAL
LIME @ START: Cj GAL: / s 7 ��D
LIME @ END- S START -
SLUDGE TOTAL' DRY Wt Lem 2 1
% SOLIDS FROM BELT PRESS: —.Q. 8- c ----.__TOTAL LBS: 2. 2 -7 z z
TOTAL VOLUME OF BIORESIDU SOLIDS OF FINAL PRODUCT: 1 = !
ALS f LIME + s-Q.. a
MOISTURE, IN TONS:`
IMMED AFTER
FINAL PRODUCT PH: tAiLLICTION t��
TIMECATE CO 5 AFTER 2 I IRL
i1ME/DATE I-I-ECTED_ ti't! _ _f
rEMP_ 'C pF SAMPLE: ss -a-,
EMP. CORRECTION TO 25'C a a !
WERATnR lAIPr. A A - 60 G9
AUNT OF SLUDGE PROCE `
AFTER BELT PRESS RUN- IS IWEASURED BY MEASURING DEPTH OF
AFTER 24 HRS_
y _a
a D

5--17-19
TOWN OF OLD FORT SIORESIDUALS MANAGEMENT FACILITY OPERATIONS LOG
DATE. Pi:pmrrlE- wnnn-lawn
TIME
'/a SOLIDS
FROM
DIGESTER
SLUDGE
PUMP
SPEED
°j
BLENDER
TEMP
* F
LIME
FEED
RATE
liBSJHR
LBS.tLiME
PER
LBSJDRY
WT. SLUDGE
TEMP, *F
P.V.
INLET
TEMP_ *F
P.V.
OUTLET
0
BELT PRESS START
SLUDGE /LIME FIRST REACHES PAST. VESSEL, IN THERMO_ METER
f
0
�
)
f
151
40
i3 _v
1��3�
d
WA
-•••w "% r m= l mt YGREtT'EMP REQUIREMENTS 18 RECYCLED THROUGH UNE PROCESS.
DIGESTER 0 START: % ar DIGESTER END: too fiS
TOTAL GAL- S-0
LIME @. START: D. r� 3 SLUDGE TOTAL DRY WT
LIME @EN2 �5 7
t TOTAL LB %SOLIDS FROM BELT PRESS: � �• 3 0 S: —`—"'
TOTAL VOLUME OF SIORESIDUALS i. LIME 4-MOISTURE IN TONS.. LIDS OF FINAL DUCT: c7 �
IMMED AFTER
"r , =R ocL I FKE55 RUN.
- — --. 4•-� L.L-r- I n yr "tit5TER BEFORE

SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
LIME PASTEURIZATION OF BIORESIDUALS
TOWN OF OLD FORT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
MCDOWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
. VV ED
Division of wa er Resource3 ,
s±- -
FEB 11 2019=
t;
Watera+i
Quol;ty RepTonal Operons
/�
t �sshc.' f'?;n

PROCESS
The Town of Old Fort Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) utilizes a lime
pasteurization process to stabilize and transform its wastewater sludge into a beneficial
product. Excess sludge from the waste treatment process is stored in two 75,000 gallon
aerated sludge holding tanks. The sludge can be thickened there to 1.0 to 1:5 % solids,
by turning the air off to the tank, allowing the solids to settle, and decanting the clearer
liquid on top back to the headworks of the plant. The sludge is then pumped through
pipes from the storage tanks to a Roediger 0.7 meter belt press. The belt press dewaters
the sludge to a 16 to 18 % solids cake. From the belt press discharge the sludge cake is
transported by conveyor to the RDP lime pasteurization equipment. The sludge cake is
first mixed with lime in a large mechanical blender. The ratio of dry weight sludge to
lime is 1: 1.3 to 1.5. The lime raises the pH of the sludge cake to greater than 12.0 for a
minimum of two hours, and greater than 11.5 for an additional 22 hours. The lime also
raises the temperature of the sludge cake to above 70 degrees Celsius. The sludge/lime
mixture (biosolids or bioresiduals) discharges into a pasteurization vessel which
transports the biosolids to the final product conveyor while maintaining the 70 degree
temperature for at least 30 minutes. The combination of increased pH, increased
temperature, and time, as verified by tests run in the WWI? lab, meets the EPA 503
regulations for a Class A material. According to the EPA regulations, this process is an
effective method of sludge stabilization and pathogen reduction, and results in an
environmentally safe product with multiple beneficial uses. After discharge from the
final conveyor, the biosolids are 41 to 50 % solids. The biosolids are stored on a covered
and curbed asphalt storage pad, located next to the belt press building and lime
equipment. The covered storage pad minimizes the effects of weather on the pile. The
leachate from the pile is drained from the storage pad back to the headworks of the plant.
The pad is large enough to contain approximately 12 months of biosolids. The Town
owns a spreader truck which will be used to distribute the biosolids on fields. The
biosolids will be sold or given away to local farmers, nurserymen and landowners for use
as a soil amendment or soil pH adjustment additive.
Division of °wafer Resources
.
FEB 11 2019
pM .
Water Ouality Pealonal Operations
Ashp:4F Fe7;or ; 2u;.

16 V� IN DW #W
Lime pasteurized'biosolids-from the Town of Old Fort will be attractive to several
markets, including farming businesses and the private sector.
Several large farming businesses and nurseries are located in the McDowell County area.
These operations could use the lime pasteurized biosolids as a soil pH enhancer, and also
to benefit from the organic and nutritional value of the biosolids. The lime pasteurized
biosolids also have the ability to improve the physical properties of soil.
In the private sector several farmers have expressed interest in using the lime pasteurized
biosolids as a soil pH enhancer and low-grade fertilizer.
The biosolids could also be used by the Town as a soil conditioner for landscaping, as
well as fill material for soil rehabilitation projects.
The Town's new spreader truck will greatly increase the Town's ability to distribute
biosolids, eliminating the need to contract this work to others.
DIVI�IC±? Gf 1��V1eOP R�SOUPCS9
—
,
F E B 1 1 2019
u>>:
Water Quality Pep'ona3 0,oerations

PUBLIC INFORMATION HANDOUT
D
Divi
FlGr) C-l"',"Jaxy Resources
FEB 1 1 2019
Water Ounl;b

USE OF LIME PASTEURIZED
WASTEWATER BIOSOLIDS
FOR SOIL IMPROVEMENT AND PLANT GROWTH
A GUIDE FOR THE CONSUMER
TOWN OF OLD FORT
WASTEWATER TREATIVMNT PLANT
MCDOWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
For hither technical guidance contact your
County Agricultural Extension Service Agent.
The Town of Old Fort may be contacted at:
Town of Old Fort
38 S. Catawba Ave.
Old Fort, NC 28762
828-668-4244
Old Fort Wastewater Treatment Plant
Tony West, ORC
828-668-4561
nlVjslon of Waior Resource ,
F E S 11 2019
v`--
Water 0uoi�i�f 9�egzo;,t Operations
Ashe✓'; - e 3 -2- n

THE LIME PASTEURIZATION PROCESS,
In the method of lime pasteurization used at the Town of Old Fort Wastewater Treatment
Plant Residuals Management Facility, wastewater sludge is dewatered to 16 to 18 %
solids and then mixed with quicklime in a large mechanical blender. During this process,
the pH of the sludge is elevated to 12.0 and remains greater than 12.0 for at least 2 hours,
and greater than 11.5 for 22 more hours. The temperature of the lime/ sludge mixture
will be greater than 70 degrees Celsius (158 degrees Fahrenheit).
The lime/sludge mixture (biosolids) is passed from the blender to a pasteurization vessel,
which maintains the temperature of 70 degrees Celsius for at least 30 minutes.
The. combination of elevate pH and elevated temperature allows the biosolids to be
classified as a Class A product according to the EPA 503 regulations. The lime
pasteurization method of producing biosolids is approved by the EPA as an effective
method of sludge stabilization and pathogen reduction, and results in an environmentally
safe product with multiple beneficial uses.
These biosolids have value as a soil pH conditioner and as a low grade fertilizer. When
used according to the recommendations in this brochure, this product may be used as a
soil pH amendment for farmers, landscapers, gardeners and commercial enterprises.
ED :4r•:
V
L�VIS1Ci3 G! ral or Resourc8J
FEB 11 2019
Water Qua!!, Re01011a3 Operations

GENERAL USES. PROPERTIES AND PRECAUTIONS
Lime pasteurized biosolids can be utilized advantageously by the local, large scale farmer
as a soil pH enhancer and low-grade fertilizer. It can also be used by individuals wishing
to enhance the pH of their lawns and gardens or any other area that may need a soil
amendment.
Lime pasteurized biosolids contain plant nutrients and may be considered a low-grade
fertilizer. However, its main value is as a soil pH enhancer and as a soil conditioner.
Lime stabilized biosolids are known to improve the physical properties of soil in the
following ways:
Enhanced aggregation — Lime stabilized biosolids increase the tendency of soil
particles to stick together.
Increased water retention — Allows sandy soils to hold water better.
Improved permeability — Helps make clay or other heavy soils more friable and
loose, reducing compaction.
Improved aeration — Looser soil encourages root growth
Increases overall soil pH — Restores soil pH to optimum conditions for several
commercial / agricultural products.
Lime pasteurized wastewater biosolids are a product of municipal sewage. These
biosolids meet the Class "A" requirements established by the EPA and NCDEQ. Contact
with children and pets should be minimized and direct ingestion of lime stabilized
biosolids should be avoided. Also, due to the highly alkaline nature of lime pasteurized
biosolids, prolonged contact with the biosolids should be avoided.
As with agricultural lime, processed biosolids cannot be applied to any site that is
flooded, frozen or snow covered, and adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent
surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored biosolids into any surface waters.
Biosolids also cannot be placed any closer than 100 feet from any public or private water
supply source (including wells), and no closer than 25 feet from any stream, river, lake or
natural drainage way.
Application of these biosolids is prohibited except in accordance with the User
Agreement and Old Fort Wastewater Treatment Plant Land Application Permit
WQ0011260.
� , e il'VE
_.
DIVIJI013 Gf V v or ReSOuicee
FEB 11 2019 }
Water Quat6�r Pe990yOT✓Qperations
ASI FP',/ Cin.- ^� L�l.F�in,C4Y

TOWN OF OLD FORT
BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT FACILITY
SPILL CONTROL PLAN FOR BIOSOLIDS SPREADER TRUCK
In the unlikely event of a spill, the following actions will be taken immediately:
1. Halt the source of the spill. If possible, move the spreader truck off of the road to
a safe location.
2. Call Old Fort Waste Treatment Operator -in -Responsible -Charge (Tony West);
Work: 668-4561. Cell: 442 2343. Inform him of all pertinent information and
conditions. The ORC will relay this information to Old Fort Town Hall: 668-
4244.
3. Call 9-1-1. Report accident, if necessary. Notify McDowell County Sheriffs
Department and Old Fort Police Department. Request local Fire Department if
necessary.
4. The Old Fort Waste Treatment ORC (or his back-up) will go to the location of the
spill as soon as possible after notification and make an assessment of the
requirements for cleaning the spill. He will then notify the Old Fort Maintenance
Department of any equipment and personnel requirements.
5. The Old Fort Waste Treatment ORC will then notify the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources: 2964500.
6. The Old Fort Waste Treatment ORC will remain at the spill site and manage
clean-up efforts to the satisfaction of NC environmental and/or law enforcement
officials. He will maintain regular communications with personnel at Old Fort
Town Hall.
7. Within 24 hours of the spill the ORC will prepare a report detailing how the spill
occurred and all actions taken.
Town of Old Fort
5/20/05
1.�IVISIGi➢ 6i? "Vc`liJi Resources
a FEB 1 1 2019
Water Quit {Y s (?C,TVv;1.aT r)pprations
nfi;:_9.

llbohd-
96P .
Annual Report Review SOP Class B Land Application
Reporting Period: S1. /4
Permit Details: WjQ OD
Is 503T Y&5..
Class A or?
Maximum Dry,Tons Per:Yea,r: ;00-
Number of acres permitted: I o3, 0
Number of fields in permit.0 -
Counties that land is permitted for: OV- D c) w
Monitoring F - requency.forTCLP: I
Monitoring Frequency for.Residuals.Analysis: Aynnj m_,4
Monitoring Frequency for.Pat.hogen & Vector Attraction Reduction: Av\AL-C 4(
Groundwater monitoring: N/A:
1.- AnnualIand Application Certificatioii Form
Was a certification form submitted 9
Was land application conducted_ m-'g the reported year?
How many dry tons and dry ions per acre were applied? 9 q, P-T.
Were the applications. within. the -permitted . amount?
Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre? 19 061 CIA �
Did it indicate compliance?
Was it signed by the appropriate people?
2. Monitoring
Were the analyses conducted at the -required ftequp4cy?
Was, an analyses taken fot .6ach source that was. landapplbe04m
Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling aty Form? y.
Were the results reported -in mg/kg?
Were the pH's 6.0 or greater fo each residual sar 1IRP9 P-N
Were the heavy metals. withinleeiling concentration petit limits?
Were the lab analyses attached?-N
Were all the required parameters tested. a�
Was TCLP analysis conducted?
Y *
Were the TLC_b;;,P contamiripts within regul4t5pry limits
'Was a corrosivi�, ignitab'ility, and reactivify analysis conducted? [IIN
3. Field Summary > - ou
-Were-the-lanclapplication ev.ents.re'corded-.on-the-F-ield-Summary-F-orms
How many. fields were applied on this year? N
Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field?
Were- all the residuals applied to permitted land? I
Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?
Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)?
Were the cumulative.pollutant loading rates calculated?
Were the calculations correct?
Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits?\�
Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?
Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?

/ ,.
pl.2Loev_IA y_C z . o3
Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?� .
Were the Field Summary Forms complete?
Was lime application •on Field Summary Form? No lime applied. pit
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction �; g �(� �'Z-
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen apd Vector Attraction ReO. ction Form summtted9yes
Did the form indicate the perioq 9f coverage; the residual class, and the pathogen redu tion
alternative and the vector attractidn reduction option u O
Was the appropriate documentation to show pathogepn and vector attraction reduction included
in the report? _
Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
Kr, ZIA
Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1— Fecal Coliform Density
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? 1
Were seven samples taken?
Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?y
Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram'of total solids or
2,000,000 Colony Forming Units/gram of totatsolids)?
Alternative 2 —Use of Process to Significantly-Reduce�Pathogens (one of five)•
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
1. Aerobic Digestion
Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
-'Were logs submitted showing time.and'temperature?
Were temperatures within range°for complete time:period?
Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68°F)'aiid 60 days at 15°C
S9°F T
2. Air Drying
• Were the residuals on sand beds of pave -or unpaved basins for three months?
Was the ambient temperature above 0°C (32°F) for two months?
Were the residuals partially digested?
W ere residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not. snow '
covered)?
3. Anaerobic Digestion
-Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
-Were logs submitted showingtine and -temperature?
Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
-Was the time and temperature between 1-5 days:at 35T.(95°F) to 55°C (131°F) and 60
days at 20°C (680F)?
4. Composting (usually will be Class`Xwhen composting is used) •
Was it a composting procedure (not�natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Was the temperature raised to 40
5. Lime Stabilization

r
r'
Was alkaline material "added to residuals a form -of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime
containingkiln dust, or fly ash)? .
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Was the pHraised to 12" after two hours "of contact?
Were logs -submitted showing time and.pH?.
Was temperature corrected to•2S°C (77°F)?
Alternative 3 _ Use of Processes Equivalent to :RSRP
(Not commonly use. See White House Manual page 100-103, tables 114 and 11-1)
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
Was the sampling conducted at the. required,' frequency?
Option 1— 38% Volatile Solids Reduction
Was there 3 8%reduction?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report? ...
Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Were the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
Were calculations correct?
— - Option 2 — 40-Day Bench Scale. Test .
Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals anaerobically digested in.lab? . .
Was the test run for 40 days? ...
Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and 37°C (999F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (riot total solids)?
Was the reduction less than IM
Were lab sheets/calculations. in: report?
Were calculations correct? .
Option 3 — 30-Day Bench. Scale Test
Were residuals from aerobicallydigested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals aerobically digested in lab? .
-Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
If not 2% total solids, was the test ran on a sample, diluted to 2% with unchlorinated "
effluent?
Was the test run for 30 days?'. .
Was the test done at 20°C (68°F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile" solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 15%?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
Were calculations correct? - .
Option 4 — Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate(SOUR)
Were residuals form aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)`?
Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted) N G+
Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (861F)?j
Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (680F)?
Was the SOUR'equal to or less than 1.5 mg of Yxygen per hour per gram of total
residual solids (dry weight basis)? p5 J ( y

Was the -sampling holding time two hours?
Was the test started within 15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? 1
Option 5 —14-Day Aerobic Process*,'
-Were the residuals from aerobically digested treatment (inspection)?
Were the residuals treated for 14 .days?
Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104°F) fora 14-6y period?
Was the average residuals temperature higher than 450C (113OF)?
.Option. 6—Alkaline.Stabilization
Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours withoutthe addition of
more alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional. twenty-two hours
without the addition of more alkali?
Was the pH corrected to.25°C (770F)?
Option 7 _ Drying of Stabilized Residuals
Does.the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?'
Were the residuals mixed, with_any other materials?
Were the residuals dried up to 75% total solids?
Option.8 — Drying of Vnstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other.materials?
Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids? -
Option 9 — Injection
• Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour after. injection
(Inspection)?
Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
Was injection done at time that crop was grooving?
If Class A with respect to pathogen, -were residuals injected with eight hours after
discharge from pathogen treatment?
5..SoilTests
Was a, Standard Soil Fertility -Analysis conducted for each application field?y
Were the soil pH's 6.0 or. greater for each application field? 0 o . .. .
• If no, was lime applied to those fields? 1.as
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in, the soil less -than 2000 for each application-field?N .
Was sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm^3? 1 .
Was the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) less than 15%? \`
6.General
• Was the report in the proper format? 11
• Was the annual report complete?— Van 4ss1 .V
Was the report submitted on time? yy
y
w� TCL p v
y(cL � �� vw l / [�`
w� TCL p v
y(cL � �� vw l / [�`